Neoadjuvant durvalumab for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from a multicenter study (IFCT-1601 IONESCO)

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC: navigating biomarker dilemmas and special population challenges

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown impressive outcomes in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recently due to advancements in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) research. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can lower the tumor load, raise the complete surgical (R0) resection rate, and improve clinical outcomes by alleviating the immune system repression caused by tumor cells. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC, focusing on: (1) its safety and efficacy profiles, (2) the most recent clinical trial evidence, and (3) critical unresolved challenges including predictive biomarker development, management of driver mutation-positive patients, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) comorbidity considerations, and its application in stage III-IVA (oligometastatic) disease. Furthermore, we explore future research directions to optimize neoadjuvant immunotherapy approaches for resectable NSCLC, aiming to guide clinical practice and investigation.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for NSCLC: superior combination strategies, optimal treatment cycles, and predictive indicators from a Bayesian meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a promising treatment strategy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, optimal combination strategies, treatment cycles, and predictive indicators for long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various neoadjuvant ICI-based therapies in resectable NSCLC, identify the optimal treatment cycles for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, and assess the prognostic value of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) for event-free survival (EFS).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science, including studies published up to October 2024. Bayesian models were used to analyze the efficacy of different ICI-based treatment combinations, assess the impact of immunochemotherapy cycles on MPR and pCR, and examine the predictive value of MPR and pCR for EFS.

Results

Data from 34 studies were included, consisting of 32 single-arm studies (reported in 26 papers) and 8 RCTs, involving 4,593 patients. Immunochemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis agents was the most effective treatment strategy, significantly improving both MPR and pCR. No significant improvement in efficacy was observed when the number of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy cycles exceeded 3 cycles. Both MPR and pCR were strong predictors of EFS. MPR showed a stronger negative correlation with event risk compared to pCR, with a log (HR) of -2.110 (95% CI: -4.150, -0.071) for MPR, and a log (HR) of -1.665 (95% CI: -2.419, -0.992) for pCR.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis agents appears to be a highly effective strategy for resectable NSCLC. Three cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy demonstrated optimal efficacy in this study. Both MPR and pCR are valuable prognostic indicators for EFS, with MPR showing a stronger predictive value. These findings offer important insights for optimizing treatment strategies and informing clinical decision-making in resectable NSCLC.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024592346.

Research trends of neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer: a bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most prevalent malignancy worldwide. Only a fraction of early-stage patients undergo radical surgery; however, many still experience recurrence and metastasis within 5 years postoperatively (approximately 30-75%). Neoadjuvant therapy has revolutionized the treatment approach for lung cancer, with a growing number of clinical trials investigating this modality. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer, intending to guide future research.

METHOD

To extract literature on neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer published in the Web of Science Core Collection, spanning January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023. Utilizing software tools including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and GraphPad Prism to conduct bibliometric analysis and visualization studies on countries, institutions, journals, authors, co-cited references, and keywords in this field.

RESULTS

A sum of 6,085 research publications from 84 countries were analyzed, with the United States leading in publications on neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer. The institution that publishes the most articles is the University of Texas System. The most published journal is Annals of Thoracic Surgery, while the most frequently co-cited journal is Journal of Clinical Oncology. Eight of the top ten co-cited references concern immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs). Keyword burst analysis indicates that the current research focuses and trends mainly center around four areas: ICIs, clinical trials, efficacy, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first bibliometric study of neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer. Over the past two decades, interest in this field has steadily increased, particularly since 2017. The United States is the largest contributor and has the highest number of publications in this field. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, clinical trials, efficacy, and NSCLC are hotspots in neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer, both now and in the foreseeable future.

[Treatment with peri-operative immunotherapy of resectable PCNBs]

For decades, early-stage, resecable, although potentially curable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been marred by unacceptably high recurrence rates. Anti-PD(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC; the recent approvals of these drugs in the perioperative setting will now transform the paradigm therapeutics of localized NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the role of perioperatively administered immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable NSCLC, synthesizing the results of early clinical trials, and discussing future directions.

Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Surgery after Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Adjuvant Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Study

OBJECTIVE

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can achieve significant clinical responses. This raises the question of whether to consider salvage surgery as a curative treatment option. Few case series reported encouraging results in terms of pathological response. However, intraoperative risk and postoperative morbidity have been highlighted. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after ICIs administration and to evaluate its effectiveness on the final pathological examination.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified stages III-IVA NSCLC consecutive patients who underwent surgery with radical intent after ICIs at three National Centers (2016-2022). Before treatment, all patients were considered unresectable by a multidisciplinary discussion. After surgery, pathological response was evaluated according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendation.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included; pretreatment clinical stage was: IIIA in 4 patients (10%), IIIB in 13 (42%), IIIC in 3 (13%), and IVA in 11 (35%). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Only anatomical resections were performed, with lobectomy that represent the main type of resection (22 patients, 74%). A minimally invasive approach was performed in 10 patients (32%), with a conversion rate of 0%. Postoperative complications were observed in eight patients (25%). Complete pathologic response (CPR) and major pathologic response (MPR) were 48% and 16%, respectively. Two and 3-years survival were 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience, salvage surgery of advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs confirm his feasibility and safety in responder patients. Moreover, it is associated with low morbidity, high CPR rate, and satisfying medium-term survival.

Surgical Techniques for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy: State of Art and Review of the Literature

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 20% of patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with stage IIIA-IIIB disease, for which the optimal treatment remains unclear. Meta-analyses reveal that neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI-chemotherapy significantly improves pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), major pathological response (MPR), and R0 rate compared to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Resectability is achieved when R0 resection can be performed after surgery. Radiographic downstaging often does not correspond to surgical downstaging. In fact, intra-operative fibrosis due to chemo-immunotherapy (synonymous with ICI-chemotherapy) can create adhesions and consequent difficult planes for dissection. Thus, pneumonectomy cannot be avoided. Even the suspicion of N2 after neoadjuvant treatment is considered a limitation of upfront surgery because of the risk of pneumonectomy. The aim of this review is to explore the literature on the technical strategies for surgical excision of NSCLC after chemo-immunotherapy, addressing even the most challenging scenarios.

Adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements

Surgical resection is the most effective therapeutic option for the cure in early stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite complete resection, up to 70% of patients die within 5 years mainly due to tumor recurrence in extra-thoracic organs. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy may improve postoperative survival, but the absolute survival benefit is modest with an around 5% improvement at 5 years. Recent advance in systemic therapy has changed treatment strategy for advanced unresectable NSCLC, and also has provided a paradigm shift in treatment strategy for resectable NSCLC. For NSCLC without oncogenic driver alterations, immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors may improve clinical outcomes in preoperative neoadjuvant setting as well as in postoperative adjuvant setting. Here, we overview recent evidence of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy and discuss emerging clinical questions in decision-making of treatment for potentially resectable patients with NSCLC harboring no oncogenic alterations.

Navigating the landscape of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for NSCLC: progress and controversies

Recently, attention has increasingly centered on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immune checkpoint inhibitors application. Numerous clinical studies have underscored the potential of immunotherapy in treating resectable NSCLC, highlighting its role in improving patient outcomes. However, despite these promising results, there is ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of immunological combination therapy strategies, the prevalence of treatment-related side effects, the identification of predictive biomarkers, and various other challenges within the neoadjuvant context. Careful consideration is essential to maximize the benefits of immunotherapy for patients with resectable NSCLC. This article offers a detailed overview of recent advancements in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC. By examining these developments, we aim to provide new perspectives and valuable insights into the benefits and challenges of applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in clinical settings.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Opportunities and challenges

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Numerous trials have explored the use of ICIs, either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, in the neoadjuvant setting for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer. Most trials have demonstrated neoadjuvant immunotherapy to be safe and to have remarkable efficacy, with a high pathological response rate and significantly improved event-free survival. This review summarizes the findings of Phase I-III clinical trials investigating various neoadjuvant regimens, including ICI monotherapy, ICI therapy combined with chemotherapy, ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI therapy in combination with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We discuss the benefits and outcomes associated with each approach. Despite the results being promising, several unresolved issues remain, including identification of reliable biomarkers, the appropriate duration of therapy, the optimal treatment regimen for tumors with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, the false-negative pathological complete response rate, and the role of digital pathology in assessing the response to treatment. Resistance to immunotherapy, in particular, remains a significant barrier to effective use of ICIs. Given the critical influence of the tumor microenvironment (TME) on the response to treatment, we examine the characteristics of the TME in both responsive and resistant tumors as well as the dynamic changes that occur in the TME in response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. We also summarize the mechanisms underlying T cell responses following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and provide a perspective on strategies to enhance the understanding of tumor heterogeneity, therapy-driven TME remodeling, and overcoming resistance to therapy. Finally, we propose future directions for advancements in personalized neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy strategies for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current evidence among special populations and future perspectives

About one third of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) presents at diagnosis with localized or locally advanced disease amenable to curative surgical resection. Surgical operability refers to stage I to IIIA and selected stage IIIB NSCLC. One of the main challenges in the management of early-stage resectable NSCLC is the optimization of available therapeutic strategies to prevent local and distant disease relapse, thus improving survival outcomes. There is evidence supporting the clinical use of both adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy-based strategies for resected/resectable, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Available data from randomized phase III trials have led to the incorporation of several immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) into the international guidelines for early-stage NSCLC. Preclinical rationale of targeting specific subsets of T-cells by acting early on immune checkpoint receptors (e.g., PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4) is strong. Recent evidence is in favor of the neoadjuvant approach alone or as a part of perioperative strategy, demonstrating survival benefit. Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy before surgery results in both pathologic complete response (pCR) and major pathologic response (MPR) improvement, and survival outcomes, with no major safety issues. In this review, we summarize the rationale behind neoadjuvant/perioperative immunotherapy strategies and, due to the clinical relevance of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC, we provide current evidence of this cutting-edge approach among special populations including older adults, women, and oncogene addicted NSCLC. To conclude, we present future perspectives in the use of immunotherapy for operable NSCLC with a special focus on novel investigational combinations underway.

Advances in clinical trials on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review

The reduction in lung cancer mortality rates over the past decade can be partially ascribed to advancements in immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have recently been evaluated in multiple clinical trials to confirm their safety and efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and perioperative settings for patients with resectable NSCLC. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for adjuvant atezolizumab following platinum-doublet chemotherapy, neoadjuvant nivolumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy, adjuvant pembrolizumab after platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab for resectable NSCLC, with potential forthcoming approvals for additional agents or indications. Novel data, approvals, and emerging research findings are dramatically shifting the accepted standards of care over just a few years. Despite these advances, the optimal application of these treatments is not entirely straightforward. This article summarizes the biological rationale for immunotherapy and the important clinical trials regarding perioperative ICIs. We also further outline the controversies and future directions to better guide the individualized treatment of NSCLC patients.

Perioperative immunotherapy for patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Unexpected potential benefits

Given that immunotherapy has resulted in a significant overall survival (OS) benefit in advanced-stage disease, it is of notable interest to determine the effectiveness of these agents in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The potential exists for the immunotherapeutic approach in early-stage NSCLC to mirror the paradigm seen in advanced NSCLC, wherein survival enhancements have notably benefited the majority of patients. However, their performance in early-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant NSCLC is controversial. In the limited studies that included patients with EGFR mutation status, we found unexpected, good survival benefits of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable EGFR-positive NSCLC, which is controversial with those in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. It is possible because of the shift toward immunosuppression that the immune environment undergoes during tumor progression. In the early disease stages, the anti-tumor immune response can be activated with fewer hindrances. In the context of EGFR mutant tumors, intratumor genetic heterogeneity can generate treatment-sensitive and -resistant subclones. The subclonality of the resistant subclone is pivotal in therapy response, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selectively controlling EGFR-mutant cell proliferation and "competitive release" potentially explaining lower pathological responses in adjuvant TKIs trials. This review delves into emerging data on perioperative treatment modalities for early-stage EGFR mutant NSCLC, exploring unique mechanisms and predictive biomarkers to guide perioperative management strategies.

A current comprehensive role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to review the efficacy, safety, and evidence for current use and potential future uses of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was carried out through PubMed to identify completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use, efficacy, and safety of ICIs in the management of resectable NSCLC.

DATA SUMMARY

To date, four phase 3 trials have emerged that have changed our treatment practice concerning the utilization of ICIs during the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. The IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials examined the application of adjuvant atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, respectively, following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. In the CheckMate 816 trial, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy received approval for patients with resectable NSCLC. Also, for patients with resectable NSCLC, the use of a pembrolizumab and chemotherapy combination as a perioperative therapy received approval based on the results of the KEYNOTE-671 trial. Apart from these trials, there are numerous phase 2 and phase 3 trials, some of which have been published while others are still in progress.

CONCLUSION

Despite the promising outcomes from these trials there remain several unanswered questions. In this review, we will assess clinical trials involving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative ICIs, aiming to address the unresolved questions related to these therapeutic approaches.

Tumor immune microenvironment analysis of non-small cell lung cancer development through multiplex immunofluorescence

Background

Emerging evidence has underscored the crucial role of infiltrating immune cells in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) development and progression. With the implementation of screening programs, the incidence of early-stage NSCLC is rising. However, the high risk of recurrence and poor survival rates associated with this disease necessitate a deeper understanding of the TIME and its relationship with driver alterations. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of immune changes in early-stage NSCLC, highlighting the significant transitions in immune response during disease progression.

Methods

Tumor tissues were collected from 105 patients with precancerous lesions or stage I-III NSCLC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to detect cancer driver alterations. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) was performed to evaluate immune cell density, percentage, and spatial proximity to cancer cells in the TIME. Next Among these patients, 64 had NGS results, including three with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 10 with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and 51 with stage I invasive cancers. Additionally, three patients underwent neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy and tumor tissue specimens before and after treatment were obtained.

Results

Patients with stage I invasive cancer had significantly higher density (P=0.01) and percentage (P=0.02) of CD8+ T cells and higher percentages of M1 macrophages (P=0.04) and immature natural killer (NK) cells (P=0.041) in the tumor parenchyma compared to those with AIS/MIA. Patients with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene exhibited decreased NK cell infiltration, increased M2 macrophage infiltration, and decreased aggregation of CD4+ T cells near tumor cells compared to EGFR wild-type patients. As NSCLC progressed from stage I to III, CD8+ T cell density and proportion increased, while PD-L1+ tumor cells were in closer proximity to PD-1+CD8+ T cells, potentially inhibiting CD8+ T cell function. Furthermore, M1 macrophages decreased in density and proportion, and the number of NK cells, macrophages, and B cells around tumor cells decreased. Additionally, patients with tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) had significantly higher proportion of M1 macrophages and lymphocytes near tumor cells, whereas those without TLS had PD-L1+ tumor cells more densely clustered around PD-1+CD8+ T cells. Notably, neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy induced the development of TLS.

Conclusions

This study offers an in-depth analysis of immune changes in NSCLC, demonstrating that the transition from AIS/MIA to invasive stage I NSCLC leads to immune activation, while the advancement from stage I to stage III cancer results in immune suppression. These findings contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying early-stage NSCLC progression and pave the way for the identification of potential treatment options.

Evidence for the evolving role of neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is becoming increasingly complex. Standard of care management for the past decade has been adjuvant chemotherapy following curative intent resection regardless of nodal status or tumour profile. With the increased incorporation of immunotherapy in NSCLC, especially in the locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic settings, multiple studies have sought to assess its utility in early-stage disease. While there are suboptimal responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, there is a strong rationale for the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in tumour downstaging, based upon the concept of enhanced T cell priming at the time of a high tumour antigen burden, and demonstrated clinically in other solid tumours, such as melanoma. In the NSCLC cancer setting, currently over 20 combinations of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and perioperative setting have been studied with results variable. Multiple large phase III studies have demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy combinations result in significant advances in pathological response, disease free and overall survival which has led to practice change across the world. Currently, combination immunotherapy regimens with novel agents targeting alternate immunomodulatory pathways are now being investigated. Given this, the landscape of treatment in resectable early-stage NSCLC has become increasingly complex. This review outlines the literature of neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy and discusses its potential benefits and complexities and ongoing considerations into future research.

Effective induction immunotherapy minimizes surgical invasiveness for locally advanced lung cancer

Background

Immunotherapy has been recommended for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its effect on surgical resection has not yet been examined. This study aimed to examine the effect of induction immunotherapy on surgical resection in terms of the surgical approach, resection extent, and perioperative recovery.

Methods

We performed a real-world study comprising consecutive patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB NSCLC who received surgical resection after induction immunotherapy from January 2019 to September 2021. The perioperative outcomes were compared in terms of the surgical approach and resection extent.

Results

Among 68 patients, 37 (54.4%) achieved a clinical objective response. Standard resection was performed in 37 patients (54.4%), while extended resection was necessary in the other 31 patients (45.6%). Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was attempted in 37 cases (54.4%), with only 1 (2.7%) conversion. MIS was significantly more commonly accomplished in patients with a clinical objective response than those without (67.6% vs. 35.5%, P=0.008). Patients with a clinical objective response were more likely to have their tumors removed via MIS and/or standard resection (75.7% vs. 51.6%, P=0.04), while those without a clinical objective response more often required extended resection using an open approach. Patients receiving standard resection or MIS had significantly better perioperative outcomes than those who underwent extended resection or thoracotomy (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

The results of this large single-center retrospective cohort indicate that in terms of a better clinical response, effective induction immunotherapy could help reduce the resection extent and/or provide more opportunities to perform MIS, resulting in better recovery.

Analysis of surgical complexity and short-term prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients: neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy improves survival benefits in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer but increases tissue density, presenting challenges for surgeons.

Objectives

To compare the differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between neoadjuvant targeted therapy (NTT) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI).

Design/methods

This study enrolled 106 patients underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant therapy between January 2020 and December 2023 at the National Cancer Center of China. Differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between the two neoadjuvant therapy cohorts were evaluated. The pathological indicators such as pathological response rate and lymph node upstaging/downstaging were then analyzed.

Results

In total, 33 patients underwent NTT and 73 underwent NCI preoperatively. Patients who received NTT showed a higher minimally invasive surgery rate (84.8% versus 53.4%, p < 0.01), shorter operative time (144 versus 184 min, p < 0.01), lower conversion rate (3.3% versus 17.8%, p = 0.03), less postoperative drainage (day 3: 140 versus 200 mL, p = 0.03), and lower incidence of postoperative complications including arrhythmias (6.1% versus 26%, p = 0.02). The pathological response rate in the NTT and NCI groups was 70% and 75%, respectively, with the latter group showing a higher complete pathological response rate. The two groups had no significant differences in major pathological response and lymph node pathological response rate.

Conclusion

Patients who received NTT presented fewer surgical challenges for surgeons and had better surgical outcomes than those who received NCI therapy, with comparable pathological response rates between the two cohorts. Accordingly, NTT is the preferred induction regimen for patients harboring mutation status.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly advanced outcomes in both metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Despite these advancements, the 5-year survival rate remains suboptimal. Even in early-stage disease a significant portion of patients relapse and die from metastatic progression. The integration of immunotherapy in the management of early-stage NSCLC demonstrated promising results, supported by a plethora of positive clinical trials conducted in recent years. Nonetheless, numerous questions persist. In this manuscript we comprehensively review the currently available data on adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative treatment strategies. We also address the challenges inherent to these approaches from different stakeholders' perspective.

Navigating the landscape of PD-1/PD-L1 imaging tracers: from challenges to opportunities

Immunotherapy targeted to immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as the program cell death receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, it is now well-known that PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy response is inconsistent among patients. The current challenge is to customize treatment regimens per patient, which could be possible if the PD-1/PD-L1 expression and dynamic landscape are known. With positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, it is possible to image these immune targets non-invasively and system-wide during therapy. A successful PET imaging tracer should meet specific criteria concerning target affinity, specificity, clearance rate and target-specific uptake, to name a few. The structural profile of such a tracer will define its properties and can be used to optimize tracers in development and design new ones. Currently, a range of PD-1/PD-L1-targeting PET tracers are available from different molecular categories that have shown impressive preclinical and clinical results, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This review will provide an overview of current PET tracers targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Antibody, peptide, and antibody fragment tracers will be discussed with respect to their molecular characteristics and binding properties and ways to optimize them.

Association of pathological response with long-term survival outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.

Revolutionizing Localized Lung Cancer Treatment: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Immunotherapy for All?

Lung cancer poses a significant public health challenge, with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing 20 to 25% of all NSCLC cases, staged between I and IIIA. Despite surgical interventions, patient survival remains unsatisfactory, with approximately 50% mortality within 5 years across early stages. While perioperative chemotherapy offers some benefit, outcomes vary. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are imperative to improve patient survival. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy emerges as a promising avenue. In this review, we explore studies demonstrating the benefits of this combination therapy, its impact on surgical procedures, and patient quality of life. However, challenges persist, particularly for patients failing to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR), those with stage II lung cancer, and individuals with specific genetic mutations. Additionally, identifying predictive biomarkers remains challenging. Nevertheless, the integration of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the preoperative setting presents a new paradigm in managing resectable lung cancer, heralding more effective and personalized treatments for patients.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer, even when diagnosed in early stages, has been linked with poor survival rates and distant recurrence patterns. Novel therapeutic approaches harnessing the immune system have been implemented in early stages, following the designated steps of advanced NSCLC treatment strategies. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimens as monotherapy, combinational, or alongside chemotherapy have been intensely investigated as adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and, more recently, perioperative therapeutic strategies, representing pivotal milestones in the evolution of early lung cancer management while holding great potential for the future. The subject of current ongoing research is optimizing treatment outcomes for patient subsets with different needs and identifying biomarkers that could be predictive of response while translating the trials' endpoints to survival rates. The aim of this review is to discuss all current treatment options with the pros and cons of each, persistent challenges, and future perspectives on immunotherapy as illuminating the path to a new era for resectable NSCLC.

Development of postoperative bronchopleural fistula after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: case reports and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to the complexity and diversity of stage III disease, the inclusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in neoadjuvant treatment regimens is also required. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) limit the application of ICIs to a certain extent. Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) is a serious and fatal complication after pneumonectomy that is rarely reported, especially in patients who accept neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we reported four patients with postoperative BPF who received a neoadjuvant regimen of sintilimab plus chemotherapy. Postoperative BPF occurred in the late stage in three patients; one patient underwent bronchoscopic fistula repair, and the fistula was closed well after surgery, and the other two patients gradually recovered within 1-2 months after symptomatic treatment with antibiotics. One patient with BPF after left pneumonectomy died of respiratory failure due to pulmonary infection. We also reviewed the literature on the development of postoperative BPF in patients receiving immuno-neoadjuvant therapy to discuss the clinical process further, postoperative pathological changes, as well as risk factors of BPF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Central type lung cancer with stage III may be the risk factors of BPF in cases of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for lung cancers patients.

Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemotherapy) for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have reported consistent associations with event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) pending longer follow-up for overall survival data.

Objective

To assess the pooled benefit of ICI-chemotherapy in 2-year EFS and pCR among patients with NSCLC and examine the impact of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors.

Data Sources

Full-text articles and abstracts in English were searched in EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through November 1, 2023, and in oncology conference proceedings from January 1, 2008, to November 1, 2023.

Study Selection

Phase 2 or 3 RCTs with neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy with or without adjuvant ICIs vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with or without placebo or observation in patients with previously untreated NSCLC staged IB to IIIB were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction of prespecified data elements was performed by 2 reviewers using a structured data abstraction electronic form. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Two-year EFS and pCR were the outcomes of interest in patients who received neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy (experimental arm) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm). Aggregated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event outcomes (2-year EFS) and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes (pCR) with their respective 95% CIs were calculated.

Results

Eight trials with 3387 patients were included, with some concerns of risk of bias as assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration method, mainly related to outcomes measurements. Neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy was associated with improved 2-year EFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.66; P < .001) and increased pCR rate (RR, 5.58; 95% CI, 4.27-7.29; P < .001) in the experimental vs control treatment arms. This association was not significantly modified by the main patient characteristics; tumor- or treatment-related factors, including tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status; type of platinum-compound chemotherapy; number of cycles of neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy; or addition of adjuvant ICIs. Patients whose tumor cells were negative for PD-L1 were at higher risk of relapse (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) than were those with low (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71) or high PD-L1 (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.58) (P = .005).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy RCTs in patients with early-stage NSCLC, 3 cycles of neoadjuvant platinum-based ICI-chemotherapy were associated with a meaningful improvement in 2-year EFS and pCR.

A review of perioperative treatment strategies with immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in resectable and stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group with different potential therapeutic approaches. Treatment is typically multimodal with either surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation if unresectable. Despite the multimodal treatment and early stage, cure rates have traditionally been low. The introduction of immunotherapy changed the treatment landscape for NSCLC in all stages, and the introduction of immunotherapy in early-stage lung cancer has improved event free survival and overall survival. Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have also improved outcomes in early-stage mutation-driven NSCLC. Optimal treatment choice and sequence is increasingly becoming based upon personalized factors including clinical characteristics, comorbidities, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) score, and the presence of targetable mutations. Despite encouraging data from multiple trials, the optimal multimodal sequence of stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treatment remains unresolved and warrants further investigation. This review article summarizes recent major clinical trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment including stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with a focus on immunotherapy and TKIs.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy protocols and cycles for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This study evaluated the use of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy cycles and regimens for non-small cell lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Databases were searched for articles published up until December 2023. Data on the major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, and conversion to thoracotomy were collected. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the treatment regimens and cycles. Stata/MP software was used for statistical analyses.

Results

In total, 2430 individuals were assessed from 44 studies. Compared with those following neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.26/0.07/0.43/0.08, 95% CI: 0.18-0.34/0.04-0.10/0.28-0.58/0.04-0.14), the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy increased significantly (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.55/0.34/0.81/0.22, 95% CI: 0.48-0.63/0.28-0.41/0.69-0.90/0.13-0.33, P=0.001/0.002/0.009/0.034). No significant differences were found in the surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy. In the chemoimmunotherapy group, no statistically significant differences were found in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle, three-cycle and four-cycle groups (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.50;0.70;0.36/0.32;0.49;0.18/0.95;0.85;0.95/0.34;0.27;0.37, P=0.255/0.215/0.253/0.848). In the ICIs group, there was little change in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle group compared to the three-cycle group. (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.28;0.20/0.06;0.08/0.45;0.35/0.10;0.02, P=0.696/0.993/0.436/0.638). The neoadjuvant treatment cycle had no significant effect on surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy in both regimens.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly increased the rate of tumor pathological remission compared to neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone but also increased the incidence of TRAEs and SAEs. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy are found to be favorable when administered for a duration of three cycles, in comparison to both two and four cycles.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023407415.

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: basis, promise, and challenges

Introduction

Survival rates for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poor despite the decade-long established standard of surgical resection and systemic adjuvant therapy. Realizing this, researchers are exploring novel therapeutic targets and deploying neoadjuvant therapies to predict and improve clinical and pathological outcomes in lung cancer patients. Neoadjuvant therapy is also increasingly being used to downstage disease to allow for resection with a curative intent. In this review, we aim to summarize the current and developing landscape of using neoadjuvant therapy in the management of NSCLC.

Methods

The PubMed.gov and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched on 15 January 2023, to identify published research studies and trials relevant to this review. One hundred and seven published articles and seventeen ongoing clinical trials were selected, and relevant findings and information was reviewed.

Results & Discussion

Neoadjuvant therapy, proven through clinical trials and meta-analyses, exhibits safety and efficacy comparable to or sometimes surpassing adjuvant therapy. By attacking micro-metastases early and reducing tumor burden, it allows for effective downstaging of disease, allowing for curative surgical resection attempts. Research into neoadjuvant therapy has necessitated the development of surrogate endpoints such as major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) allowing for shorter duration clinical trials. Novel chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy agents are being tested at a furious rate, paving the way for a future of personalized systemic therapy in NSCLC. However, challenges remain that prevent further mainstream adoption of preoperative (Neoadjuvant) therapy. These include the risk of delaying curative surgical resection in scenarios of adverse events or treatment resistance. Also, the predictive value of surrogate markers of disease cure still needs robust verification. Finally, the body of published data is still limited compared to adjuvant therapy. Addressing these concerns with more large scale randomized controlled trials is needed.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: Impact of clinicopathological factors and indirect comparison between treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolution is rapidly moving from metastatic to early-stage, however, the impact of clinicopathological variables and optimal treatment sequencing remain unclear.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with ICI as single agent or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (PCT) were included. Primary outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), event free survival (EFS) (neoadjuvant/perioperative), and disease-free survival (DFS) (adjuvant). Secondary outcomes were major pathological response (MPR), overall survival (OS), toxicity, surgical outcomes (neoadjuvant/perioperative); OS and toxicity (adjuvant). An additional secondary endpoint was to compare EFS and OS between neoadjuvant and perioperative strategies.

RESULTS

8 RCTs (2 neoadjuvant, 4 perioperative, 2 adjuvant) (4661 participants) were included. Neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI+PCT significantly improved pCR, EFS, OS, MPR and R0 resection compared to PCT. Adjuvant ICI significantly improved DFS compared to placebo. There was a significant subgroup interaction by PD-L1 status (χ2 = 10.72, P = 0.005), pCR (χ2 = 17.80, P < 0.0001), and stage (χ2 = 4.46, P = 0.003) for EFS. No difference according to PD-L1 status was found for pCR, with 14% of patients having PD-L1 negative tumors still experiencing a pCR. No interaction by PD-L1 status was found for DFS upon adjuvant ICI. Indirect comparison showed no difference in EFS and OS between neoadjuvant and perioperative ICI+PCT.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 status, pCR and stage impact on survival upon neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI. The restriction of neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI to PD-L1 + patients could preclude pCR and long-term benefit in the PD-L1- subgroup. Neoadjuvant and perioperative could be equivalent strategies.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy with Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score and Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) combined with radical lung cancer resection for the treatment of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To adjust for confounding factors, we innovatively adopted two matching methods: propensity score (PS) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with resectable NSCLC treated with NCT or NICT combined with radical lung cancer resection using propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:1 and IPTW to balance potential bias.

Results

After PSM, 116 pairs of patients who had undergone NCT or NICT were selected for the final analysis. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and major pathological remission (MPR) rates were significantly better in the NICT group than in the NCT group (pCR rate of 44.8% vs 2.6%, P< 0.001; MPR rate of 66.4% vs 20.7%, P< 0.001). No significant difference was seen between the NICT and NCT groups in terms of postoperative complications (12.1% vs 9.5%, P=0.182). Patients in the NICT group had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival(OS) than those in the NCT group ([3-year DFS: 75.2% vs 43.3%, P< 0.001] and [3-year OS: 91.5% vs 58.0%, P< 0.001]). Among all patients, those with postoperative pathology of pCR had better DFS (P< 0.001) and OS (P= 0.009). Patients with postoperative pathology of MPR had better DFS (P< 0.001) and OS (P< 0.001). The IPTW method yielded similar pathologic and prognostic results.

Conclusion

Patients with resectable NSCLC treated with NICT had better pathological responses and prognosis, than those treated with NCT, and the safety profiles of NICT and NCT were similar.

Conversion therapy with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy achieves a pathological complete response in stage IIIC NSCLC

As stage IIIC non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not recommended for surgical resection, the survival and prognosis for stage IIIC NSCLC remain poor. More powerful and individualized therapies are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of stage IIIC NSCLC. Recently, immunotherapeutics have been increasingly considered in the neoadjuvant therapy of NSCLC. This study presents a patient with stage IIIC NSCLC achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following conversion therapy with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. This case also presents a histologic transformation from squamous cell carcinoma to adenocarcinoma after prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) following surgery. Collectively, this case suggests that conversion immunotherapy with chemotherapy and subsequent surgery can be considered and benefits a subset of unresectable stage IIIC NSCLC.

Perioperative Durvalumab for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy can improve outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative regimens may combine benefits of both to improve long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II to IIIB [N2 node stage] according to the eighth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy plus durvalumab or placebo administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery, followed by adjuvant durvalumab or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 12 cycles. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (II or III) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥1% or <1%). Primary end points were event-free survival (defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of progressive disease that precluded surgery or prevented completion of surgery, disease recurrence [assessed in a blinded fashion by independent central review], or death from any cause) and pathological complete response (evaluated centrally).

RESULTS

A total of 802 patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (400 patients) or placebo (402 patients). The duration of event-free survival was significantly longer with durvalumab than with placebo; the stratified hazard ratio for disease progression, recurrence, or death was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.88; P = 0.004) at the first interim analysis. At the 12-month landmark analysis, event-free survival was observed in 73.4% of the patients who received durvalumab (95% CI, 67.9 to 78.1), as compared with 64.5% of the patients who received placebo (95% CI, 58.8 to 69.6). The incidence of pathological complete response was significantly greater with durvalumab than with placebo (17.2% vs. 4.3% at the final analysis; difference, 13.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.7 to 17.6; P<0.001 at interim analysis of data from 402 patients). Event-free survival and pathological complete response benefit were observed regardless of stage and PD-L1 expression. Adverse events of maximum grade 3 or 4 occurred in 42.4% of patients with durvalumab and in 43.2% with placebo. Data from 62 patients with documented EGFR or ALK alterations were excluded from the efficacy analyses in the modified intention-to-treat population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable NSCLC, perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly greater event-free survival and pathological complete response than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, with a safety profile that was consistent with the individual agents. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AEGEAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03800134.).

Perioperative immunotherapy in stage IB-III non-small cell lung cancer: a critical review of its rationale and considerations

Lung cancer is a dismal disease as a leading cause of overall cancer death, but the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in driver gene mutation negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is changing the paradigm of lung cancer treatment. Recently, ICIs are expanding their treatment area to early-stage NSCLC and ICIs have also changed their treatment strategies of such patients. And it is important to appropriately select patients with resectable early-stage lung cancer through a multidisciplinary team approach and decrease the tumor relapse rate in the ICIs era. In this review article, we discuss the recently released neoadjuvant and adjuvant data of ICIs, their treatment rationale, and unmet needs in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Alone or Combined with Novel Immuno-Oncology Agents in Resectable Lung Cancer: The Phase II NeoCOAST Platform Trial

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy improves pathologic complete response rate and event-free survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) versus chemotherapy alone. NeoCOAST was the first randomized, multidrug platform trial to examine novel neoadjuvant immuno-oncology combinations for patients with resectable NSCLC, using major pathologic response (MPR) rate as the primary endpoint. Eighty-three patients received a single cycle of treatment: 26 received durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) monotherapy, 21 received durvalumab plus oleclumab (anti-CD73), 20 received durvalumab plus monalizumab (anti-NKG2A), and 16 received durvalumab plus danvatirsen (anti-STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide). MPR rates were higher for patients in the combination arms versus durvalumab alone. Safety profiles for the combinations were similar to those of durvalumab alone. Multiplatform immune profiling suggested that improved MPR rates in the durvalumab plus oleclumab and durvalumab plus monalizumab arms were associated with enhanced effector immune infiltration of tumors, interferon responses and markers of tertiary lymphoid structure formation, and systemic functional immune cell activation.

SIGNIFICANCE

A neoadjuvant platform trial can rapidly generate clinical and translational data using candidate surrogate endpoints like MPR. In NeoCOAST, patients with resectable NSCLC had improved MPR rates after durvalumab plus oleclumab or monalizumab versus durvalumab alone and tumoral transcriptomic signatures indicative of augmented immune cell activation and function. See related commentary by Cooper and Yu, p. 2306. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2293.

Immune-checkpoint inhibition for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer - opportunities and challenges

Therapeutic strategies harnessing the immune system to eliminate tumour cells have been successfully used for several cancer types, including in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In these patients, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can provide durable responses and improve overall survival either as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy or other immunotherapeutic agents. However, the implementation of ICIs in early stage NSCLC has been hampered by the continuous struggle to develop robust end points to assess their efficacy in this setting, especially those enabling a fast and reproducible evaluation of the clinical activity of neoadjuvant strategies. Several trials are testing ICIs, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in early stage NSCLC as an adjuvant, neoadjuvant or perioperative approach. As a novelty, most trials in the neoadjuvant setting have adopted pathological response as a primary end point. ICIs have been approved for use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings on the basis of event-free survival and disease-free survival benefit, respectively; however, the correlation of these end points with overall survival remains unclear in these settings. Unresolved challenges for the optimal use of ICIs with curative intent include concerns about their applicability in daily clinical practice and about improving patient selection based on predictive biomarkers or assessment of pathological response and minimal residual disease. In this Review, we discuss the rationale, available strategies and current trial landscape for the implementation of ICIs in patients with resectable NSCLC, and we further elaborate on future approaches to optimize their clinical benefit.

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I-III were previously predominantly treated with surgery and chemotherapy. With the advent of Checkmate-816, neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy was FDA approved for the treatment of resectable NSCLC. There are several ongoing trials evaluating other neoadjuvant combinations of chemotherapy and immunotherapy as well as targeted therapies towards driver mutations. Here, we review previous clinical trials and discuss current ongoing trials' potential benefits and challenges.

Cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

Introduction

Perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) pembrolizumab has shown favorable efficacy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this treatment from the perspective of the United States healthcare payers.

Methods

We established a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of perioperative pembrolizumab with that of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 21-day cycles, utilizing data from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-671 trial. Additional data were extracted from other publications or online sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained was established. The main outcomes of this study were the measurement of QALYs, overall costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and net monetary benefit (NMB).

Results

During a 10-year time horizon, the total costs of perioperative pembrolizumab and the control treatment were $224,779.1 and $110,026.3, respectively. The QALYs were 4.19 and 2.97 for the two treatments, respectively, which led to an ICER of $94,222.29 per QALY gained. The NMB at the WTP threshold at $150,000 per QALY gained was $67,931.3. One-way sensitivity analysis identified the cost of pembrolizumab as the primary factor influencing cost-effectiveness. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 97.7% probability of perioperative pembrolizumab being cost-effective at the WTP threshold.

Conclusions

From the perspective of the United States healthcare payers, perioperative pembrolizumab is a cost-effective treatment for patients with early-stage NSCLC.

What is the ideal endpoint in early-stage immunotherapy neoadjuvant trials in lung cancer?

Numerous clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been performed over the last 5 years. As the number of neoadjuvant trials increases, attention must be paid to identifying informative trial endpoints. Complete pathologic response has been shown to be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for clinical outcomes, such as event-free survival or overall survival, in breast cancer and bladder cancer, but it is less established for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The simultaneous advances reported with adjuvant ICI make the optimal strategy for early-stage disease debatable. Considering the long time required to conduct trials, it is important to identify optimal endpoints and discover surrogate endpoints for survival that can help guide ongoing clinical research. Endpoints can be grouped into two categories: medical and surgical. Medical endpoints are measures of survival and drug activity; surgical endpoints describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant approaches at a surgical level as well as perioperative attrition and complications. There are also several exploratory endpoints, including circulating tumor DNA clearance and radiomics. In this review, we outline the advantages and disadvantages of commonly reported endpoints for clinical trials of neoadjuvant regimens in NSCLC.

Recent Advances in Perioperative Immunotherapies in Lung Cancer

Several clinical trials have been revolutionizing the perioperative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many of these clinical trials involve cancer immunotherapies with antibody drugs that block the inhibitory immune checkpoints programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1. While these new treatments are expected to improve the treatment outcome of NSCLC patients after pulmonary resection, several major clinical questions remain, including the appropriate timing of immunotherapy (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or both) and the identification of patients who should be treated with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies, because some early-stage NSCLC patients are cured by surgical resection alone. In addition, immunotherapy may induce immune-related adverse events that will require permanent treatment in some patients. Based on this fact as well, it is desirable to select appropriate patients for neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapies. So far, data from several important trials have been published, with findings demonstrating the efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab (IMpower010 trial), neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (CheckMate816 trial), and several perioperative (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant) immunotherapies (AEGEAN, KEYNOTE-671, NADIM II, and Neotorch trials). In addition to these key trials, numerous clinical trials have reported a wealth of data, although most of the above clinical questions have not been completely answered yet. Because there are so many ongoing clinical trials in this field, a comprehensive understanding of the results and/or contents of these trials is necessary to explore answers to the clinical questions above as well as to plan a new clinical trial. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the recent data obtained from clinical trials addressing such questions.

Sex Differences in the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the world's leading causes of morbidity and mortality. ICIs alone or combined with chemotherapy have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. The impressive results obtained have stimulated our interest in applying these therapies in early disease stage treatments, as neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising results. Among many of the factors that may influence responses, the role played by sex is attracting increased interest and needs to be addressed. Here, we aim to first review the state of the art regarding neoadjuvant ICIs, whether they are administered in monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy at stages IB-IIIA, particularly at stage IIIA, before analyzing whether sex may influence responses. To this end, a meta-analysis of publicly available data comparing male and female major pathological responses (MPR) and pathological complete responses (pCR) was performed. In our meta-analysis, MPR was found to be significantly higher in females than in males, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.82 (95% CI 1.13-2.93; p = 0.01), while pCR showed a trend to be more favorable in females than in males, but the OR of 1.62 was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.97-2.75; p = 0.08). Overall, our results showed that sex should be systematically considered in future clinical trials settings in order to establish the optimal treatment sequence.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Only a minority of lung cancers are resectable at diagnosis, and many of these will eventually relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting has a modest survival advantage, and there is significant need for new approaches to improve cure rates. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has transformed the prognosis for advanced lung cancer, and is increasingly being used in the neoadjuvant setting alone, or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. While this has demonstrated convincing improvements in event-free survival and pathologic response, questions remain over optimal duration of therapy, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, response assessment and combination with other modalities. In addition, these results must be considered in the context of recent positive studies of adjuvant immunotherapy. Here, we summarise preclinical context and clinical trials in this space, discuss areas of controversy and pitfalls, and consider future challenges.

Immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A system review

With the addition of immunotherapy, lung cancer, one of the most common cancers with high mortality rates, has broadened the treatment landscape. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are now used as the first-line therapy for metastatic disease, consolidation therapy after radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease, and adjuvant therapy after surgical resection and chemotherapy for resectable disease. The use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, however, is still debatable. We will address several aspects, namely the initial efficacy of monotherapy, the efficacy of combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy-related biomarkers, adverse effects, ongoing randomized controlled trials, and current issues and future directions for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC will be discussed here.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Promising New Standard of Care

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in the treatment of various malignancies, with preclinical studies showing improved immune responses in the preoperative setting. FDA-approved neoadjuvant-immunotherapy-based approaches include triple-negative breast cancer and early non-small cell lung cancer on the basis of improvement in pathological response and event free survival. Nevertheless, current trials have only shown benefits in a fraction of patients. It is therefore crucial to identify predictive biomarkers to improve patient selection for such approaches. This review aims to provide an overview of potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. By the extrapolation of the metastatic setting, we explore known predictive biomarkers, i.e., PD-L1, mismatch repair deficiency and tumour mutational burden, as well as potential early-disease-specific biomarkers. We also discuss the challenges of identifying reliable biomarkers and the need for standardized protocols and guidelines for their validation and clinical implementation.

Utility of 18F-FDG uptake in predicting major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non‑small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of present study was to investigate the efficiency of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in predicting major pathological response (MPR) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients with stage I-IIIB NSCLC were retrospectively derived from National Cancer Center of China, of which 36 cases received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy (I-M) and 68 cases with ICI combination therapy (I-C). ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT scans were performed at baseline and after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted and area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for biomarkers including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), inflammatory biomarkers, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) and iRECIST.

RESULTS

Fifty-four resected NSCLC tumors achieved MPR (51.9%, 54/104). In both neoadjuvant I-M and I-C cohorts, post-NAT SUVmax and the percentage changes of SUVmax (ΔSUVmax%) were significantly lower in the patients with MPR versus non-MPR (p < 0.01), and were also negatively correlated with the degree of pathological regression (p < 0.01). The AUC of ΔSUVmax% for predicting MPR was respectively 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00-1.00) in neoadjuvant I-M cohort and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86-1.00) in I-C cohort. Baseline SUVmax had a statistical prediction value for MPR only in I-M cohort, with an AUC up to 0.76 at the threshold of 17.0. ΔSUVmax% showed an obvious advantage in MPR prediction over inflammatory biomarkers, TMB, PD-L1 TPS and iRECIST.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG uptake can predict MPR in NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy through the Lens of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionised anti-cancer treatment in solid organ malignancies. Specifically, the discovery of CTLA-4 followed by PD-1 in the early 2000s led to the practice-changing clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Patients with lung cancer, including both small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), benefit from the most commonly used form of immunotherapy in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), resulting in increased survival and quality of life. In NSCLC, the benefit of ICIs has now extended from advanced NSCLC to earlier stages of disease, resulting in durable benefits and the even the emergence of the word 'cure' in long term responders. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy, and few patients achieve long-term survival. Patients may also develop immune-related toxicity, a small percentage of which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. This review article highlights the various types of immunotherapeutic strategies, their modes of action, and the practice-changing clinical trials that have led to the widespread use of immunotherapy, with a focus on ICIs in NSCLC and the current challenges associated with advancing the field of immunotherapy.

The Evolving Role for Systemic Therapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

During the last 2 decades, the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from a purely histologic classification system to a more complex model synthesizing clinical, histologic, and molecular data. Biomarker-driven targeted therapies have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring specific driver alterations in EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK. Novel immuno-oncology agents have contributed to improvements in NSCLC-related survival at the population-level. However, only in recent years has this nuanced understanding of NSCLC permeated into the systemic management of patients with resectable tumors.

Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Current Evidence and Perspectives

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world. Surgery is the most potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The five-year survival for these patients remains poor and variable, depending on the stage of disease at diagnosis, and the risk of recurrence following tumor resection is high. During the last 20 years, there has been a modest improvement in the therapeutic strategies for resectable NSCLC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have become the cornerstone for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients. Recently, their clinical development has been shifted in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings where they have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Based on the positive results from phase III trials, ICIs have become a therapeutic option in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. On October 2021 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved atezolizumab as an adjuvant treatment following surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 ≥ 1%. In March 2022, nivolumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy was approved for adult patients with resectable NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting. The current review provides an updated overview of the clinical trials exploring the role of immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, focusing on the biological rationale for their use in the perioperative setting. We will also discuss the role of potential predictive biomarkers to personalize therapy and optimize the incorporation of immunotherapy into the multimodality management of stage I-III NSCLC.

Anatomic lung resection after immune checkpoint inhibitors for initially unresectable advanced-staged non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Patients with initially unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might experience prolonged responses under immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this setting, Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) seldomly suggest surgical resection of the primary tumor with the ultimate goal to eradicate macroscopic residual disease. Our objective was to report the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent anatomic lung resection in these infrequent circumstances.

Methods

We set a retrospective multicentric single arm study, including all patients with advanced-staged initially unresectable NSCLC (stage IIIB to IVB) who received systemic therapy including ICIs and eventually anatomical resection of the primary tumor in 10 French thoracic surgery units from January 2016 to December 2020. Coprimary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete resection of the pulmonary disease, major pathologic response, risk factors associated with post-operative complications, and overall survival.

Results

Twenty-one patients (median age 64, female 62%) were included. Eighteen patients (86%) progressed after first line chemotherapy and received second line ICI. The median time between diagnosis and surgery was 22 months [interquartile range (IQR) 18-35 months]. Minimally-invasive approach was used in 10 cases (48%), with half of these requiring conversion to open thoracotomy. Nine patients (43%) presented early post-operative complications, and one patient died from broncho-pleural fistula one month after surgery. Rates of complete resection of the pulmonary disease and major pathologic response were 100% and 43%, respectively. In univariable analysis, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was the only factor associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications (P=0.027). After a median follow-up of 16.0 months after surgery (IQR, 12.0-30.0 months), 19 patients (90%) were still alive.

Conclusions

Anatomic lung resections appear to be a reasonable option for initially unresectable advanced NSCLC experiencing prolonged response under ICIs. Nonetheless, minimally invasive techniques have a low applicability and post-operative complications remains higher in patients who had lower DLCO values. The late timing of surgery may also contribute to complications.

Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients Affected by Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancers, and most NSCLC is diagnosed in the advanced stage. The advent of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) changed the therapeutic scenario both in metastatic disease (in first and subsequent lines) and earlier settings. Comorbidities, reduced organ function, cognitive deterioration, and social impairment give reasons for a greater probability of adverse events, making the treatment of elderly patients challenging. The reduced toxicity of ICIs compared to standard chemotherapy makes this approach attractive in this population. The effectiveness of ICIs varies according to age, and patients older than 75 years may benefit less than younger patients. This may be related to the so-called immunosenescence, a phenomenon that refers to the reduced activity of immunity with older age. Elders are often under-represented in clinical trials, even if they are a large part of the patients in a clinical practice. In this review, we aim to explore the biological aspects of immunosenescence and to report and analyze the most relevant and recent literature findings on the role of immunotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Recent Advancement of PD-L1 Detection Technologies and Clinical Applications in the Era of Precision Cancer Therapy

Programmed death-1 is a protein found on the surface of immune cells that can interact with its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which is expressed on the plasma membrane, the surface of secreted cellular exosomes, in cell nuclei, or as a circulating soluble protein. This interaction can lead to immune escape in cancer patients. In clinical settings, PD-L1 plays an important role in tumor disease diagnosis, determining therapeutic effectiveness, and predicting patient prognosis. PD-L1 inhibitors are also essential components of tumor immunotherapy. Thus, the detection of PD-L1 levels is crucial, especially in the era of precision cancer therapy. In recent years, innovations have been made in traditional immunoassay methods and the development of new immunoassays for PD-L1 detection. This review aims to summarize recent research progress in tumor PD-L1 detection technology and highlight the clinical applications of PD-L1.