Dissecting tumor lymphocyte infiltration to predict benefit from immune-checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: lessons from the AtezoT RIBE study

Recent advances and challenges in colorectal cancer: From molecular research to treatment

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the top causes of cancer-related fatalities globally. Recent progress in genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics has greatly improved our comprehension of the molecular underpinnings of CRC, paving the way for targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Nonetheless, obstacles such as tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance persist, hindering advancements in treatment efficacy. In this context, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and organoid technology presents promising new avenues. AI can analyze genetic and clinical data to forecast disease risk, prognosis, and treatment responses, thereby expediting drug development and tailoring treatment plans. Organoids replicate the genetic traits and biological behaviors of tumors, acting as platforms for drug testing and the formulation of personalized treatment approaches. Despite notable strides in CRC research and treatment - from genetic insights to therapeutic innovations - numerous challenges endure, including the intricate tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, adverse effects of immunotherapies, issues related to AI data quality and privacy, and the need for standardization in organoid culture. Future initiatives should concentrate on clarifying the pathogenesis of CRC, refining AI algorithms and organoid models, and creating more effective therapeutic strategies to alleviate the global impact of CRC.

Immunotherapy in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer: Strategies to overcome resistance

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the foremost causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide; however, individuals with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease-who constitute most CRC diagnoses-derive limited benefit from existing immunotherapeutic approaches. Here, we outline emerging methods designed to address the inherent resistance of MSS CRC to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recent findings emphasize how the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in MSS CRC, marked by diminished immunogenicity and high levels of regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, restricts effective antitumor immune activity. Combination regimens that merge ICIs with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, or targeted blockade of pathways such as TGF-β and VEGF have shown encouraging early outcomes, including enhanced antigen presentation and T-cell penetration. Novel immunomodulatory platforms-such as epigenetic modifiers, oncolytic viruses, and engineered probiotic vaccines-are under assessment to further reprogram the TME and boost therapeutic efficacy. Concurrently, progress in adoptive cell therapies (for example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells) and the development of cancer vaccines targeting tumor-associated and neoantigens promise to extend immune control over MSS CRC. In parallel, improving patient selection through predictive biomarkers-from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to gene expression signatures and specific molecular subtypes-could refine individualized treatment strategies. Finally, interventions that alter the gut microbiome, including probiotics and fecal transplantation, serve as complementary tools to strengthen ICI responses. Taken together, these insights and combined treatment strategies lay the foundation for more successful immunotherapeutic interventions in MSS CRC, ultimately aiming to provide sustained clinical benefits to a broader spectrum of patients.

Immunoscore Predicted by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Can Be a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Immunotherapy Susceptibility of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Objectives: Although immunotherapy is the primary treatment option for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its efficacy varies. This study aimed to identify non-invasive imaging biomarkers predictive of the immunoscore linked to dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Methods: We performed immunohistochemical staining with CD3+ and CD8+ antibodies and counted the positive cells in the invasive margin (IM) and central tumor (CT), converting them to an immunoscore of 0 to 4 points. We assessed the dynamic CECT findings obtained from 96 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC and evaluated the relationship between dynamic CECT findings and immunoscores. For validation, we assessed the treatment effects on 81 nodules using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in another cohort of 41 patients who received combined immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (n = 27) and durvalumab and tremelizumab (n = 14). Results: HCCs with peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase (p < 0.001) and rim APHE (p = 0.009) were associated with the immunoscore in univariate linear regression analysis and peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase (p = 0.004) in multivariate linear regression analysis. The time to nodular progression in HCCs with peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase was significantly longer than that in HCCs without this feature (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We identified HCCs with peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase as a noninvasive imaging biomarker to predict immune-inflamed HCC with a high immunoscore tendency. These HCCs were most likely to respond to combined immunotherapy.

A Phase I Trial of Trebananib, an Angiopoietin 1 and 2 Neutralizing Peptibody, Combined with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Ovarian and Colorectal Cancer

Ovarian cancers and microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancers are insensitive to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy, and new immunotherapeutic approaches are needed. Preclinical data suggest a relationship between immunotherapy resistance and elevated angiopoietin 2 levels. We performed a phase I dose escalation study of pembrolizumab and the angiopoietin 1/2 inhibitor trebananib (NCT03239145). This multicenter trial enrolled patients with metastatic ovarian cancer or MSS colorectal cancer. Trebananib was administered intravenously weekly for 12 weeks with 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. The toxicity profile of this combination was manageable, and the protocol-defined highest dose level (trebananib 30 mg/kg weekly plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks) was declared the maximum tolerated dose. The objective response rate for all patients was 7.3% (90% confidence interval, 2.5%-15.9%). Three patients with MSS colorectal cancer had durable responses for ≥3 years. One responding patient's colorectal cancer harbored a POLE mutation. The other two responding patients had left-sided colorectal cancers, with no baseline liver metastases, and genomic analysis revealed that they both had KRAS wild-type, ERBB2-amplified tumors. After development of acquired resistance, biopsy of one patient's KRAS wild-type ERBB2-amplified tumor showed a substantial decline in tumor-associated T cells and an increase in immunosuppressive intratumoral macrophages. Future studies are needed to carefully assess whether clinicogenomic features, such as lack of liver metastases, ERBB2 amplification, and left-sided tumors, can predict increased sensitivity to PD-1 immunotherapy combinations.

Origin, development and therapy of colorectal cancer from the perspective of a biologist and an oncologist

The intestinal epithelium, a rapidly renewing tissue, is characterized by a continuous cell turnover that occurs through a well-coordinated process of cell proliferation and differentiation. This dynamic is crucial for the long-term function of the gastrointestinal tract. Disruption of this process can lead to colorectal carcinoma, a common malignancy worldwide. The first part of the review focuses on the cellular composition of the epithelium and the molecular mechanisms that control its functions, and describes the pathways that lead to epithelial transformation and tumor progression. This forms the basis for understanding the development and progression of advanced colorectal cancer. The second part deals with current therapeutic approaches and presents the latest treatment options, ongoing clinical trials and new drugs. In addition, the biological and medical perspectives of the adverse effects of therapies and models of regeneration of the intestinal epithelium are highlighted and, finally, future treatment options are discussed.

Predictors of response to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. While treatment advancements have improved survival rates, primarily through targeted therapies based on KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations, personalized treatment strategies for CRC remain limited. Immunotherapy, mainly immune checkpoint blockade, has shown efficacy in various cancers but is effective in only a small subset of patients with CRC with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins or high microsatellite instability (MSI). Recent research has challenged the notion that CRC is immunologically inert, revealing subsets with high immunogenicity and diverse lymphocytic infiltration. Identifying precise biomarkers beyond dMMR and MSI is crucial to expanding immunotherapy benefits. Hence, exploration has extended to various biomarker sources, such as the tumor microenvironment, genomic markers, and gut microbiota. Recent studies have introduced a novel classification system, consensus molecular subtypes, that aids in identifying patients with CRC with an immunogenic profile. These findings underscore the necessity of moving beyond single biomarkers and toward a comprehensive understanding of the immunological landscape in CRC, facilitating the development of more effective, personalized therapies.

Immunotherapy for Microsatellite-Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Can we close the Gap between Potential and Practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will explore various strategies to rendering MSS mCRCs susceptible to ICI. Moreover, we will provide an overview of potential biomarkers that may aid to better patient selection, and discuss ongoing efforts in this area of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the top three most common cancers worldwide. While significant advances in treatment strategies have improved the prognosis for patients in the early stages of the disease, treatment options for metastatic CRC (mCRC) remain limited. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of several malignancies, its efficacy in mCRC is largely confined to patients exhibiting a high microsatellite instability status (MSI-H). However, the vast majority of mCRC patients do not exhibit a MSI-H, but are microsatellite stable (MSS). In these patients ICIs are largely ineffective. So far, ICIs do not play a crucial role in patients with MSS mCRC, despite the promising data for inducing long-term remissions in other tumour entities. For this reason, novel treatment strategies are needed to overcome the primary resistance upon ICI in patients with MSS.

The long-term effectiveness and mechanism of oncolytic virotherapy combined with anti-PD-L1 antibody in colorectal cancer patient

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is known to be resistant to immunotherapy. In our phase-I clinical trial, one patient achieved a 313-day prolonged response during the combined treatment of oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy. To gain a deeper understanding of the potential molecular mechanisms, we performed a comprehensive multi-omics analysis on this patient and three non-responders. Our investigation unveiled that, initially, the tumor microenvironment (TME) of this responder presented minimal infiltration of T cells and natural killer cells, along with a relatively higher presence of macrophages compared to non-responders. Remarkably, during treatment, there was a progressive increase in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells in the responder's tumor tissue. This was accompanied by a significant upregulation of transcription factors associated with T-cell activation and cytotoxicity, including GATA3, EOMES, and RUNX3. Furthermore, dynamic monitoring of peripheral blood samples from the responder revealed a rapid decrease in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), suggesting its potential as an early blood biomarker of treatment efficacy. Collectively, our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of combined oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy in certain CRC patients and provide molecular evidence that virotherapy can potentially transform a "cold" TME into a "hot" one, thereby improving sensitivity to immunotherapy.

Computational methods and biomarker discovery strategies for spatial proteomics: a review in immuno-oncology

Advancements in imaging technologies have revolutionized our ability to deeply profile pathological tissue architectures, generating large volumes of imaging data with unparalleled spatial resolution. This type of data collection, namely, spatial proteomics, offers invaluable insights into various human diseases. Simultaneously, computational algorithms have evolved to manage the increasing dimensionality of spatial proteomics inherent in this progress. Numerous imaging-based computational frameworks, such as computational pathology, have been proposed for research and clinical applications. However, the development of these fields demands diverse domain expertise, creating barriers to their integration and further application. This review seeks to bridge this divide by presenting a comprehensive guideline. We consolidate prevailing computational methods and outline a roadmap from image processing to data-driven, statistics-informed biomarker discovery. Additionally, we explore future perspectives as the field moves toward interfacing with other quantitative domains, holding significant promise for precision care in immuno-oncology.

Biomarkers to predict efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved to treat colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch-repair gene deficiency, but the response rate remains low. Value of current biomarkers to predict CRC patients' response to ICIs is unclear due to heterogeneous study designs and small sample sizes. Here, we aim to assess and quantify the magnitude of multiple biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases (to June 2023) for clinical studies examining biomarkers for efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. Random-effect models were performed for meta-analysis. We pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for biomarkers predicting response rate and survival. 36 studies with 1867 patients were included in systematic review. We found that a lower pre-treatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (n=4, HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.21-0.67) predicts good prognosis, higher tumor mutation burden (n=10, OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.16-10.78) predicts response to ICIs, and liver metastasis (n=16, OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.16-0.63) indicates resistance to ICIs, especially when combined with VEGFR inhibitors. But the predictive value of tumor PD-L1 expression (n=9, OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.48-2.14) was insignificant in CRC. Blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, tumor mutation burden, and liver metastasis, but not tumor PD-L1 expression, function as significant biomarkers to predict efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. These findings help stratify CRC patients suitable for ICI treatments, improving efficacy of immunotherapy through precise patient management. (PROSPERO, CRD42022346716).

Eradicating gross tumor disease: a prerequisite for efficient radioimmunotherapy?

Radiation therapy may induce off-target antitumor "abscopal" immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects. Several preclinical and early clinical studies revealed promising results when combining radiation therapy with immunostimulatory agents. Most radioimmunotherapy randomized trials showed disappointing results in patients with advanced tumors. In contrast, outcomes were encouraging when immunotherapy was delivered on top of gross disease elimination with curative-intent radiation therapy. In this review, we highlight available results from randomized trials and discuss the potential impact of overall tumor burden on the observed efficacy of radioimmunotherapy.

Advances in Precision Medicine Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Targeted Therapies

Precision medicine is transforming colorectal cancer treatment through the integration of advanced technologies and biomarkers, enhancing personalized and effective disease management. Identification of key driver mutations and molecular profiling have deepened our comprehension of the genetic alterations in colorectal cancer, facilitating targeted therapy and immunotherapy selection. Biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) guide treatment decisions, opening avenues for immunotherapy. Emerging technologies such as liquid biopsies, artificial intelligence, and machine learning promise to revolutionize early detection, monitoring, and treatment selection in precision medicine. Despite these advancements, ethical and regulatory challenges, including equitable access and data privacy, emphasize the importance of responsible implementation. The dynamic nature of colorectal cancer, with its tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution, underscores the necessity for adaptive and personalized treatment strategies. The future of precision medicine in colorectal cancer lies in its potential to enhance patient care, clinical outcomes, and our understanding of this intricate disease, marked by ongoing evolution in the field. The current reviews focus on providing in-depth knowledge on the various and diverse approaches utilized for precision medicine against colorectal cancer, at both molecular and biochemical levels.

An international phase II trial and immune profiling of SBRT and atezolizumab in advanced pretreated colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immuno-radiotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with advanced solid tumors, although optimized combination modalities remain unclear. Here, we report the colorectal (CRC) cohort analysis from the SABR-PDL1 trial that evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until progression or unmanageable toxicity, together with ablative SBRT delivered concurrently with the 2nd cycle (recommended dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions, adapted upon normal tissue tolerance constraint). SBRT was delivered to at least one tumor site, with at least one additional measurable lesion being kept from the radiation field. The primary efficacy endpoint was one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate from the start of atezolizumab. Sequential tumor biopsies were collected for deep multi-feature immune profiling.

RESULTS

Sixty pretreated (median of 2 prior lines) advanced CRC patients (38 men [63%]; median age, 59 years [range, 20-81 years]; 77% with liver metastases) were enrolled in five centers (France: n = 4, Spain: n = 1) from 11/2016 to 04/2019. All but one (98%) received atezolizumab and 54/60 (90%) received SBRT. The most frequently irradiated site was lung (n = 30/54; 56.3%). Treatment-related G3 (no G4-5) toxicity was observed in 3 (5%) patients. Median OS and PFS were respectively 8.4 [95%CI:5.9-11.6] and 1.4 months [95%CI:1.2-2.6], including five (9%) patients with PFS > 1 year (median time to progression: 19.2 months, including 2/5 MMR-proficient). Best overall responses consisted of stable disease (n = 38; 64%), partial (n = 3; 5%) and complete response (n = 1; 2%). Immune-centric multiplex IHC and RNAseq showed that SBRT redirected immune cells towards tumor lesions, even in the case of radio-induced lymphopenia. Baseline tumor PD-L1 and IRF1 nuclear expression (both in CD3 + T cells and in CD68 + cells) were higher in responding patients. Upregulation of genes that encode for proteins known to increase T and B cell trafficking to tumors (CCL19, CXCL9), migration (MACF1) and tumor cell killing (GZMB) correlated with responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new data on the feasibility, efficacy, and immune context of tumors that may help identifying advanced CRC patients most likely to respond to immuno-radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT N°: 2015-005464-42; Clinicaltrial.gov number: NCT02992912.

Prognostic and predictive role of immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a molecularly heterogeneous disease and one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death worldwide. The traditional classification of CRC is based on pathomorphological and molecular characteristics of tumor cells (mucinous, ring-cell carcinomas, etc.), analysis of mechanisms of carcinogenesis involved (chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype) and mutational statuses of commonly altered genes (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, APC, etc.), as well as expression signatures (CMS 1-4). It is also suggested that the tumor microenvironment is a key player in tumor progression and metastasis in CRC. According to the latest data, the immune microenvironment can also be predictive of the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we highlight how the immune environment influences CRC prognosis and sensitivity to systemic therapy.

Molecular Subtypes, microRNAs and Immunotherapy Response in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Currently, only a limited set of molecular traits are utilized to direct treatment for metastatic CRC (mCRC). The molecular classification of CRC depicts tumor heterogeneity based on gene expression patterns and aids in comprehending the biological characteristics of tumor formation, growth and prognosis. Additionally, it assists physicians in tailoring the therapeutic approach. Microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair proteins (MMRd) status has become a ubiquitous biomarker in solid tumors, caused by mutations or methylation of genes and, in turn, the accumulation of mutations and antigens that subsequently induce an immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently received approval for the treatment of mCRC with MSI-H/MMRd status. However, certain individuals experience either initial or acquired resistance. The tumor-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been linked to the ability of CRC to evade the immune system and promote its growth. Through comprehensive research conducted via the PUBMED database, the objectives of this paper were to review the molecular characteristics linked to tumor response in metastatic CRC in light of improved patients' outcomes following ICI therapies as seen in clinical trials and to identify particular microRNAs that can modulate the expression of specific oncoproteins, such as PD-L1, and disrupt the mechanisms that allow the immune system to be evaded.

Using immunogenic cell death to improve anticancer efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: From basic science to clinical application

Even though the discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer treatment, a high proportion of patients do not respond. Moreover, some types of cancers are refractory to these treatments. Thus, the need to find predictive biomarkers of efficacy and to evaluate the association with other treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, appears to be essential. Because ICIs reactivate or maintain an active status of T cells, one possibility is to combine these treatments with therapies that engage an immune response against tumor cells. Thus, by inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD) of cancer cells, some conventional anticancer treatments induce such immune response and may have an interest to be combined with ICIs. In this review, we explore preclinical studies and clinical trials that evaluate the combination of ICIs with ICD inducers. More than inducing ICD, some of these treatments appear to modulate the tumor microenvironment and more particularly to inhibit immunosuppression, thus improving treatment efficacy.

Light on life: immunoscore immune-checkpoint, a predictor of immunotherapy response

In the last decade, a plethora of immunotherapeutic strategies have been designed to modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. In particular, immune checkpoint (IC) blockade therapies present the most promising advances made in cancer treatment in recent years. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarkers predicting response to IC treatments are currently lacking. We have recently identified Immunoscore-IC, a powerful biomarker that predicts the efficiency of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC patients. Immunoscore-IC is an in vitro diagnostic assay that quantifies densities of PD-L1+, CD8+ cells, and distances between CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunoscore-IC can classify responder vs non-responder NSCLC patients for ICIs therapy and is revealed as a promising predictive marker of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in these patients. Immunoscore-IC has also shown a significant predictive value, superior to the currently used PD-L1 marker. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the addition of atezolizumab to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC. In the AtezoTRIBE trial, Immunoscore-IC emerged as the first biomarker with robust predictive value in stratifying pMMR metastatic CRC patients who critically benefit from checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, Immunoscore-IC could be a universal biomarker to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy across multiple cancer indications. Therefore, cancer patient stratification (by Immunoscore-IC), based on the presence of T lymphocytes and PD-L1 potentially provides support for clinicians to guide them through combination cancer treatment decisions.

Circulating immune cell dynamics as outcome predictors for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) continues to transform the therapeutic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with these drugs now being evaluated at every stage of the disease. In contrast to these advances, little progress has been made with respect to reliable predictive biomarkers that can inform clinicians on therapeutic efficacy. All current biomarkers for outcome prediction, including PD-L1, tumor mutational burden or complex immune gene expression signatures, require access to tumor tissue. Besides the invasive nature of the sampling procedure, other disadvantages of tumor tissue biopsies are the inability to capture the complete spatial heterogeneity of the tumor and the difficulty to perform longitudinal follow-up on treatment. A concept emerges in which systemic immune events developing at a distance from the tumor reflect local response or resistance to immunotherapy. The importance of this cancer 'macroenvironment', which can be deciphered by comprehensive analysis of peripheral blood immune cell subsets, has been demonstrated in several cutting-edge preclinical reports, and is corroborated by intriguing data emerging from ICI-treated patients. In this review, we will provide the biological rationale underlying the potential of blood immune cell-based biomarkers in guiding treatment decision in immunotherapy-eligible NSCLC patients. Finally, we will describe new techniques that will facilitate the discovery of more immune cell subpopulations with potential to become predictive biomarkers, and reflect on ways and the remaining challenges to bring this type of analysis to the routine clinical care in the near future.