Nivolumab and ipilimumab in combination with radiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The clinical benefit of adding radiotherapy to ipilimumab in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Combining radiotherapy (RT) with Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, holds promise in treating metastatic brain melanoma (MBM). Despite promising preclinical evidence, clinical studies evaluating their combined efficacy are limited and varied, necessitating a systematic review and meta-analysis to consolidate evidence and identify predictors of response or resistance in this challenging patient population. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of science were searched on July 9th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA v.17. A total of 26 studies with 1059 participants were included. The 1, 2, and 3-year overall survival rates were 0.44 [95% CI: 0.32-0.55], 0.28 [95% CI: 0.17, 0.39], and 0.19 [95% CI: 0.06-0.32], respectively. The pooled 12-month local control and 1-year progression-free survival rate were 0.53 [95% CI: 0.34-0.71] and 0.20 [95%CI: 0.10-0.30]. The pooled overall response rate, partial response rates, and stable disease rate were 0.26 [95% CI: 0.10-0.41], 0.10 [95% CI:0.05-0.15], 0.17 [95%CI:0.10-0.23], and 0.58 [95%CI: 0.45-0.70]. This study demonstrated promising results regarding adding RT to ipilimumab which was associated with significantly higher 1-year OS, 18-month OS, 2-year OS, 3-year OS, overall radiological response rate, and stable disease rate and significantly lower rate of progressive disease rate compared to ipilimumab without RT. However, no significant difference was observed between two groups in 6-month OS, 12-month LC, 1-year PFS, and partial response rate.

Tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer known for its high aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Conventional treatment of TNBC is challenging due to its heterogeneity and lack of clear targets. Recent advancements in immunotherapy have shown promise in treating TNBC, with immune checkpoint therapy playing a significant role in comprehensive treatment plans. The tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising immune cells, stromal cells, and various cytokines, plays a crucial role in TNBC progression and response to immunotherapy. The high presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins in TNBC indicates the potential of immunotherapeutic strategies. However, the complexity of the TME, while offering therapeutic targets, requires further exploration of its multiple roles in immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the interaction mechanism between TME and TNBC immunotherapy based on the characteristics and composition of TME, and elaborate on and analyze the effect of TME on immunotherapy, the potential of TME as an immune target, and the ability of TME as a biomarker. Understanding these dynamics will offer new insights for enhancing therapeutic approaches and investigating stratification and prognostic markers for TNBC patients.

Future investigative directions for novel therapeutic targets in head and neck cancer

AREAS COVERED

Here we describe novel agents, their mechanism(s) of action, preclinical results, and ongoing clinical trials in HNSCC.

EXPERT OPINION

Established therapeutic targets in HNSCC include EGFR (cetuximab) and PD-1 (pembrolizumab and nivolumab). Despite the detection of many other possible targets in HNSCC cell lines and patient tumors, no other therapies have successfully advanced to date. Identification of predictive biomarkers may guide the use of targeted agents and combination therapies. Clinical trials supported by strong preclinical data in relevant models are more likely to advance treatment options.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations in locally advanced HNSCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), prompting numerous clinical trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach in neoadjuvant therapy. This systematic review aims to consolidate and analyze the findings from various clinical trials combining neoadjuvant immunotherapy for HNSCC, with the goal of identifying the most effective neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimen.

Methods

The system conducted searches across electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of science from their inception to July 1, 2024. The primary focus was on evaluating efficacy (particularly pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and overall response rate (ORR)) and safety (primarily assessed by grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse reactions).

Results

A total of 1943 patients from 32 studies were analyzed. Combining neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy demonstrated superiority over neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone in terms of the MPR rate, while showing no statistically significant difference in the pCR rate. Furthermore, the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy exhibited a lower CR rate compared to neoadjuvant immunotherapy with radiotherapy alone, but a higher PR rate and SD rate. Apart from the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group in isolation, there were no statistically significant differences in grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among the other three combination therapy groups.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that patients with locally advanced HNSCC might benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy, particularly when used in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nonetheless, additional data is required to definitively confirm its efficacy.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=553753, identifier CRD42024553753.

Natural killer cells: a future star for immunotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The interplay between immune components and the epithelium plays a crucial role in the development and progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Natural killer (NK) cells, one of the main tumor-killing immune cell populations, have received increasing attention in HNSCC immunotherapy. In this review, we explore the mechanism underlying the interplay between NK cells and HNSCC. A series of immune evasion strategies utilized by cancer cells restrict HNSCC infiltration of NK cells. Overcoming these limitations can fully exploit the antineoplastic potential of NK cells. We also investigated the tumor-killing efficacy of NK cell-based immunotherapies, immunotherapeutic strategies, and new results from clinical trials. Notably, cetuximab, the most essential component of NK cell-based immunotherapy, inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway and activates the immune system in conjunction with NK cells, inducing innate effector functions and improving patient prognosis. In addition, we compiled information on other areas for the improvement of patient prognosis using anti-EGFR receptor-based monoclonal antibody drugs and the underlying mechanisms and prognoses of new immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of HNSCC.

Bridging the divide: unveiling mutual immunological pathways of cancer and pregnancy

The juxtaposition of two seemingly disparate physiological phenomena within the human body-namely, cancer and pregnancy-may offer profound insights into the intricate interplay between malignancies and the immune system. Recent investigations have unveiled striking similarities between the pivotal processes underpinning fetal implantation and successful gestation and those governing tumor initiation and progression. Notably, a confluence of features has emerged, underscoring parallels between the microenvironment of tumors and the maternal-fetal interface. These shared attributes encompass establishing vascular networks, cellular mobilization, recruitment of auxiliary tissue components to facilitate continued growth, and, most significantly, the orchestration of immune-suppressive mechanisms.Our particular focus herein centers on the phenomenon of immune suppression and its protective utility in both of these contexts. In the context of pregnancy, immune suppression assumes a paramount role in shielding the semi-allogeneic fetus from the potentially hostile immune responses of the maternal host. In stark contrast, in the milieu of cancer, this very same immunological suppression fosters the transformation of the tumor microenvironment into a sanctuary personalized for the neoplastic cells.Thus, the striking parallels between the immunosuppressive strategies deployed during pregnancy and those co-opted by malignancies offer a tantalizing reservoir of insights. These insights promise to inform novel avenues in the realm of cancer immunotherapy. By harnessing our understanding of the immunological events that detrimentally impact fetal development, a knowledge grounded in the context of conditions such as preeclampsia or miscarriage, we may uncover innovative immunotherapeutic strategies to combat cancer.