Idiopathic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: an epidemiological study in Italy

Prevalence and incidence rates of 17 neuromuscular disorders: An updated review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological frequency measures serve as reference point for patients, clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. Previously, we published a comprehensive review of the literature with prevalence and incidence rates for thirty neuromuscular disorders frequently encountered in the neuromuscular clinic. No meta-analyses were available at the time.

OBJECTIVE

We included various new studies and meta-analyses that have been published since 2014, we aim to update our previous review.

METHODS

Pubmed was searched for 'incidence' and 'prevalence' in combination with seventeen acquired and inherited neuromuscular disorders to identify peer-reviewed literature from 1990 to 2023. If multiple prevalence and incidence rates were found, these were summarized by providing the mean, the number of the estimates on which the mean was based and the range of these estimates. Additionally, we searched for meta-analyses to compare the found mean prevalence rates based on the summary of individual studies with the pooled prevalence rates based on the meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The mean prevalence estimates for 17 disorders ranged from 0.3/100,000 population for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, glycogenosis type V and nemaline myopathy to 20/100,000 for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type I. We found annual incidence rates for eight disorders, ranging from 0.3/100,000 population for progressive (spinal) muscular atrophy and facioscapulohumeral muscular atrophy to 1/100,000 for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 and myotonic dystrophy type 1. Plotting the mean prevalence estimates from the current study against the pooled prevalence estimates from eight meta-analyses showed reasonable agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidemiological frequencies about neuromuscular diseases- and in particular data on incidence are scarce. The mean prevalence estimates based on recently published studies on individual cohorts correspond well with the findings from the sparingly performed meta-analyses.

Nerve ultrasound helps to distinguish CIDP patients with diabetes from patients with diabetic polyneuropathy

Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) shares overlapping clinical and electrodiagnostic features with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), which complicates the differential diagnosis of CIDP in diabetic patients. 32 patients with diabetes mellitus and CIDP, 68 patients with CIDP without diabetes, 83 patients with DPN, and 28 diabetic patients without polyneuropathy were examined using clinical scores (Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS), Neuropathy Symptom Score, Neuropathy Deficit Score), nerve conduction studies, and nerve ultrasound (Ultrasound Pattern Sum Score (UPSS)). The ONLS was significantly higher in the CIDP patients with diabetes than in DPN (median [interquartile range]: 4.0 [3.0] vs. 0 [1.0], p < 0.001) as well as the UPSS (4.0 [6.0] vs. 0 [2.9], p < 0.001). Multiple binary logistic regression revealed UPSS and ONLS as statistically significant predictors to differentiate between CIDP with diabetes and DPN. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the ONLS with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.918 (95% CI: 0.868-0.0.967, p < 0.001). The UPSS total score had an AUC of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.743-0.909, p < 0.001). An UPSS ≥ 2.5 had a sensitivity of 77.4% and a specificity of 68.7% to detect CIDP. An ONLS ≥ 1.5 had a sensitivity of 87.1% and a specificity of 81.9% to detect CIDP. ROC curve analysis of a composite score of ONLS and UPSS revealed an AUC of 0.959 (95% CI: 0.928-0.991, p < 0.001). CIDP is an important differential diagnosis in people with diabetes mellitus. This study reports that the UPSS is well suited to differentiate between DPN and CIDP.

Exploring the depths of IgG4: insights into autoimmunity and novel treatments

IgG4 subclass antibodies represent the rarest subclass of IgG antibodies, comprising only 3-5% of antibodies circulating in the bloodstream. These antibodies possess unique structural features, notably their ability to undergo a process known as fragment-antigen binding (Fab)-arm exchange, wherein they exchange half-molecules with other IgG4 antibodies. Functionally, IgG4 antibodies primarily block and exert immunomodulatory effects, particularly in the context of IgE isotype-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. In the context of disease, IgG4 antibodies are prominently observed in various autoimmune diseases combined under the term IgG4 autoimmune diseases (IgG4-AID). These diseases include myasthenia gravis (MG) with autoantibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK), nodo-paranodopathies with autoantibodies against paranodal and nodal proteins, pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus with antibodies against desmoglein and encephalitis with antibodies against LGI1/CASPR2. Additionally, IgG4 antibodies are a prominent feature in the rare entity of IgG4 related disease (IgG4-RD). Intriguingly, both IgG4-AID and IgG4-RD demonstrate a remarkable responsiveness to anti-CD20-mediated B cell depletion therapy (BCDT), suggesting shared underlying immunopathologies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of B cells, antibody subclasses, and their general properties before examining the distinctive characteristics of IgG4 subclass antibodies in the context of health, IgG4-AID and IgG4-RD. Furthermore, we will examine potential therapeutic strategies for these conditions, with a special focus on leveraging insights gained from anti-CD20-mediated BCDT. Through this analysis, we aim to enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of IgG4-mediated diseases and identify promising possibilities for targeted therapeutic intervention.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.

Comparative analysis of albumin quotient and total CSF protein in immune-mediated neuropathies: a multicenter study on diagnostic implications

Introduction

Blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier dysfunction is pivotal for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, especially in spinal nerve root inflammation. Typically, either total CSF protein or the CSF to serum albumin ratio (QAlb) is measured. Total CSF protein measurements have limitations, notably its fixed reference value regardless of age, in contrast to the age-dependent reference for QAlb. Our goal was to evaluate both markers in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies.

Methods

In our multicenter research, we collected retrospective CSF data from patients suffering from immune-mediated neuropathies across four German research centers. These parameters were analyzed in relation to their clinical characteristics.

Results

Out of 419 samples, 36 (8.6%) displayed a notable variation between total CSF protein and QAlb values. A detailed analysis revealed that patients displaying elevated QAlb but normal total CSF protein levels were significantly younger at disease onset (p = 0.01), at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), and when undergoing lumbar puncture (p = 0.001) compared to patients with elevated CSF protein and normal QAlb levels. These effects were especially evident for the subgroup of samples derived by female patients.

Discussion

Our work confirms the crucial role of QAlb in diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies and particularly its efficacy as a marker for evaluating the blood-CSF barrier in patients with an earlier disease onset. Considering the significance of the albumin quotient, its assessment is especially advisable in younger patients of female sex to avoid missing a potential barrier dysfunction that might be falsely negative when using total protein.

[Modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in children]

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological and neuroimaging data and pathogenetic therapy of pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n=30) were observed in a separate structural unit of the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital of the Russian National Research Medical University named after. N.I. Pirogova Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the period from 2006 to 2023. The examination was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society on the Management of CIDP (2021). All patients received immunotherapy, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n=1), IVIG and glucocorticosteroids (GCS) (n=17, 56.7%), IVIG+GCS+plasmapheresis (n=12, 40.0%). Alternative therapy included cyclophosphamide (n=1), cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil (n=1), rituximab (n=2, 6.6%), azathioprine (n=3), mycophenolate mofetil (n=2, 6.6%).

RESULTS

In all patients, there was a significant difference between scores on the MRCss and INCAT functional scales before and after treatment. At the moment, 11/30 (36.6%) patients are in clinical remission and are not receiving pathogenetic therapy. The median duration of remission is 48 months (30-84). The longest remission (84 months) was observed in a patient with the onset of CIDP at the age of 1 year 7 months.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of CIDP is important, since the disease is potentially curable; early administration of pathogenetic therapy provides a long-term favorable prognosis.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Historical Perspective

The therapeutic administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) offers various advantages over intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This narrative review examines and compares SCIg versus IVIg in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). SCIg is as effective as IVIg but is better tolerated and easier to administer, as intravenous access is not required. Furthermore, SCIg administration is more convenient and cost-effective than IVIg, enabling flexible treatment scheduling at home and improving patients' overall quality of life. The availability of highly concentrated immunoglobulin G (IgG) subcutaneous solutions, such as IgPro20, a 20% IgG solution stabilized with L-proline, allows for the administration of larger volumes in a single session, while the parallel development of new technological devices enables the delivery of higher doses over a shorter time. Based on the results of the PATH study, SCIg has become a well-established therapy in CIDP. In addition to discussing the advantages of SCIg, this review summarizes the evolution of SCIg by discussing all the relevant clinical studies which have considered its use in the treatment of CIDP.

Outcome in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Outcomes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) have been reported in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. A considerable variation in long-term disease outcome has appeared in those reports. To overcome this uncertainty, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on CIDP outcomes, including the parameters of case fatality rate, ambulation, physical ability, and remission.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE (OVID) for reports with at least 2 years of follow-up on patients with active or previously active CIDP that were published no later than May 12, 2022. Studies were appraised for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for studies reporting prevalence data. Pooled analyses were conducted and the results were visualized using forest plots. The study protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42021266903).

RESULTS

A total of 1290 titles were identified. Sixty-nine full-text articles were screened and 21 studies with 1199 patients were selected for the data analysis. The pooled case fatality rate was 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9% to 5.7%). The pooled fraction of nonambulatory patients was 8.2% (95% CI, 5.7% to 11.6%) and, overall, 47.1% (95% CI, 39.5% to 54.9%) of CIDP patients had a good outcome without disability. The pooled rate of remission was 40.8% (95% CI, 30.6% to 51.8%).

DISCUSSION

Future research is warranted on how to prevent long-term impairment in CIDP. Care should be taken in developing clinical strategies to avoid immunomodulating therapy in the many patients in remission.

Prognosis and outcome in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in a tertiary center in Oman

Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated condition with variable clinical characteristics and different treatment modalities. We aim to present different clinical and demographic features of all patients with CIDP presented to the neuromuscular clinic within four years and their follow-up results. Methods: A retrospective study from a hospital database of 23 patients met the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria for CIPD. Complete demographic and clinical data were collected. Progress and outcome were assessed using two clinical score systems at regular intervals at 6, 12, and 18 months. Results: Mean age of patients was 43.4 ± 20.9 years (male-to-female ratio was 1.6:1). Age of onset was 39.7 ± 18.0 years. At the presentation, the Medical Research Council sum score (MRCss) was 50 (39.7-51.3), and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 3 (2.2-3.4). There was a significant improvement in MRCss during four periods (P < 0.001). Multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference in MRCss between the baseline and 12 and 18 months but no significant change between the baseline and 6 months. Likewise, mRS showed a significant improvement between the baseline and 18 months (no significant change between the baseline and 6 months or 12 months). Conclusion: The clinical characteristics of CIDP in our cohort were similar to other reported studies, and most of the studied patients had good outcomes. Our results could be utilized as baseline data for a better understanding of the characteristics of CIDP in Oman and, consequently, for better management of the disease.

Pediatric-Onset Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical features, demographic features, and treatment modalities of pediatric-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in Turkey.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients between January 2010 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated according to the Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on the management of CIDP (2021). In addition, patients with typical CIDP were divided into two groups according to the first-line treatment modalities (group 1: IVIg only, group 2: IVIg + steroid). The patients were further divided into two separate groups based on their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients, 22 (51.2%) males and 21 (48.8%) females, were included in the study. There was a significant difference between pretreatment and post-treatment modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores (P < 0.05) of all patients. First-line treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (n = 19, 44.2%), IVIg + steroids (n = 20, 46.5%), steroids (n = 1, 2.3%), IVIg + steroids + plasmapheresis (n = 1, 2.3%), and IVIg + plasmapheresis (n = 1, 2.3%). Alternative agent therapy consisted of azathioprine (n = 5), rituximab (n = 1), and azathioprine + mycophenolate mofetil + methotrexate (n = 1). There was no difference between the pretreatment and post-treatment mRS scores of groups 1 and 2 (P > 0.05); however, a significant decrease was found in the mRS scores of both groups with treatment (P < 0.05). The patients with abnormal MRI had significantly higher pretreatment mRS scores compared with the group with normal MRI (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study demonstrated that first-line immunotherapy modalities (IVIg vs IVIg + steroids) had equal efficacy for the treatment of patients with CIDP. We also determined that MRI features might be associated with profound clinical features, but did not affect treatment response.

Differenzialdiagnose der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose in der klinischen Praxis

Die Diagnose der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose (ALS) beruht vorwiegend auf klinischen Kriterien und kann aufgrund des heterogenen Erscheinungsbildes gerade in frühen Krankheitsstadien mitunter schwierig sein. Wegweisend sind der Nachweis einer kombinierten Pathologie des oberen und unteren Motoneurons, der fokale Onset, das Ausbreitungsmuster (Spreading), das typische Verteilungsmuster der Paresen, das Vorhandensein oder Fehlen nicht-motorischer Zusatzsymptome sowie Art und Geschwindigkeit der Krankheitsprogredienz. Dieser Review stellt Charakteristika der ALS sowohl im Hinblick auf die klinische Untersuchung als auch apparativer Zusatzdiagnostik in Abgrenzung zu den wichtigsten Differenzialdiagnosen in Form von Einschlusskörperchenmyositis, Chronisch Inflammatorischer Demyelinisierender Polyneuropathie (CIDP), Mulifokaler Motorischer Neuropathie (MMN), adulter Form der Spinalen Muskelatrophie (SMA), Kennedy-Syndrom und Hereditärer Spastischer Paralyse (HSP) dar.

A Budget Impact Model of Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy with IgPro20 (Hizentra) Relative to Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the United States

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare, progressive autoimmune disease causing peripheral nervous system dysfunction. Guidelines recommend immunoglobulin (IG) therapy as an immunomodulatory agent in CIDP. Drawbacks and unmet needs with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) include adverse effects and wear-off effects, along with the burden of administration based on site of care. Subcutaneous administration of Hizentra, a subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) reduces patient burden by allowing self-administration outside the hospital setting and has fewer adverse events (AEs).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the expected cost of treatment and the budget impact of Hizentra compared with IVIG for maintenance treatment of CIDP in the United States.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to estimate the expected budget impact of maintenance treatment with Hizentra for US stakeholders. The model adopts primarily a US integrated delivery network perspective and, secondarily, a commercial perspective over a 1-year time horizon. Pharmacy costs were based on a payment mix of average sales price (73%), wholesale acquisition cost (2%), and average wholesale price (25%). Costs in the model reflect 2022 US dollars. In accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines and recommendations for budget impact modeling, no discounting was performed. The PATH clinical study of Hizentra maintenance in CIDP was used to determine clinical inputs for relapse rates at initial assessment (24 weeks) and at 52 weeks for Hizentra. The ICE clinical study of Gamunex maintenance in CIDP was the basis of relapse rates for Gamunex (and other IVIGs). Literature-based estimates were obtained for infusion costs by site of care, costs of IVIG infusion-related complications, and significant IVIG AE rates. Hizentra AE rates from the US Hizentra prescribing information were assessed but were not included in the model as the AEs in CIDP were mild, easily treated, and self-limited. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate variations from the base case.

RESULTS

The model showed that a Hizentra starting dose of 0.2 g/kg is expected to result in annual cost savings of US$32,447 per patient compared with IVIG. For a hypothetical 25-million-member plan, the budget impact of a 10% market share shift from IVIG to Hizentra is expected to result in savings of US$2,296,235.

CONCLUSION

This analysis projects that Hizentra is likely associated with favorable economic benefit compared with IVIG in managing CIDP.

Sex differences in neuromuscular disorders

The prevalence, onset, pathophysiology, and clinical course of many neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) may significantly differ between males and females. Some NMDs are more frequently observed in females, and characterized to show a higher grade of severity during or after the pregnancy. Meanwhile, others tend to have an earlier onset in males and exhibit a more variable progression. Prevalently, sex differences in NMDs have a familiar character given from genetic inheritance. However, they may also influence clinical presentation and disease severity of acquired NMD forms, and are represented by both hormonal and genetic factors. Consequently, to shed light on the distinctive role of biological factors in the different clinical phenotypes, we summarize in this review the sex related differences and their distinctive biological roles emerging from the current literature in both acquired and inherited NMDs.

Sex differences in Guillain Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and experimental autoimmune neuritis

Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS) and its variants, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP and its variants, are regarded as immune mediated neuropathies. Unlike in many autoimmune disorders, GBS and CIDP are more common in males than females. Sex is not a clear predictor of outcome. Experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) is an animal model of these diseases, but there are no studies of the effects of sex in EAN. The pathogenesis of GBS and CIDP involves immune response to non-protein antigens, antigen presentation through non-conventional T cells and, in CIDP with nodopathy, IgG4 antibody responses to antigens. There are some reported sex differences in some of these elements of the immune system and we speculate that these sex differences could contribute to the male predominance of these diseases, and suggest that sex differences in peripheral nerves is a topic worthy of further study.

Epidemiology of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare but disabling disorder that often requires long-term immunomodulatory treatment. Background incidence rates and prevalence and risk factors for developing CIDP are still poorly defined. In the current study, we used a longitudinal population-based cohort study in The Netherlands to assess these rates and demographic factors and comorbidity associated with CIDP.

METHODS

We determined the incidence rate and prevalence of CIDP between 2008-2017 and the occurrence of potential risk factors in a retrospective Dutch cohort study using the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database. Cases were defined as CIDP if the diagnosis of CIDP was described in the electronic medical file.

RESULTS

In a source population of 928,030 persons with a contributing follow-up of 3,525,686 person-years, we identified 65 patients diagnosed with CIDP. The overall incidence rate was 0.68 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.45-0.99). The overall prevalence was 7.00 per 100,000 individuals (95% CI 5.41-8.93). The overall incidence rate was higher in men compared to woman (IRR 3.00, 95% CI 1.27-7.11), and higher in elderly of 50 years or older compared to people <50 years of age (IRR 17 95% CI 4-73). Twenty percent of CIDP cases had DM and 9% a co-existing other autoimmune disease.

INTERPRETATION

These background rates are important to monitor changes in the frequency of CIDP following infectious disease outbreaks identify potential risk factors, and to estimate the social and economic burden of CIDP.

Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy after the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine may follow a chronic course

Background

Methods

Conclusions

CIDP: Current Treatments and Identification of Targets for Future Specific Therapeutic Intervention

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the peripheral nervous system. This clinically heterogeneous neurological disorder is closely related to Guillain–Barré syndrome and is considered the chronic counterpart of that acute disease. Currently available treatments are mostly empirical; they include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange and chronic immunosuppressive agents, either alone or in combination. Recent advances in the understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in CIDP have brought a number of novel ways of possible intervention for use in CIDP. This review summarizes selected pre-clinical and clinical findings, highlights the importance of using adapted animal models to evaluate the efficacy of novel treatments, and proposes the outlines of future directions to ameliorate the conditions of patients with CIDP.

Hydroxychloroquine-Induced Toxic Myopathy Causing Diaphragmatic Weakness and Lung Collapse Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

A 42-year-old woman with juvenile idiopathic arthritis was treated with anakinra, corticosteroids, and hydroxychloroquine when she developed chronic hypoxic respiratory myopathy. She was admitted to the intensive care unit for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and required prolonged intubation, subsequent tracheostomy, and long-term ventilatory support due to multiple failed spontaneous breathing trials after discontinuation of anakinra and steroids. Muscle biopsy revealed type II fiber atrophy with the accumulation of autophagosomes and vacuoles presenting as curvilinear bodies, elevated MHC class I antigen expression, and infiltration by CD68+ macrophages and CD8+ T cells. Type II fiber atrophy was attributed to corticosteroid use and curvilinear bodies due to blockade of autophagy by hydroxychloroquine. After hydroxychloroquine was discontinued, the patient recovered to her prehospitalization baseline.

Antecedent infections and vaccinations in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A European collaborative study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) may be rarely preceded by infection. A causative link remains unproven, in contrast to Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), which is commonly postinfectious with well-demonstrated pathophysiological mechanisms of molecular mimicry following Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. Uncommonly, infections are reported before the onset of CIDP. In this study we aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of CIDP occurring after antecedent infections or vaccinations in two large European cohorts.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 268 subjects with "definite" or "probable" CIDP from the Inflammatory Neuropathy Clinic, Birmingham, UK (129 subjects), and from the Serbian national CIDP database (139 subjects).

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 268 (9.3%) subjects had a respiratory or gastrointestinal infection in the 6 weeks preceding CIDP onset, and 3 of 268 (1.1%) had received an influenza vaccination. CIDP disease onset occurred at a younger age (mean [standard deviation], 44.25 [17.36] years vs 54.05 [15.19] years; P < .005) and acute-onset CIDP was more common (42.9% vs 12.1%; odds ratio, 5.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-12.68; P < .001) in subjects with preceding infections or vaccinations. No differences in CIDP subtype, rates of cerebrospinal fluid protein level elevation, disability, or likelihood of treatment response, were observed.

DISCUSSION

Antecedent infections or vaccinations may precede about 10% of cases of CIDP and are more common in younger subjects. Acute-onset CIDP is more frequent after antecedent events. These findings may suggest specific pathophysiological mechanisms in such cases.

Monocentric study of 28 cases of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: first Tunisian study

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare affection of the peripheral nervous system. Its diagnostic criteria have evolved since 1975. The aim of our work is to study the epidemiological, clinical, and paraclinical aspects of CIDP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 28 CIDP patients of the neurology department of the military hospital of Tunis between January 2000 and December 2017. All these patients met the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society(EFNS/PNS)2010 diagnostic criteria for definite CIDP.

RESULTS

The average age was 50 years with a gender ratio of 1.57. We found sensitivomotor symptoms in 66% of patients. Neurological assessment showed a proximal and distal motor weakness in 50% of cases, the involvement of superficial and deep sensory systems in 44% of patients with a generalized areflexia in all patients. Median Inflammatory Neuropthy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score was 7. Concerning electrophysiology, all our patients met the EFNS/EPS 2010 diagnostic criteria for a definite CIDP. Screening for concurrent pathologies was positive in 11 patients. On the therapeutic side, there was no superiority of intravenous immunoglobin compared with pulsed methylprednisolone. Oral steroids were used as backup in about 50% of patients. There were good outcomes in 72% of patients who improved very well after treatment.

CONCLUSION

CIDP is a rare and polymorphic disorder with a variety of concurrent pathologies. Our study is the first study in Tunisia and in Maghreb countries which included the most big series of patients. Our results were similar to literature. A multicentral study would be better profitable.

CIDP associated with Sjögren's syndrome

BACKGROUND

This study addresses the challenging characterisation and differentiation of CIDP versus CIDP in association with Sjögren's syndrome to facilitate the process in clinical routine.

METHODS

Patients with both CIDP and Sjögren's syndrome and CIDP without Sjögren's syndrome were compared concerning relevant differences in clinical, laboratory and electrophysiological findings. 154 patients who fulfilled the diagnostic EFNS/PNS criteria for CIDP were included in the analysis. 54 of these patients additionally fulfilled the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome.

RESULTS

The frequency of female patients was higher in patients with CIDP and Sjögren's syndrome (52%) versus CIDP patients without Sjögren's syndrome (28%). Furthermore, the occurrence of cranial nerve impairment was significantly higher in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (39% versus 14%). There were no significant group differences in the evaluation of initial symptoms, severity of disability judged by INCAT disability scale score, presence or distribution of sensory deficits, limb weakness and the presence of ataxia, pain or dysautonomia, CSF laboratory or electrophysiological findings.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our data indicate that cranial nerve impairment and female gender might represent red flags for an additional Sjögren's syndrome in patients with CIDP. The patterns of clinical disabilities and electrophysiological findings due to peripheral nerve damage are similar in both CIDP entities.

Juvenile Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Epidemiology in Sardinia, Insular Italy

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare and disabling immunomediated radiculoneuropathy. Its worldwide epidemiology is heterogeneous and, in adults, CIDP prevalence varies from 0.6 to 9 cases per 100,000 population. Juvenile CIDP (jCIDP) is even rarer, with age-specific prevalence rates varying from 0.23 to 1.26 owing to different diagnostic criteria (American Academy of Neurology [AAN] and European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society [EFNS/PNS]), different age grouping or, genuine differences.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed jCIDP incidence and prevalence in Sardinia, an area at very-high risk for autoimmune diseases, using comparable methods.

DESIGN

The study area was the northern Sardinia, insular Italy, with 491,571 inhabitants and a pediatric population (0-18 years) of 79,086 individuals.

RESULTS

On prevalence day (December 31, 2019) the total crude, age-specific prevalence rate were 6.32 per 100,000 according with AAN criteria, 7.58 per 100,000 population with European Neuromuscular Center (ENMC) criteria, and 8.85 per 100,000 population with both 2006 and 2010 EFNS/PNS criteria. Crude mean incidence rate were 0.42 per 100,000 per year with AAN criteria, 0.50 per 100,000 per year with ENMC criteria, and 0.59 per 100,000 per year using 2006 and 2010 EFNS/PNS criteria. Of the eight patients, six had typical CIDP, one had multifocal-acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM), and one chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP). Patient's disability was generally mild. Clinical course was progressive, monophasic, or relapsing.

CONCLUSION

jCIDP prevalence and incidence rates in Sardinia were criteria-dependent, the lowest obtained when using AAN criteria, the highest using the EFNS/PNS. Nonetheless, even with the exclusion of the "possible" category, by using comparable methodology, prevalence rates in Sardinia are considerably higher than the range reported in all previous jCIDP studies.

A Global Survey of Disease Burden in Patients Who Carry a Diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Introduction

The extent to which work productivity, emotional well-being, social interactions, and family life are impacted in patients who self-identify as having chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is not well characterized.

Methods

Data from an online survey of 595 individuals with self-reported CIDP, recruited by the Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS)/CIDP Foundation, were used to assess disease and treatment burden. A total of 37% of patients were classified as “likely”, 34% as “somewhat likely”, and 28% as “unlikely” CIDP.

Results

Of ten symptoms that patients with CIDP may experience, each symptom was experienced by 77–94% of “likely”, 79–96% of “somewhat likely”, and 66–91% of “unlikely” patients. In “likely” CIDP patients 44% stopped working because of their symptoms and 24% moved to a new home. The most common treatments were intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) infusion and corticosteroids. IVIg was associated with venous access issues and work/school absenteeism.

Conclusions

CIDP diagnostic confirmation was not performed in any of the survey respondents. Our results do not add any knowledge on the diagnosis or treatment of CIDP. Our findings do provide insight into the symptoms that patients that think they have CIDP or have been told they have CIDP experience, explores how patients that are labeled as having CIDP view treatment expectations, and highlights how these symptoms affect home and work life. We hope that the findings are constructively used to get patients the services they need to improve quality of life, maintain employment, and ensure a safe home environment regardless of diagnostic accuracy.

Longer-term effects of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Who benefits?

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) represent an established cornerstone for the immunotherapy of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Efficacy of IVIg for CIDP was proven in a large phase III trial. Yet, data on longer-term efficacy and effects in distinct subgroups are scarce. Our trial investigates the long-term efficacy of IVIg treatment in CIDP patients. In this observational real-world study, we retrospectively analyzed 49 CIDP patients receiving continuous IVIg treatment with a mean initial dosage of 87 g (1 g/kg body weight) every 4 weeks over a mean time of 45 months between 2010 and 2018. INCAT-Scores before the start of treatment and at the end of the observation period were compared. Over the observation period, IVIg treatment led to a median improvement of one INCAT score point. Subgroup analyses revealed a more pronounced improvement of INCAT scores in female CIDP patients, individuals with relapsing disease courses, patients with more pronounced motor impairment (higher initial INCAT scores) and in the cohort without need for concomitant other immunotherapies. These data argue for sustained beneficial effects of longer-term immunotherapy with IVIg in CIDP, particularly in females and relapsing disease forms with higher disease activity.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy and Its Variants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and its variants comprise a group of immune-mediated neuropathies with distinctive clinical presentations and electrodiagnostic features. Prompt recognition of these treatable disorders is mandatory as delays result in significant disability and morbidity. This article highlights the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment approach of these polyneuropathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The spectrum of CIDP is expanding with the recent characterization of neuropathies associated with nodal and paranodal antibodies. These neuropathies are distinguished by their unique presentations and are often refractory to IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Subcutaneous immunoglobulins have recently been approved as a treatment option for CIDP and join corticosteroids, IVIg, and plasma exchange as first-line treatment.

SUMMARY

CIDP is characterized by progressive symmetric proximal and distal weakness, large fiber sensory loss, and areflexia, with clinical nadir reached more than 8 weeks after symptom onset. Autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies fall on a continuum, with differences in the type of nerve fibers affected and pattern of deficits. Distinguishing between typical CIDP and its variants allows for selection of the most appropriate treatment.

Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in neurological disorders: current approach and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) has become increasingly popular in recent years as an effective treatment of immune-mediated neurological diseases. Treatment-related mortality has significantly reduced primarily through better patient selection, optimization of transplant technique, and increased center experience.

AREA COVERED

Multiple sclerosis is the main indication, but people with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, stiff-person spectrum disorder, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, and other immune-mediated neurological disorders also have been treated. The review herein discusses the use of AHSCT in these neurological disorders, the importance of patient selection and transplant technique optimization and future directions.

EXPERT OPINION

Phase II and III clinical trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of AHSCT in multiple sclerosis and recent phase II clinical trials have also suggested its safety and efficacy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, with the evidence in other neurological disorders limited to individual case reports, small case series, and registry data. Therefore, further randomized controlled clinical trials are required to assess its safety and efficacy in other neurological conditions. However, in rare neurological conditions, pragmatic treatment trials or registry-based studies may be more realistic options for gathering efficacy and safety data.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Refractory CIDP With or Without IgG4 Autoantibodies (RECIPE): Protocol for a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy that is currently classified into several clinical subtypes, which are presumed to have different pathogenic mechanisms. Recently, studies identified a subgroup of patients with CIDP who were positive for IgG4 autoantibodies against paranodal proteins, such as neurofascin-155 and contactin-1, who respond poorly to first-line therapies for typical CIDP, including intravenous immunoglobulin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous rituximab according to IgG4 autoantibody status in patients with refractory CIDP.

METHODS

The Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Refractory CIDP Patients with IgG4 Autoantibodies in the Exploratory Clinical (RECIPE) trial consists of 2 cohorts: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized study cohort of 15 patients with IgG4 autoantibody-positive CIDP (rituximab:placebo = 2:1) and an open-label trial cohort of 10 patients with antibody-negative CIDP. The primary endpoint is improvement in functional outcome assessed using the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Disability Scale score at 26, 38, or 52 weeks after the start of treatment with rituximab in patients with CIDP and anti-paranodal protein antibodies. Secondary outcome measures include grip strength, manual muscle testing sum scores, results of nerve conduction studies, and other functional scales.

RESULTS

We plan to enroll 25 cases for the full analysis set. Recruitment is ongoing, with 14 patients enrolled as of January 2020. Enrollment will close in September 2020, and the study is planned to end in December 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial will determine if rituximab is safe and effective in patients with anti-paranodal antibodies. An open-label study will provide additional data on the effects of rituximab in patients with antibody-negative CIDP. The results of the RECIPE trial are expected to provide evidence for the positioning of rituximab as a pathogenesis-based therapeutic for refractory CIDP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03864185, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03864185 ; The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCT2041180037, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2041180037.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/17117.

Patients with chronic autoimmune demyelinating polyneuropathies exhibit cognitive deficits which might be associated with CSF evidence of blood-brain barrier disturbance

Background

Chronic autoimmune demyelinating polyneuropathies (CADP) result in impaired sensorimotor function. However, anecdotal clinical observations suggest the development of cognitive deficits during the course of disease.

Methods

We tested 16 patients with CADP (11 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, 4 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy and 1 patient with multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy) and 40 healthy controls (HC) with a neuropsychological test battery. Blood-brain-barrier dysfunction (BBBd) in patients was assessed retrospectively by analysing the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) status at the time the diagnosis of CAPD was established.

Results

CADP patients failed on average in 1.7 out of 9 neuropsychological tests (SD ± 1.25, min. 0, max. 5). 50% of the CADP patients failed in at least two neuropsychological tests and 44.3% of the patients failed in at least two different cognitive domains. CADP patients exhibiting BBBd at the time of first diagnosis failed in more neuropsychological tests than patients with intact integrity of the BBB (p < 0.05). When compared directly with the HC group, CADP patients performed worse than HC in tests measuring information processing ability and speed as well as phonemic verbal fluency after adjusting for confounding covariates.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that mild to moderate cognitive deficits might be present in patients with CAPD. One possible tentative explanation, albeit strong evidence is still lacking for this pathophysiological mechanism, refers to the effect of autoimmune antibodies entering the CNS via the dysfunctional blood-brain barrier typically seen in some of the CADP patients.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: update on diagnosis, immunopathogenesis and treatment

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy typically characterised by symmetrical involvement, and proximal as well as distal muscle weakness (typical CIDP). However, there are several 'atypical' subtypes, such as multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (Lewis-Sumner syndrome) and 'distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy', possibly having different immunopathogenesis and treatment responses. In the absence of diagnostic and pathogenetic biomarkers, diagnosis and treatment may be difficult, but recent progress has been made in the application of neuroimaging tools demonstrating nerve hypertrophy and in identifying subgroups of patients who harbour antibodies against nodal proteins such as neurofascin and contactin-1. Despite its relative rarity, CIDP represents a significant economic burden, mostly due to costly treatment with immunoglobulin. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of subcutaneous as well as intravenous immunoglobulin as maintenance therapy, and newer immunomodulating drugs can be used in refractory cases. This review provides an overview focusing on advances over the past several years.

Randomized, controlled crossover study of IVIg for demyelinating polyneuropathy and diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) is more effective than placebo at reducing disability in patients with diabetes and demyelinating polyneuropathy features.

METHODS

This is a double-blinded, single-center, randomized, controlled crossover trial of IVIg treatment vs placebo. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS) scores during the IVIg phasecompared with the placebo phase. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, Medical Research Council sum scores, grip strength, electrophysiologic measurements, quality of life, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects were recruited between March 2015 and April 2017. The mean change in ONLS scores was -0.2 points during the IVIg phase and 0.0 points during the placebo phase (p = 0.23). Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences between IVIg and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

IVIg did not reduce disability, improve strength, or quality of life in patients with demyelinating polyneuropathy features and diabetes after 3 months of treatment in comparison with placebo. Therefore, careful consideration of the primary diagnosis is required before immunomodulatory therapy.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with diabetes and demyelinating polyneuropathy features, IVIg did not significantly reduce disability.

Risk of osteoporosis in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathy- a population-based cohort study

The risk of osteoporosis in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathy (CIN) has not been evaluated in detail. We conducted a population-based case-control study nested in a retrospective cohort to analyze osteoporosis risk among patients with CIN using a nationwide database. Patients with CIN based on the Korean Classification of Disease diagnostic code were included and were matched to controls. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the effect of CIN on osteoporosis. After propensity score matching, 585 CIN patients and 585 controls were selected. Patients with CIN had an increased osteoporosis risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.293, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.460-3.601) compared with controls. The osteoporosis risk was higher among male patients with CIN than among male controls (HR = 5.404, 95% CI 2.252-12.969), while there were no significant differences among women. Among the CIN patients, the average daily dose of corticosteroids was higher in those who developed osteoporosis (19.6 mg [10.8-49.3]) than those who did not (16.2 mg [7.2-29.1], p = 0.001). The osteoporosis risk among CIN patients is higher than among controls. High risk of osteoporosis in male patients may indicate that osteoporosis in CIN patients results from the disease itself or related treatments.

Electrodiagnostic data-driven clustering identifies a prognostically different subgroup of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the correlations between electrodiagnostic (EDX) features in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and to investigate whether EDX data-driven clustering can identify a distinct subgroup regarding clinical phenotype and treatment response.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical and EDX data of 56 patients with definite CIDP fulfilling the 2010 European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society criteria at two teaching hospitals. A hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithm with complete linkage was used to partition the patients into subgroups with similar EDX features. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

EDX data-driven clustering partitioned the patients into two clusters, identifying a distinct subgroup characterised by coexistence of prominent conduction slowing and markedly reduced distally evoked compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes. This cluster of patients was significantly over-represented by an atypical subtype (distal acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy) compared with the other cluster (70% vs 26.1%, p=0.042). Furthermore, patients in this cluster invariably showed favourable long-term treatment outcome (100% vs 63%, p=0.023). In logistic regression analyses, the initial disability (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.4 to 25.4), F-wave latency (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.98) and distal CMAP duration (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99) were significant predictors of the poor long-term outcome.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that EDX data-driven clustering could differentiate a pattern of EDX features with prognostic implication in patients with CIDP. Reduced distally evoked CMAPs may not necessarily predict poor responses to treatment, and active treatment is warranted when prominent slowing of conduction is accompanied in the distal segments.

Incidence and Prevalence of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prevalence and incidence rates of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are required to determine the impact of CIDP on society. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of CIDP worldwide and to determine the effect of diagnostic criteria on prevalence and incidence.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted for all published incidence and prevalence studies on CIDP until May 18, 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research checklist. We performed a random effect meta-analysis to estimate pooled prevalence and incidence rates.

RESULTS

Of the 907 studies, 11 were included in the systematic review, 5 in the meta-analysis of incidence (818 cases; 220,513,514 person-years) and 9 in the meta-analysis of prevalence (3,160 cases; 160,765,325 population). These studies had a moderate quality. The pooled crude incidence rate was 0.33 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.21-0.53; I2 = 95.7%) and the pooled prevalence rate was 2.81 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.58-4.39; I2 = 99.1%). Substantial heterogeneity in incidence and prevalence across studies seems to be partly explained by using different diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide a starting point to estimate the social burden of CIDP and demonstrate the need to reach consensus on diagnostic criteria for CIDP.

History, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is probably the best recognized progressive immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy. It is characterized by a symmetrical, motor-predominant peripheral neuropathy that produces both distal and proximal weakness. Large-fiber abnormalities (weakness and ataxia) predominate, whereas small-fiber abnormalities (autonomic and pain) are less common. The pathophysiology of CIDP is inflammatory demyelination that manifests as slowed conduction velocities, temporal dispersion, and conduction block on nerve conduction studies and as segmental demyelination, onion-bulb formation, and endoneurial inflammatory infiltrates on nerve biopsies. Although spinal fluid protein levels are generally elevated, this finding is not specific for the diagnosis of ClDP. Other neuropathies can resemble CIDP, and it is important to identify these to ensure correct treatment of these various conditions. Consequently, metastatic bone surveys (for osteosclerotic myeloma), serum electrophoresis with immunofixation (for monoclonal gammopathies), and human immunodeficiency virus testing should be considered for testing in patients with suspected CIDP. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy can present as various subtypes, the most common being the classical symmetrical polyradiculoneuropathy and the next most common being a localized asymmetrical form, multifocal CIDP. There are 3 well-established, first-line treatments of CIDP-corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin-with most experts using intravenous immunoglobulin as first-line therapy. Newer immune-modulating drugs can be used in refractory cases. Treatment response in CIDP should be judged by objective measures (improvement in the neurological or electrophysiological examination), and treatment needs to be individualized to each patient.

Octagam® for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: results from three observational studies

Aim:

To present data from three studies of a Post-Authorization Safety Surveillance (PASS) program for the subset of patients receiving Octagam^® 5% or 10% for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

Methods:

Data on patients with CIDP treated with Octagam were analyzed to assess its safety and tolerability.

Results:

Of 2314 patients included in the studies, 58 patients (mean age: 64.6 years) received Octagam for CIDP, mean dose of which was 0.8 g/kg bodyweight/course. 81% of observations for clinical appearance since last observation were assessed as stable and 16.6% showed an improved clinical appearance with treatment. Adverse drug reactions were rare (<0.7% of infusions).

Conclusion:

Octagam was effective and well-tolerated in patients with CIDP.

Corticosteroids for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a progressive or relapsing and remitting paralysing illness, probably due to an autoimmune response, which should benefit from corticosteroid treatment. Non-randomised studies suggest that corticosteroids are beneficial. Two commonly used corticosteroids are prednisone and prednisolone. Both are usually given as oral tablets. Prednisone is converted into prednisolone in the liver so that the effect of the two drugs is usually the same. Another corticosteroid, dexamethasone, is more potent and is used in smaller doses. The review was first published in 2001 and last updated in 2015; we undertook this update to identify any new evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of corticosteroid treatment for CIDP compared to placebo or no treatment, and to compare the effects of different corticosteroid regimens.

SEARCH METHODS

On 8 November 2016, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomised trials of corticosteroids for CIDP. We searched clinical trials registries for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of treatment with any corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone for CIDP, diagnosed by an internationally accepted definition.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data from included studies and assessed the risk of bias independently. The intended primary outcome was change in disability, with change in impairment after 12 weeks and side effects as secondary outcomes. We assessed strength of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

One non-blinded RCT comparing prednisone with no treatment in 35 eligible participants did not measure the primary outcome for this systematic review. The trial had a high risk of bias. Neuropathy Impairment Scale scores after 12 weeks improved in 12 of 19 participants randomised to prednisone, compared with five of 16 participants randomised to no treatment (risk ratio (RR) for improvement 2.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 4.52; very low-quality evidence). The trial did not report side effects in detail, but one prednisone-treated participant died.A double-blind RCT comparing daily standard-dose oral prednisolone with monthly high-dose oral dexamethasone in 40 participants reported none of the prespecified outcomes for this review. The trial had a low risk of bias, but the quality of evidence was limited as it came from a single small study. There was little or no difference in number of participants who achieved remission (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.50 to 2.45 in favour of monthly dexamethasone; moderate-quality evidence), or change in disability or impairment after one year (low-quality evidence). Change of grip strength or Medical Research Council (MRC) scores demonstrated little or no difference between groups (moderate-quality to low-quality evidence). Eight of 16 people in the prednisolone group and seven of 24 people in the dexamethasone group deteriorated. Side effects were similar with each regimen, except that sleeplessness was less common with monthly dexamethasone (low-quality evidence) as was moon facies (moon-shaped appearance of the face) (moderate-quality evidence).Experience from large non-randomised studies suggests that corticosteroids are beneficial, but long-term use causes serious side effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are very uncertain about the effects of oral prednisone compared with no treatment, because the quality of evidence from the only RCT that exists is very low. Nevertheless, corticosteroids are commonly used in practice, supported by very low-quality evidence from observational studies. We also know from observational studies that corticosteroids carry the long-term risk of serious side effects. The efficacy of high-dose monthly oral dexamethasone is probably little different from that of daily standard-dose oral prednisolone. Most side effects occurred with similar frequencies in both groups, but with high-dose monthly oral dexamethasone moon facies is probably less common and sleeplessness may be less common than with oral prednisolone. We need further research to identify factors that predict response.

Novel pathomechanisms in inflammatory neuropathies

Inflammatory neuropathies are rare autoimmune-mediated disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system. Considerable progress has recently been made in understanding pathomechanisms of these disorders which will be essential for developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the future. Here, we summarize our current understanding of antigenic targets and the relevance of new immunological concepts for inflammatory neuropathies. In addition, we provide an overview of available animal models of acute and chronic variants and how new diagnostic tools such as magnetic resonance imaging and novel therapeutic candidates will benefit patients with inflammatory neuropathies in the future. This review thus illustrates the gap between pre-clinical and clinical findings and aims to outline future directions of development.

Early predictive factors of disability in CIDP

The objective of this study was to identify early clinical, biochemical and electrophysiological prognostic factors of disability in CIDP. We evaluated a dataset from 60 CIDP patients that included sex, age of onset, type of onset, phenotype, disease duration, response to treatment, disability at the time of diagnosis assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (baseline mRS), cerebrospinal fluid protein levels and electrophysiological data. All patients had clinical assessment of disability through the mRS within the last 6 months (last mRS) before enrollment in the study. Stepwise forward logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the impact of clinical, biochemical and electrophysiological parameters on the last mRS, considered as binary outcome (absence or presence of severe disability, i.e., <4/≥4 mRS). Moreover, we used Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to evaluate the relationship between disease duration and last mRS. We observed a significant relationship between last mRS and baseline mRS [p = 0.015, z = 2.44, OR 5.15 (CI 1.38-19.22)] and age of onset [p = 0.017, z = 2.39, OR 1.13 (CI 1.02-1.27) per additional year of age of onset]. There was no correlation between disease duration and last mRS. Our data suggest that a worse clinical status at the beginning of disease and an older age at onset may be negative prognostic factors of long-term disability independent from disease duration.