Safety and efficacy of hCDR1 (Edratide) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of phase II study

A retrospective study on the correlation between antibody levels and endothelial function in SLE patients: An analysis based on ultrasound and serum biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was a complex autoimmune disease characterized by a spectrum of clinical and immunological manifestations, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Endothelial dysfunction was critical in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular complications in SLE. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between autoantibody levels and endothelial function in SLE patients using ultrasound and serum biomarkers.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted with 317 SLE patients treated from December 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized based on Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) values into an abnormal endothelial function group (n = 191) and a normal function group (n = 126). Serum biomarkers, including soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), von Willebrand factor (vWF), and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), were assessed. Autoantibody levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), anti-Smith, and anticardiolipin antibodies levels. Statistical analyses, including correlation and logistic regression, were performed to determine associations between antibody levels and endothelial function.

RESULTS

Higher levels of Anti-Smith were significantly associated with poorer endothelial function, while higher Anti-dsDNA levels were positive correlated with endothelial function (Anti-Smith: coefficient = -0.168, Std_Error = 0.027, t_value = -6.228, P < 0.001; Anti-dsDNA: coefficient = 0.140, Std_Error = 0.022, t_value = 6.345, P < 0.001). These results underscore the importance of antibody levels in assessing endothelial health.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the intricate relationship between specific autoantibodies and endothelial dysfunction in SLE patients. Elevated sVCAM-1 and Anti-Smith levels were associated with a higher risk of endothelial impairment, whereas Anti-dsDNA antibodies showed a positively correlated better endothelial function.

Assessment of hematologic indices for diagnosis in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction

The aim was to present effective approaches utilizing novel hematological parameters for early diagnosis of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE).

Material and methods

Our study at Umraniye Training and Research Hospital involved a jSLE patient cohort from 2016 to 2022 and matched healthy controls aligning with sex and age. We use the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) for disease activity. Our approach was to analyze leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts, along with ratios such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and monocyte-to-platelet ratio (MPR). We also explored novel indices: the systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) to identify relationships between systemic indices and jSLE activity.

Results

Upon comparative analysis with the healthy control group, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients exhibited significantly elevated levels of the hematological parameters NLR, SII, and SIRI (p-values: 0.010, 0.048, 0.025, respectively). Among SLE patients, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet distribution width (PDW) values were notably higher, while hemoglobin, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and procalcitonin (PCT) values were significantly lower. In comparison, C-reactive protein (CRP) and sedimentation values were markedly elevated in the SLE group in contrast to the healthy control cohort. Patients with significantly elevated disease activity had notably higher values of NLR (p = 0.010) and SII (p = 0.048). Among patients with positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA), elevated levels of NLR, SII, and SIRI were noted (p-values: 0.018, 0.021, 0.035).

Conclusions

In this study, the novel hematological markers SII, SIRI, and AISI were found to effectively reflect inflammation in SLE patients, exhibit associations with high disease activity, and demonstrate heightened sensitivity in detecting cases with high disease activity.

A SARS-CoV-2 NSP7 homolog of a Treg epitope suppresses CD4+ and CD8+ T cell memory responses

Pathogens escape host defenses by T-cell epitope mutation or deletion (immune escape) and by simulating the appearance of human T cell epitopes (immune camouflage). We identified a highly conserved, human-like T cell epitope in non-structural protein 7 (NSP7) of SARS-CoV-2, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) hetero-tetramer complex. Remarkably, this T cell epitope has significant homology to a T regulatory cell epitope (Tregitope) previously identified in the Fc region of human immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Tregitope 289). We hypothesized that the SARS-CoV-2 NSP7 epitope (NSP7-289) may induce suppressive responses by engaging and activating pre-existing regulatory T cells. We therefore compared NSP7-289 and IgG Tregitopes (289 and 289z, a shorter version of 289 that isolates the shared NSP7 epitope) in vitro. Tregitope peptides 289, 289z and NSP7-289 bound to multiple HLA-DRB1 alleles in vitro and suppressed CD4+ and CD8+ T cell memory responses. Identification and in vitro validation of SARS-CoV-2 NSP7-289 provides further evidence of immune camouflage and suggests that pathogens can use human-like epitopes to evade immune response and potentially enhance host tolerance. Further exploration of the role of cross-conserved Tregs in human immune responses to pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 is warranted.

Advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe multisystem autoimmune disease that can cause injury in almost every body system. While considered a classic example of autoimmunity, it is still relatively poorly understood. Treatment with immunosuppressive agents is challenging, as many agents are relatively non-specific, and the underlying disease is characterized by unpredictable flares and remissions. This State of The Art Review provides a comprehensive current summary of systemic lupus erythematosus based on recent literature. In basic and translational science, this summary includes the current state of genetics, epigenetics, differences by ancestry, and updates about the molecular and immunological pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. In clinical science, the summary includes updates in diagnosis and classification, clinical features and subphenotypes, and current guidelines and strategies for treatment. The paper also provides a comprehensive review of the large number of recent clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus. Current knowns and unknowns are presented, and potential directions for the future are suggested. Improved knowledge of immunological pathogenesis and the molecular differences that exist between patients should help to personalize treatment, minimize side effects, and achieve better outcomes in this difficult disease.

Safety and efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

BACKGROUND

To determine the safety and efficacy of biological agents used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in adults.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (through Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au, ANZCTR.org.au and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for studies published from 20 May 2021 and 15 years prior. A grey literature search was performed and completed on 31 May 2021.

STUDY CRITERIA

Phase II, III or quasi randomised controlled trials, studies with only cerebral or cutaneous lupus were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted, reviewed data for accuracy, and used the Cochrane tool to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were identified, consisting of 15 groups of drugs and 25 different biological agents, totalling 16,889 patients. The main outcomes assessed included Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI), BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and combined combined/partial renal remission (CRR/PRR). Four groups of biologics were found to improve outcomes. Anti-interferons: Anifrolumab increased BICLA response and SRI 5 to 8, decreased prednisone dosages, with increased herpes zoster infections, but fewer serious adverse events. Sifalimumab improved SRI but also increased herpes zoster infections. Anti BAFF/BLyS and/or APRIL: Belimumab consistently improved SRI 4, decreased prednisone dosages, increased combined CRR/PRR, and had no adverse safety outcomes. Tabalumab increased SRI 5 at 52 weeks with no steroid sparing effect but was associated with increased infusion related adverse events. Telitacicept improved SRI 4 at 52 weeks, with no increased adverse events, though data was rather sparse. Anti CD-20 monoclonal antibody, Obinutuzumab increased combined CRR/PRR at 1 and 2 years. Anti IL12/23 monoclonal antibody, Ustekinumab, increased SRI 4 to 6, but not BICLA at 24 weeks, with no concerning safety outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Multiple biologic agents are shown in high quality studies to have a significant therapeutic impact on outcomes in SLE.

Bischoff D, S Singh S, H. Hahn B. Peptide-based immunotherapy in lupus: Where are we now?

In autoimmune rheumatic diseases, immune hyperactivity and chronic inflammation associate with immune dysregulation and the breakdown of immune self-tolerance. A continued, unresolved imbalance between effector and regulatory immune responses further exacerbates inflammation that ultimately causes tissue and organ damage. Many treatment modalities have been developed to restore the immune tolerance and immmunoregulatory balance in autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including the use of peptide-based therapeutics or the use of nanoparticles-based nanotechnology. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art therapeutic use of peptide-based therapies in autoimmune rheumatic diseases, with a specific focus on lupus.

The Therapeutic Strategies for SLE by Targeting Anti-dsDNA Antibodies

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by diverse serological autoantibodies. Anti-dsDNA antibodies are involved in multiple organ damage, especially the kidney, skin, and central nervous system. Anti-dsDNA antibodies play a pivotal role in SLE, and researchers have developed therapeutic strategies targeting these antibodies. Approaches to reduce anti-dsDNA antibodies via B cell targeted biologics against B cell surface antigens, B cell survival factors, or Bruton's tyrosine kinase have effectively eliminated B cells. However, their non-specific depletion hampers normal immune system functioning and limits the therapeutic benefits. Thus, scientists have attempted anti-dsDNA antibodies or lupus-specific strategies, such as the immature dendritic cell vaccine and immunoadsorption. Recently, synthetic mimic peptides (hCDR1, pCONs, DWEYS, FISLE-412, and ALW) that directly block anti-dsDNA autoantibodies have attracted attention, which could ameliorate lupus, decrease the serological autoantibody titer, reduce the deposition of renal autoantibodies, and improve pathological performance. These potent small peptide molecules are well tolerated, non-toxic, and non-immunogenic, which have demonstrated a benign safety profile and are expected to be hopeful candidates for SLE management. In this review, we clarify the role of anti-dsDNA antibodies in SLE, mainly focus on the current strategies targeting anti-dsDNA antibodies, and discuss their potential clinical value.

Cellular and Molecular Phenotypes of pConsensus Peptide (pCons) Induced CD8+ and CD4+ Regulatory T Cells in Lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with widespread inflammation, immune dysregulation, and is associated with the generation of destructive anti-DNA autoantibodies. We have shown previously the immune modulatory properties of pCons peptide in the induction of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ regulatory T cells which can in turn suppress development of the autoimmune disease in (NZB/NZW) F1 (BWF1) mice, an established model of lupus. In the present study, we add novel protein information and further demonstrate the molecular and cellular phenotypes of pCons-induced CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T_reg subsets. Flow cytometry analyses revealed that pCons induced CD8⁺ T_reg cells with the following cell surface molecules: CD25^highCD28^{high and low} subsets (shown earlier), CD62L^high, CD122^low, PD1^low, CTLA4^low, CCR7^low and 41BB^high. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) gene expression analyses revealed that pCons-induced CD8⁺ T_reg cells downregulated the following several genes: Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS2), RGS16, RGS17, BAX, GPT2, PDE3b, GADD45β and programmed cell death 1 (PD1). Further, we confirmed the down regulation of these genes by Western blot analyses at the protein level. To our translational significance, we showed herein that pCons significantly increased the percentage of CD8⁺FoxP3⁺ T cells and further increased the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FoxP3 when healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are treated with pCons (10 μg/ml, for 24-48 hours). In addition, we found that pCons reduced apoptosis in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and B220⁺ B cells of BWF1 lupus mice. These data suggest that pCons stimulates cellular, immunological, and molecular changes in regulatory T cells which in turn protect against SLE autoimmunity.

Contribution of the Commensal Microflora to the Immunological Homeostasis and the Importance of Immune-Related Drug Development for Clinical Applications

Not long ago, self-reactive immune activity was considered as pathological trait. A paradigm shift has now led to the recognition of autoimmune processes as part of natural maintenance of molecular homeostasis. The immune system is assigned further roles beneath the defense against pathogenic organisms. Regarding the humoral immune system, the investigation of natural autoantibodies that are frequently found in healthy individuals has led to further hypotheses involving natural autoimmunity in other processes as the clearing of cellular debris or decrease in inflammatory processes. However, their role and origin have not been entirely clarified, but accumulating evidence links their formation to immune reactions against the gut microbiome. Antibodies targeting highly conserved proteins of the commensal microflora are suggested to show self-reactive properties, following the paradigm of the molecular mimicry. Here, we discuss recent findings, which demonstrate potential links of the commensal microflora to the immunological homeostasis and highlight the possible implications for various diseases. Furthermore, specific components of the immune system, especially antibodies, have become a focus of attention for the medical management of various diseases and provide attractive treatment options in the future. Nevertheless, the development and optimization of such macromolecules still represents a very time-consuming task, shifting the need to more medical agents with simple structural properties and low manufacturing costs. Synthesizing only the biologically active sites of antibodies has become of great interest for the pharmaceutical industry and offers a wide range of therapeutic application areas as it will be discussed in the present review article.

New insights into IVIg mechanisms and alternatives in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an effective treatment for an increasing number of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. However, IVIg continues to be limited by problems of potential shortages and cost. A number of mechanisms have been described for IVIg, which have been captured in newly emergent IVIg mimetic and IVIg alternative therapies. This review discusses the recent developments in IVIg mimetics and alternatives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newly emergent IVIg mimetics and alternatives capture major proposed mechanisms of IVIg, including FcγR blockade, FcRn inhibition, complement inhibition, immune complex mimetics and sialylated IgG. Many of these emergent therapies have promising preclinical and clinical trial results.

SUMMARY

Significant research has been undertaken into the mechanism of IVIg in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disease. Understanding the major IVIg mechanisms has allowed for rational development of IVIg mimetics and alternatives for several IVIg-treatable diseases.

Effects of Peptide-Induced Immune Tolerance on Murine Lupus

The regulation of autoimmunity and the molecular mechanisms by which different immune cells, including T cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN-granulocytes), and B cells suppress autoimmune diseases is complex. We have shown previously that BWF1 lupus mice are protected from autoimmunity after i.v. injection or oral administration of tolerogenic doses of pCons, an artificial synthetic peptide based on sequences containing MHC class I and MHC class II determinants in the VH region of a J558-encoded BWF1 anti-DNA Ab. Several T cell subsets can transfer this tolerance. In this study, we determined the potential roles of granulocytes, B cells and regulatory T cells altered by pCons treatment in the BWF1 (NZB/NZW) mouse model of lupus. Immunophenotyping studies indicated that pCons treatment of BWF1 mice significantly increased CD4⁺FoxP3⁺ T cells, reduced the percent of B cells expressing CD19⁺CD5⁺ but increased the percent of CD19⁺CD1d⁺ regulatory B cells and increased the ability of the whole B cell population to suppress IgG anti-DNA production in vitro. pCons treatment significantly decreased the expression of CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4) in CD8⁺ T cells. In addition, peptide administration modified granulocytes so they became suppressive. We co-cultured sorted naïve B cells from mice making anti-DNA Ab (supported by addition of sorted naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells from young auto-antibody-negative BWF1 mice) with sorted B cells or granulocytes from tolerized mice. Both tolerized granulocytes and tolerized B cells significantly suppressed the production of anti-DNA in vitro. In granulocytes from tolerized mice compared to saline-treated littermate controls, real-time PCR analysis indicated that expression of interferon-induced TNFAIP2 increased more than 2-fold while Ptdss2 and GATA1 mRNA were up-regulated more than 10-fold. In contrast, expression of these genes was significantly down-regulated in tolerized B cells. Further, another IFN-induced protein, Bcl2, was reduced in tolerized B cells as determined by Western blot analyses. In contrast, expression of FoxP3 was significantly increased in tolerized B cells. Together, these data suggest that B cells and granulocytes are altered toward suppressive functions by in vivo tolerization of BWF1 mice with pCons and it is possible these cell types participate in the clinical benefits seen in vivo.

Identification of a potent regulatory T cell epitope in factor V that modulates CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cell responses

Identification of T cell epitopes that are recognized by Tregs may elucidate the relative contributions of thymic Tregs and induced Tregs to control of autoimmune diseases and allergy. One such T regulatory cell epitope or 'Tregitope', derived from blood Factor V, is described here. Tregs responding to Tregitope FV621 are potent suppressors of CD4+ T effector responses to Tetanus Toxoid in an in vitro bystander suppression assay, strongly inhibit proliferation of effector CD8+ T cells, down-modulate CD86 and HLA DR on antigen-presenting cells, and enhance expression of granzyme B in Tregs. Tregitope FV621 also suppresses anti-OVA immune responses in vivo. The immunomodulatory effect of Tregitope FV621 is enhanced when conjugated to albumin, suggesting that the short half-life of Tregitope peptides can be prolonged. The in silico tools used to prospectively identify the FV Tregitope described here, when combined with in vitro /in vivo validating assays, may facilitate future Tregitope discoveries.

Current Insights in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Immunopathogenesis

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) is a clinically diverse group of autoimmune skin diseases with shared histological features of interface dermatitis and autoantibodies deposited at the dermal-epidermal junction. Various genetic and environmental triggers of CLE promote infiltration of T cells, B cells, neutrophils, antigen presenting cells, and NK cells into lesional skin. In this mini-review, we will discuss the clinical features of CLE, insights into CLE immunopathogenesis, and novel treatment approaches.

Therapeutic peptides for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a place in therapy

INTRODUCTION

Studies in vitro and in vivo have identified several peptides that are potentially useful in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The rationale for their use lies in the cost-effective production, high potency, target selectivity, low toxicity, and a peculiar mechanism of action that is mainly based on the induction of immune tolerance. Three therapeutic peptides have entered clinical development, but they have yielded disappointing results. However, some subsets of patients, such as those with the positivity of anti-dsDNA antibodies, appear more likely to respond to these medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the potential use of therapeutic peptides for SLE and gives an opinion on how they may offer advantages for SLE treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Given their acceptable safety profile, therapeutic peptides could be added to agents traditionally used to treat SLE and this may offer a synergistic and drug-sparing effect, especially in selected patient populations. Moreover, they could temporarily be utilized to manage SLE flares, or be administered as a vaccine in subjects at risk. Efforts to ameliorate bioavailability, increase the half-life and prevent immunogenicity are ongoing. The formulation of hybrid compounds, like peptibodies or peptidomimetic small molecules, is expected to yield renewed treatments with a better pharmacologic profile and increased efficacy.

Getting Under the Skin: Targeting Cutaneous Autoimmune Disease

Autoimmune diseases of the skin occur when the immune system attacks normal skin. The immune system can be broadly divided into an effector arm responsible for fighting infections and cancer and a regulatory arm that reduces autoreactivity and maintains immune homeostasis. Cutaneous autoimmunity develops when the equilibrium between the effector arm and regulatory arm of the immune system is disrupted. Recent insights into the inflammatory pathways that are overactive in some cutaneous autoimmune diseases have led to therapies targeting the effector arm of the immune system with greater treatment efficacy than previously used broad immunosuppressants. The current paradigm of inhibiting excessive immune activation for treating cutaneous autoimmunity will be discussed including cytokine blockade, cellular depletion, intracellular signaling blockade and costimulatory blockade. Despite the success of this approach many cutaneous autoimmune diseases lack a clearly delineated pathway to target and therefore new strategies are needed. An emerging therapeutic strategy targeting the regulatory arm of the immune system to induce tolerance and disease remission provides new hope for treating cutaneous autoimmunity. Such an approach includes cellular therapy with regulatory T cells and chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells, cytokine therapy with low-dose interleukin-2, immune checkpoint stimulation, tolerogenic vaccines and microbiome biotherapy. This mini-review will discuss the current and emerging therapeutic strategies for cutaneous autoimmune diseases and provide an organizational framework for understanding distinct mechanisms of action.

Peptide-Based Vaccination Therapy for Rheumatic Diseases

Rheumatic diseases are extremely heterogeneous diseases with substantial risks of morbidity and mortality, and there is a pressing need in developing more safe and cost-effective treatment strategies. Peptide-based vaccination is a highly desirable strategy in treating noninfection diseases, such as cancer and autoimmune diseases, and has gained increasing attentions. This review is aimed at providing a brief overview of the recent advances in peptide-based vaccination therapy for rheumatic diseases. Tremendous efforts have been made to develop effective peptide-based vaccinations against rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), while studies in other rheumatic diseases are still limited. Peptide-based active vaccination against pathogenic cytokines such as TNF-α and interferon-α (IFN-α) is shown to be promising in treating RA or SLE. Moreover, peptide-based tolerogenic vaccinations also have encouraging results in treating RA or SLE. However, most studies available now have been mainly based on animal models, while evidence from clinical studies is still lacking. The translation of these advances from experimental studies into clinical therapy remains impeded by some obstacles such as species difference in immunity, disease heterogeneity, and lack of safe delivery carriers or adjuvants. Nevertheless, advances in high-throughput technology, bioinformatics, and nanotechnology may help overcome these impediments and facilitate the successful development of peptide-based vaccination therapy for rheumatic diseases.

Current Paradigms of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells and Clinical Implications for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Tolerogenic dendritic cells (tolDCs) are central players in the initiation and maintenance of immune tolerance and subsequent prevention of autoimmunity. Recent advances in treatment of autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have focused on inducing specific tolerance to avoid long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, DC-targeted therapies to either suppress DC immunogenicity or to promote DC tolerogenicity are of high interest. This review describes details of the typical characteristics of in vivo and ex vivo tolDC, which will help to select a protocol that can generate tolDC with high functional quality for clinical treatment of autoimmune disease in individual patients. In addition, we discuss the recent studies uncovering metabolic pathways and their interrelation intertwined with DC tolerogenicity. This review also highlights the clinical implications of tolDC-based therapy for SLE treatment, examines the current clinical therapeutics in patients with SLE, which can generate tolDC in vivo, and further discusses on possibility and limitation on each strategy. This synthesis provides new perspectives on development of novel therapeutic approaches for SLE and other autoimmune diseases.

Anti-double Stranded DNA Antibodies: Origin, Pathogenicity, and Targeted Therapies

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by high-titer serological autoantibodies, including antibodies that bind to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The origin, specificity, and pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies have been studied from a wider perspective. These autoantibodies have been suggested to contribute to multiple end-organ injuries, especially to lupus nephritis, in patients with SLE. Moreover, serum levels of anti-DNA antibodies fluctuate with disease activity in patients with SLE. By directly binding to self-antigens or indirectly forming immune complexes, anti-dsDNA antibodies can accumulate in the glomerular and tubular basement membrane. These autoantibodies can also trigger the complement cascade, penetrate into living cells, modulate gene expression, and even induce profibrotic phenotypes of renal cells. In addition, the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 is reduced by anti-DNA antibodies simultaneously with upregulation of profibrotic genes. Anti-dsDNA antibodies may even participate in the pathogenesis of SLE by catalyzing hydrolysis of certain DNA molecules or peptides in cells. Recently, anti-dsDNA antibodies have been explored in greater depth as a therapeutic target in the management of SLE. A substantial amount of data indicates that blockade of pathogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies can prevent or even reverse organ damage in murine models of SLE. This review focuses on the recent research advances regarding the origin, specificity, classification, and pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies and highlights the emerging therapies associated with them.

Recent advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease presenting highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations and multi-systemic involvement. Patients are susceptible to relapse- and remission, thus making management challenging. Moreover, a considerable number of side effects may occur with conventional therapies; therefore, there is clearly a need for new therapeutic strategies. Since the pathogenesis of SLE is highly complex, it is far from being fully understood. However, greater understanding of the pathways and of the cellular and molecular mediators involved in SLE is being achieved. Emerging evidence has allowed the development of new biological therapeutic options targeting crucial molecular mediators involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. This literature review analyzes the availability of biological and target-directed treatments, phase II and III trials, and new therapies that are being developed for the treatment of SLE.

Predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin insystemic lupus erythematosus

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and hemoglobin levels with disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore their clinical significance in predicting SLE. The present study included 212 patients with SLE and 201 healthy controls. All the clinical characteristics were collected from their medical records. The results revealed that the NLR was elevated and the hemoglobin level was markedly decreased in the patients with SLE compared with the healthy controls. NLR was positively correlated with the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), whereas it was not correlated with C3 or C4. The hemoglobin level was negatively correlated with SLEDAI-2K, ESR and CRP and positively correlated with C3 and C4. In addition, NLR [EXP(B)=1.986; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.432-2.753; P=0.001] and hemoglobin [EXP(B)=0.947; 95% CI, 0.929-0.965; P=0.001] were independent predictive factors of SLE. The optimal NLR cut-off value for predicting SLE was 2.075, with 71.14% sensitivity and 69.57% specificity, whereas the optimal hemoglobin cut-off value was 131.5 mg/l, with 75.79% sensitivity and 77.98% specificity. In addition, high NLR together with low hemoglobin levels and high NLR or low hemoglobin levels had increased positive predictive values (86.05 and 66.95, respectively). High NLR with low hemoglobin levels and high NLR or low hemoglobin levels also had higher sensitivity (64.91 and 92.40, respectively) and specificity (64.91 and 18.95, respectively), compared with high NLR alone or low hemoglobin alone. In conclusion, NLR and hemoglobin may reflect SLE disease activity and may be used as markers for predicting the outcome of SLE.

The 2018 pipeline of targeted therapies under clinical development for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a systematic review of trials

Currently, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) therapies range from antimalarials to glucocorticoids, in addition to immunosupressive agents or biologics such as rituximab or belimumab, when needed. Several unmet needs remain in the treatment SLE and more targeted drugs with improved safety profiles are expected. Based on recent advances in the understanding of the complex pathogenesis of SLE, several targeted treatments are currently assessed in clinical trials. In this study, we performed a systematic review of all targeted therapies under clinical development in SLE in 17 online registries of clinical trials. The search yielded a total of 1140 trials, from which we identified 74 targeted therapies for SLE. Those treatments target inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, or their receptors (n = 17), B cells or plasma cells (n = 17), intracellular signalling pathways (n = 10), T/B cells costimulation molecules (n = 8), interferons (n = 7), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) (n = 3), as well as various other targets (n = 12). Not all these candidate drugs will reach phase III, but the broad spectrum of drugs being investigated may satisfy the urgent need for improved lupus medications. The identification of biomarkers that would allow adequate prediction of response-to-therapy remains high, but when solved will allow a more rationale selection of the optimal pharmacological agent at the patient level.

Current and future therapies for SLE: obstacles and recommendations for the development of novel treatments

SLE is a serious, debilitating autoimmune disease that affects various organs and body systems. Of all the heterogeneous autoimmune diseases, SLE is perhaps the most heterogeneous. Patients with SLE, who are primarily female, have diverse disease manifestations and severity. SLE is characterised by substantial concentrations of autoantibodies against nuclear antigens, which are thought to be caused by immune cell dysregulation. Until recently, several immunosuppressant agents were used to treat this disease. Efforts to develop drugs against targets potentially involved in disease mechanisms have resulted in the identification and use of BAFF (B-cell activating factor)/APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) inhibitors to treat SLE. Drugs in late-stage development that focus on pathways that are dysregulated in SLE include those that target the interferon pathway, T-cell signalling and B-cell signalling. New therapeutic agents are still necessary because of the unmet medical needs associated with this disease, including insufficient disease control, poor health-related quality of life, comorbidities, toxicity of the majority of therapies and diminished survival. Despite the substantial long-term investment of research, clinical activity and resources for identifying new treatments for this disease, only one new therapy, the biological belimumab, has been approved in the past 50 years. Efforts to develop drugs to address these needs are challenged by problems associated with disease heterogeneity, variable disease mechanisms and trial design. This review provides an overview of current and future treatments, discusses challenges in the SLE drug development process and offers recommendations for overcoming these challenges.

Update on Biologic Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multisystemic autoimmune disease driven by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. Despite the advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the last decades, SLE still leads to significant morbidity and increased mortality. Although a cure for SLE is still unknown, treatment is required to control acute disease exacerbation episodes (flares), decrease the frequency and severity of subsequent lupus flares, address comorbidities, and prevent end-organ damage. While conventional SLE pharmacotherapy may exhibit suboptimal efficacy and substantial toxicity, a growing knowledge of the disease pathogenesis enabled the research on novel therapeutic agents directed at specific disease-related targets. In this paper, we review the recent progress in the clinical investigation of biologic agents targeting B cells, T cells, cytokines, innate immunity, and other immunologic or inflammatory pathways. Although many investigational agents exhibited insufficient efficacy or inadequate safety in clinical trials, one of them, belimumab, fulfilled the efficacy and safety regulatory requirements and was approved for the treatment of SLE in Europe and the USA, which confirms that, despite all difficulties, advances in this field are possible.

Defective Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease involving injuries in multiple organs and systems. Exaggerated inflammatory responses are characterized as end-organ damage in patients with SLE. Although the explicit pathogenesis of SLE remains unclear, increasing evidence suggests that dysregulation of cytokine signals contributes to the progression of SLE through the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway. Activated STAT proteins translocate to the cell nucleus and induce transcription of target genes, which regulate downstream cytokine production and inflammatory cell infiltration. The suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) is considered as a classical inhibitor of cytokine signaling. Recent studies have demonstrated that SOCS1 expression is decreased in patients with SLE and in murine lupus models, and this negatively correlates with the magnitude of inflammation. Dysregulation of SOCS1 signals participates in various pathological processes of SLE such as hematologic abnormalities and autoantibody generation. Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious complications of SLE, and it correlates with suppressed SOCS1 signals in renal tissues. Moreover, SOCS1 insufficiency affects the function of several other organs, including skin, central nervous system, liver, and lungs. Therefore, SOCS1 aberrancy contributes to the development of both systemic and local inflammation in SLE patients. In this review, we discuss recent studies regarding the roles of SOCS1 in the pathogenesis of SLE and its therapeutic implications.

Update on clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With advancement in our understanding of pathogenic mechanisms in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), there is tremendous enthusiasm in examining drugs, old and new, to improve outcomes. This review highlights recent trials' successes and impasses that have come to fore.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among B-cell therapies, belimumab continues its run of successes with sustained safety and tolerability documented in a long-term extension as well as the likely approval of a subcutaneous formulation in the near future. With greater antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and less immunogenicity, there is hope for obinituzumab to succeed where its anti-CD 20 predecessors have failed. Drugs targeting type I interferons - sifalimumab and anifrolumab - have been efficacious albeit with an increase in incidence of Herpes zoster infections. There is also renewed interest in evaluating the efficacy of calcineurin inhibitors, specifically tacrolimus in the induction and maintenance of lupus nephritis. Introspection into clinical trial designs have highlighted the effects of entry criteria, end points, background medications and geographical differences on study outcomes.

SUMMARY

There are at least 50 drugs and targets being evaluated in SLE. In addition to developing new drugs to treat lupus, future trials have to focus on more effective study designs to improve chances of trial success.

Systemic lupus erythematosus biomarkers: the challenging quest

SLE, a multisystem heterogeneous disease, is characterized by production of antibodies to cellular components, with activation of both the innate and the adaptive immune system. Decades of investigation of blood biomarkers has resulted in incremental improvements in the understanding of SLE. Owing to the heterogeneity of immune dysregulation, no single biomarker has emerged as a surrogate for disease activity or prediction of disease. Beyond identification of surrogate biomarkers, a multitude of clinical trials have sought to inhibit elevated SLE biomarkers for therapeutic benefit. Armed with new -omics technologies, the necessary yet daunting quest to identify better surrogate biomarkers and successful therapeutics for SLE continues with tenacity.

T-cell-directed therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Drug development for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has largely focused on B-cell therapies. A greater understanding of the immunopathogenesis of SLE coupled with advanced bioengineering has allowed for clinical trials centered on other targets for SLE therapy. The authors discuss the benefits and shortcomings of focusing on T-cell-directed therapies in SLE and lupus nephritis clinical trials.

Improved strategies for designing lupus trials with targeted therapies: learning from 65 years of experience

The development of new agents to manage lupus erythematosus has lagged behind other autoimmune rheumatic diseases. This is in large part because lupus is a heterogeneous disorder affecting nine principal domains (organ systems) that are difficult to measure and quantify and can be at variance with each other. Over the last two decades, a variety of guidelines, definitions, candidate surrogate or biomarkers, metrics and composite indices have been presented as benchmarks that can be utilized to assess lupus in clinical trials. Despite this, over 20 agents have failed to achieve their primary outcome measure, some of which are generally believed to be clinically effective. This article presents constructive suggestions and improved strategies in trial design that will hopefully lead to the introduction of new agents for the disease.

Association of calreticulin expression with disease activity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Measurement of disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is important for monitoring disease progression and evaluating the therapeutic effects. The severity of organ damage correlates with clinical status and prognosis. Therefore, it is imperative to find an effective biomarker measuring disease activity and organ damage for SLE management. The present study investigated the possibility of serum calreticulin (CRT) in the assessment of disease activity and organ damage in SLE patients. Serum CRT levels from 80 patients with SLE, 55 patients with other autoimmune diseases and 60 healthy controls (HC) were measured by ELISA. Disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores. Organ damage was evaluated with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. CRT levels in SLE were significantly higher than that in other autoimmune diseases and HC. CRT was correlated with SLEDAI-2K score (r=0.3345, P=0.0024), and with anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) (r=0.4483, P<0.0001). A significant negative correlation of CRT levels with complement 3 (r=-0.3635, P=0.0009) and complement 4 (r=-0.3507, P=0.0014) was observed in patients with SLE. Furthermore, the patients with SLE and a positive anti-Ro52 result had higher levels of CRT compared with those with a negative anti-Ro52 result (P<0.001). Elevated levels of CRT were also reported among patients with SLE who also indicated the presence of cumulative organ damage. In addition, increased expression of CRT correlated with the presence of lupus nephritis. In conclusion, the results of the current report provided that CRT may be used as a potential biomarker for clinical diagnosis and of prognosis, providing additional information regarding disease activity and organ damage alongside other traditional indices.

A critical review of clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus

One challenge in caring for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a paucity of approved therapeutics for treatment of the diverse disease manifestations. In the last 60 years, only one drug, belimumab, has been approved for SLE treatment. Critical evaluation of investigator initiated and pharma-sponsored randomized controlled trials (RCTs) highlights barriers to successful drug development in SLE, including disease heterogeneity, inadequate trial size or duration, insufficient dose finding before initiation of large trials, handling of background medications, and choice of primary endpoint. Herein we examine lessons learned from landmark SLE RCTs and subsequent advances in trial design, as well as discuss efforts to address limitations in current SLE outcome measures that will improve detection of true therapeutic responses in future RCTs.

Recent advances in the biologic therapy of lupus: the 10 most important areas to look for common pitfalls in clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting different organs. The improved knowledge of the disease's pathogenesis has contributed to the emergence of immune targets and new biologic drugs directed at them. Although rheumatologists continue to use off-label biologics in SLE resistant to other immunosuppressants, only belimumab has been approved as a biological therapy since 2011.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, an overview is provided on: 1) the classification of the biologic drugs in clinical trials and of those under research; 2) the results of clinical trials of biologic therapy with an interpretation of pitfalls and syntheses of potential approaches to overcome these pitfalls and, 3) the commonly used disease activity metrics and composite indices for assessing response to drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Some drugs that have failed in previous drug trials have shown to be efficacious in the treatment of lupus in observational studies. Moreover, the post-hoc analyses of the data of negative drug trials have shown that results of the same trials could be altered with the modification of some pitfalls. For future clinical trials, the consideration of these pitfalls is crucial when designing clinical trials. This could potentially enhance the approval of novel drugs for SLE.

Success and failure of biological treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus: A critical analysis

Patients affected with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) still display increased mortality and decreased quality of life in respect to general population. The major determinant of poor long term prognosis is organ damage, which is predictive of more damage and death. Damage is in turn triggered by uncontrolled disease activity and especially by the long-standing corticosteroid use which often accompanies SLE patients over their disease course, owing both to the need of reaching disease remission and to the habit of keeping patients on a small steroid dose for an indefinite period of time. Hence, the need for new drugs and therapeutic strategies aiming at minimizing damage accrual through a better control of disease activity and a steroid-sparing potential is paramount. So far, however, the therapeutic strategy in SLE requires a multitarget approach which is not devoid of widespread immunesuppression. In fact, several studies have been carried out in recent years targeting both the adaptive and the innate immune system, the majority of which did not achieve their primary endpoint, being often divergent from successful clinical experience and thereby committing physician to off-label use of targeted therapies in face of refractory SLE manifestations. The study designs and the chosen endpoints were often blamed for inadequacy, being at least in part responsible for study failures. In this review, we go over major clinical trials conducted in SLE by analyzing any critical aspects related to study design, predefined endpoints and biological activity of novel compounds that may have hampered study outcome, despite the great effort of providing less toxic drugs within a targeted, pathogenic-based approach.

Recent advances and current state of immunotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune syndrome that poses significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Dysregulated innate and adaptive immune systems are involved in its pathogenesis. A plethora of novel immunotherapies have been developed for the treatment of SLE but many have failed early clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes immunotherapies under recent development with relevance to the targeted cellular or soluble factors involved in the pathogenesis of SLE.

EXPERT OPINION

SLE is a complicated disease with much heterogeneity. Novel immunotherapies with different mechanisms of action that are currently under development include biologic agents targeting co-stimulatory molecules, cytokines or their receptors and signaling molecules and B cells, cell-based therapy and peptide therapy. Together with good scientific rationale and advanced biological engineering techniques, optimization of clinical trial design, patient selection and disease outcome measures are essential to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of these agents.

Drugs in early clinical development for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

While immunosuppressive therapy has positively impacted the prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), many patients still do not respond to traditional therapy. Thus, active SLE disease remains a significant problem. Furthermore, conventional immunosuppressive treatments for SLE are associated a high risk of side effects. These issues call for improvement in our current therapeutic armamentarium.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors highlight the recent developments in therapies for SLE, and present an overview of drugs which are in early clinical development for SLE. There are many new therapeutic approaches being developed, including those focused on B-cell targets, T-cell downregulation, co-stimulatory blockade, anti-cytokine agents, and kinase inhibition, and Toll-like receptor inhibition. They also discuss peptide therapy as a potential method to re-establish immune tolerance, and some of the challenges ahead in developing and testing novel agents for SLE.

EXPERT OPINION

Many novel agents are currently in development for SLE, but this encouraging news is tempered by several disappointments in clinical trials and provides a timely moment to reflect on the future of therapeutic development in SLE. It seems likely that biological heterogeneity between patients is a major contributor to difficulty in drug design in SLE.