BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery

Impact of Metastasectomy on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life

This article explores the impact of pulmonary metastasectomy on patient health-related quality of life, emphasizing the role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in evaluating surgical outcomes. It provides a detailed analysis of studies reporting PROMs in lung metastasectomy, compares different surgical techniques, and discusses the broader implementation of PROMs in this setting. Limitations and future directions for improving PROMs integration in clinical practice are also addressed, highlighting the importance of these measures in enhancing patient-centered care and shared decision-making.

Feasibility of postoperative home-based pulmonary function training for lung cancer patients: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary surgery can significantly impact patients' respiratory function and reduce their quality of life. Previous studies have shown that perioperative breathing exercises (BE) can facilitate the recovery of lung function and improve patients' quality of life after surgery. However, due to the lack of supervision and awareness, patients often struggle to adhere to the prescribed exercise regimen. This study statistics and analyzes the effect of postoperative respiratory function training on postoperative recovery of patients undergoing pneumonectomy in a realistic environment, in order to provide a basis for optimizing postoperative rehabilitation strategies.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical treatment for pulmonary nodules received standardized education upon admission, including guidance on performing breathing exercises. Preoperative pulmonary function tests (PFT) and arterial oxygen saturation measurements were conducted, and patients were instructed to return for follow-up pulmonary function and arterial oxygen saturation assessments at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. In addition, patients were asked to complete online questionnaires at these time points. Oxygen saturation levels were also re-assessed before discharge, and patients were encouraged to complete a discharge questionnaire. Weekly phone calls were made to remind patients to continue their breathing exercises. The study analyzed 12 potential factors that might affect the outcomes, including preoperative nebulization use, surgical method, and patient age. The primary outcome measures were the effects of postoperative breathing exercises on FEV1, FVC, DLCO, and SPO2 at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included LCQ cough assessment, FACT-L quality of life assessment, evaluations of pain and appetite, SAS anxiety level, SDS depression level, AIS sleep quality, and the modified MRAC assessment of dyspnea symptoms.

RESULTS

The study initially enrolled 296 patients (T0), including 233 patients who underwent sublobar resection (SRP) and 63 patients who underwent lobectomy (LBP). Between T0 and T1, 203 patients remained in the SRP group and 47 in the LBP group. Between T0 and T2, 36 patients remained in the SRP group and 9 in the LBP group. By T3, the SRP group had 14 patients, and the LBP group had 5 patients remaining. Due to incomplete data, SPO2 measurements were excluded from the analysis. Additionally, the SRP group at T3 and the LBP group at T2 and T3 were not included in the analysis.In the SRP group, at T1, the BE group showed significantly better recovery in FEV1 and FVC compared to the control group. By T2, the BE group had a significantly improved sleep quality compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In the LBP group, at T1, the BE group demonstrated a significant advantage in alleviating anxiety symptoms compared to the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in other outcomes.

Prevalence of surgery in Indigenous people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

As cancer incidence increases globally, so does the prevalence of cancer among Indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples face significant barriers to healthcare, including access to and uptake of surgery. To date, the synthesis of access to and uptake of surgery for Indigenous peoples living with cancer has not yet been reported.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of access to and uptake of surgery for Indigenous peoples in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Five databases were searched to identify studies of Indigenous adults with cancer and those who received surgery. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality and inclusion of articles. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of surgery in Indigenous people with cancer.

Findings

Of the 52 studies in the systematic review, 38 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of surgery in Indigenous people with cancer was 56.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45.4-66.7%), including 42.8% (95% CI: 36.3-49.5%) in the Native Hawaiian population, 44.5% (95% CI: 38.7-50.3%) in the Inuit and 51.5% (95%CI: 36.8-65.9%) in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Overall, Indigenous people received marginally less cancer surgery than non-Indigenous people (3%, 95% CI: 0-6%). Indigenous people were 15% (95% CI: 6-23%) less likely to receive surgery than non-Indigenous people for respiratory cancers. Remoteness, travel distance, financial barriers, and long waiting times to receive surgery were factors cited as contributing to lower access to surgery for Indigenous people compared to non-Indigenous people.

Interpretation

Efforts to improve access and use of cancer services and surgery for Indigenous peoples should be multilevel to address individual factors, health services and systems, and structural barriers. These determinants need to be addressed to expedite optimal care for Indigenous peoples, especially those living in outer metropolitan areas.

Funding

The Research Alliance for Urban Goori Health (RAUGH) funded this project. GG was funded by an NHMRC Investigator Grant (#1176651).

The Actual Role of CPET in Predicting Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality of Patients Undergoing Pneumonectomy

This study aims to determine whether maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) or predicted postoperative (ppo)-VO2max could still reliably predict postoperative complications and deaths in lung cancer patients undergoing pneumonectomy and which values could be more reliably considered as the optimal threshold. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer at the European Oncological Institute (April 2019-April 2023). Routine preoperative assessment included cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a lung perfusion scan. We evaluated the morbidity and mortality rates; associations between morbidity, mortality, VO2max, and ppoVO2max values were investigated through ANOVA or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to further explore the relation between VO2max, ppoVO2max values, and 90-day mortality. Results: The cardiopulmonary morbidity rate was 32.2%; the 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 2.2% and 6.7%. The PpoVO2max values were significantly lower in patients experiencing cardiopulmonary complications or deaths compared to the whole cohort, whereas VO2max, though showing a trend towards lower values, did not reach statistical significance. A VO2max value threshold of 15 mL/kg/min correlated significantly with 90-day mortality, while a ppoVO2max cut-off of 10 mL/kg/min was significantly associated with cardiopulmonary complications and 30-day and 90-day mortality rates. ROC curve analysis revealed ppoVO2max as a better predictor of 90-day mortality compared to VO2max. Conclusions: CPET and a lung perfusion scan are two key elements for the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing pneumonectomy, since it provides a holistic assessment of cardiopulmonary functionality. We recommend the routine calculation of ppoVO2max, particularly when adopting a 10 mL/kg/min threshold.

Effect of residual lung expansion on pulmonary function after lobectomy

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary function after lobectomy is often higher than what is predicted. This occurrence could be related to postoperative expansion of the residual lung. The study aim was to determine if residual lung expansion affects pulmonary function after lobectomy.

METHODS

The participants in this retrospective study were 142 patients who had undergone lobectomy via video-assisted thoracic surgery. Computed tomography and pulmonary function tests were performed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Three-dimensional computed tomography volumetry was performed to assess lung volumes preoperatively and postoperatively, and the predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s was calculated. The residual lung expansion ratio was defined as the postoperative-to-preoperative residual lung volume ratio, and the postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s ratio was defined as the measured-to-predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s ratio. The effect of the residual lung expansion ratio on the postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s ratio as well as the factors affecting the postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s ratio were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median residual lung expansion ratio was 1.17 (interquartile range: 1.10-1.24), and the median postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s ratio was 1.13 (interquartile range: 1.04-1.21). The residual lung expansion ratio significantly affected postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s ratio (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After lobectomy, better residual lung expansion was associated with improved postoperative pulmonary function.

Use of the anatomical formulae for predicted postoperative (PPO) evaluation overestimates the loss of FEV1 and DLCO after minimally invasive lung resections

Background

Pulmonary function assessment is mandatory before oncological lung resection surgery. To do so, subjects undergo a pulmonary function test (PFT) and the calculation of predicted postoperative (PPO) values to estimate the residual lung function after surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of anatomical formulae in estimating postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Methods

This is a retrospective study. Patients affected by lung cancer who underwent pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy with MIS or thoracotomy approach at our center from June 2020 to May 2021 were considered. Exclusion criteria were: subjects who underwent atypical pulmonary resection surgery or pneumonectomy; and patients who underwent adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy or immunotherapy). PFT data measured before and 1 year after surgery were collected. In particular, postoperative PFT data, especially forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and PPO values calculated by the anatomical formulae were compared. Secondary endpoints were: analysis of the postoperative pulmonary function in patients who underwent lung resection with the standard approach (thoracotomy) and evaluation of the anatomical formulae accuracy in subjects operated through thoracotomy.

Results

The sample consisted of 48 patients operated on MIS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) and 20 subjects who underwent thoracotomy for stage I-IIA and I-IIB lung cancer in both groups. The anatomical formula seemed to underestimate the postoperative FEV1% by 8.65% [interquartile range (IQR), 0.5-17.28%; P<0.001]. Furthermore, when comparing postoperative PPODLCO% and post-operative DLCO%, a significant difference was shown with an underestimation of the actual postoperative value of 2.78% (IQR, -3.63% to 10.47%; P=0.045).

Conclusions

Our results confirmed that the anatomical formulae currently used to predict postoperative pulmonary function are reliable in the case of the standard approach (thoracotomy), while they tend to overestimate the loss of FEV1 and DLCO in the postoperative period in patients who were operated on MIS, thus excluding some subjects from the operation.

Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer screening is critical for early detection and management, particularly through the use of computed tomography (CT). This study aims to compare the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) Version 2022 with the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines in classifying solid pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 224 patients who underwent lung cancer screening CT between 2016 and 2022 and had a reported solid pulmonary nodule. A fellowship-trained thoracic radiologist reviewed the CT images, characterizing nodules by size, location, margins, attenuation, calcification, growth at follow-up, and final pathologic diagnosis if malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of Lung-RADS Version 2022 in detecting malignant nodules were compared with those of the BTS guidelines using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

Of the 224 patients, 198 (88%) had nodules deemed benign, while 26 (12%) had malignant nodules. The Lung-RADS Version 2022 resulted in higher specificity than the BTS guidelines (85% vs. 65%, p < 0.001), without sacrificing sensitivity (92% for both). Nodules larger than 8 mm, spiculated margins, upper lobe location, and interval growth were associated with higher malignancy risk (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the BTS guidelines, Lung-RADS Version 2022 reduces the number of false-positive screening CT examinations while maintaining high sensitivity for detecting malignant solid pulmonary nodules.

Pulmonary Function Recovery and Displacement Patterns After Anatomic Segmentectomy vs Lobectomy

BACKGROUND

The functional benefit of segmentectomy compared with lobectomy remains controversial. This ambispective study characterizes the changes in pulmonary function as correlated to displacement patterns of residual lung after segmentectomies vs lobectomies.

METHODS

Patients with normal preoperative pulmonary function and undergoing segmentectomy or lobectomy between 2017 and 2021 were considered. Pulmonary function testing was scheduled preoperatively and at least 3 months postoperatively. Differences in the proportions of the median forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) reduction between segmentectomy and lobectomy were calculated. Covariance analysis was used to estimate the adjusted postoperative FEV1 (apoFEV1) and compare the difference value (DV) in apoFEV1 between segmentectomy and lobectomy.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 634 patients (334 lobectomies and 300 segmentectomies). Median difference in the proportions of the FEV1 reduction between segmentectomy and lobectomy was 4.58%, with maximal difference observed in right S6 (9.08%) and minimal difference in left S1+2+3 (2.80%). For resections involving the upper lobe, apoFEV1 was significantly higher after segmentectomy than after lobectomy (DV, 0.15-0.22 L), except for left S3 and S1+2+3 segmentectomies (DV, 0.08 L and 0.06 L, respectively). Compared with a lower lobe lobectomy, S6 segmentectomy conferred a higher apoFEV1, whereas S7+8 and S9+10 had a similar apoFEV1 (DV, 0.16-0.18 L, 0.07 L, and 0.00-0.06 L, respectively). Functional recovery after segmentectomy was associated with the number of intersegment planes (P < .01) and the presence of an adjacent nonoperated on lobe (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Basilar and left S3 segmentectomies did not preserve more pulmonary function compared with their corresponding lobectomies, possibly due to the presence of multiple intersegmental resection planes.

Exercise capacity prior to major cancer surgery: A cross-sectional observational study of the validity of the 6-minute walk and 30-second sit-to-stand tests

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for measuring exercise capacity, however, it is resource intensive and has limited availability. This study aimed to determine: 1) the association between the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the 30-s sit-to-stand test (30STS) with CPET peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and anaerobic threshold (AT) and 2) 6MWT and 30STS cut points associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study, retrospectively analyzing data collected from a tertiary cancer center over a 23-month period. Measures included CPET VO2peak and AT, 6MWT and 30STS test. Correlations were used to characterize relationships between variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses determined 6MWT and 30STS cut points that aligned with CPET variable cut points.

RESULTS

Note that, 156 participants were included. The 6MWT and 30STS displayed moderate correlations with VO2peak, rho = 0.65, p = 0.01 and rho = 0.52, p < 0.005 respectively. Fair correlations were observed between AT and 6MWT (rho = 0.36, p = 0.01) and 30STS (rho = 0.41, p < 0.005). The optimal cut points to identify VO2peak < 15 mL/kg/min were 493.5 m on the 6MWT and 12.5 stands on the 30STS test and for AT < 11 mL/kg/min were 506.5 m on the 6MWT and 12.5 stands on the 30STS test.

CONCLUSION

Both the 6MWT and 30STS test could be used as alternative tools for measuring exercise capacity preoperatively in the cancer setting where CPET is not available. A range of 6MWT and 30STS cut points, according to sensitivity and specificity levels, may be used to evaluate risk of postoperative outcomes.

ERJ Advances: interventional bronchoscopy

The field of interventional bronchoscopy is rapidly growing, with the development of minimally invasive approaches and innovative devices to diagnose and treat a spectrum of respiratory diseases (figure 1 ), often as outpatient procedures, and supported by high quality collaborative research. This short review covers aspects related to COPD, peripheral pulmonary nodules, interstitial lung disease, and airway stenosis and malacia.

This ERJ Advances article summarises the latest developments in the rapidly advancing field of interventional bronchoscopy https://bit.ly/44Qvgrm

[Chinese Expert Consensus on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer (2024 Edition)]

To alleviate the medical burden of lung cancer surgery and facilitate the implementation of the national hierarchical diagnosis and treatment policy, it is imperative to establish a hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system for day surgery of lung cancer. Identifying key quality control checkpoints in day surgery of lung cancer is essential to enhance medical quality, ensure safety, and improve the efficiency of medical services. These efforts aim to uphold a safe and well-structured progression of day surgery practices in China. The Chinese Expert Consensus Group on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer has convened national experts in relevant fields and integrated the latest research findings from both domestic and international sources to craft the Chinese Expert Consensus on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer (2024 Edition). This consensus is founded on the principles of holistic management of lung cancer surgery and comprehensive patient care throughout their medical journey. It encompasses preoperative assessments, anesthesia protocols, surgical procedures, postoperative care, hospital-community collaboration initiatives, and emergency response strategies. The primary objective of this expert consensus is to furnish research assistance and clinical recommendations to advance the practice of day surgery for lung cancer patients in China.
.

Empowering lung cancer treatment: Harnessing the potential of natural phytoconstituent-loaded nanoparticles

Lung cancer, the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, accounts for a substantial portion, representing 18.4% of all cancer fatalities. Despite advances in treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, surgery, and immunotherapy, significant challenges persist, including chemoresistance, non-specific targeting, and adverse effects. Consequently, there is an urgent need for innovative therapeutic approaches to overcome these limitations. Natural compounds, particularly phytoconstituents, have emerged as promising candidates due to their potent anticancer properties and relatively low incidence of adverse effects compared to conventional treatments. However, inherent challenges such as poor solubility, rapid metabolism, and enzymatic degradation hinder their clinical utility. To address these obstacles, researchers have increasingly turned to nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems (DDS). Nanocarriers offer several advantages, including enhanced drug stability, prolonged circulation time, and targeted delivery to tumor sites, thereby minimizing off-target effects. By encapsulating phytoconstituents within nanocarriers, researchers aim to optimize their bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy while reducing systemic toxicity. Moreover, the integration of nanotechnology with phytoconstituents allows for a nuanced understanding of the intricate molecular pathways involved in lung cancer pathogenesis. This integrated approach holds promise for modulating key cellular processes implicated in tumor growth and progression. Additionally, by leveraging the synergistic effects of phytoconstituents and nanocarriers, researchers seek to develop tailored therapeutic strategies that maximize efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. In conclusion, the integration of phytoconstituents with nanocarriers represents a promising avenue for advancing lung cancer treatment. This synergistic approach has the potential to revolutionize current therapeutic paradigms by offering targeted, efficient, and minimally toxic interventions. Continued research in this field holds the promise of improving patient outcomes and addressing unmet clinical needs in lung cancer management.

Longitudinal changes in the volume of residual lung lobes after lobectomy for lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

It is unclear how the residual lobe volume changes over time after lobectomy. This study aims to clarify the temporal patterns of volume changes in each remaining lung lobe post-lobectomy. A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer at Yueyang Central Hospital from January to December 2021. Lung CT images were reconstructed in three dimensions to calculate the volumes of each lung lobe preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 182 patients were included. Postoperatively, the median total lung volume change rates relative to preoperative values were -20.1%, -9.3%, and -5.9% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Except for the right middle lobe in patients who underwent right upper lobectomy, the volumes of individual lung lobes exceeded preoperative values. The volume growth of the lung on the side of the resection was significantly more than that of the lung on the opposite side. For left lobectomy patients, the right lower lobe's volume change rate exceeded that of the right upper and middle lobes. Among right lobectomy patients, the left lower lobe and the relatively inferior lobe of right lung had higher volume change rates than the superior one. Right middle lobe change rate was more in patients with right lower lobectomy than right upper lobectomy. Six months postoperatively, FEV1% and right middle lobectomy were positively correlated with the overall volume change rate. One year postoperatively, only age was negatively correlated with the overall volume change rate. 75 patients had pulmonary function tests. Postoperative FEV1 change linearly correlated with 1-year lung volume change rate, but not with theoretical total lung volume change rate or segmental method calculated FEV1 change. Time-dependent compensatory volume changes occur in remaining lung lobe post-lobectomy, with stronger compensation observed in the relatively inferior lobe compared to the superior one(s). Preoperative lung function and age may affect compensation level.

An Updated Review of Management of Resectable Stage III NSCLC in the Era of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have an established role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ICIs have now entered the paradigm of early-stage NSCLC. The recent evidence shows that the addition of ICI to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival rate in early-stage resectable NSCLC and is now a standard of care option in this setting. In this regard, stage III NSCLC merits special consideration, as it is heterogenous and requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. As the neoadjuvant approach is being adopted widely, new challenges have emerged and the boundaries for resectability are being re-examined. Consequently, it is ever more important to carefully individualize the treatment strategy for each patient with resectable stage III NSCLC. In this review, we discuss the recent literature in this field with particular focus on evolving definitions of resectability, T4 disease, N2 disease (single and multi-station), and nodal downstaging. We also highlight the controversy around adjuvant treatment in this setting and discuss the selection of patients for adjuvant treatment, options of salvage, and next line treatment in cases of progression on/after neoadjuvant treatment or after R2 resection. We will conclude with a brief discussion of predictive biomarkers, predictive models, ongoing studies, and directions for future research in this space.

Predicting Postoperative Lung Function in Patients with Lung Cancer Using Imaging Biomarkers

There have been previous studies conducted to predict postoperative lung function with pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Computing tomography (CT) can quantitatively measure small airway walls' thickness, lung volume, pulmonary vessel volume, and emphysema area, which reflect the severity of respiratory diseases. These measurements are considered imaging biomarkers. This study aimed to predict postoperative lung function with imaging biomarkers. A retrospective analysis of 79 patients with lung cancer who had undergone lung surgery was completed. Postoperative lung function measured by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was defined as an outcome. Preoperative clinico-pathological parameters and imaging biomarkers representing airway walls' thickness, severity of emphysema, total lung volume, and pulmonary vessel volume were measured quantitatively in chest CT by an automated segmentation software, AVIEW COPD. Pi1 was defined as the first percentile along the histogram of lung attenuation that represents the degree of emphysema. Wafw was defined as the airway thickness, which was calculated by the full-width at half-maximum method. Logistic and linear regressions were used to assess these variables. If the actual postoperative FEV1 was higher than the postoperative FEV1 projected by a formula, the group was considered to be preserved. Among the 79 patients, 16 of the patients were grouped as a non-preserved group, and 63 of them were grouped as a preserved group. The patients in the preserved FEV1 group had a higher vessel volume than the non-preserved group. Pi1 and Wafw were independent predictors of postoperative lung function. Imaging biomarkers can be considered significant variables in predicting postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer.

Value of preoperative evaluation of FEV1 in patients with destroyed lung undergoing pneumonectomy - a 20-year real-world study

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend a preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > 2 L as an indication for left or right pneumonectomy. This study compares the safety and long-term prognosis of pneumonectomy for destroyed lung (DL) patients with FEV1 ≤ 2 L or > 2 L.

METHODS

A total of 123 DL patients who underwent pneumonectomy between November 2002 and February 2023 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chest Hospital were included. Patients were sorted into two groups: the FEV1 > 2 L group (n = 30) or the FEV1 ≤ 2 L group (n = 96). Clinical characteristics and rates of mortality, complications within 30 days after surgery, long-term mortality, occurrence of residual lung infection/tuberculosis (TB), bronchopleural fistula/empyema, readmission by last follow-up visit, and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 96.7% (119/123) of patients were successfully discharged, with 75.6% (93/123) in the FEV1 ≤ 2 L group. As compared to the FEV1 > 2 L group, the FEV1 ≤ 2 L group exhibited significantly lower proportions of males, patients with smoking histories, patients with lung cavities as revealed by chest imaging findings, and patients with lower forced vital capacity as a percentage of predicted values (FVC%pred) (P values of 0.001, 0.027, and 0.023, 0.003, respectively). No significant intergroup differences were observed in rates of mortality within 30 days after surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, long-term mortality, occurrence of residual lung infection/TB, bronchopleural fistula/empyema, mMRC ≥ 1 at the last follow-up visit, and postoperative readmission (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

As most DL patients planning to undergo left/right pneumonectomy have a preoperative FEV1 ≤ 2 L, the procedure is generally safe with favourable short- and long-term prognoses for these patients. Consequently, the results of this study suggest that DL patient preoperative FEV1 > 2 L should not be utilised as an exclusion criterion for pneumonectomy.

Evaluation of preoperative cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk of patients undergoing lung cancer resection

Lung cancer represents the second most frequent neoplasm and the leading cause of neoplastic death among both women and men, causing almost 25% of all cancer deaths. Patients undergoing lung resection-both for primary and secondary tumors-require careful preoperative cardiopulmonary functional evaluation to confirm the safety of the planned resection, to assess the maximum tolerable volume of resection or to exclude surgery, thus shifting the therapeutic approach toward less invasive options. Cardiopulmonary reserve, pulmonary lung function and mechanical respiratory function represent the cornerstones of preoperative assessment of patients undergoing major lung resection. Spirometry with carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, split function tests, exercise tests and cardiologic evaluation are the gold standard instruments to safely assess the entire cardiorespiratory function before pulmonary resection. Although pulmonary mechanical and parenchymal function, together with cardiorespiratory compliance represent the mainstay of preoperative evaluation in thoracic surgery, the variables that are responsible for fitness in patients who have undergone lung resection have expanded and are being continually investigated. Nevertheless, because of the shift to older patients who undergo lung resection, a global approach is required, taking into consideration variables like frailty status and likelihood of postoperative functional deterioration. Finally, the decision to go ahead with surgery in fragile patients being consideredfor lung resection should be evaluated in a multispecialty preoperative discussion to provide a personalized risk stratification. The aim of this review is to focus on preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk stratification of patients candidate for lung cancer resection. It does so by a literature search of clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, meta-analyses, clinical recommendations, book chapters and randomized trials (1980-2022).

Association of Preoperative Lung Function with Complications after Lobectomy Using Race-Neutral and Race-Specific Normative Equations

Rationale: Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is performed to aid patient selection before surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The interpretation of PFT data relies on normative equations, which vary by race, but the relative strength of association of lung function using race-specific or race-neutral normative equations with postoperative pulmonary complications is unknown. Objectives: To compare the strength of association of lung function, using race-neutral or race-specific equations, with surgical complications after lobectomy for NSCLC. Methods: We studied 3,311 patients who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC and underwent preoperative PFT from 2001 to 2021. We used Global Lung Function Initiative equations to generate race-specific and race-neutral normative equations to calculate percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%). The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications within 30 days of surgery. We used unadjusted and race-adjusted logistic regression models and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analyses adjusted for relevant comorbidities to measure the association of race-specific and race-neutral FEV1% with pulmonary complications. Results: Thirty-one percent of patients who underwent surgery experienced pulmonary complications. Higher FEV1, whether measured with race-neutral (odds ratio [OR], 0.98 per 1% change in FEV1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-0.99]; P < 0.001) or race-specific (OR, 0.98 per 1% change in FEV1% [95% CI, 0.98-0.98]; P < 0.001) normative equations, was associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary complications. The area under the receiver operator curve for pulmonary complications was similar for race-adjusted race-neutral (0.60) and race-specific (0.60) models. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, higher FEV1% was similarly associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications in race-neutral (OR, 0.99 per 1% [95% CI, 0.98-0.99]) and race-specific (OR, 0.99 per 1%; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) models. The marginal effect of race on pulmonary complications was attenuated in all race-specific models compared with all race-neutral models. Conclusions: The choice of race-specific or race-neutral normative PFT equations does not meaningfully affect the association of lung function with pulmonary complications after lobectomy for NSCLC, but the use of race-neutral equations unmasks additional effects of self-identified race on pulmonary complications.

Effect of Baduanjin qigong on postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of Baduanjin qigong on improving lung function and postoperative quality of life of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to find an effective home-based pulmonary rehabilitation method.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was carried out from July 2019 to October 2021, which included 216 NSCLC postoperative participants from Beijing China-Japan Friendship Hospital and Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science. Participants were randomly divided into two groups, including the observation (n = 108) group and the control group (n = 108). The control group was given routine lung rehabilitation training, while the observation group was given Baduanjin qigong. Both groups were trained for 12 weeks.The patient's age, sex, smoking history, lung cancer stage, pathological type were recorded. Related indicators of lung function, 6-min walk distance(6MWD), Piper fatigue Scale, and Borg dyspnea score before and after intervention were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with these indicators before indicators, lung function, 6MWD, Piper fatigue Scale score and Borg score were significantly better in the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in FVC%, 6MWD and Borg score between the two groups (P > 0.05), whereas FEV1% and Piper fatigue Scale scores in the observation group were better than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both Baduanjin qigong and traditional pulmonary rehabilitation methods can improve the postoperative lung function and quality of life of patients with NSCLC; and compared with traditional pulmonary rehabilitation training, Baduanjin Qigong may have certain advantages in relieving cancer-related fatigue and FEV1%, and may be another new method of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial No.: ChiCTR1900025121.

Comparison of Robotic and Open Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in Marginal Pulmonary Function Patients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with reduced respiratory function represents a challenge for thoracic surgeons. Minimally invasive surgery seems to be beneficial for these patients because it reduces tissue trauma and its impact on respiratory mechanics. Application of the robotic technique, the use of CO2 insufflation and longer surgical time are factors that could influence the outcomes of marginal pulmonary function patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the robotic technique on the postoperative outcomes of patients with poor lung function.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from consecutive marginal respiratory function patients who underwent robotic or open lobectomy for NSCLC. Data regarding clinical, operative and postoperative details were compared between the open and robotic approaches.

RESULTS

The outcomes of 100 patients with reduced respiratory function were evaluated, of whom 59 underwent open lobectomies and 41 underwent robotic lobectomies. Robotic lobectomy was characterized by a longer operative time, a reduced hospital stay and a lower incidence of postoperative complications (22% vs. 33.9%), when compared to the open approach.

CONCLUSION

Robotic lobectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with marginal pulmonary function.

The association between cardiopulmonary exercise testing and postoperative outcomes in patients with lung cancer undergoing lung resection surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Exercise capacity should be determined in all patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer surgery and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) remains the gold standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between preoperative CPET and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lung resection surgery for lung cancer through a review of the existing literature.

METHODS

A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from inception until December 2022. Studies investigating associations between preoperative CPET and postoperative outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A random effect model meta-analysis was performed. I2 > 40% indicated a high level of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included with 6450 patients. Twenty-eight studies had low risk of bias. [Formula: see text] peak is the oxygen consumption at peak exercise and serves as a marker of cardiopulmonary fitness. Higher estimates of [Formula: see text] peak, measured and as a percentagege of predicted, showed significant associations with a lower risk of mortality [MD: 3.66, 95% CI: 0.88; 6.43 and MD: 16.49, 95% CI: 6.92; 26.07] and fewer complications [MD: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.12; 3.00 and MD: 9.82, 95% CI: 5.88; 13.76]. Using a previously defined cutoff value of > 15mL/kg/min for [Formula: see text] peak, showed evidence of decreased odds of mortality [OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28-0.81] and but not decreased odds of postoperative morbidity [OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64-1.00]. There was no relationship between [Formula: see text] slope, which depicts ventilatory efficiency, with mortality [MD: -9.60, 95% CI: -27.74; 8.54] however, patients without postoperative complications had a lower preoperative [Formula: see text] [MD: -2.36, 95% CI: -3.01; -1.71]. Exercise load and anaerobic threshold did not correlate with morbidity or mortality. There was significant heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimates of cardiopulmonary fitness as evidenced by higher [Formula: see text] peak, measured and as a percentage of predicted, were associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. A cutoff value of [Formula: see text] peak > 15mL/kg/min was consistent with improved survival but not with fewer complications. Ventilatory efficiency was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity but not with improved survival. The heterogeneity in literature could be remedied with large scale, prospective, blinded, standardised research to improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with lung cancer scheduled for lung resection surgery.

Seven preoperative factors have strong predictive value for postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery

Background

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a hospital acquired pneumonia that occurs >48 hours after tracheal intubation. The diagnosis of POP should be based on clinical and radiological findings within 30 days after surgery. It is a common complication after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer patients. However, the specific impact of preoperative comorbidities on the incidence of POP remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the preoperative data of patients with lung cancer to help surgeons predict the risk of incidence of POP after thoracoscopic lung resection.

Methods

This study is a prospective study that included patients with lung cancer who were scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery in 1 year. All cases came from two medical centers. Preoperative demographic information, tumor information, preoperative comorbidities, quality of life scores, and incidence of POP were collected. Variables were screened by univariate analysis and multivariate regression. Finally, a prediction model was constructed. A total of 53 preoperative factors were included as candidate predictors. The binary outcome variable was defined as the presence or absence of POP. The incidence of POP was the primary outcome variable. The predictive performance of the model was verified internally through 1,000 iterations of bootstrap resampling.

Results

A total of 1,229 patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled. In addition, 196 cases (15.95%) had POP; 1,025 (83.40%) patients had comorbid conditions. The total number of comorbidity diagnosed in all samples was 2,929. The prediction model suggested that patients with advanced age, high body mass index (BMI), smoking, poor physical condition, respiratory diseases, diabetes, and neurological diseases were more likely to develop POP. The area under the curve (AUC) and Brier scores were 0.851 and 0.091, respectively. The expected and observed results were in strong agreement, according to the likelihood of POP calibration curve.

Conclusions

The constructed model is capable of evaluating the probability of POP occurrence in patients with lung cancer. Seven preoperative factors in patients with lung cancer were found to be associated with increased probability of having pneumonia after thoracoscopic lung resection. This model can help predict the incidence of POP after surgery.

Safety of curative-intent lung cancer surgery in older patients (octogenarians): A contemporary multicentre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Despite octogenarians representing an ever-increasing proportion of patients with lung cancer, there is a paucity of evidence describing outcomes after lung resection for these patients. We aimed to evaluate short and mid-term outcomes for octogenarians after lung resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 5,470 consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer from 2012-2019 in two UK centres were included. Primary outcomes were perioperative, 90-day, and one-year mortality in the octogenarian vs. non-octogenarian cohort. Appropriate statistical tests were used to compare outcomes between octogenarian and non-octogenarian patients. Secondary outcomes were post-operative complications and to validate the performance of the Thoracoscore model in the octogenarian cohort.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.4% (n=513) of patients were aged ≥80. The rates of 90-day mortality, one-year mortality, and post-operative atrial fibrillation were significantly higher for octogenarians. The one-year mortality rate for octogenarians fell significantly over time (2012-2015: 16.5% vs 2016-2019: 10.2%, p=0.034). Subgroup analysis (2016-2019 only) demonstrated no significant difference in peri-operative, 90-day, or one-year mortality between octogenarian and non-octogenarian patients. Validation of the Thoracoscore model demonstrated modest discrimination and acceptable calibration.

DISCUSSION

Mortality for octogenarians fell significantly over time in this study. Indeed, when confined to the most recent time period, comparable rates of both 90-day and one-year mortality for octogenarian and non-octogenarian patients were seen. Whilst preventative strategies to reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation in octogenarians should be considered, these findings demonstrate that following appropriate patient selection, octogenarians can safely undergo lung resection for lung cancer.

Development of Machine Learning Model for VO2max Estimation Using a Patch-Type Single-Lead ECG Monitoring Device in Lung Resection Candidates

A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is essential for lung resection. However, performing a CPET can be challenging. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to estimate maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) using data collected through a patch-type single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring device in candidates for lung resection. This prospective, single-center study included 42 patients who underwent a CPET at a tertiary teaching hospital from October 2021 to July 2022. During the CPET, a single-lead ECG monitoring device was applied to all patients, and the results obtained from the machine-learning algorithm using the information extracted from the ECG patch were compared with the CPET results. According to the Bland-Altman plot of measured and estimated VO2max, the VO2max values obtained from the machine learning model and the FRIEND equation showed lower differences from the reference value (bias: -0.33 mL·kg-1·min-1, bias: 0.30 mL·kg-1·min-1, respectively). In subgroup analysis, the developed model demonstrated greater consistency when applied to different maximal stage levels and sexes. In conclusion, our model provides a closer estimation of VO2max values measured using a CPET than existing equations. This model may be a promising tool for estimating VO2max and assessing cardiopulmonary reserve in lung resection candidates when a CPET is not feasible.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Is wedge a dirty word? Demographic and facility-level variables associated with high-quality wedge resection

Objectives

Although sublobar resections have gained traction, wedge resections vary widely in quality. We seek to characterize the demographic and facility-level variables associated with high-quality wedge resections.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried from 2010 to 2018. Patients with T1/T2 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer 2 cm or less who underwent wedge resection without neoadjuvant therapy were included. A wedge resection with no nodes sampled or with positive margins was categorized as a low-quality wedge. A wedge resection with 4 or more nodes sampled and negative margins was categorized as a high-quality wedge. Facility-specific variables were investigated via quartile analysis based on the overall volume and proportion of high-quality wedge or low-quality wedge resections performed.

Results

A total of 21,742 patients met inclusion criteria, 6390 (29.4%) of whom received a high-quality wedge resection. Factors associated with high-quality wedge resection included treatment at an academic center (3005 [47.0%] vs low-quality wedge 6279 [40.9%]; P < .001). The 30- and 90-day survivals were similar, but patients who received a high-quality wedge resection had improved 5-year survival (4902 [76.7%] vs 10,548 [68.7%]; P < .001). Facilities in the top quartile by volume of high-quality wedge resections performed 69% (4409) of all high-quality wedge resections, and facilities in the top quartile for low-quality wedge resections performed 67.6% (10,378) of all low-quality wedge resections. A total of 113 facilities were in the top quartile by volume for both high-quality wedge and low-quality wedge resections.

Conclusions

High-quality wedge resections are associated with improved 5-year survival when compared with low-quality wedge resections. By volume, high-quality wedge and low-quality wedge resections cluster to a minority of facilities, many of which overlap. There is discordance between best practice guidelines and current practice patterns that warrants additional study.

Wedge resection versus lobectomy in T1 lung cancer patients: a propensity matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

Performing wedge resection rather than lobectomy for primary lung cancer remains controversial. Recent studies demonstrate no survival advantage for non-anatomical resection compared to lobectomy in patients with early-stage lung cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate whether in patients with T1 tumours, non-anatomical wedge resection is associated with equivalent survival to lobectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lung resection at the Lancashire Cardiac Centre between April 2005 and April 2018. Patients were subjected to multidisciplinary team discussion. The extent of resection was decided by the team based on British Thoracic Society guidelines. The primary outcome was overall survival. Propensity matching of patients with T1 tumours was also performed to determine whether differences in survival rates exist in a subset of these patients with balanced pre-operative characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 187 patients who underwent non-anatomical wedge resection and 431 patients who underwent lobectomy. Cox modelling demonstrated no survival difference between groups for the first 1.6 years then a risk of death 3-fold higher for wedge resection group after 1.6 years (HR 3.14, CI 1.98-4.79). Propensity matching yielded 152 pairs for which 5-year survival was 66.2% for the lobectomy group and 38.5% for the non-anatomical wedge group (SMD = 0.58, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-anatomical wedge resection was associated with significantly reduced 5-year survival compared to lobectomy in matched patients. Lobectomy should remain the standard of care for patients with early-stage lung cancer who are fit enough to undergo surgical resection.

The oncologic efficacy of extended resections for lung cancer

Extended lung resections for T3-T4 non-small-cell lung cancer remain challenging. Multimodal management is mandatory in multidisciplinary tumor boards, and here the determination of resectability is key. Long-term oncologic efficacy depends mostly on complete resection (R0) and the extent of N2 disease. The development of novel innovative treatments (targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors) sets interesting perspectives to reinforce current therapeutic options in the induction and adjuvant setting.

Impact of sex and age on adherence to guidelines in non-small cell lung cancer management

INTRODUCTION

Age-related disparities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment are well known, but few studies have assessed the impact of sex on treatment disparities. Disparities in guideline-adherence may explain the superior survival in women with NSCLC. Therefore, we aimed to define patient- and tumor-related factors associated with non-adherence to guidelines in NSCLC management with a special focus on sex and age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with NSCLC who received first-line treatment at the Vaasa Central Hospital between 2016 and 2020 were included in the study. The primary outcome was guideline adherence, defined as adherent, undertreatment, or overtreatment considering performance status. A binary logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for non-adherence to treatment guidelines depending on patient- and tumor-related factors.

RESULTS

321 patients were included in the study. Non-adherence was highest in ≥75-year-old women (41.3%), followed by ≥75-year-old men (32.6%), <75-year-old men (27.6%) and lowest in women <75-year-old (19.7%) (p = 0.035). Non-adherent care consisted more often of undertreatment in <75-year-old men than women (26.0% versus 12.1%) and overtreatment in <75-year-old women than men (7.6% versus 1.6%). Non-adherence was associated with stage III disease (aOR 2.21; 95% CI 1.07-4.59), poor pulmonary function (aOR 3.69, 95% CI 1.56-8.71), and Charlson Comorbidity Index 1-2 (aOR 2.09; 95% CI 1.09-4.01).

CONCLUSION

Sex- and age-related disparities in guideline adherence were observed in <75-year-old men and in ≥75-year-olds. Stage III NSCLC was associated with non-adherence.

Association between oxygen consumption and stepping exercise standardized with a triaxial accelerometer

OBJECTIVE

According to the current American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guideline, a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is indicated in patients with lung cancer being considered for lung surgery. The measurement of maximum oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text] max) is not sufficiently prevalent because it requires special technical equipment. Considering that stepping is a simple and common exercise, we aimed to establish a simple and reproducible test with standardization of exercise intensity using a triaxial accelerometer.

METHODS

Twenty healthy volunteers (10 male, 10 female) were included in the study. The subjects were obliged to step on the same spot at the rate of 80 and 110 counts for 1 min each and then step as quickly as possible for the last minute. Oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]) (mL/kg/min) for every breath was continuously measured during the exercise. A triaxial accelerometer was attached to the hip of test subjects whereby metabolic equivalents (METs) at each test level were measured.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study subjects was 42.9 ± 11.4 (mean ± SD). The mean value of [Formula: see text] at each level increased linearly along with the stepping level in each individual but varied among subjects. Using METs instead of step counts minimized the difference in regression lines among subjects. A receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the possibility of [Formula: see text] prediction for the critical values of 10 and 20 mL/kg/min using METs.

CONCLUSION

A simple and reproducible stepping test was suggested as applicable to standardizing the intensity of exercise using a triaxial accelerometer.

The feasibility and safety of simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of bilateral pulmonary lesions

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of bilateral pulmonary lesions.

Methods

The data of 11 patients who received simultaneous bilateral pulmonary surgery using VATS in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University between January 2016 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The cases of four male and seven female patients, with a mean age of 57.54 ± 8.37 years (range, 44-67 years), were reviewed. Nonanatomic wedge resection, pulmonary segmentectomy or lobectomy via VATS were performed depending on each patient’s situation. Mean 1 second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) was 2.55 ± 0.66 L(range, 1.49-3.88 L), mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 91.81 ± 49.56 mL(range, 30-150 mL), mean operating time was 273.72 ± 68.98 min(range, 132-390 min), and mean drainage duration was 5.27 ± 3.60 days(range, 2-14 days), with a mean total drainage volume of 1,515.90 ± 772.75 mL(range, 530-3,225 mL). Only one postoperative complication (air leakage) occurred, with an overall complication rate of 9.09%. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.81 ± 3.60 days (range, 5-18 days), and the mean total cost of hospitalization was 67,054.53 ± 20,896.49 RMB (range, 47,578.45-123,530.8 RMB).

Conclusions

Simultaneous bilateral pulmonary surgery using VATS for the treatment of bilateral pulmonary lesions is safe and feasible and can therefore be considered after strict preoperative evaluation of the patient.

Estimated metabolic equivalents of task do not correlate with the maximal oxygen consumption of patients undergoing lung resection surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) is a physiological measure that represents the metabolic cost of an activity of daily living. One MET is equivalent to the resting metabolic rate. METs can be estimated by questionnaires or calculated by measuring maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). The aim of this study is to determine whether METs estimated in the pre-consultation (METse) correlates with METs calculated from VO2max (METsVO2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study in patients scheduled for lung resection surgery. The estimation of METs was obtained in the pre-consultation according to the 2014 European and American guidelines for preoperative cardiovascular assessment in non-cardiac surgery. VO2max was calculated in the ergometry laboratory.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included in the study, of whom 25 (24%) were female. The mean age was 65.1 years (±9.8). In 26 patients (25%), the METse classification correlated with METsVO2 (κ = -0.107 P = .02). In the remaining patients, METse overestimated functional capacity measured by ergometry (METse > METsVO2).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective assessment overestimates functional capacity and should not replace objective testing in patients scheduled for lung resection surgery.

Impact of society and national guidelines on patient selection for lung cancer surgery in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the impact of different national clinical guidelines (with consistent and conflicting recommendations) on clinician's practice in the UK.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we analysed data from National Lung Cancer Audit comprising all patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2008 and 2013 within England and Wales for consistent (British Thoracic Society and National Institute of Clinical Excellence) recommendations for lower/more permissive lung function but opposing stage (N2) selection parameters for surgery.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2013, data from 167 192 patients with primary lung cancers were included. The proportion of patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer increased from 9.5% to 20.5% in 2013 (P < 0.001) as the number of general thoracic surgeons in the UK increased from 40 to 81 in the corresponding timeframe. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s of surgical patients increased from 76% (22) to 81% (22) in 2013 (P < 0.001). Of the patients undergoing surgery, the proportion of patients with N2 disease across the 6-year interval was broadly consistent between 8% and 11% without any evidence of trend (P = 0.125).

CONCLUSIONS

Within 3 years of new clinical guideline recommendations, we did not observe any overall change suggesting greater selection for surgery on lower levels of lung function. When presented with conflicting recommendation, no observable change in selection was noted on surgery for N2 disease. The observed increase in surgical resection rates is more likely due to greater access to surgery (by increasing number of surgeons) rather than any impact of guideline recommendations.

Results of emergency colectomy in nonagenarians and octogenarians previously labeled as prohibitive surgical risk

PURPOSE

There are no standardized criteria for what constitutes prohibitive risk for emergency abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed comparing two groups of patients having emergent colectomy. One group had previously been labeled as being prohibitive surgical risk and the other was a contemporary, non-prohibitive risk group also requiring emergency colectomy. All operations were performed by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

There were 27 prohibitive risk patients and 81 non-prohibitive risk (control group) patients. The average age of the prohibitive risk group was 85 years (range 78-99) compared to the control group mean age of 52 years (18-79, p < 0.00001). Prohibitive risk was due to extremes of age combined with congestive heart failure in 44%, followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with heart failure in 19%. The groups were closely matched by the type of colectomy performed. The total complication rate was much higher in the prohibitive risk group compared to the non-prohibitive risk patients (81% versus 48%, p 0.005). But the 30-day mortality rate was similar between groups (7% versus 4%, p 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Patients who are labeled as prohibitive surgical risk may be inaccurately assessed in the majority of cases. Additional research will need to be performed to evaluate the presence of quantifiable high-risk physiological conditions, and not just comorbidities, that place a patient at high risk of death after abdominal surgery. Until then, elderly patients should not be denied colectomy based upon comorbidities alone.

Gene expression profile of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumors of patients with nsclc: the influence of COPD

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is involved in the pathophysiology of lung cancer (LC) and COPD, and the latter is an important risk factor for LC. We hypothesised that the EMT gene expression profile and signalling cascade may differ in LC patients with COPD from those with no respiratory diseases. In lung tumour specimens obtained through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery from LC (n=20, control group) and LC-COPD patients (n=30), gene expression (quantitative real-time PCR amplification) of EMT markers SMAD3, SMAD4, ZEB2, TWIST1, SNAI1, ICAM1, VIM, CDH2, MMP1 and MMP9 was detected. In lung tumours of LC-COPD compared to LC patients, gene expression of SMAD3, SMAD4, ZEB2 and CDH2 significantly declined, while no significant differences were detected for the other analysed markers. A significant correlation was found between pack-years (smoking burden) and SMAD3 gene expression among LC-COPD patients. LC-COPD patients exhibited mild-to-moderate airway obstruction and a significant reduction in diffusion capacity compared to LC patients. In lung tumour samples of patients with COPD, several markers of EMT expression, namely SMAD3, SMAD4, ZEB2 and CDH2, were differentially expressed suggesting that these markers are likely to play a role in the regulation of EMT in patients with this respiratory disease. Cigarette smoke did not seem to influence the expression of EMT markers in this study. These results have potential clinical implications in the management of patients with LC, particularly in those with underlying respiratory diseases.

The downregulation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition repressor SMAD pathway may favour a pro-tumoural micro-environment in patients with chronic airway diseases, namely COPD, which could be targeted therapeuticallyhttps://bit.ly/39oXnoG

The impact of segmentectomy versus lobectomy on pulmonary function in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective

Segmentectomy has been reported as an alternative to lobectomy for small-sized NSCLC without detriment to survival. The long-term benefits of segmentectomy over lobectomy on pulmonary function have not been firmly established. This meta-analysis aims to compare postoperative changes in pulmonary function in NSCLC patients undergoing segmentectomy or lobectomy.

Methods

Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched through March 2021. Statistical comparisons were made when appropriate.

Results

Fourteen studies (2412 participants) out of 324 citations were included in this study. All selected studies were high quality, as indicated by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for assessing the risk of bias. Clinical outcomes were compared between segmentectomy and lobectomy. ΔFEV1 [10 studies, P < 0.01, WMD = 0.40 (0.29, 0.51)], ΔFVC [4 studies, P < 0.01, WMD = 0.16 (0.07, 0.24)], ΔFVC% [4 studies, P < 0.01, WMD = 4.05 (2.32, 5.79)], ΔFEV1/FVC [2 studies, P < 0.01, WMD = 1.99 (0.90, 3.08)], and ΔDLCO [3 studies, P < 0.01, WMD = 1.30 (0.69, 1.90)] were significantly lower in the segmentectomy group than in the lobectomy group. Subgroup analysis showed that in stage IA patients, the ΔFEV1% [3 studies, P < 0.01, WMD = 0.26 (0.07, 0.46)] was significantly lower in the segmentectomy group. The ΔDLCO% and ΔMVV% were incomparable.

Conclusion

Segmentectomy preserves more lung function than lobectomy. There were significantly smaller decreases in FEV1, FVC, FVC%, FEV1/FVC and DLCO in the segmentectomy group than in the lobectomy group.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01853-3.

Functional analysis of the airways after pulmonary lobectomy through computational fluid dynamics

Pulmonary lobectomy, which consists of the partial or complete resection of a lung lobe, is the gold standard intervention for lung cancer removal. The removal of functional tissue during the surgery and the re-adaptation of the remaining thoracic structures decrease the patient's post-operative pulmonary function. Residual functionality is evaluated through pulmonary function tests, which account for the number of resected segments without considering local structural alterations and provide an average at-the-mouth estimation. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been demonstrated to provide patient-specific, quantitative, and local information about airways airflow dynamics. A CFD investigation was performed on image-based airway trees reconstructed before and after the surgery for twelve patients who underwent lobectomy at different lobes. The geometrical alterations and the variations in fluid dynamics parameters and in lobar ventilation between the pre and post-operative conditions were evaluated. The post-operative function was estimated and compared with current clinical algorithms and with actual clinical data. The post-operative configuration revealed a high intersubject variability: regardless of the lobectomy site, an increment of global velocity, wall pressure, and wall shear stress was observed. Local flow disturbances also emerged at, and downstream of, the resection site. The analysis of lobar ventilation showed severe variations in the volume flow rate distribution, highlighting the compensatory effects in the contralateral lung with an increment of inflow. The estimation of post-operative function through CFD was comparable with the current clinical algorithm and the actual spirometric measurements. The results confirmed that CFD could provide additional information to support the current clinical approaches both in the operability assessment and in the prescription of personalized respiratory rehabilitation.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation of a Case With Worsening Dyspnea Due to Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Pneumonia After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

We report a case of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia after video-assisted thoracic surgery. The case was a 69-year-old man with left upper lobe lung cancer. Acute exacerbation was suspected on postoperative day 6 due to worsening dyspnea and frosted shadows on computed tomography. High-dose corticosteroids and low-to-moderate-dose corticosteroids were administered. Step-by-step rehabilitation with oxygen administration commenced as soon as possible, and the patient was able to be discharged. However, dyspnea, knee extension strength, and exercise capacity were significantly worse than before surgery. Eighteen months later, pulmonary function and knee extension strength showed improvements, but exercise capacity was unchanged from the time of discharge. Continued follow-up will be necessary.

The impact of marginal lung function on outcomes in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery

Background

The effect of marginal lung function on outcomes after lung resection has traditionally been studied in the context of open thoracic surgery. Its impact on postoperative outcomes in the era of minimally invasive lung resection is unclear.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we included adult patients who underwent minimally invasive lung resection at our institution between January 2017 and May 2020 for known malignancy or lung nodule. Marginal lung function was defined as pre-operative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and/or diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide <60% of predicted. Our outcomes included a composite outcome of pulmonary morbidity and/or 30- and 90-day mortality, and hospital length of stay. We used multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models to identify associations with outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to estimate survival.

Results

Of 300 patients, 88 (29%) had marginal lung function. Patients in the marginal group were more likely to be female (69% vs. 56%; P=0.028), and more likely to have: hypertension (HTN) (83% vs. 71%; P=0.028), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (38% vs. 12%; P<0.001), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (9% vs. 3%; P<0.019), and ischemic heart disease (28% vs. 18%; P=0.033). Patients were similar in terms of age (68±8 vs. 68±10 years; P=0.932), and other comorbidities. Anatomic lung resection comprised 56.8% of the marginal group vs. 74% in the non-marginal group (P=0.003). The most common complication was prolonged air leak (18.2% vs. 11.8%; P=0.479). Marginal lung function had a trend toward increased composite respiratory complications (22.7% vs. 15.1%; P=0.112) and 90-day mortality (5.7% vs. 4.2%; P=0.591), although they did not reach statistical significance. There was a statistically significant 1-day average increase in length of stay in the marginal lung function cohort (4.6 vs. 3.4 days; P<0.015) with a stronger association with diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide than FEV1. Survival was similar (marginal function HR =1.0; P=0.994).

Conclusions

In the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, lung resection in patients with marginal lung function may be considered in select patients. These findings aid in the selection consideration and counseling of this patient population.

The impact of pulmonary function tests on early postoperative complications in open lung resection surgery: an observational cohort study

We investigated whether pulmonary function tests (PFTs) can predict pulmonary complications and if they are, to find new cutoff values in current open lung resection surgery. In this observational study, patients underwent open lung resection surgery at a tertiary hospital were analyzed (n = 1544). Various PFTs were tested by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC_ROC) to predict pulmonary complications until 30 days postoperatively. In results, PFTs were generally not effective to predict pulmonary complications (AUC_ROC: 0.58-0.66). Therefore, we could not determine new cutoff values, and used previously reported cutoffs for post-hoc analysis [predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second (ppoFEV₁) < 40%, predicted postoperative diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (ppoDL_CO) < 40%]. In multivariable analysis, old age, male sex, current smoker, intraoperative transfusion and use of inotropes were independent risk factors for pulmonary complications (model 1: AUC_ROC 0.737). Addition of ppoFEV₁ or ppoDL_CO < 40% to model 1 did not significantly increase predictive capability (model 2: AUC_ROC 0.751, P = 0.065). In propensity score-matched subgroups, patients with ppoFEV₁ or ppoDL_CO < 40% showed higher rates of pulmonary complications [13% (21/160) vs. 24% (38/160), P = 0.014], but no difference in in-hospital mortality [3% (8/241) vs. 6% (14/241), P = 0.210] or mean survival duration [61 (95% CI 57-66) vs. 65 (95% CI 60-70) months, P = 0.830] compared to patients with both > 40%. In conclusion, PFTs themselves were not effective predictors of pulmonary complications. Decision to proceed with surgical resection of lung cancer should be made on an individual basis considering other risk factors and the patient's goals.

Anesthesia for thoracic surgery in infants and children

The management of infants and children presenting for thoracic surgery poses a variety of challenges for anesthesiologists. A thorough understanding of the implications of developmental changes in cardiopulmonary anatomy and physiology, associated comorbid conditions, and the proposed surgical intervention is essential in order to provide safe and effective clinical care. This narrative review discusses the perioperative anesthetic management of pediatric patients undergoing noncardiac thoracic surgery, beginning with the preoperative assessment. The considerations for the implementation and management of one-lung ventilation (OLV) will be reviewed, and as will the anesthetic implications of different surgical procedures including bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy, thoracotomy, and thoracoscopy. We will also discuss pediatric-specific disease processes presenting in neonates, infants, and children, with an emphasis on those with unique impact on anesthetic management.

Evaluation of predictive factors related to the presence or absence of supplemental oxygen therapy and comparison of physical functions after video-assisted thoracic surgery

We performed a retrospective study of 102 individuals to evaluate predictive factors for needing supplemental oxygen therapy following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and to compare patients' physical functions before and after surgery. Prior to surgery, we evaluated quadriceps torque, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), timed up and go test, and grip strength. During the 6MWD, patients' oxygen saturation was recorded every minute. Quadriceps torque and 6MWD were evaluated again following surgery. The indication for supplemental oxygen therapy was determined based on desaturation (<85%) during the 6MWD in room air. A total of 14 patients needed oxygen therapy at discharge (group A), while 88 patients did not need oxygen therapy (group B). In group A, the postoperative 6MWD was repeated with supplemental oxygen. Compared with the same parameters in group B, in group A the percentage diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was significantly lower (p=0.011), while a history of smoking (p=0.016), exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH, p<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p<0.001), and interstitial pneumonia (p=0.008) were significantly higher. Logistic regression analysis showed that EIH was an independent risk factor for requiring supplemental oxygen therapy following surgery (odds ratio: 46.2, 95% CI: 9-237.1; p<0.001). In group A, patients' minimum oxygen saturation was significantly improved by oxygen administration (83.4±3.4 vs. 87.7±3.3, p=0.002), but there was no difference in walking distance (359.5±64.2 vs. 353.6±41.6, p=0.482). Our data indicate that patients should be preoperatively evaluated to predict postoperative hypoxemia and that this evaluation could complement the prediction of postoperative need for oxygen therapy.

GCC2 as a New Early Diagnostic Biomarker for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Lung cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer, is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. A better prognosis is associated with early diagnosis of lung cancer patients. Although annual screening guidelines for lung cancer are recommended, using various tools such as chest X-ray, low-dose computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, these screening procedures are expensive and difficult to repeat. They are also invasive and have a high risk of radiation exposure. Therefore, a low-risk, convenient diagnostic method using liquid biopsy and biomarkers is required for the early diagnosis of lung cancer. The newly proposed biomarker GCC2 was identified through proteomic analysis of exosomes secreted from lung cancer cell lines. GCC2 expression levels in peripheral blood of the patients showed high specificity and sensitivity in early lung cancer, demonstrating that our novel exosomal biomarker GCC2 can greatly contribute to improving the diagnosis of lung cancer patients, even though it has been tested in only a few pilot studies.

Abstract

No specific markers have been identified to detect non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell-derived exosomes circulating in the blood. Here, we report a new biomarker that distinguishes between cancer and non-cancer cell-derived exosomes. Exosomes isolated from patient plasmas at various pathological stages of NSCLC, NSCLC cell lines, and human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells isolated using size exclusion chromatography were characterized. The GRIP and coiled-coil domain-containing 2 (GCC2) protein, involved in endosome-to-Golgi transport, was identified by proteomics analysis of NSCLC cell line-derived exosomes. GCC2 protein levels in the exosomes derived from early-stage NSCLC patients were higher than those from healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exosomal GCC2 to be 90% and 75%, respectively. A high area under the curve, 0.844, confirmed that GCC2 levels could effectively distinguish between the exosomes. These results demonstrate GCC2 as a promising early diagnostic biomarker for NSCLC.

Controversies in Lung Cancer: When to Resect with Compromised Pulmonary Function

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide among both men and women. Patients with lung cancer frequently have impaired pulmonary function, usually secondary to smoking-related chronic obstructive lung disease. Numerous techniques have been used to evaluate the postsurgical risk. These techniques include preoperative pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk test, stage 1 cardiopulmonary exercise test, 2D echocardiography, and quantitative ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.

Assessment of Operability and Resectability in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a lethal disease, and chronic cigarette smoking is the most common cause. The selection of treatment is based on the histologic cell type, accurate staging, and adequacy of cardiopulmonary functional reserve. The risk for surgery is highest in patients over the age of 80 years.

Delays in Managing Lung Cancer: The Importance of Fast-Tracking in the Clinical Care

Early diagnosis in lung cancer is desirable, because surgical resection offers the only hope of cure. In the face of suggestive symptoms, a normal plain chest radiograph does not exclude the diagnosis, and investigation is essential. The various imaging changes seen on computerized tomography and PET scan provide strong suggestive evidence of lung cancer, but proof of diagnosis rests on histologic examination, material that may be obtained by one of the following diagnostic procedures: bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy, fine needle aspiration biopsy, thoracentesis and pleural biopsy, lymph node biopsy, and exploratory thoracotomy.

The Value of Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity as an Indicator for Predicting Postoperative Lung Function in Non-Small Lung Cancer

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most frequently occurring concomitant diseases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is characterized by small airways and the hyperinflation of the lung. Patients with hyperinflated lung tend to have more reserved lung function than conventionally predicted after lung cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to identify other indicators in predicting postoperative lung function after lung resection for lung cancer. Patients with NSCLC who underwent curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection from 2017 to 2019 were included. Predicted postoperative FEV₁ (ppoFEV₁) was calculated using the formula: preoperative FEV₁ × (19 segments-the number of segments to be removed) ÷ 19. The difference between the measured postoperative FEV₁ and ppoFEV₁ was defined as an outcome. Patients were categorized into two groups: preserved FEV₁ if the difference was positive and non-preserved FEV₁, if otherwise. In total, 238 patients were included: 74 (31.1%) in the FEV₁ non-preserved group and 164 (68.9%) in the FEV₁ preserved group. The proportion of preoperative residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 40% in the FEV₁ non-preserved group (21.4%) was lower than in the preserved group (36.1%) (p = 0.03). In logistic regression analysis, preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was related to postoperative FEV1 preservation. (adjusted OR, 2.02, p = 0.041). Linear regression analysis suggested that preoperative RV/TLC was positively correlated with a significant difference. (p = 0.004) Preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was an independent predictor of preserved lung function in patients undergoing curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Preoperative RV/TLC is positively correlated with postoperative lung function.