Telomerase activity in human pleural mesothelioma

NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma

Background

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients.

Methods

NIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy.

Discussion

Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1.

Heterogeneous Contributing Factors in MPM Disease Development and Progression: Biological Advances and Clinical Implications

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) tumors are remarkably aggressive and most patients only survive for 5–12 months; irrespective of stage; after primary symptoms appear. Compounding matters is that MPM remains unresponsive to conventional standards of care; including radiation and chemotherapy. Currently; instead of relying on molecular signatures and histological typing; MPM treatment options are guided by clinical stage and patient characteristics because the mechanism of carcinogenesis has not been fully elucidated; although about 80% of cases can be linked to asbestos exposure. Several molecular pathways have been implicated in the MPM tumor microenvironment; such as angiogenesis; apoptosis; cell-cycle regulation and several growth factor-related pathways predicted to be amenable to therapeutic intervention. Furthermore, the availability of genomic data has improved our understanding of the pathobiology of MPM. The MPM genomic landscape is dominated by inactivating mutations in several tumor suppressor genes; such as CDKN2A; BAP1 and NF2. Given the complex heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment in MPM; a better understanding of the interplay between stromal; endothelial and immune cells at the molecular level is required; to chaperone the development of improved personalized therapeutics. Many recent advances at the molecular level have been reported and several exciting new treatment options are under investigation. Here; we review the challenges and the most up-to-date biological advances in MPM pertaining to the molecular pathways implicated; progress at the genomic level; immunological progression of this fatal disease; and its link with developmental cell pathways; with an emphasis on prognostic and therapeutic treatment strategies.

Tumors that mimic asbestos-related mesothelioma: time to consider a genetics-based tumor registry?

The diagnosis of mesothelioma is not always straightforward, despite known immunohistochemical markers and other diagnostic techniques. One reason for the difficulty is that extrapleural tumors resembling mesothelioma may have several possible etiologies, especially in cases with no meaningful history of amphibole asbestos exposure. When the diagnosis of mesothelioma is based on histologic features alone, primary mesotheliomas may resemble various primary or metastatic cancers that have directly invaded the serosal membranes. Some of these metastatic malignancies, particularly carcinomas and sarcomas of the pleura, pericardium and peritoneum, may undergo desmoplastic reaction in the pleura, thereby mimicking mesothelioma, rather than the primary tumor. Encasement of the lung by direct spread or metastasis, termed pseudomesotheliomatous spread, occurs with several other primary cancer types, including certain late-stage tumors from genetic cancer syndromes exhibiting chromosomal instability. Although immunohistochemical staining patterns differentiate most carcinomas, lymphomas, and mestastatic sarcomas from mesotheliomas, specific genetic markers in tumor or somatic tissues have been recently identified that may also distinguish these tumor types from asbestos-related mesothelioma. A registry for genetic screening of mesothelioma cases would help lead to improvements in diagnostic criteria, prognostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, as well as improved estimates of primary mesothelioma incidence and of background rates of cancers unrelated to asbestos that might be otherwise mistaken for mesothelioma. This information would also help better define the dose-response relationships for mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, as well as other risk factors for mesothelioma and other mesenchymal or advanced metastatic tumors that may be indistinguishable by histology and staining characteristics.

Molecular changes in mesothelioma with an impact on prognosis and treatment

CONTEXT

In recent decades, research on malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been developed to improve patients' outcomes by increasing the level of confidence in MPM diagnosis and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize data on genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in MPM that may be of interest for a better management of patients with MPM.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from scientific publications on genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in MPM by studying gene mutations, DNA methylation, and gene and microRNA expression profiling.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular changes in MPM consist in altered expression and in activation or inactivation of critical genes in oncogenesis, especially tumor suppressor genes at the INK4 and NF2 loci. Activation of membrane receptor tyrosine kinases and deregulation of signaling pathways related to differentiation, survival, proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle control, metabolism, migration, and invasion have been demonstrated. Alterations that could be targeted at a global level (methylation) have been recently reported. Experimental research has succeeded especially in abolishing proliferation and triggering apoptosis in MPM cells. So far, targeted clinical approaches focusing on receptor tyrosine kinases have had limited success. Molecular analyses of series of MPM cases have shown that defined alterations are present in MPM subsets, consistent with interindividual variations of molecular alterations, and suggesting that identification of patient subgroups will be essential to develop more specific therapies.

Telomerase activity in pleural malignant mesotheliomas

New treatments are needed for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), which currently has a poor prognosis. Cellular immortalisation, one of the hallmarks of cancer, depends on the activity of a telomere length maintenance mechanism (TMM) - either telomerase or alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). The TMMs are widely regarded as potential targets for cancer therapies and telomerase inhibitors have entered clinical trials. The aim of this study was to determine what proportion of MPMs use ALT and/or telomerase. Forty-three MPMs from 42 patients were examined for telomerase and ALT activity. Telomerase activity was detected by immunoaffinity purification followed by the telomere repeat amplification protocol (TRAP), and ALT activity was determined by the C-circle assay and by assessing telomere lengths using terminal restriction fragment analyses. We found that 43 of 43 MPMs were telomerase-positive[+] and ALT-negative[-]. Therefore, to investigate whether pleural mesothelial cells are unusually susceptible to activation of telomerase, we examined activation of the TMMs in an in vitro model of cellular immortalisation, in which normal pleural mesothelial cells were transduced with simian virus 40 (SV40) oncogenes. We found that normal mesothelial cells were TMM-negative, and that expression of the SV40 oncogenes did not directly activate telomerase or ALT. Immortalisation, which in this experimental system results from additional genetic changes that have not yet been identified, was accompanied by activation of either TMM. Therefore, pleural mesothelial cells are capable of activating either TMM in vitro, and the observation that 100% of MPMs were telomerase[+] suggests that there are factors in vivo that select for telomerase activity during oncogenesis of this tumour type. We conclude that MPM is a tumour that could be considered for anti-telomerase therapy.

Multiple mechanisms of telomere maintenance exist and differentially affect clinical outcome in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the prevalence of the two known telomere maintenance mechanisms, telomerase activity (TA) and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), and to assess their prognostic relevance in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In 44 DMPM specimens obtained from 38 patients, TA was determined using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol and ALT was detected by assaying ALT-associated promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. The prognostic significance of telomere maintenance mechanisms was analyzed by Cox regression in the overall series and in a subset of 29 patients who underwent a uniform treatment regimen consisting of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic i.p. chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Telomere maintenance mechanisms were detectable in 86.4% of DMPM: ALT or TA alone was found in 18.2% or 63.6% of lesions, respectively, whereas two cases (4.6%) were ALT+/TA+. TA and ALT proved to be inversely associated (P = 0.002). In the overall series, TA was prognostic for 4-year relapse (TA+ versus TA-, hazard ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-8.86; P = 0.018) and cancer-related death (TA+ versus TA-, hazard ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-12.51; P = 0.045), whereas ALT failed to significantly affect clinical outcome. These results held true also in the subset of patients submitted to uniform treatment with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic i.p. chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that both known telomere maintenance mechanisms, TA and ALT, are present in DMPM and differentially affect patient prognosis.

Cell proliferation rate and telomerase activity in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations

AIMS

The differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (MM) from benign mesothelial lesions (BML) based on histopathological criteria is sometimes not satisfying and causes diagnostic problems for histopathologists. We aimed to investigate whether the immunohistochemically determined cell proliferation rate and telomerase activity, using Ki-67 and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) immunohistochemistry, respectively, are useful in the differential diagnosis of MM from BML.

METHODS

Sixty-six cases of MM (33 epithelioid, 30 biphasic and 3 sarcomatoid) and 22 cases of BML (15 reactive mesothelial proliferations and 7 fibrous pleuritis/pericarditis) were included in this study. We evaluated the proliferative activity by Ki-67 and telomerase activity by hTERT immunohistochemistries for each case.

RESULTS

The mean value of the Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) in MMs was significantly higher than that of BMLs. Biphasic MMs have higher a Ki-67 PI than epithelioid and sarcomatoid types. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry has a sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 86% and positive predictive value of 94% in detecting MM. hTERT immunohistochemistry detected MM with sensitivity and specificity of 68%.

CONCLUSION

As a result, being cheap and simple methods, Ki-67 and hTERT immunohistochemistries can be used in differentiating malignant and benign mesothelial lesions in routine formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material.

Telomere repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) in situ reveals telomerase activity in three cell types in effusions: malignant cells, proliferative mesothelial cells, and lymphocytes

Telomerase Repeat Amplification Protocol (TRAP) in situ was performed on cytospin preparations from 65 effusions from the serous cavities (45 pleural and 19 ascitic fluids and one pericardial fluid) submitted for routine diagnosis and the results were correlated to cytological morphology. Three types of cells with nuclear fluorescence were identified: malignant cells, hyperplastic mesothelial cell and lymphocytes. Of 38 cytologically malignant effusions, 12 showed strong reactivity in all malignant cells, three strong reactivity in part of the malignant population, whereas 12 showed moderate reactivity in the whole and five in part of the malignant population, respectively. In five malignant effusions weak reactivity was found in all (one case) and in scattered (four cases) malignant cells. Two effusions contained telomerase-negative malignant cells. Two pleural and two ascitic fluids contained proliferative mesothelial cells with weak or, in one case, moderate reactivity. Lymphocytes usually showed weak telomerase activity. Telomerase was expressed in almost all malignant tumours metastatic to serous cavities. Heterogeneity in tumour populations was demonstrated, which may have diagnostic implications, especially in cytology. Weak or moderate reactivity was found in lymphocytes and in some mesothelial proliferations and may explain the low specificity for malignancy sometimes obtained with the TRAP extract method. The weak reactivity found in lymphocytes may reduce the specificity when the extract method is used but causes no diagnostic problem with the TRAP in situ method.

Pathology of malignant mesothelioma

The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma relies firstly on the identification of the mesothelial nature of the neoplastic cell and secondly on the demonstration of the invasive properties of the proliferation. The latter aspect cannot be achieved by studying cellular material yet, in the right clinical setting, it is often possible to make a presumptive diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma based on exudates. Differentiation between mesothelial hyperplasia and metastatic adenocarcinoma by cytological examination alone is unreliable, so further evidence can be gathered from techniques such as histopathology, histochemistry and electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry aims to confirm the mesothelial nature of the neoplastic cells while ruling out metastatic lesions. At present there is no single reliable marker for neoplastic mesothelioma, although evidence has been presented on a large variety of gene products. In an attempt to differentiate between hyperplastic mesothelium and malignant mesothelioma, Dhaene has been able to show that over 90% of malignant mesotheliomas show telomerase activity and express telomerase subunits.

Amplified Telomerase Analysis by Using Rotating Magnetic Particles: The Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Cancer Cells

A highly sensitive telomerase detection method that involves amplified telomerase analysis and the use of rotating magnetic particles has been developed. Magnetic particles, functionalized with a primer (1) that is recognized by telomerase, are mixed with a nucleotide mixture that includes biotinylated-dUTP, and telomerase-induced elongation of the primers proceeds with simultaneous biotin incorporation. Avidin-Horseradish peroxidase conjugate, coupled to biotin labels, yields the biocatalytic functional particles. Mixing the resulting particles with naphthoquinone-modified magnetic particles enables the optoelectronic detection of telomerase. Attraction of the magnetic particles to an electrode, followed by rotation of the particles, causes the electrocatalytic reduction of O(2) to H(2)O(2) and HRP-catalyzed oxidation of luminol (3); this results in chemilumunescence. The intensity of the emitted light depends on the telomerase content of the sample and the rotation speed of the particles. A minimum number of 10 cancer cells could be detected.

Magneto-Mechanical Detection of Nucleic Acids and Telomerase Activity in Cancer Cells

The ultra-sensitive magneto-mechanical detection of DNA, single-base-mismatches in nucleic acids, and the assay of telomerase activity are accomplished by monitoring the magnetically induced deflection of a cantilever functionalized with magnetic beads associated with the biosensing interface. The analyzed M13phi DNA hybridized with the nucleic acid-functionalized magnetic beads is replicated in the presence of dNTPs that include biotin-labeled dUTP. The resulting beads are attached to an avidin-coated cantilever, and the modified cantilever is deflected by an external magnetic field. Similarly, telomerization of nucleic acid-modified magnetic beads in the presence of dNTPs, biotin-labeled dUTP, and telomerase from cancer cell extracts and the subsequent association of the magnetic beads to the cantilever surface results in the lever deflection by an external magnetic field. M13phi DNA is sensed with a sensitivity limit of 7.1 x 10(-20) M by the magneto-mechanical detection method.

Telomerase activity, Ki-67, cyclin D1 and A expression, and apoptosis in solitary fibrous tumors: additional features of a predictable course?

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are infrequent soft tissue neoplasms which are usually benign and surgically curable. However, their behavior is not always predictable, although several clinical and pathological criteria of malignancy have been established. In many cancers, including some soft tissue tumors, telomerase activity (TA) has been shown to be a new reliable pathological marker of malignancy. Overexpression of some cyclins is associated with higher degrees of malignancy and predictive of the clinical course. In this study, we evaluated TA, mitotic and apoptotic indices (MI, AI), and the expression of Ki-67, cyclins D1 and A in five typical and two clinicopathologically atypical SFTs, the latter two of which had also recurred. High TA was demonstrated in the two atypical cases, which also showed a higher labeling index to Ki-67, as well as higher cyclin D1 and A expression, and either none or very few apoptoses. We suggest that TA, Ki-67, cyclin expression, and AI be evaluated in SFTs as possible adjunctive pathological criteria of behavior.

Gene expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions

Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.

Absence of telomerase activity and telemorase catalytic subunit mRNA in melanocyte cultures

The classic model of activation of telomerase, for which activity has been found in most cancers including cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), dictates that enzyme activity is generated by pathological reactivation of telomerase in telomerase-negative somatic cells. However, recent data demonstrated physiological up-regulation in some normal cell types when established as proliferating cultures, indicating that, in some cancer types, telomerase is expressed by the process of up-regulation in telomerase-competent precursor cells. In this study, cultures of epidermal melanocytes, progenitor cells of CMM, were established and harvested in the logarithmic phase of growth. Telomerase activity was looked for using a non-isotopic variant of the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, and transcript expression of the hTERT gene, the rate-limiting catalytic telomerase subunit, was investigated by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Neither telomerase activity nor hTERT mRNA could be detected in proliferating melanocyte cultures. Our in vitro data argue against the model of telomerase as a common biomarker of cell proliferation. The results further suggest that telomerase is tightly controlled in normal melanocytes, and that telomerase is reactivated rather than up-regulated in melanocytic precursors during melanoma initiation or progression.

Expression profile of telomerase subunits in human pleural mesothelioma

Using the TRAP assay, telomerase activity was previously detected in over 90% of human pleural mesotheliomas (MMs), but not in mesothelial cell cultures (MCCs), suggesting that telomerase re-activation occurs during multi-step mesothelioma carcinogenesis. The present study determined the expression of the telomerase RNA template (hTERC), the telomerase-associated protein (hTEP1), and the telomerase catalytic sub-unit (hTERT), in 16 pleural MMs and 4 MM-derived cell lines, in two pleural solitary fibrous tumours and in six MCCs. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that hTERT mRNA expression parallels the activity status documented by the TRAP assay, whereas hTERC and hTEP1 mRNA are commonly expressed in all malignant and non-malignant serosal cells and tissues. Three alternatively spliced hTERT transcripts were detected in all telomerase-positive samples, whereas neither variant could be detected in the MCCs. Detection of the hTERT protein with a commercially available antibody was not successful. These results indicate that hTERT expression is rate-limiting for human telomerase activity and that re-activation, rather than up-regulation, of hTERT expression can play a critical role in MM carcinogenesis. While waiting suitable anti-hTERT antibodies, these results provide information for the design of hTERT mRNA-specific in situ probes to study telomerase in archived pre-malignant serosal lesions.