Positive end-expiratory pressure affects geometry and function of the human diaphragm

Intraoperative phrenic nerve stimulation to prevent diaphragm fiber weakness during thoracic surgery

Thoracic surgery rapidly induces weakness in human diaphragm fibers. The dysfunction is thought to arise from combined effects of the surgical procedures and inactivity. This project tested whether brief bouts of intraoperative hemidiaphragm stimulation would mitigate slow and fast fiber loss of force in the human diaphragm. We reasoned that maintenance of diaphragm activity with brief bouts of intraoperative phrenic stimulation would mitigate diaphragm fiber weakness and myofilament protein derangements caused by thoracic surgery. Nineteen adults (9 females, age 59 ± 12 years) with normal inspiratory strength or spirometry consented to participate. Unilateral phrenic twitch stimulation (twitch duration 1.5 ms, frequency 0.5 Hz, current 2x the motor threshold, max 25 mA) was applied for one minute, every 30 minutes during cardiothoracic surgery. Thirty minutes following the last stimulation bout, biopsies were obtained from the hemidiaphragms for single fiber force mechanics and quantitation of myofilament proteins (abundance and phosphorylation) and compared by a linear mixed model and paired t-test, respectively. Subjects underwent 6 ±  2 hemidiaphragm stimulations at 17 ±  6 mA, during 278 ±  68 minutes of surgery. Longer-duration surgeries were associated with a progressive decline in diaphragm fiber force (p < 0.001). In slow-twitch fibers, phrenic stimulation increased absolute force (+25%, p <  0.0001), cross-sectional area (+16%, p < 0.0001) and specific force (+7%, p < 0.0005). Stimulation did not alter contractile function of fast-twitch fibers, calcium-sensitivity in either fiber type, and abundance and phosphorylation of myofilament proteins. In adults without preoperative weakness or lung dysfunction, unilateral phrenic stimulation mitigated diaphragm slow fiber weakness caused by thoracic surgery, but had no effect on myofilament protein abundance or phosphorylation.

Diaphragmatic ultrasound: approach, emerging evidence, and future perspectives in non-ICU patients

Diaphragmatic dysfunction is an important contributor to hypercapnic respiratory failure, but its presence is often challenging to determine at the bedside. Diaphragm ultrasound provides an opportunity to evaluate the function of the diaphragm noninvasively by evaluating the following parameters that can help define diaphragmatic dysfunction: diaphragm excursion, diaphragm muscle thickness, and thickening fraction. Its evaluation has the potential to assist with diagnosis of respiratory failure, provide prognosis, and assist with patient monitoring and should be considered as part of an internal medicine physician's and emergency physician's skill set. This article provides an overview on how to perform diaphragm ultrasound, review its pitfalls, and discuss the evidence of its use in patients with neuromuscular disorders and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Finally, its potential emerging uses in the perioperative setting and for evaluation of acute heart failure are discussed.

Debate on the Role of Eccentric Contraction of the Diaphragm: Is It Always Harmful?

The diaphragm is the primary muscle involved in the ventilatory pump, making it a vital component in mechanical ventilation. Various factors in patients who require mechanical ventilation can lead to the deterioration of the diaphragm, which is associated with increased mortality. This deterioration can arise from either excessive or insufficient support due to improper adjustment of ventilation programming variables. It is essential for healthcare professionals to make appropriate adjustments to these variables to prevent myotrauma, which negatively impacts muscle structure and function. One recognized cause of muscle injury is eccentric work of the diaphragm, which occurs when muscle contractions continue after the expiratory valve has opened. Current evidence suggests that these eccentric contractions during mechanical ventilation can be harmful. This brief review highlights and analyzes the existing evidence and offers our clinical perspective on the importance of properly adjusting ventilation programming variables, as well as the potential negative effects of eccentric diaphragm contractions in routine clinical practice.

Advances in achieving lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mechanical ventilation may have adverse effects on diaphragm and lung function. Lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation is an approach that challenges the clinician to facilitate physiological respiratory efforts, while maintaining minimal lung stress and strain. Here, we discuss the latest advances in monitoring and interventions to achieve lung- and diaphragm protective ventilation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Noninvasive ventilator maneuvers (P0.1, airway occlusion pressure, pressure-muscle index) can accurately detect low and excessive respiratory efforts and high lung stress. Additional monitoring techniques include esophageal manometry, ultrasound, electrical activity of the diaphragm, and electrical impedance tomography. Recent trials demonstrate that a systematic approach to titrating inspiratory support and sedation facilitates lung- and diaphragm protective ventilation. Titration of positive-end expiratory pressure and, if available, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation sweep gas flow may further modulate neural respiratory drive and effort to facilitate lung- and diaphragm protective ventilation.

SUMMARY

Achieving lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation may require more than a single intervention; it demands a comprehensive understanding of the (neuro)physiology of breathing and mechanical ventilation, along with the application of a series of interventions under close monitoring. We suggest a bedside-approach to achieve lung- and diaphragm protective ventilation targets.

Spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent experimental and clinical studies have suggested that spontaneous effort can potentially injure the lungs. This review summarizes the harmful effects of spontaneous breathing on the lungs during mechanical ventilation in ARDS and suggests potential strategies to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical and experimental studies have shown that vigorous spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation can potentially injure the lungs due to high transpulmonary pressure, the Pendelluft phenomenon, increased pulmonary perfusion, and patient-ventilator asynchrony. A definitive approach to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury is the systemic use of neuromuscular blocking agents; however, there is a risk of muscle atrophy. Alternatively, partial paralysis, bilateral phrenic nerve blockade, and sedatives may be useful for decreasing force generation from the diaphragm while maintaining muscle function. A higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone positioning may reduce force generation from the diaphragm by decreasing neuromechanical efficiency.

SUMMARY

Several potential strategies, including neuromuscular blockade, partial paralysis, phrenic nerve blockade, sedatives, PEEP, and prone positioning, could be useful to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury.

Bedside Assessment of the Respiratory System During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Assessing the respiratory system of a patient receiving mechanical ventilation is complex. We provide an overview of an approach at the bedside underpinned by physiology. We discuss the importance of distinguishing between extensive and intensive ventilatory variables. We outline methods to evaluate both passive patients and those making spontaneous respiratory efforts during assisted ventilation. We believe a comprehensive assessment can influence setting mechanical ventilatory support to achieve lung and diaphragm protective ventilation.

Personalized positive end-expiratory pressure in spontaneously breathing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by simultaneous electrical impedance tomography and transpulmonary pressure monitoring: a randomized crossover trial

PURPOSE

Personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) might foster lung and diaphragm protection in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who are undergoing pressure support ventilation (PSV). We aimed to compare the physiologic effects of personalized PEEP set according to synchronized electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and driving transpulmonary pressure (∆PL) monitoring against a classical lower PEEP/FiO2 table in intubated ARDS patients undergoing PSV.

METHODS

A cross-over randomized multicenter study was conducted in 30 ARDS patients with simultaneous recording of the airway, esophageal and transpulmonary pressure, together with EIT during PSV. Following a decremental PEEP trial (18 cmH2O to 4 cmH2O), PEEPEIT-∆PL was identified as the level with the smallest difference between lung overdistension and collapse. A low PEEP/FiO2 table was used to select PEEPTABLE. Each PEEP strategy was applied for 20 min, and physiologic data were collected at the end of each step.

RESULTS

The PEEP trial was well tolerated. Median PEEPEIT-∆PL was higher than PEEPTABLE (10 [8-12] vs. 8 [5-10] cmH2O; P = 0.021) and, at the individual patient level, PEEPEIT-∆PL level differed from PEEPTABLE in all patients. Overall, PEEPEIT-∆PL was associated with lower dynamic ∆PL (P < 0.001) and pressure-time product (P < 0.001), but there was variability among patients. PEEPEIT-∆PL also decreased respiratory drive and effort (P < 0.001), improved regional lung mechanics (P < 0.05) and reversed lung collapse (P = 0.007) without increasing overdistension (P = 0.695).

CONCLUSION

Personalized PEEP selected using synchronized EIT and transpulmonary pressure monitoring could be associated with reduced dynamic lung stress and metabolic work of breathing in ARDS patients undergoing PSV.

Lung and Diaphragm Protection During Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome often require mechanical ventilation to maintain adequate gas exchange and to reduce the workload of the respiratory muscles. Although lifesaving, positive pressure mechanical ventilation can potentially injure the lungs and diaphragm, further worsening patient outcomes. While the effect of mechanical ventilation on the risk of developing lung injury is widely appreciated, its potentially deleterious effects on the diaphragm have only recently come to be considered by the broader intensive care unit community. Importantly, both ventilator-induced lung injury and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction are associated with worse patient-centered outcomes.

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation reduces diaphragm injury during controlled mechanical ventilation in a preclinical model of ARDS

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require periods of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation, leading to diaphragm dysfunction. Our study seeks to determine whether the combination of temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation (TTDN) and mechanical ventilation changes the degree of diaphragm injury and cytokines concentration in a preclinical ARDS model. Moderate ARDS was induced in pigs using oleic acid, followed by ventilation for 12 h post-injury with volume-control at 8 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, respiratory rate and [Formula: see text] set to achieve normal arterial blood gases. Two groups received TTDN: every second breath (MV + TTDN50%, n = 6) or every breath (MV + TTDN100%, n = 6). One group received ventilation only (MV, n = 6). Full-thickness diaphragm and quadricep muscle biopsies were taken at study end. Samples were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and a point-counting technique was applied to calculate abnormal muscle area fraction. Cytokine concentrations were measured in homogenized tissue using porcine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared with serum samples. Percentage of abnormal diaphragm tissue was different between MV [8.1% (6.0-8.8)] versus MV + TTDN50% [3.4% (2.1-4.8)], P = 0.010 and MV versus MV + TTDN100% [3.1% (2.5-4.0)], P = 0.005. Percentage of abnormal quadriceps tissue was not different between groups. Cytokine concentration patterns in diaphragm samples were different between all groups (P < 0.001) and the interaction between TTDN application and resultant cytokine concentration pattern was significant (P = 0.025). TTDN, delivered in synchrony with mechanical ventilation, mitigated diaphragm injury, as evidenced by less abnormal tissue in the diaphragm samples, in pigs with oleic acid-induced ARDS and is an exciting tool for lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study adds to our understanding of applying transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation synchronously with mechanical ventilation by examining its effects on diaphragm muscle injury and cytokine concentration patterns in pigs with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We observed that using this therapy for 12 h post lung injury mitigated ventilator-induced diaphragm injury and changed the pattern of cytokine concentration measured in diaphragm tissue. These findings suggest that transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation is an exciting tool for lung and diaphragm protective ventilation.

Association of diaphragmatic dysfunction with duration of mechanical ventilation in patients in the pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation (MV) can cause diaphragmatic injury and ventilator induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD). Diaphragm ultrasonography (DU) is increasingly used to assess diaphragmatic anatomy, function and pathology of patients receiving MV in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We report the poor contractile ability of diaphragm during ventilation of critically ill patients in our PICU and the association to prolonged length of MV and PICU stay.

METHODS

Patients who received MV within 24 h of admission to the PICU, expected to undergo continuous MV for more than 48 h and succeeded to extubate were included in the study. DU monitoring was performed daily after the initiation of MV until extubation. Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) measured by DU was used as an indicator of diaphragmatic contractile activity. Patients with bilateral DTF = 0% during DU assessment were allocated into the severe VIDD group (n = 26) and the rest were into non-severe VIDD group (n = 29). The association of severe VIDD with individual length of MV, hospitalization and PICU stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

With daily DU assessment, severe VIDD occurred on 2.9 ± 1.2 days after the initiation of MV, and lasted for 1.9 ± 1.7 days. Values of DTF of all patients recovered to > 10% before extubation. The severe VIDD group had a significantly longer duration (days) of MV [12.0 (8.0-19.3) vs. 5.0 (3.5-7.5), p < 0.001] and PICU stay (days) [30.5 (14.9-44.5) vs. 13.0 (7.0-24.5), p < 0.001]. The occurrence of severe VIDD, first day of severe VIDD and length of severe VIDD were significantly positively associated with the duration of MV and PICU stay. The occurrence of severe VIDD on the second and third days after initiation of MV significantly associated to longer PICU stay (days) [43.0 (9.0-70.0) vs. 13.0 (3.0-40.0), p = 0.009; 36.0 (17.0-208.0) vs. 13.0 (3.0-40.0), p = 0.005, respectively], and the length of MV (days) was significantly longer in those with severe VIDD on the third day after initiation of MV [16.5 (7.0-29.0) vs. 5.0 (2.0-22.0), p = 0.003].

CONCLUSIONS

Daily monitoring of diaphragmatic function with bedside ultrasonography after initiation of MV is necessary in critically ill patients in PICU and the influences and risk factors of severe VIDD need to be further studied. (355 words).

Advanced waveform analysis of diaphragm surface EMG allows for continuous non-invasive assessment of respiratory effort in critically ill patients at different PEEP levels

BACKGROUND

Respiratory effort should be closely monitored in mechanically ventilated ICU patients to avoid both overassistance and underassistance. Surface electromyography of the diaphragm (sEMGdi) offers a continuous and non-invasive modality to assess respiratory effort based on neuromuscular coupling (NMCdi). The sEMGdi derived electrical activity of the diaphragm (sEAdi) is prone to distortion by crosstalk from other muscles including the heart, hindering its widespread use in clinical practice. We developed an advanced analysis as well as quality criteria for sEAdi waveforms and investigated the effects of clinically relevant levels of PEEP on non-invasive NMCdi.

METHODS

NMCdi was derived by dividing end-expiratory occlusion pressure (Pocc) by sEAdi, based on three consecutive Pocc manoeuvres at four incremental (+ 2 cmH2O/step) PEEP levels in stable ICU patients on pressure support ventilation. Pocc and sEAdi quality was assessed by applying a novel, automated advanced signal analysis, based on tolerant and strict cut-off criteria, and excluding inadequate waveforms. The coefficient of variations (CoV) of NMCdi after basic manual and automated advanced quality assessment were evaluated, as well as the effect of an incremental PEEP trial on NMCdi.

RESULTS

593 manoeuvres were obtained from 42 PEEP trials in 17 ICU patients. Waveform exclusion was primarily based on low sEAdi signal-to-noise ratio (Ntolerant = 155, 37%, Nstrict = 241, 51% waveforms excluded), irregular or abrupt cessation of Pocc (Ntolerant = 145, 35%, Nstrict = 145, 31%), and high sEAdi area under the baseline (Ntolerant = 94, 23%, Nstrict = 79, 17%). Strict automated assessment allowed to reduce CoV of NMCdi to 15% from 37% for basic quality assessment. As PEEP was increased, NMCdi decreased significantly by 4.9 percentage point per cmH2O.

CONCLUSION

Advanced signal analysis of both Pocc and sEAdi greatly facilitates automated and well-defined identification of high-quality waveforms. In the critically ill, this approach allowed to demonstrate a dynamic NMCdi (Pocc/sEAdi) decrease upon PEEP increments, emphasising that sEAdi-based assessment of respiratory effort should be related to PEEP dependent diaphragm function. This novel, non-invasive methodology forms an important methodological foundation for more robust, continuous, and comprehensive assessment of respiratory effort at the bedside.

Positive end-expiratory pressure limits inspiratory effort through modulation of the effort-to-drive ratio: an experimental crossover study

BACKGROUND

How assisted spontaneous breathing should be used during acute respiratory distress syndrome is questioned. Recent evidence suggests that high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may limit the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). The aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEEP on esophageal pressure swings, inspiratory drive, and the neuromuscular efficiency of ventilation. We hypothesized that high PEEP would reduce esophageal pressure swings, regardless of inspiratory drive changes, by modulating the effort-to-drive ratio (EDR). This was tested retrospectively in an experimental animal crossover study. Anesthetized pigs (n = 15) were subjected to mild to moderate lung injury and different PEEP levels were applied, changing PEEP from 0 to 15 cmH2O and back to 0 cmH2O in steps of 3 cmH2O. Airway pressure, esophageal pressure (Pes), and electric activity of the diaphragm (Edi) were collected. The EDR was calculated as the tidal change in Pes divided by the tidal change in Edi. Statistical differences were tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Inspiratory esophageal pressure swings decreased from - 4.2 ± 3.1 cmH2O to - 1.9 ± 1.5 cmH2O (p < 0.01), and the mean EDR fell from - 1.12 ± 1.05 cmH2O/µV to - 0.24 ± 0.20 (p < 0.01) as PEEP was increased from 0 to 15 cmH2O. The EDR was significantly correlated to the PEEP level (rs = 0.35, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher PEEP limits inspiratory effort by modulating the EDR of the respiratory system. These findings indicate that PEEP may be used in titration of the spontaneous impact on ventilation and in P-SILI risk reduction, potentially facilitating safe assisted spontaneous breathing. Similarly, ventilation may be shifted from highly spontaneous to predominantly controlled ventilation using PEEP. These findings need to be confirmed in clinical settings.

Setting positive end-expiratory pressure: role in diaphragm-protective ventilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied to improve oxygenation and lung homogeneity. However, PEEP setting has been hypothesized to contribute to critical illness associated diaphragm dysfunction via several mechanisms. Here, we discuss the impact of PEEP on diaphragm function, activity and geometry.

RECENT FINDINGS

PEEP affects diaphragm geometry: it induces a caudal movement of the diaphragm dome and shortening of the zone of apposition. This results in reduced diaphragm neuromechanical efficiency. After prolonged PEEP application, the zone of apposition adapts by reducing muscle fiber length, so-called longitudinal muscle atrophy. When PEEP is withdrawn, for instance during a spontaneous breathing trial, the shortened diaphragm muscle fibers may over-stretch which may lead to (additional) diaphragm myotrauma. Furthermore, PEEP may either increase or decrease respiratory drive and resulting respiratory effort, probably depending on lung recruitability. Finally, the level of PEEP can also influence diaphragm activity in the expiratory phase, which may be an additional mechanism for diaphragm myotrauma.

SUMMARY

Setting PEEP could play an important role in both lung and diaphragm protective ventilation. Both high and low PEEP levels could potentially introduce or exacerbate diaphragm myotrauma. Today, the impact of PEEP setting on diaphragm structure and function is in its infancy, and clinical implications are largely unknown.

Setting positive end-expiratory pressure: lung and diaphragm ultrasound

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the role of lung ultrasound and diaphragm ultrasound in guiding ventilator settings with an emphasis on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Recent advances for using ultrasound to assess the effects of PEEP on the lungs and diaphragm are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lung ultrasound can accurately diagnose the cause of acute respiratory failure, including acute respiratory distress syndrome and can identify focal and nonfocal lung morphology in these patients. This is essential in determining optimal ventilator strategy and PEEP level. Assessment of the effect of PEEP on lung recruitment using lung ultrasound is promising, especially in the perioperative setting. Diaphragm ultrasound can monitor the effects of PEEP on the diaphragm, but this needs further validation. In patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diaphragm ultrasound can be used to predict noninvasive ventilation failure. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound can be used to predict weaning outcome and accurately diagnose the cause of weaning failure.

SUMMARY

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound are useful for diagnosing the cause of respiratory failure and subsequently setting the ventilator including PEEP. Effects of PEEP on lung and diaphragm can be monitored using ultrasound.

Diaphragm excursions as proxy for tidal volume during spontaneous breathing in invasively ventilated ICU patients

There is a need to monitor tidal volume in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure, given its relation with adverse clinical outcome. However, quantification of tidal volume in non-intubated patients is challenging. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated whether ultrasound measurements of diaphragm excursion could be a valid surrogate for tidal volume in patients with respiratory failure. Diaphragm excursions and tidal volumes were simultaneously measured in invasively ventilated patients (N = 21) and healthy volunteers (N = 20). Linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio between tidal volume and diaphragm excursion. The tidal volume-diaphragm excursion ratio was 201 mL/cm in ICU patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 161-240 mL/cm], and 361 (294-428) mL/cm in healthy volunteers. An excellent association was shown within participants (R2 = 0.96 in ICU patients, R2 = 0.90 in healthy volunteers). However, the differences between observed tidal volume and tidal volume as predicted by the linear mixed models were considerable: the 95% limits of agreement in Bland-Altman plots were ± 91 mL in ICU patients and ± 396 mL in healthy volunteers. Likewise, the variability in tidal volume estimation between participants was large. This study shows that diaphragm excursions measured with ultrasound correlate with tidal volume, yet quantification of absolute tidal volume from diaphragm excursion is unreliable.

The Relationship Between Esophageal Pressure and Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Spontaneously Breathing Sedated Children: A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

Diaphragm ultrasound is a novel alternative to esophageal pressure measurements in the evaluation of diaphragm function and activity, but data about its reliability in a pediatric setting are lacking. We aimed to compare the esophageal pressure swing (∆Pes, gold standard) with the diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) as a measure of inspiratory effort in sedated children. Additionally, we studied the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the end-expiratory thickness of the diaphragm (DTee).

DESIGN

Prospective open-label non-randomized interventional physiological cohort study.

SETTING

Operating room in tertiary academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Children 28 days to 13 years old scheduled for elective surgery with general anesthesia, spontaneously breathing through a laryngeal mask airway, were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were disorders or previous surgery of the diaphragm, anticipated difficult airway or acute cardiopulmonary disease. All measurements were performed prior to surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were subjected to different levels of respiratory load, PEEP and anesthetic depth in a total of seven respiratory conditions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The esophageal pressure and diaphragm thickening fraction were simultaneously recorded for five breaths at each respiratory condition. The relation between ∆Pes and DTF was studied in a mixed model. We analyzed 407 breaths in 13 patients. Both DTF (p = 0.03) and ∆Pes (p = 0.002) could detect respiratory activity, and ∆Pes and DTF were associated across respiratory conditions (p < 0.001; R2 = 31%). With increasing inspiratory load, ∆Pes increased significantly, while DTF did not (p = 0.08). Additionally, DTee did not differ significantly between 10, 5, and 0 cm H2O PEEP (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In spontaneously breathing sedated children and across different respiratory conditions, DTF could differentiate minimal or no inspiratory effort from substantial inspiratory effort and was associated with ∆Pes. Increased efforts resulted in higher ∆Pes but not larger DTF.

The Effects of Positive End Expiratory Pressure and Lung Volume on Diaphragm Thickness and Thickening

Introduction: Diaphragm dysfunction is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the varying end-expiratory lung volume cause changes in diaphragm geometry. We aimed to assess the impact of the level of PEEP and lung inflation on diaphragm thickness, thickening fraction and displacement. Methods: An observational study in a mixed medical and surgical ICU was conducted. The patients underwent a PEEP-titration trial with the application of three random levels of PEEP: 0 cmH₂O (PEEP0), 8 cmH₂O (PEEP8) and 15 cmH₂O (PEEP15). At each step, the indices of respiratory effort were assessed, together with arterial blood and diaphragm ultrasound; end-expiratory lung volume was measured. Results: 14 patients were enrolled. The tidal volume, diaphragm displacement and thickening fraction were significantly lower with higher levels of PEEP, while both the expiratory and inspiratory thickness increased with higher PEEP levels. The inspiratory effort, as evaluated by the esophageal pressure swing, was unchanged. Both the diaphragm thickening fraction and displacement were significantly correlated with inspiratory effort in the whole dataset. For both measurements, the correlation was stronger at lower levels of PEEP. The difference in the diaphragm thickening fraction during tidal breathing between PEEP 15 and PEEP 0 was negatively related to the change in the functional residual capacity and the change in alveolar dead space. Conclusions: Different levels of PEEP significantly modified the diaphragmatic thickness and thickening fraction, showing a PEEP-induced decrease in the diaphragm contractile efficiency. When using ultrasound to assess diaphragm size and function, the potential effect of lung inflation should be taken into account.

Performance of Noninvasive Airway Occlusion Maneuvers to Assess Lung Stress and Diaphragm Effort in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Monitoring and controlling lung stress and diaphragm effort has been hypothesized to limit lung injury and diaphragm injury. The occluded inspiratory airway pressure (Pocc) and the airway occlusion pressure at 100 ms (P0.1) have been used as noninvasive methods to assess lung stress and respiratory muscle effort, but comparative performance of these measures and their correlation to diaphragm effort is unknown. The authors hypothesized that Pocc and P0.1 correlate with diaphragm effort and lung stress and would have strong discriminative performance in identifying extremes of lung stress and diaphragm effort.

METHODS

Change in transdiaphragmatic pressure and transpulmonary pressure was obtained with double-balloon nasogastric catheters in critically ill patients (n = 38). Pocc and P0.1 were measured every 1 to 3 h. Correlations between Pocc and P0.1 with change in transdiaphragmatic pressure and transpulmonary pressure were computed from patients from the first cohort. Accuracy of Pocc and P0.1 to identify patients with extremes of lung stress (change in transpulmonary pressure > 20 cm H2O) and diaphragm effort (change in transdiaphragmatic pressure < 3 cm H2O and >12 cm H2O) in the preceding hour was assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curves. Cutoffs were validated in patients from the second cohort (n = 13).

RESULTS

Pocc and P0.1 correlate with change in transpulmonary pressure (R2 = 0.62 and 0.51, respectively) and change in transdiaphragmatic pressure (R2 = 0.53 and 0.22, respectively). Area under receiver operating characteristic curves to detect high lung stress is 0.90 (0.86 to 0.94) for Pocc and 0.88 (0.84 to 0.92) for P0.1. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves to detect low diaphragm effort is 0.97 (0.87 to 1.00) for Pocc and 0.93 (0.81 to 0.99) for P0.1. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves to detect high diaphragm effort is 0.86 (0.81 to 0.91) for Pocc and 0.73 (0.66 to 0.79) for P0.1. Performance was similar in the external dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Pocc and P0.1 correlate with lung stress and diaphragm effort in the preceding hour. Diagnostic performance of Pocc and P0.1 to detect extremes in these parameters is reasonable to excellent. Pocc is more accurate in detecting high diaphragm effort.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Physiological adaptations during weaning from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has an established evidence base in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has seen exponential growth in its use over the past decades. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the approach to weaning, with variation of practice and outcomes between centres. Preconditions for weaning, management of patients' sedation and mechanical ventilation during this phase, criteria defining success or failure, and the optimal duration of a trial prior to decannulation are all debated subjects. Moreover, there is no prospective evidence demonstrating the superiority of weaning the sweep gas flow (SGF), the extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF) or the fraction of oxygen of the SGF (FdO2), thereby a broad inter-centre variability exists in this regard. Accordingly, the aim of this review is to discuss the required physiological basis to interpret different weaning approaches: first, we will outline the physiological changes in blood gases which should be expected from manipulations of ECBF, SGF and FdO2. Subsequently, we will describe the resulting adaptation of patients' control of breathing, with special reference to the effects of weaning on respiratory effort. Finally, we will discuss pertinent elements of the monitoring and mechanical ventilation of passive and spontaneously breathing patients during a weaning trial. Indeed, to avoid lung injury, invasive monitoring is often required in patients making spontaneous effort, as pressures measured at the airway may not reflect the degree of lung strain. In the absence of evidence, our approach to weaning is driven largely by an understanding of physiology.

PEEP application during mechanical ventilation contributes to fibrosis in the diaphragm

BACKGROUND

Positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP) is a potent component of management for patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). However, PEEP may cause the development of diaphragm remodeling, making it difficult for patients to be weaned from MV. The current study aimed to explore the role of PEEP in VIDD.

METHODS

Eighteen adult male New Zealand rabbits were divided into three groups at random: nonventilated animals (the CON group), animals with volume-assist/control mode without/ with PEEP 8 cmH₂O (the MV group/ the MV + PEEP group) for 48 h with mechanical ventilation. Ventilator parameters and diaphragm were collected during the experiment for further analysis.

RESULTS

There was no difference among the three groups in arterial blood gas and the diaphragmatic excursion during the experiment. The tidal volume, respiratory rate and minute ventilation were similar in MV + PEEP group and MV group. Airway peak pressure in MV + PEEP group was significantly higher than that in MV group (p < 0.001), and mechanical power was significantly higher (p < 0.001). RNA-seq showed that genes associated with fibrosis were enriched in the MV + PEEP group. This results were further confirmed on mRNA expression. As shown by Masson's trichrome staining, there was more collagen fiber in the MV + PEEP group than that in the MV group (p = 0.001). Sirius red staining showed more positive staining of total collagen fibers and type I/III fibers in the MV + PEEP group (p = 0.001; p = 0.001). The western blot results also showed upregulation of collagen types 1A1, III, 6A1 and 6A2 in the MV + PEEP group compared to the MV group (p < 0.001, all). Moreover, the positive immunofluorescence of COL III in the MV + PEEP group was more intense (p = 0.003). Furthermore, the expression of TGF-β1, one of the most potent fibrogenic factors, was upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels in the MV + PEEP group (mRNA: p = 0.03; protein: p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that PEEP application for 48 h in mechanically ventilated rabbits will cause collagen deposition and fibrosis in the diaphragm. Moreover, activation of the TGF-β1 signaling pathway and myofibroblast differentiation may be the potential mechanism of this diaphragmatic fibrosis. These findings might provide novel therapeutic targets for PEEP application-induced diaphragm dysfunction.

Positive end-expiratory pressure and prone position alter the capacity of force generation from diaphragm in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an animal experiment

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous breathing potentially injures lungs and diaphragm when spontaneous effort is vigorous in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while immobility also has risks of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) acquired weakness and diaphragm atrophy. Thus, ventilatory strategy to mitigate strong spontaneous effort should be promptly established without a systemic use of neuromuscular blocking agent. Here, we investigated the impacts of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and body position on the capacity of force generation from diaphragm following bilateral phrenic nerve stimulations in a rabbit ARDS model.

METHODS

Using lung-injured rabbits, we measured 1) transdiaphragmatic pressure by bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation and 2) end-expiratory lung volume using computed tomography, under two different levels of PEEP (high, low) and body positions (supine, prone).

RESULTS

Overall, transdiaphragmatic pressure was the highest at low PEEP in supine position and the lowest at high PEEP in prone position. Compared to values in low PEEP + supine, transdiaphragmatic pressure was significantly reduced by either prone alone (the same PEEP) or increasing PEEP alone (the same position) or both combinations. End-expiratory lung volume was significantly increased with increasing PEEP in both positions, but it was not altered by body position.

INTERPRETATION

The capacity of force generation from diaphragm was modulated by PEEP and body position during mechanical ventilation in ARDS. Higher PEEP or prone position per se or both was effective to decrease the force generation from diaphragm.

Anatomical Variation in Diaphragm Thickness Assessed with Ultrasound in Healthy Volunteers

Ultrasonography of the diaphragm in the zone of apposition has become increasingly popular to evaluate muscle thickness and thickening fraction. However, measurements in this anatomical location are frequently hindered by factors that constrain physical accessibility or that alter diaphragm position. Therefore, other anatomical positions at the chest wall for transducer placement are used, but the variability in diaphragm thickness across the dome has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate anatomical variation of diaphragm thickness in 46 healthy volunteers on three ventrodorsal lines and two craniocaudal positions on these three lines. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for diaphragm thickness in the craniocaudal direction on the mid-axillary line was significantly higher than those on the posterior axillary and midclavicular lines, suggesting it had the lowest variability (ICC_midaxillary = .89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.93, ICC_{posterior axillary} = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.85, ICC_{midclavicular} = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.47, p < 0.05). Average diaphragm thickness was comparable on the posterior axillary and midaxillary lines and substantially larger on the midclavicular line (1.24 mm [1.06-1.47], 1.27 mm [1.10-1.42] and 2.32 [1.97-2.70], p < 0.01). We conclude that the normal diaphragm has a large variability in thickness, especially in the ventrodorsal direction. Variability in craniocaudal position is the lowest at the midaxillary line, which therefore appears to be the preferred site for diaphragm thickness measurement.

Methods and Applications in Respiratory Physiology: Respiratory Mechanics, Drive and Muscle Function in Neuromuscular and Chest Wall Disorders

Individuals with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders experience respiratory muscle weakness, reduced lung volume and increases in respiratory elastance and resistance which lead to increase in work of breathing, impaired gas exchange and respiratory pump failure. Recently developed methods to assess respiratory muscle weakness, mechanics and movement supplement traditionally employed spirometry and methods to evaluate gas exchange. These include recording postural change in vital capacity, respiratory pressures (mouth and sniff), electromyography and ultrasound evaluation of diaphragmatic thickness and excursions. In this review, we highlight key aspects of the pathophysiology of these conditions as they impact the patient and describe measures to evaluate respiratory dysfunction. We discuss potential areas of physiologic investigation in the evaluation of respiratory aspects of these disorders.

EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting

Background

Diaphragm ultrasonography is rapidly evolving in both critical care and research. Nevertheless, methodologically robust guidelines on its methodology and acquiring expertise do not, or only partially, exist. Therefore, we set out to provide consensus-based statements towards a universal measurement protocol for diaphragm ultrasonography and establish key areas for research.

Methods

To formulate a robust expert consensus statement, between November 2020 and May 2021, a two-round, anonymous and online survey-based Delphi study among experts in the field was performed. Based on the literature review, the following domains were chosen: “Anatomy and physiology”, “Transducer Settings”, “Ventilator Impact”, “Learning and expertise”, “Daily practice” and “Future directions”. Agreement of ≥ 68% (≥ 10 panelists) was needed to reach consensus on a question.

Results

Of 18 panelists invited, 14 agreed to participate in the survey. After two rounds, the survey included 117 questions of which 42 questions were designed to collect arguments and opinions and 75 questions aimed at reaching consensus. Of these, 46 (61%) consensus was reached. In both rounds, the response rate was 100%. Among others, there was agreement on measuring thickness between the pleura and peritoneum, using > 10% decrease in thickness as cut-off for atrophy and using 40 examinations as minimum training to use diaphragm ultrasonography in clinical practice. In addition, key areas for research were established.

Conclusion

This expert consensus statement presents the first set of consensus-based statements on diaphragm ultrasonography methodology. They serve to ensure high-quality and homogenous measurements in daily clinical practice and in research. In addition, important gaps in current knowledge and thereby key areas for research are established.

Trial registration The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework with registration digital object identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HM8UG.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5.

Lung and diaphragm protective ventilation: a synthesis of recent data

INTRODUCTION

: To adhere to the Hippocratic Oath, to "first, do no harm", we need to make every effort to minimize the adverse effects of mechanical ventilation. Our understanding of the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) has increased in recent years. Research focuses now on methods to monitor lung stress and inhomogeneity and targets we should aim for when setting the ventilator. In parallel, efforts to promote early assisted ventilation to prevent VIDD have revealed new challenges, such as titrating inspiratory effort and synchronizing the mechanical with the patients' spontaneous breaths, while at the same time adhering to lung-protective targets.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review of the key mechanisms contributing to VILI and VIDD and the methods currently available to evaluate and mitigate the risk of lung and diaphragm injury.

EXPERT OPINION

Implementing lung and diaphragm protective ventilation requires individualizing the ventilator settings, and this can only be accomplished by exploiting in everyday clinical practice the tools available to monitor lung stress and inhomogeneity, inspiratory effort, and patient-ventilator interaction.