Counterpoint: Cardiac denervation does not play a major role in exercise limitation after heart transplantation

Heart rate kinetics during standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing in heart transplant recipients: a longitudinal study

AIMS

Heart transplantation (HTx) results in complete autonomic denervation of the donor heart, causing resting tachycardia and abnormal heart rate (HR) responses to exercise. We determined the time course of suggestive cardiac reinnervation post HTx and investigated its clinical significance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Heart rate kinetics during standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 2.5-5 years after HTx was assessed in 58 patients. According to their HR increase 30 s after exercise onset, HTx recipients were classified as denervated (slow responders: <5 beats per minute [b.p.m.]) or potentially reinnervated (fast responders: ≥5 b.p.m.). Additionally, in 30 patients, longitudinal changes of maximal oxygen consumption and HR kinetics were assessed during the first 15 post-operative years. At 2.5-5 years post HTx, 38% of our study population was potentially reinnervated. Fast responders were significantly younger (41 ± 15 years) than slow responders (53 ± 13 years, P = 0.003) but did not differ with regard to donor age, immunosuppressive regime, cardiovascular risk factors, endomyocardial biopsy, or vasculopathy parameters. While HR reserve (56 ± 20 vs. 39 ± 15 b.p.m., P = 0.002) and HR recovery after 60 s (15 ± 11 vs. 5 ± 6 b.p.m., P < 0.001) were greater in fast responders, resting HR, peak HR of predicted, and peak oxygen consumption of predicted were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Signs of reinnervation occurred mainly in younger patients. Maximal oxygen consumption was independent of HR kinetics.

Cardiac reinnervation affects cardiorespiratory adaptations to exercise training in individuals with heart transplantation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory adaptations to exercise in individuals with heart transplantation with evidence of cardiac reinnervation (cardiac reinnervation group) versus without evidence of cardiac reinnervation (no cardiac reinnervation group).

METHODS

Sedentary individuals with heart transplantation (age = 45.5 ± 2.2 years; time elapsed since surgery = 6.7 ± 0.7 years) were divided into the cardiac reinnervation (n = 16) and no cardiac reinnervation (n = 17) groups according to their heart rate response to cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, and cardiorespiratory fitness were assessed before and after 12 weeks of a thrice-weekly exercise program (five minutes of warm-up, 30 min of endurance exercise, one set of 10-15 reps in five resistance exercises, and five minutes of cool-down).

RESULTS

The cardiac reinnervation group had reduced (p < 0.01) 24-hour systolic/diastolic blood pressure (7/9 mm Hg), daytime systolic/diastolic blood pressure (9/10 mm Hg) and nighttime diastolic blood pressure (6 mm Hg) after training. The no cardiac reinnervation group reduced (p < 0.05) only 24-hour (5 mm Hg), daytime (5 mm Hg) and nighttime (6 mm Hg) diastolic blood pressure after training. Hourly analysis showed that the cardiac reinnervation group reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure for 10/21 h, while the no cardiac reinnervation group reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure for only 3/11 h. The cardiac reinnervation group also improved both maximal oxygen consumption (10.8%) and exercise tolerance (13.4%) after training, but the no cardiac reinnervation group improved only exercise tolerance (9.9%). Pulse wave velocity did not change in both groups.

CONCLUSION

There were greater improvements in ambulatory blood pressure and maximal oxygen consumption in the cardiac reinnervation than the no cardiac reinnervation group. These results suggest that cardiac reinnervation associates with hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory adaptations to exercise training in individuals with heart transplantation.

Is the denervation or hyperinnervation of the cardiac sympathetic nerve in the subepicardium related to unexpected cardiac death?

BACKGROUND

Past studies have reported that abnormal innervation of cardiac sympathetic nerve can cause sudden cardiac death through the arrythmogenesis; however, the severe cardiac sympathetic degeneration does not necessarily cause clinical problems. This study aimed to examine whether denervation or hyperinnervation of cardiac sympathetic nerves in the subepicardium is associated with unexpected cardiac death (UCD).

METHODS

Cardiac tissues of 278 forensic autopsy cases within 48 h after death were analyzed by double-staining immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase and neurofilament. The density of nerve fascicles and the degeneration rate in the subepicardium of the left ventricular anterior wall were compared between the UCD group and the non-UCD group.

RESULTS

The density of nerve fascicles was lower in the SCD group (median: 51.9/cm(2)) than in the non-SCD group (median: 58.9/cm(2)); however, the difference was not significant (P = .08). The degeneration rate was higher in the SCD group (median: 0.19) than in the non-SCD group (median: 0.17), but again, the difference was not significant (P = .43). The multiple logistic regression model did not show a significant association between the incidence of UCD and the density of nerve fascicles or the degeneration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

It cannot be concluded that the denervation or hyperinnervation of cardiac sympathetic nerves in the subepicardium is related to UCD. Abnormal innervation of cardiac sympathetic nerves in the subepicardium may not have a substantial effect on UCD, compared to other arrhythmogenic factors.

Exercise limitation following transplantation

Organ transplantation is one of the medical miracles or the 20th century. It has the capacity to substantially improve exercise performance and quality of life in patients who are severely limited with chronic organ failure. We focus on the most commonly performed solid-organ transplants and describe peak exercise performance following recovery from transplantation. Across all of the common transplants, evaluated significant reduction in VO2peak is seen (typically renal and liver 65%-80% with heart and/or lung 50%-60% of predicted). Those with the lowest VO2peak pretransplant have the lowest VO2peak posttransplant. Overall very few patients have a VO2peak in the normal range. Investigation of the cause of the reduction of VO2peak has identified many factors pre- and posttransplant that may contribute. These include organ-specific factors in the otherwise well-functioning allograft (e.g., chronotropic incompetence in heart transplantation) as well as allograft dysfunction itself (e.g., chronic lung allograft dysfunction). However, looking across all transplants, a pattern emerges. A low muscle mass with qualitative change in large exercising skeletal muscle groups is seen pretransplant. Many factor posttransplant aggravate these changes or prevent them recovering, especially calcineurin antagonist drugs which are key immunosuppressing agents. This results in the reduction of VO2peak despite restoration of near normal function of the initially failing organ system. As such organ transplantation has provided an experiment of nature that has focused our attention on an important confounder of chronic organ failure-skeletal muscle dysfunction.

L-arginine supplementation improves exercise capacity after a heart transplant

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction is associated with the decreased exercise capacity observed in heart-transplant (HTx) recipients. L-arginine supplementation (LAS) stimulates the nitric oxide (NO) pathway and restores endothelial function.

OBJECTIVE

We compared exercise capacity in healthy subjects and HTx patients and investigated whether chronic LAS might improve exercise capacity and NO/endothelin balance after an HTx.

DESIGN

Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise characteristics were measured in 11 control subjects and 22 HTx recipients. In a prospective, double-blind study, the 22 HTx recipients performed a 6-min exercise [6-min-walk test (6MWT)] and a maximal bicycle exercise test before and after a 6-wk period of placebo intake or LAS. Endothelial function was measured by analyzing blood NO metabolites, endothelin, and the resulting NO/endothelin balance.

RESULTS

Exercise capacity decreased after transplantation. Unlike with the placebo intake, 6 wk of LAS improved quality of life in HTx recipients (mean +/- SEM Minnesota Score: from 15.3 +/- 1.3 to 10.6 +/- 1.1; P < 0.001) and their submaximal exercise capacity. The distance walked during the 6MWT increased (from 525 +/- 20 to 580 +/- 20 m; P = 0.002), and the ventilatory threshold during the incremental test was delayed by 1.2 min (P = 0.01). Central factors such as resting stroke volume, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, cardiac systolodiastolic functions, and heart-rate reserve were not modified, but LAS significantly increased the NO:endothelin ratio (from 2.49 +/- 0.38 to 3.31 +/- 0.39; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Oral LAS may be a useful adjuvant therapeutic to improve quality of life and exercise tolerance in HTx recipients.