1
|
Generaal JD, Jansen MR, van Leeuwen GL, van Ginkel RJ, Been LB, van Leeuwen BL. Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03755-4. [PMID: 39259455 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03755-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE As the importance of the patient's perspective on treatment outcome is becoming increasingly clear, the availability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has grown accordingly. There remains insufficient information regarding the quality of PROMs in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to identify all PROMs used in STS patients and (2) to critically appraise the methodological quality of these PROMs. METHODS Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase on April 22, 2024. PROMs were identified by including all studies that evaluate (an aspect of) health-related quality of life in STS patients by using a PROM. Second, studies that assessed measurement properties of the PROMs utilized in STS patients were included. Quality of PROMs was evaluated by performing a COSMIN analysis. RESULTS In 59 studies, 39 PROMs were identified, with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) being the most frequently utilized. Three studies evaluated methodological quality of PROMs in the STS population. Measurement properties of the TESS, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were reported. None of the PROMs utilized in the STS population can be recommended for use based on the current evidence and COSMIN analysis. CONCLUSION To ensure collection of reliable outcomes, PROMs require methodological evaluation prior to utilization in the STS population. Research should prioritize on determining relevant content and subsequently selecting the most suitable PROM for assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmijn D Generaal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marnix R Jansen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Goudje L van Leeuwen
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J van Ginkel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas B Been
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Church AJ, Wakefield CE, Hetherington K, Shern JF. Promise and Perils of Precision Oncology for Patients With Pediatric and Young Adult Sarcomas. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e432794. [PMID: 38924707 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_432794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
The completion of multiple national pediatric precision oncology platform trials and the incorporation of standardized molecular profiling into the diagnostic care of pediatric and young adult patients with sarcomas have proven the feasibility and potential of the approach. In this work, we explore the current state of the art of precision oncology for pediatric and young adults with sarcoma. We highlight important lessons learned and the challenges that should be addressed in the next generation of trials. The chapter outlines current efforts to improve standardization of molecular assays, harmonization of data collection, and novel molecular tools such as cell-free DNA analyses. Finally, we discuss the impacts and psychosocial outcomes experienced by patients and communication strategies for providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alanna J Church
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jack F Shern
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakamura N, Hasebe S, Yamanaka S, Fujii T, Fujibuchi T, Kitani T, Takeuchi K, Sato Y, Shindo Y, Ozaki T, Nishisho T, Tabata M, Yakushijin Y. Treatments and prognostic factors for bone and soft tissue sarcoma in non-urban areas in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:345-353. [PMID: 38155238 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02453-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although bone and soft tissue sarcoma is recognized as a rare cancer that originates throughout the body, few comprehensive reports regarding it have been published in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS Bone and soft tissue sarcomas were tabulated from the Cancer Registries at eight university hospitals in the Chugoku-Shikoku region. Prognostic factors in cases were extracted in a single facility and have been analyzed. RESULTS From 2016 to 2019, 3.4 patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas per a general population of 100,000 were treated at eight university hospitals. The number of patients who underwent multidisciplinary treatment involving collaboration among multiple clinical departments has been increasing recently. In the analysis carried out at a single institute (Ehime University Hospital), a total of 127 patients (male/female: 54/73) with an average age of 67.0 y (median 69.5) were treated for four years, with a 5-year survival rate of 55.0%. In the analysis of prognostic factors by multivariate, disease stage and its relative treatment, renal function (creatinine), and a patient's ability of self-judgment, and a patient's mobility and physical capability were associated with patient prognosis regarding bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Interestingly, age did not affect the patient's prognosis (> 70 vs ≦ 70). CONCLUSIONS Physical and social factors may affect the prognosis of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas, especially those living in non-urban areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuko Nakamura
- Medical Student, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Shinji Hasebe
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
- Cancer Center, Ehime University Hospital, Toon-City, Ehime, Japan
| | - Shintaro Yamanaka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
- Cancer Center, Ehime University Hospital, Toon-City, Ehime, Japan
| | - Tomomi Fujii
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Taketsugu Fujibuchi
- Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, Japan
| | - Teruki Kitani
- Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, Japan
| | - Kazuto Takeuchi
- Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ehime Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Tobe, Japan
| | - Yasushi Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima-City, Tokushima, Japan
- The Working Group of Rare Cancers, Chugoku-Shikoku Cancer Professional Consortium, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube-City, Yamaguchi, Japan
- The Working Group of Rare Cancers, Chugoku-Shikoku Cancer Professional Consortium, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Ozaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
- The Working Group of Rare Cancers, Chugoku-Shikoku Cancer Professional Consortium, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Nishisho
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima-City, Tokushima, Japan
- The Working Group of Rare Cancers, Chugoku-Shikoku Cancer Professional Consortium, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tabata
- Center for Clinical Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
- The Working Group of Rare Cancers, Chugoku-Shikoku Cancer Professional Consortium, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Yakushijin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon-City, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
- Cancer Center, Ehime University Hospital, Toon-City, Ehime, Japan.
- The Working Group of Rare Cancers, Chugoku-Shikoku Cancer Professional Consortium, Okayama-City, Okayama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee-Miller C, Montgomery KE, Evered J, Phelps K, Norslien K, Parkes A, Kwekkeboom K. A Midwest Stakeholder Evaluation of an Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivor Needs Assessment Survey. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:123-131. [PMID: 37581596 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Over 87,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are diagnosed with cancer in the United States each year. Improvement in outcomes in the AYA population has lagged that of both younger and older patients. This decrement may be attributable to several factors, including insufficient supportive care services. Our team modified the Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB) tool, utilizing an iterative approach with patient and clinician stakeholders to meet the needs of the AYA population at a large Midwestern Cancer Center. Methods: We recruited a 10-member AYA Advisory Board (AB) from our Cancer Center patients, and met five times over 9 months to discuss supportive care and the NA-SB. We recruited a multidisciplinary group of oncology clinicians to assess content validity and conducted interviews with nine clinician stakeholders to discuss implementation. Results: The AB generated a 59-item-modified NA-SB, retaining most of the original NA-SB items and adding several more. Five items with concerns for relevance and/or clarity were revised to create the final 58-item-modified NA-SB. Priorities for implementation were identified by AB and clinician stakeholders. Conclusions: The modified NA-SB thoroughly reflects supportive care needs of our Midwestern AYA cancer survivors. When implemented, the tool may facilitate patient-care team communication and provide data to prioritize development of new supportive care resources. AYA cancer survivors have unique supportive care needs that are insufficiently addressed by current care models; using the modified NA-SB may help address those needs, leading to improved AYA outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Lee-Miller
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Jane Evered
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kat Phelps
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Amanda Parkes
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Košir U, van de Wal D, Husson O, Zablith N, Turcotte RE. Patient-physician agreement on function and pain is associated with long-term outcomes in sarcoma: findings from a longitudinal study. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01473-3. [PMID: 37847463 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01473-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to describe the level of agreement between patients and physicians on the ratings of daily functioning and pain in a cohort of sarcoma patients and assess how (dis)agreement and its change over time predicted patient-reported outcomes in survivorship. METHOD We performed secondary analysis of longitudinal data from a sarcoma-specialty clinic in Montreal, Canada. Demographics, clinical characteristics and patient-physician agreement were summarized descriptively. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of time, baseline agreement, change in agreement over time, interaction of time and change in agreement and 12-month daily functioning, quality of life, and fatigue. RESULTS Data were available for 806 patients (57.7% male, x̄ = 53.3 years) who completed at least one questionnaire. Patient-physician disagreement was common on the level of function (43.4%) and pain (45.7%). Baseline physician-patient agreement was associated with better 12-month outcomes. Improvement in agreement on function over time was significantly associated with daily functioning (F(2, 212) = 3.18, p = 0.043) and quality of life (F(2, 212) = 3.17, p < 0.044). The pattern was similar though less pronounced for the agreement on pain. CONCLUSIONS Our study offers novel insights into the importance of patient-physician agreement and communication's role in long-term patient-reported outcomes in sarcoma. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The results emphasize the importance of mutual understanding of symptoms and patients' needs and suggest that further consultation in cases of discordance of ratings and opinions might be beneficial for optimal survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urška Košir
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Deborah van de Wal
- Medical Oncology Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Medical Oncology Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine Zablith
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Robert E Turcotte
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Digklia A, Dolcan A, Kucharczyk MA, Jones RL, Napolitano A. Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care Following Treatment for Adults Treated for Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:537-545. [PMID: 37351338 PMCID: PMC10284160 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s362693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare, highly malignant sarcoma. It usually presents in the second decade of life; however, patients can be diagnosed as early as newborns and as late as in their seventies. ES is most frequently found in the long bones of the extremities and the pelvis. In older patients, ES can also arise in the soft tissues. Currently, there is no standard schedule for surveillance of adult patients with ES after their initial treatment for localised disease, not only for the early detection of recurrence but also for long-term side effects. Follow-up is based on group recommendations using extrapolated data obtained primarily from studies with paediatric patients. The main objective of this review is to summarise the data available on treatment-associated complications in long-term survivors. Furthermore, we provide a set of recommendations for optimising the follow-up of adults ES survivors, as well as for managing the sequelae that result from intensive multimodal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Digklia
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
| | - Ana Dolcan
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
| | | | - Robin L Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Andrea Napolitano
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tóth L, Krieg AH, Nowakowski AM. How much is a leg worth following radical tumor resection in bone sarcomas? Literature review. Surg Oncol 2023; 46:101900. [PMID: 36577174 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Bone sarcomas of the lower extremities are rare malignancies occurring mostly amongst adolescents and young adults. Necessarily, the therapy conducted in sarcoma centers is multimodal and multidisciplinary. In certain cases, in a metastasis free situation with adequate therapy, an overall survival rate of 90% can be achieved. Two principal surgical procedures exit for the local control of the malignancy: 1. Limb salvage with biological with/or endoprosthetic reconstruction; and, 2. amputation with restoration of the function with exoprosthesis or endo-exoprosthesis. Currently, limb salvage procedures are performed in up to 95% of cases. In contrast, amputation is performed when the disease has reached an advanced stage or limb salvage has failed. Both of the surgical options have their risks and possible complications. According to the literature, there should be no significant difference between limb salvage and amputation with respect to long-term overall survival, overall quality of life, psycho-socio-economic outcomes, or patient satisfaction. An important advantage of limb salvage is greater everyday functionality. With the expanded indication of limb salvage and great survival rates, the cases of late complications in patients expecting to maintain their own leg continues to increase. In some cases, it requires multiple interventions, ranging from minor up to the most complex revisions, to maintain the functionality of the extremity. Despite the great costs, personal effort, and the possible complications, limb salvage could be a suitable method to achieve functionally beneficial outcomes and patient satisfaction in bone sarcomas of the lower extremities over the long-term even in cases involving complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- László Tóth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland
| | - Andreas H Krieg
- Orthopaedic Department, University Children's Hospital (UKBB), 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andrej M Nowakowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Medical Faculty, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andreou D. CORR Insights®: What Proportion of Patients With Musculoskeletal Sarcomas Demonstrate Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:2161-2162. [PMID: 35969538 PMCID: PMC9555940 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dimosthenis Andreou
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eichler M, Hentschel L, Singer S, Hornemann B, Hohenberger P, Kasper B, Andreou D, Pink D, Jakob J, Arndt K, Kirchberg J, Richter S, Bornhäuser M, Schmitt J, Schuler MK. Distress in soft-tissue sarcoma and GIST patients -Results of a German multicentre observational study (PROSa). Psychooncology 2022; 31:1700-1710. [PMID: 35949152 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are a group of rare malignant tumours with a high and heterogenous disease burden. As evidence is lacking, we aimed to determine the prevalence of increased emotional distress and to identify associated factors in these patients. METHODS The PROSa-study (Burden and medical care of sarcoma) was conducted between 2017 and 2020 in 39 study centres. Cross-sectional data from adult STS and GIST patients were analysed. Distress was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4). The relation of socioeconomic and clinical factors with distress was explored in adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS Among 897 patients, prevalence of elevated anxiety and depression was 17% resp. 19%. Unemployed patients (odds ratio (OR) 6.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-15.0)) and those with a disability pension (OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.9-5.0)) were more likely to experience distress (vs. employed patients). Patients with a disability pass (vs. none) had higher odds of increased distress (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.7)). Lowest distress was observed in patients 2-<5 years and ≥5 years after diagnosis (comparison: <6 months) (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.6) and 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.6)). Patients with thoracic STS (vs. lower limbs) had twice the odds to experience distress (OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.1-3.6)). Distress was seen almost twice as often in patients with progressive disease (vs. complete remission) (OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1-2.8)). CONCLUSION Prevalence of elevated distress in STS and GIST patients is high. Unemployed patients, those with a disability pension and newly diagnosed patients are more often distressed than other patients. Clinicians and psycho-oncologists should be aware of these factors and consider the social aspects of the disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Eichler
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Sarcoma Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leopold Hentschel
- Sarcoma Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Sarcoma Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hohenberger
- Division of Surgical Oncology & Thoracic Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Kasper
- Sarcoma Unit, Mannheim Cancer Center, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dimosthenis Andreou
- Department of General Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
- Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine C, University Hospital Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jens Jakob
- Clinic for General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Karin Arndt
- German Sarcoma Foundation, Woelfersheim, Germany
| | - Johanna Kirchberg
- Sarcoma Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Richter
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bornhäuser
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Sarcoma Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Sarcoma Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus K Schuler
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
den Hollander D, Lidington E, Singer S, Sodergren SC, Salah S, Fiore M, Benson C, Desar IME, Burgers VWG, Husson O, van der Graaf WTA. 'I thought I had fibroids, and now I don't': a mixed method study on health-related quality of life in uterine sarcoma patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:65. [PMID: 35443673 PMCID: PMC9020416 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-01971-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uterine sarcomas are rare subtypes of primary urogenital tumours and need tailored treatment. This study aimed to examine the impact of diagnosis and treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with uterine sarcoma and measures available to assess HRQoL in this group. Methods Thirteen patients with uterine sarcoma and 23 health care professionals were purposively sampled from sarcoma reference centers and participated in a semi-structured interview exploring HRQoL. Patients were also asked to review the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-EN24 for relevance. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results The most commonly reported physical health issues were related to sexual dysfunction and urological symptoms. Hormone-related issues and gastrointestinal symptoms were also identified. Cancer-generic issues such as functional problems, fatigue, pain, and treatment-related adverse effects were also reported. Regarding mental health, fears (about having sex, of recurrence, or of death), altered body-image, and dealing with lacking knowledge regarding sarcoma had an impact on HRQoL. Social health issues were related to the impact on relationships with others, limitations in undertaking activities, loss of independence, changes in work or study capacity, and financial difficulties. Most of the items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-EN24 questionnaires were rated as relevant. Questions about lack of knowledge about sarcoma, shock of diagnosis, and menopausal symptoms were lacking from existing measures. Conclusions Uterine sarcoma patients experience a variety of concerns covering the physical, mental, and social domains of HRQoL that are in the main EORTC instruments, but not all of them. Combining cancer-generic, location- and sarcoma-specific items is recommended to assess HRQoL in this patient group. Trial registration NCT04071704. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-01971-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dide den Hollander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Lidington
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,University Cancer Centre Mainz (UCT), University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Samer Salah
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Marco Fiore
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Charlotte Benson
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Vivian W G Burgers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beghean R, Coffey L. "You either sink or you swim, and you're better off swimming": A qualitative study exploring the self-management experiences of soft tissue sarcoma survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 55:102062. [PMID: 34775165 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To qualitatively explore the consequences of soft tissue sarcoma and its treatment experienced by survivors, the self-management strategies they use to deal with these consequences, and any factors that may act as barriers or facilitators to their self-management. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven soft tissue sarcoma survivors who had completed their primary treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS Physical, psychological and social consequences of soft tissue sarcoma and its treatment were identified, with side-effects, physical restrictions, body image issues, fear of recurrence, feeling depressed, familial relationships and sexual activity being the most frequently reported. Nine different types of self-management strategy encompassing eighteen specific strategies were identified, including cognitive strategies, lifestyle changes and utilisation of resources. Personal, social and environmental facilitators of self-management were identified; being in a relationship, being at an appropriate life stage, and having support from family, friends and medical staff were most commonly reported. Finally, personal and environmental barriers to self-management included the adaptation period, ongoing complications, rareness of sarcoma and poor patient-healthcare provider communication. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that soft tissue sarcoma survivors, especially those who are younger and experience physical limitations, may find the immediate post-treatment period particularly challenging and may benefit from nurse-led self-management support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahela Beghean
- Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
| | - Laura Coffey
- Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Taylor RM, Fern LA, Barber J, Gibson F, Lea S, Patel N, Morris S, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower R, Hooker L, Martins A, Stark D, Raine R, Whelan JS. Specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England: BRIGHTLIGHT research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
When cancer occurs in teenagers and young adults, the impact is far beyond the physical disease and treatment burden. The effect on psychological, social, educational and other normal development can be profound. In addition, outcomes including improvements in survival and participation in clinical trials are poorer than in younger children and older adults with similar cancers. These unique circumstances have driven the development of care models specifically for teenagers and young adults with cancer, often focused on a dedicated purpose-designed patient environments supported by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the needs of teenagers and young adults. In England, this is commissioned by NHS England and delivered through 13 principal treatment centres. There is a lack of evaluation that identifies the key components of specialist care for teenagers and young adults, and any improvement in outcomes and costs associated with it.
Objective
To determine whether or not specialist services for teenagers and young adults with cancer add value.
Design
A series of multiple-methods studies centred on a prospective longitudinal cohort of teenagers and young adults who were newly diagnosed with cancer.
Settings
Multiple settings, including an international Delphi study of health-care professionals, qualitative observation in specialist services for teenagers and young adults, and NHS trusts.
Participants
A total of 158 international teenage and young adult experts, 42 health-care professionals from across England, 1143 teenagers and young adults, and 518 caregivers.
Main outcome measures
The main outcomes were specific to each project: key areas of competence for the Delphi survey; culture of teenagers and young adults care in the case study; and unmet needs from the caregiver survey. The primary outcome for the cohort participants was quality of life and the cost to the NHS and patients in the health economic evaluation.
Data sources
Multiple sources were used, including responses from health-care professionals through a Delphi survey and face-to-face interviews, interview data from teenagers and young adults, the BRIGHTLIGHT survey to collect patient-reported data, patient-completed cost records, hospital clinical records, routinely collected NHS data and responses from primary caregivers.
Results
Competencies associated with specialist care for teenagers and young adults were identified from a Delphi study. The key to developing a culture of teenage and young adult care was time and commitment. An exposure variable, the teenagers and young adults Cancer Specialism Scale, was derived, allowing categorisation of patients to three groups, which were defined by the time spent in a principal treatment centre: SOME (some care in a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults, and the rest of their care in either a children’s or an adult cancer unit), ALL (all care in a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults) or NONE (no care in a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults). The cohort study showed that the NONE group was associated with superior quality of life, survival and health status from 6 months to 3 years after diagnosis. The ALL group was associated with faster rates of quality-of-life improvement from 6 months to 3 years after diagnosis. The SOME group was associated with poorer quality of life and slower improvement in quality of life over time. Economic analysis revealed that NHS costs and travel costs were similar between the NONE and ALL groups. The ALL group had greater out-of-pocket expenses, and the SOME group was associated with greater NHS costs and greater expense for patients. However, if caregivers had access to a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults (i.e. in the ALL or SOME groups), then they had fewer unmet support and information needs.
Limitations
Our definition of exposure to specialist care using Hospital Episode Statistics-determined time spent in hospital was insufficient to capture the detail of episodes or account for the variation in specialist services. Quality of life was measured first at 6 months, but an earlier measure may have shown different baselines.
Conclusions
We could not determine the added value of specialist cancer care for teenagers and young adults as defined using the teenage and young adult Cancer Specialism Scale and using quality of life as a primary end point. A group of patients (i.e. those defined as the SOME group) appeared to be less advantaged across a range of outcomes. There was variation in the extent to which principal treatment centres for teenagers and young adults were established, and the case study indicated that the culture of teenagers and young adults care required time to develop and embed. It will therefore be important to establish whether or not the evolution in services since 2012–14, when the cohort was recruited, improves quality of life and other patient-reported and clinical outcomes.
Future work
A determination of whether or not the SOME group has similar or improved quality of life and other patient-reported and clinical outcomes in current teenage and young adult service delivery is essential if principal treatment centres for teenagers and young adults are being commissioned to provide ‘joint care’ models with other providers.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children’s Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Lea
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishma Patel
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Richard Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Hooker
- Wessex Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ana Martins
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dan Stark
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tsagkaris C, Desse D, Laskaratou ED. Mental health sequelae of bone cancer: A narrative review. Ment Health (Lond) 2021. [DOI: 10.32437/mhgcj.v4i1.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Bone cancer causes a significant mental health burden. Although the mental health implications of cancer as a whole have been widely discussed, there is limited evidence regarding the psychiatric and psychological sequelae of malignant and benign bone neoplasms in particular.
Purpose: To summarize the scientific literature, present relevant knowledge gaps and discuss a number of recommendations. Methodology: The authors searched Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar with keywords (mental health, bone cancer, musculoskeletal neoplasms, psychiatric comorbidities). When appropriate, MeSH terms and Boolean operators were used. Relevant peer reviewed studies published in English, French or German until 05 May 2021 were included.
Results and Discussion: Loss of mobility, decrease of physical activity, chronic pain and amputations in combination with patient’s previous psychiatric history, socioeconomic conditions, cancer biology and treatment-related side effects undermine the mental wellbeing of patients and carers. Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has posed an additional burden, which is yet to be comprehensively evaluated.
Conclusion: More research and solid action towards the integration of mental health care into the management of bone cancer is crucial
Collapse
|
14
|
Moon TM, Furdock R, Rhea L, Pergolotti M, Cipriano C, Spraker MB. PROMIS scores of patients undergoing neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiation therapy for surgically excised soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:42-49. [PMID: 34622039 PMCID: PMC8479243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
First to evaluate PROMIS for patients undergoing radiotherapy and surgery for sarcoma. Patients exhibited meaningful change in PROMIS scores throughout the treatment. Analyses show PROMIS scores were similar between pre- and post-operative radiotherapy. Wound complications were associated with increases in anxiety and decreases in function. These data should be considered when selecting ideal therapy.
Introduction Few recent studies have examined patient reported outcomes (PROs) during pre- or post-operative radiation therapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and none have used PROMIS. This study aims to examine PROMIS scores across peri-operative time points for patients receiving pre- or post-operative RT. Methods Anxiety, depression, pain interference, and physical function PROMIS domains were collected at the pre-operative (1), immediate post-operative (2), and post-treatment completion (3) timepoints for patients undergoing surgery and either pre-operative or post-operative RT. Median scores were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The reliable change index was used to determine minimum important change in PROMIS scores and to compare scores between timepoints. Results 95 patients were included (19 pre-operative, 76 post-operative). Both groups had significant decreases in function during treatment. Patients with wound complications were more likely to have significant increases in anxiety (36.4% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.020) and decreases in physical function (57.1% vs. 16.2%; p = 0.011) independent of RT timing. Conclusions This study demonstrates minimum significant change thresholds to detect PROMIS changes in STS patients undergoing pre- and post-operative radiotherapy. As expected, more patients with pre-operative RT than post-operative RT had wound complications (p = 0.06), but patients with complications in both groups had worse anxiety and function at the completion of treatment compared with those that did not. The association of wound complications with worse anxiety and physical function at completion of treatment should be considered when making individualized treatment recommendations regarding the timing of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Moon
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - R Furdock
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - L Rhea
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - M Pergolotti
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation Program, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, United States.,Department of Occupational Therapy, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - C Cipriano
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - M B Spraker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
den Hollander D, Van der Graaf WTA, Fiore M, Kasper B, Singer S, Desar IME, Husson O. Unravelling the heterogeneity of soft tissue and bone sarcoma patients' health-related quality of life: a systematic literature review with focus on tumour location. ESMO Open 2021; 5:e000914. [PMID: 33082266 PMCID: PMC7577059 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with sarcoma experience many physical and psychological symptoms, adversely affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL assessment is challenging due to the diversity of the disease. This review aims to unravel the heterogeneity of HRQoL of patients with sarcoma with regard to tumour location and to summarise the used measures in research. English-language literature from four databases published between January 2000 and April 2019 was reviewed. Studies that described adult sarcoma HRQoL outcomes were included and classified according to primary sarcoma location. Eighty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria covering sarcoma of the extremities (n=35), pelvis and axial skeleton (n=9), pelvis and extremities (n=5), head and neck (n=4), retroperitoneum (n=2) and multiple sarcoma locations (n=33), respectively. Urogenital and thoracic sarcoma were lacking. Fifty-four different questionnaires were used, most often cancer-generic or generic HRQoL questionnaires. Patients with sarcoma reported lower HRQoL than the general population. Distinctive patterns of HRQoL outcomes according to tumour location regarding symptoms, physical functioning, disability and psychosocial well-being were identified. In metastatic sarcoma, mostly constitutional symptoms were present. To comprehensively assess HRQoL, a sarcoma-specific measurement strategy should be developed and used covering the heterogeneity of sarcoma including location-specific issues to improve personalised HRQoL assessment in future research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dide den Hollander
- Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Winette T A Van der Graaf
- Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Fiore
- Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Bernd Kasper
- Sarcoma Unit, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Namin S, Zhou Y, Neuner J, Beyer K. Neighborhood Characteristics and Cancer Survivorship: An Overview of the Current Literature on Neighborhood Landscapes and Cancer Care. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:7192. [PMID: 34281129 PMCID: PMC8297243 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing literature on the association between neighborhood contexts and cancer survivorship. To understand the current trends and the gaps in the literature, we aimed to answer the following questions: To what degree, and how, has cancer survivorship research accounted for neighborhood-level effects? What neighborhood metrics have been used to operationalize neighborhood factors? To what degree do the neighborhood level metrics considered in cancer research reflect neighborhood development as identified in the Leadership for Energy and Environmental Design for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND) guidelines? We first conducted a review guided by PRISMA extension for scoping review of the extant literature on neighborhood effects and cancer survivorship outcomes from January 2000 to January 2021. Second, we categorized the studied neighborhood metrics under six main themes. Third, we assessed the findings based on the LEED-ND guidelines to identify the most relevant neighborhood metrics in association with areas of focus in cancer survivorship care and research. The search results were scoped to 291 relevant peer-reviewed journal articles. Results show that survivorship disparities, primary care, and weight management are the main themes in the literature. Additionally, most articles rely on neighborhood SES as the primary (or only) examined neighborhood level metric. We argue that the expansion of interdisciplinary research to include neighborhood metrics endorsed by current paradigms in salutogenic urban design can enhance the understanding of the role of socioecological context in survivorship care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sima Namin
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (Y.Z.); (K.B.)
| | - Yuhong Zhou
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (Y.Z.); (K.B.)
| | - Joan Neuner
- General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (Y.Z.); (K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Its Risk Factors in Patients with Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9050566. [PMID: 34065006 PMCID: PMC8151264 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9050566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Psychological distress is common in patients with soft tissue and bone tumors. We first investigated its frequency and the associated risk factors in patients with pre-operative bone and soft tissue tumors. Participants included 298 patients with bone and soft tissue tumors who underwent surgery in our institution between 2015 and 2020. Psychological distress was evaluated by the Distress and Impact Thermometer (DIT) that consists of two types of questions (questions about the severity of the patient's distress (DIT-D) and its impact (DIT-I)). We used a cut-off point of 4 on the DIT-D and 3 on the DIT-I for screening patients with psychological distress. We therefore investigated: (1) the prevalence of psychological distress as assessed with DIT or distress thermometer (DT), which can be decided by DIT-D ≥ 4, (2) what are the risk factors for the prevalence of psychological distress, and (3) what is the number of patients who consulted a psychiatrist for psychological distress in patients with pre-operative bone and soft tissue tumors. With DIT and DT, we identified 64 patients (21%) and 95 patients (32%), respectively, with psychological distress. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that older age, sex (female), malignancy (malignant or intermediate tumor), a lower Barthel Index, and higher numeric rating scale were risk factors for psychological distress. Two patients (3%) consulted a psychiatrist after surgery. In conclusion, careful attention to psychological distress is needed, especially for female patients, older patients, and those with malignant soft or bone tissue tumors who have more than moderate pain.
Collapse
|
18
|
Pediatric sarcoma survivorship: A call for a developmental cascades approach. Dev Psychopathol 2021; 34:1221-1230. [PMID: 33851573 DOI: 10.1017/s095457942100002x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Survivors of pediatric sarcomas often experience greater psychological and psychosocial difficulties than their non-afflicted peers. We consider findings related to poorer outcomes from a developmental cascade perspective. Specifically, we discuss how physical, neurocognitive, psychological, and psychosocial costs associated with pediatric sarcomas and their treatment function transactionally to degrade well-being in long-term pediatric sarcoma survivors. We situate the sarcoma experience as a broad developmental threat - one stemming from both the presence and treatment of a life-imperiling disease, and the absence of typical childhood experiences. Ways in which degradation in one developmental domain spills over and effects other domains are highlighted. We argue that the aggregate effect of these cascades is two-fold: first, it adds to the typical stress involved in meeting developmental milestones and navigating developmental transitions; and second, it deprives survivors of crucial coping strategies that mitigate these stressors. This position suggests specific moments of intervention and raises specific hypotheses for investigators to explore.
Collapse
|
19
|
McKay GE, Zakas AL, Osman F, Lee-Miller C, Pophali P, Parkes A. Disparities Between Provider Assessment and Documentation of Care Needs in the Care of Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Sarcoma. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e891-e900. [PMID: 33852368 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the occurrence of cancer during a complex developmental time, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients have unique psychosocial needs that necessitate supportive care, which is optimally provided using National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) AYA guidelines. We sought to explore compliance with NCCN AYA guidelines and compare with oncology providers' perceptions of AYA care needs. METHODS Retrospective chart reviews of AYA patients (15-39 years at time of cancer diagnosis) with sarcoma seen at least once in 2019 at the University of Wisconsin identified documentation of discussions deemed critical per NCCN AYA guidelines. As per the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative certification, we considered a threshold of these factors being discussed 75% of the time or higher to be compliant. Compliance was compared with an electronic survey of University of Wisconsin oncology providers regarding AYA patient needs, with items determined to have adequate resources if noted sufficient by at least 75% of providers. RESULTS We identified 43 AYA patients with sarcoma. Less than 75% of patients had documentation of discussion of contraception, sexual health, fertility, finances, genetics, social work referral, and clinical trials indicating noncompliance with NCCN guidelines. Surveys, completed by 38 oncology providers, showed significant discordance between providers' perceptions of AYAs' access to resources and providers' documented discussions of supportive care resources. CONCLUSION Disparities between oncology provider assessment of AYA care needs and documentation of critical components of AYA patient care demonstrate the need for novel tools to evaluate AYA care needs beyond provider assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace E McKay
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Anna L Zakas
- Division of Oncology Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Fauzia Osman
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Cathy Lee-Miller
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Priyanka Pophali
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Amanda Parkes
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Almeida A, Martins T, Lima L. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sarcoma: A scoping review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 50:101897. [PMID: 33476977 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sarcoma is a heterogeneous group of tumours, usually affecting young patients and related to both endogenous and exogenous risk factors. The importance of obtaining the patient's perspective of the illness experience is imperative. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are the outcomes that come directly from the patient. They include symptoms, functional health, well-being, quality of life, psychological issues, among other indicators reported by the patients. The objective of this scoping review was to map the PROs in sarcoma patients and how they are measured. METHODS The review process was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for scoping reviews. RESULTS The search identified 116 potentially relevant studies, with 27 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The most common PRO evaluated in the selected studies were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), followed by functional outcome, aspects of mental health, and specific symptoms. Generic HRQoL questionnaires were widely used. Quantitative studies usually applied more than one type of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to measure different PROs. CONCLUSIONS PROs should be carefully analysed to better understand the sarcoma patient's needs. The PROMs used in the selected studies about sarcoma were not specific to sarcoma, therefore, to better reflect on the perceptions of sarcoma patients, a different new and specific measurement strategy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Almeida
- Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto -(ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal; Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil of Porto (IPO- Porto), Porto, Portugal.
| | - Teresa Martins
- Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto (Nursing School of Porto), Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (NursID: Innovation and Development in Nursing), Porto, Portugal.
| | - Lígia Lima
- Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto (Nursing School of Porto), Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (NursID: Innovation and Development in Nursing), Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kollár A, Müller S, Limacher A, Briner I, Klenke F, Bernhard J. Return to Work and Quality of Life in Disease-Free Adult Patients with Soft-Tissue and Bone Sarcoma of the Extremity. PRAXIS 2021; 110:22-29. [PMID: 33406937 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of extremital sarcoma patients may be associated with significant functional disabilities and psychosocial distress affecting return to work (RtW) and quality of life (QoL). In this exploratory study we prospectively investigated the RtW rate, explored biomedical and psychosocial predictors of RtW, and compared generic QoL with Swiss population norms. Forty people (89 %) returned to work. Full-time employment before sarcoma diagnosis, high educational level, and low tumor grade showed an increased probability of RtW. The median age was lower in patients who returned to work, and they reported less fear of progression. Generic QoL (SF-36) was reduced in almost all dimensions when compared to a normative Swiss population. Physical functioning and fear of progression have to be addressed in the rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attila Kollár
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sabrina Müller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Irene Briner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Frank Klenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Bernhard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
den Hollander D, Fiore M, Martin-Broto J, Kasper B, Casado Herraez A, Kulis D, Nixon I, Sodergren SC, Eichler M, van Houdt WJ, Desar IME, Ray-Coquard I, Piccinin C, Kosela-Paterczyk H, Miah A, Hentschel L, Singer S, Wilson R, van der Graaf WTA, Husson O. Incorporating the Patient Voice in Sarcoma Research: How Can We Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in This Heterogeneous Group of Patients? A Study Protocol. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:1. [PMID: 33561018 PMCID: PMC7792589 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcomas comprise 1% of adult tumors and are very heterogeneous. Long-lasting and cumulative treatment side-effects detract from the (progression-free) survival benefit of treatment. Therefore, it is important to assess treatment effectiveness in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as well. However, questionnaires capturing the unique issues of sarcoma patients are currently lacking. Given the heterogeneity of the disease, the development of such an instrument may be challenging. The study aims to (1) develop an exhaustive list of all HRQoL issues relevant to sarcoma patients and determine content validity; (2) determine a strategy for HRQoL measurement in sarcoma patients. We will conduct an international, multicenter, mixed-methods study (registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04071704) among bone or soft tissue sarcoma patients ≥18 years, using EORTC Quality of Life Group questionnaire development guidelines. First, an exhaustive list of HRQoL issues will be generated, derived from literature and patient (n = 154) and healthcare professional (HCP) interviews (n = 30). Subsequently, another group of sarcoma patients (n = 475) and HCPs (n = 30) will be asked to rate and prioritize the issues. Responses will be analyzed by priority, prevalence and range of responses for each item. The outcome will be a framework for tailored HRQoL measurement in sarcoma patients, taking into account sociodemographic and clinical variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dide den Hollander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.d.H.); (W.T.A.v.d.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Marco Fiore
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Javier Martin-Broto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, 41013 Sevilla, Spain;
| | - Bernd Kasper
- Sarcoma Unit, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim University Medical Center, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | | | - Dagmara Kulis
- Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (D.K.); (C.P.)
| | - Ioanna Nixon
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Beatson Cancer Center, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK;
| | | | - Martin Eichler
- University Cancer Center (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany; (M.E.); (L.H.)
| | - Winan J. van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ingrid M. E. Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- HESPER Lab, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Claire Piccinin
- Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (D.K.); (C.P.)
| | - Hanna Kosela-Paterczyk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-034 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Aisha Miah
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK;
| | - Leopold Hentschel
- University Cancer Center (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany; (M.E.); (L.H.)
| | - Susanne Singer
- Epidemiology and Informatics, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, University Medical Centre Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
- University Cancer Centre Mainz (UCT), University Medical Centre Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Roger Wilson
- Sarcoma Patients EuroNet, D-85521 Riemerling, Germany;
| | - Winette T. A. van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.d.H.); (W.T.A.v.d.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.d.H.); (W.T.A.v.d.G.)
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kosir U, Bowes L, Taylor RM, Gerrand C, Windsor R, Onasanya M, Martins A. Psychological adaptation and recovery in youth with sarcoma: a qualitative study with practical implications for clinical care and research. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038799. [PMID: 33234628 PMCID: PMC7684813 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study explored factors that play a role in psychological adaptation and recovery of young people with sarcoma. DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING National Health Service hospitals in the UK. METHODS Using purposive sampling, participants were recruited for semistructured interviews over the telephone or face to face in order to answer questions about how cancer impacted various domains of their life. Data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS Thirty participants, aged 15-39 years with primary sarcoma diagnosis provided in-depth accounts of their experience. Emerging themes from the interviews were grouped into two overarching themes that relate to one's adaptation to illness: individual level and environmental level. The qualitative nature of our study sheds light on meaningful connections between various factors and their role in one's psychological adaptation to sarcoma. We devised a visual matrix to illustrate how risk and protective factors in adaptation vary between and within individuals. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that young people with sarcoma report an array of both positive and negative factors related to their illness experience. The route to recovery is a multifactorial process and a one-size-fits-all approach to psychosocial care proves inadequate. We propose that moving beyond the latent constructs of resilience and psychopathology towards a dynamic model of psychological adaptation and recovery in this population can result in optimisation of care. We offer some recommendations for professionals working with young people with sarcoma in clinic and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urska Kosir
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Lucy Bowes
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Cancer Clinical Trials, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and AHP Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Craig Gerrand
- Sarcoma Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, UK
| | - Rachael Windsor
- Paediatric & Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Onasanya
- Paediatric & Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ana Martins
- Paediatric & Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fiore M, Brunelli C, Miceli R, Manara M, Lenna S, Rampello NN, Callegaro D, Colombo C, Radaelli S, Pasquali S, Caraceni AT, Gronchi A. A Prospective Observational Study of Multivisceral Resection for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3904-3916. [PMID: 33175262 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09307-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) may require multivisceral resection (MVR). Clinical outcome (morbidity and renal function) and quality of life (QoL) are not as well reported as the oncologic outcome. METHODS Patients with primary RPS who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2016 were prospectively enrolled in an observational longitudinal study. At baseline, then at 4 and 12 months, the study measured Clavien-Dindo morbidity, estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR), EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, DN4 (neuropathic pain [NP]), lower-extremity functional scale (LEFS), and the brief pain inventory. The primary end point was the difference in global health status (GHS/QoL). The secondary end points were EGFR changes, difference in other QLQ-C30 scales, pain intensity, NP, and LEFS. The study is registered at ClinTrials.gov (NCT03480399). RESULTS Of 74 patients, 58 were evaluable. Morbidity grade 3 or higher was 24.1%, and mortality was 1.3%. After nephrectomy, the mean 1-year EGFR change was -33.9%. The GHS/QoL at baseline was 58.6 and had increased of 6.9 points at 1 year, comparable with that of the general population. A transient worsening in pain and diarrhea had recovered at 12 months. Average pain was mild and did not differ at 12 months. However, NP was found in 41.4% of the patients and was significantly associated with resection of the psoas muscle. At baseline, LEFS was already lower than the normative value, and worsening after surgery was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION A QoL measure after MVR in primary RPS is complex and requires multiple tools. Whereas overall MVR is safe and associated with an improvement in GHS/QoL, chronic NP is frequent and deserves specific attention. Pre-surgery rehabilitation tracks may help to prevent or reduce chronic NP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Fiore
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Cinzia Brunelli
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Manara
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Susanna Lenna
- Department of Surgery, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Nicolò N Rampello
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Callegaro
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Colombo
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Radaelli
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Pasquali
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto T Caraceni
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Soomers V, Desar IM, van de Poll-Franse LV, Husson O, van der Graaf WT. Quality of life and experiences of sarcoma trajectories (the QUEST study): protocol for an international observational cohort study on diagnostic pathways of sarcoma patients. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039309. [PMID: 33109665 PMCID: PMC7592281 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sarcomas are rare tumours with considerable heterogeneity. Early and accurate diagnosis is important to optimise patient outcomes in terms of local disease control, overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Time to diagnosis is variable in bone as well as soft tissue sarcoma. Possible factors for a long time from first symptom to diagnosis (the total interval) include patient, tumour and healthcare characteristics, but until now the most relevant risk factors and its association with outcomes remain unknown. Our study aims to (1) quantify total interval, the time interval from first symptom until (histological) diagnosis; (2) identify factors associated with interval length and (3) determine the association between total interval and HRQoL, stage and tumour size at diagnosis, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a longitudinal, prospective, international, multicentre cohort study among patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed bone or soft tissue sarcoma at eight centres (three in UK, five in The Netherlands). Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at five points in time; one at diagnosis and at follow-up points of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Questionnaire data is collected within the Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry: an international data management system for collection of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical data will be extracted from patient records. The primary endpoint is HRQoL at diagnosis, measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Secondary endpoints are stage and tumour size at diagnosis, PFS, OS, additional patient-reported outcomes, such as quality-adjusted life years and psychological distress. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was given by the Health Research Authority and Research Ethics Committee for the United Kingdom (18/WA/0096) and medical ethical committee of Radboudumc for The Netherlands (2017-3881). Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and presented at meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03441906.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Soomers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Me Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Centre of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Winette Ta van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of medical oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Unraveling the Heterogeneity of Sarcoma Survivors' Health-Related Quality of Life Regarding Primary Sarcoma Location: Results from the SURVSARC Study. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113083. [PMID: 33105807 PMCID: PMC7690571 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Sarcomas are a rare group of heterogenous tumors that can develop anywhere in the body. Currently, studies on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) focus on sarcomas of the arm and leg or have too small sample sizes to examine the heterogeneity between different sarcoma locations, leading to limited insight into HRQoL of survivors with specific sarcoma locations. The aim of this study was to assess differences in HRQoL and examine treatment-specific HRQoL issues per sarcoma location. We found, in a population of 1099 sarcoma survivors, different patterns of HRQoL according to primary sarcoma location and a high number of additional, unique treatment-specific HRQoL issues per location, which were not captured with the general HRQoL questionnaire used in cancer patients. This indicates that the currently used HRQoL measures are too generic to capture all sarcoma-related issues, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive sarcoma-specific HRQoL measurement strategy. Abstract Sarcoma patients experience physical and psychological symptoms, depending on age of onset, subtype, treatment, stage, and location of the sarcoma, which can adversely affect patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to unravel the heterogeneity of sarcoma survivors’ HRQoL regarding primary sarcoma location. A cross-sectional study was conducted among Dutch sarcoma survivors (N = 1099) aged ≥18, diagnosed 2–10 years ago. Primary sarcoma locations were head and neck, chest, abdominal including retroperitoneal, pelvis including urogenital organs, axial skeleton, extremities (upper and lower), breast, skin and other locations. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer—Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 was used to measure HRQoL accompanied by treatment-specific HRQoL questions. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Axial skeleton sarcomas had the lowest functioning levels and highest symptoms compared to other locations. Skin sarcomas had the highest functioning levels and lowest symptoms on most scales. Bone sarcomas scored worse on several HRQoL domains compared to soft tissue sarcomas. High prevalence of treatment-specific HRQoL issues were found per location. In conclusion, sarcomas can present everywhere, which is reflected by different HRQoL outcomes according to primary sarcoma location. The currently used HRQoL measure lacks treatment-specific questions and is too generic to capture all sarcoma-related issues, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive sarcoma-specific HRQoL measurement strategy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hentschel L, Richter S, Kopp HG, Kasper B, Kunitz A, Grünwald V, Kessler T, Chemnitz JM, Pelzer U, Schuler U, Freitag J, Schilling A, Hornemann B, Arndt K, Bornhäuser M, Schuler MK. Quality of life and added value of a tailored palliative care intervention in patients with soft tissue sarcoma undergoing treatment with trabectedin: a multicentre, cluster-randomised trial within the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG). BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035546. [PMID: 32859662 PMCID: PMC7454199 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The choice of drug treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) continues to be a challenge regarding efficacy, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. Unlike other cancer types, where integrating patient-reported outcomes (PRO) has proven to be beneficial for QoL, there is no such evidence in patients with STS as of now. The YonLife trial aimed to explore the effect of a tailored multistep intervention on QoL, symptoms and survival in patients with advanced STS undergoing treatment with trabectedin as well as identifying predictors of QoL. DESIGN YonLife is a cluster-randomised, open-label, proof-of-concept study. The intervention incorporates electronic PRO assessment, a case vignette and expert-consented treatment recommendations. PARTICIPANTS Six hospitals were randomised to the control arm (CA) or interventional arm (IA). Seventy-nine patients were included of whom 40 were analysed as per-protocol analysis set. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was the change of Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) total score after 9 weeks. Secondary outcomes included QoL (FACT-G subscales), anorexia and cachexia (Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT)), symptoms (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)), anxiety and depression (HADS), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)) and survival assessment. RESULTS After 9 weeks of treatment, QoL declined less in the IA (ΔFACT-G total score: -2.4, 95% CI: -9.2 to 4.5) as compared with CA (ΔFACT-G total score: -3.9; 95% CI:-11.3 to 3.5; p=0.765). In almost all FACT-G subscales, average declines were lower in IA, but without reaching statistical significance. Smaller adverse trends between arms were observed for MDASI, FAACT, HADS and BPI scales. These trends failed to reach statistical significance. Overall mean survival was longer in IA (648 days) than in CA (389 days, p=0.110). QoL was predicted by symptom severity, symptom interference, depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION Our data suggest a potentially favourable effect of an electronic patient-reported outcomes based intervention on QoL that needs to be reappraised in confirmatory studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT02204111).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leopold Hentschel
- Department of Psychooncology of the University Cancer Center (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Richter
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Kopp
- Interdisciplinary Center for Soft-Tissue-Sarcoma, GIST and Bone-Tumor, Robert-Bosch-Center of Tumor Diseases, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Bernd Kasper
- Sarcoma Unit, Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Viktor Grünwald
- Interdisciplinary Genitourinary Oncology/West-German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Torsten Kessler
- Hematology Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Uwe Pelzer
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schuler
- University Palliative Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Janet Freitag
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andrea Schilling
- Department of Social Work, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Department of Psychooncology of the University Cancer Center (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karin Arndt
- Patient Advocacy, Das Lebenshaus e.V, Wölfersheim, Germany
| | - Martin Bornhäuser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Kajo Schuler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Oncology, HELIOS Hospital Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Košir U, Denis-Larocque G, Tsimicalis A, Freeman C, Turcotte RE, Cury F, Alcindor T, Goulding K. Psychological functioning, coping styles and their relationship to appraisal of physical limitations following invasive surgical procedures for soft-tissue sarcoma: A qualitative study. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:1266-1275. [PMID: 32221986 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study explored psychological functioning and coping styles in adult patients with soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical procedures in a single expert sarcoma medical center in Canada. METHODS This is a qualitative study with three formats of data collection. The interview guide was based on theoretical health-related quality of life model. We began the investigation with 2 online and 2 in-person focus groups. Four individual semistructured interviews were added to further explore emerging themes. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic networks approach. RESULTS Twenty-eight adults (13 female, 24-75 years of age) participated. In the domain of psychological functioning we identified three main themes; changes in mood, worry, and body image concerns. In the domain of coping styles, we identified four adaptive coping styles; positive reframing and optimism, finding a purpose, being proactive, and using humor. Among the maladaptive coping styles, we found passive acceptance, and avoidance and denial. CONCLUSIONS Psychological well-being can be contingent on physical functioning and coping styles in adults with soft-tissue sarcoma. Both psychological and physical function impact quality of life. Patients with more physical limitations, psychological distress and maladaptive coping styles should be monitored for their well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urška Košir
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Qubec, Canada
| | | | - Argerie Tsimicalis
- McGill University Ingram School of Nursing, Montreal, Qubec, Canada.,McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Qubec, Canada
| | | | | | - Fabio Cury
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Qubec, Canada
| | | | - Krista Goulding
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Qubec, Canada.,Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Martins A, Bennister L, Fern LA, Gerrand C, Onasanya M, Storey L, Wells M, Whelan JS, Windsor R, Woodford J, Taylor RM. Development of a patient-reported experience questionnaire for patients with sarcoma: the Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM). Qual Life Res 2020; 29:2287-2297. [PMID: 32227293 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02481-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to develop a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with sarcoma-the Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM). METHODS AND RESULTS The systematic development of SAM included a three-stage, mixed-methods study using semi-structured interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, with all stages involving patients from across the United Kingdom. In-depth interviews were conducted with 121 patients (50% male; aged 13-82; with soft tissue sarcoma (62%), bone tumours (28%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (10%)). Content analysis of the interview transcripts identified 1415 post-diagnosis experience statements. Experience statements were reviewed, repetition was removed and sentences were refined to form 395 'items' which were included in an Item Reduction Questionnaire (IRQ) grouped as physical, emotional, social and financial wellbeing and sexuality. The IRQ was completed by 250 patients who rated each item on importance and worry. Items with a mean score above 5 (6 in the emotional domain) were removed, which reduced the list to 166 items. After review by the research team, 23 clinicians and 34 patients, 66 items were retained to test content validity. Items with a content validity ratio of < .33 were removed. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 10 patients on the final 22 items to test comprehension. Minor changes were made to four. CONCLUSION SAM comprises of 22 items reflecting physical, emotional, social, financial wellbeing and sexuality. This systematic process of using patient experience to develop the content of SAM will ensure that it measures what is important to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Martins
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Lindsey Bennister
- Patient Representative, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Craig Gerrand
- London Sarcoma Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
| | - Maria Onasanya
- Patient Representative, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Lesley Storey
- Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, Curzon Building, Birmingham, B4 7BD, UK
| | - Mary Wells
- Nursing Directorate, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Rachael Windsor
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Julie Woodford
- London Sarcoma Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK. .,UCLH Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, 1st Floor East, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Palm RF, Jim HSL, Boulware D, Johnstone PAS, Naghavi AO. Using the revised Edmonton symptom assessment scale during neoadjuvant radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 22:22-28. [PMID: 32181374 PMCID: PMC7063105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Patent-reported outcomes guide managment for retroperitoneal sarcoma. All patients completed treatment uninterrupted with improvements in anxiety and pain. Symptom reporting helps personalize patient care in the era of precision medicine.
Background and purpose Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare, complex disease requiring multidisciplinary management. We have previously reported that use of the Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r-CSS) allows for proactive symptom management, and we sought to report the results of ESAS-r-CSS screening during pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) for a cadre of patients with RPS. Materials and methods We reviewed records of 47 patients with RPS evaluated at our institution between 2015 and 2018. Of this group, 29 non-metastatic patients were treated with definitive intent neoadjuvant RT with at least 2 weekly ESAS-r-CSS reports. A generalized estimating equation model was used to compare 13 symptoms during weekly on-treatment visits compared to baseline scores at week 1 of RT. Additionally, covariate effects of age, gender, dose, tumor size and location were assessed. Results The population was predominantly male (66%) with median age of 65 years, KPS of 90, and tumor size of 12.8 cm. ESAS scores significantly decreased for anxiety at week 3 (P = 0.01), and pain at week 5 (P = 0.01). Worse constipation was reported at week 2 (P = 0.02). In an exploratory covariate analysis, female gender, age, high dose, and larger tumor size were associated with worse ESAS scores across all time points. Conclusion Patient reporting of symptoms during radiotherapy through weekly ESAS-r-CSS facilitates timely management in patients with this unique tumor type. Expectant care during RT offers the opportunity to minimize symptom progression or treatment interruptions in a population that generally has worsening side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David Boulware
- Department of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Peter A S Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Saebye C, Amidi A, Keller J, Andersen H, Baad-Hansen T. Changes in Functional Outcome and Quality of Life in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients within the First Year after Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E463. [PMID: 32079176 PMCID: PMC7072592 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients undergoing surgery may experience reduced functional outcome (FO) and quality of life (QoL) compared to the general population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of FO and QoL in patients with STS in the extremities within the first year after first-time limb-sparing surgery. Twenty-nine out of 40 eligible patients were included in the present study. QoL and FO were evaluated by questionnaires while FO was also evaluated by objective tests. Patients were assessed before surgery and at fixed time points within the first year after surgery. Patients with STS in the extremities had an average strength of 82.34% (95% CI: 68.57-96.11) of the expected strength at one year post surgery. Multivariate, repeated ANOVA showed statistically significant reductions in strength in the disease-affected extremity when compared with the healthy side after surgery. Multivariate, repeated ANOVA showed a statistically significant improvement in FO and QoL within the first year post surgery. Limb-sparing surgery for STS significantly reduced strength in the disease-affected extremity and generally reduced FO and QoL in the first months after surgery. Improvements were observed for FO and QoL at one year after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Saebye
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark
| | - Ali Amidi
- Unit for Psychooncology & Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Johnny Keller
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark
| | - Henning Andersen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark
| | - Thomas Baad-Hansen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Martins A, Whelan JS, Bennister L, Fern LA, Gerrand C, Onasanya M, Storey L, Wells M, Windsor R, Woodford J, Taylor RM. Qualitative study exploring patients experiences of being diagnosed and living with primary bone cancer in the UK. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028693. [PMID: 31551374 PMCID: PMC6773292 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of patients with primary bone cancer. DESIGN Qualitative study design using semistructured interviews and focus groups. SETTING Hospitals across the UK and recruitment through UK sarcoma charities and support groups. METHODS Semistructured telephone/face-to-face interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of 26 participants. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. PARTICIPANTS Patients (n=26) with primary bone cancer aged 13-77 years. The majority were male (69%), white (85%); diagnosed within 4 years (54%); and had lower limb sarcoma (65%). Ten participants had undergone an upper/lower limb amputation (39%). RESULTS The health-related quality-of-life domains of physical, emotional and social well-being and healthcare professionals' role were the overarching themes of analysis. The physical domain anchored patient experiences. The intensity and length of treatment, the severity of side-effects, the level of disability after surgery and the uncertainty of their prognosis had an impact on patient's self-image, confidence, mood and identity, and caused disruption to various aspects of the patients' social life, including their relationships (emotional and sexual) and participation in work/school and leisure activities. Adaptation was influenced by the way patients dealt with stress and adversity, with some finding a new outlook in life, and others struggling with finding their 'new normal'. Family and friends were the main source of support. Healthcare professional's expertise and support was critical. Rehabilitation services had a considerable role in patient's physical and emotional well-being, but inequitable access to these services was apparent. CONCLUSIONS This study described the impact of primary bone cancer on patients' well-being and adjustment over time with the identification of influencing factors of better/worse experiences. It showed that impact was felt after end of treatment and affected patients at different life stages. Holistic models of survivorship care are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Martins
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Craig Gerrand
- Sarcoma Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Stanmore, UK
| | - Maria Onasanya
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lesley Storey
- Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mary Wells
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachael Windsor
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julie Woodford
- Sarcoma Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Stanmore, UK
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- CNMAR, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Maggi G, Terrenato I, Giacomelli L, Zoccali C, Condoleo MF, Falcicchio C, Baldi J, Vari S, Ferraresi V, Biagini R, Pugliese P. Sarcoma patients' quality of life from diagnosis to yearly follow-up: experience from an Italian tertiary care center. Future Oncol 2019; 15:3125-3134. [PMID: 31512484 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate sarcoma patients' perception of quality of life and psychosocial distress across the different disease's stages. Patients & methods: Total 329 sarcoma patients were monitored from diagnosis up to a maximum of six consecutive follow-up visits. Results: Functional status worsened over time with the lowest value after surgery and a full recovery not earlier than the second follow-up visit. Married and single patients exhibited similar quality of life pattern. High levels of psychological distress were observed from diagnosis to active treatment periods with a progressive improvement during follow-up. Psychological distress pattern over time varied by marital status and age. Conclusion: Our study suggests the importance of integrating psychosocial care to medical therapy across the entire sarcoma journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Maggi
- Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Terrenato
- Biostatistic Unit - Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Giacomelli
- Department of Surgical Sciences & Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Polistudium SrL, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmine Zoccali
- Orthopaedics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Falcicchio
- Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Baldi
- Orthopaedics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vari
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Ferraresi
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Biagini
- Orthopaedics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Pugliese
- Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|