Solid Tumor–Induced Immune Regulation Alters the GvHD/GvT Paradigm after Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Fine-tuning tumor- and allo-immunity: advances in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients

Cancer is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population and post-transplant malignancy is the third most common cause of death in KTR. Moreover, it is well known that certain cancer types are overrepresented after transplantation, especially non-melanoma skin cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, with remarkable survival benefit in a subgroup of patients. ICI are monoclonal antibodies that block the binding of specific co-inhibitory signaling molecules. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the main targets of ICI. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) have been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns about tumor response, allo-immunity, and risk of transplant rejection. Indeed, graft rejection has been estimated as high as 48% and represents an emerging problem. The underlying mechanisms of organ rejection in the context of treatment with ICI are poorly understood. The search for restricted antitumoral responses without graft rejection is of paramount importance. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the use of ICI in KTR, the potential mechanisms involved in kidney graft rejection during ICI treatment, potential biomarkers of rejection, and how to deal with rejection in clinical practice.

Graft-Versus-Solid-Tumor Effect: From Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation to Adoptive Cell Therapies

After allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), donor lymphocytes may contribute to the regression of hematological malignancies and select solid tumors, a phenomenon referred to as the graft-versus-tumor effect (GVT). However, this immunologic reaction is frequently limited by either poor specificity resulting in graft-versus-host disease or the frequency of tumor-specific T cells being too low to induce a complete and sustained anti-tumor response. Over the past 2 decades, it has become clear that the driver of GVT following allogeneic HSCT is T-cell-mediated recognition of antigens presented on tumor cells. With that regard, even though the excitement for using HSCT in solid tumors has declined, clinical trials of HSCT in solid tumors provided proof of concept and valuable insights leading to the discovery of tumor antigens and the development of targeted adoptive cell therapies for cancer. In this article, we review the results of clinical trials of allogeneic HSCT in solid tumors. We focus on lessons learned from correlative studies of these trials that hold the potential for the creation of tumor-specific immunotherapies with greater efficacy and safety for the treatment of malignancies.

Nobel Prize for immune checkpoint inhibitors, understanding the immunological switching between immunosuppression and autoimmunity

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary form of immunotherapy in cancer. However, the percentage of patients responding to therapy is relatively low, while adverse effects occur in a large number of patients. In addition, the therapeutic mechanisms of ICIs are not yet completely described.

AREAS COVERED

The initial view (articles published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, etc.) was that ICIs increase tumor-specific immunity. Recent data (collected from the same databases) suggest that the ICIs pharmacotherapy actually extends beyond the topic of immune reactivity, including additional immune pathways, such as disrupting immunosuppression and increasing tumor-specific autoimmunity. Unfortunately, there is no clear delimitation between these specific autoimmune reactions that are therapeutically beneficial, and nonspecific autoimmune reactions/toxicity that can be extremely severe side effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Immune checkpoint mechanisms perform a non-selective immune regulation, maintaining a dynamic balance between immunosuppression and autoimmunity. By blocking these mechanisms, ICIs actually perform an immunological reset, decreasing immunosuppression and increasing tumor-specific immunity and predisposition to autoimmunity. The predisposition to autoimmunity induces both side effects and beneficial autoimmunity. Consequently, further studies are necessary to maximize the beneficial tumor-specific autoimmunity, while reducing the counterproductive effect of associated autoimmune toxicity.

Immunization with alloantibodies-covered melanoma cells induces regional antitumor effects that become systemic when combined with 5-FU treatment

Alloantibodies, in particular immunoglobulin G (allo-IgG), confer a rejection advantage to tumors sharing the same major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in mice. However, when administrated intratumorally, this effect can only be achieved in combination with dendritic cells (DCs) activation. Here, we developed high titer allo-IgG by multiple rounds of immunization with allogenic B16 melanoma cells, which allows for the strong binding with B16 cells. We demonstrate that B16 cells incubated with these allo-IgG (referred to as allo-IgG-B16) become highly immunogenic, which release tumor antigens that are efficiently presented by classic DCs in lymph nodes (LNs). Injection of allo-IgG-B16 turns the tumor into an immune hot one and even elicits a systemic antitumor response when used together with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This systemic response is tumor-specific and relies on the critical site - LNs. Our findings provide a rationale for the use of allo-IgG in cancer treatment.

Intratumoral immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 and TLR9 agonist induces systemic antitumor immunity without accelerating rejection of cardiac allografts

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockades, have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy. However, there is a growing concern whether PD-1 inhibitors can be administered safely to transplant recipients with advanced cancer, as the T cells activated by checkpoint inhibitors may become reactive not only toward tumor antigens but also toward donor alloantigen, thereby resulting in allograft rejection. Here, immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/toll like receptor 9 agonist was administered to C57BL/6 mice bearing a cardiac allograft that were receiving maintenance immunosuppression or a PI4KIIIβ inhibitor-based tolerogenic regimen. Intratumoral (i.t.), but not systemic, immunotherapy promoted potent anti-tumor responses, but did not accelerate allograft rejection. This effect was associated with a pro-immunogenic effect induced by i.t. immunotherapy resulting in systemic cellular and humoral immune anti-tumor responses. Furthermore, when the tumor and cardiac allograft shared major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens, i.t. immunotherapy promoted immune responses directed against tumor and the cardiac allograft resulting in allograft rejection. The anti-tumor effect was compromised by maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporin A, indicating that an optimal balance between enhanced anti-tumor immunity and decreased transplant immunoreactivity is critical. A clinically relevant approach could be to temporarily withdraw maintenance immunosuppression and/or replace it with a PI4KIIIβ inhibitor-based tolerance-inducing regimen to allow for effective immunotherapy to take place.

Donor Lymphocyte-Derived Natural Killer Cells Control MHC Class I-Negative Melanoma

Natural killer (NK) cells provide a natural defense against MHC-I-negative tumors, such as melanoma. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) containing NK cells, a form of adoptive immunotherapy used after allogenic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT), promotes antitumor immune responses but is often associated with life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Here, we showed that without prior allo-BMT, DLI provoked melanoma control associated with the infiltration and persistence of the transferred NK cells. This allograft acceptance did not correlate with an increase of GvHD; instead it correlated with the expansion and activation of tumor-infiltrating NK cells that expressed the cytotoxic molecules (e.g., IFNγ and granzyme B) and maturation signatures (e.g., CD11b^hiCD27^lo and KLRG^hi/CD43^hi). The development of beneficial tumor-infiltrating NK cells of DLI origin required host CD4⁺ T-cell help in part by producing IL2, as well as by limiting regulatory CD4⁺ T cells (Treg). IL2 blockade impaired the NK-dependent melanoma control, which could not be rescued by IL2 administration beyond CD4⁺ T-cell help. Our findings linked NK allograft acceptance-CD4⁺ T-cell help crosstalk to melanoma development without the need of allo-BMT. We thereby helped define that tumor-infiltrating NK cells of DLI origin may serve as effective therapeutic targets for controlling melanoma.

Improved Anti-Tumour Adaptive Immunity Can Overcome the Melanoma Immunosuppressive Tumour Microenvironment

Clinical benefits obtained from checkpoint blockade regimens demonstrate the importance of overcoming the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) in cancer immunotherapy. Intravenous (i.v.) injection of B16 melanoma cells (H-2K^b) leads to lethal disseminated pulmonary metastasis in Balb/c recipients (H-2K^d). This lack of immune control is related to low major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression on B16 cells which is associated with delayed and decreased anti-tumour adaptive immune responses (e.g., alloantibody formation) as: (i) other tumour types with normal H-2K^b expression are rejected with concomitant antibody production; (ii) preincubation of B16 with IFN-gamma to upregulate H-2K^b expression resulted in improved antibody production and anti-tumour activity. The delayed/decreased anti-tumour adaptive immune responses induced by B16 inoculation is not able to interrupt progression of primary metastases, while it is able to effectively eliminate secondary inoculated subcutaneously (s.c.) B16 cells from progression. This is due to the presence of an immunosuppressive TME within the primary metastases characterized by increased regulatory T cells (Tregs) and an increased T helper cells (Th) 2/1 profile. These tumour-induced immunosuppressive T cell populations are counteracted by improved adaptive immunity via active and passive immunization, resulting in effective elimination of the TME, destruction of the metastatic tumour and a reversal of Th2/1 profile in a time-sensitive manner. Thus, we here demonstrate that the TME is not irreversible and adaptive immunity is able to eradicate established solid tumour and its immunosuppressive TME. This study will help design treatments to overcome the immunosuppressive effect of the TME and improve efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.