Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence, Stage, and Survival: A Large Population-Based Study

Disparities in Overall Survival Rates for Cancers across Income Levels in the Republic of Korea

BACKGROUND

The overall survival rates among cancer patients have been improving. However, the increase in survival is not uniform across socioeconomic status. Thus, we investigated income disparities in the 5-year survival rate (5YSR) in cancer patients and the temporal trends.

METHODS

This study used a national cancer cohort from 2002 to 2018 that was established by linking the Korea Central Cancer Registry and the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) claim database to calculate the cancer survival rate by income level in the Republic of Korea. Survival data were available from 2002 onward, and the analysis was based on the actuarial method. We compared the survival of the earliest available 5-year period of 2002-2006 and the latest available 5-year period of 2014-2018, observing until 31 December 2021. Income level was classified into six categories: Medical Aid beneficiaries and five NHIS subtypes according to insurance premium. The slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality were used to measure absolute and relative differences in 5YSR by income, respectively.

RESULTS

The 5YSR between the 2002-2006 and 2014-2018 periods for all cancers improved. A significant improvement in 5-year survival rates (5YSR) over the study period was observed in lung, liver, and stomach cancer. The SII of survival rates for lung (17.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-28.1), liver (15.1, 95% CI 10.9-19.2), stomach (13.9, 95% CI 3.2-24.7), colorectal (11.4, 95% CI 0.9-22.0), and prostate (10.7, 95% CI 2.5-18.8) cancer was significantly higher, implying higher survival rates as income levels increased. The SII for lung, liver, and stomach cancer increased, while that of thyroid, breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer decreased over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Although substantial improvement in the 5YSR was observed across cancer types and income levels from 2002 to 2018, this increase was not uniformly distributed across income levels. Our study revealed persistent income disparities in the survival of cancer patients, particularly for lung and liver cancer.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Six Common Cancer Survival Rates in South Korea: Population-Wide Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

In South Korea, the cancer incidence rate has increased by 56.5% from 2001 to 2021. Nevertheless, the 5-year cancer survival rate from 2017 to 2021 increased by 17.9% compared with that from 2001 to 2005. Cancer survival rates tend to decline with lower socioeconomic status, and variations exist in the survival rates among different cancer types. Analyzing socioeconomic patterns in the survival of patients with cancer can help identify high-risk groups and ensure that they benefit from interventions.

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze differences in survival rates among patients diagnosed with six types of cancer-stomach, colorectal, liver, breast, cervical, and lung cancers-based on socioeconomic status using Korean nationwide data.

Methods

This study used the Korea Central Cancer Registry database linked to the National Health Information Database to follow up with patients diagnosed with cancer between 2014 and 2018 until December 31, 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by income status were generated, and log-rank tests were conducted for each cancer type to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios with 95% CIs for any cause of overall survival were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with the time since diagnosis.

Results

The survival rates for the six different types of cancer were as follows: stomach cancer, 69.6% (96,404/138,462); colorectal cancer, 66.6% (83,406/125,156); liver cancer, 33.7% (23,860/70,712); lung cancer, 30.4% (33,203/109,116); breast cancer, 91.5% (90,730/99,159); and cervical cancer, 78% (12,930/16,580). When comparing the medical aid group to the highest income group, the hazard ratios were 1.72 (95% CI 1.66-1.79) for stomach cancer, 1.60 (95% CI 1.54-1.56) for colorectal cancer, 1.51 (95% CI 1.45-1.56) for liver cancer, 1.56 (95% CI 1.51-1.59) for lung cancer, 2.19 (95% CI 2.01-2.38) for breast cancer, and 1.65 (95% CI 1.46-1.87) for cervical cancer. A higher deprivation index and advanced diagnostic stage were associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Conclusions

Socioeconomic status significantly mediates disparities in cancer survival in several cancer types. This effect is particularly pronounced in less fatal cancers such as breast cancer. Therefore, considering the type of cancer and socioeconomic factors, social and medical interventions such as early cancer detection and appropriate treatment are necessary for vulnerable populations.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Methyltransferase Like 13 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the cancers with the highest incidence and mortality rates. This study aims to explore the diagnostic and prognostic utility of methyltransferase like 13 (METTL13) in patients with HCC via bioinformatics analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 We obtained mRNA data of HCC from the database of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), drawing survival curve by R 4.2.1 software. Cox regression analysis was conducted based on tumor stage and METTL13 expression. The GSE114564 dataset was chosen from the Gene Expression Omnibus. The differences in serum METTL13 levels between the groups of early HCC (eHCC) and non-cancer controls were evaluated. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) of serum METTL13 for diagnosing eHCC.

RESULTS

 A total of 225 cases with HCC were screened from TCGA, and 29 cases were normal controls. The results showed that the METTL13 expression in the HCC group was higher than that in the normal controls (P <.001). The univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.895, P = .006] and multivariate Cox regression (HR = 1.702, P = .037) analyses showed that high METTL13 expression reduced overall survival in HCC. Serum METTL13 levels were higher in the eHCC group than in the non-cancer controls (P = .008). The optimum AUC for predicting eHCC by serum METTL13 was 0.7091.

CONCLUSION

 Serum METTL13 has a moderate diagnostic value for eHCC. High METTL13 expression is correlated with a worse prognosis in patients with HCC. Methyltransferase like 13 possesses the potential to be a novel biomarker for HCC.

Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and risk of liver cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

BACKGROUND

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure has been associated with liver cancer incidence and mortality in a limited number of studies. We sought to evaluate this relationship for the first time in a U.S. cohort with historical exposure assessment.

METHODS

We used spatiotemporal prediction models to estimate annual average historical PM2.5 concentrations (1980-2015) at residential addresses of 499,729 participants in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, a cohort in 6 states (California, Florida, Louisiana, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania) and 2 metropolitan areas (Atlanta, Georgia, and Detroit, Michigan) enrolled in 1995-1996 and followed up through 2017. We used a time-varying Cox model to estimate the association for liver cancer and the predominant histologic type, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), per 5 µg/m3 increase in estimated outdoor PM2.5 levels, incorporating a 5-year average, lagged 10 years prior to cancer diagnosis and adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level and catchment state. We also evaluated PM2.5 interactions with hypothesized effect modifiers.

RESULTS

We observed a non-significantly increased risk of liver cancer associated with estimated PM2.5 exposure (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05 [0.96-1.14], N = 1,625); associations were slightly stronger for HCC, (84 % of cases; HR = 1.08 [0.98-1.18]). Participants aged 70 or older at enrollment had an increased risk of liver cancer versus other age groups (HR = 1.50 [1.01-2.23]); p-interaction = 0.01) and risk was elevated among participants who did not exercise (HR = 1.81 [1.22-2.70]; p-interaction = 0.01). We found no evidence of effect modification by sex, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes status, or alcohol consumption (p-interaction > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings in this large cohort suggest that residential ambient PM2.5 levels may be associated with liver cancer risk. Further exploration of the variation in associations by age and physical activity are important areas for future research.

Most deprived Louisiana census tracts have higher hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and worse survival

Background

Liver cancer incidence increased in the US from 1975 through 2015 with heterogeneous rates across subpopulations. Upstream or distal area-level factors impact liver cancer risks.

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the association between area-level deprivation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence and survival. We also explored the association between area deprivation and treatment modalities.

Methods

Louisiana Tumor Registry identified 4,151 adult patients diagnosed with malignant HCC from 2011 to 2020 and linked residential address to census tract (CT)-level Area Deprivation Index (ADI) categorized into quartiles (Q1 = least deprived). ANOVA examined the association between ADI quartile and CT age-adjusted incidence rate (AAIR) per 100,000. Chi-square tested the distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics across ADI quartiles. Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard models evaluated survival by deprivation quartile.

Results

Among the 1,084 CTs with incident HCC, the average (SD) AAIR was 8.02 (7.05) HCC cases per 100,000 population. ADI was observed to be associated with incidence, and the mean (SD) AAIR increased from 5.80 (4.75) in Q1 to 9.26 (7.88) in Q4. ADI was also associated with receipt of surgery (p < 0.01) and radiation (p < 0.01) but not chemotherapy (p = 0.15). However, among those who received chemotherapy, people living in the least deprived areas began treatment approximately 10 days sooner than those living in other quartiles. Q4 patients experienced the worst survival with a median of 247 (95% CI 211-290) days vs. Q1 patients with a median of 474 (95% CI 407-547) days (p < 0.0001). Q4 had marginally poorer survival (HR 1.20, 1.05-1.37) than Q1 but the association became non-significant (HR 1.12, 0.96-1.30) when adjusted for rurality, liquor store density, sex, race/ethnicity, age, insurance, BMI, stage, hepatitis diagnosis, and comorbidities.

Conclusion

Increasing neighborhood (CT) deprivation (ADI) was observed to be associated with increased HCC incidence and poorer HCC survival. However, the association with poorer survival becomes attenuated after adjusting for putative confounders.

Immunotherapy Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Diverse and Underserved Population in the United States

Background 

  Incidence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in the Bronx is 61% higher than the rest of New York State. Underserved populations are not well represented in clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Methods

Demographics were tabulated for 194 patients treated with ICI at the Montefiore-Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center (MECCC) between 2017 and 2022. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-squared test, and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves.

Results

MECCC patients were 40.7% Hispanic and 20.6% Black, compared with 3% and 2%, respectively, in the landmark IMbrave 150 study. Median overall survival (mOS) on ICI was 9.0 months, 25.0 months for the 100 (51.5%) favorable-prognosis Child Pugh A (CPA) patients included in HCC clinical trials. Disease control rate (DCR) was 58.5% among 123 evaluable patients per mRECIST 1.1. Baseline liver function, as defined by CP and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na), correlated with survival (p < 0.001). Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and alcoholism were over-represented relative to National Cancer Institute (NCI) data (56.2% vs 4.7% and 38.7% vs 8.2%, respectively). HCV treatment correlated with prolonged survival in infected patients (p = 0.0017). AFP decline correlated with response (p = 0.001). Hispanic patients lived longer when clinical variables were controlled for (mOS 52 vs 23 months; p = 0.011).

Conclusion

In an underserved HCC population, ICI yielded a DCR of 58.5% and low rates of severe toxicity. This work highlights ICI efficacy in minority groups, a need for earlier HCC diagnosis and for studies of genetic and environmental factors in Hispanics with HCC.

Pan-viral serology uncovers distinct virome patterns as risk predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

This study evaluates the pan-serological profiles of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) compared to several diseased and non-diseased control populations to identify risk factors and biomarkers of liver cancer. We used phage immunoprecipitation sequencing, an anti-viral antibody screening method using a synthetic-phage-displayed human virome epitope library, to screen patient serum samples for exposure to over 1,280 strains of pathogenic and non-pathogenic viruses. Using machine learning methods to develop an HCC or iCCA viral score, we discovered that both viral scores were positively associated with several liver function markers in two separate at-risk populations independent of viral hepatitis status. The HCC score predicted all-cause mortality over 8 years in patients with chronic liver disease at risk of HCC, while the viral hepatitis status was not predictive of survival. These results suggest that non-hepatitis viral infections may contribute to HCC and iCCA development and could be biomarkers in at-risk populations.

Utilization of Antiviral Therapy for Patients With Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Real-World US Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although oral antiviral therapy (OAV) is reported to improve outcomes in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is underutilized. We determined the rate and factors associated with OAV utilization among patients with HBV-related HCC in a US population with health insurance.

METHODS

Patients with HBV-related HCC were identified from the de-identified administrative health claims database for patients with private insurance, Optum Clinformatics (2003-2021).

RESULTS

We identified 2129 patients with HBV-related HCC: 71% male, mean age 62.7 ± 12.5 years, 40% Asian individuals, 72% with cirrhosis, and 37% received OAV. The treatment rate improved over time (40.5% after 2010 vs 26.3% earlier; P < .001). Significantly lower treatment rates were noted for females, non-Asian patients, noncirrhotic patients, and patients without gastroenterologist/hepatologist or infectious disease (GI/ID) specialist care (P < .0001). OAV treatment predictors included Asian race and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.6; 95% CI, 2.8-4.5; P < .001), male sex (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0; P < .001), seeing a GI/ID specialist (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.10-1.99; P = .0091), having compensated cirrhosis (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7-2.8; P < .001), and being treated from 2011 to 2021 (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0; P < .001); being younger (aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P < .001) was less likely for treatment. OAV initiated at or before HCC diagnosis was associated independently with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99; P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HBV-related HCC, only 1 in 3 received OAV despite having insurance coverage. Efforts must continue to develop ways to improve HBV OAV treatment, especially among females, non-Asian patients, and patients without cirrhosis or not seen by specialists.

Trends in hepatocellular carcinoma stage by racial/ethnic group in the United States, 1992-2019

Background & Aims

Although incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) began to decline in the United States in the past decade, disparities in rates among racial/ethnic groups have persisted. Whether disparities in stage at diagnosis have remained over time, however, is unclear.

Methods

National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program has created a new staging-over-time variable that facilitates the examination of trends in HCC stage. Thus, the proportions of HCCs diagnosed by stage between 1992 and 2019 were examined among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) individuals. HCC incidence between 1992 and 2019 was also analysed using Joinpoint regression.

Results

Between 1992 and 2019, the proportion of stage 1 HCCs increased and the proportion of stage 4 HCCs decreased among non-Hispanic White, NHB, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals. Among AI/AN persons, the proportion of stage 1 tumours remained stable, and the proportion of stage 4 tumours declined. In the most recent time period, NHB individuals had the lowest proportions of stage 1 HCCs (32%) and the highest proportion of stage 4 HCCs (20%) of any group. Joinpoint analysis found that HCC incidence began to decline by 2013 among all groups except AI/AN individuals, the only group that had an increase in incidence.

Conclusions

Despite generally favourable trends in HCC stage and incidence rates, disparities remain. NHB persons continue to have less favourable stages at diagnosis, and incidence rates continue to increase among AI/AN persons.

Impact and implications

HCC incidence rates among most United States racial/ethnic groups began to decline in recent years, but whether stage at diagnosis also improved was unclear. As a result, a new SEER stage variable was used to examine stage trends by race/ethnicity. Although the finding of generally favourable trends in stage as well as incidence is encouraging, continuity disparities in both stage and incidence require serious attention.

Treatment Disparities Partially Mediate Socioeconomic- and Race/Ethnicity-Based Survival Disparities in Stage I-II Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic status (SES) patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receive procedural treatments less often and have shorter survival. Little is known about the extent to which these survival disparities result from treatment-related disparities versus other causal pathways. We aimed to estimate the proportion of SES-based survival disparities that are mediated by treatment- and facility-related factors among patients with stage I-II HCC.

METHODS

We analyzed patients aged 18-75 years diagnosed with stage I-II HCC in 2008-2016 using the National Cancer Database. Inverse odds weighting mediation analysis was used to calculate the proportion mediated by three mediators: procedure type, facility volume, and facility procedural interventions offered. Intersectional analyses were performed to determine whether treatment disparities played a larger role in survival disparities among Black and Hispanic patients.

RESULTS

Among 46,003 patients, 15.0% had low SES, 71.6% had middle SES, and 13.4% had high SES. Five-year overall survival was 46.9%, 39.9%, and 35.7% among high, middle, and low SES patients, respectively. Procedure type mediated 45.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.1-60.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI 25.7-47.7%) of overall survival disparities for low and middle SES patients, respectively, which was more than was mediated by the two facility-level mediators. Procedure type mediated a larger proportion of survival disparities among low-middle SES Black (46.6-48.2%) and Hispanic patients (92.9-93.7%) than in White patients (29.5-29.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

SES-based disparities in use of procedural interventions mediate a large proportion of survival disparities, particularly among Black and Hispanic patients. Initiatives aimed at attenuating these treatment disparities should be pursued.

A Review of Healthcare Disparities Relevant to Interventional Radiology

Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities have received focused attention recently, as they became more visible in the COVID era. We continue to learn more about how healthcare disparities manifest for our patients and, more broadly, the structural underpinnings that result in predictable outcomes gaps. This review summarizes what we know about disparities relevant to interventional radiologists. The prevalence and magnitude of disparities are quantified and discussed where relevant. Specific examples are provided to demonstrate how factors like gender, ethnicity, social status, geography, etc. interact to create inequities in the delivery of interventional radiology (IR) care. Understanding and addressing health disparities in IR is crucial for improving real-world patient outcomes and reducing the economic burden associated with ineffective and low-value care. Finally, the importance of intentional mentorship, outreach, education, and equitable distribution of high-quality healthcare to mitigate these disparities and promote health equity in interventional radiology is discussed.

Impact of Food Insecurity on Outcomes Following Resection of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Food insecurity (FI) may predispose individuals to suboptimal nutrition, leading to chronic disease and poor health outcomes. We sought to assess the impact of county-level FI on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing resection of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancer.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with HPB cancer between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Data on annual county-level FI were obtained from the Feeding America: Mapping the Meal Gap report and were categorized into tertiles. Textbook outcome was defined as no extended length of stay, perioperative complications, 90-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. Multiple logistic regression and Cox regression models were used to assess outcomes and survival relative to FI.

RESULTS

Among 49,882 patients (hepatocellular: n = 11,937, 23.9%; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 2111, 4.2%; extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 4047, 8.1%; gallbladder: n = 2853, 5.7%; pancreatic: n = 28,934, 58.0%), 6702 (13.4%) patients underwent a surgical resection. Median age was 75 years (interquartile range 69-82), and most patients were male (n = 25,767, 51.7%) and self-identified as White (n = 36,381, 72.9%). Overall, 5291 (10.6%) and 39,664 (79.5%) individuals resided in low or moderate FI counties, respectively, while 4927 (9.8%) patients resided in high FI counties. Achievement of textbook outcome (TO) was 56.3% (n = 6702). After adjusting for competing risk factors, patients residing in high FI counties had lower odds to achieve a TO versus individuals living in low FI counties (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.88, p = 0.003). In addition, patients residing in moderate and high FI counties had a greater risk of mortality at 1- (referent, low, moderate: hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14; high: HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21), 3- (referent, low, moderate: HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14; high: HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21), and 5- (referent, low, moderate: HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09; high: HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13) years versus individuals from low FI counties.

CONCLUSIONS

FI was associated with adverse perioperative outcomes and long-term survival following resection of an HPB malignancy. Interventions directed towards mitigating nutritional inequities are needed to improve outcomes among vulnerable HPB populations.

The impact of social risk factors on the presentation, treatment and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at an urban, academic safety-net hospital

BACKGROUND

Vulnerable populations have worse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. We sought to understand if this could be mitigated at a safety-net hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of HCC patients was conducted (2007-2018). Stage at presentation, intervention and systemic therapy were analyzed (Chi-square for categorical variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables) and median survival calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

388 HCC patients were identified. Sociodemographic factors were similar for stage at presentation, except insurance status (diagnosis at earlier stages for commercial insurance and later stages for safety-net/no insurance). Higher education level and origin of mainland US increased intervention rates for all stages. Early-stage disease patients had no differences in receipt of intervention or therapy. Late-stage disease patients with higher education level had increased intervention rates. Median survival was not impacted by any sociodemographic factor.

CONCLUSION

Urban safety-net hospitals with a focus on vulnerable patient populations provide equitable outcomes and can serve as a model to address inequities in HCC management.

Disparities in Socioeconomic Factors Mediate the Impact of Racial Segregation Among Patients With Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer

BACKGROUND

Structural racism within the U.S. health care system contributes to disparities in oncologic care. This study sought to examine the socioeconomic factors that underlie the impact of racial segregation on hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancer inequities.

METHODS

Both Black and White patients who presented with HPB cancer were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2005-2015) and 2010 Census data. The Index of Dissimilarity (IoD), a validated measure of segregation, was examined relative to cancer stage at diagnosis, surgical resection, and overall mortality. Principal component analysis and structural equation modeling were used to determine the mediating effect of socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

Among 39,063 patients, 86.4 % (n = 33,749) were White and 13.6 % (n = 5314) were Black. Black patients were more likely to reside in segregated areas than White patients (IoD, 0.62 vs. 0.52; p < 0.05). Black patients in highly segregated areas were less likely to present with early-stage disease (relative risk [RR], 0.89; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.95) or undergo surgery for localized disease (RR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.70-0.91), and had greater mortality hazards (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.17) than White patients in low segregation areas (all p < 0.05). Mediation analysis identified poverty, lack of insurance, education level, crowded living conditions, commute time, and supportive income as contributing to 25 % of the disparities in early-stage presentation. Average income, house price, and income mobility explained 17 % of the disparities in surgical resection. Notably, average income, house price, and income mobility mediated 59 % of the effect that racial segregation had on long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Racial segregation, mediated through underlying socioeconomic factors, accounted for marked disparities in access to surgical care and outcomes for patients with HPB cancer.

Hispanic Individuals are Underrepresented in Phase III Clinical Trials for Advanced Liver Cancer in the United States

Background

Hispanic individuals comprise the second-largest subpopulation after non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals in the United States (US). We compared the relative contribution of Hispanic individuals to the ten most common causes of cancer-related deaths and studied enrollment of Hispanic patients in multinational phase III advanced liver cancer trials with the aim to investigate whether racial subpopulations are adequately represented in liver cancer trials.

Methods

Relative cancer incidence rates in Hispanic individuals, NHW individuals, non-Hispanic black (NHB) individuals, and Asian individuals were obtained from both the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) database. Searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, we identified phase III clinical trials studying advanced liver cancer in the last ten years and collected enrollment for each race and ethnicity. Incidence rates of liver cancer and enrollment rates in phase III trials were compared by race and ethnicity.

Results

The cancer type with the relatively highest contribution of Hispanic individuals was liver cancer. From 2015 to 2019, 15.1% of liver cancer cases occurred in Hispanic individuals compared to 12.5% in Asian individuals, 11% in NHB individuals, and 7.5% in NHW individuals. In the last ten years, Hispanic individuals made up 1.6% of patients and NHB individuals 1.3% of patients included in phase III multinational liver cancer trials, compared to 31% NHW individuals and 47% Asian individuals.

Conclusion

Hispanic individuals are disproportionately underrepresented in multinational phase III clinical trials for liver cancer despite having the highest relative incidence rates among the four major racial or ethnic groups in the US.

Recent Advances in Image-Guided Locoregional Therapies for Primary Liver Tumors

Primary liver cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. with incidences predicted to rise over the next several decades. Locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, are described as image-guided percutaneous procedures, which offer either a curative intent for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma or bridging/downstaging for surgical resection or transplantation. Catheter-driven locoregional therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization, induce tumor hypoxia, can be palliative, and improve survival for early-to-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the antineoplastic mechanisms underpinning locoregional therapies, different treatment approaches, and the current state of the literature for the efficacy of locoregional therapies for primary liver cancer. We also discuss emerging advancements, such as the adjuvant use of immunotherapies and molecular targeting agents with locoregional therapy, for the treatment of primary liver cancer.

Ethnic disparities in the epidemiology, treatment, and outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States

There are significant ethnic disparities in incidence, tumor stage, curative therapy receipt, and survival among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the US. While previous models had predicted an increasing trend in the incidence rate of HCC until 2030 in the US, recent studies have shown that HCC incidence plateaued in 2013 and then started to decline in 2015. The decreasing trend has been observed in all ethnicities except for American Indians/Alaska Natives, whose incidence rates of HCC continue to rise. Current evidence shows that African-Americans and Hispanics are two groups that are more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage HCC, and this finding has been consistent in different socioeconomic statuses of the patients. These two ethnic minority groups are also among those who are less likely to have curative therapy for early-stage HCC. Finally, advances in early diagnosis and treatment approaches have led to an improvement in HCC survival for all ethnicities; however, African-Americans continue to have the worst survival. More studies to find the causes of these disparities and interventions to eliminate them are urgently needed.

Upregulation of HCFC1 expression promoted hepatocellular carcinoma progression through inhibiting cell cycle arrest and correlated with immune infiltration

Background: Host cell factor 1 (HCFC1) was reported associated with the progression of a variety of cancers. However, its role in the prognosis and immunological characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients has not been revealed. Methods: The expression and prognostic value of HCFC1 in HCC were investigated from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and a cohort of 150 HCC patients. The associations between HCFC1 expression with somatic mutational signature, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were investigated. Next, the correlation of HCFC1 expression with immune cell infiltration was investigated. In vitro, cytological experiments were conducted to verify the role of HCFC1 in HCC. Results: HCFC1 mRNA and protein upregulated in HCC tissues and correlated to poor prognosis. Multivariate regression analysis based on a cohort of 150 HCC patients revealed that high HCFC1 protein expression was an independent risk factor for prognosis. Upregulation of HCFC1 expression was associated with TMB, MSI, and tumor purity. HCFC1 expression showed a significant positive association with B cell memory, T cell CD4 memory, macrophage M0, and a significant positive association with immune checkpoint-related gene expression in the tumor microenvironment. HCFC1 expression negatively correlated to ImmuneScore, EstimateScore, and StromalScore. The single-cell RNA sequencing analysis demonstrated that the malignant cells and immune cells (B cells, T cells, and macrophages) represented high HCFC1 expression in HCC tissues. Functional analysis revealed that HCFC1 was remarkably correlated with cell cycle signaling. HCFC1 knockdown inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion capacity while promoting the apoptosis of HCC cells. At the same time, the cell-cycle-related proteins such as Cyclin D1 (CCND1), Cyclin A2 (CCNA2), cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) were downregulated. Conclusion: Upregulation of HCFC1 predicted undesirable prognosis of HCC patients and promoted tumor progression through inhibiting cell cycle arrest.

A Comprehensive Narrative Review on the History, Current Landscape, and Future Directions of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Systemic Therapy

We provide a comprehensive review of current approved systemic treatment strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), starting with the phase III clinical trial of sorafenib which was the first to definitively show a survival benefit. After this trial, there was an initial period of little progress. However, in recent years, an explosion of new agents and combinations of agents has resulted in a markedly improved outlook for patients. We then provide the authors' current approach to therapy, i.e., "How We Treat HCC". Promising future directions and important gaps in therapy that persist are finally reviewed. HCC is a highly prevalent cancer worldwide and the incidence is growing due not only to alcoholism, hepatitis B and C, but also to steatohepatitis. HCC, like renal cell carcinoma and melanoma, is a cancer largely resistant to chemotherapy but the advent of anti-angiogenic, targeted and immune therapies have improved survival for all of these cancers. We hope this review will heighten interest in the field of HCC therapies, provide a clear outline of the current data and strategy for treatment, and sensitize readers to new developments that are likely to emerge in the near future.

Life expectancy of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma according to the upfront treatment: A nationwide analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to update the life expectancy of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in an exhaustive nationwide population according to the upfront treatment performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From the French Program for the Medicalization of Information System database, all patients older than 18 years diagnosed with a de novo HCC from January 2011 to December 2018 were retrospectively selected. Five-year survival rates (95% confidence intervals [CI]) were computed according to the first surgical or interventional radiology procedures performed.

RESULTS

A total of 63,996 patients (80% men) with a median age of 68 years (Q₁, Q₃: 61, 77) were selected, including 24,007 patients who underwent at least one procedure (5-year survival of 45.5%; (95% CI: 44.8-46.2), and 39,989 with none (5-year survival, 9.6%; (95% CI: 9.3-10.0). Only 20.5% (13,101/63,996) of patients could undergo an upfront curative procedure. Liver transplantation achieved the best outcome, whether performed upfront (n = 791; 5-year survival, 79.0% [95% CI: 76.1-82.1]) or during subsequent steps (n = 2217; 5-year survival 80.9% [95% CI: 79.2-82.7]). Tumor ablation (n = 5306), open resection (n = 5171), and minimally-invasive resection (n = 1833) achieved 5-year survival rates of 53.8% (95% CI: 52.3-55.4), 54.1% (95% CI: 52.6-55.6), and 66.2% (95% CI: 63.7-68.7), respectively, with more patients with cirrhosis and subsequent procedures in the tumor ablation group. Patients with upfront transarterial (chemo)embolization (n = 10,247) and selective internal radiation therapy (n = 659) had 5-year survival rates of 31.3% (95% CI: 30.3-32.4) and 18.5% (95% CI: 15.2-22.5).

CONCLUSION

While HCC remains mostly diagnosed at an advanced stage associated with a poor prognosis, all the curative options provide 5-year survival rates above 50%.

Unraveling the Sweet Secrets of HCC: Glucometabolic Rewiring in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary form of liver cancer. It causes ∼ 800 000 deaths per year, which is expected to increase due to increasing rates of obesity and metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Current therapies include immune checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies, but these therapies are not satisfactorily effective and often come with multiple side effects and recurrences. Metabolic reprogramming plays a significant role in HCC progression and is often conserved between tumor types. Thus, targeting rewired metabolic pathways could provide an attractive option for targeting tumor cells alone or in conjunction with existing treatments. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify novel targets involved in cancer-mediated metabolic reprogramming in HCC. In this review, we provide an overview of molecular rewiring and metabolic reprogramming of glucose metabolism in HCC to understand better the concepts that might widen the therapeutic window against this deadly cancer.

Understanding the Changing Landscape of Health Disparities in Chronic Liver Diseases and Liver Cancer

Liver disease and liver cancer disparities in the U.S. are reflective of complex multiple determinants of health. This review describes the disproportionate burden of liver disease and liver cancer among racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minority, rural, low socioeconomic status (SES) populations, and place-based contexts. The contributions of traditional and lifestyle-related risk factors (e.g., alcohol consumption, evitable toxin exposure, nutrition quality) and comorbid conditions (e.g., viral hepatitis, obesity, type II diabetes) to disparities is also explored. Biopsychosocial mechanisms defining the physiological consequences of inequities underlying these health disparities, including inflammation, allostatic load, genetics, epigenetics, and social epigenomics are described. Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) framework, integrative research of unexplored social and biological mechanisms of health disparities, appropriate methods and measures for early screening, diagnosis, assessment, and strategies for timely treatment and maintaining multidisciplinary care should be actively pursued. We review emerging research on adverse social determinants of liver health, such as structural racism, discrimination, stigma, SES, rising care-related costs, food insecurity, healthcare access, health literacy, and environmental exposures to pollutants. Limited research on protective factors of liver health is also described. Research from effective, multilevel, community-based interventions indicate a need for further intervention efforts that target both risk and protective factors to address health disparities. Policy-level impacts are also needed to reduce disparities. These insights are important, as the social contexts and inequities that influence determinants of liver disease/cancer have been worsened by the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic and are forecasted to amplify disparities.

Neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus PD-1 inhibitor bridging to tumor resection in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is widely utilized in advanced-stage carcinomas including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while its neoadjuvant application plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Thereby, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant therapy bridging to surgical resection in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

METHODS

Twenty intermediate-stage HCC (China Liver Cancer (CNLC) stage II) patients treated with neoadjuvant TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor (camrelizumab or sintilimab) bridging to surgery were consecutively enrolled.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) to neoadjuvant therapy were 75.0% and 100.0%, respectively; meanwhile, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was decreased after the neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.001). Moreover, 14 (70.0%) patients had successful downstaging (patients converted to CNLC stage I). Neither median disease-free survival (DFS) nor median overall survival (OS) was reached; additionally, the 1-year accumulating DFS rate was 86.6%; meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year accumulating OS rates were 100.0% and 76.4%, separately. Moreover, patients with successful downstaging had a prolonged DFS (P = 0.014) compared to patients with failed downstaging; meanwhile, this trend was also observed in assessing accumulating OS (P = 0.067) (without statistical significance). Main adverse events included pain (50.0%), fever (25.0%), neutropenia (25.0%), nausea and vomiting (25.0%), fatigue (25.0%), peripheral neuropathy (20.0%), anemia (15.0%), thrombopenia (15.0%), diarrhea (15.0%), anorexia (15.0%), and rash (15.0%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor realizes a satisfying downstaging rate, acceptable survival profile, and tolerance in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

Epidemiologic and socioeconomic factors impacting hepatitis B virus and related hepatocellular carcinoma

Chronic Hepatitis B is a highly prevalent disease worldwide and is estimated to cause more than 800000 annual deaths from complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although universal hepatitis B vaccination programs may have reduced the incidence and prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and related HCC, the disease still imposes a significant healthcare burden in many endemic regions such as Africa and the Asia-Pacific region. This is especially concerning given the global underdiagnosis of hepatitis B and the limited availability of vaccination, screening, and treatment in low-resource regions. Demographics including male gender, older age, ethnicity, and geographic location as well as low socioeconomic status are more heavily impacted by chronic hepatitis B and related HCC. Methods to mitigate this impact include increasing screening in high-risk groups according to national guidelines, increasing awareness and health literacy in vulnerable populations, and developing more robust vaccination programs in under-served regions.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation

The prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and reduction of its disparities necessitates research on the role of contextual social determinants of health. Empirical evidence on the role of contextual factors (e.g., neighborhood built and social environment) in these disparities is extremely limited. Oluyomi and colleagues conducted a Texas-wide study examining the contribution of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation, proxied by the area deprivation index on HCC disparities. Future studies are needed to complement and extend these findings. See related article by Oluyomi et al., p. 1402.

Mitochondrial GCN5L1 regulates glutaminase acetylation and hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Glutaminolysis is a critical metabolic process that promotes cancer cell proliferation, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Delineating the molecular control of glutaminolysis could identify novel targets to ameliorate this oncogenic metabolic pathway. Here, we evaluated the role of general control of amino acid synthesis 5 like 1 (GCN5L1), a regulator of mitochondrial protein acetylation, in modulating the acetylation and activity of glutaminase to regulate HCC development.

METHODS

Cell proliferation was determined by MTT, 2D and soft agar clone formation assays and orthotopic tumour assays in nude mice. GLS1/2 acetylation and activities were measured in cells and tumours to analyse the correlation with GCN5L1 expression and mTORC1 activation.

RESULTS

Hepatic GCN5L1 ablation in mice markedly increased diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced HCC, and conversely, the transduction of mitochondrial-restricted GCN5L1 protected wild-type mice against HCC progression in response to DEN and carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄ ) exposure. GCN5L1-depleted HepG2 hepatocytes enhanced tumour growth in athymic nude mice. Mechanistically, GCN5L1 depletion promoted cell proliferation through mTORC1 activation. Interestingly, liver-enriched glutaminase 2 (GLS2) appears to play a greater role than ubiquitous and canonical tumour-enriched glutaminase 1 (GLS1) in promoting murine HCC. Concurrently, GCN5L1 promotes acetylation and inactivation of both isoforms and increases enzyme oligomerisation. In human HCC tumours compared to adjacent tissue, there were variable levels of mTORC1 activation, GCN5L1 levels and glutaminase activity. Interestingly, the levels of GCN5L1 inversely correlated with mTORC1 activity and glutaminase activity in these tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified that glutaminase activity, rather than GLS1 or GLS2 expression, is the key factor in HCC development that activates mTORC1 and promotes HCC. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis of liver cancer, we found that HCC patients with high GCN5L1 expression survived longer than those with low GCN5L1 expression. Collectively, GCN5L1 functions as a tumour regulator by modulating glutaminase acetylation and activity in the development of HCC.

Disparities in risk of advanced stage liver cancer and mortality by race and ethnicity

BACKGROUND

In the United States liver cancer is the 5th and 7th most common cause of cancer related-death among men and women, respectively. Compared to other racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. Asian and Pacific Islander populations experience the highest incidence rates of liver cancer, but little is known about disparities in risk of advanced stage disease or risk of liver cancer mortality across these heterogenous populations. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

METHODS

In a population-based cohort of 60,146 patients 20-79 years of age diagnosed with liver cancer from 2004-2018 identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, we examined associations between race/ethnicity, including specific Asian and Pacific Islander subgroups, and risk of advanced stage liver cancer and liver cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black, Filipino, and Laotian patients had 30%-85% elevated odds of being diagnosed with stage IV liver cancer, while Hispanic, Vietnamese, and Chinese patients had 7-33% lower odds of being diagnosed with stage IV liver cancer (all p-values <0.05). Additionally, non-Hispanic Black, Kampuchean, and Laotian patients had 6-22% elevated hazards of liver cancer-specific mortality, and Hispanic, Vietnamese, Chinese, and Korean patients had 3-27% lower hazards of liver cancer-specific mortality (all p-values <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variations in risk of advanced stage liver cancer and in risk of liver cancer mortality were observed by race and ethnicity including considerable heterogeneity across individuals broadly defined as Asians and Pacific Islanders. Further efforts to understand the contributors to these disparities are needed in order to inform potential targeted screening and treatment interventions.

Racial and ethnic disparities in incidence and mortality for the five most common gastrointestinal cancers in the United States

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal cancers account for a significant burden of cancers in the United States. We sought to measure relative incidence of and mortality from the five most common gastrointestinal malignancies by race and ethnicity.

METHODS

We used data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cancer Registry and the National Center for Health Statistics to calculate incidence and mortality rates for colorectal, pancreatic, liver, esophageal, and gastric cancer from 2013 to 2017 (incidence) and 2014 to 2018 (mortality). We then calculated incidence and mortality rate ratios, comparing each racial/ethnic group (non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic) to non-Hispanic White.

RESULTS

Colorectal cancer had highest overall incidence and mortality. When compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, all other racial/ethnic groups had significantly higher incidence of liver and gastric cancer but lower incidence of esophageal cancer. Non-Hispanic Black individuals had higher incidence of colorectal and pancreatic cancer than non-Hispanic White individuals, while Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Island individuals had lower incidence of these two cancers compared to non-Hispanic White individuals. Disparity patterns were similar for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver and gastric cancer have the greatest differences in incidence and mortality by race/ethnicity. Non-Hispanic Black individuals carry the highest burden of gastrointestinal malignancies overall.

Gender disparity in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after curative hepatectomy

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Whether there is gender disparity in the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been not fully addressed. This study aimed to investigate the impact of gender on HCC recurrence following curative hepatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1087 patients with HCC (917 males, 170 females) who underwent curative hepatectomy. Cox regression models were constructed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the risk parameters associated with HCC recurrence. In the sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis were used. Logistic regression models were used to assess the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of the risk parameters related to early and late recurrence.

RESULTS

Male patients showed significantly higher risk for HCC recurrence than females, in both multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR [95% CI] = 1.480 [1.084-2.020], P = 0.014) and PSM analysis (HR [95% CI] = 1.589 [1.093-2.312], P = 0.015). Higher risk of HCC recurrence was again found in males in the subgroup analysis, but the effect of male versus female gender on HCC recurrence did not depend on any selected subgroups (all P for interaction > 0.05). Gender was an independent risk factor for early recurrence (OR [95% CI] = 1.864 [1.215-2.936], P = 0.006), but not for late recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

There is gender disparity in the recurrence of patients with HCC after curative hepatectomy: males had a higher risk for HCC recurrence than females.

Targeting population groups with heavier burden of hepatocellular carcinoma incidence: a nationwide descriptive epidemiological study in Sweden

Contemporary European studies examining associations between socioeconomic status and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence are scarce. We aimed to target population groups with a heavier burden of HCC by assessing associations of individual‐level sociodemographic variables and neighbourhood deprivation with all‐stage and stage‐specific HCC incidence rates (IR). Patient and population data stratified by calendar year (2012‐2018), sex, age (5‐year groups), household income (low, medium and high), country of birth (Nordic, non‐Nordic) and neighbourhood deprivation (national quintiles Q1‐Q5) were retrieved from Swedish registers. HCC stages were defined by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages 0 to A (early‐stage) and B to D (late‐stage). IR (per 100 000 person‐years) were estimated by Poisson regression models. Men had four times higher IR than women. IRs increased markedly with lower household income as well as with neighbourhood deprivation. Seven times higher IR was observed among people with a low household income living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (IR 3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28‐4.64) compared to people with a high household income living in the least deprived neighbourhoods (IR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46‐0.74). The gradient across income categories was more pronounced for late‐stage than early‐stage HCC. IR reached 30 (per 100 000 person‐years) for people in the age span 60 to 79 years with low income and 20 for 60 to 79 year old people living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (regardless of income). Men with low household income and/or living in the most deprived neighbourhoods might be considered as primary targets in studies evaluating the cost‐effectiveness of screening for early‐stage HCC detection.