Temozolomide as monotherapy is effective in treatment of advanced malignant neuroendocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma tumor spheroid drug screen reveals vulnerability to tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare neoplasms with no effective treatments and poor prognosis. Few reliable preclinical models exist for the study of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas, limiting investigation of novel treatments. We used tumor spheroids from our recently established gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma patient-derived xenograft models to systematically screen for compounds with diverse structures to identify potential new categories of therapeutic agents that can target gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.

METHODS

Tumor spheroids were derived from our NEC913 and NEC1452 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma patient-derived xenograft models. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma spheroids were screened against a library of 885 compounds from the National Cancer Institute Diversity Set VII collection. Cell viability was measured via AlamarBlue assay. After identification of potential therapeutic compounds, synergy screening of a selected group with temozolomide and doxorubicin was performed, and these combinations were further analyzed for γH2AX and phosphorylated-ERK proteins.

RESULTS

We identified 16 compounds that inhibit over 75% of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma spheroid survival. Seven are inhibitors of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1, a DNA repair enzyme working closely with the topoisomerase I complex. When combined with temozolomide or doxorubicin, the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 inhibitor cytarabine increased the cytotoxic effects of these drugs on NEC1452 cells which was further evidenced by increasing γH2AX and decreasing phosphorylated-ERK in combination treatment compared to temozolomide alone.

CONCLUSION

Both NEC913 and NEC1452 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma spheroid lines are useful preclinical models for drug testing. Our library screen revealed these gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma spheroids are highly sensitive to a novel class of anti-cancer drugs that target nuclear genome stability.

Somatostatin Receptor Subtype-2 Targeting System for Specific Delivery of Temozolomide

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a DNA alkylating agent that produces objective responses in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) when the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is inactivated. At high doses, TMZ therapy exhausts MGMT activity but also produces dose-limiting toxicities. To reduce off-target effects, we converted the clinically approved radiotracer 68Ga-DOTA-TOC into a peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) for targeted delivery of TMZ to somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2)-positive tumor cells. We used an integrated radiolabeling strategy for direct quantitative assessment of receptor binding, pharmacokinetics, and tissue biodistribution. In vitro studies revealed selective binding to SSTR2-positive cells with high affinity (5.98 ± 0.96 nmol/L), internalization, receptor-dependent DNA damage, cytotoxicity, and MGMT depletion. Imaging and biodistribution analysis showed preferential accumulation of the PDC in receptor-positive tumors and high renal clearance. This study identified a trackable SSTR2-targeting system for TMZ delivery and utilizes a modular design that could be broadly applied in PDC development.

MGMT is frequently inactivated in pancreatic NET-G2 and is associated with the therapeutic activity of STZ-based regimens

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) has been linked with alkylating agent resistance and tumor growth suppression. However, its role remains undetermined in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NET). The MGMT expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in 142 patients to evaluate MGMT immunoreactivity and clinicopathological factors. We analyzed the relationship between MGMT expression and treatment efficacy in 19 patients who received STZ-based regimens. In 142 Pan-NET, 97 cases (68.3%) were judged as MGMT-positive and 45 cases (31.6%) as negative. MGMT negativity was significantly more common in NET-G2 (62.5%) than in NET-G1 (11.2%, p < 0.001). MGMT-negative cases were associated significantly with larger tumor size (p < 0.01), higher Ki-67 index (p < 0.01), higher mitotic index (p < 0.05), and more frequent liver metastasis (p < 0.05). Of the 19 cases treated with STZ, 6 cases were determined as SD and 4 cases as PD in MGMT-positive patients (N = 10), while 5 cases were determined as PR and 4 cases as SD in MGMT-negative patients (N = 9). Progression-free survival in MGMT-negative cases was significantly better than in MGMT-positive cases (p < 0.05). MGMT expression was lower in NET-G2 than in NET-G1, and STZ-based regimens improved the therapeutic outcomes of MGMT-negative Pan-NET. These findings indicate that NET-G2 may represent a better therapeutic target for STZ treatment.

Targeted Genomic Profiling and Chemotherapy Outcomes in Grade 3 Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (G3 GEP-NET)

BACKGROUND

Grade 3 gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 GEP-NET) are poorly characterized in terms of molecular features and response to treatments.

METHODS

Patients with G3 GEP-NET were included if they received capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) or oxaliplatin with either 5-fluorouracile (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (XELOX) as first-line treatment (chemotherapy cohort). G3 NET which successfully undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) were included in the NGS cohort.

RESULTS

In total, 49 patients were included in the chemotherapy cohort: 15 received CAPTEM and 34 received FOLFOX/XELOX. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 42.9%, 9.0 months, and 33.6 months, respectively. Calculating a Ki67 cutoff using ROC curve analysis, tumors with Ki67 ≥ 40% had lower ORR (51.2% vs. 0%; p = 0.007) and shorter PFS (10.6 months vs. 4.4 months; p < 0.001) and OS (49.4 months vs. 10.0 months; p = 0.023). In patients who received FOLFOX/XELOX as a first-line treatment, ORR, PFS, and OS were 38.2%, 7.9 months, and 30.0 months, respectively. In the NGS cohort (N = 13), the most mutated genes were DAXX/ATRX (N = 5, 38%), MEN1 (N = 4, 31%), TP53 (N = 4, 31%), AKT1 (N = 2, 15%), and PIK3CA (N = 1, 8%).

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOX/XELOX chemotherapy is active as the first-line treatment of patients with G3 GEP-NET. The mutational landscape of G3 NET is more similar to well-differentiated NETs than NECs.

Rare tumors: a blue ocean of investigation

Advances in novel drugs, therapies, and genetic techniques have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of cancers, substantially improving cancer patients' prognosis. Although rare tumors account for a non-negligible number, the practice of precision medicine and development of novel therapies are largely hampered by many obstacles. Their low incidence and drastic regional disparities result in the difficulty of informative evidence-based diagnosis and subtyping. Sample exhaustion due to difficulty in diagnosis also leads to a lack of recommended therapeutic strategies in clinical guidelines, insufficient biomarkers for prognosis/efficacy, and inability to identify potential novel therapies in clinical trials. Herein, by reviewing the epidemiological data of Chinese solid tumors and publications defining rare tumors in other areas, we proposed a definition of rare tumor in China, including 515 tumor types with incidences of less than 2.5/100 000 per year. We also summarized the current diagnosis process, treatment recommendations, and global developmental progress of targeted drugs and immunotherapy agents on the status quo. Lastly, we pinpointed the current recommendation chance for patients with rare tumors to be involved in a clinical trial by NCCN. With this informative report, we aimed to raise awareness on the importance of rare tumor investigations and guarantee a bright future for rare tumor patients.

Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211)

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective responses. Retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that capecitabine and temozolomide are associated with high response rates (RRs) and long progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide versus capecitabine/temozolomide in patients with advanced low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic NETs. Key eligibility criteria included progression within the preceding 12 months and no prior temozolomide, dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide or dacarbazine, capecitabine or fluorouracil. The primary end point was PFS; secondary endpoints were overall survival, RR, safety, and methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 72); the primary analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, the median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide versus 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for the primary end point (stratified log-rank P = .022). In the final analysis (May 2021), the median overall survival was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = .42). MGMT deficiency was associated with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. The median PFS and RR observed with capecitabine/temozolomide are the highest reported in a randomized study for pancreatic NETs. MGMT deficiency was associated with response, and although routine MGMT testing is not recommended, it can be considered for select patients in need of objective response (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01824875).

Prospective Evaluation of MGMT-Promoter Methylation Status and Correlations with Outcomes to Temozolomide-Based Chemotherapy in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

Temozolomide (TEM) as a single agent or in combination with capecitabine (CAPTEM) is active in well-differentiated advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of gastro-entero-pancreatic and thoracic origin. The predictive role of MGMT-promoter methylation in this setting is controversial. We sought to prospectively evaluate the MGMT-promoter methylation status ability to predict outcomes to TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with NET. A single-center, prospective, observational study has been conducted at the ENETS Center-of-Excellence Outpatient Clinic of the IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi in Bologna, Italy. Patients with advanced, gastro-entero-pancreatic or lung well-differentiated NETs candidate to TEM-based chemotherapy and with available tumor samples for MGMT-promoter methylation assessment were included. The MGMT-promoter methylation status was analyzed by using pyrosequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by the MGMT-promoter methylation status. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Survival outcomes were compared by restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference. Of 26 screened patients, 22 were finally enrolled in the study. The most frequent NET primary sites were the pancreas (64%) and the lung (23%). MGMT promoter was methylated in five tumors (23%). At a median follow-up time of 47.2 months (95%CI 29.3-89.7), the median PFS was 32.8 months (95%CI 17.2-NA), while the median OS was not reached. Patients in the methylated MGMT group, when compared to those in the unmethylated MGMT group, had longer PFS (median not reached [95%CI NA-NA] vs. 30.2 months [95%CI 15.2-NA], respectively; RMST p = 0.005) and OS (median not reached [95%CI NA-NA] vs. not reached [40.1-NA], respectively; RMST p = 0.019). After adjusting for confounding factors, the MGMT-promoter methylation status was independently associated to the PFS. Numerically higher ORR (60% vs. 24%; p = 0.274) and DCR (100% vs. 88%; p = 1.00) were observed in the methylated vs. unmethylated MGMT group. TEM-based chemotherapy was well-tolerated (adverse events grade ≥3 < 10%). In this prospective study, MGMT-promoter methylation predicted better outcomes to TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with NET.

Chemotherapy in Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) G1, G2, and G3: A Narrative Review

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with a wide spectrum of clinical behavior, from the long survival of well-differentiated NETs to the dismal prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), being G3 NETs a recently recognized intermediate entity. While the role of chemotherapy is well established in NECs, data on NETs mostly derives from small studies, experts' opinions, and extrapolating results from small-cell lung cancer studies. This narrative review aims to summarize available evidence about the use of chemotherapy in the setting of G1-2 NETs and G3 NETs. We performed literature research in PubMed Library for all articles published up to September 2022 about the efficacy of chemotherapy in NETs. Treatment regimens with STZ-5FU, CAPTEM, and anti-metabolite-based treatment are the most active and tolerated in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) G1-G2, while platinum-based regimens (FOLFOX/XELOX) and TEM/CAPTEM showed the best activity in thoracic NETs. Solid evidence about chemotherapy efficacy in G3 NETs is still lacking. Literature data support the use of chemotherapy in low-intermediate grade NETs after the failure of other therapies or if tumor shrinkage is needed. Studies assessing G3 NETs independently from NECs are needed to better understand the role of chemotherapy in this setting.

A case of aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumour with extremely rapid progression: possible diagnostic value of TERT promoter methylation

Most pituitary adenoma/neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET) are histologically benign and grow slowly; however, a subset of these tumours exhibit a more aggressive clinical course characterized by local invasiveness and early recurrence. These high-risk PitNETs often require multiple surgeries and radiation over several years and may eventually acquire carcinomatous characteristics, such as metastasis in some cases. Herein, we report a rare case of PitNET causing oculomotor paresis with extremely rapid recurrence only 3 months after initial surgery, followed by lethal liver metastasis. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings were consistent with typical PitNETs, other than moderate invasion of the cavernous sinus. Pathological examination of the specimen obtained from the initial transsphenoidal surgery revealed increased mitosis and elevated rates of cells positive for Ki-67 and p53. Based on the immunohistochemical assessment for transcription factors and pituitary hormones, the diagnosis was determined to be a silent sparsely granulated corticotroph PitNET with focal malignant transformation. Aggressive features represented by Ki-67 and p53 positivity were more robust in recurrent and metastatic specimens, but hormone immunostaining was decreased. Epigenetic analysis revealed methylation of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter in the tumour, resulting in TERT upregulation. Despite extensive research, markers for distinguishing extremely aggressive PitNETs have not been determined. Although further analysis is needed, our case demonstrates the possible usefulness of assessing TERT promoter methylation status in the stratification of recurrence risk in extremely high-risk variants of PitNET.

Therapeutic strategies for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: current perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies mainly arising in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and bronchopulmonary systems, with steadily increasing incidence. The therapeutic landscape has widened and the therapeutic strategy should be based on new sequences and combinations, still debated.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we provide an overview of current approved pharmacological treatments in patients with NENs, with the aim to summarize evidence of efficacy of the main different options in GEP and pulmonary NENs, principally focusing on somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapy with everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and chemotherapy. We discuss biological rationale and toxicities, including current indications according to differentiation and placement in the therapeutic algorithm, clinical trials, and combinations. Furthermore, we recommend areas for further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Therapeutic management of patients with NENs represents a challenge for clinicians and the identification of effective sequences and combinations is of utmost importance. Major efforts should be directed to early identify and overcome resistance and to limit toxicity. The progress in the therapeutic management of NENs grows faster and the choice of the best approach should be based on randomized clinical trials, as well as on long-term, real-world data.

Epigenetic Regulation in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare, diverse group of neuroendocrine tumors that form in the pancreatic and gastrointestinal tract, and often present with side effects due to hormone hypersecretion. The pathogenesis of these tumors is known to be linked to several genetic disorders, but sporadic tumors occur due to dysregulation of additional genes that regulate proliferation and metastasis, but also the epigenome. Epigenetic regulation in these tumors includes DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling and regulation by noncoding RNAs. Several large studies demonstrate the identification of epigenetic signatures that may serve as biomarkers, and others identify innovative, epigenetics-based targets that utilize both pharmacological and theranostic approaches towards the development of new treatment approaches.

Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a rare group of tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells of the digestive system. Their incidence has increased over the last decades. The specific pathogenetic mechanisms underlying GEP-NEN development have not been completely revealed. Unfunctional GEP-NENs are usually asymptomatic; some grow slowly and thus impede early diagnosis, which ultimately results in a high rate of misdiagnosis. Therefore, many GEP-NEN patients present with later staged tumors. Motivated hereby, research attention for diagnosis and treatment for GEP-NENs increased in recent years. The result of which is great progress in clinical diagnosis and treatment. According to the most recent clinical guidelines, improved grading standards can accurately define poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), which are subclassified into large and small cell NECs. Combining different functional imaging methods facilitates precise diagnosis. The expression of somatostatin receptors helps to predict prognosis. Genetic analyses of mutations affecting death domain associated protein (DAXX), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1), alpha thalassemia/intellectual disability syndrome X-linked (ATRX), retinoblastoma transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB 1), and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD 4) help distinguishing grade 3 NENs from poorly differentiated NECs. The aim of this review is to summarize the latest research progress on diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours and somatostatin receptor status: an assessment of unlicensed use of somatostatin analogues in the clinical practice

Background

The use of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) has not been formally approved in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the absence of positive controlled trials, even though it is recommended as a potential therapeutic option in recent guidelines.

Patients and methods

We have assessed the use of SSA in the general practice in Austria by retrospectively analysing patients with pulmonary NETs referred to our European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society centre in Vienna for second opinion or further therapy. In addition, we have analysed the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression of those patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and SSTR imaging, e.g. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTANOC-positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and whether such analyses had been carried out before referral at our centre.

Results

Out of 34 patients (19 atypical and 15 typical carcinoids) with metastatic or advanced disease, 10/34 (29%) had been prescribed SSA before referral. No IHC for SSTR had been carried out, and only 9/34 (27%) had undergone SSTR imaging by nuclear medicine. Sufficient material for IHC was available in 29/34 (85%) patients and SSTR-IHC was rated negative in 13/29 (45%), weakly positive in 4/29 (14%), moderately positive in 5/29 (17%) and strongly positive in 7/29 (24%) patients. On SSTR imaging, 8/34 patients (24%) were positive, 13/34 (38%) negative and 13/34 patients (38%) showed a mix of positive and negative NET lesions. In 11/29 (38%) patients with both IHC and imaging available, discordance of SSTR expression on imaging and histological assessment was detected.

Conclusions

These data show that uncritical use of SSA should be discouraged, and assessment of SSTR, preferably by imaging, is mandatory before prescription of SSA in pulmonary NETs.

•

SSAs are not formally approved in pulmonary NETs.

•

SSAs are recommended as a potential therapeutic option for advanced lung NETs in guidelines.

•

We assessed the use of SSAs for lung NET in the general practice in Austria.

•

Only 27% had undergone SSTR imaging before referral and receptor status was highly heterogeneous.

•

Our data emphasize that uncritical use of SSAs should be discouraged; assessment of SSTRs is recommended.

Thermodynamic Solubility Profile of Temozolomide in Different Commonly Used Pharmaceutical Solvents

The solubility parameters, and solution thermodynamics of temozolomide (TMZ) in 10 frequently used solvents were examined at five different temperatures. The maximum mole fraction solubility of TMZ was ascertained in dimethyl sulfoxide (1.35 × 10⁻²), followed by that in polyethylene glycol-400 (3.32 × 10⁻³) > Transcutol^® (2.89 × 10⁻³) > ethylene glycol (1.64 × 10⁻³) > propylene glycol (1.47 × 10⁻³) > H₂O (7.70 × 10⁻⁴) > ethyl acetate (5.44 × 10⁻⁴) > ethanol (1.80 × 10⁻⁴) > isopropyl alcohol (1.32 × 10⁻⁴) > 1-butanol (1.07 × 10⁻⁴) at 323.2 K. An analogous pattern was also observed for the other investigated temperatures. The quantitated TMZ solubility values were regressed using Apelblat and Van’t Hoff models and showed overall deviances of 0.96% and 1.33%, respectively. Apparent thermodynamic analysis indicated endothermic, spontaneous, and entropy-driven dissolution of TMZ in all solvents. TMZ solubility data may help to formulate dosage forms, recrystallize, purify, and extract/separate TMZ.

Long-term treatment with streptozocin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Case series

RATIONALE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare entities representing 1% to 3% of all malignant pancreatic neoplasms. Current guidelines recommend a combination of streptozocin (STZ) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for patients with metastatic well-differentiated pNETs requiring systemic therapy. The highest median progression-free survival rate reported in previous studies for this combination was 23 months (95% confidence interval 14.5-31.5). However, it remains unclear for how long this regimen can be safely administered.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report about 3 therapy-naïve patients with metastatic G2 (Ki67 10%-15%) pNETs treated with STZ/5-FU, that achieved sustained disease control for longer than 36 months.

DIAGNOSIS

Metastatic, well-differentiated G2 pNETs.

INTERVENTIONS

Systemic chemotherapy with STZ/5-FU was administered until the disease progressed. In 1 case showing a mixed response, selected metastases of increasing size were additionally treated with surgery and brachytherapy.

OUTCOMES

In our 3 patients with metastatic G2 pNETs, STZ/5-FU induced long-term disease control over 44, 42, and 95 months, respectively. No side effects that led to treatment discontinuation were observed.

LESSONS

In patients with metastatic G2 pNETs achieving disease control, STZ/5-FU can be safely administered.

Long-term effect of everolimus in recurrent thymic neuroendocrine neoplasia

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) of the thymus is a very rare entity with a poor prognosis. None of the treatments was proofed by studies. Usually, therapy protocols for bronchopulmonary carcinoids are used. So far no data exist on the effect of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. We describe our long-term experience with everolimus and give a thorough review of the therapeutic strategies used so far.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four patients (mean age 46 years, range 37-55) with progressing thymic NEN (t-NEN) (two well-differentiated atypical carcinoids and two atypical carcinoids with large cell characteristics) were treated with everolimus 10 mg/day after the failure of at least one previous medical therapy. Everolimus was applied after a mean interval of 32.4 months (range 5-56) after the first diagnosis. The follow-up included clinical examination, imaging and chromogranin A testing in 3 or 6 monthly intervals.

RESULTS

We observed stable disease for a mean of 20.8 months. Both patients with large cell characteristics t-NEN (Ki-67 of 20%) had rapid progress after 7 and 10 months and had more previous therapies (three and six) than the patients with well-differentiated t-NEN (Ki-67 5% and 10%, progress after 24 and 42 months, one and two previous therapies). No severe side effects occurred. In three of four patients, everolimus led to stable disease for the longest compared to the other nonsurgical therapies used.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the sparse data available everolimus is a promising treatment for t-NEN at least in second-line therapy. A low Ki-67 index was associated with a better outcome.

Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors

The role for cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains debated. Compared to patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) where chemotherapy is utilized ubiquitously, chemotherapy may play a more select role in patients with certain types of NETs (e.g., pancreatic tumors, higher grade tumors, and tumors possessing DNA damage repair defects). The primary types of chemotherapy that have been tested in patients with NETs include alkylating agent- and platinum agent-based combinations. Across regimens, chemotherapy appears to elicit greater antitumor activity in patients with pancreatic or grade 3 NETs. The role for chemotherapy in lower grade extra-pancreatic NETs remains undefined. Furthermore, while chemotherapy has demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit for patients in the systemic setting, its role in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is as-of-yet undetermined. Finally, efforts to combine chemotherapy with targeted therapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy are ongoing, in hopes of improving the cytoreductive treatment options for patients with NETs.

Renal function in patients receiving streptozocin for locally advanced or metastatic digestive neuroendocrine tumours: results of the Streptotox-FFCD 0906 study

INTRODUCTION

Streptozocin can impair renal function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evolution of renal function in patients receiving this anti-mitotic for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic digestive well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

A prospective and a retrospective cohort of patients with normal baseline renal function were analysed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% during treatment. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of glomerular filtration rate changes, the impact of combined nephrotoxic treatments, other toxicities, compliance, and the objective response rate.

RESULTS

After screening 142 patients, 27 were included in the prospective and 84 in the retrospective cohort. A decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% was observed in 32 patients (30%): respectively four (15.4%) and 28 patients (34.1%) among respectively 26 and 82 patients with numerous measures (P = 0.0097). Altogether, 39 patients (35%) experienced grade 1-2 renal toxicity, while no grade 3-4 occurred in the prospective and 1 occurred in the retrospective cohort. Renal toxicity was more frequent in the retrospective cohort with a less careful follow up. As best responses, objective response was achieved in 27% of patients with pancreatic primary tumours, disease control in 78.9% of patients with pancreatic primary tumours, in 87% of those with small bowel tumours and in 72.7% of patients with other primary locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Strongly recommended for pancreatic NET, streptozocin is associated with frequent mild renal toxicity but low occurrence of renal impairment in patients with baseline normal renal function and under adequate hydration.

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and ¹⁷⁷Lu-oxodotreotide for somatostatin-receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, sunitinib for pancreatic NETs (P-NETs), and everolimus for P-NETs and non-functioning lung or gastrointestinal NETs. Nevertheless, chemotherapy remains an essential component of the treatment armamentarium of patients with NENs, particularly of patients with P-NETs or those with bulky, symptomatic or rapidly progressive tumors (generally G3 or high-G2 NENs). In this manuscript we will comprehensively review available evidence related to the use of chemotherapy in lung and GEP NENs and will critically discuss its role in the treatment algorithm of this family of neoplasms.

Should temozolomide be used on the basis of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase status in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TEM) is an active treatment in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Patients affected by glioblastoma multiforme or advanced melanoma treated with TEM who have deficiency of O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) have a better responses and survival. However, the predictive role of MGMT in patients with NETs treated with TEM is still debated.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, based on PRISMA methodology, searching in the main databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial.gov) and the proceedings of the main international congresses, until April 26, 2021.

RESULTS

Twelve out of 616 articles were selected for our analysis, regarding a total of 858 NET patients treated with TEM-based chemotherapy. The status of MGMT had been tested in 513 (60%) patients, using various methods. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was higher in MGMT-deficient compared with MGMT-proficient NETs, with a risk difference of 0.31 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.13-0.50; p < 0.001; I²: 73%) and risk ratio of 2.29 (95% CI: 1.34-3.91; p < 0.001; I²: 55%). The pooled progression free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio, HR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.43-0.74; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20-0.62; p = 0.011) were longer in MGMT-deficient versus MGMT-proficient NETs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggested that MGMT status may be predictive of TEM efficacy. However, due to the high heterogeneity of the evaluated studies the risk of biases should be considered. On this hypothesis future homogeneous prospective studies are warranted.

State of the art and future directions in the systemic treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous malignancies whose natural evolution may be defined according to various prognostic factors, including localization of the primitive tumour, hormone secretory status, histological grade, tumour burden, tumour growth rate, expression of somatostatin receptors and fluorodeoxyglucose-avidity. The treatment of these tumours in an advanced setting is based on relatively little robust data.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent pathological classification introduced a new category of high-grade but well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3), with markedly different behaviour from neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Yet, the optimal treatment of those tumours is still uncertain. Advances are needed in molecular subtyping of NENs to understand better their heterogeneity and inform personalized therapies.

SUMMARY

The current review summarizes the current knowledge, indicates some exciting future directions and outlines the most interesting ongoing clinical trials likely to impact current practice.

Digestive Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Management and Future Directions

Digestive well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3) have been clearly defined since the 2017 World Health Organization classification. They are still a rare category lacking specific data and standardized management. Their distinction from other types of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) not only lies in morphology but also in genotype, aggressiveness, functional imaging uptake, and treatment response. Most of the available data comes from pancreatic series, which is the most frequent tumor site for this entity. In the non-metastatic setting, surgical resection is recommended, irrespective of grade and tumor site. For metastatic NET G-3, chemotherapy is the main first-line treatment with temozolomide-based regimen showing more efficacy than platinum-based regimen, especially when Ki-67 index <55%. Targeted therapies, such as sunitinib and everolimus, have also shown some positive therapeutic efficacy in small samples of patients. Functional imaging plays a key role for detection but also treatment selection. In the second or further-line setting, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has shown promising response rates in high-grade NEN. Finally, immunotherapy is currently investigated as a new therapeutic approach with trials still ongoing. More data will come with future work now focusing on this specific subgroup. The aim of this review is to summarize the current data on digestive NET G-3 and explore future directions for their management.

Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Which Systemic Treatment Should I Start With?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) often present as advanced disease and there is little data to guide treatment sequencing in the advance disease setting. Therefore, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the current evidence supporting the use of systemic treatment for patients with diagnosis of advanced and metastatic panNENs, as well as to provide strategies for treatment selection and address challenges for treatment selection and sequencing of therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Substantial advances have been made and many clinical trials have been performed over the past two decades expanding therapeutic options available for patients with advanced panNETs. Available systemic treatments for patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors include somatostatin receptors ligands (SRLs), traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT), and biologically targeted therapies, whereas patients with poorly differentiated neurodocrine carcinomas have more limited treatment options. Despite these advances, no clear guidelines exist to support the best sequence of treatments, not only the first-line, but also subsequent lines of therapy in patients with panNENs. Advances in molecular research and discovery of biomarkers for response allowing a more personalized approach to the multimodality therapy of panNENs are still limited. Understanding the impact of previous therapies on subsequent treatment efficacy and toxicity is also an ongoing research question. In the absence of definite predictive markers and paucity of comparative randomized trials, along with the heterogeneity of this patient population, systemic therapy selection in advanced non-resectable disease should be patient centered and often require evaluation within a multidisciplinary setting. The specific clinical context of the patient, with assessment of individual patient clinical and pathological features, somatostatin receptors imaging, and goals of treatment must all be considered when deciding on systemic therapy in the patient. Additional research is needed to address the gap in knowledge regarding optimal sequencing and timing of therapies and to provide individual care.

Phase II study of temozolomide monotherapy in patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EPNEC) is a lethal disease with a poor prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is used as the standard first-line treatment for unresectable EPNEC. Several retrospective studies have reported the results of the utilization of temozolomide (TMZ) as a drug for the second-line treatment for EPNEC. Patients with unresectable EPNEC that were resistant to platinum-based combination chemotherapy were recruited for a prospective phase II study of TMZ monotherapy. A 200 mg/m2 dose of TMZ was given from day 1 to day 5, every 4 weeks. Response rate (RR) was evaluated as the primary end-point. The presence of O6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in EPNEC patients was also evaluated as exploratory research. Thirteen patients were enrolled in this study. Primary lesions were pancreas (n = 3), stomach (n = 3), duodenum (n = 1), colon (n = 1), gallbladder (n = 1), liver (n = 1), uterus (n = 1), bladder (n = 1), and primary unknown (n = 1). Each case was defined as pathological poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma from surgically resected and/or biopsied specimens. The median Ki-67 labeling index was 60% (range, 22%-90%). The RR was 15.4%, progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.7), overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.0-9.5), and OS from first-line treatment was 19.2 months (95% CI, 15.1-23.3). No grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity had occurred and there was one case of grade 3 nausea. One case presented MGMT deficiency and this case showed partial response. Temozolomide monotherapy is a feasible, modestly effective, and safe treatment for patients with unresectable EPNEC following platinum-based chemotherapy, especially those with MGMT deficiency.

Metastatic Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas

CONTEXT

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are believed to harbor malignant potential; about 10% to 15% of pheochromocytomas and up to 50% of abdominal paragangliomas will exhibit metastatic behavior.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Extensive searches in the PubMed database with various combinations of the key words pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, metastatic, malignant, diagnosis, pathology, genetic, and treatment were the basis for the present review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

To pinpoint metastatic potential in PPGLs is difficult, but nevertheless crucial for the individual patient to receive tailor-made follow-up and adjuvant treatment following primary surgery. A combination of histological workup and molecular predictive markers can possibly aid the clinicians in this aspect. Most patients with PPGLs have localized disease and may be cured by surgery. Plasma metanephrines are the main biochemical tests. Genetic testing is important, both for counseling and prognostic estimation. Apart from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, molecular imaging using 68Ga-DOTATOC/DOTATATE should be performed. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy may be performed to determine whether 131I-MIBG therapy is a possible option. As first-line treatment in patients with metastatic disease, 177Lu-DOTATATE or 131I-MIBG is recommended, depending on which shows best expression. In patients with very low proliferative activity, watch-and-wait or primary treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues may be considered. As second-line treatment, or first-line in patients with high proliferative rate, chemotherapy with temozolomide or cyclophosphamide + vincristine + dacarbazine is the therapy of choice. Other therapies, including sunitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, and PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors, have shown modest effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic PPGLs need individualized management and should always be discussed in specialized and interdisciplinary tumor boards. Further studies and newer treatment modalities are urgently needed.

Large Cell Neuro-Endocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Current Treatment Options and Potential Future Opportunities

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung (LCNECs) are rare tumors representing 1-3% of all primary lung cancers. Patients with LCNEC are predominantly male, older, and heavy smokers. Histologically, these tumors are characterized by large cells with abundant cytoplasm, high mitotic rate, and neuroendocrine immunohistochemistry-detected markers (chromogranin-A, synaptophysin, and CD56). In 2015 the World Health Organization classified LCNEC as a distinct subtype of pulmonary large-cell carcinoma and, therefore, as a subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Because of the small-sized tissue samples and the likeness to other neuroendocrine tumors, the histological diagnosis of LCNEC remains difficult. Clinically, the prognosis of metastatic LCNECs is poor, with high rates of recurrence after surgery alone and overall survival of approximately 35% at 5 years, even for patients with early stage disease that is dramatically shorter compared with other NSCLC subtypes. First-line treatment options have been largely discussed but with limited data based on phase II studies with small sample sizes, and there are no second-line well defined treatments. To date, no standard treatment regimen has been developed, and how to treat LCNEC is still on debate. In the immunotherapy and targeted therapy era, in which NSCLC treatment strategies have been radically reshaped, a few data are available regarding these opportunities in LCNEC. Due to lack of knowledge in this field, many efforts have been done for a deeper understanding of the biological and molecular characteristics of LCNEC. Next generation sequencing analyses have identified subtypes of LCNEC that may be relevant for prognosis and response to therapy, but further studies are needed to better define the clinical impact of these results. Moreover, scarce data exist about PD-L1 expression in LCNEC and its predictive value in this histotype with regard to immunotherapy efficacy. In the literature some cases are reported concerning LCNEC metastatic patients carrying driver mutations, especially EGFR alterations, showing targeted therapy efficacy in this setting of disease. Due to the rarity and the challenging understanding of LCNEC, in this review we aim to summarize the management options currently available for treatment of LCNEC.

Diagnosis and treatment of refractory pituitary adenomas: a narrative review

Although aggressive pituitary adenomas (PAs) have been proposed and widely discussed for more than a decade, there is no general agreement regarding their definition, diagnosis or management. As one of the largest pituitary centers in China, we have diagnosed and treated more than fifty cases of aggressive PA and 3 pituitary carcinomas in the past 5 years and proposed a new term, i.e., refractory PAs, to define these adenomas. The definitions of aggressive and refractory PAs overlap with each other, though there are some differences between them. We interpret the definition for refractory PA in this review, emphasizing that more attention and early identification of these adenomas are needed. Although temozolomide (TMZ) has been used to treat pituitary carcinomas and refractory PA since 2006, which has significantly improved the prognosis of these patients, treatment of refractory PA is a tremendous challenge for endocrinologists and neurosurgeons. Overall, refractory PA is defined as PA with a Ki-67 labeling index ≥3%, a faster growth rate than that of normal PA, infiltration of surrounding tissues, recurrence or regrowth in the early postoperative period, and continued growth and/or secretion of excessive hormones despite attempts to control it. These criteria for refractory PA are stricter than for aggressive PA. The diagnosis and treatment of refractory PA requires the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team to achieve the best results.

Temozolomide alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: an Italian multicenter real-world analysis

PURPOSE

Temozolomide (TEM) has been reported to be active alone or in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). We retrospectively evaluated activity and toxicity of TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NENs and explored the potential correlation with clinical/biological factors.

METHODS

Patients received oral TEM alone or in combination with CAP. Objective response rate (ORR) [complete response + partial response (PR)], median progression-free survival (mPFS), and toxicity were calculated. The O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene inactivation status in tumor tissue was evaluated by pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

From September 2008 to April 2020, 170 patients (84% progressive on different therapies) were consecutively treated, 114 (67%) patients received TEM-CAP and 56 (33%) TEM alone. Primary tumor sites were: pancreas 98 (58%), gastrointestinal tract 21 (12%), lung 35 (21%), and unknown 16 (9%). The ORR was 28% for the whole population (33% for TEM-CAP and 18% for TEM as single agent). The median OS (mOS) and mPFS of the whole population were 35.6 months (32.6-48.7) and 14.7 months (10.1-18.3), respectively. There were 48% PR in the MGMT hypermethylated, mainly in pancreatic NENs. Vomiting and leukopenia were the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This large retrospective analysis suggested that a TEM-based chemotherapy is active in advanced, pretreated NEN patients. It generated solid hypotheses that warrant a future prospective study in a biological homogeneous NEN population and clinical setting.

An Overview on Molecular Characterization of Thymic Tumors: Old and New Targets for Clinical Advances

Thymic tumors are a group of rare mediastinal malignancies that include three different histological subtypes with completely different clinical behavior: the thymic carcinomas, the thymomas, and the rarest thymic neuroendocrine tumors. Nowadays, few therapeutic options are available for relapsed and refractory thymic tumors after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. In the last years, the deepening of knowledge on thymus' biological characterization has opened possibilities for new treatment options. Several clinical trials have been conducted, the majority with disappointing results mainly due to inaccurate patient selection, but recently some encouraging results have been presented. In this review, we summarize the molecular alterations observed in thymic tumors, underlying the great biological differences among the different histology, and the promising targeted therapies for the future.

177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Heavily Pretreated with Chemotherapy: Analysis of Outcome, Safety, and Their Determinants

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their determinants in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), previously pretreated with chemothe-r-apy, undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with advanced PanNETs, previously pretreated with one (67%) or several (33%) lines of chemotherapy, were included, of whom 90% had progressive disease and the majority (74.5%) had grade 2 tumors. 177Lu-DOTATATE, 7.4 GBq per cycle, was administered with 6- to 8-week intervals in 88% of patients utilizing a dosimetry-guided protocol until an absorbed dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys was reached.

RESULTS

A mean dose of 32 ± 10.9 GBq per patient was administered in 1-10 cycles starting a median of 36 months after PanNET diagnosis. The median follow-up was 34 months, the median PFS was 24 months, and the median OS was 42 months from start of PRRT. Independent risk factors for both progression and death were liver tumor burden >50%, more than one line of previous chemotherapy, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Resection of the primary tumor was linked to longer survival. Bone marrow toxicity grade 3-4 occurred in 10.8%. One patient (1.0%) developed acute myeloid leukemia. Bone marrow toxicity was unrelated to type and length of previous chemotherapy, amount of administered activity, and absorbed dose to the bone marrow.

CONCLUSION

177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was feasible, highly effective, and safe in patients with advanced PanNETs heavily pretreated with chemotherapy. More than one line of chemotherapy was a therapy-related independent risk factor for shorter PFS and OS.

A Ki-67 Index to Predict Treatment Response to the Capecitabine/Temozolomide Regimen in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of the capecitabine/temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimen has been demonstrated in metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), but because of varying response rates among the patients, biomarkers to predict its response are greatly needed. Here, we investigated the clinical utility of a Ki-67 index to predict the CAPTEM regimen objective responses and select patients who could benefit from this regimen.

METHODS

Metastatic NENs patients treated with the CAPTEM regimen from 4 high-volume medical centers were selected and grouped in a training and validation cohort. The classification and regression tree (CART) was generated to identify the optimal threshold of Ki-67 for stratifying the patients into different Ki-67 range groups based on their response to the CAPTEM regimen.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate of the entire cohort (N = 151) were 26.5 and 76.2%, respectively, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.0 months. CART analysis showed that patients in the Ki-67 range group 10-40% demonstrated a significantly higher ORR than those in Ki-67 >40 and <10% groups (p < 0.001 in the training cohort and p = 0.036 in the validation cohort). Response to the CAPTEM regimen was not influenced by the expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase or primary tumor location. Multivariate analysis identified the Ki-67 index as the only independent prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.031) and PFS (p = 0.006). The proposed Ki-67 index was externally validated and could be used to clinically identify suitable metastatic NENs patients who could achieve an optimal cytoreduction using the CAPTEM regimen.

Temozolomide Alone or Combined with Capecitabine for the Treatment of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A "Real-World" Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs) are a rare group of tumors with different prognosis and response to therapy. Their heterogeneity is dependent on the site of origin, morphology, and Ki67. Temozolomide (TEM) appears to be active in metastatic NENs (mNENs) but there is limited evidence about its efficacy in gastrointestinal NENs. We analyzed "real-world" data on the use of TEM alone or in association with capecitabine (CAPTEM) in patients with mNENs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with advanced NENs treated with TEM or CAPTEM between 2009 and 2019 were included. A pretreatment tumor growth rate (TGR0) was calculated. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were analyzed. A propensity score analysis and inverse probability of treatment weights for Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

TEM-based therapy was administered to 95 patients (26.3% CAPTEM and 83.7% TEM) with a median age of 59 years (range 26-85) years. ECOG performance status was 0-2. Carcinoid syndrome was reported in 12 (12.6%) patients. Twenty (21.1%) patients with grade (G) 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and 9 (9.4%) with G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) were included in the analysis. Median PFS of the entire group was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-11.5). In multivariate analysis, a higher risk of progression was observed for NEC G3 patients (hazard ratio [HR] 2.70, 95% CI: 1.25-5.84) and for a TGR ≥19.55 (HR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.45-4.40). Median OS was 23.4 months (95% CI: 17.0-29.0) and was similar in both treatment groups (23.9 vs. 20.5 months for TEM and CAPTEM, respectively, p = 0.585). In multivariate analysis, TGR ≥19.55 was associated with a higher risk of death (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.16-4.11) than TGR <19.55, as was NEC G3 (HR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.04-5.59) with respect to NETs. No differences in terms of mPFS or mOS were seen in relation to the primary site of disease. In the 86 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 44.1% and the DCR was 70.9%. Mild adverse events (grade I-II) included anemia, neutropenia, and headache. Rare cases of G 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

TEM-based regimens are associated with a high DCR and a relatively tolerable toxicity profile in NENs of pancreatic, intestinal, and lung origin. Further investigation of these specific NETs is warranted in prospective clinical trials.

Recent Advances in the Management of Typical and Atypical Lung Carcinoids

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung represent about 20% to 30% of all neuroendocrine tumors. On the basis of clinical and pathologic characteristics, 2 different categories of tumors may be defined: poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms, characterized by a high rate of recurrences and poor prognosis, and well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids), which generally display an indolent course. Lung carcinoids represent only 1% to 5% of all lung malignancies, but their incidence has significantly increased over the past 30 years. Surgery is the reference standard of treatment for lung carcinoids with locoregional disease. For advanced or unresectable lung carcinoids, several therapeutic options are available, but the choice should be shared within a multidisciplinary team to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. We describe the current management of these rare neoplasms.

O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and glucose transporter 2 in foregut and hindgut gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

Streptozocin (STZ) is used for treating both pancreatic (PanNET) and gastrointestinal (GI-NET) neuroendocrine tumors but its therapeutic efficacy is relatively low in GI-NETs. Therefore, it has become pivotal to select GI-NET patients who could benefit from STZ treatment. STZ is transported via the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) into the cells and the loss of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) also increases its therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, GLUT2 high and MGMT low status could be the surrogate markers of STZ.

Methods

In this study, we examined the MGMT and GLUT2 status in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). We studied 84 NEN cases: 33 foregut and 37 hindgut GI-NETs and 14 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas (GI-NECs).

Results

In GI-NETs, MGMT scores of ≥2 and ≥ 3 were 77% (54/70) and 56% (39/70), respectively, and GLUT2 scores of ≥4 and ≥ 6 were 30% (21/70) and 4.3% (3/70), respectively. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction revealed that MGMT promoter methylation was detected only in 2/14 GI-NECs but none of the included GI-NETs. GLUT2 (GLUT2 score) and MGMT immunoreactivity (MGMT and H-scores) were both significantly correlated with Ki-67 labeling index (GLUT2 score: P = 0.0045, ρ = − 0.4570; MGMT score: P = 0.0064, ρ = − 0.4399; H-score: P = 0.0110, ρ = − 0.4135) and MGMT immunoreactivity were significantly correlated with GLUT2 immunoreactivity (MGMT score: P = 0.0198; H-score, P = 0.0004, ρ = 0.5483) in hindgut NETs, but not in foregut NETs. However, discrepancies from the above correlation between GLUT2 and MGMT immunoreactivity were detected in several GI-NET cases which could be potential candidates for STZ therapy.

Conclusion

The evaluation of MGMT and GLUT2 status could provide an important information in planning STZ therapy in GI-NET patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07579-6.

Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Adjuvant and Systemic Treatments

OPINION STATEMENT

Bronchial carcinoids are uncommon tumors accounting for 20 to 30% of all neuroendocrine tumors and about 1-2% of all cancers of pulmonary origin. Bronchial carcinoids are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and have a favorable survival outcome when compared with other subtypes of lung cancers. Treatment of bronchial carcinoids is not simple owing to intricacy of symptom presentation and heterogeneity of disease biology. Successful treatment of patients requires a multimodality approach. Resection is curative in the majority of patients with localized tumors and adjuvant treatment is not routinely recommended. Multiple options for systemic therapy exist for patients with advanced disease. To date, very few randomized clinical trials have been done, partly owing to the relative rarity of this malignancy. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are reasonable first-line choice for patients with tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Everolimus is an appropriate first-line choice for somatostatin receptor negative tumors and for any patients with progressive disease. PRRT can also be considered for progressive tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Based on retrospective series, cytotoxic chemotherapy can be selected in patients with progressive tumors, primarily when cytoreduction is needed. Herein, we will discuss evidence supporting the role of adjuvant and systemic treatment therapies for those with bronchial carcinoid tumors by focusing on various studies.

Medical Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are relatively rare but their incidence has increased almost sevenfold over the last four decades. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified according to their histologic differentiation and their grade. Their grade is based on their Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic index. Their prognosis is highly variable according to these elements and treatments also vary according to their classification. Surgery is the only curative treatment for localized and advanced panNENs and offers a better prognosis than non-surgical treatments. In the case of an advanced panNEN without the possibility of resection and/or ablation, medical treatment remains the cornerstone for improving survival and preserving quality-of-life. PanNENs are considered as chemosensitive tumors, unlike midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Thus, panNENs can be treated with chemotherapy, but targeted therapies and somatostatin analogs are also treatment options. The scarcity and heterogeneity of NENs make their management difficult. The present review aims to clarify the medical treatments currently available for advanced panNENs, based on their characteristics, and to propose a treatment algorithm.

Well Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Digestive Tract: A Narrative Review

The 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the digestive tract introduced a new category of tumors named well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3). These lesions show a number of mitosis, or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% with a well-differentiated morphology, therefore separating them from neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) which are poorly differentiated. It has become clear that NET G-3 show differences not only in morphology but also in genotype, clinical presentation, and treatment response. The incidence of digestive NET G-3 represents about one third of NEN G-3 with main tumor sites being the pancreas, the stomach and the colon. Treatment for NET G-3 is not yet standardized because of lack of data. In a non-metastatic setting, international guidelines recommend surgical resection, regardless of tumor grading. For metastatic lesion, chemotherapy is the main treatment with similar regimen as NET G-2. Sunitinib has also shown some positive results in a small sample of patients but this needs confirmation. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and immunotherapy could be future available treatments after ongoing studies. The goal of this review was to sum up the latest data on the epidemiology and management of digestive NET G-3.

Temozolomide therapy for aggressive pituitary tumours - current understanding and future perspectives

The use of temozolomide (TMZ) for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours (APT) has revolutionised clinical practice in this field with significantly improved clinical outcomes and long-term survival. Its use is now well established however a large number of patients do not respond to treatment and recurrence after cessation of TMZ is common. A number of challenges remain for clinicians such as appropriate patient selection, treatment duration and the role of combination therapy. This review will examine the use of TMZ to treat APT including mechanism of action, treatment regimen and duration; biomarkers predicting response to treatment and patient selection; and current evidence for administration of TMZ in combination with other agents.

Phase 1 dose escalation trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) and temozolomide in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are understudied and have limited systemic treatment options. Prior studies for patients with advanced NETs have demonstrated promising results when antimetabolite agents, including fluoropyrimidines, were combined with temozolomide TMZ. TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) is an antineoplastic agent that is non-cross resistant with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine and that has a different toxicity profile. This study evaluated the safety of TAS-102 in combination with TMZ in patients in neuroendocrine tumors. Escalating doses of TMZ (100, 150 and 200 mg/m²) on days 8-12 were given in combination with TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice a day) on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28 day cycle in subjects with advanced NETs. Primary endpoints were safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Growth factor support was mandated starting with level 2 to avoid treatment delays. Fifteen evaluable subjects were enrolled in the phase 1 study. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed on level 1. One DLT was observed on level 2 (grade 3 fatigue and inability to resume treatment), and 1 on level 3 (grade 4 thrombocytopenia). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events included neutropenia (33%), lymphopenia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (27%). Disease control rate of 92% and partial response rate of 8% were observed in 13 evaluable subjects. This study established MTD of TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice daily) and TMZ (200 mg/m² daily). This regimen was well tolerated. Early signs of clinically meaningful activity were observed. Further evaluation of the efficacy of this regimen is warranted.

Temozolomide Combined With Capecitabine In The Treatment Of Mixed Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Of The Lung With Poor Tolerance After Repeated Radiochemotherapy: A Case Report And Literature Review

The incidence of lung neuroendocrine carcinomas, which originate from lung neuroendocrine cells, is 1.35/100,000, among which mixed neuroendocrine carcinomas are very rare. Because of the heterogeneity and significant differences in sensitivity to treatments, there is no effective treatment, and the prognosis is poor. In this article, we report the diagnosis and treatment of a case of mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung in our hospital. During the treatment, the patients had significant myelosuppression after initial chemotherapy, but benefited from oral chemotherapy consisting of a combination of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM). The report was approved by the affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong University.

Temozolomide Is a Potential Therapeutic Tool for Patients With Metastatic Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma-Case Report and Review of the Literature

Context: Metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (MPP) therapy mainly involves radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. In recent years, temozolomide (TMZ) showed great promise in some MMP patients, especially those with SDHB germline mutation. We reported a patient with MPP who did not have any known germline genetic change and responded remarkably well to TMZ monotherapy. Case presentation: The patient was a 41-year-old woman with local and distant recurrence (soft tissues and bone metastases) of retroperitoneal paraganglioma. She suffered from dizziness, palpitation, sweating, weight loss and constipation, with the blood pressure fluctuating substantially from 130/100 mmHg to 190/120 mmHg, although she was on phenoxybenzamine and metoprolol medication. The patient showed clinical and radiological response after 3-cycle TMZ therapy. Upon 15 cycles of TMZ therapy, her symptoms were dramatically alleviated, urinary norepinephrine excretion decreased from 1,840 μg/24 h to 206 μg/24 h, and CT showed that the lesions further shrank. Molecular profiling of the tumor tissue of the patient revealed hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter and a negative immunostaining for MGMT. Globally, only 26 cases of MPP treated with TMZ have been described so far. TMZ is effective, especially in patients with SDHB mutation, which can be explained by the silencing of MGMT expression as a consequence of MGMT promoter hypermethylation in SDHB-mutated tumors. Although, in general, patients with SDHB mutation or MGMT promoter hypermethylation have better response to TMZ, there are also exceptions. Severe side effects are uncommon, with only 17.4% patients experiencing Grade 3 toxicities, including lymphopenia, and hypertension. Conclusions: TMZ is effective and safe in MPP patients, and, it may work better on patients with SDHB-related MPP. Measurement of MGMT expression might help assess the tumor sensitivity to TMZ but this needs further systematic investigation.

Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Over the years, there have been significant advances in systemic treatments for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Despite these advancements, uncertainty remains regarding how to best sequence available therapies. For well-differentiated and metastatic panNETs that are somatostatin receptor (SSTR) avid on functional imaging, first-line therapy typically consists of somatostatin analogs (SSAs), given their favorable toxicity profile and overall low burden for patients. When progression of disease is observed on an SSA, multiple treatment options are available, including the targeted agents everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), as well as chemotherapy, with the latter often preferred for those panNETs of heavy tumor burden, higher grade, and/or more aggressive behavior clinically and/or radiographically. Here, we review panNET classification, currently available systemic treatments, therapy sequencing, and areas of active investigation to further our treatments for the disease.

MGMT Promoter Methylation and Parathyroid Carcinoma

Context

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is extremely rare. Prognosis is poor, with no known evidence-based systemic therapies. We previously reported complete remission in a patient with metastasized parathyroid carcinoma and high tumor MGMT promoter methylation status who was treated with temozolomide.

Objective

To study MGMT promoter methylation status in an additional set of aggressive parathyroid tumors.

Design/Setting

The study included 12 patients: 7 with sporadic and 5 with familial primary hyperparathyroidism (two of the latter carried a CDC73 gross deletion). Patient 9 is the previously described patient with PC and high MGMT methylation status. Her daughter (patient 12) had surgery for severe primary hyperparathyroidism due to atypical parathyroid adenoma during pregnancy. Eleven patients thus had PC and one had atypical parathyroid adenoma. MGMT promoter methylation status was determined from DNA extracted from primary (n = 10) or metastatic (n = 2) tumors. A mean methylation level >20% was considered high. Patient 11 had metastatic PC and received temozolomide cycles.

Results

Only the previously published patient (patient 9) had high tumor MGMT promoter methylation status. This was not a characteristic of the atypical parathyroid adenoma of the daughter (patient 12). Patient 11 (CDC73 intragenic deletion) has disseminated PC, low MGMT promoter methylation, and stable disease on follow-up after temozolomide treatment.

Conclusion

High MGMT promoter methylation status seems rare in PC. However, as demonstrated in other neuroendocrine tumors, some patients with disseminated PC might benefit from temozolomide. Demonstration of high methylation status could be a predictor of positive response to temozolomide treatment.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Carcinoid Brain Metastasis: A Case Report

Carcinoid brain metastases are extremely rare and are associated with a poor prognosis. Treatment options are variable, ranging from surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy alone or combined. We report on a case of rectal carcinoid metastatic to the cerebellum and review chemotherapeutic regimens for carcinoid tumor treatment, focusing on the potential role of temozolomide or stereotactic radiosurgery.