Phase I Trial of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Antagonist 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan

Comparison of the tolerability of 161Tb- and 177Lu-labeled somatostatin analogues in the preclinical setting

PURPOSE

[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is an established somatostatin receptor (SSTR) agonist for the treatment of metastasized neuroendocrine neoplasms, while the SSTR antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-LM3 has only scarcely been employed in clinics. Impressive preclinical data obtained with [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 in tumor-bearing mice indicated the potential of terbium-161 as an alternative to lutetium-177. The aim of the present study was to compare the tolerability of 161Tb- and 177Lu-based DOTA-LM3 and DOTATATE in immunocompetent mice.

METHODS

Dosimetry calculations were performed based on biodistribution data of the radiopeptides in immunocompetent mice. Treatment-related effects on blood cell counts were assessed on Days 10, 28 and 56 after application of [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 or [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE at 20 MBq per mouse. These radiopeptides were also applied at 100 MBq per mouse and the effects compared to those observed after application of the 177Lu-labeled counterparts. Bone marrow smears, blood plasma parameters and organ histology were assessed at the end of the study.

RESULTS

The absorbed organ dose was commonly higher for the SSTR antagonist than for the SSTR agonist and for terbium-161 over lutetium-177. Application of a therapeutic activity level of 20 MBq [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 or [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE was well tolerated without major hematological changes. The injection of 100 MBq of the 161Tb- and 177Lu-based somatostatin analogues affected the blood cell counts, however. The lymphocytes were 40-50% lower in treated mice compared to the untreated controls on Day 10 irrespective of the radionuclide employed. At the same timepoint, thrombocyte and erythrocyte counts were 30-50% and 6-12% lower, respectively, after administration of the SSTR antagonist (p < 0.05) while changes were less pronounced in mice injected with the SSTR agonist. All blood cell counts were in the normal range on Day 56. Histological analyses revealed minimal abnormalities in the kidneys, liver and spleen of treated mice. No correlation was observed between the organ dose and frequency of the occurrence of abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Hematologic changes were more pronounced in mice treated with the SSTR antagonist than in those treated with the SSTR agonist. Despite the increased absorbed dose delivered by terbium-161 over lutetium-177, [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 and [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE should be safe at activity levels that are recommended for their respective 177Lu-based analogues.

Dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

To evaluate the dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of the novel radiolabelled somatostatin receptor antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).

METHODS

This study was part of a phase I/II trial of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three planned cycles (median activity/cycle: 4.5 GBq), in 40 patients with progressive NETs. Organ absorbed doses were monitored at each cycle using patient-specific dosimetry; the cumulative absorbed-dose limits were set at 23.0 Gy for the kidneys and 1.5 Gy for bone marrow. Absorbed dose coefficients (ADCs) were calculated using both patient-specific and model-based dosimetry for some patients.

RESULTS

In all evaluated organs, maximum [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan uptake was observed at the first imaging timepoint (4 h after injection), followed by an exponential decrease. Kidneys were the main route of elimination, with a cumulative excretion of 57-66% within 48 h following the first treatment cycle. At the first treatment cycle, [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan showed a median terminal blood half-life of 127 h and median ADCs of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan were 5.0 Gy/GBq in tumours, 0.1 Gy/GBq in the bone marrow, 0.9 Gy/GBq in kidneys, 0.2 Gy/GBq in the liver and 0.8 Gy/GBq in the spleen. Using image-based dosimetry, the bone marrow and kidneys received median cumulative absorbed doses of 1.1 and 10.8 Gy, respectively, after three cycles.

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan showed a favourable dosimetry profile, with high and prolonged tumour uptake, supporting its acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

State-of-the-Art Hybrid Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) may be challenging to diagnose due to their small size and diverse anatomical locations. Hybrid imaging techniques, specifically positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), represent the current state-of-the-art for evaluating NENs. The preferred radiopharmaceuticals for NEN PET imaging are gallium-68 (68Ga) DOTA-peptides, which target somatostatin receptors (SSTR) overexpressed on NEN cells. Clinical applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptides PET/CT include diagnosis, staging, prognosis assessment, treatment selection, and response evaluation. Fluorodeoxyglucose-18 (18F-FDG) PET/CT aids in detecting low-SSTR-expressing lesions and helps in patient stratification and treatment planning, particularly in grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). New radiopharmaceuticals such as fluorine-labeled SSTR agonists and SSTR antagonists are emerging as alternatives to 68Ga-labeled peptides, offering improved detection rates and favorable biodistribution. The maturing of PET/MRI brings advantages to NEN imaging, including simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI images, superior soft tissue contrast resolution, and motion correction capabilities. The PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptides has demonstrated higher lesion detection rates and more accurate lesion classification compared to PET/CT. Overall, hybrid imaging offers valuable insights in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning of NENs. Further research is needed to refine response assessment criteria and standardize reporting guidelines.

Radionuclide Theranostics in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper aims to address the latest findings in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) theranostics, focusing on new evidence and future directions of combined diagnosis with positron emission tomography (PET) and treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

RECENT FINDINGS

Following NETTER-1 trial, PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE was approved by FDA and EMA and is routinely employed in advanced G1 and G2 SST (somatostatin receptor)-expressing NET. Different approaches have been proposed so far to improve the PRRT therapeutic index, encompassing re-treatment protocols, combinations with other therapies and novel indications. Molecular imaging holds a potential added value in characterizing disease biology and heterogeneity using different radiopharmaceuticals (e.g., SST and FDG) and may provide predictive and prognostic parameters. Response assessment criteria are still an unmet need and new theranostic pairs showed preliminary encouraging results. PRRT for NET has become a paradigm of modern theranostics. PRRT holds a favorable toxicity profile, and it is associated with a prolonged time to progression, reduction of symptoms, and improved patients' quality of life. In light of further optimization, different new strategies have been investigated, along with the development of new radiopharmaceuticals.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist Versus Agonist for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Therapy-Resistant Meningioma: PROMENADE Phase 0 Study

Our primary aim was to compare the therapeutic index (tumor-to-bone marrow and tumor-to-kidney absorbed-dose ratios) of the new radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 with the established radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in the same patients with progressive, standard therapy-refractory meningioma. Methods: In this prospective, single-center, open-label phase 0 study (NCT04997317), 6 consecutive patients were included: 3 men and 3 women (mean age, 63.5 y). Patients received 6.9-7.3 GBq (standard injected radioactivity) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC followed by 3.3-4.9 GBq (2 GBq/m2 × body surface area) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 at an interval of 10 ± 1 wk. In total, 1 [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 2-3 [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 treatment cycles were performed. Quantitative SPECT/CT was done at approximately 24, 48, and 168 h after injection of both radiopharmaceuticals to calculate meningioma and organ absorbed doses as well as tumor-to-organ absorbed-dose ratios (3-dimensional segmentation approach for meningioma, kidneys, liver, bone marrow, and spleen). Results: The median of the meningioma absorbed dose of 1 treatment cycle was 3.4 Gy (range, 0.8-10.2 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 11.5 Gy (range, 4.7-22.7 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. The median bone marrow and kidney absorbed doses after 1 treatment cycle were 0.11 Gy (range, 0.05-0.17 Gy) and 2.7 Gy (range, 1.3-5.3 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 0.29 Gy (range, 0.16-0.39 Gy) and 3.3 Gy (range, 1.6-5.9 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11, resulting in a 1.4 (range, 0.9-1.9) times higher median tumor-to-bone marrow absorbed-dose ratio and a 2.9 (range, 2.0-4.8) times higher median tumor-to-kidney absorbed-dose ratio with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, 2 patients developed reversible grade 2 lymphopenia after 1 cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC. Afterward, 2 patients developed reversible grade 3 lymphopenia and 1 patient developed reversible grade 3 lymphopenia and neutropenia after 2-3 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed at 15 mo or more after the start of therapy. The disease control rate was 83% (95% CI, 53%-100%) at 12 mo or more after inclusion. Conclusion: Treatment with 1 cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 showed 2.2-5.7 times higher meningioma absorbed doses and a favorable therapeutic index compared with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC after injection of 1.4-2.1 times lower activities. The first efficacy results demonstrated a high disease control rate with an acceptable safety profile in the standard therapy for refractory meningioma patients. Therefore, larger studies with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 are warranted in meningioma patients.

Theranostics - a sure cure for cancer after 100 years?

Cancer has remained a formidable challenge in medicine and has claimed an enormous number of lives worldwide. Theranostics, combining diagnostic methods with personalized therapeutic approaches, shows huge potential to advance the battle against cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of theranostics in oncology: exploring its history, current advances, challenges, and prospects. We present the fundamental evolution of theranostics from radiotherapeutics, cellular therapeutics, and nanotherapeutics, showcasing critical milestones in the last decade. From the early concept of targeted drug delivery to the emergence of personalized medicine, theranostics has benefited from advances in imaging technologies, molecular biology, and nanomedicine. Furthermore, we emphasize pertinent illustrations showcasing that revolutionary strategies in cancer management enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide targeted therapies customized for individual patients, thereby facilitating the implementation of personalized medicine. Finally, we describe future perspectives on current challenges, emerging topics, and advances in the field.

A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

We present the results of an open-label, phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in 40 patients with previously treated, progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), in which dosimetry was used to guide maximum administered activity.

METHODS

This study was conducted in two parts. Part A consisted of 15 patients who completed three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan at a fixed administered activity and peptide amount per cycle (4.5 GBq/300 µg). Part B, which included 25 patients who received one to five cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, evaluated different administered activities (4.5 or 6.0 GBq/cycle) and peptide amounts (300, 700, or 1300 μg/cycle), limited to a cumulative absorbed radiation dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys and 1.5 Gy to the bone marrow.

RESULTS

Median cumulative administered activity of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan was 13.0 GBq over three cycles (13.1 GBq in part A and 12.9 GBq in part B). Overall, 17 (42.5%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment‑related adverse events; the most common were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Two patients developed myeloid neoplasms considered treatment related by the investigator. Disease control rate for part A and part B was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-99.4), and overall response rate was 21.1% (95% CI: 9.6-37.3).

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three cycles, has an acceptable safety profile with a promising clinical response in patients with progressive, SSTR-positive NETs. A 5-year long-term follow-up study is ongoing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

68Ga-SSO-120 PET for Initial Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

PET imaging using the somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) antagonist satoreotide trizoxetan (SSO-120, previously OPS-202) could offer accurate tumor detection and screening for SSTR2-antagonist radionuclide therapy in patients with SSTR2-expressing small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this single-center study was to investigate tumor uptake and detection rates of 68Ga-SSO-120 in comparison to 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging of SCLC patients. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed SCLC who underwent additional whole-body 68Ga-SSO-120 PET/CT during the initial diagnostic workup were retrospectively included. The mean administered activity was 139 MBq, and the mean uptake time was 60 min. Gold-standard staging 18F-FDG PET/CT was evaluated if available within 2 wk before or after 68Ga-SSO-120 PET if morphologic differences in CT images were absent. 68Ga-SSO-120- or 18F-FDG-positive lesions were reported in 7 anatomic regions (primary tumor, thoracic lymph node metastases, and distant metastases including pleural, contralateral pulmonary, liver, bone, and other) according to the TNM classification for lung cancer (eighth edition). Consensus TNM staging (derived from CT, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, PET, and brain MRI) by a clinical tumor board served as the reference standard. Results: Thirty-one patients were included, 12 with limited and 19 with extensive disease according to the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group classification. 68Ga-SSO-120-positive tumor was detected in all patients (100%) and in 90 of the 217 evaluated regions (41.5%). Thirteen patients (42.0%) had intense average 68Ga-SSO-120 uptake (region-based mean SUVmax ≥ 10); 28 patients (90.3%) had average 68Ga-SSO-120 uptake greater than liver uptake (region-based mean peak tumor-to-liver ratio > 1). In 25 patients with evaluable 18F-FDG PET, primary tumor, thoracic lymph node metastases, and distant metastases were detected in 100%, 92%, and 64%, respectively, of all investigated patients by 68Ga-SSO-120 and in 100%, 92%, and 56%, respectively, by 18F-FDG PET. 68Ga-SSO-120 PET detected additional contralateral lymph node, liver, and brain metastases in 1, 1, and 2 patients, respectively (no histopathology available), and 18F-FDG PET detected additional contralateral lymph node metastases in 3 patients (1 confirmed, 1 systematic endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration-negative, and 1 without available histopathology). None of these differences altered Veterans Administration Lung Study Group staging. The region-based monotonic correlation between 68Ga-SSO-120 and 18F-FDG uptake was low (Spearman ρ = 0.26-0.33). Conclusion: 68Ga-SSO-120 PET offers high diagnostic precision with comparable detection rates and additional complementary information to the gold standard, 18F-FDG PET. Consistent uptake in most patients warrants exploration of SSTR2-directed radionuclide therapy.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic, Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Bicenter Study

The current study aimed to compare 68Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-cyclo(d-Cys-amino-Phe-hydroorotic acid-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-d-Tyr-NH2 (JR11) and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: A prospective bicenter study aimed at enrolling 100 patients with histologically proven, metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors was conducted. The first 48 patients represented the study cohort. Each patient received 68Ga-DOTATATE on the first day and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 on the second day. Whole-body PET/CT scans were performed at 40-60 min after injection. Normal-organ uptake, lesion numbers, lesion uptake, and sensitivity were compared. The potential impact on clinical management was also determined. Results: Overall, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 demonstrated lower background uptake in normal organs. Compared with 68Ga-DOTATATE, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 detected significantly more liver lesions (673 vs. 584, P = 0.002). The target-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher on 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (6.4 ± 8.7 vs. 3.1 ±2.6, P = 0.000). Comparable uptake was observed for primary tumors, bone lesions, and lymph node metastases. In total, 180 lesions were detected on conventional imaging in 15 patients; 165 and 139 lesions of them were positive on 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTATATE, leading to a sensitivity of 91.7% and 77.2%, respectively. In 14.5% (7/48) of patients, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET might have a potential impact on clinical management. Conclusion: 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 shows better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than 68Ga-DOTATATE. The detection of more lesions by the antagonist may have a potential impact on clinical management in a subgroup of patients.

Molecular imaging Theranostics of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, originating mostly from the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract followed by the lungs. Multidisciplinary discussion is mandatory for optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. Well-differentiated NEN (NET) present a high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) and can be studied with [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides ([68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE) PET/CT to assess disease extension and the eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). SSTR-analogues labelled with 90Y or 177Lu have been used since mid-90s for NET therapy. PRRT is now considered an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NET: following the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE by FDA and EMA, PRRT is now part of the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. New strategies to improve PRRT efficacy and to reduce its toxicity are under evaluation (eg, personalization of treatment schemes, the selection of the most suitable patients, improvement of response assessment criteria, optimization of treatment sequencing, feasibility of PRRT-retreatment, combination of PRRT with other treatments options). Recently, several emerging radiopharmaceuticals showed encouraging results for both imaging and therapy (eg, SSTR-analogues labelled with 18F, SSTR-antagonists for both diagnosis and therapy, alpha-labelling for therapy, radiopharmaceuticals binding to new cellular targets). Aim of this review is to focus on current knowledge and to outline emerging perspectives for NEN's diagnosis and therapy.

First preclinical evaluation of [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 and comparison with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11, alpha versus beta radionuclide therapy of NETs

BACKGROUND

The [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE mediated peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is sometimes leading to treatment resistance and disease recurrence. An interesting alternative could be the somatostatin antagonist, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11, that demonstrated better biodistribution profile and higher tumor uptake than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Furthermore, treatment with alpha emitters showed improvement of the therapeutic index of PRRT due to the high LET offered by the alpha particles compared to beta emitters. Therefore, [²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 can be a potential candidate to improve the treatment of NETs (Graphical abstract). DOTA-JR11 was radiolabeled with [²²⁵Ac]Ac(NO₃)₃ and [¹⁷⁷Lu]LuCl₃. Stability studies were performed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and mouse serum. In vitro competitive binding assay has been carried out in U2OS-SSTR2 + cells for ^natLa-DOTA-JR11, ^natLu-DOTA-JR11 and DOTA-JR11. Ex vivo biodistribution studies were performed in mice inoculated with H69 cells at 4, 24, 48 and 72 h after injection of [²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11. A blocking group was included to verify uptake specificity. Dosimetry of selected organs was determined for [²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11.

RESULTS

[²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 has been successfully prepared and obtained in high radiochemical yield (RCY; 95%) and radiochemical purity (RCP; 94%). [²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 showed reasonably good stability in PBS (77% intact radiopeptide at 24 h after incubation) and in mouse serum (~ 81% intact radiopeptide 24 h after incubation). [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 demonstrated excellent stability in both media (> 93%) up to 24 h post incubation. Competitive binding assay revealed that complexation of DOTA-JR11 with ^natLa and ^natLu did not affect its binding affinity to SSTR2. Similar biodistribution profiles were observed for both radiopeptides, however, higher uptake was noticed in the kidneys, liver and bone for [²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11.

CONCLUSION

[²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11 showed a higher absorbed dose in the kidneys compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11, which may limit further studies with this radiopeptide. However, several strategies can be explored to reduce nephrotoxicity and offer opportunities for future clinical investigations with [²²⁵Ac]Ac-DOTA-JR11.

Clinical Advances and Perspectives in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

Targeted radionuclide therapy has become increasingly prominent as a nuclear medicine subspecialty. For many decades, treatment with radionuclides has been mainly restricted to the use of iodine-131 in thyroid disorders. Currently, radiopharmaceuticals, consisting of a radionuclide coupled to a vector that binds to a desired biological target with high specificity, are being developed. The objective is to be as selective as possible at the tumor level, while limiting the dose received at the healthy tissue level. In recent years, a better understanding of molecular mechanisms of cancer, as well as the appearance of innovative targeting agents (antibodies, peptides, and small molecules) and the availability of new radioisotopes, have enabled considerable advances in the field of vectorized internal radiotherapy with a better therapeutic efficacy, radiation safety and personalized treatments. For instance, targeting the tumor microenvironment, instead of the cancer cells, now appears particularly attractive. Several radiopharmaceuticals for therapeutic targeting have shown clinical value in several types of tumors and have been or will soon be approved and authorized for clinical use. Following their clinical and commercial success, research in that domain is particularly growing, with the clinical pipeline appearing as a promising target. This review aims to provide an overview of current research on targeting radionuclide therapy.

Peptide Radioligands in Cancer Theranostics: Agonists and Antagonists

The clinical success of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs in the diagnosis and therapy-"theranostics"-of tumors expressing the somatostatin subtype 2 receptor (SST₂R) has paved the way for the development of a broader panel of peptide radioligands targeting different human tumors. This approach relies on the overexpression of other receptor-targets in different cancer types. In recent years, a shift in paradigm from internalizing agonists to antagonists has occurred. Thus, SST₂R-antagonist radioligands were first shown to accumulate more efficiently in tumor lesions and clear faster from the background in animal models and patients. The switch to receptor antagonists was soon adopted in the field of radiolabeled bombesin (BBN). Unlike the stable cyclic octapeptides used in the case of somatostatin, BBN-like peptides are linear, fast to biodegradable and elicit adverse effects in the body. Thus, the advent of BBN-like antagonists provided an elegant way to obtain effective and safe radiotheranostics. Likewise, the pursuit of gastrin and exendin antagonist-based radioligands is advancing with exciting new outcomes on the horizon. In the present review, we discuss these developments with a focus on clinical results, commenting on challenges and opportunities for personalized treatment of cancer patients by means of state-of-the-art antagonist-based radiopharmaceuticals.

Interim Analysis of a Prospective Validation of 2 Blood-Based Genomic Assessments (PPQ and NETest) to Determine the Clinical Efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Reliable biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are lacking. We validated the role of 2 circulating biomarkers: the PRRT prediction quotient (PPQ) as a predictive marker for response and the NETest as a monitoring biomarker. Furthermore, we evaluated whether tissue-based genetic alterations are effective in predicting progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with 177Lu-DOTATATE-treated somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs (n = 67; median age, 66 y; 52% female; 42% pancreatic, 39% small-bowel; 78% grade 1 or 2). All cases were metastatic (89% liver) and had received 1-8 prior treatments (median, 3), including somatostatin analogs (91%), surgery (55%), or chemotherapy (49%). Treatment response included PFS. According to RECIST, version 1.1, responders had stable disease or a partial response (disease-control rate) and nonresponders had progression. Blood was collected before each cycle and at follow-up. Samples were deidentified and assayed and underwent masked analyses. The gene expression assays included RNA isolation, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and multialgorithm analyses. The PPQ (positive predicts a responder; negative predicts a nonresponder) at baseline was determined. The NETest (0-100 score) was performed. Statistics were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U testing (2-tailed) or Kaplan-Meier survival testing (PFS). In patients with archival tumor tissue, next-generation sequencing was performed through an institutional platform (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets). Results: Forty-one patients (61%) were responders. PPQ accurately predicted 96% (64/67). The hazard ratio for prediction was 24.4 (95% CI, 8.2-72.5). Twelve-month disease control was 97% for PPQ-positive patients versus 26% for PPQ-negative patients (P < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival was not reached in those predicted to respond (PPQ-positive, n = 40) but was 8 mo in those predicted not to respond (PPQ-negative, n = 27). The NETest result in responders was 67 ± 25 at baseline and significantly (P < 0.05) decreased (-37 ± 44%) at follow-up. The NETest result in nonresponders was 44 ± 23 at baseline and significantly (P < 0.05) increased (+76% ± 56%) at progression. Overall, the NETest changes (increases or decreases) were 90% accurate. Thirty patients underwent next-generation sequencing. Tumors were microsatellite-stable, and the median mutational burden was 1.8. Alterations involved mainly the mTOR/PTEN/TSC pathway (30%). No relationship was associated with PRRT response. Conclusion: Our interim analysis confirmed that PPQ is an accurate predictor of 177Lu-DOTATATE responsiveness (radiosensitivity) and that NETest changes accurately correlated with treatment response. Tissue-based molecular genetic information had little value in PRRT prediction. Blood-based gene signatures may improve the management of patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE by providing information on tumor radiosensitivity and disease course, thus allowing individualized strategies.

Systemic Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Patients with metastatic or advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) carry poorer prognoses relative to patients with other NETs due to bulkier and often, more proliferative baseline disease. Patients with these tumors also possess more approved treatment options relative to patients with other NETs, making therapeutic sequencing nuanced. As such, defining optimal therapeutic sequencing and developing more potent cytoreductive treatments for patients are significant areas of research need in the field. Herein this review, we discuss the current systemic therapy landscape, our approach to therapeutic sequencing in the clinic and ongoing studies seeking to define optimal sequencing of systemic therapies, and novel therapeutics in development, for patients with pancreatic NETs. We limit the scope of this latter topic to agents with preclinical or clinical rationale over the last 8 years to provide a contemporary view of the drug development landscape and focus primarily on new types of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus immunotherapy combinations.

Direct comparison of [18F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 and [18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide for PET imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: Antagonist versus agonist

BACKGROUND

[¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide is an ¹⁸F-labeled somatostatin analogue which is a good clinical alternative for ⁶⁸Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues. However, radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonists might outperform agonists regarding imaging sensitivity of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). No direct comparison between the antagonist [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 and the agonist [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide as SSTR PET probes is available. Herein, we present the radiosynthesis of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 and compare its NETs imaging properties directly with the established agonist radioligand [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide preclinically.

METHODS

[¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 was synthesized in an automated synthesis module. The in vitro binding characteristics (IC₅₀) of [^natF]AlF-NOTA-JR11 and [^natF]AlF-NOTA-octreotide were evaluated and the in vitro stability of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 was determined in human serum. In vitro cell binding and internalization was performed with [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 and [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide using SSTR2 expressing cells and the pharmacokinetics were evaluated using μPET/CT in mice bearing BON1.SSTR2 tumor xenografts.

RESULTS

Excellent binding affinity for SSTR2 was found for [^natF]AlF-NOTA-octreotide (IC₅₀ of 25.7 ± 7.9 nM). However, the IC₅₀ value for [^natF]AlF-NOTA-JR11 (290.6 ± 71 nM) was 11-fold higher compared to [^natF]AlF-NOTA-octreotide, indicating lower affinity for SSTR2. [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 was obtained in a good RCY (50 ± 6 %) but with moderate RCP of 94 ± 1 %. [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 demonstrated excellent stability in human serum (>95 % after 240 min). 2.7-fold higher cell binding was observed for [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 as compared to [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide after 60 min. μPET/CT images demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetics and tumor uptake between [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 (SUV_max: 3.7 ± 0.8) and [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide (SUV_max: 3.6 ± 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

[¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 was obtained in good RCY, albeit with a moderate RCP. The cell binding study showed significant higher binding of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 compared to [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide, despite the higher IC₅₀ value of AlF-NOTA-JR11. However, pharmacokinetics and in vivo tumor uptake was comparable for both radiotracers. Novel Al¹⁸F-labeled derivatives of JR11 with higher SSTR2 affinity should be developed for increased tumor uptake and NET imaging sensitivity.

Clinical Pharmacology of Radiotheranostics in Oncology

The combined use of diagnostic and therapeutic radioligands with the same molecular target, also known as theranostics, enables accurate patient selection, targeted therapy, and prediction of treatment response. Radioiodine, bone-seeking radioligands and norepinephrine analogs have been used for many years for diagnostic imaging and radioligand therapy of thyroid carcinoma, bone metastases, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and neuroblastoma, respectively. In recent years, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs and prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer, respectively. Several candidate compounds are targeting novel theranostic targets such as fibroblast activation protein, C-X-C chemokine receptor 4, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor. In addition, several strategies to improve efficacy of radioligand therapy are being evaluated, including dosimetry-based dose optimization, multireceptor targeting, upregulation of target receptors, radiosensitization, pharmacogenomics, and radiation genomics. Design and evaluation of novel radioligands and optimization of dose and dose schedules, within the complex context of individualized multimodal cancer treatment, requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes clinical pharmacology. Significant increases in the use of these radiopharmaceuticals in routine oncological practice can be expected, which will have major impact on patient care as well as (radio)pharmacy utilization.

Alpha-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using actinium-225 labeled somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has over the last two decades emerged as a very promising approach to treat neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with rapidly expanding clinical applications. By chelating a radiometal to a somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligand, radiation can be delivered to cancer cells with high precision. Unlike conventional external beam radiotherapy, PRRT utilizes primarily β or α radiation derived from nuclear decay, which causes damage to cancer cells in the immediate proximity by irreversible direct or indirect ionization of the cells' DNA, which induces apoptosis. In addition, to avoid damage to surrounding normal cells, PRRT privileges the use of radionuclides that have little penetrating and more energetic (and thus more ionizing) radiations. To date, the most frequently radioisotopes are β- emitters, particularly Yttrium-90 (90Y) and Lutetium-177 (177Lu), labeled SSTR agonists. Current development of SSTR-targeting is triggering the shift from using SSTR agonists to antagonists for PRRT. Furthermore, targeted α-particle therapy (TAT), has attracted special attention for the treatment of tumors and offers an improved therapeutic option for patients resistant to conventional treatments or even beta-irradiation treatment. Due to its short range and high linear energy transfer (LET), α-particles significantly damage the targeted cancer cells while causing minimal cytotoxicity toward surrounding normal tissue. Actinium-225 (225Ac) has been developed into potent targeting drug constructs including somatostatin-receptor-based radiopharmaceuticals and is in early clinical use against multiple neuroendocrine tumor types. In this article, we give a review of preclinical and clinical applications of 225Ac-PRRT in NETs, discuss the strengths and challenges of 225Ac complexes being used in PRRT; and envision the prospect of 225Ac-PRRT as a future alternative in the treatment of NETs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

The concept of using a targeting molecule labeled with a diagnostic radionuclide for using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography imaging with the potential to demonstrate that tumoricidal radiation can be delivered to tumoral sites by administration of the same or a similar targeting molecule labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide termed "theranostics." Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is a well-established second/third-line theranostic treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated (neuro-)endocrine neoplasms (NENs). PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE was approved by the regulatory authorities in 2017 and 2018 for selected patients with low-grade well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs. It improves progression-free survival as well as quality of life of GEP NEN patients. Favorable symptomatic and biochemical responses using PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE have also been reported in patients with functioning metastatic GEP NENs like metastatic insulinomas, Verner Morrison syndromes (VIPomas), glucagonomas, and gastrinomas and patients with carcinoid syndrome. This therapy might also become a valuable therapeutic option for inoperable low-grade bronchopulmonary NENs, inoperable or progressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and medullary thyroid carcinomas. First-line PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE and combinations of this therapy with cytotoxic drugs are currently under investigation. New radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands include SSAs coupled with alpha radiation emitting radionuclides and somatostatin receptor antagonists coupled with radionuclides.

Diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by nuclear medicine: Update and future perspective

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are the second most common cause of cancer related deaths in the World. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is a rare tumor that originated from peptidergic neurons and neuroendocrine cells. NENs occurs in all parts of the body, especially in stomach, intestine, pancreas and lung. These rare tumors are challenging to diagnose at earlier stages because of their wide anatomical distribution and complex clinical features. Traditional imaging methods including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are mostly of useful for detection of larger primary tumors that are 1cm in size. A new medical imaging specialty called nuclear medicine uses radioactive substances for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Nuclear medicine imaging relies on the tissue-specific uptake of radiolabeled tracers. Nuclear medicine techniques can easily identify the NENs tissues for their ability to absorb and concentrate amine, precursors, and peptides, whereas the traditional imaging methods are difficult to perform well. The somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a targetable receptor frequently expressed in the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), and is a promising target for tumor-targeted therapies and radiography. SSTR based somatostatin receptor imaging and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a new hot subject in the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs due to the rapid development of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and radionuclide. This review aims to provide an overview of the current status of nuclear medicine imaging modalities in the imaging of GEP-NENs, and puts them in perspective of clinical practice.

Nuclear Medicine and Radiological Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multidisciplinary Update

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are part of a large family of tumors arising from the neuroendocrine system. PanNENs show low-intermediate tumor grade and generally high somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. Therefore, panNENs benefit from functional imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogues (SSA) for diagnosis, staging, and treatment choice in parallel with morphological imaging. This narrative review aims to present conventional imaging techniques and new perspectives in the management of panNENs, providing the clinicians with useful insight for clinical practice. The ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET/CT is the most widely used in panNENs, not only fr diagnosis and staging purpose but also to characterize the biology of the tumor and its responsiveness to SSAs. On the contrary, the ¹⁸F-Fluordeoxiglucose (FDG) PET/CT is not employed systematically in all panNEN patients, being generally preferred in G2-G3, to predict aggressiveness and progression rate. The combination of ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can finally suggest the best therapeutic strategy. Other radiopharmaceuticals are ⁶⁸Ga-exendin-4 in case of insulinomas and ¹⁸F-dopamine (DOPA), which can be helpful in SSTR-negative tumors. New promising but still-under-investigation radiopharmaceuticals include radiolabeled SSTR antagonists and ¹⁸F-SSAs. Conventional imaging includes contrast enhanced CT and multiparametric MRI. There are now enriched by radiomics, a new non-invasive imaging approach, very promising to early predict tumor response or progression.

Optimisation of radioligand therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: Current and evolving evidence

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with radioligand therapy (RLT) for example, ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is generally well-tolerated and prolongs time to progression in most patients. However, approximately 20% of patients are nonresponders. In addition, complete responses are rare (<5% of patients), and durable responses beyond 3-4 years are uncommon. This article will discuss factors which may improve the outcomes of PRRT by using biomarkers to identify patients at high risk to be nonresponders (imaging and liquid biomarkers) and will examine mechanisms to potentially improve/optimise current RLT treatment strategies. These include mechanisms to potentiate the effects of RLT, increase tumour absorbed dose, overcoming radio-resistance and upregulation of somatostatin receptors, although larger studies will be required to demonstrate which techniques are going to be most efficacious in clinical practice.

Therapy Resistant Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a heterogenous group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract, the incidence of which has been increasing for several decades. While there has been significant progress in the development of therapeutic options for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, these remain limited both in quantity and durability of benefit. This review examines the latest research elucidating the mechanisms of both up-front resistance and the eventual development of resistance to the primary systemic therapeutic options including somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with lutetium Lu 177 dotatate, everolimus, sunitinib, and temozolomide-based chemotherapy. Further, potential strategies for overcoming these mechanisms of resistance are reviewed in addition to a comprehensive review of ongoing and planned clinical trials addressing this important challenge.

Comparison of the Anti-Tumour Activity of the Somatostatin Receptor (SST) Antagonist [177Lu]Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan and the Agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Mice Bearing AR42J SST2-Positive Tumours

Limited experiments have compared the treatment effects of repetitive cycles of radiolabelled somatostatin (SST) analogues. In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted in an AR42J cancer cell model, comparing the antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan with the agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in terms of their binding properties, biodistribution, anti-tumour activity and toxicity. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed at different timepoints. In the in vitro assays, [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan recognised twice as many SST2 binding sites as [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. In mice treated once a week for four consecutive weeks, [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (15 MBq) revealed a significantly greater median time taken to reach a tumour volume of 850 mm3 (68 days) compared to [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE at 15 MBq (43 days) or 30 MBq (48 days). This was associated with a higher tumour uptake, enhanced DNA damage and no or mild effects on body weight, haematological toxicity, or renal toxicity with [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (15 MBq). At the end of the study, complete tumour senescence was noted in 20% of animals treated with [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, in 13% of those treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE at 30 MBq, and in none of those treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE at 15 MBq. In conclusion, repeated administrations of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan were able to potentiate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with a higher tumour uptake, longer median survival, and enhanced DNA damage, with a favourable efficacy/safety profile compared to [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

Radiolabeled Nanocarriers as Theranostics-Advancement from Peptides to Nanocarriers

Endogenous targeted radiotherapy is emerging as an integral modality to treat a variety of cancer entities. Nevertheless, despite the positive clinical outcome of the treatment using radiolabeled peptides, small molecules, antibodies, and nanobodies, a high degree of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity still persist. This limits the amount of dose that can be injected. In an attempt to mitigate these side effects, the use of nanocarriers such as nanoparticles (NPs), dendrimers, micelles, liposomes, and nanogels (NGs) is currently being explored. Nanocarriers can prolong circulation time and tumor retention, maximize radiation dosage, and offer multifunctionality for different targeting strategies. In this review, the authors first provide a summary of radiation therapy and imaging and discuss the new radiotracers that are used preclinically and clinically. They then highlight and identify the advantages of radio-nanomedicine and its potential in overcoming the limitations of endogenous radiotherapy. Finally, the review points to the ongoing efforts to maximize the use of radio-nanomedicine for efficient clinical translation.

Molecular Imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasias

Molecular imaging, which uses molecular targets due to the overexpression of specific peptide hormone receptors on the tumour surface, has become an indispensable diagnostic technique. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) especially differentiated NENs or neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a rare group of heterogeneous tumours, characterized by the expression of hormone receptors on the tumour cell surface. This property makes them receptive to diagnostic and therapeutic approaches (theranostics) using radiolabelled peptides. Amongst the known hormone receptors, somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are expressed on the majority of NETs and are therefore the most relevant receptors for theranostic approaches. Current research aims to medically upregulate their expression, while other focuses are on the use of different radiopeptides (64Cu and 67Cu) or somatostatin-antagonists instead of the established somatostatin agonists. The GLP-1 receptor is another clinically relevant target, as GLP-1-R imaging has become the new standard for the localisation of insulinomas. For staging and prognostic evaluation in dedifferentiated NENs, 18F-FDG-imaging is useful, but lacks a therapeutic counterpart. Further options for patients with insufficient expression of SSTR involve metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and the molecular target C-X-C motif chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4). New targets such as the glucose-dependant insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) and the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) have been identified in NENs recently and await further evaluation. For medullary thyroid cancer 18-F-DOPA imaging is standard, however this technique is rather second line for other NENs. In this area, the discovery of minigastrin, which targets the cholecystokinin-2 (CCK2) receptors in medullary thyroid carcinoma and foregut NENs, may improve future management. This review aims to provide an overview of the most commonly used functional imaging modalities for theranostics in NENs today and in the possible future.

Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen (rhPSMA) ligands allow for labeling with 18F and radiometals for endoradiotherapy. rhPSMA-7.3 has been designated as a lead compound with promising preclinical data for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3, which has shown higher tumor uptake than 177Lu-PSMA I&T. In this retrospective analysis, we compared pretherapeutic clinical dosimetry data of both PSMA ligands. Methods: Six patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer underwent both 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T pretherapeutic dosimetry. Whole-body scintigraphy was performed at 1 h, 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 7 d after injection. Regions of interest covering the whole body, organs, bone marrow, and tumor lesions were drawn for each patient. Absorbed doses for individual patients and pretherapeutic applications were calculated using OLINDA/EXM. To facilitate the comparison of both ligands, we introduced the therapeutic index (TI), defined as the ratio of mean pretherapeutic doses to tumor lesions over relevant organs at risk. Results: Mean whole-body pretherapeutic effective doses for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T were 0.12 ± 0.07 and 0.05 ± 0.03 Sv/GBq, respectively. Mean absorbed organ doses for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T were, for example, 1.65 ± 0.28 and 0.73 ± 0.18 Gy/GBq for the kidneys, 0.19 ± 0.09 and 0.07 ± 0.03 Gy/GBq for the liver, 2.35 ± 0.78 and 0.80 ± 0.41 Gy/GBq for the parotid gland, and 0.67 ± 0.62 and 0.30 ± 0.27 Gy/GBq for the bone marrow, respectively. Tumor lesions received mean absorbed doses of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T of 6.44 ± 6.44 and 2.64 ± 2.24 Gy/GBq, respectively. The mean TIs for the kidneys were 3.7 ± 2.2 and 3.6 ± 2.2 for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T, respectively, and those for the bone marrow were 15.2 ± 10.2 and 15.1 ± 10.2 for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T, respectively. Conclusion: Pretherapeutic clinical dosimetry confirmed preclinical results of mean absorbed doses for tumors that were 2-3 times higher for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 than for 177Lu-PSMA I&T. Absorbed doses to normal organs also tended to be higher for 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3, resulting overall in similar average TIs for both radiopharmaceuticals with considerable interpatient variability. 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 has promise for a therapeutic efficacy similar to that of 177Lu-PSMA I&T at smaller amounts of injected activity, simplifying radiation safety measurements (especially for large patient numbers or dose escalation regimens).

Diagnostic Value of Radiolabelled Somatostatin Analogues for Neuroendocrine Tumour Diagnosis: The Benefits and Drawbacks of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arise from secondary epithelial cell lines in the gastrointestinal or respiratory system organs. The rate of development of these tumours varies from an indolent to an aggressive course, typically being initially asymptomatic. The identification of these tumours is difficult, particularly because the primary tumour is often small and undetectable by conventional anatomical imaging. Consequently, diagnosis of NETs is complicated and has been a significant challenge until recently. In the last 30 years, the advent of novel nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures has led to a substantial increase in NET detection. Great varieties of exclusive single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals for detecting NETs are being applied successfully in clinical settings, including [111In]In-pentetreotide, [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-TOC/TATE, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, and [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC/TATE. Among these tracers for functional imaging, PET radiopharmaceuticals are clearly and substantially superior to planar or SPECT imaging radiopharmaceuticals. The main advantages include higher resolution, better sensitivity and increased lesion-to-background uptake. An advantage of diagnosis with a radiopharmaceutical is the capacity of theranostics to provide concomitant diagnosis and treatment with particulate radionuclides, such as beta and alpha emitters including Lutetium-177 (177Lu) and Actinium-225 (225Ac). Due to these unique challenges involved with diagnosing NETs, various PET tracers have been developed. This review compares the clinical characteristics of radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for NET diagnosis, focusing on the most recently FDA-approved [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TATE as a state-of-the art NET-PET/CT radiopharmaceutical.

EANM dosimetry committee recommendations for dosimetry of 177Lu-labelled somatostatin-receptor- and PSMA-targeting ligands

The purpose of the EANM Dosimetry Committee is to provide recommendations and guidance to scientists and clinicians on patient-specific dosimetry. Radiopharmaceuticals labelled with lutetium-177 (177Lu) are increasingly used for therapeutic applications, in particular for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours using ligands for somatostatin receptors and prostate adenocarcinoma with small-molecule PSMA-targeting ligands. This paper provides an overview of reported dosimetry data for these therapies and summarises current knowledge about radiation-induced side effects on normal tissues and dose-effect relationships for tumours. Dosimetry methods and data are summarised for kidneys, bone marrow, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, pituitary glands, tumours, and the skin in case of radiopharmaceutical extravasation. Where applicable, taking into account the present status of the field and recent evidence in the literature, guidance is provided. The purpose of these recommendations is to encourage the practice of patient-specific dosimetry in therapy with 177Lu-labelled compounds. The proposed methods should be within the scope of centres offering therapy with 177Lu-labelled ligands for somatostatin receptors or small-molecule PSMA.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs-A Continuously Evolving Class of Radiopharmaceuticals

Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are recognized as favorable molecular targets in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), with subtype 2 (SST₂) being the predominantly and most frequently expressed. PET/CT imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled SST agonists, e.g., ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TOC (SomaKit TOC^®) or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT^®), plays an important role in staging and restaging these tumors and can identify patients who qualify and would potentially benefit from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with the therapeutic counterparts ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TOC or ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TATE (Lutathera^®). This is an important feature of SST targeting, as it allows a personalized treatment approach (theranostic approach). Today, new developments hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy. Among them, the use of SST₂ antagonists, such as JR11 and LM3, has shown certain advantages in improving image sensitivity and tumor radiation dose, and there is evidence that they may find application in other oncological indications beyond NETs and NENs. In addition, PRRT performed with more cytotoxic α-emitters, such as ²²⁵Ac, or β^- and Auger electrons, such as ¹⁶¹Tb, presents higher efficacy. It remains to be seen if any of these new developments will overpower the established radiolabeled SST analogs and PRRT with β^--emitters.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues for Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with 68Ga for diagnosis and with 90Y or 177Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [18F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with 18F (to overcome the limits imposed by 68Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

The evolution of PRRT for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors; What comes next?

Lu-177 has been developed for the treatment of patients with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). A second generation pure no-carrier-added Lu-177 has a high specific activity and has waste disposal advantages over the first generation carrier-added Lu-177. PRRT has recently been developed for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The majority of pancreatic and gastroenteric NETs (GEP-NETs) express the somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) 2 and 5. These receptors can be specifically targeted with a somatostatin peptide analogue (DOTATOC/DOTATATE) which can be chelated to a positron emission tomography (PET) emitting radioisotope such as Ga-68 for imaging or to a β-emitting radioisotope Lu-177 for therapy. A key advantage of this approach is that the receptor expression can be demonstrated by PET imaging before the patient is treated. Clinical studies in G1 and G2 GEP-NETS have demonstrated that PRRT is extremely effective in terms of progression free survival (PFS), symptom control and quality of life, with a well-established safety profile. A beneficial effect on outcome survival awaits to be confirmed. The first commercially available product Lu-177-DOTATATE was approved following the NETTER-1 trial in G1 and G2 GE-NETS. Lu-177-DOTATATE 7,4 GBq every 8 weeks for 4 cycles, together with octreotide LAR 30 mg monthly, demonstrated a median PFS of 28,4 months compared to 8,5 months for octreotide LAR 60 mg monthly. A second pivotal study COMPETE is currently in progress, comparing no carrier-added (n.c.a.) Lu-177-DOTATOC to the m-TOR inhibitor Everolimus in both GE-NETs and PNETs. Two studies, NETTER-2 and COMPOSE are currently underway in patients with high grade G2 and G3 NETs. Novel SSTR antagonists are being developed as next generation targeting molecules for SSTR2-expressing tumors. Antagonists have a higher tumor binding to receptors than agonists, opening up the potential indications for SSTR2 targeting to tumors which have a relatively lower expression of SSTR2 compared to NET such as small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer. In addition to Lu-177, radioisotopes with different radiation properties such as Tb-161 and the α-emitter Ac-225 are being developed which have the potential to improve treatment efficacy across the range of G1 to G3 NETs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Distinct In Vitro Binding Profile of the Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Antagonist [177Lu]Lu-OPS201 Compared to the Agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours with the radiolabelled somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST₂) peptide agonist [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is effective and well-established. Recent studies suggest improved therapeutic efficacy using the SST₂ peptide antagonist [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201. However, little is known about the cellular mechanisms that lead to the observed differences. In the present in vitro study, we compared kinetic binding, saturation binding, competition binding, cellular uptake and release of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 versus [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE using HEK cells stably transfected with the human SST₂. While [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE exhibited comparable affinity (K_D, 0.15 ± 0.003 and 0.08 ± 0.02 nM, respectively), [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 recognized four times more binding sites than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Competition assays demonstrated that a high concentration of the agonist displaced only 30% of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 bound to HEK-SST₂ cell membranes; an indication that the antagonist binds to additional sites that are not recognized by the agonist. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 showed faster association and slower dissociation than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Whereas most of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 remained at the cell surface, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was almost completely internalised inside the cell. The present data identified distinct differences between [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE regarding the recognition of receptor binding sites (higher for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201) and their kinetics (faster association and slower dissociation of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201) that explain, to a great extent, the improved therapeutic efficacy of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy

The objective of this study was to assess the safety, dosimetry, and efficacy of the 177Lu-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist DOTA-p-Cl-Phe-cyclo(d-Cys-Tyr-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)d-Tyr-NH2 (177Lu-DOTA-LM3) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Methods: Fifty-one patients (aged 27-76 y; mean, 51.6 ± 13.9 y) with metastatic NENs underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 between August 2017 and December 2019. The median administered activity per cycle was 6.1 ± 0.88 GBq (range, 2.8-7.4 GBq). 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT was used for patient selection and follow-up after 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT. Morphologic and molecular responses were evaluated in accordance with RECIST 1.1 and the criteria of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Dosimetry was performed on 11 patients and compared with the SSTR agonist 177Lu-DOTATOC in 247 patients undergoing PRRT on the same dosimetry protocol. Results: Higher uptake and a longer effective half-life were found for 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 than for the agonist 177Lu-DOTATOC in the whole body and in the kidneys, spleen, and metastases, resulting in higher mean absorbed organ and tumor doses. All patients tolerated therapy without any serious acute adverse effects. Mild nausea without vomiting was observed in 5 (9.8%) patients; no other symptoms were reported. The most severe delayed adverse event was Common Terminology Criteria (CTC)-3 thrombocytopenia in 3 (5.9%) patients. Neither CTC-4 thrombocytopenia nor CTC-3-4 anemia or leukopenia was observed after treatment. No significant decline in renal function was observed, nor was hepatotoxicity. According to RECIST 1.1, disease control could be reached in 40 patients (disease control rate, 85.1%) of the 47 patients monitored after 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT, with a partial response in 17 (36.2%) and stable disease in 23 (48.9%), whereas 7 patients (14.9%) had progressive disease, and by EORTC criteria, there was complete remission in 2 patients (4.3%), partial remission in 21 (44.7%), stable disease in 18 (38.3%), and progressive disease in 6 (12.8%). Conclusion: The antagonist PRRT with 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 could be administered without severe adverse effects and was well tolerated by most patients, with thrombocytopenia occurring in only a few. No other severe adverse effects were observed; in particular, there was no nephrotoxicity. The SSTR antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 appears to be promising for PRRT, provides a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor radiation doses than SSTR agonists, and was effective in treating advanced metastatic NENs, especially in patients with low or no SSTR agonist binding, even achieving complete remission in some patients.

Theranostics in neuroendocrine tumors: an overview of current approaches and future challenges

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors, mainly localized in the gastrointestinal system. What characterizes NENs is the expression of hormone receptors on the tumor cell surface, making them accessible for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches (theranostics) using radiolabelled peptides. Somatostatin receptors subtype-two (SST2) play an important role in NENs since they are overexpressed and homogeneously distributed at the surface of the majority of NENs. Accordingly, targeting SST2 for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has been established. Current research aims at upregulating its expression by epigenetic treatment or improving its targeting via use of alternative radioligands. In addition, recent data suggest a future role of SST antagonists as a diagnostic tool and a potential therapeutic option. Another promising target is the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor. Targeting GLP-1R using exendin-4 (GLP-1 analogue) has a high sensitivity for the localization of the often SST2-negative sporadic insulinomas and insulinomas in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1. Further options for patients with insufficient expression of SST2 involve metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and the molecular target C-X-C motif chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4), which have been evaluated for potential theranostic approach in symptomatic NENs or dedifferentiated tumors. Recently, new targets such as the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) and the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) have been identified in NENs. Finally, minigastrin - a ligand targeting the cholecystokinin-2 (CCK2) receptors in medullary thyroid carcinoma and foregut neuroendocrine tumors - may improve future management of these diseases with currently limited therapeutic options. This review summarises the current approaches and future challenges of diagnostic and therapeutic evaluations in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Novel therapeutics for patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent the most common subtype of NETs. The incidence of all NETs, and specifically GEP NETs, has risen exponentially over the last three decades. Only within the past several years have these tumors been appropriately classified, allowing for meaningful drug development. Broadly, some of the most exciting drug classes being developed for patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs include newer types of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or combinations which increase the potency of lutetium-177 (177Lu)-Dotatate, novel multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) and immunotherapy modalities, beyond checkpoint inhibitors, which seek to unleash the immune system against NETs. Specifically looking at newer types of PRRT, somatostatin receptor antagonists and alpha-emitter radionuclides each have demonstrated the ability to elicit greater DNA damage than 177Lu-Dotatate in preclinical models. Early clinical experiences with each of these agents suggest they may be more cytotoxic than 177Lu-Dotatate. Other approaches seeking to build upon the DNA damage created by 177Lu-Dotatate include combinations of PRRT with radiosensitizers such as heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors, chemotherapy combinations, and triapine. Many of these combinations have just begun to be tested clinically. With regards to novel RTKIs, some of the ones which have demonstrated potent cytoreductive potential include cabozantinib and lenvatinib. Other RTKIs which are further along the clinical development spectrum and have demonstrated benefit in randomized trials include surufatinib and pazopanib. And though single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have not demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in patients with GEP NETs, outside of certain biomarker selected subsets, somatostatin receptor-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and vaccines such as SurVaxM, which targets survivin, represent two means through which NET-directed immunity may be modulated. The potential of these agents, if clinically realized, will likely improve outcomes for patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs.

Digestive Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Management and Future Directions

Digestive well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3) have been clearly defined since the 2017 World Health Organization classification. They are still a rare category lacking specific data and standardized management. Their distinction from other types of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) not only lies in morphology but also in genotype, aggressiveness, functional imaging uptake, and treatment response. Most of the available data comes from pancreatic series, which is the most frequent tumor site for this entity. In the non-metastatic setting, surgical resection is recommended, irrespective of grade and tumor site. For metastatic NET G-3, chemotherapy is the main first-line treatment with temozolomide-based regimen showing more efficacy than platinum-based regimen, especially when Ki-67 index <55%. Targeted therapies, such as sunitinib and everolimus, have also shown some positive therapeutic efficacy in small samples of patients. Functional imaging plays a key role for detection but also treatment selection. In the second or further-line setting, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has shown promising response rates in high-grade NEN. Finally, immunotherapy is currently investigated as a new therapeutic approach with trials still ongoing. More data will come with future work now focusing on this specific subgroup. The aim of this review is to summarize the current data on digestive NET G-3 and explore future directions for their management.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

Drug Development in Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Is on the Horizon?

OPINION STATEMENT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) constitute a heterogenous group of malignancies. Translational research into NEN cell biology is the cornerstone for drug development strategies in this field. Somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) expression is the hallmark of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Somatostatin analogs and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) form the basis of anti-SSTR2 treatment onto new combination strategies, antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies. Classical pathways involved in NET development (PI3K-Akt-mTOR and antiangiogenics) are reviewed but new potential targets for NET treatment will be explored. Epigenetic drugs have shown clinical activity in monotherapy and preclinical combination strategies are more than attractive. Immunotherapy has shown opposite results in different NEN settings. Although the NOTCH pathway has been targeted with disappointing results, new strategies are being developed. Finally, after years of solid preclinical evidence on different genetically engineered oncolytic viruses, clinical trials for refractory NET patients are now ongoing.

Strategies Towards Improving Clinical Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotate is an effective and safe second- or third-line treatment option for patients with low-grade advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). In this review, we will focus on possible extensions of the current use of PRRT and on new approaches which could further improve its treatment efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Promising results were published regarding PRRT in other NENs, including lung NENs or high-grade NENs, and applying PRRT as neoadjuvant or salvage therapy. Furthermore, a diversity of strategic approaches, including dosimetry, somatostatin receptor antagonists, somatostatin receptor upregulation, radiosensitization, different radionuclides, albumin binding, alternative renal protection, and liver-directed therapy in combination with PRRT, have the potential to improve the outcome of PRRT. Also, novel biomarkers are presented that could predict response to PRRT. Multiple preclinical and early clinical studies have shown encouraging potential to advance the clinical outcome of PRRT in NEN patients. However, at this moment, most of these strategies have not yet reached the clinical setting of randomized phase III trials.

Somatostatin receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using 177Lu-DOTATATE has been approved for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic NETs. An understanding of benefits and risks is important for the appropriate implementation of this therapy. This review summarizes study data supporting the use of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for the treatment of advanced NETs and highlights risks, including potential toxicities in specific populations. Key ongoing clinical trials, including randomized studies, are designed to better define the position of PRRT within the broader therapeutic landscape. Preclinical and early-phase human studies are focused on the development of novel somatostatin-receptor agonists and antagonists, new radionuclides, and radiosensitizing combination therapies.

A clinical score for neuroendocrine tumor patients under consideration for Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy

We developed a clinical score (CS) at Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (VICC) that we hoped would predict outcomes for patients with progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) receiving therapy with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-DOTATATE. Patients under consideration for 177Lu-DOTATATE between March 1, 2016 and March 17, 2020 at VICC were assigned a CS prospectively. The CS included 5 categories: available treatments for tumor type outside of 177Lu-DOTATATE, prior systemic treatments, patient symptoms, tumor burden in critical organs and presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The primary outcome of the analysis was progression-free survival (PFS). To evaluate the effect of the CS on PFS, a multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed adjusting for tumor grade, primary tumor location, and the interaction between 177Lu-DOTATATE doses received (zero, 1-2, 3-4) and CS. A total of 91 patients and 31 patients received 3-4 doses and zero doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, respectively. On multivariable analysis, in patients treated with 3-4 doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, for each 1-point increase in CS, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 2.0 (95% CI 1.61-2.48). On multivariable analysis, in patients who received zero doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, for each 1-point increase in CS, the estimated HR for PFS was 1.22 (95% CI 0.91-1.65). Among patients treated with 3-4 doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, those with lower CS experienced improved PFS with the treatment compared to patients with higher CS. This PFS difference, based upon CS, was not observed in patients who did not receive 177Lu-DOTATATE, suggesting the predictive utility of the score.

Systemic Therapy Improvements Will Render Locoregional Treatments Obsolete for Patients with Cancer with Liver Metastases

Hepatic metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with cancer. Apart from curative resection, which offers patients the potential for long-term survival, an array of locoregional therapies, with limited evidence of improving survival, are used to treat them. The authors use examples from the realm of gastrointestinal cancer, largely focusing on the experience of patients with neuroendocrine cancer, hepatobiliary cancer, and colorectal cancer, to suggest that current systemic therapies offer, at minimum, similar survival outcomes for patients compared with these locoregional approaches.

Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show peculiar clinical and histomorphological features, with variable prognosis. In recent years, advances in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology and heterogeneous clinical presentation, as well as the availability of different diagnostic procedures for panNEN diagnosis and novel therapeutic options for patient clinical management, has led to the recognition of the need for an active multidisciplinary discussion for optimal patient care. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become indispensable for the management of panNENs. Several PET radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize either panNEN receptor expression or metabolism. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of all the currently used radiopharmaceuticals and of the new upcoming tracers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), and their clinical impact on therapy management. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT (SSA-PET/CT) has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and is recommended for the staging and restaging of any non-insulinoma well-differentiated panNEN cases to carry out detection of unknown primary tumor sites or early relapse and for evaluation of in vivo somatostatin receptors expression (SRE) to select patient candidates for peptide receptor radiometabolic treatment (PRRT) with 90Y or 177Lu and/or cold analogs. SSA-PET/CT also has a strong impact on clinical management, leading to a change in treatment in approximately a third of the cases. Its role for treatment response assessment is still under debate due to the lack of standardized criteria, even though some semiquantitative parameters seem to be able to predict response. [18F]FDG PET/CT generally shows low sensitivity in small growing and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET; G1 and G2), while it is of utmost importance in the evaluation and management of high-grade NENs and also provides important prognostic information. When positive, [18F]FDG PET/CT impacts therapeutical management, indicating the need for a more aggressive treatment regime. Although FDG positivity does not exclude the patient from PRRT, several studies have demonstrated that it is certainly useful to predict response, even in this setting. The role of [18F]FDOPA for the study of panNET is limited by physiological uptake in the pancreas and is therefore not recommended. Moreover, it provides no information on SRE that has crucial clinical management relevance. Early acquisition of the abdomen and premedication with carbidopa may be useful to increase the accuracy, but further studies are needed to clarify its utility. GLP-1R agonists, such as exendin-4, are particularly useful for benign insulinoma detection, but their accuracy decreases in the case of malignant insulinomas. Being a whole-body imaging technique, exendin-PET/CT gives important preoperative information on tumor size and localization, which is fundamental for surgical planning as resection (enucleation of the lesion or partial pancreatic resection) is the only curative treatment. New upcoming tracers are under study, such as promising SSTR antagonists, which show a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor-to-background ratio that increases tumor detection, especially in the liver. [68Ga]pentixafor, an in vivo marker of CXCR4 expression associated with the behavior of more aggressive tumors, seems to only play a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET since there is an inverse expression of SSTR2 and CXCR4 in G1 to G3 NETs with an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2 expression with increasing grade. Other tracers, such as [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC, [18F]SiTATE, and [18F]AlF-OC, are also under investigation.