A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Phase I Trial of Selinexor in Pediatric Recurrent/Refractory Solid and CNS Tumors (ADVL1414): A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Trial

PURPOSE

Selinexor is a first-in-class, central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant, oral inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), the main nuclear exporter of many key tumor suppressors. We report a phase I trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS and solid tumors (NCT02323880).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A rolling six design was used to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and first dose pharmacokinetics of selinexor administered once (35-45 mg/m2) or twice (20-35 mg/m2) weekly during a 28-day cycle (part A). Ten additional patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) were treated at the MTD administered once weekly (part B).

RESULTS

In part A, 49 patients were enrolled. Continuous twice weekly dosing was limited by extended hematologic toxicity. The MTD on a twice weekly schedule for 3 weeks on/1 week off (twice weekly 3/1) was 20 mg/m2/dose. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on this schedule included fatigue, acute reversible neurologic changes, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase increase. On a continuous once weekly schedule, the MTD was 35 mg/m2/dose; DLTs included seizure and thrombocytopenia. In part B (HGG expansion), there were no additional DLTs observed. Non-DLTs included lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, nausea, and vomiting. There were no objective responses. The median number of cycles received was 1 (range, 1-9); eight of 59 patients (13.5%) received 5 to 9 cycles, five of whom had HGG.

CONCLUSIONS

Selinexor-related toxicities were primarily hematologic and neurologic, requiring dose or dose-frequency reduction. The MTD and recommended initial phase II dose of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent solid and CNS tumors is 35 mg/m2/dose once weekly.

Experimental Insights and Recommendations for Successfully Performing Cerebral Microdialysis With Hydrophobic Drug Candidates

Cerebral microdialysis in rodents represents a robust and versatile technique for quantifying the pharmacologically relevant unbound fraction of drugs in the brain. When this unbound fraction is simultaneously determined in plasma, it facilitates the calculation of the corresponding unbound plasma-to-brain partition coefficient (Kp,uu) for a given compound in vivo. This coefficient is critical for understanding the penetration and distribution of drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, obtaining valid and accurate microdialysis data can be particularly challenging for hydrophobic drugs due to their pronounced non-specific interactions with the components of the microdialysis system. The present study reports the outcomes of comprehensive microdialysis investigations in rodents, focusing on three hydrophobic compounds: actinomycin D, selinexor, and ulixertinib. These compounds exhibited varying degrees of non-specific binding to the surfaces of the microdialysis apparatus, leading to low recovery rates and substantial carry-over effects. To diminish these limitations, strategies such as surface coating and the use of optimized materials were employed to enhance the reliability of the microdialysis system. To ensure the robustness and reproducibility of microdialysis-related research outcomes, our experimental findings were supplemented with a narrative literature review. This review encompassed keyword-driven PubMed-indexed publications on microdialysis from 1970 to 2024, providing a broader context for the challenges and solutions associated with the technique. By integrating empirical results with practical recommendations, this study offers a comprehensive resource aimed at advancing the application of cerebral microdialysis in preclinical drug development, particularly for compounds with challenging physicochemical properties.

Updates in Diagnostic Techniques and Experimental Therapies for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a rare but extremely malignant central nervous system tumor primarily affecting children that is almost universally fatal with a devastating prognosis of 8-to-12-month median survival time following diagnosis. Traditionally, DIPG has been diagnosed via MR imaging alone and treated with palliative radiation therapy. While performing surgical biopsies for these patients has been controversial, in recent years, advancements have been made in the safety and efficacy of surgical biopsy techniques, utilizing stereotactic, robotics, and intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring as well as the development of liquid biopsies that identify tumor markers in either cerebrospinal fluid or serum. With more molecular data being collected from these tumors due to more frequent biopsies being performed, multiple treatment modalities including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, and epigenetic modifying agents continue to be developed. Numerous recent clinical trials have been completed or are currently ongoing that have shown promise in extending survival for patients with DIPG. Focused ultrasound (FUS) has also emerged as an additional promising adjunct invention used to increase the effectiveness of therapeutic agents. In this review, we discuss the current evidence to date for these advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of DIPG.

Effect of Exportin 1/XPO1 Nuclear Export Pathway Inhibition on Coronavirus Replication

The nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins using XPO1 (exportin 1) plays a vital role in cell proliferation and survival. Many viruses also exploit this pathway to promote infection and replication. Thus, inhibiting the XPO1-mediated nuclear export pathway with selective inhibitors has a diverse effect on virus replication by regulating antiviral, proviral, and anti-inflammatory pathways. The XPO1 inhibitor Selinexor is an FDA-approved anticancer drug predicted to have antiviral or proviral functions against viruses. Here, we observed that the pretreatment of cultured cell lines from human or mouse origin with the nuclear export inhibitor Selinexor significantly enhanced the protein expression and replication of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), a mouse coronavirus. The knockdown of cellular XPO1 protein expression also significantly enhanced the replication of MHV in human cells. However, for SARS-CoV-2, Selinexor treatment had diverse effects on virus replication in different cell lines. These results indicate that XPO1-mediated nuclear export pathway inhibition might affect coronavirus replication depending on cell types and virus origin.

Identification and Pharmacological Targeting of Treatment-Resistant, Stem-like Breast Cancer Cells for Combination Therapy

Tumors frequently harbor isogenic yet epigenetically distinct subpopulations of multi-potent cells with high tumor-initiating potential-often called Cancer Stem-Like Cells (CSLCs). These can display preferential resistance to standard-of-care chemotherapy. Single-cell analyses can help elucidate Master Regulator (MR) proteins responsible for governing the transcriptional state of these cells, thus revealing complementary dependencies that may be leveraged via combination therapy. Interrogation of single-cell RNA sequencing profiles from seven metastatic breast cancer patients, using perturbational profiles of clinically relevant drugs, identified drugs predicted to invert the activity of MR proteins governing the transcriptional state of chemoresistant CSLCs, which were then validated by CROP-seq assays. The top drug, the anthelmintic albendazole, depleted this subpopulation in vivo without noticeable cytotoxicity. Moreover, sequential cycles of albendazole and paclitaxel-a commonly used chemotherapeutic -displayed significant synergy in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) from a TNBC patient, suggesting that network-based approaches can help develop mechanism-based combinatorial therapies targeting complementary subpopulations.

Statement of significance

Network-based approaches, as shown in a study on metastatic breast cancer, can develop effective combinatorial therapies targeting complementary subpopulations. By analyzing scRNA-seq data and using clinically relevant drugs, researchers identified and depleted chemoresistant Cancer Stem-Like Cells, enhancing the efficacy of standard chemotherapies.

Low & Anaplastic Grade Glioma Umbrella Study of MOlecular Guided TherapieS (LUMOS-2): study protocol for a phase 2, prospective, multicentre, open-label, multiarm, biomarker-directed, signal-seeking, umbrella, clinical trial for recurrent IDH mutant, grade 2/3 glioma

INTRODUCTION

All grade 2/3 gliomas are incurable and at the time of inevitable relapse, patients have significant unmet needs with few effective treatments. This study aims to improve outcomes by molecular profiling of patients at relapse, then matching them with the best available drug based on their molecular profile, maximising the chances of patient benefit while simultaneously testing multiple novel drugs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Low & Anaplastic Grade Glioma Umbrella Study of MOlecular Guided TherapieS (LUMOS-2) will be an international, phase 2, multicentre, open-label, biomarker-directed, umbrella clinical trial for recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant, histologically grade 2/3 gliomas. Investigational treatment will be assigned based on molecular profiling of contemporaneous tissue obtained at disease relapse using next-generation sequencing. LUMOS-2 will begin with three therapeutic treatment arms: paxalisib, cadonilimab and selinexor. Patient molecular profiles will be assessed by an expert, multidisciplinary Molecular Tumour Advisory Panel. Patients whose molecular profile is considered suitable for a targeted agent like paxalisib will be allocated to that arm, others will be randomised to the available arms of the trial. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary objectives include assessment of overall survival, response rate, safety and quality of life measures. Two additional therapeutic arms are currently in development.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Central ethics approval was obtained from the Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Zone, Sydney, Australia (Approval: 2022/ETH02230). Other clinical sites will provide oversight through local governance processes, including obtaining informed consent from suitable participants. A report describing the results of the study will be submitted to international meetings and peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12623000096651.

XPO1/Exportin-1 in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia; Biology and Therapeutic Targeting

Exportin 1 is responsible for the export of hundreds of proteins, several RNA species and ribosomal components from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Several transported proteins are important for regulation of cell proliferation and survival both in normal and malignant cells. We review the biological importance and the possibility of therapeutic targeting of Exportin 1 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Exportin 1 levels can be increased in human primary AML cells, and even exportin inhibition as monotherapy seems to have an antileukemic effect. The results from Phase I/II studies also suggest that exportin inhibition can be combined with conventional chemotherapy, including intensive induction and consolidation therapy possibly followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation as well as AML-stabilizing therapy in elderly/unfit patients with hypomethylating agents. However, the risk of severe toxicity needs to be further evaluated; hematological toxicity is common together with constitutional side effects, electrolyte disturbances, and gastrointestinal toxicity. A recent randomized study of intensive chemotherapy with and without the Exportin inhibitor selinexor in elderly patients showed reduced survival in the selinexor arm; this was due to a high frequency of relapse and severe infections during neutropenia. Experimental studies suggest that Exportin 1 inhibition can be combined with other forms of targeted therapy. Thus, Exportin 1 inhibition should still be regarded as a promising strategy for AML treatment, but future studies should focus on the risk of toxicity when combined with conventional chemotherapy, especially in elderly/unfit patients, combinations with targeted therapies, identification of patient subsets (AML is a heterogeneous disease) with high susceptibility, and the possible use of less toxic next-generation Exportin 1 inhibitors.

Effect of exportin 1/XPO1 nuclear export pathway inhibition on coronavirus replication

Nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins using XPO1 (exportin 1) plays a vital role in cell proliferation and survival. Many viruses also exploit this pathway to promote infection and replication. Thus, inhibiting the XPO1-mediated nuclear export pathway with selective inhibitors has a diverse effect on virus replication by regulating antiviral, proviral, and anti-inflammatory pathways. The XPO1 inhibitor, Selinexor, is an FDA-approved anticancer drug predicted to have antiviral or proviral functions against viruses. Here, we observed that pretreatment of cultured cell lines from human or mouse origin with nuclear export inhibitor Selinexor significantly enhanced protein expression and replication of Mouse Hepatitis Virus (MHV), a mouse coronavirus. Knockdown of cellular XPO1 protein expression also significantly enhanced the replication of MHV in human cells. However, for SARS-CoV-2, selinexor treatment had diverse effects on virus replication in different cell lines. These results indicate that XPO1-mediated nuclear export pathway inhibition might affect coronavirus replication depending on cell types and virus origin.

A Role for the Hippo/YAP1 Pathway in the Regulation of In Vitro Vasculogenic Mimicry in Glioblastoma Cells

The Hippo pathway plays a tumorigenic role in highly angiogenic glioblastoma (GBM), whereas little is known about clinically relevant Hippo pathway inhibitors' ability to target adaptive mechanisms involved in GBM chemoresistance. Their molecular impact was investigated here in vitro against an alternative process to tumour angiogenesis termed vasculogenic mimicry (VM) in GBM-derived cell models. In silico analysis of the downstream Hippo signalling members YAP1, TAZ and TEAD1 transcript levels in low-grade glioblastoma (LGG) and GBM tumour tissues was performed using GEPIA. TAZ transcript levels did not differ between the healthy and tumour tissues data analysed. In contrast, YAP1 transcript levels were elevated in GBM tissues, whereas TEAD1 levels were high in both LGG and GBM. All three Hippo pathway inhibitors tested, GNE7883, VT107 and IAG933 effectively inhibited U87 and U251 cell migration and in vitro VM as assessed on Cultrex matrix. YAP1 gene and protein expression were induced upon VM, and its translocation to the nucleus was inhibited by the Hippo pathway inhibitors tested. SiRNA-mediated transient silencing of YAP1 repressed cell migration, VM formation and CTGF and Cyr61 transcription. In conclusion, targeting of VM using Hippo pathway inhibitors could help circumvent GBM chemoresistance and effectively complement other brain cancer treatments.

Clinical and translational advances in primary brain tumor therapy with a focus on glioblastoma-A comprehensive review of the literature

This comprehensive review paper examines the most updated state of research on glioblastoma, an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options. By analyzing 76 recent studies, from translational and basic sciences, to clinical trials, we highlight various aspects of glioblastoma and shed light on potential therapeutic strategies. The interplay between tumor cells, neural progenitor cells, and the tumor microenvironment is explored. Targeting the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway through extracellular-vesicle (EV)-mediated signaling emerges as a potential therapeutic strategy. Personalized modeling approaches utilizing patient-specific MRI data offer promise for optimizing treatment strategies. The response of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) to different treatment modalities is examined, emphasizing the need to inhibit the transformation of proneural (PN) GSCs into resistant mesenchymal (MES) GSCs. Metabolic therapy and combination therapies show potential in reversing treatment resistance and inhibiting both PN and MES GSCs. Immunotherapy, targeted approaches, and molecular dynamics in gliomas are discussed, providing insights into early-stage diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, the potential use of Zika virus as an oncolytic agent is explored. Analysis of phase 0 to 3 clinical trials reveal promising outcomes for various experimental treatments, highlighting the importance of combination therapies, predictive signatures, and patient selection strategies. Specific compounds demonstrate potential therapeutic benefits and tolerability. Phase 3 trials indicate the efficacy of DCVax-L in improving survival rates and depatux-m in prolonging progression-free survival. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches and continued exploration of targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and tumor biology understanding in shaping the future of glioblastoma treatment.

CDK4/6 inhibition augments anti-tumor efficacy of XPO1 inhibitor selinexor in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

XPO1 is an attractive and promising therapeutic target frequently overexpressed in multiple hematological malignancies. The clinical use of XPO1 inhibitors in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) is not well documented. Here, we demonstrated that XPO1 overexpression is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with NKTL. The compassionate use of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor in combination with chemotherapy showed favorable clinical outcomes in three refractory/relapsed (R/R) NKTL patients. Selinexor induced complete tumor regression and prolonged survival in sensitive xenografts but not in resistant xenografts. Transcriptomic profiling analysis indicated that sensitivity to selinexor was correlated with deregulation of the cell cycle machinery, as selinexor significantly suppressed the expression of cell cycle-related genes. CDK4/6 inhibitors were identified as sensitizers that reversed selinexor resistance. Mechanistically, targeting CDK4/6 could enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of selinexor via the suppression of CDK4/6-pRb-E2F-c-Myc pathway in resistant cells, while selinexor alone could dramatically block this pathway in sensitive cells. Overall, our study provids a preclinical proof-of-concept for the use of selinexor alone or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors as a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with R/R NKTL.

Novel-and Not So Novel-Inhibitors of the Multifunctional CRM1 Protein

Chromosome Region Maintenance 1 (CRM1), also known as Exportin 1 (XPO1), is a protein that is critical for transport of proteins and RNA to the cytoplasm through the nuclear pore complex. CRM1 inhibition with small molecule inhibitors is currently being studied in many cancers, including leukemias, solid organ malignancies and brain tumors. We review the structure of CRM1, its role in nuclear export, the current availability of CRM1 inhibitors, and the role of CRM1 in a number of distinct cellular processes. A deeper understanding of how CRM1 functions in nuclear export as well as other cellular processes may allow for the development of additional novel CRM1 inhibitors.

Evaluating the Base Excision Repair Inhibitor TRC102 and Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma in the Phase 2 Adult Brain Tumor Consortium Trial BERT

PURPOSE

Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a dismal prognosis. Although the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) is the mainstay of chemotherapy, therapeutic resistance rapidly develops in patients. Base excision repair inhibitor TRC102 (methoxyamine) reverses TMZ resistance in preclinical glioma models. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral TRC102+TMZ in recurrent GBM (rGBM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A preregistered (NCT02395692), nonrandomized, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (BERT) was planned and conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC-1402). Arm 1 included patients with bevacizumab-naïve GBM at the first recurrence, with the primary endpoint of response rates. If sufficient activity was identified, a second arm was planned for the bevacizumab-refractory patients. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at 6 months (PFS6), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Arm 1 enrolled 19 patients with a median of two treatment cycles. Objective responses were not observed; hence, arm 2 did not open. The median OS was 11.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.2-17.9]. The median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.7). The PFS6 was 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-33.1%). Most toxicities were grades 1 and 2, with two grade 3 lymphopenias and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with PFS ≥ 17 months and OS > 32 months were deemed "extended survivors." RNA sequencing of tumor tissue, obtained at diagnosis, demonstrated significantly enriched signatures of DNA damage response (DDR), chromosomal instability (CIN70, CIN25), and cellular proliferation (PCNA25) in "extended survivors."

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the safety and feasibility of TRC102+TMZ in patients with rGBM. They also warrant further evaluation of combination therapy in biomarker-enriched trials enrolling GBM patients with baseline hyperactivated DDR pathways.

Adverse events reporting of XPO1 inhibitor - selinexor: a real-word analysis from FAERS database

As the world's first oral nuclear export inhibitor, selinexor is increasingly being used in clinical applications for malignant tumors. However, there is no extensive exploration on selinexor's adverse events (ADEs), necessitating a real-word assessment of its clinical medication safety. FAERS data (July 2019-June 2023) were searched for selinexor ADE reports across all indications. Use the system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PT) from the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) to describe, categorize, and statistic ADEs. Disproportionality analysis was employed through calculation of reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Based on total of 4392 selinexor related ADE reports as the primary suspect (PS), of which 2595 instances were severe outcomes. The predominant ADEs included gastrointestinal disorders, myelosuppression symptoms, and various nonspecific manifestations. 124 signals associated with selinexor ADE were detected, and 10 of these top 15 signals were not included into the instructions. Our study provides real-world evidence regarding the drug safety of selinexor, which is crucial for clinicians to safeguard patients' health.

Beyond oncology: Selinexor's journey into anti-inflammatory treatment and long-term management

Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), is gaining recognition beyond oncology for its potential in anti-inflammatory therapy. This review elucidates Selinexor's dual action, highlighting its anti-tumor efficacy in various cancers including hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, and its promising anti-inflammatory effects. In cancer treatment, Selinexor has demonstrated benefits as monotherapy and in combination with other therapeutics, particularly in drug-resistant cases. Its role in enhancing the effectiveness of bone marrow transplants has also been noted. Importantly, the drug's impact on key inflammatory pathways provides a new avenue for the management of conditions like sepsis, viral infections including COVID-19, and chronic inflammatory diseases such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Parkinson's Disease. The review emphasizes the criticality of managing Selinexor's side effects through diligent dose optimization and patient monitoring. Given the complexities of its broader applications, extensive research is called upon to validate Selinexor's long-term safety and effectiveness, with a keen focus on its integration into clinical practice for a diverse spectrum of disorders.

H3 K27M-altered glioma and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: Semi-systematic review of treatment landscape and future directions

H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma is a recently identified brain tumor associated with poor prognosis. As of 2016, it is classified by the World Health Organization as a distinct form of grade IV glioma. Despite recognition as an important prognostic and diagnostic feature in diffuse glioma, radiation remains the sole standard of care and no effective systemic therapies are available for H3K27M mutant tumors. This review will detail treatment interventions applied to diffuse midline glioma and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) prior to the identification of the H3 K27M mutation, the current standard-of-care for H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma treatment, and ongoing clinical trials listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov evaluating novel therapeutics in this population. Current clinical trials were identified using clinicaltrials.gov, and studies qualifying for this analysis were active or ongoing interventional trials that evaluated a therapy in at least 1 treatment arm or cohort comprised exclusively of patients with DIPG and H3 K27M-mutant glioma. Forty-one studies met these criteria, including trials evaluating H3 K27M vaccination, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and small molecule inhibitors. Ongoing evaluation of novel therapeutics is necessary to identify safe and effective interventions in this underserved patient population.

The nuclear export protein exportin-1 in solid malignant tumours: From biology to clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Exportin-1 (XPO1), a crucial protein regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic transport, is frequently overexpressed in various cancers, driving tumor progression and drug resistance. This makes XPO1 an attractive therapeutic target. Over the past few decades, the number of available nuclear export-selective inhibitors has been increasing. Only KPT-330 (selinexor) has been successfully used for treating haematological malignancies, and KPT-8602 (eltanexor) has been used for treating haematologic tumours in clinical trials. However, the use of nuclear export-selective inhibitors for the inhibition of XPO1 expression has yet to be thoroughly investigated in clinical studies and therapeutic outcomes for solid tumours.

METHODS

We collected numerous literatures to explain the efficacy of XPO1 Inhibitors in preclinical and clinical studies of a wide range of solid tumours.

RESULTS

In this review, we focus on the nuclear export function of XPO1 and results from clinical trials of its inhibitors in solid malignant tumours. We summarized the mechanism of action and therapeutic potential of XPO1 inhibitors, as well as adverse effects and response biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

XPO1 inhibition has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in the fight against cancer, offering a novel approach to targeting tumorigenic processes and overcoming drug resistance. SINE compounds have demonstrated efficacy in a wide range of solid tumours, and ongoing research is focused on optimizing their use, identifying response biomarkers, and developing effective combination therapies.

KEY POINTS

Exportin-1 (XPO1) plays a critical role in mediating nucleocytoplasmic transport and cell cycle. XPO1 dysfunction promotes tumourigenesis and drug resistance within solid tumours. The therapeutic potential and ongoing researches on XPO1 inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumours. Additional researches are essential to address safety concerns and identify biomarkers for predicting patient response to XPO1 inhibitors.

Combinatorial Approaches for Chemotherapies and Targeted Therapies With Radiation: United Efforts to Innovate in Patient Care

Combinatorial therapies consisting of radiation therapy (RT) with systemic therapies, particularly chemotherapy and targeted therapies, have moved the needle to augment disease control across nearly all disease sites for locally advanced disease. Evaluating these important combinations to incorporate more potent therapies with RT will aid our understanding of toxicity and efficacy for patients. This article discusses multiple disease sites and includes a compilation of contributions from expert Red Journal editors from each disease site. Leveraging improved systemic control with novel agents, we must continue efforts to study novel treatment combinations with RT.

Selinexor in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Selinexor, an XPO1 inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option in the challenging landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a review of selinexor, with a focus on available clinical studies involving MM patients and its safety profile. Clinical trials, such as STORM and BOSTON, have demonstrated its efficacy, particularly in combination regimens, showcasing notable overall response rates (ORR) and prolonged median progressionfree survival (mPFS). Selinexor's versatility is evident across various combinations, including carfilzomibdexamethasone (XKd), lenalidomidedexamethasone (XRd), and pomalidomidedexamethasone (XPd), with efficacy observed even in tripleclass refractory and highrisk patient populations. However, challenges, including resistance mechanisms and adverse events, necessitate careful management. Realworld evidence also underscores selinexor's effectiveness in RRMM, though dose adjustments and supportive measures remain crucial. Ongoing trials are exploring selinexor in diverse combinations and settings, including pomalidomidenaïve patients and postautologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) maintenance.

EXPERT OPINION

The evolving landscape of selinexor's role in the sequencing of treatment for RRMM, its potential in highrisk patients, including those with extramedullary disease, as revealed in the most recent international meetings, and ongoing investigations signal a dynamic era in myeloma therapeutics. Selinexor emerges as a pivotal component in multidrug strategies and innovative combinations.

UCHL1 is a potential molecular indicator and therapeutic target for neuroendocrine carcinomas

Neuroendocrine carcinomas, such as neuroendocrine prostate cancer and small-cell lung cancer, commonly have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. We report that ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1), a deubiquitinating enzyme, is elevated in tissues and plasma from patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Loss of UCHL1 decreases tumor growth and inhibits metastasis of these malignancies. UCHL1 maintains neuroendocrine differentiation and promotes cancer progression by regulating nucleoporin, POM121, and p53. UCHL1 binds, deubiquitinates, and stabilizes POM121 to regulate POM121-associated nuclear transport of E2F1 and c-MYC. Treatment with the UCHL1 inhibitor LDN-57444 slows tumor growth and metastasis across neuroendocrine carcinomas. The combination of UCHL1 inhibitors with cisplatin, the standard of care used for neuroendocrine carcinomas, significantly delays tumor growth in pre-clinical settings. Our study reveals mechanisms of UCHL1 function in regulating the progression of neuroendocrine carcinomas and identifies UCHL1 as a therapeutic target and potential molecular indicator for diagnosing and monitoring treatment responses in these malignancies.

Androgen deprivation induces double-null prostate cancer via aberrant nuclear export and ribosomal biogenesis through HGF and Wnt activation

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) targeting androgen/androgen receptor (AR)- signaling pathways is the main therapy for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, ADT eventually fails in most patients who consequently develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). While more potent AR antagonists and blockers for androgen synthesis were developed to improve clinical outcomes, they also show to induce more diverse CRPC phenotypes. Specifically, the AR- and neuroendocrine-null PCa, DNPC, occurs in abiraterone and enzalutamide-treated patients. Here, we uncover that current ADT induces aberrant HGF/MET signaling activation that further elevates Wnt/β-catenin signaling in human DNPC samples. Co-activation of HGF/MET and Wnt/β-catenin axes in mouse prostates induces DNPC-like lesions. Single-cell RNA sequencing analyses identify increased expression and activity of XPO1 and ribosomal proteins in mouse DNPC-like cells. Elevated expression of XPO1 and ribosomal proteins is also identified in clinical DNPC specimens. Inhibition of XPO1 and ribosomal pathways represses DNPC growth in both in vivo and ex vivo conditions, evidencing future therapeutic targets.

Safety of selinexor as the only exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor so far: a post-marketing study based on the world Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (Vigibase)

BACKGROUND

Exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitors are being developed as a new agent for anti-cancer therapies. This study aimed to broadly portray the adverse event (AE) profile of selinexor, an XPO1 inhibitor, in actual clinical practice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Disproportionality analyses were conducted by calculating the information component and reporting odds ratio in VigiBase over different reporting periods. All selinexor-related AEs were classified by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.

RESULTS

A total of 116,443 AEs were identified in 2,608 patients that received selinexor. Patients with cardiac disorders had a higher propensity for death. Thirteen SOCs and 125 PTs were identified as having a potential connection with selinexor. Notably, 29 suspected signals detected in our study were defined as significant AEs by the European Medicines Agency, including febrile neutropenia, pancytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Attention should be paid to these AEs, despite most toxicities being manageable and reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights a number of AEs associated with selinexor. Most toxicities are reversible but require careful management. The benefit of selinexor still outweighs the potential risks, indicating XPO1 inhibitors as promising agents.

KPT330 promotes the sensitivity of glioblastoma to olaparib by retaining SQSTM1 in the nucleus and disrupting lysosomal function

ABBREVIATIONS

AO: acridine orange; ATM: ATM serine/threonine kinase; CHEK1: checkpoint kinase 1; CHEK2: checkpoint kinase 2; CI: combination index; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; DSBs: double-strand breaks; GBM: glioblastoma; HR: homologous recombination; H2AX: H2A.X variant histone; IHC: immunohistochemistry; LAPTM4B: lysosomal protein transmembrane 4 beta; MAP1LC3/LC3: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3; PARP: poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; RAD51: RAD51 recombinase; SQSTM1: sequestosome 1; SSBs: single-strand breaks; RNF168: ring finger protein 168; XPO1: exportin 1.

Advances in Diagnostic Tools and Therapeutic Approaches for Gliomas: A Comprehensive Review

Gliomas, a prevalent category of primary malignant brain tumors, pose formidable clinical challenges due to their invasive nature and limited treatment options. The current therapeutic landscape for gliomas is constrained by a "one-size-fits-all" paradigm, significantly restricting treatment efficacy. Despite the implementation of multimodal therapeutic strategies, survival rates remain disheartening. The conventional treatment approach, involving surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, grapples with substantial limitations, particularly in addressing the invasive nature of gliomas. Conventional diagnostic tools, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET), play pivotal roles in outlining tumor characteristics. However, they face limitations, such as poor biological specificity and challenges in distinguishing active tumor regions. The ongoing development of diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches represents a multifaceted and promising frontier in the battle against this challenging brain tumor. The aim of this comprehensive review is to address recent advances in diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches for gliomas. These innovations aim to minimize invasiveness while enabling the precise, multimodal targeting of localized gliomas. Researchers are actively developing new diagnostic tools, such as colorimetric techniques, electrochemical biosensors, optical coherence tomography, reflectometric interference spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and optical biosensors. These tools aim to regulate tumor progression and develop precise treatment methods for gliomas. Recent technological advancements, coupled with bioelectronic sensors, open avenues for new therapeutic modalities, minimizing invasiveness and enabling multimodal targeting with unprecedented precision. The next generation of multimodal therapeutic strategies holds potential for precision medicine, aiding the early detection and effective management of solid brain tumors. These innovations offer promise in adopting precision medicine methodologies, enabling early disease detection, and improving solid brain tumor management. This review comprehensively recognizes the critical role of pioneering therapeutic interventions, holding significant potential to revolutionize brain tumor therapeutics.

Nuclear transport proteins: structure, function, and disease relevance

Proper subcellular localization is crucial for the functioning of biomacromolecules, including proteins and RNAs. Nuclear transport is a fundamental cellular process that regulates the localization of many macromolecules within the nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments. In humans, approximately 60 proteins are involved in nuclear transport, including nucleoporins that form membrane-embedded nuclear pore complexes, karyopherins that transport cargoes through these complexes, and Ran system proteins that ensure directed and rapid transport. Many of these nuclear transport proteins play additional and essential roles in mitosis, biomolecular condensation, and gene transcription. Dysregulation of nuclear transport is linked to major human diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and viral infections. Selinexor (KPT-330), an inhibitor targeting the nuclear export factor XPO1 (also known as CRM1), was approved in 2019 to treat two types of blood cancers, and dozens of clinical trials of are ongoing. This review summarizes approximately three decades of research data in this field but focuses on the structure and function of individual nuclear transport proteins from recent studies, providing a cutting-edge and holistic view on the role of nuclear transport proteins in health and disease. In-depth knowledge of this rapidly evolving field has the potential to bring new insights into fundamental biology, pathogenic mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches.

Viral Subversion of the Chromosome Region Maintenance 1 Export Pathway and Its Consequences for the Cell Host

In eukaryotic cells, the spatial distribution between cytoplasm and nucleus is essential for cell homeostasis. This dynamic distribution is selectively regulated by the nuclear pore complex (NPC), which allows the passive or energy-dependent transport of proteins between these two compartments. Viruses possess many strategies to hijack nucleocytoplasmic shuttling for the benefit of their viral replication. Here, we review how viruses interfere with the karyopherin CRM1 that controls the nuclear export of protein cargoes. We analyze the fact that the viral hijacking of CRM1 provokes are-localization of numerous cellular factors in a suitable place for specific steps of viral replication. While CRM1 emerges as a critical partner for viruses, it also takes part in antiviral and inflammatory response regulation. This review also addresses how CRM1 hijacking affects it and the benefits of CRM1 inhibitors as antiviral treatments.

The synergy of the XPO1 inhibitors combined with the BET inhibitor INCB057643 in high-grade B-cell lymphoma via downregulation of MYC expression

High grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (HGBCL-DH) represents an uncommon B-cell lymphoma (BCL) with aggressive clinical courses and poor prognosis. Despite revolutionary therapeutic advances in BCL, there has been limited treatment progress in HGBCL-DH, thus necessitating additional therapeutic strategies for HGBCL-DH. This study demonstrated that the BET antagonist INCB057643 synergized with the XPO1 inhibitors (selinexor and eltanexor) to decrease cell viability and increase cell apoptosis in HGBCL-DH cells with or without TP53 mutations. As anticipated, the combined treatment of INCB057643 with selinexor slowed tumor growth and reduced the tumor burden in TP53-mutated HGBCL-DH xenografts. Mechanistically, MYC functional inhibition was a potential molecular mechanism underlying the synergy of the combined INCB057643 and selinexor treatment in HGBCL-DH cells independent of TP53 mutation status. In TP53 mutated HGBCL-DH cells, inducing DNA damage and impairing the DNA damage response (DDR) were involved in the therapeutic interaction of the combined regimen. In TP53 wild-type cells, the molecular mechanism was linked with upregulation of p53 levels and activation of its targeted pathways, rather than dysregulation of the DDR. Collectively, we might provide a potential promising combination therapy regimen for the management of HGBCL-DH. Clinical evaluations are warranted to confirm this conclusion.

Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival

Durable objective response rate (ORR) remains a meaningful endpoint in recurrent cancer; however, the target ORR for single-arm recurrent glioblastoma trials has not been based on historic information or tied to patient outcomes. The current study reviewed 68 treatment arms comprising 4793 patients in past trials in recurrent glioblastoma in order to judiciously define target ORRs for use in recurrent glioblastoma trials. ORR was estimated at 6.1% [95% CI 4.23; 8.76%] for cytotoxic chemothera + pies (ORR = 7.59% for lomustine, 7.57% for temozolomide, 0.64% for irinotecan, and 5.32% for other agents), 3.37% for biologic agents, 7.97% for (select) immunotherapies, and 26.8% for anti-angiogenic agents. ORRs were significantly correlated with median overall survival (mOS) across chemotherapy (R2= 0.4078, P < .0001), biologics (R2= 0.4003, P = .0003), and immunotherapy trials (R2= 0.8994, P < .0001), but not anti-angiogenic agents (R2= 0, P = .8937). Pooling data from chemotherapy, biologics, and immunotherapy trials, a meta-analysis indicated a strong correlation between ORR and mOS (R2= 0.3900, P < .0001; mOS [weeks] = 1.4xORR + 24.8). Assuming an ineffective cytotoxic (control) therapy has ORR = 7.6%, the average ORR for lomustine and temozolomide trials, a sample size of ≥40 patients with target ORR>25% is needed to demonstrate statistical significance compared to control with a high level of confidence (P < .01) and adequate power (>80%). Given this historic data and potential biases in patient selection, we recommend that well-controlled, single-arm phase II studies in recurrent glioblastoma should have a target ORR >25% (which translates to a median OS of approximately 15 months) and a sample size of ≥40 patients, in order to convincingly demonstrate antitumor activity. Crucially, this response needs to have sufficient durability, which was not addressed in the current study.

The efficacy and adverse effects of anlotinib in the treatment of high-grade glioma: A retrospective analysis

Introduction

Anlotinib, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor, was found to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in brain metastases.

Methods

This paper retrospectively analyzed 26 newly diagnosed or recurrent high-grade gliomas from 2017 to 2022, and the patients received oral anlotinib during concurrent postoperative chemoradiotherapy or after recurrence. Efficacy was evaluated according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, and the main study endpoints were PFS at 6 months and overall survival (OS) at 1 year.

Results

After the follow-up, until May 2022, 13 patients survived and 13 patients died, with a median follow-up time of 25.6 months. The disease control rate (DCR) was 96.2% (25/26), and the overall response rate (ORR) rate was 73.1% (19/26). The median PFS after oral anlotinib was 8.9 months (0.8-15.1), and the PFS at 6 months was 72.5%. The median OS after oral anlotinib was 12 months (1.6-24.4), and the OS at 12 months was 42.6%. Anlotinib-related toxicities were observed in 11 patients, mostly grades 1-2. In the multivariate analysis, patients with Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) above 80 had a highermedian PFS of 9.9months (p = 0.02), and their sex, age, IDH mutation, MGMTmethylation, and whether anlotinib was combined with chemoradiotherapy or maintenance treatment had no effect on PFS.

Conclusion

We found that anlotinib combined with chemoradiotherapy in treating high-grade central nervous system (CNS) tumors can prolong PFS and OS and that it was safe.

Clinically oriented prediction of patient response to targeted and immunotherapies from the tumor transcriptome

BACKGROUND

Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice, demonstrating significant survival benefits. However, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers.

METHODS

We present ENLIGHT, a transcriptomics-based computational approach that identifies clinically relevant genetic interactions and uses them to predict a patient's response to a variety of therapies in multiple cancer types without training on previous treatment response data. We study ENLIGHT in two translationally oriented scenarios: personalized oncology (PO), aimed at prioritizing treatments for a single patient, and clinical trial design (CTD), selecting the most likely responders in a patient cohort.

FINDINGS

Evaluating ENLIGHT's performance on 21 blinded clinical trial datasets in the PO setting, we show that it can effectively predict a patient's treatment response across multiple therapies and cancer types. Its prediction accuracy is better than previously published transcriptomics-based signatures and is comparable with that of supervised predictors developed for specific indications and drugs. In combination with the interferon-γ signature, ENLIGHT achieves an odds ratio larger than 4 in predicting response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the CTD scenario, ENLIGHT can potentially enhance clinical trial success for immunotherapies and other monoclonal antibodies by excluding non-responders while overall achieving more than 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

ENLIGHT demonstrably enhances the ability to predict therapeutic response across multiple cancer types from the bulk tumor transcriptome.

FUNDING

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program, NIH and by the Israeli Innovation Authority.

[A case-control study of multiple myeloma patients with central nervous system involvement]

Objective: To investigate the treatment options for multiple myeloma patients with central nervous system involvement (CNS-MM) , as well as their clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. Methods: Between January 2011 and January 2022 our center diagnosed 18 people with CNS-MM. A retrospective analysis was done on the clinical information from the initial diagnosis and central nervous system involvement, and it was compared to 1∶3 matched newly diagnosed MM from the same period. Analysis was done on the clinical characteristics and survival rates of the two groups. Results: In patients with CNS-MM, the median time of onset was 14.2 (0.9-79.6) months and the median overall survival (OS) was 30.5 months from initial diagnosis and only 3.8 months in patients after CNS involvement. The CNS-MM patients showed more IgD type (P=0.010) , severer anemia (P=0.014) , a higher proportion of bone marrow plasma cells (P=0.013) , more extramedullary lesions (P=0.001) , and increased lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) (P=0.009) when compared to the control group. Lenalidomide or pomalidomide-based combinations had higher rates of hematology and CNS remission than bortezomib or daratumumab-based regimens (75.0% vs 16.7% , P=0.019) . Patients who received IMiD-based regimens and had 2 high-risk factors at initial diagnosis (high LDH and extramedullary lesions) had a significantly lower incidence of CNS-MM (P=0.026) . At the initial diagnosis, LDH (P=0.008, HR=7.319, 95% CI 1.663-32.219) and extramedullary lesions (P=0.006, HR=8.054, 95% CI 1.828-35.486) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of CNS-MM. Conclusion: Patients with CNS-MM had a poor prognosis. Patients with high LDH or extramedullary lesions at the time of the initial diagnosis are more likely to have CNS-MM. The prognosis of this patient may be improved by immunoregulator-based therapy.

Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers

Compared with traditional therapies, targeted therapy has merits in selectivity, efficacy, and tolerability. Small molecule inhibitors are one of the primary targeted therapies for cancer. Due to their advantages in a wide range of targets, convenient medication, and the ability to penetrate into the central nervous system, many efforts have been devoted to developing more small molecule inhibitors. To date, 88 small molecule inhibitors have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat cancers. Despite remarkable progress, small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment still face many obstacles, such as low response rate, short duration of response, toxicity, biomarkers, and resistance. To better promote the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting cancers, we comprehensively reviewed small molecule inhibitors involved in all the approved agents and pivotal drug candidates in clinical trials arranged by the signaling pathways and the classification of small molecule inhibitors. We discussed lessons learned from the development of these agents, the proper strategies to overcome resistance arising from different mechanisms, and combination therapies concerned with small molecule inhibitors. Through our review, we hoped to provide insights and perspectives for the research and development of small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment.

Inhibition of XPO1 with KPT-330 induces autophagy-dependent apoptosis in gallbladder cancer by activating the p53/mTOR pathway

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a highly aggressive malignant cancer in the biliary system with poor prognosis. XPO1 (chromosome region maintenance 1 or CRM1) mediates the nuclear export of several proteins, mainly tumor suppressors. Thus, XPO1 functions as a pro-oncogenic factor. KPT-330 (Selinexor) is a United States Food and Drug Administration approved selective inhibitor of XPO1 that demonstrates good therapeutic effects in hematologic cancers. However, the function of XPO1 and the effect of KPT-330 have not been reported in GBC.

METHODS

We analyzed the correlation between XPO1 expression levels by q-PCR and clinical features of GBC patients. Cell proliferation assays were used to analyze the in vitro antitumor effects of XPO1 inhibitor KPT-330. mRNA sequencing was used to explore the underlying mechanisms. Western blot was performed to explore the relationship between apoptosis and autophagy. The in vivo antitumor effect of KPT-330 was investigated in a nude mouse model of gallbladder cancer.

RESULTS

We found that high expression of XPO1 was related to poor prognosis of GBC patients. We observed that XPO1 inhibitor KPT-330 inhibited the proliferation of GBC cells in vitro. Furthermore, XPO1 inhibitor KPT-330 induced apoptosis by reducing the mitochondrial membrane potential and triggering autophagy in NOZ and GBC-SD cells. Indeed, XPO1 inhibitor KPT-330 led to nuclear accumulation of p53 and activated the p53/mTOR pathway to regulate autophagy-dependent apoptosis. Importantly, KPT-330 suppressed tumor growth with no obvious toxic effects in vivo.

CONCLUSION

XPO1 may be a promising prognostic indicator for GBC, and KPT-330 appears to be a potential drug for treating GBC effectively and safely.

Eltanexor Effectively Reduces Viability of Glioblastoma and Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cells at Nano-Molar Concentrations and Sensitizes to Radiotherapy and Temozolomide

Current standard adjuvant therapy of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) using temozolomide (TMZ) frequently fails due to therapy resistance. Thus, novel therapeutic approaches are highly demanded. We tested the therapeutic efficacy of the second-generation XPO1 inhibitor Eltanexor using assays for cell viability and apoptosis in GBM cell lines and GBM stem-like cells. For most GBM-derived cells, IC₅₀ concentrations for Eltanexor were below 100 nM. In correlation with reduced cell viability, apoptosis rates were significantly increased. GBM stem-like cells presented a combinatorial effect of Eltanexor with TMZ on cell viability. Furthermore, pretreatment of GBM cell lines with Eltanexor significantly enhanced radiosensitivity in vitro. To explore the mechanism of apoptosis induction by Eltanexor, TP53-dependent genes were analyzed at the mRNA and protein level. Eltanexor caused induction of TP53-related genes, TP53i3, PUMA, CDKN1A, and PML on both mRNA and protein level. Immunofluorescence of GBM cell lines treated with Eltanexor revealed a strong accumulation of CDKN1A, and, to a lesser extent, of p53 and Tp53i3 in cell nuclei as a plausible mechanism for Eltanexor-induced apoptosis. From these data, we conclude that monotherapy with Eltanexor effectively induces apoptosis in GBM cells and can be combined with current adjuvant therapies to provide a more effective therapy of GBM.

Selinexor inhibits growth of patient derived chordomas in vivo as a single agent and in combination with abemaciclib through diverse mechanisms

Chordoma is a rare cancer that grows in the base of the skull and along the mobile spine from remnants of embryonic notochord tissue. The cornerstone of current treatments is surgical excision with adjuvant radiation therapy, although complete surgical removal is not always possible. Chordomas have high rates of metastasis and recurrence, with no approved targeted agents. Selinexor and eltanexor are selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) that prevent the karyopherin protein exportin-1 (XPO1) from shuttling its cargo proteins through nuclear pore complexes out of the nucleus and into the cytoplasm. As cancer cells overexpress XPO1, and many of its cargos include tumor suppressor proteins and complexes bound to oncogene mRNAs, XPO1 inhibition can suppress oncogene translation and restore tumor suppressor protein activity in different cancer types. SINE compounds have exhibited anti-cancer activity in a wide range of hematological and solid tumor malignancies. Here we demonstrate the preclinical effectiveness of SINE compounds used as single agents or in combination with either the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, or the CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, against various patient- derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models of chordoma, which included clival and sacral chordomas from adult or pediatric patients with either primary or metastatic disease, with either differentiated or poorly differentiated subtypes. SINE treatment significantly impaired tumor growth in all five tested chordoma models, with the selinexor and abemaciclib combination showing the strongest activity (tumor growth inhibition of 78-92%). Immunohistochemistry analysis of excised tumors revealed that selinexor treatment resulted in marked induction of apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation, as well as nuclear accumulation of SMAD4, and reduction of Brachyury and YAP1. RNA sequencing showed selinexor treatment resulted in differences in activated and repressed signaling pathways between the PDX models, including changes in WNT signaling, E2F pathways and glucocorticoid receptor signaling. This is consistent with SINE-compound mediated XPO1 inhibition exhibiting anti-cancer activity through a broad range of different mechanisms in different molecular chordoma subsets. Our findings validate the need for further investigation into selinexor as a targeted therapeutic for chordoma, especially in combination with abemaciclib.

The efficacy of selinexor (KPT-330), an XPO1 inhibitor, on non-hematologic cancers: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE

Selinexor is a novel XPO1 inhibitor which inhibits the export of tumor suppressor proteins and oncoprotein mRNAs, leading to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells. While selinexor is currently FDA approved to treat multiple myeloma, compelling preclinical and early clinical studies reveal selinexor's efficacy in treating hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies, including sarcoma, gastric, bladder, prostate, breast, ovarian, skin, lung, and brain cancers. Current reviews of selinexor primarily highlight its use in hematologic malignancies; however, this review seeks to summarize the recent evidence of selinexor treatment in solid tumors.

METHODS

Pertinent literature searches in PubMed and the Karyopharm Therapeutics website for selinexor and non-hematologic malignancies preclinical and clinical trials.

RESULTS

This review provides evidence that selinexor is a promising agent used alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in non-hematologic malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical investigation of selinexor treatment for solid malignancies is warranted.

A Three-Gene Signature Predicts Response to Selinexor in Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Selinexor is the first selective inhibitor of nuclear export to be approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, there are no known genomic biomarkers or assays to help select MM patients at higher likelihood of response to selinexor. Here, we aimed to characterize the transcriptomic correlates of response to selinexor-based therapy.

METHODS

We performed RNA sequencing on CD138+ cells from the bone marrow of 100 patients with MM who participated in the BOSTON study, followed by differential gene expression and pathway analysis. Using the differentially expressed genes, we used cox proportional hazard models to identify a gene signature predictive of response to selinexor, followed by validation in external cohorts.

RESULTS

The three-gene signature predicts response to selinexor-based therapy in patients with MM in the BOSTON cohort. Then, we validated this gene signature in 64 patients from the STORM cohort of triple-class refractory MM and additionally in an external cohort of 35 patients treated in a real-world setting outside of clinical trials. We found that the signature tracks with both depth and duration of response, and it also validates in a different tumor type using a cohort of pretreatment tumors from patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Furthermore, the genes involved in the signature, WNT10A, DUSP1, and ETV7, reveal a potential mechanism through upregulated interferon-mediated apoptotic signaling that may prime tumors to respond to selinexor-based therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we present a present a novel, three-gene expression signature that predicts selinexor response in MM. This signature has important clinical relevance as it could identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with selinexor-based therapy.

Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Glioblastoma

Cells of glioblastoma, the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor, are characterized by their rapid growth and infiltration of adjacent healthy brain parenchyma, which reflects their aggressive biological behavior. In order to maintain their excessive proliferation and invasion, glioblastomas exploit the innate biological capacities of the patients suffering from this tumor. The pathways involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis are the mechanisms most commonly affected. The following work reviews the regulatory pathways of cell growth in general as well as the dysregulated cell cycle and apoptosis relevant mechanisms observed in glioblastomas. We then describe the molecular targeting of the current established adjuvant therapy and present ongoing trials or completed studies on specific promising therapeutic agents that induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of glioblastoma cells.