Papulonodular lichenoid and pseudolymphomatous reaction at the injection site of hepatitis B virus vaccination

Drug-induced cutaneous pseudolymphoma: A systematic review of the literature

Drug-induced cutaneous pseudolymphoma (CPL) is a common form of pseudolymphoma and there are numerous drugs associated with it. In this study, we performed a systematic review of the literature by searching PubMed/Medline and Embase databases to determine the most common drugs responsible for CPL and to define the demographic, clinical, histopathological and immunopathological characteristics of patients (updated on 30 December 2020). From 883 initially found articles, 56 studies (89 reported cases) were included. The mean age of patients was 54.4 ± 17.7 (ranging 8-86) years, and 46 (51.7%) were men. The median time interval between drug intake and CPL occurrence was 120 days (range 1-7300 days). The shortest median time interval between taking the drug and the onset of the disease was observed among patients taking antidepressants (60 days) (range 7-540) and the longest median time interval was observed in individuals using immunomodulators (300 days) (range 3-7300). The most-reported drug categories causing CPL were anti-hypertensives (17.9%), anticonvulsants (14.6%), monoclonal antibodies (13.4%) and antidepressants (11.2%). Moreover, the most common drugs were phenytoin (6.7%), amlodipine (5.6%), fluoxetine (5.6%) and carbamazepine (4.4%). Histopathological evaluation of 76 cases revealed 62 (81.5%) reports of T-cell infiltrations. Furthermore, positive reports of CD4 (94.0%), CD8 (93.0%) and CD30 (87.5%) were noted. The lowest prevalence of CD30-positive reports was observed among monoclonal antibodies. In conclusion, anti-hypertensives, anti-convulsants, monoclonal antibodies and anti-depressants are the most common drugs responsible for CPL. It mostly presents in middle-aged patients with almost no gender difference as pruritic papules, nodules and plaques.

Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions: A narrative review evaluating demographics, clinical features and culprit medications

Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions (LDE) are adverse drug reactions (ADR) characterized by symmetric, erythematous, violaceous papules reminiscent but rarely fully characteristic of lichen planus (LP). We aimed to analyse the literature describing cases of LDE within the last 20 years to provide additional insight into culprit drugs, typical latency to onset of the eruption, the spectrum of clinical presentations, severity and management. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE between January 2000 and 27 January 2021. The keywords 'lichenoid drug rash' and 'lichenoid drug eruption' were used. Cases were included if LDE diagnosis was made, and culprit drugs were identified. A total of 323 cases with LDE were identified from 163 published case reports and studies. The mean patient age was 58.5 years (1 month to 92 years), and 135 patients (41.8%) were female. Checkpoint inhibitors (CKI) were the most frequently reported culprit drugs (136 cases; 42.1%), followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (39 cases; 12.0%) and anti-TNF-α-monoclonal antibodies (13 cases; 4.0%). The latency between initiation of the drug and manifestation was 15.7 weeks (range: 0.1-208 weeks). After discontinuing the culprit drug, the median time to resolution was 14.2 weeks (range: 0.71-416 weeks). One hundred thirty-six patients (42.1%) were treated with topical, and 54 patients (16.7%) with systemic glucocorticoids. Overall, we conclude that, albeit rare, LDE is challenging to diagnose ADR induced by mostly CKI, TKI, and biologics. Treatment modalities resemble that of lichen planus, and the culprit drugs had to be discontinued in only 26%, which is low compared with other types of adverse drug reactions. This is probably due to the low risk of aggravation (e.g. toxic epidermal necrolysis) if the drug is continued and the benefit/risk ratio favouring the drug, as is often the case in cancer therapy.

[Pathology of the nipple-areola complex : Part II. Tumors, tumor-like lesions, and supernumerary breast lesions]

The nipple-areola complex is the origin of various morphologically distinct tumors and tumor-like lesions, which can be delineated from the special structures of the nipple, in particular the intramammary ducts, skin-appendages, and the intramammary stroma. Benign tumors are most frequent and this includes epithelial tumors such as mammary adenoma and syringomatous tumor of the nipple. Less commonly observed are benign mesenchymal tumors such as leiomyoma of the nipple, or tumor-like lesions like pseudo-lymphoma. With excess formations of the nipple, the different forms of polythelia and polymastia have to be considered.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions to vaccines

Vaccination continues to be the single most important and successful public health intervention, due to its prevention of morbidity and mortality from prevalent infectious diseases. Severe immunologically mediated reactions are rare and less common with the vaccine than the true infection. However, these events can cause public fearfulness and loss of confidence in the safety of vaccination. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature search and narrative review of immune-mediated vaccine adverse events and their known and proposed mechanisms, and outline directions for future research. Improving our knowledge base of severe immunologically mediated vaccine reactions and their management drives better vaccine safety and efficacy outcomes.

Disseminated induced pseudolymphoma DTP vaccine

This article considers the variant of disseminated vaccine-induced pseudolymphoma (VIP), which appeared after the introduction of the DTP vaccine. The article describes features of the observed case: common skin rashes affecting the skin of the face, left and right shoulder, chest and upper back. The effectiveness of topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors and intralesional injections of betamethasone dipropionate and betamethasone sodium phosphate solution has been shown.

Jessner-Kanof lymphocytic infiltration of the skin associated with glatiramer acetate

Glatiramer acetate (GLAT) is a well tolerated and safe immunomodulatory drug for the treatment of relapsing=remitting multiple sclerosis. The most commonly recognized side effects are localized injection site reactions consisting of pain, pruritus, mild erythema and induration, which sometimes persist for several days. We describe the first case of a biopsy-proven lymphocytic infiltration (T-cell pseudolymphoma) with the clinical appearance of a figured erythema on the ventrolateral thighs in the first four weeks under GLAT treatment, resolving without any evidence of recurrence despite ongoing therapy. A T-cell pseudolymphoma is a very rare side effect of GLAT treatment. For clinical purposes it is important to state that re-exposition after GLAT-induced pseudolymphoma is possible without permanent sequelae.

Cutaneous Pseudolymphomas

The term cutaneous pseudolymphoma refers to benign reactive lymphoid proliferations in the skin that simulate cutaneous lymphomas. It is a purely descriptive term that encompasses various reactive conditions with a varied etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, histology, and behavior. We present a review of the different types of cutaneous pseudolymphoma. To reach a correct diagnosis, it is necessary to contrast clinical, histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular findings. Even with these data, in some cases only the clinical course will confirm the diagnosis, making follow-up essential.

Injection Site Lichenoid Dermatitis Following Pneumococcal Vaccination: Report and Review of Cutaneous Conditions Occurring at Vaccination Sites

Background

Cutaneous dermatoses and malignancies have occurred at the sites of vaccines.

Purpose

To describe a man who developed a lichenoid dermatitis at the pneumococcal vaccine injection site and to review cutaneous dermatoses and malignancies occurring at vaccination sites.

Methods

PubMed was used to search the following terms, separately and in combination: adverse, condition, cutaneous, dermatosis, dermatitis, injection, PCV13, pneumococcal, pneumonia, prevnar, reaction, skin, site, vaccination, and vaccine. All papers were reviewed, and relevant manuscripts, along with their reference citations, were evaluated.

Results

Several vaccines—including bacillus Calmette-Guerin, hepatitis B, influenza, leishmaniasis, meningitis, pneumococcal, smallpox, tetanus (alone and in combination with diphtheria, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenza type B or plague and yellow fever), and varicella-zoster—have been associated with post-vaccination site reactions. A 70-year-old male developed a lichenoid dermatitis that occurred at the pneumococcal vaccine injection site within 2 weeks after PCV13 vaccination; the erythematous nodule resolved spontaneously within 9 weeks following immunization.

Conclusions

Dermatoses at the injection sites of vaccines can be granulomatous, immunity-related conditions, infections, lichenoid, neutrophilic, or pseudolymphomatous. Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are the most common vaccination site-associated malignancies; however, melanoma and sarcomas (dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, fibrosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma) are also smallpox vaccine-related site neoplasms. A cutaneous immunocompromised district that is created by vaccine-induced local immunologic changes is hypothesized to be the pathogenesis of vaccination site reactions.

A local reaction at or near injection site: case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data

The need for developing a case definition and guidelines for a local reaction at or near the injection site, methods for the development of the case definition and guidelines as an adverse event following immunization as well as the rationale for selected decisions about the case definition for a local reaction at or near the injection site are explained in the Preamble section. The case definition is structured in 2 levels of diagnostic certainty: level 1 includes any description of morphological or physiological change at or near the injection site that is described or identified by a healthcare provider. Level 2 is any description of morphological or physiological change at or near injection site that is described by any other person. In Guidelines section, the working group recommends to enable meaningful and standardized data collection, analysis, and presentation of information about a local reaction at or near the injection site. However, implementation of all guidelines might not be possible in all settings. The availability of information may vary depending upon resources, geographic region, and whether the source of information is a prospectively designed clinical trial, a post-marketing surveillance or epidemiologic study, or an individual report of a local reaction at injection site.

Cutaneous B-cell pseudolymphoma at the site of vaccination

Pseudolymphomas are a rare complication of vaccination, presenting with dense lymphoid infiltrates and prominent follicular pattern. We report our observations on 4 patients with vaccination-induced B-cell pseudolymphoma (all females; age range 19 to 60 years; median: 34.5 years). Clinically 3 patients presented with subcutaneous nodules and 1 presented with a large, indurated, erythematous plaque. Histology revealed in all cases dense lymphoid infiltrates in the subcutaneous fat with prominent follicular pattern. The follicles displayed features of reactive germinal centers (normal mantle zone, presence of tingible body macrophages, normal proliferation). Necrotic areas surrounded by palisaded histiocytes were seen in 3 biopsies from 2 patients. A mixed-cell infiltrate with eosinophils and plasma cells was present in all cases. In addition, histiocytes with granular basophilic cytoplasm could be observed around the focal area of necrosis or within the inflammatory infiltrate. Follow-up was available for 3 patients. One patient was alive with persistent disease 6 months after the first observation. Two patients were treated with local radiotherapy and are alive and free of disease after 12 and 72 months, respectively. One of these two patients had a second pseudolymphoma on the contralateral arm after a new injection of vaccine. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma after vaccination should be distinguished histopathologically from low-grade cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (follicle center cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma) and from other B-cell pseudolymphomas with prominent follicular pattern requiring different treatment (eg, Borrelia burgdorferi-induced lymphocytoma cutis).

Drug-Associated Lymphoma and Pseudolymphoma: Recognition and Management

This article discusses ways to recognize and manage lymphomas and pseudolymphomas associated with drug exposure. Over the last 30 years, the classification of pseudolymphomas and lymphomas has undergone significant change, especially following the application of sophisticated immunostaining and gene rearrangement analysis. The term cutaneous pseudolymphomas (CPL) is a nonspecific term for a heterogeneous group of benign reactive T- or B-cell lymphoproliferative processes that simulate cutaneous lymphomas clinically or histologically. While pseudolymphomas are relatively rare diseases, their clinical and histological heterogeneity has led to multiple systems of categorization based on immunological factors, causative agents, presentation, and clinical course.

Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma following vaccination

Atypical lymphoid infiltrations arose within the influenza inoculation sites of two adult female patients. One patient developed a low-grade cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) that was responsive to local excision and radiation therapy despite spread to a distant cutaneous site. The second patient's clinical course was characterized by a locally aggressive, histologically reactive inflammatory reaction responsive only to radiation therapy after multiple failed attempts at surgical resection.

Granulome vaccinal avec hyperplasie lymphocytaire : 10 cas

BACKGROUND

Few cases of cutaneous lymphocytic hyperplasia secondary to vaccination have been published, although such lesions are not rare.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report a series of 10 cases registered between 1993 and 2003.

RESULTS

Mean age was 25. The clinical aspect was solitary or multiple subcutaneous nodules, located on the arm, developing after a delay of 1 to 18 months after vaccination. Histologic examination showed a lymphocytic infiltration of the subcutaneous fat, with diffuse and/or follicular pattern, without nuclear atypia, the morphological and immunohistochemical analysis of which revealed the benign nature. In all cases, there was fibrosis and granuloma composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils and macrophages with basophilic cytoplasm. Morin stain showed intralesional aluminium in the 6 investigated cases. Evolution was always benign, with no relapse following exeresis.

DISCUSSION

Cutaneous lymphocytic hyperplasia secondary to vaccination has to be suspected in a young patient with subcutaneous nodules appearing at a vaccination site. Evidence of aluminium in the lesions supports the diagnosis and the hypothesis that aluminium in the vaccine excipient might have a role in the onset of such lesions.