Neuropeptide Y increases force development through a mechanism that involves calcium entry in resistance arteries

DPP-4 Inhibitors as Potential Candidates for Antihypertensive Therapy: Improving Vascular Inflammation and Assisting the Action of Traditional Antihypertensive Drugs

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is an important protease that is widely expressed on the surface of human cells and plays a key role in immune-regulation, inflammation, oxidative stress, cell adhesion, and apoptosis by targeting different substrates. DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are commonly used as hypoglycemic agents. However, in addition to their hypoglycemic effect, DPP-4i have also shown potent activities in the cardiovascular system, particularly in the regulation of blood pressure (BP). Previous studies have shown that the regulatory actions of DPP-4i in controlling BP are complex and that the mechanisms involved include the functional activities of the nerves, kidneys, hormones, blood vessels, and insulin. Recent work has also shown that inflammation is closely associated with the elevation of BP, and that the inhibition of DPP-4 can reduce BP by regulating the function of the immune system, by reducing inflammatory reactions and by improving oxidative stress. In this review, we describe the potential anti-hypertensive effects of DPP-4i and discuss potential new anti-hypertensive therapies. Our analysis indicated that DPP-4i treatment has a mild anti-hypertensive effect as a monotherapy and causes a significant reduction in BP when used in combined treatments. However, the combination of DPP-4i with high-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can lead to increased BP. We suggest that DPP-4i improves vascular endothelial function in hypertensive patients by suppressing inflammatory responses and by alleviating oxidative stress. In addition, DPP-4i can also regulate BP by activating the sympathetic nervous system, interfering with the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), regulating Na/H₂O metabolism, and attenuating insulin resistance (IR).

Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase iv inhibition on arterial blood pressure

1. The aim of the present study was to determine whether inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) elevates arterial blood pressure and whether any such effect is dependent on genetic background, the sympathetic nervous system and Y(1) receptors. The rationale behind this study was that: (i) neuropeptide (NP) Y(1-36) and peptide YY(1-36) (PYY(1-36)) are endogenous Y(1) receptor agonists and are metabolised by DPP IV to NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36), which are not Y(1) but rather selective Y(2) receptor agonists; (ii) Y(1) receptors mediate vasoconstriction, whereas Y(2) receptors have little effect on vascular tone; (iii) vaso-constrictor effect of the Y(1) receptor is enhanced in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) compared with normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats; and (iv) NPY(1-36) is released from sympathetic nerve terminals. 2. We examined the effects of acute administration of 3-N-[(2S,3S)-2-amino-3-methylpentanoyl]-1,3-thiazolidine (P32/98; a DPP IV inhibitor) on arterial blood pressure in anaesthetized adult SHR and WKY rats in the absence and presence of either captopril, hydralazine or chlorisondamine to lower basal mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) by different mechanisms (inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme, direct vasodilation and ganglionic blockade, respectively). 3. In naïve SHR with severely elevated basal blood pressures (MABP = 176 +/- 3 mmHg; n = 4), i.v. boluses (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) of P32/98 did not affect blood pressure. 4. When basal blood pressure was reduced by pretreatment of SHR with either captopril (30 mg/kg, i.v.; MABP = 116 +/- 3 mmHg; n = 9) or hydralazine (5 mg/kg, i.p.; MABP = 84 +/- 3 mmHg; n = 7), P32/98 (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) caused significant dose-related increases in arterial blood pressure (4 +/- 2, 10 +/- 2 and 12 +/- 3 mmHg in the captopril-pretreated group, respectively (P < 0.01); 5 +/- 2, 8 +/- 3 and 11 +/- 4 mmHg in the hydralazine-pretreated group, respectively (P < 0.01)). 5. The increases in arterial blood pressure induced by P32/98 in captopril- or hydralazine-pretreated SHR were entirely blocked by pretreatment with the selective Y(1) receptor antagonist N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-d-arginine amide (BIBP 3226; 6 mg/kg per h). 6. When basal blood pressure was reduced in SHR by pretreatment with chlorisondamine (10 mg/kg, s.c.; MABP = 108 +/- 4 mmHg; n = 7), inhibition of DPP IV with P32/98 did not affect arterial blood pressure. Basal heart rate in chlorisondamine-treated SHR was significantly reduced compared with naïve SHR, captopril-pretreated SHR and hydralazine-pretreated SHR, indicating effectiveness of ganglionic blockade. 7. Unlike the results in genetically hypertensive animals, in normotensive WKY rats pretreated with captopril (30 mg/kg, i.v.; MABP = 81 +/- 4 mmHg; n = 6), or hydralazine (5 mg/kg, i.p.; MABP = 63 +/- 4 mmHg; n = 4) or chlorisondamine (10 mg/kg, s.c.; MABP = 63 +/- 4 mmHg; n = 5), P32/98 did not affect arterial blood pressure. 8. We conclude that, in genetically susceptible animals, inhibition of DPP IV increases arterial blood pressure via Y(1) receptors when elevated blood pressure is reduced with antihypertensive drugs provided that the sympathetic nervous system is functional. The results suggest vigilance because DPP IV inhibitors are used more widely in hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive drugs.

Enhanced neuropeptide Y immunoreactivity and vasoconstriction in mesenteric small arteries from the early non-obese diabetic mouse

The present study investigated whether sympathetic neurotransmission is altered at an early stage of diabetes in mesenteric small arteries isolated from female non-obese diabetic (NOD) and control animals without diabetes from the same mouse strain. The NOD diabetic mice had increased plasma glucose and hypertension. Confocal microscopy showed distribution of nerve terminals was similar, but immunoreaction intensity for neuropeptide Y (NPY) and tyrosine hydroxylase was higher in small arteries from NOD diabetic compared with NOD control mice. In the presence of prazosin and activated with vasopressin, electrical field stimulation evoked contractions which were more pronounced in mesenteric arteries from NOD diabetic versus NOD control mice and inhibited by the NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226. NPY concentration-response curves were leftward shifted in arteries from NOD diabetic versus NOD control both in arteries with and without endothelium, but not in the presence of the BIBP 3226. The present findings suggest that enhanced NPY content and vasoconstriction to NPY by activation of NPY Y(1) receptors in arteries from diabetic mice may contribute to the enhanced sympathetic nerve activity and vascular resistance in female non-obese early diabetic animals.

Neuropeptide Y regulates intracellular calcium through different signalling pathways linked to a Y(1)-receptor in rat mesenteric small arteries

Simultaneous measurements of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) and tension were performed to clarify whether the mechanisms which cause the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-elicited contraction and potentiation of noradrenaline contractions, and the NPY inhibition of forskolin responses are linked to a single or different NPY receptor(s) in rat mesenteric small arteries. In resting arteries, NPY moderately elevated [Ca(2+)](i) and tension. These effects were antagonized by the selective Y(1) receptor antagonist, (R)-N(2)-(diphenacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-D-argininea mide (BIBP 3226) (apparent pK(B) values of 8.54+/-0.25 and 8.27+/-0.17, respectively). NPY (0.1 microM) caused a near 3 fold increase in sensitivity to noradrenaline but did not significantly modify the tension-[Ca(2+)](i) relationship for this agonist. BIBP 3226 competitively antagonized the contractile response to NPY in arteries submaximally preconstricted with noradrenaline (pA(2) 7.87+/-0.20). In arteries activated by vasopressin, the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin (3 microM) induced a maximum relaxation and a return of [Ca(2+)](i) to resting levels. NPY completely inhibited these effects. The contractile responses to NPY in arteries maximally relaxed with either sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or nifedipine were not significantly higher than those evoked by the peptide at resting tension, in contrast to the contractions to NPY in forskolin-relaxed arteries. BIBP 3226 competitively antagonized the contraction to NPY in forskolin-relaxed arteries with a pA(2) of 7.92+/-0.29. Electrical field stimulation (EFS) at 8-32 Hz caused large contractions in arteries relaxed with either forskolin or noradrenaline in the presence of phentolamine. These responses to EFS were inhibited by BIBP 3226. Similar EFS in resting, non-activated arteries did not produce any response. The present results suggest that different intracellular pathways are linked to a single NPY Y(1) receptor in intact rat mesenteric small arteries, and provide little support for involvement of other postjunctional NPY receptors in the contractile responses to NPY. Neurally released NPY also seems to act through Y(1) receptors, and may serve primarily as an inhibitor of vasodilatation.

Altered neuropeptide Y Y1 responses in mesenteric arteries in rats with congestive heart failure

The aim of the present study was to elucidate if the potentiating effect of neuropeptide Y on various vasoactive agents in vitro is (1) altered in mesenteric arteries from rats with congestive heart failure and (2) mediated by the neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor. The direct vascular effects of neuropeptide Y and its modulating effects on the contractions induced by endothelin-1-, noradrenaline-, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-, U46619-(9,11-dideoxy-11alpha, 9alpha-epoxymethano-prostaglandin F2alpha) and ATP, and acetylcholine-induced dilatations were studied in the presence and absence of the neuropeptide Y Y1 antagonist, BIBP3226 (BIBP3226¿(R)-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl ]-D-arginine-amide¿). Neuropeptide Y, per se, had no vasoactive effect in the arteries. The potency of endothelin-1 was significantly decreased in congestive heart failure rats. Neuropeptide Y and neuropeptide Y-(13-36) potentiated the endothelin-1-induced contraction in congestive heart failure mesenteric arteries. In 20% of the congestive heart failure rats, sarafotoxin 6c induced a contraction of 31+/-4%. Neuropeptide Y also potentiated U46619- and noradrenaline-induced contractions but not 5-HT-induced contractions in congestive heart failure arteries. In sham-operated animals neuropeptide Y potentiated noradrenaline- and 5-HT-induced contractions. These potentiations were inhibited by BIBP3226. Acetylcholine induced an equipotent relaxation in both groups which was unaffected by neuropeptide Y. In conclusion, neuropeptide Y responses are altered in congestive heart failure rats. The potentiating effect differs between vasoactive substances. Neuropeptide Y Y1 and non-neuropeptide Y1 receptors are involved.

Characterization of NPY receptors mediating contraction in rat intramyocardial coronary arteries

In vitro experiments in a microvascular myograph were designed in order to characterize the receptor subtypes and the mechanisms underlying the contractions induced by neuropeptide Y (NPY) in rat coronary small arteries. The rank order of potency for NPY-receptor agonist-induced increases in tension in endothelium-intact preparations was polypeptide Y (PYY)> NPY > or = [Leu31Pro34]NPY, while NPY(13-36) only induced small contractions at the highest concentration applied. The selective neuropeptide Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226, caused rightward shifts in the concentration-response curves for NPY and the slope of the Schild plot was not significantly different from unity. The pA2 value for BIBP 3226 against NPY was 7.88+/-0.15 (n = 6). We have earlier shown that endothelial cell removal does not change the contractile responses induced by NPY, but indomethacin (3 x 10(-6) M) significantly reduced the contractions induced by the peptide. In contrast, the thromboxane receptor antagonist, SQ29548, which abolished the contractions induced by the thromboxane analogue, U46619, did not change the concentration-response curves for NPY. In conclusion, the present study suggests that Y1 receptors mediate NPY-induced contractions in rat coronary resistance arteries, and that a non-thromboxane prostanoid is involved in the contractile mechanism.

Neuropeptide Y-induced potentiation of noradrenergic vasoconstriction in the human saphenous vein: involvement of endothelium generated thromboxane

1. We investigated the potentiating effect of low concentrations of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on the vasoconstriction induced by transmural nerve stimulation (TNS) and noradrenaline (NA) in human saphenous veins. The effects of (i) endothelium removal; (ii) the addition of the NO pathway precursor L-arginine; (iii) the ET(A)/ET(B) endothelin receptor antagonist Ro 47-0203; (iv) the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin; (v) the selective thromboxane A2 (TxA2) receptor antagonists Bay u3405 and ifetroban, and (vi) the TxA2 synthase inhibitor, UK 38485, were studied in order to gain information about the mechanisms of NPY-induced potentiation. 2. Contractile response curves for TNS (0.5-8 Hz) and for exogenously administered NA (0.1-3 microM) were obtained in superfused saphenous vein rings. The contractions induced by both TNS and NA at all tested frequencies and concentrations, respectively, were significantly potentiated by 50 nM NPY in endothelium intact veins. Conversely, in endothelium-denuded vessel rings the contractile-response curves to TNS and NA overlapped both in the absence and presence of NPY, thus suggesting that a release of vasoactive substances from endothelial cells could account for the noradrenergic NPY-induced potentiation. 3. In vessels with intact endothelium, the potentiating action of NPY on TNS and NA was unaffected by the presence of high concentrations of the NO precursor L-arginine (3-10 mM) or the non-selective ET(A)/ET(B) endothelin receptor antagonist, Ro 47-0203 (10 microM). These data indicate that the NPY-induced effect does not involve either the endothelium-derived vasodilator nitric oxide or the vasoconstrictor endothelin. Conversely, in the presence of the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (30 microM), NPY failed to potentiate the vasoconstrictions produced by either nerve stimulation or by exogenous NA, thus providing evidence that arachidonic acid metabolites through the cyclo-oxygenase pathway are mainly responsible for the potentiation evoked by NPY. 4. When the TxA2 receptor antagonists, Bay u 3405 (1 microM) and ifetroban (1 microM) were added to the superfusing medium, NPY did not alter either the frequency- or the concentration-response curves for either TNS or NA. Accordingly, both TNS- and NA-induced contractions were not potentiated by NPY in the presence of the TxA2 synthase inhibitor, UK 38485 (10 microM). This clearly demonstrates the pivotal role of TxA2 in NPY-induced potentiation. 5. In superfused vein rings with endothelium, a subthreshold concentration (0.2 nM) of the TxA2 mimetic U 46619 potentiated both TNS- and NA-induced vasoconstrictions. This potentiation was higher at low stimulation frequencies and low NA concentrations, and resembled that produced by NPY. 6. Our results indicate that in the human saphenous vein NPY potentiates the contractions produced by sympathetic nerve stimulation acting at the postjunctional level, primarily on endothelial cells. In particular, the NPY-induced release of a cyclo-oxygenase metabolite, namely TxA2, may have a synergistic effect on the vasoconstriction induced by the noradrenergic mediator. Thus, such a mechanism may play a key role in the maintenance of the sympathetic tone of large human capacitance vessels.

Interactions between neuropeptide Y and the adenylate cyclase pathway in rat mesenteric small arteries: role of membrane potential

1. Simultaneous measurements of membrane potential and tension were performed to investigate the intracellular mechanisms of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in rat mesenteric small arteries. 2. NPY (0.1 microM) depolarized arterial smooth muscle cells from -55 to -47 mV and increased wall tension by 0.22 N m-1, representing 11% of the contraction elicited by a high-potassium solution. Isoprenaline (1 microM) and acetylcholine (1 microM) evoked hyperpolarizations of 11 and 17 mV, respectively. NPY inhibited the isoprenaline-induced effects on membrane potential without affecting those of acetylcholine. 3. Forskolin evoked sustained concentration-dependent hyperpolarizations of small mesenteric arteries. NPY (0.1 microM) inhibited the responses to 1 microM forskolin, but did not alter the stable hyperpolarization elicited by the specific activator of protein kinase A (PKA) SP-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS (0.1 mM). Forskolin increased the cyclic AMP (cAMP) content of the arteries 21-fold, and NPY inhibited the forskolin-evoked increase in cAMP levels by 91%. 4. The hyperpolarization produced by 1 microM forskolin was not affected by either charybdotoxin (0.1 microM) or 4-aminopyridine (0.5 mM), but glibenclamide (5 microM) inhibited the hyperpolarization by 70%. Glibenclamide also inhibited the hyperpolarization evoked by SP-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS by 59%. 5. Neither depolarization nor contraction caused by NPY were significantly affected by either glibenclamide (5 microM) or nifedipine (1 microM), but they were reduced by gadolinium (10 microM). However, the blocking effect of NPY on forskolin-elicited hyperpolarization was not affected by gadolinium. 6. Charybdotoxin (0.1 microM) and 4-aminopyridine (0.5 mM) strongly enhanced the depolarization and contraction caused by NPY (0.1 microM), and nifedipine (1 microM) prevented the enhanced responses to NPY in the presence of charybdotoxin. 7. These findings suggest that NPY acts through at least two different intracellular mechanisms in mesenteric small arteries: a depolarization of arterial smooth muscle which is probably due to activation of non-selective cation channels, and a marked inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity, which in turn inhibits the hyperpolarization produced by cAMP accumulation in these arteries.

Distribution and functional effects of neuropeptide Y on equine ureteral smooth muscle and resistance arteries

The distribution of neuropeptide Y (NPY)-immunoreactive (IR) nerves, as well as the functional effects of NPY and the Y1- and Y2-receptor agonists, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and NPY(13-36), respectively, have been investigated in vitro in both visceral and arterial smooth muscle of the horse intravesical ureter. NPY-IR nerve fibres were widely distributed along the entire length of the ureter, although the intravesical part was the most richly innervated region, and the only one where NPY-IR ganglion cells were found. NPY (10(-7) M) did not affect either basal tone or spontaneous rhythmic contractions of the isolated intravesical ureter, but significantly enhanced the increases in both tone and frequency of phasic activity elicited by noradrenaline (10(-6) and 10(-5) M). The Y1-receptor agonist, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (10(-7) and 10(-6) M) did not significantly alter either ureteral basal tone or the contractile activity induced by noradrenaline, whereas the Y2-receptor agonist, NPY(13-36) (10(-7) M), mimicked the potentiating effect of NPY on noradrenaline responses. In ureteral resistance arteries (effective lumen diameters of 130-300 microm), NPY (10(-10) to 10(-7) M) elicited concentration-dependent contractions, which were inversely correlated with the arterial lumen diameter. Submaximal concentrations of NPY (10(-8) M) significantly increased the sensitivity of ureteral arteries to noradrenaline. [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (10(-10) to 10(-7) M), but not NPY(13-36), induced a contractile effect of similar magnitude and potency as those of NPY, and also potentiated noradrenaline responses. The present results demonstrate a rich NPY-innervation in the intravesical ureter and reveal functional effects of the peptide enhancing motor activity in both ureteral and arterial smooth muscles, although the receptors mediating such effects seem to be different. Thus, NPY potentiates the phasic contractions and tone elicited by noradrenaline through Y2-receptors, whereas it both contracts and potentiates noradrenaline vasoconstriction in ureteral arteries via Y1-receptors.

Neuropeptide Y modulates ATP-induced increases in internal calcium via the adenylate cyclase/protein kinase A system in a human neuroblastoma cell line

The modulatory effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on ATP-induced increases in cytosolic free-calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) were investigated in the CHP-234 human neuroblastoma cell line. Pretreatment of cells with 100 nM NPY potentiated the increase in [Ca2+]i evoked subsequently by 20 microM ATP, compared with initial application of ATP in a control experiment, whereas a similar pretreatment with 1 microM NPY attenuated the subsequent response to ATP. Both actions of NPY were completely blocked by H-89 [N-[2-((3-(4-bromo-phenyl)-2-propenyl)-amino)-ethyl]-5 isoquinoline sulphonamide dihydrochloride], a selective antagonist of protein kinase A. The effects of 100 nM NPY were mimicked by H-89, while forskolin and 8-Br-cAMP mimicked the effects of 1 microM NPY. Both basal and forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels were inhibited by 100 nM NPY and by 100 nM NPY(13-36), a selective agonist of the NPY Y2-receptor subtype. In contrast, at 1 microM such inhibition was not observed for either NPY or NPY(13-36). It is concluded that NPY has a biphasic modulatory effect on increases in [Ca2+]i produced by ATP, which probably involves the cAMP/protein kinase A cascade.

Effects of noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y on rat mesenteric microvessel contraction

We have studied the contractile effects of the sympathetic transmitter noradrenaline and its cotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY) given alone and in combination on isolated rat mesenteric resistance vessels (200-300 microns diameter). Noradrenaline and NPY each concentration-dependently contracted rat mesenteric microvessels (EC50 approximately equal to 800 nM and 10 nM, respectively), but noradrenaline caused considerably greater maximal effects than NPY (14.3 mN vs. 3.5 mN). A low antagonistic potency of yohimbine indicated that the response to noradrenaline did not involve alpha 2-adrenoceptors, and the subtype-selective antagonists 5-methylurapidil, tamsulosin and chloroethylclonidine indicated mediation via an alpha 1A-adrenoceptor. Shallow Schild regressions for prazosin and 5-methylurapidil indicated that an alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtype with relatively low prazosin affinity might additionally be involved. Studies with the NPY analogues PYY, [Leu31, Pro34] NPY and NPY18-36 demonstrated that NPY acted via a Y1 NPY receptor. In addition to its direct vasoconstricting effects NPY also lowered the noradrenaline EC50 but did not appreciably affect maximal noradrenaline responses indicating possible potentiation. The potentiating NPY response occurred with similar agonist potency as the direct contractile NPY effects and also via a Y1 NPY receptor. The Ca2+ entry blocker nitrendipine (300 nM) reduced direct contractile responses to noradrenaline and NPY but did not affect the potentiation response to NPY.

Regional involvement of an endothelium-derived contractile factor in the vasoactive actions of neuropeptide Y in bovine isolated retinal arteries

1. In vitro experiments in a microvascular myograph were designed in order to investigate the effects of human neuropeptide Y (NPY), its receptor subtype and the mechanisms underlying NPY actions in bovine isolated retinal proximal (PRA) and distal (DRA) arteries. 2. A single concentration of NPY (10 nM) induced a prompt and reproducible contraction which reached a plateau within 1-4 min, after which the response returned to baseline over the next 2-10 min. Cumulative addition of NPY induced concentration-dependent contractions of bovine retinal arteries, with an EC50[M] of 1.7 nM and a maximal response equal to 54 +/- 8% of Emax (absolute maximal contractile levels of vessels) and not different from that obtained by a single addition of the peptide. There were no significant differences in either sensitivity or maximal response to NPY between PRA and DRA. 3. Porcine NPY and the selective Y1-receptor agonist, [Pro34]NPY, also induced concentration-dependent contractions of the retinal arteries with a potency and maximal response not significantly different from those of human NPY; in contrast, the selective Y2-receptor agonist, NPY(13-36), caused only a 5% contraction at the highest concentration used. 4. Removal of extracellular Ca2+ or pretreatment with the 1,4-dihydropyridine Ca(2+)-channel blocker, nifedipine (1 microM), reduced the contractile response of 10 nM NPY to 18.4 +/- 3.3% (n = 6) and 18.6 +/- 3.9% (n = 6); respectively, of the controls. 5. Mechanical removal of the endothelium depressed the maximal contraction elicited by NPY in PRA but did not affect either sensitivity or maximal response to the peptide in DRA. In endothelium-intact arteries, blockade of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway with 3 microM indomethacin increased resting tension in both PRA and DRA and significantly inhibited sensitivity and maximal contraction to NPY of PRA and DRA, respectively. The thromboxane A2 (TXA2)/prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) receptor antagonist, SQ30741, reduced both sensitivity and maximal contraction to NPY in PRA but not in DRA. 6. In endothelium-denuded PRA, indomethacin but not SQ30741 significantly reduced NPY maximal response and induced a marked increase in resting tension suggesting a basal release of a vasodilator prostanoid from smooth muscle cells. 7. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (150 u ml-1) reduced the maximal contraction to NPY in PRA. Inhibition of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase with NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG) (30 microM), enhanced sensitivity and maximal contraction to NPY in both PRA and DRA. In the presence of L-NOARG, SOD did not further inhibit NPY responses in PRA. 8. NPY (10 nM) induced a 2.9 fold leftwards shift of the noradrenaline concentration-response curves in PRA and increased maximal response by 50 +/- 16%. Neither 1 nor 10 nM NPY affected noradrenaline responses in DRA. [Pro34]NPY (10 nM), but not NPY(13-36), mimicked the potentiating effect of NPY on noradrenaline responses in PRA. 9. TXA2 analogue, U46619, at 10 nM elicited 3.6 fold leftwards shift of the noradrenaline concentration-responses curves in PRA and increased the maximal contraction by 32 +/- 3%, whereas in the presence of 1 microM SQ30741, 10 nM NPY did not potentiate noradrenaline responses. 10. The present results indicate that NPY may play a role in the regulation of retinal blood flow through both a direct contractile action, independent of the vessel size and a potentiation of the responses induced by noradrenaline in the proximal part of the retinal circulation, both effects being mediated by Y1 receptors. NPY promotes Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and stimulates the synthesis of contractile prostanoids in PRA and DRA, although only in PRA does the peptide trigger the release of an endothelium-derived contractile factor which facilitates the contraction and also seems to account for the potentiating effect of NPY.

Ca2+ handling mechanisms underlying neuropeptide Y-induced contraction in canine basilar artery

The effects of neuropeptide Y on isometric tension simultaneously measured with cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) and Ca2+ sensitivity of contractile elements were studied in isolated canine basilar arteries. Neuropeptide Y (1-100 nM) increased [Ca2+]cyt and tension in a concentration-dependent and parallel manner, whereas 9,11-dideoxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-epoxymethano prostaglandin F2 alpha (U46619) (10-100 nM), a thromboxane A2 mimetic, produced a large contraction with a small increase in [Ca2+]cyt. Ca2+ channel antagonists such as d-cis-diltiazem (10 mM) abolished both [Ca2+]cyt and tension augmented by neuropeptide Y. In Ca(2+)-free solution containing 0.2 mM EGTA, neuropeptide Y did not change [Ca2+]cyt and tension, whereas U46619 transiently increased both of them. Furthermore, neuropeptide Y apparently did not affect the Ca2+ sensitivity when assessed in the artery permeabilized with Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin, whereas U46619 augmented it. These findings suggest that neuropeptide Y-induced contraction in the canine basilar artery is produced mainly by Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels.