Influence of the hydration state on blood pressure values in a group of patients on regular maintenance hemodialysis

Role of Antihypertensives in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review

The primary goal of this research is to identify the factors of intradialytic hypertension in hemodialysis patients and stabilize blood pressure (BP) even without antihypertensive medicines. There are various treatment alternatives for lowering BP in these patients, many of which do not require extra pharmacological therapy (e.g. long, slow hemodialysis; short, daily hemodialysis; nocturnal hemodialysis; or, most effectively, dietary salt and fluid restriction in addition to the reduction of dialysate sodium concentration). These parameters provide good monitoring of BP, even with previously diagnosed hypertension. The adjustment of the extracellular volume with a low incidence of intradialytic hypotensive episodes is the most plausible explanation for this outcome.

We did a systematic evaluation of all published articles since 1994 to evaluate antihypertensive drug outcomes in hemodialysis patients. All articles were searched in the English language using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The screening techniques, study selection, data extraction procedures, and risk evaluation of bias were done using specified criteria and overseen by one of the senior writers with the application of quality assessment tools to the final articles. Data were searched using regular and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) keywords. Although substantial developments have emerged in the medical field, there is still a significant knowledge gap in the sector, particularly when it comes to BP guidelines and therapy choices for hypertensive hemodialysis patients. Until additional data are available, we should treat hypertension in hemodialysis with the use of active pursuit of euvolemia using dry weight probing and reduction of salt excess.

Fluid overload is associated with use of a higher number of antihypertensive drugs in hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is multifactorial, highly prevalent in the hemodialysis (HD) population and its adequate control requires, in addition to adequate volume management, often the use of multiple antihypertensive drugs. We aimed to describe the use of antihypertensive agents in a group of HD patients and to evaluate the factors associated with the use of multiple classes (≥3) of antihypertensives.

METHODS

We analyzed the baseline data from the HDFit study. Clinically stable patients with HD vintage between 3 and 24 months without any severe mobility limitation were recruited from sites throughout southern Brazil. Fluid status was measured pre-dialysis with the Body Composition Monitor (BCM; Fresenius, Germany). Fluid overload (FO) was considered when the overhydration index (OH) was greater than 7% of extracellular water (OH/ECW > 7%) and overweight was defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m² . Prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs were obtained from participants' reports and medical records. Logistic regression was employed to determine factors associated with excessive use of antihypertensive medication (≥3 classes).

FINDINGS

Of 195 studied patients, 171 with complete data were included (70% male, 53 ± 15 years old, 57% of them with FO). Pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 150 ± 24 mmHg and patients used a median of 2 (1-3) antihypertensive drugs. Vasodilators (20%) were of lowest prevalence, use of other classes varied from 40% to 53%. Sixty-two (36%) subjects used ≥3 classes and presented a higher prevalence of diabetes and FO, lower prevalence of overweight, and higher SBP. In a logistic regression model age, BMI <25 kg/m² , and OH/ECW > 7% were associated with excessive drug use.

DISCUSSION

More than one-third of participants used ≥3 classes of antihypertensive drugs, and it was associated with older age, BMI <25 kg/m² and FO. Strategies that better manage FO may aid better blood pressure control and avoid the use of multiple antihypertensive medications.

Fluid Status, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Abnormalities in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

♦ Objective

Hypertension, reduced arterial distensibility, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are risk factors for mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, few studies have focused on the relation between fluid status, blood pressure (BP), and cardiovascular abnormalities in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. This study was designed, first, to assess, using tracer dilution techniques, fluid status in PD patients compared to a control population of stable renal transplant (RTx) patients; second, to study the relation between fluid status, BP, and arterial wall abnormalities; third, to assess the determinants of cardiac structure; and last, to compare office and ambulatory BP measurements with respect to cardiac abnormalities.

♦ Design

Cross-sectional study.

♦ Setting

Multicenter study.

♦ Patients

41 stable PD patients with a mean Kt/V urea of 2.4 ± 0.7, and 77 stable RTx patients.

♦ Intervention

Fluid status was assessed by tracer dilution techniques: extracellular volume (ECV) with bromide dilution; total body water (TBW) with deuterium oxide; and plasma volume (PV) with dextran 70. Echocardiography was performed to assess left ventricular mass (LVM), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and relative wall thickness as indicators of LVH. Echography of the common carotid artery was performed to assess arterial distensibility. Both office and 24-hour ambulatory BP measurements were performed.

♦ Results

Fluid status, as assessed by ECV corrected for body surface area (BSA) (ECV:BSA), was significantly different between PD and RTx patients (9.4 ± 2.6 vs 8.6 ± 1.2 L/m2, p < 0.05). In 36.6% of the PD patients, ECV:BSA was above the 90th percentile of the RTx patients. Fluid status corrected for BSA, assessed by TBW (TBW:BSA), ECV (ECV:BSA), or plasma volume (PV:BSA), was significantly related to diastolic BP (DBP) ( r = 0.35, r = 0.37, r = 0.53; p < 0.05). Arterial distensibility of the common carotid artery was related to systolic BP (SBP) ( r = –0.36, p < 0.05). ECV was significantly related to LVEDD ( r = 0.41, p < 0.05) as a marker of eccentric LVH, whereas arterial distensibility was related to relative wall thickness ( r = –0.53, p < 0.001) as a marker of concentric LVH. An abnormal day–night BP rhythm, which was not related to fluid status, was observed in 68.4% of patients. Ambulatory DBP and SBP but not office DBP and SBP were related to LVM ( r = 0.43, r = 0.46; p < 0.01).

♦ Conclusions

A large proportion of PD patients whose treatment prescriptions are in accordance with the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines were found to be overhydrated compared with a population of stable RTx patients. Fluid status was significantly related to DBP and eccentric LVH, whereas arterial distensibility of the common carotid artery was significantly related to SBP and concentric LVH. In contrast to ambulatory BP, office BP was not related to LVM.

Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study

BACKGROUND

Volume overload and depletion both lead to high morbidity and mortality. Achieving euvolemia is a challenge in patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis (HD). Blood volume analysis (BVA) uses radiolabeled albumin to determine intravascular blood volume (BV). The measured BV is compared to an ideal BV (validated in healthy controls). We hypothesized that BVA could be used in HD to evaluate the adequacy of the current clinically prescribed "estimated dry weight" (EDW) and to titrate EDW in order to improve overall volume status. We were also interested in the reproducibility of BVA results in end stage kidney disease.

METHODS

Twelve adults on chronic HD were recruited; 10 completed the study. BVA (Daxor, New York, NY, USA) was used to measure BV at baseline. EDW was kept the same if the patient was deemed to be euvolemic by BVA otherwise, the prescribed EDW was changed with the aim that measured BV would match ideal BV. A second BVA measurement was done 1-3 months later in order to measure BV again.

RESULTS

Based on BVA, 6/10 patients were euvolemic at baseline and 5/10 were euvolemic at the second measurement. When comparing patients who had their prescribed EDW changed after the initial BVA to those who did not, both groups had similar differences between measured and ideal BV (P = 0.75). BV values were unchanged at the second measurement (P = 0.34) and there was no linear correlation between BV change and weight change (r² = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study is the first longitudinal measurement of BVA in HD patients. It revealed that changing weight did not proportionally change intravascular BV. BV remained stable for 1-3 months. BVA may not be helpful in clinically stable HD patients but studies on patients with hemodynamic instability and uncertain volume status are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02717533), first registered February 4, 2015.

Measurement of Fluid Status Using Bioimpedance Methods in Korean Pediatric Patients on Hemodialysis

Adequate fluid management is an important therapeutic goal of dialysis. Recently, bioelectrical impedance methods have been used to determine body fluid status, but pediatric reports are rare. To determine the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance methods in the assessment of body fluid statusof children undergoing hemodialysis (HD), 12 children on HD were studied. A multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis device (Inbody S10) and bioimpedance spectroscopy device (BCM) were used to evaluate fluid status. Fluid removal during a HD session (assessed as body-weight change, ΔBWt) was compared with the difference in total body water determined by each device (measured fluid difference, ΔMF), which showed strong correlation using either method (Pearson's coefficient, r = 0.772 with Inbody S10 vs. 0.799 with BCM). Bioimpedance measurement indicated fluid overload (FO; ΔHS greater than 7%) in 34.8% with Inbody S10 and 56.5% with BCM, and only about 60% of children with FO by bioimpedance methods showed clinical symptoms such as hypertension and edema. In some patients with larger weight gain Inbody S10-assessed overhydration (OH) was much smaller than BCM-assessed OH, suggesting that BCM is more relevant in estimating fluid accumulation amount than Inbody S10. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of body composition monitors to assess fluid status in Korean children receiving HD.

Review: Blood pressure in haemodialysis patients: The importance of the relationship between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, salt intake and extracellular volume

This review outlines the major mechanisms for control of blood pressure (BP) in individuals with renal failure on haemodialysis. Dietary salt stimulates thirst and, thereby, greater fluid intake with excessive fluid gain between dialysis sessions and chronic expansion of extracellular volume. At the same time, this volume expansion often fails to suppress the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) appropriately and this inevitably leads to high BP in the majority of individuals on haemodialysis.

A greater understanding of the mechanisms involved leads to more rational treatment and better BP control. This can be achieved by careful measurement of BP before and after dialysis, allowing time for the equilibration of extracellular fluid shifts that occur after dialysis, combined with measurements of plasma renin activity. It is relatively easy to then decide how the high BP should be treated either by removal of excess volume by gradual ultrafiltration combined with restriction of salt intake to help prevent thirst and excessive fluid gain between dialyses, or by inhibition of the RAS, or by a combination of both.

In those individuals who are unable to adequately reduce their dietary salt intake and still continue to gain large amounts of weight between dialysis, and are resistant to reducing their pre-dialysis weight, calcium antagonists may help to lower BP, either alone or in combination with RAS blockade. However, the BP often remains resistant to treatment unless they can be persuaded to reduce their salt intake.

Techniques for the assessment of volume status in patients with end stage renal disease

While advances in assessing extracellular volume status have occurred, no methodology is sufficiently robust and accurate in all patients to recommend routine use in clinical practice. All of the methods described also perform best when measured serially in patients and when correlated with other ancillary methods of volume assessment such as body weight, physical examination and determination of vital signs and symptomatology. Perhaps, the best method for assessing and modifying dry weight is to utilize multiple complementary methods such as advocated by Ronco et in the “5B” approach (39). In this approach, the clinician utilizes data from: fluid balance (body weight changes), blood pressure, biomarkers (such as the natriuretic peptides), bioimpedance, and blood volume changes. Body (thoracic and IVC) ultrasound can also be included (Fig. 1). These combined data sources will likely lead to greater detection of subtle volume overload, a finding likely to contribute to excess mortality and morbidity. Clinical trials of such strategies are needed to better inform clinicians.

Significance of interdialytic weight gain versus chronic volume overload: consensus opinion

Predialysis volume overload is the sum of interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and residual postdialysis volume overload. It results mostly from failure to achieve an adequate volume status at the end of the dialysis session. Recent developments in bioimpedance spectroscopy and possibly relative plasma volume monitoring permit noninvasive volume status assessment in hemodialysis patients. A large proportion of patients have previously been shown to be chronically volume overloaded predialysis (defined as >15% above 'normal' extracellular fluid volume, equivalent to >2.5 liters on average), and to exhibit a more than twofold increased mortality risk. By contrast, the magnitude of the mortality risk associated with IDWG is much smaller and only evident with very large weight gains. Here we review the available evidence on volume overload and IDWG, and question the use of IDWG as an indicator of 'nonadherence' by describing its association with postdialysis volume depletion. We also demonstrate the relationship between IDWG, volume overload and predialysis serum sodium concentration, and comment on salt intake. Discriminating between volume overload and IDWG will likely lead to a more appropriate management of fluid withdrawal during dialysis. Consensually, the present authors agree that this discrimination should be among the primary goals for dialysis caretakers today. In consequence, we recommend objective measures of volume status beyond mere evaluations of IDWG.

Role of twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children on dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pre- or postdialysis BP recordings are imprecise, can be biased, and have poor test-retest reliability in children on dialysis. We aimed to examine the possible differences between pre- and postdialysis BP levels and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in diagnosis of hypertension (HTN).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Twenty-four children on dialysis had 24-hour ABPM in the interdialytic period, and values were compared with average pre- and postdialysis systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) recordings that week. Each patient had an echocardiogram to determine presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).

RESULTS

By ABPM, 8% of patients had white coat HTN and 12% had masked HTN. There was no significant difference in diagnosis of systolic HTN based on ABPM daytime SBP mean or load and postdialysis SBP. However, only 15% of patients had diastolic HTN based on postdialysis measures, whereas 46% of patients had significantly elevated daytime DBP loads and 71% had high nighttime DBP loads on ABPM. Forty-eight percent of patients were SBP nondippers. Children with LVH had higher daytime and nighttime SBP loads, significantly higher daytime and nighttime DBP loads, and lesser degree of nocturnal dipping of SBP compared with those who did not.

CONCLUSION

ABPM is more informative than pre- and postdialysis BPs and improves the predictability of BP as a risk factor for target organ damage. Diagnosis and treatment monitoring of HTN among pediatric dialysis patients is enhanced with addition of ABPM.

Diagnosing hypertension by intradialytic blood pressure recordings

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of hypertension among hemodialysis patients by predialysis or postdialysis blood pressure (BP) recordings is imprecise and biased and has poor test-retest reliability. The use of intradialytic BP measurements to diagnose hypertension is unknown.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A diagnostic-test study was done with interdialytic ambulatory BP as reference standard. Index BP recordings tested were: predialysis (method 1), postdialysis (method 2), intradialytic (method 3), intradialytic including predialyis and postdialysis (method 4), and the average of predialysis and postdialysis (method 5). Each index BP was recorded over six consecutive dialysis treatments.

RESULTS

There were differences among index BP measurements in reproducibility, bias, precision, and accuracy. Method 4 was the most reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70 for systolic and diastolic BP). All 5 measurement methods overestimated 44-h ambulatory systolic BP. Methods 2, 3, or 4 overestimated ambulatory systolic BP by only a small amount. Method 4 was the most precise and accurate. For diagnosis of hypertension, BP cut-point by method 4 of 135/75 mmHg, had a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 75.9% for systolic BP (area under ROC curve 0.90). Median cut-off systolic BP of 140 mmHg from a single dialysis provides approximately 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity in diagnosing systolic hypertension; a median cut-off diastolic BP of 80 mmHg provides approximately 75% sensitivity and 75% specificity in diagnosing diastolic hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Consideration of intradialytic BP measurements together with predialysis and postdialysis BP measurements improves the reproducibility, bias, precision, and accuracy of BP measurement compared with predialysis or postdialysis measurements.

[The physiopathology of dialysis-associated hypertension]

Hypertension in subjects on long term dialysis is frequent. Its origins are found in extracellular volume overload, which is complicated by increased peripheral arterial resistance. The latter is affected by many systems, including that of renin-angiotensin, endothelin, nitric oxide, the sympathetic nervous system, and others. The interaction between these factors may explain why the control of hypertension in dialysis patients requires ongoing attention to the many aspects of good dialysis.

Relationship between interdialytic weight gain and blood pressure among prevalent hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is common in hemodialysis patients; however, the relationship between interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and blood pressure (BP) is incompletely characterized. This study seeks to define the relationship between IDWG and BP in prevalent hemodialysis subjects.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, & PARTICIPANTS

This study used data from 32,295 dialysis sessions in 442 subjects followed up for 6 months in the Crit-Line Intradialytic Monitoring Benefit (CLIMB) Study.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Mixed linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between percentage of IDWG (IDWG [%] = [current predialysis weight - previous postdialysis weight]/dry weight * 100) as the independent variable and systolic BP (SBP) and predialysis - postdialysis SBP (deltaSBP) as dependent variables.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analyses, every 1% increase in percentage of IDWG was associated with a 1.00 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], +/-0.24) increase in predialysis SBP (P < 0.0001), 0.65 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.24) decrease in postdialysis SBP (P < 0.0001), and 1.66 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.25) increase in deltaSBP (P < 0.0001). After controlling for other significant predictors of SBP, every 1% increase in percentage of IDWG was associated with a 1.00 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.24) increase in predialysis SBP (P < 0.0001) and a 1.08 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.22) increase in deltaSBP with hemodialysis (P < 0.0001). However, in subjects with diabetes as the cause of end-stage renal disease, subjects with lower creatinine levels, and older subjects, the magnitude of the association between percentage of IDWG and predialysis SBP was less pronounced. The magnitude of percentage of IDWG on deltaSBP was less pronounced in younger subjects and subjects with lower dry weights. Results were similar with diastolic BP.

LIMITATIONS

Hemodialysis BP measurements are imprecise estimates of BP and true hemodynamic burden in dialysis subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

In prevalent hemodialysis subjects, increasing percentage of IDWG is associated with increases in predialysis BP and BP changes with hemodialysis; however, the magnitude of the relationship is modest and modified by other clinical factors. Thus, although overall volume status may impact on BP to a greater extent, day-to-day variations in weight gain have a modest role in BP increases in prevalent subjects with end-stage renal disease.

Circadian rhythm of hydration in healthy subjects and uremic patients studied by bioelectrical impedance analysis

BACKGROUND

Healthy subjects and patients after successful kidney transplantation show a circadian rhythm for glomerular filtration rate and for the glomerular transport of macromolecules. We aimed to evaluate by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) whether body hydration status also follows a circadian rhythm in patients with impaired renal function.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 28 subjects divided into 3 groups: 8 healthy volunteers, 8 patients affected by chronic kidney disease and 12 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis. During 24 h, 9 BIA measurements were taken in every subject every 180 min.

RESULTS

BIA findings demonstrate that normal subjects have a circadian rhythm in hydration status that reaches maximum body water content at night, between 21.00 and 23.00 h. In patients with chronic kidney disease, this rhythm, with maximum at night, is maintained. The rhythm is also present in ESRD patients, if the residual diuresis is at least 500 ml/day, while there is no rhythm when residual diuresis is <300 ml/day.

CONCLUSIONS

In normal subjects, body hydration status shows a circadian rhythm, which is weakened or lost in oligoanuric patients on dialysis, but partially maintained in subjects with preterminal uremia and in hemodialyzed patients with residual diuresis >500 ml/day.

A whole-body model to distinguish excess fluid from the hydration of major body tissues

BACKGROUND

Excess fluid (ExF) accumulates in the body in many conditions. Currently, there is no consensus regarding methods that adequately distinguish ExF from fat-free mass.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to develop a model to determine fixed hydration constants of primary body tissues enabling ExF to be calculated from whole-body measurements of weight, intracellular water (ICWWB), and extracellular water (ECWWB).

DESIGN

Total body water (TBW) and ECWWB were determined in 104 healthy subjects by using deuterium and NaBr dilution techniques, respectively. Body fat was estimated by using a reference 4-component model, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and air-displacement plethysmography. The model considered 3 compartments: normally hydrated lean tissue (NH_LT), normally hydrated adipose tissue (NH_AT), and ExF. Hydration fractions (HF) of NH_LT and NH_AT were obtained assuming zero ExF within the diverse healthy population studied.

RESULTS

The HF of NH_LT mass was 0.703 +/- 0.009 with an ECW component of 0.266 +/- 0.007. The HF of NH_AT mass was 0.197 +/- 0.042 with an ECW component of 0.127 +/- 0.015. The ratio of ECW to ICW in NH_LT was 0.63 compared with 1.88 in NH_AT. ExF can be estimated with a precision of 0.5 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

To calculate ExF over a wide range of body compositions, it is important that the model takes into account the different ratios of ECW to ICW in NH_LT and NH_AT. This eliminates the need for adult age and sex inputs into the model presented. Quantification of ExF will be beneficial in the guidance of treatment strategies to control ExF in the clinical setting.

Interdialytic weight gain as a marker of blood pressure, nutrition, and survival in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Excessive interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) is usually related to an overload of sodium and water, and is the most important factor for arterial hypertension in dialysis. On the other hand, food intake also contributes to IDWG, and is the basic factor for nutrition. The objective of this study is to assess the long-term prognostic effect of IDWG and its relationship with the nutritional status and blood pressure in patients in hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

We describe the results of a 5-year prospective observation study in which 134 HD patients were included (70 males and 64 females), with ages between 18 and 81. Initially, the average data were collected during 4 weeks, including total IDWG and percentages according to dry weight (IDWG%), nutritional parameters, and blood pressure. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts according to IDWG% (<2.9, 2.9-3.9, and >3.9%, respectively). Student t test, ANOVA, linear regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared with log-rank test were used as statistical tools.

RESULTS

The mean IDWG% for the whole studied population was 3.5 +/- 1.1% (1.5-8.0%). It was not related to gender, but had an inverse correlation with age (P < 0.000) and serum bicarbonate level (P= 0.009). It was directly correlated with predialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure, nPCR, urea and creatinine levels (P < 0.01 for all of them), and the body mass index (P < 0.000). Serum levels of albumin (44.7 +/- 4.0 g/dL) and prealbumin (31.9 +/- 7.4 mg/dL) had a direct correlation with total IDWG (P < 0.01). We found no significant relationship between or IDWG% and ferritin and transferrin levels. Five-year actuarial survival was 0.38, 0.52, and 0.63, respectively, in the 3 cohorts for IDWG% (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that a greater IDWG is directly associated with a better nutritional status, although it is also associated with higher predialysis blood pressure. The greater the IDWG%, the better the long-term prognosis of the patients. The beneficial effects of IDWG on the nutritional status and prognosis are greater than the negative aspects that depend on its effects on blood pressure. One must distinguish clearly between some isolated instances of not complying with a diet from those situations where a higher IDWG is merely a reflection of a good nutritional status, and one must be careful so that dietary recommendations will not have a negative influence on nutritional aspects. One must watch and correct the trend towards higher acidosis in patients with a greater IDWG.

Noncardiac consequences of hypertension in hemodialysis patients

The incidence of cerebrovascular events and peripheral vascular disease is higher in dialysis patients compared to the general population. Although normotensive dialysis patients have an elevated risk of stroke, hypertension remains an important risk factor for symptomatic cerebrovascular accidents. The risk of stroke increases in a linear fashion with blood pressure (BP) level. Furthermore, hypertension is also an important risk factor for silent cerebral infarction in dialysis patients. With regard to peripheral vascular disease, the association with hypertension is less clear. The spectrum of cerebrovascular accidents differs from the general population, as the relative incidence of cerebral hemorrhage to cerebral infarction is much higher. The prognosis of cerebral hemorrhage is poor and depends on the size and location of the hemorrhage. In order to prevent noncardiac complications, strict control of hypertension is of major importance in dialysis patients.

Volume status and blood pressure during long-term hemodialysis: role of ventricular stiffness

The importance of volume status on blood pressure in hemodialysis patients has long been recognized. We hypothesized that the enhanced volume dependency of blood pressure is partly determined by ventricular stiffness at end systole. A total of 115 long-term hemodialysis patients were invited to receive a comprehensive, noninvasive cardiovascular examination. End-systolic elastance was determined by using a novel, noninvasive echo-Doppler technique. The positive ratios of the interdialytic systolic blood pressure change vs weight gain during the subsequent 25 hemodialysis sessions were averaged to obtain the volume sensitivity index (mm Hg/kg). The averaged interdialytic weight gain per fat-free mass was correlated significantly with averaged percent change in systolic blood pressure (r=0.45, P<0.001). The estimated end-systolic elastance at baseline was significantly correlated with subsequently observed volume sensitivity index (volume sensitivity index=[1.17xend-systolic elastance]+6.4; r=0.34, P=0.001). End-systolic elastance was also significantly correlated with various vascular function parameters, including effective arterial elastance (r=0.48, P<0.001), pulse wave velocity (r=0.30, P=0.001), carotid augmentation index (r=0.31, P<0.001), and aortic compliance (r=-0.49, P<0.001). The results suggest that end-systolic elastance, a direct measure of left ventricular mechanical properties at end systole, is coupled to arterial mechanical properties and predicts the extent of subsequent interdialytic systolic blood pressure rise relative to weight gain. Therefore, ventricular stiffness at end systole is a determinant of the enhanced volume sensitivity of blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.

Effect of icodextrin on volume status, blood pressure and echocardiographic parameters: a randomized study

Overhydration is a risk factor for hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients. Recently, a high prevalence of subclinical overhydration was observed in peritoneal dialysis patients. Aim of the present open-label randomized study was to assess the effect of a icodextrin 7.5% solution on fluid status [extracellular water (ECW) bromide dilution], blood pressure regulation (24-hour ambulatory measurements) and echocardiographic parameters during a study period of 4 months, and to relate the effect to peritoneal membrane characteristics (dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio). Forty peritoneal dialysis patients (22 treated with icodextrin, 18 controls) were randomized to either treatment with icodextrin during the long dwell or standard glucose solutions. Thirty-two patients (19 treated with icodextrin, 13 controls] completed the study. The use of icodextrin resulted in a significant increase in daily ultrafiltration volume (744 +/- 767 mL vs. 1670 +/- 1038 mL; P = 0.012) and a decrease in ECW (17.5 +/- 5.2 L vs. 15.8 +/- 3.8 L; P = 0.035). Also the change in ECW between controls and patients treated with icodextrin was significant (-1.7 +/- 3.3 L vs. +0.9 +/- 2.2 L; P = 0.013). The effect of icodextrin on ECW was not related to peritoneal membrane characteristics, but significantly related to the fluid state of the patients (ECW:height) (r = -0.72; P < 0.0001). Left ventricular mass (LVM) decreased significantly in the icodextrin-treated group (241 +/- 53 grams vs. 228 +/- 42 grams; P = 0.03), but not in the control group. In this randomized open-label study, the use of icodextrin resulted in a significant reduction in ECW and LVM. The effect of icodextrin on ECW was not related to peritoneal membrane characteristics, but was related to the initial fluid state of the patient.

Assessment of blood pressure in hemodialysis patients

It is self-evident that accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Patients on hemodialysis typically do not have their BP measured under standardized conditions, a source of error in the assessment of their BP. However, their are some unique sources of error involving interdialytic weight gain, occurrence of sleep apnea and consequent nocturnal hypertension, inability to take BP in both arms in patients who have hemodialysis angioaccess in the arm, and the white coat effect in these patients as well. Precise measurement of BP in hemodialysis patients requires interdialytic ambulatory BP monitoring. However, when ambulatory BP monitoring is not possible, BP obtained in the dialysis unit can be used in a qualitative sense for prediction of hypertension in these patients. A 2-week average predialysis BP of greater than 150/85 mmHg or a postdialysis BP of greater than 130/75 mmHg has at least 80% sensitivity in diagnosing hypertension. Specificity of at least 80% can be achieved if predialysis BP of greater than 160/90 mmHg or postdialysis BP of greater than 140/80 mmHg are used. However, poor agreement between hemodialysis unit BP and ambulatory BP precludes their use for the precise prediction of BP. Improving measurement techniques in the dialysis unit, averaging multiple BP values, using 20-minute postdialysis readings, or home BP monitoring can improve BP determination when interdialytic BP monitoring is not possible.

Time-averaged concentration of dialysate sodium relates with sodium load and interdialytic weight gain during sodium-profiling hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Factors determining sodium level during sodium-profiling hemodialysis rarely have been studied. We hypothesized that the time-averaged concentration of dialysate sodium (TAC(Na)) is related to intradialytic sodium load and interdialytic complications.

METHODS

Eleven patients underwent 6-week periods of (1) conventional hemodialysis with a dialysate sodium concentration of 138 mmol/L (TAC(138)) and (2) sodium-profiling hemodialysis with a dialysate sodium concentration of 150 to 138 mmol/L (TAC(Na), 140 mmol/L [TAC(140)]) and (3) 155 to 130 mmol/L (TAC(Na), 147 mmol/L [TAC(147)]). Serum sodium level, weight gain, 24-hour blood pressure, and intradialytic and interdialytic discomfort were compared.

RESULTS

Serum sodium levels increased during the TAC(140) and TAC(147) periods (P < 0.05 compared with predialysis serum sodium). Intradialytic change in sodium level correlated positively with TAC(Na) (r = 0.945; P < 0.001). Regression analysis indicates that positive sodium load occurred with TAC(Na) more than 137.8 mmol/L. Interdialytic weight gain increased in proportion to TAC(Na) (P < 0.05 compared with each other period), with a positive correlation (r = 0.823; P < 0.001). TAC(Na) causing interdialytic weight gain less than 3 kg was estimated to be less than 143.5 mmol/L. Intradialytic hypotension decreased, but interdialytic discomforts increased during the TAC(147) period (P < 0.05 compared with TAC(138) and TAC(140)). Mean 24-hour blood pressures and pressure loads increased during the TAC(147) period (P < 0.05 compared with TAC(138) and TAC(140)). Mean diastolic blood pressure correlated positively with TAC(Na) (r = 0.354; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TAC(Na) is a factor determining sodium load and interdialytic complications during sodium-profiling hemodialysis. Defining the optimal TAC(Na) for individual centers based on their protocols will be helpful to avoid sodium load and excessive weight gain.

A new technique for establishing dry weight in hemodialysis patients via whole body bioimpedance

BACKGROUND

Quantitative techniques are necessary to achieve dry weight (DW) in patients with kidney failure. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a non-invasive method that determines the volume of body fluid compartments. The current work evaluates the use of BIS data in hemodialysis patients for the prediction of DW.

METHODS

A new technique has been devised for the estimation of DW that involves the intersection of two slopes, slope normovolemia (SNV) and slope hypervolemia (SHV). These slopes characterize the variation in extracellular water (ECW) with body weight (BW) in the states of normovolemia and hypervolemia, respectively. SNV was established via measurements of ECW and BW in 30 healthy subjects. In a longitudinal study in new hemodialysis patients, successive reduction of post-dialysis weight (PDW) was attempted until clinical signs of normovolemia were presented. Measurements of ECW and BW that were acquired at the beginning of each treatment were used to determine SHV.

RESULTS

SNV was found to be 0.239 L/kg and 0.214 L/kg for male and female healthy subjects, respectively. A significant DeltaPDW predicted by the new method (-4.98 kg) was highly correlated to the DeltaPDW achieved in the study (-5.85 kg, R = 0.839). Blood pressure was reduced (P < 0.001) and an 86% decrease in antihypertensive agents was achieved.

CONCLUSION

The method of intersecting slopes (SHV with SNV) via BIS is a new method for the prediction DW. This approach will offer considerable improvement for the routine management of DW in the dialysis setting.

Hemodialysis-associated hypertension: pathophysiology and therapy

The majority of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are hypertensive. Hypertension in the hemodialysis patient population is multifactorial. Further, hypertension is associated with an increased risk for left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular complications, and mortality. Antihypertensive medications alone do not adequately control blood pressure (BP) in hemodialysis patients. There are, however, several therapeutic options available to normalize BP in these patients, often without the need for additional drug therapy (eg, long, slow hemodialysis; short, daily hemodialysis; nocturnal hemodialysis; or, most effectively, dietary salt and fluid restriction in combination with reduction of dialysate sodium concentration). Optimal BP in dialysis patients is not different from recommendations for the general population, even though definite evidence is not yet available. Predialysis systolic and diastolic BPs are of particular importance. Left ventricular mass correlates with predialysis systolic BP. Survival is better in hemodialysis patients with a mean arterial pressure below 99 mm Hg as compared with those with higher BP. Low predialysis systolic BP (<110 mm Hg) and low predialysis diastolic BP (<70 mm Hg) are associated with increased mortality, primarily because of severe congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease. Patients that experience repeated intradialytic hypotensive episodes should also be viewed with caution, and predialytic BP values should be reevaluated. A possible treatment option for these patients may be slow, long hemodialysis; short, daily hemodialysis; or nocturnal hemodialysis. Among the antihypertensive agents currently available, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors appear to have the greatest ability to reduce left ventricular mass. Pressure load can be satisfactorily determined by using the average value of predialysis BP measurements over 1 month. In selected hemodialysis patients, interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) may help to determine if the patient is in fact hypertensive. In addition, ABPM provides important information about the change in BP between day and night. Regular home BP monitoring, yearly echocardiography, and treatment of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease are recommended.

Relationship between volume status and blood pressure during chronic hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between volume status and blood pressure (BP) in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients remains incompletely understood. Specifically, the effect of interdialytic fluid accumulation (or intradialytic fluid removal) on BP is controversial.

METHODS

We determined the association of the intradialytic decrease in body weight (as an indicator of interdialytic fluid gain) and the intradialytic decrease in plasma volume (as an indicator of postdialysis volume status) with predialysis and postdialysis BP in a cross-sectional analysis of a subset of patients (N=468) from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study. Fifty-five percent of patients were female, 62% were black, 43% were diabetic and 72% were prescribed antihypertensive medications. Dry weight was defined as the postdialysis body weight below which the patient developed symptomatic hypotension or muscle cramps in the absence of edema. The intradialytic decrease in plasma volume was calculated from predialysis and postdialysis total plasma protein concentrations and was expressed as a percentage of the plasma volume at the beginning of HD.

RESULTS

Predialysis systolic and diastolic BP values were 153.1 +/- 24.7 (mean +/- SD) and 81.7 +/- 14.8 mm Hg, respectively; postdialysis systolic and diastolic BP values were 136.6 +/- 22.7 and 73.9 +/- 13.6 mm Hg, respectively. As a result of HD, body weight was reduced by 3.1 +/- 1.3 kg and plasma volume was contracted by 10.1 +/- 9.5%. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that each kg reduction in body weight during HD was associated with a 2.95 mm Hg (P=0.004) and a 1.65 mm Hg (P=NS) higher predialysis and postdialysis systolic BP, respectively. In contrast, each 5% greater contraction of plasma volume during HD was associated with a 1.50 mm Hg (P=0.026) and a 2.56 mm Hg (P < 0.001) lower predialysis and postdialysis systolic BP, respectively. The effects of intradialytic decreases in body weight and plasma volume were greater on systolic BP than on diastolic BP.

CONCLUSIONS

HD treatment generally reduces BP, and these reductions in BP are associated with intradialytic decreases in both body weight and plasma volume. The absolute predialysis and postdialysis BP levels are influenced differently by acute intradialytic decreases in body weight and acute intradialytic decreases in plasma volume; these parameters provide different information regarding volume status and may be dissociated from each other. Therefore, evaluation of volume status in chronic HD patients requires, at minimum, assessments of both interdialytic fluid accumulation (or the intradialytic decrease in body weight) and postdialysis volume overload.

Hypertension in hemodialysis patients

Hypertension is very common and often poorly controlled in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. While high blood pressure has been documented to adversely impact several intermediate outcomes of cardiovascular disease, whether hypertension is an independent risk factor for mortality in this population is not clear. Expansion of extracellular fluid volume is the major pathophysiologic mechanism for the development of hypertension in these patients; however, alterations in other humoral mechanisms also play a significant role. Optimization of volume status is, therefore, the cornerstone of therapy with additional use of antihypertensive medications as needed. Good quality prospective studies are urgently needed to define the measurement techniques and blood pressure goals, and to develop therapeutic strategies for more effective management of hypertension in this high-risk population.

Determinants of mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure in chronic haemodialysis patients

Hypertension is highly prevalent in the dialysis population, and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of the observed excess of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in these patients. Nevertheless, there are no reports on the clinical and biochemical determinants of both pulse pressure (PP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in dialysis populations. A total of 541 haemodialysed patients from 11 dialysis centres were included in the study. The demographic, clinical, and biological characteristics were recorded. Both pre- and post- dialytic blood pressures (systolic and diastolic) were measured. PP and MAP were calculated. Mean predialytic PP was 67 +/- 17 mm Hg and significantly decreased after dialysis (60 +/- 18 mm Hg; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, a 10 mm Hg increase in PP was positively associated with age (RR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.35-5.01, for a 10-year increase in age), diabetes mellitus (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14), interdialytic weight gain (IWG) (RR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.07-3.18, for 1% increase in IWG), and current smoking (RR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.13-5.92) and negatively with Hb concentration (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99, for a 1 g/100 ml in Hb). Mean predialytic MAP was 98 +/- 15 mm Hg and significantly decreased after dialysis (91 +/- 16 mm Hg; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, a 10 mm Hg increase in MAP was positively associated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.6, for 50 ng/ml in PTH), erythropoietin (EPO) treatment (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16), and current smoking (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.39-2.41). PP and MAP are associated with different clinical parameters. Most of these factors are potentially reversible. Smoking cessation, correction of anaemia and limitation of IWG should be important challenges for physicians in care of dialysis patients.

Interdialytic weight gain, compliance with dialysis regimen, and age are independent predictors of blood pressure in hemodialysis patients

Hypertension is a common problem in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. The purpose of this study is to identify the clinical and demographic factors independently associated with blood pressure in this population. Data collected for the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Wave 1 by the US Renal Data System were analyzed. The mean predialysis blood pressure for this cohort of 5,369 patients was 149/79 mm Hg. Sixty-three percent of the patients were hypertensive; 27%, 25%, and 11% had stages 1, 2, and 3 hypertension, respectively. Young age, black race, male sex, diabetes as cause of end-stage renal disease, erythropoietin therapy, and smoking were associated with higher blood pressure in the univariate analysis. Patients skipping or shortening one or more dialysis treatments had higher blood pressure. The presence of congestive heart failure and coronary heart disease was associated with lower blood pressure. On multivariate analysis, high interdialytic weight gain, noncompliance with dialysis regimen, and younger age were independent predictors of higher blood pressure. In summary, hypertension is common and poorly controlled in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Greater interdialytic weight gain and noncompliance with dialysis regimen are independently associated with higher blood pressure, and advancing age is associated with lower blood pressure levels in this population. Therapeutic regimens emphasizing reduction of interdialytic weight gain and improved compliance with the dialysis regimen need to be evaluated for improving the management of hypertension. The effect of age and other comorbid conditions, particularly cardiovascular disease, must be considered while studying the relationship between blood pressure and mortality in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

Hydration of fat-free body mass: review and critique of a classic body-composition constant

The assumed "constancy" of fat-free body mass hydration is a cornerstone in the body-composition research field. Hydration, the observed ratio of total body water to fat-free body mass, is stable at approximately 0.73 in mammals and this constancy provides a means of estimating total body fat in vivo. This review examines both in vitro and in vivo data that support the hydration constancy hypothesis and provides a critique of applied methodology. Biological topics of interest are then examined and critical areas in need of future research are identified. These are important issues because water dilution is the only method currently available for estimating body fat in all mammals, which range in body mass by a factor of 10(4).

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and interdialytic weight gain in children receiving chronic hemodialysis

Volume overload appears to induce hypertension in hemodialysis patients, yet studies of the effect of hydration status on interdialytic blood pressure (BP) have yielded contradictory results. We measured interdialytic BP by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) during inpatient fluid restriction in 12 children receiving chronic hemodialysis to describe the overall BP pattern and to determine the effect of weight gain on BP change. Weight was measured on admission and four times each day. For each weight, casual BP was measured and compared with the mean of 3 hours of ABPM surrounding the weight measurement. Sleep BP decreased from daytime BP by 6% for systolic BP (SBP) and 11% for diastolic BP (DBP). Sleep loads were greater than daytime loads (P < 0.01) for SBP (53% v 28%) and DBP (57% v 27%). Overall, 58% (7 of 12) of the patients had sleep SBP load greater than 50%, and 67% (8 of 12) of the patients had sleep DBP load greater than 50%. Casual and ABPM measurements of BP showed moderate correlations for SBP (r = 0.51) and DBP (r = 0.46) and mean differences between methods of 6.3 +/- 13.2 mm Hg and -1.4 +/- 12.6 mm Hg, respectively. Increases in interdialytic weight were positively associated with increases in SBP (r = 0.41; P < 0.001), and interdialytic BP changes varied closely with corresponding weight changes. We conclude that in children receiving chronic hemodialysis: (1) sleep BP decreases are attenuated and sleep BP loads are elevated, (2) casual BP correlates poorly with ABPM, and (3) interdialytic weight and BP are related.

Factors associated with inadequate blood pressure control in hypertensive hemodialysis patients

Hypertension is common in hemodialysis patients and increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We determined the prevalence of inadequate control of hypertension in 489 patients receiving hemodialysis and identified factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension. We interviewed the patients and abstracted demographic and clinical information from a computerized database. The prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension (average predialysis blood pressure, > or =160/90 mm Hg) was 62%. Ninety-one percent of patients with uncontrolled hypertension were receiving submaximal antihypertensive drug therapy, and 59% withheld their medications before dialysis. Uncontrolled hypertensives had a greater interdialytic weight gain (3.8% v 3.5%, P = 0.07) and a greater excess weight gain (3.1 +/- 1.6 kg v 2.5 +/- 1.4 kg; P < 0.05) compared with controlled hypertensives. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension showed higher interdialytic weight gain (2.7 +/- 0.06 kg v 2.2 +/- 0.13 kg; P < 0.05), were more likely to be black (94% v 81%; P < 0.05), were more likely to have hypertension as the cause of their end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (42% v 24%; P < 0.05), and had been receiving hemodialysis for a shorter time (4.3 +/- 2 yr v 6.1 +/- 0.9 yr; P < 0.05) compared with normotensive patients. There was significant correlation between diastolic blood pressure and both interdialytic weight gain (r = 0.31, P < 0.05) and percent weight gain (r = 0.34, P < 0.05) in the hypertensive but not in the normotensive patients (r = -0.21). Interdialytic weight gain and hypertension as a cause of ESRD were independent predictors of predialysis systolic blood pressure. We conclude that hypertension is uncontrolled in most patients undergoing hemodialysis. Submaximal antihypertensive therapy, excessive interdialytic weight gain, and withholding antihypertensive medication before dialysis are correctable factors potentially contributing to uncontrolled hypertension.

Blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy and long-term prognosis in hemodialysis patients

Cardiovascular events are the main cause of death in patients with chronic renal failure who are treated with hemodialysis. Hypertension is frequent among dialysis patients and may be a major cause of mortality, although epidemiological studies are controversial in this regard. This disparity in results may be the consequence of an inadequate definition of hypertension in dialysis patients as well as the interaction with hypertension with other risk factors such as malnutrition or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which are strong predictors of death. Although the goal of blood pressure in dialysis has not been established yet, it seems that predialysis blood pressure levels lower than 150/90 mm Hg must be achieved for patients to avoid complications. LVH is very frequent among dialysis patients and starts early in the progression of chronic renal failure. Hypertension is the main cause for its development, but other potentially reversible factors such as anemia, volume overload, secondary hyperparathyroidism, dose of dialysis or malnutrition may also be implicated. Hence, an adequate management of patients on hemodialysis must include the strict control of blood pressure, preferably with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, together with those early measures in order to avoid the development of the other causes of LVH or to treat them when they already exist.

Evaluating volume status in hemodialysis patients

Accurate determination of the volume and distribution of body fluids in end stage renal disease patients will permit improved assessment of dry weight and strategies for optimal fluid removal. Certain biochemical markers and anatomical measures have been proposed as markers of dry weight, but these markers primarily reflect the volume of the intravascular compartment and may not reflect total body volume status. Noninvasive determination of total body water and extracellular fluid volumes using bioimpedance analyses has also been proposed for assessment of dry weight, but such determinations do not yet have sufficient accuracy for routine use. Several devices have been recently developed for continuously monitoring changes in blood volume on-line during routine hemodialysis. Such blood volume monitors cannot be used to determine dry weight directly; however, continuous monitoring of blood volume can be used to detect fluid overload because intradialytic changes in blood volume are small in hemodialysis patients who are overhydrated. Furthermore, continuous monitoring of blood volume can be used to predict symptoms resulting from intradialytic hypovolemia. The combined use of blood volume monitoring and time-dependent ultrafiltration and dialysate sodium profiles will be used increasingly in the future to assist in the prevention of hypotension and symptoms that result from intradialytic hypovolemia, especially when automated systems for controlling intradialytic blood volume are individualized and shown to be safe and effective.