1
|
Hultink D, Souwer ETD, Bastiaannet E, Dekker JWT, Steup WH, Hamaker ME, Sonneveld DJA, Consten ECJ, Neijenhuis PA, Portielje JEA, van den Bos F. The prognostic value of a geriatric risk score for older patients undergoing emergency surgery of colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101711. [PMID: 38310662 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency surgery of colorectal cancer is associated with high mortality rates in older patients. We investigated whether information on four geriatric domains has prognostic value for 30-day mortality and postoperative morbidity including severe complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive patients aged 70 years or older who underwent emergency colorectal cancer surgery in six Dutch hospitals (2014-2017) were studied. Presence of geriatric risk factors was scored prior to surgery as either 0 (risk absent) or 1 (risk present) in each of four geriatric domains and summed up to calculate a sumscore with a value between 0 and 4. In addition, we separately investigated the use of a mobility aid. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were any postoperative complications and severe complications. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the sumscore and outcomes. RESULTS Two hundred seven patients were included. Median age was 79.4 years. One hundred seventy-five patients (76%) presented with obstruction, 22 (11%) with a perforation, and 17 (8%) with severe anemia. Mortality rates were 2.9%, 13.6%, and 29.6% for patients with a sumscore of 0, 1-2, and 3-4 respectively, with odds ratio (OR) 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-22.95] and OR 10.6 [95% CI 1.99-56.34] for a sumscore of 1-2 and 3-4 respectively. Use of a mobility aid was associated with increased mortality OR 8.0 [95% CI 2.74-23.43] and severe complications OR 2.31 [95% CI 1.17-4.55]. DISCUSSION This geriatric sumscore and the use of a mobility aid have strong association with 30-day mortality after emergency surgery of colorectal cancer. This could provide better insight into surgical risk and help select high-risk patients for alternative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniëlle Hultink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands.
| | - Esteban T D Souwer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - W H Steup
- Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johanna E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Leiden, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boeding JRE, Elferink MAG, Tanis PJ, de Wilt JHW, Gobardhan PD, Verhoef C, Schreinemakers JMJ. Surgical treatment and overall survival in patients with right-sided obstructing colon cancer-a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:248. [PMID: 37796315 PMCID: PMC10556181 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04541-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare baseline characteristics, 90-day mortality and overall survival (OS) between patients with obstructing and non-obstructing right-sided colon cancer at a national level. METHODS All patients who underwent resection for right-sided colon cancer between January 2015 and December 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and stratified for obstruction. Primary outcome was 5-year OS after excluding 90-day mortality as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 525 patients (7%) with obstructing and 6891 patients (93%) with non-obstructing right-sided colon cancer were included. Patients with right-sided obstructing colon cancer (OCC) were older and had more often transverse tumour location, and the pathological T and N stage was more advanced than in those without obstruction (p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality in patients with right-sided OCC was higher compared to that in patients with non-obstructing colon cancer: 10% versus 3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year OS of those surviving 90 days postoperatively was 42% in patients with OCC versus 73% in patients with non-obstructing colon cancer, respectively (p < 0.001). Worse 5-year OS was found in patients with right-sided OCC for all stages. Obstruction was an independent risk factor for decreased OS in right-sided colon cancer (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.57-2.03). CONCLUSION In addition to increased risk of postoperative mortality, a stage-independent worse 5-year OS after excluding 90-day mortality was found in patients with right-sided OCC compared to patients without obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boeding JRE, Cuperus IE, Rijken AM, Crolla RMPH, Verhoef C, Gobardhan PD, Schreinemakers JMJ. Postponing surgery to optimise patients with acute right-sided obstructing colon cancer - A pilot study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106906. [PMID: 37061403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right-sided obstructing colon cancer is most often treated with acute resection. Recent studies on right-sided obstructing colon cancer report higher mortality and morbidity rates than those in patients without obstruction. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyse whether it is possible to optimise the health condition of patients with acute right-sided obstructing colon cancer, prior to surgery, and whether this improves postoperative outcomes. METHOD All consecutive patients with high suspicion of, or histologically proven, right-sided obstructing colon cancer, treated with curative intent between March 2013 and December 2019, were analysed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: optimised group and non-optimised group. Pre-operative optimisation included additional nutrition, physiotherapy, and, if needed, bowel decompression. RESULTS In total, 54 patients were analysed in this study. Twenty-four patients received optimisation before elective surgery, and thirty patients received emergency surgery, without optimisation. Scheduled surgery was performed after a median of eight days (IQR 7-12). Postoperative complications were found in twelve (50%) patients in the optimised group, compared to twenty-three (77%) patients in the non-optimised group (p = 0.051). Major complications were diagnosed in three (13%) patients with optimisation, compared to ten (33%) patients without optimisation (p = 0.111). Postoperative in-hospital stay, 30-day mortality, as well as primary anastomosis were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION This pilot study suggests that pre-operative optimisation of patients with obstructing right sided colonic cancer may be feasible and safe but is associated with longer in-patient stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Iris E Cuperus
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chok AY, Zhao Y, Chen HLR, Tan IEH, Chew DHW, Zhao Y, Au MKH, Tan EJKW. Elderly patients over 80 years undergoing colorectal cancer resection: Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for survival. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:892-905. [PMID: 37342856 PMCID: PMC10277950 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery remains the primary treatment for localized colorectal cancer (CRC). Improving surgical decision-making for elderly CRC patients necessitates an accurate predictive tool.
AIM To build a nomogram to predict the overall survival of elderly patients over 80 years undergoing CRC resection.
METHODS Two hundred and ninety-five elderly CRC patients over 80 years undergoing surgery at Singapore General Hospital between 2018 and 2021 were identified from the American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Prognostic variables were selected using univariate Cox regression, and clinical feature selection was performed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. A nomogram for 1- and 3-year overall survival was constructed based on 60% of the study cohort and tested on the remaining 40%. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration plots. Risk groups were stratified using the total risk points derived from the nomogram and the optimal cut-off point. Survival curves were compared between the high- and low-risk groups.
RESULTS Eight predictors: Age, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, serum albumin level, distant metastasis, emergency surgery, postoperative pneumonia, and postoperative myocardial infarction, were included in the nomogram. The AUC values for the 1-year survival were 0.843 and 0.826 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC values for the 3-year survival were 0.788 and 0.750 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. C-index values of the training cohort (0.845) and validation cohort (0.793) suggested the excellent discriminative ability of the nomogram. Calibration curves demonstrated a good consistency between the predictions and actual observations of overall survival in both training and validation cohorts. A significant difference in overall survival was seen between elderly patients stratified into low- and high-risk groups (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION We constructed and validated a nomogram predicting 1- and 3-year survival probability in elderly patients over 80 years undergoing CRC resection, thereby facilitating holistic and informed decision-making among these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Yun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | | | - Ivan En-Howe Tan
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | | | - Yue Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Marianne Kit Har Au
- Group Finance, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
- Singhealth Community Hospitals, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boeding JRE, Gobardhan PD, Rijken AM, Seerden TCJ, Verhoef C, Schreinemakers JMJ. Preoptimisation in patients with acute obstructive colon cancer (PREOCC) - a prospective registration study protocol. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:186. [PMID: 37231376 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02799-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates are high in patients with obstructing colon cancer (OCC). Different treatment options have been evaluated over the years, mainly for left sided OCC. Optimising the preoperative health condition in elective colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment shows promising results. The aim of this study is to determine whether preoptimisation is feasible in patients with OCC, with a special interest/focus on right-sided OCC, and if, ultimately, optimisation reduces mortality and morbidity (stoma rates, major and minor complications) rates in OCC. METHODS This is a prospective registration study including all patients presenting with OCC in our hospital. Patients with OCC, treated with curative intent, will be screened for eligibility to receive preoptimisation before surgery. The preoptimisation protocol includes; decompression of the small bowel with a NG-tube for right sided obstruction and SEMS or decompressing ileostomy or colostomy, proximal to the site of obstruction, for left sided colonic obstructions. For the additional work-up, additional nutrition by means of parenteral feeding (for patients who are dependent on a NG tube) or oral/enteral nutrition (in case the obstruction is relieved) is provided. Physiotherapy with attention to both cardio and muscle training prior surgical resection is provided. The primary endpoint is complication-free survival (CFS) at the 90 day period after hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes include pre- and postoperative complications, patient- and tumour characteristics, surgical procedures, total in hospital stay, creation of decompressing and/or permanent ileo- or colostomy and long-term (oncological) outcomes. DISCUSSION Preoptimisation is expected to improve the preoperative health condition of patients and thereby reduce postoperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial Registry: NL8266 date of registration: 06-jan-2020. STUDY STATUS Open for inclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smalbroek BP, Weijs TJ, Dijksman LM, Poelmann FB, Goense L, Dijkstra RR, Wijffels NAT, Boerma D, Smits AB. Use of ileostomy versus colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer: retrospective cohort study. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad038. [PMID: 37194457 PMCID: PMC10189278 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer causes the majority of large bowel obstructions and surgical resection remains the gold standard for curative treatment. There is evidence that a deviating stoma as a bridge to surgery can reduce postoperative mortality rate; however, the optimal stoma type is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between ileostomy and colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer. METHODS This was a national, retrospective population-based cohort study with 75 contributing hospitals. Patients with radiological left-sided obstructive colon cancer between 2009 and 2016, where a deviating stoma was used as a bridge to surgery, were included. Exclusion criteria were palliative treatment intent, perforation at presentation, emergency resection, and multivisceral resection. RESULTS A total of 321 patients underwent a deviating stoma; 41 (12.7 per cent) ileostomies and 280 (87.2 per cent) colostomies. The ileostomy group had longer length of stay (median 13 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 10-16) versus 9 (i.q.r. 6-14) days, P = 0.003) and more nutritional support during the bridging interval. Both groups showed similar complication rates in the bridging interval and after primary resection, including anastomotic leakage. Stoma reversal during resection was more common in the colostomy group (9 (22.0 per cent) versus 129 (46.1 per cent) for ileostomy and colostomy respectively, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that patients having a colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer had a shorter length of stay and lower need for nutritional support. No difference in postoperative complications were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo P Smalbroek
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Valued Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Teus J Weijs
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Lea M Dijksman
- Valued Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Floris B Poelmann
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas Goense
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Robert R Dijkstra
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Niels A T Wijffels
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Comparing Emergent and Elective Colectomy Outcomes in Elderly Patients: A NSQIP Study. Int J Surg Oncol 2021; 2021:9990434. [PMID: 34912578 PMCID: PMC8668335 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9990434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction With the increasing prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, especially in the elderly, and the variability between physiological and chronological age and its impact on functional status, acute symptoms leading to emergent surgery due to colorectal malignancy may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to identify the outcome differences of elective vs. emergent open colectomy in patients above 80 years. Methods The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was reviewed from 2010 to 2014 for open colectomy based on CPT codes. Comparison between groups was done based on the clinical context at presentation as elective or emergent surgery. Data were analyzed using SAS. Results Elective colectomies were performed in 8289 (70.8%) vs. emergent colectomies in 3409 (29.1%). Emergent colectomy patients had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) preoperative classification III-IV, 1429 (42.0%) and 224 (6.6%), vs. 1238 (14.9%) and 21 (0.2%) in elective colectomy patients (p < 0.0001). Emergent colectomy patients had more comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (493 (14.5%) vs. 796 (9.6%)), congestive heart failure (206 (6.0%) vs. 310 (3.8%)), dialysis (106 (3.1%) vs. 56 (0.7%)), and acute renal failure (166 (4.9%) vs. 46 (0.6%)) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were significantly higher in emergent colectomy (1651 (48.4%) and 872 (25.6%)) vs. elective colectomy (1859 (22.4%) and 567 (6.8%)) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion Emergent open colectomy in elderly patients carries a higher risk of morbidity and mortality when compared to elective open colectomy with risk factors being higher ASA classification and more comorbidities.
Collapse
|
8
|
Souwer ETD, Bastiaannet E, Steyerberg EW, Dekker JWT, Steup WH, Hamaker MM, Sonneveld DJA, Burghgraef TA, van den Bos F, Portielje JEA. A Prediction Model for Severe Complications after Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Patients of 70 Years and Older. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133110. [PMID: 34206349 PMCID: PMC8268502 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Older patients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Existing CRC surgical prediction models have not incorporated geriatric predictors, limiting applicability for preoperative decision-making. The objective was to develop and internally validate a predictive model based on preoperative predictors, including geriatric characteristics, for severe postoperative complications after elective surgery for stage I-III CRC in patients ≥70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospectively collected database contained 1088 consecutive patients from five Dutch hospitals (2014-2017) with 171 severe complications (16%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used for predictor selection and prediction model building. Internal validation was done using bootstrapping. RESULTS A geriatric model that included gender, previous DVT or pulmonary embolism, COPD/asthma/emphysema, rectal cancer, the use of a mobility aid, ADL assistance, previous delirium and polypharmacy showed satisfactory discrimination with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.73-0.64); the AUC for the optimism corrected model was 0.65. Based on these predictors, the eight-item colorectal geriatric model (GerCRC) was developed. CONCLUSION The GerCRC is the first prediction model specifically developed for older patients expected to undergo CRC surgery. Combining tumour- and patient-specific predictors, including geriatric predictors, improves outcome prediction in the heterogeneous older population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esteban T. D. Souwer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, 2545 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (E.B.); (J.E.A.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (E.B.); (J.E.A.P.)
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Jan Willem T. Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier De Graaf Gasthuis, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands;
| | - Willem H. Steup
- Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, 2545 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands;
| | - Marije M. Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Thijs A. Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands;
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Johanna E. A. Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (E.B.); (J.E.A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fahim M, Dijksman LM, Derksen WJM, Bloemen JG, Biesma DH, Smits AB. Prospective multicentre study of a new bowel obstruction treatment in colorectal surgery: Reduced morbidity and mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2414-2420. [PMID: 34023165 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bowel obstruction patients are at increased risk of emergency surgery and have poor nutritional and physical conditions. These patients could benefit from prehabilitation and prevention of emergency surgery. This study assessed the effect of a multimodal obstruction treatment for bowel obstruction patients in colorectal surgery on the risk of emergency surgery and postoperative morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter observational cohort study included all consecutive bowel obstruction patients who received obstruction treatment (obstruction protocol) in the period 2019-2020 in two Dutch hospitals. Benign and malignant causes of bowel obstruction were included. Treatment consisted of 1. dietary adjustments, 2. postponing surgery for three weeks, 3. laxatives, and 4. prehabilitation. We compared emergency surgery and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates to known rates from the literature. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients were included: obstruction treatment was successful in 77 patients (87%) who underwent elective surgery and unsuccessful in 12 patients (13%) who underwent emergency surgery. Sixty-six (74%) had colorectal cancer, and 22 (25%) had benign disease. Thirty-day mortality of 0% in our study was significantly lower than the national average of 4% in colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands (p = 0.049). Anastomotic leakage rate was 3%, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) 8%, and bowel perforation 0%. These rates did not differ significantly from rates reported in literature. CONCLUSION The obstruction treatment prevented emergency surgery in most patients with bowel obstruction and reduced postoperative morbidity and mortality. The obstruction treatment seems to be a safe and efficient alternative to emergency surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fahim
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
| | - L M Dijksman
- Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - W J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - J G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623, EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - D H Biesma
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pilleron S, Gower H, Janssen-Heijnen M, Signal VC, Gurney JK, Morris EJ, Cunningham R, Sarfati D. Patterns of age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival: a systematic narrative literature review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044239. [PMID: 33692182 PMCID: PMC7949400 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patterns of age disparities in cancer survival, using colon and lung cancer as exemplars. DESIGN Systematic review of the literature. DATA SOURCES We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science through 18 December 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We retained all original articles published in English including patients with colon or lung cancer. Eligible studies were required to be population-based, report survival across several age groups (of which at least one was over the age of 65) and at least one other characteristic (eg, sex, treatment). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies against selected evaluation domains from the QUIPS tool, and items concerning statistical reporting. We evaluated age disparities using the absolute difference in survival or mortality rates between the middle-aged group and the oldest age group, or by describing survival curves. RESULTS Out of 3047 references, we retained 59 studies (20 for colon, 34 for lung and 5 for both sites). Regardless of the cancer site, the included studies were highly heterogeneous and often of poor quality. The magnitude of age disparities in survival varied greatly by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, stage at diagnosis, cancer site, and morphology, the number of nodes examined and treatment strategy. Although results were inconsistent for most characteristics, we consistently observed greater age disparities for women with lung cancer compared with men. Also, age disparities increased with more advanced stages for colon cancer and decreased with more advanced stages for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although age is one of the most important prognostic factors in cancer survival, age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival have so far been understudied in population-based research. Further studies are needed to better understand age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020151402.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pilleron
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Helen Gower
- Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Surgical Cancer Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Maryska Janssen-Heijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Virginia Claire Signal
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jason K Gurney
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Eva Ja Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Cunningham
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- New Zealand Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fahim M, Dijksman LM, van der Nat P, Derksen WJM, Biesma DH, Smits AB. Increased long-term mortality after emergency colon resections. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1941-1948. [PMID: 32627889 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM Emergency surgery is a known predictor for 30-day mortality. However, its relationship with long-term mortality is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of emergency surgery compared with elective surgery on long-term survival. METHOD Data from the Dutch Colorectal Audit and the Dutch Cancer Centre registry of a large nonacademic teaching hospital were used to analyse outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer from 2009 until 2017. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression were used to assess the effect of emergency surgery on long-term mortality with adjustment for patient, tumour and treatment characteristics. RESULTS A total of 1139 patients with a median follow-up of 40 months (interquartile range 23-65 months) were included. Emergency surgery was performed in 158 patients (14%). The 5-year survival after emergency surgery was 46% compared with 72% after elective surgery. After adjusting for baseline differences there was an independent and significant association between emergency surgery and increased long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.28-2.51, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Emergency surgery for colon cancer seems to lead to a significantly increased risk of long-term mortality compared with elective surgery. Detection and treatment of early symptoms that can lead to emergency surgery might be the way forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fahim
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - L M Dijksman
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - P van der Nat
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Centre for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - D H Biesma
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boeding JRE, Ramphal W, Rijken AM, Crolla RMPH, Verhoef C, Gobardhan PD, Schreinemakers JMJ. A Systematic Review Comparing Emergency Resection and Staged Treatment for Curable Obstructing Right-Sided Colon Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3545-3555. [PMID: 33067743 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09124-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for obstructing colon cancer (OCC) is controversial because the outcome of acute resection is less favorable than for patients without obstruction. Few studies have investigated curable right-sided OCC, and patients with OCC usually undergo acute resection. This study aimed to better understand the outcome and best management of potentially curable right-sided OCC. METHODS A systematic review of studies was performed with a focus on differences in mortality and morbidity between emergency resection and staged treatment for patients with potentially curable right-sided OCC. In March 2019, the study searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google scholar databases according to PRISMA guidelines using search terms related to "colon tumour," "stenosis or obstruction and surgery," and "decompression or stents." All English-language studies reporting emergency or staged treatment for potentially curable right-sided OCC were included in the review. Emergency resection and staged resection were compared for mortality, morbidity, complications, and survival. RESULTS Nine studies were found to be eligible and comprised 600 patients treated with curative intent for their right-sided OCC by emergency resection or staged resection. The mean overall complication rate was 42% (range 19-54%) after emergency resection, and 30% (range 7-44%) after staged treatment. The average mortality rate was 7.2% (range 0-14.5%) after emergency resection and 1.2% (range 0-6.3%) after staged treatment. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were comparable for the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS The patients who received staged treatment for right-sided OCC had lower mortality rates, fewer complications, and fewer anastomotic leaks and stoma creations than the patients who had emergency resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Winesh Ramphal
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Souwer ETD, Bastiaannet E, Steyerberg EW, Dekker JWT, van den Bos F, Portielje JEA. Risk prediction models for postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in the older population - a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1217-1228. [PMID: 32414672 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of patients with Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is 65 years or older. We aimed to systematically review existing clinical prediction models for postoperative outcomes of CRC surgery, study their performance in older patients and assess their potential for preoperative decision making. METHODS A systematic search in Pubmed and Embase for original studies of clinical prediction models for outcomes of CRC surgery. Bias and relevance for preoperative decision making with older patients were assessed using the CHARMS guidelines. RESULTS 26 prediction models from 25 publications were included. The average age of included patients ranged from 61 to 76. Two models were exclusively developed for 65 and older. Common outcomes were mortality (n = 10), anastomotic leakage (n = 7) and surgical site infections (n = 3). No prediction models for quality of life or physical functioning were identified. Age, gender and ASA score were common predictors; 12 studies included intraoperative predictors. For the majority of the models, bias for model development and performance was considered moderate to high. CONCLUSIONS Prediction models are available that address mortality and surgical complications after CRC surgery. Most models suffer from methodological limitations, and their performance for older patients is uncertain. Models that contain intraoperative predictors are of limited use for preoperative decision making. Future research should address the predictive value of geriatric characteristics to improve the performance of prediction models for older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esteban T D Souwer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biochemical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fahim M, Visser RA, Dijksman LM, Biesma DH, Noordzij PG, Smits AB. Routine postoperative intensive care unit admission after colorectal cancer surgery for the elderly patient reduces postoperative morbidity and mortality. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:408-415. [PMID: 31696590 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Routine postoperative overnight intensive care unit (ICU) admission might reduce this risk. This study aimed to examine the effect of routine overnight ICU admission after CRC surgery on postoperative adverse outcomes and costs in patients aged 80 years or older. METHODS Patients aged 80 years or older who underwent CRC surgery in our centre were included in this observational cohort study. All patients in the period 2014-2017 with routine overnight ICU admission were assigned to the ICU cohort; all patients in the period 2009-2013 were assigned to the non-ICU cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to compare the primary composite end-point (30-day mortality, serious complications and readmission) between the groups. Cost data from the literature were used to perform a cost analysis. RESULTS A total of 242 patients were included, 125 in the ICU cohort and 117 in the non-ICU cohort. Routine overnight ICU admission was associated with a reduced risk of the composite end-point (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87, P = 0.02) after adjusting for important confounders. In the ICU cohort 28% of patients experienced ICU events requiring intervention; this was not associated with postoperative morbidity or mortality. The 9% reduction in the incidence of serious complications in the ICU cohort is sufficient to offset the additional costs of routine overnight ICU admission. CONCLUSION Routine overnight ICU admission after CRC surgery in patients aged 80 years and older is associated with reduced risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity and seems to be cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fahim
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - R A Visser
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - L M Dijksman
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - D H Biesma
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - P G Noordzij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fahim M, Dijksman L, van Kessel C, Smeeing D, Braaksma A, Derksen W, Smits A. Promising results of a new treatment in patients with bowel obstruction in colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:415-419. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
16
|
Javarsiani MH, Javanmard SH, Colonna F. Metastatic components in colorectal cancer. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES 2019; 24:75. [PMID: 31523261 PMCID: PMC6734673 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_957_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent experiments have shown that cells with different genetic mutations can give rise to cancer transformation, both in vitro and in vivo, supported by the crosstalk between cancer cells and stroma. The stroma and the complex set of involved cells make up the tumor microenvironment that supports the engraftment of metastatic cells. In fact, environmental factors support colorectal cancer arise by formation and maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this review, we discuss interactions between CSCs and their microenvironment that can provide better therapeutic opportunities in the metastatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shagayegh Haghjooy Javanmard
- Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Francesca Colonna
- Department of General Pathology, Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Largo Francesco University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Emergency Surgery for Obstructive Colon Cancer in Elderly Patients: Results of a Multicentric Cohort of the French National Surgical Association. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62:941-951. [PMID: 31283592 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although elderly patients constitute most of the patients undergoing surgery for obstructed colon cancer, available data in the literature are very limited. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the management and outcomes of elderly patients treated for obstructed colon cancer. DESIGN This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS Between 2000 and 2015, 2325 patients managed for an obstructed colon cancer in member centers of the French National Surgical Association were identified. Data were collected by each center on a voluntary basis after institutional approval. Bowel obstruction was defined clinically and confirmed by imaging. PATIENTS Three age groups were defined, including patients <75 years, 75 to 84 years, and ≥85 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative and oncologic results in elderly patients with an obstructed colon cancer were measured. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of the overall survival with the survival that would have been expected based on the corresponding general population. INTERVENTIONS A total of 302 patients (13%) underwent colonic stent insertion, and 1992 (87%) underwent surgery as emergency procedure. RESULTS A total of 2294 patients were analyzed (<75 y, n = 1200 (52%); 75-84 y, n = 650 (28%); and ≥85 y, n = 444 (20%)). Elderly patients were more likely to be women (p < 0.0001), to have proximal colon cancer (p < 0.0001), and to have a higher incidence of comorbidities (p < 0.0001). The use of colonic stent or the type of surgery was identical regardless of age. In patients with resected colon cancer, elderly patients had less stage IV disease (p < 0.0001). The absence of tumor resection (p < 0.0001) and definitive stoma rate increased with age (p < 0.0001). Postoperative mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in elderly patients (p < 0.0001), but surgical morbidity was similar across age groups (p = 0.60). Postoperative morbidity was correlated to the 6-month mortality rate in elderly (p < 0.0001). Overall and disease-free survivals were significantly lower in more elderly patients (p < 0.0001) but relative survival was not (p = 0.09). LIMITATIONS It is quite difficult to know how to interpret these data as a whole, given the inherent bias in the study population, lack of ability to stratify by performance status, and long study period duration. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients have high morbidity with lower survival in the highest age ranges of elderly subgroups. These data should be considered when deciding on an operative approach. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A964.
Collapse
|
18
|
Brouwer NPM, Heil TC, Olde Rikkert MGM, Lemmens VEPP, Rutten HJT, de Wilt JHW, van Erning FN. The gap in postoperative outcome between older and younger patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer has been bridged; results from the Netherlands cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 2019; 116:1-9. [PMID: 31163335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Previous studies have shown that older patients benefited less than younger patients from surgical treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC care has advanced over time, and it is time to assess whether the difference in postoperative mortality between older and younger CRC patients is still present. METHODS Patients with primary stage I-III CRC diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 111,778). Trends in postoperative mortality and 1-year postoperative relative survival (RS) were analysed, stratified according to age (<75 versus ≥75 years) and tumour location (colon versus rectum). One-year postoperative RS was analysed to correct for background mortality in the older population. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2016, 30-day postoperative mortality showed a stronger decrease for older patients (from 10.0% to 4.0% for colon cancer [p < 0.001] and from 8.3% to 2.7% for rectal cancer [p < 0.001]) compared with younger patients (from 2.0% to 0.9% for colon cancer [p < 0.001] and from 1.4% to 0.7% for rectal cancer [p = 0.01]). Between 2005 and 2016, also 1-year RS increased more for older patients (from 84.8% to 94.6% for colon cancer and from 86.1% to 97.2% for rectal cancer) compared with younger patients (from 94.0% to 97.8% for colon cancer and from 96.3% to 98.8% for rectal cancer). CONCLUSION Between 2005 and 2016, differences in postoperative mortality between older and younger CRC patients decreased. One-year postoperative RS was almost equal for older and younger patients in 2015-2016. This information is crucial for shared decision-making on surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelleke P M Brouwer
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Thea C Heil
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Marcel G M Olde Rikkert
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 30, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Harm J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Groningen JT, Eddes EH, Fabry HFJ, van Tilburg MWA, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Snel Y, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, de Noo ME. Hospital Teaching Status and Patients' Outcomes After Colon Cancer Surgery. World J Surg 2018; 42:3372-3380. [PMID: 29572565 PMCID: PMC6132859 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4580-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Background and objectives It is increasingly accepted that quality of colon cancer surgery might be secured by combining volume standards with audit implementation. However, debate remains about other structural factors also influencing this quality, such as hospital teaching status. This study evaluates short-term outcomes after colon cancer surgery of patients treated in general, teaching or academic hospitals. Methods All patients (n = 23,593) registered in the Dutch Colorectal Audit undergoing colon cancer surgery between 2011 and 2014 were included. Patients were divided into groups based on teaching status of their hospital. Main outcome measures were serious complications, failure to rescue (FTR) and 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression models on these outcome measures and with hospital teaching status as primary determinant were used, adjusted for case-mix, year of surgery and hospital volume. Results Patients treated in teaching and academic hospitals showed higher adjusted serious complication rates, compared to patients treated in general hospitals (odds ratio 1.25 95% CI [1.11–1.39] and OR 1.23 [1.05–1.46]). However, patients treated in teaching hospitals had lower adjusted FTR rates than patients treated in general hospitals (OR 0.63 [0.44–0.89]). However, for all outcomes there was considerable between-hospitals variation within each type of teaching status. Conclusion On average, patients treated in general hospitals had lower serious complication rates, but patients treated in teaching hospitals had more favorable FTR rates. Given the hospital variation within each hospital teaching type, it is possible to deliver excellent care regardless of the hospital teaching type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia T van Groningen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Eric H Eddes
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Hans F J Fabry
- Department of Surgery, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal/Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Yvonne Snel
- Co-operating General Hospitals, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mirre E de Noo
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage remains a major complication after surgery for colorectal carcinoma, but its origin is still unknown. Our hypothesis was that early anastomotic leakage is mostly related to technical failure of the anastomosis, and that late anastomotic leakage is mostly related to healing deficiencies. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess differences in risk factors for early and late anastomotic leakage. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS The Dutch ColoRectal Audit is a nationwide project that collects information on all Dutch patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. PATIENTS All patients undergoing surgical resection for colorectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2011 and 2015 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Late anastomotic leakage was defined as anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention later than 6 days postoperatively. RESULTS In total, 36,929 patients were included; early anastomotic leakage occurred in 863 (2.3%) patients, and late anastomotic leakage occurred in 674 (1.8%) patients. From a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model, independent predictors of early anastomotic leakage relative to no anastomotic leakage and late anastomotic leakage relative to no anastomotic leakage included male sex (OR, 1.8; p < 0.001 and OR, 1.2; p = 0.013) and rectal cancer (OR, 2.1; p < 0.001 and OR, 1.6; p = 0.046). Additional independent predictors of early anastomotic leakage relative to no anastomotic leakage included BMI (OR, 1.1; p = 0.001), laparoscopy (OR, 1.2; p = 0.019), emergency surgery (OR, 1.8; p < 0.001), and no diverting ileostomy (OR, 0.3; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of late anastomotic leakage relative to no anastomotic leakage were Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥II (OR, 1.3; p = 0.003), ASA score III to V (OR, 1.2; p = 0.030), preoperative tumor complications (OR, 1.1; p = 0.048), extensive additional resection because of tumor growth (OR, 1.7; p = 0.003), and preoperative radiation (OR, 2.0; p = 0.010). LIMITATIONS This was an observational cohort study. CONCLUSIONS Most risk factors for early anastomotic leakage were surgery-related factors, representing surgical difficulty, which might lead to technical failure of the anastomosis. Most risk factors for late anastomotic leakage were patient-related factors, representing the frailty of patients and tissues, which might imply healing deficiencies. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A730.
Collapse
|
21
|
Boeding JRE, Ramphal W, Crolla RMPH, Boonman-de Winter LJM, Gobardhan PD, Schreinemakers JMJ. Ileus caused by obstructing colorectal cancer-impact on long-term survival. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1393-1400. [PMID: 30046958 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3132-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unclear whether obstructing colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis than non-obstructing CRC. Of CRC patients, 10-28% present with symptoms of acute obstruction. Previous studies regarding obstruction have been primarily based on short-term outcomes, risk factors and treatment modalities. With this study, we want to determine the long-term survival of patients presenting with acute obstructive CRC. METHODS This single-centre observational retrospective cohort study includes all CRC patients who underwent surgery between December 2004 and 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: ileus and no ileus. Survival analyses were performed for both groups. Additional survival analyses were performed in patients with and without synchronous metastases. The primary outcome was survival in months. RESULTS A total of 1236 patients were included in the analyses. Ileus occurred in 178 patients (14.4%). The 5-year survival for patients with an ileus was 32% and without 60% (P < 0.01). In patients without synchronous metastases, survival with and without an ileus was 40.9 and 68.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). If ileus presentation was complicated by a colon blowout, 5-year survival decreased to 29%. No significant difference was found in patients with synchronous metastases. Survival at 5 years in this subgroup was 10 and 12% for patients with and without an ileus, respectively (P = 0.705). CONCLUSIONS Patients with obstructive CRC have a reduced short-term overall survival. Also, long-term overall survival is impaired in patients who present with acute obstructive CRC compared to patients without obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - Winesh Ramphal
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier M P H Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mothes H, Bauschke A, Schuele S, Eigendorff E, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Settmacher U. Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: how can we improve outcome? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017; 143:1879-1889. [PMID: 28534171 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2438-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients over 70 years of age are characterised by diminished long-term survival rates following resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to younger patients. The aim of this study was to clarify whether reduced survival is a result of malignancy, comorbidities or the treatment received. METHODS All patients with CRC, who were admitted to our institution over a period of 10 years, were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Disease-specific, disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated dependent on variables considered potentially relevant for the patients' prognosis. RESULTS 915 patients were included in the study. Observed 5- and 10-year survival rates for the whole group were 48 ± 2% and 40 ± 2%, respectively, but 10-year survival rates dropped to 14 ± 4% for patients aged 80 and older. Resection of the primary tumour was attempted in all cases independent of age. Emergency admission, Charlson index ≥2, ECOG ≥2, old age, second malignancies, distant metastases, high grading and non-resective surgery were identified as independent prognostic parameters associated with decreased overall survival. In contrast, disease-specific and disease-free survival rates for patients after elective radical resection in UICC-stage I-III did not show significant differences related to age. Tumour site, UICC-stage and resection status were independent statistically significant predictors of disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS Similar disease-specific survival rates in all age groups speak in favour of tumour resection in curative intent even in old patients. Better outcome may be achieved, if regular screening for colorectal cancer is considered even in the elderly to avoid late presentation requiring emergency surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Mothes
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| | - Astrid Bauschke
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Silke Schuele
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Ekkehard Eigendorff
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van Poelgeest R, van Groningen JT, Daniels JH, Roes KC, Wiggers T, Wouters MW, Schrijvers G. Level of Digitization in Dutch Hospitals and the Lengths of Stay of Patients with Colorectal Cancer. J Med Syst 2017; 41:84. [PMID: 28391455 PMCID: PMC5385195 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0734-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A substantial amount of research has been published on the association between the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) and quality outcomes in U.S. hospitals, while limited research has focused on the Western European experience. The purpose of this study is to explore the association between the use of EMR technologies in Dutch hospitals and length of stay after colorectal cancer surgery. Two data sets were leveraged for this study; the HIMSS Analytics Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAMSM) and the Dutch surgical colorectal audit (DSCA). The HIMSS Analytics EMRAM score was used to define a Dutch hospital's electronic medical records (EMR) capabilities while the DSCA was used to profile colorectal surgery quality outcomes (specifically total length of stay (LOS) in the hospital and the LOS in ICU). A total of 73 hospitals with a valid EMRAM score and associated DSCA patients (n = 30.358) during the study period (2012-2014) were included in the comparative set. A multivariate regression method was used to test differences adjusted for case mix, year of surgery, surgical technique and for complications, as well as stratifying for academic affiliated hospitals and general hospitals. A significant negative association was observed to exist between the total LOS (relative median LOS 0,974, CI 95% 0.959-0,989) of patients treated in advanced EMR hospitals (high EMRAM score cohort) versus patients treated at less advanced EMR care settings, once the data was adjusted for the case mix, year of surgery and type of surgery (laparoscopy or laparotomy). Adjusting for complications in a subgroup of general hospitals (n = 39) yielded essentially the same results (relative median LOS 0,934, CI 95% 0,915-0,954). No consistent significant associations were found with respect to LOS on the ICU. The findings of this study suggest advanced EMR capabilities support a healthcare provider's efforts to achieve desired quality outcomes and efficiency in Western European hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia T van Groningen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Theo Wiggers
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Michel W Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA), Leiden, the Netherlands
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Guus Schrijvers
- Julius Center, Public Health, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Amelung FJ, Mulder CLJ, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ, Draaisma WA. Efficacy of loop colostomy construction for acute left-sided colonic obstructions: a cohort analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32:383-390. [PMID: 27838818 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2695-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Acute primary resection as treatment for left-sided colonic obstruction (LSCO) is notorious for its high morbidity and mortality rates. Both stenting and loop colostomy construction can serve as a bridge to surgery, hereby avoiding the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with emergency resections. This study aims to investigate the safety of a loop colostomy in patients presenting with acute LSCO. METHODS Retrospective analysis of all patients that received a loop colostomy for LSCO between 2003 and 2015 was performed. Primary outcomes were mortality, major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades III-IV) and minor morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). RESULTS One hundred forty-six patients presenting with acute LSCO received a diverting colostomy. After colostomy construction, mortality occurred in four patients (2.7%) and major complications were reported in 20 patients (13.7%). In 61 patients, the diverting colostomy served as a palliative measure, because of metastatic disease or unfitness for major surgery. The remaining 85 patients all underwent delayed resection, resulting in an overall mortality, major morbidity and minor morbidity of 6.9% (n = 6), 14.0% (n = 12) and 26.7% (n = 23), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Diverting colostomy construction is a minimally invasive and safe treatment option for LSCO. It can serve as a definite palliative measure, as well as a bridge to elective surgery. A diverting colostomy as a bridge to surgery might even be a valid alternative for emergency resections, since mortality and morbidity rates following colostomy construction and delayed resection appear lower than reported outcomes following primary resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke J Amelung
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L J Mulder
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo A M J Broeders
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Govaert JA, Govaert MJPM, Fiocco M, van Dijk WA, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM. Hospital costs of colorectal cancer surgery for the oldest old: A Dutch population-based study. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114:1009-1015. [PMID: 27778336 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background Due to increasing healthcare costs, discussions regarding increased hospital costs when operating on high-risk patients is rising. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze if oldest-old colorectal cancer patients have a greater impact on hospital costs than their younger counterparts. METHODS All colorectal cancer procedures performed in 29 Dutch hospitals between 2010 and 2012 and listed in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit were analyzed. Oldest-old patients (≥85 years) were compared to patients <85 years. Ninety-day hospital costs were measured uniformly in all hospitals based on time-driven activity-based costs. RESULTS Compared to <85-year-old patients (n = 9130), the oldest old (n = 783) had longer hospital stays (LOS) (11.3 vs. 13.2, P < 0.001), more severe complications (21.8% vs. 29.0%, P < 0.001), more failure to rescue (13.9% vs. 37.0%, P < 0.001) and higher mortality (3.0% vs. 10.7%, P < 0.001). Deceased oldest-old patients had significantly less LOS and less LOS ICU. Total hospital costs were 3% lower for oldest-old patients (€13,168) than for <85-year-old patients (€13,644, P < 0.001). In cases of severe complications or death, hospital costs for the oldest old were 25% and 31% lower than those of <85-year-old patients (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Although frequently assumed to be more expensive, operating on oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer does not increase hospital costs compared to younger patients. This was most likely due to faster deterioration or less aggressive treatment of oldest-old patients when (severe) complications occurred. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:1009-1015. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes A Govaert
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Fiocco
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden University Mathematical Institute, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter A van Dijk
- Performation, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,XIS, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bakker IS, Snijders HS, Grossmann I, Karsten TM, Havenga K, Wiggers T. High mortality rates after nonelective colon cancer resection: results of a national audit. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:612-21. [PMID: 26749028 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM Colon cancer resection in a nonelective setting is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify risk factors for overall mortality after colon cancer resection with a special focus on nonelective resection. METHOD Data were obtained from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Patients undergoing colon cancer resection in the Netherlands between January 2009 and December 2013 were included. Patient, treatment and tumour factors were analysed in relation to the urgency of surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS The study included 30 907 patients. A nonelective colon cancer resection was performed in 5934 (19.2%) patients. There was a 4.4% overall mortality rate, with significantly more deaths after nonelective surgery (8.5% vs 3.4%, P < 0.001). Older patients, male patients and patients with high comorbidity, advanced tumours, perforated tumours, a tumour in the right or transverse colon and postoperative anastomotic leakage were at risk of postoperative death. In nonelective resections, a right-sided tumour and postoperative anastomotic leakage were associated with high mortality. CONCLUSION Nonelective colon cancer resection is associated with high mortality. In particular, right-sided resections and patients with tumour perforation are at particularly high risk. The optimization of patients prior to surgery and expeditious operation after diagnosis might prevent the need for a nonelective resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I S Bakker
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H S Snijders
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - I Grossmann
- Department of Surgery, Afd. P, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - T M Karsten
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Havenga
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - T Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cooper Z, Scott JW, Rosenthal RA, Mitchell SL. Emergency Major Abdominal Surgical Procedures in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Mortality and Functional Outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63:2563-2571. [PMID: 26592523 PMCID: PMC4827160 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review the current literature on mortality and functional outcomes after emergency major abdominal surgery in older adults. DESIGN Systematic literature search and standardized data collection of primary research publications from January 1994 through December 2013 on mortality or functional outcome in adults aged 65 and older after emergency major abdominal surgery using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CINAHL. Bibliographies of relevant reports were also hand-searched to identify all potentially eligible studies. SETTING Systematic review of retrospective and cohort studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews guidelines. PARTICIPANTS Older adults. MEASUREMENTS Articles were assessed using a standardized quality scoring system based on study design, measurement of exposures, measurement of outcomes, and control for confounding. RESULTS Of 1,459 articles screened, 93 underwent full-text review, and 20 were systematically reviewed. In-hospital and 30-day mortality of all older adults exceeded 15% in 14 of 16 studies, where reported. Older adults undergoing emergency major abdominal surgery consistently had higher mortality across study settings and procedure types than younger individuals undergoing emergency procedures and older adults undergoing elective procedures. In studies that stratified older adults, odds of death increased with age. None of these studies examined postoperative functional status, which precluded including functional outcomes in this review. Differences in exposures, outcomes, and data presented in the studies did not allow for quantification of association using metaanalysis. CONCLUSION Age independently predicts mortality after emergency major abdominal surgery. Data on changes in functional status of older adults who undergo these procedures are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zara Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John W. Scott
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronnie A. Rosenthal
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan L. Mitchell
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
De Rosa M, Pace U, Rega D, Costabile V, Duraturo F, Izzo P, Delrio P. Genetics, diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (Review). Oncol Rep 2015; 34:1087-96. [PMID: 26151224 PMCID: PMC4530899 DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer death. Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment in early cases but often patients are primarily diagnosed in an advanced stage of disease and sometimes also distant metastases are present. Neoadjuvant therapy is therefore needed but drug resistance may influence response and concur to recurrent disease. At molecular level, it is a very heterogeneous group of diseases with about 30% of hereditary or familial cases. During colorectal adenocarcinomas development, epithelial cells from gastrointestinal trait acquire sequential genetic and epigenetic mutations in specific oncogenes and/or tumour suppressor genes, causing CRC onset, progression and metastasis. Molecular characterization of cancer associated mutations gives valuable information about disease prognosis and response to the therapy. Very early diagnosis and personalized care, as well as a better knowledge of molecular basis of its onset and progression, are therefore crucial to obtain a cure of CRC. In this review, we describe updated genetics, current diagnosis and management of CRC pointing out the extreme need for a multidisciplinary approach to achieve the best results in patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina De Rosa
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ugo Pace
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology-Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' IRCCS, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Rega
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology-Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' IRCCS, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Valeria Costabile
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Duraturo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Izzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology-Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' IRCCS, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pitfalls in Communication That Lead to Nonbeneficial Emergency Surgery in Elderly Patients With Serious Illness. Ann Surg 2014; 260:949-57. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
30
|
Hamaker ME, Prins MC, Schiphorst AH, van Tuyl SAC, Pronk A, van den Bos F. Long-term changes in physical capacity after colorectal cancer treatment. J Geriatr Oncol 2014; 6:153-64. [PMID: 25454769 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Revised: 08/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Older patients with colorectal cancer are faced with the dilemma of choosing between the short-term risks of treatment and the long-term risks of insufficiently treated disease. In addition to treatment-related morbidity and mortality, patients may suffer from loss of physical capacity. The purpose of this review was to gather all available evidence regarding long-term changes in physical functioning and role functioning after colorectal cancer treatment, by performing a systematic Medline and Embase search. This search yielded 27 publications from 23 studies. In 16 studies addressing physical functioning after rectal cancer treatment, a median drop of 10% (range -26% to -5%) in the mean score for this item at three months. At six months, mean score was still 7% lower than baseline (range -18% to 0%) and at twelve months 5% lower (range -13% to +5%). For role functioning (i.e. ability to perform daily activities) after rectal cancer treatment, scores were -18% (range -39% to -2%), -8% (range -23% to +6%) and -5% (range -17% to +10%) respectively. Elderly patients experience the greatest and most persistent decline in self-care capacity (up to 61% at one year). This systematic review demonstrates that both physical functioning and role functioning are significantly affected by colorectal cancer surgery. Although initial losses are recovered partially during follow-up, there is a permanent loss in both aspects of physical capacity, in patients of all ages but especially in the elderly. This aspect should be included in patient counselling regarding surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije E Hamaker
- Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Professor Lorentzlaan 76, 3707 HL, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Meike C Prins
- Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Professor Lorentzlaan 76, 3707 HL, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ranking and rankability of hospital postoperative mortality rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259:844-9. [PMID: 24717374 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine to what extent random variation and variation in case-mix influence hospital rankings on the basis of mortality rates and to determine the suitability of mortality for ranking hospitals in colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND Comparing and ranking postoperative mortality rates between hospitals becomes increasingly popular. Differences in hospital case-mix, and chance variation related to caseload, may influence rankings. The suitability of mortality for rankings remains unclear. METHODS Data were derived from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Hospital rankings based on fixed- and random-effects logistic regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for case-mix were compared with the percentile based on expected ranks (the chance that a hospital performs better than a random hospital). Rankability, measuring which part of variation between hospitals is not due to chance, was calculated. RESULTS Some 25,591 patients undergoing colorectal resections in 92 hospitals were evaluated. Postoperative mortality rates ranged between 0% and 8.8%. Adjustment for case-mix with a fixed-effects model caused large changes in rankings. A smaller additional effect on changes in rankings occurred after adjusting with a random-effects model, with lower volume hospitals moving toward the mean. Percentile based on expected ranks ranged between 10% and 85%. Rankability was 38%, meaning that 62% of hospital variation in mortality was due to chance. CONCLUSIONS Hospital ranks changed after case-mix adjustment and random-effects models, compared with unadjusted analysis. A large proportion of hospital variation in mortality was due to chance. Caution should be warranted when interpreting hospital rankings on the basis of postoperative mortality. Percentiles of expected ranks may help identify hospitals with exceptional performance.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 2014; 101:424-32; discussion 432. [PMID: 24536013 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection with restoration of bowel continuity is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with colonic cancer. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) and subsequent death after colonic cancer surgery. METHODS Data were retrieved from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Patients undergoing colonic cancer resection with creation of an anastomosis between January 2009 to December 2011 were included. Outcomes were AL requiring reintervention and postoperative mortality following AL. RESULTS AL occurred in 7·5 per cent of 15 667 patients. Multivariable analyses identified male sex, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) fitness grade, extensive tumour resection, emergency surgery, and surgical resection types such as transverse resection, left colectomy and subtotal colectomy as independent risk factors for AL. A defunctioning stoma was created in a small group of patients, leading to a lower risk of leakage. The mortality rate was 4·1 per cent overall, and was significantly higher in patients with AL than in those without leakage (16·4 versus 3·1 per cent; P < 0·001). Multivariable analyses identified older age, high ASA grade, high Charlson score and emergency surgery as independent risk factors for death after AL. The adjusted risk of death after AL was twice as high following right compared with left colectomy. CONCLUSION The elderly and patients with co-morbidity have a higher risk of death after AL. Accurate preoperative patient selection, intensive postoperative surveillance for AL, and early and aggressive treatment of suspected leakage is important, especially in patients undergoing right colectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I S Bakker
- Departments of Surgery, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colon & rectal cancer multidisciplinary management: The radiology experts review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:469-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Revised: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 10/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
34
|
Henneman D, ten Berge MG, Snijders HS, van Leersum NJ, Fiocco M, Wiggers T, Tollenaar RA, Wouters MW. Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: Non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement. J Surg Oncol 2013; 109:567-73. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.23532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2013] [Accepted: 11/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Henneman
- Department of Surgery; Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden The Netherlands
| | | | - Heleen S. Snijders
- Department of Surgery; Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden The Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Fiocco
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics; Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Theo Wiggers
- Department of Surgery; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | | | - Michel W.J.M. Wouters
- Department of Surgery; Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology; Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
van de Velde CJH, Boelens PG, Tanis PJ, Espin E, Mroczkowski P, Naredi P, Pahlman L, Ortiz H, Rutten HJ, Breugom AJ, Smith JJ, Wibe A, Wiggers T, Valentini V. Experts reviews of the multidisciplinary consensus conference colon and rectal cancer 2012: science, opinions and experiences from the experts of surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 40:454-68. [PMID: 24268926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 10/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first multidisciplinary consensus conference on colon and rectal cancer was held in December 2012, achieving a majority of consensus for diagnostic and treatment decisions using the Delphi Method. This article will give a critical appraisal of the topics discussed during the meeting and in the consensus document by well-known leaders in surgery that were involved in this multidisciplinary consensus process. Scientific evidence, experience and opinions are collected to support multidisciplinary teams (MDT) with arguments for medical decision-making in diagnosis, staging and treatment strategies for patients with colon or rectal cancer. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative treatment for colon and rectal cancer. Standardizing treatment is an effective instrument to improve outcome of multidisciplinary cancer care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. In this article, a review of the following focuses; Perioperative care, age and colorectal surgery, obstructive colorectal cancer, stenting, surgical anatomical considerations, total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery and training, surgical considerations for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and local recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), surgery in stage IV colorectal cancer, definitions of quality of surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery, preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and how about functional outcome after surgery?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| | - P G Boelens
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Espin
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Mroczkowski
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery/An-Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Germany
| | - P Naredi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - L Pahlman
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - H Ortiz
- Department of Surgery, Public University of Navarra, Spain
| | - H J Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A J Breugom
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - J J Smith
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, UK
| | - A Wibe
- Department of Surgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - T Wiggers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - V Valentini
- Unviersita Cattolica S. Cuore, Radioterapia 1, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sjödahl R, Rosell J, Starkhammar H. Causes of death after surgery for colon cancer-impact of other diseases, urgent admittance, and gender. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013; 48:1160-5. [PMID: 23964717 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2013.828771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. In patients with colon cancer, high age and comorbidity is common. In this population-based retrospective study we have investigated causes of death and the influence of urgent operation, and gender on survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Medical records of 413 patients with verified colon cancer were reviewed. The diagnosis was made during 2000-2006 and operation was performed in 385 patients (93%). RESULTS. The overall 5-year survival after surgery was 48.3%. At the end of the follow-up, 128 patients (54.9%) had verified colon cancer when they died but 105 patients (45.1%) had no signs of colon cancer. Their 5-year survival was 5.5% and 41.9%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Median survival time was significantly shorter after urgent compared with elective admittance, 20.7 months versus 77.9 months, and the 5-year survival 32.4% versus 57.9% (p = 0.0001). The tumor stage at operation was more favorable in patients dying with no signs of colon cancer than in those dying with cancer regarding stage I-II (66.7% versus 16.4%), and stage IV (1.0% versus 53.1%), but not regarding stage III (30.5% versus 29.7%). The overall survival in women who were operated was longer than in men (p = 0.045) as well as survival after elective admittance (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION. After a median follow-up of 56.1 months almost half of the patients who were dead had died from other causes than colon cancer. Ten percent of those patients had an incorrectly reported diagnosis of colon cancer as cause of death. Urgent admittance was associated with reduced survival time. The median survival time was longer in women than in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rune Sjödahl
- Regional Cancer Center Southeast , SE-581 85 Linköping , Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|