Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe)

FRED X flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Two-center experience and mini-review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) is a safe and effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. The novel FRED X features an antithrombotic surface coating ("X Technology") on an otherwise unmodified stent design. This two-center study evaluates the clinical safety and efficacy of FRED X and compares it to the literature.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated between 2020 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed for aneurysm characteristics, procedural details and complications, and angiographic outcomes. A mini-review of the literature for FRED X clinical trials was performed and results were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (mean age 56 years) were treated for 34 aneurysms. The mean aneurysm size was 7.7 ± 5.0 mm, 7 (21%) were ruptured, 6 (18%) were recurrent after previous treatment, 11 (32.3%) were located in the posterior circulation, and 4 (12.5%) had non-saccular morphology. All procedures were technically successful and no balloon angioplasty was required. There was 1 (2.9%) symptomatic complication (a transient ischemic attack) and no procedural morbidity or mortality. Technical asymptomatic events included 1 procedural stent occlusion that was reopened with thrombectomy and 3 cases of vasospasm. Complete and adequate occlusion rates were 68% (19/28) and 89% (25/28) at a mean follow-up time of 6 months, respectively. The results of this study are comparable to previous FRED X studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate a high feasibility and procedural safety of the FRED X with adequate mid-term occlusion rates. Long-term and comparative studies are needed to evaluate the full potential of the FRED X.

Evaluation of the Significance of Persistent Remnant Filling and Enlargement After Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical course after flow diversion (FD) treatment with a focus on aneurysms with remnant sac filling, by analyzing angiographic outcomes, aneurysm volume, and clinical events.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients who underwent FD for intracranial aneurysms between July 2014 and June 2021.

RESULTS

The majority of aneurysms (52.5%) were located in the internal carotid artery, with a median diameter of 16.6 mm and neck size of 9.3 mm. Remnant filling was observed in 17 aneurysms (27.9%) more than 18 months after FD, 10 (16.4%) of these aneurysms underwent enlargement, which occurred only in cases with subtotal filling or entry remnant states. Eleven patients experienced major adverse events, and three exhibited unfavorable functional outcomes. The incidence of major adverse events and unfavorable functional outcomes was significantly higher in the aneurysm enlargement group than that in the no-filling or stable remnant filling groups (P < 0.001). Aneurysmal diameter and the presence of incorporated branches were independent predictors of aneurysm enlargement, while the presence of incorporated branches was the only independent predictor of persistent remnant filling.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm enlargement after FD is not uncommon, particularly when the aneurysm is large, has incorporated vessels, or does not undergo occlusion within 12 months, often culminating in major adverse events and unfavorable functional outcomes. In addition to investigating angiographic results, it is necessary to evaluate the changes in aneurysm size and clinical events when assessing the efficacy of FD.

Technical success, procedural safety, and efficacy of the Silk Vista Baby in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms over a mid-to-long-term follow-up

Background

Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with the Silk Vista Baby (SVB) flow diverter is lacking. This study aimed to assess the technical success, procedural safety, and efficacy of the SVB (Balt, Montmorency, France) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in small cerebral vessels over a mid-to long-term follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with the SVB between September 2018 and June 2021. Data regarding patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and technical procedures were also collected. Angiographic and clinical findings were recorded during the procedure and over a period of at least 12 months.

Results

Angiographic and clinical follow-up data were available for 50 patients/50 aneurysms. The procedural complication rate was 8%. At 12 months, the final results showed a technical success rate of 100%, the re rupture rate was 0%, neuromorbidity and mortality rates of 4 and 0%, respectively, and an almost complete occlusion rate of 94%.

Conclusion

Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with the SVB was safe and effective. Long-term results showed high rates of adequate and stable occlusions.

Flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center study with a standardized antithrombotic treatment protocol

BACKGROUND

The use of antithrombotic medication following acute flow diversion for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm (IA) is challenging with no current guidelines. We investigated the incidence of treatment-related complications and patient outcomes after flow diversion for a ruptured IA before and after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic medication protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study including consecutive patients treated for acutely ruptured IAs with flow diversion during 2015-2023. We divided the patients into two groups: those treated before the implementation of the protocol (pre-protocol) and those treated after the implementation of the protocol (post-protocol). The primary outcomes were hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. A secondary outcome was clinical outcome using the modified Ranking Scale (mRS).

RESULTS

Totally 39 patients with 40 ruptured IAs were treated with flow diversion (69% pre-protocol, 31% post-protocol). The patient mean age was 55 years, 62% were female, 63% of aneurysms were in the posterior circulation, 92% of aneurysms were non-saccular, and 44% were in poor grade on admission. Treatment differences included the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (pre-group 48% vs. post-group 100%), and the use of early dual antiplatelets (pre-group 44% vs. 92% post-group). The incidence of ischemic complications was 37% and 42% and the incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 30% and 33% in the pre- and post-groups, respectively, with no between-group differences. There were three (11%) aneurysm re-ruptures in the pre-group and none in the post-group. There were no differences in mortality or mRS 0-2 between the groups at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

We found no major differences in the incidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic complications after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic protocol for acute flow diversion for ruptured IAs. There is an urgent need for more evidence-based guidelines to optimize antithrombotic treatment after flow diversion in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Aneurysm Treatment With the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device in Retrospective Evaluation: Periprocedural Results from the Pipe-VADER Study

OBJECTIVE

The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device is a fourth-generation flow diverter with an antithrombotic coating and a reduced profile compared to previous Pipeline versions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the procedural feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this device.

METHODS

The Pipe-VADER study was designed as a retrospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated with the Vantage at 3 neurovascular centers. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, early complications, and extent of postinterventional contrast retention were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with 31 aneurysms (median size: 5.0 mm, posterior circulation: 4 [12.9%], ruptured: 5 [16.1%]) were included. The technical success rate was 100%, with multiple stents used in 4/30 (13.3%) procedures. Of the 30 procedures, adjunctive coiling was performed in 3 (10.0%) and balloon angioplasty in 2 (6.7%). Median procedure time was 62 minutes. Procedural ischemic stroke occured in 4 (13.3%) cases, whereof 2 were major strokes (6.6%). There were no hemorrhagic complications. Initial contrast retention was observed in 29/31 (93.5%) aneurysms. All 27 overstented side vessels were patent at the end of the procedure. Short-term follow-up (median: 5 months) showed complete and favorable occlusion rates of 70% (14/20) and 80% (16/20), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The new Pipeline Vantage appears to be safe and feasible for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and warrants further evaluation.

Management of Intracranial Aneurysms that Do Not Occlude on Initial Follow-up After Treatment With the Pipeline Embolization Device

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The pipeline embolization device (PED) has become widely accepted as a safe and efficacious treatment for intracranial aneurysms with high rates of complete occlusion at initial follow-up. For aneurysms that are not completely occluded at initial follow-up, further treatment decision-making is varied. Furthermore, the risk of aneurysmal rupture in these incompletely occluded aneurysms after PED is not known. The objective of this study was to determine treatment decision-making that results in increased occlusion status at final follow-up and to evaluate risk of rupture in those aneurysms that do not go onto occlusion.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of prospective data for intracranial aneurysms treated with PED at two institutions from 2013 to 2019. Aneurysms with near-complete or incomplete occlusion at initial follow-up were included in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 606 total aneurysms treated at two academic institutions with PED with incomplete occlusion at initial follow-up in 134 aneurysms (22.1%). Of the 134 aneurysms that were nonoccluded at initial follow-up, 76 aneurysms (56.7%) went on to complete or near complete occlusion with final complete or near complete occlusion in 90.4% of all aneurysms treated. The time to final imaging follow-up was 28.2 months (13.8-44.3) Retreatment with a second flow diverter was used in 28 aneurysms (20.9%). No aneurysms that were incompletely occluded at initial follow-up had delayed rupture. Furthermore, older patient age was statistically significant for incomplete occlusion at initial follow-up ( P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED that do not occlude at initial follow-up may go on to complete occlusion with continuous observation, alteration in antiplatelet regimens, or repeat treatment. Delayed aneurysmal rupture was not seen in patients with incomplete occlusion.

Comparison of a covered stent and pipeline embolization device in intracranial aneurysm: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The Willis covered stent (WCS) and pipeline embolization device (PED) have partly overlapping therapeutic indications. However, the differences of effect between these two treatments remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcome, angiographic outcome, and complications following treatment with a WCS versus PED.

METHODS

Patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by a WCS or PED between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. The primary outcomes were complications, clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2), and angiographic outcome (incomplete aneurysm occlusion). Propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 94 aneurysms treated by WCS and 698 aneurysms by PED were included. Compared with the PED group, patients in the WCS group are younger, a greater number have a poor condition at admission, a larger proportion of ruptured, non-saccular, and anterior circulation aneurysms, a smaller aneurysm neck width, and less coiling assistance is required. A total of 42 (44.7%) branches were covered by WCS. After adjustment for age, sex, aneurysm type, rupture status, neck size, aneurysm location, and coiling, 50 WCS and PED pairs were examined for internal carotid artery aneurysms. No significant differences were observed in clinical (10.4% vs 2.1%, P=0.206) and angiographic outcomes (12.8% vs 18.2%, P=0.713). However, 27 branches covered by WCS, including 22 ophthalmic arteries and five posterior communicating arteries. Patients in the WCS group had a higher intraoperative complication rate than those in the PED group (28% vs 6%, P=0.008), especially in the occlusion rate of covered branches (51.9% vs 11.1%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes of WCS or PED demonstrate the therapeutic potential of WCS as a viable alternative for aneurysms. However, the complication of occlusion of covered branches might not be negligible.

No Delayed Ruptures on Long-Term Follow-Up of a Case Series of Persistently Filling Saccular Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms After Flow Diversion With the Pipeline Embolization Device

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms results in high occlusion rates. However, 10% to 20% remain persistently filling at 1 year. Often, these are retreated, but benefits of retreatment are not well established. A better understanding of the long-term rupture risk of persistently filling aneurysms after flow diversion is needed.

METHODS

Our institutional database of 974 flow diversion cases was queried for persistently filling saccular aneurysms of the clinoidal, ophthalmic, and communicating segments of the internal carotid artery treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED, Medtronic). Persistent filling was defined as continued flow into the aneurysm on 1 year catheter angiogram. The clinical record was queried for retreatments and delayed ruptures. Clinical follow-up was required for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-four persistent aneurysms were identified. The average untreated aneurysm size was 5.6 mm. A branch vessel originated separately in 55% of cases from the body of the aneurysm in 10.6% of cases and from the neck in 34% of cases. Eighteen percent of aneurysms demonstrated >95% filling at 1 year, and 61% were filling 5% to 95% of their original size. The mean follow-up time was 4.9 years, including 41 cases with >5 years. No retreatment was undertaken in 91.5% of aneurysms. There were no cases of delayed subarachnoid hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Among saccular internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with PED that demonstrated persistent aneurysm filling at 1 year, there were no instances of delayed rupture on long-term follow-up. These data suggest that observation may be appropriate for continued aneurysm filling at least in the first several years after PED placement.

Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide-Neck Aneurysms - SCENT: 3-year outcomes

BACKGROUND

To report the 3-year safety and effectiveness of the Surpass Streamline flow diverter in the SCENT trial (Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide-Neck Aneurysms).

METHODS

The Surpass Streamline flow diverter device was evaluated in a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, non-randomized interventional trial including patients with uncoilable or previously treated but failed aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. 3-year outcomes were tabulated with descriptive statistics and compared with 1-year outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 180 patients in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) cohort, 36-month clinical and angiographic follow-up was available in 134 and 117 cases, respectively. Effectiveness endpoint of complete aneurysm occlusion without clinically significant stenosis or retreatment was met in 71.8% (79/110, 95% CI 62.4% to 80.0%) of cases. Safety composite endpoint was 12.2% (22/180) over the 3-year period, with two major safety events (ipsilateral ischemic strokes) occurring between 12-36 months. Complete aneurysm occlusion was noted in 77.8% (91/117), and 99.1% (116/117) of the patients demonstrated adequate aneurysm occlusion (complete occlusion or neck residual). There were four cases (2.2%) of aneurysm rupture, all occurring within the first month of the index procedure. Target aneurysm retreatment rate was 2.8% (5/180).

CONCLUSION

The present findings support the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Surpass Streamline flow diverter device.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01716117.

Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of small vs. large aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms with high obliteration rates and low morbidity. However, long-term (≥ 1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes still require further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the occlusion and complication rates for small (< 10 mm) versus large (10-25 mm) aneurysms at long-term following treatment with PED. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We conducted a comprehensive search of English language databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our studies included a minimum of 10 patients treated with PED for small vs. large aneurysms and with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of clinical complications measured by the occurrence of symptomatic stroke (confirmed clinically and radiographically), intracranial hemorrhage, or aneurysmal rupture. The primary efficacy endpoint was the complete aneurysm occlusion rate. Our analysis included 19 studies with 1277 patients and 1493 aneurysms. Of those, 1378 aneurysms met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.9 years, and most aneurysms were small (89.75%; N = 1340) in women (79.1%; N = 1010). The long-term occlusion rate was 73% (95%, CI 65 to 80%) in small compared to 84% (95%, CI 76 to 90%) in large aneurysms (p < 0.01). The symptomatic thromboembolic complication rate was 5% (95%, CI 3 to 9%) in small compared to 7% (95%, CI 4 to 13%) in large aneurysms (p = 0.01). The rupture rate was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.92), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.96) for small vs. large aneurysms, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The long-term occlusion rate after PED treatment is higher in large vs. small aneurysms. Symptomatic thromboembolic rates with stroke are also higher in large vs. small aneurysms. The difference in the rates of aneurysm rupture and intracranial hemorrhage was insignificant. Although the PED seems a safe and effective treatment for small and large aneurysms, further studies are required to clarify how occlusion rate and morbidity are affected by aneurysm size.

Early clinical experience with the new generation Pipeline Vantage flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms using short-term dual antiplatelet therapy

PURPOSE

The Pipeline Vantage flow diverter with Shield technology (PV) used in this study is a 4th-generation flow diverter (FD) designed to reduce thrombogenicity, promote endothelialization of the implant and increase efficiency in achieving aneurysm closure. In this study, we report the aneurysm occlusion rate, complication rate and clinical outcome with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the treatment of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms using the PV.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients treated between September 2021 and January 2023 with the PV and subsequently underwent short-term DAPT for 3 months. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, peri- and post-procedural complications, clinical outcomes and the grade of aneurysm occlusion were documented.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with 32 aneurysms were treated. Successful FD implantation was achieved in all cases (100%). No periprocedural complications were documented. The overall symptomatic complication rate was 10% and the neurologic, treatment-related symptomatic complication rate was 6.6%. Only one symptomatic complication (3.3%) was device-related. Permanent clinical deterioration occurred in 2/30 patients (6.6%), leading to deterioration of the mRS within the first 3 months after treatment. No mortality was documented. The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion after 3 months and after a mean imaging follow-up of 9.9 months was 65.6% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of the PV for the treatment of saccular intracranial aneurysms achieves a good aneurysm occlusion rate with a low rate of complications. In addition, the use of short-term DAPT after PV implantation appears to be safe.

Verification of software-based preoperative simulation of flow diverters in clinical cases

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to verify the use of a preoperative simulation software for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow diverters (FDs) based on three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) data.

METHODS

Based on 3DRA data, the preoperative simulation software (UKNOW) was used to simulate the deployment of virtual FDs. The length and dimensions of virtual and real devices were compared. The deployment plan recommended by the UKNOW software was preliminarily used to complete implantations in the real world. During the experiment, experienced neurointerventional experts were responsible for supervising and judging information such as the length, dimension, and deployment location of the FDs.

RESULTS

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 29 patients who received FD treatment. There was no statistical difference between the length of the real device and the virtual device (p = 0.6). The dimensions of FDs recommended by the software were consistent with the dimensions used in 24 out of the 29 real cases. In four of the remaining five cases, neurointerventional experts found that the FD dimensions recommended by the software were superior to those were actually used. Thus, the accuracy rate for FD dimension recommendations by the UKNOW software was 96.6% (28/29). Procedures performed in five cases using deployment plans recommended by the UKNOW software all achieved good postoperative results; the deployment positions of the device were reasonable, and all devices showed good wall adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

UKNOW software could accurately simulate the length and deployment position of the real FDs and provide suitable device dimensions.

Early Termination versus Standard Regimen Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Intracranial Aneurysm Patients Treated With Pipeline Embolization Device Flex With Shield Technology: Preliminary Experience of 3 U.S. Centers

BACKGROUND

Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (PED-Shield) is a third-generation flow diverter with reduced thromboembolic potential. However, safety profile and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) recommendations with PED-Shield is not well -established. We aim to assess the safety and complication profile with early termination of DAPT with use of PED-Shield.

METHODS

Databases of 3 high-volume cerebrovascular centers were retrospectively reviewed. We identified patients with unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with PED-Shield. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, complications, and angiographic outcomes were extracted. All patients who had early termination of DAPT, defined as <180 days, as well as standard duration were included.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients, totaling 37 aneurysms, had early termination of DAPT and 24 patients with 24 aneurysms received standard duration (>180 days) of DAPT. There was no difference in pre-procedural DAPT regimens between the groups (P = 0.503). Following DAPT termination, o1ne major thromboembolic complication was observed in the early termination group while no major or minor thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complication was noted in the standard duration group. Time of angiographic follow-up was not statistically different (P = 0.063) between the early termination (343 days, interquartile range [IQR] 114-371 days) and the standard duration (175 days, IQR 111-224.5 days) groups. There were no statistically significant differences in complete aneurysm occlusion (P = 0.857), residual neck (P = 0.582), and aneurysm remnant (P = 0.352) rates between the groups on angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Early termination of DAPT proves safe after PED-Shield treatment of intracranial aneurysms with comparable complete occlusion rates.

Trends in Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysmal Treatment from 2010 to 2020: A Focus on Flow Diversion

OBJECTIVE

Flow diverters are a promising new tool in the neurosurgeon's arsenal for aneurysm management. We sought to quantify the trends of flow diversion in comparison to traditional endovascular coiling and surgical clip ligation techniques in the United States from 2010 to 2020 with an emphasis on aneurysm location and preferences in usage for ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms.

METHODS

In this large cross-sectional study, patients aged 18 and older within the MARINER database were analyzed. Descriptive characteristics were calculated for all included patients. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables. P values < 0.05 were statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 45,542 procedures were conducted in the United States from 2010 to 2020 (clipping: 14,491; coiling: 28,840; flow diversion: 2211). The Southern United States had the largest operative volume across all 3 intervention types, closely followed by the Midwest. Aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery were mostly clipped, whereas coiling and flow diversion techniques were most utilized for anterior communicating and posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Flow diversion is growing most rapidly in the treatment of unruptured aneurysms, though there were also significant increases in usage for ruptured aneurysm treatment from 2019 to 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow diverters have gained significant traction in the treatment for both unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. In the coming years, the indications and use of flow diversion will undoubtedly grow further, but excitement over their application should be tempered by the safety and efficacy data that continues to emerge.

Safety and efficacy of the surpass streamline for intracranial aneurysms (SESSIA): A multi-center US experience pooled analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion has established as standard treatment for intracranial aneurysms, the Surpass Streamline is the only FDA-approved braided cobalt/chromium alloy implant with 72-96 wires. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the Surpass in a post-marketing large United States cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter study of consecutive patients treated with the Surpass for intracranial aneurysms between 2018 and 2021. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and aneurysm characteristics were collected. Efficacy endpoint included aneurysm occlusion on radiographic follow-up. Safety endpoints were major ipsilateral ischemic stroke or treatment-related death.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients with 314 aneurysms were included. Median age was 60 years, 202 (73%) patients were females. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in 156 (56%) patients. The most common location of the aneurysms was the anterior circulation in 89% (279/314). Mean aneurysm dome width was 5.77 ± 4.75 mm, neck width was 4.22 ± 3.83 mm, and dome/neck ratio was 1.63 ± 1.26. Small-sized aneurysms were 185 (59%). Single device was used in 94% of the patients, mean number of devices per patient was 1.06. At final follow-up, complete obliteration rate was 81% (194/239). Major stroke and death were encountered in 7 (3%) and 6 (2%) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest cohort study using a 72-96 wire flow diverter. The Surpass Streamline demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile, making it a valuable option for treating not only large but also wide-necked small and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms.

Flow diversion for compressive unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms with neuro-ophthalmological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and efficacy of flow diverters (FD) for the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with compressive neuro-ophthalmological symptoms (NOS) are scarce and comprise mainly small case series.

METHODS

We performed a search of three databases and included series with ≥10 patients, with unruptured aneurysms of the ICA and NOS, treated with FD. Random-effects analysis of treatment results and safety was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies reporting on 594 patients were included. Pooled proportions of NOS recovery, improvement, transient and permanent worsening were: 47.4% (95% CI 35.0% to 60.1%); 74.5% (95% CI 67.9% to 80.2%); 7.1% (95% CI 3.3% to 14.7%); and 4.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 7.4%), respectively. Rates of complete recovery and improvement in patients with isolated visual symptoms were 30.6% (95% CI 12.5% to 57.7%) and 56.6% (95% CI 42.3% to 69.9%). Isolated oculomotor symptoms recovered completely in 47.8% (95% CI 29.9% to 66.3%) and improved in 78% (95% CI 69.2% to 84.9%). Morbidity occurred in 5% (95% CI 2.8% to 9%) and mortality in 3.9% (95% CI 2% to 7.5%) of patients. An increased likelihood of symptom improvement was observed when treatment was performed early (<1 month) after symptom onset (OR=11.22, 95% CI 3.9% to 32.5%).

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion promotes recovery or improvement of compressive symptoms in a large proportion of patients but is associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Transient and permanent NOS worsening is not uncommon. Early treatment is of utmost importance, as it increases the likelihood of symptom improvement more than 10-fold.

Comparison of pipeline embolization device, flow re-direction endoluminal device and surpass flow diverters in the treatment of intracerebral aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

The use of flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms has gained broad acceptance. Three flow-diverting stents are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the United States. We sought to compare the outcomes and safety profiles between the three devices at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review of aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization device (PED), flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED), and SURPASS was performed for aneurysms treated between 2018 and 2022 at our institution.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 142 patients. Precisely, 86 aneurysms were treated with a pipeline, 33 aneurysms were treated with FRED, and 23 aneurysms were treated with SURPASS. The 1-year complete occlusion rates were 59.4%, 60%, and 65%, respectively (0.91). Linear regression models found that only adjunctive coiling predicted aneurysm occlusion at 6 months (p = 0.02), but this effect was lost at 1 year and beyond. There was no significant difference in acute thrombotic or acute hemorrhagic complications between the three cohorts. There was a higher rate of delayed hemorrhagic complications in the SURPASS cohort (10%) compared to the PED (1.3%) and FRED (0%) cohorts (p = 0.04). There was also a higher rate of in-stent stenosis in the SURPASS cohort (20%) compared to the PED (5%) and FRED (3.1%) cohorts (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PED, FRED, and SURPASS all resulted in similar complete occlusion rates at 6 months and 1 year. SURPASS was associated with higher in-stent stenosis as well as delayed hemorrhagic complications. Additional future studies evaluating the newest generation of flow-diverting stents with long-term follow-up will be necessary to make any definitive conclusions.

First clinical experience with the Derivo 2heal embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The development of new flow-diverting devices with antithrombotic coatings may result in an improved safety profile, particularly a reduction in ischaemic stroke rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate our initial experience with the recently introduced coated Derivo® 2heal® Embolization Device (Acandis, Pforzheim, Germany).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis of patients with intracranial aneurysms undergoing Derivo® 2heal® Embolization Device treatment. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, complications, and degree of initial and short-term aneurysm occlusion were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 unruptured aneurysms in 9 patients were treated with the Derivo® 2heal® Embolization Device in 10 treatment sessions. In one case the Derivo® 2heal® Embolization Device could not be deployed due to severe friction in the microcatheter. In all successful cases, one Derivo® 2heal® Embolization Device was sufficient to treat the target aneurysm and no additional coiling was performed. In-stent balloon angioplasty was performed in one procedure (10%) to improve vessel wall apposition. Twelve arterial side branches were covered in 9 procedures and all were patent at the end of the procedure. There were no clinical complications and no thromboembolic events during treatment. At the end of the procedure, contrast retention was observed in 13/16 (81%) aneurysms and at short-term follow-up, 6/9 (67%) were completely occluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results of the new Derivo® 2heal® Embolization Device appear promising and warrant further evaluation by multicentre studies with long-term follow-up.

Active drug-coated flow diverter in a preclinical model of intracranial stenting

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters carry the risk of thromboembolic complications (TEC). We tested a coating with covalently bound heparin that activates antithrombin to address TEC by locally downregulating the coagulation cascade. We hypothesized that the neuroimaging evidence of TEC would be reduced by the coating.

METHODS

16 dogs were implanted with overlapping flow diverters in the basilar artery, separated into two groups: heparin-coated (n=9) and uncoated (n=7). Following implantation, high-frequency optical coherence tomography (HF-OCT) was acquired to quantify acute thrombus (AT) formation on the flow diverters. MRI was performed postoperatively and repeated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks, consisting of T1-weighted imaging, time-0f-flight (ToF), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. Neurological examinations were performed throughout the 8-week duration of the study.

RESULTS

The mean AT volume on coated devices was lower than uncoated (0.014 vs 0.018 mm³); however, this was not significant (P=0.3). The mean number of foci of magnetic susceptibility artifacts (MSAs) on SWI was significantly different between the uncoated and coated groups at the 1-week follow-up (P<0.02), and remained statistically different throughout the duration of the study. The AT volume showed a direct linear correlation with the MSA count and 80% of the variance in the MSA could be explained by the AT volume (P<0.001). Pathological analysis showed evidence of ischemic injury at locations of MSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin-coated flow diverters significantly reduced the number of new MSAs after 1 week follow-up, showing the potential to reduce TEC.

Comparison of pipeline classic and flex embolization devices in endovascular performance for intracranial aneurysms

To investigate the endovascular performance of the Pipeline Classic embolization device (PED Classic) and PED Flex device (PED Flex) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Fifty-three patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED Classic were retrospectively enrolled into the PED Classic group, and 118 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED Flex were enrolled into the PED Flex group. The Procedure time, contrast dosage, fluoroscopy time, and perioperative complications were analyzed. The success rate of the stenting procedure was 100% in both groups. In the PED Classic group, 58 PED Classic devices were implanted, and 26 aneurysms underwent coil embolization. In the PED Flex group, 126 PED Flex devices were implanted, and 35 aneurysms underwent concomitant coil embolization. The procedure time was significantly (P < .001) greater in the PED Classic (159.0 ± 42.0 minutes) than in the PED Flex (121.9 ± 4.0 minutes) group. The dosage of contrast agent (156.4 ± 39.4 vs 110.1 ± 38.5 mL) and the total fluoroscopic time (34.7 ± 5.7 minutes vs 22.8 ± 7.6 minutes) were significantly (P < .001) greater in the PED Classic than in the PED Flex group. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 5 (9.4%) patients in the PED Classic group and in 3 (2.5%) patients in the Flex group, without a statistically significant (P = .11) difference. The performance of the PED Flex device may be safer and easier than that of the PED Classic device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms despite some serious complications which remain to be prevented.

Long-term outcomes following pipeline embolization of unruptured aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device (PED) for unruptured aneurysms is associated with high occlusion and low morbidity and mortality. However, most reports have limited follow-up of 1-2 years. Therefore, we sought to report our outcomes after PED for unruptured aneurysms in patients with at least 5-years of follow-up.

METHODS

Review of patients undergoing PED for unruptured aneurysms from 2009 to 2016.

RESULTS

Overall, 135 patients with 138 aneurysms were included for analysis. Seventy-eight percent of aneurysms (n=107) over a median radiographic follow-up of 5.0 years underwent complete occlusion. Among aneurysms with at least 5-years of radiographic follow-up (n=71), 79% (n=56) achieved complete obliteration. No aneurysm recanalized after radiographic obliteration. Furthermore, over a median clinical follow-up period of 4.9 years, 84% of patients (n=115) self-reported mRS scores between 0 and 2. For patients with at least 5-years of clinical follow-up, 88% (n=61) reported mRS between 0 and 2. In total, 3% (n=4) of patients experienced a major, non-fatal neurologic complication related to the PED, 5% (n=7) of patients experienced a minor neurologic complication related to PED placement, and 2% (n=3) died from either delayed aneurysm rupture, delayed ipsilateral hemorrhage after PED placement, or delayed (9 months after treatment) neural compression after progressive thrombosis of a PED-treated dolichoectactic vertebrobasilar aneurysm.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of unruptured aneurysms with the PED is associated with high rates of long-term angiographic occlusion and low, albeit clinically important, rates of major neurologic morbidity and mortality. Thus, flow diversion via PED placement is safe, effective, and durable.

Morphological features predicting in-stent stenosis after pipeline implantation for unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Purpose

Elongation denotes the regularity of an aneurysm and parent artery. This retrospective research study was conducted to identify the morphological factors that could predict postoperative in-stent stenosis (ISS) after Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) implantation for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).

Methods

Patients with UIA and treated with PED at our institute between 2015 and 2020 were selected. Preoperative morphological features including both manually measured shape features and radiomics shape features were extracted and compared between patients with and without ISS. Logistic regression analysis was performed for factors associated with postoperative ISS.

Results

A total of 52 patients (18 men and 34 women) were involved in this study. The mean angiographic follow-up time was 11.87 ± 8.26 months. Of the patients, 20 of them (38.46%) were identified with ISS. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that elongation (odds ratio = 0.008; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.255; p = 0.006) was an independent risk factor for ISS. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) was 0.734 and the optimal cut-off value of elongation for ISS classification was 0.595. The sensitivity and specificity of prediction were 0.6 and 0.781, respectively. The ISS degree of elongation of less than 0.595 was larger than the ISS degree of elongation of more than 0.595.

Conclusion

Elongation is a potential risk factor associated with ISS after PED implantation for UIAs. The more regular an aneurysm and parent artery, the less likelihood of an ISS occurrence.

Comparative outcomes of the treatment of unruptured paraophthalmic aneurysms in the era of flow diversion

BACKGROUND

Paraophthalmic aneurysms present a challenge to surgeons and their ideal management remains up for debate. We studied recent outcomes of these lesions in a single center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing treatment for paraophthalmic aneurysms from 2017-2019 was performed. Factors including patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment modality, radiographic treatment outcome, clinical outcome, and length of stay were collected, and bivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total 84.5% (82/97) of aneurysms were treated endovascularly and 15.5% (15/97) surgically. In the surgery cohort, there were three transient perioperative complications (20%) and one minor postoperative complication (6.7%). Complete aneurysm occlusion or near complete (<2mm residual) was achieved in 100% (15/15). All but one patient had mRS ≤1 at the last follow-up. In the endovascular group, 78.1% (64/82) underwent flow diversion alone. Endovascular treatment was associated with a 4.9% (4/82) rate of periprocedural complications: 3 transient events, and 1 death, and a 3.7% (3/82) rate of delayed complications: 2 transient vision changes, and one death. Rate of total occlusion was 87.8% (72/82). 76 patients (92.7%) had mRS ≤1 at the last follow-up. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the endovascular group (3.4 days vs. 7.0 days) [p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

This series demonstrates similar safety to previously reported series as well as the efficacy of both surgical clipping and endovascular embolization of paraophthalmic aneurysms. Rate of complications and treatment efficacy were similar in both groups although this represents a single institution series not generalizable to all centers.

The FRESH Study: Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the New FRED X Flow Diverter with Antithrombotic Surface Treatment Technology-First Multicenter Experience in 161 Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diverters with antithrombotic coatings are increasingly used to improve the safety of flow diverter treatments of intracranial aneurysms. This study aimed to investigate the safety and short-term efficacy of the new FRED X flow diverter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical charts and procedural and imaging data of a consecutive series of patients with intracranial aneurysms who were treated with the FRED X at 9 international neurovascular centers were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one patients (77.6% women; mean age, 55 years) with 184 aneurysms (11.2% acutely ruptured) were included in this study. Most aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (77.0%), most frequently at the ICA (72.7%). The FRED X was successfully implanted in all procedures. Additional coiling was performed in 29.8%. In-stent balloon angioplasty was necessary in 2.5%. The rate of major adverse events was 3.1%. Thrombotic events occurred in 7 patients (4.3%) with 4 intra- and 4 postprocedural in-stent thromboses, respectively (1 patient had both peri- and postprocedural thrombosis). Of these thrombotic events, only 2 (1.2%) led to major adverse events (ischemic strokes). Postinterventional neurologic morbidity and mortality were observed in 1.9% and 1.2%, respectively. The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion after a mean follow-up of 7.0 months was 66.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The new FRED X is a safe and feasible device for aneurysm treatment. In this retrospective multicenter study, the rate of thrombotic complications was low, and the short-term occlusion rates are satisfactory.

Safety and effect of pipeline flex embolization device for complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms

To investigate the safety and short-term effect of Pipeline Flex devices in the treatment of complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms, a retrospective study was performed for patients with complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms who were treated with the Pipeline Flex embolization device (PED Flex device) combined with or without coiling. The clinical, endovascular, and follow-up data were analyzed. One hundred and thirty-one patients with 159 complex unruptured cerebral aneurysms were treated with the PED Flex device, with 144 Flex devices deployed. Periprocedural complications occurred in four patients, resulting in the complication rate of 3.1%, including ischemic complications in three patients (2.3%) and hemorrhagic complication in one (0.8%). At discharge, the mRS was 0 in 101 (77.1%) patients, 1 in 25 (19.1%), 2 in four (3.1%), and 4 in one (0.8%), with the good prognosis rate (mRS 0-2) of 99.2%. Clinical follow-up was carried out in 87 (66.4%) patients 3-42 months after the procedure, with the mRS of 0 in 78 (89.7%), 1 in five (5.7%), 2 in three (3.4%), and 4 in one (1.1%). No significant (P = 0.16) difference existed in the mRS at discharge compared with that at clinical follow-up. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 61 (46.7%) patients with 80 (50.3%) aneurysms at 3-40 months, with the OKM grade of D in 57 (71.3%) aneurysms, C in eight (10%), and B in 15 (18.8%). Asymptomatic instent stenosis occurred in four patients (6.6%). In conclusion: The treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Flex embolization device may be safe and effective, with a high complete occlusion rate, a decreased complication rate, and a good prognosis rate at medium follow-up.

Safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device treatments for intradural internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single center in a Japanese population

Background:

The pipeline embolization device (PED) is the most common flow diverter device in the world. To date, there have been no reports of treatment outcomes specific to intradural internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The safety and efficacy of the PED treatments for intradural ICA aneurysms are reported.

Methods:

131 patients with 133 aneurysms underwent PED treatments for intradural ICA aneurysms. The mean aneurysm dome size and neck length were 12.7 ± 4.3 mm and 6.1 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. We used adjunctive endosaccular coil embolization for 88 aneurysms (66.2%). A total of 113 aneurysms (85%) were angiographically followed up 6 months following the procedure, and 93 aneurysms (69.9%) were followed up for 1 year.

Results:

The angiographic outcome at 6 months showed that 94 (83.2%) aneurysms had O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grade D, 6 (5.3%) had C, 10 (8.8%) had B, and 3 (2.7%) had A. At 1 year, 82 (88.2%) aneurysms had OKM grade D, 6 (6.5%) had C, 3 (3.2%) had B, and 2 (2.2%) had A. Multivariate analysis showed that aneurysm neck size and adjunctive coiling were statistically significant in aneurysm occlusion status. Major morbidity modified Rankin Scale >2 and mortality rates related to procedures were 3.0% and 0%, respectively. Delayed aneurysm ruptures were not observed.

Conclusion:

These results reveal that PED treatment of intradural ICA aneurysms is safe and efficacious. The combined use of adjunctive coil embolization not only prevents delayed aneurysm ruptures but also contributes to an increase in the rate of complete occlusion.

Comparison of Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The use of flow diverters for treating intracranial aneurysms has been widely used in the past decade; however, data comparing pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic Inc) and flow-redirection endoluminal device (FRED; MicroVention) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of PED and FRED in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of aneurysms treated with PED and FRED devices. Patients treated with PED or FRED were included. Cases requiring multiple or adjunctive devices were excluded. Primary outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included good functional outcome, need for retreatment, and any complication.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 150 patients, including 35 aneurysms treated with FRED and 115 treated with PED. Aneurysm characteristics including location and size were comparable between the 2 cohorts. 6-month complete occlusion rate was significantly higher in the PED cohort (74.7% vs 51.5%; P = .017) but lost significance after inverse probability weights. Patients in the PED cohort were associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications (3.5% vs 0%; P = .573), and the rate of in-stent stenosis was approximately double in the FRED cohort (15.2% vs 6.9%; P = .172).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PED, FRED offers modest 6-month occlusion rates, which may be due to aneurysmal and baseline patient characteristics differences between both cohorts. Although not significant, FRED was associated with a higher complication rate mostly because of in-stent stenosis. Additional studies with longer follow-up durations should be conducted to further evaluate FRED thrombogenicity.

First clinical multicenter experience with the new Pipeline Vantage flow diverter

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion is an innovative and increasingly used technique for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. New flow diverters (FDs) are being introduced to improve the safety and efficacy of this treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the new Pipeline Vantage (PV) FD.

METHODS

Patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the PV at 10 international neurovascular centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, complications, and the grade of occlusion were assessed.

RESULTS

60 patients with 70 aneurysms (5.0% with acute hemorrhage, 90.0% located in the anterior circulation) were included. 82 PVs were implanted in 61 treatment sessions. The PV could be successfully implanted in all treatments. Additional coiling was performed in 18.6%, and in-stent balloon angioplasty (to enhance the vessel wall apposition) in 24.6%. Periprocedural technical complications occurred in 24.6% of the treatments, were predominantly FD deployment problems, and were all asymptomatic. The overall symptomatic complication rate was 8.2% and the neurological symptomatic complication rate was 3.3%. Only one symptomatic complication was device-related (perforator artery infarctions leading to stroke). After a mean follow-up of 7.1 months, the rate of complete aneurysm occlusion was 77.9%. One patient (1.7%) died due to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage which occurred before treatment, unrelated to the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The new PV FD is safe and feasible for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The short-term occlusion rates are promising but need further assessment in prospective long-term follow-up studies.

Methylprednisolone is related to lower incidence of postoperative bleeding after flow diverter treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Background and objectives

Regarding the anti-inflammatory effect, methylprednisolone is a candidate to prevent patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) from postoperative bleeding (PB) after flow diverter (FD) treatment. This study aimed to investigate whether methylprednisolone is related to a lower incidence of PB after FD treatment for UIAs.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed UIA patients receiving FD treatment between October 2015 and July 2021. All patients were observed until 72  h after FD treatment. The patients receiving methylprednisolone (80  mg, bid, for at least 24 h) were considered as standard methylprednisolone treatment (SMT) users, otherwise as non-SMT users. The primary endpoint indicated the occurrence of PB, including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, and ventricular bleeding, within 72 h after FD treatment. This study compared the incidence of PB between SMT users and non-SMT users and investigated the protective effect of SMT on PB after FD treatment using the Cox regression model. Finally, after controlling the potential factors related to PB, we performed subgroup analysis to further confirm the protective effect of SMT on PB.

Results

This study finally included 262 UIA patients receiving FD treatment. PB occurred in 11 patients (4.2%), and 116 patients (44.3%) received SMT postoperatively. The median time from the end of surgery to PB was 12.3 h (range: 0.5-48.0 h). SMT users had a lower incidence of PB comparing with non-SMT users (1/116, 0.9% vs. 10/146, 6.8%, respectively; p = 0.017). The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that SMT users (HR, 0.12 [95%CI, 0.02-0.94], p = 0.044) had a lower risk of PB postoperatively. After controlling the potential factors related to PB (i.e., gender, irregular shape, surgical methods [FD and FD + coil] and UIA sizes), the patients receiving SMT still had a lower cumulative incidence of PB, comparing with patients receiving non-SMT (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

SMT was correlated with the lower incidence of PB for patients receiving FD treatment and may be a potential method to prevent PB after the FD treatment.

PREDICT: Precise deployment of Silk Vista Baby in confined territory: A technical note

Flow diverters (FD) have become increasingly useful in treating complex intracranial aneurysms, particularly wide-necked and recurrent aneurysms. Their use has progressively expanded to smaller vessels beyond the circle of Willis (CoW), and Silk Vista Baby (SVB) is one such low-profile FD which stands out because of deliverability through a 0.017″ microcatheter and smoother navigability. Precise deployment of SVB, specifically, the proximal end, can be challenging in certain anatomical locations when the proximal landing zone is very short, limited by vessel bifurcation or important branches arising from the artery or its geometry. We present our series to describe our technique and rule to 'PREDICT' the final deployment of SVB in real time, and discuss the nuances, exceptions and bail-out strategies. Using this technique, we were able to precisely deploy SVB in distal intracranial vessels with a mean proximal landing zone as short as 2.6 mm in 80% instances, requiring bail-out strategies in only 20% cases. This rule can be reliably followed in treating complex intracranial aneurysms with SVB FD within a confined territory, until validated software-based real-time planning tools are developed.

Pipeline for the treatment of distal cerebral circulation aneurysms: A multicenter study focusing on periprocedural Complications

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Distal cerebral circulation aneurysms (DCCAs) remain treatment challenges for neurointervention. The off-label use of the pipeline embolization device (PED) for these aneurysms remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PED for DCCAs in a multicenter cohort of patients.

METHODS

Between March 2016 and June 2021, we retrospectively analyzed the neurointerventional data on the clinical and radiological records of all patients undergoing PED treatment of DCCAs at three medical centers.

RESULTS

A total of 53 consecutive patients with 53 DCCAs were treated with PED. The mean aneurysm size was 12.3 ± 5.7 mm. In total, 75.4% (40/53) were fusiform and 24.5% (13/53) were saccular. Of these, 17.0% (9/53) were recurrent aneurysms that were previously treated with endovascular or microsurgical approaches. The technical success rate was 100%, among which 81.1% (43/53) procedures were completed with a single PED, and the rest (10/53, 18.8%) required telescoping with two devices. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 51 patients, with a median follow-up time of 12 months. At the latest follow-up, 46/51 (90.2%) aneurysms showed complete obliteration, and 4/51 (7.8%) showed reduced filling. Periprocedural complications such as hemorrhage were observed in two patients with MCA aneurysms (3.8%, 2/53), and ischemic events occurred in six patients (11.3%, 6/53). The overall mortality and morbidity rates were 7% (4/53).

CONCLUSIONS

PED is a viable option for treating DCCAs, especially for recurrent aneurysms. Coverage of bifurcation branches and perforator may increase the risk of complications.

A multicenter retrospective controlled study of the Pipeline™ and Tubridge™ Flow Diverter devices for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of PipelineTM and TubridgeTM Flow Diverter devices (FDs) in the treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 92 patients with intracranial wide-necked aneurysms who were treated with those two flow-diverter devices (FDs) at four participating centers between July 2012 and December 2020.

RESULTS

This study included 92 patients who underwent endovascular therapy using either Pipeline™ (n = 39) or TubridgeTM (n = 53) for treating intracranial wide-necked aneurysms. The periprocedural complication developed in 2.56% (1/39) patients of Pipeline group and 3.77% (2/53) patients of the TubridgeTM group. During perioperative period, one patient in Pipeline™ group showed subarachnoid hemorrhage (2.56%, 1/39) and two ischemic complications in the Tubridge™ group (3.77%, 2/53). Follow-up assessments were conducted on 31 patients (79.49%) in the Pipeline™ group (the mean follow-up period was 9.7 ± 3.3 months). The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final angiographic follow-up was 77.42%. Patients with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0.44 ± 0.31. Follow-up assessments were conducted on 42 patients (79.25%) in the TubridgeTM group (the mean follow-up period was 9.1 ± 4.4 months). The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final angiographic follow-up was 85.71%. Patients with mRS score of 0.52 ± 0.28. Three patients showed parent artery stenosis, and one showed parent artery occlusion.

CONCLUSION

Both the PipelineTM and TubridgeTM are safe and effective for the treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms, with no significant difference in the rate of complete aneurysm occlusion and perioperative complications between the two FDs.

Efficacy of pipeline embolization device vs. traditional coils in embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

In recent years, the Pipeline embolization device (PED) has been widely used in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms, but there are some inconsistent findings on whether its efficacy and safety are superior to those of traditional coils embolization (coils alone, stent-assisted coils and balloon-assisted coils). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PED in intracranial aneurysm embolization by comparing with traditional coils.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies (case-control studies and cohort studies) comparing the efficacy of PED with traditional coils in intracranial aneurysm embolization published before April 1, 2022. The endpoints observed in this meta-analysis were procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage, procedure-related intracranial ischemia, other procedure-related complications (e.g., aneurysm rupture, neurological impairment, etc.), retreatment rate, complete occlusion (100%) of the aneurysm at the last follow-up, and favorable functional outcome (MRS ≤ 2).

Results

A total of 10 studies with a total of 1,400 patients (PED group: 576 and Traditional coils: 824) were included in this meta-analysis. A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that the PED group had a higher rate of complete aneurysm occlusion [OR = 2.62, 95% Cl (1.94, 3.55), p &lt; 0.00001] and Lower re-treatment rate [OR = 0.20, 95% Cl (0.12, 0.34 p &lt; 0.00001)] compared with the traditional coil embolization group at the last follow-up. In terms of procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage [OR = 3.04, 95% Cl (1.08, 8.57), p = 0.04] and other procedure-related complications [OR = 2.91, 95% Cl (1.48, 5.57), p = 0.002], the incidence of PED was higher than that of the traditional coil embolization group. Moreover, in terms of favorable functional outcome [OR = 0.4, 95% Cl (0.22, 0.71), p = 0.002] of patients at the last follow-up, the PED group was lower than the traditional coil embolization group. There was no statistically significant between the two groups in terms of surgery-related intracranial ischemia complications [OR = 0.88, 95% Cl (0.47, 1.64), p = 0.68].

Conclusion

PED had higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion and lower rates of aneurysm retreatment compared with traditional coils, but traditional coils was superior to the PED group in terms of procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage complication and other procedure-related complications (aneurysm rupture, neurological impairment), and favorable functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2). This result still needs to be further confirmed by additional large-sample, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022325673.

Comparative study of on-label versus off-label treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device

OBJECTIVE

The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is widely used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, including in off-label applications. In this work, the authors compared the real-world efficacy and safety of PED use in on-label and off-label aneurysm treatments.

METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of patients who underwent PED placement at a high-volume academic medical center were retrospectively obtained. Treatments were classified as on-label if they fell within the applications approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as of 2021. Recorded outcomes included aneurysm occlusion, procedural complications, ischemic events, in-stent stenosis, intracranial hemorrhage, postprocedural functional status, and death.

RESULTS

In total, 416 aneurysms in 330 patients were treated with PED, comprising 256 aneurysms that received on-label treatments and 160 that received off-label treatments. The overall rate of complete aneurysm occlusion was 76.4% for on-label aneurysms and 75.6% for off-label aneurysms (p = 0.898). The risk of ischemic stroke in patients who underwent off-label treatments was 15.2%, which was higher than the 4.2% rate in patients who underwent on-label treatment (p = 0.003). All other clinical complications, procedural complications, and long-term functional status were comparable between the on-label and off-label groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, off-label use of PED is common and can achieve similar efficacy as on-label use. However, in aggregate, off-label use was found to carry an increased rate of ischemic complications. With judicious attention to safety and individual patient characteristics, these results highlight the scale and general feasibility of off-label PED use by experts.

Predictors of flow diverter stent in large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms, single-center experience

Background

Flow diversion with or without coiling has been established as the treatment of choice for large unruptured aneurysms. This study aims to assess possible predictors for radiological and clinical outcome such as location of the aneurysm (anterior or posterior circulation), complexity by a branching artery, bifurcation, and adjuvant coiling.

Methods

This study was conducted on 65 consecutive patients with 65 large, unruptured intracranial aneurysms (size ≥ 10 mm) treated with flow diverters. Follow-up angiography was done for 60 patients (92.3%) at 12 ± 8.6 months range from 3 to 36 months.

Results

Complete occlusion was achieved in 50 from 60 aneurysms (83.4%), while 8 aneurysms (13.3%) had neck remnant, and another two aneurysms (3.3%) remained with aneurysmal remnant. Periprocedural complications were encountered in 14 patients (21.5%) with morbidity in six patients (9.2%) and mortality in one patient (1.5%). In a multivariate logistic regression, anterior versus posterior location was less likely associated with worse outcome; adjusted OR (95% CI) of 0.16 (0.07–0.01), p = 0.006. Complete occlusion in complex aneurysms with branching artery was 60% versus 88% in simple aneurysms without branching artery (p-value = 0.04).

Conclusions

Flow diverter deployment of a large, unruptured aneurysm in the anterior circulation might have a better outcome than one in the posterior circulation. Flow diverter of aneurysms with branching artery or at bifurcation might be associated with aneurysm persistence and complications respectively.

Clinical Results of Flow Diverter Treatments for Cerebral Aneurysms under Local Anesthesia

Flow diverters (FD) have become the mainstay for the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). Most FD procedures are performed under general anesthesia, and the influence of local anesthesia (LA) on outcomes remains unknown. This study evaluated the results of FD placement under LA. Data of patients treated for FD under LA between August 2016 and January 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2. Major stroke, steno-occlusive events of FD, mortality, and satisfactory aneurysm occlusion were also evaluated. In total, 169 patients undertook 182 treatments (139 [82%) female, mean age 61 ± 11 years). The median maximum aneurysm size was 9.5 mm (interquartile range 6.1-14 mm). A flow re-directed endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device were used in 103 (57%) and 78 (43%) treatments. One patient (0.59%) experienced major stroke, and steno-occlusive events were observed in four patients (2.4%). A good outcome at 90 days was obtained in 164 patients (98%), and one patient died (0.59% mortality). During the median follow-up period of 345 days (interquartile range 176–366 days), satisfactory aneurysm occlusion was observed in 126 of 160 aneurysms (79%). Our results suggest that FD placement under LA is a safe and effective treatment for UIA.

Excessive platelet inhibition following Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

High levels of platelet inhibition have been associated with hemorrhagic complications following Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms. We therefore titrate clopidogrel dosing to maintain a moderate level of platelet inhibition using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. However, many patients demonstrate dramatic increases in platelet inhibition following treatment despite being on a consistent antiplatelet regimen. We therefore elected to explore the incidence of this phenomenon and possible predisposing factors.

METHODS

All successful Pipeline aneurysm treatments performed at our institution from 2011 to 2019 with moderate procedure-day platelet inhibition levels as indicated by a VerifyNow PRU of 60-235 were included. Patients who received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and those treated for ruptured/symptomatic lesions were excluded. The incidence of excessive platelet inhibition defined by a PRU<60 within 8 weeks of treatment was noted. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determined independent predictors of the phenomenon.

RESULTS

Some 190 treatments were performed in 178 qualifying patients. A post-procedure PRU <60 occurred following 79% of treatments, documented on average after 8.5 (range 1-47) days. A higher procedure day hematocrit level (P=0.003, OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.029 to 1.152) was an independent predictor of reaching a PRU <60, while intra-procedural midazolam exposure (P=0.044, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.201 to 0.980) and a higher procedure-day PRU (P=0.047, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.982 to 1.000) were associated with a reduced odds. Time-since-procedure and hematocrit levels were associated with excessive platelet inhibition when excluding patients who initially demonstrated hyperresponse.

CONCLUSION

Elevations in platelet inhibition were frequently observed following flow diversion with Pipeline.

Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging Study of Intracranial Complex Aneurysms Treated by Internal Maxillary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Cerebral revascularization strategies through extracranial to intracranial bypass have been adopted in the management of complex intracranial aneurysms. The internal maxillary artery used as a donor in a bypass is an effective method. At present, there are few quantitative analyses of cerebral blood flow perfusion. The main focus of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of blood perfusion after bypass grafting.

METHODS

From April 2015 to December 2017, 19 patients who underwent internal maxillary artery radial artery middle cerebral artery bypass surgery with unobstructed bypass vessels were selected. Cerebral blood flow perfusion before and after bypass surgery was quantitatively evaluated by computed tomography perfusion imaging. The cerebral blood perfusion in the region of interest was measured by computed tomography perfusion.

RESULTS

The aneurysms were excised after trapping in 2 cases with mass effects and neural compression. Proximal occlusion of the parent artery was performed in 9 cases of fusiform or giant dissecting aneurysms. Trapping was performed after bypass surgery in 8 cases. Within 3 months after surgery, 17 patients had good outcomes. After the hypothesis test, there was a significant difference between the preoperative △cerebral blood volume and postoperative △cerebral blood volume in the anterior area of the semioval center cross section (P = 0.001 < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The internal maxillary artery as a bypass donor is an effective method that can provide sufficient intracranial blood perfusion, and there is usually no cerebral ischemia in the surrounding area.

Pipeline embolization of proximal middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion of aneurysms located in the M1 segment and middle cerebral artery bifurcation with Pipeline embolization device is sometimes performed, but further study is needed to support its regular use in aneurysm treatment. Here, we report measures of safety and efficacy for Pipeline embolization in the proximal middle cerebral artery in a multi-center cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of eligible patients were retrospectively obtained from participating centers and assessed for key clinical and angiographic outcomes. Additional details were extracted for patients with complications.

RESULTS

In our multi-center cohort, complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 71% (17/24) of treated aneurysms. There were no deaths or disabling strokes, but non-disabling ischemic strokes occurred in 8% (2/24) of patients. For aneurysms in the M1 segment, complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 75% (12/16) of aneurysms, aneurysm volume reduction was observed in 100% (16/16) of aneurysms, and non-disabling ischemic strokes occurred in 13% (2/16) of patients. For aneurysms at the middle cerebral artery bifurcation, complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 63% (5/8) of aneurysms, aneurysm volume reduction occurred in 88% (7/8) of aneurysms, and ischemic or hemorrhagic complications occurred in 0% (0/8) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms in the M1 segment and middle cerebral artery bifurcation demonstrated a 71% rate of complete aneurysm occlusion. There were no deaths or disabling strokes, but there was an 8% rate of non-disabling ischemic strokes.

Comprehensive review of the recent advances in devices for endovascular treatment of complex brain aneurysms

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) showed superiority for endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms and technology has since moved on rapidly. Many approaches and technology now exist for the endovascular management of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which reflects their varied nature - there is no one-size-fits-all technique. We aim to provide an overview of the various classes of device and the major developments over the past decade. Coiling is the oldest of the technology and continues to demonstrate high levels of occlusion and acceptable risks, making it the default treatment choice, particularly in the acutely ruptured aneurysm setting. Advances on coiling include the use of adjuncts such as balloons, stents and fully retrievable temporary neck-bridging devices, which have facilitated the treatment of more complex aneurysms. Flow divertors have also revolutionised complex aneurysm treatment with small added risk in acute aneurysm treatment and seek to remodel the aneurysm-vessel interface without accessing the aneurysm sac. The latest development and most promising avenue appears to be intrasaccular flow disrupting devices like WEB, Contour and Neqstent that provide excellent opportunities to treat wide neck complex aneurysm with minimal mortality and morbidity and good occlusion rates and may in future replace a significant number of stent-assisted coiling too.

Pipeline embolization of MCA aneurysms in the M2-M4 segment: Dual center study and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Flow diversion of distal MCA aneurysms in the M2-M4 segments with Pipeline embolization device is promising, but further study is needed. Here, we seek to quantify the safety and efficacy of Pipeline embolization in the M2-M4 region in a dual-center cohort and comprehensive meta-analysis.

METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of eligible patients was obtained from participating centers. A systematic review was performed with searches of Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles from inception to May 2021. 86 studies were identified in systematic review. Of these, 7 studies with 46 aneurysms met the inclusion criteria and were aggregated with 8 aneurysms from our dual-center cohort for analysis.

RESULTS

In our dual-center cohort, complete occlusion was observed in 88% (7/8) of aneurysms, and no patients experienced hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. Clinical outcomes were reported for 100% (54/54) of aneurysms included in meta-analysis and angiographic follow-up was available for 91% (49/54). The overall rate of complete aneurysm occlusion was 80% (95% CI, 69-91%), and the overall rate of clinical complication was 9% (95% CI, 2-16%).

CONCLUSION

Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms of the M2-M4 segments of the MCA was reasonably effective and safe in a small group of selected patients, but further study is needed to validate these preliminary results.

Pipeline embolization of distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion is commonly used to treat intracranial aneurysms in various regions of the cerebral vasculature, but is only approved for use in the internal carotid arteries. Treatment of distal PICA aneurysms with PED is sometimes performed but has not been well studied. Here, we report our experience with flow diversion of distal PICA aneurysms with PED.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of eligible patients was retrospectively obtained and assessed for key demographic characteristics and clinical and angiographic outcomes. Principal outcomes included rates of aneurysm occlusion, ischemic or hemorrhagic complication, technical complication, and in-stent stenosis.

RESULTS

Three female and 2 male patients underwent placement of PED in the PICA for treatment of 5 distal PICA aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was obtained for all patients. Complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 100% (5/5) of treated aneurysms at 6 month and longest angiographic follow-up. While there were no ischemic or device-related complications, delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred in 20% (1/5) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Pipeline embolization of distal PICA aneurysms can be performed in select patients. Further study is necessary in larger cohorts to better define clinical scenarios in which flow diversion in the distal PICA should be considered.

Safety and Efficacy of Coils in Conjunction With the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms

Background: Flow diverters (FD) have shown promising results in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, there is still controversy whether pipeline flex embolization device (PED flex)-assisted coils can facilitate the curing of aneurysms. Our aim was to assess the safety and effectiveness of PED flex adjunctive with coils (PED flex + coil) in the treatment of IAs. Method: Patients who underwent PED flex treatment in combination with coiling between January 2018 and June 2020 were included in this study. The clinical and radiographic characteristics before and after treatments were retrospectively evaluated. The study cohort comprised of 125 patients with 140 IAs, which was subdivided into two subgroups: one group included patients treated only through PED alone, and the other group included patients treated through PED flex adjunctive with coil. Patient baseline characteristics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment-related factors, and outcomes were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of both techniques. Results: Aneurysms in the PED flex + coil group were larger (10.0 ± 5.8 mm, P < 0.001) and wider (7.2 ± 4.6 mm, P = 0.002) compared with those in the PED flex group. There was no statistical difference in the perioperative complication rate between the two groups. The overall complete occlusion rate was 75.7% at 6.2 months, with 71.7% at 6.2 ± 1.7 months in the PED flex group and 85.4% at 6.2 ± 1.8 months in the PED flex + coil group, respectively. A higher percentage of satisfactory angiography results was found in the PED flex + coil group during follow-up (92.7 vs. 78.8%, P = 0.047). Conclusion: PED flex placement with adjunctive coil embolization represents a safe alternative option for the treatment of IAs. In these cases, coil embolization increases the occlusion rate in PED flex-treated patients without increasing the periprocedural complications.

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization and Coil Embolization for the Treatment of Large Unruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysms

The efficacy of flow diversion (FD) in the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms has been established. The pipeline embolization device (PED) is one of the most commonly used FD devices. Coil embolization is also useful for treating paraclinoid aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PED treatment and coil embolization for large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms. This was a single-center, retrospective study of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2009 and 2019 (coil embolization between 2009 and 2015, and PED between 2015 and 2019). Cases with a follow-up period of less than 1 year and recurrence after coil embolization were excluded. The treatment outcomes between coil embolization and PED were compared. We investigated 45 patients with 45 large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms treated by endovascular surgery in our institution. Twenty-four patients were treated with coil embolization and 21 with PED. In the PED group, the device cost was significantly lower (2,770.4 ± 699.5 vs. 1941.2 ± 552.8 [1000 yen], P = 0.03), procedure duration was significantly shorter (155.4 ± 66.7 vs. 95.1 ± 35.4 min, P <0.01), and the numbers of re-treatments were lower than those in the coil embolization group (41.7 vs. 14.3%, P = 0.05). Both PED and coil embolization were effective and safe for large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms, and their treatment results were similar. The PED is more beneficial because of its lower cost, shorter procedure duration, and fewer retreatments, and is therefore more useful for the treatment of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms.

Predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: PREMIER trial 1 year analysis

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters have revolutionized the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Nevertheless, some aneurysms fail to occlude with flow diversion. The Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Device (PREMIER) was a prospective, multicenter and single-arm trial of small and medium wide-necked unruptured aneurysms. In the current study, we evaluate the predictors of treatment failure in the PREMIER cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed PREMIER patients who had incomplete occlusion (Raymond-Roy >1) at 1 year angiographic follow-up and compared them with those who achieved Raymond-Roy 1, aiming to identify predictors of treatment failure.

RESULTS

25 aneurysms demonstrated incomplete occlusion at 1 year. There was a median reduction of 0.9 mm (IQR 0.41-2.43) in maximum diameter between pre-procedure and 1 year measurements, with no aneurysmal hemorrhage. Patients with incomplete occlusion were significantly older than those with complete occlusion (p=0.011). Smoking (p=0.045) and C6 segment location (p=0.005) were significantly associated with complete occlusion, while location at V4 (p=0.01) and C7 (p=0.007) and involvement of a side branch (p<0.001) were significantly associated with incomplete occlusion. In multivariable logistic regression, significant predictors of incomplete occlusion were non-smoker status (adjusted OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.11 to 18.09; p=0.03) and side branch involvement (adjusted OR 11.68, 95% CI 3.84 to 35.50; p<0.0001), while C6 location had reduced odds of incomplete occlusion (adjusted OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.84; p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study are consistent with previous retrospective series and warrant consideration for technique adaptations to achieve higher occlusion rates. Further follow-up is needed to assess progression of aneurysm occlusion and clinical behavior in these cases.

Antiplatelet Therapy and Periprocedural Risk Factor Analysis for Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aneurysm treatment using the Pipeline Embolization Device has been established but appropriate maintenance of dual antiplatelet therapy (APT) is essential. This multicenter retrospective study assessed whether APT was properly adjusted for clopidogrel resistance and identified risk factors associated with periprocedural complications.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of use of the Pipeline Embolization Device for internal carotid artery aneurysms (>10 mm) between November 2015 and April 2020 were analyzed. Dual APT (aspirin + clopidogrel) was prescribed before treatment. If preprocedural P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) values were >240, APT was adjusted. Periprocedural complications were compared between APT nonadjustment and adjustment groups and periprocedural risk factors were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 162 procedures were assessed. The mean maximum aneurysm size was 15.35 mm. APT adjustment was required in 47 cases (29.0%), primarily by switching to prasugrel. There were no significant differences in complication incidence between the 2 groups even after propensity score matching. The risk factor independently associated with ischemic complications was a neck size of 8 mm or larger (odds ratio [OR], 5.25; P = 0.018) and restricting analysis to the APT nonadjustment group showed PRU values of 190 or higher (OR, 5.84; P = 0.047) and neck sizes of 8 mm or larger (OR, 7.05; P = 0.029) as significant factors. The risk factor independently associated with hemorrhagic complications was a neck size of 7 mm or larger (OR, 11.57; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

APT adjustment for clopidogrel resistance was safe and effective. Neck width was a risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. PRU values of 190 or higher were also associated with ischemic complications.

First Experience of Three Neurovascular Centers With the p64MW-HPC, a Low-Profile Flow Diverter Designed for Proximal Cerebral Vessels With Antithrombotic Coating

Background: In the last decade, flow diversion (FD) has been established as hemodynamic treatment for cerebral aneurysms arising from proximal and distal cerebral arteries. However, two significant limitations remain—the need for 0.027” microcatheters required for delivery of most flow diverting stents (FDS), and long-term dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) in order to prevent FDS-associated thromboembolism, at the cost of increasing the risk for hemorrhage. This study reports the experience of three neurovascular centers with the p64MW-HPC, a FDS with anti-thrombotic coating that is implantable via a 0.021” microcatheter.

Materials and methods: Three neurovascular centers contributed to this retrospective analysis of patients that had been treated with the p64MW-HPC between March 2020 and March 2021. Clinical data, aneurysm characteristics, and follow-up results, including procedural and post-procedural complications, were recorded. The hemodynamic effect was assessed using the O'Kelly–Marotta Scale (OKM).

Results: Thirty-two patients (22 female, mean age 57.1 years) with 33 aneurysms (27 anterior circulation and six posterior circulation) were successfully treated with the p64MW-HPC. In 30/32 patients (93.75%), aneurysmal perfusion was significantly reduced immediately post implantation. Follow-up imaging was available for 23 aneurysms. Delayed aneurysm perfusion (OKM A3: 8.7%), reduction in aneurysm size (OKM B1-3: 26.1%), or sufficient separation from the parent vessel (OKM C1-3 and D1: 65.2%) was demonstrated at the last available follow-up after a mean of 5.9 months. In two cases, device thrombosis after early discontinuation of DAPT occurred. One delayed rupture caused a caroticocavernous fistula. The complications were treated sufficiently and all patients recovered without permanent significant morbidity.

Conclusion: Treatment with the p64MW-HPC is safe and feasible and achieves good early aneurysm occlusion rates in the proximal intracranial circulation, which are comparable to those of well-established FDS. Sudden interruption of DAPT in the early post-interventional phase can cause in-stent thrombosis despite the HPC surface modification. Deliverability via the 0.021” microcatheter facilitates treatment in challenging vascular anatomies.

Long-term results and comparison of flow re-direction endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device in endovascular treatment of intracranial carotid aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of two flow diverters, i.e., pipeline embolization device and flow re-direction endoluminal device, in the treatment of distal carotid aneurysms.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients with 175 aneurysms were included from February 2012 to September 2019. Ninety-nine aneurysms were treated with flow re-direction endoluminal device and 76 with pipeline embolization device. Angiographic follow-ups were at the 6th, 12th, 24th, 36th, and 60th months; the O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale was used to assess aneurysms occlusion. Outcomes of two devices were compared; possible associations regarding patient characteristics, aneurysm properties, treatment details, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 33 months, with 10 patients lost to follow-up. Occlusion rates at the 6th and 12th months and during the last follow-up were similar for flow re-direction endoluminal device (81%, 84%, and 90%) and pipeline embolization device (82%, 85%, and 93%). Occlusion rates were also similar after stand-alone use without coiling. There was no significant difference regarding adverse event rates with a 10.9% overall complication rate, 3.6% mortality, and 0.7% permanent morbidity. All the mortality and morbidity were related to hemorrhagic complications. Device deployment failure was observed with five flow re-direction endoluminal devices and two pipeline embolization devices, whereas two severe in-stent stenoses occurred with each device.

CONCLUSIONS

Both flow re-direction endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device are feasible and effective in flow diversion of distal internal carotid artery aneurysms, with similar adverse events rates and aneurysm occlusion success. Aneurysm occlusion rates increase with time, while the presence of an integrated branch significantly decreases treatment success.