Contralateral Hippocampal Stimulation for Failed Unilateral Anterior Temporal Lobectomy in Patients with Bilateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Comparative Efficacy of Surgical Strategies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the therapeutic effects of open and minimally invasive surgeries in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

This study systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials, subsequent open-label expansion studies, prospective studies and retrospective studies on surgical procedures for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. The main outcome was seizure-free status. A one-arm meta-analysis integrating data from all studies was performed to evaluate the treatment outcomes at multiple time points.

RESULTS

A total of 62 studies were included, representing 5958 individuals who received five treatment regimens. The analysis results indicate that anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) and selective amygdalohippocampectomy is still the best choice for treating drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in adult epilepsy patients. During the overall follow-up period, the seizure free rates for ATL, selective amygdalohippocampectomy, laser interstitial thermal therapy, radiofrequency thermocoagulation, and gamma knife surgery were 62%, 70%, 58%, 47%, and 57%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the five surgical methods included in this study, ATL and selective amygdala hippocampal resection seem to have more advantages in postoperative epilepsy control compared to laser interstitial hyperthermia, radiofrequency thermocoagulation, and gamma knife surgery. Each surgical treatment method has its unique focus, and when choosing a specific method, it is necessary to consider the patient's specific situation, the type and location of epileptic seizures, and possible side effects. Treating physician will develop personalized treatment plans based on these factors to maximize treatment effectiveness and reduce risks.

The ATLAS/NOA-29 study protocol: a phase III randomized controlled trial of anterior temporal lobectomy versus gross-total resection in newly-diagnosed temporal lobe glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

The discovery of cellular tumor networks in glioblastoma, with routes of malignant communication extending far beyond the detectable tumor margins, has highlighted the potential of supramarginal resection strategies. Retrospective data suggest that these approaches may improve long-term disease control. However, their application is limited by the proximity of critical brain regions and vasculature, posing challenges for validation in randomized trials. Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is a standardized surgical procedure commonly performed in patients with pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Translating the ATL approach from epilepsy surgery to the neuro-oncological field may provide a model for investigating supramarginal resection in glioblastomas located in the anterior temporal lobe.

METHODS

The ATLAS/NOA-29 trial is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, phase III randomized controlled trial designed to compare ATL with standard gross-total resection (GTR) in patients with newly-diagnosed anterior temporal lobe glioblastoma. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS), with superiority defined by significant improvements in OS and non-inferiority in the co-primary endpoint, quality of life (QoL; "global health" domain of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), seizure outcomes, neurocognitive performance, and the longitudinal assessment of six selected domains from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BN20 questionnaires. Randomization will be performed intraoperatively upon receipt of the fresh frozen section result. A total of 178 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio over a 3-year recruitment period and followed-up for a minimum of 3 years. The trial will be supervised by a Data Safety Monitoring Board, with an interim safety analysis planned after the recruitment of the 57th patient to assess potential differences in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores between the treatment arms 6 months after resection. Assuming a median improvement in OS from 17 to 27.5 months, the trial is powered at > 80% to detect OS differences with a two-sided log-rank test at a 5% significance level.

DISCUSSION

The ATLAS/NOA-29 trial aims to determine whether ATL provides superior outcomes at equal patients' Qol compared to GTR in anterior temporal lobe glioblastoma, potentially establishing ATL as the surgical approach of choice for isolated temporal glioblastoma and redefining the standard of care for this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00035314), registered on October 18, 2024.

Efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation in drug resistance epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In the context of drug-resistant epilepsy, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has received FDA approval. However, there have been reports of potential adverse effects, such as depression and memory impairment associated with DBS.This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of DBS on the quality of life (QoL), and seizure frequency of patients who had DRE, and assess its potential adverse events. The study followed PRISMA guidelines and thoroughly assessed databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, up to 31 July. Statistical analysis, fixed effect model analysis, performed by the Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (CMA) version 3.0. Additionally, Cochran's Q test was conducted to determine the statistical heterogeneity. The systematic review encompassed 54 studies, with 38 studies included in the subsequent meta-analysis. The total number of patients included in the studies was 999. The findings indicated a significant decrease in the mean seizure frequency of subjects following DBS (SMD: 0.609, 95% CI: 0.519 to 0.700, p-value < 0.001). Moreover, patients' QoL significantly improved after DBS (SMD: -0.442, 95% CI: -0.576 to -0.308, p-value < 0.001). The hippocampus displayed the most notable effect size among the different DBS targets. Subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration revealed increased DBS efficacy after two years. There are few reports of adverse events, such as insertional-related complications, infection, and neuropsychiatric complications, but the majority of these were temporary and non-fatal. DBS emerged as an effective and safe procedure for reducing seizure frequency and enhancing the quality of life in DRE patients, with minimal adverse events. Furthermore, the efficacy of DBS was observed to improve over time.

Conduction treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy in rats: the dose-effect relationship between current resistance and therapeutic effect

Objective

To investigate the effect of current resistance on therapeutic outcomes, and the mechanism of current conduction treatment in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Methods

Rats were randomly divided into four groups: normal control, epileptic group, low-resistance conduction (LRC) and high-resistance conduction (HRC) group. The content of glutamate (Glu) and gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) in the hippocampus was determined using a neurotransmitter analyzer. mRNA and protein expression of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) /IL-1 receptor 1(IL-1R1) and high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB-1)/toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) in hippocampal neurons were tested. Video electroencephalogram monitoring was used to record seizures and EEG discharges. Cognitive function in the rats was tested using the Morris water maze.

Results

Glu/GABA ratio in the epileptic control and HRC groups was significant differences from LRC group. The levels of HMGB1/TLR4 and IL-1β/IL-1R1 in the LRC group and normal control group were significantly lower than those in epileptic control group (p < 0.01) and the HRC group. The mRNA levels of HMGB1/TLR4 and IL-1β/IL-1R1 in the LRC group and normal control group were significantly lower than those in epileptic control group. The frequency of total and propagated seizures was lower in the LRC group than in the epileptic control and HRC groups (p < 0.01). The numbers of platform crossings in the LRC group and normal control group were significantly higher than those in the epileptic control and HRC groups in the space exploration experiment.

Conclusion

Current resistance affected seizure control and cognitive protection in rats with TLE treated by current conduction. The lower current resistance, the better seizure control and cognitive protection in rats with TLE treated by current conduction. Glu/GABA, IL-1β/IL-1R1, and HMGB1/TLR-4 may participate in the anti-seizure mechanism of current conduction treatment.

Palliative Epilepsy Surgery Procedures in Children

Surgical treatment of epilepsy typically focuses on identification of a seizure focus with subsequent resection and/or disconnection to "cure" the patient's epilepsy and achieve seizure freedom. Palliative epilepsy surgery modalities are efficacious in improving seizure frequency, severity, and quality of life. In this paper, we review palliative epilepsy surgical options for children: vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, deep brain stimulation, hemispherotomy, corpus callosotomy, lobectomy and/or lesionectomy and multiple subpial transection. Reoperation after surgical resection should also be considered. If curative resection is not a viable option for seizure freedom, these methods should be considered with equal emphasis and urgency in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy.

A systematic review of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in childhood

OBJECTIVE Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) presents a therapeutic challenge in children, necessitating the consideration of multiple treatment options. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been studied in adults with DRE, little evidence is available to guide clinicians regarding the application of this potentially valuable tool in children. Here, the authors present the first systematic review aimed at understanding the safety and efficacy of DBS for DRE in pediatric populations, emphasizing patient selection, device placement and programming, and seizure outcomes. METHODS The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and recommendations. Relevant articles were identified from 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL) from their inception to November 17, 2017. Inclusion criteria of individual studies were 1) diagnosis of DRE; 2) treatment with DBS; 3) inclusion of at least 1 pediatric patient (age ≤ 18 years); and 4) patient-specific data. Exclusion criteria for the systematic review included 1) missing data for age, DBS target, or seizure freedom; 2) nonhuman subjects; and 3) editorials, abstracts, review articles, and dissertations. RESULTS This review identified 21 studies and 40 unique pediatric patients (ages 4–18 years) who received DBS treatment for epilepsy. There were 18 patients with electrodes placed in the bilateral or unilateral centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CM) electrodes, 8 patients with bilateral anterior thalamic nucleus (ATN) electrodes, 5 patients with bilateral and unilateral hippocampal electrodes, 3 patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and 1 patient with unilateral STN electrodes, 2 patients with bilateral posteromedial hypothalamus electrodes, 2 patients with unilateral mammillothalamic tract electrodes, and 1 patient with caudal zona incerta electrode placement. Overall, 5 of the 40 (12.5%) patients had an International League Against Epilepsy class I (i.e., seizure-free) outcome, and 34 of the 40 (85%) patients had seizure reduction with DBS stimulation. CONCLUSIONS DBS is an alternative or adjuvant treatment for children with DRE. Prospective registries and future clinical trials are needed to identify the optimal DBS target, although favorable outcomes are reported with both CM and ATN in children. ABBREVIATIONS ATN = anterior thalamic nucleus; CM = centromedian nucleus of the thalamus; DBS = deep brain stimulation; DRE = drug-resistant epilepsy; RNS = responsive neurostimulation; STN = subthalamic nucleus; VNS = vagus nerve stimulation.

Invasive Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Epilepsy

Neuromodulatory strategies are increasingly adopted for the treatment of intractable epilepsy in children. These encompass a wide range of treatments aimed at externally stimulating neural circuitry in order to decrease seizure frequency. In the current review, the authors discuss the evidence for invasive neuromodulation, namely vagus nerve and deep brain stimulation in affected children. Putative mechanisms of action and biomarkers of treatment success are explored and evidence of the efficacy of invasive neuromodulation is highlighted.

The surgical outcome of patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to explore the surgical outcome of unilateral anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (BTLE).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who were diagnosed with BTLE by scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) and underwent ATL from 2001 to 2015. In addition, 80 patients were randomly selected as a control group.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients were included in this study and were divided into four groups by intracranial recordings as follows: 78 patients with unilateral seizure onset (Group 1), 13 patients with lateralizable dominant seizure onset (Group 2), 14 patients with lateralizable neuroimaging abnormalities (Group 3), and 12 patients without lateralizable dominant seizure onset or neuroimaging abnormalities (Group 4). The 12 patients in Group 4 declined surgical resection, whereas the remaining 105 patients received ATL, and 93 of them were followed up for more than 1 year after surgery. At the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-ups the percentage of patients who were seizure free was 52.9%, 56.5%, and 58.9%, respectively. For the mean postoperative efficacy, there was a statistical difference in patients who were seizure free either between Group 1 + Group 2 + Group 3 and the control group (44.1% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.002), or between Group 1 and the control group (48.5% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.019), or between Group 2 + Group 3 and the control group (32.0% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.002). However, the difference was significant only at the first year follow-up, and there was no significant difference afterward.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the surgical outcome of patients with BTLE is not as good as that of patients with unilateral TLE in short-term follow-up, quite a portion of these patients could benefit from unilateral temporal lobe resection in the long term.

Deep brain stimulation for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with an emphasis on alleviation of seizure frequency outcome

OBJECTIVE

Conflicting conclusions have been reported regarding predictors of deep brain stimulation (DBS) outcome in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The main goal of this meta-analysis study was to identify possible predictors of remarkable seizure reduction (RSR).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of English-language literature published since 1990 and indexed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library that addressed seizure outcomes in patients who underwent DBS for refractory TLE. A pooled RSR rate was determined for eight included studies. RSR rates were analyzed relative to potential prognostic variables. Random- or fixed-effects models were used depending on the presence or absence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The pooled RSR rate among 61 DBS-treated patients with TLE from 8 studies was 59%. Higher likelihood of RSR was found to be associated with lateralization of stimulation, lateralized ictal EEG findings, and a longer follow-up period. Seizure semiology, MRI abnormalities, and patient sex were not predictive of RSR rate. The best electrode type for RSR was the Medtronic 3389. Hippocampal and anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) sites of stimulation had similar odds of producing RSR.

CONCLUSIONS

DBS is an effective therapeutic modality for intractable TLE, particularly in patients with lateralized EEG abnormalities and in patients treated on the ictal side. This meta-analysis provides evidence-based information for determining DBS suitability in presurgical counseling and for explaining seizure outcomes.

Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Despite optimal medical treatment, including epilepsy surgery, many epilepsy patients have uncontrolled seizures. Since the 1970s interest has grown in invasive intracranial neurostimulation as a treatment for these patients. Intracranial stimulation includes both deep brain stimulation (DBS) (stimulation through depth electrodes) and cortical stimulation (subdural electrodes). This is an updated version of a previous Cochrane review published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DBS and cortical stimulation for refractory epilepsy based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register on 29 September 2015, but it was not necessary to update this search, because records in the Specialized Register are included in CENTRAL. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 11, 5 November 2016), PubMed (5 November 2016), ClinicalTrials.gov (5 November 2016), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP (5 November 2016) and reference lists of retrieved articles. We also contacted device manufacturers and other researchers in the field. No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing deep brain or cortical stimulation versus sham stimulation, resective surgery, further treatment with antiepileptic drugs or other neurostimulation treatments (including vagus nerve stimulation).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four review authors independently selected trials for inclusion. Two review authors independently extracted the relevant data and assessed trial quality and overall quality of evidence. The outcomes investigated were seizure freedom, responder rate, percentage seizure frequency reduction, adverse events, neuropsychological outcome and quality of life. If additional data were needed, the study investigators were contacted. Results were analysed and reported separately for different intracranial targets for reasons of clinical heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve RCTs were identified, eleven of these compared one to three months of intracranial neurostimulation with sham stimulation. One trial was on anterior thalamic DBS (n = 109; 109 treatment periods); two trials on centromedian thalamic DBS (n = 20; 40 treatment periods), but only one of the trials (n = 7; 14 treatment periods) reported sufficient information for inclusion in the quantitative meta-analysis; three trials on cerebellar stimulation (n = 22; 39 treatment periods); three trials on hippocampal DBS (n = 15; 21 treatment periods); one trial on nucleus accumbens DBS (n = 4; 8 treatment periods); and one trial on responsive ictal onset zone stimulation (n = 191; 191 treatment periods). In addition, one small RCT (n = 6) compared six months of hippocampal DBS versus sham stimulation. Evidence of selective reporting was present in four trials and the possibility of a carryover effect complicating interpretation of the results could not be excluded in five cross-over trials without any or a sufficient washout period. Moderate-quality evidence could not demonstrate statistically or clinically significant changes in the proportion of patients who were seizure-free or experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (primary outcome measures) after one to three months of anterior thalamic DBS in (multi)focal epilepsy, responsive ictal onset zone stimulation in (multi)focal epilepsy patients and hippocampal DBS in (medial) temporal lobe epilepsy. However, a statistically significant reduction in seizure frequency was found for anterior thalamic DBS (mean difference (MD), -17.4% compared to sham stimulation; 95% confidence interval (CI) -31.2 to -1.0; high-quality evidence), responsive ictal onset zone stimulation (MD -24.9%; 95% CI -40.1 to -6.0; high-quality evidence) and hippocampal DBS (MD -28.1%; 95% CI -34.1 to -22.2; moderate-quality evidence). Both anterior thalamic DBS and responsive ictal onset zone stimulation do not have a clinically meaningful impact on quality life after three months of stimulation (high-quality evidence). Electrode implantation resulted in postoperative asymptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in 1.6% to 3.7% of the patients included in the two largest trials and 2.0% to 4.5% had postoperative soft tissue infections (9.4% to 12.7% after five years); no patient reported permanent symptomatic sequelae. Anterior thalamic DBS was associated with fewer epilepsy-associated injuries (7.4 versus 25.5%; P = 0.01) but higher rates of self-reported depression (14.8 versus 1.8%; P = 0.02) and subjective memory impairment (13.8 versus 1.8%; P = 0.03); there were no significant differences in formal neuropsychological testing results between the groups. Responsive ictal-onset zone stimulation seemed to be well-tolerated with few side effects.The limited number of patients preclude firm statements on safety and tolerability of hippocampal DBS. With regards to centromedian thalamic DBS, nucleus accumbens DBS and cerebellar stimulation, no statistically significant effects could be demonstrated but evidence is of only low to very low quality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Except for one very small RCT, only short-term RCTs on intracranial neurostimulation for epilepsy are available. Compared to sham stimulation, one to three months of anterior thalamic DBS ((multi)focal epilepsy), responsive ictal onset zone stimulation ((multi)focal epilepsy) and hippocampal DBS (temporal lobe epilepsy) moderately reduce seizure frequency in refractory epilepsy patients. Anterior thalamic DBS is associated with higher rates of self-reported depression and subjective memory impairment. There is insufficient evidence to make firm conclusive statements on the efficacy and safety of hippocampal DBS, centromedian thalamic DBS, nucleus accumbens DBS and cerebellar stimulation. There is a need for more, large and well-designed RCTs to validate and optimize the efficacy and safety of invasive intracranial neurostimulation treatments.