A Comparison of International Management Guidelines for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment

INTRODUCTION

This second part of the S2k guidelines is an update of the 2015 S1 European guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

These guidelines aim to provide an accepted decision aid for the selection, implementation and assessment of appropriate and sufficient therapy for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS).

METHODS

The chapters have been selected after a Delphi procedure among the experts/authors. Certain passages have been adopted without changes from the previous version. Potential treatment complications are not included, being beyond the scope of these guidelines.

RESULTS

Since the S1 guidelines publication, validation of new therapeutic approaches has almost completely overhauled the knowledge in the field of HS treatment. Inflammatory nodules/abscesses/draining tunnels are the primary lesions, which enable the classification of the disease severity by new validated tools. In relation to the degree of detectable inflammation, HS is classified into the inflammatory and the predominantly non-inflammatory forms. While the intensity of the inflammatory form can be subdivided by the IHS4 classification in mild, moderate and severe HS and is treated by medication accordingly, the decision on surgical treatment of the predominantly non-inflammatory form is based on the Hurley stage of the affected localization. The effectiveness of oral tetracyclines as an alternative to the oral combination of clindamycin/rifampicin should be noted. The duration of systemic antibiotic therapy can be shortened by a 5-day intravenous clindamycin treatment. Adalimumab, secukinumab and bimekizumab subcutaneous administration has been approved by the EMA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. Various surgical procedures are available for the predominantly non-inflammatory form of the disease. The combination of a medical therapy to reduce inflammation with a surgical procedure to remove irreversible tissue damage is currently considered a holistic therapeutic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Suitable therapeutic options while considering HS severity in the therapeutic algorithm according to standardized criteria are aimed at ensuring a proper therapy.

A young woman's experience of surgery for severe hidradenitis suppurativa

A young woman with severe hidradenitis suppurativa describes her struggles with the disease and the impact surgery has had on her life.

Surgical Deroofing in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Alone or as an Adjunct to Medical Therapies

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory condition that remains challenging to manage. Deroofing is a surgical technique whereby the "dermal roof" of the entire lesion and sinus tracts are removed.

OBJECTIVE

A prospective study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of deroofing in the management of both acute and chronic HS lesions in Hurley Stage I-III disease. The role of deroofing as an adjunct to adalimumab and the impact of deroofing on pain control and quality of life (QoL) were also quantified.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in an open, single arm study treated by a single clinician. In total, 115 lesions were deroofed and patients were followed at 3 and 12 months after deroofing.

RESULTS

At 3 and 12 months, the recurrence rate was 10% (12/115) and 11% (13/108), respectively. Deroofing is an effective adjunctive treatment for patients on adalimumab. Deroofing also improved pain and QoL scores.

CONCLUSION

Deroofing is a safe and effective surgical technique that can be used for acute and chronic recurrent/fixed lesions in Hurley I-III disease alone or as an adjunct to systemic therapies. Deroofing has a low recurrence rate, reduces pain, and improves QoL.

Hidradenitis suppurativa, from basic science to surgery and a new era of tailored targeted therapy: An expert opinion paper

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by an aberrant activation of innate immunity and increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin 17 (IL-17). IL-17 has been shown to play a key role in the pathogenesis of HS and evidence highlights the potential of IL-17-targeted therapies. The fully human IgG/κ monoclonal antibody secukinumab, which specifically targets IL-17A and inhibits interaction with its receptor, has recently been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. Secukinumab offers patients an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option in terms of sustained response by rapidly improving signs and symptoms, and preventing disease progression in the absence of loss of response. Being a challenging disease, HS is associated with a delay to diagnosis of 3-10 years and, consequently, late implementation of appropriate treatment, leading to disease progression. Misdiagnosis due to flawed understanding and lack of awareness among medical providers and patients is considered an important factor contributing to the delayed diagnosis. Thus, serious efforts must be made on a large scale to urgently reduce the delay in HS diagnosis and reduce the disease burden in patients, including raising awareness, implementation of education programmes at medical and specialisation schools, as well as continuous education of healthcare providers at different levels for the early detection of HS and initiation of appropriate treatment. Here, we present the main critical unmet needs in the diagnosis and treatment of patients affected by HS, address how disease awareness and comprehensive multidisciplinary management (offering both medical and surgical care) can benefit patients, and suggest therapeutic options, based on clinical characterisation and early identification and intervention (window of opportunity), to be adopted for a timely and better management of disease progression and to fill current gaps.

Increased risk of incident alopecia areata among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A multicenter cohort study in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and alopecia areata (AA) share similar inflammatory pathway and pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, the association between HS and AA was unclear. We aimed to evaluate the risk of incident AA among patients with HS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter cohort study by using the US Collaborative Network in the TriNetX Research Network. Patients with HS diagnosis were recruited and 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to identify the non-HS control group. Hazard ratio (HR) of AA in different sensitivity models were calculated within the follow-up periods.

RESULTS

Comparing with non-HS controls, the risk of incident AA in HS patients was 1.79-fold higher (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-2.44) within 15-year follow up. Similar trends were observed in 3-year and 8-year follow up. For female HS patients, the risk of incident AA was 1.75-fold higher than non-HS female (95% CI 1.23-2.48). However, the trend was not observed in male HS patients (HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.79-2.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HS were associated with increased risk of incident AA. Clinicians should be aware of the observed association and the actual immunological interplay between the two diseases should be clarified in future lab-based studies.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treatment During Pregnancy and Lactation: Navigating Challenges

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), or acne inversa, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition primarily affecting skin folds such as the axilla, groins, and the inframammary, perineal, and perianal regions. It is characterized by painful abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring. Predominantly affecting young adults, particularly females, HS often emerges during reproductive age, and flares are widely reported during pregnancy and postpartum, underscoring the need to consider management strategies tailored to pregnant or lactating individuals. Moreover, the chronic and relapsing nature of HS, along with challenges related to the safety and compliance of medication use during pregnancy and lactation, as well as various comorbidities and psychological distress, significantly complicate its management in pregnant or lactating women. Treatment options, including topical clindamycin, oral clindamycin-rifampicin, adalimumab, metformin, antiseptic washes, and certolizumab pegol, have accumulated evidence supporting their relative safety in pregnant and lactating women. While certolizumab pegol has shown promising safety data among biologics, it requires more efficacy data in HS. Conversely, while newly approved HS medications such as secukinumab and bimekizumab show promise for the general population, further research is necessary to evaluate their safety profiles in pregnant and breastfeeding individuals. The scant research available on HS in pregnant and lactating women, also shown by our systematic literature review, highlights the need for a comprehensive investigation into the safety, efficacy, and suitability of management strategies.

Minimally invasive management of hidradenitis suppurativa using a 1470 nm diode laser: a step-by-step description of our technique

BACKGROUND

The management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure sustainable treatment results, especially in the advanced stages. Traditionally, deroofing and wide excision represented commonly employed surgical techniques. Due to the recurrent nature of HS, tissue preservation should be a relevant aspect of surgical management. The aim of this manuscript is to demonstrate the use of a diode laser for the management of different stages of HS, paying attention to tissue preservation.

METHODS

This is a technical manuscript demonstrating our technique for laser-assisted management of HS. A diode laser with a wavelength of 1470 nm was used for this indication. The depth of the sinus/tract dictates the amount of energy required. Our preference is to use 8 Watts for deep lesions and 5 Watts for shallow lesions.

RESULTS

The following 7 critical steps are important to achieve an optimal result with this technique: Drain all collections, minimize tissue damage, protect healthy skin, control risk factors, adopt a multidisciplinary approach, follow up closely, and be patient.

CONCLUSION

Laser-based management of hidradenitis suppurativa is a promising surgical option in the multidisciplinary treatment of this difficult pathology. The minimally invasive nature of laser surgery, especially tissue preservation, is a strong argument for the role of this technique in the management of this chronic, recurrent condition.

Expert consensus on unmet needs, referral criteria and treatment goals for hidradenitis suppurativa in Saudi Arabia

Purpose: There is limited information about the diagnosis and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This Delphi consensus study was conducted to develop recommendations for the management of HS in the KSA.Methods: The expert panel including 12 dermatologists with extensive experience treating HS patients provided nine consensus statements and recommendations on diagnosis and assessment, management, comorbidities and multidisciplinary approach, and education. The experts also developed clinical questions pertaining to the management of HS and rolled out as a survey to 119 dermatologists practising in the KSA.Results: The topics covered included: referring physicians' awareness of HS; referral criteria for HS; definition of moderate-to-severe HS; treatment goals; definition of treatment success; treatment and biologic initiation; comorbidities and multidisciplinary approach; patient education and awareness of HS. Full consensus (100%) from the expert dermatologists was received on all the topics except referring physicians' awareness of HS, definition of treatment success, and treatment and biologic initiation. The survey results resonated with the expert opinion.Conclusion: As HS is a chronic disease with negative impact on quality-of-life, timely diagnosis and treatment, early identification of comorbid conditions and a multidisciplinary care approach are crucial for effective management of HS.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) consensus recommendations for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular disease characterized by painful, recurrent, inflamed lesions most commonly occurring in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. HS can inflict immense physical and psychological impact on patients who suffer from this distressing disease. Management of HS generally requires combining various medical and procedural treatment modalities; however, the disease is often recalcitrant to conventional treatments. In light of recent evidence supporting the effectiveness of biologic agents in the treatment of HS, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association established an expert panel of nine dermatologists to develop consensus statements aimed to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidance in optimizing HS patient management in Taiwan. The recommendations described in the statements were summarized in a management algorithm in terms of general care, topical treatment, systemic treatment, and procedural treatment.

Equity and Outcome Events in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Exploring Effect Modifiers Associated with Diagnostic Delay in the Real World

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) experience significantly delayed diagnoses of 7-10 years from symptom onset on average, but the reasons for this remain largely unknown. This study investigated drivers of diagnostic delay from the perspective of healthcare system equity.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify published factors associated with delayed HS diagnosis to inform data analysis. Clinical and demographic data from the Adelphi HS Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a real-world cross-sectional survey of dermatologists and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA in 2020/2021, were used to model factors influencing delay to diagnosis from onset of symptoms and first consultation.

RESULTS

Factors influencing delay to HS diagnosis in the literature with the most available evidence were misdiagnosis, delay in specialist referral and patient embarrassment. Data analysis revealed that increasing age was associated with reduced diagnostic delay after symptom onset. Patients with HS who were White or in Germany were also more likely to receive a faster diagnosis. Smokers, patients with concomitant conditions, or a family history of HS were slower to be diagnosed. When time to diagnosis following first consultation was assessed, increasing age was associated with quicker diagnosis. Moreover, patients with a family history of HS were diagnosed quicker, whereas those with high body mass index, more concomitant conditions, in employment, managed by multiple physicians or European were more delayed.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of a thorough analysis of real-world data, multiple factors that potentially influenced the timely diagnosis of HS have been identified. For the first time, this study quantifies the relative impact of these modifiers, providing valuable insights into areas that require attention for faster diagnoses and improved disease outcomes.

Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Real-World Survey from the EU5 and USA

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin disorder. Treatment strategies in patients with HS are challenging; real-world evidence in a HS population is warranted for greater disease understanding. The objective of this analysis was to describe real-world treatment patterns and treatment satisfaction in patients with HS.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional market research survey with retrospective data collection in patients with HS from the USA and five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) between November 2020 and April 2021, using physician- and patient-reported surveys. Eligible physicians were general dermatologists actively managing patients with HS; dermatologists were required to have consulted with ≥2 patients with HS in the previous 12 months. Adult (≥18 years) and adolescent (10-17 years) HS patients visiting a participating dermatologist were included. Outcomes included treatment patterns, flare status, treatments prescribed in response to flares, previous surgeries, barriers to biologics, and patient- and physician-reported satisfaction with the disease control provided by treatment.

RESULTS

Survey data from 1,787 patients were collected from 312 dermatologists. The most frequently prescribed treatments were topicals, oral antibiotics, and antiseptic washes/creams at diagnosis and sampling. At sampling, biologics were more frequently prescribed in patients with more severe disease (prescribed in 26.6%, 31.0%, and 52.4% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively); oral antibiotics (48.8%), topicals (37.4%), and biologics (34.3%) were the most frequently prescribed treatment classes in response to a flare. Of patients currently not receiving a biologic, dermatologists reported that 18.9% of patients' condition warranted their use. Approximately one quarter of dermatologists (24.5%) and patients (27.4%) were not satisfied with current treatment; of patients who were dissatisfied, 12.8% reported they would never raise their dissatisfaction with their doctor.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data suggest a high disease burden and potential undertreatment in patients with HS. Patients received multiple treatments, and a notable proportion underwent surgery. Robustly integrating the patient voice in HS treatment decisions may lead to better outcomes and improved treatment satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin disorder. Treatment strategies in patients with HS are challenging; real-world evidence in a HS population is warranted for greater disease understanding. The objective of this analysis was to describe real-world treatment patterns and treatment satisfaction in patients with HS.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional market research survey with retrospective data collection in patients with HS from the USA and five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) between November 2020 and April 2021, using physician- and patient-reported surveys. Eligible physicians were general dermatologists actively managing patients with HS; dermatologists were required to have consulted with ≥2 patients with HS in the previous 12 months. Adult (≥18 years) and adolescent (10-17 years) HS patients visiting a participating dermatologist were included. Outcomes included treatment patterns, flare status, treatments prescribed in response to flares, previous surgeries, barriers to biologics, and patient- and physician-reported satisfaction with the disease control provided by treatment.

RESULTS

Survey data from 1,787 patients were collected from 312 dermatologists. The most frequently prescribed treatments were topicals, oral antibiotics, and antiseptic washes/creams at diagnosis and sampling. At sampling, biologics were more frequently prescribed in patients with more severe disease (prescribed in 26.6%, 31.0%, and 52.4% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively); oral antibiotics (48.8%), topicals (37.4%), and biologics (34.3%) were the most frequently prescribed treatment classes in response to a flare. Of patients currently not receiving a biologic, dermatologists reported that 18.9% of patients' condition warranted their use. Approximately one quarter of dermatologists (24.5%) and patients (27.4%) were not satisfied with current treatment; of patients who were dissatisfied, 12.8% reported they would never raise their dissatisfaction with their doctor.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data suggest a high disease burden and potential undertreatment in patients with HS. Patients received multiple treatments, and a notable proportion underwent surgery. Robustly integrating the patient voice in HS treatment decisions may lead to better outcomes and improved treatment satisfaction.

Demographic Data, Risk Factors, and Disease Burden of HS Patients in Lithuania at a Reference Center

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) diagnosis often faces a global delay of 7.2 years due to factors like lack of recognition, stigma, and socioeconomic barriers. Limited effective therapies and frequent exacerbations impact patients' quality of life, posing a significant burden on healthcare systems.

METHODS

HS patients were assessed according to European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) Registry questionnaire guidelines at various stages of the disease and treatment.

RESULTS

The study included 49 patients; 57.14% (n = 28) of them were male. The average age of the subjects was 39.91 ± 13.665 years; the average BMI was 27.84 ± 7.362. A total of 59.18% (n = 29) were active or previous smokers. There were statistically more male smokers than female (p < 0.01). Average disease onset was 25.71 ± 13.743 years; the mean time to diagnosis was 5.2 ± 7.607 years. A total of 70.2% (n = 33) were previously misdiagnosed. Subjects had 6.17 ± 6.98 painful days over the preceding 4 weeks. The average intensity of pain according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) was 5.60 ± 3.36 points. The mean dermatology life quality index (DLQI) at baseline was 8.9 ± 7.436.

CONCLUSIONS

The research revealed delayed diagnoses, especially for females. Smoking was linked to higher Hurley stages, with a prevalence among male smokers, and HS had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life.

To what Extent does Vitamin D and its Serum Levels Influence the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Literature Review

Vitamin D plays a role in inflammatory skin conditions and can improve them. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an autoinflammatory chronic skin disease in which most patients exhibit a hypovitaminosis D. However, it is uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation could relieve the severity of HS. A systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted on 4 September 2023. Studies that investigated vitamin D and its potential implications for the severity of HS were included. In contrast, studies that focused on the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency were excluded, as well as studies on syndromic HS. Seven studies with a total of 575 patients were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 3 utilized a cross-sectional design, 2 were pilot studies, 1 a controlled cohort study, and 1 a prospective case-control study. In all included studies, HS patients were vitamin D deficient. There was evidence indicating that serum vitamin D levels negatively correlated with the severity of the disease, and at least suggestive evidence that vitamin D supplementation could have a positive impact on the course of HS. To better understand these correlations, conducting a randomized controlled trial study on vitamin D and its effects on HS severity is imperative.

Evidence on Hidradenitis Suppurativa as an Autoinflammatory Skin Disease

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and debilitating inflammatory skin disease that often exhibits heterogeneity in its clinical presentation, especially in the context of its rare syndromic forms. The pathogenesis of HS results from a complex interplay of genetic predisposition, innate and adaptive immunity dysregulation, smoking, obesity and environmental factors. In the early phase of the disease, the innate immune system is hyperactivated, contributing to tissue damage and triggering the activation and amplification of the adaptive immune response, which plays a pivotal role in the chronic stages of the disease. Recent studies focused on elucidating the importance of innate immunity impairment and autoinflammation in HS and increasing evidence has emerged on the occurrence of the disease in the context of well-known monogenic and polygenic autoinflammatory syndromes (AIDs). This review provides a comprehensive examination of the current scientific background supporting the contribution of autoinflammation to HS etiology, including genetic data, molecular studies and clinical evidence, as well as the association between HS and AIDs. However, further research is needed to shed light on the pathogenic mechanism of this challenging condition and to identify potential perspectives for future therapeutic approaches.

New insights on hidradenitis suppurativa phenotypes and treatment response: An exploratory automated analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials

BACKGROUND

Defining hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) subtypes was previously limited by small sample sizes and poor interrater reliability; no study has investigated subtype treatment responses. The objective of this analysis was to characterize HS clusters in adult patients with moderate to severe HS and evaluate secukinumab treatment responses between clusters.

METHODS

Clusters were identified via an unsupervised machine learning clustering analysis using baseline data from the randomized, placebo-controlled SUNSHINE (NCT03713619) and SUNRISE (NCT03713632) phase 3 trials. To assess treatment responses, patients received secukinumab every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W) or placebo, for 16 weeks, after which, placebo patients randomly switched to SECQ2W/SECQ4W, and SECQ2W/SECQ4W patients maintained their original treatment, until week 52. Baseline outcomes included patient characteristics, disease characteristics and severity, HS-associated comorbidities and previous treatment exposures. Treatment response was assessed via the HS clinical response (HiSCR), abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, flares and NRS30 (skin pain).

RESULTS

Based on baseline data, three clusters were identified from 1084 patients (Cluster 1: 54.1%, Cluster 2: 17.8%, Cluster 3: 28.1%). Cluster 1 was predominantly female (65.4%) and was characterized by milder HS. Cluster 2 had more patients from the Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa region (58.5%) and was characterized by moderate HS. Cluster 3 had the highest rates of previous exposure to biologics (45.9%) and prior HS-related surgeries (47.5%) and was characterized by severe HS. SECQ2W and SECQ4W demonstrated efficacy versus placebo in all clusters at week 16; SECQ2W and SECQ4W efficacy was maintained to week 52. SECQ2W treatment showed a trend for greater efficacy versus SECQ4W in Cluster 3 through week 52.

CONCLUSIONS

Three HS clusters were identified. Secukinumab demonstrated benefit over placebo in all clusters. However, patients with more severe disease may take longer to respond and more frequent secukinumab dosing may be required for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

SUNSHINE (NCT03713619) and SUNRISE (NCT03713632).

Guidelines How to Integrate Surgery and Targeted Therapy with Biologics for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Delphi Consensus Statements from an Italian Expert Panel

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent and painful nodules and abscesses in intertriginous skin areas, which can progress to sinus tract formation, tissue destruction, and scarring. HS is highly debilitating and severely impairs the psychological well-being and quality of life of patients. The therapeutic approach to HS is based on medical therapy and surgery. First-line medical therapy includes topical antibiotics, systemic antibiotics, and biologics. Main surgical procedures include deroofing, local excision, and wide local excision. Despite the availability of multiple therapeutic options, the rates of disease recurrence and progression continue to be high. In recent years, the possibility of combining biologic therapy and surgery has raised considerable interest. In a clinical trial, the perioperative use of adalimumab has been associated with greater response rates and improved inflammatory load and pain, with no increased risk of postoperative infectious complications. However, several practical aspects of combined biologic therapy and surgery are poorly defined. In June 2022, nine Italian HS experts convened to address issues related to the integration of biologic therapy and surgery in clinical practice. To this purpose, the experts identified 10 areas of interest based on published evidence and personal experience: (1) patient profiling (diagnostic criteria, disease severity classification, assessment of response to treatment, patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities); (2) tailoring surgery to HS characteristics; (3) wide local excision; (4) presurgery biologic treatment; (5) concomitant biologic and surgical treatments; (6) pre- and postsurgery management; (7) antibiotic systemic therapy; (8) biologic therapy after radical surgery; (9) management of adverse events to biologics; and (10) management of postoperative infectious complications. Consensus between experts was reached using the Estimate-Talk-Estimate method (Delphi Method). The statements were subsequently presented to a panel of 27 HS experts from across Italy, and their agreement was assessed using the UCLA Appropriateness Method. This article presents and discusses the consensus statements.

Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?

BACKGROUND

Molecularly targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis), have emerged as essential tools in the treatment of dermatological diseases. These therapies modulate the immune system through specific signaling pathways, providing effective alternatives to traditional systemic immunosuppressive agents. This review aims to provide an updated summary of targeted immune therapies for inflammatory skin diseases, considering their pathophysiology, efficacy, dosage, and safety profiles.

METHODS

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed over the past 10 years, focusing on randomized clinical trials, case reports, and case series related to targeted immune therapies in dermatology. Eligibility criteria were applied, and data were extracted from each study, including citation data, study design, and results.

RESULTS

We identified 1360 non-duplicate articles with the initial search strategy. Title and abstract review excluded 1150, while a full-text review excluded an additional 50 articles. The review included 143 studies published between 2012 and 2022, highlighting 39 drugs currently under investigation or in use for managing inflammatory skin diseases.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The heterogeneity of summarized information limits this review. Some recommendations originated from data from clinical trials, while others relied on retrospective analyses and small case series. Recommendations will likely be updated as new results emerge.

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of chronic skin diseases, offering new options for patients unresponsive to standard treatments. Paradoxical reactions are rarely observed. Further studies are needed to fully understand the mechanisms and nature of these therapies. Overall, targeted immune therapies in dermatology represent a promising development, significantly improving the quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

A review of surgical and reconstructive techniques for hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory follicular dermatological condition that typically affects the intertriginous and anogenital regions of the apocrine gland-bearing skin. The management of this chronic and recurring disease necessitates a combination of lifestyle changes, medication, and surgical approaches to achieve the best possible outcomes. While medical treatments are recommended for this multimodal disease, surgical therapy, which is the gold standard of treatment for HS, has proven to be the most effective treatment because it provides long-lasting local disease control, reduces the recurrence of lesions, and ensures complete healing of lesions. In the last decade, there has been exponential growth in research into various surgical techniques and reconstructive care, enabling patients to have more surgical options. There is a wide range of surgical management procedures available, such as incision and drainage, deroofing, excisional surgery, carbon dioxide laser therapy, and skin tissue-sparing excision with electrosurgical peeling. Among these surgical procedures, wide surgical excision is the best option since it can eradicate all the affected lesions. Meanwhile, the preferred approach to reconstruction at various anatomical locations remains debatable. Here, we review a variety of surgical treatments and reconstructive techniques for HS, particularly various flap techniques for the axillary, gluteal, and inframammary regions.

Secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa based on prior biologic exposure: an efficacy and safety analysis from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with a substantial disease burden. Secukinumab has previously been reported to have sustained efficacy with a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. It is unknown whether prior biologic exposure affects the efficacy and safety of secukinumab.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS based on prior exposure to -biologics.

METHODS

This was an analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized at baseline to receive secukinumab every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W), or placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients on the SECQ2W and SECQ4W schedules remained on the same treatment regimen, while patients randomized to placebo were switched to either SECQ2W or SECQ4W up to week 52. Assessments based on prior exposure to biologics included Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, flare rates, HS-related pain [numerical rating scale 30 (NRS30)], 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4-55), Dermatology Life Quality Index, EuroQol-5D and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 1084 patients were randomized in the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials and included in this analysis; 255 (23.5%) were biologic-experienced [SECQ2W (n = 80); SECQ4W (n = 81); placebo (n = 94)] and 829 (76.5%) were biologic-naïve [SECQ2W (n = 281); SECQ4W (n = 279); placebo (n = 269)]. At week 16, responses were more efficacious for secukinumab than for placebo with regard to HiSCR in patients who were biologic-experienced {SECQ2W 37.0% [odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-3.08]; SECQ4W 38.8% [OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.86-3.22]; placebo 27.3%} and biologic-naïve [SECQ2W 45.6% (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.15-2.33); SECQ4W 45.4% (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.29); placebo 34.2%]. Similar results were observed for AN count, NRS30 and IHS4-55. The higher response seen at week 16 with secukinumab was sustained, with a trend toward improvement over time, through to week 52 in both subgroups. Additional efficacy was observed for quality-of-life assessments, and no differences in safety between subgroups were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of prior biologic exposure, secukinumab was efficacious in improving the signs and symptoms of HS. This finding positions secukinumab as the first option in patients who are biologic-naïve, as well as in patients who have previously been treated with other biologic therapy, based on individual patient needs.

Topical and Systemic Retinoids in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating chronic skin disorder characterized by painful inflammatory nodules, abscesses and sinus tracts involving intertriginous areas and has an adverse impact on patient quality of life. Over the past decade, the therapeutic options of HS have increased significantly to comprise multiple modalities, including topical medication, systemic therapies (mainly antibiotics, retinoids, and biologics), surgical approaches, and lifestyle modifications. Biologics alone or in combination with surgery remain the treatment of choice for moderate to severe disease. However, non-biologic therapies (including retinoids) may be used as monotherapy for mild disease and in combination with biologics and surgical treatment in moderate to severe disease. Retinoids, specifically isotretinoin, acitretin, and alitretinoin, are historically used in the management of HS, supported by anecdotal evidence and with variable treatment response. Although the current American and European guidelines offer different recommendations on the use of retinoids in HS, retinoids remain a valuable ally in HS management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current scientific literature on retinoid therapy (topical and systemic) in HS, highlighting disparities in mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety to clarify their role in HS treatment.

Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor povorcitinib (INCB054707) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase 1 inhibition may alleviate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)-associated inflammation and improve symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and safety of povorcitinib (selective oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor) in HS.

METHODS

This placebo-controlled phase 2 study randomized patients with HS 1:1:1:1 to receive povorcitinib 15, 45, or 75 mg or placebo for 16 weeks. Primary and key secondary end points were mean change from baseline in abscess and inflammatory nodule count and percentage of patients achieving HS Clinical Response at week 16.

RESULTS

Of 209 patients randomized (15 mg, n = 52; 45 mg, n = 52; 75 mg, n = 53; placebo, n = 52), 83.3% completed the 16-week treatment. At week 16, povorcitinib significantly reduced abscess and inflammatory nodule count from baseline (least squares mean [SE] change: 15 mg, -5.2 [0.9], P = .0277; 45 mg, -6.9 [0.9], P = .0006; 75 mg, -6.3 [0.9], P = .0021) versus placebo (-2.5 [0.9]). More povorcitinib-treated patients achieved HS Clinical Response at week 16 (15 mg, 48.1%, P = .0445; 45 mg, 44.2%, P = .0998; 75 mg, 45.3%, P = .0829) versus placebo (28.8%). A total of 60.0% and 65.4% of povorcitinib- and placebo-treated patients had adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

Baseline lesion counts were mildly imbalanced between groups.

CONCLUSION

Povorcitinib demonstrated efficacy in HS, with no evidence of increased incidence of adverse events among doses.

Genetic mutations in pyoderma gangrenosum, hidradenitis suppurativa, and associated autoinflammatory syndromes: Insights into pathogenic mechanisms and shared pathways

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and the associated autoinflammatory syndromes, including pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne (PAPA) syndrome, PSTPIP1-associated myeloid-related proteinemia inflammatory (PAMI) syndrome, pyoderma gangrenosum, acne, and hidradenitis suppurativa (PASH) syndrome, and pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, acne, and suppurative hidradenitis (PAPASH) syndrome are dermatological conditions characterized by chronic inflammation and tissue damage. Recent advances in genetic research have identified specific mutations associated with these disorders, shedding light on their underlying pathogenic mechanisms. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of identified mutations and presumed pathophysiology in PG, HS, and the associated autoinflammatory syndromes.

Factors Affecting Treatment Selection Among Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Importance

Despite the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of adalimumab for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), prescription rates remain low, indicating a critical gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice. Understanding the medical decision-making process that these patients use when considering biologic agents and other HS therapies may uncover opportunities for improved patient-physician communication and HS disease control.

Objective

To elucidate factors that affect the medical decision-making process for patients with HS, with an emphasis on biologic therapies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-ended semistructured interviews were conducted with English-speaking adults with HS (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 2 dermatology clinics that are part of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. All participants had an average 7-day pain score of 1 or higher on a 0- to 10-point numeric rating scale. Surveys were conducted between November 2019 and March 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to August 2022. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached at 21 interviews.

Results

A total of 21 participants (median [IQR] age, 38.5 [27.9-43.4] years; 16 females [76%]) were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (96%) had Hurley stage II or III disease, and 15 (71%) had a history of adalimumab use. Suffering threshold, perceptions of treatment risk, treatment fatigue, disease understanding, and sources of information (included dermatologists, the internet, advertisements, and friends and loved ones) were identified as factors affecting participants' decisions to initiate new treatments for HS.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this qualitative study suggest that mitigating misconceptions about treatment risk, identifying gaps in disease knowledge, and emphasizing early treatment to prevent scarring and disease progression may empower patients with HS to engage in treatment planning and to try new therapies.

New treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum and hidradenitis suppurativa: A review

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are stubborn inflammatory skin diseases categorized as neutrophilic hypodermal dermatoses. These conditions exhibit connections with other autoinflammatory disorders driven by immune responses. Their pathogenesis is complex, rooted in significant imbalances in both innate and adaptive immune systems, particularly featuring elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-8, IL-17, and IL-23. Studies involving skin tissue pathology and serology have indicated that targeting specific cytokines can bring therapeutic benefits. Indeed, many patients in clinical settings have responded positively to such interventions. Yet, given the diverse cytokines in play, focusing on a single one with antibody therapy might not always be effective. When resistance to biologics emerges, a combined approach targeting multiple overactive cytokines with immunosuppressants, for example cyclosporine and Janus kinase inhibitors, could be an option. In the current review, we explore recent therapeutic developments for PG and HS.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: new insights into disease mechanisms and an evolving treatment landscape

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa, is a chronic disabling and debilitating inflammatory disease with a high unmet medical need. The prevalence of HS reported in most studies is 1-2%, although it is likely to be under-reported and estimates vary globally owing to variance in data collection methods, ethnicity, geographical location and under-diagnosis. HS is characterized by persistent, painful cutaneous nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels commonly affecting the axillary, anogenital, inguinal and perianal/gluteal areas. Over time, chronic uncontrolled inflammation results in irreversible tissue destruction and scarring. Although the pathophysiology of HS has not been fully elucidated, the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-17 pathways have an important role, involving multiple cytokines. Currently, treatment options include topical medications; systemic therapies, including repeated and/or rotational courses of systemic antibiotics, retinoids and hormonal therapies; and various surgical procedures. The anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab is currently the only biologic approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for HS; however, its efficacy varies, with a clinical response reported in approximately 50% of patients in phase III trials. HS is a rapidly evolving field of discovery, with a diverse range of agents with distinct mechanisms of action currently being explored in clinical trials. Several other promising therapeutic targets have recently emerged, and agents targeting the IL-17 and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways are the most advanced in ongoing or completed phase III clinical trials. Alongside limited therapeutic options, significant challenges remain in terms of diagnosis and disease management, with a need for better treatment outcomes. Other unmet needs include significant diagnostic delays, thus missing the therapeutic 'window of opportunity'; the lack of standardized outcome measures in clinical trials; and the lack of established, well-defined disease phenotypes and biomarkers.

Advances in surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurative

Hidradenitis suppurative is a chronic, refractory and recurrent dermatological disease. The disease should be managed by targeted surgical intervention on the basis of medical treatment. Currently, the surgical treatment methods include local treatments like incision and drainage, unroofing, laser therapy, intense pulsed light therapy, photodynamic therapy, as well as complete lesion resection such as skin-tissue saving excision with electrosurgical peeling and extended excision. The clearance range, therapeutic effect, postoperative complications, and recurrence risk vary among the different treatment methods. Local treatments cause less damage, but have high recurrence rates, and are mainly for mild to moderate hidradenitis suppurative patients. Complete lesion resections have relatively low recurrence rates, but may bring more surgical injuries, and postoperative reconstructions are needed, which are mainly for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurative patients. In this article, the surgical treatment principles and various surgical treatment methods of hidradenitis suppurative are reviewed, to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease in clinical practice.

Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns Among US Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, autoinflammatory skin disease associated with many comorbidities. One biologic (adalimumab) is approved for HS. This study assessed the sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs of patients with HS following biologic approval.

METHODS

This non-interventional, retrospective cohort study involved adult (≥ 18 years) and adolescent (12-17 years) patients diagnosed with HS in the United States (US) using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database during the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018.

RESULTS

Of 42,843 identified patients, 10,909 met the incident HS patient criteria (10,230 adults, 628 adolescents, 51 patients aged <12 years). Patients were mostly diagnosed by a general practitioner/pediatrician (adults: 41.6%; adolescents: 39.6%) or dermatologist (adults: 22.1%; adolescents: 30.6%). Commonly reported Charlson comorbidities at pre-index in adult patients were diabetes without complications (20.4%), chronic pulmonary disease (16.4%) and diabetes with complications (9.0%), and the most frequent Elixhauser comorbidities were uncomplicated hypertension (38.3%), obesity (22.5%), uncomplicated diabetes (19.0%) and depression (17.4%). The burden of comorbidities generally increased over time after diagnosis in both adults and adolescents. HS-related surgical procedures were uncommon in the 2-years post-index period: an incision and drainage procedure was reported in 7.6% of adults and 6.4% of adolescents. Patients were predominantly treated with both topical and systemic antibiotic treatments (adults: 25.0% and 65.1%, respectively; adolescents: 41.7% and 74.5%, respectively). Biologic prescription was higher in adults than adolescents (3.5% vs. 1.8%). Total healthcare costs for adult and adolescent patients in the 2-years post-index period were US$42,143 and US$16,057, respectively, with outpatient costs accounting for the majority of these costs (US$20,980 and US$8408, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In adult and adolescent patients with HS, comorbidity burden continues to increase after diagnosis. All-cause and HS-specific HCRU and costs are high in adults and adolescents with HS. These findings support the need for a multidisciplinary comprehensive care strategy for patients with HS.

Navigating the Multidimensional Impact of Living with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An In-Depth Netnographic Study on Social Media Platforms

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing considerable distress. It impacts mobility, social interaction, and quality of life. In Brazil, there is a notable gap in epidemiological data and patient experiences regarding HS.

METHODS

This study, spanning 2019 to 2022, employed netnography to probe the experiences of Brazilian patients with HS. This approach gleans insights from online interactions, offering a direct view into patients' lives.

RESULTS

Notably, the data illuminated the challenges patients face, such as difficulties in obtaining a diagnosis and the complexities involved in managing a chronic, and often debilitating, condition. Furthermore, patients' experiences with various treatments, encompassing antibiotics, biologic agents, lifestyle alterations, surgical procedures, and alternative remedies, were also examined.

CONCLUSION

By undertaking a longitudinal analysis of patient interactions, the study aimed to offer a richer understanding of HS, from its diagnosis to its treatment. It underscores the necessity for a more patient-centered approach when managing this condition. We hope that this enhanced understanding can facilitate better care for those affected by HS.

Laser and intense pulsed light in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) requires a combination of medical, surgical, and lifestyle interventions. Intense pulsed light (IPL) and lasers have been reported to be useful. The aim of this review is to find the evidence supporting IPL and laser treatment of HS and to provide guidance for the management of specific HS lesions. We searched PubMed and Web of Science for "laser" and "hidradenitis suppurativa" on April 6, 2022. Inclusion criteria were >10 patients, reported follow-up, English language, and human subjects with a diagnosis of HS. A total of 724 articles were screened, but only 17 studies qualified for inclusion (IPL (n = 4), Nd:YAG (n = 6), CO2 laser (n = 6), and intralesional treatment (n = 2). The majority of the studies had a low (n = 10) or moderate (n = 7) evidence level. Treatment effect was noticed in studies using IPL and Nd:YAG (hair reduction). CO2 laser was used for surgery with a success rate ranging from 70.7% to 96.7%. CO2 laser is useful for surgery of stationary HS lesions, but it is difficult to draw a conclusion on the use of IPL and Nd:YAG (hair reduction) as the studies were too heterogeneous to perform a meta-analysis.

Inborn Errors of Immunity in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Pathogenesis and Disease Burden

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as Verneuil's disease and acne inversa, is a prevalent, debilitating, and understudied inflammatory skin disease. It is marked by repeated bouts of pathological inflammation causing pain, hyperplasia, aberrant healing, and fibrosis. HS is difficult to manage and has many unmet medical needs. There is clinical and pharmacological evidence for extensive etiological heterogeneity with HS, suggesting that this clinical diagnosis is capturing a spectrum of disease entities. Human genetic studies provide robust insight into disease pathogenesis. They also can be used to resolve etiological heterogeneity and to identify drug targets. However, HS has not been extensively investigated with well-powered genetic studies. Here, we review what is known about its genetic architecture. We identify overlap in molecular, cellular, and clinical features between HS and inborn errors of immunity (IEI). This evidence indicates that HS may be an underrecognized component of IEI and suggests that undiagnosed IEI are present in HS cohorts. Inborn errors of immunity represent a salient opportunity for rapidly resolving the immunological landscape of HS pathogenesis, for prioritizing drug repurposing studies, and for improving the clinical management of HS.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A 52-week analysis of a postmarketing surveillance study in Japan

Adalimumab is a human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-α that was approved in Japan for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic recurrent inflammatory skin disease. We report the results of the final analysis of the postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03894956), which evaluated the 52-week safety and efficacy of adalimumab for HS treatment in real-world clinical practice in Japan. This multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study (March 2019 to May 2021) included patients with HS treated with subcutaneous adalimumab at doses following the package insert. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were effectiveness, including HS clinical response (HiSCR), C-reactive protein (CRP), skin pain, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Of the 84 patients registered at 65 sites, 83 patients were included in the analyses. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported by 10 (12.0%) patients; two patients reported a serious ADR, including one patient with serious infection. Other safety events of special interest reported were liver disorder and dermatitis psoriasiform (one patient each). Almost all patients with ADRs were recovering or had recovered, except for one patient who experienced a serious ADR of liver disorder and died. At 12 weeks, 55.4% of patients achieved HiSCR; this increased to 60.5% and 62.8% at 24 and 52 weeks of adalimumab treatment, respectively. Significant reductions from baseline in CRP (P < 0.05), skin pain (P < 0.0001), and DLQI (P < 0.0001) were observed at all time points. The results from this PMS study demonstrated that long-term adalimumab treatment is well tolerated and effective in patients with HS in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Obstacles to Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Current Perspectives on Improving Clinical Management

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that can progress to significant tunnels and scars that affect quality of life, especially if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. Average delay after initial presentation of HS symptoms can range from 3 to 10 years in adults and 1 to 2 years in children. Factors associated with diagnostic delay include female gender, non-white race, and greater disease severity at diagnosis. Contributing factors include misdiagnoses, difficulty accessing a dermatologist, hesitation in seeking care due to the stigmatizing nature of the disease, and lack of awareness among providers and patients. While efforts to increase awareness include academic talks at conferences and by foundations geared toward HS, social media offers the opportunity to reach young audiences. Many patients report dissatisfaction with their HS treatments. Better understanding of HS pathophysiology and implementation of clinically focused phenotypes and endotypes can lead to development of more targeted and efficacious therapies. FDA approval of medications for HS beyond adalimumab will increase access to a wider selection of therapies, and implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring may maximize the use of biologics for HS.

Emerging Treatments and the Clinical Trial Landscape for Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Part II: Procedural and Wound Care Therapies

Procedural treatments are a cornerstone of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) management. New interventional therapies are being studied as part of the upsurge in HS research and clinical trials. Additionally, draining wounds can impart a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life, requiring daily dressing changes. However, standardized guidelines on how to best manage HS wounds both day-to-day and post-procedure are lacking. In part II of this emerging therapies review, procedural treatments and wound care dressings and devices that are being investigated for HS management are discussed.

Prostatic Abscesses in a Patient Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor Therapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Case Report

This report is the first to present the case of a patient who developed bacterial abscess-forming prostatitis while undergoing treatment with adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking therapy, for hidradenitis suppurativa. A 36-year-old male presented with persistent anogenital pain and dysuria for approximately three weeks. Two days before presentation at the emergency room (ER), a rubber band ligation was performed to address suspected hemorrhoids stages I-II. In the ER, clinical and laboratory examinations suggested acute prostatitis, prompting the initiation of antibiotic therapy. In the absence of an adequate response, magnetic resonance imaging was performed, which identified a complex abscess and fistulation system originating from the right prostatic lobe. Following the insertion of a drain, adalimumab was discontinued, and antibiotic therapy was intensified, resulting in the resolution of the abscess. After six weeks, follow-up showed the patient to be free of symptoms. This case highlights a rare adverse event of patients using immunomodulating medications and may help physicians to manage similar cases in the future. Immunomodulating drugs can lead to the development of prostatic abscesses in young patients, necessitating attentive and careful clinical examination with a low threshold for further diagnostic workup in uncommon case presentations.

Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review on Treatment Landscape and Current Issues

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, and inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful, deep-seated, nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts in sensitive areas of the body, including axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. Antibiotics represent the first-line pharmacological treatment of HS because of their anti-inflammatory properties and antimicrobial effects. This narrative review summarizes the most significant current issues on the role of systemic antibiotics in the management of HS, critically analyzing the main limits of their use (antibiotic resistance and toxicity). Although, in the last decades, several cytokines have been implicated in the pathomechanism of HS and the research on the use of novel biologic agents in HS has been intensified, antibiotics remain a valid therapeutic approach. Future challenges regarding antibiotic therapy in HS comprise their use in association with biologics in the management of acute flare or as a bridge therapy to surgery.

New Insight into the Molecular Pathomechanism and Immunomodulatory Treatments of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder characterized by deep-seated nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts and scars localized in the intertriginous areas. It is accompanied by pain, malodourous secretion and a dramatically decreased quality of life. Although the pathogenesis has not been entirely elucidated, the primary event is follicular hyperkeratosis of the pilosebaceous apocrine unit. Since the registration of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor Adalimumab in 2015, several cytokines have been implicated in the pathomechanism of HS and the research of novel therapeutic targets has been intensified. We provide an update on the inflammatory cytokines with a central role in HS pathogenesis and the most promising target molecules of future HS management.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and JAK Inhibitors: A Review of the Published Literature

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa or Verneuil's disease, is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicles characterized by inflammatory, painful, deep-rooted lesions in the areas of the body characterized by the presence of the apocrine glands. Unfortunately, huge unmet needs still remain for its treatment. Objective: The purpose of our review was collecting all cases, case series, trials, and ongoing studies available in the literature on the use of this class of drugs for HS. Materials and Methods: The investigated manuscripts included trials, reviews, letters to the editor, real-life studies, case series, and reports. Manuscripts were identified, screened, and extracted for the relevant data following the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Results: We selected 56 articles of which 25 met the selection criteria for our review. Among the JAK inhibitors to date, there is only one published clinical trial in the literature (Janus kinase 1 inhibitor INCB054707), a real-life study with 15 patients up to week 24 in which upadacitinib was used and a case series where tofacitinib was successfully used. Conversely, there are several ongoing clinical trials. Conclusions: Results to date in the literature show promising levels of efficacy and the safety of JAK inhibitors in HS. Several clinical trials are underway from which it will be very important to compare the available data. There are still too few studies conducted with a low sample size, so it remains critical to investigate this issue further in the future with a real-life study involving a large sample of patients in order to provide safe and viable therapeutic alternatives for HS.

Secukinumab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (SUNSHINE and SUNRISE): week 16 and week 52 results of two identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Few therapeutic options are available for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. We aimed to assess the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa in two randomised trials.

METHODS

SUNSHINE and SUNRISE were identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials done in 219 primary sites in 40 countries. Patients aged 18 years old or older with the capacity to provide written informed consent and with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (defined as a total of ≥5 inflammatory lesions affecting ≥2 distinct anatomical areas) for at least 1 year were eligible for inclusion. Included patients also agreed to daily use of topical over-the-counter antiseptics on the areas affected by hidradenitis suppurativa lesions while on study treatment. Patients were excluded if they had 20 or more fistulae at baseline, had ongoing active conditions requiring treatment with prohibited medication (eg, systemic biological immunomodulating treatment, live vaccines, or other investigational treatments), or met other exclusion criteria. In both trials, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by means of interactive response technology to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks, or subcutaneous placebo all via a 2 mL prefilled syringe in a double-dummy method as per treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response, defined as a decrease in abscess and inflammatory nodule count by 50% or more with no increase in the number of abscesses or in the number of draining fistulae compared with baseline, at week 16, assessed in the overall population. Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response was calculated based on the number of abscesses, inflammatory nodules, draining fistulae, total fistulae, and other lesions in the hidradenitis suppurativa affected areas. Safety was assessed by evaluating the presence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to common terminology criteria for adverse events, which were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. Both the SUNSHINE, NCT03713619, and SUNRISE, NCT03713632, trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 31, 2019, and June 7, 2021, 676 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNSHINE trial, of whom 541 (80%; 304 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·1 years [SD 11·7]) were included in the analysis (181 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 180 [33%] in the placebo group). Between the same recruitment dates, 687 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNRISE trial, of whom 543 (79%; 306 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·3 [11·4] years) were included in the analysis (180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 183 [34%] in the placebo group). In the SUNSHINE trial, significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (rounded average number of patients with response in 100 imputations, 81·5 [45%] of 181 patients) compared with the placebo group (60·7 [34%] of 180 patients; odds ratio 1·8 [95% CI 1·1-2·7]; p=0·0070). However, there was no significant difference between the number of patients in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (75·2 [42%] of 180 patients) and the placebo group (1·5 [1·0-2·3]; p=0·042). Compared with the placebo group (57·1 [31%] of 183 patients), significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group (76·2 [42%] of 180 patients; 1·6 [1·1-2·6]; p=0·015) and the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (83·1 [46%] of 180 patients; 1·9 [1·2-3·0]; p=0·0022) had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response in the SUNRISE trial. Patient responses were sustained up to the end of the trials at week 52. The most common adverse event by preferred term up to week 16 was headache in both the SUNSHINE (17 [9%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 20 [11%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 14 [8%] in the placebo group) and SUNRISE (21 [12%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 17 [9%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 15 [8%] in the placebo group) trials. No study-related deaths were reported up to week 16. The safety profile of secukinumab in both trials was consistent with that previously reported, with no new or unexpected safety findings detected.

INTERPRETATION

When given every 2 weeks, secukinumab was clinically effective at rapidly improving signs and symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa with a favourable safety profile and with sustained response up to 52 weeks of treatment.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma.

[Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory dermatosis characterized by the presence of inflammatory nodules and abscesses in the apocrine gland-rich areas that may progress to suppurative fistulas and scars. Despite being considered one of the dermatological conditions with the greatest impact on patient quality of life, it is often underdiagnosed. Hidradenitis suppurativa, especially in its severe forms, is associated with numerous comorbidities, so a holistic and multidisciplinary perspective is crucial for the management of these patients. The therapeutic approach is complex and challenging. The medical treatment options are diverse and must be adapted to clinical presentation and disease severity. Surgical therapy should be considered as an adjuvant to medical treatment, particularly in refractory cases and in the presence of scars or anatomical and/or functional mutilation. These recommendations reflect the main aspects of the management of the patient with hidradenitis suppurativa and are addressed to all healthcare professionals who take part in their follow-up.

A Case Study of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex, chronic, inflammatory skin disease that is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed. Patients frequently present to with painful nodules, inflammatory papules, sinus tracts, and scarring to intertriginous areas seeking care to alleviate symptoms. There is a paucity of information available specifically aimed to educate emergency nurse practitioners on how to recognize, diagnose, and treat this population. The article highlights the main diagnostic criteria and treatment options available for HS patients to help expand disease awareness.

Impact of hidradenitis suppurativa-specific wound dressing system on patient quality of life and dressing-related pain: pilot study

Objective:

It is theorised that adhesive-free wound care developed specifically for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can improve their quality of life (QoL). Our study aimed to investigate the impact of a novel wound care device on Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and other factors related to experienced pain, time spent changing dressings, comfort, ease of use and body image.

Method:

A 21-day, single-arm, unblinded, pilot trial was conducted to assess ease of use and the impact of effective wound care on various aspects of wound management in patients with HS. Participants were provided two trial garments and trial dressings as required, to use over a 21-day period in the home setting. A seven-item questionnaire and the DLQI questionnaire was completed on days 0, 7, 14 and 21.

Results:

All 15 participants were female, aged >18 years old and with a diagnosis of HS. Mean DLQI score at baseline (day 0) was 19.3, which was reduced to 4.53 on day 21, a significant improvement in 100% of participants (p<0.001). High levels of dressing-related pain, assessed using an 11-point Visual Analogue Scale, reduced from 5.53 at baseline to 0.8 on day 21. Other significant improvements in terms of patient comfort, time spent on changing dressings, body confidence and the dressing's ability to retain exudate were also noted.

Conclusion:

The results illustrated the improvement made to study participants' day-to-day activities and QoL when effective HS-specific wound care products were provided. Wound care is an essential component in the treatment journey of patients.

Pharmacological interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials and non-randomised studies

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic recommendations for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have recently shifted towards non-invasive pharmacological options. Recent evidence has shown promising efficacy for specific treatments. However, data regarding the comparative efficacy of these treatments in patients with HS are still limited. Therefore, we plan to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to summarise the benefits and harms of different pharmacological interventions for treating people living with HS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Library beginning from their inception dates with no language restrictions. A grey literature search will be performed to supplement the electronic databases. Both randomised trials and non-randomised studies using validated measurement tools that investigated the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions among people living with HS will be included. The predefined primary outcomes will include treatment responses that reflect the patient's perspective and all-cause discontinuation. Screening, selection, extraction, assessment of the risk of bias and analysis of the strength of the evidence will be performed independently by a pair of reviewers. A two-step approach of traditional pairwise and NMA will be performed. Based on a random-effects model, standardised weighted mean differences and ORs with corresponding 95% CIs will be pooled as effect estimates for the continuous and categorical endpoints, respectively. Statistical and methodological heterogeneities will be assessed. Preplanned subgroup analyses and univariate meta-regression will be conducted to quantify the potential sources of heterogeneity. Evidence-based synthesis will be based on the magnitudes of effect size, evidence certainty and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because this study is based on existing published data. These findings will be disseminated through scientific meetings and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022302795.

Drug Survival of Oral Retinoids in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Real-Life Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cohort studies on the use of retinoids for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have yielded contradicting results. As the clinical presentation of HS is heterogeneous, with different predilection sites and hallmark features, it can be hypothesized that HS phenotypes are associated with the effectiveness of specific retinoid treatments.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the drug survival of oral retinoids in the treatment of HS and to establish predictors for longer treatment duration.

METHODS

A retrospective, dual-center study was conducted in the Netherlands in adult HS patients treated with oral retinoids between 2011 and 2021. Drug survival analyses were performed through Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Additionally, Cox regression models were used to determine predictors for a longer drug survival.

RESULTS

In total, 102 patients were included. Overall drug survival of (low-dose) isotretinoin (n = 66) at 12 and 24 months was 44.2% and 15.5%, respectively. Termination of treatment was mostly due to ineffectiveness (26%). Presence of widespread comedones (p = 0.03) and the use of concomitant systemic medication (p = 0.04) were associated with a prolonged treatment duration. For acitretin (n = 36), the overall drug survival was 42.0% at 12 months and 37.4% at 24 months, and was also predominantly determined by ineffectiveness (28%). Interestingly, the scarring folliculitis phenotype (p < 0.05) was associated with prolonged drug survival time for acitretin treatment relative to the regular phenotype.

CONCLUSION

Comparable drug survival rates at 12 months for isotretinoin and acitretin were found. HS patients with widespread comedones and the scarring folliculitis phenotype could benefit from treatment with isotretinoin or acitretin, respectively.

Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by the formation of comedones, papules, nodules, abscesses and sinus tracts in the axillary, inframammary, groin, and gluteal areas. Up to 3.8% of the Canadian population has HS, though due to a lack of awareness of HS, many patients are initially misdiagnosed and do not receive adequate treatment early on in the disease course. Once a diagnosis of HS is made, developing an effective management plan can be a dilemma for many providers. There is significant variability in response to any given therapy within the HS patient population and many HS patients have other medical comorbidities which must be taken into consideration. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for all healthcare providers to diagnose and manage HS and its associated comorbidities. A sample electronic medical record template for HS management was developed by the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Executive Board and is intended for use in clinical settings. This will help to increase collaboration between primary healthcare providers, dermatologists, and other medical specialists and ultimately improve the quality of care that HS patients receive.

Real-World Considerations of Candidacy for Biologics in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory skin disease that is often recalcitrant to multiple treatments. In determining biologic candidacy for patients with HS, we propose a paradigm shift away from Hurley staging and towards consideration of other variables. Biologics represent a long-term treatment option for HS that may serve as a disease-modifying agent. These medications are typically initiated in patients with moderate to severe disease, which, based on inclusion criteria in clinical trials, is often defined as Hurley stage II or III disease, at which point irreversible tissue damage has already occurred. In real-world clinical settings, these considerations include treatments tried and failed, predicted disease trajectory, disease characteristics beyond lesion type, impact of disease on patients' functional status and quality of life, and patient comorbidities, venturing away from the limitations of Hurley stage designations. Future clinical trials may benefit from inclusion of recalcitrant Hurley stage I patients, which may then re-shape treatment guidelines and insurance coverage and improve patient access to biologic treatments.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors for Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) vary among different countries, and several biologics and small molecule inhibitors have been tested for treating moderate-to-severe HS over the past few years. However, treatment guidelines for HS vary among different countries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to exam the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs) of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in treating moderate-to-severe HS. Binary outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total of 2076 participants on nine biologics and three small-molecule inhibitors for treating moderate-to-severe HS, including adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, avacopan, bimekizumab, CJM112, etanercept, guselkumab, IFX-1, INCB054707, infliximab, and MABp1. The meta-analysis revealed only adalimumab (RR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.44-2.17) and bimekizumab (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) achieved significant improvement on hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), and adalimumab was superior to placebo in achieving dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 (RR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.70-9.28). No increase in SAEs was found for all included active treatments when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab and bimekizumab are the only two biologics effective in achieving HiSCR with acceptable safety profile, whereas adalimumab is the only biologic effective in achieving DLQI 0/1.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa International Online Community: Patient Characteristics and a Novel Model of Treatment Effectiveness

Treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa is diverse, yet frequently unsatisfactory. The aims of this study were to create a reproducible artificial intelligence-based patient-reported outcome platform for evaluation of the clinical characteristics and comorbidities of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, and to use this to grade treatment effectiveness. A retrospective patient-reported outcome study was conducted, based on online questionnaires completed by English-speaking patients registered to the hidradenitis suppurativa Stuff-ThatWorks^® online community. Data collected included patient characteristics, comorbidities and treatment satisfaction. These were recoded into scalable labels using a combination of machine learning algorithm, manual coding and validation. A model of treatment effectiveness was generated. The cohort included 1,050 patients of mean ± standard deviation age 34.3 ± 10.3 years. Greater severity of hidradenitis suppurativa was associated with younger age at onset (p < 0.001) and male sex (p < 0.001). The most frequent comorbidities were depression (30%), anxiety (26.4%), and polycystic ovary syndrome (16.6%). Hurley stage I patients rated topical agents, dietary changes, turmeric, and pain relief measures more effective than tetracyclines. For Hurley stage II, adalimumab was rated most effective. For Hurley stage III, adalimumab, other biologic agents, systemic steroids, and surgical treatment were rated more effective than tetracyclines. Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa often have comorbid psychiatric and endocrine diseases. This model of treatment effectiveness provides a direct comparison of standard and complementary options.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: racial and socioeconomic considerations in management

Studies on hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have found an increased prevalence of HS in skin of color and lower socioeconomic status patients, although the reasons for these differences are unclear. Demographic and therapeutic studies of HS originate primarily from developed Western countries, and data from low- and medium-income countries (LMIC) remain comparatively limited. In this review paper, we discuss differences in clinical presentation and comorbidities between racial and socioeconomic subpopulations and describe the genetic, biomedical, psychosocial, and ecological factors that may explain the associations between HS and skin of color and socioeconomic status. We highlight biomedical treatment considerations for LMIC including cost effective and less complex treatment strategies. We touch on population-based strategies to address the social determinants of health in HS management and discuss additional challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Outcome Comparison of Different Reconstructive Approaches for Axillary Defects Secondary to Radical Excision of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Radical excision of debilitating hidradenitis suppurativa lesions is the only curative approach in the advanced stages of the disease. Different concepts for axillary reconstruction do exist, but data on their clinical outcome are scarce.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of two reconstructive methods (posterior arm flap vs. vacuum-assisted closure [VAC] + split-thickness skin graft [STSG]) for axillary defects in patients with severe axillary hidradenitis suppurativa treated at the University Hospital Zurich between 2005 and 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients (mean age 36 ± 10 years, mean BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m2, Hurley stage II-III) with 67 operated axillae were stratified according to their type of reconstruction. Median operation time in the flap group was 144 min (IQR 114-207) (cumulative 181 min [IQR 124-300]) and 50 min (IQR 40-81) in the VAC + STSG group (cumulative 151 min [IQR 94-194], p < 0.01; p = 0.20 [cumulative time]). The cumulative length of stay was 6 ± 3 days in the flap group and 14 ± 7 days in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Time to complete wound healing was 27 days (IQR 20-49) in the flap group and 62 days (IQR 41-75) in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Vancouver Scar Scale score was 6 (IQR 4-9) in the flap group and 11 (IQR 9-12) in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Protective sensory recovery was most satisfactory in the flap group (p < 0.01). Forty-four percent of patients of the VAC + STSG group demonstrated functional impairment of arm abduction. Time to return to work was less in group A with 42 days (IQR 27-57) needed as compared to group B with 48 days (IQR 34-55) needed (p = 0.32). The average cost saving was 25% higher for the flap group than for the VAC + STSG group.

CONCLUSION

Despite an increased operation time, axillary reconstruction by the posterior arm flap yields a reduced length of stay, less time to complete wound healing along with restoration of a protective sensibility, and less axillary scarring avoiding functional deficits - eventually allowing earlier return to work.