Controlled trial of captopril in chronic heart failure: a rest and exercise hemodynamic study

Exercising with a Single Ventricle: Limitations and Therapies

Treatment for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS) and other single ventricle conditions requires a series of surgical interventions for long-term survival, typically culminating in the Fontan procedure. The result is an abnormal circulatory physiology with an absence of a sub-pulmonary ventricle. Exercise capacity in the Fontan circulation is often limited and is due to multiple factors, both central and peripheral. Multiple interventions, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic, have been studied to attempt to overcome these inherent limitations. This review will focus on the physiology of the exercising Fontan patient and on the interventions aimed at the enhancement of exercise capacity studied thus far.

Clinical management of amyloid cardiomyopathy

Clinical heart failure, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias are hallmark features of amyloid cardiomyopathy. In contrast to the advancements in targeted therapies, there is a general lack of evidence-based practice guidelines for clinical management of amyloid cardiomyopathy. In this review, we review the role of routine medical therapy in amyloid cardiomyopathy, from heart failure management to orthostatic hypotension, atrial arrhythmias, thromboembolic complications, and prevention of sudden death. We conclude by discussing approaches to patients with end-stage disease.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition improves right ventricular function: a meta-analysis

The benefits of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are well established for left ventricular dysfunction, but remain unknown for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to investigate the role of RAAS inhibition on RV function in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were systematically searched and 12 studies were included for statistical synthesis, comprising 265 RAAS inhibition treatment patients and 265 placebo control patients. The treatment arm showed a trend towards increased RV ejection fraction (weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.95, 95% CI -0.12 to 2.02, p=0.08) compared with the control arm. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards improvement in RV ejection fraction in patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers compared with control (WMD=1.11, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.26, p=0.06), but not in the respective comparison for ACE inhibitors (WMD=0.07, 95% CI -2.74 to 2.87, p>0.05). No differences were shown between the two groups with regard to maximal oxygen consumption, RV end-systolic volume, RV end-diastolic volume, duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and resting and maximal heart rate. Mild adverse drug reactions were common but evenly distributed between the treatment and control groups. The current meta-analysis highlights that there may be a role for RAAS inhibition, particularly treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers, in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. However, further confirmation will be required by larger prospective trials.

Effect of Valsartan on Systemic Right Ventricular Function

Background—

The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with a systemic right ventricle has not been elucidated.

Methods and Results—

We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial of angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan 160 mg twice daily compared with placebo in patients with a systemic right ventricle caused by congenitally or surgically corrected transposition of the great arteries. The primary end point was change in right ventricular ejection fraction during 3-year follow-up, determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging or, in patients with contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging, multirow detector computed tomography. Secondary end points were change in right ventricular volumes and mass, peak, and quality of life. Primary analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. A total of 88 patients (valsartan, n=44; placebo, n=44) were enrolled in the trial. No serious adverse effects occurred in either group. There was no significant effect of 3-year valsartan therapy on systemic right ventricular ejection fraction (treatment effect, 1.3%; 95% confidence interval, −1.3% to 3.9%; P =0.34), maximum exercise capacity, or quality of life. There was a larger increase in right ventricular end-diastolic volume (15 mL; 95% confidence interval, 3–28 mL; P <0.01) and mass (8 g; 95% confidence interval, 2–14 g; P =0.01) in the placebo group than in the valsartan group.

Conclusions—

There was no significant treatment effect of valsartan on right ventricular ejection fraction, exercise capacity, or quality of life. Valsartan was associated with a similar frequency of significant clinical events as placebo. Small but significant differences between valsartan and placebo were present for change in right ventricular volumes and mass.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com . Unique identifier: ISRCTN52352170.

ACE inhibitors in pediatric patients with heart failure

This article reviews reports of ACE inhibitor use in pediatric heart failure and summarizes the present implications for clinical practice. Captopril, enalapril, and cilazapril are orally active ACE inhibitors, and widely used in pediatric cardiology, although more than ten other ACE inhibitors have been applied clinically in adults. Effects of ACE inhibitors on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in pediatric patients are similar to those in adults. ACE inhibitors lower aortic pressure and systemic vascular resistance, do not affect pulmonary vascular resistance significantly, and lower left atrial and right atrial pressures in pediatric patients with heart failure. In infants with a large ventricular septal defect and pulmonary hypertension, ACE inhibitors decrease left-to-right shunt in those infants with elevated systemic vascular resistance. ACE inhibitors induce a small increase in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular fractional shortening, and systemic blood flow in children with left ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, and aortic regurgitation. These beneficial effects usually persist long term without the development of tolerance. Therapeutic trials of ACE inhibitors have been reported in children with heart failure and divergent hemodynamics, including myocardial dysfunction, left-to-right shunt, such as large ventricular septal defect and pulmonary hypertension, aortic or mitral regurgitation, and Fontan circulation. Hypotension and renal failure usually occur within 5 days after starting ACE inhibition or increasing the dose and, in most cases, recovery is seen after reduction or cessation of the drug. With all ACE inhibitors, smaller doses are administered initially to prevent excessive hypotension, and doses are increased gradually to the target dose. Captopril is administered orally, usually every 8 hours. Daily doses range from 0.3 to 1.5 mg/kg in children. Enalapril is administered orally, once or twice a day, and daily doses range from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg. Enalaprilat is administered intravenously, one to three times a day, in doses ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg/dose. For the treatment of chronic heart failure in children, ACE inhibitors are essential along with other medications including diuretics, digoxin, and beta-blockers (beta-adrenoceptor antagonists).

A meta-analysis of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on functional capacity in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction

AIM

To determine by meta-analysis whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search 13 multi-centre double blind parallel group trials that evaluated the effect of ACE inhibitors vs. placebo on exercise duration were selected. Ninety-four percent of patients were in New York Heart Association class II-IV. The studies were combined using the Cochrane meta-analysis program (Review manager version 4.1). Analyses according to treatment period, exercise protocols and publication periods were performed. Treatment with ACE inhibitor over 4-12 weeks resulted in a beneficial effect on exercise duration (P=0.003 and P=0.0008 for 4- and 12-weeks treatment, respectively), but the magnitude of improvements did not exceed 30 s corresponding to only 5% compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the pronounced effect on mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic LVSD, ACE inhibitors have improving effect on functional capacity measured as exercise tolerance time.

Adverse effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure and/or ventricular dysfunction : meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The evidence-based benefit/risk evaluation of therapeutic interventions in randomised clinical trials should include both the assessment of the benefits and of the adverse outcomes. There is ample evidence that ACE inhibitors improve the symptoms and prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF) and ventricular dysfunction. However, there is little systematic information on the tolerability and adverse effects associated with their use in these conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the adverse events related to ACE inhibitor use in the treatment of CHF and ventricular dysfunction.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Description of adverse events in reports of randomised clinical trials of ACE inhibitors in CHF or ventricular dysfunction was examined, and a meta-analysis was performed. Trials were included if they were placebo- or standard treatment-controlled, and if the treatment duration was at least 8 weeks. Relative risks and their 95% CIs were estimated with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Only 22 (43%) of 51 original reports contained information on the number of withdrawals and their causes. Missing information from the remaining 29 trials was obtained from the authors. The weighted mean duration of treatment was 100.2 weeks. After excluding administrative reasons, heart failure, myocardial infarction and hypertension, the withdrawal rates attributed to adverse events were 13.8% and 9.4% for the ACE inhibitor and control groups, respectively (RR = 1.54 [95% CI 1.30-1.83]; weighted difference = 3.1 per 100 treated patients [95% CI 1.8-4.4]). Cough, hypotension, renal dysfunction, dizziness, hyperkalaemia, and impotence were all significantly more prevalent among patients treated with ACE inhibitors than among those in the control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CHF or ventricular dysfunction enrolled in randomised clinical trials, treatment with an ACE inhibitor for an average of 2 years leads to an additional 3% of treatment withdrawals. In a significant proportion of the reports on these randomised clinical trials, information on adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal was inadequate. Proper evidence-based evaluation of the benefit/risk of therapeutic interventions needs a more systematic approach to reporting of adverse events experiences recorded in clinical trials.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers: what we know and current controversies

A little more than a decade ago, management of heart failure was changed forever when a number of randomized clinical trials confirmed that a class of drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, could improve survival in patients with heart failure. The recognition that blockade of one of the neurohumoral systems activated in heart failure could improve outcomes prompted widespread testing of other neurohumoral blockers, such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents, aldosterone antagonists, and most recently, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of heart failure. This article describes what is known about the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in the management of heart failure and presents the current controversies surrounding the use of these agents.

Use of ejection fraction (or lack thereof), morbidity/mortality and heart failure drug trials: a review

Ejection fraction (EF) is an ejection phase parameter used to assess the performance of the heart in normal individuals and pathologic states such as myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, and congestive heart failure (CHF). It can be measured by radionuclide ventriculography, angiocardiography, echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. EF is dependent on the loading conditions of the heart as well as contractility of the myocardium which makes it a less useful measure of cardiac performance. Nevertheless, it has been widely utilized and discussed for years. EF has been used as an entry criteria for many trials in CHF and has been used to characterize the hemodynamic effects of various classes of drugs which are used in treating CHF. How predictive an increase in EF on therapy is of morbidity and mortality is a matter of debate. This review outlines the utilization (or lack thereof), of EF in various CHF drug trials, its relationship to symptomatic improvement and morbidity/mortality.

In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, restoration of sinus rhythm confers substantial benefit

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefit of sinus rhythm (SR) restoration in patients with chronic controlled atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study on the short-term outcome (6 to 9 months) of clinical and echocardiographic variables following attempted cardioversion.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifteen men and 5 women, ranging in age from 40 to 76 years, who had chronic controlled (mean [+/- SD] ventricular rate, 82 +/- 10 beats/min) AF and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) of < 28% at baseline. Control was provided by retrospective paired echocardiographic examinations of six AF patients, plus the study cases with potentially unsuccessful cardioversion or early recurrence of AF.

INTERVENTIONS

Attempt to restore SR with amiodarone or electrical countershock.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Conversion was attained in 17 patients, but AF recurred early in 4 patients, 3 of whom had proven ischemic LVSD. In the 13 patients with sustained SR, LVFS increased from 20 +/- 4% to 31 +/- 6% (p < 0.0001). In contrast, no changes were detected in the control group (n = 13). This improvement was paralleled by decreases in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension (from 55 +/- 7 to 51 +/- 6 mm; p = 0.014), LV mass (from 181 +/- 28 to 159 +/- 37 g; p = 0.015), and left atrial diameter (from 45 +/- 9 mm to 42 +/- 7; p = 0.003). A marked decrease in heart rate (from 82 +/- 9 to 64 +/- 5 beats/min; p < 0.0001) and a reduction in New York Heart Association functional class (from 2.3 +/- 0.9 to 1.2 +/- 0.4; p = 0.0007) also were observed in patients with sustained SR but not among subjects in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when adequate control of the ventricular rate has been achieved, the LV function of patients with chronic AF greatly improves after restoration and maintenance of SR.

Endocrine predictors of acute hemodynamic effects of growth hormone in congestive heart failure

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to assess whether there could be any clinical and/or endocrine (spontaneous growth hormone [GH] secretion rate, baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1]) predictors and/or determinants of the acute effects of continuous intravenous infusion of recombinant human GH on hemodynamic parameters in 12 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study involved 12 male patients with chronic CHF (ischemic in 8 patients and idiopathic in 4). Ten patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and 2 in class II. The first 24 hours were considered the control period; in fact, during the following 24 hours, all the patients underwent intravenous constant pump infusion of recombinant human GH. Blood samples for GH assay were taken every 20 minutes during the first night of the study (from 10 PM to 6 AM). Moreover, blood samples for GH assay were also taken during exogenous GH infusion. Blood samples for IGF-1 assays were taken at 8 AM of each of the 3 days of the study. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and capillary wedge (PCWP) pressure, cardiac index, and arterial blood pressure were measured 30 minutes after right heart catheterization (baseline 1), at the end of the control period (baseline 2), and every 4 hours during GH infusion. A negative correlation has been found between mean nocturnal GH levels and baseline IGF-1 levels (r = -0.47, P =.124) and between mean nocturnal GH levels and both postinfusion absolute (r = -0.67, P <.05) and delta (postinfusion-preinfusion) (r = -0.58; P < 005) IGF-1 levels. No significant correlations have been found between several parameters of liver function (albumin, bilirubin, and pseudocholinesterase) and mean nocturnal GH. However, baseline IGF-1 levels showed a negative significant correlation (r = -0.76, P <.01) with total bilirubin and a positive correlation (r = 0.72, P <.01) with pseudocholinesterase. Baseline IGF-1 levels showed a significant negative correlation with baseline mean PAP (r = -0.68, P <.05) and PCWP (r = -0.70, P <.05) and a positive correlation with baseline cardiac index (r = 0.71, P <.05). Baseline IGF-1 levels also showed a significant negative correlation with absolute mean PAP (r = -0.63, P <.05) and mean PCWP (r = -0.67, P <.05) after GH infusion. After GH infusion, IGF-1 levels also negatively correlated with post-GH infusion mean PAP (r = -0.50, P =.09) and mean PCWP (r = -0.66, P <.05). The positive correlation between either baseline or postinfusion IGF-1 and the postinfusion cardiac index (r = 0.40 and 0.43, respectively) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

GH has acute functional effects on the heart in patients with CHF, including both an increase in myocardial contractility and a decrease in vascular resistances, and among patients with CHF, those with low baseline IGF-1 are likely to have fewer beneficial effects from GH infusion.

Symptomatic systolic ventricular failure

Over the past 20 to 30 years there have been significant advances in the management of heart failure related to improved understanding of pathophysiology, better methods of assessment, and improved drug treatments. The aims of treatment have broadened, with increased emphasis on earlier intervention. Clinical research activity in this area has been considerable, increasingly allowing an evidence-based approach to management. Most earlier trials of treatment were relatively short-term, small-group studies with various clinical end points, including severity of symptoms, exercise performance, and left ventricular function assessment; however, increasingly a higher standard of evidence has been required, including a provision of reliable, large-scale mortality trial data. This has been further encouraged, if not mandated, by the relatively recent appreciation that some agents may demonstrate dissociation of treatment effects, possibly dose related, with improved short-term outcomes but adverse effects on survival with prolonged treatment. The general principles of management of congestive heart failure encompass patient evaluation and confirmation of the diagnosis, consideration, and correction of underlying remediable causes and precipitating factors, pharmacological treatment, patient education and counseling, and planned follow-up, as summarized in recently published guidelines. This review focuses primarily on the available randomized controlled clinical trial evidence related to the pharmacological treatment of the clinical congestive heart failure syndrome. Other aspects of management, such as patient education, counseling, and planned follow-up, should be regarded as complementary to pharmacological treatment and important to ensure compliance and optimal long-term outcomes.

Pulmonary edema induced by angiotensin I in rats

This study was performed to demonstrate an experimental procedure of pulmonary edema induced by angiotensin I (AT I) in rats and to elucidate the mechanism of hemodynamic pulmonary edema. In the previous pilot study, 20 microg/kg of AT I was found to be an adequate dose for inducing pulmonary edema. To elucidate the mechanism of AT I pulmonary edema and protective measures against it, we observed the effects of captopril (CAP, 5 and 10 mg/kg), an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; losartan (LOS, 10 mg/kg), an angiotensin II (AT II)-receptor antagonist; and phentolamine (PHE, 10 mg/kg), an alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker, on AT I-induced pulmonary edema in rats. Similarly, we also observed the effects of CAP (10 and 20 mg/kg) on pulmonary edema induced by 25 microg/kg of adrenaline (ADR) in rats. The development of AT I-induced pulmonary edema was significantly suppressed by CAP and LOS, but was unaffected by PHE. In contrast, the development of ADR-induced pulmonary edema was not suppressed by CAP. These results suggest that AT I-induced pulmonary edema is developed via the AT II and a specific AT II-receptor, without the indirect action of adrenaline.

Efficacy of combination therapy with trandolapril and verapamil sr in primary hypertension: a 4 x 4 trial design. The Trandolapril Study Group

The Joint National Committee V suggested that combination therapy can provide effective blood pressure control in patients with stage I-IV hypertension. This 4 x 4 factorial trial design assessed the efficacy of monotherapy with trandolapril-an ACE inhibitor, and verapamil SR-a calcium antagonist, each in a range of 3 doses as monotherapy, and in combination therapy in patients with stage I-III diastolic hypertension. After a 4-week, single-blind placebo treatment period, 746 patients in 39 study centers were randomized to 1 of the 16 double-blind treatments for 6 weeks (placebo, verapamil SR monotherapy 120, 180, or 240 mg; trandolapril monotherapy 0.5, 2, or 8 mg; and trandolapril/verapamil SR combinations 0.5/120, 0.5/180, 0.5/240, 2/120, 2/180, 2/240, 8/120, 8/180, or 8/240 mg. Both mono and combination therapies achieved the primary efficacy parameters: lowered diastolic blood pressure (at trough) more than placebo, p < 01 (except the 120 mg verapamil SR, NS, 0.5 mg trandolapril, 0.5/180 and 2/120 combinations, p < 05), yielded a trough to peak ratio of > 0.52 and had higher percentages of responders compared to placebo. Combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy for sitting diastolic blood pressure 2/180, p < 01; 2/240 and 8/240, p < 05. There were no differences between active treatment groups and placebo as a percentage of patients having adverse reactions. Trandolapril, 2 and 8 mg, appeared to have a greater incremental effect on the systolic blood pressure reduction of the combination than verapamil SR 180 and 240 mg.

Angiotensin II-Induced Pulmonary Edema in a Rabbit Model

Effect of minaprine on hypoxia- or hypoxia/hypoglycemia (ischemia)-induced impairment of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) uptake by rat hippocampal slices was evaluated. Since minaprine was found to possess both a stimulating effect on acetylcholine release and a blocking effect on 5-HT2 receptors, the improving effect of minaprine on impaired 2DG uptake was compared to the findings obtained with oxotremorine, ketanserin and pentobarbital. Hippocampal slices were exposed to 20-min ischemia, and then these slices were returned to oxygenated and glucose-containing buffer for 6 hr. Ischemia reduced 30 mM KCl-induced 2DG uptake by the hippocampus. Pretreatment with minaprine, oxotremorine, pentobarbital and ketanserin attenuated the ischemia-induced decline of 2DG uptake. In addition, minaprine, oxotremorine and pentobarbital relatively recovered the increase of 2DG uptake in the hippocampal slices under hypoxia for 45 min. The present results suggest that minaprine exerts a neuroprotective action against ischemia-induced deficit of energy metabolism in vitro.

Circadian variation in blood pressure and heart rate in nonhypertensive congestive heart failure

This study was designed to determine whether decreases in the circadian variability of arterial blood pressure and heart rate measured in ambulatory patients would correlate with neurohumoral indices of the severity of congestive heart failure not the result of systemic arterial hypertension, and whether treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors would restore a more normal pattern. The study also examined the ability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to discern pharmacodynamic patterns in patients with congestive heart failure, which is associated with decreased variability in circadian variations in blood pressure and heart rate among hospitalized patients. Increased plasma norepinephrine, renin activity, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) have a positive correlation with worsening clinical status. ACE inhibitors have been found to be beneficial in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure and neurohumoral measurements were recorded in 30 patients with congestive heart failure (class II-IV, New York Heart Association) before treatment with lisinopril or captopril and repeated after 6 weeks of treatment. Fourier analysis was used as a curve-smoothing technique to compare the pharmacodynamics of the two ACE inhibitors. The absolute amplitude of systolic blood pressure correlated inversely with plasma norepinephrine and ANP (p = 0.004) but not with renin activity. Mean 24-h systemic arterial blood pressure did not decrease significantly after treatment with ACE inhibitors. An increase in absolute amplitude of systolic blood pressure correlated inversely with baseline amplitude (p < 0.00001). Inspection of the Fourier-smoothed curves demonstrated differences in the circadian effect of lisinopril and captopril on systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product. Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring may prove useful in the assessment of the severity and treatment of congestive heart failure.

Hemodynamic and hormonal effects of quinaprilat in patients with congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pharmacodynamic activity and safety of rising single and multiple doses of intravenous quinaprilat compared with placebo in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV congestive heart failure who were receiving digitalis or diuretic therapy or both.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups to receive low (0.5 to 1.0 mg), medium (1.0 and 2.5 mg), or high (5.0 and 10.0 mg) single intravenous doses of quinaprilat or placebo on day 1. On the basis of responses observed on day 1, the three treatment groups received stable multiple intravenous doses of either quinaprilat or placebo every 6 hours on days 2 and 3. Hemodynamic measurements, hormonal assessments, and safety were evaluated before and at specified intervals during the study.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, single and multiple doses of quinaprilat increased cardiac index and reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and right atrial pressure in a dose-related manner. No clinically important change in heart rate was observed. Hemodynamic changes after multiple-dose quinaprilat administration were similar to those observed after single doses and were generally sustained during the 6-hour dosing interval. Relative to placebo, quinaprilat reduced plasma angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity, angiotensin II concentration, and aldosterone concentration and increased plasma renin activity; no prominent changes in plasma catecholamine and atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations were observed. There were no clinically important drug-related changes in the safety parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Single and multiple intravenous doses of 0.5 to 10 mg quinaprilat are well-tolerated and produce favorable dose-dependent hemodynamic effects and hormonal changes consistent with those expected of an ACE inhibitor in patients with NYHA class III and IV congestive heart failure.

Lisinopril versus placebo in the treatment of heart failure: the Lisinopril Heart Failure Study Group

Lisinopril, a long-acting, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, was compared with placebo in a randomized, parallel, double-blind, 12-week study of 193 patients with heart failure. All patients were New York Heart Association Functional Class II, III, or IV and had remained symptomatic despite optimal dosing with digoxin and diuretics. After 12 weeks of therapy, the improvement in treadmill exercise duration was greater in the lisinopril group (113 seconds) compared with the placebo group (86 seconds). This improvement in exercise duration was particularly evident in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions less than 35% (lisinopril = 130 seconds; placebo = 94 seconds). In patients receiving lisinopril, the increase in exercise duration was accompanied by an improvement in quality of life as measured by the Yale Scale Dyspnea/Fatigue Index and in signs and symptoms of heart failure. In addition, the lisinopril group had a larger mean increase (3.7%) in left ventricular ejection fraction when compared with the placebo group (1.3%). Thus, lisinopril, administered once daily for 12 weeks, was well tolerated and efficacious in the treatment of heart failure when used concomitantly with diuretics and digoxin.

Pulmonary edema induced by angiotensin II in rats

We performed this study to demonstrate the experimental procedure for inducing pulmonary edema by angiotensin II (AT II) in rats and to determine the mechanism of hemodynamic pulmonary edema. In the pilot study, 10 micrograms/ml of AT II was found to be adequate as the edematogenic dose for inducing pulmonary edema. The edematogenic dose of AT II was intravenously given to rats pretreated with 20 mg/kg of an AT II-receptor antagonist, E 4177 (3-[(2'-carboxybiphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-2-cyclopropyl-7-methyl-3H- imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine), and to rats given 10 mg/kg of an alpha-adrenergic blocker, phentolamine. Similarly, pulmonary edema was induced by 25 micrograms/ml of adrenaline in rats pretreated with E 4177 (20 mg/kg) and rats with no pretreatment. E 4177 completely suppressed the development of AT II-induced pulmonary edema, whereas phentolamine could not. On the contrary, E 4177 could not suppress the development of adrenaline-induced pulmonary edema. We concluded that AT II-induced pulmonary edema will develop via the specific AT II receptor without the indirect action of adrenaline.

Improvement in exercise capacity of candidates awaiting heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

This study determined the frequency of improvement in peak oxygen uptake and its role in reevaluation of candidates awaiting heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory candidates for transplantation usually wait > 6 months to undergo the procedure, and during this period symptoms may lessen, and peak oxygen uptake may improve. Whereas initial transplant candidacy is based increasingly on objective criteria, there are no established guidelines for reevaluation to determine who can leave the active waiting list.

METHODS

All ambulatory transplant candidates with initial peak oxygen uptake < 14 ml/kg per min were identified. Of 107 such patients listed, 68 survived without early deterioration or transplantation to undergo repeat exercise. A strategy of reevaluation using specific clinical criteria and exercise performance was tested to determine whether patients with improved oxygen uptake could safely be followed without transplantation.

RESULTS

In 38 of the 68 patients, peak oxygen uptake increased by > or = 2 ml/kg per min to a level > or = 12 ml/kg per min after 6 +/- 5 months, together with an increase in anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen pulse and exercise heart rate reserve and a decrease in heart rate at rest. Increased peak oxygen uptake was accompanied by stable clinical status without congestion in 31 of 38 patients, and these 31 were taken off the active waiting list. At 2 years, their actuarial survival rate was 100%, and the survival rate without relisting for transplantation was 85%.

CONCLUSION

Reevaluation of exercise capacity and clinical status allowed removal of 31 (29%) of 107 ambulatory transplant candidates from the waiting list with excellent early survival despite low peak oxygen uptake on initial testing. The ability to increase peak oxygen uptake, particularly with increased peak oxygen pulse, may indicate improved prognosis as well as functional capacity and, in combination with stable clinical status, may be an indication to defer transplantation in favor of more compromised candidates.

Contribution of specific skeletal muscle metabolic abnormalities to limitation of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure: a phosphorus 31 nuclear magnetic resonance study

Several studies of phosphorus 31 (31P) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have demonstrated the presence of skeletal muscle metabolic abnormalities during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). We studied the contribution of these abnormalities to the limitation of exercise capacity in CHF. In 25 patients (age 57 +/- 2 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 28% +/- 1.6%, peak oxygen consumption (VO2) 16 +/- 1.2 ml/kg/mm) (mean +/- SEM), we studied the calf muscle at rest and during plantar flexion with 31P MRS. The phosphocreatine (PCr) depletion rate was significantly negatively correlated to peak VO2 (r = -0.62, p = 0.001) but not to LVEF. Muscle pH was correlated with the inorganic phosphorus (Pi)/PCr ratio (r = -0.69, p = 0.0001) and with the PCr/adenosine triphosphate beta (ATP beta) ratio (which negatively relates to adenosine diphosphate [ADP] concentration) (r = 0.65, p = 0.00001). Although muscle ATP (ATP/sum of phosphorus [sigma P] remained stable, in 8 patients ATP/sigma P decreased significantly (-15% +/- 4%, p = 0.0002). In this ATP-depleted group, peak VO2 was significantly lower than that of the nondepleted group and PCr depletion more rapid, whereas LVEF did not differ. Skeletal muscle metabolic abnormalities in CHF contribute markedly to the alteration of exercise capacity. Rapid PCr depletion and muscle acidosis are the most relevant abnormalities. ATP depletion and excessive increase in ADP during exercise may contribute further to exercise limitation specifically in patients with more marked CHF.

Optimizing the treatment of heart failure

The introduction of new drugs, and a re-evaluation of older drugs, have radically changed the pharmacological management of heart failure. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, digitalis, diuretics and the combination of nitrates and hydralazine are now used. The first Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS I) and the second Vasodilator therapy in Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT II) have demonstrated that patients with severe or advanced heart failure should be treated with ACE inhibitors, digitalis and diuretics (other vasodilators can be used if ACE inhibitors are contraindicated) to improve symptoms and duration of life. The Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) and the Munich Heart Failure trial have shown that patients with mild heart failure should be treated with ACE inhibitors. However, data from several large clinical registries suggest that only 40% of patients with heart failure are being given ACE inhibitors perhaps through fear of serious renal damage or hypotension; these fears are unfounded. Patients with anterior myocardial infarcts and reduced left ventricular function also benefit from ACE inhibitors. The fourth International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS 4) and results from the Gruppo Italiano per Io Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto miocardico 3 (GISSI 3) have indicated that patients with acute myocardial infarction benefit from early ACE inhibitor therapy and that survival is increased. Heart failure treatment can be optimized by establishing a disease etiology and stressing the need to restrict dietary sodium. ACE inhibitors should be used for depressed left systolic ventricular function, including patients in New York Heart Association class I heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Exercise testing in heart failure. A critical review

Exercise intolerance is one of the primary characteristics of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF). Therefore, exercise testing has been widely used in the assessment of CHF patients, both to define the severity of the disease and to assess the efficacy of pharmaceutical agents in clinical trials. A number of different exercise tests can be used, although maximal exercise testing is the most common. Maximal exercise capacity can be determined by measuring exercise duration during incremental exercise, or maximal oxygen (O2) consumption, or it can be estimated by anaerobic threshold. While baseline exercise testing in CHF patients accurately identifies and quantifies cardiac failure and determines prognosis, it is of limited value in assessing changes that occur as a result of drug therapy. A key drawback of exercise testing as a measurement of drug effect is the fact that exercise changes produced by drug intervention do not correlate well with changes in the mortality rate. Several examples of the lack of correlation between exercise testing and mortality rates have been observed in clinical trials with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and vasodilators. ACE inhibitors have a modest effect on maximal exercise capacity but they improve survival. It is thought that neuroendocrine activation more closely reflects mortality rates and also the changes in survival observed with pharmacological intervention compared with other modes of evaluation.

Postinfarct heart failure: role of diuretic therapy

There can be no doubt that ACE inhibitors prolong survival in patients with a low ejection fraction. There is no evidence whether or not diuretics have the same effect. The pathophysiology of asymptomatic patients with poor left ventricular function differs from that of patients with the clinical syndrome of heart failure, and different treatments may well be needed. Diuretics still have a crucial role in the relief of symptoms.

Angiotensin II receptor blockade: an innovative approach to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy

Through the multiple actions of angiotensin II (AII), the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) participates in cardiovascular homeostasis. Angiotensin II acts by binding to specific membrane-bound receptors, which are coupled to one of several signal transduction pathways. These AII receptors exhibit heterogeneity, represented by AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes. The AT1 receptor mediates the major cardiovascular action of the RAS. This receptor has been cloned from multiple species, disclosing features consistent with a transmembrane, G-protein-linked receptor. Further AII receptor heterogeneity is evident by the cloning of isotypes of the AT1 receptor. Blocking the interaction of AII with its receptor is the most direct site to inhibit the actions of the RAS. Many AII receptor antagonists, including peptide analogs of AII and antibodies directed against AII, possess unfavorable properties that have limited their clinical utility. The discovery and further development of imidazole compounds with AII antagonist properties and favorable characteristics, however, has promise for clinical utility. The leader in this field is a selective AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (previously known as DuP 753 or MK-954). Losartan was demonstrated to be an effective antagonist of many AII-induced actions and an effective antihypertensive agent in many animal models of hypertension (HTN). Losartan also demonstrated secondary benefits in preventing stroke, treating congestive heart failure (CHF), and delaying the progression of renal disease in animal models. Clinical studies confirm the AII antagonist action of losartan and suggest that losartan will be effective in the treatment of essential HTN. AII antagonism is likely to provide useful treatment in essential HTN and CHF, conditions in which the RAS is known to play a major role. The utility of AII antagonism may extend beyond that of HTN and CHF, as suggested by the potential usefulness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in the treatment or prevention of many other diseases. The key advantage AII antagonists provide over ACE inhibitors is that they may avoid unwanted side effects, related to bradykinin potentiation with the latter drugs. The AII antagonists will help determine the role of the RAS in physiologic regulation and in the pathophysiology of various disease states.

The pharmacological characterization of FK 739, a new angiotensin II-receptor antagonist

The pharmacological properties of FK 739, a new angiotensin II-receptor antagonist, were examined. FK 739 inhibited the specific binding of [125I]-angiotensin II to rat aortic smooth muscle cell membrane with an IC50 value of 8.6 nM, but did not displace the specific binding of [125I]-angiotensin II to bovine cerebellum membrane. In isolated helical strips of rabbit aorta, FK 739 shifted the concentration-response curve of angiotensin II-induced contraction in parallel to the right, and the values of the slope and pA2 were 1.06 and 8.45, respectively. In in vivo studies, oral administration of FK 739 at 10 mg/kg significantly inhibited the angiotensin I-induced pressor response in normotensive rats and dogs, and it caused a fall of mean blood pressure in renal hypertensive rats and dogs. In spontaneously hypertensive rats, FK 739 at 32 and 100 mg/kg significantly decreased the mean blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, we studied whether FK 739 would cause side effects such as dry cough, like other ACE inhibitors did. Oral administration of FK 739 (10 and 32 mg/kg) did not affect the capsaicin-induced bronchial edema. On the other hand, captopril (10 mg/kg) significantly enhanced capsaicin-induced bronchial edema. These results indicate that FK 739 is a potent and competitive antagonist for AT1-type receptors, and suggest that FK 739 might be a safe and useful agent for the treatment of hypertension in clinical trials.

Pharmacological profile of valsartan: a potent, orally active, nonpeptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor subtype

1. The pharmacological profile of valsartan, (S)-N-valeryl-N-([2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]-methyl)-vali ne, a potent, highly selective, and orally active antagonist at the angiotensin II (AII) AT1-receptor, was studied in vitro and in vivo. 2. Valsartan competed with [125I]-AII at its specific binding sites in rat aortic smooth muscle cell membranes (AT1-receptor subtype) with a Ki of 2.38 nM, but was about 30,000 times less active in human myometrial membranes (AT2-receptor subtype). 3. In rabbit aortic rings incubated for 5 min with valsartan, at concentrations of 2, 20 and 200 nM, the concentration-response curve of AII was displaced to the right and the maximum response was reduced by 33%, 36% and 40%, respectively. Prolongation of the incubation time with valsartan to 1 h or 3 h, further reduced the maximum response by 48% or 59% (after 20 nM) and by 59% or 60% (after 200 nM) respectively. After 3 h incubation an apparent pKb value of 9.26 was calculated. Contractions induced by noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine, or potassium chloride were not affected by valsartan. No agonistic effects were observed in the rabbit aorta at concentrations of valsartan up to 2 microM. 4. In bovine adrenal glomerulosa, valsartan inhibited AII-stimulated aldosterone release without affecting the maximum response (pA2 8.4). 5. In the pithed rat, oral administration of valsartan (10 mg kg-1) shifted the AII-induced pressor response curves to the right, without affecting responses induced by the electrical stimulation of the sympathetic outflow or by noradrenaline. Animals treated with valsartan 24 h before pithing also showed significant inhibition of the response to AII. 6. In conscious, two-kidney, one-clip renal hypertensive rats (2K1C), valsartan decreased blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner after single i.v. or oral administration. The respective ED30 values were 0.06 mg kg-1 (i.v.) and 1.4 mg kg-1 (p.o.). The antihypertensive effect lasted for at least 24 h after either route of administration. After repeated oral administration for 4 days (3 and 10 mg kg-1 daily), in 2K1C renal hypertensive rats, systolic blood pressure was consistently decreased, but heart rate was not significantly affected. 7. In conscious, normotensive, sodium-depleted marmosets, valsartan decreased mean arterial pressure, measured by telemetry, after oral doses of 1-30 mg kg-1. The hypotensive effect persisted up to 12 h after 3 and 10 mg kg-1 and up to 24 h after 30 mg kg-1. 8. In sodium-depleted marmosets, the hypotensive effect of valsartan lasted longer than that of losartan(DuP 753). In renal hypertensive rats, both agents had a similar duration (24 h), but a different onset of action (valsartan at 1 h, losartan between 2 h and 24 h).9. These results demonstrate that valsartan is a potent, specific, highly selective antagonist of AII at theAT1-receptor subtype and does not possess agonistic activity. Furthermore, it is an efficacious, orally active, blood pressure-lowering agent in conscious renal hypertensive rats and in conscious normotensive,sodium-depleted primates.

Acute effect of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy on ventilatory and hemodynamic responses to exercise. Pathophysiological basis for early symptomatic improvement

BACKGROUND

Improvement of exertional dyspnea occurs immediately after percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC), but the pathophysiological basis for this early symptomatic improvement has not been elucidated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Exercise hemodynamic measurement and exercise ventilatory measurement with arterial blood gas analysis were performed in 21 patients aged 50.4 +/- 9.5 years (mean +/- SD) with symptomatic mitral stenosis before and a few days after PTMC. Exercise ventilatory measurement were also performed in 14 normal control subjects aged 48.9 +/- 4.9 years. After PTMC, mitral valve area increased (from 1.0 +/- 0.3 to 1.7 +/- 0.3 cm2, P < .001), mean mitral gradient (from 12.2 +/- 5.2 to 5.2 +/- 2.2 mm Hg, P < .001), and mean left atrial pressure (from 18.7 +/- 6.1 to 12.1 +/- 4.0 mm Hg, P < .001) decreased. All patients experienced significant symptomatic improvement soon after PTMC. Comparison of hemodynamic parameters at the same ergometer work rate showed a significant decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (from 77 +/- 18 to 67 +/- 14 mm Hg, P < .001) and diastolic pressure (from 36 +/- 10 to 28 +/- 7 mm Hg, P < .001) and a significant increase in cardiac output (from 6.4 +/- 1.4 to 8.1 +/- 1.9 L/min, P < .001). Despite the improvement in exercise hemodynamics and symptoms, exercise capacity determined by peak oxygen uptake (from 18.0 +/- 2.9 to 18.6 +/- 3.1 mL.kg-1 x min-1) and anaerobic threshold (from 11.7 +/- 2.4 to 12.0 +/- 2.4 mL.kg-1 x min-1) remained unchanged. Excessive exercise ventilation, as assessed by the slope of the regression line between expired minute ventilation and carbon dioxide output, decreased significantly from 37.2 +/- 6.7 to 33.9 +/- 5.8 (P < .001), but remained significantly higher than that in the normal subjects (27.9 +/- 3.6, P < .01). The ratio of total dead space to tidal volume and total dead space per breath during exercise decreased significantly after PTMC (P < .05). The change in excessive exercise ventilation after PTMC was correlated with the change in dead space to tidal volume ratio (r = .59).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant relief of exertional dyspnea immediately after PTMC is not accompanied by an improvement in exercise capacity. A decrease in excessive ventilation due to a decrease in physiological dead space resulting from hemodynamic improvement partly contributes to the early relief of symptoms after PTMC. However, lung compliance, which was not measured in the present study, may have changed after PTMC. This change may also contribute to the symptomatic improvement.

Can further benefit be achieved by adding flosequinan to patients with congestive heart failure who remain symptomatic on diuretic, digoxin, and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor? Results of the flosequinan-ACE inhibitor trial (FACET)

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and digoxin are each effective in treating congestive heart failure, but many patients remain symptom-limited on all three medications. This trial was designed to determine whether the addition of oral flosequinan, a new direct-acting arterial and venous vasodilator with possible dose-dependent positive inotropic effects, improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in such patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, double-blind multicenter trial, 322 patients with predominantly New York Heart Association class II or III congestive heart failure and left ventricular ejection fractions of 35% or less, who were stabilized on a diuretic, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and digoxin, were treated with 100 mg flosequinan once daily, 75 mg flosequinan twice daily, or matching placebo. Efficacy was evaluated with serial measurements of treadmill exercise time, responses to the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (LWHF), and clinical assessments during a baseline phase and a 16-week treatment period. After 16 weeks, 100 mg flosequinan once daily produced a significant increment in median exercise time (64 seconds at 16 weeks) compared with placebo (5 seconds), whereas the higher-dose flosequinan group did not show a statistically significant increase. Flosequinan (100 mg once daily) also improved the overall LWHF score significantly compared with placebo; both active therapies decreased the physical component, but 75 mg flosequinan twice daily was associated with a trend toward worsening of the emotional component. Most clinical assessments tended to improve on active therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that additional symptomatic benefit can be attained by adding flosequinan to a therapeutic regimen already including a converting enzyme inhibitor. Because in the future most patients will fall into this category, flosequinan is a potential adjunctive agent in the management of severe congestive heart failure. However, because recent evidence indicates that the flosequinan dose studied in the present trial has an adverse effect on survival, the benefit-to-risk ratio must be assessed in individual patients.

How should physicians view heart failure? The philosophical and physiological evolution of three conceptual models of the disease

During the last 50 years, physicians have developed three distinct conceptual models of heart failure that have provided a rational basis for the treatment of the disease. In the 1940s through the 1960s, physicians regarded heart failure principally as an edematous disorder and formulated a cardiorenal model of the disease in an attempt to explain the sodium retention of these patients. This model led to the widespread use of digitalis and diuretics. In the 1970s and 1980s, physicians viewed heart failure principally as a hemodynamic disorder and formulated a cardiocirculatory model of the disease in an attempt to explain patients' symptoms and disability. This model led to the widespread use of peripheral vasodilators and the development of novel positive inotropic agents. Now, in the 1990s, physicians are beginning to think about heart failure as a neurohormonal disorder in an attempt to explain the progression of the disease and its poor long-term survival. This new conceptual framework has led to the widespread use of converting-enzyme inhibitors and the development of beta blockers for the treatment of heart failure. Which conceptual model most accurately describes the syndrome of heart failure and leads physicians to utilize the most effective treatment? This paper critically reviews the available evidence supporting and refuting the validity of all three models of heart failure. We conclude that, to varying degrees, all three approaches provide useful, but incomplete, insights into this physiologically complex and therapeutically challenging disease.

Counteraction of the vasodilator effects of enalapril by aspirin in severe heart failure

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to determine if a standard dose of aspirin interacts relevantly with the circulatory effects of enalapril in severe heart failure.

BACKGROUND

The frequent association of heart failure with coronary artery disease confers potential for combined treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor aspirin, the pharmacodynamic actions of which are, in part, mutually opposed.

METHODS

In 18 patients, on 3 consecutive days, hemodynamic measurements were performed at baseline and 4 h after administration of a double placebo, enalapril (10 mg) plus placebo and enalapril plus aspirin (350 mg) according to a double-blind, randomized, crossover protocol.

RESULTS

Enalapril given before aspirin led to significant decreases in systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular filling pressure and total pulmonary resistance together with a significant increase in cardiac output. When given with or on the day after aspirin, enalapril did not elicit significant changes in any of these variables. There was a clear tendency to lower values for pulmonary artery pressure on all regimens, and slowing of the heart rate was incurred whether or not aspirin had been given. Chi-square analysis of the individual responses showed that the probability of effecting a decrease in systemic vascular resistance > or = 300 dynes.s.cm-5 was six times greater when enalapril was given without aspirin (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In severe heart failure, the prostaglandin synthesis inhibition by aspirin counteracts the systemic arterial vasodilation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with enalapril and substantiates its dependence on the integrity of prostaglandin metabolism. Trends toward reductions of pulmonary artery pressure and slowing of the heart rate were still observed, presumably subsequent to lowered norepinephrine concentrations indicating maintenance of prostaglandin-independent actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.

Persistent hemodynamic improvement with short-term nitrate therapy in patients with chronic congestive heart failure already treated with captopril

To evaluate the therapeutic potential of organic nitrates in patients with chronic congestive heart (CHF) failure already treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the temporal hemodynamic effects of oral isosorbide dinitrate, 40 to 120 mg administered every 6 hours to 11 nitrate responders who had been treated with captopril 89 +/- 32 mg/day, were studied. The administration of isosorbide dinitrate resulted in a significant decline in mean right atrial pressure, from 13 +/- 6 mm Hg at baseline (mean value of measurements performed every 2 hours for 24 hours with captopril therapy) to 9 +/- 4 mm Hg at 1 hour with persistent effect for most of the study period. Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 38 +/- 7 mm Hg at baseline to 29 +/- 9 mm Hg at 1 hour, with effect persisting for 24 hours. Mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure also decreased from 24 +/- 6 to 15 +/- 7 mm Hg at 1 hour and remained significantly reduced for 20 hours. Systemic blood pressure demonstrated a transient decrease lasting 2 hours after initiation of therapy which was asymptomatic in all patients. The results of this study demonstrate a preserved vasodilatory effect of organic nitrates in patients already treated with ACE inhibitors. Nitrates mediated improvement in right and left ventricular filling pressures, and reduction of pulmonary hypertension demonstrates a rationale for the use of these therapeutic methods in combination and suggest the need for long-term evaluation of the effect of nitrate therapy in patients with chronic CHF already treated with ACE inhibitors.

Long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: once-daily lisinopril versus twice-daily captopril in mild-to-moderate heart failure

Once-daily lisinopril (5-20 mg) was compared with twice-daily captopril (12.5-50 mg) in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition conducted in 31 centers for 12 weeks in patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-III) who were currently receiving digitalis and/or diuretics. The drugs were compared with regard to their effects on exercise duration, measured with bicycle ergometry, and on ectopic activity, measured using Holter monitoring. Both drugs significantly increased exercise duration after both 6 and 12 weeks of randomized treatment. Neither ACE inhibitor had any significant impact on the hourly rate of either ventricular ectopic counts or couplets, nor was there any difference between treatments with regard to the proportions of patients in whom ventricular ectopic counts were reduced. Both drugs were well tolerated, with no differences observed between treatments. Potassium, urea, and creatinine levels remained stable for both treatments throughout the study.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, left ventricular dysfunction, and early heart failure

A study was undertaken to examine the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on exercise performance in 18 patients with major impairment of left ventricular systolic function. The study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, and patients received treatment with either once-daily lisinopril (2.5-10 mg) or placebo for a period of 6 weeks. A total of 15 patients completed the study. Compared with placebo, lisinopril had no significant effect on supine or standing blood pressure or heart rate. Although lisinopril had no effect on exercise duration during a low-intensity exercise protocol, in patients undergoing a high-intensity exercise protocol, there was a trend toward improved exercise time and peak oxygen consumption improved significantly. In addition, treatment with lisinopril resulted in an increase in renal blood flow and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Moreover, administration of once-daily lisinopril 10 mg resulted in a decrease in plasma concentrations of angiotensin II, aldosterone, and atrial natriuretic peptide, and an increase in plasma concentrations of active renin.

Effect of flosequinan on exercise capacity and cardiac function in patients with chronic mild heart failure: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

Although beneficial effects of a new vasodilating agent, flosequinan, have been demonstrated in patients with severe heart failure, its efficacy has not been studied in patients with a less severe form of chronic heart failure. In this study, the effects of 4 weeks' administration of flosequinan, 50 mg daily, and placebo on exercise capacity, cardiac function, and symptoms of heart failure were investigated in 24 patients with chronic mild heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class, mainly class II) in a double-blind clinical trial. When the parameter changes during the treatment period of the flosequinan and placebo groups were compared, no significant difference was found in any of the measurements except for left ventricular fractional shortening determined from M-mode echocardiograms; it was increased by 2.9 +/- 1.3% in the flosequinan group whereas it was decreased by 1.3 +/- 0.9% in the placebo group (P less than 0.05 vs flosequinan treatment). However, when compared to baseline values, flosequinan significantly increased exercise time in the symptom-limited maximal exercise test (704 +/- 103 to 763 +/- 107 s, P less than 0.05) and the oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (13.8 +/- 1.3 to 16.7 +/- 1.4 ml/min kg, P less than 0.05), and improved symptoms assessed with a new heart failure severity classification (a median value of 2.0-1.5, P less than 0.05). These improvements were not observed in the placebo group. Serious adverse effects were not observed in either group. These results suggest that flosequinan is useful for the treatment of chronic mild heart failure as well as severe heart failure.

Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on the long-term progression of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with heart failure. SOLVD Investigators

BACKGROUND

In patients with heart failure, activation of the renin-angiotensin system is common and has been postulated to provide a stimulus for further left ventricular (LV) structural and functional derangement. We tested the hypothesis that chronic administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril prevents or reverses LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction among patients with depressed ejection fraction (EF) and symptomatic heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined subsets of patients enrolled in the Treatment Trial of Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Fifty-six patients with mild to moderate heart failure underwent serial radionuclide ventriculograms, and 16 underwent serial left heart catheterizations, before and after randomization to enalapril (2.5-20 mg/day) or placebo. At 1 year, there were significant treatment differences in LV end-diastolic volume (EDV; p less than 0.01), end-systolic volume (ESV; p less than 0.005), and EF (p less than 0.05). These effects resulted from increases in EDV (mean +/- SD, 136 +/- 27 to 151 +/- 38 ml/m2) and ESV (103 +/- 24 to 116 +/- 24 ml/m2) in the placebo group and decreases in EDV (140 +/- 44 to 127 +/- 37 ml/m2) and ESV (106 +/- 42 to 93 +/- 37 ml/m2) in the enalapril group. Mean LVEF increased in enalapril patients from 0.25 +/- 0.07 to 0.29 +/- 0.08 (p less than 0.01). There was a significant treatment difference in LV end-diastolic pressure at 1 year (p less than 0.05), with changes paralleling those of EDV. The time constant of LV relaxation changed only in the placebo group (p less than 0.01 versus enalapril), increasing from 59.2 +/- 8.0 to 67.8 +/- 7.2 msec. Serial radionuclide studies over a period of 33 months showed increases in LV volumes only in the placebo group. Two weeks after withdrawal of enalapril, EDV and ESV increased to baseline levels but not to the higher levels observed with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF, chronic ACE inhibition with enalapril prevents progressive LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction (increased ESV). These effects probably result from a combination of altered remodeling and sustained reduction in preload and afterload.

Effects of once-daily benazepril therapy on exercise tolerance and manifestations of chronic congestive heart failure. The Benazepril Heart Failure Study Group

The effects of the long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril hydrochloride on exercise tolerance and signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) were evaluated in a double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients with chronic New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms of CHF and an ejection fraction by radionuclide scanning of less than or equal to 35% were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with ascending doses of oral benazepril (n = 114) or placebo (n = 58) once daily, while continuing to receive background therapy with digoxin and diuretics. After randomization, patients were evaluated clinically every 2 weeks during a 12-week, double-blind treatment period. Maximal exercise tolerance was measured before and at specified time points after randomization by graded treadmill exercise testing. At week 12, mean exercise time increased 95 +/- 12 (SEM) seconds in the group receiving benazepril, whereas the increase was 37 +/- 18 seconds in the group receiving placebo (p less than 0.01 for the difference between the groups). There was also greater improvement in overall clinical status and in the signs and symptoms of CHF in benazepril-treated patients than in control subjects. There were 3 deaths in placebo-treated patients and none in benazepril-treated patients (p less than 0.05); the overall incidence of adverse effects was identical in the 2 groups. Benazepril is a well-tolerated angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor that provides clinically important improvement in exercise tolerance and in signs and symptoms when given once daily to patients with CHF receiving background therapy with digoxin and a diuretic.

Effectiveness of preload reserve as a determinant of clinical status in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The SOLVD Investigators

The hemodynamic determinants of clinical status in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction have not been established. In the present study, preload reserve--LV distension during exercise--was related to clinical status, and the effect of acute angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition was examined in 97 patients with ejection fraction less than or equal to 0.35 enrolled in the trial, Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Sixty-one asymptomatic patients (group I) were compared with 36 patients with symptomatic heart failure (group II). Radionuclide LV volumes were measured at rest and during maximal cycle exercise. Group II patients had higher resting heart rates, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and lower ejection fractions (all p less than 0.005). During exercise, only patients in group I had increased stroke volume (from 35 +/- 8 to 39 +/- 11 ml/m2 [mean +/- SD; p less than 0.0005]) due to an increase in end-diastolic volume (from 119 +/- 29 to 126 +/- 29 ml/m2 [p less than 0.0005]), contributing to a greater increase in LV minute output (p less than 0.0001, group I vs group II). After administration of intravenous enalapril (1.25 mg), LV end-diastolic volume response to exercise was augmented in group II (rest, 140 +/- 42; exercise, 148 +/- 43 ml/m2; p less than 0.0005) and LV output response increased slightly (p less than 0.05). Thus, in patients with asymptomatic systolic dysfunction, recruitment of preload during exercise is responsible for maintaining a stroke volume contribution to the cardiac output response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of quinapril on blood pressure and heart rate in congestive heart failure

The effect of quinapril on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and their variabilities in 12 patients with severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III and IV) was assessed using ambulatory electrocardiographic and intraarterial monitoring. Mean +/- standard deviation daytime BP was 122/75 +/- 20/15 mm Hg at baseline and 113/70 +/- 13/16 mm Hg after 16 weeks of therapy with quinapril (p greater than 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP); mean nighttime BP was 114/69 +/- 19/14 mm Hg at baseline and 107/69 +/- 15/14 mm Hg with quinapril (p greater than 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP). Mean daytime HR was unchanged but nighttime HR was reduced from 77 +/- 11 to 71 +/- 10 beats/min, p = 0.02. HR variability (difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles of the frequency distribution of RR intervals) increased from 91 +/- 34 to 134 +/- 47 ms, p = 0.008. The variability of successive differences between RR intervals also increased significantly (75th to 25th percentile = 17 +/- 4 ms at baseline and 31 +/- 26 ms with quinapril, p = 0.02). Long-term quinapril caused clinically unimportant decreases in BP in patients with severe congestive heart failure. An increase in vagal activity caused by the reduction in circulating angiotensin II may account for the effect of converting enzyme inhibition on HR and its variability.

Vasodilators. A re-evaluation of their role in heart failure

Over the past 25 years, the concept of circulation in heart failure has evolved from that of a simple circuit with a weak pump and high pressures to a complex integrated system of cellular modification, cardiac compensation and systemic neurohumoral responses. The original model of cardiac afterload as the systemic vascular resistance has been refined to reflect the interdependence of preload and afterload and the central role of atrioventricular valve regurgitation. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the impact of vasodilator therapy far exceeds the direct haemodynamic effects on preload and afterload, and depends on the mechanism by which vasodilation is achieved, with increasing emphasis on those agents which oppose neurohumoral activation. The potential goals of therapy have broadened to include not only haemodynamic stabilisation through tailored therapy for patients referred with advanced heart failure, but also the prevention of disease progression for patients with asymptomatic ventricular dilation. As the different profiles of heart failure have come to be recognised, the purpose and design of vasodilator treatment must now be considered individually for each patient.

Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy

Cine nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging was used to serially measure cardiovascular function in 17 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 45% who were treated for 3 months with benazepril hydrochloride, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, while continuing treatment with diuretic agents and digoxin. Interobserver reproducibilities for ejection fraction (r = 0.94, SEE 3.3%), end-systolic volume (r = 0.98, SEE 10.6 ml), end-diastolic volume (r = 0.99, SEE 8.29 ml), end-systolic mass (r = 0.96, SEE 15.4 g), end-systolic wall stress (r = 0.91, SEE 10 dynes.s.cm-5) and end-systolic stress/volume ratio (r = 0.85, SEE 0.13) demonstrated applicability of cine NMR imaging for the serial assessment of cardiovascular function in response to pharmacologic interventions in patients with heart failure. During 12 weeks of treatment with benazepril, ejection fraction increased progressively from 29.7 +/- 2.2% (mean +/- SEM) to 36 +/- 2.2% (p less than 0.05), end-diastolic volume decreased from 166 +/- 14 to 158 +/- 12 ml (p = NS), end-systolic volume decreased from 118 +/- 12 to 106 +/- 11 ml (p less than 0.05), left ventricular mass decreased from 235 +/- 13 to 220 +/- 12 g (p less than 0.05), end-systolic wall stress decreased 29% from 90 +/- 5 to 64 +/- 5 dynes.s.cm-5 (p less than 0.05), end-systolic pressure decreased from 92.6 +/- 3.7 to 78.8 +/- 5.3 (p less than 0.05) and end-systolic stress/volume ratio, a load-independent index of contractility, decreased from 0.83 +/- 0.05 to 0.67 +/- 0.06 (p less than 0.05), demonstrating that improved ejection fraction is due to afterload reduction.