Diltiazem, nifedipine, and their combination in patients with stable angina pectoris: effects on angina, exercise tolerance, and the ambulatory electrocardiographic ST segment

Angina in 2022: Current Perspectives

Angina is the main symptom of ischemic heart disease; mirroring a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand. Epicardial coronary stenoses are only responsible for nearly half of the patients presenting with angina; whereas in several cases; symptoms may underlie coronary vasomotor disorders; such as microvascular dysfunction or epicardial spasm. Various medications have been proven to improve the prognosis and quality of life; representing the treatment of choice in stable angina and leaving revascularization only in particular coronary anatomies or poorly controlled symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Antianginal medications aim to reduce the oxygen supply-demand mismatch and are generally effective in improving symptoms; quality of life; effort tolerance and time to ischemia onset and may improve prognosis in selected populations. Since antianginal medications have different mechanisms of action and side effects; their use should be tailored according to patient history and potential drug-drug interactions. Angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries patients should be phenotyped with invasive assessment and treated accordingly. Patients with refractory angina represent a higher-risk population in which some therapeutic options are available to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; but robust data from large randomized controlled trials are still lacking.

Clinical Experience with Diltiazem in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in the world. Coronary artery diseases, atrial fibrillation or hypertensive heart disease, are among the most important cardiovascular disorders. Hypertension represents a significant risk factor for cardiovascular mortality; thus, control of high blood pressure has become a priority to prevent major complications. Although the choice of drugs for treating hypertension remains controversial, extensive clinical evidences point to calcium channel blockers as first-line agents. Diltiazem, a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is an effective and safe antihypertensive drug, alone or in combination with other agents. Diltiazem lowers myocardial oxygen demand through a reduction in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac contractility, representing also a good alternative for the treatment of stable chronic angina. Furthermore, diltiazem reduces conduction in atrioventricular node, which is also useful for heart rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this review, clinical experts highlight studies on diltiazem effectiveness and safety for the treatment of several cardiovascular diseases and make evidence-based recommendations regarding the management of diltiazem in the clinical practice.

Funding

Lacer Spain.

Efficacy and safety of dual calcium channel blockade for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dual calcium-channel blocker (CCB) with a dihydropyridine (DHP) and a nondihydropyridine (NDHP) has been proposed for hypertension treatment. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach is not well known.

METHODS

A MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomized clinical trials published on this topic from 1966 to February 2012 was performed. Efficacy outcomes of decrease in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures from baseline, changes in heart rate (HR), and adverse effects were compared between dual CCB therapy vs. DHP or NDHP. SBP, DBP, and HR were expressed as weighted mean deviation (WMD).

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies with 153 patients were included. Dual CCB produced a significantly greater reduction in SBP (21.6±9.2 mmHg) from baseline than DHP (10.3±6.3 mmHg (WMD = 10.9 mmHg, P < 0.0001)) or NDHP (8.9±4.2 mmHg (WMD = 14.1 mmHg, P = 0.002)). Dual CCB therapy reduced DBP from baseline more than either monotherapy (dual CCB = 17.5±10.2 mmHg vs. DHP = 11.6±8.7 mmHg, WMD = 5.5 mmHg, P < 0.001; and NDHP = 10.5±5.6 mmHg, WMD = 5.3 mmHg, P = 0.03). Dual CCB therapy had significantly lower HR compared to DHP (P < 0.001) but was comparable to NDHP (P = 0.12) (Delta change dual CCB = -4.0±3.5 vs. DHP = -2.0±1.5 and NDHP = -6.0±5.0 beats/min). Dual CCB therapy did not increase adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual CCB therapy lowers blood pressure significantly better than CCB monotherapy, without an increase in adverse events. However, given the lack of long-term outcome data on efficacy and safety, dual CCB therapy should be used with restraint, if at all. Large-scale long-term trials are needed to further evaluate such a strategy.

[Benefits and risks of exercise training in coronary artery disease patients]

Cardiac rehabilitation programs improve vital and functional prognosis in patients suffering from stable angina or after myocardial infarction. The studies focusing on the balance risks/benefits of cardiac rehabilitation are relatively old; therefore, the patients included in these studies are different from today's patients mainly because of different management of the acute phases and of modifications of the medical treatment in stable angina (ABCDE protocols). The authors present the preliminary results of a French multicentric register focusing on complications during cardiac rehabilitation conducted on behalf of the French Society of Cardiology. Complications are rare: one resuscitated cardiac arrest/1.3 millions exercise training hours and no death was reported. It must be highlighted that, in some patients, the antianginal medical treatment must be reinforced in order to allow exercise training without myocardial ischaemia.

Combined Effects of Benidipine and Diltiazem in a Rat Model of Experimental Angina

We examined the combined effects of the calcium channel blockers 1,4-dihydropyridine (benidipine) and benzothiazepine (diltiazem) on vasopressin-induced myocardial ischemia in anesthetized rats, an experimental model of angina. Benidipine (3, 10 microg/kg, i.v.) and diltiazem (300, 1000 microg/kg, i.v.) caused dose-related inhibition of vasopressin-induced S-wave depression, an index of myocardial ischemia. Co-administration of low doses of benidipine (3 microg/kg) and diltiazem (300 microg/kg) almost completely inhibited the S-wave depression, where the efficacy was similar to that obtained with the use of high doses of benidipine (10 microg/kg) or diltiazem (1000 microg/kg). These results suggest that the administration strategy employed may be useful in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Sustained-release diltiazem reduces myocardial ischemic episodes in end-stage renal disease: a double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis and suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD) often receive doses of calcium channel antagonists that are too low. This may be the result of physician's desire to avoid adverse side effects during hemodialysis. The aim of this study was the assessment of the safety and efficacy of incremental doses of diltiazem for the treatment of myocardial ischemia in ERSD patients with CAD to identify the optimal dose of the drug. A total of 196 chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled with CAD showing more than 5 min of transient myocardial ischemia during a 48-h Holter ECG monitoring. A double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial design was used. Incremental doses of diltiazem (120 to 240 mg/d) were administered in 4 mo. With a dose of 120 and 180 mg/d, a significant reduction in the number and duration of total and symptomatic ischemic episodes was observed (P < 0.001), but the number and the duration of silent ischemic episodes were not reduced. Conversely, the efficacy on silent myocardial ischemia was obtained with a dosage of diltiazem of 240 mg/d (P < 0.001). In addition, with a sustained-release formulation (120 mg twice daily), the efficacy was similar to that obtained with four 60-mg tablets, but the safety was improved, especially during hemodialytic session. The circadian variations analysis of transient ischemic episodes showed a significant reduction in both ischemic peaks observed at baseline only with 240 mg/d of diltiazem. The findings emphasize that sustained-release diltiazem (120 mg twice daily) can be largely useful in uremic patients with CAD on maintenance dialysis. Diltiazem reduces the number and the duration of silent ischemic episodes, has a good tolerability, and positively modifies the circadian pattern of ischemic episodes.

Combined administration of diltiazem and nicardipine attenuates hypertensive responses to emergence and extubation

Diltiazem and nicardipine, when injected as a mixture during anesthesia, reduce blood pressure in an additive manner without changing heart rate. The author evaluated the use of this mixture for controlling the blood pressure during emergence from general anesthesia and at extubation. The subjects included 15 preoperative hypertensive (HT) patients who underwent various types of surgery and 18 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who underwent clipping of a cerebral aneurysm. General anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or sevoflurane, supplemented with fentanyl. A mixed solution containing 2.5 mg diltiazem plus 0.5 mg nicardipine in 1 mL was injected intermittently every 2 to 4 minutes to bring the blood pressure to its resting level from cessation of inhaled anesthetics to extubation. Untreated patients who underwent similar types of surgery and anesthesia were selected for comparison. The average systolic blood pressure during emergence and at extubation increased to 156 +/- 19 mm Hg (mean +/- standard deviation) and 170 +/- 10 mm Hg in the untreated HT group, and increased to 157 +/- 16 mm Hg and 170 +/- 5mm Hg in the untreated SAH group. Systolic blood pressure was well controlled at 127 +/- 14 mm Hg and 145 +/- 14 mm Hg in the treated HT group with 3.7 +/- 1.9 mL of the mixture, and at 120 +/- 9 mm Hg and 137 +/- 20 mm Hg in the treated SAH group with 7.1 +/- 2.5 mL of the mixture. No significant difference (P < .05) in the heart rate was found between the untreated and the treated HT or SAH groups. Two patients in the treated SAH group exhibited tachycardia. The combined administration of diltiazem and nicardipine can help control blood pressure in patients with a possible HT response to emergence from general anesthesia and extubation.

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: combination calcium channel blocker therapy in the treatment of hypertension

Effective control of blood pressure is usually achieved only with the use of two or more antihypertensive medications. The treatment options for hypertension are numerous, and the number of possible combinations large. The selection of a specific combination drug regimen has often been linked to the perceived need for diuretic therapy as first- or second-step therapy; thus, the popularity of such drug combinations as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/diuretic, an angiotensin-receptor blocker/diuretic, or a beta blocker/diuretic. Rational alternatives exist, including an ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a dihydropyridine CCB/b blocker combination. Traditionally, recommendations have advised against the use of combination therapy with two drugs from the same therapeutic class. However, because of the different binding and pharmacologic characteristics of CCBs, a rationale exists for combining different agents in this class in the management of hypertension and/or symptomatic coronary artery disease. In the treatment of either hypertension or angina, combination CCB therapy can prove uniquely successful.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily modified-release diltiazem capsules with once-daily amlodipine tablets in patients with stable angina

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily diltiazem capsules with amlodipine tablets in patients with stable angina. After a run-in period of 1 to 3 weeks, 34 patients received once-daily diltiazem and 33 patients received amlodipine. Patients received either diltiazem, 240 mg/day, or amlodipine, 5 mg/day, for 2 weeks followed by diltiazem, 360 mg/day, or amlodipine, 10 mg/day, for 2 weeks. Standard treadmill exercise testing was the primary efficacy assessment. Patients also recorded incidence of angina attacks and use of glyceryl trinitrate spray. Both treatments gave significant improvement in time to onset of angina and time to maximal exercise. With the exception of amlodipine, 5 mg/day, both treatments gave significant increases in time to 1-mm ST segment depression. Diltiazem, 360 mg/day, gave a significant decrease in rate pressure product. There were no significant treatment differences in any of the exercise test parameters. Both treatments reduced incidence of angina attacks and use of glyceryl trinitrate spray. The incidence of edema was significantly less in patients receiving diltiazem. In conclusion, both treatments were effective in controlling patients' angina, but diltiazem was better tolerated, with a lower incidence of edema.

Heart rate-lowering and -regulating effects of once-daily sustained-release diltiazem

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic evidence suggests that an elevated heart rate (HR) is an adverse and independent prognostic factor in arterial hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Although diltiazem is characterized as an HR-lowering calcium antagonist, no studies have quantified the magnitude of HR changes in patients with angina or hypertension.

HYPOTHESIS

The study was undertaken to explore the magnitude of proportional HR reduction at varying levels of resting HR with the sustained-release formulation of diltiazem (SR diltiazem) at the usual clinical doses of 200 or 300 mg once daily.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted on six comparative double-blind studies including 771 patients with angina or hypertension in which SR diltiazem 200-300 mg once daily was compared either with placebo or with other agents known not to influence HR (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics). Sustained-release diltiazem decreases elevated baseline HR, with an increasing effect at higher initial rates.

RESULTS

Multiple comparisons by baseline HR category showed a significant difference between both groups for baseline HR of 74-84 beats/min and > or = 85 beats/min (p = 0.001). Sustained-release diltiazem had no significant HR-decreasing effect on baseline HR < or =74 beats/min but appears to have a genuine regulating effect on HR: it reduces tachycardia without inducing excessive bradycardia. These findings are in contrast to those with dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, which tend to increase HR and have been associated with an adverse outcome in acute cardiovascular conditions. At the same time, there is evidence to suggest that HR-lowering calcium-channel blockers decrease cardiovascular event rates following myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

When calcium antagonists are indicated for use in patients with angina or hypertension, an HR-lowering agent, that is, diltiazem rather than dihydropyridine, should be recommended.

Sustained reduction of exercise perfusion defect extent and severity with isosorbide mononitrate (Imdur) as demonstrated by means of technetium 99m sestamibi

BACKGROUND

The impact of long-acting nitrates on the extent and severity of stress-induced myocardial ischemia is not well described, especially after long-term treatment.

METHODS

Forty patients with chronic stable angina and reversible ischemia on an exercise stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (ex-SPECT) were prospectively studied in a 6-week period. At baseline, rest thallium-201/exercise stress technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT was performed, followed by treatment with extended-release isosorbide 5-mononitrate (5-ISMN, Imdur). Follow-up ex-SPECT was performed 5 days and 6 weeks after the initiation of therapy with extended-release 5-ISMN. The exercise treadmill testing (ETT) protocol and exercise duration of the follow-up studies were the same as that of the baseline ETT. Defect extent and severity were analyzed both by means of an automated quantitative method, with CEqual software, and visually, with a 20-segment scoring system (which was also used to derive a summed stress score [SSS]).

RESULTS

In the 6-week study period, significant reductions occurred in both the extent and the severity of exercise-induced ischemia by means of quantitative SPECT (13.8% [P<.0003] and 12.7% [P<.0003], respectively). There was no significant change in these variables between stages 2 (day 5) and 3 (6 weeks), indicating no development of tolerance to the nitrate effect. Similar reductions were noted by means of the visual analysis (SSS reduction of 13.0% [P<.002]) in the entire study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chronic-stable-angina treated with a long-acting nitrate demonstrate improvement in myocardial perfusion defect extent and severity in an extended period by means of both visual and quantitative analysis of sequential exercise testing to the same rate-pressure product end point.

Analysis of arrhythmias in the Circadian Antiischemia Program in Europe (CAPE) study

The aim of this study was to analyze whether, in patients with long-standing (>4 years) coronary artery disease (CAD), the addition of the long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine to conventional treatment [beta-blockers (BBLs) and nitrates] during anginal attacks would have a proarrhythmic effect. This was tested by analyzing data from patients who had taken part in the Circadian Anti-ischemia Program in Europe (CAPE) trial. After a 2-week, single-blind, run-in period (Phase 1), patients were randomized to amlodipine, 5 mg/day (first 4 weeks) and 10 mg/day (second 4 weeks), or placebo for 8 weeks (Phase 2). The 48-h Holter data were analyzed for 167 amlodipine-treated patients and 83 placebo patients based on a 2:1 randomization scheme. Sixty-three per cent of amlodipine patients and 67% of placebo patients were receiving concomitant BBLs, and >90% had taken sublingual nitrates during anginal attacks, as basic antiischemic therapy. After 7 weeks of therapy, when 48-h Holter monitoring was repeated, there were no significant changes in the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in the placebo or amlodipine groups for all patients or subgroups of patients with or without BBLs. Also, between-group comparisons showed no significant differences in arrhythmias between amlodipine and placebo patients. In summary, amlodipine (5-10 mg/day) given to patients with severe, chronic CAD receiving conventional antiischemic therapy, did not produce any proarrhythmic effects.

Antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of mibefradil in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris

Five placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-design studies were performed to evaluate the antianginal and anti-ischemic characteristics of the novel T-channel-selective calcium antagonist, mibefradil, in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Of the 5 studies, 2 were monotherapy dose-finding trials and 3 were conducted in patients receiving background antianginal therapy: either beta blockers (2 studies) or long-acting nitrates (1 study). A total of 865 patients were randomized to 1 of 4 mibefradil dose groups (25, 50, 100, and 150 mg; n = 565) and placebo (n = 300). The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of mibefradil were assessed across all 5 studies by evaluating exercise tolerance test variables, weekly number of anginal attacks and short-acting nitroglycerin consumption, and in both dose-finding studies, the number and total duration of silent ischemic episodes (48-hour Holter monitoring). A statistically significant increase in exercise duration was achieved in 3 of 5 studies with the 50-mg dose of mibefradil and in 3 of 3 studies with the 100-mg dose of the compound over the effects observed in the placebo groups. A significant delay in time to onset of ischemia during exercise was induced in all studies with the 50- and 100-mg doses of mibefradil. The 25-mg dose of mibefradil was not significantly better than placebo, and the effects of the 150-mg dose of the compound were similar to those observed with the 100-mg dose. Across all studies, a dose-related decrease was observed in the number of weekly anginal attacks and in weekly nitroglycerin consumption. Similarly, a significant dose-related decrease in the number and duration of silent ischemic episodes was observed during Holter monitoring for 48 hours in the 2 dose-finding studies. The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects were associated with a dose-related decrease in heart rate and double product both at rest and at exercise termination. Treatment with the 50- and 100-mg doses of mibefradil was found to be well tolerated and safe compared with placebo, a finding that held true for patients on chronic beta-blocker or long-acting nitrate therapy. Taken together, these studies indicate that mibefradil is an effective and well-tolerated once-daily treatment for chronic stable angina pectoris at doses of 50 and 100 mg, which are the lowest and highest effective doses of the compound, respectively.

Assessment of ischemic changes by ambulatory ECG-monitoring: comparison with 12-lead ECG during exercise testing

The accuracy of commercially available ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (AEM) systems for reproducing ischemic changes has been questioned. Since these systems are widely used for evaluation of ST-segment changes, both for prognostic purposes and for assessment of the efficacy of antiischemic drugs, such doubts must be clarified. For this purpose, we recorded electrocardiograms (ECGs) during exercise testing, using split leads, simultaneously with a 12-lead electrocardiograph and with the Marquette AEM recorder. We studied 29 patients with proven coronary artery disease and positive exercise tests and 19 individuals with low likelihood of coronary artery disease and negative stress tests. All 29 patients who had ST-segment depression during exercise as recorded on the 12-lead ECG had ST-segment depression in at least one of the three AEM leads (resembling the V5, V3, and aVF leads of the 12-lead system). The maximal degree of ST-segment depression with AEM was similar to 12-lead ECG (2.3 mm and 2.1 mm, respectively). The best lead for ischemia detection with AEM was the V5 type, which detected ischemic changes in 26 of the 29 patients, while the 12-lead V5 detected ischemia in 24 patients. The inferior AEM lead detected ischemia in only 4 patients, while the aVF lead of the 12-lead ECG detected ischemia in 23 patients. Of the 19 patients with negative exercise tests only 1 patient had a 1-mm ST-segment depression on AEM. Thus, of the 48 patients studied, similar responses were observed in 47. The results of indicate that the Marquette AEM system is as accurate as the 12-lead ECG in detecting ischemic changes and in assessing their severity.

Comparison between metoprolol orally osmotic once daily and metoprolol two or three times daily in suppressing exercise-induced and daily myocardial ischemia

Metoprolol is a widely used anti-ischemic drug with a relatively short half-life. To improve patient' compliance and to provide 24-hour coverage, its once daily ORally OSmotic (OROS) formulation was developed. In this multicenter double-blind study, the anti-ischemic effects of metoprolol OROS given once daily at doses of 190 and 285 mg were compared to the regular metoprolol formulation of 100 mg 2 or 3 times daily. Sixty-five patients with stable coronary artery disease, positive exercise tests, and ischemic episodes during daily activity as recorded by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (AEM) were included. In the OROS group, 23 patients completed all 3 treatment periods. In these patients, the number of myocardial ischemic episodes decreased from 239 on placebo to 128 during the 190 mg/day dose (p < 0.0001) and to 86 during the 285 mg/day treatment period (p < 0.0001). In the metoprolol group, there were 204 episodes at baseline and 142 and 140 during the 100 mg 2 or 3 times daily treatment periods (p < 0.0001 for both). During exercise testing, time to 1-mm ST depression increased significantly in the OROS group from 6.3 minutes at baseline to 7.1 and 9.6 minutes during 190- and 285-mg treatment periods. In the metoprolol group, it increased from 5.8 to 7.2 and 8.2 minutes, respectively. Both formulations of metoprolol were well tolerated. The OROS formulation was highly effective in suppressing daily and exercise-induced ischemia and exerted its effect throughout the 24-hour period.

Re-examining the clinical safety and roles of calcium antagonists in cardiovascular medicine

Despite recent analyses questioning the safety of calcium antagonists, evidence and clinical practice strongly support a major role for these drugs in the management of many cardiovascular diseases such as arrhythmia, vascular spasm, hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, stable angina, and myocardial infarction. These agents are a heterogeneous class of drugs with each formulation possessing unique properties and clinical applications. This article presents a review of the available literature and discusses the recommended use of various calcium antagonists in the treatment of diseases of the heart and vascular system.

Dual calcium-channel blocker therapy in the treatment of hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To review the in vitro receptor binding data of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) and in vivo studies in humans regarding the use of dual calcium-channel blocker therapy, with a focus on the use of this therapy for hypertension.

DATA SOURCE

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify literature pertaining to CCBs.

STUDY SELECTION

In vitro studies and investigations that evaluated CCB receptor binding and the interactions between subclasses of CCBs were chosen. All studies in humans and clinical trials that evaluated the use of dual CCB therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases were selected for review. Also, case reports describing the use of dual CCB therapy were included in this article.

DATA EXTRACTION

The methodology, results, and conclusions of the selected data were evaluated. Data regarding the in vitro receptor binding kinetics of CCBs, as well as interactions, were reported. Because there is limited information on dual CCB therapy for hypertension, clinical studies using this treatment for ischemic heart disease were also reviewed. They were summarized and compared on the basis of the degree of disease control (e.g., blood pressure, exercise tolerance), adverse effects, and other clinical endpoints of pharmacologic therapy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In vitro studies have identified binding sites for the dihydropyridine (nifedipine), diphenylalkylamine (verapamil), and benzothiazepine (diltiazem) subclasses of CCBs, and indicate that they are allosterically related to each other within the voltage-sensitive calcium-channel receptor. Dihydropyridine binding affinity is decreased with concomitant verapamil binding, but is enhanced by concomitant diltiazem binding. Dual CCB therapy has been shown to be efficacious in patients with ischemic heart disease. Although this therapy is limited by dose-related adverse effects, it appears to have an important role in patients with ischemia that is refractory to conventional therapy, or for those whose therapeutic options are limited by contraindications. Theoretically, many patients with hypertension may benefit similarly from dual CCB therapy. Because data evaluating this treatment option are sparse, recommendations regarding safety, efficacy, and the role of dual CCB therapy for hypertension would be premature.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled data evaluating dual CCB therapy for the treatment of hypertension are lacking. This treatment modality may be beneficial in the future, but requires further investigation to determine safety and efficacy.

Effects of a new calcium antagonist, mibefradil (Ro 40-5967), on silent ischemia in patients with stable chronic angina pectoris: a multicenter placebo-controlled study. The Mibefradil International Study Group

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) on the frequency and duration of episodes of asymptomatic ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris and to determine the most efficient single therapeutic dose of this drug.

BACKGROUND

Mibefradil is a novel calcium channel antagonist that shows a high bioavailability, induces no reflex tachycardia and has no negative inotropic effects.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design trial, 126 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris were studied. After 1 week of a placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, 100, 150 mg of mibefradil or placebo for 2 weeks. Ambulatory 48-h electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring was performed at the end of both the placebo run-in period and the active treatment period.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, mibefradil was associated with significantly less ischemia as manifested during ambulatory ECG monitoring. In the 150- and 100-mg groups, respectively, the drug resulted in a 73% and 63% reduction in the frequency of episodes of ST segment depression and a 78% and 58% reduction in the total duration of ST segment depression. Highly significant linear dose-response relations were present across all treatment groups for ischemic episodes and ischemia duration (p < 0.001). Electrocardiographic abnormalities related to treatment were first-degree atrioventricular block, sinus bradycardia and short Wenckebach episodes, observed during sleep on Holter monitoring. All ECG events were dose related.

CONCLUSIONS

Mibefradil is a new, safe, well tolerated and very effective dose-dependent anti-ischemic calcium channel antagonist.

Calcium channel antagonists in the management of anginal syndromes: changing concepts in relation to the role of coronary vasospasm

Despite the increasing evidence that alterations in coronary vascular tone can and do occur in patients with anginal syndromes, only in a minority of such patients with Prinzmetal's angina is there decisive evidence that the coronary vasodilation induced by calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) plays a specific therapeutic role. CCAs may also give therapeutic benefit in a number of conditions in which coronary vasoconstriction may contribute to ischemia, such as hyperventilation, cold-induced angina, or silent ischemia not caused by an increase in heart rate. Thus, the decision of whether or not to use CCAs in angina syndromes will often have to be made on grounds other than what appears to be a minor role of vasospasm in the overall spectrum of angina. There are preliminary indications that the long-term prognosis may be different among different categories of CCAs.

Time-series analysis of long-term ambulatory myocardial ischemia: effects of beta-adrenergic and calcium channel blockade

We have previously demonstrated the utility of time-series analysis applied to 72-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic data in patients with coronary artery disease. The present investigation applied time-series analysis to long-term (120-hour) ambulatory electrocardiographic data to determine the minimal period of monitoring needed (1) to detect periodicity of ischemia-related variables in ambulatory patients, (2) to describe auto-correlation and cross-correlation functions for heart rate and ischemia, and (3) to describe the effects of beta-adrenergic and calcium channel blockade on circadian characteristics and coupling of heart rate and ischemia. A double-blind crossover design was used to obtain 120-hour recordings during placebo, atenolol (200 mg/day), and diltiazem (360 mg/day) administration. During all three treatment periods, distinct circadian variation of heart rate was documented by autocorrelation and Fourier analysis. Ischemia did not exhibit clear periodicity as indexed by autocorrelation in any period; however, it was coupled to heart rate in all treatment periods as reflected in cross-correlation analysis. Although diltiazem did not quantitatively alter the circadian characteristics of heart rate or ischemia, atenolol produced a shift in the coupling between remaining ischemia and heart rate in time. Significant autocorrelation was detected for all treatment periods after 72 hours of monitoring, suggesting that 72 hours is the minimum amount of time needed for analysis of ambulatory electrocardiographic data in patients with coronary artery disease.

Diltiazem: ten years of clinical experience in the treatment of hypertension

Diltiazem hydrochloride is a benzothiazepine derivative calcium-channel blocker with proven antianginal and antihypertensive capabilities. Its primary mechanism of action is vasodilatation, which results in diminished vascular resistance and improved perfusion to various vascular beds and target organs. The antihypertensive efficacy of diltiazem in various demographic groups has been studied and compared with diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and other calcium-channel blockers. These studies have shown that the antihypertensive effect of diltiazem is similar to that of the other therapies. Diltiazem does not adversely affect electrolytes or carbohydrate or lipid metabolism, and it may have beneficial effects on the heart and kidneys. Diltiazem reduces myocardial hypertrophy and exerts antianginal effects on the heart through coronary vasodilation and reduction in the blood pressure double product. Diltiazem improves renal perfusion and attenuates proteinuria. These effects may be helpful in limiting the progression of renal injury. Overall, the efficacy and tolerability of diltiazem, as well as its salutary effects on the heart and kidneys, make it an important therapeutic consideration for patients with hypertensive disease.

Daily life cardiac ischaemia. Should it be treated?

Daily life cardiac ischaemia is defined as reversible myocardial cellular hypoxia that occurs during activities of daily living, without artificial provocation. Most of these daily life ischaemic episodes are not associated with symptoms. However, it is not practical to distinguish silent versus symptomatic daily life ischaemia as both are associated with haemodynamic abnormalities and future adverse outcomes. Daily life cardiac ischaemia is best detected using ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring; however, there are other diagnostic tools (e.g. exercise treadmill) that can be used. Once detected, the optimal therapy for daily life myocardial ischaemia has yet to be identified. However, it does appear that usual antianginal medications including nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and antiplatelet drugs are effective in reducing the incidence and severity of daily life myocardial ischaemia. Medical therapy and revascularisation should be utilised to obliterate all episodes of daily life cardiac ischaemia to prevent future cardiac events. Moreover, the efficacy of the chosen therapeutic regimen for each patient should be documented with follow-up objective testing. The diagnosis and management of daily life myocardial ischaemia is continually evolving. Future research as well as economic considerations will shape future management strategies.

Efficacy of metoprolol and diltiazem in treating silent myocardial ischemia

Recent studies strongly support the prognostic importance of transient silent ischemia. Because patients with silent ischemia are at higher risk of a cardiac event, they are likely to benefit not only from control of symptoms, but also from treatment directed at prevention of ischemia. The efficacy of controlled-release metoprolol 200 mg once daily and diltiazem 60 mg 4 times daily was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in 32 patients with proven coronary artery disease, predominantly asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, positive bicycle exercise test results, and > or = 5 minutes of asymptomatic ST-segment depression on a 24-hour screening ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG). At the beginning and at the end of both 3-week treatment periods, an exercise test was performed and a 72-hour ambulatory ECG was recorded. Both active treatment periods were preceded by a 2-week placebo phase. Both treatments effectively reduced and postponed exercise-induced ST depression and reduced the total ischemic integral on the ambulatory ECG. Only metoprolol significantly reduced the mean number of ischemic episodes (54%, p = 0.0003, vs 31% for diltiazem, p = NS) and the mean duration of ischemia (51%, p = 0.012, vs 27% for diltiazem, p = NS) compared with baseline values. Metoprolol strongly blunted the morning and afternoon peak in the circadian distribution of ischemia, whereas diltiazem did not change the circadian distribution of ischemia at all.

Amlodipine reduces transient myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: double-blind Circadian Anti-Ischemia Program in Europe (CAPE Trial)

OBJECTIVES

This study was carried out to determine the effect of the once-daily calcium channel blocking agent amlodipine (half-life 35 to 50 h) on the circadian pattern of myocardial ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina.

BACKGROUND

Myocardial ischemia during normal daily life, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and the circadian pattern parallels that for myocardial infarction and sudden death.

METHODS

The Circadian Anti-Ischemia Program in Europe (CAPE) was a large, 10-week international (63 sites), double-blind, parallel study. After a 2-week, single-blind placebo phase, during which stable doses of antianginal treatment were maintained (beta-adrenergic blocking agents in 65% of patients), patients with chronic stable angina with at least three attacks of angina per week, with at least four ischemic episodes or > or = 20 min of ST segment depression in 48 h of Holter monitoring, were randomized to receive treatment with either 5 mg/day of amlodipine or placebo (2:1 randomization). The dose was increased to 10 mg/day after 4 weeks. During week 7 of treatment, 48-h ambulatory ECG monitoring was repeated.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifteen of 1,160 patients screened were eligible, and 250 had complete evaluable data. Compared with placebo, amlodipine significantly reduced both the frequency of ST segment depression episodes (60% for amlodipine vs. 44% for placebo, p = 0.025) and total integrated ST ischemic area (62% mm-min vs. 50% mm-min, p = 0.042). Amlodipine reduced ischemia over the 24 h with the intrinsic circadian pattern maintained. In addition, diary data showed a significant reduction in angina (70% for amlodipine vs. 44% for placebo, p = 0.0001) and in nitroglycerin consumption (67% vs. 22%, respectively, p = 0.0006). Amlodipine and placebo demonstrated similar safety profiles (adverse events 17.3% for amlodipine and 13.3% for placebo; discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 2% vs. 4.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily amlodipine, when added to background treatment, significantly reduced both symptomatic and asymptomatic ischemic events over 24 h in patients with chronic stable angina.

Transdermal nitroglycerin patch therapy reduces the extent of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using quantitative thallium-201 tomography

OBJECTIVES

This study prospectively evaluated whether transdermal nitroglycerin patches could limit the extent of exercise-induced left ventricular ischemia as assessed by quantitative thallium-201 tomography.

BACKGROUND

Although antianginal medications are effective at reducing chest pain symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease, there is limited evidence that these agents can also reduce myocardial ischemia.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial evaluating nitroglycerin patch therapy in patients in stable condition with angiographic coronary artery disease and no previous myocardial infarction. All patients were weaned from antianginal agents and had a baseline symptom-limited treadmill test followed by thallium-201 tomography. Forty patients with perfusion defects involving > or = 5% of the left ventricle were randomized to receive either intermittent (12 h on/off) active nitroglycerin patch therapy (0.4 mg/h) or placebo. Exercise tomography was repeated a mean (+/- SD) of 6.1 +/- 1.8 days after randomization.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to receive active patch therapy had a significant reduction in their total perfusion defect size (-8.9 +/- 11.1%) compared with placebo-treated patients (-1.8 +/- 6.1%, p = 0.04), which was most apparent in those with the largest (> or = 20%) baseline perfusion defects (-11.4 +/- 13.4% vs. 1.0 +/- 3.6%, respectively, p < 0.02). Furthermore, 7 (33%) of 21 patients receiving active therapy had a > or = 10% decrease in their perfusion defects compared with only 1 (5%) of 19 patients randomized to receive placebo (p = 0.002). Nitrate therapy did not significantly reduce heart rate, blood pressure or double product, indicating benefit through enhancement of coronary blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term, intermittent nitroglycerin patch therapy significantly reduces myocardial ischemia, particularly in patients with large ischemic perfusion defects. Thallium-201 tomography can be used to assess sequential changes in the extent of exercise-induced left ventricular ischemia.

Effects of combined intravenous nicardipine and diltiazem administration on the circulatory response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

To evaluate the effect of combined intravenous administration of the calcium antagonists, nicardipine and diltiazem, on the circulatory responses to tracheal intubation, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and rate pressure product (RPP) in response to laryngoscopy following tracheal intubation were compared in patients receiving saline placebo or nicardipine 10 μg·kg^-1 and diltiazem 0.1 mg·kg^-1 60 s before the initiation of laryngoscopy. Each group was comprised of ten patients undergoing elective surgery. The patients receiving saline showed a significant increase in MAP and RPP associated with tracheal intubation. However, these increases were significantly attenuated (P<0.05) in the patients to whom nicardipine and diltiazem were administered concurrently.

Comparison of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and atenolol on antianginal efficacies and exercise hemodynamic responses in stable angina pectoris

A gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) of nifedipine has been developed to provide a once-daily dosing, and predictable, relatively constant plasma concentrations. This study compared the antianginal efficacy of nifedipine GITS with a once-a-day beta-receptor blocker, atenolol. Seventeen patients with documented coronary artery disease and stable stress-induced angina pectoris were studied during a 2-week, single-blind, placebo baseline phase and a 12-week randomized, double-blind, active drug crossover efficacy phase, using the bicycle exercise test and ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings. Patients exercised significantly longer with nifedipine GITS (883 +/- 47 seconds) and atenolol (908 +/- 44 seconds) than with placebo (794 +/- 41 seconds). Nifedipine GITS reduced systolic blood pressure at all stages of exercise compared with placebo but, because heart rate tended to increase more during nifedipine therapy, there was no difference in rate-pressure products between the placebo and nifedipine GITS periods. In contrast, atenolol reduced heart rate, systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product during exercise compared with placebo. Whereas left ventricular ejection fractions (by radionuclide angiocardiography) increased with exercise, the maximal increase was smaller with atenolol than with placebo and nifedipine. The net increase in left ventricular ejection fraction at the end of exercise was greater with nifedipine than with placebo or atenolol. Ambulatory electrocardiograms showed only a small number of ischemic events. Neither nifedipine GITS nor atenolol reduced the number of ischemic events or total duration of ST-segment deviations significantly. It is concluded that nifedipine GITS is as effective an antianginal agent as atenolol, but the hemodynamic effects of the 2 agents differ.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of metoprolol and diltiazem on the total ischaemic burden in patients with chronic stable angina: a randomized controlled trial

We conducted a randomised controlled trial to study the effects of metoprolol and diltiazem on the total ischaemic burden--sum of symptomatic and silent myocardial ischaemia, in 146 patients with stable angina pectoris. One-hundred thirty-four completed the study protocol. Sixty-eight patients received metoprolol (100 mg twice daily, n = 52, 50 mg twice daily, n = 16) while 66 received diltiazem (90 mg three times daily, n = 50, 60 mg three times daily, n = 16). The drugs were given for 4 weeks. The primary outcome variables were frequency and duration of total ischaemic burden, silent and symptomatic myocardial ischaemia. These were measured on 48 h of Holter monitoring. The reductions in duration and frequency of total ischaemic burden by metoprolol, 76% and 40%, respectively, were significantly higher than by diltiazem, 43% and 24%, respectively (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02). The frequency and duration of silent myocardial ischaemia, which constituted more than 80% of the total ischaemic burden in the two groups showed similar results. However, the reduction in frequency of symptomatic myocardial ischaemia only was significantly greater by metoprolol (63% than diltiazem (24%) as the difference in reduction of duration of symptomatic ischaemia was insignificant (85% vs. 75%; P > 0.05). Whether a greater reduction of total ischaemic burden by metoprolol as compared to diltiazem has any implications for prognosis in patients with chronic stable angina remains to be established.

Effects of atenolol and diltiazem on exercise tolerance and ambulatory ischaemia

Twenty-five normotensive patients with stable angina, angiographically documented coronary disease and normal left ventricular function were randomized to a crossover study comparing atenolol 100 mg x 1, sustained-release diltiazem 120 mg x 2, and their combination. A maximal symptom limited bicycle exercise test and a 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring were performed at the end of each treatment period. Exercise duration was increased equally in the different treatment groups. Time to onset of 1-mm ST-segment depression was longer with atenolol (P < 0.02) and combination therapy (P < 0.01) than with diltiazem. The maximal ST-segment depression was decreased with atenolol (P < 0.05) and combination therapy (P < 0.02), whereas, time to onset of angina was prolonged only with combination therapy (P < 0.03). The number of ischaemic episodes during ambulatory monitoring was lower with atenolol and combination therapy than with diltiazem (P < 0.01). The difference between atenolol and diltiazem was mainly due to lower ischaemic activity with atenolol between 06:00 h and 12:00 h (P < 0.05). Anginal frequency (P < 0.01) and nitroglycerin consumption (P < 0.05) were lower with combination therapy than with monotherapy. Thus, while comparable effects were achieved on clinical variables, atenolol appeared to be more effective than diltiazem, reducing myocardial ischaemia during exercise and ambulatory monitoring. With combination therapy, both clinical and electrocardiograph signs of ischaemia were improved.

Discordance between effects of anti-ischemic therapy on ambulatory ischemia, exercise performance and anginal symptoms in patients with stable angina pectoris. The Angina and Silent Ischemia Study Group (ASIS)

OBJECTIVES

We sought to define the extent to which the therapeutic efficacy of three single-drug regimens on ambulatory ischemia paralleled efficacy on other clinical manifestations of ischemia, specifically exercise test performance and anginal symptoms.

BACKGROUND

Some studies have shown that the presence and severity of ambulatory ischemia are predictive of anginal symptoms and exercise test performance, whereas other studies have not. Less is known about effects of antianginal treatment and whether response to therapy for one clinical manifestation reflects therapeutic responses for other clinical manifestations.

METHODS

We studied 50 patients in the Angina and Silent Ischemia Study who had documented coronary disease, an exercise test positive for ischemia, the presence of ambulatory and asymptomatic ischemia on ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) Holter monitoring and stable anginal symptoms. Patients received maximally tolerated doses of sustained release propranolol (mean 293 mg/day), sustained release diltiazem (mean 350 mg/day), nifedipine (mean 79 mg/day) and placebo, each for 2-week periods in a double-blind, crossover fashion. Patients' responses to treatment were assessed by 48-h ambulatory ECG monitoring, exercise test (standard Bruce protocol) and diaries of angina. Levels of efficacy for each agent and for each clinical measure were compared using Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

With placebo there was no correlation among the frequency of ischemic episodes by ambulatory ECG monitoring, exercise time to 1.0-mm ST segment depression or frequency of anginal episodes. Furthermore, for a given patient the efficacy of each active medication in reducing ambulatory ischemia was not correlated with response in anginal symptoms or exercise test performance (r = -0.21 to 0.24, p = NS). Within each of these clinical measures, efficacy of one drug was more strongly correlated with efficacy of another drug (r = 0.64 to 0.81 for ambulatory ischemia, 0.48 to 0.56 for exercise test performance and 0.16 to 0.54 for anginal symptoms).

CONCLUSIONS

Different measures of ischemia, specifically ambulatory ischemia assessed by ambulatory ECG monitoring, exercise performance on exercise test and anginal symptoms, are independent. Efficacy for each clinical end point must be assessed separately when considering response to drug treatment.

Silent myocardial ischemia

The documentation of abnormalities related to myocardial ischemia, whether symptomatic or silent, is of central importance. Whenever this information is available, it should be used in the overall assessment of the patient at risk for adverse outcome. The level of concern for treatment of CAD should be based on the risk implications associated with the ischemia-related abnormalities detected during objective testing rather than on the presence or absence of pain. The exercise stress test is still the single most useful test to begin the evaluation of a patient with an analyzable ST segment. In persons suspected of having CAD, the detection of ischemic-type ST-segment depression, at a low workload (e.g., < 120 beats/min or < 6.5 METS) of > 2 mm magnitude or persisting for more than 6 min implies high risk for adverse outcome. Asymptomatic ischemia during everyday activities, detected by Holter monitoring, in the high-risk patient, most probably adds additional risk beyond the risk of an abnormal stress test alone. Left ventricular imaging by two-dimensional echocardiography, RNA, angiogram, vest, etc, showing an ejection fraction > or = 40%, reversible wall motion abnormalities in multiple regions and redistribution defects or a failure to increase ejection fraction during exercise even if the patient remains asymptomatic, also imply high risk. The presence of any of these abnormal findings, regardless of symptoms, should therefore prompt as high a degree of concern as with ischemia-related signals associated with pain. Thus any therapy chosen should be directed toward elimination of transient ischemia, not just relief of symptoms that may or may not be ischemia related. If this course is chosen, the efficacy of the therapeutic regimen and possible progression of CAD should be assessed with follow-up testing for ischemia. We believe that risk factor modification and aspirin should be considered for most, if not all, patients in whom ischemia, silent or symptomatic, is suspected or detected. If symptoms or ischemia suggesting low risk is present, anti-ischemic medical therapy may be considered, but follow-up is advised. If a high-risk ischemic signal, even without symptoms, is detected, medical therapy should be used to attempt to modify the signal. If the ischemic signal suggesting high risk persists despite medical therapy, revascularization should be considered. Until additional data from large clinical trials are available, this approach appears to have the greatest likelihood of modifying the adverse outcome of CAD.

Comparative efficacy of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system versus diltiazem when added to beta blockers in stable angina pectoris

To determine the relative efficacy of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and diltiazem, 20 patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease were studied in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial. All patients were taking concomitant beta blockers. Efficacy was assessed by symptoms, exercise treadmill testing, and ambulatory ST-segment monitoring at baseline and after 6 weeks on each medication. Mean daily dose was titrated to 119 +/- 7 mg (nifedipine GITS) and 342 +/- 59 mg (diltiazem). The addition of either nifedipine GITS or diltiazem resulted in a significant reduction in angina frequency, improvement in exercise treadmill duration (7 vs 7 and 8 minutes; baseline vs nifedipine GITS and diltiazem), time to angina onset (4 vs 7 and 7 minutes; baseline vs nifedipine GITS and diltiazem), and time to ST-segment depression (5 vs 6 and 7 minutes; baseline vs nifedipine GITS and diltiazem). There was no significant difference between nifedipine GITS and diltiazem with respect to the magnitude of improvement in anginal symptoms or exercise test parameters. Both nifedipine GITS and diltiazem reduced the overall frequency and duration of ischemic episodes on ambulatory monitoring, but this reduction was not statistically different. Thus, nifedipine GITS and diltiazem at maximally tolerated doses were equally effective at reducing angina and increasing exercise tolerance as beta blockers alone.

The influence of pretreatment periods with diltiazem on nifedipine kinetics

The effect of durations of diltiazem pretreatment on nifedipine kinetics was evaluated. Eighteen healthy male subjects were randomly allocated to three groups, 6 subjects each, for single doses of 60 mg diltiazem, and 3 days and 6 days with diltiazem 60 mg three times a day. All subjects received 20 mg nifedipine orally on two occasions using a double-blind cross-over, placebo-controlled method. No significant difference on pharmacokinetic parameters of nifedipine without diltiazem were observed among three groups. The single dose with 60 mg diltiazem significantly increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for nifedipine compared with that in control an average of 35.1% (P < .05) and decreased the total body clearance (CL) an average of 24.0% (P < .05). Three days and 6 days pretreatment with diltiazem 60 mg three times a day significantly increased mean nifedipine AUC to 151.1% (P < .01), 188.0% (P < .05) of control values, and decreased CL to 58.2% (P < .01), 63.9% (P < .05) of control values, respectively. The elimination half-life (t1/2) of nifedipine were significantly prolonged both after 3 days' and after 6 days' pretreatment of diltiazem. These results suggest that diltiazem affects the nifedipine kinetics rapidly and pretreatment duration dependently. A clinically important drug interaction may occur when both drugs are administered simultaneously.

Silent myocardial ischemia is not predictive of myocardial infarction in peripheral vascular surgery patients

Continuous ambulatory ECG (CAECG) monitoring has been advocated as an effective low-cost preoperative method for detecting silent myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. In addition, silent ischemic events are associated with an increased incidence of postoperative myocardial infarctions. Ninety-six patients (mean age 73 years) admitted for elective aortic (24) or infrainguinal (72) operations over a 2-year period underwent 24-hour two- or three-lead CAECG monitoring. Results were reviewed by a single cardiologist blinded to the study. The criterion for ischemia was ST segment depressions of 1 mm or greater for 40 seconds or more 60 msec after the J point. Postoperative myocardial infarction was determined by ECG changes and/or elevated serum creatinine phosphokinase with positive MB isoenzymes. Risk factors included hypertension (71%), history of coronary artery disease (66%), smoking (61%), and diabetes mellitus (47%). Nine out of 96 patients (9.4%) had a positive CAECG test for silent myocardial ischemia. Only one patient (11.1%) developed postoperative myocardial infarction and there were no deaths in this group. The incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction in the nonischemic group was 16.1% (14/87). However, the mortality in this group was 6.9% (6/87). New and malignant arrhythmias requiring preoperative medical intervention were observed in seven patients (7.4%): two cases of ventricular tachycardia and five cases of atrial flutter/fibrillation. Contrary to previous reports, CAECG monitoring for silent ischemia was not a significant predictor of postoperative myocardial infarction or mortality in our patient population. However, we continue to recommend the preoperative use of CAECG monitoring as a diagnostic tool for unsuspected malignant arrhythmias.

Effect of diltiazem on silent ischemic episodes, plasma bradykinin and prostaglandin metabolism

Plasma bradykinin and prostaglandin metabolism are related to the anginal pain modulating system in patients with ischemic heart disease. We carried out a placebo controlled single blind test of diltiazem (30 mg three times a day) in 15 patients with chronic stable angina. The effect of diltiazem was evaluated by exercise treadmill testing and 48-h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Plasma bradykinin, thromboxane B2, and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha levels were determined by radioimmunoassay prior to and during diltiazem therapy. Diltiazem significantly increased the exercise time and reduced episodes of angina. Diltiazem, however, did not appreciably improve either the frequency of silent myocardial ischemic episodes or the total duration of the silent myocardial ischemic episodes. Diltiazem also tended to decrease plasma bradykinin, thromboxane B2, and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha levels. When ischemic episodes on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring are categorized according to heart rate change at the onset of episode (type A, preceded by heart rate increase > or = 5 beats/min; type B, no preceding heart rate increase), diltiazem was only effective on type A ischemic episodes as well as on symptomatic ischemia. Further, bradykinin was significantly decreased by diltiazem only in patients with exercise-induced silent ischemia or no exercise-induced ischemia, while the thromboxane B2/6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha ratio was unaffected by the administration of diltiazem. Thus, silent and symptomatic ischemia may be associated with different bradykinin and prostaglandin responses.

Treatment strategies for daily life silent myocardial ischemia: A correlation with potential pathogenic mechanisms

Recent investigations of SMI occurring during daily life have advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia. These contributions have directed our attention away from "chest pain" alone and physical exertion as the central provoking factor toward transient myocardial ischemia and its broader triggers and consequences. Transient myocardial ischemic episodes, the majority of which are silent, are found in a subset of patients with any clinical manifestations of CAD (eg, stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and sudden death), as well as in those patients with CAD who are and have been totally asymptomatic. These episodes are an independent predictor of increased risk for future cardiac events. Most medical therapy and revascularization therapies have the potential to prevent or relieve these silent episodes; however, we do not yet know which method is superior in reducing SMI episodes or preventing future cardiac events. Furthermore, the benefit of reducing SMI versus the cost and potential morbidity of these chosen therapies is not known. At least three trials are now underway to examine some of these concerns (Table 2). Focus on pain relief alone does not appear to be an adequate approach to alter outcome in patients with CAD and may prove insufficient to control SMI. Until these issues are resolved, we believe a conservative approach to the management of patients with CAD is warranted. Documentation of ischemia (painful or painless) is essential. Three general principles should be kept in mind. First, the presence of detectable ischemia is of central importance. This information should be used in the overall risk assessment of the patient. Second, the level of concern or aggressiveness of treatment should be based on the risk associated with the ischemic abnormalities documented (Table 3). The exercise stress test is the most useful to begin this process. The detection of ischemic-type ST-segment depression, either silent or painful, at a low workload (eg, less than or equal to 120 beats per minute or less than or equal to 6.5 metabolic equivalents [METS]) implies high risk for adverse outcome. Likewise, these ST-segment changes occurring in leads that reflect multiple coronary artery distribution, of greater than 2 mm in magnitude and persisting for greater than 6 minutes, are all markers for high risk. Thallium redistribution defects occurring at low work loads, in multiple areas, associated with increased lung uptake and enlargement of the cardiac pool all imply high risk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Attenuation of the circadian patterns of myocardial ischemia with nifedipine GITS in patients with chronic stable angina

The Nifedipine Gastro-Intestinal Therapeutic System (GITS) Circadian Anti-ischemia Program (N-CAP) was designed to test the effect of nifedipine GITS as monotherapy or in combination with a beta-adrenergic blocking agent on the circadian pattern of angina and silent ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina. At 118 sites in the United States, 1,174 patients were screened for entry into this study. To be eligible for participation patients were required to have at least two episodes of angina a week and at least two episodes of myocardial ischemia during 48-h ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring during the baseline placebo period. A total of 207 patients completed all phases of the study. Beta-blockers were continued in those patients already receiving them. In this 7- to 10-week single-blind placebo withdrawal study, a 1-week placebo run-in was followed by up to 5 weeks of single-blind titration with nifedipine GITS, a 4-week efficacy phase with an established dose and a final single-blind 2-week placebo withdrawal period. Ambulatory ECG monitoring was performed at the end of each placebo phase and at the end of the efficacy phase with a digital monitoring device that was validated in a pilot study. Overall, nifedipine GITS significantly reduced the weekly number of anginal episodes from 5.7 to 1.8 (p = 0.0001) and the number of ischemic events from 7.3 to 4 (p = 0.0001) reported during the 48-h monitoring periods, with a significant increase in both during the placebo withdrawal period. The baseline circadian pattern of ischemia showed an early morning peak and a secondary peak in the afternoon. Nifedipine GITS significantly reduced ischemia during the 48-h period when administered as monotherapy or in combination with a beta-blocker. Patients were also randomized to receive nifedipine GITS in either a morning or an evening dose. The two regimens resulted in equal anti-ischemic benefit. The primary side effect of nifedipine GITS was edema, which was dose related. In summary, nifedipine GITS reduced the number of anginal and ischemic episodes when given alone or in combination with a beta-blocker. Nifedipine GITS had a sustained effect: a single daily dose was effective over 24 h regardless of whether it was administered in the morning or evening. This study also suggests that combination therapy with nifedipine GITS and a beta-blocker is especially efficacious in reducing ischemia.

Effect of diltiazem slow-release formulation on silent myocardial ischemia in stable coronary artery disease. The Canadian Multicenter Diltiazem Study Group

Silent myocardial ischemia is associated with adverse outcome in several subsets of coronary artery disease patients. This article presents results of a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study of the effects of sustained-release diltiazem (180 mg twice daily) on ischemic episodes in 60 patients with documented coronary artery disease. The mean age of the study population was 60 years and 93% were male. The mean number of episodes of silent ischemia per patient was 5.6 (placebo) and 2.8 (diltiazem), a 50% reduction (p less than 0.0001). Duration of ST-segment depression was 119 minutes (placebo) and 67 minutes (diltiazem), a 44% reduction (p less than 0.001). This study demonstrates that sustained-release diltiazem can significantly reduce the frequency and total duration of silent ischemic episodes.

Response of angina and ischemia to long-term treatment in patients with chronic stable angina: a double-blind randomized individualized dosing trial of nifedipine, propranolol and their combination

Seventy-four patients with chronic stable mild angina, mild coronary artery disease (83% had one- or two-vessel disease) and normal left ventricular function were studied to measure the response of treadmill exercise performance and painful and silent ischemia in the ambulatory setting to randomly assigned treatment with nifedipine or propranolol and their combination; titration to maximal tolerated dosages was performed in double-blind manner. At 3 months both nifedipine and propranolol reduced the weekly angina rate (p less than 0.05); during treadmill exercise testing, increases (p less than 0.05) were noted in time to angina and total exercise time and decreases in maximal ST depression at the end of exercise. There were no differences between the responses to nifedipine and propranolol and no significant additional changes were seen after another 3 months of therapy. The combination of nifedipine and propranolol reduced the number of patients with angina on exercise treadmill testing from 64% to 38% (p less than 0.05). During ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring before treatment, there were 1.4 +/- 2.4 (mean +/- SD) episodes/24 h of painful ischemia and a very low silent ischemia frequency: mean 1.1 +/- 2.7 episodes/24 h, mean duration 16 +/- 25 min/24 h. Treatment with propranolol and nifedipine resulted in reduction of episodes and duration of painful and painless ischemia; approximately 77% of patients were free of all ischemic episodes. It is concluded that patients with chronic stable mild angina have a low incidence of silent ischemia. Nifedipine or propranolol alone, titrated to individualized maximally tolerated dosages, are equally effective in long-term control of painful and painless ischemia, anginal episodes and exercise-induced ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Paradoxical effect of long-term treatment of nifedipine on total ischemic load in patients with stable angina pectoris

In 50 patients with stable effort angina the effect of three drugs, metoprolol, nifedipine, and diltiazem was assessed by analyzing exercise stress test response and ambulatory ECG recordings. Both metoprolol and diltiazem caused a significant increase in time to ischemic threshold during exercise and a significant decrease of maximum ST-segment depression (during exercise and ambulatory ECG monitoring) and in the average number of daily ischemic episodes. Only metoprolol significantly reduced heart rate and rate-pressure product at the ischemic threshold during exercise. In the group of patients treated with nifedipine no significant improvement was observed in exercise tolerance or in number of ischemic episodes/24 h. Moreover, the subset of nonresponders in the two methods was larger than in the other two groups. In some of these patients a clearcut worsening of total ischemic load was observed, despite the control of symptoms. This adverse effect might be attributed to the different consequences of the vasodilatory effect of nifedipine on blood flow through stenosed vessels.

Therapeutic targets in ischaemic heart disease

The adequate treatment of a disease syndrome is dependent upon a clear definition of the symptomatic, pathological, physiological and prognostic targets against which therapy is to be deployed. The syndromes of ischaemic heart disease, including angina pectoris, are complex in origin, pathology, pathophysiology and natural history, and a complete clinical profile is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve in individual patients. The prime goals of pharmacotherapy in ischaemic heart disease are easy to define, but difficult to accomplish in practice. Relief of pain, breathlessness and fatigue are the prime clinical targets for pharmacotherapy. In view of their sinister significance, the electrophysiological indications of myocardial ischaemia, whether symptomatic or silent, are also crucial targets towards which therapy must be directed. Ischaemic heart disease is accompanied by a wide variety of regional and global abnormalities of myocardial contractile function associated with widespread reflex stimulation of the peripheral vascular system and neuroendocrine systems. Primarily, drug therapy must be directed at correction of these pathophysiological components of the syndrome. Longer term but no less essential goals in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease are the prevention of the clinical sequelae of the syndrome and its progression. A natural sequel of coronary artery obstructive disease is successive thrombotic events and loss of myocardium. Calcium antagonists, by preventing the increase in myocardial cytosolic calcium during acute ischaemic episodes, defer cell necrosis; in this respect, they are unique among currently available antianginal drugs. With regard to progression, the prime pathological cause of ischaemic heart disease is coronary atheroma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)