Achieving Optimal Population Cardiovascular Health Requires an Interdisciplinary Team and a Learning Healthcare System: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Community-Based and Public Health Initiatives Drive Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A State-of-the-Art Review

BACKGROUND

Because of the massive global healthcare burden that cardiovascular diseases (CVD) present, it is critical that effective, highly scalable prevention strategies be identified and implemented to meet this unique health challenge.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to analyze and synthesize current research initiatives for CVD prevention at both community-based and practice-based levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This state-of-the-art review article highlights successful intervention strategies and their outcomes, explores the implications for population-based practice, and discusses the importance of long-term behavior change in achieving sustained CVD prevention. The article also discusses the need for building community capacity through engagement and collaboration and advocates for culturally appropriate dissemination strategies to ensure equitable access to new technologies and interventions in CVD prevention.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This review suggests that clinicians and researchers should integrate evidence-based, community-engaged, and culturally tailored strategies into practice and future research to promote long-term behavior change and equitable CVD prevention.

Artificial intelligence to improve cardiovascular population health

With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), novel opportunities arise to revolutionize healthcare delivery and improve population health. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of recent advancements in AI technologies and their applications in enhancing cardiovascular health at the population level. From predictive analytics to personalized interventions, AI-driven approaches are increasingly being utilized to analyse vast amounts of healthcare data, uncover disease patterns, and optimize resource allocation. Furthermore, AI-enabled technologies such as wearable devices and remote monitoring systems facilitate continuous cardiac monitoring, early detection of diseases, and promise more timely interventions. Additionally, AI-powered systems aid healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making processes, thereby improving accuracy and treatment effectiveness. By using AI systems to augment existing data sources, such as registries and biobanks, completely new research questions can be addressed to identify novel mechanisms and pharmaceutical targets. Despite this remarkable potential of AI in enhancing population health, challenges related to legal issues, data privacy, algorithm bias, and ethical considerations must be addressed to ensure equitable access and improved outcomes for all individuals.

Long-term mortality outcome of a primary care-based mobile health intervention for stroke management: Six-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite growing evidence of primary care-based interventions for chronic disease management in resource-limited settings, long-term post-trial effects remain inconclusive. We investigated the association of a 12-month system-integrated technology-enabled model of care (SINEMA) intervention with mortality outcomes among patients experiencing stroke at 6-year post-trial.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This study (clinicltiral.gov registration number: NCT05792618) is a long-term passive observational follow-up of participants and their spouse of the SINEMA trial (clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT03185858). The original SINEMA trial was a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 50 villages (clusters) in rural China among patients experiencing stroke during July 2017-July 2018. Village doctors in the intervention arm received training, incentives, and a customized mobile health application supporting monthly follow-ups to participants who also received daily free automated voice-messages. Vital status and causes of death were ascertained using local death registry, standardized village doctor records, and verbal autopsy. The post-trial observational follow-up spanned from 13- to 70-months post-baseline (up to April 30, 2023), during which no intervention was requested or supported. The primary outcome of this study was all-cause mortality, with cardiovascular and stroke cause-specific mortality also reported. Cox proportional hazards models with cluster-robust standard errors were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), adjusting for town, age, and sex in the main analysis model. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Of 1,299 patients experiencing stroke (mean age 65.7 years, 42.6% females) followed-up to 6 years, 276 (21.2%) died (median time-to-death 43.0 months [quantile 1-quantile 3: 26.7-56.8]). Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 19.0% (121 among 637) in the intervention arm versus 23.4% (155 among 662) in the control arm (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59, 0.90; p = 0.004); 14.4% versus 17.7% (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58, 0.94; p = 0.013) for cardiovascular cause-specific mortality; and 6.0% versus 7.9% (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44, 1.15; p = 0.16) for stroke cause-specific mortality. Although multisource verification was used to verify the outcomes, limitations exist as the survey- and record-matching-based nature of the study, unavailability of accurate clinical diagnostic records for some cases and the potential confounders that may influence the observed association on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite no observed statistically difference on stroke cause-specific mortality, the 12-month SINEMA intervention, compared with usual care, significantly associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular cause-specific mortality during 6 years of follow-up, suggesting potential sustained long-term benefits to patients experiencing stroke.

Multilevel factors influence the use of a cardiovascular disease assessment tool embedded in the electronic health record in oncology care

Digital health tools are positive for delivering evidence-based care. However, few studies have applied rigorous frameworks to understand their use in community settings. This study aimed to identify implementation determinants of the Automated Heart-Health Assessment (AH-HA) tool within outpatient oncology settings as part of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. A mixed-methods approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) examined barriers and facilitators to AH-HA implementation in four NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practices participating in the WF-1804CD AH-HA trial. Provider surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interviews with providers (n = 15) were coded using deductive (CFIR) and inductive codes by trained analysts. The CFIR rating tool was used to rate each quote for (i) valence, defined as a positive (+) or negative (-) influence, and (ii) strength, defined as a neutral (0), weak (1), or strong (2) influence on implementation. All providers considered discussing cardiovascular health with patients as important (61.5%, n = 8/13) or somewhat important (38.5%, n = 5/13). The tool was well-received by providers and was feasible to use in routine care among cancer survivors. Providers felt the tool was acceptable and usable, had a relative advantage over routine care, and had the potential to generate benefits for patients. Common reasons clinicians reported not using AH-HA were (i) insufficient time and (ii) the tool interfering with workflow. Systematically identifying implementation determinants from this study will guide the broader dissemination of the AH-HA tool across clinical settings and inform implementation strategies for future scale-up hybrid trials.

The Role of Primary Care in Achieving Life's Essential 8: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

To reduce morbidity and mortality rates of cardiovascular disease, an urgent need exists to improve cardiovascular health among US adults. In 2022, the American Heart Association issued Life's Essential 8, which identifies and defines 8 health behaviors and factors that, when optimized through a combination of primary prevention, risk factor management, and effective treatments, can promote ideal cardiovascular health. Because of its central role in patient care across the life span, primary care is in a strategic position to promote Life's Essential 8 and improve cardiovascular health in the United States. High-quality primary care is person-centered, team-based, community-aligned, and designed to provide affordable optimized health care. The purpose of this scientific statement from the American Heart Association is to provide evidence-based guidance on how primary care, as a field and practice, can support patients in implementing Life's Essential 8. The scientific statement aims to describe the role and functions of primary care, provide evidence for how primary care can be leveraged to promote Life's Essential 8, examine the role of primary care in providing access to care and mitigating disparities in cardiovascular health, review challenges in primary care, and propose solutions to address challenges in achieving Life's Essential 8.

Incidence of Kawasaki disease among children in Chandigarh, India during 2015-2019: a trend analysis

Background

Only limited information exists regarding the epidemiology of Kawasaki disease (KD) in low-income and middle-income countries. The present study provides the incidence of KD during 2015-2019 in Chandigarh, north India. Our centre follows the largest KD cohort in India.

Methods

Children with KD at Chandigarh diagnosed during January 2015-December 2019 were enrolled in the study. Annual incidence rates were determined using decadal growth rates of the National Census 2011. We computed the incidence of KD in children aged <5, and <15 years. We also undertook linear trend analysis using our incidence data from 1994 to 2019.

Findings

During 2015-2019, 83 patients (66 males, 17 females) were diagnosed with KD in Chandigarh. Incidence rates during these 5 years were 5.64, 9.25, 9.11, 9.87, and 9.72/100,000 in children aged <5 years, and 2.65, 4.44, 3.86, 5.07, 4.74/100,000 in children aged <15 years. The median age at diagnosis was 48 months (range: 12 days to 15 years). Compared to previous data (2009-2014), there was a 53.1% increase in annual incidence of KD in children aged <5 years, and a 53.7% increase in children aged <15 years. Coronary artery abnormalities during acute phase were noted in 16.9%, and in 7.2% of patients at 6 weeks of follow-up. The trend analysis indicated a monthly rise of 0.002 cases per 100,000 children aged <5 years, and 0.0165 cases per 100,000 children aged <15 years.

Interpretation

The incidence of KD has continued to show an upward trend in Chandigarh over the period 2015-2019. This may indicate a true rise in the occurrence of KD or may reflect better disease ascertainment as a result of greater awareness about KD amongst healthcare professionals.

Funding

None.

Hypertension Trends and Disparities Over 12 Years in a Large Health System: Leveraging the Electronic Health Records

BACKGROUND

The digital transformation of medical data enables health systems to leverage real-world data from electronic health records to gain actionable insights for improving hypertension care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a serial cross-sectional analysis of outpatients of a large regional health system from 2010 to 2021. Hypertension was defined by systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or recorded treatment with antihypertension medications. We evaluated 4 methods of using blood pressure measurements in the electronic health record to define hypertension. The primary outcomes were age-adjusted prevalence rates and age-adjusted control rates. Hypertension prevalence varied depending on the definition used, ranging from 36.5% to 50.9% initially and increasing over time by ≈5%, regardless of the definition used. Control rates ranged from 61.2% to 71.3% initially, increased during 2018 to 2019, and decreased during 2020 to 2021. The proportion of patients with a hypertension diagnosis ranged from 45.5% to 60.2% initially and improved during the study period. Non-Hispanic Black patients represented 25% of our regional population and consistently had higher prevalence rates, higher mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and lower control rates compared with other racial and ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large regional health system, we leveraged the electronic health record to provide real-world insights. The findings largely reflected national trends but showed distinctive regional demographics and findings, with prevalence increasing, one-quarter of the patients not controlled, and marked disparities. This approach could be emulated by regional health systems seeking to improve hypertension care.

Advancing the care of individuals with cancer through innovation & technology: Proceedings from the cardiology oncology innovation summit 2020 and 2021

As cancer therapies increase in effectiveness and patients' life expectancies improve, balancing oncologic efficacy while reducing acute and long-term cardiovascular toxicities has become of paramount importance. To address this pressing need, the Cardiology Oncology Innovation Network (COIN) was formed to bring together domain experts with the overarching goal of collaboratively investigating, applying, and educating widely on various forms of innovation to improve the quality of life and cardiovascular healthcare of patients undergoing and surviving cancer therapies. The COIN mission pillars of innovation, collaboration, and education have been implemented with cross-collaboration among academic institutions, private and public establishments, and industry and technology companies. In this report, we summarize proceedings from the first two annual COIN summits (inaugural in 2020 and subsequent in 2021) including educational sessions on technological innovations for establishing best practices and aligning resources. Herein, we highlight emerging areas for innovation and defining unmet needs to further improve the outcome for cancer patients and survivors of all ages. Additionally, we provide actionable suggestions for advancing innovation, collaboration, and education in cardio-oncology in the digital era.

Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.

Objective

To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.

Methods

The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient's weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.

Results

Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, P < .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10-0.39], P < .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07-0.59], P = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score >80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT >300 seconds and final infusion rate.

Conclusion

A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.

Association of physical activity and PM2.5-attributable cardiovascular disease mortality in the United States

Objective

The study aimed to explore the association between physical activity (PA) and PM2. 5-attributable cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality trends across the United States (US) at the state level.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study for PM2.5-attributable CVD mortality and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for PA prevalence. The study covered all 50 US states and the District of Columbia from 2001 to 2019. We utilized Joinpoint Regression to calculate AAPC from 2011 to 2019 and Pearson correlation coefficients to assess state-level associations between PA and PM2.5-attributable CVD mortality AAPC.

Results

During 2011-2019, a total of 244,318 PM2.5-attributable CVD deaths were recorded. The age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) of PM2.5-attributable CVD declined substantially from 2011 to 2019 across all US states, with the most pronounced reductions observed in industrialized states such as West Virginia (51% decline), Kentucky (32%), and Ohio (22%). AAMR ratios for the US states varied substantially, ranging from 0.1 in Hawaii to 1.7 in Arkansas. The AAPC ranged from -9.4% (West Virginia) to -1.7% (New Mexico) in the majority of states, while a few states such as Alaska, Wyoming, and Washington saw slight positive AAPCs from 0.9 to 2.9%. A significant correlation was found between PA and PM2.5-attributable CVD mortality trends (r = 0.454, p = 0.001), with similar results in subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest a correlation between increased physical activity (PA) and increased PM2.5-attributable CVD mortality, highlighting the potential need to consider PM2.5 exposure when engaging in PA to mitigate adverse cardiovascular health impacts. However, further research is warranted to establish causality and underlying mechanisms in the relationship between PA and PM2.5-attributable CVD mortality. Potential limitations include reliance on self-reported PA data.

Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams

Interdisciplinary research teams can be extremely beneficial when addressing difficult clinical problems. The incorporation of conceptual and methodological strategies from a variety of research disciplines and health professions yields transformative results. In this setting, the long-term goal of team science is to improve patient care, with emphasis on population health outcomes. However, team principles necessary for effective research teams are rarely taught in health professional schools. To form successful interdisciplinary research teams in cardio-oncology and beyond, guiding principles and organizational recommendations are necessary. Cardiovascular disease results in annual direct costs of $220 billion (about $680 per person in the US) and is the leading cause of death for cancer survivors, including adult survivors of childhood cancers. Optimizing cardio-oncology research in interdisciplinary research teams has the potential to aid in the investigation of strategies for saving hundreds of thousands of lives each year in the United States and mitigating the annual cost of cardiovascular disease. Despite published reports on experiences developing research teams across organizations, specialties and settings, there is no single journal article that compiles principles for cardiology or cardio-oncology research teams. In this review, recurring threads linked to working as a team, as well as optimal methods, advantages, and problems that arise when managing teams are described in the context of career development and research. The worth and hurdles of a team approach, based on practical lessons learned from establishing our multidisciplinary research team and information gleaned from relevant specialties in the development of a successful team are presented.

Association of cardiovascular health at old age with all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study in China

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease has become the leading cause of death worldwide, but there is a lack of data on whether cardiovascular health (CVH) is associated with elderly mortality in China. We investigated the relationship between the ideal CVH score of Chinese elderly and the all-cause mortality.

METHODS

The Beijing Elderly Comprehensive Health Cohort Study included a total of 4,499 participants aged 60 years and above. The CVH metric was calculated at baseline and had a score ranging from 0 to 12. The relationship of CVH metrics with all-cause mortality was investigated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The robustness of results was tested using subgroup and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The median CVH score among participants was 8.00 (2.00), with only 8.0% scoring 11-12 points. 667 deaths were observed during an average follow-up time of 8.2 years. Participants with a CVH score of 11-12 had a decreased risk of all-cause mortality when compared to those with a CVH score of 0-4(HR = 0.584, 95% CI: 0.373-0.913). Participants had a 7.5% lower risk of all-cause death with each unit higher CVH score (HR = 0.925, 95%CI: 0.885-0.967) with a linearly decreasing trend (P nonlinear = 0.575). The relationships were greater in younger elderly people and stroke patients (P interaction = 0.011 and 0.037. respectively). The consistency of significant trends in sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of association (P trend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the Chinese elderly, there was a linear relationship between improving CVH scores and a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Because of the enormous benefits brought by one point, strategies are essential for improving cardiovascular health attainment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2100049866).

Evaluation of Statin Prescribing Practices and Predictors of Statin Underutilization in Persons With HIV

BACKGROUND

Persons with HIV (PWH) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with those without HIV. Despite the increased risk, PWH are less likely to be prescribed statin therapy compared with the general population. The purpose of this study is to describe the statin prescribing practices of an outpatient HIV clinic and identify potential predictors of statin underutilization.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, single-center chart review of PWH ages 40-79 years receiving care at an HIV clinic. Statin eligibility, statin prescribing practices, and appropriateness of statin therapy were evaluated. Logistical regression analyses were conducted to assess for predictors of underutilization of statin therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 606 patients, statin therapy was indicated in 362 patients (60%). Among those with a statin indication, 60.2% were prescribed appropriate statin therapy, 11.6% were prescribed statin therapy but not at the indicated intensity, and 28.2% were not prescribed statin therapy. Tobacco use ( P = 0.0023) was identified as a predictor of statin underutilization. The odds of statin prescribing were higher for those with clinical atherosclerotic CVD ( P = 0.004) and hypertension ( P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Statin underutilization was significantly higher in PWH smoking tobacco and PWH without atherosclerotic CVD or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 190 mg/dL or higher. In addition, this study highlights the need for more robust CVD prevention efforts in PWH. Identifying predictors of statin underutilization may aid in elucidating where gaps in cardiovascular prevention care may exist.

Ineffective health management in people with hypertension: Accuracy study

PURPOSE

To analyze the accuracy of the clinical indicators of the nursing diagnosis Ineffective Health Management in people with hypertension.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. The ineffective health management was investigated in 120 people with hypertension in a referral public outpatient clinic in Brazil between August and November 2020. The accuracy measures were analyzed using Rasch analysis, considering the difficulty of clinical indicator and person's ability.

RESULTS

Ineffective health management is probably present in 37.5% of people with hypertension. 'Failure to include treatment regimen in daily living' was the clinical indicator with the highest sensitivity value, and 'failure to take action to reduce risk factor' had the highest specificity value.

CONCLUSIONS

Rasch analysis demonstrated that all clinical indicators contribute significantly to estimating the presence of ineffective health management in people with hypertension in the outpatient scenario.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This research contributes by providing accurate clinical indicators of ineffective health management, helping nurses prescribe and deliver the appropriate nursing interventions for people with hypertension by telenursing.

Status of Cardiovascular Health in US Adults and Children Using the American Heart Association's New "Life's Essential 8" Metrics: Prevalence Estimates From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2013 Through 2018

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association recently published an updated algorithm for quantifying cardiovascular health (CVH)-the Life's Essential 8 score. We quantified US levels of CVH using the new score.

METHODS

We included individuals ages 2 through 79 years (not pregnant or institutionalized) who were free of cardiovascular disease from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys in 2013 through 2018. For all participants, we calculated the overall CVH score (range, 0 [lowest] to 100 [highest]), as well as the score for each component of diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, sleep duration, body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure, using published American Heart Association definitions. Sample weights and design were incorporated in calculating prevalence estimates and standard errors using standard survey procedures. CVH scores were assessed across strata of age, sex, race and ethnicity, family income, and depression.

RESULTS

There were 23 409 participants, representing 201 728 000 adults and 74 435 000 children. The overall mean CVH score was 64.7 (95% CI, 63.9-65.6) among adults using all 8 metrics and 65.5 (95% CI, 64.4-66.6) for the 3 metrics available (diet, physical activity, and body mass index) among children and adolescents ages 2 through 19 years. For adults, there were significant differences in mean overall CVH scores by sex (women, 67.0; men, 62.5), age (range of mean values, 62.2-68.7), and racial and ethnic group (range, 59.7-68.5). Mean scores were lowest for diet, physical activity, and body mass index metrics. There were large differences in mean scores across demographic groups for diet (range, 23.8-47.7), nicotine exposure (range, 63.1-85.0), blood glucose (range, 65.7-88.1), and blood pressure (range, 49.5-84.0). In children, diet scores were low (mean 40.6) and were progressively lower in higher age groups (from 61.1 at ages 2 through 5 to 28.5 at ages 12 through 19); large differences were also noted in mean physical activity (range, 63.1-88.3) and body mass index (range, 74.4-89.4) scores by sociodemographic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The new Life's Essential 8 score helps identify large group and individual differences in CVH. Overall CVH in the US population remains well below optimal levels and there are both broad and targeted opportunities to monitor, preserve, and improve CVH across the life course in individuals and the population.

Life's Essential 8: Updating and Enhancing the American Heart Association's Construct of Cardiovascular Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association

In 2010, the American Heart Association defined a novel construct of cardiovascular health to promote a paradigm shift from a focus solely on disease treatment to one inclusive of positive health promotion and preservation across the life course in populations and individuals. Extensive subsequent evidence has provided insights into strengths and limitations of the original approach to defining and quantifying cardiovascular health. In response, the American Heart Association convened a writing group to recommend enhancements and updates. The definition and quantification of each of the original metrics (Life's Simple 7) were evaluated for responsiveness to interindividual variation and intraindividual change. New metrics were considered, and the age spectrum was expanded to include the entire life course. The foundational contexts of social determinants of health and psychological health were addressed as crucial factors in optimizing and preserving cardiovascular health. This presidential advisory introduces an enhanced approach to assessing cardiovascular health: Life's Essential 8. The components of Life's Essential 8 include diet (updated), physical activity, nicotine exposure (updated), sleep health (new), body mass index, blood lipids (updated), blood glucose (updated), and blood pressure. Each metric has a new scoring algorithm ranging from 0 to 100 points, allowing generation of a new composite cardiovascular health score (the unweighted average of all components) that also varies from 0 to 100 points. Methods for implementing cardiovascular health assessment and longitudinal monitoring are discussed, as are potential data sources and tools to promote widespread adoption in policy, public health, clinical, institutional, and community settings.

Connected Health Innovation Research Program (C.H.I.R.P.): A bridge for digital health and wellness in cardiology and oncology

Study objective

Cancer and heart disease are leading causes of mortality, and cardio-oncology is emerging as a new field addressing the cardiovascular toxicities related to cancer and cancer therapy. Interdisciplinary research platforms that incorporate digital health to optimize cardiovascular health and wellness in cancer survivors are therefore needed as we advance in the digital era. Our goal was to develop the Connected Health Innovation Research Program (C.H.I.R.P.) to serve as a foundation for future integration and assessments of adoption and clinical efficacy of digital health tools for cardiovascular health and wellness in the general population and in oncology patients.

Design/setting/participants

Partner companies were identified through the American Medical Association innovation platform, as well as LinkedIn and direct contact by our team. Company leaders met with our team to discuss features of their technology or software. Non-disclosure agreements were signed and data were discussed and obtained for descriptive or statistical analysis.

Results

A suite of companies with technologies focused on wellness, biometrics tracking, audio companions, oxygen saturation, weight trends, sleep patterns, heart rate variability, electrocardiogram patterns, blood pressure patterns, real-time metabolism tracking, instructional video modules, or integration of these technologies into electronic health records was collated. We formed an interdisciplinary research team and established an academia-industry collaborative foundation for connecting patients with wellness digital health technologies.

Conclusions

A suite of software and device technologies accessible to the cardiology and oncology population has been established and will facilitate retrospective, prospective, and case research studies assessing adoption and clinical efficacy of digital health tools in cardiology/oncology.

The pursuit of health equity in digital transformation, health informatics, and the cardiovascular learning healthcare system

African Americans have a higher rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and a lower rate of specialty consultation and treatment than Caucasians. These disparities also exist in the care and treatment of chemotherapy-related cardiovascular complications. African Americans suffer from cardiotoxicity at a higher rate than Caucasians and are underrepresented in clinical trials aimed at preventing cardiovascular injury associated with cancer therapies. To eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in the prevention of cardiotoxicity, an interdisciplinary and innovative approach will be required. Diverse forms of digital transformation leveraging health informatics have the potential to contribute to health equity if they are implemented carefully and thoughtfully in collaboration with minority communities. A learning healthcare system can serve as a model for developing, deploying, and disseminating interventions to minimize health inequities and maximize beneficial impact.

Establishing an interdisciplinary research team for cardio-oncology artificial intelligence informatics precision and health equity

Study objective

A multi-institutional interdisciplinary team was created to develop a research group focused on leveraging artificial intelligence and informatics for cardio-oncology patients. Cardio-oncology is an emerging medical field dedicated to prevention, screening, and management of adverse cardiovascular effects of cancer/ cancer therapies. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in cancer survivors. Cardiovascular risk in these patients is higher than in the general population. However, prediction and prevention of adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with a history of cancer/cancer treatment is challenging. Thus, establishing an interdisciplinary team to create cardiovascular risk stratification clinical decision aids for integration into electronic health records for oncology patients was considered crucial.

Design/setting/participants

Core team members from the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM), and Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), and additional members from Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, and other institutions have joined forces to apply high-performance computing in cardio-oncology.

Results

The team is comprised of clinicians and researchers from relevant complementary and synergistic fields relevant to this work. The team has built an epidemiological cohort of ~5000 cancer survivors that will serve as a database for interdisciplinary multi-institutional artificial intelligence projects.

Conclusion

Lessons learned from establishing this team, as well as initial findings from the epidemiology cohort, are presented. Barriers have been broken down to form a multi-institutional interdisciplinary team for health informatics research in cardio-oncology. A database of cancer survivors has been created collaboratively by the team and provides initial insight into cardiovascular outcomes and comorbidities in this population.

Tracking Blood Pressure Control Performance and Process Metrics in 25 US Health Systems: The PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory

Background The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network Blood Pressure Control Laboratory Surveillance System was established to identify opportunities for blood pressure (BP) control improvement and to provide a mechanism for tracking improvement longitudinally. Methods and Results We conducted a serial cross-sectional study with queries against standardized electronic health record data in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) common data model returned by 25 participating US health systems. Queries produced BP control metrics for adults with well-documented hypertension and a recent encounter at the health system for a series of 1-year measurement periods for each quarter of available data from January 2017 to March 2020. Aggregate weighted results are presented overall and by race and ethnicity. The most recent measurement period includes data from 1 737 995 patients, and 11 956 509 patient-years were included in the trend analysis. Overall, 15% were Black, 52% women, and 28% had diabetes. BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was observed in 62% (range, 44%-74%) but varied by race and ethnicity, with the lowest BP control among Black patients at 57% (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94). A new class of antihypertensive medication (medication intensification) was prescribed in just 12% (range, 0.6%-25%) of patient visits where BP was uncontrolled. However, when medication intensification occurred, there was a large decrease in systolic BP (≈15 mm Hg; range, 5-18 mm Hg). Conclusions Major opportunities exist for improving BP control and reducing disparities, especially through consistent medication intensification when BP is uncontrolled. These data demonstrate substantial room for improvement and opportunities to close health equity gaps.