1
|
Lim HS, González-Costello J, Belohlavek J, Zweck E, Blumer V, Schrage B, Hanff TC. Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock in the intensive care unit. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:1059-1073. [PMID: 38518863 PMCID: PMC11148863 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Hemodynamic derangements are defining features of cardiogenic shock. Randomized clinical trials have examined the efficacy of various therapeutic interventions, from percutaneous coronary intervention to inotropes and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock has not been well-studied. This State-of-the-Art review will provide a framework for hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock, including a description of the 4 therapeutic phases from initial 'Rescue' to 'Optimization', 'Stabilization' and 'de-Escalation or Exit therapy' (R-O-S-E), phenotyping and phenotype-guided tailoring of pharmacological and MCS support, to achieve hemodynamic and therapeutic goals. Finally, the premises that form the basis for clinical management and the hypotheses for randomized controlled trials will be discussed, with a view to the future direction of cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoong Sern Lim
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - José González-Costello
- Advanced Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, BIOHEART-Cardiovascular Diseases Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Ciber Cardiovascular (CIBERCV), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Belohlavek
- 2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Elric Zweck
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Vanessa Blumer
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas C Hanff
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Choi KH, Kang D, Park H, Park TK, Lee JM, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Cho J, Yang JH. In-hospital and long-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction versus heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2024. [PMID: 38855925 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS This study sought to examine the difference in clinical characteristics, treatment strategy, trends in mortality, and medical costs according to the aetiologies of cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS AND RESULTS This was a population-based, nationwide, cohort study from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. All CS adults (≥18 years) were admitted to an intensive care unit from January 2010 to December 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were cardiac replacement therapy (left ventricular assisted device implantation or heart transplantation), all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) during follow-up, and actual in-hospital medical costs. Among 136 092 individuals with CS, 48 704 (29.7%) cases were due to acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), and the remaining 87 388 (71.3%) were due to HF-CS (ischaemic cardiomyopathy [ICM] vs. non-ICM, 49 504 [56.6%] vs. 37 884 [45.4%]). Patients with HF-CS were older, less likely to be male, and less likely to receive mechanical circulatory support, compared to those with AMI-CS. During the 10-year study period, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased, and actual medical costs tended to increase, regardless of CS aetiology. Compared with AMI-CS, HF-CS was associated with higher risks of in-hospital mortality (40.3% vs. 28.5%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-1.52), cardiac replacement therapy (adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.34), as well as follow-up mortality after successful discharge (19.3% vs. 8.5%; adjusted-hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.48-1.59). HF-CS had lower medical costs than AMI-CS (adjusted ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.79-0.80). CONCLUSIONS With medical advances during the past 10 years, the mortality of CS has decreased significantly, but the mortality of HF-CS remains high. The findings highlight the need for effective treatment strategies for patients with HF-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Danbee Kang
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyejeong Park
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taek Kyu Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhee Cho
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fisher T, Hill N, Kalakoutas A, Lahlou A, Rathod K, Proudfoot A, Warren A. Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis. Crit Care 2024; 28:192. [PMID: 38845019 PMCID: PMC11157877 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are at higher risk of mortality from many acute cardiovascular conditions, but studies have demonstrated differing findings regarding the mortality of cardiogenic shock in women and men. To examine differences in 30-day mortality and mechanical circulatory support use by sex in patients with cardiogenic shock. MAIN BODY Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in April 2024. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials or observational studies, included adult patients with cardiogenic shock, and reported at least one of the following outcomes by sex: raw mortality, adjusted mortality (odds ratio) or use of mechanical circulatory support. Out of 4448 studies identified, 81 met inclusion criteria, pooling a total of 656,754 women and 1,018,036 men. In the unadjusted analysis for female sex and combined in-hospital and 30-day mortality, women had higher odds of mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.44, p < 0.001). Pooled unadjusted mortality was 35.9% in men and 40.8% in women (p < 0.001). When only studies reporting adjusted ORs were included, combined in-hospital/30-day mortality remained higher in women (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15, p < 0.001). These effects remained consistent across subgroups of acute myocardial infarction- and heart failure- related cardiogenic shock. Overall, women were less likely to receive mechanical support than men (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.79, p < 0.001); specifically, they were less likely to be treated with intra-aortic balloon pump (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89, p < 0.001) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR = 0.84, 95% 0.71-0.99, p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen with use of percutaneous ventricular assist devices (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.51-1.33, p = 0.42). CONCLUSION Even when adjusted for confounders, mortality for cardiogenic shock in women is approximately 10% higher than men. This effect is seen in both acute myocardial infarction and heart failure cardiogenic shock. Women with cardiogenic shock are less likely to be treated with mechanical circulatory support than men. Clinicians should make immediate efforts to ensure the prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment of cardiogenic shock in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Fisher
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Rd, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Nicole Hill
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, UK
| | | | - Assad Lahlou
- Barts Health Library Services, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Krishnaraj Rathod
- Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Alex Warren
- Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Higgins A, Gage A, van Diepen S, Katz JN. Schrodinger's Shock: Confronting Uncertainty and Fatalism in Cardiogenic Shock Trials. J Card Fail 2024:S1071-9164(24)00190-8. [PMID: 38810772 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Higgins
- Departments of Critical Care Cardiology and Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
| | - Ann Gage
- Department of Cardiology, Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA.
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine & Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, NY USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berg DD, Singal S, Palazzolo M, Baird-Zars VM, Bofarrag F, Bohula EA, Chaudhry SP, Dodson MW, Hillerson D, Lawler PR, Liu S, O'Brien CG, Pisani BA, Racharla L, Roswell RO, Shah KS, Solomon MA, Sridharan L, Thompson AD, Diepen SVAN, Katz JN, Morrow DA. Modes of Death in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A Report from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network. J Card Fail 2024; 30:728-733. [PMID: 38387758 PMCID: PMC11098678 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on how patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) die. METHODS The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a research network of cardiac intensive care units coordinated by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group (Boston, MA). Using standardized definitions, site investigators classified direct modes of in-hospital death for CS admissions (October 2021 to September 2022). Mutually exclusive categories included 4 modes of cardiovascular death and 4 modes of noncardiovascular death. Subgroups defined by CS type, preceding cardiac arrest (CA), use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), and transition to comfort measures were evaluated. RESULTS Among 1068 CS cases, 337 (31.6%) died during the index hospitalization. Overall, the mode of death was cardiovascular in 82.2%. Persistent CS was the dominant specific mode of death (66.5%), followed by arrhythmia (12.8%), anoxic brain injury (6.2%), and respiratory failure (4.5%). Patients with preceding CA were more likely to die from anoxic brain injury (17.1% vs 0.9%; P < .001) or arrhythmia (21.6% vs 8.4%; P < .001). Patients managed with tMCS were more likely to die from persistent shock (P < .01), both cardiogenic (73.5% vs 62.0%) and noncardiogenic (6.1% vs 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS Most deaths in CS are related to direct cardiovascular causes, particularly persistent CS. However, there is important heterogeneity across subgroups defined by preceding CA and the use of tMCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Sachit Singal
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Palazzolo
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vivian M Baird-Zars
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fadel Bofarrag
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mark W Dodson
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah
| | - Dustin Hillerson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Shuangbo Liu
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Connor G O'Brien
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Barbara A Pisani
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Robert O Roswell
- Northwell, Department of Cardiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell. New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Kevin S Shah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Michael A Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lakshmi Sridharan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Andrea D Thompson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sean VAN Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jason N Katz
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine & Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, New York
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Warren A, McCall P, Proudfoot A, Gillon S, Abu-Arafeh A, McKnight AJ, Mudie R, Armstrong D, Tzolos E, Livesey JA, Sinclair A, Baston V, Dalzell J, Owen D, Fleming L, Scott I, Puxty A, Lee MMY, Walker F, Hobson S, Campbell E, Kinsella M, McGinnigle E, Docking R, Price G, Ramsay A, Bauld R, Herron S, Lone NI, Mills NL, Hartley L. EPidemiology Of Cardiogenic sHock in Scotland (EPOCHS): A multicentre, prospective observational study of the prevalence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in Scotland. J Intensive Care Soc 2024; 25:147-155. [PMID: 38737313 PMCID: PMC11086715 DOI: 10.1177/17511437231217877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite high rates of cardiovascular disease in Scotland, the prevalence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock are unknown. Methods We undertook a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit at 13 hospitals in Scotland for a 6-month period. Denominator data from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group were used to estimate ICU prevalence; data for coronary care units were unavailable. We undertook multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results In total, 247 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. After exclusion of coronary care unit admissions, this comprised 3.0% of all ICU admissions during the study period (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%-3.5%). Aetiology was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 48%. The commonest vasoactive treatment was noradrenaline (56%) followed by adrenaline (46%) and dobutamine (40%). Mechanical circulatory support was used in 30%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 55%. After multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), admission lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.19), Society for Cardiovascular Angiographic Intervention stage D or E at presentation (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10-4.29) and use of adrenaline (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.40-5.40) were associated with mortality. Conclusions In Scotland the prevalence of cardiogenic shock was 3% of all ICU admissions; more than half died prior to discharge. There was significant variation in treatment approaches, particularly with respect to vasoactive support strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Warren
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
| | - Philip McCall
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Peri-Operative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian Scott
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nazir I Lone
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicholas L Mills
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- BHF/University Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koerber DM, Katz JN, Bohula E, Park JG, Dodson MW, Gerber DA, Hillerson D, Liu S, Pierce MJ, Prasad R, Rose SW, Sanchez PA, Shaw J, Wang J, Jentzer JC, Kristin Newby L, Daniels LB, Morrow DA, van Diepen S. Variation in risk-adjusted cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay and the association with in-hospital mortality: An analysis from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry. Am Heart J 2024; 271:28-37. [PMID: 38369218 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested that there is wide variability in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay (LOS); however, these studies are limited by the absence of detailed risk assessment at the time of admission. Thus, we evaluated inter-hospital differences in CICU LOS, and the association between LOS and in-hospital mortality. METHODS Using data from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry, we included 22,862 admissions between 2017 and 2022 from 35 primarily tertiary and quaternary CICUs that captured consecutive admissions in annual 2-month snapshots. The primary analysis compared inter-hospital differences in CICU LOS, as well as the association between CICU LOS and all-cause in-hospital mortality using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. RESULTS The overall median CICU LOS was 2.2 (1.1-4.8) days, and the median hospital LOS was 5.9 (2.8-12.3) days. Admissions in the longest tertile of LOS tended to be younger with higher rates of pre-existing comorbidities, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, as well as higher rates of mechanical ventilation, intravenous vasopressor use, mechanical circulatory support, and renal replacement therapy. Unadjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality was 9.3%, 6.7%, and 13.4% in the lowest, intermediate, and highest CICU LOS tertiles. In a competing risk analysis, individual patient CICU LOS was correlated (r2 = 0.31) with a higher risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality. The relationship remained significant in admissions with heart failure, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS In a large registry of academic CICUs, we observed significant variation in CICU LOS and report that LOS is independently associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality. These findings could potentially be used to improve CICU resource utilization planning and refine risk prognostication in critically ill cardiovascular patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Koerber
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Erin Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark W Dodson
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT
| | - Daniel A Gerber
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Dustin Hillerson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Shuangbo Liu
- Max Rady College of Medicine, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Matthew J Pierce
- North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | | | - Scott W Rose
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Pablo A Sanchez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Jeffrey Shaw
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L Kristin Newby
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel SM, Berg DD, Bohula EA, Baird-Zars VM, Barsness GW, Chaudhry SP, Chonde MD, Cooper HA, Ginder C, Jentzer JC, Kontos MC, Miller PE, Newby LK, O'Brien CG, Park JG, Pierce MJ, Pisani BA, Potter BJ, Shah KS, Teuteberg JJ, Katz JN, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Early Serial Assessment of Aggregate Vasoactive Support and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry. Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e011736. [PMID: 38587438 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.124.011736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associations of early changes in vasoactive support with cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remain incompletely defined. METHODS The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units. Patients admitted with CS (2018-2023) had vasoactive dosing assessed at 4 and 24 hours from cardiac intensive care unit admission and quantified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). Prognostic associations of VIS at both time points, as well as change in VIS from 4 to 24 hours, were examined. Interaction testing was performed based on mechanical circulatory support status. RESULTS Among 3665 patients, 82% had a change in VIS <10, with 7% and 11% having a ≥10-point increase and decrease from 4 to 24 hours, respectively. The 4 and 24-hour VIS were each associated with cardiac intensive care unit mortality (13%-45% and 11%-73% for VIS <10 to ≥40, respectively; Ptrend <0.0001 for each). Stratifying by the 4-hour VIS, changes in VIS from 4 to 24 hours had a graded association with mortality, ranging from a 2- to >4-fold difference in mortality comparing those with a ≥10-point increase to ≥10-point decrease in VIS (Ptrend <0.0001). The change in VIS alone provided good discrimination of cardiac intensive care unit mortality (C-statistic, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.70-0.75]) and improved discrimination of the 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.72 [95% CI, 0.69-0.74] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.74-0.78]) and the clinician-assessed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stage (0.72 [95% CI, 0.70-0.74] to 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.79]). Although present in both groups, the mortality risk associated with VIS was attenuated in patients managed with versus without mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio per 10-point higher 24-hour VIS, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.23-1.49] versus 1.84 [95% CI, 1.69-2.01]; Pinteraction <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Early changes in the magnitude of vasoactive support in CS are associated with a gradient of risk for mortality. These data suggest that early VIS trajectory may improve CS prognostication, with the potential to be leveraged for clinical decision-making and research applications in CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth M Patel
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Vivian M Baird-Zars
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Gregory W Barsness
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J.)
| | | | - Meshe D Chonde
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.D.C.)
| | - Howard A Cooper
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY (H.A.C.)
| | - Curtis Ginder
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J.)
| | - Michael C Kontos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.C.K.)
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (P.E.M.)
| | - L Kristin Newby
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (L.K.N.)
| | - Connor G O'Brien
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (C.G.O.B.)
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Matthew J Pierce
- Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY (M.J.P.)
| | - Barbara A Pisani
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (B.A.P.)
| | - Brian J Potter
- Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Research Center and Cardiovascular Center, Quebec, QC, Canada (B.J.P.)
| | - Kevin S Shah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (K.S.S.)
| | - Jeffrey J Teuteberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (J.J.T.)
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York (J.N.K.)
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (S.v.D.)
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zapata L, Gómez-López R, Llanos-Jorge C, Duerto J, Martin-Villen L. Cardiogenic shock as a health issue. Physiology, classification, and detection. Med Intensiva 2024; 48:282-295. [PMID: 38458914 DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome with high mortality and a growing incidence. It is characterized by an imbalance between the tissue oxygen demands and the capacity of the cardiovascular system to meet these demands, due to acute cardiac dysfunction. Historically, acute coronary syndromes have been the primary cause of CS. However, non-ischemic cases have seen a rise in incidence. The pathophysiology involves ischemic damage of the myocardium and a sympathetic, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and inflammatory response, perpetuating the situation of tissue hypoperfusion and ultimately leading to multiorgan dysfunction. The characterization of CS patients through a triaxial assessment and the widespread use of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) scale has allowed standardization of the severity stratification of CS; this, coupled with early detection and the "hub and spoke" approach, could contribute to improving the prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Zapata
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Rocío Gómez-López
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
| | - Celina Llanos-Jorge
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Jorge Duerto
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Martin-Villen
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jentzer JC, Senghavi D, Patel PC, Bhattacharyya A, van Diepen S, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Kashani KB. Shock Severity Classification and Mortality in Adults With Cardiac, Medical, Surgical, and Neurological Critical Illness. Mayo Clin Proc 2024; 99:727-739. [PMID: 37815781 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Classification could perform risk stratification in a mixed cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, similar to its validation in patients with acute cardiac disease. METHODS We included 21,461 adult Mayo Clinic ICU patient admissions from December 1, 2014, to February 28, 2018, including cardiac ICU (16.7%), medical ICU (37.4%), neurosciences ICU (27.7%), and surgical ICU (18.2%). The SCAI Shock Classification (a 5-stage classification from no shock [A] to refractory shock [E]) was assigned in each 4-hour period during the first 24 hours of ICU admission. RESULTS The median age was 65 years, and 43.2% were female. In-hospital mortality occurred in 1611 (7.5%) patients, with a stepwise increase in in-hospital mortality in each higher maximum SCAI Shock stage overall: A, 4.0%; B, 4.6%; C, 7.0%; D, 13.9%; and E, 40.2%. The SCAI Shock Classification provided incremental mortality risk stratification in each ICU, with the best performance in the cardiac ICU and the worse performance in the neurosciences ICU. The SCAI Shock Classification was associated with higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32 per each stage; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.41; P<.001); this association was not observed in the neurosciences ICU when considered separately. CONCLUSION The SCAI Shock Classification provided incremental mortality risk stratification beyond established prognostic markers across the spectrum of medical and surgical critical illness, proving utility outside its original intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN.
| | - Devang Senghavi
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Parag C Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Anirban Bhattacharyya
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vitaly Herasevich
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Kianoush B Kashani
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nair RM, Kumar S, Saleem T, Lee R, Higgins A, Khot UN, Reed GW, Menon V. Impact of Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index on Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock on Mechanical Circulatory Support. Am J Cardiol 2024; 217:119-126. [PMID: 38382702 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
This single-center, observational study assessed the impact of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) on temporary mechanical circulatory support. All adult patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic main campus Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) between December 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, CICU with CS necessitating mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, or venous arterial-extra corporeal membrane oxygenation were retrospectively analyzed for this study. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were collected through physician-directed chart review. The impact of age, gender, and BMI on 30-day mortality was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the survival difference in specific subsets. A total of 393 patients with CS on temporary MCS were admitted to our CICU during the study period. The median age of our cohort was 63 years (interquartile range 54 to 70 years), median BMI was 28.50 kg/m2 (interquartile range 24.62 to 29.72) and 70% (n = 276) were men. In total, 22 patients >80 years had received MCS compared with 372 patients <80 years. Patients >80 years on MCS had significantly higher 30-day mortality compared with those <80 years (81.8% vs 49.3%, p = 0.006). Upon stratifying patients by BMI, 161 (41%) patients were found to have BMI ≥30 kg/m2 whereas 232 (59%) patients had BMI <30 kg/m2. Comparison of 30-day mortality revealed that patients with BMI ≥30 did significantly worse than patients with BMI <30 (59.6% vs 45.3%, p = 0.007). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between men and women. On multivariable logistic regression, both age and BMI had a positive linear relation with adjusted 30-day mortality whereas gender did not have a major effect. Advanced age and higher BMI are independently associated with worse outcomes in patients with CS on MCS. Utilizing a strict selection criterion for patients in CS is pertinent to derive the maximum benefit from advanced mechanical support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raunak M Nair
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sachin Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Talha Saleem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ran Lee
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrew Higgins
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Umesh N Khot
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Grant W Reed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Venu Menon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park DY, Jamil Y, Ahmad Y, Coles T, Bosworth HB, Sikand N, Davila C, Babapour G, Damluji AA, Rao SV, Nanna MG, Samsky MD. Frailty and In-Hospital Outcomes for Management of Cardiogenic Shock without Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2078. [PMID: 38610842 PMCID: PMC11012362 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Frailty and cardiovascular diseases are intertwined, commonly sharing risk factors and exhibiting bidirectional relationships. The relationship of frailty and non-acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (non-AMI-CS) is poorly described. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 and identified all hospitalizations for non-AMI-CS. We classified them into frail and non-frail groups according to the hospital frailty risk score cut-off of 5 and compared in-hospital outcomes. (3) Results: A total of 503,780 hospitalizations for non-AMI-CS were identified. Most hospitalizations involved frail adults (80.0%). Those with frailty had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-2.20, p < 0.001), do-not-resuscitate status, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility compared with those without frailty. They also had higher odds of in-hospital adverse events, such as acute kidney injury, delirium, and longer length of stay. Importantly, non-AMI-CS hospitalizations in the frail group had lower use of mechanical circulatory support but not rates of cardiac transplantation. (4) Conclusions: Frailty is highly prevalent among non-AMI-CS hospitalizations. Those accompanied by frailty are often associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality compared to those without frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Yong Park
- Department of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Yasser Jamil
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Yousif Ahmad
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Theresa Coles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Hayden Barry Bosworth
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences School of Nursing, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Nikhil Sikand
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Carlos Davila
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Golsa Babapour
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Abdulla A. Damluji
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Sunil V. Rao
- NYU Langone Health System, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Michael G. Nanna
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Marc D. Samsky
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Williams S, Kalakoutas A, Olusanya S, Schrage B, Tavazzi G, Carnicelli AP, Montero S, Vandenbriele C, Luk A, Lim HS, Bhagra S, Ott SC, Farrero M, Samsky MD, Kennedy JLW, Sen S, Agrawal R, Rampersad P, Coniglio A, Pappalardo F, Barnett C, Proudfoot AG. The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel. Crit Care 2024; 28:105. [PMID: 38566212 PMCID: PMC10988801 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04884-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational data suggest that the subset of patients with heart failure related CS (HF-CS) now predominate critical care admissions for CS. There are no dedicated HF-CS randomised control trials completed to date which reliably inform clinical practice or clinical guidelines. We sought to identify aspects of HF-CS care where both consensus and uncertainty may exist to guide clinical practice and future clinical trial design, with a specific focus on HF-CS due to acute decompensated chronic HF. METHODS A 16-person multi-disciplinary panel comprising of international experts was assembled. A modified RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness methodology was used. A survey comprising of 34 statements was completed. Participants anonymously rated the appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 to 9 (1-3 as inappropriate, 4-6 as uncertain and as 7-9 appropriate). RESULTS Of the 34 statements, 20 were rated as appropriate and 14 were rated as inappropriate. Uncertainty existed across all three domains: the initial assessment and management of HF-CS; escalation to temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support (tMCS); and weaning from tMCS in HF-CS. Significant disagreement between experts (deemed present when the disagreement index exceeded 1) was only identified when deliberating the utility of thoracic ultrasound in the immediate management of HF-CS. CONCLUSION This study has highlighted several areas of practice where large-scale prospective registries and clinical trials in the HF-CS population are urgently needed to reliably inform clinical practice and the synthesis of future societal HF-CS guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Williams
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Antonis Kalakoutas
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Segun Olusanya
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Benedict Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anthony P Carnicelli
- Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Santiago Montero
- Acute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Cardiology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Adriana Luk
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hoong Sern Lim
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sai Bhagra
- Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sascha C Ott
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marc D Samsky
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jamie L W Kennedy
- Heart Failure / Transplant Program, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Sounok Sen
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Richa Agrawal
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Amanda Coniglio
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blumer V, Kanwar MK, Barnett CF, Cowger JA, Damluji AA, Farr M, Goodlin SJ, Katz JN, McIlvennan CK, Sinha SS, Wang TY. Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024; 149:e1051-e1065. [PMID: 38406869 PMCID: PMC11067718 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock continues to portend poor outcomes, conferring short-term mortality rates of 30% to 50% despite recent scientific advances. Age is a nonmodifiable risk factor for mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and is often considered in the decision-making process for eligibility for various therapies. Older adults have been largely excluded from analyses of therapeutic options in patients with cardiogenic shock. As a result, despite the association of advanced age with worse outcomes, focused strategies in the assessment and management of cardiogenic shock in this high-risk and growing population are lacking. Individual programs oftentimes develop upper age limits for various interventional strategies for their patients, including heart transplantation and durable left ventricular assist devices. However, age as a lone parameter should not be used to guide individual patient management decisions in cardiogenic shock. In the assessment of risk in older adults with cardiogenic shock, a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach is central to developing best practices. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we aim to summarize our contemporary understanding of the epidemiology, risk assessment, and in-hospital approach to management of cardiogenic shock, with a unique focus on older adults.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska J, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Möbius-Winkler S, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Winzer EB, Westermann D, Schrage B. Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:612-625. [PMID: 38353681 PMCID: PMC10954943 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) accounts for a significant proportion of all CS cases. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence on sex-related differences in HF-CS, especially regarding use of treatment and mortality risk in women vs. men. This study aimed to investigate potential differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and mortality between women and men with HF-CS. METHODS In this international observational study, patients with HF-CS (without acute myocardial infarction) from 16 tertiary-care centers in five countries were enrolled between 2010 and 2021. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and 30-day mortality in women vs. men with HF-CS. RESULTS N = 1030 patients with HF-CS were analyzed, of whom 290 (28.2%) were women. Compared to men, women were more likely to be older, less likely to have a known history of heart failure or cardiovascular risk factors, and lower rates of highly depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and renal dysfunction. Nevertheless, CS severity as well as use of treatments were comparable, and female sex was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (53.0% vs. 50.8%; adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-1.19). CONCLUSIONS In this large HF-CS registry, sex disparities in risk factors and clinical presentation were observed. Despite these differences, the use of treatments was comparable, and both sexes exhibited similarly high mortality rates. Further research is necessary to evaluate if sex-tailored treatment, accounting for the differences in cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation, might improve outcomes in HF-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Cardio Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Dept Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio E Biagio E Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia Italy, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Unità Di Cure Intensive Cardiologiche and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi, ONLUS, Santa Maria Nascente, Milan, Italy
| | - Ephraim B Winzer
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Combes A, Price S, Levy B. What's new in VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:590-592. [PMID: 38498163 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07356-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 47, Boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| | - Susanna Price
- Cardiology and Critical Care, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Bruno Levy
- Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur Et Des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alviar CL, Li BK, Keller NM, Bohula-May E, Barnett C, Berg DD, Burke JA, Chaudhry SP, Daniels LB, DeFilippis AP, Gerber D, Horowitz J, Jentzer JC, Katrapati P, Keeley E, Lawler PR, Park JG, Sinha SS, Snell J, Solomon MA, Teuteberg J, Katz JN, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II Risk Score among cardiogenic shock subtypes in the critical care cardiology trials network registry. Am Heart J 2024; 270:1-12. [PMID: 38190931 PMCID: PMC11032171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification has potential to guide triage and decision-making in cardiogenic shock (CS). We assessed the prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II score, derived in Europe for acute myocardial infarct-related CS (AMI-CS), in a contemporary North American cohort, including different CS phenotypes. METHODS The critical care cardiology trials network (CCCTN) coordinated by the TIMI study group is a multicenter network of cardiac intensive care units (CICU). Participating centers annually contribute ≥2 months of consecutive medical CICU admissions. The IABP-SHOCK II risk score includes age > 73 years, prior stroke, admission glucose > 191 mg/dl, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl, lactate > 5 mmol/l, and post-PCI TIMI flow grade < 3. We assessed the risk score across various CS etiologies. RESULTS Of 17,852 medical CICU admissions 5,340 patients across 35 sites were admitted with CS. In patients with AMI-CS (n = 912), the IABP-SHOCK II score predicted a >3-fold gradient in in-hospital mortality (low risk = 26.5%, intermediate risk = 52.2%, high risk = 77.5%, P < .0001; c-statistic = 0.67; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .79). The score showed a similar gradient of in-hospital mortality in patients with non-AMI-related CS (n = 2,517, P < .0001) and mixed shock (n = 923, P < .001), as well as in left ventricular (<0.0001), right ventricular (P = .0163) or biventricular (<0.0001) CS. The correlation between the IABP-SHOCK II score and SOFA was moderate (r2 = 0.17) and the IABP-SHOCK II score revealed a significant risk gradient within each SCAI stage. CONCLUSIONS In an unselected international multicenter registry of patients admitted with CS, the IABP- SHOCK II score only moderately predicted in-hospital mortality in a broad population of CS regardless of etiology or irrespective of right, left, or bi-ventricular involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Alviar
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY;.
| | - Boyangzi K Li
- Division of Cardiology, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Norma M Keller
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Erin Bohula-May
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - James A Burke
- Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA
| | | | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Daniel Gerber
- Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - James Horowitz
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, CA
| | | | - Ellen Keeley
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Patrick R Lawler
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Shashank S Sinha
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA
| | - Jeffrey Snell
- Division of Cardiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael A Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Jason N Katz
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Laghlam D, Benghanem S, Ortuno S, Bouabdallaoui N, Manzo-Silberman S, Hamzaoui O, Aissaoui N. Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14:45. [PMID: 38553663 PMCID: PMC10980676 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by low cardiac output and sustained tissue hypoperfusion that may result in end-organ dysfunction and death. CS is associated with high short-term mortality, and its management remains challenging despite recent advances in therapeutic options. Timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary team-based management have demonstrated favourable effects on outcomes. We aimed to review evidence-based practices for managing patients with ischemic and non-ischemic CS, detailing the multi-organ supports needed in this critically ill patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Driss Laghlam
- Research & Innovation Department, RIGHAPH, Service de Réanimation polyvalente, CMC Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, 48 Ter boulevard Victor Hugo, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
| | - Sarah Benghanem
- Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre & Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AfterROSC, Paris, France
| | - Sofia Ortuno
- Service Médecine intensive-réanimation, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Université Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Nadia Bouabdallaoui
- Institut de cardiologie de Montreal, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stephane Manzo-Silberman
- Université Sorbonne, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, Institute of Cardiology- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), ACTION Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Olfa Hamzaoui
- Service de médecine intensive-réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital Robert Debré, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
- Unité HERVI "Hémostase et Remodelage Vasculaire Post-Ischémie" - EA 3801, Reims, France
| | - Nadia Aissaoui
- Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre & Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AfterROSC, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Senman B, Jentzer JC, Barnett CF, Bartos JA, Berg DD, Chih S, Drakos SG, Dudzinski DM, Elliott A, Gage A, Horowitz JM, Miller PE, Sinha SS, Tehrani BN, Yuriditsky E, Vallabhajosyula S, Katz JN. Need for a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-Promoting a Team-Based Model of Care to Improve Outcomes and Identify Best Practices. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e031979. [PMID: 38456417 PMCID: PMC11009990 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock continues to carry a high mortality rate despite contemporary care, with no breakthrough therapies shown to improve survival over the past few decades. It is a time-sensitive condition that commonly results in cardiovascular complications and multisystem organ failure, necessitating multidisciplinary expertise. Managing patients with cardiogenic shock remains challenging even in well-resourced settings, and an important subgroup of patients may require cardiac replacement therapy. As a result, the idea of leveraging the collective cognitive and procedural proficiencies of multiple providers in a collaborative, team-based approach to care (the "shock team") has been advocated by professional societies and implemented at select high-volume clinical centers. A slowly maturing evidence base has suggested that cardiogenic shock teams may improve patient outcomes. Although several registries exist that are beginning to inform care, particularly around therapeutic strategies of pharmacologic and mechanical circulatory support, none of these are currently focused on the shock team approach, multispecialty partnership, education, or process improvement. We propose the creation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-akin to the successful Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Consortium-with a goal to promote sharing of care protocols, education of stakeholders, and discovery of how process and performance may influence patient outcomes, quality, resource consumption, and costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christopher F. Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Jason A. Bartos
- Department of Medicine‐Cardiovascular DivisionUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMNUSA
| | - David D. Berg
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | | | - Stavros G. Drakos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training InstituteUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | | | - Andrea Elliott
- Department of Medicine‐Cardiovascular DivisionUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMNUSA
| | - Ann Gage
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineCentennial Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - James M. Horowitz
- Division of CardiologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | - P. Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical CampusFalls ChurchVAUSA
| | - Behnam N. Tehrani
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical CampusFalls ChurchVAUSA
| | - Eugene Yuriditsky
- Division of CardiologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
- Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cardiovascular InstituteProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Jason N. Katz
- Division of CardiologyNYU Grossman School of Medicine & Bellevue Hospital CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mehta A, Vavilin I, Nguyen AH, Batchelor WB, Blumer V, Cilia L, Dewanjee A, Desai M, Desai SS, Flanagan MC, Isseh IN, Kennedy JLW, Klein KM, Moukhachen H, Psotka MA, Raja A, Rosner CM, Shah P, Tang DG, Truesdell AG, Tehrani BN, Sinha SS. Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1354158. [PMID: 38545346 PMCID: PMC10965643 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1354158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a time-sensitive and hemodynamically complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of etiologies and clinical presentations. Despite contemporary therapies, CS continues to maintain high morbidity and mortality ranging from 35 to 50%. More recently, burgeoning observational research in this field aimed at enhancing the early recognition and characterization of the shock state through standardized team-based protocols, comprehensive hemodynamic profiling, and tailored and selective utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices has been associated with improved outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of CS, novel phenotypes, evolving definitions and staging systems, currently available pharmacologic and device-based therapies, standardized, team-based management protocols, and regionalized systems-of-care aimed at improving shock outcomes. We also explore opportunities for fertile investigation through randomized and non-randomized studies to address the prevailing knowledge gaps that will be critical to improving long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Mehta
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Ilan Vavilin
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Andrew H. Nguyen
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Wayne B. Batchelor
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Vanessa Blumer
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Lindsey Cilia
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Aditya Dewanjee
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Mehul Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Shashank S. Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Michael C. Flanagan
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Iyad N. Isseh
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Jamie L. W. Kennedy
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Katherine M. Klein
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Hala Moukhachen
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Mitchell A. Psotka
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Anika Raja
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Carolyn M. Rosner
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Palak Shah
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Daniel G. Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Alexander G. Truesdell
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Behnam N. Tehrani
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Matsushita K, Delmas C, Marchandot B, Roubille F, Lamblin N, Leurent G, Levy B, Elbaz M, Champion S, Lim P, Schneider F, Khachab H, Carmona A, Trimaille A, Bourenne J, Seronde M, Schurtz G, Harbaoui B, Vanzetto G, Biendel C, Labbe V, Combaret N, Mansourati J, Filippi E, Maizel J, Merdji H, Lattuca B, Gerbaud E, Bonnefoy E, Puymirat E, Bonello L, Morel O. Optimal Heart Failure Medical Therapy and Mortality in Survivors of Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the FRENSHOCK Registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e030975. [PMID: 38390813 PMCID: PMC10944045 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.030975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of pharmacological therapy on cardiogenic shock (CS) survivors have not been extensively studied. Thus, this study investigated the association between guideline-directed heart failure (HF) medical therapy (GDMT) and one-year survival rate in patients who are post-CS. METHODS AND RESULTS FRENSHOCK (French Observatory on the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in 2016) registry was a prospective multicenter observational survey, conducted in metropolitan French intensive care units and intensive cardiac care units. Of 772 patients, 535 patients were enrolled in the present analysis following the exclusion of 217 in-hospital deaths and 20 patients with missing medical records. Patients with triple GDMT (beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) at discharge (n=112) were likely to have lower left ventricular ejection fraction on admission and at discharge compared with those without triple GDMT (n=423) (22% versus 28%, P<0.001 and 29% versus 37%, P<0.001, respectively). In the overall cohort, the one-year mortality rate was 23%. Triple GDMT prescription was significantly associated with a lower one-year all-cause mortality compared with non-triple GDMT (adjusted hazard ratio 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19-0.80]; P=0.007). Similarly, 2:1 propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting based on the propensity score demonstrated a lower incidence of one-year mortality in the triple GDMT group. As the number of HF drugs increased, a stepwise decrease in mortality was observed (log rank; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In survivors of CS, the one-year mortality rate was significantly lower in those with triple GDMT. Therefore, this study suggests that intensive HF therapy should be considered in patients following CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Matsushita
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital CivilCentre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine RégénérativeUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
| | - Clément Delmas
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitRangueil University Hospital/Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), UMR‐1048, INSERMToulouseFrance
| | - Benjamin Marchandot
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital CivilCentre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
| | - François Roubille
- PhyMedExp, Université de Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, Cardiology DepartmentCHU de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
| | - Nicolas Lamblin
- Urgences et Soins Intensifs de CardiologieCHU Lille, University of Lille, Inserm U1167LilleFrance
| | - Guillaume Leurent
- Department of CardiologyCHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI‐UMR 1099RennesFrance
| | - Bruno Levy
- Réanimation Médicale BraboisCHRU NancyNancyFrance
| | - Meyer Elbaz
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitRangueil University Hospital/Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), UMR‐1048, INSERMToulouseFrance
| | | | - Pascal Lim
- Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRBAP‐HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri‐Mondor, Service de CardiologieCréteilFrance
| | - Francis Schneider
- Médecine Intensive‐RéanimationHôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
| | - Hadi Khachab
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of CardiologyCH d’Aix en ProvenceAix‐en‐ProvenceFrance
| | - Adrien Carmona
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital CivilCentre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
| | - Antonin Trimaille
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital CivilCentre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine RégénérativeUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
| | - Jeremy Bourenne
- Aix Marseille UniversitéService de Réanimation des Urgences, CHU La Timone 2MarseilleFrance
| | | | - Guillaume Schurtz
- Urgences et Soins Intensifs de CardiologieCHU Lille, University of Lille, Inserm U1167LilleFrance
| | - Brahim Harbaoui
- Cardiology DepartmentHôpital Croix‐Rousse and Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de LyonLyonFrance
- University of Lyon, CREATIS UMR5220, INSERM U1044, INSA‐15LyonFrance
| | | | - Caroline Biendel
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitRangueil University Hospital/Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), UMR‐1048, INSERMToulouseFrance
| | - Vincent Labbe
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Tenon, Département Médico‐Universitaire APPROCHESAssistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Nicolas Combaret
- Department of CardiologyHU Clermont‐Ferrand, CNRS, Université Clermont AuvergneClermont‐FerrandFrance
| | - Jacques Mansourati
- Department of CardiologyUniversity Hospital of Brest and University of Western BrittanyOrphyFrance
| | - Emmanuelle Filippi
- Department of CardiologyGeneral Hospital of Atlantic BrittanyVannesFrance
| | - Julien Maizel
- Intensive Care DepartmentCHU Amiens‐PicardieAmiensFrance
| | - Hamid Merdji
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine RégénérativeUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
- Medical Intensive Care UnitNouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
| | - Benoit Lattuca
- Department of CardiologyNîmes University Hospital, Montpellier UniversityNîmesFrance
| | - Edouard Gerbaud
- Cardiology Intensive Care Unit and Interventional CardiologyHôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, Bordeaux Cardio‐Thoracic Research Centre, U1045, Bordeaux University, Hôpital Xavier ArnozanPessacFrance
| | - Eric Bonnefoy
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitLyon Brom University HospitalLyonFrance
| | - Etienne Puymirat
- Cardiology DepartmentEuropean Georges Pompidou HospitalParisFrance
| | - Laurent Bonello
- Department of Cardiology, Aix‐Marseille Université, Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de MarseilleHôpital Nord, Mediterranean Association for Research and Studies in Cardiology (MARS Cardio)MarseilleFrance
| | - Olivier Morel
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital CivilCentre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine RégénérativeUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Diakos NA, Swain L, Bhave S, Qiao X, Libermann T, Haywood J, Goel S, Annamalai S, Esposito M, Chweich H, Faugno A, Kapur NK. Circulating Proteome Analysis Identifies Reduced Inflammation After Initiation of Hemodynamic Support with Either Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation or Impella in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2024:10.1007/s12265-024-10501-1. [PMID: 38409476 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
In-hospital mortality associated with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high despite the use of percutaneous assist devices. We sought to determine whether support with VA-ECMO or Impella in patients with CS alters specific components of the plasma proteome. Plasma samples were collected before device implantation and 72 h after initiation of support in 11 CS patients receiving ECMO or Impella. SOMAscan was used to detect 1305 circulating proteins. Sixty-seven proteins were changed after ECMO (18 upregulated and 49 downregulated, p < 0.05), 38 after Impella (10 upregulated and 28 downregulated, p < 0.05), and only eight proteins were commonly affected. Despite minimal protein overlap, both devices were associated with markers of reduced inflammation and increased apoptosis of inflammatory cells. In summary, ECMO and Impella are associated with reduced expression of inflammatory markers and increased markers of inflammatory cell death. These circulating proteins may serve as novel targets of therapy or biomarkers to tailor AMCS use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos A Diakos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lija Swain
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shreyas Bhave
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaoying Qiao
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Towia Libermann
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Genomics, Proteomics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Center, Boston, USA
| | - Jillian Haywood
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Siya Goel
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shiva Annamalai
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michele Esposito
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Haval Chweich
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony Faugno
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Navin K Kapur
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Interventional Research Laboratories, Division of Cardiology, The Cardiovascular Center for Research and Innovation (CVCRI), Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Warren A, Morrow D, Proudfoot AG. Cardiogenic shock: all hail the RCT, long live the registry. Crit Care 2024; 28:53. [PMID: 38374050 PMCID: PMC10877743 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04835-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Warren
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - D Morrow
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Group, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Puri K, Jentzer JC, Spinner JA, Hope KD, Adachi I, Tume SC, Tunuguntla HP, Choudhry S, Cabrera AG, Price JF. Clinical Presentation, Classification, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:595-608. [PMID: 38296404 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite growing cardiogenic shock (CS) research in adults, the epidemiology, clinical features, and outcomes of children with CS are lacking. OBJECTIVES This study sought to describe the epidemiology, clinical presentation, hospital course, risk factors, and outcomes of CS among children hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). METHODS We examined consecutive ADHF hospitalizations (<21 years of age) from a large single-center retrospective cohort. Patients with CS at presentation were analyzed and risk factors for CS and for the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality were identified. A modified Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock classification was created and patients were staged accordingly. RESULTS A total of 803 hospitalizations for ADHF were identified in 591 unique patients (median age 7.6 years). CS occurred in 207 (26%) hospitalizations. ADHF hospitalizations with CS were characterized by worse systolic function (P = 0.040), higher B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (P = 0.032), and more frequent early severe renal (P = 0.023) and liver (P < 0.001) injury than those without CS. Children presenting in CS received mechanical ventilation (87% vs 26%) and mechanical circulatory support (45% vs 16%) more frequently (both P < 0.001). Analyzing only the most recent ADHF hospitalization, children with CS were at increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared with children without CS (28% vs 11%; OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.05-3.45; P = 0.033). Each higher CS stage was associated with greater inpatient mortality (OR: 2.40-8.90; all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CS occurs in 26% of pediatric hospitalizations for ADHF and is independently associated with hospital mortality. A modified Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions classification for CS severity showed robust association with increasing mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kriti Puri
- Lillie Frank Abercrombie Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Joseph A Spinner
- Lillie Frank Abercrombie Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kyle D Hope
- Lillie Frank Abercrombie Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Iki Adachi
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sebastian C Tume
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hari P Tunuguntla
- Lillie Frank Abercrombie Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Swati Choudhry
- Lillie Frank Abercrombie Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Antonio G Cabrera
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jack F Price
- Lillie Frank Abercrombie Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Low CJW, Ling RR, Lau MPXL, Liu NSH, Tan M, Tan CS, Lim SL, Rochwerg B, Combes A, Brodie D, Shekar K, Price S, MacLaren G, Ramanathan K. Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:209-221. [PMID: 38206381 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07278-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiogenic shock is associated with high mortality. In refractory shock, it is unclear if mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices improve survival. We conducted a network meta-analysis to determine which MCS devices confers greatest benefit. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases through 27 August 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched studies (PSMs). We conducted frequentist network meta-analysis, investigating mortality (either 30 days or in-hospital) as the primary outcome. We assessed risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) and as sensitivity analysis reconstructed survival data from published survival curves for a one-stage unadjusted individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis using a stratified Cox model. RESULTS We included 38 studies (48,749 patients), mostly reporting on patients with Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stages C-E cardiogenic shock. Compared with no MCS, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump (ECMO-IABP; network odds ratio [OR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-0.86, moderate certainty) was associated with lower mortality. There were no differences in mortality between ECMO, IABP, microaxial ventricular assist device (mVAD), ECMO-mVAD, centrifugal VAD, or mVAD-IABP and no MCS (all very low certainty). Our one-stage IPD survival meta-analysis based on the stratified Cox model found only ECMO-IABP was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, HR, 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.66). CONCLUSION In patients with cardiogenic shock, ECMO-IABP may reduce mortality, while other MCS devices did not reduce mortality. However, this must be interpreted within the context of inter-study heterogeneity and limited certainty of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Jer Wei Low
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Ruiyang Ling
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michele Petrova Xin Ling Lau
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nigel Sheng Hui Liu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melissa Tan
- Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 9, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Chuen Seng Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shir Lynn Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Pre-Hospital and Emergency Research Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alain Combes
- Service de Médecine Intensive-RéanimationInstitut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- UMRS 116, Institute of Cardio Metabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Universite INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kiran Shekar
- Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Queensland University of Technology, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- University of Queensland, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Susanna Price
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 9, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Kollengode Ramanathan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
- Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 9, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Riccardi M, Pagnesi M, Chioncel O, Mebazaa A, Cotter G, Gustafsson F, Tomasoni D, Latronico N, Adamo M, Metra M. Medical therapy of cardiogenic shock: Contemporary use of inotropes and vasopressors. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:411-431. [PMID: 38391010 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is a primary cardiac disorder that results in both clinical and biochemical evidence of tissue hypoperfusion and can lead to multi-organ failure and death depending on its severity. Inadequate cardiac contractility or cardiac power secondary to acute myocardial infarction remains the most frequent cause of cardiogenic shock, although its contribution has declined over the past two decades, compared with other causes. Despite some advances in cardiogenic shock management, this clinical syndrome is still burdened by an extremely high mortality. Its management is based on immediate stabilization of haemodynamic parameters so that further treatment, including mechanical circulatory support and transfer to specialized tertiary care centres, can be accomplished. With these aims, medical therapy, consisting mainly of inotropic drugs and vasopressors, still has a major role. The purpose of this article is to review current evidence on the use of these medications in patients with cardiogenic shock and discuss specific clinical settings with indications to their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Riccardi
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Matteo Pagnesi
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ovidiu Chioncel
- Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C. Iliescu', Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm MASCOT, AP-HP Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | | | - Finn Gustafsson
- Heart Centre, Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniela Tomasoni
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nicola Latronico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marianna Adamo
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Randhawa VK, Baran DA. Unraveling heart failure cardiogenic shock profiles and pathways. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:445-447. [PMID: 38124463 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Varinder Kaur Randhawa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David A Baran
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska J, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Möbius Winkler S, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Reichenspurner H, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Winzer EB, Westermann D, Gustafsson F, Schrage B. Clinical presentation, shock severity and mortality in patients with de novo versus acute-on-chronic heart failure-related cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:432-444. [PMID: 37940139 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) accounts for a significant proportion of CS cases. Whether patients with de novo HF and those with acute-on-chronic HF in CS differ in clinical characteristics and outcome remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in clinical presentation and mortality between patients with de novo and acute-on-chronic HF-CS. METHODS AND RESULTS In this international observational study, patients with HF-CS from 16 tertiary care centres in five countries were enrolled between 2010 and 2021. To investigate differences in clinical presentation and 30-day mortality, adjusted logistic/Cox regression models were fitted. Patients (n = 1030) with HF-CS were analysed, of whom 486 (47.2%) presented with de novo HF-CS and 544 (52.8%) with acute-on-chronic HF-CS. Traditional markers of CS severity (e.g. blood pressure, heart rate and lactate) as well as use of treatments were comparable between groups. However, patients with acute-on-chronic HF-CS were more likely to have a higher CS severity and also a higher mortality risk, after adjusting for relevant confounders (de novo HF 45.5%, acute-on-chronic HF 55.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.72, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION In this large HF-CS cohort, acute-on-chronic HF-CS was associated with more severe CS and higher mortality risk compared to de novo HF-CS, although traditional markers of CS severity and use of treatments were comparable. These findings highlight the vast heterogeneity of patients with HF-CS, emphasize that HF chronicity is a relevant disease modifier in CS, and indicate that future clinical trials should account for this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS S. Maria Nascente-Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ephraim B Winzer
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jentzer JC, Sanghavi D, Patel PC, Bhattacharyya A, van Diepen S, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Kashani KB. PROGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF SERIAL DETERMINATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS SHOCK CLASSIFICATION IN ADULTS WITH CRITICAL ILLNESS. Shock 2024; 61:246-252. [PMID: 38150371 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000002292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether serial assessment of shock severity can improve prognostication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of 21,461 ICU patient admissions from 2014 to 2018. We assigned the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage in each 4-h block during the first 24 h of ICU admission; shock was defined as SCAI Shock stage C, D, or E. In-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: The admission SCAI Shock stages were as follows: A, 39.0%; B, 27.0%; C, 28.9%; D, 2.6%; and E, 2.5%. The SCAI Shock stage subsequently increased in 30.6%, and late-onset shock developed in 30.4%. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients who had shock on admission (11.9%) or late-onset shock (7.3%) versus no shock (4.3%). Persistence of shock predicted higher mortality (adjusted OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.06-1.13, for each ICU block with shock). The mean SCAI Shock stage had higher discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the admission or maximum SCAI Shock stage. Dynamic modeling of the SCAI Shock classification improved discrimination for in-hospital mortality (C-statistic = 0.64-0.71). Conclusions: Serial application of the SCAI Shock classification provides improved mortality risk stratification compared with a single assessment on admission, facilitating dynamic prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Devang Sanghavi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Parag C Patel
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Vitaly Herasevich
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bloom JE, Wong N, Nehme E, Dawson LP, Ball J, Anderson D, Cox S, Chan W, Kaye DM, Nehme Z, Stub D. Association of socioeconomic status in the incidence, quality-of-care metrics, and outcomes for patients with cardiogenic shock in a pre-hospital setting. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2024; 10:89-98. [PMID: 36808236 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The relationship between lower socioeconomic status (SES) and poor cardiovascular outcomes is well described; however, there exists a paucity of data exploring this association in cardiogenic shock (CS). This study aimed to investigate whether any disparities exist between SES and the incidence, quality of care or outcomes of CS patients attended by emergency medical services (EMS). METHODS AND RESULTS This population-based cohort study included consecutive patients transported by EMS with CS between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2019 in Victoria, Australia. Data were collected from individually linked ambulance, hospital, and mortality datasets. Patients were stratified into SES quintiles using national census data produced by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.A total of 2628 patients were attended by EMS for CS. The age-standardized incidence of CS amongst all patients was 11.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 11.4-12.3] per 100 000 person-years, with a stepwise increase from the highest to lowest SES quintile (lowest quintile 17.0 vs. highest quintile 9.7 per 100 000 person-years, P-trend < 0.001). Patients in lower SES quintiles were less likely to attend metropolitan hospitals and more likely to be received by inner regional and remote centres without revascularization capabilities. A greater proportion of the lower SES groups presented with CS due to non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina pectoris (UAP), and overall were less likely to undergo coronary angiography. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an increased 30-day all-cause mortality rate in the lowest three SES quintiles when compared with the highest quintile. CONCLUSION This population-based study demonstrated discrepancies between SES status in the incidence, care metrics, and mortality rates of patients presenting to EMS with CS. These findings outline the challenges in equitable healthcare delivery within this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason E Bloom
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Nathan Wong
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Emily Nehme
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Luke P Dawson
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Jocasta Ball
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - David Anderson
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, McMahons Road, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Shelley Cox
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - William Chan
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - David M Kaye
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Ziad Nehme
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, McMahons Road, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Dion Stub
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, 31 Joseph Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lasica R, Djukanovic L, Vukmirovic J, Zdravkovic M, Ristic A, Asanin M, Simic D. Clinical Review of Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:133. [PMID: 38256394 PMCID: PMC10818732 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Although acute heart failure (AHF) is a common disease associated with significant symptoms, morbidity and mortality, the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with hypertensive acute heart failure (H-AHF) still remain a challenge in modern medicine. Despite great progress in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, this disease is still accompanied by a high rate of both in-hospital (from 3.8% to 11%) and one-year (from 20% to 36%) mortality. Considering the high rate of rehospitalization (22% to 30% in the first three months), the treatment of this disease represents a major financial blow to the health system of each country. This disease is characterized by heterogeneity in precipitating factors, clinical presentation, therapeutic modalities and prognosis. Since heart decompensation usually occurs quickly (within a few hours) in patients with H-AHF, establishing a rapid diagnosis is of vital importance. In addition to establishing the diagnosis of heart failure itself, it is necessary to see the underlying cause that led to it, especially if it is de novo heart failure. Given that hypertension is a precipitating factor of AHF and in up to 11% of AHF patients, strict control of arterial blood pressure is necessary until target values are reached in order to prevent the occurrence of H-AHF, which is still accompanied by a high rate of both early and long-term mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ratko Lasica
- Department of Cardiology, Emergency Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (R.L.); (L.D.); (M.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.Z.); (A.R.)
| | - Lazar Djukanovic
- Department of Cardiology, Emergency Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (R.L.); (L.D.); (M.A.)
| | - Jovanka Vukmirovic
- Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Marija Zdravkovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.Z.); (A.R.)
- Clinical Center Bezanijska Kosa, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Arsen Ristic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.Z.); (A.R.)
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Milika Asanin
- Department of Cardiology, Emergency Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (R.L.); (L.D.); (M.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.Z.); (A.R.)
| | - Dragan Simic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.Z.); (A.R.)
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Manzi L, Sperandeo L, Forzano I, Castiello DS, Florimonte D, Paolillo R, Santoro C, Mancusi C, Di Serafino L, Esposito G, Gargiulo G. Contemporary Evidence and Practice on Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Acute or Chronic Heart Failure. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:136. [PMID: 38248013 PMCID: PMC10814482 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) has a global prevalence of 1-2%, and the incidence around the world is growing. The prevalence increases with age, from around 1% for those aged <55 years to >10% for those aged 70 years or over. Based on studies in hospitalized patients, about 50% of patients have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and 50% have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HF is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and HF-related hospitalizations are common, costly, and impact both quality of life and prognosis. More than 5-10% of patients deteriorate into advanced HF (AdHF) with worse outcomes, up to cardiogenic shock (CS) condition. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is essential to assess hemodynamics in the diagnosis and care of patients with HF. The aim of this article is to review the evidence on RHC in various clinical scenarios of patients with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Gargiulo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.M.); (L.S.); (I.F.); (D.S.C.); (D.F.); (R.P.); (C.S.); (C.M.); (L.D.S.); (G.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Donnelly S, Barnett CF, Bohula EA, Chaudhry SP, Chonde MD, Cooper HA, Daniels LB, Dodson MW, Gerber D, Goldfarb MJ, Guo J, Kontos MC, Liu S, Luk AC, Menon V, O'Brien CG, Papolos AI, Pisani BA, Potter BJ, Prasad R, Schnell G, Shah KS, Sridharan L, So DYF, Teuteberg JJ, Tymchak WJ, Zakaria S, Katz JN, Morrow DA, van Diepen S. Interhospital Variation in Admissions Managed With Critical Care Therapies or Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Units: An Analysis From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2024; 17:e010092. [PMID: 38179787 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wide interhospital variations exist in cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU) admission practices and the use of critical care restricted therapies (CCRx), but little is known about the differences in patient acuity, CCRx utilization, and the associated outcomes within tertiary centers. METHODS The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of tertiary and academic CICUs in the United States and Canada that captured consecutive admissions in 2-month periods between 2017 and 2022. This analysis included 17 843 admissions across 34 sites and compared interhospital tertiles of CCRx (eg, mechanical ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, continuous renal replacement therapy) utilization and its adjusted association with in-hospital survival using logistic regression. The Pratt index was used to quantify patient-related and institutional factors associated with CCRx variability. RESULTS The median age of the study population was 66 (56-77) years and 37% were female. CCRx was provided to 62.2% (interhospital range of 21.3%-87.1%) of CICU patients. Admissions to CICUs with the highest tertile of CCRx utilization had a greater burden of comorbidities, had more diagnoses of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or cardiogenic shock, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality (median, 12.7%) was 9.6%, 11.1%, and 18.7% in low, intermediate, and high CCRx tertiles, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences in adjusted mortality were observed across tertiles when admissions were stratified by the provision of CCRx. Baseline patient-level variables and institutional differences accounted for 80% and 5.3% of the observed CCRx variability, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In a large registry of tertiary and academic CICUs, there was a >4-fold interhospital variation in the provision of CCRx that was primarily driven by differences in patient acuity compared with institutional differences. No differences were observed in adjusted mortality between low, intermediate, and high CCRx utilization sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Donnelly
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (S.D.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher F Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (C.F.B., C.G.O.)
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.B., J.G., D.A.M.)
| | - Sunit-Preet Chaudhry
- Division of Cardiology, Ascension St. Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, IN (S.-P.C.)
| | - Meshe D Chonde
- Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (M.D.C.)
| | - Howard A Cooper
- Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla (H.A.C.)
| | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (L.B.D.)
| | - Mark W Dodson
- Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT (M.W.D.)
| | - Daniel Gerber
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA (D.G.)
| | - Michael J Goldfarb
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada (M.J.G)
| | - Jianping Guo
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.B., J.G., D.A.M.)
| | - Michael C Kontos
- Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.C.K.)
| | - Shuangbo Liu
- Max Rady College of Medicine, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada (S.L.)
| | - Adriana C Luk
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre at Toronto General Hospital, Division of Cardiology and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.C.L.)
| | - Venu Menon
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (V.M.)
| | - Connor G O'Brien
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (C.F.B., C.G.O.)
| | - Alexander I Papolos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, DC (A.I.P.)
| | | | - Brian J Potter
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Research Center and Cardiovascular Center, QC, Canada (B.J.P.)
| | | | - Gregory Schnell
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Canada (G.S.)
| | - Kevin S Shah
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (K.S.S.)
| | | | - Derek Y F So
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, ON, Canada (D.Y.F.S.)
| | | | - Wayne J Tymchak
- Department of Critical Care Medicine (W.J.T.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (W.J.T.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Sammy Zakaria
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.Z.)
| | | | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.B., J.G., D.A.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aboal J, Pascual J, Loma-Osorio P, Nuñez M, Badosa E, Martín C, Ferrero M, Moral S, Ballesteros E, Pedraza J, Tapia S, Brugada R. Impact of a Cardiogenic Shock Program on Mortality in a Non-Transplant Hospital. Heart Lung Circ 2024; 33:38-45. [PMID: 38151398 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiogenic shock is associated with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Improvements in this care process could lead to better outcomes. METHODS This retrospective study of patients with cardiogenic shock compared two periods: no specific program to address cardiogenic shock and implementation of a cardiogenic shock program. This program included the establishment of a multidisciplinary team (shock team), early alert to the transplant hospital, initiation of a ventricular assist extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program, and extension of continuous care by acute cardiovascular care specialists. The primary objective was to analyse whether there were differences between in-hospital mortality and mortality during follow-up. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were examined as a secondary objective. RESULTS A total of 139 patients were enrolled: 69 of them in the previous period and 70 in the cardiogenic shock program period. There was a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality (55.1% vs 37.1%; p=0.03) and mortality during follow-up (62.7% vs 44.6%; p=0.03) in the second period. Diabetes mellitus, ejection fraction, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and implementation of the cardiogenic shock program were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a comprehensive cardiogenic shock program in a non-transplanting hospital improved in-hospital and follow-up mortality of patients in cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Aboal
- University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
| | | | | | - Maria Nuñez
- University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Sergio Moral
- University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Esther Ballesteros
- Territorial Management of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine of Girona, Girona, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute, Girona (IdIBGi), Girona, Spain
| | | | - Simón Tapia
- University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Ramon Brugada
- University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain; Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute, Girona (IdIBGi), Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kaur G, Berg DD. The Changing Epidemiology of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Clin 2024; 40:1-13. [PMID: 37973347 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Coronary care units (CCUs) were originally designed to monitor and treat peri-infarction ventricular arrhythmias but have evolved into highly specialized cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) that provide care to a patient population that is increasingly heterogeneous and complex. Paralleling broader epidemiologic trends, patients admitted to contemporary CICUs are older and have a greater burden of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. Moreover, contemporary CICU patients have high illness severity and often present with acute noncardiac organ dysfunction. In addition to these shifting demographic patterns, there have been important epidemiologic changes in CICU technologies, multidisciplinary systems of care, and physician staffing and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurleen Kaur
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David D Berg
- Department of Medicine, Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, TIMI Study Group, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Morrow DA, Platz E. Cardiac arrest in the Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS)-SHOCK trial in perspective. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2023; 12:864-866. [PMID: 37976082 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Morrow
- TIMI Study Group, Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Elke Platz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Truesdell AG, Rosner C, Fordyce CB. None of us alone is as effective as all of us together. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2023; 12:831-833. [PMID: 37798086 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G Truesdell
- Virginia Heart, 2901 Telestar Court, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular Institute, 2901 Telestar Court, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Carolyn Rosner
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular Institute, 2901 Telestar Court, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Christopher B Fordyce
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and the Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Satashia P, White A, Isha S, Hanson A, Jenkins A, Blasavage J, Matos N, Tomlinson A, Zhang S, Quinones Q, Waldron N, Bhattacharyya A, Kiley S, Guru P, Chaudhury S, Shapiro A, Moreno Franco P, Sanghavi DK. Adding an extension piece to the end of the purge side arm of the Impella device can prevent the incidence of the cassette breaking and decrease the Impella device failure rate: Impact of practice change on patient outcome. Perfusion 2023:2676591231220305. [PMID: 38060246 DOI: 10.1177/02676591231220305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Background: Impella 5.5® with Smart Assist is a minimally invasive Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating ongoing cardiogenic shock for up to 14 days. The Impella® intends to reduce ventricular workload and provide the circulatory support necessary for myocardial recovery.Research Question: Compared to standard practice, does adding an extension piece to the purge tube side arm of the Impella® Device decrease the incidence of device failure and positively impact the health outcome of adult patients receiving Impella® support?Study Design and Methods: A retrospective chart review of ICU patients was done at a tertiary care center from August 2018 to August 2022 to assess the differences in patient outcomes related to Impella® Device utilization before and after the implementation of the extension piece to the purge tube sidearm. Among patients reviewed, a total of 20 were included in our review, with seven not having the purge tube side arm extension added, while 13 patients had the extension.Results: The two study groups had no significant difference in patient health outcomes. Additionally, there were no instances of device failure requiring explanation without the extension tubing. However, there were no cases of the purge cassette cracking with the addition of the extension tubing.Conclusion: The addition of extension tubing to the purge cassette of the Impella® Device did not impact patient health outcomes or the incidence of device failure. There was a complete reduction in the incidence of the purge cassette cracking, which could reduce the potential for infection or device failure over a long period of mechanical support. There is a need for long-term prospective studies to confirm the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parthkumar Satashia
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Andrew White
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Shahin Isha
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Abby Hanson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Anna Jenkins
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jessica Blasavage
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nikki Matos
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Amanda Tomlinson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Quintin Quinones
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nathan Waldron
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Sean Kiley
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Pramod Guru
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sanjay Chaudhury
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Anna Shapiro
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Pablo Moreno Franco
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Devang K Sanghavi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jentzer JC, Van Diepen S, Patel PC, Henry TD, Morrow DA, Baran DA, Kashani KB. Serial Assessment of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e032748. [PMID: 37930059 PMCID: PMC10727310 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One-time assessment of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification robustly predicts mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We sought to determine whether serial SCAI shock classification could improve risk stratification. METHODS AND RESULTS Unique admissions to a single academic level 1 CICU from 2015 to 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Electronic health record data were used to assign the SCAI shock stage during 4-hour blocks of the first 24 hours of CICU admission. Shock was defined as hypoperfusion (SCAI shock stage C, D, or E). In-hospital death was evaluated using logistic regression. Among 2918 unique CICU patients, 1537 (52.7%) met criteria for shock during ≥1 block, and 266 (9.1%) died in the hospital. The SCAI shock stage on admission was: A, 37.6%; B, 31.5%; C, 25.9%; D, 1.8%; and E, 3.3%. Patients who met SCAI criteria for shock on admission (first 4 hours) and those with worsening SCAI shock stage after admission were at higher risk for in-hospital death. Each higher admission (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18-1.56]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70), maximum (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.37-1.85]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73) and mean (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.99-2.95]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.78) SCAI shock stage was incrementally associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate. Discrimination was highest for the mean SCAI shock stage (P<0.05). Each additional 4-hour block meeting SCAI criteria for shock predicted a higher mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24]). CONCLUSIONS Dynamic assessment of shock using serial SCAI shock classification assignment can improve mortality risk stratification in CICU patients by quantifying the magnitude and duration of shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sean Van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Alberta HospitalEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - Parag C. Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineMayo Clinic FloridaJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | - Timothy D. Henry
- The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital and The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular InstituteCincinnatiOHUSA
| | - David A. Morrow
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular DivisionBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - David A. Baran
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineCleveland Clinic FloridaWestonFLUSA
| | - Kianoush B. Kashani
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of MedicineMayo Clinic RochesterRochesterMNUSA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nishimoto Y, Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Sakakura K, Kawai T, Kikuchi A, Watanabe T, Yamada T, Fukunami M, Yamaji K, Ishii H, Amano T, Kozuma K. Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e031838. [PMID: 38038195 PMCID: PMC10727314 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock after the revision of guideline recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use and the approval of the Impella require further investigation, because their impact remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS Using the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (J-PCI) registry database from 2019 to 2021, we identified 12 171 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock under mechanical circulatory support. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) IABP alone, (2) Impella, and (3) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO); the VA-ECMO group was further stratified into (3a) VA-ECMO alone, (3b) VA-ECMO in combination with IABP, and (3c) VA-ECMO in combination with Impella. The quarterly prevalence and outcomes were reported. The use of IABP alone decreased significantly from 63.5% in the first quarter of 2019 to 58.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021 (P for trend=0.01). Among 4245 patients requiring VA-ECMO, the use of VA-ECMO in combination with IABP decreased significantly from 78.7% to 67.3%, whereas the use of VA-ECMO in combination with Impella increased significantly from 4.2% to 17.0% (P for trend <0.001 for both). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk difference in the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the first quarter of 2019 for in-hospital mortality was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]). CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed substantial changes in the use of different mechanical circulatory support modalities in acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock, but they did not significantly improve the outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Nishimoto
- Division of CardiologyOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | - Taku Inohara
- Department of CardiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Shun Kohsaka
- Department of CardiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Kenichi Sakakura
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical CenterJichi Medical UniversitySaitamaJapan
| | - Tsutomu Kawai
- Division of CardiologyOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | - Atsushi Kikuchi
- Division of CardiologyOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | | | - Takahisa Yamada
- Division of CardiologyOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | | | | | - Hideki Ishii
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Tetsuya Amano
- Department of CardiologyAichi Medical UniversityNagakuteJapan
| | - Ken Kozuma
- Department of CardiologyTeikyo University HospitalTokyoJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fernando SM, MacLaren G, Barbaro RP, Mathew R, Munshi L, Madahar P, Fried JA, Ramanathan K, Lorusso R, Brodie D, McIsaac DI. Age and associated outcomes among patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:1456-1466. [PMID: 37792052 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) can be used to support severely ill patients with cardiogenic shock. While age is commonly used in patient selection, little is known regarding its association with outcomes in this population. We sought to evaluate the association between increasing age and outcomes following V-A ECMO. METHODS We used individual-level patient data from 440 centers in the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. We included all adult patients receiving V-A ECMO from 2017 to 2019. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included a composite of complications following initiation of V-A ECMO. We conducted Bayesian analyses of the relationship between increasing age and outcomes of interest. RESULTS We included 15,172 patients receiving V-A ECMO. Of these, 8172 (53.9%) died in hospital. For the analysis conducted using weakly informed priors, and as compared to the reference category of age 18-29, the age bracket of 30-39 (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.79-1.10) was not associated with hospital mortality, but age brackets 40-49 (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% CrI: 1.08-1.47), 50-59 (OR 1.78, 95% CrI: 1.55-2.06), 60-69 (OR 2.24, 95% CrI: 1.94-2.59), 70-79 (OR 2.90, 95% CrI: 2.49-3.39) and ≥ 80 (OR 4.02, 95% CrI: 3.13-5.20) were independently associated with increasing hospital mortality. Similar results were found in the analysis conducted with an informative prior, as well as between increasing age and post-ECMO complications. CONCLUSIONS Among patients receiving V-A ECMO for cardiogenic shock, increasing age is strongly associated with increasing odds of death and complications, and this association emerges as early as 40 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Fernando
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Department of Critical Care, Lakeridge Health Corporation, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan P Barbaro
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rebecca Mathew
- Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Laveena Munshi
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Purnema Madahar
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Acute Respiratory Failure, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin A Fried
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kollengode Ramanathan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Roberto Lorusso
- Department of Cardio Thoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bertaina M, Morici N, Frea S, Garatti L, Briani M, Sorini C, Villanova L, Corrada E, Sacco A, Moltrasio M, Ravera A, Tedeschi M, Bertoldi L, Lettino M, Saia F, Corsini A, Camporotondo R, Colombo CNJ, Bertolin S, Rota M, Oliva F, Iannaccone M, Valente S, Pagnesi M, Metra M, Sionis A, Marini M, De Ferrari GM, Kapur NK, Pappalardo F, Tavazzi G. Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. ESC Heart Fail 2023; 10:3472-3482. [PMID: 37723131 PMCID: PMC10682868 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock-2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in-hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). METHODS AND RESULTS All patients with AMI-CS or ADHF-CS enrolled in the Altshock-2 registry between March 2020 and February 2022 were selected. The primary objective was the characterization of ADHF-CS patients as compared with AMI-CS. In-hospital length of stay and mortality were secondary endpoints. One-hundred-ninety of the 238 CS patients enrolled in the aforementioned period were considered for the present analysis: 101 AMI-CS (80% ST-elevated myocardial infarction and 20% non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction) and 89 ADHF-CS. As compared with AMI-CS, ADHF-CS patients were younger [63 (IQR 59-76) vs. 67 (IQR 54-73) years, P = 0.01], but presented with higher creatinine [1.6 (IQR 1.0-2.6) vs. 1.2 (IQR 1.0-1.4) mg/dL, P < 0.001], bilirubin [1.3 (IQR 0.9-2.3) vs. 0.6 (IQR 0.4-1.1) mg/dL, P = 0.01], and central venous pressure values [14 mmHg (IQR 8-12) vs. 10 mmHg (IQR 7-14),P = 0.01]. Norepinephrine was the most common catecholamine used in AMI-CS (79.3%), whereas epinephrine was used more commonly in ADHF-CS (65.5%); 75.8% vs. 46.6% received a temporary mechanical support in AMI-CS and ADHF-CS, respectively (P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was longer in the latter [28 (IQR 13-48) vs. 17 (IQR 9-29) days, P = 0.001]. Heart replacement therapies were more frequently used in the ADHF-CS group (heart transplantation 13.5% vs. 0% and left ventricular assist device 11% vs. 2%, P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). In-hospital mortality was 41.1% (38.6% AMI-CS vs. 43.8% ADHF-CS, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS ADHF-CS is characterized by a higher prevalence of end-organ and biventricular dysfunction at presentation, a longer hospital length of stay, and higher need of heart replacement therapies when compared with AMI-CS. In-hospital mortality was similar between the two aetiologies. Our data warrant development of new management protocols focused on CS aetiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Bertaina
- Division of CardiologySan Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS S. Maria Nascente—Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUSMilanItaly
| | - Simone Frea
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitCittà della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Laura Garatti
- Cardiology Department and De Gasperis Cardio CenterASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaMilanItaly
| | | | - Carlotta Sorini
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical BiotechnologiesUniversity of SienaSienaItaly
| | - Luca Villanova
- Cardiology Department and De Gasperis Cardio CenterASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaMilanItaly
| | - Elena Corrada
- Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS RozzanoMilanItaly
| | - Alice Sacco
- Cardiology Department and De Gasperis Cardio CenterASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaMilanItaly
| | | | - Amelia Ravera
- Cardiology Department, Intensive Care UnitS. Giovanni Di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona HospitalSalernoItaly
| | - Michele Tedeschi
- Cardiology Department, Intensive Care UnitS. Giovanni Di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona HospitalSalernoItaly
| | | | | | - Francesco Saia
- Cardiology UnitIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Anna Corsini
- Cardiology UnitIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Rita Camporotondo
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitFondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCSPaviaItaly
| | | | - Stephanie Bertolin
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive CareAO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare ArrigoAlessandriaItaly
| | - Matteo Rota
- Units of Biostatistics and Biomathematics and Bioinformatics, Department of Molecular and Translational MedicineUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Fabrizio Oliva
- Cardiology Department and De Gasperis Cardio CenterASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaMilanItaly
| | - Mario Iannaccone
- Division of CardiologySan Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Serafina Valente
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical BiotechnologiesUniversity of SienaSienaItaly
| | - Matteo Pagnesi
- Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of Brescia, Cardiothoracic Department, Civil HospitalsBresciaItaly
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of Brescia, Cardiothoracic Department, Civil HospitalsBresciaItaly
| | - Alessandro Sionis
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology DepartmentHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauBarcelonaSpain
| | - Marco Marini
- Division of Cardiology and ICCU, Department of Cardiovascular SciencesOspedali RiunitiAnconaItaly
| | - Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
- Intensive Cardiac Care UnitCittà della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoTurinItaly
- Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
| | | | - Federico Pappalardo
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive CareAO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare ArrigoAlessandriaItaly
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical‐Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric SciencesUniversity of Pavia ItalyPaviaItaly
- Anesthesia and Intensive CareFondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Anestesia e Rianimazione IPaviaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Contarino C, Chifari F, D'Souza GA, Herbertson LH. Validation of a Multiscale Computational Model Using a Mock Circulatory Loop to Simulate Cardiogenic Shock. ASAIO J 2023; 69:e502-e512. [PMID: 37923315 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000002062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to characterize the hemodynamics of cardiogenic shock (CS) through a computational model validated using a mock circulatory loop (MCL) and to perform sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation studies after the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Validation and Verification (V&V) guidelines. The uncertainties in cardiac cycle time ( ), total resistance ( ), and total volume ( ) were quantified in the MCL and propagated in the computational model. Both models were used to quantify the pressure in the left atrium, aorta (Ao), and left ventricle (LV), along with the flow through the aortic valve, reaching a good agreement. The results suggest that 1) is the main source of uncertainty in the variables under study, 2) showed its greatest impact on the uncertainty of Ao hemodynamics, and 3) mostly affected the uncertainty of LV pressure and Ao flow at the late-systolic phase. Comparison of uncertainty levels in the computational and experimental results was used to infer the presence of additional contributing factors that were not captured and propagated during a first analysis. Future work will expand upon this study to analyze the impact of mechanical circulatory support devices, such as ventricular assist devices, under CS conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Contarino
- From the Research and Development, Computational Life Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Francesco Chifari
- From the Research and Development, Computational Life Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Gavin A D'Souza
- Division of Applied Mechanics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Luke H Herbertson
- Division of Applied Mechanics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ma JW, Hu SY, Hsieh MS, Lee YC, Huang SC, Chen KJ, Chang YZ, Tsai YC. PEAL Score to Predict the Mortality Risk of Cardiogenic Shock in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1614. [PMID: 38003929 PMCID: PMC10672116 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The in-hospital mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high (28% to 45%). As a result, several studies developed prediction models to assess the mortality risk and provide guidance on treatment, including CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II scores, which performed modestly in external validation studies, reflecting the heterogeneity of the CS populations. Few articles established predictive scores of CS based on Asian people with a higher burden of comorbidities than Caucasians. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of a contemporary Asian population with CS, identify risk factors, and develop a predictive scoring model. METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2019 to collect the patients who presented with all-cause CS in the emergency department of a single medical center in Taiwan. We divided patients into subgroups of CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or heart failure (HF-CS). The outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. We built the prediction model based on the hazard ratio of significant variables, and the cutoff point of each predictor was determined using the Youden index. We also assessed the discrimination ability of the risk score using the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS We enrolled 225 patients with CS. One hundred and seven patients (47.6%) were due to AMI-CS, and ninety-eight patients among them received reperfusion therapy. Forty-nine patients (21.8%) eventually died within 30 days. Fifty-three patients (23.55%) presented with platelet counts < 155 × 103/μL, which were negatively associated with a 30-day mortality of CS in the restrictive cubic spline plot, even within the normal range of platelet counts. We identified four predictors: platelet counts < 200 × 103/μL (HR 2.574, 95% CI 1.379-4.805, p = 0.003), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% (HR 2.613, 95% CI 1.020-6.692, p = 0.045), age > 71 years (HR 2.452, 95% CI 1.327-4.531, p = 0.004), and lactate > 2.7 mmol/L (HR 1.967, 95% CI 1.069-3.620, p = 0.030). The risk score ended with a maximum of 5 points and showed an AUC (95% CI) of 0.774 (0.705-0.843) for all patients, 0.781 (0.678-0.883), and 0.759 (0.662-0.855) for AMI-CS and HF-CS sub-groups, respectively, all p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Based on four parameters, platelet counts, LVEF, age, and lactate (PEAL), this model showed a good predictive performance for all-cause mortality at 30 days in the all patients, AMI-CS, and HF-CS subgroups. The restrictive cubic spline plot showed a significantly negative correlation between initial platelet counts and 30-day mortality risk in the AMI-CS and HF-CS subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Wen Ma
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan; (J.-W.M.); (K.-J.C.); (Y.-C.T.)
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan;
| | - Sung-Yuan Hu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan; (J.-W.M.); (K.-J.C.); (Y.-C.T.)
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan;
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11217, Taiwan;
| | - Ming-Shun Hsieh
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11217, Taiwan;
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taoyuan Branch, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan;
| | - Yi-Chen Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan;
| | - Shih-Che Huang
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan;
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Ju Chen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan; (J.-W.M.); (K.-J.C.); (Y.-C.T.)
- Center for Cardiovascular Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan
| | - Yan-Zin Chang
- Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Drug Testing Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Tsai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan; (J.-W.M.); (K.-J.C.); (Y.-C.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jalil S, Ahmed A, Abdalla M, Al-Hijji M. Severe mitral stenosis masquerading as cardiogenic shock successfully managed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous mitral commissurotomy: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2023; 7:ytad553. [PMID: 38025122 PMCID: PMC10681707 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Rheumatic fever is still a major cause of mitral valve (MV) stenosis in the developing world. Few patients with critical rheumatic MV stenosis can present with acute cardiogenic shock (CS) that requires urgent treatment with circulatory support and definitive valvular repair or replacement. Case summary A 37-year-old gentleman was admitted with heart failure, CS Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions D, and atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. He had no prior medical history. He had multiple organ failures and required intubation, two DC shocks of 200 joules without haemodynamic improvement, continuous renal replacement therapy, and medical and mechanical circulatory support using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). His echocardiography showed severe rheumatic mitral stenosis (mitral valve area 2D of 0.7 cm2, mean diastolic gradient of 17 mmHg, Wilkins score 7). His Society of Thoracic Surgery score and EuroScore were 50.1% and 12.1%, respectively. Thus, a percutaneous transcatheter mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) was decided as the definitive treatment in a multidisciplinary team meeting. Following the procedure, the patient's circulatory support was gradually weaned off, and he was successfully extubated with a marked improvement in his renal functions. The patient achieved a complete recovery without any long-term sequelae. Discussion Cardiogenic shock related to severe rheumatic MV stenosis requires multidisciplinary team management with prompt diagnosis, initiation of the most appropriate mechanical support device (e.g. ECMO or tandem heart), and relief of the MV obstruction. Percutaneous transcatheter mitral commissurotomy can be the preferred option in this setting if the valve is pliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Jalil
- Weill Cornell Medicine, College of Medicine, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ashraf Ahmed
- Internal Medicine Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mahmoud Abdalla
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Hamad Medical Corporation, Heart Hospital, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohammed Al-Hijji
- Weill Cornell Medicine, College of Medicine, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Structural Cardiology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Heart Hospital, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Alvarez Villela M, Fu D, Roslin K, Smoller R, Asemota D, Miklin DJ, Kodra A, Vullaganti S, Roswell RO, Rangasamy S, Saikus CE, Kon ZN, Pierce MJ, Husk G, Stevens GR, Maybaum S. Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1206570. [PMID: 38028504 PMCID: PMC10644172 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1206570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Expert opinion and professional society statements have called for multi-tier care systems for the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, little is known about how to pragmatically define centers with different levels of care (LOC) for CS. Methods Eleven of 23 hospitals within our healthcare system sharing a common electronic health record were classified as different LOC according to their highest mechanical circulatory support (MCS) capabilities: Level 1 (L-1)-durable left ventricular assist device, Level 1A (L-1A)-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Level 2 (L-2)-intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous ventricular assist device; and Level 3 (L-3)-no MCS. All adult patients treated for CS (International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10 code R57.0) between 2016 and 2022 were included. Etiologies of CS were identified using associated diagnostic codes. Management strategies and outcomes across LOC were compared. Results Higher LOC centers had higher volumes: L-1 (n = 1): 2,831 patients, L-1A (n = 4): 3,452, L-2 (n = 1): 340, and L-3 (n = 5): 780. Emergency room admissions were more common in lower LOC (96% at L-3 vs. 46% L-1; p < 0.001), while hospital transfers were predominant at higher LOC (40% at L-1 vs. 2.7% at L-3; p < 0.001). Men comprised 61% of the cohort. Patients were younger in the higher LOC [69 (60-78) years at L-1 vs. 77 (67-85) years at L-3; p < 0.001]. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-CS and acute heart failure (AHF)-CS were concentrated in higher LOC centers while other etiologies of CS were more common in L-2 and L-3 (p < 0.001). Cardiac arrest on admission was more prevalent in lower LOC centers (L-1: 2.8% vs. L-3: 12.1%; p < 0.001). Patients with AMI-CS received more percutaneous coronary intervention in lower LOC (51% L-2 vs. 29% L-1; p < 0.01) but more coronary arterial bypass graft surgery at higher LOC (L-1: 42% vs. L-1A: 23%; p < 0.001). MCS use was consistent across levels for AMI-CS but was more frequent in higher LOC for AHF-CS patients (L-1: 28% vs. L-2: 10%; p < 0.001). Despite increasing in-hospital mortality with decreasing LOC, no significant difference was seen after multivariable adjustment. Conclusion This is the first report describing a pragmatic classification of LOC for CS which, based on MCS capabilities, can discriminate between centers with distinct demographics, practice patterns, and outcomes. This classification may serve as the basis for future research and the creation of CS systems of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Alvarez Villela
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Danni Fu
- Department of Cardiology, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Kylie Roslin
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rebecca Smoller
- Department of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Daniel Asemota
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Daniel J. Miklin
- Department of Cardiology, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Arber Kodra
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sirish Vullaganti
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Robert O. Roswell
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sabarivinoth Rangasamy
- Department of Cardiology, Northern Westchester Hospital, Northwell Health, Mount Kisco, NY, United States
| | - Christina E. Saikus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Zachary N. Kon
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Matthew J. Pierce
- Department of Cardiology, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Gregg Husk
- Department of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Gerin R. Stevens
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Cardiology, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Simon Maybaum
- Department of Cardiology, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Berg DD, Kaur G, Bohula EA, Baird-Zars VM, Alviar CL, Barnett CF, Barsness GW, Burke JA, Chaudhry SP, Chonde M, Cooper HA, Daniels LB, Dodson MW, Gerber DA, Ghafghazi S, Gidwani UK, Goldfarb MJ, Guo J, Hillerson D, Kenigsberg BB, Kochar A, Kontos MC, Kwon Y, Lopes MS, Loriaux DB, Miller PE, O’Brien CG, Papolos AI, Patel SM, Pisani BA, Potter BJ, Prasad R, Roswell RO, Shah KS, Sinha SS, Smith TD, Solomon MA, Teuteberg JJ, Thompson AD, Zakaria S, Katz JN, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2023; 12:651-660. [PMID: 37640029 PMCID: PMC10599641 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Invasive haemodynamic assessment with a pulmonary artery catheter is often used to guide the management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and may provide important prognostic information. We aimed to assess prognostic associations and relationships to end-organ dysfunction of presenting haemodynamic parameters in CS. METHODS AND RESULTS The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is an investigator-initiated multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) in North America coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. Patients with CS (2018-2022) who underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment within 24 h of CICU admission were included. Associations of haemodynamic parameters with in-hospital mortality were assessed using logistic regression, and associations with presenting serum lactate were assessed using least squares means regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients on temporary mechanical circulatory support and adjusted for vasoactive-inotropic score. Among the 3603 admissions with CS, 1473 had haemodynamic data collected within 24 h of CICU admission. The median cardiac index was 1.9 (25th-75th percentile, 1.6-2.4) L/min/m2 and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 74 (66-86) mmHg. Parameters associated with mortality included low MAP, low systolic blood pressure, low systemic vascular resistance, elevated right atrial pressure (RAP), elevated RAP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio, and low pulmonary artery pulsatility index. These associations were generally consistent when controlling for the intensity of background pharmacologic and mechanical haemodynamic support. These parameters were also associated with higher presenting serum lactate. CONCLUSION In a contemporary CS population, presenting haemodynamic parameters reflecting decreased systemic arterial tone and right ventricular dysfunction are associated with adverse outcomes and systemic hypoperfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Gurleen Kaur
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Vivian M Baird-Zars
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- Leon H Charney Division of Cardiology, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher F Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - James A Burke
- Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Heart Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | | | - Meshe Chonde
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Howard A Cooper
- Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mark W Dodson
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA
| | - Daniel A Gerber
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shahab Ghafghazi
- Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Umesh K Gidwani
- Division of Cardiology, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Goldfarb
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jianping Guo
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Dustin Hillerson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Benjamin B Kenigsberg
- Departments of Cardiology and Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ajar Kochar
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael C Kontos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Younghoon Kwon
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mathew S Lopes
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Daniel B Loriaux
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Connor G O’Brien
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander I Papolos
- Departments of Cardiology and Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Siddharth M Patel
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Barbara A Pisani
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Brian J Potter
- Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) Research Center and Cardiovascular Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Rajnish Prasad
- Division of Cardiology, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, GA, USA
| | - Robert O Roswell
- Division of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin S Shah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shashank S Sinha
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Timothy D Smith
- Lindner Center for Research and Education, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Michael A Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Teuteberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrea D Thompson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sammy Zakaria
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Waksman R, Pahuja M, van Diepen S, Proudfoot AG, Morrow D, Spitzer E, Nichol G, Weisfeldt ML, Moscucci M, Lawler PR, Mebazaa A, Fan E, Dickert NW, Samsky M, Kormos R, Piña IL, Zuckerman B, Farb A, Sapirstein JS, Simonton C, West NEJ, Damluji AA, Gilchrist IC, Zeymer U, Thiele H, Cutlip DE, Krucoff M, Abraham WT. Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC). Circulation 2023; 148:1113-1126. [PMID: 37782695 PMCID: PMC11025346 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.064527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
The Shock Academic Research Consortium is a multi-stakeholder group, including representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration and other government agencies, industry, and payers, convened to develop pragmatic consensus definitions useful for the evaluation of clinical trials enrolling patients with cardiogenic shock, including trials evaluating mechanical circulatory support devices. Several in-person and virtual meetings were convened between 2020 and 2022 to discuss the need for developing the standardized definitions required for evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices in clinical trials for cardiogenic shock patients. The expert panel identified key concepts and topics by performing literature reviews, including previous clinical trials, while recognizing current challenges and the need to advance evidence-based practice and statistical analysis to support future clinical trials. For each category, a lead (primary) author was assigned to perform a literature search and draft a proposed definition, which was presented to the subgroup. These definitions were further modified after feedback from the expert panel meetings until a consensus was reached. This manuscript summarizes the expert panel recommendations focused on outcome definitions, including efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Waksman
- Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (R.W.)
| | - Mohit Pahuja
- Division of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (M.P.)
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (S.v.D.)
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK (A.G.P.)
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany (A.G.P.)
| | - David Morrow
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.M.)
| | - Ernest Spitzer
- Cardialysis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (E.S.)
- Cardiology Department, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (E.S.)
| | - Graham Nichol
- University of Washington-Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, University of Washington Harborview Center, Seattle (G.N.)
| | - Myron L Weisfeldt
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (M.L.W.)
| | - Mauro Moscucci
- Office of Cardiovascular Devices, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (M.M., B.Z., A.F., J.S.S.)
| | - Patrick R Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Canada (P.R.L.)
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (P.R.L.)
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada (P.R.L.)
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Université Paris Cité, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Lariboisière, France (A.M.)
| | - Eddy Fan
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada (E.F.)
| | - Neal W Dickert
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.W.D.)
| | - Marc Samsky
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (M.S.)
| | - Robert Kormos
- Global Medical Affairs Heart Failure, Abbott Laboratories, Austin, TX (R.K.)
| | - Ileana L Piña
- Division of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (I.L.P.)
| | - Bram Zuckerman
- Office of Cardiovascular Devices, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (M.M., B.Z., A.F., J.S.S.)
| | - Andrew Farb
- Office of Cardiovascular Devices, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (M.M., B.Z., A.F., J.S.S.)
| | - John S Sapirstein
- Office of Cardiovascular Devices, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (M.M., B.Z., A.F., J.S.S.)
| | | | | | - Abdulla A Damluji
- Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (A.A.D.)
| | - Ian C Gilchrist
- Department of Interventional Cardiology/Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State Health/Hershey Medical Center (I.C.G.)
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Germany (H.T.)
- Leipzig Heart Science, Germany (H.T.)
| | - Donald E Cutlip
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA (D.E.C.)
| | - Mitchell Krucoff
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.K.)
| | - William T Abraham
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University College of Medicine/Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (W.T.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Truesdell AG, Alkalbani M, Isseh I. Editorial: Moving from clinical intuition to clinical evidence in cardiogenic shock. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2023; 55:66-67. [PMID: 37380504 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G Truesdell
- Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, USA; Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | | | - Iyad Isseh
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kim MS. Elucidating the Interplay: Exploring the Impact of Acute Heart Failure on Aspiration Pneumonia Hospitalizations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE 2023; 5:187-188. [PMID: 37937203 PMCID: PMC10625878 DOI: 10.36628/ijhf.2023.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Min-Seok Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|