Compounding Benefits of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy for the Reduction of Major Cardiovascular Events: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Obicetrapib in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

BACKGROUND

Obicetrapib is a highly selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor that reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. The efficacy and safety of obicetrapib have not been fully characterized among patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We conducted a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who were receiving maximum tolerated doses of lipid-lowering therapy. Patients with an LDL cholesterol level of 100 mg per deciliter or higher or a non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level of 130 mg per deciliter or higher, as well as those with an LDL cholesterol level of 55 to 100 mg per deciliter or a non-HDL cholesterol level of 85 to 130 mg per deciliter and at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor, were eligible for inclusion. The patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 10 mg of obicetrapib once daily or matching placebo for 365 days. The primary end point was the percent change in the LDL cholesterol level from baseline to day 84.

RESULTS

A total of 2530 patients underwent randomization; 1686 patients were assigned to receive obicetrapib and 844 to receive placebo. The mean age of the patients was 65 years, 34% were women, and the mean baseline LDL cholesterol level was 98 mg per deciliter. The least-squares mean percent change from baseline to day 84 in the LDL cholesterol level was -29.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -32.1 to -27.8) in the obicetrapib group, as compared with 2.7% (95% CI, -0.4 to 5.8) in the placebo group, for a between-group difference of -32.6 percentage points (95% CI, -35.8 to -29.5; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who were receiving maximum tolerated doses of lipid-lowering therapy and were at high risk for cardiovascular events, obicetrapib reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 29.9%. (Funded by NewAmsterdam Pharma; BROADWAY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05142722.).

2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2025 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2024 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. This year's edition includes a continued focus on health equity across several key domains and enhanced global data that reflect improved methods and incorporation of ≈3000 new data sources since last year's Statistical Update.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Saturated fat in an evolutionary context

Evolutionary perspectives have yielded profound insights in health and medical sciences. A fundamental recognition is that modern diet and lifestyle practices are mismatched with the human physiological constitution, shaped over eons in response to environmental selective pressures. This Darwinian angle can help illuminate and resolve issues in nutrition, including the contentious issue of fat consumption. In the present paper, the intake of saturated fat in ancestral and contemporary dietary settings is discussed. It is shown that while saturated fatty acids have been consumed by human ancestors across time and space, they do not feature dominantly in the diets of hunter-gatherers or projected nutritional inputs of genetic accommodation. A higher intake of high-fat dairy and meat products produces a divergent fatty acid profile that can increase the risk of cardiovascular and inflammatory disease and decrease the overall satiating-, antioxidant-, and nutrient capacity of the diet. By prioritizing fiber-rich and micronutrient-dense foods, as well as items with a higher proportion of unsaturated fatty acids, and in particular the long-chain polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids, a nutritional profile that is better aligned with that of wild and natural diets is achieved. This would help prevent the burdening diseases of civilization, including heart disease, cancer, and neurodegenerative conditions. Saturated fat is a natural part of a balanced diet; however, caution is warranted in a food environment that differs markedly from the one to which we are adapted.

Learnings from Implementation Strategies to Improve Lipid Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol reduces cardiovascular risk. International lipid management guidelines recommend LDL-cholesterol goals or thresholds for initiating lipid-lowering therapy. However, contemporary real-world studies have shown that many high- and very high-risk patients are not attaining LDL-cholesterol goals and are not receiving intensive lipid-lowering therapies. In this review, recent examples of implementation strategies for optimising lipid management are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implementation studies are heterogenous in their strategies and design. At the clinician level, multidisciplinary team-based care (including multidisciplinary lipid clinics), pharmacist- or nurse-led interventions, decision-support algorithms or protocols, and educational initiatives have shown potential to improve lipid management. Various strategies to improve patient adherence to lipid-lowering therapies have demonstrated at least short-term efficacy, including education, shared decision-making, behavioural support and nudges. Electronic health records can be leveraged at low cost to identify patients requiring initiation or intensification of lipid-lowering therapies, but the optimal method of integrating automated alerts or nudges to influence decision-making requires further research. Moreover, telehealth and remote care delivery models can improve access to healthcare and facilitate lipid-lowering. Multifaceted strategies with a systematic approach to targeting clinician, patient and system related factors can be successful in improving lipid management. Future implementation research should evaluate longer-term outcomes and follow implementation science theories, models and/or frameworks at all stages. By doing so, ongoing implementation studies will help researchers better understand the impact, sustainability and scalability of strategies, and where barriers and facilitators to lipid management may exist in other contexts.

Efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering therapies in combination with or without statin to reduce the cardiovascular risk: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Background and aims

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) pose a significant global health burden. Lowering low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol is the primary therapeutic aim for preventing primary and secondary CVD events. While statins are the standard treatments, their limitations, such as side effects and intolerance in certain patient groups, necessitate exploration of alternative lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs). We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating cardiovascular outcomes associated with non-statin LLTs (bempedoic acid, alirocumab, evolocumab, ezetimibe, and inclisiran) in adults with CVD or high cardiovascular risk.

Methods

EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched for eligible studies, from inception until February 08, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction and validation were conducted, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool-2 for RCTs.

Results

The search strategy yielded 2104 citations. Post screening for eligibility, nine unique trials/studies (84 publications) were identified. Among these, one trial each was identified for bempedoic acid and alirocumab, three for evolocumab, and four for ezetimibe. No published literature documenting the cardiovascular outcomes of inclisiran was identified. Only one trial (CLEAR Outcomes) included statin-intolerant patients at baseline. Most studies evaluated a 3-component, 4-component, or 5-component major adverse cardiovascular events composite as an outcome along with individual components. The quality of the included trials was found to be fair-to-good.

Conclusions

The systematic review findings emphasise the significance of considering non-statin LLTs as viable treatment options for individuals with CVD or high cardiovascular risk who cannot tolerate or achieve optimal lipid control with statin therapy alone.

Combination blood pressure lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: messages from the ADVANCE trial

The Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial investigated the effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering using a fixed combination of perindopril-indapamide versus placebo in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The study showed that combination perindopril-indapamide had significant benefits in reducing cardiovascular, renal, and mortality events, with consistent relative risk reductions across different patient subgroups. Secondary analyses of ADVANCE have identified novel risk markers in T2D including cessation of BP lowering therapy, absent peripheral pulses and cardiac biomarkers to name a few. ADVANCE also shed light on practical aspects of hypertension management, including the limitations of office BP, tolerability of combination BP lowering therapy across the range of BP levels and the interpretation of changes in serum creatinine after treatment initiation. This review article summarizes the findings of ADVANCE and its subsequent substudies, which have been foundational in our understanding of BP management and the use of combination BP lowering therapy in T2D.

The impact of carbohydrate restriction-induced elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ketogenic diet trial study design

BACKGROUND

Despite innovations in pharmacotherapy to lower lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), ASCVD persists as the leading global cause of mortality. Elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are a well-known risk factor and have been a main target in the treatment of ASCVD. The latest research suggests that ketogenic diets are effective at improving most non-LDL-C/apolipoprotein B cardiometabolic risk factors. However, ketogenic diets can induce large increases in LDL-C to >190 mg/dl in some individuals. Interestingly, these individuals are often otherwise lean and healthy. The influence of increased levels of LDL-C resulting from a carbohydrate-restricted ketogenic diet on the progression of atherosclerosis in otherwise metabolically healthy individuals is poorly understood. This observational study aims to assess and describe the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in this population within 12 months.

METHODS

Hundred relatively lean individuals who adopted ketogenic diets and subsequently exhibited hypercholesterolemia with LDL-C to >190 mg/dl, in association with otherwise good metabolic health markers, were enrolled and observed over a period of 12 months. Participants underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography scans to assess the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in a year.

RESULTS

Data analysis shall begin following the conclusion of the trial with results to follow.

CONCLUSION

Ketogenic diets have generated debate and raised concerns within the medical community, especially in the subset exhibiting immense elevations in LDL-C, who interestingly are lean and healthy. The relationship between elevated LDL-C and ASCVD progression in this population will provide better insight into the effects of diet-induced hypercholesterolemia.

Obicetrapib as an Adjunct to Stable Statin Therapy in Japanese Subjects: Results from a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

AIMS

Obicetrapib is a highly selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apoB), when taken as monotherapy and in combination with ezetimibe on a background of statins, in clinical trials predominantly conducted in Northern European/Caucasian participants. We characterized the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib within an Asian-Pacific region population.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial examined obicetrapib 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/d, compared with placebo, for 8 weeks as an adjunct to stable statin therapy (atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d or rosuvastatin 5 or 10 mg/d) in Japanese men and women who had not achieved 2022 Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines and had LDL-C ＞70 mg/dL or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) ＞100 mg/dL and triglycerides (TG) ＜400 mg/dL. Endpoints included LDL-C, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoproteins, TG, steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) in obicetrapib arms, safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

In the 102 randomized subjects (mean age 64.8 y, 71.6% male), obicetrapib significantly lowered median LDL-C, apoB, and non-HDL-C, and raised HDL-C at all doses; responses in the obicetrapib 10 mg group were -45.8%, -29.7%, -37.0%, and +159%, respectively (all p＜0.0001 vs. placebo). The PK profile demonstrated near complete elimination of drug by 4 weeks. Obicetrapib was well tolerated and there were no adverse safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

All doses of obicetrapib taken as an adjunct to stable statin therapy significantly lowered atherogenic lipoprotein lipid parameters, showed near complete elimination of drug by 4 weeks, and were safe and well tolerated in a Japanese population, similar to previous studies of obicetrapib conducted in predominantly Caucasian participants.

Effect of adding PCSK9 inhibitors to lipid-lowering interventions on arterial stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerosis, a leading cause of mortality, necessitates effective management of hypercholesterolemia, specifically elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The emergence of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) has revolutionised lipid-lowering. PCSK9i demonstrates substantial LDL-C reduction and cardiovascular benefits, particularly in statin-intolerant or nonresponsive individuals. However, the potential pleiotropic effects of PCSK9i, especially on arterial stiffness, remain a subject of investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis seek to provide a nuanced understanding of the potential pleiotropic effects of PCSK9i, specifically on arterial health. The primary objective was to analyse the influence of PCSK9i on arterial stiffness, extending beyond traditional lipid-lowering metrics and contributing to a more comprehensive approach to cardiovascular risk reduction.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across major databases, clinical trial registries and grey literature. Inclusion criteria comprised adults in prospective cohort studies undergoing PCSK9i augmentation in lipid-lowering therapy, with a focus on arterial stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity (PWv). Random-effects meta-analyses, sensitivity analyses and meta-regression models were employed to assess the pooled effect of adding PCSK9i to lipid-lowering interventions on arterial stiffness.

RESULTS

Five studies (158 participants) met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating a significant reduction in PWv (mean difference: -2.61 m/s [95% CI: -3.70, -1.52]; ES: -1.62 [95% CI: -2.53, -.71]) upon adding PCSK9i to lipid-lowering interventions. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression models suggested potential sex-based and baseline PWv-dependent variations, emphasising patient-specific characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis provides robust evidence that adding PCSK9i to lipid-lowering interventions significantly improves arterial stiffness, indicating broader vascular benefits beyond LDL-C reduction.

Evaluation of 13 Formulae for Calculated LDL-C Using Direct Homogenous Assay in a South Indian Population

BACKGROUND

LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is regarded as a significant therapeutic target and a known risk factor for atherosclerosis. It can be calculated using the results of the other lipid tests or tested directly. Despite its shortcomings, the Friedewald formula is most frequently utilized since it is simple and practical. Until now, several formulae have been proposed for calculating LDL-C; however, their accuracy has not been evaluated across different populations. We sought to evaluate the validity of calculated LDL-C by comparing the findings with values acquired by the direct homogeneous technique, utilizing 13 distinct formulae from the literature.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective observational study conducted for a year at SRIHER, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. From the total 25 043 patients who had their serum lipid profile tested, 16 314 participants had their fasting blood sugar and fasting lipid profile measured simultaneously, and they were chosen for the research.

RESULTS

The de Cordova, Chen, Martin/Hopkins (initial), and Teerakanchana equations correlated well with the direct LDL-C assay. When the dataset was stratified according to triglycerides, the Chen and Martin/Hopkins initial equations had the better measurement of agreement compared to other equations. The Martin/Hopkins initial equation outperformed all the other equations when the whole dataset irrespective of the triglyceride population was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the Martin/Hopkins initial equation outperformed all the other equations and can be used as an alternative to direct LDL-C measurement in a South Indian population.

The effects of multidisciplinary collaborative care on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary collaborative care has been widely recommended as an effective strategy for managing diabetes; however, the cardiovascular risk factors of patients with diabetes are often inadequately managed in primary care settings. This study aimed to assess the effect of multidisciplinary collaboration on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings.

METHODS

Five databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS and CENTRAL) were systematically searched to retrieve randomised controlled trials. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the interventions included a multidisciplinary team with professionals from at least three health disciplines and focused on patients with diabetes in primary care settings. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects.

RESULTS

In total, 19 studies comprising 6538 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with usual care, multidisciplinary collaborative care significantly reduced cardiovascular risk factors, including mean systolic blood pressure (-3.27 mm Hg, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -4.72 to -1.82, p < 0.01), diastolic blood pressure (-1.4 mm Hg, 95 % CI: -2.32 to -0.47, p < 0.01), glycated haemoglobin (-0.42 %, 95 % CI: -0.59 to -0.25, p < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein (-0.16 mmol/L, 95 % CI: -0.26 to -0.06, p < 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein (0.06 mmol/L, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.12, p < 0.05). The subgroup analysis showed multidisciplinary collaboration was more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk factors when it comprised team members from a number of different disciplines, combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological components, included both face-to-face and remote interactions and was implemented in high-income countries.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary collaborative care is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care. Further studies need to be conducted to determine the optimal team composition.

Obicetrapib on top of maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: rationale and designs of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN

BACKGROUND

Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024.

CONCLUSION

These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated.

Carbohydrate Restriction-Induced Elevations in LDL-Cholesterol and Atherosclerosis: The KETO Trial

Background

Increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can occur on carbohydrate restricted ketogenic diets. Lean metabolically healthy individuals with a low triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio appear particularly susceptible, giving rise to the novel "lean mass hyper-responder" (LMHR) phenotype.

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to assess coronary plaque burden in LMHR and near-LMHR individuals with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (ketogenic diet [KETO]) compared to matched controls with lower LDL-C from the Miami Heart (MiHeart) cohort.

Methods

There were 80 KETO individuals with carbohydrate restriction-induced LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥60 mg/dL, and triglyceride levels ≤80 mg/dL, without familial hypercholesterolemia, matched 1:1 with MiHeart subjects for age, gender, race, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking status. Coronary artery calcium and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were used to compare coronary plaque between groups and correlate LDL-C to plaque levels.

Results

The matched mean age was 55.5 years, with a mean LDL-C of 272 (maximum LDL-C of 591) mg/dl and a mean 4.7-year duration on a KETO. There was no significant difference in coronary plaque burden in the KETO group as compared to MiHeart controls (mean LDL 123 mg/dL): coronary artery calcium score (median 0 [IQR: 0-56]) vs (1 [IQR: 0-49]) (P = 0.520) CCTA total plaque score (0 [IQR: 0-2] vs [IQR: 0-4]) (P = 0.357). There was also no correlation between LDL-C level and CCTA coronary plaque.

Conclusions

Coronary plaque in metabolically healthy individuals with carbohydrate restriction-induced LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL on KETO for a mean of 4.7 years is not greater than a matched cohort with 149 mg/dL lower average LDL-C. There is no association between LDL-C and plaque burden in either cohort. (Diet-induced Elevations in LDL-C and Progression of Atherosclerosis [Keto-CTA]; NCT057333255).

Efficacy and Safety of Inclisiran in Patients with Polyvascular Disease: Pooled, Post Hoc Analysis of the ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Patients with polyvascular disease (PVD) are at very high cardiovascular risk and require intensive lipid-lowering therapy. This analysis describes the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus placebo in patients with and without PVD.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of the ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 trials, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 284 mg inclisiran (300 mg inclisiran sodium) or placebo on day 1, day 90, and 6-monthly thereafter. Percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to day 510 and corresponding time-adjusted change from day 90 and up to day 540 were evaluated per patients' PVD status. Safety was assessed over 540 days.

RESULTS

Of 3454 patients, 470 (13.6%) had PVD, and 2984 (86.4%) did not. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment arms in both cohorts. A greater proportion of patients with PVD had comorbidities versus those without. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) placebo-corrected LDL-C percentage change from baseline to day 510 was -48.9% (-55.6 to -42.2) in patients with PVD and -51.5% (-53.9 to -49.1) in patients without. Proportions of patients with reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events were similar between treatment arms, irrespective of PVD status, except for an excess of mild or moderate clinically relevant TEAEs at the injection site with inclisiran.

CONCLUSION

Twice-yearly inclisiran dosing (after the initial and 3-month doses) was well tolerated and provided effective and sustained lipid-lowering in patients, irrespective of PVD status.

Association of genetic variants related to combined lipid-lowering and antihypertensive therapies with risk of cardiovascular disease: 2 × 2 factorial Mendelian randomization analyses

BACKGROUND

Lipid-lowering drugs and antihypertensive drugs are commonly combined for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the relationship of combined medications with CVD remains controversial. We aimed to explore the associations of genetically proxied medications of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs, either alone or both, with risk of CVD, other clinical and safety outcomes.

METHODS

We divided 423,821 individuals in the UK Biobank into 4 groups via median genetic scores for targets of lipid-lowering drugs and antihypertensive drugs: lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) mediated by targets of statins or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) mediated by targets of β-blockers (BBs) or calcium channel blockers (CCBs), combined genetically lower LDL-C and SBP, and reference (genetically both higher LDL-C and SBP). Associations with risk of CVD and other clinical outcomes were explored among each group in factorial Mendelian randomization.

RESULTS

Independent and additive effects were observed between genetically proxied medications of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs with CVD (including coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral artery diseases) and other clinical outcomes (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and dementia) (P > 0.05 for interaction in all outcomes). Take the effect of PCSK9 inhibitors and BBs on CVD for instance: compared with the reference, PCSK9 group had a 4% lower risk of CVD (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95%CI, 0.94-0.99), and a 3% lower risk was observed in BBs group (OR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.94-0.99), while combined both were associated with a 6% additively lower risk (OR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.92-0.97; P = 0.87 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetically proxied medications of combined lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs have an independent and additive effects on CVD, other clinical and safety outcomes, with implications for CVD clinical practice, subsequent trials as well as drug development of polypills.

Coronary artery calcium in 2023: Guidelines for LDL-C goals, non-statin therapies, and aspirin use

Personalizing risk assessment and treatment decisions for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) rely on pooled cohort equations and increasingly coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. A growing body of evidence supports that elevated CAC scores correspond to progressively elevated ASCVD risk, and that scores of ≥100, ≥300, and ≥1000 denote risk that is equivalent to certain secondary prevention populations. This has led consensus guidelines to incorporate CAC score thresholds for guiding escalation of preventive therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, initiation of non-statin lipid lowering medications, and use of low-dose daily aspirin. As data on CAC continues to grow, more decision pathways will incorporate CAC score cutoffs to guide management of blood pressure and cardiometabolic medications. CAC score is also being used to enrich clinical trial study populations for elevated ASCVD risk, and to screen for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in patients who received chest imaging for other diagnostic purposes.

Canadian Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Calcium Screening Based on the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Background

Cost-effectiveness of testing for coronary artery calcium (CAC) relative to other treatment strategies is not established in Canada.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using CAC score-guided statin treatment compared with universal statin therapy among intermediate-risk, primary prevention patients eligible for statins.

Methods

A state transition, microsimulation model used data from Canadian sources and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis to simulate clinical and economic consequences of cardiovascular disease from a Canadian publicly funded health care system perspective. In the CAC score-guided treatment arm, statins were started when CAC ≥1. Outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 5 and 10 years; an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was considered cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses examined uncertainty in model parameters.

Results

Compared with universal statin treatment at 5 and 10 years, CAC score-guided statin treatment was projected to increase mean costs by $326 (95% CI: $325-$326) and $172 (95% CI: $169-$175), increase mean QALYs by 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.01) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02-0.02), and cost $54,492 (95% CI: $52,342-$56,816) and $8,118 (95% CI: $7,968-$8,279) per QALY gained, respectively. The model was most sensitive to statin cost, CAC testing cost, adherence to statin monitoring, and disutility associated with daily statin use. At 5 years, CAC score-guided statin treatment was cost-effective when CAC test costs ranged from $80 to $160 in different scenarios.

Conclusions

CAC score-guided statin initiation in comparison to universal statin treatment was borderline cost-neutral at 5 years and cost-effective at 10 years in statin-eligible Canadian patients at intermediate cardiovascular disease risk.

Whether and Why Do We Need a Vaccine Against Atherosclerosis? Can We Expect It Anytime Soon?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of premature death. Lipid disorders, particularly elevated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), contribute significantly to ASCVD. The risk of developing ASCVD is influenced by the duration of exposure to elevated LDL-C concentrations (cholesterol-years concept). Implementing lipid-lowering treatments based on the principles of "the earlier the better," "the lower the better," and "the longer the better" has been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk and significantly extend lifespan. Despite the availability of numerous lipid-lowering drugs, achieving satisfactory control of lipid disorders remains very challenging. Therefore, there is a need for novel approaches to improve treatment adherence.

RECENT FINDINGS

One promising solution under investigation is the development of an anti-PCSK9 vaccine, which could be administered annually to provide long-term control over LDL-C concentrations. Experimental studies and the sole clinical trial conducted thus far have demonstrated that the anti-PCSK9 vaccine induces a durable immune response associated with lipid-lowering and anti-atherosclerotic effects. Furthermore, it has exhibited good tolerability and a satisfactory safety profile. However, we still need data from phase 2, 3, and cardiovascular outcome trial to confirm its safety and efficacy and add value in the armamentarium of available and perspective lipid-lowering drugs. This article highlights the significance of developing an anti-PCSK9 vaccine and provides an overview of the current knowledge on various anti-PCSK9 vaccines.

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2024 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2023 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. The AHA strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional global data, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Long-Lasting Control of LDL Cholesterol Induces a 40% Reduction in the Incidence of Cardiovascular Events: New Insights from a 7-Year Study

Recent studies have yielded controversial results on the long-term effects of statins on the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. To fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and CV events in hypertensive patients without previous CV events and naïve to antidyslipidemic treatment within the "Campania Salute Network" in Southern Italy. We studied 725 hypertensive patients with a mean follow-up of 85.4 ± 25.7 months. We stratified our cohort into three groups based on LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in mg/dl: group 1) patients showing during the follow-up a mean LDL-C value ≤100 mg/dl in absence of statin therapy; group 2) statin-treated patients with LDL ≤100 mg/dl; and group 3) patients with LDL-C >100 mg/dl. No significant difference among the groups was observed in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and medications. The incidence of first CV events was 5.7% in group 1, 6.0% in group 2, and 11.9% in group 3 (P < 0.05 vs. group 1 and group 2). A stable long-term satisfactory control of LDL-C plasma concentration (≤100 mg/dl) reduced the incidence of major CV events from one event every 58.6 patients per year to one event every 115.9 patients per year. These findings were confirmed in a Cox regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding factors. Collectively, our data demonstrate that a 7-year stable control of LDL-C reduces the incidence of CV events by 40%. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: There are several discrepancies between Mendelian studies and other investigations concerning the actual effects of reduction of plasma concentration of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol on the incidence of major cardiovascular events. Taken together, our data in nondiabetic subjects show that a 7-year stable control of LDL cholesterol induces a ∼40% reduction of the incidence of cardiovascular events.

Quantifying the ‘distance to LDL-C goal’ in patients at very high cardiovascular risk with hyperlipidaemia in Germany: a retrospective claims database analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study quantified the 'distance to LDL-C goal' in patients at very high cardiovascular risk with uncontrolled hyperlipidaemia. 'Distance to LDL-C goal' was defined as the percentage by which low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels needed to be reduced to achieve the LDL-C goals specified in the 2016 or 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis using data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database included patients who were predominantly treated by a primary care physician, diabetologist or cardiologist between 2014 and 2018, with a diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia and an initial LDL-C measurement (index event) and one or more cardiovascular risk factors. The primary outcome was to assess the proportion of patients with uncontrolled hyperlipidaemia and to classify the 'distance to LDL-C goal' in these patients.

RESULTS

Data from 32,963 patients were analysed (n = 27,159, n = 3873 and n = 1931 patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). Most patients had uncontrolled LDL-C levels (⩾70 mg/dL; ⩾1.8 mmol/L) at index (91.0%, 86.4% and 94.0% of patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). Analysis of the 'distance to LDL-C goal' indicated that approximately one-third of patients in each cohort required an LDL-C level reduction of up to 50% relative to index to achieve their LDL-C goal (35.8%, 43.7% and 28.4% of patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). LDL-C control was not achieved at 36 months post-index in most patients with uncontrolled LDL-C levels (86.8%, 81.7% and 90.2% of patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LDL-C levels were uncontrolled in most patients with hyperlipidaemia. Analysis of the 'distance to LDL-C goal' showed that most patients required a substantial LDL-C level reduction to achieve their LDL-C goal.

Lipid-lowering therapy and LDL-C control for primary prevention in persons with diabetes across 90 health systems in the United States

Objective

National guidelines recommend statin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. We assessed the extent of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy utilization in community practice.

Methods

We evaluated lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and 1-year follow-up in patients aged 40-75 years with type 2 diabetes but without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), across 90 health systems in the United States participating in an electronic health record-derived dataset, Cerner Real-World Data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with utilization of moderate- to high-intensity statin.

Results

We identified 241,232 patients with type 2 diabetes (58.1 % on moderate- to high-intensity statin, 7.0 % on low-intensity statin, and 34.9 % on no statin). Predictors of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy included retinopathy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.38), hypertension (aOR, 1.52; 95 % CI, 1.43-1.61), and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (aOR, 1.14; 95 % CI, 1.07-1.21). Women (aOR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.82-0.87), and those with rheumatoid arthritis (aOR, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.71-0.87), psoriasis (aOR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.75-0.96), and hepatitis C (aOR, 0.40; 95 % CI, 0.39-0.46), had reduced odds of moderate- to high-intensity statin treatment. Utilization of ezetimibe was rare (2.0 %). LDL-C control was suboptimal at baseline (37.0 % and 27.9 % had LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL, respectively). At 1-year follow-up, the rate of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy utilization was 65.3 %.

Conclusion

Increased efforts are needed to improve LDL-C control and LLT use for primary prevention of ASCVD in adults with type 2 diabetes, in particular among women and those with risk-enhancing inflammatory conditions.

MSGene: Derivation and validation of a multistate model for lifetime risk of coronary artery disease using genetic risk and the electronic health record

Currently, coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death among adults worldwide. Accurate risk stratification can support optimal lifetime prevention. We designed a novel and general multistate model (MSGene) to estimate age-specific transitions across 10 cardiometabolic states, dependent on clinical covariates and a CAD polygenic risk score. MSGene supports decision making about CAD prevention related to any of these states. We analyzed longitudinal data from 480,638 UK Biobank participants and compared predicted lifetime risk with the 30-year Framingham risk score. MSGene improved discrimination (C-index 0.71 vs 0.66), age of high-risk detection (C-index 0.73 vs 0.52), and overall prediction (RMSE 1.1% vs 10.9%), with external validation. We also used MSGene to refine estimates of lifetime absolute risk reduction from statin initiation. Our findings underscore the potential public health value of our novel multistate model for accurate lifetime CAD risk estimation using clinical factors and increasingly available genetics.

Association of non-HDL-C and depression: a cross-sectional analysis of the NHANES data

Objectives

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) has attracted attention because it is associated with a variety of diseases and is easy to measure. However, the relationship between non-HDL-C and depression is still unclear. Our aim was to assess the relationship between non-HDL-C and depression using the cross-sectional NHANES survey from 2005 to 2018.

Methods

We examined the association between non-HDL-C and depression using weighted multivariable logistic regression models and subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results.

Results

There were 42,143 participants in this study and 8.6% had depression (weighted 7.53%). Non-HDL-C was higher in participants with depression compared to those without depression (weighted mean 3.64 vs. 3.73, p < 0.01). There was a positive association between non-HDL-C and depression with a 95% OR of 1.22 adjusted for multifactorial (95% CI,1.03-1.45). In subgroup analyses, non-HDL-C was positively associated with depression in men (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01-1.70), normal BMI (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66-1.32) and in participants without hypertension (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01-1.66).

Conclusion

Non-HDL-C positively correlated with depression, and further research may be better for clinical service.

The Greatly Under-Represented Role of Smooth Muscle Cells in Atherosclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes previous and recent research on the fundamental role of arterial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) as drivers of initial and, along with macrophages, later stages of human atherosclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies using human tissues and SMC lineage-tracing mice have reinforced earlier observations that SMCs drive initial atherogenesis in humans and contribute a multitude of phenotypes including foam cell formation hitherto attributed primarily to macrophages in atherosclerosis. Arterial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) are the primary cell type in human pre-atherosclerotic intima and are responsible for the retention of lipoproteins that drive the development of atherosclerosis. Despite this, images of atherogenesis still depict the process as initially devoid of SMCs, primarily macrophage driven, and indicate only relatively minor roles such as fibrous cap formation to intimal SMCs. This review summarizes historical and recent observations regarding the importance of SMCs in the formation of a pre-atherosclerotic intima, initial and later foam cell formation, and the phenotypic changes that give rise to multiple different roles for SMCs in human and mouse lesions. Potential SMC-specific therapies in atherosclerosis are presented.

Pharmacological strategies to manage hyperkalaemia: out with the old, in with the new? Not so fast…

Since the 1950s, sodium polystyrene sulphonate (SPS) has been the dominant cation exchange agent prescribed for hyperkalaemia. Clinicians have had plenty of time to learn of SPS's advantages and limitations. The demands of drug regulatory agencies regarding the incorporation of medications into the market were not so stringent then as they are today, and the efficacy and safety of SPS have been questioned. In recent years, two novel cation exchangers, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, have received (or are in the process of receiving) regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions globally, after scrutiny of carefully conducted trials regarding their short-term and mid-term efficacy. In this debate, we defend the view that all three agents are likely to have similar efficacy. Harms are much better understood for SPS than for newer agents, but currently there are no data to suggest that novel agents are safer than SPS. Drug choices need to consider costs, access and numbers-needed-to-treat to prevent clinically important events; for potassium exchangers, we need trials directly examining clinically important events.

Obicetrapib plus ezetimibe as an adjunct to high-intensity statin therapy: A randomized phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Obicetrapib, a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein particles, and apolipoproteins, when added to high-intensity statin in patients with dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and lipid-altering efficacy of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe combination therapy as an adjunct to high-intensity statin therapy.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial administered 10 mg obicetrapib plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 40), 10 mg obicetrapib (n = 39), or placebo (n = 40) for 12 weeks to patients with LDL-C >70 mg/dL and triglycerides (TG) <400 mg/dL, on stable high-intensity statin. Endpoints included concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein particles, and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9), safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were included in the primary analysis (mean age 62.6 years, 63.9% male, 84.5% white, average body mass index of 30.9 kg/m2). LDL-C decreased from baseline to week 12 by 63.4%, 43.5%, and 6.35% in combination, monotherapy, and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.0001 vs. placebo). LDL-C levels of <100, <70, and <55 mg/dL were achieved by 100%, 93.5%, and 87.1%, respectively, of patients taking the combination. Both active treatments also significantly reduced concentrations of non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and total and small LDL particles. Obicetrapib was well tolerated and no safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSION

The combination of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe significantly lowered atherogenic lipid and lipoprotein parameters, and was safe and well tolerated when administered on top of high-intensity statin to patients with elevated LDL-C.

Does low-density lipoprotein fully explain atherosclerotic risk in familial hypercholesterolemia?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic disorder of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth leading to increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, not all carriers of FH variants display an FH phenotype. Despite this fact, FH variants confer increased risk for atherosclerotic disease in population cohorts. An important question to consider is whether measurements of LDL-C can fully account for this risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

The atherosclerotic risk associated with FH variants is independent of observed adult LDL-C levels. Modeling adult longitudinal LDL-C accounts for more of this risk compared to using a single measurement. Still, even when adjusting for observed longitudinal LDL-C in adult cohorts, FH variant carriers are at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Genetic analyses, observational studies, and clinical trials all suggest that cumulative LDL-C is a critical driver of cardiovascular risk that may not be fully appreciated by routine LDL-C measurements in adulthood. As such, FH variants confer risk independent of adult LDL-C because these variants increase cumulative LDL-C exposure starting from birth.

SUMMARY

Both research and clinical practice focus on LDL-C measurements in adults, but measurements during adulthood do not reflect lifelong cumulative exposure to LDL-C. Genetic assessments may compliment clinical assessments by better identifying patients who have experienced greater longitudinal LDL-C exposure.

Association of Rare Protein-Truncating DNA Variants in APOB or PCSK9 With Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

Importance

Protein-truncating variants (PTVs) in apolipoprotein B (APOB) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) are associated with significantly lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations. The association of these PTVs with coronary heart disease (CHD) warrants further characterization in large, multiracial prospective cohort studies.

Objective

To evaluate the association of PTVs in APOB and PCSK9 with LDL cholesterol concentrations and CHD risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This studied included participants from 5 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) studies and the UK Biobank. NHLBI study participants aged 5 to 84 years were recruited between 1971 and 2002 across the US and underwent whole-genome sequencing. UK Biobank participants aged 40 to 69 years were recruited between 2006 and 2010 in the UK and underwent whole-exome sequencing. Data were analyzed from June 2021 to October 2022.

Exposures

PTVs in APOB and PCSK9.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Estimated untreated LDL cholesterol levels and CHD.

Results

Among 19 073 NHLBI participants (10 598 [55.6%] female; mean [SD] age, 52 [17] years), 139 (0.7%) carried an APOB or PCSK9 PTV, which was associated with 49 mg/dL (95% CI, 43-56) lower estimated untreated LDL cholesterol level. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 21.5 (13.9-29.4) years, incident CHD was observed in 12 of 139 carriers (8.6%) vs 3029 of 18 934 noncarriers (16.0%), corresponding to an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.89; P = .02). Among 190 464 UK Biobank participants (104 831 [55.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 57 [8] years), 662 (0.4%) carried a PTV, which was associated with 45 mg/dL (95% CI, 42-47) lower estimated untreated LDL cholesterol level. Estimated CHD risk by age 75 years was 3.7% (95% CI, 2.0-5.3) in carriers vs 7.0% (95% CI, 6.9-7.2) in noncarriers, corresponding to an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.32-0.81; P = .004).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among 209 537 individuals in this study, 0.4% carried an APOB or PCSK9 PTV that was associated with less exposure to LDL cholesterol and a 49% lower risk of CHD.

Coronary Artery Calcium Score to Refine the Use of PCSK9i in Asymptomatic Individuals: A Multicohort Study

Background

The value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the allocation of PCSK9i (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) among individuals without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is unknown for indications that do not require confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia. We aimed to assess the ability of CAC to stratify ASCVD risk under 3 non–familial hypercholesterolemia PCSK9i allocation paradigms.

Methods and Results

We included participants without clinically evident ASCVD from MESA (Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study, DHS (Dallas Heart Study), and HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study. Three PCSK9i eligibility scenarios were defined: a broad scenario informed only by high low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (N=567), a restrictive one combining higher low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and presence of ≥2 additional risk factors (N=127), and a high‐risk scenario where individuals with subclinical organ damage or high estimated risk would be treated to achieve low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <55 mg/dL (N=471). The high‐risk scenario had the highest ASCVD event rates (27.8% at 10 years). CAC=0 was observed in 35% participants in the broad scenario, 25% in the restrictive scenario, and 16% in the high‐risk scenario. In all, CAC=0 was associated with the lowest incident ASCVD rates at 5 and 10 years, and CAC burden was independently associated with ASCVD events adjusting for traditional risk factors.

Conclusions

CAC may be used to refine the allocation of PCSK9i, potentially leading to a more conservative use if CAC=0. The value of CAC testing is greater in scenarios that use low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and/or traditional risk factors to define PCSK9i eligibility (CAC=0 present in 1 of 3–4 patients), whereas its prevalence is lower when allocation is informed by presence of noncoronary subclinical organ damage.