Coronary artery bypass surgery with or without mitral valve annuloplasty in moderate functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: final results of the Randomized Ischemic Mitral Evaluation (RIME) trial

Practice Change in Surgical Treatment Strategies for Ischaemic Mitral Regurgitation and Late Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) results from dysfunctional myocardial remodelling, which portends a poor clinical prognosis. This study assessed the surgical treatment of IMR and its associations with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in the context of 2014 reports suggesting non-surgical management of non-severe IMR.

METHOD

Patients who underwent mitral valve (MV) procedures for IMR at Liverpool Hospital (Sydney, Australia) between 2008 and 2020 were included based on coronary disease and echocardiographic criteria. Data were obtained from patient records and linkage with the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Death Index. The primary outcome was the type of MV surgery performed in 2008-2014 and 2015-2020. Secondary outcomes were survival and freedom from combination of mortality and congestive heart failure (CHF) readmission, comparing MV repair and MV replacement and the outcomes for two periods by MV procedure.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients treated surgically for IMR, 78 had MV repair (59 in 2008-2014, 19 in 2015-2020) and 28 had MV replacement (14 in 2008-2014, 14 in 2015-2020). Patients were followed up for 7.2 years (interquartile range 5.2-9.1). Compared to 2008-2014, there was a reduced proportion of MV procedures for IMR (4.2% and 2.0%; p<0.001) and MV repair for IMR (80.8% and 57.6%; p=0.012) post-2014. Freedom from a combination of mortality and CHF readmission over 10 years was significantly better in the MV repair than in the MV replacement group (log rank p<0.001). Over 5 years, freedom from mortality and the combination of mortality and CHF readmission were similar in both periods (log rank p=0.675 and p=0.433). In the earlier period, freedom from combined outcome was better in the MV repair group than the MV replacement group (log rank p<0.001) but not different in the second period (log rank p=0.149). Mitral regurgitation recurrence was less in the later period (25.8% and 3.6%; p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of MV procedures and MV repairs performed for IMR declined significantly after 2014, indicating a significant change in practice towards conservative surgical correction of IMR. The combined long-term outcomes were unchanged after the change in practice, but the incidence of mitral regurgitation recurrence was significantly improved.

Mitral repair with annuloplasty for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in people undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of mitral repair with annuloplasty for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in people undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Predictive Value of Viable Myocardium of Papillary Muscle-Ventricular Wall Complex for Improvement in Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Background

Performing a mitral valve procedure during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with coronary artery disease complicated by moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the benefit of isolated CABG and to develop a new index of viable myocardium within the papillary muscle-ventricular wall complex (VM-PM-VWC) to predict the improvement of IMR by CABG alone.

Methods

In total, 122 patients (age, 62.34 ± 8.53 years; 78.70% male) with moderate IMR who underwent CABG alone at Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) to evaluate the VM-PM-VWC. Based on the postoperative echocardiography results at 1-year follow-up, patients were divided into IMR-unimproved (moderate or severe IMR, n = 38) and IMR-improved (no or mild IMR, n = 84) groups. Factors associated with improvement were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The VM-PM-VWC was an independent factor for moderate IMR improvement (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.24; P < 0.001). The cutoff value for moderate IMR improvement was 12.50%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 76.32% and 80.95%, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] 0.830; 95% CI, 0.741-0.919; P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 3.71 (interquartile range: 2.17-5.10) years, major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event-free survival was higher in the improved group than in the unimproved group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Most patients with moderate IMR improved from isolated CABG. The VM-PM-VWC was an independent predictor of IMR improvement, which could help surgical decision making.

Clinical Trial Registration

ChiCTR2100042454.

Concomitant interventions in mitral valve surgery - A European perspective

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, major findings on concomitant procedures and anticoagulation management have occurred in Mitral Valve (MV) surgery. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the current practices in MV interventions across Europe.

METHODS

In October 2021, all national cardio-thoracic societies in the European region were identified following an electronic search and sent an online survey of 14 questions to distribute among their member consultant/attending cardiac surgeons.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 91 consultant/attending cardiac surgeons across 12 European countries, with 78% indicating MV repair as their specialty area. 57.1% performed >150 operations/year and 71.4% had 10+ years of experience.Concomitant tricuspid valve repair is performed for moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) by 69% of surgeons and for mild TR by 26.3%, both with annular diameter >40 mm. 50.6% indicated ischaemic MV surgery in patients undergoing CABG if moderate mitral regurgitation with ERO >20 mm2 and regurgitant volume >30 mL, and 45.1% perform it if severe MR with ERO >40 mm2 and regurgitant volume >60 mL. For these patients the preferred management was: MVR if predictors of repair failure identified (47.2%) and downsizing annuloplasty ring only (34.1%).For atrial fibrillation (AF) in cardiac surgery, 34.1% perform ablation with biatrial lesion and 20% with left sided only. 62.6% perform concomitant Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion irrespective of AF ablation with a left atrial clip. A wide variability in anticoagulation strategies for MV repair and bioprosthetic MV valve was reported both for patients in sinus rhythm and AF.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a variable practice for MV surgery, and a degree of lack of compliance with surgical intervention guidelines and anticoagulation strategy.

Mitral valve replacement versus repair for severe mitral regurgitation in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Objective

This study compares early and long-term outcomes following mitral valve (MV) repair and replacement in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods

Patients with primary or secondary MR and LVEF <50% who underwent MV replacement or repair (with/without atrial septal defect closure and/or atrial fibrillation ablation) between 2005 and 2017 at our center were retrospectively analyzed using unadjusted and propensity score matching techniques (42 pairs).

Results

A total of 356 patients with either primary (n = 162 [45.5%]) or secondary MR (n = 194 [54.5%]) and LVEF <50% underwent MV repair (n = 293 [82.3%]) or replacement (n = 63 [17.7%]) during the study period. In-hospital mortality was 0.3% (repair) and 1.6% (replacement) in the unmatched cohort (P = .32); there were no in-hospital deaths after matching. Estimated survival was 72.8% (repair) versus 50.1% (replacement) at 8 years in the unmatched (P < .001), and 64.3% (repair) versus 50.7% (replacement) in the matched groups (P = .028). Eight-year cumulative incidence of reoperation was 7.0% and 11.6% in unmatched (P = .28), and 9.9% and 12.7% in matched (P = .69) repair and replacement groups, respectively. Markedly reduced LVEF (<40%) was among the independent predictors of long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P = .002). In secondary MR, MV repair showed an 8-year survival benefit over replacement (65.1% vs 44.6%; P = .002), with no difference in reoperation rate (11.6% [repair] vs 17.0% [replacement]; P = .11).

Conclusions

MV repair performed in primary or secondary MR and reduced LVEF provides superior long-term results compared with replacement. Severe LV dysfunction is a significant predictor of reduced survival following MV surgery.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Plus Mitral Valve Plasty May Not Provide More Advantage in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) and of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) plus mitral valve plasty (MVP) in treating coronary heart disease with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation to find a better surgical method.

METHODS

Clinical data of 822 patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into the OPCABG and CABG+MVP groups according to surgical methods. Baseline data of both groups were corrected, and clinical efficacy of the two surgical methods was analyzed and compared using the propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the use of mammary artery grafts, number of grafts, and blood product consumption between the two groups (P>0.05) after IPTW. However, the CABG+MVP group had a significantly longer operation time than the OPCABG group (4.13 ± 0.85 hours vs. 5.65 ± 1.02 hours, P<0.001). No statistically significant differences in postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were observed between the two groups. However, the intra-aortic balloon pump rate was higher in the CABG+MVP group than in the OPCABG group (12.3% vs. 25.0%, P=0.012). Although CABG+MVP can improve ischemic mitral regurgitation significantly (95.4% vs. 81.2%, P<0.001), there were no significant differences in the cumulative survival rate and the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the groups (P>0.05) after IPTW.

CONCLUSION

CABG+MVP may not provide more advantage in patients with coronary heart disease and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Best treatment option for secondary mitral regurgitation surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies

The objective of this study is to ascertain whether subvalvular papillary muscle repair in conjunction with restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty represents the most efficacious treatment for patients presenting with secondary ischemic mitral regurgitation, as compared to restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty alone and to mitral valve replacement. A network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate outcomes of randomized controlled trials, propensity-matched studies, and observational studies, comparing various treatments for secondary ischemic mitral regurgitation. The average follow-up duration for late mortality was 4.4 years. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without mitral valve surgery had a late mortality incidence of 3.7%. Restrictive mitral annuloplasty demonstrated a rate of 6.5%, while restrictive mitral annuloplasty + CABG resulted in a rate of 4.1%. Subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty ± CABG and mitral valve replacement + CABG had rates of 4.4% and 5.1%. SUCRA analysis showed that CABG was the most effective treatment for reducing late mortality (70.0%). This was followed by subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty with or without CABG (62.4%). The top strategy for decreasing early death, reoperation, and readmission to the hospital for heart failure is subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty with or without CABG, based on SUCRA probabilities (84.6%, 85.54%, and 86.3%, respectively). Subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty ± CABG has potential to reduce the risks associated with early mortality, reoperation, and re-hospitalization for heart failure. However, further research is required to substantiate these findings.

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapies: Do They Have a Role in Advanced Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction?

Transcatheter mitral valve repair should be considered for patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction for symptom improvement and survival benefit. Patients with a higher severity of secondary mitral regurgitation relative to the degree of left ventricular dilation are more likely to benefit from transcatheter mitral valve repair. A multidisciplinary Heart Team should participate in patient selection for transcatheter mitral valve therapy.

Management of secondary mitral regurgitation: from drugs to devices

Severe secondary mitral regurgitation carries a poor prognosis with one in five patients dying within 12 months of diagnosis. Fortunately, there are now a number of safe and effective therapies available to improve outcomes. Here, we summarise the most up-to-date treatments. Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is the mainstay therapy and has been shown to reduce the severity of mitral regurgitation in 40-45% of patients. Rapid medication titration protocols reduce heart failure hospitalisation and facilitate earlier referral for device therapy. The pursuit of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation has been shown to significantly reduce mitral regurgitation severity, as has the use of cardiac resynchronisation devices in patients who meet guideline-directed criteria. Finally, we highlight the key role of mitral valve intervention, particularly transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for management of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation in carefully selected patients with poor left ventricular systolic function, with a number needed to treat of 3.1 to reduce heart failure hospitalisation and 5.9 to reduce all-cause death. To slow the rapid accumulation of morbidity and mortality, we advocate a proactive approach with accelerated medical optimisation, followed by management of atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronisation therapy if indicated, then, rapid referral to the Heart Team for consideration of mitral valve intervention in patients with ongoing symptoms and at least moderate-severe mitral regurgitation. Mitral TEER has been shown to be 'reasonably cost-effective' (but not cost-saving) in the UK in selected patients, although TEER remains underused with only 6.5 procedures per million population (pmp) compared with Germany (77 pmp), Switzerland (44 pmp) and the USA (32 pmp).

Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in ischemic heart disease: to operate or not? A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deciding whether to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone or in combination with mitral valve repair is a common dilemma encountered by surgeons when treating patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation, a common condition related to coronary artery disease. Although ischemic mitral regurgitation after CABG has been linked to unfavorable results, the benefits of including mitral valve repair are still unknown. This discrepancy led us to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether combining CABG with mitral valve surgery leads to better clinical results than CABG alone.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Studies comparing the results of CABG versus CABG with mitral valve replacement were searched in the databases of PubMed and Google Scholar. There were six randomized clinical trials included in this study.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We analyzed 852 patients' data. There were no significant variations between patients who acquired CABG alone or CABG+(MVR) in terms of their risk of death at one year, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or hospitalization for heart failure. For recurrent/residual mitral regurgitation; it revealed an RR=5.42, 95% CI, 0.77 to 37.98, and a P value of =0.065. According to the analysis of study heterogeneity, no apparent heterogeneity was identified in the outcomes of death after one year, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or hospitalization for heart failure. However, the outcome of recurrent or residual mitral regurgitation showed significant variation (I2=66%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent CABG alone versus CABG plus MVR did not differ significantly from one another. However, the comparison of CABG alone with CABG plus MVR underlines the need for customized treatment plans based on the unique characteristics of each patient.

Efficacy of mitral valve repair in combination with coronary revascularization for moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of mitral valve repair (MVR) in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) remains unclear. To evaluate whether MVR + CABG is superior to CABG alone, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible RCTs from the date of their inception to October 2023. The primary outcomes were operative (in-hospital or within 30 days) and long-term (≥ 1 year) mortality. The secondary outcomes were postoperative stroke, worsening renal function (WRF), and reoperation for bleeding or tamponade. The authors performed random-effects meta-analyses and reported the results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Compared with CABG alone, MVR + CABG did not increase the risk of operative mortality (RR, 1.244; 95% CI, 0.514-3.014); however, it was also not associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality (RR, 0.676; 95% CI, 0.417-1.097). Meanwhile, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative stroke (RR, 2.425; 95% CI, 0.743-7.915), WRF (RR, 1.257; 95% CI, 0.533-2.964), and reoperation for bleeding or tamponade (RR, 1.667; 95% CI, 0.527-5.270).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that MVR + CABG fails to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with moderate IMR compared to CABG alone.

The high-risk features among patients undergoing mitral valve operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation: The 3-strike score

Objective

Ischemic mitral regurgitation is prevalent and associated with high surgical risk. With the less-invasive option of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, the optimal patient selection for mitral valve operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation remains unclear. We sought to identify high-risk features in this group to guide patient selection.

Methods

Using the Cardiothoracic Surgery Trial Network's severe ischemic mitral regurgitation trial data, we identified patient and echocardiographic characteristics associated with an increased risk of 2-year mortality using the support vector classifier and Cox proportional hazards model. We identified 6 high-risk features associated with 2-year survival. Patients were categorized into 3 groups, each having 1 or less, 2, or 3 or more of the 6 identified high-risk features.

Results

Among the 251 patients, the median age was 69 (Q1 62, Q3 75) years, and 96 (38%) were female. Two-year mortality was 21% (n = 53). We identified 6 high-risk preoperative features: age 75 years or more (n = 69, 28%), prior sternotomy (n = 49, 20%), renal insufficiency (n = 69, 28%), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 15, 6%), left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (n = 131, 52%), and ventricular end-systolic volume index less than 50 mL/m2 (n = 93, 37%). In patients who had 1 or less, 2, and 3 or more high-risk features, 90-day mortality was 4.2% (n = 5), 9.9% (n = 4), and 20.0% (n = 10), respectively (P = .006), and 2-year mortality was 10% (n = 12), 22% (n = 18), and 46% (n = 23) (P < .001), respectively.

Conclusions

We developed the 3-strike score by identifying high-risk preoperative features for mitral valve surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Patients having 3 or more of such high-risk features should undergo careful evaluation for surgical candidacy given the high early and late mortality after mitral valve operations.

Mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using a mosaic porcine bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve repair

This study retrospectively evaluated the mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using a stented porcine aortic valve bioprosthesis (Mosaic; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with concomitant mitral valve (MV) repair. From 1999 to 2014, 157 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 75 [70-79] years; 47% women) underwent SAVR with concomitant MV repair (SAVR + MV repair), and 1045 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 76 [70-80] years; 54% women) underwent SAVR only at 10 centers in Japan as part of the long-term multicenter Japan Mosaic valve (J-MOVE) study. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81.5% ± 4.1% in the SAVR + MV repair group and 85.1% ± 1.4% in the SAVR only group, and the 8-year overall survival rates were 75.2% ± 5.7% and 78.1% ± 2.1%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.576). Among women with mild or moderate mitral regurgitation who were not receiving dialysis, those who underwent SAVR + MV repair, were aged > 75 years, and had a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 30-75% tended to have a lower mortality risk. In conclusion, this subgroup analysis of the J-MOVE cohort showed relevant mid-term outcomes after SAVR + MV repair.

Should moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting? a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased risks of mortality and heart failure. However, the optimal management of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to appraise whether moderate IMR should be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 15 October 2022 for studies that assessed CABG alone versus CABG with mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with moderate IMR. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with propensity-matched data including 1209 patients assessing CABG alone (n = 598) versus CABG with MV surgery (n = 611) were included. Compared to CABG alone, the addition of MV surgery did not significantly increase perioperative mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.52-1.96; p = 0.98) and stroke (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 0.97-4.72; p = 0.06), whereas a longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (MD, 54.91; 95% CI, 42.13-67.68; p < 0.01) and an increased incidence of renal failure were observed in the combined-procedure group. At follow-up, the addition of MV surgery was significantly associated with reduced rates of residual MR (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.51; p < 0.01) and NYHA class III-IV (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in either mid-term mortality (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-1.70; p = 0.82) or late mortality (RR, 91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.71; p = 0.78) between the CABG alone group and the combined-procedure group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate IMR, the addition of MV surgery to CABG did not increase perioperative mortality. Despite the reduced rates of moderate MR and NYHA class III-IV at follow-up, the addition of MV surgery did not translate in a reduction in mid-term or late mortality.

Restrictive annuloplasty on remodeling and survival in patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the influence of concomitant restrictive mitral annuloplasty (RMA) on postoperative left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

This study comprised 157 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction ≤40%) who underwent CABG and completed echocardiographic examination at 1 year after surgery, with 84 (54%) undergoing concomitant RMA for clinically relevant ischemic mitral regurgitation. The primary end point was postoperative reduction in LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI). The secondary end point was overall survival. Median follow-up was 5.1 years.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients who underwent CABG with RMA had a larger LVESVI (83 ± 23 vs 75 ± 24 mm; P = .046). One-year postoperatively, CABG with RMA reduced the LVESVI more than did CABG alone (37% vs 21% from baseline; P < .001), yielding nearly identical postoperative LVESVI (53 ± 27 vs 61 ± 26 mm; P = .065). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, concomitant RMA was associated with significant LV reverse remodeling (odds ratio, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.34-5.78; P = .006). The prevalence in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation was not different between the groups (7% vs 10%; P = .58). Survival rates were similar between the groups (5 years, 78% vs 83%; P = .35).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing CABG, concomitant RMA was associated with significant reduction in LVESVI. The influence of LV reverse remodeling on survival remains undetermined.

Does Sustained Reduction of Functional Mitral Regurgitation Impact Survival?

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with increased mortality and has been considered a marker for advanced heart disease, yet the value of mitral valve repair (MVr) in this population remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the impact of reducing FMR burden through surgical MVr on survival. Patients with severe FMR who underwent MVr with an undersized, complete, rigid, annuloplasty between 2004 and 2017 were assessed (n = 201). Patients were categorized based on grade of recurrent FMR (0-4). Time-to-event Kaplan-Meier estimations of freedom from death or reoperation were performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated all-cause mortality and reported in hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Patients were categorized by postoperative recurrent FMR: 45% (91/201) of patients had grade 0, 29% (58/201) grade 1, 20% (40/201) grade 2, 2% (4/201) grade 3%, and 4% (8/201) grade 4. The cumulative incidence of reoperation with death as a competing risk was higher in patients with grades ≥3 recurrent FMR compared to grades ≤2 (44.6% vs 14.6%, subhazard ratio 3.69 [95% CI, 1.17-11.6]; P = 0.026). Overall freedom from death or reoperation was superior for recurrent FMR grades ≤2 compared to grades ≥3 (log-rank P < 0.001). Increasing recurrent FMR grade was independently associated with mortality (HR 1.30 [95% CI, 1.07-1.59] P = 0.009). Reduced postoperative FMR grade resulted in an incrementally lower risk of death or reoperation after MVr. These results suggest that achieving a durable reduction in FMR burden improves long-term survival.

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapies: Do They Have a Role in Advanced Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction?

Transcatheter mitral valve repair should be considered for patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction for symptom improvement and survival benefit. Patients with a higher severity of secondary mitral regurgitation relative to the degree of left ventricular dilation are more likely to benefit from transcatheter mitral valve repair. A multidisciplinary Heart Team should participate in patient selection for transcatheter mitral valve therapy.

Late outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting with or without mitral repair for moderate or moderate-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Operative indication of the additional mitral repair for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still unclear.

METHODS

This study was designed as the nation-wide multi-center retrospective analysis with additional survival data. CABGs without past heart surgery registered in 2014 and 2015 were included. Concomitant surgery other than tricuspid or arrhythmia surgery, mitral replacement, and off-pump cases, was excluded. Grade 1 or 4 MR, and ejection fraction < 20 or > 50 were excluded. Additional questionnaire was sent to each hospital, regarding the pathology of MR and clinical outcomes. Additional data were registered between May 28, 2021 and Dec 31, 2021, and the primary outcomes were all-death and cardiac death. The secondary outcomes were heart failure and cerebrovascular event requiring admission, mitral re-intervention. Patients underwent on-pump CABG (CABG only group 221 cases) and CABG with mitral repair (CABG + Mitral repair group 276 cases) were enrolled.

RESULTS

After Propensity score matching, 362 cases (CABG only 181cases vs CABG + mitral repair 181 cases) were matched. Cox regression model showed no statistical difference in the long-term survival between CABG alone group and combined procedure group (p = 0.52). Cardiac death (p = 1.00), heart failure (p = 0.68), and cerebrovascular event (p - 0.80) requiring admission were not different between groups as well. The incidence of mitral re-intervention was very few (2 cases in CABG only group, 4 cases in CABG + mitral repair group).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate ischemic MR, additional mitral repair to CABG did not improve long-term survival, freedom from heart failure, or cerebrovascular event.

Effect of concurrent mitral valve surgery for secondary mitral regurgitation upon mortality after aortic valve replacement or coronary artery bypass surgery

Objectives

It is uncertain whether concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement for moderate or greater secondary mitral regurgitation at the time of coronary artery bypass graft or aortic valve replacement surgery improves long-term survival.

Methods

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or aortic valve replacement surgery with moderate or greater secondary mitral regurgitation were reviewed. The effect of concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement upon long-term mortality was assessed while accounting for patient and operative characteristics and mitral regurgitation severity.

Results

Of 1,515 patients, 938 underwent coronary artery bypass graft or aortic valve replacement surgery alone and 577 underwent concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement. Concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement did not alter the risk of postoperative mortality for patients with moderate mitral regurgitation (hazard ratio = 0.93; 0.75-1.17) or more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation (hazard ratio = 1.09; 0.74-1.60) in multivariable regression. Patients with more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass graft-only surgery had a survival advantage from concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement in the first two postoperative years (P = 0.028) that did not persist beyond that time. Patients who underwent concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement had a higher rate of later mitral valve operation or reoperation over the five subsequent years (1.9% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.0014) than those who did not.

Conclusions

These observations suggest that mitral valve repair or replacement for more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting may be reasonable in a suitably selected coronary artery bypass graft population but not for aortic valve replacement, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting. Our findings are supportive of 2021 European guidelines that severe secondary mitral regurgitation "should" or be "reasonabl[y]" intervened upon at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting but do not support 2020 American guidelines for performing mitral valve repair or replacement concurrent with aortic valve replacement, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting.

Mitral Interventions in Heart Failure

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who have secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) have poorer outcomes and quality of life than those without SMR. Guideline-directed medical therapy is the cornerstone of SMR treatment. Careful evaluation of landmark trials using mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in SMR has led to an improved understanding of who will benefit from percutaneous interventions with emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach. The success with mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in SMR has also spurred the evaluation of its role in populations that were not initially studied, such as end-stage heart failure and cardiogenic shock. A spectrum of transcatheter devices in development and clinical trials promise to further provide a growing array of management options for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with symptomatic SMR.

Mitral Regurgitation in Female Patients: Sex Differences and Disparities

Mitral regurgitation is the most common valvular disease, particularly in older adults. Recent literature has consistently supported that there are significant differences in mitral regurgitation outcomes between male and female patients and that this is likely multifactorial. Numerous sex differences in anatomy and pathophysiology may play a role in delayed diagnoses, referrals, and treatments for female patients. Despite the recognition of these discrepancies in the literature, many guidelines that steer clinical care do not incorporate these factors into society recommendations. Identifying and validating sex-specific diagnostic parameters and increasing the representation of female patients in trials of new mitral regurgitation treatment modalities are key factors in improving outcomes for female patients.

Surgical versus transcatheter repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: A propensity score-matched cohorts comparison

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr) and surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) among patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with SMR treated using either TMVr (n = 199) or SMVr (n = 222) at 2 centers were included and retrospectively analyzed. To account for differences in patient demographic characteristics, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause death within 2 years after the procedure.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 202 matched patients. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 24.3% for TMVr and 23.0% for SMVr (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.71; P = .909). Severe heart failure symptoms at 2 years were less prevalent after SMVr (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV: 13.5% vs 29.5%; P = .032) than after TMVr. A higher proportion of the SMVr patients had SMR reduction to none or mild at discharge (90.8% vs 72.0%; P < .001) and 2 years (86.5% vs 59.6%; P < .001). Among patients who achieved none or mild MR at discharge, 7 patients (10.1%) in the SMVr group and 15 (34.9%) in the TMVr group had progression to moderate or greater MR at 2 years (P = .003). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly improved (+10.1% ± 11.1%; P < .001) after SMVr (LVEF at 2 years: 45.7% ± 12.8%), whereas it remained unchanged (-1.3% ± 8.9%; P = .260) after TMVr (LVEF at 2 years: 34.0% ± 13.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity score-matched analysis, there was no significant difference in 2-year survival between TMVr and SMVr, despite greater and more durable SMR reduction, as well as LVEF improvement in the surgical group.

Structural Interventions in Heart Failure: Mending a Broken Heart

Advanced heart failure is often accompanied by perturbations in cardiac chamber or valve geometries which result in worsening cardiac function and hemodynamics. Once limited to surgical procedures, recent developments in minimally invasive percutaneous techniques have demonstrated efficacy in patients with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction who are at an elevated surgical risk for perioperative events. This review highlights a subset of the interventions available in clinical practice or in development for the treatment of these valvular and structural alterations.

Outcome of Surgery for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Depends on the Type and Timing of the Coronary Revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Long-term outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair versus MV replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing either prior (PCR) or concomitant coronary revascularization (CCR) by surgery (CABG) or intervention (PCI) are uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 446 patients receiving MV surgery for IMR between July 2006 and December 2010, 125 patients-87 CCR (69.1%) and 38 PCR (30.9%)-were eligible for inclusion in the study. Survival was higher in CCR versus PCR at long-term follow-up (78.83% vs. 57.9%, p = 0.016). The incidence of MACCE was lower in the CCR compared to PCR at both hospital discharge (34.11% vs. 63.57%, p = 0.003) and at follow-up (34.11% vs. 65.79%, p = 0.0008). Patients receiving CABG or CABG with PCI in PCR had higher mortality risks after MV surgery than CCR patients (X2 = 6.029, p = 0.014 and X2 = 6.466, p = 0.011, respectively). Whereas in the PCR group, MV repair and MV replacement achieved similar survival probability (X2 = 1.551, p = 0.213), MV repair in the CCR group led to improved survival compared to MV replacement (X2 = 3.921, p = 0.048). In MV replacement, LAD-CABG improved survival compared to LAD-PCI (U = 15,000.00, Z = -2.373 p = 0.018), and a substantial impact of arterial IMA-LAD grafting was revealed in the Cox-regression analysis (HR 0.334, CI: 0.113-0.989, p = 0.048) as opposed to venous-LAD grafting (HR 0.588, CI: 0.166-2.078, p = 0.410).

CONCLUSION

Early treatment of IMR concomitant to coronary revascularization enhances long-term survival compared to delayed MV surgery after PCR. MV repair is not superior to MV replacement when performed late after coronary revascularization; however, MV repair leads to better survival than MV replacement when performed concomitantly with CABG with arterial LAD revascularization.

Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Combined With Mitral Valve Repair Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Alone in Patients With Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes between those who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone and CABG with mitral valve repair (MVR) in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. The present study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors performed a comprehensive search of international databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant studies published from inception to March 1, 2023. The search was performed again before the submission of the manuscript on March 20, 2023. Primary outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included early mortality and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) score from baseline, change in ejection fraction (EF) from baseline (%), and major cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 13 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Out of 13 included studies, four were randomized control trials (RCTs) and nine were retrospective cohort studies. The pooled analysis showed that early mortality was significantly lower in patients in the CABG group compared to the CABG+MVR group (risk ratio [RR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.70). Long-term mortality was also lower in patients who underwent CABG compared to patients in the CABG+MVR group. However, the difference was statistically insignificant (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.02). No significant differences were reported in the EF score between patients who underwent CABG and patients who underwent CABG plus MVR (mean difference [MD]: 0.40, 95% CI: -1.90, 2.69). NYHA score was significantly lower in patients in the CABG+repair group compared to the CABG alone group (MD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.72). In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that concomitant MVR during CABG may not improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate this intervention in more detail.

Predictors of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Effect of Concomitant Mitral Repair

Background Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) or functional MR intensity with or without repair increases the risk of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and if the contaminant is undertaken, it doubles the risk of the surgery. This study aimed to characterize patients with concomitant CABG and mitral valve repair (MVR) and assess the surgical and long-term outcomes. Methods We conducted a cohort study from 2014 to 2020 on 364 patients who underwent CABG. A total of 364 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group I (n= 349) included patients with isolated CABG, and Group II included patients who underwent CABG with concomitant mitral valve repair (MVR) (n= 15). Results Regarding preoperative presentation, most patients were male: 289 (79.40%), hypertensive 306 (84.07%), diabetic 281 (77.20%), dyslipidemic 246 (67.58%), presenting with NYHA classes III-IV: 200 (54.95%), and upon angiography, found to have the three-vessel disease: 265 (73%). Regarding their age mean± SD and Log EuroSCORE median (Q1-Q3), they had a mean age of 60.94± 10.60 years and a median score of 1.87 (1.13-3.19). The most prevalent postoperative complications were low cardiac output 75 (20.66%), acute kidney injury (AKI) 63 (17.45%), respiratory complications 55 (15.32%), and atrial fibrillation (AF) 55 (15.15%). Regarding long-term outcomes, most patients reported class I NYHA 271 (83.13%) and an echocardiographic decrease in MR severity. Patients with a CABG + MVR were significantly younger (53.93± 15.02 vs. 61.24± 10.29 years; P= 0.009), had a lower ejection fraction (33.6 [25-50] vs. 50 [43-55] %; p= 0.032), and had a higher prevalence of LV dilation (32 [9.17%]). EuroSCORE was significantly higher in patients with mitral repair (3.59 [1.54-8.63] vs. 1.78 (1.13-3.11); P= 0.022). The mortality percentage was higher with MVR but did not attain statistical significance. Intraoperative CPB and ischemic durations were longer in the CABG + MVR group. Furthermore, neurological complications were higher in patients with mitral repair (4 (28.57%) vs. 30 (8.65%), P= 0.012). The study's follow-up duration median was 24 (9-36) months. The composite endpoint occurred more frequently in older patients (HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.02-1.09]; 0.001), patients with low ejection fraction (HR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.93-0.99]; P= 0.006) and in patients with preoperative myocardial infarction (MI) (HR: 2.3 [95%: 1.14- 4.68]; P= 0.021). Conclusion Most IMR patients benefited from CABG and CABG + MVR, as evident by NYHA class and echocardiographic follow-up. CABG + MVR had a higher Log EuroSCORE risk with increased intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and ischemic durations, which may have played a role in increasing the incidence of postoperative neurological complications. On follow-up, no differences were reported between the two groups. However, age, ejection fraction, and a history of preoperative MI were identified as factors affecting the composite endpoint.

Comparative study of coronary artery bypass grafting combined with off-pump mitral valvuloplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting alone in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation

INTRODUCTION

Whether mitral surgery should be performed simultaneously with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (MIMR) is controversial. This study was performed to introduce a method of off-pump mitral valvuloplasty after off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and compare it with OPCABG alone.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients with MIMR underwent OPCABG. Among them, 21 patients (Group A) underwent posterior mitral annuloplasty without cardiopulmonary bypass, and 62 patients (Group B) underwent OPCABG alone. The primary endpoint of follow-up was the mitral regurgitation area.

RESULTS

The mean mitral regurgitant area in Group A and B was 6.42 ± 1.02 and 5.49 ± 1.24 cm² preoperatively (p = .479), 2.93 ± 1.35 and 3.28 ± 1.93 cm² at 1 week postoperatively (p = .516), 3.06 ± 2.16 and 3.09 ± 1.85 cm² at 3 months postoperatively (p = .839), and 3.02 ± 1.60 and 3.7 cm² (median) at 1 year postoperatively (p = .043). There was less regurgitation in Group A at the mid-term. Intragroup comparison showed significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative values in both groups, with no difference in the regurgitant area at each postoperative time point in Group A but a significant difference between 3 months and 1 year postoperatively in Group B (p = .042). Multiple linear regression showed that the mid-term mitral regurgitant area changes were negatively correlated with graft flow and positively correlated with age.

CONCLUSION

In patients with MIMR who underwent OPCABG plus off-pump mitral valve annuloplasty, the mitral regurgitant area was smaller and mitral regurgitation recurrence was less frequent at the mid-term follow-up.

Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery Versus No Intervention in Patients with Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score Analysis

Objectives

Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with worse long-term outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of mitral valve repair with CABG in patients with moderate IMR.

Materials

This observational study enrolled 3,215 consecutive patients from the Juntendo CABG registry with moderate IMR and multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent CABG between 2002 and 2017.

Methods

The CABG alone and CABG with mitral valve surgery (MVs) groups were compared. The propensity score was calculated for each patient. Long-term all-cause death, cardiac death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were compared.

Results

Our database had 101 patients who underwent CABG with moderate IMR. Propensity score matching selected 40 pairs for final analysis. MVs was associated with increased risks of postoperative atrial fibrillation, blood transfusion, and longer hospitalization. Long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and the incidence of MACCEs were similar.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of moderate IMR combined with CABG was related to increased risk of several non-fatal short-term complications when compared to CABG alone, with similar long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of MVs in patients with moderate IMR and severe coronary artery disease.

Contemporary Management of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation at Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines for the treatment of moderate or severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have changed. This study assessed the real-world impact of changing guidelines on the management of IMR during CABG over time. We hypothesized that the utilization of mitral valve repair for IMR would decrease over time, whereas mitral valve replacement for severe IMR would increase.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CABG in a statewide collaborative database (2011-2020) were stratified by severity of IMR. Trends in mitral valve repair or replacement were evaluated. To account for differences of the patients, propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare patients with and without mitral intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 11,676 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1355 (11.6%) with moderate IMR and 390 (3.3%) with severe IMR. The proportion of patients undergoing mitral intervention for moderate IMR decreased over time (2011, 17.7%; 2020, 7.5%; P_trend = .001), whereas mitral replacement for severe IMR remained stable (2011, 11.1%; 2020, 13.3%; P_trend = .14). Major morbidity was higher for patients with moderate IMR who underwent mitral intervention (29.1% vs 19.9%; P = .005). In a propensity analysis of 249 well-matched pairs, there was no difference in major morbidity (29.3% with mitral intervention vs 23.7% without; P = .16) or operative mortality (1.2% vs 2.4%; P = .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with recent guideline updates, patients with moderate IMR were less likely to undergo mitral repair. However, the rate of replacement for severe IMR did not change. Mitral intervention during CABG did not increase operative mortality or morbidity.

Isolated OPCABG in moderate chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: is it a justifiable alternative approach ?

OBJECTIVE

Current evidence does not allow a consensus on the management of moderate chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR). We compared moderate CIMR patients undergoing off-pump CABG (OPCABG) alone and CABG + MV repair for early mortality, major adverse systemic events (MASE) and mid-term functional outcomes.

METHODS

210 patients with moderate CIMR who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) Group I (n = 106) or CABG + mitral valve repair (MV rep) Group II (n = 104) were followed prospectively. For comparison, patients were further sub-divided based on the product of regurgitant fraction and ejection fraction "RFEF"(Good/Bad) and MR jet direction (Central/Eccentric). The primary end point of the study was mortality and secondary end points were MASE, percentage improvements in indexed left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESVI %), MR grade and functional outcomes of the patients.

RESULTS

In-hospital and overall mortality was significantly lower in Group I (1.89% vs. 13.46%, p < 0.001 and 5.66% vs. 15.38%; p = 0.024 respectively). Group II had significantly higher MASE, ventilation time, mean ICU and hospital stay. At 36 months, LVESVI% (17.56% ± 9.12% vs. 18.81% ± 7.48%; p = 0.279), MR grade improvement (80.18% vs. 83.50%; p = 0.544), NYHA class and MLHF scores were also similar in both groups. On subgroup analysis, Good RFEF with Central jet subgroup had comparable improvement in LVESVI% and MR grade with either procedure, while Bad Eccentric subgroup showed a significantly higher improvement in LVESVI% and MR grade with CABG + MV repair.

CONCLUSION

OPCABG is associated with significantly reduced mortality and MASE with comparable improvement in LVEDVI% and MR grade. CABG + MV Rep results in significant improvement in LVEDVI% and MR grade in patients with bad eccentric MR. The recommended procedures in the "Good Central" and "Bad Eccentric" subsets are CABG and CABG + Mvrepair, respectively.

Effect of left ventricular hyperenhancement in magnetic resonance imaging on reverse remodeling after mitral valve repair for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation

We aimed to investigate cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived predictors of a lack of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after undersized mitral annuloplasty (uMAP) for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients who underwent uMAP for moderate IMR and cardiac MRI evaluation between 2004 and 2017. Cardiac MRI evaluation included cine MRI LV and right ventricular volumetric measurements and gadolinium-enhanced MRI assessment of myocardial scarring. LV dimensions were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at follow-up using serial transthoracic echocardiography, and the mid-term (median, 49 months) predictors of a lack of LV reverse remodeling were analyzed. At the mid-term follow-up (mean follow-up period: 85 ± 40 months), 15 patients exhibited reverse LV remodeling. The relative reduction in LV dimension at follow-up was negatively correlated with the preoperative number of LV segments with myocardial infarction (MI) (defined as an LV segment with >25% enhancement). The optimal cut-off for predicting a lack of reverse LV remodeling at follow-up was >5 LV segments with MI, with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 92%, respectively. This cut-off value also predicted all-cause mortality at follow-up, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 67%, respectively. The presence of >5 LV segments with MI on gadolinium-enhanced MRI might be a useful predictor of lack of reverse LV remodeling and all-cause mortality outcomes after undersized mitral annuloplasty for moderate IMR.

Treatment options for ischemic mitral regurgitation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is in evolution, as percutaneous procedures and complex surgical repair have been recently investigated in randomized clinical trials and matched studies. This study aims to review and compare the current treatment options for IMR.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. The primary outcome was all-cause long-term mortality. The secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality, unplanned rehospitalization, reoperation, and composite end points as defined in the original articles.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. The MitraClip procedure did not confer a significant benefit in mortality and repeated hospitalization compared with medical therapy alone. In patients with moderate IMR, the adjunct of mitral procedure over coronary artery bypass graft is not associated with clinical improvements. When evaluating mitral valve (MV) replacement versus repair, hospital mortality was greater among patients undergoing replacement (odds ratio [OR], 1.91; P = .009), but both reoperation and readmission rates were lower (OR, 0.60, P = .05; and OR, 0.45, P < .02, respectively). Comparing restrictive annuloplasty alone with adjunctive subvalvular repair, subvalvular procedures resulted in fewer readmissions (OR, 0.50; P = .06) and adverse composite end points (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip procedure is not associated with improved outcomes compared with medical therapy. MV replacement is associated with increased early mortality but reduced reoperation rate and readmission rate compared with MV repair using annuloplasty in moderate-to-severe IMR. Despite no significant benefit in isolated outcomes comparing annular and adjunct subvalvular procedures, the adjunct of subvalvular procedures reduces the risk of major postoperative adverse events.

Adjunctive Techniques for Repair of Ischaemic Mitral Regurgitation

Ischaemic mitral regurgitation is a complex process with debate in the literature as to the optimal treatment pathway. Multiple therapies are available to alleviate mitral regurgitation including medical management, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement. Medical management with goal-directed therapy should be utilised in patients with heart failure and mild-to-moderate regurgitation. Transcatheter approaches are typically used in patients with prohibitive operative risk, although their use is expanding, especially in those with functional mitral regurgitation who are not responding to goal-directed medical therapy. It is generally accepted that patients with mild-to-moderate disease can avoid valve intervention if successful revascularisation is performed. A higher consideration should be given to valve replacement over repair in patients with severe mitral regurgitation in the setting of myocardial ischaemia. Operative course must be personalised to each patient, and continues to develop with improving technologies and ongoing research into optimal treatment.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in low ejection fraction: state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the number of patients with reduced ejection fraction secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) increases, coronary artery bypass grafting is being used with increasing frequency. In this review, we summarize the different operative considerations in this vulnerable patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preoperative optimization with mechanical circulatory support devices, especially in the setting of hemodynamic instability, can reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. The advantage of advanced techniques, such as off-pump CABG and multiple arterial grafting remains unclear. Concomitant procedures, such as ablation for atrial fibrillation remain important considerations that should be tailored to the individual patients risk profile.

SUMMARY

Despite improvements in perioperative care of patients undergoing CABG, patients with a reduced ejection fraction remain at elevated risk of major morbidity and mortality. Preoperative optimization and careful selection of intraoperative techniques can lead to improved outcomes.

Nomogram Predicts Improvement of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Developing a nomogram to predict improvement in moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is in need.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2018, data were retrospectively collected from 112 patients with prior myocardial infarction and moderate IMR undergoing CABG. Patients were divided into two groups based on IMR degree 1 year after CABG as follows: Improved Group with no or mild IMR (n=54) and Failure Group with moderate or severe IMR (n=58). To determine the predictors of postoperative IMR improvement, preoperative clinical and echocardiographic data were compared, and a nomogram was formulated based on all independent predictors. Discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the prediction model were assessed.

RESULTS

Independent predictors of IMR improvement after CABG constructing the nomogram included duration between infarction and operation, poster-inferior to left ventricular volume ratio, maximum difference of the time to reach minimum systolic volume of 16 segments, P3 leaflet tethering angle, and annular Non-planar angle. The nomogram exhibited well-fitted calibration curves and excellent discriminative ability. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.974. Patients with a score > 236 demonstrated a high probability of IMR improvement (sensitivity, 90.7%; specificity, 93.1%). Patients in the Improved Group demonstrated greater actuarial survival rates than those in the Failure Group.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram combining 5 preoperative clinical and echocardiographic predictors provides an accurate preoperative estimation of moderate IMR improvement after surgery, with excellent discriminative ability. Based on this nomogram, patients with a higher score predict higher probabilities of IMR improvement.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic and mitral bioprosthesis: Current state and future perspectives

The use of bioprosthetic valves for treating patients with severe valve disease has increased over the last 2 decades, and, as a consequence, a growing number of patients with failing surgical bioprosthesis is expected in the near future. In this setting, valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic/mitral valve replacement (TAVR and TMVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo surgery. Despite the increasing experience in ViV procedures, the development of these techniques faces several specific challenges, mainly related to the unique anatomical and physiological characteristics presented in ViV-TAVR/TMVR. Subsequently, various approaches have been proposed to overcome ViV-related complications and pitfalls. A growing body of evidence is currently available concerning early- and long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ViV-TAVR/TMVR. These data should be comprehensively evaluated by the Heart Team in the decision-making process involving patients with failing surgical bioprostheses. In this review, we aimed to delineate the technical challenges and risks associated with ViV-TAVR and ViV-TMVR, provide an updated overview of the main clinical results, and summarize the future perspectives of this evolving field.

The association between myocardial scar and the response of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation to isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

Background

The factors that associated with the response of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) to isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether left ventricular (LV) myocardial scar assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is associated with the outcome of moderate IMR after isolated CABG.

Methods

Forty-six patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and moderate IMR who underwent isolated CABG between January 2014 and February 2019 in Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were enrolled in this case-control study. All patients underwent CMR and echocardiography before surgery. Patients were classified into two groups according to the severity of IMR 1 year after CABG: an improved group (no or mild IMR) and an unimproved group (moderate or severe IMR). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between individual variables and unimproved IMR at 1-year post-CABG.

Results

Compared to patients in the improved group, the patients in the unimproved group had a significantly greater amount of LV myocardial scar (18.0%±9.5% vs. 30.8%±11.2%, P<0.001). In the multiple logistic regression model, after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index, only LV myocardial scar (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.96, P=0.001) was independently associated with unimproved IMR after isolated CABG. Furthermore, there was no difference in the 3-year overall survival rates between the two groups (92.3% vs. 90.3%, P=0.46). In addition, patients in the unimproved group had a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (P=0.01) and more major adverse cardiac events such as MI, angina pectoris, and readmission for heart failure (P=0.03).

Conclusions

A greater amount of preoperative LV myocardial scar was associated with unimproved moderate IMR after isolated CABG. Measuring preoperative LV myocardial scar is helpful to predict post-operative outcome and determine optimal surgery in patients with moderate IMR.

Clinical Outcomes Following Durable Mitral Valve Repair for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the incidence and determinants of postoperative adverse events in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who achieved long-term durable mitral valve repair.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2015, 166 patients with chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40% underwent restrictive mitral annuloplasty. During follow-up (65±34 months), echocardiographic assessments were performed 809 times (mean, 4.9±2.4 times) and 20 patients who had developed postoperative recurrent MR (≥moderate) were excluded. Finally, 146 patients (68±9 years) whose MR was well controlled over time were included.

RESULTS

A total of 61 mortalities and/or 27 readmissions for heart failure were observed in 76 patients (52%). Among hospital survivors, age (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.05; P=0.001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61; P=0.001) were identified as independent predictors of long-term mortality and/or readmission for heart failure. The degree of LV function recovery after surgery was comparable between patients with and without adverse events. However, the former group showed greater values for systolic pulmonary artery pressure, tricuspid regurgitation severity, inferior vena cava dimension, and plasma brain natriuretic peptide level throughout the follow-up period (group effect p<0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 50% of patients died or were hospitalized for heart failure even in the absence of recurrent mitral regurgitation during the 5-year follow-up, indicating that durable mitral repair does not always lead to favorable clinical outcomes. The adverse events might be related to volume overload secondary to impaired renal function and less favorable pulmonary hemodynamics.

Left ventricle restoration. Keep the door open

Surgical left ventricle restoration (SVR) was first by Cooley in 1958 with the "linear suture technique," and three decades later, Dor used a circular patch to reconstruct the left ventricle excluding the scarred parts of the septum and ventricular wall. It gained popularity and eventually almost abandoned after the contrasting literature evidence. Hassanabad et al. presented a comprehensive review of current literature on SVR techniques and clinical outcomes, trying to understand if SVR has still a substantial role in the modern medicine.

Conservative, surgical, and percutaneous treatment for mitral regurgitation shortly after acute myocardial infarction

AIMS 

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with high mortality rates and has inconclusive recommendations in clinical guidelines. We aimed to report the international experience of patients with secondary MR following acute MI and compare the outcomes of those treated conservatively, surgically, and percutaneously.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

Retrospective international registry of consecutive patients with at least moderate-to-severe MR following MI treated in 21 centres in North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The registry included patients treated conservatively and those having surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) or percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using edge-to-edge repair. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. A total of 471 patients were included (43% female, age 73 ± 11 years): 205 underwent interventions, of whom 106 were SMVR and 99 PMVR. Patients who underwent mitral valve intervention were in a worse clinical state (Killip class ≥3 in 60% vs. 43%, P < 0.01), but yet had lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality compared with those treated conservatively [11% vs. 27%, P < 0.01 and 16% vs. 35%, P < 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.46, P < 0.01]. Surgical mitral valve repair or replacement was performed earlier than PMVR [median of 12 days from MI date (interquartile range 5-19) vs. 19 days (10-40), P < 0.01]. The immediate procedural success did not differ between SMVR and PMVR (92% vs. 93%, P = 0.53). However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher in SMVR than in PMVR (16% vs. 6%, P = 0.03 and 31% vs. 17%, P = 0.04; adjusted HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.55-9.07, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS 

Early intervention may mitigate the poor prognosis associated with conservative therapy in patients with post-MI MR. Percutaneous mitral valve repair can serve as an alternative for surgery in reducing MR for high-risk patients.

Joint preoperative transthoracic and intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiographic assessment of functional mitral regurgitation severity provides better association with long-term mortality

OBJECTIVES

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is observed with ischaemic heart disease or aortic valve disease. Assessing the value of mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR/P) is complicated by frequent discordance between preoperative transthoracic echocardiographic (pTTE) and intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiographic (iTOE) assessment of MR severity. We examined the association of pTTE and iTOE with postoperative mortality in patients with or without MR, at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or aortic valve replacement without MVR/P.

METHODS

Medical records of 6629 patients undergoing CABG and/or aortic valve replacement surgery with or without functional MR and who did not undergo MVR/P were reviewed. MR severity assessed by pTTE and iTOE were examined for association with postoperative mortality using proportional hazards regression while accounting for patient and operative characteristics.

RESULTS

In 72% of 709 patients with clinically significant (moderate or greater) functional MR detected by pTTE, iTOE performed after induction of anaesthesia demonstrated a reduction in MR severity, while 2% of patients had increased severity of MR by iTOE. iTOE assessment of MR was better associated with long-term postoperative mortality than pTTE in patients with moderate MR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.31 (1.11-1.55) vs 1.02 (0.89-1.17), P-value for comparison of HR 0.025] but was not different for more than moderate MR [1.43 (0.96-2.14) vs 1.27 (0.80-2.02)].

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CABG and/or aortic valve replacement without MVR/P, these findings support intraoperative reassessment of MR severity by iTOE as an adjunct to pTTE in the prediction of mortality. Alone, these findings do not yet provide evidence for an operative strategy.

Functional Mitral Regurgitation Outcome and Grading in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to define excess-mortality linked to functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) quantified in routine-practice.

BACKGROUND

Appraisal of FMR in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is challenging because risks of excess mortality remain uncertain and guidelines diverge.

METHODS

Cases of HFrEF (ejection-fraction <50%) Stage B-C that were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 and had routine-practice FMR quantitation (FMR cohort, n = 6,381) were analyzed for excess mortality thresholds/rates within the cohort and in comparison to the general population. These were also compared to those of a degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) simultaneous cohort (DMR cohort, n = 2,416).

RESULTS

In the FMR cohort (age: 70 ± 11 years, ejection fraction: 36 ± 10%, effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA]: 0.09 ± 0.13 cm²), EROA distribution was skewed towards low-values (≥0.40 cm² in only 8% vs 38% for the DMR cohort; P < 0.0001). One-year mortality was high (15.6%), increasing steeply from 13.3% without FMR to 28.5% with EROA ≥0.30 cm² (adjusted odds ratio: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.19-2.97]; P = 0.001). In the long term, 3,538 FMR cohort patients died with excess mortality threshold ∼0.10 cm² (vs ∼0.20 cm² in the DMR cohort), with 0.10 cm² EROA increments independently associated with considerable mortality increment (adjusted HR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.08-1.15]; P < 0.0001) and with no detectable interaction. Compared to the general population, FMR excess mortality increased exponentially with higher EROA (risk ratio point estimates 2.8, 3.8, and 5.1 at EROA 0.20, 0.30, and 0.40 cm², respectively), and was much steeper than that of the DMR cohort (P < 0.0001). In nested models, individualized EROA was the strongest FMR survival marker, and a new expanded FMR grading scale based on 0.10 cm² EROA increments provided incremental power over current American Heart Association-American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology guidelines (all P < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In HFrEF, FMR is skewed towards smaller EROA. Nevertheless, when measured in routine practice, EROA is the strongest independent FMR determinant of survival after diagnosis. Excess mortality increases exponentially above the threshold of 0.10 cm², with a much steeper slope than in DMR, for any EROA increment. An expanded EROA-based stratification, superior to existing grading schemes in determining survival, should allow guideline harmonization.