Efficacy of Ertugliflozin on Heart Failure-Related Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Results of the VERTIS CV Trial

Racial and regional differences in efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on multiple cardiorenal outcomes across different racial/ethnic groups and regions.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases in April 2024 for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Owing to inconsistencies in the reporting of the racial/ethnic and regional demographics, participants were grouped into three racial groups (Asian, Black, and White) and four regional (Asia, Central/South America, Europe, North America) groups. We compared the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors among these racial/ethnic and regional groups by calculating the ratio of hazard ratios (RHR). We evaluated the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular death, HHF, all-cause death, major adverse cardiac events, and cardiorenal composite outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 14 randomized placebo-controlled trials with 94,445 participants. Across the three racial/ethnic groups, SGLT2 inhibitors showed comparable efficacy. Compared with White patients, the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on HHF was more pronounced in Black patients (RHR, 0.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.94), and a numerically lower risk was associated with Asian patients (RHR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.38-1.01). A consistent reduction in cardiovascular events with SGLT2 inhibitors was observed across all regions, while the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on HHF was more pronounced in Asia than in other regions (RHR, 0.52; 95 % CI, 0.33-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors showed generally consistent efficacy across various racial/ethnic and regional groups, with some differences noted in specific populations. Ensuring adequate representation of diverse populations in clinical trials would be key to addressing healthcare disparities.

Cardiorenal protection with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a registry cross-sectional study

IMPORTANCE

Although sodium‒glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have cardiorenal benefits, their efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cardiorenal protective effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients with T2DM and CCS receiving PCI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of 1,430 patients from a tertiary hospital database who underwent PCI (January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2022).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cardiac outcomes (PMI/4aMI) and renal outcomes (eGFR and CI-AKI).

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) (176 dapagliflozin vs. 176 control), the dapagliflozin group showed significantly lower PMI/4aMI rates pre-PSM (39.78% vs. 66.99%; OR 0.862, 95% CI 0.823-0.904; p < 0.001) and post-PSM (39.77% vs. 60.23%; OR 0.660, 95% CI 0.531-0.821; p < 0.001), with sustained significance after adjustment (adjusted OR 0.436, 95% CI 0.285-0.668; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses highlighted increased protection in patients aged ≥ 65 years, those with multivessel disease, and those with higher contrast volumes. Renal outcomes (CI-AKIESUR and CI-AKIKDIGOs) were not significantly different before or after PSM or after adjustment (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Dapagliflozin exerted robust cardioprotective effects against PMI/4aMI in patients with T2DM and CCS undergoing PCI, particularly among patients in high-risk subgroups, but it did not significantly reduce the risk of CI-AKI. These findings support the peri-PCI use of dapagliflozin to mitigate cardiac risk while highlighting the need for further research to elucidate its renal effects in this population.

A comprehensive review of the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin

INTRODUCTION

Ertugliflozin is the fourth sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) inhibitor approved by the US FDA in 2017 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AREAS COVERED

The main purpose of this review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin. We conducted a search of relevant literature on ertugliflozin in the PubMed and Web of Science databases up to 22 October 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Ertugliflozin reduces the incidence of composite renal endpoints, maintain eGFR, and decreases urine albumin to creatinine ratio. Cardiovascular effects of ertugliflozin are primarily demonstrated in the VERTIS CV trial. However, the cardiovascular benefits of ertugliflozin are inferior to those of empagliflozin or canagliflozin. Ertugliflozin had non-significant impact on major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); ertugliflozin did reduce the risk of HHF, including in elderly population. Notably, ertugliflozin did not significantly reduce NT-proBNP levels in heart failure patients, while it decreased the incidence of persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation events. Ertugliflozin may be beneficial for ocular diseases or neurodegenerative diseases. Adverse events associated with ertugliflozin are similar to those of previously approved SGLT2 inhibitors, although it is associated with a higher overall risk of cancer, especially renal cancer.

Effect of Hypoglycemic Drugs on Patients with Heart Failure with or without T2DM: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Background

Anti-diabetic drugs have been noted to have a cardioprotective effect in patients with diabetes and heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of various anti-diabetic drugs on the prognosis of HF patients with and without diabetes.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before November 2024 that investigated the use of anti-diabetic medications in patients with HF. Primary outcomes included re-admission due to HF, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTpro-BNP) levels, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to compare the effectiveness of different anti-diabetic drugs.

Results

A total of 33 RCTs involving 29,888 patients were included. Sotagliflozin was the most effective in reducing the risk of re-admission due to HF and all-cause death, with a cumulative probability of 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. Liraglutide reduced the risk of cardiovascular death in HF patients with a cumulative probability of 0.97 and had the best efficacy in reducing NTpro-BNP levels with a cumulative probability of 0.69. Empagliflozin was best in improving LVEF in HF patients, with a cumulative probability of 0.69.

Conclusions

This Bayesian network meta-analysis demonstrates that sotagliflozin may be the best option for HF patients with and without diabetes. However, due to the small number of articles in this study, our results must be treated cautiously. Subsequently, there is an urgent need for more high-quality studies to validate our findings.

Heart failure outcomes captured by adverse event reporting in participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Observations from the VERTIS CV trial

AIMS

In VERTIS CV, ertugliflozin was associated with a 30% risk reduction for adjudication-confirmed, first and total hospitalizations for heart failure (HHF) in participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We evaluated the impact of ertugliflozin on the broader spectrum of all reported heart failure (HF) events independent of adjudication confirmation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from participants who received ertugliflozin (5 or 15 mg) were pooled and compared versus placebo. HF events included all investigator-reported HF adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) based on the narrow standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) query 'cardiac failure'. Terms for orthopnoea, dyspnoea, and peripheral oedema were evaluated separately. The effect of ertugliflozin on the first HF event was assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. Total HF events were assessed by Andersen-Gill models to account for first and recurrent events. A total of 8238 participants received ≥1 dose of ertugliflozin or placebo (mean follow-up 3.5 years). Investigator-reported HF events and AE capture yielded 420 first and 627 total HF events (vs. 238 and 345 adjudication-confirmed HHF events, respectively, in the primary analyses). Ertugliflozin reduced the risk for first (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.84; p < 0.001) and total HF AEs (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57-0.78; p < 0.001), with similar results for first and total HF SAEs. Additionally, ertugliflozin reduced oedema risk, but not orthopnoea/dyspnoea.

CONCLUSION

The effect of ertugliflozin was consistent across the spectrum of total investigator-reported HF AEs and was similar in magnitude to adjudicated HHF events.

Glycemic Targets and Prevention of Complications

CONTEXT

Complications of diabetes mellitus have significant impacts on morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and health costs for individuals. Setting and achieving glycemic targets to prevent these complications is a top priority when managing diabetes. However, patients often already have complications when diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, methods to prevent disease progression become a crucial component of diabetes management. The purpose of this article is to review glycemic targets and methods of screening and managing diabetes-related complications.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A PubMed review of the literature pertaining to diabetes mellitus, glycemic targets, microvascular complications, and macrovascular complications was conducted. We reviewed articles published between 1993 and 2024. Guidelines published by nationally recognized organizations in the fields of diabetes, nephrology, and cardiology were referenced. Public health statistics obtained by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Kidney Foundation were used.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Achieving glycemic targets and screening for diabetes-related complications at appropriate intervals remains the key factor for early detection and intervention. An algorithmic approach to glycemic management based on individual risk factors is beneficial in choosing pharmacotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The consequences of diabetes-related complications can be detrimental. However, achieving and maintaining glycemic targets combined with diligent screening, reduction of risk factors, and prompt treatment can halt disease progression.

Chinese consensus report on the assessment and management of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with cardiovascular disease: 2024 edition

As cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality rates continue to rise in China, the importance of identifying and managing CVD risk factors grows. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder, affecting an estimated 936 million individuals aged 30-69 worldwide, with China leading globally with about 176 million affected. Increasing research indicates a close association between OSA and the onset and progression of various CVD, significantly affecting outcomes. However, OSA has long been underrecognized and undertreated in CVD clinical practice. To address this gap, a multidisciplinary expert panel developed evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology and the Delphi process. This consensus provides 17 recommendations on core clinical issues such as screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CVD patients with OSA, aiming to standardize care and improve patient outcomes. The recommendations were informed by current evidence-based research and extensive expert consensus discussions. This approach seeks to support clinical decision-making, improve the quality of care, and address the unique challenges of managing OSA in Chinese CVD patients.

Superior benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for diabetic kidney disease: A cohort study

AIM

To compare cardiorenal outcomes of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) in a national diabetic kidney disease (DKD) population.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and Laboratory Databases. Propensity score-matched prevalent new users of SGLT-2is (n = 1524) and DPP-4is (n = 6005) during 2017-2018 were selected from adults with DKD and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2. Composite renal outcomes included sustained eGFR decrease, renal failure and renal mortality. Composite cardiovascular (CV) outcomes included acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure and CV death. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Compared with DPP-4i users, SGLT-2i users had a reduced risk of composite renal endpoint (HR: 0.16; CI: 0.12-0.24), consistently for a prolonged time to 50% or higher eGFR decrease (HR 0.17; CI: 0.11-0.27), renal failure (HR: 0.14; CI: 0.08-0.23) and decreased renal death (HR: 0.10; CI: 0.01-0.70). SGLT-2i users had a better composite CV outcome than DPP-4i users (HR: 0.74; CI: 0.64-0.85), and lower risks of stroke (HR: 0.76; CI: 0.62-0.92) and hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 0.68; CI: 0.55-0.84). Findings were consistent in analyses stratified by concomitant antidiabetic agents or intervals between DKD diagnosis and study drug initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the superior cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is compared with DPP-4is in the DKD population, regardless of concomitant antidiabetic agents or time from DKD onset to study drug initiation. SGLT-2is should be prioritized in adult patients with DKD.

The Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Management

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes confers an elevated risk of developing heart failure and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Until recently, there have been limited options to prevent and reduce the cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes. However, recent therapeutic advances have led to the adoption of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in cardiovascular management. Though SGLT2i were originally used for antihyperglycemic treatment, a series of landmark trials found that SGLT2i may confer cardio-protective effects in patients with heart failure and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, particularly a reduction in cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. The cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2i were similarly demonstrated in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Though previous trials found SGLT2i to be cardio-protective in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, recent trials demonstrated that SGLT2i may also provide cardiovascular benefits in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction. These advances have led SGLT2i to become an instrumental component of cardiovascular therapy.

Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Ertugliflozin by Baseline Use of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors or Diuretics, Including Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist: Analyses from the VERTIS CV Trial

Introduction

VERTIS CV was a placebo-controlled cardiovascular (CV) outcome trial evaluating the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic CV disease. The aim of the current analyses was to evaluate VERTIS CV cardiorenal outcomes according to baseline use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors or diuretics, including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).

Methods

Participants received ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, or placebo once daily and were followed for a mean of 3.5 years. Prespecified CV and kidney outcomes were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard modeling in participant subgroups defined by baseline use of RAAS inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers) or diuretics (loop diuretics, non-loop diuretics, MRAs), with interaction testing to assess for treatment effect modification.

Results

A total of 8,246 patients were randomized in VERTIS CV. At baseline, 6,686 (81%) participants were being treated with RAAS inhibitors, 3,542 (43%) with diuretics, 1,252 (15%) with loop diuretics, and 674 (8%) with MRAs. No significant interactions were observed for cardiorenal outcomes by baseline use of RAAS inhibitors or MRAs (p interaction > 0.05 for all). Statistically significant interactions for a first event of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or CV death, and of HHF (alone), were observed with baseline use of diuretics, including loop diuretics, with an increased benefit of ertugliflozin treatment versus placebo.

Conclusion

In VERTIS CV, baseline use of diuretics, particularly loop diuretics, identified a subgroup that demonstrated greater benefit with ertugliflozin on first HHF/CV death and HHF outcomes, with no modification of treatment effect observed with baseline use of RAAS inhibitors or MRAs. There was no evidence of treatment effect on the kidney composite outcomes by baseline use of RAAS inhibitors, diuretics, loop diuretics, or MRAs.

Insightful Perspectives on Sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors: Navigating Safety Updates and Beyond

SGLT2 (Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2) inhibitors, also known as gliflozin class, are a novel family of oral drugs being used to treat type 2 diabetes. SGLT2 inhibitors can work alone or in conjunction with other medications. This class includes five drugs, including canagliflozin, ertugliflozin, sotagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin. SGLT2 inhibitors inhibit the SGLT2 cotransporter in the proximal tubules of the kidney, reducing glucose and sodium reabsorption. It promotes the elimination of sugar in urine (diabetes mellitus) and lowers blood sugar levels. SGLT2 inhibitors also have pleiotropic effects on cardiac and renal function, broadening their therapeutic applications in heart failure. Despite the clinical benefits, regulators have placed secondary warnings in product information since the medications first hit the market. SGLT2 inhibitors, in particular, have had a significant impact on a variety of risk factors. This can lead to hypoglycaemia, urinary tract infections, diabetic ketoacidosis, lower limb amputation, and fractures. Although some of these events are uncommon, they can lead to severe and deadly consequences; therefore, patients must be closely monitored. In general, SLGT2 inhibitors are an efficient diabetes treatment with strong cardiovascular and renal protection and a favourable safety overview. This review sought to summarise the safety overview of commercially available SGLT2 inhibitors.

Fasting substrates predict chronic kidney disease progression in CREDENCE trial patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUNDSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors slow down progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We tested whether the circulating substrate mix is related to CKD progression and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and albuminuric CKD in the CREDENCE trial.METHODSWe measured fasting substrates in 2,543 plasma samples at baseline and 1 year after randomization to either 100 mg canagliflozin or placebo and used multivariate Cox models to explore their association with CKD progression, heart failure hospitalization/cardiovascular death (hHF/CVD), and mortality.RESULTSHigher baseline lactate and free fatty acids (FFAs) were independently associated with a lower risk of CKD progression (HR = 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54-0.98] and HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.48-0.95], respectively) and hHF/CVD HR = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.50-0.99] and HR = 0.63 [95% CI: 0.42-0.94]). Canagliflozin led to a rise in plasma FFAs, glycerol, β-hydroxybutyrate, and acetoacetate. Changes in substrate between baseline and year 1 predicted an approximately 30% reduction in relative risk of both CKD progression and hHF/CVD independently of treatment. More patients who did not respond to canagliflozin treatment in terms of CKD progression belonged to the bottom lactate and FFA distribution tertiles.CONCLUSIONIn T2D patients with albuminuric CKD, basic energy substrates selectively influenced major long-term endpoints; canagliflozin treatment amplified their effects by chronically raising their circulating levels.

SGLT2 inhibition alters substrate utilization and mitochondrial redox in healthy and failing rat hearts

Previous studies highlight the potential for sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) to exert cardioprotective effects in heart failure by increasing plasma ketones and shifting myocardial fuel utilization toward ketone oxidation. However, SGLT2i have multiple in vivo effects and the differential impact of SGLT2i treatment and ketone supplementation on cardiac metabolism remains unclear. Here, using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology combined with infusions of [13C6]glucose or [13C4]βOHB, we demonstrate that acute SGLT2 inhibition with dapagliflozin shifts relative rates of myocardial mitochondrial metabolism toward ketone oxidation, decreasing pyruvate oxidation with little effect on fatty acid oxidation in awake rats. Shifts in myocardial ketone oxidation persisted when plasma glucose levels were maintained. In contrast, acute βOHB infusion similarly augmented ketone oxidation, but markedly reduced fatty acid oxidation and did not alter glucose uptake or pyruvate oxidation. After inducing heart failure, dapagliflozin increased relative rates of ketone and fatty acid oxidation, but decreased pyruvate oxidation. Dapagliflozin increased mitochondrial redox and reduced myocardial oxidative stress in heart failure, which was associated with improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction after 3 weeks of treatment. Thus, SGLT2i have pleiotropic effects on systemic and heart metabolism, which are distinct from ketone supplementation and may contribute to the long-term cardioprotective benefits of SGLT2i.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitors and Their Impact on the Management of Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a life-threatening condition with severe incapacitating consequences. Many body organs and systems may be affected, which may also hinder the quality of life and finances at the individual and societal levels. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have also emerged as potentially useful drugs in the HF domain and other medical fields, in addition to their glucose-lowering effect. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the authors searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus websites for SGLT2i and SGLT2i-related terms and their impact on HF events, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), renal composite outcomes, and improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, involving human adult populations. Two reviewers conducted the literature search, and disagreements were resolved through mutual consensus and input from a third reviewer. A literature search was conducted from 1st February to 20th February 2024. We included studies published after 2018 to focus only on the latest advancements. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or systematic reviews of these studies were included in our study. Of the 44 initial articles identified, only 14 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcomes revealed the superiority of SGLT2i therapeutics over placebo in all four domains mentioned above. A total of 234,509 patients from 11 papers with moderate heterogeneity (P = 0.07; I2 = 42%) evaluating the effect of SGLT2i in comparison to placebo on HF events were considered; of these, 128,477 patients received the intervention drug, and 106,032 individuals were assigned to the control group. The absolute numbers of HF events were 6845 and 8877, respectively. The study showed an overall benefit of SGLT2i in patients with heart failure due to their ability to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in comparison to placebo (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.89-0.96; P < 0.00001). This systematic review confirmed previous findings related to the use of SGLT2i as adjunctive therapy for HF and amelioration of KCCQ scores and as a protective agent against MACE and renal impairment progression.

SGLT2 inhibitors, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across the spectrum of kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality across KDIGO and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] groups.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to August 8th, 2023. In pairs, researchers selected large randomized placebo-controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, with minimum duration of one year. Researchers independently extracted study-level data and assessed within-study risk of bias with RoB 2.0 and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Meta-analyses employed a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 14 trials, encompassing 97,412 participants and a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Risk of bias was overall low. Overall, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.89, 95 %-CI 0.85-0.93), cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) (HR 0.78, 95 %-CI 0.75-0.82), all-cause death (HR 0.89, 95 %-CI 0.83-0.94), and HHF (HR 0.71, 95 %-CI 0.67-0.75). The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on MACE was different across KDIGO (Pinteraction = 0.038) and UACR (Pinteraction = 0.008) groups, with greater benefits in KDIGO Very High (HR 0.72, 95 %-CI 0.61-0.86) and UACR > 300 mg/g (HR 0.76, 95 %-CI 0.68-0.86) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with reductions in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. Greater reductions in MACE are expected in subjects in high-risk groups for kidney disease.

Empagliflozin attenuates hypoxia-induced heart failure of zebrafish embryos via influencing MMP13 expression

BACKGROUND

Today, sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are more than diabetes drugs. They are also indicated in chronic heart failure (HF) treatment in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, independently of the ejection fraction. Multiple mechanisms have been suggested behind the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. However, the underlying mechanisms still remain largely unexplored. Here, we used a zebrafish embryo model to search for new potential players whereby SGLT2 inhibitors attenuate HF.

METHODS

HF in zebrafish embryos was caused exposing them to chemically induced hypoxia. As a SGLT2 inhibitor, we used empagliflozin. Its effect on hypoxia-induced HF of the embryos was evaluated using video microscopy and calculation of fractional shortening (FS) of embryos´ hearts. RT-qPCR of brain natriuretic peptide (bnp) expression was also used to examine empagliflozin´s effect on HF. Transcriptome analysis of total RNA of the embryos was performed to search for new potential mechanisms contributing to the beneficial effect of empagliflozin on HF.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin significantly attenuated hypoxia-induced HF of zebrafish embryos as shown with improved FS of the hearts and decreased bnp expression. Transcriptome analysis revealed that the improvement of HF in response to empagliflozin was accompanied with decreased matrix metalloproteinase 13a (mmp13a) expression. Treatment of hypoxia-induced embryos with MMP13 inhibitor ameliorated the impaired heart function accordingly to the effect of empagliflozin. MMP13 inhibitor was not toxic to the embryos.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that empagliflozin´s favorable effect on attenuating HF is mediated via MMP13. MMP13 provides a novel option when developing new therapeutics for HF treatment.

Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Review

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic condition commonly complicating type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to poor quality of life and increased risk of major adverse lower-limb (MALE) and cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE). Therapeutic management of PAD in T2D patients is much more arduous, often due to bilateral, multi-vessel, and distal vascular involvement, in addition to increased systemic polyvascular atherosclerotic burden. On the other hand, the pathophysiological link between PAD and T2D is very complex, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction and increased subclinical inflammation in addition to chronic hyperglycemia. Therefore, the clinical approach should not ignore vascular protection with the aim of reducing limb and overall CV events besides a mere glucose-lowering effect. However, the choice of the best medications in this setting is challenging due to low-grade evidence or lacking targeted studies in PAD patients. The present review highlighted the strong relationship between T2D and PAD, focusing on the best treatment strategy to reduce CV risk and prevent PAD occurrence and worsening in patients with T2D. The Medline databases were searched for studies including T2D and PAD up to June 2024 and reporting the CV effectiveness and safety of the most used glucose-lowering agents, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design, or country. The main outcomes considered were MACE-including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and CV death-and MALE-defined as lower-limb complications, amputations, or need for revascularization. To the best of our current knowledge, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors represent the best choice to reduce CV risk in T2D and PAD settings, but a personalized approach should be considered. GLP-1 receptor agonists should be preferred in subjects with prevalent atherosclerotic burden and a history of previous MALE, while SGLT2 inhibitors should be used in those with heart failure if overall CV benefits outweigh the risk of lower-limb complications.

Effects of canagliflozin on total heart failure events across the kidney function spectrum: Participant-level pooled analysis from the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial

AIMS

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) face high risks of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations that are often recurrent, especially as kidney function declines. We examined the effects of canagliflozin on total HF events by baseline kidney function in patients with T2D at high cardiovascular risk and/or with chronic kidney disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Leveraging pooled participant-level data from the CANVAS programme (n = 10 142) and CREDENCE trial (n = 4401), first and total HF hospitalizations were examined. Cox proportional hazards models were built for the time to first HF hospitalization, and proportional means models based on cumulative mean functions were used for recurrent HF hospitalizations. Treatment effects were evaluated overall as well as within baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) strata (<45, 45-60, and >60 ml/min/1.73 m2). HF hospitalizations were independently and blindly adjudicated. Among 14 540 participants with available baseline eGFR values, 672 HF hospitalizations occurred over a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Among participants who experienced a HF hospitalization, 357 had a single event (201 in placebo-treated patients and 156 in canagliflozin-treated patients), 77 had 2 events, and 39 had >2 events. Canagliflozin reduced risk of first HF hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70) consistently across baseline eGFR strata (pinteraction = 0.84). Canagliflozin reduced total HF hospitalizations overall (mean event ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.73) and across eGFR subgroups (pinteraction = 0.51). Canagliflozin also reduced cardiovascular death and total HF hospitalizations (mean event ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80) and across eGFR subgroups (pinteraction = 0.82). The absolute risk reductions were numerically larger, and numbers needed to treat were smaller when evaluating total events versus first events alone. These observed HF benefits were highly consistent across the range of eGFR, with larger absolute benefits in participants who had worse kidney function at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with T2D at high cardiovascular risk and/or with chronic kidney disease, canagliflozin reduced the total burden of HF hospitalizations, with consistent benefits observed across the kidney function spectrum.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CANVAS (NCT01032629), CANVAS-R (NCT01989754), CREDENCE (NCT02065791).

Racial, ethnic and regional differences in the effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials

OBJECTIVES

The cardiorenal protective effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) across racial and ethnic groups are not well defined. By conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes trials (CVOTs), we aimed to compare racial/ethnic as well as regional patterns in the effects of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

DESIGN

Trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and search of bibliographies to 7 July 2023. Setting North America, South/Central America, Europe (Eastern and Western), Asia, Australia-New Zealand (Pacific), Asia/Pacific, and Africa.

SETTING

North America, South/Central America, Europe (Eastern and Western), Asia, Australia-New Zealand (Pacific), Asia/Pacific, and Africa.

PARTICIPANTS

people with type 2 diabetes enrolled in cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were (i) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), (ii) composite CVD death/heart failure (HF) hospitalization; (iii) composite renal outcome; and (iv) their components. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.

RESULTS

In total, 14 unique CVOTs (7 comparing SGLT2-Is vs placebo and 7 comparing GLP1-RAs vs placebo) were eligible. The proportion of participants enrolled in the trials ranged from 66.6-93.2% for White populations, 1.2-21.6% for Asian populations, 2.4-8.3% for Black populations and 0.9-23.1% for Other populations. The HR (95% CI) for MACE comparing SGLT2-Is vs placebo was 0.92 (0.86-0.98), 0.69 (0.53-0.92) and 0.70 (0.54-0.91) for White, Asian and Hispanic/Latino populations, respectively. Comparing GLP1-RAs vs placebo, the corresponding HR (95% CI) was 0.88 (0.80-0.97), 0.76 (0.63-0.93) and 0.82 (0.70-0.95), respectively. SGLT2-Is reduced the risk of all other cardiorenal outcomes in White and Asian populations, except for HF hospitalizations in Asians. No effects were observed in Black populations except for a reduced risk of HF hospitalizations by SGLT2-I. SGLT1-Is reduced the risk of composite CVD death/HF hospitalization in North America and Europe, whereas GLP1-RAs reduced the risk of MACE in Europe. GRADE certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be substantial racial/ethnic differences in the cardiorenal effects of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs in patients with T2D, with consistent benefits observed among White and Asian populations and consistent lack of benefits in Black populations. Whether the differences are due to issues with under-representation of Black populations and low statistical power or racial/ethnic variations in the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs need further investigation.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023401734.

Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on heart failure events in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors significantly reduce the risk for hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in patients with diabetes, and HF; findings in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not uniform. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis exploring the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on HF events in patients with CKD and across subgroups defined by baseline kidney function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search in major electronic databases was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) providing data on the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on the primary outcome, time to hospitalization or urgent visit for worsening HF in patients with prevalent CKD at baseline or across subgroups stratified by baseline estimated glomerular-filtration-rate (eGFR) were included. Twelve studies (n = 89,191 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with CKD, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced the risk for HF events by 32% compared to placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.73]. Reduction in HF events with SGLT-2 inhibitors was more prominent in patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.62-0.74) than in those with eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.83). Subgroup analysis according to type of SGLT-2 inhibitor showed a consistent treatment effect across all studied agents (p-subgroup-analysis = 0.44). Sensitivity analysis including data from studies including only diabetic patients showed an even more pronounced effect in eGFR subgroup <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54-0.70).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors led to a significant reduction in HF events in patients with CKD. Such findings may change the landscape of prevention of HF events in patients with advanced CKD. PROSPERO Registration number CRD42022382857.

Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Literature Review, Reflection and Outlook

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional dysfunction of the ventricular filling or blood supply. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent predictor of mortality for HF. The increase in prevalence, co-morbidity and hospitalization rates of both DM and HF has further fueled the possibility of overlapping disease pathology between the two. For decades, antidiabetic drugs that are known to definitively increase the risk of HF are the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and saxagliptin in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, and insulin, which causes sodium and water retention, and whether metformin is effective or safe for HF is not clear. Notably, sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and partial glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) all achieved positive results for HF endpoints, with SGLT2 inhibitors in particular significantly reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Further understanding of the mutual pathophysiological mechanisms between HF and DM may facilitate the detection of novel therapeutic targets to improve the clinical outcome. This review focuses on the association between HF and DM, emphasizing the efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs and HF treatment. In addition, recent therapeutic advances in HF and the important mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)/vericiguat contribute to the benefits of HF are summarized.

Examining the Impact of Ertugliflozin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) constitute a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally, particularly among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Ertugliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is hypothesized to confer cardiovascular protection; however, long-term follow-up studies are necessary to support the hypothesis. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the cardiovascular effects of ertugliflozin in diabetic versus non-diabetic cohorts, focusing on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hospitalizations for heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the review encompassed studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2024. Eligibility was restricted to studies involving T2DM patients undergoing ertugliflozin treatment with reported outcomes relevant to cardiovascular health. Out of 767 initially identified articles, 6 met the inclusion criteria. Data concerning hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were extracted to compare the effects of ertugliflozin with those of a placebo or other standard therapies. The collective sample size across these studies was 8246 participants. Ertugliflozin was associated with a significant reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure relative to a placebo (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.90, p < 0.05). Furthermore, when combined with metformin, ertugliflozin potentially reduced MACEs (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.07), although this finding did not reach statistical significance. Importantly, for patients with pre-existing heart failure, ertugliflozin significantly decreased the exacerbations of heart failure (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.84, p < 0.01). Overall, ertugliflozin markedly reduces hospitalizations due to heart failure in T2DM patients and may improve additional cardiovascular outcomes. These results endorse the integration of ertugliflozin into therapeutic protocols for T2DM patients at elevated cardiovascular risk and substantiate its efficacy among SGLT2 inhibitors. Continued investigations are recommended to delineate its long-term cardiovascular benefits in diverse patient populations, including the potential impact on arrhythmias.

The contemporary role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the management of heart failure: State-of-the-art review

Novel therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), etc. The purpose of this review is to determine the effects of ARNI and SGLT2i in heart failure (HF), compare the impact of SGLT2i with ARNI, and finally evaluate the current data regarding the combination of these two drugs in HF. Various trials on the respective medications have shown some significant reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) death. The combination of these drugs has shown more CV benefits than monotherapy. There is emerging data about these two drugs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At present, there are less head-to-head comparison trials of these two drugs. This review provides insights on the current evidence, comparative efficacy, and combination therapy of ARNI and SGLT2i in managing HF, focussing on HFrEF and HFpEF.

Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure outcomes and cardiovascular death across the cardiometabolic disease spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been studied in patients with heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and acute myocardial infarction. Individual trials were powered to study composite outcomes in one disease state. We aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on specific clinical endpoints across multiple demographic and disease subgroups.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we queried online databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and SCOPUS) up to Feb 10, 2024, for primary and secondary analyses of large trials (n>1000) of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (including acute myocardial infarction). Outcomes studied included composite of first hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death, first hospitalisation for heart failure, cardiovascular death, total (first and recurrent) hospitalisation for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024513836.

FINDINGS

We included 15 trials (N=100 952). Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of first hospitalisation for heart failure by 29% in patients with heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·67-0·77]), 28% in patients with type 2 diabetes (0·72 [0·67-0·77]), 32% in patients with chronic kidney disease (0·68 [0·61-0·77]), and 28% in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (0·72 [0·66-0·79]). SGLT2 inhibitors reduced cardiovascular death by 14% in patients with heart failure (HR 0·86 [95% CI 0·79-0·93]), 15% in patients with type 2 diabetes (0·85 [0·79-0·91]), 11% in patients with chronic kidney disease (0·89 [0·82-0·96]), and 13% in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (0·87 [0·78-0·97]). The benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors on both first hospitalisation for heart failure and cardiovascular death was consistent across the majority of the 51 subgroups studied. Notable exceptions included acute myocardial infarction (22% reduction in first hospitalisation for heart failure; no effect on cardiovascular death) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (26% reduction in first hospitalisation for heart failure; no effect on cardiovascular death).

INTERPRETATION

SGLT2 inhibitors reduced heart failure events and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These effects were consistent across a wide range of subgroups within these populations. This supports the eligibility of a large population with cardiorenal-metabolic diseases for treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors.

FUNDING

None.

Transporter Proteins as Therapeutic Drug Targets-With a Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors

Membrane transporters interact not only with endogenous substrates but are also engaged in the transport of xenobiotics, including drugs. While the coordinated function of uptake (solute carrier family-SLC and SLCO) and efflux (ATP-binding cassette family-ABC, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family-MATE) transporter system allows vectorial drug transport, efflux carriers alone achieve barrier functions. The modulation of transport functions was proved to be effective in the treatment strategies of various pathological states. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are the drugs most widely applied in clinical practice, especially in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) serves as virus particles (HBV/HDV) carrier, and inhibition of its function is applied in the treatment of hepatitis B and hepatitis D by myrcludex B. Inherited cholestatic diseases, such as Alagille syndrome (ALGS) and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) can be treated by odevixibat and maralixibat, which inhibit activity of apical sodium-dependent bile salt transporter (ASBT). Probenecid can be considered to increase uric acid excretion in the urine mainly via the inhibition of urate transporter 1 (URAT1), and due to pharmacokinetic interactions involving organic anion transporters 1 and 3 (OAT1 and OAT3), it modifies renal excretion of penicillins or ciprofloxacin as well as nephrotoxicity of cidofovir. This review discusses clinically approved drugs that affect membrane/drug transporter function.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a swinging pendulum in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are integral in treating patients with heart failure, regardless of the existence of diabetes mellitus. In light of their benefits on the heart muscle, the question of their effect on acute coronary syndrome is raised, and a hypothesis as to whether they can be implemented in its treatment is proposed. The aim of the article was to indicate the potential of using SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A PubMed search for articles published between October 2017 and May 2022 was conducted using the following keywords: "SGLT2 inhibitors," "Acute Coronary Syndrome," "Treatment," "Prognosis." Reference lists of identified articles were searched for further articles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Reports from clinical trials and animal studies thus far investigating mechanistic pathways of SGLT2 inhibitors' effect in relation to acute myocardial infarction were interplayed to extract relevant findings and analyze the safety of this therapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors indicate beneficial effects in acute cardiovascular incident by various mechanisms, and early initiation of therapy may improve outcomes for AMI survivors.

Effects of different sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis

Background

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of different sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on prognosis and cardiac structural remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods

Relevant studies published up to 20 March 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library CNKI, China Biomedical Literature Service, VIP, and WanFang databases. We included randomized controlled trials of different SGLT2i and pooled the prognosis data of patients with HF. We compared the efficacy of different SGLT2i in patients with HF and conducted a sub-analysis based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results

We identified 77 randomized controlled trials involving 43,561 patients. The results showed that SGLT2i significantly enhanced outcomes in HF, including a composite of hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular death, individual hospitalizations for HF, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and LVEF among all HF patients (P < 0.05) compared to a placebo. Sotagliflozin was superior to empagliflozin [RR = 0.88, CI (0.79-0.97)] and dapagliflozin [RR = 0.86, CI (0.77-0.96)] in reducing hospitalizations for HF and CV death. Dapagliflozin significantly reduced hospitalizations [RR = 0.51, CI (0.33-0.80)], CV death [RR = 0.73, CI (0.54-0.97)], and all-cause mortality [RR = 0.69, CI (0.48-0.99)] in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). SGLT2i also plays a significant role in improving cardiac remodeling and quality of life (LVMi, LVEDV, KCQQ) (P < 0.05). Among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), SGLT2i significantly improved cardiac function in HFpEF patients (P < 0.05). In addition, canagliflozin [RR = 0.09, CI (0.01-0.86)] demonstrated greater safety compared to sotagliflozin in a composite of urinary and reproductive infections of HFpEF patients.

Conclusion

Our systematic review showed that SGLT2i generally enhances the prognosis of patients with HF. Sotagliflozin demonstrated superiority over empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in a composite of hospitalization for HF and CV death in the overall HF patients. Canagliflozin exhibited greater safety compared to sotagliflozin in a composite of urinary and reproductive infections of HFpEF. Overall, the efficacy of SGLT2i was greater in HFrEF patients than in HFpEF patients.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with high risks of premature chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular diseases, cardiovascular death and impaired quality of life. People with diabetes are more likely to develop kidney impairment, and approximately one in three adults with diabetes have CKD. People with CKD and diabetes experience a substantially higher risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown potential effects in preventing kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with CKD and diabetes. However, new trials are emerging rapidly, and evidence synthesis is essential to summarising cumulative evidence.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to assess the benefits and harms of SGLT2 inhibitors for people with CKD and diabetes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 17 November 2023 using a search strategy designed by an Information Specialist. Studies in the Register are continually identified through regular searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies were eligible if they evaluated SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo, standard care or other glucose-lowering agents in people with CKD and diabetes. CKD includes all stages (from 1 to 5), including dialysis patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the study risk of bias. Treatment estimates were summarised using random effects meta-analysis and expressed as a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The primary review outcomes were all-cause death, 3-point and 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal stroke, and kidney failure.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-three studies randomising 65,241 people with CKD and diabetes were included. SGLT2 inhibitors with or without other background treatments were compared to placebo, standard care, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, or insulin. In the majority of domains, the risks of bias in the included studies were low or unclear. No studies evaluated the treatment in children or in people treated with dialysis. No studies compared SGLT2 inhibitors with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or tirzepatide. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors decreased the risk of all-cause death (20 studies, 44,397 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94; I2 = 0%; high certainty) and cardiovascular death (16 studies, 43,792 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.93; I2 = 29%; high certainty). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably make little or no difference to the risk of fatal or nonfatal MI (2 studies, 13,726 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14; I2 = 24%; moderate certainty), and fatal or nonfatal stroke (2 studies, 13,726 participants: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.30; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably decrease 3-point MACE (7 studies, 38,320 participants: RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98; I2 = 46%; moderate certainty), and 4-point MACE (4 studies, 23,539 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96; I2 = 77%; moderate certainty), and decrease hospital admission due to heart failure (6 studies, 28,339 participants: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79; I2 = 17%; high certainty). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors may decrease creatinine clearance (1 study, 132 participants: MD -2.63 mL/min, 95% CI -5.19 to -0.07; low certainty) and probably decrease the doubling of serum creatinine (2 studies, 12,647 participants: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89; I2 = 53%; moderate certainty). SGLT2 inhibitors decrease the risk of kidney failure (6 studies, 11,232 participants: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79; I2 = 0%; high certainty), and kidney composite outcomes (generally reported as kidney failure, kidney death with or without ≥ 40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) (7 studies, 36,380 participants: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.78; I2 = 25%; high certainty) compared to placebo. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors incur less hypoglycaemia (16 studies, 28,322 participants: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98; I2 = 0%; high certainty), and hypoglycaemia requiring third-party assistance (14 studies, 26,478 participants: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.88; I2 = 0%; high certainty), and probably decrease the withdrawal from treatment due to adverse events (15 studies, 16,622 participants: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08; I2 = 16%; moderate certainty). The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on eGFR, amputation and fracture were uncertain. No studies evaluated the effects of treatment on fatigue, life participation, or lactic acidosis. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to standard care alone, sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitors, or insulin were uncertain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors alone or added to standard care decrease all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and kidney failure and probably decrease major cardiovascular events while incurring less hypoglycaemia compared to placebo in people with CKD and diabetes.

Diabetes and Stroke: Impact of Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant risk factor for stroke. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting stringent glycemic control to reduce macrovascular complications, particularly stroke, is not as clear as for microvascular complications. Presently, risk reduction strategies are based on controlling multiple risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, glycemia, smoking, and weight. Since 2008, new pharmacological therapies for treating T2DM have been required to undergo trials to ensure their cardiovascular safety. Remarkably, several novel therapies have exhibited protective effects against the combined endpoint of major cardiovascular events. Evidence from these trials, with stroke as a secondary endpoint, along with real-world data, suggests potential benefits in stroke prevention, particularly with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Conversely, the data on sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors remains more controversial. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors appear neutral in stroke prevention. More recent pharmacological therapies still lack significant data on this particular outcome. This article provides a comprehensive review of the evidence on the most recent T2DM therapies for stroke prevention and their impact on clinical practice.

Roles of O-GlcNAcylation in Mitochondrial Homeostasis and Cardiovascular Diseases

Protein posttranslational modifications are important factors that mediate the fine regulation of signaling molecules. O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine-modification (O-GlcNAcylation) is a monosaccharide modification on N-acetylglucosamine linked to the hydroxyl terminus of serine and threonine of proteins. O-GlcNAcylation is responsive to cellular stress as a reversible and posttranslational modification of nuclear, mitochondrial and cytoplasmic proteins. Mitochondrial proteins are the main targets of O-GlcNAcylation and O-GlcNAcylation is a key regulator of mitochondrial homeostasis by directly regulating the mitochondrial proteome or protein activity and function. Disruption of O-GlcNAcylation is closely related to mitochondrial dysfunction. More importantly, the O-GlcNAcylation of cardiac proteins has been proven to be protective or harmful to cardiac function. Mitochondrial homeostasis is crucial for cardiac contractile function and myocardial cell metabolism, and the imbalance of mitochondrial homeostasis plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). In this review, we will focus on the interactions between protein O-GlcNAcylation and mitochondrial homeostasis and provide insights on the role of mitochondrial protein O-GlcNAcylation in CVDs.

Heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction: A review of disease burden and remaining unmet medical needs within a new treatment landscape

This review provides a comprehensive overview of heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), including its definition, diagnosis, and epidemiology; clinical, humanistic, and economic burdens; current pharmacologic landscape in key pharmaceutical markets; and unmet needs to identify key knowledge gaps. We conducted a targeted literature review in electronic databases and prioritized articles with valuable insights into HFmrEF/HFpEF. Overall, 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 66 real-world evidence studies, 18 clinical practice guidelines, and 25 additional publications were included. Although recent heart failure (HF) guidelines set left ventricular ejection fraction thresholds to differentiate categories, characterization and diagnosis criteria vary because of the incomplete disease understanding. Recent epidemiological data are limited and diverse. Approximately 50% of symptomatic HF patients have HFpEF, more common than HFmrEF. Prevalence varies with country because of differing definitions and study characteristics, making prevalence interpretation challenging. HFmrEF/HFpEF has considerable mortality risk, and the mortality rate varies with study and patient characteristics and treatments. HFmrEF/HFpEF is associated with considerable morbidity, poor patient outcomes, and common comorbidities. Patients require frequent hospitalizations; therefore, early intervention is crucial to prevent disease burden. Recent RCTs show promising results like risk reduction of composite cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Costs data are scarce, but the economic burden is increasing. Despite new drugs, unmet medical needs requiring new treatments remain. Thus, HFmrEF/HFpEF is a growing global healthcare concern. With improving yet incomplete understanding of this disease and its promising treatments, further research is required for better patient outcomes.

Early SGLT2 inhibitor use is associated with improved left atrial strain following acute coronary syndrome

AIM

Left atrial (LA) strain, a novel marker of LA function, reliably predicts diastolic dysfunction. SGLT2 inhibitors improve heart failure outcomes, but limited data exists regarding their use in the immediate aftermath of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We studied the effect of empagliflozin on LA strain in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and ACS.

METHODS

Patients with ACS and T2D were identified and empagliflozin was initiated in eligible patients prior to discharge. Patients not initiated on empagliflozin were analysed as a comparator group. A blinded investigator assessed LA strain using baseline and 3-6 month follow-up echocardiograms.

RESULTS

Forty-four participants (n = 22 each group) were included. Baseline characteristics and LA strain were similar in the two groups. LA reservoir, conduit and contractile strain increased in empagliflozin group (28.0 ± 8.4% to 34.6 ± 12.2% p < 0.001, 14.5 ± 5.4% to 16.7 ± 7.0% p = 0.034, 13.5 ± 5.2% to 17.9 ± 7.2% p = 0.005, respectively) but remained unchanged in comparison group (29.2 ± 6.7% to 28.8 ± 7.0%, 12.8 ± 4.2% to 13.3 ± 4.7%, 16.7 ± 5.3% to 15.5 ± 4.5%, respectively, p = NS). The difference in change between groups was significant for LA reservoir (p = 0.003) and contractile strain (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS and T2D, addition of empagliflozin to standard ACS therapy prior to discharge is associated with improved LA function.

Pharmacotherapies in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Various pharmacotherapies exist for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but with unclear comparative efficacy. We searched EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library from inception through August 2021 for all randomized clinical trials in HFpEF (EF >40%) that evaluated beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Outcomes assessed were cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. We included 22 randomized clinical trials (30,673 participants; mean age = 71.7 ± 4.2 years; females = 49.3 ± 7.7%; median follow-up = 24.4 ± 11.1 months). Compared with placebo, there was no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular mortality [beta-blockers; odds ratio (OR) 0.79 (0.46-1.34), MRA; OR 0.90 (0.70-1.14), ACE OR 0.95 (0.59-1.53), ARB; OR 1.02 (0.87-1.19), ARNI; OR 0.97 (0.74-1.26) and SGLT2i; OR 1.00 (0.84-1.18)] or all-cause mortality [beta blockers; OR 0.75 (0.54-1.04), MRA; OR 0.90 (0.75-1.08) ACE; OR 1.05 (0.71-1.54), ARB; OR 1.03 (0.91-1.15), ARNI; OR 0.99 (0.82-1.20) and SGLT2i; OR 1.00 (0.89-1.13)]. The certainty in these estimates was low or very low. There was a significantly reduction in HF hospitalization with the use of SGLT2i [OR 0.71 (0.62-0.82), moderate certainty], ARNI [OR 0.77 (0.63-0.94), low certainty], and MRA [OR 0.81 (0.66-0.98), moderate certainty]; with corresponding P scores of 0.84, 0.68, and 0.58, respectively. In HFpEF, the use of beta-blockers, MRA, ACE/ARB/ARNI, or SGLT2i was not associated with improved cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. SGLT2i, ARNI, and MRA reduced the risk of HF hospitalizations.

Plausible prediction of renoprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney diseases

This narrative review was conducted due to uncertainty in predicting the beneficial impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on a dip of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), regardless of albuminuria presence, with the aim of elucidating plausible predictors of kidney function outcome among patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched in May 2023 for relevant articles published in English between 2013 and 2023. A total of 25 full-length scientific publications (comprising 11 large randomized trials and two cohort studies) were included for analysis. The majority of studies demonstrated a limited value of conventional biomarkers, such as initial decline in eGFR, a trajectory of eGFR during SGLT2 inhibitor administration, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), in prediction of renoprotection. Included studies showed that the tendency to decreased eGFR, UACR, hemoglobin, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipid profile, serum uric acid, inflammatory biomarkers and natriuretic peptides did not predict clinical outcomes in groups without heart failure (HF) treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. In HF groups, biomarkers of inflammation, kidney injury, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, ketogenesis, energy metabolism, and adipose tissue dysfunction (adropin and irisin), were detected with the aim of finding potential biomarkers. Biomarkers of adipose tissue dysfunction and inflammation may be promising for predicting SGLT2 inhibitor benefit compared with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and energy metabolism indicators.

Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome

The diagnostic criteria, treatments at the time of admission, and drugs used in patients with acute coronary syndrome are well defined in countless guidelines. However, there is uncertainty about the measures to recommend during patient discharge planning. This document brings together the most recent evidence and the standardized and optimal treatment for patients at the time of discharge from hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome, for comprehensive and safe care in the patient's transition between care from the acute event to the outpatient care, with the aim of optimizing the recovery of viable myocardium, guaranteeing the most appropriate secondary prevention, reducing the risk of a new coronary event and mortality, as well as the adequate reintegration of patients into daily life.

SGLT-2 Inhibitors: The Next-generation Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become a worldwide concern in recent years, primarily in highly developed Western societies. T2DM causes systemic complications, such as atherosclerotic heart disease, ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease, kidney failure, and diabetes-related maculopathy and retinopathy. The growing number of T2DM patients and the treatment of long-term T2DM-related complications pressurize and exhaust public healthcare systems. As a result, strategies for combating T2DM and developing novel drugs are critical global public health requirements. Aside from preventive measures, which are still the most effective way to prevent T2DM, novel and highly effective therapies are emerging. In the spotlight of next-generation T2DM treatment, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are promoted as the most efficient perspective therapy. SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) include phlorizin derivatives, such as canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin. SGLT-2, along with SGLT-1, is a member of the SGLT family of proteins that play a role in glucose absorption via active transport mediated by Na+/K+ ATPase. SGLT-2 is only found in the kidney, specifically the proximal tubule, and is responsible for more than 90% glucose absorption. Inhibition of SGLT-2 reduces glucose absorption, and consequently increases urinary glucose excretion, decreasing blood glucose levels. Thus, the inhibition of SGLT-2 activity ultimately alleviates T2DM-related symptoms and prevents or delays systemic T2DM-associated chronic complications. This review aimed to provide a more detailed understanding of the effects of SGLT2i responsible for the acute improvement in blood glucose regulation, a prerequisite for T2DM-associated cardiovascular complications control.

Heterogeneity in cardiorenal protection by Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure across the ejection fraction strata: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gliflozins or Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are relatively novel antidiabetic medications that have recently been shown to represent favorable effects on patients' cardiorenal outcomes. However, there is shortage of data on potential disparities in this therapeutic effect across different patient subpopulations.

AIM

To investigate differential effects of SGLT2i on the cardiorenal outcomes of heart failure patients across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) levels.

METHODS

Literature was searched systematically for the large randomized double-blind controlled trials with long enough follow up periods reporting cardiovascular and renal outcomes in their patients regarding heart failure status and LVEF levels. Data were then meta-analyzed after stratification of the pooled data across the LVEF strata and New York Heart Associations (NYHA) classifications for heart failure using Stata software version 17.0.

RESULTS

The literature search returned 13 Large clinical trials and 13 post hoc analysis reports. Meta-analysis of the effects of gliflozins on the primary composite outcome showed no significant difference in efficacy across the heart failure subtypes, but higher efficacy were detected in patient groups at lower NYHA classifications (I2 = 46%, P = 0.02). Meta-analyses across the LVEF stratums revealed that a baseline LVEF lower than 30% was associated with enhanced improvement in the primary composite outcome compared to patients with higher LVEF levels at the borderline statistical significance (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.60 to 0.79 vs 0.81, 95%CI: 0.75 to 0.87; respectively, P = 0.06). Composite renal outcome was improved significantly higher in patients with no heart failure than in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.72 vs 0.94, 95%CI: 0.74 to 1.13; P = 0.04). Acute renal injury occurred significantly less frequently in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction who received gliflozins than in HFpEF (HR: 0.67, 95%CI: 51 to 0.82 vs 0.94, 95%CI: 0.82 to 1.06; P = 0.01). Volume depletion was consistently increased in response to SGLT2i in all the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Heart failure patients with lower LVEF and lower NYHA sub-classifications were found to be generally more likely to benefit from therapy with gliflozins. Further research are required to identify patient subgroups representing the highest benefits or adverse events in response to SGLT2i.

Comparative cardiovascular benefits of individual SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes and heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and a history of heart failure (HF), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) benefits. However, the comparative efficacy of individual SGLT2is remains uncertain. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy and safety of five SGLT2is (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin) on CV outcomes in these patients.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to September 23, 2022, to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2is to placebo in T2D patients with HF. The main outcomes included composite CV death/heart failure hospitalization (HFH), HFH, CV death, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Pairwise and NMA approaches were applied.

Results

Our analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 20,438 patients with T2D and HF. All SGLT2is significantly reduced HFH compared to standard of care (SoC) alone. "Add-on" SGLT2is, except ertugliflozin, significantly reduced composite CV death/HFH relative to SoC alone. Moreover, canagliflozin had lower composite CV death/HFH compared to dapagliflozin. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the top-ranked SGLT2is for reducing HFH were canagliflozin (95.5%), sotagliflozin (66.0%), and empagliflozin (57.2%). Head-to-head comparisons found no significant differences between individual SGLT2is in reducing CV death. "Add-on" SGLT2is reduced all-cause mortality compared with SoC alone, although only dapagliflozin was statistically significant. No SGLT2is were significantly associated with serious adverse events. A sensitivity analysis focusing on HF-specific trials found that dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin significantly reduced composite CV death/HFH, consistent with the main analysis. However, no significant differences were identified from their head-to-head comparisons in the NMA. The SUCRA indicated that sotagliflozin had the highest probability of reducing composite CV death/HFH (97.6%), followed by empagliflozin (58.4%) and dapagliflozin (44.0%).

Conclusion

SGLT2is significantly reduce the composite CV death/HFH outcome. Among them, canagliflozin may be considered the preferred treatment for patients with diabetes and a history of heart failure, but it may also be associated with an increased risk of any adverse events compared to other SGLT2is. However, a sensitivity analysis focusing on HF-specific trials identified sotagliflozin as the most likely agent to reduce CV death/HFH, followed by empagliflozin and dapagliflozin.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022353754.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Among Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVE

Results from large placebo-controlled randomized trials in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) have become available recently. This article discusses results of these clinical trials.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed articles were identified from MEDLINE (1966 to December 31, 2022) using search terms dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, SGLT-2Is, HFmrEF, and HFpEF.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Eight completed, pertinent clinical trials were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

EMPEROR-Preserved, and DELIVER demonstrated that empagliflozin and dapagliflozin reduce CV death and heart failure hospitalization (HHF) in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, with/without diabetes when added to a standard heart failure (HF) regimen. The benefit is primarily due to reduction in HHF. Additional data from post hoc analyses of trials of dapagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin suggest that these benefits may be a class effect. Benefits appear greatest in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction 41% up to about 65%.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

While many pharmacologic treatments have been proven to reduce mortality and improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in people with HFmrEF and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), there are few therapy which improve CV outcome in people with HFpEF. SGLT-2I become one of the first class of pharmacologic agent that can be used to reduce HHF and CV mortality.

CONCLUSION

Studies showed that empagliflozin and dapagliflozin reduce the combined risk of CV death or HHF in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF when added to a standard HF regimen. Given that benefit has now been demonstrated across the spectrum of HF, SGLT-2Is should be considered one of the standard HF pharmacotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov till March 2023 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials of SGLT2i in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included data from 14 RCTs. SGLT2i reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.87; I2 = 0%); these results were consistent across the cohorts of HFmrEF and HFpEF patients. There was no significant decrease in the risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.13; I2 = 36%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.05; I2 = 0%). There was a significant improvement in the quality of life in the SGLT2i group (SMD 0.13, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.20; I2 = 51%).

CONCLUSION

The use of SGLT2i is associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome and a higher quality of life among HFpEF/HFmrEF patients. However, further research involving more extended follow-up periods is required to draw a comprehensive conclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022364223).

A Comprehensive Guide to Sodium Glucose Cotransport Inhibitors

Sodium-glucose cotransport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a class of drugs initially approved by the Food and Drug Association (FDA) as antihyperglycemic agents for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, lately, these agents (Canagliflozin, Empagliflozin, Ertugliflozin, Sotagliflozin, and Dapagliflozin) have become better known for their cardiovascular (CV) and reno-protective effects. In this comprehensive review and analysis, we display the advancement of Sodium Glucose Cotransport Inhibitors have shown in cardiology, specifically heart failure in a concise, yet thorough manner.

SGLT2 inhibitors among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been recommended in the practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; however, their effects among patients with preserved ejection fraction have been debatable.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the SGLT2 inhibitor effect among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including DELIVER and EMPEROR-Preserved trials.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries for relevant articles from inception until August 30th, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating hazard ratio (HR) using the random effect model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and probability value (P). Statistical significance was met if 95% CI does not cross numeric "1" and P < .05.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 15,989 total patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age of patients enrolled in SGLT2 inhibitors and placebo was 69.13 and 69.37 years, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 2.24 years. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced composite cardiovascular mortality or first hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74-0.87], P < .001, I2 = 0%), heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.74 [95% CI: 0.67-0.82], P < .001, I2 = 0%) compared with placebo. However, all-cause mortality (HR, 0.97 [95% CI: 0.89-1.06], P = .54, I2 = 0%) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.96 [95% CI: 0.82-1.13), P = .66, I2 = 35.09%] were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study finding shows that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization; however, all-cause mortality was comparable between the groups.

Efficacy of SGLT2-inhibitors across different definitions of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been evaluated in phase 3 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled individuals with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) based on detailed clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic criteria (hereafter HF-RCTs), and in cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) in diabetic patients, in which the diagnosis of HFpEF relied on medical history.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a study-level meta-analysis of the efficacy of SGLT2i across different definitions of HFpEF. Three HF-RCTs (EMPEROR-Preserved, DELIVER, and SOLOIST-WHF) and four CVOTs (EMPA-REG OUTCOME, DECLARE-TIMI 58, VERTIS-CV, and SCORED) were included, for a total of 14 034 patients. SGLT2i reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) in all RCTs pooled together [risk ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.63-0.89, NNT 19], in HF-RCTs (risk ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97, NNT 13), and in CVOTs (risk ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, NNT 26). SGLT2i also decreased the risk of HFH in all RCTs (risk ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.90, NNT 45), in HF-RCTs (risk ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.93, NNT 37), and in CVOTs (risk ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.99, NNT 46). By contrast, SGLT2i were not superior to placebo for cardiovascular death or all-cause death in all RCTs, HF-RCTs, or CVOTs. Results were comparable after excluding one RCT at a time. Meta-regression analysis confirmed that the type of RCT (HF-RCT vs. CVOT) did not influence the SGLT2i effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In RCTs, SGLT2i improved the outcomes of patients with HFpEF regardless of how the latter was diagnosed.

Cardiovascular Diseases: Therapeutic Potential of SGLT-2 Inhibitors

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a global health concern, affecting millions of patients worldwide and being the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, thus creating a major public health concern. Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a promising class of medications for managing CVD. Initially developed as antihyperglycemic agents for treating type 2 diabetes, these drugs have demonstrated significant cardiovascular benefits beyond glycemic control. In our paper, we discuss the role of empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and the relatively recently approved bexagliflozin, the class of SGLT-2 inhibitors, as potential therapeutic targets for cardiovascular diseases. All mentioned SGLT-2 inhibitors have demonstrated significant cardiovascular benefits and renal protection in clinical trials, in patients with or without type 2 diabetes. These novel therapeutic approaches aim to develop more effective treatments that improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of these conditions. However, the major scientific achievements of recent years and the many new discoveries and mechanisms still require careful attention and additional studies.

SGLT2 inhibitors: an evidence-based update on cardiovascular implications

INTRODUCTION

Sodium Glucose co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (also known as 'gliflozins') represent a cornerstone to treat diabetes mellitus. Moreover, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated important cardioprotective effects of gliflozins, independent of the presence of diabetes. Herein, we summarize the recent therapeutic progress in the cardiovascular field obtained with SGLT2 inhibitors.

AREA COVERED

We critically examine the rationale and results of recent clinical studies examining the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes, along with a brief overview of the main ongoing trials that have been designed in order to answer the many pending questions in the field of gliflozins and cardiovascular disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The favorable results of several clinical trials have broadened the therapeutic scenario for SGLT2 inhibitors, opening, at the same time, new challenges. Additionally, recent preclinical findings have evidenced off-target effects of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular Outcomes Across Various Patient Populations

BACKGROUND

The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on heart failure (HF) outcomes and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with varying combinations of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), HF, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The authors conducted a meta-analysis assessing the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on HF outcomes and CV death across different patient populations.

METHODS

Online databases were queried up to November 2022 for primary and secondary analyses of trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HF, T2DM, or CKD. Outcomes of interest were composite of first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or CV death (first HFH/CV death), first HFH, and CV death. Data were pooled by means of a random-effects model to derive HRs and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials (n = 90,413) were included. Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of first HFH/CV death by 24% in HF (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.72-0.81), 23% in T2DM (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.73-0.81), and 23% in CKD (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.72-0.82). The benefit was consistent in HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction, HF with or without T2DM, and HF with or without CKD. The benefit was also consistent in T2DM with or without CKD, T2DM without HF, CKD without HF, and in patients with all 3 comorbidities. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced CV death by 16% in HF, 15% in T2DM, and 12% in CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HF events and CV death in cohorts of HF, T2DM and CKD, and these effects appear consistent in patients with varying combinations of these diseases.

Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: an overview of 36 systematic reviews

The recently published randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in heart failure with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) led researchers to perform a plethora of systematic reviews (SRs), often providing contradictory conclusions. This overview of reviews was aimed at summarizing the evidence of these SRs, quantifying the overlap, re-analyzing the evidence in case new studies that were identified, and mapping knowledge gaps. Literature search was conducted through Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane until March 22, 2023. Overall, 36 SRs synthesizing results from 18 RCTs were identified. A substantial overlap was identified among the SRs synthesizing large heart failure or cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). Regarding the composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) mortality or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), all authors reported a significant favorable effect. A beneficial effect was also noted for CV and all-cause mortality, albeit not significant. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS, MD = 1.97, p < 0.001), Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS, MD = 2.29, p < 0.001), Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS, MD = 1.59, p < 0.001), and the 6-min walking distance (MD = 10.78 m, p = 0.032). Regarding safety, SGLT2i were associated with a significantly lower risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo (RR = 0.94, p = 0.002). The use of SGLT2i in HFpEF is both efficient and safe. Further research is required to clarify the impact of SGTL2i on different subphenotypes of HFpEF and the cardiorespiratory capacity of these patients.

Systematic review of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a hopeful prospect in tackling heart failure-related events

In modern cardiology, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are critical components of heart failure (HF) treatment algorithms and exert their effects primarily by preventing glucose reabsorption and facilitating its urinary excretion. The objective was to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, particularly canagliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, ertugliflozin, sotagliflozin (dual SGLT inhibitor), and their use in HF. Systematic searches of PubMed/Medline, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were performed. There were no restrictions imposed on the date and status of publication; however, there were restrictions on language for the searched studies. A total of 1139 records were identified in the bibliographic searches from both databases and the register of choice for this systematic review. Following duplicate removal, screening for titles and abstracts, and thorough assessment of full-text articles, 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Altogether, 83 878 patients were included in this review. Among the included studies, two RCTs, with six respective reports, investigated canagliflozin, four RCTs with 13 derived reports investigated dapagliflozin, three RCTs with 12 separate reports studied the effects of empagliflozin, one RCT and its three respective reports assessed ertugliflozin's effects, and two RCTs with one added report investigated the dual inhibitor sotagliflozin. Pooled meta-analytic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors were as follows: on atrial fibrillation odds ratio (OR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-1.01, prediction interval (PI): 0.57-1.19; on HF hospitalization OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.78, PI: 0.60-0.78; on cardiovascular death OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.58-1.15, PI: 0.42-1.60; and on major adverse cardiovascular events OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, PI: 0.71-1.15. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improve the quality of life in HF patients. Their beneficial effects on HF, especially in left ventricular dysfunction, have made their use possible irrespective of diabetes mellitus or atrial fibrillation status.