Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering on Intracranial and Extracranial Bleeding in Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy

Unawareness and untreated hypertension: a public health problem needs to be solved

Current state of BP management and methods for improving BP status for hypertensive patients.

Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Dementia, and Alzheimer Neuropathologic Changes: Findings From the ACT Autopsy Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is common in older adults and is associated with dementia. Less is known whether this association is mediated by Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes, the examination of which was the objective of this study.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional examination of the Kaiser Permanente Washington database of the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) autopsy cohort with information on CAA, dementia, the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) (amyloid neuritic plaques), and Braak (tau neurofibrillary tangles). CAA was diagnosed by immunohistochemistry and dementia by ACT Consensus Diagnostic Conference. AD neuropathology was categorized by CERAD scores and Braak stages. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of the associations of CAA with dementia, adjusting for age at death and sex, and with additional adjustments separately for CERAD scores (moderate-severe vs mild-absent), Braak stages (V-VI vs 0-IV), APOE ε4, and stroke. Formal mediation analyses were conducted to estimate age-sex-adjusted OR (95% CI) for natural indirect effects (NIEs) of CERAD scores and Braak stages.

RESULTS

The 848 participants had a mean age of 86.7 ± 4.6 years at death, and 57.6% were female. CAA was present in 322 participants (38.0%), of whom 152, 145, and 25 had mild, moderate, and severe CAA, respectively. Dementia was present in 384 participants (45.3%), of whom 317 had AD. Dementia was more common in those with CAA than without (53.7% vs 40.1%; age-sex-adjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18-2.10). This association remained significant after separate adjustment for other covariates but lost significance when adjusted for CERAD scores (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.93-1.71) and Braak stages (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.69-1.33). Findings from our formal mediation analyses show that ORs (95% CIs) for NIE of CERAD scores and Braak stages were 1.25 (1.13-1.37) and 1.63 (1.38-1.88), respectively, and CERAD scores and Braak stages mediated 53% and 111% of the total association, respectively.

DISCUSSION

We observed a significant association between CAA and dementia that disappeared when adjusted for CERAD or Braak stages. Findings from our mediation analyses suggest that the CAA-dementia association may be potentially mediated by AD neuropathologic changes. This hypothesis needs to be tested in future mechanistic studies in AD accounting for unmeasured confounders.

Late-Life Blood Pressure and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Findings from the U.S. National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Dataset

High blood pressure (BP) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) are two common risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage, potentially leading to cognitive impairment. Less is known about the relationship between BP and CAA, the examination of which was the objective of this study. We analyzed data from 2510 participants in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) who had information on longitudinal BP measurements before death and on CAA from autopsy. Using the average of four systolic BPs (SBPs) prior to death, SBP was categorized into three groups: <120 mmHg (n = 435), 120-139 mmHg (n = 1335), and ≥140 mmHg (n = 740). CAA was diagnosed using immunohistochemistry in 1580 participants and categorized as mild (n = 759), moderate (n = 529), or severe (n = 292). When adjusted for age at death, sex, APOE genotype, Braak, CERAD, antihypertensive medication use, and microinfarcts, the odds ratios (95% CIs) for CAA associated with SBPs of 120-139 and ≥140 mmHg were 0.91 (0.74-1.12) and 1.00 (0.80-1.26), respectively. Findings from predictor effect plots show no variation in the probability of CAA between the three SBP categories. Microbleeds had no association with CAA, but among those with SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, the proportion of those with microbleeds was numerically greater in those with more severe CAA (p for trend, 0.084). In conclusion, we found no evidence of an association between SBP and CAA. Future studies need to develop non-invasive laboratory tests to diagnose CAA and prospectively examine this association and its implication on the pathophysiology and outcome of Alzheimer's disease.

The 2022 focused update of the 2018 Korean Hypertension Society Guidelines for the management of hypertension

Hypertension is the leading cause of death in human being, which shows high prevalence and associated complications that increase the mortality and morbidity. Controlling blood pressure (BP) is very important because it is well known that lowering high BP effectively improves patients' prognosis. This review aims to provide a focused update of the 2018 Korean Hypertension Society Guidelines for the management of hypertension. The importance of ambulatory BP and home BP monitoring was further emphasized not only for the diagnosis but also for treatment target. By adopting corresponding BPs, the updated guideline recommended out-of-office BP targets for both standard and intensive treatment. Based on the consensus on corresponding BPs and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) revisit, the updated guidelines recommended target BP in high-risk patients below 130/80 mmHg and it applies to hypertensive patients with three or more additional cardiovascular risk factors, one or more risk factors with diabetes, or hypertensive patients with subclinical organ damages, coronary or vascular diseases, heart failure, chronic kidney disease with proteinuria, and cerebral lacunar infarction. Cerebral infarction and chronic kidney disease are also high-risk factors for cardiovascular disease. However, due to lack of evidence, the target BP was generally determined at < 140/90 mmHg in patients with those conditions as well as in the elderly. Updated contents regarding the management of hypertension in special situations are also discussed.

The effect of heart rate on blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study

This study explored the effect of heart rate (HR) on the stability and accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement and the optimal HR range for the most accurate blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. A total of 583 patients (383 and 200 with AF and sinus rhythm (SR), respectively) were included in this study. The noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), invasive blood pressure (IBP), and HR were repeatedly measured ten times at 30-second intervals for every patient. Both the AF and SR groups were then subdivided into five groups depending on the HR (i.e., < 60, 60-80, 80-100, 100-120, and ≥120 bpm). The difference between the IBP and NIBP (i.e., △SBP) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated, and the stability and accuracy of NIBP measurements were analyzed. CV and △SBP were significantly higher in the AF group. In the AF group, the CV of NIBP was highest when the HR was ≥ 100 bpm; and △SBP was significantly lower in the HR groups with 60-80 and 80-100 bpm (< 60 bpm, △SBP 11.62 ± 2.64 mmHg; 60-80 bpm, △SBP 7.10 ± 1.92 mmHg; 80-100 bpm, △SBP 7.10 ± 2.95 mmHg; 100-120 bpm, △SBP 10.52 ± 2.72 mmHg; ≥120 bpm, △SBP 14.15 ± 3.61 mmHg, P < 0.05). The stability and accuracy of the NIBP in the SR groups were not affected by the HR. In AF patients, the NIBP stability was low when the HR was high, and the NIBP was often underestimated when the HR was high or low. Sixty to 100 bpm is the best HR range for measuring blood pressure in AF patients.

Investigation of Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients with and without Antithrombotic Therapy in a Real-World Setting

Background Although numerous studies have demonstrated a strong association between blood pressure (BP) and hemorrhagic complications of antithrombotic therapy, there is still a paucity of information regarding the status of BP control in hypertensive patients on antithrombotic therapy. Methods This cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at an outpatient clinic to examine BP control and its associated factors in hypertensive patients receiving or not receiving antithrombotic therapy. Results Of 26,803 outpatients who had scheduled visits in 2018, 7,800 hypertensive patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,727 cases were on oral antithrombotic drugs. Then, target BP values were defined according to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension 2019. While BP values <140/90 mmHg were observed in 63.0% and 61.6% of patients with and without antithrombotic therapy, respectively, only 31.1% and 23.4% of them displayed BP values <130/80 mmHg. Multivariable logistic analysis indicated that comorbidity with obesity was a significant correlate of insufficient BP control (target BP <130/80 mmHg) in hypertensive patients, irrespective of antithrombotic therapy (patients with antithrombotic therapy, odds ratio (OR) = 1.690, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.351-2.113; patients without antithrombotic therapy, OR = 1.475, 95% CI = 1.290-1.687). Conclusion The majority of patients exhibited BP values <140/90 mmHg, whereas BP values <130/80 mmHg were achieved only in a small proportion of the patients. Furthermore, obesity appeared to be one of the factors contributing to insufficient BP control in a real-world setting.

Clinical perspectives on ischemic stroke

Treatments for acute stroke have improved over the past years, but have largely been limited to revascularization strategies. The topic of neuroprotection, or strategies to limit brain tissue damage or even reverse it, has remained elusive. Thus, the clinical mainstays for stroke management have focused on prevention. The lack of clinical translation of neuroprotective therapies which have shown promise in the laboratory may, in part, be due to a historic inattention to comorbidities suffered by a majority of stroke patients. With the advent of more stroke models that include one or more relevant comorbidities, it may be possible to identify effective treatments that may translate into new treatments at the clinical level. In the meantime, we review comorbidities in stroke patients, modification of stroke risk factors and available acute stroke treatments in the clinic.

Exposure to the Chinese famine in early life and self-reported arthritis risk in adulthood

Evidence shows that undernutrition during early life is associated with an increased risk of chronic diseases in adulthood. We aimed to investigate whether exposure to the Chinese famine in the fetal or infant stage was associated with self-reported arthritis risk in adulthood. A total of 3,622 participants were included in the final analysis. Participants were classified into non-, fetal-, and infant-exposed group. Arthritis was self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of arthritis. The prevalence of arthritis was 27.07%, 27.74%, and 34.09% among individuals in non-, fetal-, infant-exposed group, respectively. Infant-exposed group (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12-1.56) had a higher arthritis risk then non-exposed group after adjustment for gender, age, area, education level, smoking status, drinking status, and physical activity. Participants who experienced severe famine during infant and fetal period had higher (41.46%, OR=1.71 and 32.94%, OR=1.36) arthritis risk than those exposed to less severe famine. Exposure to the Chinese famine in early life was associated with an increased risk of arthritis in adulthood, which was partially influenced by some factors (e.g., gender, area, body mass index, and born in severely affected area or not).

Cardiovascular outcomes at recommended blood pressure targets in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to all middle-aged and elderly hypertensive study patients with high cardiovascular risk

PURPOSE

Event-based clinical outcome trials have shown limited evidence to support guidelines recommendations to lower blood pressure (BP) to <130/80 mmHg in middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus or with general high cardiovascular (CV) risk. We addressed this issue by post-hoc analysing the risk of CV events in patients who participated in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial and compared the hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with all high-risk hypertensive patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the proportion of on-treatment visits before the occurrence of an event (<25% to ≥75%) in which BP was reduced to <140/90 or <130/80 mmHg. Patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 5250) were compared with the entire VALUE population with high CV risk (n = 15,245).

RESULTS

After adjustments for baseline differences between groups, a reduction in the proportion of visits in which BP was reduced to <140/90 mmHg, but not to <130/80 mmHg, was accompanied by a progressive increase in the risk of CV morbidity and mortality as well as stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure in both diabetes mellitus and in all high-risk patients. Target BP <130/80 mmHg reduced stroke risk in the main population but not in the diabetes mellitus patients. Patients with diabetes mellitus had higher event rates for the primary cardiac endpoint and all-cause mortality driven by a higher rate of heart failure.

CONCLUSION

In the high-risk hypertensive patients of the VALUE trial achieving more frequently BP <140/90 mmHg, but not <130/80 mmHg, showed principally the same protective effect on overall and cause-specific cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and in the general high-risk hypertensive population.

2020 Consensus summary on the management of hypertension in Asia from the HOPE Asia Network

Hypertension professionals from Asia have been meeting together for the last decade to discuss how to improve the management of hypertension. Based on these education and research activities, the Hypertension, brain, cardiovascular and renal Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network was officially established in June 2018 and includes experts from 12 countries/regions across Asia. Among the numerous research and review papers published by members of the HOPE Asia Network since 2017, publications in three key areas provide important guidance on the management of hypertension in Asia. This article highlights key consensus documents, which relate to the Asian characteristics of hypertension, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Hypertension and hypertension-related diseases are common in Asia, and their characteristics differ from those in other populations. It is essential that these are taken into consideration to provide the best opportunity for achieving "perfect 24-hour blood pressure control", guided by out-of-office (home and ambulatory) blood pressure monitoring. These region-specific consensus documents should contribute to optimizing individual and population-based hypertension management strategies in Asian country. In addition, the HOPE Asia Network model provides a good example of the local interpretation, modification, and dissemination of international best practice to benefit specific populations.

Sagas of the Solanaceae: Speculative ethnobotanical perspectives on the Norse berserkers

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The Norse berserkers were wild warriors of Scandinavia known to enter a trance-like state that allowed them to fight with increased strength and a rage that granted them immunity to many forms of harm in battle. Though many theories have been advanced as to the cause of this state, the most widely believed is that the intoxicating mushroom Amanita muscaria was used.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The following article underlines the issues with this theory and provides an alternate intoxicant that fits with the reports of berserker behaviour much better: Hyoscyamus niger.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature from a variety of disciplines pertaining to history, toxicology, pharmacology, and botany was compiled to frame and support the argument.

RESULTS

H. niger proved to be a more likely intoxicant used to induce the berserker rage state.

CONCLUSIONS

With its anticholinergic tropane alkaloids and symptom profile, H. niger is a much more likely cause of the berserker state than A muscaria. Though there is not enough archaeological and historical evidence to prove or disprove this theory, it provides a novel explanation that is at present the most viable means of understanding the berserkers' trance.

Association of Pulse Pressure With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Under Different Antiplatelet Strategies After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis of GLOBAL LEADERS

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the association of pulse pressure (PP) and different antiplatelet regimes with clinical and safety outcomes in an all-comers percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) population.

METHODS

In this analysis of GLOBAL LEADERS (n = 15,936) we compared the experimental therapy of 23 months of ticagrelor after 1 month of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs standard DAPT for 12 months followed by aspirin monotherapy in subjects who underwent PCI and were divided into 2 groups according to the median PP (60 mm Hg). The primary end point (all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction) and the composite end points: patient-oriented composite end points (POCE), Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5, and net adverse clinical events (NACE) were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 2 years, subjects in the high-PP group (n = 7971) had similar rates of the primary end point (4.3% vs 3.9%; P = 0.058), POCE (14.9% vs 12.7%; P = 0.051), and BARC 3 or 5 (2.5% vs 1.7%; P = 0.355) and higher rates of NACE (16.4% vs 13.7%; P = 0.037) compared with the low-PP group (n = 7965). Among patients with PP < 60 mm Hg, the primary end point (3.4% vs 4.4%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.96), POCE (11.8% vs 13.5%, aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98), NACE (12.8% vs 14.7%, aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96), and BARC 3 or 5 (1.4% vs 2.1%, aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97) were lower with ticagrelor monotherapy compared with DAPT. The only significant interaction was for BARC 3 or 5 (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

After contemporary PCI, subjects with high PP levels experienced high rates of NACE at 2 years. In those with low PP, ticagrelor monotherapy led to a lower risk of bleeding events compared with standard DAPT.

Edoxaban Versus Warfarin Stratified by Average Blood Pressure in 19 679 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Hypertension in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial

Hypertension is a risk factor for both stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Data are sparse regarding the interaction between blood pressure and the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), 19,679 patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertension were categorized according to average systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The primary efficacy and safety end points were the time to the first stroke or systemic embolic event and the time to the first International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding event, respectively. Risk was calculated using Cox proportional hazards models based on average SBP and DBP and adjusting for 18 clinical characteristics. The efficacy and safety of a higher dose edoxaban regimen (60/30 mg) versus warfarin were evaluated with stratification by average SBP and DBP. Stroke/systemic embolic event occurred significantly more frequently in patients with elevated average SBP (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.50–2.70 for SBP ≥150 mm Hg relative to 130–139 mm Hg) or DBP (hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.76–3.16 for DBP ≥90 mm Hg relative to 75–<85 mm Hg). The higher dose edoxaban regimen reduced stroke/systemic embolic event across the full range of SBP ( P interaction =0.55) and DBP ( P interaction =0.44) compared with warfarin. The higher dose edoxaban regimen reduced the risk of major bleeding events, including intracranial hemorrhage, without modification by average SBP ( P interaction =0.29). The relative safety of edoxaban was most pronounced in patients with elevated DBP ( P interaction =0.007). The efficacy and safety of edoxaban were consistent across the full range of SBP, while the superior safety of edoxaban was most pronounced among patients with elevated DBP.

2018 Korean society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: part III-hypertension in special situations

Treatment of hypertension improves cardiovascular, renal, and cerebrovascular outcomes. However, the benefit of treatment may be different according to the patients' characteristics. Additionally, the target blood pressure or initial drug choice should be customized according to the special conditions of the hypertensive patients. In this part III, we reviewed previous data and presented recommendations for some special populations such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, elderly people, and cardio-cerebrovascular disease.

Intracerebral hemorrhage: an update on diagnosis and treatment

Introduction: Spontaneous non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is most often caused by small vessel diseases: deep perforator arteriopathy (hypertensive arteriopathy) or cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Although ICH accounts for only 10-15% of all strokes it causes a high proportion of stroke mortality and morbidity, with few proven effective acute or preventive treatments. Areas covered: We conducted a literature search on etiology, diagnosis, treatment, management and current clinical trials in ICH. In this review, We describe the causes, diagnosis (including new brain imaging biomarkers), classification, pathophysiological understanding, treatment (medical and surgical), and secondary prevention of ICH. Expert opinion: In recent years, significant advances have been made in deciphering causes, understanding pathophysiology, and improving acute treatment and prevention of ICH. However, the clinical outcome remains poor and many challenges remain. Acute interventions delivered rapidly (including medical therapies - targeting hematoma expansion, hemoglobin toxicity, inflammation, edema, anticoagulant reversal - and minimally invasive surgery) are likely to improve acute outcomes. Improved classification of the underlying arteriopathies (from neuroimaging and genetic studies) and prognosis should allow tailored prevention strategies (including sustained blood pressure control and optimized antithrombotic therapy) to further improve longer-term outcome in this devastating disease.

Blood pressure targets in type 2 diabetes. Evidence against or in favour of an aggressive approach

When associated with high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterised by a high risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) and renal outcomes. However, both can be effectively reduced by antihypertensive treatment. Current guidelines on the treatment of hypertension emphasize the need to effectively treat high blood pressure in diabetic individuals, but their recommendations differ in terms of the optimal target blood pressure value to aim for in order to maximise CV and renal protection. In some guidelines the recommended target blood pressure values are <140/90 mmHg (systolic/diastolic), whereas in others, blood pressure values close or even less than 130/80 mmHg are recommended. This paper will discuss the evidence for and against a conservative or more aggressive blood pressure target for treated diabetic hypertensive individuals based on the evidence provided by randomised trials, trial meta-analyses and large observational studies. Based on the available evidence, it appears that blood pressure targets will probably have to be lower than <140/90 mmHg, and that values approaching 130/80 mmHg should be recommended. However, evidence in favour of even lower systolic values, i.e. <130 mmHg, is limited and is definitively against a reduction to <120 mmHg.

Unanswered questions and research priorities to optimise stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation with the new oral anticoagulants

This review article discusses the following, as yet unanswered, questions and research priorities to optimise patient management and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation with the new direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs): 1. In patients prescribed a NOAC, can the anticoagulant effects or plasma concentrations of the NOACs be measured rapidly and reliably and, if so, can “cut-off points” between which anticoagulation is therapeutic (i.e. the “therapeutic range”) be defined? 2. In patients who are taking a NOAC and bleeding (e.g. intracerebral haemorrhage), can the anticoagulant effects of the direct NOACs be reversed rapidly and, if so, can NOAC-associated bleeding and complications be minimised and patient outcome improved? 3. In patients taking a NOAC who experience an acute ischaemic stroke, to what degree of anticoagulation or plasma concentration of NOAC, if any, can thrombolysis be administered safely and effectively? 4. In patients with a recent cardioembolic ischaemic stroke, what is the optimal time to start (or re-start) anticoagulation with a NOAC (or warfarin)? 5. In anticoagulated patients who experience an intracranial haemorrhage, can anticoagulation with a NOAC be re-started safely and effectively, and if so when? 6. Are the NOACs effective and safe in multimorbid geriatric people (who commonly have atrial fibrillation and are at high risk of stroke but also bleeding)? 7. Can dose-adjusted NOAC therapy augment the established safety and efficacy of fixed-dose unmonitored NOAC therapy? 8. Is there a dose or dosing regimen for each NOAC that is as effective and safe as adjusted-dose warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation who have mechanical prosthetic heart valves? 9. What is the long-term safety of the NOACs?

Blood pressure levels and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after ischemic stroke

Objective:

To investigate the association between blood pressure (BP) levels and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after ischemic stroke.

Methods:

We performed a post hoc analysis of data from the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial, a randomized clinical trial including 20,332 patients with recent noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. BP measurements were divided into predefined categories. We calculated incidence rates per BP category and performed multivariable Cox regression analysis with systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) categories as time-dependent covariables.

Results:

One hundred thirty-three ICHs occurred during 50,778 person-years of follow-up, resulting in an incidence rate of 2.6 per 1,000 person-years. The incidence rate of ICH increased with increasing SBP and DBP categories. Risk of ICH was significantly higher in patients with SBP ≥160 mm Hg (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.34–3.86) compared with those with SBP of 130–<140 mm Hg and in patients with DBP ≥100 mm Hg (hazard ratio 3.08, 95% confidence interval 1.78–5.34) compared with those with DBP of 80–<90 mm Hg. The association between SBP or DBP and ICH did not differ by ischemic stroke subtype (p = 0.55 and 0.93).

Conclusions:

Among patients with recent noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, the risk of ICH is high. High SBP and DBP are associated with an increased risk of ICH. The association between BP and ICH is not dependent on ischemic stroke subtype.

Evaluation of the antithrombotic abilities of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants using the Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System®

The Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System (T-TAS^®) is a novel automated microchip flow-chamber system for the quantitative evaluation of thrombus formation under blood flow conditions. T-TAS^® uses two types of microchip to evaluate thrombus formation: the AR-chip quantifies white thrombus formation and the PL-chip quantifies platelet thrombus formation. We assessed the antithrombotic abilities of various non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) using T-TAS^®. One hundred and three consecutive patients who were hospitalized with cardiovascular diseases were enrolled. We divided the patients into 2 groups; a control group that did not receive an anticoagulant (non-AC group) and an anticoagulant group (AC group). The AC group was further divided into warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. We performed common coagulation tests and evaluated the area under the flow pressure curve (AR-AUC and PL-AUC) to quantify antithrombotic ability using T-TAS^® at the trough. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the non-AC and AC groups. Only 55.1 % of patients in the AC group achieved the target blood pressure (BP) of less than 130/80 mmHg. Compared with the non-AC group, AR-AUC was significantly decreased in the AC, warfarin, dabigatran and apixaban groups. Only the rivaroxaban group did not show a significant decrease in AR-AUC. NOACs showed a significant decrease in PL-AUC compared with the non-AC group. In conclusion, T-TAS^® was a useful tool for evaluating anticoagulation activity. NOACs was significantly effective as an antiplatelet agent. BP control should be a higher priority than the selection of an anticoagulant drug, especially NOACs.

Blood pressure control versus atrial fibrillation management in stroke prevention

Hypertension is one of the major risk factors for atrial fibrillation which in turn is the most prevalent concomitant condition in hypertensive patients. While both these pathological conditions are independent risk factors for stroke, the association of hypertension and atrial fibrillation increases the incidence of disabling strokes. Moreover, documented or silent atrial fibrillation doubles the rate of cardiovascular death. Lowering blood pressure is strongly recommended, particularly for primary stroke prevention. However, a relatively small percentage of hypertensive patients still achieve the recommended blood pressure goals. The management of atrial fibrillation with respect to stroke prevention is changing. New oral anticoagulants represent a major advancement in long-term anticoagulation therapy in non valvular atrial fibrillation. They have several benefits over warfarin, including improved adherence to the anticoagulation therapy. This is an important issue since non-adherence to stroke prevention medications is a risk factor for first and recurrent strokes.

Antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a practical approach

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly is a complex condition. It has a direct impact on the underuse of antithrombotic therapy reported in this population.

DISCUSSION

All patients aged ≥75 years with AF have an individual yearly risk of stroke >4 %. However, the risk of hemorrhage is also increased. Moreover, in this population it is common the presence of other comorbidities, cognitive disorders, risk of falls and polymedication. This may lead to an underuse of anticoagulant therapy. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least as effective as conventional therapy, but with lesser risk of intracranial hemorrhage. The simplification of treatment with these drugs may be an advantage in patients with cognitive impairment. The great majority of elderly patients with AF should receive anticoagulant therapy, unless an unequivocal contraindication. DOACs may be the drugs of choice in many elderly patients with AF. In this manuscript, the available evidence about the management of anticoagulation in elderly patients with AF is reviewed. In addition, specific practical recommendations about different controversial issues (i.e. patients with anemia, thrombocytopenia, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, renal dysfunction, cognitive impairment, risk of falls, polymedication, frailty, etc.) are provided.

Characteristics of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients Receiving Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

Objectives

The first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) introduced to the market in Japan was dabigatran in March 2011, and three more NOACs, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have since become available. Randomized controlled trials of NOACs have revealed that intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurs less frequently with NOACs compared with warfarin. However, the absolute incidence of ICH associated with NOACs has increased with greater use of these anticoagulants, and we wanted to explore the incidence, clinical characteristics, and treatment course of patients with NOACs-associated ICH.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of symptomatic ICH patients receiving NOACs between March 2011 and September 2014.

Results

ICH occurred in 6 patients (5 men, 1 woman; mean ± SD age, 72.8 ± 3.2 years). Mean time to onset was 146.2 ± 111.5 days after starting NOACs. Five patients received rivaroxaban and 1 patient received apixaban. None received dabigatran or edoxaban. Notably, no hematoma expansion was observed within 24 h of onset in the absence of infusion of fresh frozen plasma, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, recombinant activated factor VIIa or hemodialysis. When NOAC therapy was initiated, mean HAS-BLED and PANWARDS scores were 1.5 ± 0.5 and 39.5 ± 7.7, respectively. Mean systolic blood pressure was 137.8 ± 15.9 mmHg within 1 month before spontaneous ICH onset.

Conclusion

Six symptomatic ICHs occurred early in NOAC therapy but hematoma volume was small and did not expand in the absence of infusion of reversal agents or hemodialysis. The occurrence of ICH during NOAC therapy is possible even when there is acceptable mean systolic blood pressure control (137.8 ± 15.9 mmHg) and HAS-BLED score ≤ 2. Even stricter blood pressure lowering and control within the acceptable range may be advisable to prevent ICH during NOAC therapy.

2013 Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: part III-hypertension in special situations

Different treatment strategies are suggested for special situations. Hypertension is common in the elderly and frequently accompanied by or complicates other clinical conditions such as metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

Management of acute stroke in patients taking novel oral anticoagulants

Each year, 1·0–2·0% of individuals with atrial fibrillation and 0·1–0·2% of those with venous thromboembolism who are receiving one of the novel oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) can be expected to experience an acute ischemic stroke. Additionally, 0·2–0·5% of individuals with atrial fibrillation who are receiving one of the novel oral anticoagulants can be expected to experience an intracranial hemorrhage. This opinion piece addresses the current literature and offers practical approaches to the management of patients receiving novel oral anticoagulants who present with an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Specifically, we discuss the role of thrombolysis in anticoagulated patients with acute ischemic stroke and factors to consider concerning restarting anticoagulation after acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.