Direct Mechanical Intervention Versus Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Registries

Safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in different age groups of acute ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus direct MT in different age groups of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from the prospective endovascular stroke registry of the Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy, between January 2015 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into age groups (≤ 80 years old and > 80 years old); for each age group, they were further divided in the bridging therapy group and the direct MT group. We performed a propensity score analysis according to baseline characteristics. Safety outcomes were any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) and 3-month mortality. Efficacy outcomes were successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, mTICI, score ≥ 2b) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, mRS, ≤ 2).

RESULTS

We included 761 AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO (mean age 73.5 ± 12.8 years; 44.8% males; mean baseline NIHSS 16 ± 5). After propensity score, there were 365 patients ≤ 80 years old (52% bridging therapy) and 187 patients > 80 years old (57% bridging therapy). In both age groups of patients, we found no statistically significant differences in the rates of any ICH, sICH, successful recanalization and 3-month mortality and functional independence between bridging therapy and direct MT groups.

CONCLUSION

In our population, safety and efficacy outcomes of bridging therapy versus direct MT did not differ in both AIS patients ≤ 80 and > 80 years old.

Malignant Brain Edema and Associated Factors in Large Hemispheric Infarction Following Reperfusion Therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore Malignant Brain Edema (MBE) and associated factors in patients with Large Hemispheric Infarction (LHI) following early reperfusion therapy.

METHODS

We consecutively and retrospectively enrolled a cohort of 114 LHI patients who had received early reperfusion therapy, including Intravenous Thrombolysis (IVT) or Endovascular Therapy (EVT) at the hyperacute stage of stroke between January 2009 and December 2018. MBE was defined as a midline shift ≥5 mm, accompanied by signs of herniation. Multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to identify independent factors associated with MBE in LHI patients following early reperfusion therapy.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled patients, 69 (60.53%) were treated with IVT alone and 45 (39.47%) with EVT. Successful recanalization was achieved in 56 (49.12%) patients, while complete recanalization was achieved in 38 (33.33%) patients. After early reperfusion therapy, 50 (43.86%) developed MBE in LHI patients. The MBE group showed higher rates of in-hospital death (54% vs. 4.69%), 3-month mortality (64% vs. 10.94%), and 3-month unfavorable outcomes (90% vs. 64.06%) (all p<0.01). Neither different reperfusion therapy (EVT vs. IVT alone) nor different recanalization status (complete recanalization or not) was independently associated with the development of MBE in LHI patients following reperfusion therapy in multivariate analyses. MBE was independently associated with age [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.953, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.910-0.999, p =0.044], right hemisphere stroke (OR 4.051, 95% CI 1.035-15.860, p =0.045), previous ischemic stroke or TIA (OR 0.090, 95% CI 0.014-0.571, p =0.011), and hypodensity >1/3 MCA territory (OR 8.071, 95% CI 1.878-34.693, p =0.005). Meanwhile, patients with lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) had a trend of higher incidence of MBE following reperfusion therapy (OR 0.710, 95% CI 0.483-1.043, p =0.081).

CONCLUSION

MBE occurred in nearly one-half of LHI patients following early reperfusion therapy and was related to poor outcomes. An increased risk of MBE was found to be associated with younger age, right hemisphere stroke, absence of a history of ischemic stroke or TIA, and hypodensity >1/3 MCA region on baseline CT images.

Efficacy and safety of thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO)-induced posterior circulation ischemic stroke.

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute BAO, using an updated meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared the efficacy and safety of EVT with and without IVT in the treatment of acute BAO ischemic stroke. The extracted data included sample size, patient age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 and 0-3, mortality rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Results

Five studies that included a total of 1,578 patients (594 IVT + EVT vs. 984 EVT), met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that bridging IVT was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (41% vs. 34%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68, p = 0.006). Furthermore, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVT + EVT group than in the direct EVT group (25% vs. 30%; OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003), with low heterogeneity observed (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.78). However, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the rates of sICH (5% vs. 6%; OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52-1.39, p = 0.53), SAH (3% vs. 3%; OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.39-2.22, p = 0.87), perforation (2% vs. 3%; OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95, p = 0.51), and dissection (3% vs. 2%; OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.13-7.14, p = 0.98).

Conclusion

Bridging IVT in conjunction with EVT was associated with better functional outcomes and reduced mortality rates in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to BAO compared to EVT alone, without an increased risk of sICH, SAH, perforation, and dissection. In addition, the benefit of bridging IVT to EVT appeared to be more pronounced in European patients than in Asian patients compared to EVT alone. However, the conclusions of this study are not definitive and require validation through large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to draw more robust conclusions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024531363.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolysis for Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systemic Review

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common cause behind a significant number of people who develop disabilities or die worldwide. Most of the strokes that occur globally are attributed to AIS as a result of large vessel occlusions that typically occur in arteries like the internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries. Primary treatments for AIS are mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and the clinical scenario can dictate what method would provide the most optimal outcome for the patient. MT has a more favorable efficacy and safety profile but can be more technically challenging and time-consuming. This article conducts a comparison with regard to safety and efficacy between MT and IVT, which are the primary treatment methods for AIS. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Europe PubMed Central, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases were used to search for relevant articles. This search was conducted from June 2024 to July 2024. The process involved examining the titles and abstracts of all relevant publications after which, the selected articles were read entirely to confirm eligibility. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions I tool was used to assess for bias in the articles selected. The management of AIS involving IVT with or without MT is highly dependent on the clinical scenario. Nevertheless, MT alone has demonstrated better or comparable functional outcomes in patients compared to both bridging therapy (BT) and IVT alone. However, it is important to note that in select patient groups, such as those with large artery atherosclerosis, BT has been able to show better efficacy than MT alone. Given the significant burden of AIS on patient quality of life and healthcare spending, it is prudent to continue to explore newer thrombolytics and thrombectomy techniques.

Impact of qualifying artery on the efficacy of stenting plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a post-hoc analysis of the CASSISS trial

BACKGROUND

A recent trial failed to show any benefit of stenting plus medical therapy over medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. We aimed to examine whether the symptomatic qualifying artery modifies the effect of stenting plus medical therapy.

METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of the CASSISS trial that included patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis, randomly assigned to undergo stenting plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone; 358/380 patients were included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used with an interaction term to estimate the altered treatment effect by the qualifying artery. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the qualifying artery territory beyond 30 days through 1 year. The five secondary outcomes included stroke or death related to the qualifying artery territory at 2 and 3 years.

RESULTS

No significant treatment allocation-by-stenosis site interaction was observed (Pinteraction=0.435). Compared with medical therapy alone, the adjusted ORs for stenting plus medical therapy were 2.73 (95% CI 0.42 to 17.65) for internal carotid artery stenosis, 1.20 (95% CI 0.29 to 4.99) for M1 stenosis, 0.23 (95% CI 0.02 to 2.31) for vertebral artery stenosis, and 1.33 (95% CI 0.34 to 5.28) for basilar artery stenosis. Of the five secondary outcomes, none showed a significant treatment allocation-by-stenosis site interaction including stroke in the qualifying artery territory at 2 years (Pinteraction=0.659) and 3 years (Pinteraction=0.493).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with transient ischemic attacks or ischemic stroke due to severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, there was no evidence that the symptomatic qualifying artery could determine the addition of stenting to medical therapy.

Is endovascular treatment alone as effective and safe as that with preceding intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct endovascular therapy (EVT) and bridging therapy (EVT with preceding intravenous thrombolysis i.e. IVT), in acute anterior circulation, large vessel occlusion stroke.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS and ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes of interest were measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and included: no disability (mRS0), no significant disability despite some symptoms (mRS1), slight disability (mRS2), moderate disability (mRS3), moderately severe disability (mRS4), severe disability (mRS5), mortality (mRS6). Additionally, we inspected patients having excellent outcome, functional independence outcome, and poor outcome, along with successful reperfusion and intracranial hemorrhage. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of seven RCTs involving 2,392 patients were finally included. The chances of achieving successful reperfusion were significantly more with IVT+EVT as compared to EVT alone (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.00; P=0.03) (I2=0%). There was no significant difference in the number of patients having outcomes ranging from mRS0 to mRS6, excellent outcome, functional independence, poor outcome or incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, who underwent either EVT alone or IVT+EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional trials are needed to determine if the absence of significant differences is due to insufficient sample size or if the combination therapy is truly not beneficial.

Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the DEVT and RESCUE BT Trials

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus alteplase before endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis using data from 2 multicenter, randomized trials: the DEVT trial (Direct Endovascular Treatment for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) from May 2018 to May 2020 and the RESCUE BT trial (Intravenous Tirofiban Before Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke) from October 2018 to October 2021. Patients with acute intracranial large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours from last known well were dichotomized into 2 groups: tirofiban plus EVT versus alteplase bridging with EVT. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality. Multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for baseline systolic blood pressure, occlusion site, onset-to-puncture time, anesthesia, and first choice of EVT) and propensity score overlap weighting (balance in demographic covariates, stroke characteristics, and initial management between groups) were performed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eighteen alteplase-treated patients in the DEVT trial and 98 tirofiban-treated patients in the RESCUE BT trial were included (median age, 70 years; 115 [53.2%] men). The rate of functional independence was 60.2% in the tirofiban group compared with 46.6% in the alteplase group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.60-2.63]). Compared with alteplase, tirofiban was not associated with increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.8% versus 9.2%; P=0.51) and mortality (17.8% versus 19.4%; P=0.76). The propensity score overlap weighting analyses showed consistent outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset, tirofiban plus EVT was comparable to alteplase bridging with EVT regarding the efficacy and safety outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require confirmation in a randomized trial.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifiers: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568 and ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Meta-analysis of direct endovascular thrombectomy vs bridging therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Debates persist when using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), comparing bridging therapy (BT) with MT alone.

METHOD

We conducted searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2023 to identify pertinent clinical trials and observational studies.

RESULT

76 studies, involving 37,658 patients, revealed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence between DEVT and BT. However, a trend favoring BT for achieving functional independence with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 was observed, having Odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86; p < 0.001). DEVT was associated with higher postprocedural mortality (OR 1.44;95% CI 1.25-1.65; p < 0.001), but a lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to BT (OR 0.855; 95% CI 0.621-1.177; p = 0.327). Successful recanalization rates favored BT, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment decisions (OR 0.759; 95% CI 0.594-0.969; p = 0.027). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify key contributors to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis underscores the intricate equilibrium between functional efficacy and safety in the evaluation of DEVT and BT for ACS-LVO. Fundamentally, while BT appears more efficacious, concerns about safety arise due to the superior safety profile demonstrated by DEVT. Individualized treatment decisions are imperative, and further trials are warranted to enhance precision in clinical guidance.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes with and without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Ischemic Cores Identified with CT or MRI

Background Whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) provides additional benefits in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and a large infarct core (LIC) remains unclear. Purpose To examine whether treatment with IVT before EVT is beneficial in patients with LIC identified with CT or MRI (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score 0-5). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients diagnosed with AIS due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) and LIC treated with EVT who were enrolled in the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) Registry in France between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome measure was a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-3) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS score 0-2) at 90 days, improvement in degree of disability (ordinal shift in mRS score toward a better outcome) at 90 days, early neurologic improvement at 24 hours, and successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher). Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 24 hours and mortality at 90 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted analysis was used to assess the treatment effect of IVT adjusted for baseline variables. Results Of 1408 patients (mean age, 68.3 years ± 15.4 [SD]; 789 men), 654 (46.4%) were treated with IVT prior to EVT. In the IPTW-adjusted data set, IVT plus EVT was associated with a higher rate of favorable outcome at 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.24 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.46]; P = .01), functional independence at 90 days (OR, 1.47 [95% CI: 1.22, 1.77]; P < .001), improvement in degree of disability at 90 days (common OR, 1.30 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.49]; P < .001), early neurologic improvement (OR, 1.26 [95% CI: 1.07, 1.49]; P = .005), and successful reperfusion (OR, 1.43 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.79]; P = .002) than EVT alone. Rates of brain hemorrhage within 24 hours and mortality at 90 days were similar between groups. Conclusion In patients with AIS due to LVO with LIC identified with CT or MRI, treatment with IVT before EVT appeared to provide a clinical benefit over EVT alone. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03776877 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kallmes and Rabinstein in this issue.

Bridging thrombolysis improves survival rates at 90 days compared with direct mechanical thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1096 patients

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of MT, with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), in acute BAO through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.

METHODS

Systematic searches of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were undertaken on August 1, 2022. Good functional outcome defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were 90-day mortality, successful post-thrombectomy recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

RESULTS

Three studies reporting 1096 patients with BAO AIS were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in good functional outcome were detected between the two groups (RR=1.28 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.92); p=0.117). However, specifically patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) benefited from bridging IVT (OR=2.52 (95% CI 1.51 to 4.22); p<0.001) with better functional outcomes. There was a significantly lower 90-day mortality rate for patients who underwent bridging IVT compared with MT alone (RR=0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.80); p=0.008). No significant differences were detected in rates of post-treatment recanalization (RR=1.01 (95% CI 0.35 to 2.91); p=0.954), sICH (RR=0.96 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.42); p=0.724), and SAH (RR=0.93 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.83); p=0.563).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AIS due to BAO, bridging IVT was associated with lower mortality rates at 90 days, compared with direct MT. There were no improved functional outcomes or increased sICH or SAH between both arms, However, patients with LAA benefited from bridging IVT, with better functional outcomes.

Endovascular Thrombectomy versus Endovascular Thrombectomy Preceded by Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus EVT preceded by intravenous thrombolysis (EVT + IVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion remain controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis seek to compare these 2 modalities.

METHODS

Online Protocol is available at PROSPERO (york.ac.uk) (registration# CRD42022357506). MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS ≤1, 90-day mean mRS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 1-3 and 3-7 days, 90-day Barthel Index, 90-day EQ-5D-5L (EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level), the volume of infarction (mL), successful reperfusion, complete reperfusion, recanalization, 90-day mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, embolization in new territory, new infarction, puncture site complications, vessel dissection, and contrast extravasation. The certainty in the evidence was determined by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials yielding 2332 patients were included, of which 1163 and 1169 underwent EVT and EVT + IVT, respectively. The relative risk (RR) of 90-day mRS ≤2 was similar between the groups (RR = 0.96[0.88, 1.04]; P = 0.28). EVT was non-inferior to EVT + IVT because the lower bond of 95% confidence interval of the risk difference (RD = -0.02 [-0.06, 0.02]; P = 0.36) exceeded the -0.1 non-inferiority margin. The certainty in the evidence was high. The RR of successful reperfusion (RR = 0.96 [0.93, 0.99]; P = 0.006), any ICH (RR = 0.87 [0.77, 0.98]; P = 0.02), and puncture site complications (RR = 0.47 [0.25, 0.88]; P = 0.02) were lower with EVT. For EVT + IVT, the number needed to treat for successful reperfusion was 25, and the number needed to harm for any ICH was 20. The 2 groups were similar in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

EVT is non-inferior to EVT + IVT. In centers capable of both EVT and IVT, if timely EVT is feasible, it is reasonable to skip bridging IVT and keep rescue thrombolysis at the discretion of the interventionist for patients presenting within 4.5 hours of anterior ischemic stroke.

Mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses

To assess the clinical value of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing it with the MT alone. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of both observational and randomized controlled studies (RCTs) to investigate various outcomes. Our search for relevant studies was conducted between January 2011 and June 2022 in four major databases: PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library. We collected data on several outcomes, including functional independence (FI; defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2), excellent outcomes (mRS 0-1), successful recanalization (SR), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), any intracerebral hemorrhage (aICH), and mortality at three months or discharge. The primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome were FI and sICH, respectively, whereas excellent outcomes and SR were considered secondary efficacy outcomes. Additionally, mortality and aICH were analyzed as secondary safety outcomes. We employed the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model for RCTs when I² < 50%, otherwise the random-effects model was utilized. For observational studies and subgroup analyses, we used the random-effects model to minimize potential bias. A total of 55 eligible studies (nine RCTs and 46 observational studies) were included. For RCTs, the MT + IVT group was superior in FI (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.46), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.43), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.45), mortality (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, the MT + IVT group reduced the risk of mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88). However, the difference in FI between the MT + IVT group and the MT alone group was not significant (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.99-1.38, Fig. 3a). For observational studies, the results of FI (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16-1.33), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.54), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), mortality (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77) in the MT + IVT group were better. Additionally, the MT + IVT group increased the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) including sICH (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.21) and aICH (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.46) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, significant better outcomes were seen in the MT + IVT group on FI (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.21-1.52), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.26-1.75), and mortality (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94). The MT + IVT therapy did improve the prognosis for AIS patients and did not increase the risk of HT compared with MT alone therapy.

Association of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Delayed Reperfusion After Incomplete Mechanical Thrombectomy

PURPOSE

Treatment of distal vessel occlusions causing incomplete reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is debated. We hypothesized that pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may facilitate delayed reperfusion (DR) of residual vessel occlusions causing incomplete reperfusion after MT.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with incomplete reperfusion after MT, defined as extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) 2a-2c, and available perfusion follow-up imaging at 24 ± 12 h after MT. DR was defined as absence of any perfusion deficit on time-sensitive perfusion maps, indicating the absence of any residual occlusion. The association of IVT with the occurrence of DR was evaluated using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity analyses based on IVT timing (time between IVT start and the occurrence incomplete reperfusion following MT) were performed.

RESULTS

In 368 included patients (median age 73.7 years, 51.1% female), DR occurred in 225 (61.1%). Atrial fibrillation, higher eTICI grade, better collateral status and longer intervention-to-follow-up time were all associated with DR. IVT did not show an association with the occurrence of DR (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44-1.46, even in time-sensitive strata, aOR 2.28 [95% CI 0.65-9.23] and aOR 1.53 [95% CI 0.52-4.73] for IVT to incomplete reperfusion following MT timing <80 and <100 min, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A DR occurred in 60% of patients with incomplete MT at ~24 h and did not seem to occur more often in patients receiving pretreatment IVT. Further research on potential associations of IVT and DR after MT is required.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A “Stroke Belt” Region of Southern Europe

The aim of this 4-year observational study is to analyze the outcomes of stroke patients treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) compared to bridging therapy (BT) (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] + BT) based on 3-month outcomes, in real clinical practice in the "Stroke Belt" of Southern Europe. In total, 300 patients were included (41.3% dMT and 58.6% BT). The frequency of direct referral to the stroke center was similar in the dMT and BT group, whereas the time from onset to groin was longer in the BT group (median 210 [IQR 160–303] vs. 399 [IQR 225–675], p = 0.001). Successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) and hemorrhagic transformation were similar in both groups. The BT group more frequently showed excellent outcomes at 3 months (32.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that BT was independently associated with excellent outcomes (OR 2.7. 95% CI,1.2–5.9, p = 0.02) and lower mortality (OR 0.36. 95% CI 0.16–0.82, p = 015). Conclusions: Compared with dMT, BT was associated with excellent functional outcomes and lower 3-month mortality in this real-world clinical practice study conducted in a region belonging to the “Stroke Belt” of Southern Europe. Given the disparity of results on the benefit of BT in the current evidence, it is of vital importance to analyze the convenience of its use in each health area.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The current guideline recommends using an intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in eligible acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO). Some recent studies found no significant differences in the long-term functional outcomes between bridging therapy (BT, i.e., IV tPA prior to MT) and direct MT (dMT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and functional outcomes between BT and dMT in AIS patients with ELVO who were eligible for IV tPA administration. Based on the ELVO location, patients were categorized as the anterior group (occlusion of the anterior circulation), or the combined group (occlusion of the anterior and/or posterior circulation). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the study type, i.e., RCT and non-RCT.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (3985 patients) matched the eligibility criteria. Comparing the BT and dMT groups, no significant differences in terms of mortality and good functional outcome were observed at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic (sICH) events were more frequent in BT patients in the combined group (OR = 0.73, p = 0.02); this result remained significant only in the non-RCT subgroup (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03). The RCT subgroup had a significantly higher rate of successful revascularization in BT patients (OR = 0.73, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis uncovered no significant differences in functional outcome and mortality rate at 90 days between dMT and BT in patients with AIS who had ELVO. Although BT performed better in terms of successful recanalization rate, there is a risk of increased sICH rate in this group.

A study on endovascular treatment alone and bridging treatment for acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase (a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rt-PA) before endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients in different periods.

METHODS

This study enrolled a total of 140 patients hospitalized between 2019 and 2022 with AIS from large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. Those patients were divided into the EVT alone group and IVT + EVT group, in which EVT was preceded by intravenous rt-PA. According to the time from onset to femoral artery puncture, the above two groups were divided into the following subgroups: < 4.5 h, between 4.5 and 6 h, between 6 and 8 h, and between 8 and 10 h. There were 78 patients in the EVT alone group and 62 patients in the IVT + EVT group.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in functional independence, recanalization rate, favorable outcome rate, or mortality between the EVT and IVT + EVT groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, a lower incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage was observed in the EVT group (P < 0.05). A comparison of time-dependent efficacy between the two groups showed that within 6-8 h, there were statistically significant differences between admission and postoperation in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at 24 h (P = 0.01) or 7 days (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no difference in clinical efficacy and safety between the abovementioned two groups, treatment with IVT + EVT could increase the risk of bleeding compared to EVT. Moreover, in the 6-8 h subgroup, the efficacy of EVT alone was better than that of IVT + EVT.

No sex difference was found in the safety and efficacy of intravenous alteplase before endovascular therapy

Background and purpose

Prior studies on sex disparities were post-hoc analyses, had limited treatment modalities, and had controversial findings. Our study aimed to examine whether sex difference modifies the effect of intravenous alteplase before endovascular therapy.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of 850 eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular therapy. A propensity score was utilized as a covariate to achieve approximate randomization of alteplase pretreatment. The baseline characteristics of women and men were compared. Logistic regression with interaction terms, adjusted for potential confounders, was used to investigate the effect of sex on the prognosis of bridging therapy.

Results

In comparison to men, women were older [78.00 (70.00–84.00) vs. 67 (61.00–74.00), P &lt; 0.001], had more atrial fibrillation (61.4 vs. 35.2%, P &lt; 0.001), had a lower ASPECTS [10.00 (8.00–10.00) vs. 10 (9.00–10.00), P = 0.0047], and had a higher NIHSS score [17.00 (14.00–20.00) vs. 16 (13.00–19.00), P = 0.005]. Women tended to receive less bridging therapy (26.3 vs. 33%, P = 0.043) and more retrieval attempts [2.00 (1.00–2.00) vs. 1 (1.00–2.00), P = 0.026]. There was no sex difference in functional independence at 90 days after bridging therapy (OR 0.968, 95% CI 0.575–1.63), whereas men benefited more after EVT alone (OR 0.654, 95% CI 0.456–0.937). There were no sex-treatment interactions observed regardless of the location of the occlusion. There were no significant sex differences in all safety outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study could not confirm that sex modifies the treatment effect of intravenous alteplase before endovascular therapy. At the same time, we advocate for women to seek timely medical treatment.

Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of direct endovascular treatment (EVT) and bridging therapy (EVT with prior intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)) in patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke.

METHODS

This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Eligible RCTs were identified through a systemic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from the inception dates to January 10, 2022. The pooled analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The primary outcome was functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (range 0 to 5) at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality (mRS 6) within 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs involving 1633 patients were finally included. Findings of pooled analyses indicated that neither the primary outcomes (no disability (mRS 0), no significant disability despite some symptoms (mRS 1), slight disability (mRS 2), moderate disability (mRS 3), moderately severe disability (mRS 4), severe disability (mRS 5), excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), functional independence outcome (mRS 0-2), and poor outcome (mRS 3-5)) nor the secondary outcomes (successful reperfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality) in the EVT groups were not statistically significant compared with the IVT plus EVT groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the outcomes of sensitivity analysis implied that the findings of meta-analysis were credible.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO of anterior circulation, EVT alone yielded efficacy and safety outcomes similar to IVT plus EVT.

The End of Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator's Reign?

Mechanical thrombectomy is a highly effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion in the anterior cerebral circulation, significantly increasing the likelihood of recovery to functional independence. Until recently, whether intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy provided additional benefits to patients with acute ischemic stroke-large-vessel occlusion remained unclear. Given that reperfusion is a key factor for clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke-large-vessel occlusion and the efficacy of both intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy is time-dependent, achieving complete reperfusion with a single pass should be the primary angiographic goal. However, it remains undetermined whether extending the procedure with additional endovascular attempts or local lytics administration safely leads to higher reperfusion grades and whether there are significant public health and cost implications. Here, we outline the current state of knowledge and research avenues that remain to be explored regarding the consistent therapeutic benefit of intravenous thrombolysis in anterior circulation strokes and the potential place of adjunctive intra-arterial lytics administration, including alternative thrombolytic agent place.

Cost-effective analysis of mechanical thrombectomy alone in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: a Markov modelling study

OBJECTIVE

Recently, a randomised controlled trial (DIRECT-MT) demonstrated that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was non-inferior to MT with intravenous alteplase as to the functional outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether MT alone is cost-effective compared with MT with alteplase in China.

METHODS

A Markov decision analytic model was built from the Chinese healthcare perspective using a lifetime horizon. Probabilities, costs and outcomes data were obtained from the DIRECT-MT trial and other most recent/comprehensive literature. Base case calculation was conducted to compare the costs and effectiveness between MT alone and MT with alteplase. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

MT alone had a lower cost and higher effectiveness compared with MT with alteplase. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that, over a lifetime horizon, MT alone had a 99.5% probability of being cost-effective under the willingness-to-pay threshold of 1× gross domestic product per capita in China based on data obtained from the DIRECT-MT trial. These results remained robust under one-way sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

MT alone was cost-effective compared with MT with alteplase in China. However, cautions are needed to extend this conclusion to regions outside of China.

Differential Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mechanical Thrombectomy and Bridging Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a dramatic impact on acute stroke care. Its effects may accompany stroke care for a long time. We compared the treatment, short-term and long-term functional outcomes of patients with AIS from 2019 to 2020. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 epidemic on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients in our hospital.

Methods

We collected information on subjects treated with MT in 2019–2020, including age, sex, time from the onset to arterial sheath insertion, time from the onset to recanalization, the rate of lung infection and hemorrhagic transformation, modified Rankin scale (mRS), NHISS, and ASPECTS.

Results

The number of patients with MT decreased significantly by 26.6% in 2020 (p = 0.025). The pretreatment ASPECTS score for 2020 was significantly higher than 2019 (p = 0.004). Besides, the patients were more likely to develop lung infection (65 vs. 54.1%, p = 0.042) and had a higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation (47.4% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.005) in 2019. The discharged mRS reflected the worse short-term functional prognosis of patients with MT in 2019 (66 vs. 44.9%, p = 0.046). In the subgroup analysis of bridging thrombolysis (BT), more patients with BT are expected to have a poor short-term functional prognosis in 2020, according to the discharged mRS (62.5 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.024). However, there was no difference in mRS at 180 days between the two groups (p = 0.094).

Conclusion

For patients with MT, both short- and long-term functional outcomes were not significantly affected due to the mild condition of patients admitted to hospital in 2020. For patients with BT, the COVID-19 pandemic has prolonged the green channel time of stroke, leading to a poor short-term functional prognosis of patients with stroke in the pandemic period. There was no difference in the effectiveness of direct MT and BT during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ISP-Net: Fusing features to predict ischemic stroke infarct core on CT perfusion maps

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke is one of the leading death causes. Delineating stoke infarct core in medical images plays a critical role in optimal stroke treatment selection. However, accurate estimation of infarct core still remains challenging because of 1) the large shape and location variation of infarct cores; 2) the complex relationships between perfusion parameters and final tissue outcome.

METHODS

We develop an encoder-decoder based semantic model, i.e., Ischemic Stroke Prediction Network (ISP-Net), to predict infarct core after thrombolysis treatment on CT perfusion (CTP) maps. Features of native CTP, CBF (Cerebral Blood Flow), CBV (Cerebral Blood Volume), MTT (Mean Transit Time), Tmax are generated and fused with five-path convolutions for comprehensive analysis. A multi-scale atrous convolution (MSAC) block is firstly put forward as the enriched high-level feature extractor in ISP-Net to improve prediction accuracy. A retrospective dataset which is collected from multiple stroke centers is used to evaluate the performance of ISP-Net. The gold standard infarct cores are delineated on the follow-up scans, i.e., non-contrast CT (NCCT) or MRI diffusion-weighted image (DWI).

RESULTS

In clinical dataset cross-validation, we achieve mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.801, precision of 81.3%, sensitivity of 79.5%, specificity of 99.5%, Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.721. Our approach yields better outcomes than several advanced deep learning methods, i.e., Deeplab V3, U-Net++, CE-Net, X-Net and Non-local U-Net, demonstrating the promising performance in infarct core prediction. No significant difference of the prediction error is shown for the patients with follow-up NCCT and follow-up DWI (P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study provides an approach for fast and accurate stroke infarct core estimation. We anticipate the prediction results of ISP-Net could offer assistance to the physicians in the thrombolysis or thrombectomy therapy selection.

Bridging Thrombolysis versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Due to Basilar Artery Occlusion

Background and Purpose

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) acute ischemic stroke. It remains unclear whether bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT confers any benefit. This study compared the outcomes of acute BAO patients who were treated with direct MT versus combined IVT plus MT.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients who were treated for acute BAO from eight comprehensive stroke centers between January 2015 and December 2019. Patients received direct MT or combined bridging IVT plus MT. Primary outcome was favorable functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 0–3 measured at 90 days. Secondary outcome measures included mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

Results

Among 322 patients, 127 (39.4%) patients underwent bridging IVT followed by MT and 195 (60.6%) underwent direct MT. The mean±standard deviation age was 67.5±14.1 years, 64.0% were male and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 16 (interquartile range, 8 to 25). At 90-day, the rate of favorable functional outcome was similar between the bridging IVT and direct MT groups (39.4% vs. 34.4%, P=0.361). On multivariable analyses, bridging IVT was not as Comorbidisociated with favorable functional outcome, mortality or sICH. In subgroup analyses, patients with underlying atherosclerosis treated with bridging IVT compared to direct MT had a higher rate of favorable functional outcome at 90 days (37.2% vs. 15.5%, P=0.013).

Conclusions

Functional outcomes were similar in BAO patients treated with bridging IVT versus direct MT. In the subgroup of patients with underlying large-artery atherosclerosis stroke mechanism, bridging IVT may potentially confer benefit and this warrants further investigation.

Modeling Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke for the Evaluation of Endovascular Therapy According to Thrombus Composition

More than 40% of endovascular therapy (EVT) fail to achieve complete reperfusion of the territory of the occluded artery in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Understanding factors influencing EVT could help overcome its limitations. Our objective was to study the impact of thrombus cell composition on EVT procedures, using a simulation system for modeling thrombus-induced large vessel occlusion (LVO) in flow conditions. In an open comparative trial, we analyzed the behavior of size-standardized platelet-rich and red blood cells (RBC)-rich thrombi during simulated stent retriever-mediated EVT procedures. Sixteen simulated EVT procedures were performed (8 RBC- vs. 8 platelet-rich thrombi). Platelet-rich thrombi were associated with a higher number of stent retriever passes (p = 0.03) and a longer procedure duration (p = 0.02) compared to RBC-rich thrombi. Conversely, RBC-rich thrombi released more embolic fragments than platelet-rich thrombi (p = 0.004). Both RBC-rich and platelet-rich thrombi underwent drastic compaction after being injected into the in vitro circulation model, and histologic analyses showed that these EVT-retrieved thrombi displayed features comparable to those previously observed in thrombi from patients with AIS patients having LVO, including a marked structural dichotomy between RBC- and platelet-rich areas. Our results show that the injection of in vitro-produced thrombi in artificial cerebrovascular arterial networks is suitable for testing recanalization efficacy and the risk of embolization of EVT devices and strategies in association with thrombus cell composition.

Effect of Occlusion Site on the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Alteplase Before Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of DIRECT-MT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent trials showed thrombectomy alone was comparable to bridging therapy in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion eligible for both intravenous alteplase and endovascular thrombectomy. We performed this study to examine whether occlusion site modifies the effect of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy.

METHODS

This is a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized trial evaluating risk and benefit of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy (DIRECT-MT [Direct Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy in Order to Revascularize AIS Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals]). Among 658 randomized patients, 640 with baseline occlusion site information were included. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis with an interaction term was used to estimate treatment effect modification by occlusion location (internal carotid artery versus M1 versus M2). We report the adjusted common odds ratio for a shift toward better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale after thrombectomy alone compared with combination treatment adjusted for age, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, the time from stroke onset to randomization, the modified Rankin Scale score before stroke onset, and collateral score per the DIRECT-MT statistical analysis plan.

RESULTS

The overall adjusted common odds ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82-1.43) with thrombectomy alone compared with combination treatment, and there was no significant treatment-by-occlusion site interaction (P=0.47). In subgroups based on occlusion location, we found the following adjusted common odds ratios: 0.99 (95% CI, 0.62-1.59) for internal carotid artery occlusions, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.77-1.64) for M1 occlusions, and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.53-2.79) for M2 occlusions. No treatment-by-occlusion site interactions were observed for dichotomized modified Rankin Scale distributions and successful reperfusion (extended thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) before thrombectomy. Differences in symptomatic hemorrhage rate were not significant between occlusion locations (internal carotid artery occlusion: 7.02% in bridging therapy versus 7.14% for thrombectomy alone, P=0.97; M1 occlusion: 5.06% versus 2.48%, P=0.22; M2 occlusion: 9.09% versus 4.76%; P=0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prespecified subgroup of a randomized trial, we found no evidence that occlusion location can inform intravenous alteplase decisions in endovascular treatment eligible patients directly presenting at endovascular treatment capable centers. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03469206.

Major Publications in the Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature: 2020

OBJECTIVES

To summarize selected meta-analyses and trials related to critical care pharmacotherapy published in 2020.

DATA SOURCES

The Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update group screened 36 journals monthly for impactful publications.

STUDY SELECTION

The group reviewed a total of 119 articles during 2020 according to relevance for practice.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles were selected with consensus and importance to clinical practice from those included in the monthly Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update. The group reviewed articles according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations criteria. Articles with a 1A grade were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Several trials were summarized, including two meta-analyses and five original research trials. Original research trials evaluating vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine versus hydrocortisone in sepsis, the use of nonsedation strategies, dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery, remdesivir for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Two meta-analyses determining the impact of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock and the use of corticosteroids in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was included.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical review provides summary and perspectives of clinical practice impact on influential critical care pharmacotherapy publications in 2020.

Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone vs. Bridging Thrombolysis for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although the current guidelines recommend bridging thrombolysis (BT) therapy, which is intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), for patients with acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), the effectiveness and safety of IVT remain controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to demonstrate the non-inferiority of direct EVT alone (DEVT) compared to BT for the efficacy and safety in patients with AIS-LVO who were eligible for IVT.

METHODS

The literature was searched in big databases between 1 January 1990 and 1 April 2021. The search included both randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) that compared DEVT with BT for patients with AIS-LVO who were eligible for IVT (time from stroke onset ≤ 4.5 h). Only NRSs with good intergroup variable matching were included in the study. Outcomes measured included 90-day functional independence, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization. The noninferiority margin for risk difference was set at 5% from the literature review.

RESULTS

Three RCTs (n = 1094) and four NRSs (n = 1366) were included in the meta-analysis. There were 1227 patients (49.9%) in the DEVT group and 1233 patients (50.1%) in the BT group. A statistically significant noninferiority of DEVT compared to BT was concluded in 90-day functional independence, mortality and successful reperfusion. Even in the sICH rate, DEVT group showed a superiority (risk difference, -2%; 95% confidence interval, -4 to -0.002%).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from RCTs and observational NRSs supports the use of DEVT (without IVT) as the first choice for treatment of patients with AIS-LVO within a time span of 4.5 h or less from stroke onset.

Endovascular Thrombectomy preceded by intravenous Alteplase versus endovascular Thrombectomy alone in Han Chinese patients treated for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association and the Chinese Stroke Association guidelines are recommending intravenous alteplase intervention before endovascular thrombectomy if patients are eligible to do so but the benefits of endovascular thrombectomy are different in Chinese patients with stroke than those of the white patients. The objective of the study was to compare outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy with intravenous alteplase against those treated with endovascular thrombectomy alone.

METHODS

A report is a retrospective analysis of comparing demographics, imaging, clinical and adverse outcomes in the Han Chinese patient who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, with or without preceding intravenous alteplase administration. Patients with terminus and non-terminus intracranial occlusions and ≤ 2 points neurologic deficit underwent endovascular thrombectomy preceded by 0.9 mg/ kg intravenous alteplase (ET cohort, n = 184) and those who had contra-indication for intravenous alteplase were treated with endovascular thrombectomy alone (EA cohort, n = 141).

RESULTS

The most common procedural complications were embolization into new territory (p = 0.866) and uneventful artery vasospasm (p = 0.712). Insignificant differences were reported for any procedural complications (p = 0.991), imaging outcomes, the modified Rankin scale score (p = 0.663), and death (28 vs. 24, p = 0.761) within 90 days between patients of both cohorts. At the discharge of the hospital, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores of patients of the ET cohort were lower than those of the EA cohort (8.58 ± 3.79 vs. 10.23 ± 4.97, p = 0.003). The Barthel Index of survivors at 90 days after endovascular thrombectomy was higher for patients of the ET cohort than those of the EA cohort (87.47 ± 12.58 vs. 84.01 ± 13.47, p = 0.032). The most common adverse effect was asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.297). Insignificant differences were reported for adverse effects after thrombectomy between survivors of both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome measures in Han Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy alone were statistically the same as those treated with endovascular thrombectomy plus intravenous alteplase.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Iii TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 4.

Acute Recanalization of Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation Stroke: Is Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone Better in Patients over 80 Years of Age? Findings from a Retrospective Observational Study

Real-world data report worse 3-month clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The aim was to identify factors influencing clinical outcome in elderly patients with anterior circulation AIS treated with MT (±intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)). In a retrospective, monocentric study, analysis of prospectively collected data of 138 patients (≥80 years) was performed. IVT was an independent negative predictor (OR 0.356; 95% CI: 0.134–0.942) and female sex an independent positive predictor (OR 4.179, 95% CI: 1.300–13.438) of 3-month good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale 0–2). Female sex was also an independent negative predictor of 3-month mortality (OR 0.244, 95% CI: 0.100–0.599). Other independent negative predictors of 3-month good clinical outcome were older age, lower pre-stroke self-sufficiency, more severe neurological deficit and longer procedural intervals. Mortality was also independently predicted by longer procedural interval and by the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (p < 0.05 in all cases). Our results demonstrated, that in patients aged ≥80 years with anterior circulation AIS undergoing MT (±IVT), IVT reduced the chance of 3-month good clinical outcome and female sex was associated with a greater likelihood of 3-month good clinical outcome and lower probability of 3-month mortality.

Thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about direct mechanical thrombectomy (d-MT) vs. intravenous thrombolysis before MT (IVT + MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients have been reported. This study aims to investigate the differences in efficacy and safety of MT with or without IVT for the treatment of patients with AIS.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov from March 2011 to February 2021 were systematically searched for studies comparing the two strategies directly. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the risk of bias and pool the data with a random effect model.

RESULTS

We pooled 1633 patients from 4 RCTs. The primary outcome, proportion of patients achieving functional independence (mRS0-2) at 90 days, was not significantly different between the two groups (MT 46.02% vs. IVT + MT 45.47%, OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.25). However, the risk of developing any ICH was lower in the d-MT group (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63-0.89). In addition, the remaining secondary outcomes, such as successful reperfusion (eTICI scale, 2b-3) at final angiogram (OR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-1.03) and mortality at 90 days (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.85-1.31), did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes were similar for d-MT and IVT + MT, with d-MT having a lower risk of any ICH. We need to focus on precision medicine in the future.

REGISTRATION

URL: http://inplasy.com ; Unique identifier: INPLASY202130094.

Direct endovascular treatment versus bridging therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for intravenous thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this review and meta-analysis we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of direct endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and bridging therapy for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)-eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies providing outcomes of patients with IVT-eligible AIS-LVO who have undergone EVT with or without IVT. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included the rates of (1) an excellent outcome defined as an mRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, (2) mortality at 90 days, (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (4) any type of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), (5) successful recanalization, and (6) clot migration.

RESULTS

We included three RCTs and six observational studies (4 of which were propensity score-adjusted studies) with a total of 3133 patients. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, no differences in the rates of mRS scores 0-2, mRS scores 0-1, mortality at 90 days, sICH or successful recanalization were detected between patients with AIS-LVO who underwent direct EVT or bridging therapy. The patients treated with direct EVT had a lower risk ratio for any type of ICH and clot migration than did the patients treated with bridging therapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with bridging therapy, direct EVT may be equally effective and yield a lower rate of ICH and clot migration in patients with AIS.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO: CRD42021236691.

Inhouse Bridging Thrombolysis Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcome in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Findings From the German Stroke Registry

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) is highly effective. To date, it remains controversial if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to EVT is superior compared with EVT alone. The aim of our study was to specifically address the question, whether bridging IVT directly prior to EVT has additional positive effects on reperfusion times, successful reperfusion, and functional outcomes compared with EVT alone.

Methods: Patients with LVOS in the anterior circulation eligible for EVT with and without prior IVT and direct admission to endovascular centers (mothership) were included in this multicentric, retrospective study. Patient data was derived from the German Stroke Registry (an open, multicenter, and prospective observational study). Outcome parameters included groin-to-reperfusion time, successful reperfusion [defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale 2b-3], change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and mortality at 90 days.

Results: Of the 881 included mothership patients with anterior circulation LVOS, 486 (55.2%) received bridging therapy with i.v.-rtPA prior to EVT, and 395 (44.8%) received EVT alone. Adjusted, multivariate linear mixed effect models revealed no difference in groin-to-reperfusion time between the groups (48 ± 36 vs. 49 ± 34 min; p = 0.299). Rates of successful reperfusion (TICI ≥ 2b) were higher in patients with bridging IVT (fixed effects estimate 0.410, 95% CI, 0.070; 0.750, p = 0.018). There was a trend toward a higher improvement in the NIHSS during hospitalization [ΔNIHSS: bridging-IVT group 8 (IQR, 9.8) vs. 4 (IQR 11) points in the EVT alone group; fixed effects estimate 1.370, 95% CI, −0.490; 3.240, p = 0.149]. mRS at 90 days follow-up was lower in the bridging IVT group [3 (IQR, 4) vs. 4 (IQR, 4); fixed effects estimate −0.350, 95% CI, −0.680; −0.010, p = 0.041]. There was a non-significantly lower 90 day mortality in the bridging IVT group compared with the EVT alone group (22.4% vs. 33.6%; fixed effects estimate 0.980, 95% CI −0.610; 2.580, p = 0.351). Rates of any intracerebral hemorrhage did not differ between both groups (4.1% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.864).

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that bridging IVT might improve rates of successful reperfusion and long-term functional outcome in mothership patients with anterior circulation LVOS eligible for EVT.

Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes of Direct Thrombectomy vs Bridging Therapy in Large Vessel Occlusion: Analysis of the SELECT Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of direct endovascular thrombectomy (dEVT) compared to bridging therapy (BT; IV tissue plasminogen activator + EVT) and to assess whether BT potential benefit relates to stroke severity, size, and initial presentation to EVT vs non-EVT center.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter cohort study of imaging selection for endovascular thrombectomy (Optimizing Patient Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke [SELECT]), patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting to EVT-capable centers within 4.5 hours from last known well were stratified into BT vs dEVT. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2). Secondary outcomes included a shift across 90-day mRS grades, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. We also performed subgroup analyses according to initial presentation to EVT-capable center (direct vs transfer), stroke severity, and baseline infarct core volume.

RESULTS

We identified 226 LVOs (54% men, mean age 65.6 ± 14.6 years, median NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 17, 28% received dEVT). Median time from arrival to groin puncture did not differ in patients with BT when presenting directly (dEVT 1.43 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.13-1.90] hours vs BT 1.58 [IQR 1.27-2.02] hours, p = 0.40) or transferred to EVT-capable centers (dEVT 1.17 [IQR 0.90-1.48] hours vs BT 1.27 [IQR 0.97-1.87] hours, p = 0.24). BT was associated with higher odds of 90-day functional independence (57% vs 44%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-4.03, p = 0.046) and functional improvement (adjusted common OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.18-3.60, p = 0.011) and lower likelihood of 90-day mortality (11% vs 23%, aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.58, p = 0.003). No differences in any other outcomes were detected. In subgroup analyses, patients with BT with baseline NIHSS scores <15 had higher functional independence likelihood compared to those with dEVT (aOR 4.87, 95% CI 1.56-15.18, p = 0.006); this association was not evident for patients with NIHSS scores ≥15 (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40-2.74, p = 0.92). Similarly, functional outcomes improvements with BT were detected in patients with core volume strata (ischemic core <50 cm3: aOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02-4.33, p = 0.044 vs ischemic core ≥50 cm3: aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.01-16.02, p = 0.64) and transfer status (transferred: aOR 2.21, 95% CI 0.93-9.65, p = 0.29 vs direct to EVT center: aOR 1.84, 95% CI 0.80-4.23, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

BT appears to be associated with better clinical outcomes, especially with milder NIHSS scores, smaller presentation core volumes, and those who were "dripped and shipped." We did not observe any potential benefit of BT in patients with more severe strokes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02446587.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with ischemic stroke from anterior circulation LVO within 4.5 hours from last known well, BT compared to dEVT leads to better 90-day functional outcomes.

Safety and Outcomes of Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke With vs Without IV Thrombolysis

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that IV thrombolysis (IVT) treatment before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is associated with better outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large artery occlusion (LAO) stroke, we examined a large real-world database, the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombectomy Register (SITS-ISTR).

METHODS

We identified centers recording ≥10 consecutive patients in the SITS-ISTR, with at least 70% available modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months during 2014 to 2019. We defined LAO as intracranial internal carotid artery, first and second segment of middle cerebral artery, and first segment of anterior cerebral artery. Main outcomes were functional independence (mRS score 0-2) and death at 3 months and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) per modified SITS-Monitoring Study. We performed propensity score-matched (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 6,350 patients from 42 centers, 3,944 (62.1%) received IVT. IVT + EVT-treated patients had less frequent atrial fibrillation, ongoing anticoagulation, previous stroke, heart failure, and prestroke disability. PSM analysis showed that IVT + EVT-treated patients had a higher rate of functional independence than patients treated with EVT alone (46.4% vs 40.3%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of death at 3 months (20.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.035). SICH rates (3.5% vs 3.0%, p = 0.42) were similar in both groups. Multivariate adjustment yielded results consistent with PSM.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with IVT was associated with favorable outcomes in EVT-treated LAO stroke in the SITS-ISTR. These findings, while indicative of international routine clinical practice, are limited by observational design, unmeasured confounding, and possible residual confounding by indication.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that IVT before EVT increases the probability of functional independence at 3 months compared to EVT alone.

Comparison of Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis With Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Whether bridging treatment combining intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is superior to direct EVT alone for emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation is unknown. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to investigate and assess the effect and safety of bridging treatment vs. direct EVT in patients with LVO in the anterior circulation.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched to assess the effect and safety of bridging treatment and direct EVT in LVO. Functional independence, mortality, asymptomatic and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH and sICH, respectively), and successful recanalization were evaluated. The risk ratio and the 95% CI were analyzed.

Results: Among the eight studies included, there was no significant difference in the long-term functional independence (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 0.845–1.204, P = 0.926), mortality (OR = 1.060, 95% CI = 0.840–1.336, P = 0.624), recanalization rate (OR = 1.015, 95% CI = 0.793–1.300, P = 0.905), and the incidence of sICH (OR = 1.320, 95% CI = 0.931–1.870, P = 0.119) between bridging therapy and direct EVT. After adjusting for confounding factors, bridging therapy showed a lower recanalization rate (effect size or ES = −0.377, 95% CI = −0.684 to −0.070, P = 0.016), but there was no significant difference in the long-term functional independence (ES = 0.057, 95% CI = −0.177 to 0.291, P = 0.634), mortality (ES = 0.693, 95% CI = −0.133 to 1.519, P = 0.100), and incidence of sICH (ES = −0.051, 95% CI = −0.687 to 0.585, P = 0.875) compared with direct EVT. Meanwhile, in the subgroup analysis of RCT, no significant difference was found in the long-term functional independence (OR = 0.927, 95% CI = 0.727–1.182, P = 0.539), recanalization rate (OR = 1.331, 95% CI = 0.948–1.867, P = 0.099), mortality (OR = 1.072, 95% CI = 0.776–1.481, P = 0.673), and sICH incidence (OR = 1.383, 95% CI = 0.806–2.374, P = 0.977) between patients receiving bridging therapy and those receiving direct DVT.

Conclusion: For stroke patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion and who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, there is no significant difference in the clinical effect between direct EVT and bridging therapy, which needs to be verified by more randomized controlled trials.

Changes in Procoagulant Blood Biomarkers After Mechanical Thrombectomy

OBJECTIVES

There is limited knowledge of the relationship between mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and endothelial inflammation in large-vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Intimal arterial damage releases tissue factor, a precipitant of the clotting cascade and thrombosis. We report changes in blood coagulation markers after MT treated with and without tissue plasminogen activator for AIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of LVO-AIS treated with MT were included. Blood coagulation marker levels were measured within 10 h of stroke onset as a baseline and then 48 h later. Assayed biomarkers included: tissue factor procoagulant activity (TFPCA), factor VII (FVII), activated factor VII (FVIIa), factor VIII (FVIII), d-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). Biomarker levels of MT with tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) or without (non-TPA) are reported.

RESULTS

Biomarker levels from five patients with LVO-AIS treated with MT (three non-TPA, two TPA) were included. In non-TPA cases, TFPCA and PAI-1 increased while FVII, FVIIa, TAT, d-dimer, and TFPI decreased from baseline to 48 h. In TPA cases, TFPCA, FVIIa, d-dimer, TFPI, and PAI-1 decreased while FVIII increased from baseline to 48 h.

CONCLUSIONS

TFPCA increased after MT in non-TPA but decreased in TPA treated patients. This finding suggests that MT is associated with elevated inflammation and procoagulation which may be reduced with TPA treatment. With further validation, the increase in TFPCA levels could help guide anticoagulant management of patients with MT without TPA.

Silver Jubilee of Stroke Thrombolysis With Alteplase: Evolution of the Therapeutic Window

In 1995, the results of a landmark clinical trial by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) made a paradigm shift in managing acute cerebral ischemic stroke (AIS) patients at critical care centers. The study demonstrated the efficacy of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), alteplase in improving neurological and functional outcome in AIS patients when administered within 3 h of stroke onset. After about 12 years of efforts and the results of the ECASS-III trial, it was possible to expand the therapeutic window to 4.5 h, which still represents a major logistic issue, depriving many AIS patients from the benefits of tPA therapy. Constant efforts in this regards are directed toward either speeding up the patient recruitment for tPA therapy or expanding the current tPA window. Efficient protocols to reduce the door-to-needle time and advanced technologies like telestroke services and mobile stroke units are being deployed for early management of AIS patients. Studies have demonstrated benefit of thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging in AIS patients at up to 9 h of stroke onset, signifying “tissue window.” Several promising pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are being explored to mitigate the adverse effects of delayed tPA therapy, thus hoping to further expand the current tPA therapeutic window without compromising safety. With accumulation of scientific data, stroke organizations across the world are amending/updating the clinical recommendations of tPA, the only US-FDA approved drug for managing AIS patients. Alteplase has been a part of our neurocritical care and we intend to celebrate its silver jubilee by dedicating this review article discussing its journey so far and possible future evolution.

MR CLEAN-NO IV: intravenous treatment followed by endovascular treatment versus direct endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial occlusion-study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Background

Endovascular treatment (EVT) has greatly improved the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation. Currently, there is clinical equipoise concerning the added benefit of intravenous alteplase administration (IVT) prior to EVT. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of omitting IVT before EVT in patients with AIS caused by an anterior circulation LVO.

Methods

MR CLEAN-NO IV is a multicenter randomized open-label clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design). Patients ≥ 18 years of age with a pre-stroke mRS < 3 with an LVO confirmed on CT angiography/MR angiography eligible for both IVT and EVT are randomized to receive either IVT (0.9 mg/kg) followed by EVT, or direct EVT in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective is to assess superiority of direct EVT. Secondarily, non-inferiority of direct EVT compared to IVT before EVT will be explored. The primary outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Ordinal regression with adjustment for prognostic variables will be used to estimate treatment effect. Secondary outcomes include reperfusion graded with the eTICI scale after EVT and stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) at 24 h. Safety outcomes include intracranial hemorrhages scored according to the Heidelberg criteria. A total of 540 patients will be included.

Discussion

IVT prior to EVT might facilitate early reperfusion before EVT or improved reperfusion rates during EVT. Conversely, among other potential adverse effects, the increased risk of bleeding could nullify the beneficial effects of IVT. MR CLEAN-NO IV will provide insight into whether IVT is still of added value in patients eligible for EVT.

Trial registration

www.isrctn.com: ISRCTN80619088. Registered on 31 October 2017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05063-5.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Thrombolysis: Real-World Efficacy and Safety Analysis Based on a Nationwide Registry Study

Background

It was uncertain if direct endovascular thrombectomy (ET) was superior to bridging thrombolysis (BT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large‐vessel occlusions. We aimed to examine real‐world clinical outcomes of ET using nationwide registry data in China and to compare the efficacy and safety between BT and direct ET.

Methods and Results

Patients treated with ET from a nationwide registry study in China were included. Rapid neurological improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and in‐hospital mortality were compared between the 2 groups using multivariate logistic models and propensity‐score matching analyses. A total of 7674 patients from 592 stroke centers were included. The median onset‐to‐puncture time, onset‐to‐door time, and door to puncture time were 290, 170, and 99 minutes, respectively. A total of 2069 (27.0%) patients received BT treatment. Patients in the BT group had a significantly shorter onset‐to‐puncture time (235 versus 323 minutes; P<0.001) and onset‐to‐door time (90 versus 222 minutes; P<0.001) compared with the direct ET group. The prior use of intravenous thrombolysis was associated with a higher rate of rapid neurological improvement (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.96) and higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18–1.80) in multivariate analyses and propensity‐score matching analyses.

Conclusions

This study reflects the current application of ET in China. More patients received direct ET than BT. Our results suggested that favorable short‐term outcomes could be achieved with BT compared with direct ET. Higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the BT group.

Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

For patients with large vessel occlusion strokes, it is unknown whether endovascular treatment alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment (standard treatment) can achieve similar functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether endovascular thrombectomy alone is noninferior to intravenous alteplase followed by endovascular thrombectomy for achieving functional independence at 90 days among patients with large vessel occlusion stroke.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial conducted at 33 stroke centers in China. Patients (n = 234) were 18 years or older with proximal anterior circulation intracranial occlusion strokes within 4.5 hours from symptoms onset and eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. Enrollment took place from May 20, 2018, to May 2, 2020. Patients were enrolled and followed up for 90 days (final follow-up was July 22, 2020).

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 116 patients were randomized to the endovascular thrombectomy alone group and 118 patients to combined intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving functional independence at 90 days (defined as score 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale; range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The noninferiority margin was -10%. Safety outcomes included the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 hours and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped early because of efficacy when 234 of a planned 970 patients had undergone randomization. All 234 patients who were randomized (mean age, 68 years; 102 women [43.6%]) completed the trial. At the 90-day follow-up, 63 patients (54.3%) in the endovascular thrombectomy alone group vs 55 (46.6%) in the combined treatment group achieved functional independence at the 90-day follow-up (difference, 7.7%, 1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.1% to ∞)P for noninferiority = .003). No significant between-group differences were detected in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (6.1% vs 6.8%; difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -7.1% to 5.6%) and 90-day mortality (17.2% vs 17.8%; difference, -0.5%; 95% CI, -10.3% to 9.2%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with ischemic stroke due to proximal anterior circulation occlusion within 4.5 hours from onset, endovascular treatment alone, compared with intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment, met the prespecified statistical threshold for noninferiority for the outcome of 90-day functional independence. These findings should be interpreted in the context of the clinical acceptability of the selected noninferiority threshold.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568.

In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting

Purpose

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO.

Materials and Methods

We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis.

Results

Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0–1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients.

Conclusions

MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-020-02727-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Time from I.V. Thrombolysis to Thrombectomy and Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

Whether the time from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke has an effect on the functional outcome is unknown.

METHODS

The Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry is an ongoing, prospective, multicenter, observational study that perform EVT in France. Data were analyzed from patients treated by IVT and EVT between October 2013 and December 2018 in 6 comprehensive stroke centers. In the primary analysis, we assessed the association of time from IVT administration to start of EVT with functional outcome (measured with the modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), by means of ordinal logistic regression. Secondary end points included angiographic and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1,986 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent IVT and EVT. An increased IVT to start of EVT time was associated with a worse functional outcome at 90 days (mRS = 0-2, adjusted odds ratio [OR] per 30 minutes increase in time = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-0.96; mRS = 0-1, adjusted OR per 30 minutes increase in time = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84-0.94), a lower chance of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) grade 2b to 3 reperfusion (adjusted OR per 30 minutes increase in time = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.98), and an increased probability of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (adjusted OR per 30 minutes increase in time = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.99-1.18).

INTERPRETATION

These findings provide a basis for further studies to determine if the functional outcome of patients with stroke can be greatly improved by optimizing IVT to EVT times. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:511-519.

Bridging Thrombolysis Achieved Better Outcomes Than Direct Thrombectomy After Large Vessel Occlusion: An Updated Meta-Analysis

The utility and necessity of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains an issue of strong debate. This study aims to compare the outcomes of bridging thrombolysis (BT, IVT+MT) with direct MT (d-MT) after large vessel ischemic stroke based on the most up-to-date evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from January 2017 to June 2020 were searched for studies that directly compared the outcomes of the 2 strategies. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Combined estimates of odds ratios (ORs) of BT versus d-MT were derived. Multiple subgroup analyses were performed, especially for IVT-eligible patients. Thirty studies involving 7191 patients in the BT group and 4891 patients in the d-MT group were included. Methodological quality was generally high. Compared with patients in the d-MT group, patients in the BT group showed significantly better functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days (OR=1.43 [95% CI, 1.28-1.61]), had lower mortality at 90 days (OR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.60-0.75]), and achieved higher successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score 2b-3) rate (OR=1.23 [95% CI, 1.07-1.42]). No significant difference was detected in the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between 2 groups (OR=1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]). Subgroup analysis showed that functional independence frequency remained significantly higher in BT group regardless of IVT eligibility or study design. Compared with d-MT, bridging with IVT led to better clinical outcomes, lower mortality at 90 days, and higher successful recanalization rates, without increasing the risk of near-term hemorrhagic complications. The benefits of BT based on this most recent literature evidence support the current guidelines of using BT.

Functional Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy with or without Previous Thrombolysis

INTRODUCTION

Combined intravenous therapy (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the use of  IVT before MT is recently being questioned.

OBJECTIVES

To compare patients treated with IVT before MT with those treated with MT alone, in a real-world scenario.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of AIS patients with LVO of the anterior circulation who underwent MT, with or without previous IVT, between 2016 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 524 patients were included (347 submitted to IVT+MT; 177 to MT alone). No differences between groups were found except for a higher time from stroke onset to CT and to groin puncture in the MT group (297.5 min vs 115.0 min and 394.0 min vs 250.0 min respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age<75 years (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.71-4.07, p < 0.001), not using antiplatelet therapy (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.21-3.08, p = 0.006), low prestroke mRS (OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.89-9.89, p < 0.001), initial NIHSS (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93, p < 0.001), absent cerebral edema (OR 7.83, 95% CI 3.31-18.51, p < 0.001), and mTICI 2b/3 (OR 4.56, 95% CI 2.17-9.59, p < 0.001) were independently associated with good outcome (mRS 0-2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the idea that IVT before MT does not influence prognosis, in a real-world setting.

Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy may Increase the Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage inTreating Carotid T Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Current evidence does not agree on the merits of direct and bridging thrombectomy. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy (DT) and bridging thrombectomy (BT) in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to carotid T occlusion.

METHODS

Patients with stroke due to carotid T occlusion who were treated with DT or BT were retrospectively collected from four advanced stroke centres. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Successful recanalization was defined by a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or 3. A favourable outcome was defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days after stroke onset. Multivariable analysis was performed to control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 111 enrolled patients, 57 (51.4%) patients were treated with DT, and 54 (48.6%) were treated with BT. Patients treated with DT had a shorter imaging to puncture (ITP) time (53 min versus 92 min, P<0.001) and symptom onset to puncture (OTP) time (198 min versus 218 min, P=0.045) than patients treated with BT. No significant difference was detected concerning the rate of successful recanalization (80.7% versus 77.8%, P=0.704) or a favourable outcome between patients treated with DT and BT (35.1% versus 33.3%, P=0.846). Patients treated with DT had a lower intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) rate (40.4% versus 59.3%, P=0.046), but the difference was not significant for symptomatic ICH (sICH, 12.3% versus 16.7%, P=0.511) or asymptomatic ICH (aICH, 28.1% versus 42.6%, P=0.109). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the ratio of favorable prognosis, successful reperfusion, sICH and mortality did not differ between the two groups. However, there was a higher rate of ICH (OR=2.492, 95% CI 1.005 to 6.180, p=0.049) in the BT group as compared with the DT group.

CONCLUSIONS

DT seems equivalent to BT in treating stroke due to carotid T occlusion in favorable outcome, successful recanalization, 90-day morality and sICH. However, BT may increase the incidence of ICH in this specific type stroke.

Bridge mechanical thrombectomy may be a better choice for acute large vessel occlusions

Direct mechanical thrombectomy (DMT) was confirmed non-inferior to bridge mechanical thrombectomy (BMT, MT preceded by intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h after symptom onset) for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO) in mothership patients. However, the noninferiority of DMT in the general population (including drip and ship mode) is controversial, and the impact of thrombolysis on retrieval attempts remains uncertain. This was a post-hoc analysis of a multi-center, prospective enrolled study. Patients were divided into the BMT group and the DMT group. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared by using univariate analysis, multivariable analysis, and propensity score matching analysis, respectively. Of all 245 patients enrolled in this study, 79 (32.2%) patients underwent BMT. In the multivariable analysis, the ratio of excellent prognosis (defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1 at 90 days) was significantly higher in the BMT group compared with the DMT group (odds ratio, 2.731; 95% confidence interval, 1.238-6.023; P = 0.013). The ratio of good prognosis (mRS score 0-2 at 90 days), successful recanalization rate [modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score 2b-3] and mortality rate were similar between the two groups. The excellent prognosis rate was significantly higher in the BMT group after propensity score matching (P = 0.023). BMT was associated with a higher ratio of excellent prognosis (mRS 0-1) and a similar successful recanalization rate without increasing peri-operation complications compared with DMT in AIS-LVO patients. It is prudent to continue BMT until further data is available.

Bridging therapy is associated with improved cognitive function after large vessel occlusion stroke - an analysis of the German Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND

The targeted use of endovascular therapy (EVT), with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute large cerebral vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) has been proven to be superior compared to IVT alone. Despite favorable functional outcome, many patients complain about cognitive decline after EVT. If IVT in addition to EVT has positive effects on cognitive function is unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the German Stroke Registry (GSR, an open, multicenter and prospective observational study) and compared cognitive function 90 days after index ischemic stroke using MoCA in patients with independent (mRS ≤ 2 pts) and excellent (mRS = 0 pts) functional outcome receiving combined EVT and IVT (EVT + IVT) vs. EVT alone (EVT-IVT).

RESULTS

Of the 2636 GSR patients, we included 166 patients with mRS ≤ 2 at 90 days in our analysis. Of these, 103 patients (62%) received EVT + IVT, 63 patients (38%) were treated with EVT alone. There was no difference in reperfusion status between groups (mTICI ≥ 2b in both groups at 95%, p = 0.65). Median MoCA score in the EVT + IVT group was 20 pts. (18-25 IQR) vs. 18 pts. (16-21 IQR) in the EVT-IVT group (p = 0.014). There were more patients with cognitive impairment (defined as MoCA < 26 pts) in the EVT-IVT group (54 patients (86%)) compared to the EVT + IVT group (78 patients (76%)). EVT + IVT was associated with a higher MoCA score at 90 days (mRS ≤ 2: p = 0.033, B = 2.39; mRS = 0: p = 0.021, B = 4.38).

CONCLUSIONS

In Patients with good functional outcome after LVOS, rates of cognitive impairment are lower with combined EVT and IVT compared to EVT alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03356392.

Endovascular Therapy or Alteplase in Patients with Comorbidities: Insights from UNMASK EVT

OBJECTIVE

Decisions to treat large-vessel occlusion with endovascular therapy (EVT) or intravenous alteplase depend on how physicians weigh benefits against risks when considering patients' comorbidities. We explored EVT/alteplase decision-making by stroke experts in the setting of comorbidity/disability.

METHODS

In an international multi-disciplinary survey, experts chose treatment approaches under current resources and under assumed ideal conditions for 10 of 22 randomly assigned case scenarios. Five included comorbidities (cancer, cardiac/respiratory/renal disease, mild cognitive impairment [MCI], physical dependence). We examined scenario/respondent characteristics associated with EVT/alteplase decisions using multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Among 607 physicians (38 countries), EVT was chosen less often in comorbidity-related scenarios (79.6% under current resources, 82.7% assuming ideal conditions) versus six "level-1A" scenarios for which EVT/alteplase was clearly indicated by current guidelines (91.1% and 95.1%, respectively, odds ratio [OR] [current resources]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.47). However, EVT was chosen more often in comorbidity-related scenarios compared to all other 17 scenarios (79.6% versus 74.4% under current resources, OR: 1.34, 1.17-1.54). Responses favoring alteplase for comorbidity-related scenarios (e.g. 75.0% under current resources) were comparable to level-1A scenarios (72.2%) and higher than all others (60.4%). No comorbidity independently diminished EVT odds when considering all scenarios. MCI and dependence carried higher alteplase odds; cancer and cardiac/respiratory/renal disease had lower odds. Being older/female carried lower EVT odds. Relevant respondent characteristics included performing more EVT cases/year (higher EVT-, lower alteplase odds), practicing in East Asia (higher EVT odds), and in interventional neuroradiology (lower alteplase odds vs neurology).

CONCLUSION

Moderate-to-severe comorbidities did not consistently deter experts from EVT, suggesting equipoise about withholding EVT based on comorbidities. However, alteplase was often foregone when respondents chose EVT. Differences in decision-making by patient age/sex merit further study.