Rifampin preventive therapy for tuberculosis in Boston's homeless

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the foremost cause of death by an infectious disease globally. Multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB; resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid, or rifampicin alone) is a burgeoning public health challenge in several parts of the world, and especially Eastern Europe, Russia, Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Pre-extensively drug-resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB) refers to MDR/RR-TB that is also resistant to a fluoroquinolone, and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) isolates are additionally resistant to other key drugs such as bedaquiline and/or linezolid. Collectively, these subgroups are referred to as drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). All forms of DR-TB can be as transmissible as rifampicin-susceptible TB; however, it is more difficult to diagnose, is associated with higher mortality and morbidity, and higher rates of post-TB lung damage. The various forms of DR-TB often consume >50% of national TB budgets despite comprising <5-10% of the total TB case-load. The past decade has seen a dramatic change in the DR-TB treatment landscape with the introduction of new diagnostics and therapeutic agents. However, there is limited guidance on understanding and managing various aspects of this complex entity, including the pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, management and prevention of MDR-TB and XDR-TB, especially at the primary care physician level.

Preconcentration of rifampicin prior to its efficient spectroscopic determination in the wastewater samples based on a nonionic surfactant

Every year, tuberculosis affects the lungs of millions of people and rifampicin is the commonly used medicine for its treatment due to its antibiotic nature. The frequent use of rifampicin may lead to its increased concentration in the water resources. This research work is focused on the cloud point extraction (CPE) procedure for the preconcentration of rifampicin prior to its determination in water. The UV/vis spectrophotometric method was adapted for the measurement of rifampicin content after the phase separation. Triton-X 100 was used as the nonionic surfactant which contains hydrophilic polyethylene chain feasible for the extraction of analyte. Various analytical parameters that can affect the extraction efficacy were optimized to achieve linearity of the proposed method in the concentration range of 3.54–81.41 mgL^–1. The Limit of detection and quantification were 1.261 and 4.212 mgL^–1, respectively. The Preconcentration factor was 40 with relative standard deviation (%RSD) of 2.504%. The standard addition methodology was adopted for the validation of this procedure and effectively applied for the determination of rifampicin in real wastewater samples.

Tuberculosis preventive treatment: the next chapter of tuberculosis elimination in India

The End TB Strategy envisions a world free of tuberculosis—zero deaths, disease and suffering due to tuberculosis by 2035. This requires reducing the global tuberculosis incidence from >1250 cases per million people to <100 cases per million people within the next two decades. Expanding testing and treatment of tuberculosis infection is critical to achieving this goal. In high-burden countries, like India, the implementation of tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) remains a low priority. In this analysis article, we explore potential challenges and solutions of implementing TPT in India. The next chapter in tuberculosis elimination in India will require cost-effective and sustainable interventions aimed at tuberculosis infection. This will require constant innovation, locally driven solutions to address the diverse and dynamic tuberculosis epidemiology and persistent programme monitoring and evaluation. As new tools, regimens and approaches emerge, midcourse adjustments to policy and practice must be adopted. The development and implementation of new tools and strategies will call for close collaboration between local, national and international partners—both public and private—national health authorities, non-governmental organisations, research community and the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industry. Leading by example, India can contribute to global knowledge through operational research and programmatic implementation for combating tuberculosis infection.

Better Completion of Pediatric Latent Tuberculosis Treatment Using 4 Months of Rifampin in a US-based Tuberculosis Clinic

BACKGROUND

Children less than 5 years of age have the highest age-specific rate of progression from latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active disease. Therefore, regimens for treatment of pediatric LTBI must be not only efficacious but practical enough to overcome the unique childhood barriers to regimen adherence. Since 2012, a 4-month regimen of daily rifampin (4R) has been the standard recommendation for pediatric LTBI at the Denver Metro Tuberculosis Clinic.

METHODS

Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we compared treatment completion rates between 4R and 9-month isoniazid (9H) regimens for all pediatric patients treated for LTBI at the Denver Metro Tuberculosis Clinic between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015, and assessed the influence of clinical and demographic characteristics on successful completion of the 2 regimens.

RESULTS

There were 395 children in the 4R cohort and 779 in the 9H cohort. Completion rates overall were significantly higher for 4R than 9H (83.5% vs. 68.8%, P < 0.001). Drug toxicity leading to treatment noncompletion was low in both groups (1.5% in 4R and 0.7% in 9H, P = 0.23), and no patient progressed to active tuberculosis in either cohort. The 9H cohort was more likely to fail treatment completion because of barriers potentially related to the longer duration of treatment such as relocation or loss to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients were significantly more likely to complete LTBI treatment using a 4R than with a 9-month isoniazid regimen. Better completion rates of 4R may increase efficacy of tuberculosis prevention and decrease demand on public health resources.

Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: a cause for concern?

The drug isoniazid (INH) is a key component of global tuberculosis (TB) control programmes. It is estimated, however, that 16.1% of TB disease cases in the former Soviet Union countries and 7.5% of cases outside of these settings have non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) INH resistance. Resistance has been linked to poorer treatment outcomes, post-treatment relapse and death, at least for specific sites of disease. Multiple genetic loci are associated with phenotypic resistance; however, the relationship between genotype and phenotype is complex, and restricts the use of rapid sequencing techniques as part of the diagnostic process to determine the most appropriate treatment regimens for patients. The burden of resistance also influences the usefulness of INH preventive therapy. Despite seven decades of INH use, our knowledge in key areas such as the epidemiology of resistant strains, their clinical consequences, whether tailored treatment regimens are required and the role of INH resistance in fuelling the MDR-TB epidemic is limited. The importance of non-MDR INH resistance needs to be re-evaluated both globally and by national TB control programmes.

Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

There are approximately 56 million people who harbor Mycobacterium tuberculosis that may progress to active tuberculosis (TB) at some point in their lives. Modeling studies suggest that if only 8% of these individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI) were treated annually, overall global incidence would be 14-fold lower by 2050 compared to incidence in 2013, even in the absence of additional TB control measures. This highlights the importance of identifying and treating latently infected individuals, and that this intervention must be scaled up to achieve the goals of the Global End TB Strategy. The efficacy of LTBI treatment is well established, and the most commonly used regimen is 9 months of daily self-administered isoniazid. However, its use has been hindered by limited provider awareness of the benefits, concern about potential side effects such as hepatotoxicity, and low rates of treatment completion. There is increasing evidence that shorter rifamycin-based regimens are as effective, better tolerated, and more likely to be completed compared to isoniazid. Such regimens include four months of daily self-administered rifampin monotherapy, three months of once weekly directly observed isoniazid-rifapentine, and three months of daily self-administered isoniazid-rifampin. The success of LTBI treatment to prevent additional TB disease relies upon choosing an appropriate regimen individualized to the patient, monitoring for potential adverse clinical events, and utilizing strategies to promote adherence. Safer, more cost-effective, and more easily completed regimens are needed and should be combined with interventions to better identify, engage, and retain high-risk individuals across the cascade from diagnosis through treatment completion of LTBI.

Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Children

Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an effective way of preventing future cases of tuberculosis disease. We review pediatric and adult studies of LTBI treatment (isoniazid and rifampin monotherapy, isoniazid plus rifampin, isoniazid plus rifapentine, and rifampin plus pyrazinamide). Based upon this review and our pediatric experience, we can offer recommendations for routine (isoniazid) and alternative courses of therapy.

Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Isoniazid resistance is an obstacle to the treatment of tuberculosis disease and latent tuberculosis infection in children. We aim to summarize the literature describing the risk of isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis among children with tuberculosis disease.

METHODS

We did a systematic review of published reports of children with tuberculosis disease who had isolates tested for susceptibility to isoniazid. We searched PubMed, Embase and LILACS online databases up to January 12, 2012.

RESULTS

Our search identified 3403 citations, of which 95 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 8351 children with tuberculosis disease for resistance to isoniazid. The median proportion of children found to have isoniazid-resistant strains was 8%; the distribution was right-skewed (25th percentile: 0% and 75th percentile: 18%).

CONCLUSIONS

High proportions of isoniazid resistance among pediatric tuberculosis patients have been reported in many settings suggesting that diagnostics detecting only rifampin resistance are insufficient to guide appropriate treatment in this population. Many children are likely receiving substandard tuberculosis treatment with empirical isoniazid-based regimens, and treating latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid may not be effective in large numbers of children. Work is needed urgently to identify effective regimens for the treatment of children sick with or exposed to isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis and to better understand the scope of this problem.

Hepatotoxicity Related to Anti-tuberculosis Drugs: Mechanisms and Management

Development of idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is an intricate process involving both concurrent as well as sequential events determining the direction of the pathways, degree of liver injury and its outcome. Decades of clinical observation have identified a number of drug and host related factors that are associated with an increased risk of antituberculous drug-induced hepatotoxicity, although majority of the studies are retrospective with varied case definitions and sample sizes. Investigations on genetic susceptibility to hepatotoxicity have so far focused on formation and accumulation reactive metabolite as well as factors that contribute to cellular antioxidant defense mechanisms and the environment which can modulate the threshold for hepatocyte death secondary to oxidative stress. Recent advances in pharmacogenetics have promised the development of refined algorithms including drug, host and environmental risk factors that allow better tailoring of medications based on accurate estimates of risk-benefit ratio. Future investigations exploring the pathogenesis of hepatotoxicity should be performed using human tissue and samples whenever possible, so that the novel findings can be translated readily into clinical applications.

Current management options for latent tuberculosis: a review

Tuberculosis remains the world's second leading infectious cause of death, with nearly one-third of the global population latently infected. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection is a mainstay of tuberculosis-control efforts in low-to medium-incidence countries. Isoniazid monotherapy has been the standard of care for decades, but its utility is impaired by poor completion rates. However, new, shorter-course regimens using rifamycins improve completion rates and are cost-saving compared with standard isoniazid monotherapy. We review the currently available therapies for latent tuberculosis infection and their toxicities and include a brief economic comparison of the different regimens.

Moving toward tuberculosis elimination: implementation of statewide targeted tuberculin testing in Tennessee

RATIONALE

From 1993 to 2010, annual U.S. tuberculosis (TB) rates declined by 58%. However, this decline has slowed and disproportionately occurred among U.S.-born (78%) versus foreign-born persons (47%). Addressing the high burden of latent TB infection (LTBI) must be prioritized.

OBJECTIVES

Only Tennessee has implemented a statewide program for finding and treating people with LTBI. The program was designed to address high statewide TB rates and growing burden among the foreign-born. We sought to assess the feasibility and yield of Tennessee's program.

METHODS

Analyzing data from the 4.8-year period from program inception in March 2002 through December 2006, we quantified patients screened using a TB risk assessment tool, tuberculin skin tests (TST) placed and read, TST results, and patients initiating and completing LTBI treatment. We then estimated the number needed to screen to find and treat one person with LTBI and to prevent one case of TB.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 168,517 persons screened, 102,709 had a TST placed and read. Among 9,090 (9%) with a positive TST result, 53% initiated treatment, 54% of whom completed treatment. An estimated 195 TB cases were prevented over the 4.8 years analyzed, and program performance measures improved annually. The number of TSTs placed to prevent one TB case ranged from 150 for foreign-born persons to 9,834 for persons without TB risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted tuberculin testing and LTBI treatment is feasible and likely to reduce TB rates over time. Yield and cost-effectiveness are maximized by prioritizing foreign-born persons, a large population with high TB risk.

Poor Compliance Makes Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Unsatisfactory

Objectives: The recommended treatment for latent tuberculosis infection is isoniazid for 9 months, but this regimen has a low completion rate. The authors wanted to compare treatment with isoniazid and treatment with isoniazid and rifampin in the typical public health setting in a large diverse state and recover as much information as possible from a state database. Methods: Patients who received latent tuberculosis infection treatment were identified in the Texas Department of State Health Services database for the years 1995-2002. Treatment completion, adverse reactions, and disease development were recorded. Results were analyzed using logistic regression to predict disease development. Results: In sum, 50 578 patients received isoniazid, and 280 received isoniazid/rifampin. Sixty-one percent of the isoniazid group and 54% of the isoniazid/rifampin group completed treatment. Eighteen percent of the isoniazid/rifampin group possibly had adverse reactions and discontinued treatment; 3% of the isoniazid group discontinued therapy because of side effects. More than 70% of patients with adverse reactions in the isoniazid/rifampin group took the treatment for more than 4 months. Overall, 168 patients in the isoniazid group with a normal chest X-ray and a positive skin test developed tuberculosis during follow-up to 2008; no patients in the isoniazid/rifampin group who had a normal X-ray and completed chemoprophylaxis developed tuberculosis during follow-up. Conclusions: The isoniazid/rifampin regimen appears to be as effective as the isoniazid regimen. However, completion rates on combination therapy were slightly lower. This regimen needs more formal clinical study since it has the potential to decrease administrative costs and improve completion rates. In addition, state departments of health need to develop networks using community-based resources to reach patients and increase completion rates.

Interferon-gamma release assay and Rifampicin therapy for household contacts of tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

Longitudinal studies in household contacts to identify subgroups at risk of active tuberculosis are lacking.

METHODS

Household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients were prospectively enrolled to receive chest radiography, sputum studies, and T-SPOT.TB assay at initial visit. Repeat examinations every 6 months for 3 years, and 4-month rifampin preventive therapy for T-SPOT.TB-positive contacts were provided. We investigated factors predicting T-SPOT.TB-positivity and active pulmonary tuberculosis.

RESULTS

583 contacts were enrolled with a follow-up duration of 20.7 ± 9.4 months. 176 (30.2%) were T-SPOT.TB-positive initially and 32 (18.2%) of them received preventive therapy. Old age, living in the same room/house with the index case, the index case having a high smear grade (3+ ∼ 4+) and pulmonary cavitation were associated with T-SPOT.TB-positivity. Active tuberculosis developed in 9 T-SPOT.TB-positive contacts; risk factors included T-SPOT.TB-positivity without preventive therapy, living in the same room, and the index case being ≤50 years or female. 108 (61.4%) T-SPOT.TB-positive contacts had repeat examinations. Forty-five had T-SPOT.TB reversion and none of them developed active tuberculosis.

CONCLUSION

Household contacts who are T-SPOT.TB-positive and live in the same room as the index case are at risk of active tuberculosis and require preventive therapy and close follow-up.

Adverse events and development of tuberculosis after 4 months of rifampicin prophylaxis in a tuberculosis outbreak

We screened tuberculosis (TB) contacts as an outbreak investigation with tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). We evaluated adverse events and TB incidence in all persons screened after rifampicin (RFP) prophylaxis, and specifically assessed the new TB cases in relation to initial TST and IGRA results. The 180 contacts were divided into four groups: TST+/IGRA+ (n = 101), TST+/IGRA- (n = 22), TST-/IGRA+ (n = 16), and TST-/IGRA- (n = 41). RFP treatment (4 months) was prescribed only to the TST+/IGRA+ group. Of 87 contacts who initiated prophylaxis, adverse events occurred in 21 contacts (24.1%) including hepatotoxicity (11.5%), flu-like syndrome (5.7%), and thrombocytopenia (3.4%). TB developed in two TST+/IGRA+ subjects after completion of prophylaxis, including one multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB case during 21.8 months of follow-up. Adverse events were frequent, and development of TB including MDR-TB occurred after RFP prophylaxis.

Re-examining treatment of latent tuberculosis infection

In April 2000, the American Thoracic Society published guidelines for targeted tuberculin testing and the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) (1). These guidelines are a joint statement of the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and were endorsed by both the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Similar recommendations were published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America in its guidelines for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) (2). These updated guidelines were developed in recognition of the importance of treating LTBI as one component of eliminating TB in the United States - a goal reiterated in 1999 by the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis (3) - but also realizing the differing risks and benefits of treatment for patients based on their individual risks of developing active disease or drug toxicity (4). The 2000 edition of theCanadian Tuberculosis Standardsprovided similar recommendations for the treatment of LTBI (formerly known as chemoprophylaxis) and reminded us of the two major Canadian TB elimination initiatives: the National Tuberculosis Elimination Strategy (Medical Services Branch, 1992), with the aim of eliminating TB in First Nations people by 2010, and the National Consensus Conference on Tuberculosis (Health Canada, 1997), with an interim goal of a 5% reduction in the number of TB cases each year in Canada (5). Given the recent publication of the American guidelines and the updatedCanadian Tuberculosis Standards(Fifth Edition), it was considered timely to remind readers of the evidence supporting the use of antituberculous chemotherapy in the treatment of latent infection.

Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in children

Recent increases in the dosages of the essential antituberculosis agents isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP), pyrazinamide (PZA) for use in children recommended by World Health Organization have raised concerns regarding the risk of hepatotoxicity. Published data relating to the incidence and pathogenesis of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ADIH), particularly in children, is reviewed. Amongst 12,708 children receiving chemoprophylaxis, mainly with INH, but also other combinations of INH, RMP and PZA only 1 case (0.06%) of jaundice was recorded and abnormal liver functions documented in 110 (8%) of the 1225 children studied. Excluding tuberculous meningitis (TBM) 8984 were children treated for tuberculosis disease and jaundice documented in 75 (0.83%) and abnormal liver function tests in 380 (9.9%) of the 3855 children evaluated. Amongst 717 children treated for TBM, however, jaundice occurred in 72 (10.8%) and abnormal LFT were recorded in 174 (52.9%) of those studied. Case reports document the occurrence of ADIH in at least 63 children. Signs and symptoms of ADIH were frequently ignored in the recorded cases. ADIH can occur in children at any age or at any dosage of INH, RMP or PZA, but the incidence of.ADIH is is considerably lower in children than in adults. Children with disseminated forms of disease are at greater risk of ADIH. The use of the higher dosages of INH, RMP and PZA recently recommended by WHO is unlikely to result in a greater risk of ADIH in children.

Letting sleeping dos lie: does dormancy play a role in tuberculosis?

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which causes tuberculosis, remains a major human public health threat. This is largely due to a sizeable reservoir of latently infected individuals, who may relapse into active disease decades after first acquiring the infection. Furthermore, patients have a very slow response to treatment of active disease. Latency and antibiotic tolerance are commonly taken as a proxy for dormancy, a stable nonreplicative state. However, latency is a clinical term that is solely defined by a lack of disease indicators. The actual state of the bacterium in human latency is not well understood. Here we evaluate the results of several in vitro models of dormancy and consider the applicability of various animal models for studying aspects of human latency and resistance to killing by antibiotics. Furthermore, we propose a model for the initiation of dormancy and resuscitation during infection.

New approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection

With nearly 9 million new active disease cases and 2 million deaths occurring worldwide every year, tuberculosis continues to remain a major public health problem. Exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis leads to active disease in only ~10% people. An effective immune response in remaining individuals stops M. tuberculosis multiplication. However, the pathogen is completely eradicated in ~10% people while others only succeed in containment of infection as some bacilli escape killing and remain in non-replicating (dormant) state (latent tuberculosis infection) in old lesions. The dormant bacilli can resuscitate and cause active disease if a disruption of immune response occurs. Nearly one-third of world population is latently infected with M. tuberculosis and 5%-10% of infected individuals will develop active disease during their life time. However, the risk of developing active disease is greatly increased (5%-15% every year and ~50% over lifetime) by human immunodeficiency virus-coinfection. While active transmission is a significant contributor of active disease cases in high tuberculosis burden countries, most active disease cases in low tuberculosis incidence countries arise from this pool of latently infected individuals. A positive tuberculin skin test or a more recent and specific interferon-gamma release assay in a person without overt signs of active disease indicates latent tuberculosis infection. Two commercial interferon-gamma release assays, QFT-G-IT and T-SPOT.TB have been developed. The standard treatment for latent tuberculosis infection is daily therapy with isoniazid for nine months. Other options include therapy with rifampicin for 4 months or isoniazid + rifampicin for 3 months or rifampicin + pyrazinamide for 2 months or isoniazid + rifapentine for 3 months. Identification of latently infected individuals and their treatment has lowered tuberculosis incidence in rich, advanced countries. Similar approaches also hold great promise for other countries with low-intermediate rates of tuberculosis incidence.

The use of anti-tuberculosis therapy for latent TB infection

Tuberculosis infection is of global public health significance, with millions of incident cases each year. Many cases, particularly in low-prevalence settings, result from the reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI); potentially acquired years prior to active disease. Up to one-third of the world’s population has been infected with LTBI, and so may be at risk for future active TB disease. A variety of antituberculosis medications and treatment regimens have now been evaluated in the management of LTBI, with the aim of eradicating tuberculosis bacilli and reducing the likelihood of subsequent reactivation disease. This article reviews LTBI therapies and their use in clinical contexts, and considers future directions for individual and population-based strategies in LTBI management.

Saudi guidelines for testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection

Pulmonary tuberculosis is a common disease in Saudi Arabia. As most cases of tuberculosis are due to reactivation of latent infection, identification of individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) who are at increased risk of progression to active disease, is a key element of tuberculosis control programs. Whereas general screening of individuals for LTBI is not cost-effective, targeted testing of individuals at high risk of disease progression is the right approach. Treatment of those patients with LTBI can diminish the risk of progression to active tuberculosis disease in the majority of treated patients. This statement is the first Saudi guideline for testing and treatment of LTBI and is a result of the cooperative efforts of four local Saudi scientific societies. This Guideline is intended to provide physicians and allied health workers in Saudi Arabia with the standard of care for testing and treatment of LTBI.

Adherence to treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in a clinical population in New York City

BACKGROUND

Low adherence to treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (TLTBI) diminishes TB prevention efforts. This study examined the treatment completion rate among those who started TLTBI and factors associated with adherence to TLTBI.

METHODS

Patients who started TLTBI in New York City (NYC) Health Department chest clinics during January 2002-August 2004 were studied. TLTBI completion rate were described and compared according to patient demographic and clinical characteristics by regimen using univariate analysis and log-binomial regression.

RESULTS

A total of 15 035 patients started and 6788 (45.2%) completed TLTBI. Treatment completers were more likely than non-completers to be >or=35 years old (52.5%, adjusted relative risk (aRR)=1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1, 1.2), contacts to pulmonary TB patients (57.4%, aRR=1.5, 95% CI=1.4, 1.7), treated by directly observed preventive therapy (DOPT) (71.4%, aRR=1.3, 95% CI=1.2, 1.3), and to have received the rifamycin-based regimen (60.0%, aRR=1.2, 95% CI=1.1, 1.3). The completion rate with an isoniazid regimen did not differ between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons. Among those who failed to complete, 3748 (47.8%) failed to return for isoniazid and 59 (14.7%) for rifamycin after the first month of medication dispensing.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter regimen and DOPT increased completion rates for LTBI. Though efforts to improve TLTBI completion need to address all groups, greater focus is needed for persons who are contacts and HIV-infected, as they have higher risk of developing TB.

Scaling up programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a prioritized research agenda

Frank Cobelens and colleagues outline key research questions that need to be addressed to maximize the impact of programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Antituberculosis drugs and hepatotoxicity

Isoniazid, pyrazinamide and rifampicin have hepatotoxic potential, and can lead to such reactions during antituberculosis chemotherapy. Most of the hepatotoxic reactions are dose-related; some are, however, caused by drug hypersensitivity. The immunogenetics of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity, especially inclusive of acetylaor phenotype polymorphism, have been increasingly unravelled. Other principal clinical risk factors for hepatotoxicity are old age, malnutrition, alcoholism, HIV infection, as well as chronic hepatitis B and C infections. Drug-induced hepatic dysfunction usually occurs within the initial few weeks of the intensive phase of antituberculosis chemotherapy. Vigilant clinical (including patient education on symptoms of hepatitis) and biochemical monitoring are mandatory to improve the outcomes of patients with drug-induced hepatotoxicity during antituberculosis chemotherapy. Some fluoroquinolones like ofloxacin/levofloxacin may have a role in constituting non-hepatotoxic drug regimens for management of tuberculosis (TB) in the presence of hepatic dysfunction. Isoniazid administration is currently the standard therapy for latent TB infection. Rifamycins like rifampicin or rifapentine, alone or in combination with isoniazid, may also be considered as alternatives, pending accumulation of further clinical data. During treatment of latent TB infection, regular follow up is essential to ensure adherence to therapy and facilitate clinical monitoring for hepatic dysfunction. Monitoring of liver chemistry is also required for those patients at risk of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

Enhancement of treatment completion for latent tuberculosis infection with 4 months of rifampin

BACKGROUND

Isoniazid is the standard medication used to treat latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The lengthy treatment with isoniazid, its perceived hepatotoxicity, and the increasing influx of foreign-born persons from countries with a higher prevalence of isoniazid resistance have compromised this regimen. In 2000, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommended 4 months of rifampin (4R) as an acceptable alternative regimen to 9 months of isoniazid (9H). In a county chest clinic in northern New Jersey, a self-administered 9H regimen for patients with LTBI was generally prescribed until the year 2002. After recognizing poor completion rates, LTBI treatment was shifted predominantly to the alternative 4R regimen.

METHODS

Medical records of patients placed on LTBI treatment during 2000 (predominantly a 9H regimen) and 2003 (predominantly a 4R regimen) were reviewed. A total of 474 patients were included in the study. chi(2), Fishers exact, two-sample t, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. The main outcome variable was treatment completion.

RESULTS

A total of 80.5% of patients receiving 4R and 53.1% receiving 9H completed treatment (p < 0.0001); 34.7% of patients receiving 9H were unavailable for follow-up, compared to 12.6% receiving 4R (p = <0.0001). Fewer drug reactions were observed in the group receiving 4R compared to the group receiving 9H (3.1% vs 5.8%), although this was not statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis identified treatment regimen as a significant predictor for treatment completion (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3 to 8.1). Employment was negatively associated with treatment completion in the same model (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving 4R were significantly more likely to complete therapy than those receiving 9H.

An official ATS statement: hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis therapy

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a problem of increasing significance, but has been a long-standing concern in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) infection. The liver has a central role in drug metabolism and detoxification, and is consequently vulnerable to injury. The pathogenesis and types of DILI are presented, ranging from hepatic adaptation to hepatocellular injury. Knowledge of the metabolism of anti-TB medications and of the mechanisms of TB DILI is incomplete. Understanding of TB DILI has been hampered by differences in study populations, definitions of hepatotoxicity, and monitoring and reporting practices. Available data regarding the incidence and severity of TB DILI overall, in selected demographic groups, and in those coinfected with HIV or hepatitis B or C virus are presented. Systematic steps for prevention and management of TB DILI are recommended. These include patient and regimen selection to optimize benefits over risks, effective staff and patient education, ready access to care for patients, good communication among providers, and judicious use of clinical and biochemical monitoring. During treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) monitoring is recommended for those who chronically consume alcohol, take concomitant hepatotoxic drugs, have viral hepatitis or other preexisting liver disease or abnormal baseline ALT, have experienced prior isoniazid hepatitis, are pregnant or are within 3 months postpartum. During treatment of TB disease, in addition to these individuals, patients with HIV infection should have ALT monitoring. Some experts recommend biochemical monitoring for those older than 35 years. Treatment should be interrupted and, generally, a modified or alternative regimen used for those with ALT elevation more than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in the presence of hepatitis symptoms and/or jaundice, or five times the ULN in the absence of symptoms. Priorities for future studies to develop safer treatments for LTBI and for TB disease are presented.

Adverse reactions to first-line antituberculosis drugs

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently available drugs are effective for treatment of the disease or latent infection, but may cause serious adverse effects.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the literature for side effects of five first-line antituberculous medications (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and streptomycin). Incidence of the major side effects were compiled with particular attention to the incidence of isoniazid hepatotoxicity.

RESULTS

Hepatotoxicity to isoniazid is a serious problem. Although overall incidence may be decreasing, incidence averaged 9.2 per 1000 patients who were compliant, in multiple studies, with a case fatality rate of 4.7%. The incidence is higher with increasing age. Other serious adverse effects include dermatological, gastrointestinal, hypersensitivity, neurological, haematological and renal reactions. They can lead to drug discontinuation (in up to 10% of patients) or even more serious morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Side effects to antituberculosis drugs are common, and include hepatitis, cutaneous reactions, gastrointestinal intolerance, haematological reactions and renal failure. These adverse effects must be recognised early, to reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

Mutant Prevention Concentration of Isoniazid, Rifampicin and Rifabutin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is a new parameter that may be of aid in determining the risk of resistant mutants being selected.

METHODS

The MPCs of 224 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates were estimated by plating more than 10(10) cells on drug-containing agar and determining the concentration that allowed no colony growth. Antibiotics used were isoniazid, rifampicin and rifabutin.

RESULTS

The MPC90 of clinical isolates in our setting is 2.4, 2.2 and 0.4 mg/l for isoniazid, rifampicin and rifabutin, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Isoniazid and rifampicin are two drugs that present a low risk of selection of resistant mutants when used in monotherapy. However, determination of the MPC of each strain can provide data to minimize this risk and thus enable treatment to be optimized.

Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Challenges and Prospects

This article reviews the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative persons.

Treatment completion and costs of a randomized trial of rifampin for 4 months versus isoniazid for 9 months

There is little published information regarding treatment completion, safety, and efficacy of rifampin administered daily for 4 months-a recommended alternative to 9 months of isoniazid for therapy of latent tuberculosis infection. In an open-label randomized trial at a university-affiliated respiratory hospital, consenting patients whose treating physician had recommended therapy for latent tuberculosis infection were randomized to daily self-administered rifampin for 4 months or daily self-administered isoniazid for 9 months. Of 58 patients randomized to rifampin, 53 (91%) took 80% of doses, and 50 (86%) took more than 90% of doses within 20 weeks compared with 44 (76%) and 36 (62%) who took 80 and 90%, respectively, of doses of isoniazid within 43 weeks (relative risks: 80% of doses, 1.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.4]; 90% of doses, 1.4 [1.1, 1.7]). Adverse events resulted in permanent discontinuation of therapy for two (3%) patients taking rifampin, and for eight (14%) patients taking isoniazid. Three patients developed drug-induced hepatitis--all were taking isoniazid. Total costs of therapy were significantly higher for isoniazid. In conclusion, completion of therapy was significantly better with 4 months of rifampin and major side effects were somewhat lower. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of the 4-month rifampin regimen.

Treatment of infections due to resistant organisms

Antibiotic resistance remains rare in paediatric community-acquired pneumonia in the UK, but is more common in hospital-acquired pneumonia and in patients with chronic lung diseases. It should also be considered in children arriving from countries with a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance, children with previous heavy antibiotic exposure, those who are immunosuppressed, and those who are not responding to conventional therapy. The most frequent bacterial cause of paediatric pneumonia is Streptococcus pneumoniae and globally there are major concerns about the increasing resistance of this organism to penicillin. Intermediate resistance may be overcome with conventional doses of parenteral penicillin and there is as yet no convincing evidence that intermediate/high level resistance is associated with a worse clinical outcome. Continued vigilance and research is required. The recently introduced pneumococcal conjugate vaccines offer great promise as they are likely to prevent cases of disease due to penicillin-resistant serotypes.

Twice weekly isoniazid and rifampin treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in Canadian plains Aborigines

Six months of twice weekly directly observed isoniazid and rifam-picin treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection was implemented to improve the outcome of treatment. A total of 591 infected aborigines without previous tuberculosis or treatment of latent TB infection received twice weekly isoniazid and rifampicin for 6 mo from 1992 to 1995. The outcome was compared with 403 infected aborigines without previous tuberculosis or treatment of latent TB infection who received self-administered isoniazid daily for 1 yr from 1986 to 1989. Of patients, 487 (82%) completed the twice weekly 6-mo regimen compared with 77 (19%) who completed the daily 12-mo regimen. The main reason for incomplete treatment was default. Both groups were followed over a 6-yr period. The rate of tuberculosis in the twice-weekly isoniazid and rifampicin-treated patients was 0.9/1,000 patient-years compared with 9/1,000 patient-years in the daily isoniazid-treated patients. The rate of side effects was higher for directly observed treatment patients, 136/1,000 patient-years of drugs, compared with 39/ 1,000 patient-years for self-administered treatment patients. Life-threatening side effects such as skin allergic reactions and hepatitis were the same in both groups. A regimen of 52 doses of directly observed twice weekly isoniazid and rifampicin is an effective and well-tolerated regimen to improve the outcome of the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in a population with a high rate of default with daily self-administered isoniazid.

Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: renewed opportunity for tuberculosis control

New recommendations for targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection have recently been published. Changes in nomenclature from screening to targeted tuberculin testing and from preventive therapy to treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) are intended to promote more widespread implementation by programs and health care providers. Targeted tuberculin testing is designed to identify persons at high risk for TB and is discouraged for persons at low risk. New recommendations for treatment of LTBI in both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and HIV-uninfected patients include isoniazid for 9 months as the preferred regimen: isoniazid for 6 months based on local program conditions, rifampin and pyrazinamide for 2 months, and rifampin for 4 months. Treatment monitoring now places greater emphasis on clinical, rather than routine, laboratory monitoring. More widespread implementation of targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of LTBI is an important control strategy that will enhance efforts to eliminate TB in the United States.

Treatment and prevention of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB), which is defined as combined resistance to isoniazid and rifampicin, is a 'man-made' disease that is caused by improper treatment, inadequate drug supplies or poor patient supervision. Patients with MDRTB face chronic disability and death, and represent an infectious hazard for the community. Cure rates of 96% have been achieved but require prompt recognition of the disease, rapid accurate susceptibility results, and early administration of an individualised re-treatment regimen. Such regimens are usually based on a quinolone and an injectable agent (i.e. an aminoglycoside or capreomycin) supplemented by other 'second-line' drugs. This therapy is prolonged (e.g. 24 months), expensive, and has multiple adverse effects. Prevention of MDRTB is therefore of paramount importance. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended a multifaceted programme, known by the acronym DOTS (directly observed therapy, short-course), that promotes effective treatment of drug-susceptible TB as the prime method of limiting drug resistance. DOTS was part of a successful MDRTB control programme in New York City, which also included treatment of prevalent MDRTB cases, streamlined laboratory testing, effective infection control procedures and wider application of screening and preventive therapy (although the optimal chemotherapy for MDRTB infection remains undefined). Industrialised countries have the resources to treat patients with MDRTB and to mount these extensive control programmes. Unfortunately, MDRTB is also prevalent in Asia, South America and the former Soviet Union. First world countries have a vested interest, as well as a moral responsibility, to assist in controlling MDRTB in these 'hot spots'.

Multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis

The national and international emergence of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis has complicated both the programmatic control of the tuberculosis epidemic and the clinical management of individual cases. In the United States, the problem of MDR tuberculosis is regionalized and likely stems from multifactorial causes, including the concurrent HIV epidemic. The epidemic is propagated by two distinct entities, PDR and ADR tuberculosis, which result from different inadequacies in tuberculosis control programs. The clinical management of drug-resistant tuberculosis, MDR tuberculosis in particular, is complex, frequently results in adverse outcomes, and often necessitates consultation with a specialist in the field. Two important management principles are to always use at least two agents to which the organism is susceptible and to never add a single drug to a failing regimen. Selection of an appropriate treatment regimen and determination of the duration of therapy depend on the resistance pattern, toxicities of the drugs, and the patient's response to therapy. Measures to ensure patient adherence with therapy are of paramount importance in the setting of drug resistance. Preventive therapy should be considered in the management of close contacts to active cases of MDR tuberculosis, although there is little evidence to support this practice.