A Scoping Review of Measures Used in Early Intervention Services for Psychosis

Reasons for Discharge in a National Network of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs

BACKGROUND

Discharge from early psychosis intervention is a critical stage of treatment that may occur for a variety of reasons. This study characterizes reasons for discharge among participants in early psychosis intervention programs participating in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) which comprises >100 programs in the United States organized under 8 academic hubs.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed 1787 discharges, focusing on program completion, unilateral termination by the client/family, and lost contact with the client/family. We performed exploratory analyses of demographic, clinical, and functional predictors of discharge reason. Variables predictive of discharge type were included in multilevel logistic regressions, allowing for the estimation of predictors of discharge reason and variability in rates by program and hub.

STUDY RESULTS

An estimated 20%-30% of enrolled patients completed the program. Program completion rates were higher among participants who were older on admission, had lower negative symptoms severity, spent more time in education, employment, or training, and who were covered by private insurance (a close proxy for socioeconomic status). Programs were more likely to lose contact with male participants, Black participants, and participants who were never covered by private insurance. After accounting for patient-level factors, there was substantial program-level variation in all 3 discharge outcomes, and hub-level variability in the proportion of participants who completed the program. The impact of race on program completion varied substantially by program.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants were discharged from early psychosis intervention services for diverse reasons, some of which were associated with sociocultural factors. Disengagement is a widespread problem affecting all hubs.

SARPEP, a rapid-learning healthcare system of early intervention services for psychosis in Quebec, Canada: Feasibility, acceptability and early impacts

INTRODUCTION

Despite growing interest in learning health systems, their application and evaluation in mental health have been scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and early impacts of SARPEP, a rapid learning healthcare system (RLHS) for early intervention services for psychosis in Quebec, Canada.

METHODS

SARPEP comprised technology-supported monitoring of program and patient outcomes, feedback and capacity-building. It involved 11 services (128 professionals, 1700+ patients). We descriptively analyzed quantitative data on the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) collected in the first two years.

RESULTS

Reach: Patient and family partners, all programs (clinicians, managers), government representatives and the provincial early psychosis association agreed to co-design and implement all SARPEP components.

EFFECTIVENESS

Data informed program- and provincial-level decision-making. Some quality indicators (e.g., timely access) improved over time. 80 % of youth were satisfied with services. Adoption: All programs collected data on satisfaction and quality, with data collection improving over time. Eight programs and all stakeholder groups participated in most community-of-practice sessions.

IMPLEMENTATION

The time required for data collection and providing feedback decreased over time. SARPEP offered rapid, flexible support; tools; and a community of practice that facilitated collecting data, and monitoring and improving practices. Maintenance: All programs remained in SARPEP post study.

CONCLUSION

Involving all stakeholders, RLHSs can be deployed, adopted, and maintained in mental healthcare and increase the measurement of practices and quality improvement efforts. Strategies are needed to increase the completion of patient-reported measures and to rigorously evaluate the RLHS' effectiveness in improving service quality and outcomes.

Overview of Regional Care for Adolescents Over the Age of 15 With a Mental State at Risk in France

INTRODUCTION

Early detection and intervention in psychotic disorders are public health issues that have led to the creation of specific care systems in France, the visibility of which is still debated. Moreover, these services are often concentrated in adult rather than child psychiatry, which may increase the duration of untreated psychosis.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to take stock of the care provided in the adolescent unit of the Candélie hospital (Lot-et-Garonne, France) in 2023 and the proportion of adolescents aged over 15 diagnosed with a mental health risk who were followed up. The second objective was to propose an experimental approach to improving care for this group of patients by introducing an 'advanced practice nurse'.

METHODS

Activity data for 2022 were collected by the IT department of the Candélie hospital. At risk mental state adolescents were identified according to the COGDIS and COPER criteria.

RESULTS

The results of the retrospective study carried out in 2022 show that staffing levels and care units in adolescent medicine are saturated. Depending on the system, between 19% and 39% of the patients are considered to have an at risk mental state. The construction of an Ishikawa diagram highlights three major issues on which the advanced nurse practitioner could intervene: support the system under pressure, delegate part of the medical activities given the shortage of doctors, and coordinate the transition of child and adolescent mental health care to adult mental health care.

CONCLUSION

Restructuring existing health care systems by including initial consultation and monitoring of adolescents and their families by advanced practice nurses would allow earlier intervention with these adolescents.

A Review of Reviews of Patient-Reported Measures in Psychosis: Need to Consider Factors Affecting Equity and the Involvement of Patients

Background

Patient-reported measures are increasingly valued in psychosis care and research. For patient-reported measures to reflect patient perspectives, patients must be involved in developing them. Furthermore, their development and evaluation must consider sociodemographic characteristics influencing patient experiences and outcomes and measurement. As reviews reflect the state of the field and guide clinicians/researchers in selecting measures, our aim was to evaluate literature reviews of patient-reported measures on their consideration of factors affecting equity and patient involvement.

Study Design

For this review of reviews, we searched 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO) for reviews on patient-reported measures in psychosis. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, and descriptively synthesized and appraised the quality of included reviews. Using Cochrane's PROGRESS-Plus and a Canadian equity framework, reviews were evaluated on their consideration of sociodemographic characteristics, accessibility, and patient involvement.

Study Results

Of 10 reviews (6 systematic, 4 nonsystematic; 1111 studies; 313 measures), 6 limited their search to English. Barring 2 reviews that reported the age, gender, and countries of samples in included studies, the reviews did not extract/comment on population/sociodemographic characteristics. One commented on one measure's readability; none commented on the samples' literacy levels. Four reviews considered the availability of translations; only 1 evaluated cross-cultural validity. Only 2 considered the costs of measures. Only 1 evaluated patient involvement in developing patient-reported measures. One referenced equity frameworks/standards.

Conclusions

Reviews of patient-reported measures in psychosis demonstrate minimal attention to equity and patient involvement. We offer recommendations to strengthen patient-reported measures research by attending to equity, social determinants, and patient-centrism.

Putting measurement-based care into action: a multi-method study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

BACKGROUND

Measurement-based care (MBC) is an effective tool in the delivery of evidence-based practices (EBPs). MBC utilizes feedback loops to share information and drive changes throughout a learning healthcare system. Few studies have demonstrated this practice in team-based care for young people with early psychosis. This paper describes the development of a personalized feedback report derived from routine assessments that is shared with clients and clinicians as part of a MBC process.

METHODS

We used a multi-method approach to evaluate the implementation of a personalized feedback report at 5 early psychosis coordinated specialty care programs (CSC). We compared clients enrolled in CSC who did and did not receive a feedback report over the first 6 months of treatment. The sample included 204 clients: 146 who did not receive the feedback report (treatment as usual, TAU) and were enrolled over 2 years, and 58 who received the feedback report. A subset of 67 clients completed measures at both intake and 6-month follow-up, including 42 who received the personalized feedback report and 25 who did not. We compared the two groups with regard to self-reported symptoms, likelihood of completing treatment, and perception of shared decision making. We conducted qualitative interviews with 5 clients and 5 clinicians to identify the benefits and challenges associated with the personalized feedback report.

RESULTS

The total sample showed significant improvements in shared decision-making and in their intent to complete the program. Post hoc analyses revealed significant increases in the personalized feedback group, and non-significant changes in the TAU group, although group-by-time interactions did not reach statistical significance. The feedback report group engaged in significantly more sessions of Supported Employment and Education (SEE), case management, and peer support, and fewer medication visits over the first 6 months of treatment. Both groups showed significant improvement in symptoms and functioning. Results from the qualitative analysis indicated that the experience of receiving the reports was valuable and validating for both patients and clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

A personalized feedback report was integrated into standard of care for early psychosis programs. This process may improve shared decision-making, strengthen the likelihood to stay in treatment, and increase treatment attendance in psychosocial interventions. We posit that this process facilitates recovery-oriented care, strengths-focused treatment planning, enhances intrinsic motivation, and strengthens the therapeutic alliance.

Assessing Patient Satisfaction With Metacognitive Training (MCT) for Psychosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES

Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis is a group intervention that combines cognitive-behavioural therapy and psychoeducation. It has proven efficacy in reducing psychotic symptoms and correcting cognitive biases implicated in the development and maintenance of psychotic symptoms. However, other outcomes, such as patient satisfaction with the intervention, have not been well studied despite their importance for adherence and overall success. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials was conducted to assess satisfaction with MCT among adults with psychotic spectrum disorders.

METHODS

The search was conducted in Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were followed, and certainty of evidence was ascertained using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023418097).

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction was considered the primary outcome in 3 of the 10 studies reviewed. Four studies compared MCT with other psychosocial interventions (a newspaper discussion group, cognitive remediation and supportive therapy), two of which found significantly higher satisfaction with MCT. A high percentage of all patients found MCT comprehensible and considered it an important part of their treatment; they would recommend the training to others and found the group setting advantageous. Most participants expressed high subjective satisfaction or acceptance of MCT.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found evidence that MCT may be associated with high levels of satisfaction in clinical trials whose main objective is to assess patient satisfaction, but more research is needed to consolidate the findings, especially for the extended version of MCT.

Patient- and family-reported experiences of their treating teams in early psychosis services in Chennai, India and Montreal, Canada

BACKGROUND

Cross-cultural psychosis research has mostly focused on outcomes, rather than patient and family experiences. Therefore, our aim was to examine differences in patients' and families' experiences of their treating teams in early intervention services for psychosis in Chennai, India [low- and middle-income country] and Montreal, Canada [high-income country].

METHODS

Patients (165 in Chennai, 128 in Montreal) and their families (135 in Chennai, 110 in Montreal) completed Show me you care, a patient- and family-reported experience measure, after Months 3, 12, and 24 in treatment. The measure assesses the extent to which patients and families view treating teams as being supportive. A linear mixed model with longitudinal data from patient and family dyads was used to test the effect of site (Chennai, Montreal), stakeholder (patient, family), and time on Show me you care scores. This was followed by separate linear mixed effect models for patients and families with age and gender, as well as symptom severity and functioning as time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, Chennai patients and families reported more supportive behaviours from their treating teams (β=4.04; β= 9, respectively) than did Montreal patients (Intercept =49.6) and families (Intercept=42.45). Higher symptom severity over follow-up was associated with patients reporting lower supportive behaviours from treating teams. Higher levels of positive symptoms (but lower levels of negative symptoms) over follow-up were associated with families reporting lower supportive behaviours from treating teams. There was no effect of time, age, gender and functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The levels to which treating teams are perceived as supportive may reflect culturally shaped attitudes (e.g., warmer attitudes towards healthcare providers in India vis-à-vis Canada) and actual differences in how supportive treating teams are, which too may be culturally shaped. Being expected to be more involved in treatment, Chennai families may receive more attention and support, which may further reinforce their involvement. Across contexts, those who improve over follow-up may see their treating teams more positively.

Patient-reported outcome measures in early psychosis: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the single-item self-reported health and self-reported mental health measures in Chennai, India and Montreal, Canada

AIM

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable information and promote shared decision-making but are infrequently used in psychosis. Self-rated Health (SRH) and Self-rated Mental Health (SRMH) are single-item PROMs in which respondents rate their health and mental health from 'poor' to 'excellent'. We examined the psychometric properties of the SRH and SRMH in early psychosis services in Chennai, India and Montreal, Canada.

METHODS

Assessments were completed in Tamil/English in Chennai and French/English in Montreal. Test-retest reliability included data from 59 patients in Chennai and Montreal. Criterion validity was examined against clinician-rated measures of depression, anxiety, positive and negative symptoms, and a quality-of-life PROM for 261 patients in Chennai and Montreal.

RESULTS

SRH and SRMH had good to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC >0.63) at both sites and in English and Tamil (but not French). Results for criterion validity were mixed. In Montreal, low SRH was associated with not being in positive symptom remission, and poorer functioning and quality of life. SRH was associated only with functioning in Chennai. No associations were found for SRMH in Montreal. In Chennai, low SRMH was associated with not being in positive symptom remission and poorer functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported outcome measures may perform differently across contexts as a potential function of variations in sociodemographics, illness characteristics/course, understandings of health/mental health, and so forth. More work is needed to understand if discrepancies between PROMs and CROMs indicate poor validity of PROMs or 'valid' differences between patient and clinician perceptions. Our work suggests that single-item PROMs can be feasibly integrated into clinical settings.

Using latent class analysis to investigate enduring effects of intersectional social disadvantage on long-term vocational and financial outcomes in the 20-year prospective Chicago Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Class and social disadvantage have long been identified as significant factors in the etiology and epidemiology of psychosis. Few studies have explicitly examined the impact of intersecting social disadvantage on long-term employment and financial independence.

METHODS

We applied latent class analysis (LCA) to 20-year longitudinal data from participants with affective and non-affective psychosis (n = 256) within the Chicago Longitudinal Research. LCA groups were modeled using multiple indicators of pre-morbid disadvantage (parental social class, educational attainment, race, gender, and work and social functioning prior to psychosis onset). The comparative longitudinal work and financial functioning of LCA groups were then examined.

RESULTS

We identified three distinct latent classes: one comprised entirely of White participants, with the highest parental class and highest levels of educational attainment; a second predominantly working-class group, with equal numbers of Black and White participants; and a third with the lowest parental social class, lowest levels of education and a mix of Black and White participants. The latter, our highest social disadvantage group experienced significantly poorer employment and financial outcomes at all time-points, controlling for diagnosis, symptoms, and hospitalizations prior to baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, on most measures, the two less disadvantaged groups did not significantly differ from each other.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses add to a growing literature on the impact of multiple forms of social disadvantage on long-term functional trajectories, underscoring the importance of proactive attention to sociostructural disadvantage early in treatment, and the development and evaluation of interventions designed to mitigate ongoing social stratification.

Veteran Experiences With an mHealth App to Support Measurement-Based Mental Health Care: Results From a Mixed Methods Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Mental health conditions are highly prevalent among US veterans. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is committed to enhancing mental health care through the integration of measurement-based care (MBC) practices, guided by its Collect-Share-Act model. Incorporating the use of remote mobile apps may further support the implementation of MBC for mental health care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate veteran experiences with Mental Health Checkup (MHC), a VHA mobile app to support remote MBC for mental health.

METHODS

Our mixed methods sequential explanatory evaluation encompassed mailed surveys with veterans who used MHC and follow-up semistructured interviews with a subset of survey respondents. We analyzed survey data using descriptive statistics. We then compared responses between veterans who indicated having used MHC for ≥3 versus <3 months using χ2 tests. We analyzed interview data using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We received 533 surveys (533/2631, for a 20% response rate) and completed 20 interviews. Findings from these data supported one another and highlighted 4 key themes. (1) The MHC app had positive impacts on care processes for veterans: a majority of MHC users overall, and a greater proportion who had used MHC for ≥3 months (versus <3 months), agreed or strongly agreed that using MHC helped them be more engaged in their health and health care (169/262, 65%), make decisions about their treatment (157/262, 60%), and set goals related to their health and health care (156/262, 60%). Similarly, interviewees described that visualizing progress through graphs of their assessment data over time motivated them to continue therapy and increased self-awareness. (2) A majority of respondents overall, and a greater proportion who had used MHC for ≥3 months (versus <3 months), agreed/strongly agreed that using MHC enhanced their communication (112/164, 68% versus 51/98, 52%; P=.009) and rapport (95/164, 58% versus 42/98, 43%; P=.02) with their VHA providers. Likewise, interviewees described how MHC helped focus therapy time and facilitated trust. (3) However, veterans also endorsed some challenges using MHC. Among respondents overall, these included difficulty understanding graphs of their assessment data (102/245, 42%), not receiving enough training on the app (73/259, 28%), and not being able to change responses to assessment questions (72/256, 28%). (4) Interviewees offered suggestions for improving the app (eg, facilitating ease of log-in, offering additional reminder features) and for increasing adoption (eg, marketing the app and its potential advantages for veterans receiving mental health care).

CONCLUSIONS

Although experiences with the MHC app varied, veterans were positive overall about its use. Veterans described associations between the use of MHC and engagement in their own care, self-management, and interactions with their VHA mental health providers. Findings support the potential of MHC as a technology capable of supporting the VHA's Collect-Share-Act model of MBC.

A call to action: informing research and practice in suicide prevention among individuals with psychosis

Although it is well established that individuals living with psychosis are at increased risk for suicidal ideation, attempts, and death by suicide, several gaps in the literature need to be addressed to advance research and improve clinical practice. This Call-to-Action highlights three major gaps in our understanding of the intersection of psychosis and suicide as determined by expert consensus. The three gaps include research methods, suicide risk screening and assessment tools used with persons with psychosis, and psychosocial interventions and therapies. Specific action steps to address these gaps are outlined to inform research and practice, and thus, improve care and prognoses among persons with psychosis at risk for suicide.

Putting measurement-based care into action: A mixed methods study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Background

Measurement-based care (MBC) is an effective tool in the delivery of evidence-based practices (EBPs). MBC utilizes feedback loops to share information and drive changes throughout a learning healthcare system. Few studies have demonstrated this practice in team-based care for people with early psychosis. This paper describes the development of a personalized feedback report derived from routine assessments that is shared with clients and clinicians as part of a MBC process.

Methods

We used a quasi pre-post comparison design with mixed methods to evaluate the implementation of a personalized feedback report at 5 early psychosis coordinated specialty care programs (CSC). We compared clients enrolled in CSC who did and did not receive a feedback report over the first 6 months of treatment. The sample included 204 clients: 146 who did not receive the feedback report and were enrolled over 2 years, and 58 who received the feedback report. A subset of 67 clients completed measures at both intake and 6-month follow-up, including 42 who received the report and 25 who did not. We compared the two groups with regard to self-reported symptoms, likelihood of completing treatment, and perception of shared decision making. We conducted qualitative interviews with 5 clients and 5 clinicians to identify the benefits and challenges associated with the personalized feedback report.

Results

People who received a personalized feedback report reported significant improvements in shared decision-making and had greater improvements over time in their intent to attend future treatment sessions. They engaged in more sessions for Supported Employment and Education (SEE), case management, and peer support, and fewer medication visits over the first 6 months of treatment. Both groups showed significant improvement in symptoms and functioning. Results from the qualitative analysis indicated that the experience of receiving the reports was valuable and validating for both patients and clinicians.

Conclusions

A personalized feedback report was integrated into standard of care for early psychosis programs. This process may improve shared decision-making, strengthen the likelihood to stay in treatment, and increase engagement in psychosocial interventions. We posit that this process facilitates strengths-focused discussions, enhances intrinsic motivation, and strengthens the therapeutic alliance.

What should inpatient psychological therapies be for? Qualitative views of service users on outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is limited research on what, when and how outcomes should be measured in psychological therapy trials in acute mental health inpatient wards.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to consider what outcomes service users think are important to measure.

METHODS

This qualitative study explored the views of 14 participants, who had an inpatient admission within the last year, on outcomes of psychological therapies using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis from a critical realist perspective with both inductive and deductive coding.

RESULTS

The 126 outcomes that were important to participants were mapped onto an established taxonomy of outcomes across different health areas and the socioecological framework to consider the wider context and help summarise the outcomes. Most of the outcomes were mapped to the intrapersonal and interpersonal level. In addition to the outcome mapping, three themes were constructed from the qualitative data: (1) I am not a problem I am a person, (2) Feeling cared for and loved, (3) What does getting better look like.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the need for patient-reported outcomes which are cocreated with service users, disseminating research and training on preventing dehumanising experiences, enhancing psychological safety and therapeutic relationships and improving access to psychological therapy.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The wider People with Personal Experience Involvement Committee at the University of Bath were consulted which included a focus group during the early planning stages. We also collaborated with a person with personal experience, at every stage of the research. This included developing our research question and aims, protocol, participant documents (e.g., information and debrief forms), advertisement and recruitment strategy, interview topic guide, the codes, the final themes and quotes and reviewing the manuscript. People with lived experience of being admitted to an acute mental health inpatient ward participated in our study.

Predictors of positive patient-reported outcomes from 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': a national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The components of care delivered by Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services vary, but the impact on patient experience is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between components of care provided by EIP services in England and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

2374 patients from EIP services in England were surveyed during the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis. Participants were asked about the care they received, and completed the 'Patient Global Impressions' Scale (rating whether their mental health had improved), and 'Friends and Family Test' (rating whether they would recommend their service). Information about service structure was obtained from service providers. We analysed associations between outcomes and components of care using multilevel regression.

FINDINGS

The majority of participants were likely to recommend the treatment they had received (89.8%), and felt that their mental health had improved (89.0%). Participants from services where care coordinators had larger case loads were less likely to recommend their care. Participants were more likely to recommend their care if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, family therapy or targeted interventions for carers. Participants were more likely to report that their mental health had improved if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis or targeted interventions for carers.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific components of EIP care were associated with improved patient reported outcomes. Psychosocial interventions and carer support may be particularly important in optimising outcomes for patients.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings emphasise the need for small case load sizes and comprehensive packages of treatment in EIP services.