1
|
Moore CM, Wakim PG, Taylor HA. Factors Affecting COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making and Satisfaction: A Survey of U.S. High School Students. J Adolesc Health 2024; 74:1139-1145. [PMID: 38520433 PMCID: PMC11102307 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate self-reported individual-, household-, and community-level factors impacting COVID-19 vaccination decision-making among a sample of high school-aged US adolescents. METHODS We surveyed adolescents ages 15-17 living in the United States during September and October 2022 (n = 454). Univariable and targeted bivariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine associations between adolescent characteristics and COVID-19 vaccination status, satisfaction with vaccination status, reasons weighed for and against vaccination, and experience of perceived access barriers. RESULTS More than three-quarters of high school-aged adolescents in our sample reported satisfaction with their current COVID-19 vaccination status, and respondents were more likely to report satisfaction with their COVID-19 vaccination status when they reported actively participating in the decision. DISCUSSION Adolescents remain an important age group for targeted public health and policy interventions given that their vaccination rates still lag behind averages for adults. Allowing for minor consent to vaccination, as well as parent-, school-, or peer-based interventions, may prove especially effective for addressing rates among high school-aged students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire M Moore
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Paul G Wakim
- Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Holly A Taylor
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Groenewald C, Isaacs D, Maluleka M. "It Doesn't Cure, but It Protects": COVID-19 Vaccines through the Eyes of Children and Their Parents. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1305. [PMID: 37631873 PMCID: PMC10459681 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, studies have examined COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and/or hesitancy amongst adult populations across the globe. However, there is a paucity of literature illustrating children's voices in vaccination debates. This article draws on qualitative data collected via a mixed-methods study that explored South Africans' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2021. Interviews were conducted with a purposive sample (N = 29) of children (>18 years) and their parents regarding their initial perspectives on COVID-19 vaccines. Given the dyadic nature of our study, we explored the intergenerational influence that parents' perspectives had on children's vaccine acceptability and the role that vaccine literacy, or lack thereof, played in vaccine decision making. Findings showed a great level of vaccine acceptability among children and parents, where many placed hopes in the vaccines to promote societal health and wellbeing. Intergenerational transfer of perspectives was observed where children's willingness to receive a vaccine was intrinsically linked to their parents' vaccine acceptability. Some participants also expressed concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, related to misinformation, mistrust, and limited vaccine literacy. We discuss the findings as they relate to vaccine and health literacy, also considering the prospective implications of this work as we enter the "recovery" period of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Groenewald
- Human and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban 4001, South Africa;
- Department of Psychology, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6139, South Africa
- South African Research Ethics Training Initiative, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
- DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
| | - Dane Isaacs
- Desmond Tutu Centre for Religion and Social Justice, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa;
| | - Mafanato Maluleka
- Human and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban 4001, South Africa;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuzmichev A, Harada NM, Forbes CA, Dean HD. Public Health Reports in 2022: Impact Factor Increase; COVID-19 Coverage; Authorship by State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Agencies; and New Department on Public Health Ethics. Public Health Rep 2023:333549231168623. [PMID: 37144359 PMCID: PMC10160819 DOI: 10.1177/00333549231168623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Kuzmichev
- Public Health Reports, Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Noelle M Harada
- Public Health Reports, Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Christine A Forbes
- Public Health Reports, Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Hazel D Dean
- Public Health Reports, Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mansfield LN, Choi K, Delgado JR, Macias M, Munoz-Plaza C, Lewin B, Bronstein D, Chang J, Bruxvoort K. Decision-Making about COVID-19 Vaccines among Health Care Workers and Their Adolescent Children. West J Nurs Res 2023:1939459231170981. [PMID: 37096318 DOI: 10.1177/01939459231170981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Health care workers promote COVID-19 vaccination for adolescent patients, and as parents, may influence their own children to get vaccinated. We conducted virtual, semi-structured qualitative interviews with vaccinated health care workers and their adolescent children to explore their decision-making process for COVID-19 vaccination. In total, 21 health care workers (physicians, nurses, and medical staff) and their adolescent children (N = 17) participated in interviews. The following three themes described parent-adolescent decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination: (1) family anticipation and hesitation about COVID-19 vaccine approval; (2) parents' or adolescents' choice: the decision maker for adolescent COVID-19 vaccination; and (3) leveraging one's vaccination status to encourage others to get vaccinated. Nurses encouraged adolescent autonomy in decisions for COVID-19 vaccination while physicians viewed vaccination as the parent's decision. Health care workers and their adolescent children used role-modeling to motivate unvaccinated peers and may model their decision-making process for adolescent COVID-19 vaccination with their own children to support their patients' and parents' vaccine decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa N Mansfield
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Division of General Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kristen Choi
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeanne R Delgado
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Division of General Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mayra Macias
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Corrine Munoz-Plaza
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Lewin
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - David Bronstein
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - John Chang
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Katia Bruxvoort
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Although vaccines are important for all age groups, issues of vaccine uptake and vaccine hesitancy have particular salience for the adolescent and young adult age group. This article reviews the importance of vaccination for adolescents and young adults, the variability in uptake of different vaccines, the reasons for vaccine hesitancy for this age group, and the legal framework for consent for vaccination. One important difference between vaccine hesitancy for adolescents and hesitancy for younger children or adults is the unique developmental, clinical, ethical, and legal context in which the decision to vaccinate is made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail English
- Center for Adolescent Health & the Law, PO Box 3795, Chapel Hill, NC 27515, USA; Gillings School of Global Publlic Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
| | - Amy B Middleman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1200 Children's Avenue, Suite 12200, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delgado JR, Mansfield LN, Bruxvoort K, Macias M, Grotts J, Lewin B, Bronstein D, Munoz-Plaza C, Szilagyi P, Chang J, Choi K. Adolescent Self-Consent for COVID-19 Vaccination: Views of Healthcare Workers and Their Adolescent Children on Vaccination Autonomy. J Adolesc Health 2023; 72:674-681. [PMID: 36775750 PMCID: PMC9916604 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored the perceptions of healthcare worker parents (physicians, nurses, and staff) and their adolescents (aged 12-17 years) on adolescent self-consent to COVID-19 vaccination by applying the concept of positive deviance of those already vaccinated against COVID-19. METHODS We used a qualitative descriptive design to conduct individual, semi-structured interviews with COVID-19-vaccinated healthcare workers in Southern California and their vaccinated adolescent children. Separate interviews were conducted with parents and adolescents from November to December 2021 using digital phone conferencing software. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic and constant comparative analysis techniques were used to identify relevant themes and subthemes. RESULTS Twenty one healthcare workers (9 nurses, one nurse practitioner, one technologist, and 10 physicians) and their adolescents (N = 17) participated. Three overarching themes were identified to describe participants' perspectives about adolescent self-consent for COVID-19 vaccination: (1) Family values and practices around adolescent vaccination; (2) Differences in parent and adolescent support for vaccine self-consent laws; and (3) Parent and adolescent uncertainty on readiness for vaccine self-consent laws. Adolescents largely supported self-consent while parents supported the policy if they would be able to have a discussion with their adolescent prior to the decision. DISCUSSION Parents and adolescents supported adolescent self-consent for COVID-19 vaccination, with the reservation that adolescents should discuss the decision alongside their parents to exercise their medical autonomy with supportive guidance. Greater adolescent involvement in making decisions and providing self-consent for healthcare, including vaccines, could prepare adolescents to have a greater sense of autonomy over their health and contribute to population health measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne R Delgado
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Division of General Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Lisa N Mansfield
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Division of General Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Katia Bruxvoort
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mayra Macias
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
| | - Joseph Grotts
- UCLA School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Bruno Lewin
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
| | - David Bronstein
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
| | - Corrine Munoz-Plaza
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
| | - Peter Szilagyi
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - John Chang
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
| | - Kristen Choi
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; UCLA School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Assadi M, Kiani M, Shamsi Gooshki E, Aryanian Z, Afshar ZM, Hatami P. COVID‐19 vaccination in children as a global dilemma through an ethical lens: A retrospective review. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e976. [DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud Assadi
- Department of Medical Ethics Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
- Health Research Institute Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran
| | - Mehrzad Kiani
- Department of Medical Ethics Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki
- Department of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine/Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Zeinab Aryanian
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
- Department of Dermatology Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran
| | - Zeinab M. Afshar
- Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza, Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Kermanshah Iran
| | - Parvaneh Hatami
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paul S, Mishra CM. Do we need to vaccinate every child against COVID-19: What evidence suggests-A systematic review of opinions. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1002992. [PMID: 36424958 PMCID: PMC9679503 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
It is still debatable whether all children should receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The comparatively mild cases and low risk of COVID-19 in children compared to adults, as well as the lack of clarity on the relative effects of the disease and vaccine, indicate that the risk-benefit ratio of vaccination in children is more nuanced. To consider and highlight the complexity of policy decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccination in children, we outlined the points regarding for and against vaccination of children against COVID-19 in this systemic review. Using Medical Search Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords, we searched PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The primary search term was COVID-19 vaccination (all synonyms), factors (all synonyms), and among children (all synonyms). A total of 367 articles were searched. Finally, 64 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The major theme/tone of 28 (43.75%) articles was in favor of children's COVID vaccination, and they were highlighting the positive factors, whereas the major theme/tone of 20 (31.25%) articles was against it. Approximately 16 (25.0%) articles were in a neutral position. Major factors highlighted by articles in favor of childhood COVID vaccination were as follows: the increasing rate of disease burden (29 articles), prevention of interruption of academic activities of children or school reopening (24 articles), and a role in defense against COVID infection (21 articles). Major factors against childhood vaccination were as follows: mild infection among children (27 articles), ethical concerns and legal problems regarding the consent of minors (17 articles), and vaccine hesitancy among parents for childhood vaccination (11 articles). Whereas, factors of uncertainty were the role in the reduction of community transmission (19 articles), protection against MIS-C (10 articles), and defense against long COVID (7 articles). Considering all the factors of COVID-19 disease progression among children, a cautious approach will be essential before proceeding with COVID-19 vaccination in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chandra Mauli Mishra
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mihaly LK, Schapiro NA, English A. From Human Papillomavirus to COVID-19: Adolescent Autonomy and Minor Consent for Vaccines. J Pediatr Health Care 2022; 36:607-610. [PMID: 35941049 PMCID: PMC9356615 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Adolescent minors in every state can give their own consent for some health care. Although parent consent is generally required for vaccination, there are exceptions in some states. Completion rates are low for recommended adolescent vaccines; allowing adolescents to consent may improve coverage, although more study is needed on barriers to vaccine completion and the feasibility of changes in consent laws. The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the importance of vaccines and related challenges. This policy brief reviews laws governing adolescent consent for health care, including vaccines, and recommends advocacy to support increased adolescent access to vaccines and improved public health.
Collapse
|
10
|
Efendi D, Rifani SR, Milanti A, Efendi F, Wong CL, Rustina Y, Wanda D, Sari D, Fabanjo IJ, De Fretes ED, Mohamad RW, Sawasemariay O, Faidiban RH, Nur Q, Tiwery IB, Huda MH, Mobalen O, Nuraidah. The Role of Knowledge, Attitude, Confidence, and Sociodemographic Factors in COVID-19 Vaccination Adherence among Adolescents in Indonesia: A Nationwide Survey. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1489. [PMID: 36146569 PMCID: PMC9505584 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents is important because the adolescent population has the highest incidence of COVID-19. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination adherence among Indonesian adolescents. This cross-sectional study involved 7986 adolescents, polled through online and offline surveys conducted in six major islands of Indonesia. The online questionnaire was distributed through popular social messaging and social media platforms. Our team also contacted schools and public places to recruit participants from remote areas. In total, 7299 respondents completed the questionnaire. Binary logistic analysis revealed that higher levels of knowledge, positive attitudes, and confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine were significantly associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination adherence in adolescents. Sociodemographic factors were also significantly associated with higher adherence to vaccination programs. Meanwhile, younger age and habitation in private housing were related to lower adherence to the vaccination program. Parental factors related to adolescent compliance were education level, household income, history of infection of family or friends with COVID-19, and working status. The national authorities and stakeholders should take extensive measures to increase attitude, knowledge, confidence, and family support among adolescence through multiple channels.
Collapse
|
11
|
Humble RM, Sell H, Wilson S, Sadarangani M, Bettinger JA, Meyer SB, Dubé È, Lemaire-Paquette S, Gagneur A, MacDonald SE. Parents' perceptions on COVID-19 vaccination as the new routine for their children ≤ 11 years old. Prev Med 2022; 161:107125. [PMID: 35792197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Canadian children 5-11 years old became eligible for COVID-19 vaccination on November 19, 2021, with eligibility for younger children expected later. We aimed to descriptively assess parents' COVID-19 vaccine intentions and acceptability of future doses, including co-administration and annual vaccination for their children. We conducted a cross-sectional Canadian online survey of parents from October 14-November 12, 2021, just prior to authorization of the pediatric formulation of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5-11 years. We assessed parents' intention to vaccinate their children aged 5-11 years, 2-4 years, and 6-23 months; reasons for their intention; and preferences for delivery and access to vaccines. Of 1129 parents, 56% intended to vaccinate their child aged 5-11 years against COVID-19; intentions were lower for children aged 6-23 months (41.9%) and 2-4 years (45.4%). Most parents who intended to vaccinate supported co-administration with routine (61.1%) or influenza (55.4%) vaccines, administration at school (63.6%), receipt of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccine (57.8%), and annual vaccination (56.4%) for their child. Despite parents' high COVID-19 vaccination uptake for themselves (88.8%), intentions for children aged 5-11 years was low. Currently, 56.9% of Canadian children aged 5-11 years have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, and only 37.1% are fully vaccinated. Given that intentions for children <5 years was lower than those 5-11 years, we can also expect low uptake in this group. Parents' preferences regarding delivery and access to COVID-19 vaccination should be considered by public health officials when planning vaccination strategies for children.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuzmichev A, Harada NM, Griffith DM, Powell KM, Dean HD. Public Health Reports in 2021: Impact Factor Increase and New Article Collections on Racism and COVID-19. Public Health Rep 2022; 137:397-407. [PMID: 35435072 PMCID: PMC9109544 DOI: 10.1177/00333549221091785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Kuzmichev
- Public Health Reports,
Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services,
Washington, DC, USA
| | - Noelle M. Harada
- Public Health Reports,
Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services,
Washington, DC, USA
| | - Derek M. Griffith
- Racial Justice Institute, Center for
Men’s Health Equity, Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown
University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Krista M. Powell
- CDR, US Public Health Service, US
Department of Veterans Affairs, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hazel D. Dean
- Public Health Reports,
Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services,
Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ross LF. State Versus Adolescent Override for Parental Refusals to Vaccinate Against COVID-19. Pediatrics 2022; 149:186815. [PMID: 35490286 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
14
|
Rudan I, Adeloye D, Katikireddi V, Murray J, Simpson C, Shah SA, Robertson C, Sheikh A. The COVID-19 pandemic in children and young people during 2020-2021: A complex discussion on vaccination. J Glob Health 2021; 11:01011. [PMID: 35047183 PMCID: PMC8763337 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.01011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Rudan
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Davies Adeloye
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Josie Murray
- COVID-19 Surveillance Lead, Public Health Scotland, Fife, UK
| | - Colin Simpson
- School of Health, Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Chris Robertson
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK and Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - EAVE II collaboration
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK
- COVID-19 Surveillance Lead, Public Health Scotland, Fife, UK
- School of Health, Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK and Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|