Lamivudine/zidovudine as a combined formulation tablet: bioequivalence compared with lamivudine and zidovudine administered concurrently and the effect of food on absorption

Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetics Study of Two Zidovudine/Lamivudine Tablets in Chinese Healthy Volunteers

Zidovudine/lamivudine tablets are nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors that are used to treat human immunodeficiency virus. The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of test and reference preparations of zidovudine/lamivudine tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. We designed a randomized, open, single-center, single-dose, 2-crossover experiment with a 7-day washout period involving 20 healthy subjects. The subjects were given a single dose of the test or reference preparation after fasting overnight for 10 hours. Blood samples were subsequently collected at scheduled time points from 0 hour (preadministration) up to 24 hours postadministration. The plasma concentrations of zidovudine and lamivudine were determined by a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare differences in the mean values of key PK parameters between the 2 preparations. Bioequivalence was evaluated by 2 one-sided t-tests and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR). In total, 19 of the 20 subjects completed the trial. Based on the analysis of PK parameters, the relative bioavailability of zidovudine and lamivudine was 101.1% ± 2.0% and 100.3% ± 1.5%, respectively. ANOVA found no significant difference in primary PK parameters when compared between the 2 formulations, and the 90% CIs of the GMR of the 2 formulations were within the bioequivalence margins of 80%-125%. No serious adverse events occurred. Thus, we confirmed that the 2 preparations were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese volunteers. Our analysis demonstrated that both products showed good tolerance in all subjects.

Chemometrics as a valuable tool for evaluating interactions between antiretroviral drugs and food

AIMS

Clinically significant interactions with food occur for more than half of antiretroviral drugs. Different physiochemical properties deriving from the chemical structures of antiretroviral drugs may contribute to the variable food effect. Chemometric methods allow analysing a large number of interrelated variables concomitantly and visualizing correlations between them. We used a chemometric approach to determine the types of correlations among different features of antiretroviral drugs and food that may influence interactions.

METHODS

Thirty-three antiretroviral drugs were analysed: ten nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, six non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, five integrase strand transfer inhibitors, ten protease inhibitors, one fusion inhibitor and one HIV maturation inhibitor. Input data for the analysis were collected from already published clinical studies, chemical records and calculations. We constructed a hierarchical partial least squares (PLS) model with three response parameters: postprandial change of time to reach maximum drug concentration (ΔTmax ), albumin binding (%) and logarithm of partition coefficient (logP). Predictor parameters were the first two principal components of principal component analysis (PCA) models for six groups of molecular descriptors.

RESULTS

PCA models explained 64.4% to 83.4% of the variance of the original parameters (average: 76.9%), whereas the PLS model had four significant components and explained 86.2% and 71.4% of the variance in the sets of predictor and response parameters, respectively. We observed 58 significant correlations between ΔTmax , albumin binding (%), logP and constitutional, topological, hydrogen bonding and charge-based molecular descriptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemometrics is a useful and valuable tool for analysing interactions between antiretroviral drugs and food.

Effect of Food on the Pediatric Dispersible Tablet Formulations of TRIUMEQ and DOVATO in Healthy Adult Participants

This randomized food effect study in healthy adult participants examined dispersible tablet formulations of fixed-dose combinations of dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (TRIUMEQ) and dolutegravir/lamivudine (DOVATO). While adult tablet formulations of these combinations are currently approved for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus, alternate formulations for children are urgently needed to facilitate appropriate pediatric dosing for patients who may have difficulty swallowing a conventional tablet. This study compared the effect of a high-fat, high-calorie meal on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of dispersible tablet (DT) formulations of the two-drug and three-drug regimens, with administration under fasting conditions. Both the two-drug and three-drug dispersible tablet formulations, administered under fasting conditions and following a high-fat, high-calorie meal, were well tolerated in healthy participants. There were no clinically relevant differences in drug exposure for either regimen when administered with a high-fat meal as compared to under fasting conditions. Safety observations were similar for both treatments, either in the fed or fasted state. Both TRIUMEQ DT and DOVATO DT formulations can be administer with or without food.

Interactions of Antiretroviral Drugs with Food, Beverages, Dietary Supplements, and Alcohol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Multiple factors may affect combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). We investigated the impact of food, beverages, dietary supplements, and alcohol on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of 33 antiretroviral drugs. Systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines was performed, with 109 reports of 120 studies included. For each drug, meta-analyses or qualitative analyses were conducted. We have found clinically significant interactions with food for more than half of antiretroviral agents. The following drugs should be taken with or immediately after the meal: tenofovir disoproxil, etravirine, rilpivirine, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir. Didanosine, zalcitabine, zidovudine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, and indinavir should be taken on an empty stomach for maximum patient benefit. Antiretroviral agents not mentioned above can be administered regardless of food. There is insufficient evidence available to make recommendations about consuming juice or alcohol with antiretroviral drugs. Resolving drug-food interactions may contribute to maximized cART effectiveness and safety.

Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of the Interactions of Antiretroviral Agents with Food and Supplements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Because pharmacokinetic changes in antiretroviral drugs (ARV), due to their concurrent administration with food or nutritional products, have become a clinical challenge, it is necessary to monitor the therapeutic efficacy of ARV in people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to clarify the pharmacokinetic outcomes of the interaction between supplements such as food, dietary supplements, and nutrients, and ARV. Twenty-four articles in both healthy subjects and PLWH were included in the qualitative analysis, of which five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Food−drug coadministration significantly increased the time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) (p < 0.00001) of ARV including abacavir, amprenavir, darunavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, zidovudine, ritonavir, and tenofovir alafenamide. In addition, the increased maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of ARV, such as darunavir, under fed conditions was observed. Area under the curve and terminal half-life were not significantly affected. Evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects, it is vital to clinically investigate ARV and particular supplement interaction in PLWH. Educating patients about any potential interactions would be one of the effective recommendations during this HIV epidemic.

Improving the clinical relevance of a mouse pregnancy model of antiretroviral toxicity; a pharmacokinetic dosing-optimization study of current HIV antiretroviral regimens

Animal models can be useful tools for the study of HIV antiretroviral (ARV) safety/toxicity in pregnancy and the mechanisms that underlie ARV-associated adverse events. The utility and translatability of animal model-based ARV safety/toxicity data is improved if ARVs are tested in clinically relevant concentrations. The objective of this work was to improve the clinical relevance of our mouse pregnancy model of ARV toxicity, by determining the doses of currently prescribed ARV regimens that would yield human therapeutic plasma concentrations. Pregnant mice were administered increasing doses of ARV combinations by oral gavage, followed by measurement of drug concentrations in the maternal plasma and amniotic fluid. Concentrations of ten different ARVs in maternal plasma and amniotic fluid samples of pregnant mice are presented, with dosing optimization to yield human pregnancy-relevant plasma drug concentrations. We have proposed optimal dosing for different regimen component drugs to achieve human therapeutic plasma levels, so that a clinically relevant standard dosing is established. A review of related ARV pharmacokinetic studies in (pregnant/non-pregnant) rodents and human pregnancy is also shown. We hope these data will inform and encourage the use of mouse pregnancy models in the study of ARV safety/toxicity.

What is the effect of pill burden on adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy?

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a combination treatment involving three or more antiretroviral agents for patients with HIV. ART has reduced HIV-related morbidity and mortality via single-tablet or multiple-tablet regimens. Single-tablet regimens, with their lower pill burdens, have demonstrated higher adherence rates, improved viral suppression, and reduced resource use compared with multiple-tablet regimens. In addition, select newer ARTs do not require the high levels of adherence for viral load suppression required by older ART formulations.

Challenges in oral drug delivery of antiretrovirals and the innovative strategies to overcome them

Development of novel drug delivery systems (DDS) represents a promising opportunity to overcome the various bottlenecks associated with the chronic antiretroviral (ARV) therapy of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Oral drug delivery is the most convenient and simplest route of drug administration that involves the swallowing of a pharmaceutical compound with the intention of releasing it into the gastrointestinal tract. In oral delivery, drugs can be formulated in such a way that they are protected from digestive enzymes, acids, etc. and released in different regions of the small intestine and/or the colon. Not surprisingly, with the exception of the subcutaneous enfuvirtide, all the marketed ARVs are administered orally. However, conventional (marketed) and innovative (under investigation) oral delivery systems must overcome numerous challenges, including the acidic gastric environment, and the poor aqueous solubility and physicochemical instability of many of the approved ARVs. In addition, the mucus barrier can prevent penetration and subsequent absorption of the released drug, a phenomenon that leads to lower oral bioavailability and therapeutic concentration in plasma. Moreover, the frequent administration of the cocktail (ARVs are administered at least once a day) favors treatment interruption. To improve the oral performance of ARVs, the design and development of more efficient oral drug delivery systems are called for. The present review highlights various innovative research strategies adopted to overcome the limitations of the present treatment regimens and to enhance the efficacy of the oral ARV therapy in HIV.

Dutrebis (lamivudine and raltegravir) for use in combination with other antiretroviral products for the treatment of HIV-1 infection

Raltegravir and lamivudine have been part of highly active therapy regimens throughout the past years of antiretroviral therapy. A fixed-dose, single-tablet regimen comprising a non-poloxamer formulation of the integrase inhibitor raltegravir and the transcriptase inhibitor lamivudine (raltegravir/lamivudine; Dutrebis(®)) has been recently licensed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. In several Phase I pharmacokinetic studies, one Dutrebis (150 mg lamivudine/300 mg raltegravir) fixed-dose combination tablet showed a higher bioavailability but comparable lamivudine and 400 mg raltegravir poloxamer exposures. Thus, the co-administration of raltegravir together with lamivudine created a potent, effective, well-tolerated antiretroviral combination, which could be more convenient for the patient. However, the disadvantage of twice a day administration, and the existence of other fixed-dose combinations limit its widespread clinical use. This article reviews pharmacokinetics data and appraises their potential use in current and future HIV therapy.

Impact of Pill Burden on Adherence, Risk of Hospitalization, and Viral Suppression in Patients with HIV Infection and AIDS Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of pill burden on outcomes in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) as a single-tablet regimen (STR) or multiple-tablet regimen (MTR).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

DATA SOURCES

South Carolina Medicaid medical and pharmacy paid claims data were obtained from the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office; laboratory data were obtained from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

PATIENTS

A total of 2174 patients covered by South Carolina Medicaid who were dispensed a complete ART STR (580 patients) or MTR (1594 patients) lasting at least 60 days between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2013.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Outcomes were ART adherence; risk of, time to, and total number of hospitalizations; and viral load suppression. Patients were followed from the index date (start date of their complete ART regimen) until the earliest date of one of the following: treatment discontinuation; treatment switch from MTR to STR, or vice versa; end of study period; last date of Medicaid eligibility; or death. Differences in outcomes were evaluated by using bivariate χ(2) and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, as well as multivariate regression models controlling for covariates measured during a 6-month baseline period. The STR and MTR cohorts were, on average, similar in terms of age at index date, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, sex, drug abuse, and mental health diagnoses, but they differed significantly in racial composition, index year of regimen, previous treatment, baseline viral load, and CD4 measures. The bivariate analysis revealed that the STR cohort was more adherent (p<0.0001), had a lower risk of hospitalization (p=0.0076), and had a higher proportion of patients with viral suppression (64.5% vs 49.5%, p<0.0001). In addition, multivariate regression models revealed that the STR cohort was more adherent and was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.86), but no significant difference in viral load suppression was noted between the STR and MTR cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The STR was associated with higher adherence rates and a lower risk of hospitalization (both in the adjusted and unadjusted analyses) in South Carolina Medicaid patients with HIV infection and AIDS. A higher proportion of patients in the STR cohort had viral suppression during the follow-up period in the unadjusted analysis compared with the MTR cohort; however, no significant difference in viral suppression was observed when controlling for adherence.

Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in mothers and breastfeeding infants from 6 to 24 weeks post-partum: results of the BAN Study

BACKGROUND

An intensive, prospective, open-label pharmacokinetic (PK) study in a subset of HIV-infected mothers and their uninfected infants enrolled in the Breastfeeding, Antiretroviral and Nutrition (BAN) Study was performed to describe drug exposure and antiviral response.

METHODS

Women using Combivir(®) (zidovudine [ZDV] + lamivudine [3TC]) +Aluvia(®) (lopinavir/ritonavir [LPV/RTV]) were enrolled. Breast milk (BM), mother plasma (MP) and infant plasma (IP) samples were obtained over 6 h after observed dosing at 6, 12 or 24 weeks post-partum for drug concentrations and HIV RNA.

RESULTS

A total of 30 mother/infant pairs (10 each at 6, 12 and 24 weeks post-partum) were enrolled. Relative to MP, BM concentrations of ZDV and 3TC were 35% and 21% higher, respectively, whereas LPV and RTV were 80% lower. Only 3TC was detected in IP with concentrations 96% and 98% lower than MP and BM, respectively. Concentrations in all matrices were similar at 6-24 weeks. The majority (98.3%) of BM concentrations were >HIV(wt) IC50, with one having detectable virus. There was no association between PK parameters and MP or BM HIV RNA.

CONCLUSIONS

ZDV and 3TC concentrated in BM whereas LPV and RTV did not, possibly due to protein binding and drug transporter affinity. Undetectable to low antiretroviral concentrations in IP suggest prevention of transmission while breastfeeding may be due to antiretroviral effects on systemic or BM HIV RNA in the mother. Low IP 3TC exposure may predispose an infected infant to HIV resistance, necessitating testing and treating infants early.

Single-dose pharmacokinetic properties, bioavailability, and tolerability of two lamivudine 100-mg tablet formulations: a randomized crossover study in healthy Chinese male subjects

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine is used in the treatment of HIV and chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections. Since 1999, at least 2 million Chinese HBV patients have been treated with lamivudine, but there are limited studies on the pharmacokinetics and safety of the drug in Chinese populations.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed lamivudine tablet (test drug) and a branded lamivudine tablet (reference drug) in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

METHODS

A single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the administration of oral lamivudine 100 mg in each period. Plasma lamivudine concentrations were analyzed by a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability parameters were calculated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including Cmax (1239 [328.9] ng/mL vs 1176 [341.5] ng/mL), AUC0-t (4096 [599.1] ng · h/mL vs 4064 [678.2] ng · h/mL), and AUC0-∞ (4200 [607.7] ng · h/mL vs 4162 [672.2] ng · h/mL). The geometric mean test/reference ratios (90% CI) calculated for the log-transformed parameters were Cmax, 1.06 (96.21-116.90); AUC0-t, 1.01 (96.53-105.39); and AUC0-∞, 1.01 (96.81-105.16), all of which were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. No serious AEs were reported, and all mild AEs were recovered quickly without treatment.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the test formulation of lamivudine 100 mg meets the FDA regulatory standards for bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Absence of Food Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Telbivudine Following Oral Administration in Healthy Subjects

The influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine, a candidate antiviral agent against hepatitis B virus (HBV), was investigated in healthy adult subjects following a 600-mg oral dose administered with and without a high-fat/high-calorie meal. Telbivudine was well tolerated under fasting and fed conditions. Oral absorption of telbivudine as measured by maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity)) was not altered by food intake immediately before oral dosing. Values of Cmax, Tmax, and AUC were comparable when telbivudine was administered under fed and fasting conditions. Results from this study indicated that the absorption of telbivudine was not affected by a high-fat/high-calorie meal; telbivudine can therefore be administered orally with no regard to the timing of meals.

A Combined-Formulation Tablet of Lamivudine/Nevirapine/Stavudine: Bioequivalence Compared With Concurrent Administration of Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Stavudine in Healthy Indian Subjects

Generic fixed-dose combinations of antiretrovirals are frequently prescribed for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. A randomized, 2-way study was conducted in 24 fasting, healthy, Indian male subjects to assess bioequivalence between a single combination tablet containing lamivudine, stavudine, and nevirapine (treatment A) with respect to separate marketed tablets administered simultaneously (treatment B). Each subject received treatments A and B separated by 19 days of a drug-free washout period. Plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals, determined by a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay, were used to assess pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration curve. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for either treatment. As geometric mean ratios (% treatment A/treatment B) of log-transformed parameters of area under the plasma concentration curve and plasma concentration, as well as their resultant 90% confidence intervals, were within 80% to 125% and 75% to 133%, respectively, 2 treatments were considered bioequivalent in the extent and rate of absorption. Both treatments exhibited similar tolerability under fasting conditions.

Spillover adherence effects of fixed-dose combination HIV therapy

The impact of fixed-dose combination (FDC) products on adherence to other, non-fixed regimen components has not been examined. We compared adherence to a third antiretroviral (ART) component among patients receiving a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone consisting of the FDC Epzicom(®), GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC (abacavir sulfate 600 mg + lamivudine 300 mg; FDC group) versus NRTI combinations taken as two separate pills (NRTI Combo group) using data from a national sample of 30 health plans covering approximately 38 million lives from 1997 to 2005. Adherence was measured as the medication possession ratio (MPR). Multivariate logistic regression compared treatment groups based on the likelihood of achieving ≥95% adherence, with sensitivity analyses using alternative thresholds. MPR was assessed as a continuous variable using multivariate linear regression. Covariates included age, gender, insurance payer type, year of study drug initiation, presence of mental health and substance abuse disorders, and third agent class. The study sample consisted of 650 FDC and 1947 NRTI Combo patients. Unadjusted mean adherence to the third agent was higher in the FDC group than the NRTI Combo group (0.92 vs 0.85; P < 0.0001). In regression analyses, FDC patients were 48% and 39% more likely to achieve 95% and 90% third agent adherence, respectively (P ≤ 0.03). None of the other MPR specifications achieved comparable results. Among managed care patients, use of an FDC appears to substantially improve adherence to a third regimen component and thus the likelihood of achieving the accepted standard for adherence to HIV therapy of 95%.

Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine and lamivudine-triphosphate after administration of 300 milligrams and 150 milligrams once daily to healthy volunteers: results of the ENCORE 2 study

There is interest in evaluating the efficacy of lower doses of certain antiretrovirals for clinical care. We determined here the bioequivalence of plasma lamivudine (3TC) and intracellular 3TC-triphosphate (3TC-TP) concentrations after the administration of two different doses. ENCORE 2 was a randomized crossover study. Subjects received 3TC at 300 and 150 mg once daily for 10 days (arm 1; n = 13) or vice versa (arm 2; n = 11), separated by a 10-day washout. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (0 to 24 h) were assessed on days 10 and 30. Plasma 3TC and 3TC-TP levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Within-subject changes in PK parameters (the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0-24)], the trough concentration of drug in plasma at 24 h [C(24)], and the maximum concentration of drug in plasma [C(max)]) were evaluated by determining the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) adjusted for study arm, period, and intra-individual variation. Regimens were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval (90% CI) fell within the range of 0.8 to 1.25. A total of 24 subjects completed the study. The GM (90% CI) 3TC AUC(0-24)), expressed as ng·h/ml, for the 300- and 150-mg doses were 8,354 (7,609 to 9,172) and 4,773 (4,408 to 5,169), respectively. Bioequivalence in 3TC PK following the administration of 300 and 150 mg was not demonstrated: the GMRs for AUC(0-24), C(24), and C(max) were 0.57 (0.55 to 0.60), 0.63 (0.59 to 0.67), and 0.56 (0.53 to 0.60), respectively. The GM (90% CI) 3TC-TP AUC(0-24) values (pmol·h/10(6) cells) for the 300- and 150-mg doses were 59.5 (51.8 to 68.3) and 44.0 (38.0 to 51.0), respectively. Bioequivalence in 3TC-TP PK following the administration of 300 and 150 mg was not demonstrated: the GMRs for AUC(0-24), C(24), and C(max) were 0.73 (0.64 to 0.83), 0.82 (0.68 to 0.99), and 0.70 (0.61 to 0.82), respectively. We found that 3TC at 150 mg is not bioequivalent to the standard regimen of 300 mg, indicating that saturation of cytosine phosphorylation pathways is not achieved at a dose of 150 mg.

Joint population pharmacokinetic analysis of zidovudine, lamivudine, and their active intracellular metabolites in HIV patients

The population pharmacokinetic parameters of zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC), and their active intracellular metabolites in 75 naïve HIV-infected patients receiving an oral combination of AZT and 3TC twice daily as part of their multitherapy treatment in the COPHAR2-ANRS 111 trial are described. Four blood samples per patient were taken after 2 weeks of treatment to measure drug concentrations at steady state. Plasma AZT and 3TC concentrations were measured in 73 patients, and among those, 62 patients had measurable intracellular AZT-TP and 3TC-TP concentrations. For each drug, a joint population pharmacokinetic model was developed and we investigated the influence of different covariates. We then studied correlations between the mean plasma and intracellular concentrations of each drug. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the plasma AZT concentration, with an additional compartment for intracellular AZT-TP. A similar model but with zero-order absorption was found to adequately described concentrations of 3TC and its metabolite 3TC-TP. The half-lives of AZT and 3TC were 0.81 h (94.8%) and 2.97 h (39.2%), respectively, whereas the intracellular half-lives of AZT-TP and 3TC-TP were 10.73 h (69%) and 21.16 h (44%), respectively. We found particularly a gender effect on the apparent bioavailability of AZT, as well as on the mean plasma and intracellular concentrations of AZT, which were significantly higher in females than in males. Relationships between mean plasma drug and intracellular metabolite concentrations were also highlighted both for AZT and for 3TC. Simulation with the model of plasma and intracellular concentrations for once- versus twice-daily regimens suggested that a daily dosing regimen with double doses could be appropriate.

Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine, zidovudine, and nevirapine administered as a fixed-dose combination formulation versus coadministration of the individual products

The pharmacokinetics of 150 mg lamivudine, 300 mg zidovudine, and 200 mg nevirapine were assessed following single oral administration of a fixed-dose combination tablet and coadministration of the separate innovator products in healthy male subjects (n = 64) under fasting conditions in an open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study. Multiple blood samples were collected up to 72 hours and plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals were assayed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods, and bioequivalence was assessed using an analysis of variance model. The ratio of the least squares mean (fixed-dose combination to individual products) and 90% confidence intervals of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and C(max) for lamivudine, zidovudine, and nevirapine were all within 80.0% to 125.0%, suggesting a similar rate and extent of antiretroviral exposure in the bloodstream. Mean oral clearance (CL/F) values of lamivudine, zidovudine, and nevirapine for the fixed-dose combination were 23.7, 127, and 1.65 L/h, respectively. The fixed-dose combination and individual products were equally safe and well tolerated, with only a few subjects experiencing drug-related adverse events. The current fixed-dose combination of lamivudine, zidovudine, and nevirapine is expected to provide a similar efficacy/safety profile as coadministration of the individual products, a better adherence to treatment, and considerable cost savings in the treatment of HIV.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of lamivudine, stavudine and zidovudine in controlled HIV-infected patients on HAART

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed at building a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for lamivudine (LMV), stavudine (STV) and zidovudine (ZDV), estimating their inter and intraindividual PK variability and investigating the influence of different covariates.

METHODS

Population PK of LMV, STV and ZDV was separately evaluated from plasma concentrations obtained in 54, 39 and 27 HIV1-infected patients, respectively, enrolled in the COPHAR1-ANRS102 trial. The primary objective of this trial was to study the pharmacokinetics of indinavir (IDV) and nelfinavir (NFV) in treated patients with a sustained virological response. Concentrations of nucleoside analogs (NA) were measured in plasma as a secondary objective. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination was used, with zero-order absorption for LMV and first-order absorption for STV and ZDV.

RESULTS

Mean parameters [interpatient variability in coefficient of variation (CV%)] of LMV, STV and ZDV were: oral volume of distribution (V/F) 145 l (52%), 24 l (81%) and 248 l (80%), oral clearance (Cl/F) 32 l/h, 16 l/h (74%) and 124 l/h (51%), respectively. For LMV, absorption duration (Ta) was 1.46 h (64%). For STV and ZDV, ka was 0.46 h(-1) and 2.9 h(-1), respectively. We found a systematic effect of combination with NFV vs. IDV. We found that intrapatient variability was greater than interpatient variability (except for STV) and greater than 55% for the three drugs.

CONCLUSION

This trial enabled the estimation of the population PK parameters of three NA in patients with a sustained virological response, and the median curves could be used as references for concentration-controlled strategies. We observed, as for the protease inhibitors, a great variability of PK parameters.

Predicting effect of food on extent of drug absorption based on physicochemical properties

PURPOSE

To develop a statistical model for predicting effect of food on the extent of absorption (area under the curve of time-plasma concentration profile, AUC) of drugs based on physicochemical properties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Logistic regression was applied to establish the relationship between the effect of food (positive, negative or no effect) on AUC of 92 entries and physicochemical parameters, including clinical doses used in the food effect study, solubility (pH 7), dose number (dose/solubility at pH 7), calculated Log D (pH 7), polar surface area, total surface area, percent polar surface area, number of hydrogen bond donor, number of hydrogen bond acceptors, and maximum absorbable dose (MAD).

RESULTS

For compounds with MAD >or= clinical dose, the food effect can be predicted from the dose number category and Log D category, while for compounds with MAD < clinical dose, the food effect can be predicted from the dose number category alone. With cross validation, 74 out of 92 entries (80%) were predicted into the correct category. The correct predictions were 97, 79 and 68% for compounds with positive, negative and no food effect, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A logistic regression model based on dose, solubility, and permeability of compounds is developed to predict the food effect on AUC. Statistically, solubilization effect of food primarily accounted for the positive food effect on absorption while interference of food with absorption caused negative effect on absorption of compounds that are highly hydrophilic and probably with narrow window of absorption.

Adherence to combined Lamivudine+Zidovudine versus individual components: A community-based retrospective medicaid claims analysis

Adherence to a fixed dose combination of dual nucleoside antiretroviral therapy was compared between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients newly started on a fixed dosed combination of lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg/zidovudine (ZDV) 300 mg versus its components taken as separate pills. Medicaid pharmacy claims data were used for analyses. To examine the association between treatment group and medication adherence, three types of multivariate regressions were employed. In addition, all regressions were conducted for the whole population using data from 1995 to 2001 as well as a subpopulation, which excluded data prior to September 1997. Model covariates included patient characteristics, healthcare utilization, and non-study antiretroviral therapy use. The likelihood of > or =95% adherence among patients on combination therapy was three times greater than patients taking 3TC and ZDV in separate pills. Also, combination therapy patients had on average 1.4 fewer adherence failures per year of follow-up and nearly double the time to adherence failure compared to the separate pills group. Consistency among study results suggests that fixed dose combination therapies such as lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg/ zidovudine (ZDV) 300 mg should be considered when prescribing HIV treatment that includes an appropriate dual nucleoside.

Adverse effects of antiretroviral drugs on HIV-1-infected and -uninfected human monocyte-derived macrophages

Antiretroviral drugs approved for treatment of HIV-1 infection include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs). Use of these drugs in combinations (highly active antiretroviral therapy) has delayed disease progression. However, long-term therapy is associated with potentially serious adverse effects. NRTIs are thought to contribute to these adverse effects via depletion of mtDNA. Inasmuch as macrophages (major targets for HIV-1) are highly metabolically active with large numbers of mitochondria, we investigated the effects of NRTIs (didanosine, stavudine, lamivudine, and zidovudine) on the viability and function of HIV-1-infected and -uninfected human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). We demonstrate that the combinations didanosine/stavudine and lamivudine/zidovudine decrease mtDNA content in MDMs, with HIV-1-infected MDMs displaying a greater reduction than uninfected cells. This decrease correlated with decreased complement-mediated phagocytosis (C'MP) by MDMs, a process dependent on mitochondrial function. Inasmuch as PIs have previously been reported to interact with cellular proteases and given that cellular proteases are involved in the phagocytic process, we investigated the effects of the PI indinavir on C'MP. We demonstrate that indinavir augments C'MP by uninfected MDMs, but not HIV-1-infected MDMs. This study provides additional understanding on the effects of commonly used antiretroviral drugs on cellular immune function.

Pharmacokinetic Profiling and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Lamivudine Tablet Formulations After Single Oral Administration in Healthy Human Indian Volunteers

The present study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and single-dose tolerability of 2 marketed brands of lamivudine (3TC) 150-mg tablets, Lamivir (Cipla, Mumbai, India) and Epivir (GSK, Basingstoke, UK). The randomized, 2-treatment study was conducted in 24 fasting, healthy, Indian male subjects. Each subject received Epivir and Lamivir formulation separated by 7 days of drug-free washout period. Plasma concentrations of 3TC were used to estimate PK parameters such as maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUCinfinity). Geometric mean ratios (relative to Epivir) and resultant 90% CI of 3TC for Cmax and AUCinfinity were 1.00 (0.89-1.12) and 1.01 (0.94-1.07), respectively. As 90% CIs were entirely within 0.80-1.25 for log-transformed data, the 2 formulations were considered bioequivalent in the extent (AUCinfinity) and rate of absorption (Cmax and time to Cmax [tmax]). The means of primary PK parameters of 3TC, Cmax, and AUCinfinity in Indian subjects were comparable to those previously reported in the literature. Both formulations exhibited similar tolerability under fasting conditions.

Equivalent steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in plasma and lamivudine triphosphate within cells following administration of lamivudine at 300 milligrams once daily and 150 milligrams twice daily

Once-daily administration of 300 mg of lamivudine in combination with other antiretroviral agents has been proposed as a possible way to optimize anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment and to facilitate adherence. A single-center, randomized, two-way, crossover study was conducted in 60 healthy subjects to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in plasma and its putative active anabolite, lamivudine 5'-triphosphate (lamivudine-TP), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following 7 days of treatment with lamivudine at 300 mg once daily and 7 days of the standard regimen of 150 mg twice daily. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 h for determination of plasma lamivudine concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and intracellular lamivudine-TP concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by high-performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on lamivudine and lamivudine-TP concentration-time data. Regimens were considered bioequivalent if 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio (once daily/twice daily) of geometric least-squares (GLS) means for lamivudine and lamivudine-TP pharmacokinetic values fell within the acceptance range of 0.8 to 1.25. Steady-state plasma lamivudine pharmacokinetics following the once- and twice-daily regimens were bioequivalent with respect to the area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC(24,ss)) (GLS mean ratio, 0.94; 90% CI, 0.92, 0.97) and average plasma lamivudine concentration over the dosing interval (C(ave,ss)) (GLS mean ratio, 0.94; 90% CI, 0.92, 0.97). Steady-state intracellular lamivudine-TP pharmacokinetics after the once- and twice-daily regimens were bioequivalent with respect to AUC(24,ss) (GLS mean ratio, 0.99; 90% CI, 0.88, 1.11), C(ave,ss) (GLS mean ratio, 0.99; 90% CI, 0.88, 1.11), and maximum lamivudine concentration (C(max,ss)) (GLS mean ratio, 0.93; 90% CI, 0.81, 1.07). Lamivudine-TP trough concentrations were modestly lower (by 18 to 24%) during the once-daily regimen; the clinical importance of this is unclear, given the large intersubject variability in values that was observed (coefficient of variation, 48 to 124%). Once-daily lamivudine was as well tolerated as the twice-daily regimen. Overall, the results of this study suggest that for key AUC-related parameters, lamivudine at 300 mg once daily is pharmacokinetically equivalent to lamivudine at 150 mg twice daily.

Tolerabilities of antiretrovirals in paediatric HIV infection

Data on the efficacy and tolerability of antiretrovirals in children are limited as, in contrast to adult studies, large paediatric cohort studies are lacking. Thus, data pertaining to adults are often extrapolated to children despite the acknowledgement that children are not little adults. This review summarises information gathered from existing reports and focuses on the tolerabilities of antiretrovirals in children infected with HIV-1. The efficacy of antiretrovirals is not included in the scope of the discussion. Taste of antiretrovirals should be an important factor when considering the tolerability of antiretrovirals in children. However, antiretroviral options are often limited in young children as only some of the antiretrovirals are available as paediatric formulations. All antiretrovirals have been associated with toxicities in children, but in general, they are relatively well tolerated. The gastrointestinal system including hepatic system is most prone to being affected by these drugs. Skin rashes and hypersensitivity reactions are also associated with antiretroviral use, particularly with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Mitochondrial toxicities that lead to impairment of liver function, pancreatic function and lactic acidosis are associated with most of the nucleoside analogues. Haematological toxicity is often a dose limiting adverse effect especially of the nucleoside analogues, in particular zidovudine. The protease inhibitors are associated with gastrointestinal intolerance (diarrhoea) and metabolic derangements that can lead to hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia, which in turn and can lead to changes in body habitus. The renal system is also affected by several drugs, the most important of which is indinavir, which has been associated with renal stones and damage to the renal tubules. Fortunately, with lower incidence of major toxicity and with the range of drugs now available for paediatric use, toxicities are usually not a barrier to effect antiretroviral therapy in children.

Food-drug interactions

Interactions between food and drugs may inadvertently reduce or increase the drug effect. The majority of clinically relevant food-drug interactions are caused by food-induced changes in the bioavailability of the drug. Since the bioavailability and clinical effect of most drugs are correlated, the bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic effect parameter. However, in order to evaluate the clinical relevance of a food-drug interaction, the impact of food intake on the clinical effect of the drug has to be quantified as well. As a result of quality review in healthcare systems, healthcare providers are increasingly required to develop methods for identifying and preventing adverse food-drug interactions. In this review of original literature, we have tried to provide both pharmacokinetic and clinical effect parameters of clinically relevant food-drug interactions. The most important interactions are those associated with a high risk of treatment failure arising from a significantly reduced bioavailability in the fed state. Such interactions are frequently caused by chelation with components in food (as occurs with alendronic acid, clodronic acid, didanosine, etidronic acid, penicillamine and tetracycline) or dairy products (ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin), or by other direct interactions between the drug and certain food components (avitriptan, indinavir, itraconazole solution, levodopa, melphalan, mercaptopurine and perindopril). In addition, the physiological response to food intake, in particular gastric acid secretion, may reduce the bioavailability of certain drugs (ampicillin, azithromycin capsules, didanosine, erythromycin stearate or enteric coated, and isoniazid). For other drugs, concomitant food intake may result in an increase in drug bioavailability either because of a food-induced increase in drug solubility (albendazole, atovaquone, griseofulvin, isotretinoin, lovastatin, mefloquine, saquinavir and tacrolimus) or because of the secretion of gastric acid (itraconazole capsules) or bile (griseofulvin and halofantrine) in response to food intake. For most drugs, such an increase results in a desired increase in drug effect, but in others it may result in serious toxicity (halofantrine).

Domestic cat model for predicting human nucleoside analogue pharmacokinetics in blood and seminal plasma

To establish whether a feline model can predict nucleoside analogue behavior in human semen, zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) pharmacokinetic parameters (PKs) were determined in the blood and seminal plasma of healthy cats. Our results show considerable similarity in ZDV and 3TC PKs between cats and humans. As in humans, ZDV and 3TC tend to accumulate in feline seminal plasma. Area under the blood plasma concentration-time curve was predictive of seminal plasma excretion. The felid model offers a unique in vivo experimental alternative for investigating the pharmacokinetics of nucleoside analogues in the male genital tract.

A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine taken as a triple combination tablet and as abacavir plus a lamivudine-zidovudine double combination tablet by HIV-1-infected adults

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of a triple combination tablet containing abacavir (ABC) 300 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and zidovudine (ZDV) 300 mg taken twice/day, and those of ABC 300 mg twice/day plus a double combination tablet containing 3TC 150 mg and ZDV 300 mg twice/day (ABC-COM).

DESIGN

Open-label, crossover study.

SETTING

Two hospital-based clinical research units.

PATIENTS

Twelve men infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1.

INTERVENTION

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ABC, 3TC, and ZDV were assessed after dosing with ABC-COM and the triple combination tablet.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ABC, 3TC, and ZDV were similar for the triple combination tablet versus ABC-COM for the following: geometric mean (GM) area under the serum concentration-time curve, ABC 6.08 versus 5.87, 3TC 5.51 versus 5.53, and ZDV 1.38 versus 1.46 microg x hr/ml; GM maximum serum concentration (Cmax-ss), ABC 3.09 versus 3.19, 3TC 1.26 versus 1.40, and ZDV 1.19 versus 1.15 microg/ml; median time to Cmax-ss, ABC 0.75 versus 0.75, 3TC 1.50 versus 1.24, and ZDV 0.75 versus 0.75 hours; and GM oral clearance, ABC 51 versus 49, 3TC 27 versus 27, and ZDV 217 versus 206 L/hour. The GM half-lives of ABC and ZDV were similar for both treatments, 1.69 versus 1.58 and 2.30 versus 2.08 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ABC, 3TC, and ZDV were similar in patients who took them as ABC-COM or as a triple combination tablet.

Abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine as a combined formulation tablet: bioequivalence compared with each component administered concurrently and the effect of food on absorption

A single-center, open-label, three-way crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects to assess (1) the bioequivalence of a combined abacavir 300 mg/lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg (A/L/Z) combination tablet relative to the separate brand-name components administered simultaneously and (2) the effect of food on the bioavailability of the drugs from the combination tablet. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive each of the following three treatments, separated by a 2-day washout period: one A/L/Z combination tablet after an overnight fast, one abacavir 300 mg tablet + one lamivudine 150 mg tablet + one zidovudine 300 mg tablet sequentially after an overnight fast, or one A/L/Z combination tablet 5 minutes after completing a standardized high-fat breakfast (67 g fat, 58 g carbohydrate, and 33 g protein). Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdose for determination of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine serum concentrations. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Treatments were considered bioequivalent if 90% confidence intervals (CI) for geometric least squares (GLS) mean ratios for abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(infinity)) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) fell entirely within 0.80 to 1.25 for log-transformed parameters. The combined A/L/Z tablet was bioequivalent in the extent (AUC) and rate of absorption (Cmax and time of Cmax [tmax]) to the individual brand-name drug components administered concurrently under fasted conditions. GLS ratios and 90% CI for AUC(infinity) and Cmax were 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) and 1.00 (0.90, 1.11), respectively, for abacavir; 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) and 0.90 (0.84, 0.99), respectively, for lamivudine; and 0.95 (0.89, 1.02) and 0.96 (0.80, 1.15), respectively, for zidovudine. The extent of absorption of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine from the combination tablet was not altered by administration with meals, indicating that this formulation may be administered with or without food. However, food slowed the rate of absorption, delayed the tmax, and reduced the Cmax of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine. These changes, which were consistent with those observed with the individual reference formulations when administered with food, were not considered clinically important. All formulations were well tolerated underfasted and fed conditions.

Pharmacological basis for concentration-controlled therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir

Conventional antiretroviral therapy involves administration of standard fixed doses to adults and adolescents. This approach ignores interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and results in substantial differences in systemic concentrations among patients. Thus, variability in systemic concentrations contributes to variability in response to therapy. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir designed to achieve select target concentrations versus standard dose therapy. Twenty-four antiretroviral-naïve subjects completed the 24-week study; 13 received standard therapy, and 11 received concentration-controlled therapy. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Oral clearance for all three drugs was not different between weeks 2 and 28; average ratios of week 2 oral clearance to week 28 oral clearance were 0.95, 1.09, and 1.06 for zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals including 1. The selected target concentrations were average steady-state concentrations of 0.19 mg/liter for zidovudine and 0.44 mg/liter for lamivudine and a trough concentration of 0.15 mg/liter for indinavir; mean concentrations achieved at week 28 in the concentration-controlled arm were 0.20, 0.54, and 0.19 mg/liter, respectively. Concentration-controlled therapy significantly reduced interpatient variability in zidovudine concentrations and significantly increased indinavir concentrations. There was no difference in adverse drug effects or adherence. This investigation has provided a pharmacologic basis for concentration-controlled therapy by demonstrating that it is feasible and has a safety profile no different from that of standard therapy. Additional studies to evaluate the virologic effect of the concentration-controlled approach to antiretroviral therapy are warranted.

Efficacy, safety, and adherence with a twice-daily combination lamivudine/zidovudine tablet formulation, plus a protease inhibitor, in HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

A randomized, open-label, multicenter study to establish clinical equivalence (non-inferiority) of a regimen employing a lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg combination tablet, administered twice daily, plus a marketed protease inhibitor, compared with a conventional regimen of 150 mg lamivudine twice daily, 600 mg zidovudine daily, and a protease inhibitor, in antiretroviral-experienced patients infected with HIV-1.

PATIENTS

Adults who were seropositive for HIV-1 infection with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 10000 copies/ml (Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction assay, lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) 400 copies/ml) and CD4+ cell counts > or = 300 x 10(6)/l). All patients had been receiving the conventional lamivudine/zidovudine/protease inhibitor regimen for > or = 10 weeks immediately prior to the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to the conventional regimen (n = 113) or combination tablet regimen (n = 110) for 16 weeks. The primary study endpoint was treatment failure, defined as an increase in HIV-1 RNA > or = 0.5 log10 above baseline in patients with viral load > LLOQ at randomization and as HIV-1 RNA increasing to > or = 1250 copies/ml in patients with viral load < LLOQ at randomization.

RESULTS

The combination tablet regimen was associated with a 3.5% greater success rate than the conventional regimen (96.4 versus 92.9%), with four and eight patients failing treatment due to increases in HIV-1 RNA levels, respectively. The lower limit of the associated confidence interval for the difference was -2.4%, which was well within the -10% margin predefined as clinically unimportant. This establishes the clinical equivalence (non-inferiority) of the combination tablet regimen to the conventional regimens regarding virologic response. The combination tablet and conventional regimens were similar with respect to percentage of patients maintaining HIV-1 RNA levels < LLOQ at the end of study or improving from baseline to undetectability (94 versus 91%; P= 0.063), overall incidence of drug-related adverse events (21 versus 19%) (P=0.868), and mean area under the curve for CD4+ cell counts [treatment difference, 5.9 cells (95% confidence interval, -15.8 to 27.6 x 10(6) cells/l)]. A self-reported adherence questionnaire indicated that patients in the combination tablet group were less likely to miss doses of nucleoside analogue medication at weeks 8 (P= 0.007) and 16 (P= 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination lamivudine/zidovudine tablet/protease inhibitor regimen is clinically equivalent (non-inferior) to the conventional regimen with respect to virologic response and may offer adherence advantages.

Population pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in adult human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients enrolled in two phase III clinical trials

Lamivudine population pharmacokinetics were investigated by using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM) analysis of data from 394 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients treated with lamivudine (150 to 300 mg every 12 h) in two large, phase III clinical efficacy-safety trials, NUCA3001 and NUCA3002. Analyses of 1,477 serum lamivudine concentration determinations showed that population estimates for lamivudine oral clearance (CL/F; 25.1 liters/h) and volume of distribution (V/F; 128 liters) were similar to values previously reported for HIV-infected patients in phase I pharmacokinetic studies. Lamivudine CL/F was significantly influenced by the covariates creatinine clearance and weight and not affected by age, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification, CD4(+) cell count, HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA PCR, or gender and race when CL/F was corrected for differences in patient weight. The population estimate for lamivudine V/F was not significantly influenced by the covariates gender, race, age, weight, renal function, HIV-1 RNA PCR, or CDC classification and CD4(+) cell count when creatinine clearance was included with CL/F in the model. Lamivudine disposition was significantly influenced by renal function. However, as only three patients had an estimated creatinine clearance of <60 ml/min, dosage adjustments for patients with impaired renal function should not be determined based on the population parameters derived in this analysis.