1
|
Afaya A, Kim SW, Park HS, Lim MC, Jung MS, Nam EJ, Park JS, Jeong J, Ryu JM, Kim J, Kim J, Kim M, Jin J, Han J, Kim SY, Park SY, Katapodi MC, Kim S. Psychosocial barriers and facilitators for cascade genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a scoping review. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:121-132. [PMID: 38662264 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00379-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Despite increased awareness and availability of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome for over 20 years, there is still significant underuse of cascade genetic testing among at-risk relatives. This scoping review synthesized evidence regarding psychosocial barriers and facilitators of family communication and/or uptake of cascade genetic testing in relatives from HBOC families. Search terms included 'hereditary breast and ovarian cancer' and 'cascade genetic testing' for studies published from 2012-2022. Through searching common databases, and manual search of references, 480 studies were identified after excluding duplications. Each article was reviewed by two researchers independently and 20 studies were included in the final analysis. CASP, RoBANS 2.0, RoB 2.0, and MMAT were used to assess the quality of included studies. A convergent data synthesis method was used to integrate evidence from quantitative and narrative data into categories and subcategories. Evidence points to 3 categories and 12 subcategories of psychosocial barriers and facilitators for cascade testing: (1) facilitators (belief in health protection and prevention; family closeness; decisional empowerment; family support, sense of responsibility; self-efficacy; supportive health professionals); (2) bidirectional concepts (information; perception of genetic/cancer consequences; negative emotions and attitude); and (3) barriers (negative reactions from family and negative family dynamics). Healthcare providers need to systematically evaluate these psychosocial factors, strengthen facilitators and alleviate barriers to promote informed decision-making for communication of genetic test results and uptake of genetic testing. Bidirectional factors merit special consideration and tailored approaches, as they can potentially have a positive or negative influence on family communication and uptake of genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agani Afaya
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Care Center, Dairim St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Seok Park
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Division of Tumor Immunology, Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mi Sook Jung
- College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Soo Park
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jai Min Ryu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - JiSun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihye Kim
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Juhye Jin
- Department of Nursing, Korea National University of Transportation, Jeungpyeong, Korea
| | - Jeehee Han
- Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Yeon Kim
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Korea Armed Forces Nursing Academy, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Park
- College of Nursing, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Maria C Katapodi
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sue Kim
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schulze J, Dhaliwal JK, Miller M, Quinn E, Wetherill L, Cook L. Factors Influencing Patient Disclosure of Parkinson's Disease Genetic Testing Results to Relatives. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38586948 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have received genetic test results are faced with the decision of whether, and how, to share that information with family. Studies in other specialties have shown high rates of disclosure motivated by a sense of responsibility. Rates of, and attitudes surrounding, disclosure have yet to be reported in this population. OBJECTIVES To explore the disclosure practices and motivations of patients with PD regarding genetic test results, allowing insight to guide genetic counseling and navigation of test result discussions. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to adults with PD and previous genetic test results. Survey questions assessed demographics, genetic testing results and delivery, sharing behaviors, perceptions of PD, and motivations and barriers to family disclosure. RESULTS Among respondents, 88.9% shared results with at least one family member, most often a child (73.5%) or sibling (65.4%). Seventy-four percent reported sharing results with someone outside of their family, most frequently a friend (88.4%). The most common motivation for disclosure was the perception that family members would want to know. Barriers to disclosure were lack of close relationships, understanding results, and perceived utility. CONCLUSIONS Disclosure rates in this PD population were consistent with those in previously reported populations. Motivations were anchored in perceptions of utility and family desire for information, suggesting a need to adjust patient education to improve retention and to explore family dynamics and perceptions of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanine Schulze
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Mandy Miller
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emily Quinn
- Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA
| | - Leah Wetherill
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lola Cook
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cragun DL, Hunt PP, Dean M, Weidner A, Shields AK, Tezak A, Pal T. Applying the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions to increase family communication about hereditary cancer. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100133. [PMID: 37214492 PMCID: PMC10194404 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Evaluate an intervention to increase family communication (FC) of positive hereditary cancer test results using the Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions (FDECI). Methods We developed 'programme theory' during the FDECI development phase by aligning intervention components with behavior change techniques (BCTs) and theoretical factors expected to improve FC. During the feasibility phase, we obtained feedback from 12 stakeholder interviews. Results Intervention components aligned with a total of 14 unique BCTs for which prior evidence links the BCT to theoretical factors that influence behavior change. Constructive stakeholder feedback included: more information desired, rewording to support autonomy by highlighting options, and improvements to navigation, visuals, and audio. Positive comments included: comprehensiveness of materials, modeling of conversations, and usefulness of the materials for helping a person prepare to share positive test results. Conclusion The first FDECI phases were helpful for improving the intervention and planning our ongoing effectiveness and future implementation phases. Innovation Our application of the FDECI is novel, including plans to test our 'programme theory' using coincidence analysis (CNA) to determine who accesses which intervention materials, how utilizing certain materials impact the aligned theoretical factors, and whether these in turn make a difference in the behavioral outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah L. Cragun
- University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Paige Phillips Hunt
- University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Marleah Dean
- University of South Florida, Department of Communication, Tampa, FL; Health Outcomes & Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Health Outcomes & Behavior Program, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Anne Weidner
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Andrea K. Shields
- University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Ann Tezak
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinnamon DD, Jordan E, Haas GJ, Hofmeyer M, Kransdorf E, Ewald GA, Morris AA, Owens A, Lowes B, Stoller D, Tang WHW, Garg S, Trachtenberg BH, Shah P, Pamboukian SV, Sweitzer NK, Wheeler MT, Wilcox JE, Katz S, Pan S, Jimenez J, Aaronson KD, Fishbein DP, Smart F, Wang J, Gottlieb SS, Judge DP, Moore CK, Mead JO, Huggins GS, Ni H, Burke W, Hershberger RE. Effectiveness of the Family Heart Talk Communication Tool in Improving Family Member Screening for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Results of a Randomized Trial. Circulation 2023; 147:1281-1290. [PMID: 36938756 PMCID: PMC10133091 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.062507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Managing disease risk among first-degree relatives of probands diagnosed with a heritable disease is central to precision medicine. A critical component is often clinical screening, which is particularly important for conditions like dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) that remain asymptomatic until severe disease develops. Nonetheless, probands are frequently ill-equipped to disseminate genetic risk information that motivates at-risk relatives to complete recommended clinical screening. An easily implemented remedy for this key issue has been elusive. METHODS The DCM Precision Medicine Study developed Family Heart Talk, a booklet designed to help probands with DCM communicate genetic risk and the need for cardiovascular screening to their relatives. The effectiveness of the Family Heart Talk booklet in increasing cardiovascular clinical screening uptake among first-degree relatives was assessed in a multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. The primary outcome measured in eligible first-degree relatives was completion of screening initiated within 12 months after proband enrollment. Because probands randomized to the intervention received the booklet at the enrollment visit, eligible first-degree relatives were limited to those who were alive the day after proband enrollment and not enrolled on the same day as the proband. RESULTS Between June 2016 and March 2020, 1241 probands were randomized (1:1) to receive Family Heart Talk (n=621) or not (n=620) within strata defined by site and self-identified race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, or Hispanic). Final analyses included 550 families (n=2230 eligible first-degree relatives) in the Family Heart Talk arm and 561 (n=2416) in the control arm. A higher percentage of eligible first-degree relatives completed screening in the Family Heart Talk arm (19.5% versus 16.0%), and the odds of screening completion among these first-degree relatives were higher in the Family Heart Talk arm after adjustment for proband randomization stratum, sex, and age quartile (odds ratio, 1.30 [1-sided 95% CI, 1.08-∞]). A prespecified subgroup analysis did not find evidence of heterogeneity in the adjusted intervention odds ratio across race/ethnicity strata (P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS Family Heart Talk, a booklet that can be provided to patients with DCM by clinicians with minimal additional time investment, was effective in increasing cardiovascular clinical screening among first-degree relatives of these patients. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT03037632.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D. Kinnamon
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Elizabeth Jordan
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Garrie J. Haas
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Mark Hofmeyer
- Medstar Research Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Evan Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Anjali Owens
- Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brian Lowes
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | | | - W. H. Wilson Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sonia Garg
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Barry H. Trachtenberg
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Houston TX
| | - Palak Shah
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA
| | - Salpy V. Pamboukian
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; current address, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Nancy K. Sweitzer
- Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; current address, Division of Cardiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Matthew T. Wheeler
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Jane E. Wilcox
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Stuart Katz
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen Pan
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center & New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Javier Jimenez
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South, Miami, FL
| | | | | | - Frank Smart
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Jessica Wang
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Jonathan O. Mead
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Gordon S. Huggins
- Cardiology Division, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Hanyu Ni
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Wylie Burke
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ray E. Hershberger
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho A, Leach E, Virani A, Arbour L, Bartels K, Wong EK. Cascade testing for inherited arrhythmia conditions: Experiences and attitudes of family communication approaches for a Canadian cohort. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:815-828. [PMID: 35032083 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Inherited arrhythmia conditions (IAC) can lead to sudden cardiac death at any age, and relatives of an affected person have up to a 50% chance of inheriting the condition and are at risk for developing features. Cascade testing is a stepwise approach for identifying relatives at risk for IACs through clinical screening and genetic testing. Early detection can reduce morbidity and mortality for affected individuals and determine potential risk mitigation strategies for relatives. However, cardiovascular genetic studies have reported an incomplete uptake of cascade testing in at-risk relatives. We explored patient perspectives on cascade testing for IACs and alternative approaches to family communication. Twelve semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with probands of the British Columbia Inherited Arrhythmia Program confirmed to carry a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with an IAC. Thematic analysis of transcripts through an iterative coding process revealed five main themes: (a) a stepwise approach is followed in disclosing risk to relatives, (b) relatives' autonomy in cascade testing is supported, (c) lived experience with the condition influences disclosure and uptake of cascade testing, (d) collaborative approach to informing relatives reduces negative impact of disclosure, and (e) direct contact from a healthcare provider is viewed as acceptable. The findings highlight this patient cohort's experiences and opinions with approaches to disclosure and demonstrate their understanding and acceptance of their relatives' approaches to cascade testing. In addition, while the notion of direct contact was generally accepted, a collaborative approach to contacting relatives between the proband and provider may be most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Ho
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emma Leach
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alice Virani
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Clinical Ethics Service, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laura Arbour
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Bartels
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eugene K Wong
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Genetics Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Galen K, Lavin M, Skouw-Rasmussen N, Fischer K, Noone D, Pollard D, Mauser-Bunschoten E, Khair K, Gomez K, van Loon E, Bagot CN, Elfvinge P, d'Oiron R, Abdul-Kadir R. European principles of care for women and girls with inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2021; 27:837-847. [PMID: 34343384 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite increasing awareness of issues faced by women and girls with inherited BDs (WGBD), standards of care are lacking, with disparities in diagnosis and treatment for WGBD across Europe. We aimed to develop practical principles of care (PoC) to promote standardization of care for WGBD within European Haemophilia Treatment and Comprehensive Care Centres (HTC/CCCs). METHODS The co-creation process, supported by the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders, consisted of four multidisciplinary meetings with health care providers (HCPs) experienced in WGBD care, and European Haemophilia Consortium representatives, combined with broad patient and HCP consultations in the European haemophilia community. Relevant medical societies outside Europe were contacted for confirmation. RESULTS We developed ten PoC for WGBD, stressing the importance and benefits of a centralized, multidisciplinary, comprehensive, family-centred approach to support and manage WGBD during all life stages. These PoC emphasise the right to equitable access and quality of care for all people with BDs, irrespective of gender. Multiple medical societies outside Europe also confirmed their support for endorsement. CONCLUSIONS Ten PoC for WGBD evolved from an iterative process among stakeholders, supported by relevant medical societies worldwide. These PoC can serve as a benchmark for diagnosis and comprehensive multidisciplinary management of WGBD, and improve awareness of their unique challenges. They offer a framework to guide HTC/CCCs in providing equitable care for all WGBD, both in their own services and in other healthcare settings. Implementation of these principles aims to positively impact the health, wellbeing and quality of life for WGBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin van Galen
- Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Lavin
- Irish Centre for Vascular Biology, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, RCSI, Dublin and National Coagulation Centre, St. James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Kathelijn Fischer
- Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Declan Noone
- President, European Haemophilia Consortium, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Debra Pollard
- Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis Unit, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Kate Khair
- Director of Research, Haemnet, London, UK
| | - Keith Gomez
- Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis Unit, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Petra Elfvinge
- Department of Haematology, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roseline d'Oiron
- Centre de Référence de l'Hémophilie et des Maladies Hémorragiques Constitutionnelles, APHP Paris Saclay - Hôpital Bicêtre and Inserm, U 1176 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Rezan Abdul-Kadir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stiles MK, Wilde AAM, Abrams DJ, Ackerman MJ, Albert CM, Behr ER, Chugh SS, Cornel MC, Gardner K, Ingles J, James CA, Juang JMJ, Kääb S, Kaufman ES, Krahn AD, Lubitz SA, MacLeod H, Morillo CA, Nademanee K, Probst V, Saarel EV, Sacilotto L, Semsarian C, Sheppard MN, Shimizu W, Skinner JR, Tfelt-Hansen J, Wang DW. 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families. J Arrhythm 2021; 37:481-534. [PMID: 34141003 PMCID: PMC8207384 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence-based practical patient-centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the emotionally charged subject, but because finding (or not finding) the cause of the arrest may influence management of family members. The formation of multidisciplinary teams is essential to provide a complete service to the patients and their families, and the varied expertise of the writing committee was formulated to reflect this need. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence. The recommendations were opened for public comment and reviewed by the relevant scientific and clinical document committees of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); the document underwent external review and endorsement by the partner and collaborating societies. While the recommendations are for optimal care, it is recognized that not all resources will be available to all clinicians. Nevertheless, this document articulates the evaluation that the clinician should aspire to provide for patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin K Stiles
- Waikato Clinical School Faculty of Medicine and Health Science The University of Auckland Hamilton New Zealand
| | - Arthur A M Wilde
- Heart Center Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology Amsterdam University Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Elijah R Behr
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute St George's University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | | | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Clinical Genetics Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | - Jodie Ingles
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | | | - Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang
- Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine Taipei Taiwan
| | - Stefan Kääb
- Department of Medicine I University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany
| | | | | | | | - Heather MacLeod
- Data Coordinating Center for the Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry Okemos MI USA
| | | | - Koonlawee Nademanee
- Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, and Pacific Rim Electrophysiology Research Institute at Bumrungrad Hospital Bangkok Thailand
| | | | - Elizabeth V Saarel
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Cardiology at Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA
- St Luke's Medical Center Boise ID USA
| | - Luciana Sacilotto
- Heart Institute University of São Paulo Medical School São Paulo Brazil
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Mary N Sheppard
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute St George's University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | | | - Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
- Department of Forensic Medicine Faculty of Medical Sciences Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Dao Wu Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
London KS, Zegre-Hemsey J, Root M, Kleinmann A, White JL. Retrospective Diagnosis of Congenital Long QT Syndrome in a Patient With Febrile Syncope. J Emerg Nurs 2021; 46:214-219. [PMID: 32164933 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
9
|
Stiles MK, Wilde AAM, Abrams DJ, Ackerman MJ, Albert CM, Behr ER, Chugh SS, Cornel MC, Gardner K, Ingles J, James CA, Jimmy Juang JM, Kääb S, Kaufman ES, Krahn AD, Lubitz SA, MacLeod H, Morillo CA, Nademanee K, Probst V, Saarel EV, Sacilotto L, Semsarian C, Sheppard MN, Shimizu W, Skinner JR, Tfelt-Hansen J, Wang DW. 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:e1-e50. [PMID: 33091602 PMCID: PMC8194370 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence-based practical patient-centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the emotionally charged subject, but because finding (or not finding) the cause of the arrest may influence management of family members. The formation of multidisciplinary teams is essential to provide a complete service to the patients and their families, and the varied expertise of the writing committee was formulated to reflect this need. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence. The recommendations were opened for public comment and reviewed by the relevant scientific and clinical document committees of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); the document underwent external review and endorsement by the partner and collaborating societies. While the recommendations are for optimal care, it is recognized that not all resources will be available to all clinicians. Nevertheless, this document articulates the evaluation that the clinician should aspire to provide for patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin K Stiles
- Waikato Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Arthur A M Wilde
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Elijah R Behr
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St George's, University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sumeet S Chugh
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jodie Ingles
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang
- Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Stefan Kääb
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Andrew D Krahn
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Heather MacLeod
- Data Coordinating Center for the Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry, Okemos, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Koonlawee Nademanee
- Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Medicine, and Pacific Rim Electrophysiology Research Institute at Bumrungrad Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Elizabeth V Saarel
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Cardiology at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and St Luke's Medical Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
| | - Luciana Sacilotto
- Heart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mary N Sheppard
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St George's, University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jonathan R Skinner
- Cardiac Inherited Disease Group, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dao Wu Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marleen van den Heuvel L, Stemkens D, van Zelst-Stams WAG, Willeboordse F, Christiaans I. How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population. J Genet Couns 2019; 29:786-799. [PMID: 31889383 PMCID: PMC7649718 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The uptake of predictive DNA testing in families with a hereditary disease is <50%. Current practice often relies on the proband to inform relatives about the possibility of predictive DNA testing, but not all relatives are informed adequately. To enable informed decision-making concerning predictive DNA testing, the approach used to inform at-risk relatives needs to be optimized. This study investigated the preferences of patients, relatives, and the general population from the Netherlands on how to inform relatives at risk of autosomal dominant diseases. Online surveys were sent to people with autosomal dominant neuro-, onco-, or cardiogenetic diseases and their relatives via patient organizations (n = 379), and to members of the general population via a commercial panel (n = 1,000). Attitudes of the patient and population samples generally corresponded. A majority believed that initially only first-degree relatives should be informed, following the principles of a cascade screening approach. Most participants also thought that probands and healthcare professionals (HCPs) should be involved in informing relatives, and a large proportion believed that HCPs should contact relatives directly in cases where patients are unwilling to inform, both for untreatable and treatable conditions. Participants from the patient sample were of the opinion that HCPs should actively offer support. Our findings show that both patients and HCPs should be involved in informing at-risk relatives of autosomal dominant diseases and suggest that relatives' 'right to know' was considered a dominant issue by the majority of participants. Further research is needed on how to increase proactive support in informing of at-risk relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Marleen van den Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne Stemkens
- VSOP Dutch Patient Alliance for Rare and Genetic Diseases, Soest, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Imke Christiaans
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|