1
|
Holloway EE, Gray S, Mihalopoulos C, Versace VL, Le Gautier R, Chatterton ML, Hagger V, Halliday J, Henshaw K, Harrap B, Manallack S, Black T, Van Bruggen N, Hines C, O'Neil A, Skinner TC, Speight J, Hendrieckx C. Low-Intensity mental health Support via a Telehealth Enabled Network for adults with diabetes (LISTEN): protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness implementation trial. Trials 2023; 24:350. [PMID: 37221629 PMCID: PMC10204211 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07338-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health problems are common among people with diabetes. However, evidence-based strategies for the prevention and early intervention of emotional problems in people with diabetes are lacking. Our aim is to assess the real-world effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of a Low-Intensity mental health Support via a Telehealth Enabled Network (LISTEN), facilitated by diabetes health professionals (HPs). METHODS A hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation trial, including a two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial, alongside mixed methods process evaluation. Recruited primarily via the National Diabetes Services Scheme, Australian adults with diabetes (N = 454) will be eligible if they are experiencing elevated diabetes distress. Participants are randomised (1:1 ratio) to LISTEN-a brief, low-intensity mental health support program based on a problem-solving therapy framework and delivered via telehealth (intervention) or usual care (web-based resources about diabetes and emotional health). Data are collected via online assessments at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2, primary endpoint) follow-up. The primary outcome is between-group differences in diabetes distress at T2. Secondary outcomes include the immediate (T1) and longer-term (T2) effect of the intervention on psychological distress, general emotional well-being, and coping self-efficacy. A within-trial economic evaluation will be conducted. Implementation outcomes will be assessed using mixed methods, according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Data collection will include qualitative interviews and field notes. DISCUSSION It is anticipated that LISTEN will reduce diabetes distress among adults with diabetes. The pragmatic trial results will determine whether LISTEN is effective, cost-effective, and should be implemented at scale. Qualitative findings will be used to refine the intervention and implementation strategies as required. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN: ACTRN12622000168752) on 1 February, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith E Holloway
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Shikha Gray
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Vincent L Versace
- School of Medicine, Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Roslyn Le Gautier
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Virginia Hagger
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer Halliday
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Benjamin Harrap
- School of Medicine, Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah Manallack
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Adrienne O'Neil
- IMPACT Institute, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Timothy C Skinner
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychology, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Björk Brämberg E, Arapovic-Johansson B, Bültmann U, Svedberg P, Bergström G. Prevention of sick leave at the workplace: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving intervention among employees with common mental disorders. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1756. [PMID: 34565357 PMCID: PMC8474950 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11786-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Common mental disorders are highly prevalent in the working population, affecting about 1 in 5 persons in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. About 30% of those affected have a first period of sick leave. Despite several attempts to reduce the risk of sick leave among employees with common mental disorders, there is a lack of knowledge about effective, preventive interventions which aim to reduce such risks. This protocol describes the design of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of a problem-solving intervention delivered by first-line managers to employees with common mental disorders on the prevention of sick leave during the 12-month follow-up. Methods/design The study applies a two-armed cluster-randomized trial design of a problem-solving intervention conducted in private-sector companies. First-line managers are randomized into intervention- or control groups by computer-generated random numbers, allocation ratio 1:1. Employees are eligible if at risk for future sick leave due to common mental disorders. These are identified by self-reported psychological health measured by the General Health Questionnaire 12-item, cut-off ≥3, or a positive answer to risk of sick leave. The intervention is based on problem-solving principles. It involves the training of the first-line managers who then deliver the intervention to employees identified at risk of sick leave. First-line managers in the control group receives a lecture. Primary outcome is number of registered days of sick leave due to common mental disorders during the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are general health, psychological symptoms, work performance, work ability and psychosocial work environment. A process evaluation will examine the intervention’s reach, fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, satisfaction and context. Research assistants managing the screening procedure, outcome assessors and employees are blinded to randomization and allocation. Discussion The study includes analyses of the intervention’s effectiveness and an alongside process evaluation. Methodological strengths and limitations, for example the risk of selection bias, attrition and risk of contamination are discussed. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04975750 Date of registration: 08/16/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Björk Brämberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - B Arapovic-Johansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - U Bültmann
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Community & Occupational Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Svedberg
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Bergström
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rees G, McCabe M, Xie J, Constantinou M, Gan A, Holloway E, Man RE, Jackson J, Fenwick EK, Lamoureux E. High vision-related quality of life indices reduce the odds of depressive symptoms in aged care facilities. Aging Ment Health 2020; 24:1596-1604. [PMID: 31392896 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1650889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To examine the association between vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) and depressive symptoms in residents with vision impairment (VI) in aged care facilities.Methods: In this cross-sectional study using baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial (ACTRN12615000587505) assessing the effectiveness of a novel eye care model, 186 English-speaking residents (mean age 84 years, SD[standard deviation] = 8.7; 33.9% male) with VI and moderate cognitive functioning or better were recruited from 38 facilities across Victoria, Australia. VRQoL was measured using Rasch-transformed scores from the 'Reading'; 'Mobility', and 'Emotional' scales of the Impact of Vision Impairment for Residential Care (IVI-RC) questionnaire. Outcomes were presence of depressive symptoms (binary score: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia [CSDD] > 0 vs. CSDD = 0) and severity of depressive symptoms (continuous CSDD score; sample range 1-21). Independent associations with presence and severity of depressive symptoms were examined using zero-inflated logistic and linear multivariable models, respectively.Results: Of the 186 participants, n = 79 (42.5%), n = 94 (50.5%) and n = 13 (7%) reported no, mild (scores 1-7), and clinically significant depressive symptoms (score ≥8), respectively. Better vision-related Mobility (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.95, p = 0.02) was associated with reduced odds of depressive symptoms. With every unit improvement in vision-related Reading (β=-0.48; 95% CI: -0.94, -0.01, p = 0.04) and Emotional (β=-0.56; 95% CI: -1.09, -0.02, p = 0.04), severity of depressive symptoms reduced, independent of sociodemographic and medical issues.Conclusion: Better VRQoL was independently associated with reduced depressive symptoms. Supporting older people in aged care to maintain optimal levels of vision-specific functioning, independence, and emotional well-being may protect their mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwyneth Rees
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marita McCabe
- Institute for Health and Aging, Australian Catholic University, Australia
| | - Jing Xie
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marios Constantinou
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alfred Gan
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
| | - Edith Holloway
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ryan Ek Man
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
| | - Jonathon Jackson
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom.,Australian College of Optometry, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eva K Fenwick
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
| | - Ecosse Lamoureux
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.,Department of Ophthalmology, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roche YSB, Chur-Hansen A. Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of psychologists working with persons with vision impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 43:621-631. [PMID: 31293173 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1634155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Psychologists working with persons with vision impairment face unique challenges in providing psychological services, including mental health care and cognitive assessments. While existing competency guidelines for general disability and rehabilitation psychology are relevant to working with persons with vision impairment in many ways, specific competencies are needed. Previous psychological research into the provision of therapy for persons with vision impairment has focused mainly on communication and intervention strategies and lacks input from the vision-impaired community. MATERIALS AND METHODS This qualitative study, grounded in disability, rehabilitation psychology, and competency frameworks aimed to identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for psychologists working with persons with vision impairment. RESULTS Through triangulating responses from both registered psychologists (N = 10) and persons with vision impairment (N = 5), a thematic analysis identified 29 competencies under six major themes, including: Expertise, Impact, Approach, Collaboration, Assessment, and Flexibility. Competencies were discretely categorized as knowledge, skills, or attitudes. CONCLUSIONS This study provides data that may be used as the basis for more rigorous research into identifying areas for vision impaired-specific competency-based training in undergraduate, postgraduate, and professional psychology curricula.Implications for rehabilitationWhilst competencies for disability and rehabilitation psychology already exist, the competencies for psychologists working with persons with vision impairment require updating, informed by both practitioners and clients with vision impairment.These competencies include: knowledge of eye conditions and pathologies; knowledge of the variation in impact of vision loss; general knowledge about vision loss and normal lifespan development; and, the ability to assess the specific impact of vision loss on the individual.Other skills and attitudes, such as oral communication skills and relaying hope and optimism, whilst necessary for all therapeutic encounters, may require particular modification when working with vision-impaired persons.Educators responsible for professional postgraduate courses in psychology should ensure that training incorporates an understanding of the need to modify approaches for particular groups of clients, such as those with vision impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Chur-Hansen
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holloway E, Sturrock B, Lamoureux E, Keeffe J, Hegel M, Casten R, Mellor D, Rees G. Can we address depression in vision rehabilitation settings? Professionals' perspectives on the barriers to integrating problem-solving treatment. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 40:287-295. [PMID: 27868437 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Low vision rehabilitation (LVR) is a pertinent context for integrating early, evidence-based psychological interventions given the high prevalence of untreated depression in adults with vision impairment. This study aims to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators to staff-delivered telephone-based problem-solving treatment for primary care (PST-PC) offered as an integrated component of LVR. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews, developed using the theoretical domains framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), were conducted with 21 LVR professionals and a clinical psychologist involved in the delivery of PST-PC. Barriers and facilitators at the practitioner, client, intervention, and organizational level were identified with thematic analysis using a "theoretical" approach. RESULTS Prominent barriers were a lack of role recognition for PST-PC practitioners (n = 32), unmet client expectation with PST-PC (n = 28), dissatisfaction with telephone delivery (n = 27), and limited organizational awareness of PST-PC (n = 39). Facilitating factors included a recognized need for evidence-based psychological services (n = 28), clients experiencing benefits in early sessions (n = 38), PST-PC promoting practical skills (n = 26), and comprehensive PST-PC training (n = 36). CONCLUSIONS PST-PC may provide an accessible early intervention for LVR clients with depressive symptoms. Ongoing practitioner training, clinical support, and screening potential LVR clients for treatment suitability are likely to enhance delivery in this setting. Implications for rehabilitation Depression is highly prevalent in adults engaged in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) programs, yet few receive support. Clinical guidelines recommend integrated models of care be offered within rehabilitation settings as early intervention for mild to moderate levels of depressive symptoms. Integrated telephone-based problem-solving treatment for primary care (PST-PC) delivered by trained LVR practitioners is a practical, skills-based model that has potential to increase access to an early psychological intervention in LVR clients with depressive symptoms. LVR clients are often older in age, have multiple comorbid health conditions and a significant level of functional disability, requiring flexibility in the delivery of PST-PC and specialized staff training, and support in working with older and more complex clients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith Holloway
- a Centre for Eye Research Australia , Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,b Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Bonnie Sturrock
- a Centre for Eye Research Australia , Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,b Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Ecosse Lamoureux
- a Centre for Eye Research Australia , Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,b Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia.,c Singapore Eye Research Institute , National University of Singapore , Singapore.,d Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School , Singapore
| | - Jill Keeffe
- e LV Prasad Eye Institute , Hyderabad , India
| | - Mark Hegel
- f Department of Psychiatry , Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center , Lebanon , NH , USA
| | - Robin Casten
- g Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior , Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - David Mellor
- h School of Psychology , Deakin University , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Gwyneth Rees
- a Centre for Eye Research Australia , Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,b Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| |
Collapse
|