Considerations for the use of biological therapies in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease that primarily affects middle-aged individuals but is increasingly prevalent among the elderly due to longer life expectancies. Treating elderly onset RA (EORA) is challenging for clinicians because of unique disease characteristics, comorbidities, polypharmacy, age-related physiological changes, and limited studies on the safety and efficacy of biological therapies in this population. This review aims to evaluate the use of various biological therapies in elderly RA patients.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review examines various aspects of RA in the elderly using published literature, randomized control trials, meta-analyses, and recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR).

EXPERT OPINION

In EORA patients, the initiation of biological therapy is often delayed. Methotrexate remains the first-line treatment for both EORA and young onset RA (YORA). The combination of methotrexate and biological treatment shows comparable safety and efficacy in both EORA and YORA, except for rituximab, which is less effective in patients over 75. For elderly RA patients, biological (b-) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are preferred as the first advanced therapy over targeted synthetic (ts-) DMARDs due to their superior safety profile.

Biological treatment in elderly and young patients with ankylosing spondylitis: TURKBIO real-life data results

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the effect of age on disease activity and biological treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Patients and methods

A total of 811 AS patients registered in the TURKBIO registry database between 2011 and 2019 were categorized according to their age at the time of entry into the registry and assigned to one of two groups: young patients, defined as <60 years of age (n=610), and those aged ≥60 years (n=201) were recorded as elderly patients. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, along with disease activity markers and other follow-up parameters, as well as current and prior treatments, were electronically recorded during each visit using open-source software.

Results

The mean age of the elderly patients was 67±5.8 years, while the mean age of the younger patients was 49.2±10.9 years. Male predominance was lower in the older AS group compared to the younger AS group (p=0.002). During follow-up period, 397 patients (comprising 318 young and 79 elderly individuals) had a history of using at least one biological disease-modifying agent (bDMARD). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of DMARD and bDMARD-use distributions. First tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) retention rates were found to be similar in both groups over 10 years of follow-up. Adverse events were found to be similar in young (19.9%) and elderly (26.8%) AS patients.

Conclusion

Research in the TURKBIO cohort reveals that both older and younger patients with AS exhibited similar disease activity levels with comparable treatment approaches. Moreover, the results of TNFi treatments in elderly patients were the same as those observed in younger patients, with no notable increase in safety concerns.

Nail lichen planus treatment safety

AREAS COVERED

Topical therapies for nail lichen planus (clobetasol propionate, topical tacrolimus, bath-PUVA), intralesional treatment (triamcinolone), and systemic treatment (corticosteroids, retinoids, small molecule inhibitors (jak/stat inhibitors)), TNF-alpha inhibitors (etanercept), systemic immunomodulators (oral calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mophetil), and antimalarials (chloroquine), each with unique safety profiles and considerations. Herein, we discuss common and uncommon adverse events, as well as utilization for special populations, including pregnant and pediatric patients.

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part II: focus on elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis is becoming a frequent concern in geriatric age due to the higher risk to develop treatment adverse events, logistic issues, vulnerability to immune-related diseases and cancer, presence of comorbidities and the risk of drug interactions. In this context, traditional systemic treatments are often contraindicated, and biologic drugs and small molecules seem to be a valuable option. However, data on their effectiveness and safety in elderly patients are scant.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to analyze the current literature in order to point out data on the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs and small molecules for the management of psoriasis in elderly patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review suggests biologics and small molecules as an effective and safe option for the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis in elderly patients.

Treating psoriasis in the elderly: biologics and small molecules

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis prevalence in the elderly is growing. It is estimated that 15% of elderly psoriasis patients suffer from moderate-to-severe disease, thus requiring systemic treatments. However, conventional systemic agents' use is limited due to contraindications and drug-interactions. Conversely, biologics and small molecules seem to be a valuable option, although the geriatric psoriasis population is frequently excluded from trials and shared guidelines are lacking.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant English literature (trials, real-life studies, case series, and reviews) regarding biologics and/or small molecules in the elderly were searched for up to January 17, 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the elderly may be challenging due to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and increased risk of infections and cancers. However, new targeted therapies offer the possibility to perform a tailored-tail management, considering comorbidities, drug-interactions, and frailties which characterize this class of patients. Several real-world data support biologics and small molecules' efficacy and safety in the elderly with mainly no significant difference as compared to young adults. Elderly psoriasis patients' expectations are as high as those of their younger counterparts. Hence, they deserve the best therapeutic options according to their peculiarities for a long-term psoriasis remission and an improved quality of life.

Drug Survival, Safety, and Effectiveness of Biologics in Older Patients with Psoriasis: A Comparison with Younger Patients-A BioCAPTURE Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease in any age group, but also in older patients (≥ 65 years of age). Since older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, limited data specifically on this growing population are available, e.g. regarding the safety and performance of biological treatment.

AIMS

We aimed to give insight into this specific population by comparing the drug survival and safety of biologics in older patients with that in younger patients.

METHODS

In this real-world observational study, data from 3 academic and 15 non-academic centers in The Netherlands were extracted from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. Biologics included in this study were tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≥ 65 years and < 65 years. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure comorbid disease status, and all adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuation were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. All AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were studied to check whether they could be classified as serious AEs (SAEs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall 5-year drug survival and split according to reasons of discontinuation (ineffectiveness or AEs) were constructed. Cox regression models were used to correct for possible confounders and to investigate associations with drug survival in both age groups separately. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores during the first 2 years of treatment and at the time of treatment discontinuation were assessed and compared between age groups.

RESULTS

A total of 890 patients were included, of whom 102 (11.4%) were aged ≥ 65 years. Body mass index, sex, and distribution of biologic classes (e.g. TNFα, IL12/23) were not significantly different between the two age groups. A significantly higher CCI score was found in older patients, indicative of more comorbidity (p < 0.001). The 5-year ineffectiveness-related drug survival was lower for older patients (44.5% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.006), and the 5-year overall (≥ 65 years: 32.4% vs. < 65 years: 42.1%; p = 0.144) and AE-related (≥ 65 years: 82.1% vs. < 65 years: 79.5%; p = 0.913) drug survival was comparable between age groups. Of all AEs (n = 155) that led to discontinuation, 16 (10.3%) were reported as SAEs but these only occurred in younger patients. After correcting for confounders, the same trends were observed in the drug survival outcomes. Linear regression analyses on PASI scores showed no statistical differences at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment between age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study in a substantial, well-defined, prospective cohort provides further support that the use of biologics in older patients seems well-tolerated and effective. Biologic discontinuation due to AEs did not occur more frequently in older patients. Older patients discontinued biologic treatment more often due to ineffectiveness, although no clear difference in PASI scores was observed. More real-world studies on physician- and patient-related factors in older patients are warranted.

Small interfering RNAs in the management of human rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has unclear pathogenesis, but the molecules that feed its inflammatory state are known. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are useful to identify molecular targets and evaluate the efficacy of specific drugs, and can themselves be used for therapeutic purposes.

SOURCES OF DATA

A systematic search of different databases to March 2022 was performed to define the role of siRNAs in RA therapy. Twenty suitable studies were identified.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Small interfering RNAs can be useful in the study of inflammatory processes in RA, and identify possible therapeutic targets and drug therapies.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Many genes and cytokines participate in the inflammatory process of RA and can be regulated with siRNA. However, it is difficult to determine whether the responses to siRNAs and other drugs studied in human cells in vitro are similar to the responses in vivo.

GROWING POINTS

Inflammatory processes can be affected by the gene dysregulation of siRNAs on inflammatory cytokines.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

To date, it is not possible to determine whether the pharmacological response of siRNAs on cells in vitro would be similar to what takes place in vivo for the diseases studied so far.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-TNF Biosimilars for Psoriasis in Pediatric and Geriatric Populations: A 72-Week Real-Life Study

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETA) biosimilars in elderly and children with psoriasis.

Methods

A real-life retrospective observational study was conducted on pediatric (<18 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) psoriasis patients treated with anti-TNF biosimilar agents referring to the Psoriasis Unit of the University of Naples Federico II, Italy, from January 2018 to January 2022. At baseline, demographic characteristics (age and sex), data on psoriasis duration and severity (measured by Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] and body surface area [BSA]), presence of psoriatic arthritis if applicable, comorbidities, and previous psoriasis treatments were recorded. Patients were monitored by regular follow-ups (week 12, 24, 48 and 72) through clinical and haematological assessments and adverse events (AEs) were registered.

Results

A total of 11 children and 23 elderly psoriasis patients were enrolled. Concerning children, 6 (54.5%) were under ADA biosimilar and 5 (45.5%) under ETA biosimilar. ETA and ADA biosimilars were equally effective and safe for up to 72 weeks (mean PASI and BSA < 3). No significant AEs were reported, and none discontinued treatment. In the elderly, 15 (65.2%) were treated with ADA biosimilar and 8 (34.8%) with ETA biosimilar. ETA and ADA biosimilars were equally effective up to 72 weeks (mean PASI < 4 and mean BSA < 5%). AEs (mainly mild) were registered in 9 subjects (39.1%). Also, 4 (17.4%) patients discontinued biologicals for secondary lack of efficacy (3, 75%) or AEs (1, 25%).

Conclusion

Our study found that ADA and ETA biosimilars are effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in children and the elderly. No statistically significant efficacy and safety differences were found between ADA and ETA biosimilars in both children and the elderly. Geriatric patients displayed a higher discontinuation rate and side effects than the pediatric counterpart even if without approaching statistical significance.

Safety of Systemic Medications Among Older Adults With Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are common among older adults (≥65 years old), but clinical trials often exclude that population.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize evidence from observational studies on the safety of systemic therapies (conventional or biologic) for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis among older adults in a systematic review.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (inception to October 31, 2019) and included observational studies reporting adverse events among older people treated with systemic therapy for psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Outcomes were death, hospitalization, emergency department visits, infections, major cardiovascular events, renal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and cytopenias. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

We included 22 studies on treatment for psoriasis and 2 for atopic dermatitis. Most studies were small and non-comparative and 20 of 24 were low quality. Studies comparing safety between medications or medication classes or between older and younger adults did not show apparent differences but had wide confidence intervals around relative effect estimates. Heterogeneity of study design and reporting precluded quantitative synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is scant evidence on the safety of conventional systemic and biologic medications for older adults with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis; older adults and their clinicians should be aware of this evidence gap.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of biologic agents between elderly-onset and young-onset RA patients: the ANSWER cohort study

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) and young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA) patients. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged ≧18 years enrolled in a Japanese multicenter observational registry between 2009 and 2018 who had moderate or high disease activity when initiating bDMARDs were included. EORA was defined as RA with onset at 60 or over. After propensity score weighting for differences in confounding factors, generalized estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between the age of RA onset and bDMARD clinical effectiveness at 48 weeks after starting a bDMARD. Among a total of 7183 patients in the registry, 2815 (39.2%) were identified as EORA. The proportion of patients on bDMARDs was lower in the EORA as compared to the YORA (18.3% vs 28.0%, p < 0.001). Of the 989 bDMARD initiators, 364 (36.8%) were identified as EORA. The median follow-up duration was 48 weeks both in the EORA and in the YORA. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics between the two age groups, there was no significant difference in Clinical Disease Activity Index scores at 48 weeks (mean difference 1.01, 95% CI = - 0.62 to 2.64, p = 0.22). There was a non-significant trend toward lower remission in EORA (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.24-1.14, p = 0.10), and low disease activity/remission was similar (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.29-2.52, p = 0.77). Drug retention (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.55-1.35, p = 0.78) and discontinuations due to adverse events (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38-1.18, p = 0.22) were similar between the two age groups after adjustment for confounders. In RA patients initiating bDMARDs, improvements in clinical disease at 48 weeks were similar between EORA and YORA. Drug retention and adverse events discontinuation were similar between the two age groups.

Does Older Age have an Impact on Rituximab Efficacy and Safety? Results from the NOR-DMARD Register

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab in older vs younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Data on 367 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab in the Norwegian Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (NOR-DMARD) register were analysed, comparing patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 91) with patients aged < 65 years (n = 276). Drug survival was compared using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Disease activity, as assessed by the Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and the Simplified Disease Activity Index, was analysed with linear mixed models. The occurrence of adverse events was analysed by quasi-Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

Drug survival was similar in the two age groups. The proportion of patients who remained taking rituximab over 2 years was 72% in those under aged 65 years vs 74% in those aged ≥ 65 years. No statistically significant association with age was found for drug survival in either the unadjusted (hazard ratio 1.13, p = 0.65) or adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses for the model with DAS28-ESR as a confounder (effect size 1.11, p = 0.73). Models including the Simplified Disease Activity Index instead of DAS28-ESR yielded similar results. Age was furthermore not significantly associated with disease activity over time, although there was a tendency towards a poorer response in older patients. In the older age group, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia (107 vs 51 per 1000 patient-years) and other serious infections (142 vs 66 per 1000 patient-years).

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab is a reasonable therapeutic option for older patients with rheumatoid arthritis although vigilance is needed with regard to the infection profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01581294.

Elderly-Onset and Adult-Onset Ulcerative Colitis Are More Similar than Previously Reported in a Nationwide Cohort

BACKGROUND

Elderly-onset ulcerative colitis (EO-UC) is recognized as a distinct subpopulation of UC. To our knowledge, there have been no nationwide studies of EO-UC populations in the USA.

AIMS

We aim to characterize differences in presentation at diagnosis and clinical course between EO-UC and adult-onset UC (AO-UC) patients in a national cohort.

METHODS

Complete medical records of patients newly diagnosed with UC from October 2001 to October 2011 in the Veterans Affairs health system were obtained. Patients were followed until colectomy, death, or the end of the observation period on November 2015. EO-UC patients (age of diagnosis ≥65 years) were compared to AO-UC patients (age of diagnosis ≤40 years) with respect to demographic, severity, and therapeutic data. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP statistical software.

RESULTS

We identified 836 newly diagnosed UC patients, of which 207 had EO-UC and 102 had AO-UC. The mean age of diagnosis was 72.4 years (EO-UC) and 32.9 years (AO-UC), with a mean 8-year follow-up period. The incidence of pancolitis at the time of diagnosis was similar between both groups (p = 0.67). There was no difference in steroid use (36.7 vs 45.1%, p = 0.1563), thiopurine use (19.3 vs 22.6%, p = 0.5081), and colectomy rates (6.3 vs 5.9%, p = 0.8911) between EO-UC and AO-UC populations. There was lower anti-TNF use in EO-UC patients compared to AO-UC patients (5.8 vs 14.7%, p = 0.0091).

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide cohort, we found that the use of steroids, thiopurines, and colectomy was similar in both populations, while anti-TNF use was lower among the elderly.

Elderly psoriatic arthritis patients on TNF-α blockers: results of an Italian multicenter study on minimal disease activity and drug discontinuation rate

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthropathy, associated with skin and/or nail psoriasis. Real world data on efficacy and safety of TNF-α blockers in the elderly with PsA are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, through the achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA), drug discontinuation rate, and safety in elderly patients with PsA on TNF-α blockers. A multicenter, observational study was carried out in four Italian centers. The assessment of disease activity and safety were performed at the start of anti-TNF-α (T0), at 6 months (T6) and at 12 months (T12). A total of 145 PsA patients were included in the study. At baseline 68 (46.9%) patients were on etanercept, 60 (41.3%) on adalimumab, 11 (7.6%) on golimumab, and 6 (4.1%) on infliximab. All the variables concerning PsA activity showed a statistically significant improvement when comparing T6 and T12 with T0. After 6 and 12 months of therapy, respectively, 31 (22.6%) and 71 (51.8%) patients achieved MDA (p < 0.001). The drug discontinuation rate was 5.5% with a mean of 6.8 months (range 2-10 months), and it was due to lack of efficacy, adverse events, and lost to follow-up. Nine patients (6.2%) reported the onset of mild infections resolved with antimicrobial specific oral regimen without therapy interruption. TNF-α blockers are effective in the achievement of a low disease status and safe in elderly patients with PsA. Therefore, age should not be considered a limitation to their use.

Performance of the classification criteria in patients with late-onset axial spondyloarthritis

AIM

To evaluate the performance of four different classification criteria for spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with late-onset symptoms and to compare the clinical, laboratory and radiographic outcomes among the patients with symptoms before and after 45 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 329 patients with SpA were enrolled in this prospective cohort. Patients with psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, colitis associated arthritis and peripheral or undifferentiated SpA were excluded. The remaining individuals were divided into two groups based on their ages at the time of onset of symptoms: from 16 to 45 years of age (adult-onset, A-O) and after 45 years of age (late-onset, L-O). The clinical data were collected, including BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, mSASSS, ASDAS, as were concomitant diseases and medications, efficacy and safety data. The performance of four SpA classification criteria, including modified New York, ESSG, Amor and ASAS, was evaluated in both groups. p value <.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (9.72%) had L-O axial SpA. Mean age of diagnosis and symptoms were 57.6 (8.0) years and 7.6 (5.1) years, respectively. L-O patients had statistically worse functional impairment and higher disease activity. However, they had lower radiographic sacroiliac and spine damage (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that almost 10% of the patients with SpA had late-onset of symptoms. Moreover, they had higher disease activity, worse physical function and lower spine radiographic damage than A-O SpA patients. Additionally, the ASAS classification criteria had the best performance and might be used in clinical practice.

Biologic treatments for elderly patients with psoriasis

The number of elderly patients with psoriasis is increasing in Japan. However, biologic treatment is generally considered to be challenging in elderly patients, due to their increased risk of complications compared with younger patients. Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of biologics in senior elderly patients (≥75 years old) with psoriasis. The study involved a cohort of 27 patients aged 75-88 years who were being treated with biologics over a period of more than 1 year. Initial biologics administrated to were adalimumab (five cases) and ustekinumab (22 cases). Eight patients discontinued treatment: two developed cancer; one was transferred to hospital; and five others experienced either bone fracture, interstitial pneumonia, cerebral hemorrhage resulting in death, decrepitude or developed hepatopathy following prophylactic tuberculosis treatment. Efficacy, evaluated by the percentage of patients achieving 75% reduction of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, was 76.9% at week 16 (n = 26), 88.0% at week 24 (n = 25) and 90.5% at week 52 (n = 21). Biologic treatments thus show clear efficacy in elderly patients with psoriasis, however, the increased frequency of adverse events requires rigorous patient observation.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in psoriatic patients over the age of 65

BACKGROUND

Clinical data on the long-term safety and efficacy of infliximab on psoriatic patients who are older than 65 years are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim is to report the long-term efficacy, safety and tolerance of infliximab in geriatric patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Dermatology of the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Clinical data were reported at week 12, 52, 104, 208.

RESULTS

151 charts were evaluated. A total of 27 patients were included. Range of the age was between 65 and 85 years; mean age was 73 years ±5.4; female to male ratio was 1:2; mean age of onset of psoriasis was 43 years±17. The average of treatment duration was 39 months ±27 (range 1-100). Fourteen patients suffered from plaque type psoriasis and 13 from psoriatic arthritis. At the baseline the mean PASI score was 15.6 ± 10.2. At week 12, 52, 104, and 208 the mean PASI was 2, 2.3, 1.9 and 1.8 respectively. A reduction in the mean PASI was maintained in the long-term treatment in 12 patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that long-term treatment with infliximab is effective and safe in patients over 65 years old and that IV therapy is also associated with a high compliance.

Targeting Low Disease Activity in Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current and Future Roles of Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

Elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classified into two clinical subsets, elderly-onset RA (EORA) and younger-onset elderly RA. With the improvement of life expectancy in the general population and advent of the super-aging society, the number of patients with EORA is anticipated to increase. Both large and small joints are affected initially at onset, and individuals with early EORA have higher scores of disease activity and levels of acute-phase reactants than those with early younger-onset RA. EORA is a progressive disease similar to younger-onset RA. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are equally or slightly less effective in elderly patients than in younger patients with RA, and disease duration may have a greater impact on disease outcomes than age. Evidence of non-TNF biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use in EORA is limited. TNF inhibitors may not increase the risk for infection in elderly patients any more than methotrexate; however, increasing age is an independent and strong risk factor for serious infections in patients with RA. Treatment choice in patients with EORA is strongly influenced by comorbidities, especially cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, and frailty. To prevent progression to irreversible geriatric syndromes, non-frail patients with EORA, who are aging successfully should undergo intensive treatment using the treat-to-target strategy, and pre-frail and frail patients with EORA should be treated with the aim of returning to a non-frail or pre-frail stage, respectively. An appropriate treatment strategy for EORA and younger-onset elderly RA should be developed in the next decade using a multi-disciplinary approach.

Risk factors of adverse events during treatment in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

The risk factors of adverse events during a number of currently used treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in elderly patients were examined.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted for 300 elderly RA patients registered in December 2009 at Sasebo Chuo Hospital, Japan, and the adverse events during the treatments for RA were assessed.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 74.3 ± 5.8 years. The Steinbrocker stage was IV in almost one-half of the patients. Methotrexate (MTX) was used in 54.0% of patients and biologics in 23.0% of patients. Adverse events occurred in 103 patients (34.3%). The most common adverse events were infections (46.6%), including pneumonia (21.4%). Multiple logistic analyses revealed that the factors significantly related to infection were advanced Steinbrocker stage and the existence of respiratory diseases, and that of pneumonia was the existence of diabetes mellitus (DM).

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly RA patients with advanced stage, respiratory diseases or DM should be monitored for infections, including pneumonia, carefully during treatment.

Safety and tolerability of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in psoriasis: a narrative review

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors are an alternative to oral systemic therapies for psoriasis. Data regarding the safety of TNF-α inhibitors from randomized clinical trials may not fully reflect the effects on the clinic patient population receiving the therapy, but other sources of information are available. We performed a literature review to assess the safety and tolerability of the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with TNF-α inhibitors. A literature search was conducted using PubMed for articles dating from January 2000 to October 2013. Randomized controlled, cohort, open-label, and observational studies were included, as well as case reports and letters to the editor. Articles found on PubMed describing the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in psoriasis patients were included, while studies highlighting interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 inhibitors were excluded, as were non-English articles. In total, 58 articles were included in the review. TNF-α inhibitors exhibit both efficacy and tolerability in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Adverse effects associated with these medications are not common and can be minimized with routine clinical monitoring and patient education. While the risk of severe adverse events is low, the lack of very large, long-term, randomized safety trials limits the ability to fully define the safety of these agents. TNF-α inhibitors have a good efficacy/safety ratio for use in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Serious adverse effects are not common, and common injection-site reactions are usually manageable. The benefits of TNF-α inhibitors outweigh the risks for moderate-to-severe psoriasis; however, there are potential adverse effects and the patient populations at highest risk include the elderly and those with a history of malignancy.

The use of anti-COX2 siRNA coated onto PLGA nanoparticles loading dexamethasone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

In drug delivery systems, some genes have the potential to interrupt unnecessary gene expression in specific target cells. In this study, two types of drug, glucocorticoids and siRNA, were co-delivered into conditioned cells to inhibit the expression of unnecessary genes and proteins involved in arthritis. To deliver the two factors into a human chondrocyte cell line (C28/I2), dexamethasone was first loaded into PLGA nanoparticles, and then drug-loaded PLGA nanoparticles were complexed with poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI)/siRNA. To test the co-delivery of siRNA and dexamethasone into chondrocytes, cells were transfected with green fluorescence protein siRNA (GFP siRNA) and drugs. After transfection with GFP siRNA, 70% reduction of C28/I2 cells demonstrated GFP expression, whereas MOCK carrying PLGA nanoparticles and PLGA nanoparticles without siRNA showed no differences of GFP expressions. COX-2 and iNOS productions in C28/I2 cells were examined after TNF-α pre-treatment to induce expression of arthritis-related molecules in vitro. The reduction of gene and protein expression associated with arthritis by transfection with dexamethasone-loaded and COX-2 siRNA-complexed PLGA nanoparticles was evaluated by RT-PCR, real time-qPCR, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence imaging.

Indirect comparison of the effects of anti-TNF biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by means of a mixed treatment comparison performed on efficacy data from published randomised, controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To compare ASAS (Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Response Criteria), 20 response patterns between anti-TNF biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by means of a mixed treatment comparison of different randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of biological therapies.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed to identify a number of similarly designed double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of the TNF-α inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis patients, conducted over an 18-year period. The end-point of interest was ASAS20 response criteria at 24 weeks. Results were analyzed simultaneously using Bayesian mixed treatment comparison techniques. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) of ASAS20 response and associated 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The probability of being the best treatment was also reported.

RESULTS

Three RCTs were selected for data extraction and further analysis. By mean of MTC, all anti-TNF agents demonstrated to be more efficacious in inducing an ASAS20 response than placebo. Infliximab shows a 72% probability of being the best treatment of all. Adalimumab and etanercept show probabilities of 13% and 15%, respectively. No differences were observed when comparing directly an anti-TNF-α agent against another. When compared with placebo, Infliximab increases the probability of response by ∼7-times (OR = 6.8), Adalimumab by ∼4-times (OR = 4.4), and Etanercept by 5-times (OR = 4.9). Differences in trials procedures, the use of a fixed-effect model, and the small number of trials included represent limitations of this study

CONCLUSIONS

Even if the mixed treatment comparisons between infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept did not show a statistically significant difference, this analysis suggests that infliximab, compared to placebo, is expected to provide the highest rate of ASAS20 response in SA patients naive to biologic treatments.

Bioboosters in the treatment of rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review of currently available biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

Immunologic research has clarified many aspects of the pathogenesis of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. Biologic drugs acting on different steps of the immune response, including cytokines, B- and T-cell lymphocytes, have been marketed over the past 10 years for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-cytokine agents in RA (including the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) drugs infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)-1 anakinra, and anti-IL-6 tocilizumab) demonstrated a significant efficacy compared to traditional therapies, if combined with methotrexate (MTX), as measured by ACR 20, 50 and 70 response criteria. The new therapies have also been demonstrated to be superior to MTX in slowing or halting articular damage. RCTs have shown the efficacy of anti-TNFα in AS patients through significant improvement of symptoms and function. Trials of anti-TNFα in PsA patients showed marked improvement of articular symptoms for psoriasis and radiological disease progression. More recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of B-cell depletion with rituximab, and T-cell inactivation with abatacept. All these drugs have a satisfactory safety profile. This paper reviews the different aspects of efficacy and tolerability of biologics in the therapy of RA, AS, and PsA.