Constitutive Expression of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) by Striatal Cell Lines Immortalized using the tsA58 Allele of the SV40 Large T Antigen

Rodent striatal cells were immortalized using the A58 temperature-sensitive allele of the SV40 large T antigen. Seventy-eight clones and 10 mixed cultures were characterized at the nonpermissive and permissive temperatures. Based on morphology and expression of proteins, cells were classified into three primary types, with types b and c expressing some neuronal characteristics. Type a cells have an epithelial-like morphology with coarse cytoplasmic extensions and occasional fine processes. These cells express vimentin, do not grow well under serum-free conditions and, when confluent, form a uniform monolayer. Type b cells have a polygonal shape and usually extend multiple thin processes. These cells possess large nuclei with multiple nucleoli and do not express vimentin. Type c cells have a fibroblast-like appearance, are unipolar or multipolar, and their soma is smaller than that of type b cells. Type c cells do not express vimentin, and when confluent form a uniform monolayer. Some type b and c clones express NCAM and MAP-2. Several type b and c cell lines were found to consistently express glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) immunoreactivity under several tissue culture conditions. Selected cell lines were transplanted into the intact adult rat brain in several locations. Cells survived well for 15 wk and did not form tumors. The proteins expressed in vivo were similar to those expressed in vitro.

Transduction of human GAD67 cDNA into immortalized striatal cell lines using an Epstein-Barr virus-based plasmid vector increases GABA content

The M213-20 and M213-1L cell lines were immortalized from rat striatum using the tsA58 allele of the SV40 large T antigen, contain the GAD enzyme, and produce GABA (Giordano et al., 1994, Exp. Neurol. 124:395-400). Cell lines that produce large amounts of GABA may be useful for transplantation into the brain in conditions such as Huntington's disease or epilepsy, where localized application of GABA may be of therapeutic value. We have explored the potential use of the pREP10 plasmid vector, which replicates episomally, to increase GAD expression and GABA production in M213-20 and M213-1L cells. Human GAD(67) cDNA was transfected into M213-20 and M213-1L, and subclones were isolated with hygromycin selection. Immunochemical studies showed increased GAD(67) expression compared to the parent M213-20 and M213-1L cell lines. Staining for the EBNA antigen and Southern blots demonstrated that the pREP10 plasmid was stably maintained in the cells for at least 12-15 months in culture. Several clones were isolated in which GABA concentrations were increased by as much as 4-fold (M213-1L) or 44-fold (M213-20) compared to the parent cell lines or 12-fold (M213-1L) and 94-fold (M213-20) greater than rat striatal tissue (1.678 +/- 0.4 micromol/g prot). The ability of these cells to continue to produce large amounts of GABA while being maintained in culture for extended periods suggests that similar methods might be used with human cell lines to produce cells that can be transplanted into the brain to deliver GABA for therapeutic purposes.

Genetic regulatory elements introduced into neural stem and progenitor cell populations

The genetic manipulation of neural cells has advantage in both basic biology and medicine. Its utility has provided a clearer understanding of how the survival, connectivity, and chemical phenotype of neurones is regulated during, and after, embryogenesis. Much of this achievement has come from the recent generation by genetic means of reproducible and representative supplies of precursor cells which can then be analyzed in a variety of paradigms. Furthermore, advances made in the clinical use of transplantation for neurodegenerative disease have created a demand for an abundant, efficacious and safe supply of neural cells for grafting. This review describes how genetic methods, in juxtaposition to epigenetic means, have been used advantageously to achieve this goal. In particular, we detail how gene transfer techniques have been developed to enable cell immortalization, manipulation of cell differentiation and commitment, and the controlled selection of cells for purification or safety purposes. In addition, it is now also possible to genetically modify antigen presentation on cell surfaces. Finally, there is detailed the transfer of therapeutic products to discrete parts of the central nervous system (CNS), using neural cells as elegant and sophisticated delivery vehicles. In conclusion, once the epigenetic and genetic controls over neural cell production, differentiation and death have been more fully determined, providing a mixture of hard-wired elements and more flexibly expressed characteristics becomes feasible. Optimization of the contributions and interactions of these two controlling systems should lead to improved cell supplies for neurotransplantation.

The use of nonneuronal cells for gene delivery

The implantation of genetically engineered nonneuronal cells can provide an effective method for achieving localized delivery of discrete molecules to the CNS or for providing substrates for regrowth of neural structures. Most primary nonneuronal cells have the advantage of being easily obtainable from the prospective host for ex vivo retrovirus-mediated genetic manipulation (most will be mitotic in culture) and reimplantation as an autologous graft (circumventing the problem of immune rejection). As primary cells, they are unlikely to be tumorigenic. The most vexing problem for such systems remains the apparent loss of transgene expression from viral promoters after prolonged periods of engraftment. Much effort is currently being directed at optimizing sustained transgene expression by varying the promoters, by varying the cell types to be engineered, or by regulating expression by enhancing promoter function or substrate availability. While nonneuronal cells are excellent vehicles for achieving passive delivery of substances to the CNS, they lack the ability to incorporate into the host cytoarchitecture in a functional manner (e.g., make synaptic contacts). For this reason, not only may certain essential circuits not be re-formed, but the regulated release of certain substances through feedback loops may be missing. While apparently unimportant for some substances (e.g., ACh), for others (e.g., NGF), their unregulated, inappropriate, excessive, or ectopic release may actually be inimical to the host. Furthermore, the loss of foreign gene expression (the bane of gene therapy) may leave engineered nonneural cells incapacitated, whereas donor tissue originating from brain may intrinsically produce various CNS factors allowing correction to proceed despite inactivation of the introduced gene. In fact, CNS-derived tissue may provide as-yet-unrecognized endogenous neuralspecific substances which are equally as beneficial to the host as the gene in question. Thus, future developments in gene delivery to the brain for some conditions may emphasize using neurons or neural progenitors for ex vivo genetic manipulation (Fisher, 1997) and refining techniques for the direct injection of therapeutic genes into neurons in vivo (see Snyder and Fisher, 1996). For a wide variety of conditions, however, using nonneuronal cellular vehicles or even nonbiologic synthetic vehicles may be efficient, effective, and safe strategies for the passive delivery of therapeutic molecules to discrete regions of the CNS. In fact, this approach may come closer than any other to immediate human applications.

In vivo and ex vivo gene transfer to the brain

The use of gene transfer techniques to express novel proteins within different cellular populations has provided insights into the function and plasticity of the brain. Recently, this technique has been successfully used to explore physiological processes within the CNS and to intervene in neurodegenerative disease and cancer. Progress in manipulating transgene products in vivo and in achieving cell-specific targeting of genetic material offers promise for enhancing the usefulness of this technique and its therapeutic potential for treating human disorders of the CNS.