Examining the Presence, Consequences, and Reduction of Implicit Bias in Health Care: A Narrative Review

Quality-Improvement Strategies for Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Birth: ACOG Committee Statement No. 17

The nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth rate is a metric that may be used to evaluate obstetric care and compare performance across similar hospitals and regions. Safe reduction of primary cesarean birth prevents the need for future cesarean births and associated maternal morbidity risk. Quality-improvement methodologies such as optimizing culture of care; practice environment; data collection and monitoring, including monitoring of data by race and ethnicity; and proactive management and planning for known and unanticipated drivers of cesarean birth may safely reduce NTSV cesarean birth rates. Obstetrician-gynecologists should engage with patients in informed decision making, informed consent, and birth preference conversations, particularly related to induction of labor and cesarean birth, to support equitable and respectful obstetric care and outcomes related to NTSV cesarean birth.

Uncovering Unconscious Bias in First-Year Nursing Students: A Qualitative Study on Student Perceptions, Empathy, and Growth

BACKGROUND

Unconscious biases shape nursing students' perceptions and decision-making, potentially impacting patient outcomes. Targeted training programs emphasizing self-reflection and practical application are critical for fostering empathy, reducing care disparities, and strengthening team trust.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study used thematic analysis to examine reflections from 55 first-year nursing students on a nonfiction health-related novel, highlighting bias awareness.

RESULTS

Students developed a deeper understanding of unconscious biases and how such biases impact patient care. This course's integrative approach enhanced empathy and recognition of bias.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive bias training and self-reflection are of the utmost importance in nursing education. These approaches significantly raise students' awareness of unconscious biases and, therefore, their empathy and cultural humility in providing quality, equitable patient care.

"Patients, Trauma Survivors, Sweethearts, or Troublemakers?": A Discourse Analysis of General Practitioners' and Pharmacists' Accounts of Clients on Opioid Substitution Treatment

Despite the high level of scientific support for the effectiveness of opioid substitution treatments (OSTs), individuals who rely on this treatment are a highly stigmatized population within healthcare settings. Previous studies mainly focused on the experiences of OST clients, while the perspective of medical professionals regarding OST remains largely unexplored. This study aims to investigate the discourse of pharmacists and general practitioners about OST through the lens of positioning theory. To explore their stance toward OST, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 pharmacists and general practitioners working in pharmacies, community health centers, private medical practices, prisons, and drug treatment services in Flanders, Belgium. The participants of this study discursively constructed four storylines to position themselves and OST clients, namely, a biomedical, psychodynamic, biopsychosocial, and moralizing storyline. These storylines are based on historical explanatory addiction models, and their use varies according to the participant's work setting. While the moralizing storyline was characterized by othering, stereotyping, and labeling, participants who applied the biopsychosocial storyline approached clients in a destigmatizing manner. To conclude, participants used the identified storylines to define the position of clients in OST, along with their related rights and duties. The dominant storyline thus shapes the view on and treatment of OST clients in a medical setting.

Active ingredients in implicit racial bias training: Incorporating participant voice to promote engagement

Growing recognition of the serious consequences of racism in the United States encourage organizations and agencies to move toward an anti-racist approach. Implicit racial bias trainings are one piece of the approach toward this end. While many such trainings are being conducted nationwide, it remains unclear what practices best encourage participation, engagement, and desired outcomes following implicit racial bias trainings. We collected data from 225 implicit racial bias training participants working in criminal legal, educational, health care, and corporate settings. At the end of the trainings, participants completed brief surveys measuring knowledge about implicit bias, ethnocultural empathy, and acceptability of racial bias. Written responses about what was liked and could be improved in the training were also collected and analyzed using inductive coding to arrive at codes, categories, and themes. Results suggest participant voice is integral in understanding how to engage participants in trainings. Participants described being engaged in the training through a targeted introduction to the topic and through stylistic considerations by the facilitator including modeling vulnerability and self-examination. Findings emphasize that what participants perceive to be best practices in such trainings integrate strategies through which we can educate adult learners, engage participants, and address a sensitive topic head-on.

Health Care Practitioner Bias and Access to Inpatient Rehabilitation Services Among Survivors of Violence

Importance

Posthospital inpatient rehabilitation is essential for many patients with traumatic injuries. However, rehabilitation centers lack transparency and oversight in their admission practices and may be influenced by health care practitioner (HCP) use of stigmatizing language in patient medical records, leading to inequities in access to care.

Objectives

To examine differences in admission to inpatient rehabilitation centers for patients hospitalized for violent penetrating (VP) injuries compared with motor vehicle crash (MVC) injuries.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This mixed-methods retrospective qualitative study used data obtained from hospital records from 2015 to 2021. Data analysis occurred between July and December 2023. The study was performed at Boston Medical Center, an urban level I trauma center. The cohort included all patients hospitalized for VP or MVC injuries who were discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation center between 2015 and 2021.

Exposures

Injury type, categorized as VP or MVC.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary quantitative outcome was a denial for admission to an inpatient rehabilitation center. Qualitative content analysis identified similarities and differences across injury types in the manifestations of predetermined stigmatizing language categories in patients' medical records.

Results

Of 323 patients discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation center (median [IQR] age, 38 [25-59] years; 208 men [64.4%]; 29 Hispanic patients [9.0%], 118 non-Hispanic Black patients [36.5%], and 152 non-Hispanic White patients [47.1%]), 107 patients (33.1%) experienced at least 1 denial by a center before being placed (32 of 55 patients with VP injuries [58.2%] vs 75 of 268 patients with MVC injuries [28.0%]). Compared with patients with MVC injuries, patients with VP injuries had greater than 3 times the odds of experiencing a denial (odds ratio, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.93-6.48; P < .001). Medical records of patients with VP injuries had increased use of stigmatizing language that indicated culturally based or injury-related stereotyping, skepticism toward patient-reported symptoms, and heightened HCP-power dynamics contributing to unilateral decision-making.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this mixed-methods qualitative study of hospital patients discharged to rehabilitation centers, significant disparities in denials for admission were observed among survivors of violence, who were disproportionally Black or Hispanic. Stigmatizing language found in medical records suggested that bias within the referral process may have contributed to these disparities. These findings underscore the need for reformed clinical documentation practices and enhanced oversight of rehabilitation referral processes to promote equitable access to care.

Effects of Implicit Racial Bias and Standardized Patient Race on Genetic Counseling Students' Patient-Centered Communication

Clinician racial bias has been associated with less patient-centered communication, but little is known about how it affects trainees' communication. We investigated genetic counseling students' communication during sessions with Black or White standardized patients (SPs) and the extent to which communication was associated with SP race or student scores on the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Sixty students conducted a baseline SP session and up to two follow-up sessions. Students were randomly assigned to a different White or Black SP and one of three clinical scenarios for each session. Fifty-six students completed the IAT. Session recordings were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Linear regression models assessed the effects of IAT score and SP race on a variety of patient-centered communication indicators. Random intercept models assessed the within-student effects of SP race on communication outcomes during the baseline session and in follow-up sessions (n = 138). Students were predominantly White (71%). Forty students (71%) had IAT scores indicating some degree of pro-White implicit preference. Baseline sessions with White relative to Black SPs had higher patient-centeredness scores. Within-participant analyses indicate that students used a higher proportion of back-channels (a facilitative behavior that cues interest and encouragement) and conducted longer sessions with White relative to Black SPs. Students' stronger pro-White IAT scores were associated with using fewer other facilitative statements during sessions with White relative to Black SPs. Different patterns of communication associated with SP race and student IAT scores were found for students than those found in prior studies with experienced clinicians.

"Understand the Way We Walk Our Life": Indigenous Patients' Experiences and Recommendations for Healthcare in the United States

BACKGROUND

The quality of healthcare experiences for Indigenous communities is worse when compared to non-Indigenous patients. Bias and discrimination within healthcare systems relate to worsened care and worsened health outcomes for Indigenous patients. The purpose of this study was to learn about the experiences of Indigenous people within healthcare settings, as well as their viewpoints for improving healthcare delivery to this population.

METHODS

Indigenous research methods were employed in this study as clinic administrators and staff, elders, and Indigenous researchers collaborated on the study purpose, design, and analysis. Twenty Indigenous patients participated in one of four focus groups regarding their experiences with healthcare systems.

RESULTS

Seven main themes emerged, highlighting participants' experiences during health encounters, in relation to healthcare systems, and Indigenous health beliefs. Participants discussed challenges and barriers in each area and offered recommendations for care delivery to this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study highlighted that biased care results in poor quality of healthcare delivery and that there are actionable steps that providers and systems of healthcare can take to reduce bias within healthcare systems. The provision of culturally congruent care is imperative in improving the health and well-being of Indigenous communities.

Ask, Acknowledge, Ascend: Addressing Mistrust as a Strategy to Address Disparities in Orthopaedic Ambulatory Care

Advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, robotics, anesthesia techniques, and recovery protocols have been instrumental in shifting orthopaedic surgical care from the hospital-based operating room to ambulatory surgical centers. Outpatient surgical services are thought to offer a lower-cost model of care, reduced out-of-pocket expenses, more predictable scheduling, faster recovery times, convenience, and lower risk of nosocomial infections. With these known advantages, it is critical to examine whether this safer environment is accessible to all. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities have been well-documented in the inpatient orthopaedic environment and concern has been raised that the shift toward outpatient surgery could widen disparities and access to care. This article describes ongoing disparities in ambulatory orthopaedic surgery for racialized minorities, women, and people with obesity. Having experienced these disparities, many lack trust in health care providers and the health system. Approaches for addressing this mistrust to create meaningful patient-centered care are described.

Healing Health Care Disparities: Development and Pilot Testing of a Virtual Reality Implicit Bias Training Module for Physicians in the Context of Black Maternal Health

Grounded in communication models of cultural competence, this study reports on the development and testing of the first module in a larger virtual reality (VR) implicit bias training for physicians to help them better: (a) recognize implicit bias and its effects on communication, patients, and patient care; (b) identify their own implicit biases and exercise strategies for managing them; and (c) learn and practice communicating with BIPOC patients in a culture-centered manner that demonstrates respect and builds trust. Led by communication faculty, a large, interdisciplinary team of researchers, clinicians, and engineers developed the first module tested herein focused on training goal (a). Within the module, participants observe five scenes between patient Marilyn Hayes (a Black woman) and Dr. Richard Flynn (her obstetrician, a White man) during a postpartum visit. The interaction contains examples of implicit bias, and participants are asked to both identify and consider how implicit bias impacts communication, the patient, and patient care. The team recruited 30 medical students and resident physicians to participate in a lab-based study that included a pretest, a training experience of the module using a head-mounted VR display, and a posttest. Following the training, participants reported improved attitudes toward implicit bias instruction, greater importance of determining patients' beliefs and perspectives for history-taking, treatment, and providing quality health care; and greater communication efficacy. Participants' agreement with the importance of assessing patients' perspectives, opinions, and psychosocial and cultural contexts did not significantly change. Implications for medical education about cultural competency and implicit bias are discussed.

Advancing Health Equity in the Cardiovascular Device Life Cycle

Despite advancements in diagnostics and therapeutics for cardiovascular disease, significant health disparities persist among patients from historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, women, individuals who are socioeconomically under-resourced or underinsured, and those living in rural communities. While transcatheter interventions have revolutionized the treatment landscape in cardiology, populations bearing the greatest burden of disease continue to face inequitable access and poorer outcomes. A notable gap in the literature concerns the role of modern approaches to cardiovascular device innovation in shaping and perpetuating health disparities. Health equity has been declared one of the top strategic initiatives for 2022 to 2025 by the Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, underscoring the need for greater attention, dialogue, and targeted interventions in this space. This narrative review uses the cardiovascular device life cycle as a conceptual framework to enhance understanding and guide future efforts to mitigate disparities in the field of interventional cardiology. Drawing on illustrative examples from interventional cardiology, we examine current practices in cardiovascular device regulation and approval, clinical trial evaluation, adoption patterns, and postprocedural outcomes with the aim of uncovering potential mechanisms of disparities and identifying opportunities for targeted interventions.

Implicit bias in referrals to relational psychological therapies: review and recommendations for mental health services

Introduction

Timely and appropriate psychological treatment is an essential element required to address the growing burden of mental health issues, which has significant implications for individuals, society, and healthcare systems. However, research indicates that implicit biases among mental health professionals may influence referral decisions, potentially leading to disparities in access to relational psychological therapies. This study investigates bias in referral practices within mental health services, identifying key themes in referral procedures and proposing recommendations to mitigate bias and promote equitable access.

Methods

A systematic review of literature published between 2002 and 2022 was conducted, focusing on biases, referral practices, and relational psychological therapies. The search strategy involved full-text screening of studies meeting inclusion criteria, specifically those examining professional and organizational implicit bias in mental health referrals. Thematic synthesis was employed to analyze and categorize bias within these domains, providing a structured framework for understanding its impact on referral decision making processes.

Results

The search yielded 2,964 relevant papers, of which 77 underwent full-text screening. Ultimately, eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the review. The analysis revealed that bias development mechanisms in referral decisions occurred across five key domains: resource allocation, organizational procedures, clinical roles, decision-making, and referral preferences. These domains highlight organizational and practitioner-level factors contributing to disparities in access to psychological therapies.

Discussion

Findings suggest that implicit biases within referral processes can limit equitable access to psychological therapies, particularly relational therapies that emphasize therapeutic alliance and patient-centered care. This study provides recommendations to address these biases, including standardized referral guidelines, enhanced professional training on implicit bias, and improved oversight mechanisms within mental health services.

Sex and Cardiac Operations: Are We Being Fair to Our Female Patients?

BACKGROUND

Research suggests that although men have a higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) rate, women with CVD are more likely to experience a poorer prognosis, possibly owing to incorrect diagnosis and poorer treatment. A question not yet addressed is whether some of this inequality could be due to sex bias when selecting patients for operation.

METHOD

The participants were from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort who had been admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis over the study period. Participants were recruited between 1984 and 1995 and followed up until 2017. Using propensity score nearest neighbour matching, women were matched 1:1 with men on year of birth, year and reason of admission, smoking status, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), and family history of CVD. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

After matching, 19,960 admissions (50% women) to hospital for cardiac reasons were available for analysis. Women were less likely to have a cardiac intervention, that is (endovascular or surgical revascularisation), after admission for any cardiovascular reason (6.83% of men, 2.84% of women; odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.42-0.75), or admission for cardiac ischaemia only (11.07% of men; 6.09% of women; OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.37-0.74). The sex difference was more pronounced in the early part of the study but persisted in the latter phase.

CONCLUSIONS

In this matched study of cardiovascular admissions to Scottish hospitals, women were less likely to be recommended for a surgical procedure, even when matched with men for common CVD risk factors.

Implicit bias assessment by career stage in medical education training: a narrative review

Implicit biases involve associations outside conscious awareness that lead to a negative evaluation of a person based on individual characteristics. Early evaluation of implicit bias in medical training can prevent long-term adverse health outcomes related to racial bias. However, to our knowledge, no present studies examine the sequential assessment of implicit bias through the different stages of medical training. The objective of this narrative review is to examine the breadth of existing publications that assess implicit bias at the current levels of medical training, pre-medical, graduate, and postgraduate. Protocol for this study was drafted using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Reviews (SANRA). Keyword literature search on peer-reviewed databases Google Scholar, PubMed, Ebsco, ScienceDirect, and MedEd Portal from January 1, 2017, to March 1, 2022, was used to identify applicable research articles. The online database search identified 1,512 articles. Full screening resulted in 75 papers meeting the inclusion criteria. Over 50% of extracted papers (74%) were published between 2019 and 2021 and investigated implicit bias at the post-graduate level (43%), followed by the graduate level (34%), and pre-medical level (9.4%). Fourteen percent were classified as mixed. Studies at the medical and medical graduate level identified an implicit preference towards white, male, non-LGBTQIA+, thin, patients. Study findings highlight notable gaps within the sequential assessment of implicit bias, specifically at the pre-medical training level. Longitudinal epidemiological research is needed to examine the long-term effect of implicit biases on existing healthcare disparities.

Evaluating Modern Implicit Bias Training in the Urology Workforce

Introduction Implicit bias can lead to unintended influence in the treatment of other people and impact the care of patients. As such, there has been an increase in training to improve provider awareness of their own biases. There are many ways to address bias training within the medical community, but we currently do not have data on its use within urology. Our current study examined the frequency, modality, and intensity of bias training among urology providers. Methods We created a survey to evaluate exposure to bias education in members of the urologic community, with an optional exercise in implicit bias training. This survey was sent to a nationwide audience through the Society of Academic Urology (SAU) database and also shared on social media. All responses were anonymous. Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to study commencement (IRB STUDY23020038). Patients were asked about their exposure to bias training within their institution, who provided that bias training, and if they felt bias training to be effective. Results Of the 84 providers who responded to the survey, 77 (91%) were physician providers (e.g., attendings), five (5%) were resident physicians, and two (2%) were advanced practice providers (APPs). Additionally, 56 (67%) respondents reported that bias training is mandatory within their departments, while 63 (75%) indicated that the primary method of training is an online course or module. Only seven (8%) respondents noted that their bias training was sponsored by the urology department or division at their institution. Only 37 (44%) providers agreed the bias training they were provided had a positive impact. While race and gender in the workplace are frequently presented, topics related to ageism, ableism, and diversity of religion are less often represented. Discussion Most of the providers surveyed had some exposure to bias training. The majority of training is presented as online courses or modules sponsored by the institution or university. These modalities appear to be associated with low satisfaction rates among urology providers. Bias training and recognition of biases are important for patient outcomes and satisfaction, especially within urology. To ensure we provide optimal care for our patients, ownership of this issue and ensuring adequate training for our providers is warranted. Conclusion Our study shows that bias training within the urologic community is limited in scope and its current implementation leads to low satisfaction among providers. This is the first study to evaluate this subject among urology providers. Future studies are warranted to evaluate more engaging and meaningful ways to educate providers on diversity topics.

Ascertaining provider-level implicit bias in electronic health records with rules-based natural language processing: A pilot study in the case of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Implicit, unconscious biases in medicine are personal attitudes about race, ethnicity, gender, and other characteristics that may lead to discriminatory patterns of care. However, there is no consensus on whether implicit bias represents a true predictor of differential care given an absence of real-world studies. We conducted the first real-world pilot study of provider implicit bias by evaluating treatment parity in prostate cancer using unstructured data-the most common way providers document granular details of the patient encounter.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Patients ≥18 years with a diagnosis of very-low to favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer followed by 3 urologic oncologists from 2010 through 2021. The race Implicit Association Test was administered to all providers. Natural language processing screened human annotation using validated regex ontologies evaluated each provider's care on four prostate cancer quality indicators: (1) active surveillance utilization; (2) molecular biomarker discussion; (3) urinary function evaluation; and (4) sexual function evaluation. The chi-squared test and phi coefficient were utilized to respectively measure the statistical significance and the strength of association between race and four quality indicators. 1,094 patients were included. While Providers A and B demonstrated no preference on the race Implicit Association Test, Provider C showed preference for White patients. Provider C recommended active surveillance (p<0.01, φ = 0.175) and considered biomarkers (p = 0.047, φ = 0.127) more often in White men than expected, suggestive of treatment imparity. Provider A considered biomarkers (p<0.01, φ = 0.179) more often in White men than expected. Provider B demonstrated treatment parity in all evaluated quality indicators (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, providers' practice patterns were associated with both patient race and implicit racial preferences in prostate cancer. Alerting providers of existing implicit bias may restore parity, however future assessments are needed to validate this concept.

"They Did Not Know How to Talk to Us and It Seems That They Didn't Care:" Narratives from Bereaved Family Members of Black Veterans

Racial disparities in the quality of health care services, including end of life (EOL) care, are well-documented. While several explanations for these inequities have been proposed, few studies have examined the underlying mechanisms. This paper presents the results of the qualitative phase of a concurrent mixed-methods study (QUANT + QUAL) that sought to identify explanations for observed racial differences in quality of EOL care ratings using the Department of Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). The objective of the qualitative phase of the study was to understand the specific experiences that contributed to an unfavorable overall EOL quality rating on the BFS among family members of Black Veterans. We used inductive thematic analysis to code BFS open-ended items associated with 165 Black Veterans whose family member rated the overall quality of care received by the Veteran in the last month of life as "poor" or "fair." Four major themes emerged from the BFS narratives, including (1) Positive Aspects of Care, (2) Unmet Care Needs, (3) Lack of Empathy, Dignity, and Respect, and (4) Poor Communication. Additionally, some family members offered recommendations for care improvements. Our discussion includes integrated results from both our qualitative and previously reported quantitative findings that may serve as a foundation for future evidence-based interventions to improve the equitable delivery of high-quality EOL care.

Provider Perceptions of Outcomes in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

In the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU), predicting the complications and long-term impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is influenced by the providers' perceptions. Little is understood about such perceptions as they relate to provider role and experience. A multi-disciplinary group in the PCICU of a single center was surveyed regarding two patient scenarios: (1) ECMO after cardiac surgery, and (2) cardiac arrest with need for CPR. Respondents indicated their risk tolerance for potential complications of these interventions, and the impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Responses were compared based on providers' role and experience. 101 providers were surveyed and were willing to tolerate a 50% risk of death with ECMO or continued CPR but had less tolerance for the risk of other long-term morbidities. For most potential complications, nurses had the lowest risk tolerance and attending physicians the highest. Provider experience had no impact on risk tolerance. All providers underestimated HRQoL scores compared to previously published scores of patients who survived the surveyed scenarios. This survey is one of the first to explore providers' perceptions of ECMO and CPR. PCICU providers are more willing to accept the risk of death than other morbid complications, and poorly predict HRQoL outcomes. Team members have varied risk tolerance for complications and predict their impact differently. Understanding the variability of and influences on perceptions of patient outcomes could help improve communication with patients and families, team dynamics, and decision-making in the PCICU.

Addressing Underscreening for Cervical Cancer among South Asian Women: Using Concept Mapping to Compare Service Provider and Service User Perspectives of Cervical Screening in Ontario, Canada

Cervical cancer is largely preventable through screening and treatment of cervical lesions. In the province of Ontario, South Asian women have some of the lowest rates of screening. The roles of service providers-those in healthcare and community services-and their interactions with screen-eligible people can greatly impact the uptake of screening. In our study, we used concept mapping (CM) to engage over 70 South Asian service users (i.e., those eligible for cervical screening) and service providers to identify a range of ideas and experiences that impact uptake of cervical screening for South Asian women, which were then rated by 45 participants in terms of 'importance' and 'ease to address' to encourage participation in cervical screening. Overall, ideas related to knowledge and education were rated as most important and easiest to address by both groups. Some differences were seen with South Asian service users valuing the importance of addressing 'cultural beliefs and influences specific to sexual health' more than service providers, while service providers valued the importance of addressing 'lack of comfort and supportive relationships' more than South Asian service users. Future interventions should target the knowledge and education needs of service users and increase service providers' awareness of cultural beliefs and influences specific to sexual health.

Protocol for the SELECT study: a sequential mixed methods study of the selection of UK medical students into clinical academic training

BACKGROUND

Internationally, there has been a move towards fostering diverse healthcare workforces that are representative of the patient populations they serve. Selection criteria for academic-clinicians often aim to capture skills and attributes that demonstrate both clinical and academic excellence. Currently, it is not known whether the selection criteria for early academic-clinical careers advantage or disadvantage certain ethnic or socioeconomic groups. The UK has a structured route of integrated clinical academic training with entry level training for newly qualified doctors administered through the 'Specialised Foundation Programme' which provides protected time for research within the first two years of postgraduate clinical training. In this study, we aim to identify what selection criteria are used within the UK Specialised Foundation Programme, and how these relate to demographic factors.

METHODS

We will perform a mixed methods study consisting of a document analysis of person specifications and selection criteria used in the 2024 UK Specialised Foundation Programme, and a national cross-sectional survey of current medical students in the UK. We will obtain the person specifications, selection criteria, white space (open ended questions used during shortlisting) and interview questions and mark schemes from each Specialised Unit of Applications via information available on their websites or through Freedom of Information requests. Our survey will collect information relating to demographic data, selection criteria, and perceptions of specialised foundation programme selection.

DISCUSSION

International literature has demonstrated inequity in academic markers used in selection of post-graduate clinicians and that disadvantages caused by selection can compound over time. As such it is important to understand what inequity exists within the selection of early academic-clinicians, as this can help inform more equitable selection practices and help nurture a more diverse academic-clinical workforce.

Race and Ethnicity and Clinician Linguistic Expressions of Doubt in Hospital Admission Notes

Importance

Stigmatizing language in electronic health records (EHRs) can generate or reinforce negative stereotypes about patients from minoritized groups and erode their trust and experience. However, less is known about the use of such language to cast doubt on patient clinical history in hospital settings.

Objective

To compare the prevalence of language expressing doubt about patient clinical history (eg, experiences and symptoms) in hospital admission notes by patient race and ethnicity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, natural language processing tools were applied to analyze 54 936 admission notes from 1249 clinicians about patients aged 18 years or older at admission and hospitalized at an academic health system in the Northeast US between January 1, 2018, and February 28, 2023. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, to July 31, 2023.

Exposure

Patient race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and racial and ethnic minoritized groups excluding non-Hispanic Black [includes multiple racial and ethnic groups, such as Hispanic and Asian]) as recorded in the EHR based on self-report or registrar determination.

Main Outcome and Measure

Binary indicator for at least 1 term casting doubt on patient clinical history was defined using epistemic stance, a linguistic construct expressing a writer's degree of certainty in information. Terms were manually validated via iterative review of notes by the study team.

Results

Among 56 325 admission notes (mean [SD] age of patients, 55.9 [19.0] years; 30 913 notes among female patients [54.9%]; 25 649 notes among non-Hispanic Black patients [45.5%], 26 442 notes among non-Hispanic White patients [46.9%], and 2985 notes among members of racial and ethnic minoritized groups excluding non-Hispanic Black patients [5.3%]), we analyzed 54 936 admission notes that had no missing data. Among all analyzed admission notes, 39 023 notes (71.0%) contained doubt language. Notes written about non-Hispanic Black patients had increased odds of containing at least 1 word or phrase of doubt (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.28; P < .001) compared with notes among non-Hispanic White patients. Compared with notes among non-Hispanic White patients, notes written about members of racial and ethnic minoritized groups excluding non-Hispanic Black patients had similar odds of containing at least 1 term of doubt.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this study, language casting doubt on patient clinical history was more likely to be found in notes of non-Hispanic Black patients. These results suggest that with the implementation of policies allowing patients full access to their health records, examining clinical documentation standards may be associated with improved patient experience.

Shifting paradigms: A collective and structural strategy for addressing healthcare inequity

Healthcare inequity is a persistent systemic problem, yet many solutions have historically focused on "debiasing" individuals. Individualistic strategies fit within a competency-based medical education and assessment paradigm, whereby professional values of social accountability, patient safety, and healthcare equity are linked to an individual clinician's competence. Unfortunately, efforts to realise the conceptual linkages between medical education curricula and goals to improve healthcare equity fail to address the institutional values, policies, and practices that enable structural racism. In this article, we explore alternative approaches that target collective and structural causes of health inequity. We first describe the structural basis of healthcare inequity by identifying the ways in which institutional culture, power and privilege erode patient-centred care and contribute to epistemic injustice. We then outline some reasons that stereotypes, which are a culturally supported foundation for discrimination, bias and racism in healthcare, cannot be modified effectively through individualistic strategies or education curricula. Finally, we propose a model that centres shared values for leadership by individuals and institutions with consistency in goal setting, knowledge translation, and talent development. Figure 1 summarises the key recommendations. We have provided cases to supplement this work and facilitate discussion about the model's application to practice.

The Role of Interactional Processes in Mental Health Disparities: A Narrative Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Providers

Mental health disparities between racial/ethnic minority groups and non-Latinx Whites in the United States persist despite significant efforts aimed at decreasing these disparities. Efforts to address mental health disparities have largely focused on individual (e.g., stigma, help-seeking, health behaviors) and structural (e.g., public policy, interventions, addressing poverty) level factors. In contrast, this paper considers how processes at the interactional level (i.e., interactions between patients and providers) are also an important contributor to racial/ethnic disparities in mental health. Specifically, social psychological research has demonstrated how biases, including stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination, can affect patient-provider interactions and contribute to mental health disparities. This narrative review of empirical studies that examine interactional processes between patients and mental health providers identified eleven studies to be included. Concepts represented in the studies are summarized and additional frameworks that can help explain how disparities are maintained are proposed. Last of all, practical suggestions for mitigating provider bias during patient-provider interactions are provided based on the findings from the narrative review.

The nature and validity of implicit bias training for health care providers and trainees: A systematic review

The number of health care educational institutions/organizations adopting implicit bias training is growing. Our systematic review of 77 studies (published 1 January 2003 through 21 September 2022) investigated how implicit bias training in health care is designed/delivered and whether gaps in knowledge translation compromised the reliability and validity of the training. The primary training target was race/ethnicity (49.3%); trainings commonly lack specificity on addressing implicit prejudice or stereotyping (67.5%). They involved a combination of hands-on and didactic approaches, lasting an average of 343.15 min, often delivered in a single day (53.2%). Trainings also exhibit translational gaps, diverging from current literature (10 to 67.5%), and lack internal (99.9%), face (93.5%), and external (100%) validity. Implicit bias trainings in health care are characterized by bias in methodological quality and translational gaps, potentially compromising their impacts.

"Let Us Take Care of the Medicine": A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Communication When Caring for Febrile Infants

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for the management of febrile infants emphasize patient-centered communication. Although patient-centeredness is central to high-quality health care, biases may impact physicians' patient-centeredness. We aimed to 1) identify physicians' assumptions that inform their communication with parents of febrile infants and 2) examine physicians' perceptions of bias.

METHODS

We recruited physicians from 3 academic pediatric emergency departments (EDs) for semistructured interviews. We applied a constant comparative method approach to conduct a thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Two coders followed several analytical steps: 1) discovery of concepts and code assignment, 2) identification of themes by grouping concepts, 3) axial coding to identify thematic properties, and 4) identifying exemplar excerpts for rich description. Thematic saturation was based on repetition, recurrence, and forcefulness.

RESULTS

Fourteen physicians participated. Participants described making assumptions regarding 3 areas: 1) the parent's affect, 2) the parent's social capacity, and 3) the physician's own role in the parent-physician interaction. Thematic properties highlighted the importance of the physician's assumptions in guiding communication and decision-making. Participants acknowledged an awareness of bias and specifically noted that language bias influenced the assumptions that informed their communication.

CONCLUSIONS

ED physicians described subjective assumptions about parents that informed their approach to communication when caring for febrile infants. Given the emphasis on patient-centered communication in febrile infant guidelines, future efforts are necessary to understand how assumptions are influenced by biases, the effect of such behaviors on health inequities, and how to combat this.

Learning to teach at a norm-critical clinical learning centre: A Phenomenographic study

BACKGROUND

Campus-based clinical learning centres are used for practice and learning in nursing students' education and can be arenas in which to enhance students' awareness and competence in social justice issues. Norm-critical approaches can be used as pedagogical tools in these centres to prepare students for hands-on caring situations in which social norms can bias the outcome.

OBJECTIVES

To describe nursing teachers' conceptions of learning norm-critical approaches and implementing them in a clinical training centre.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study is based on interviews with 10 teachers at a Swedish university college.

METHODS

The data was analysed using a phenomenographic approach.

RESULTS

Five categories of description emerged in the analysis that described conceptions related to norm-critical approaches. These categories were: personally developing and meaningful; easily integrated with established nursing concepts; highlighting surrounding power; something to lean on when letting students take the first steps in norm-critical initiatives; and helping implementation in teaching and education.

CONCLUSIONS

Teachers who are facing the task of providing norm-critical, practical education to nursing students in campus-based clinical learning environments are ambivalent towards the core principles of norm criticism, which they conceive as natural and provoking, at the same time. We therefore need to un-dramatise norm criticism and better prepare teachers in how to use it. Teachers would benefit from follow-up activities and formal collaborations regarding norm-critical teaching, so that they are given context to discuss, reflect, and learn from each other.

Provider Implicit Racial Bias in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study is to (1) assess implicit racial bias among pediatric providers and (2) use virtual patient (VP) vignettes to determine the impact of implicit racial bias on clinical decision-making in pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD) pain care.

DESIGN/METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a mid-sized, freestanding children's hospital in the northeast. Participants (N = 52) were pediatric SCD providers (87% cisgender female, 90% White, M age = 38.78). Providers completed a demographic questionnaire, the race Implicit Association Test (IAT) with adult and child faces, and a measure of SCD explicit bias (5-point Likert scale). Providers also made clinical decisions for four VP vignettes depicting Black and White youth in the emergency department (ED) with either SCD or cancer pain. Frequency tables were calculated.

RESULTS

On the race IAT, providers demonstrated a pro-White implicit bias for both adult (81%) and child (89%) faces. Responses to the explicit bias measure reflected low levels of agreement with negative stereotypes about SCD patients. No significant differences emerged in providers' pain treatment decisions for Black vs. White, or SCD vs. cancer VPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate pediatric providers harbor implicit racial bias similar to the general population. Findings from VP vignettes did not demonstrate that pain treatment decision-making differed based on race or diagnosis. This may be due to standardized protocols and procedures in the pediatric emergency setting. Future research is needed to clarify the role of implicit bias in clinical decision-making and the potential efficacy of treatment protocols in preventing biases from interfering with pediatric SCD pain care.

Racial Differences in Stigmatizing and Positive Language in Emergency Medicine Notes

OBJECTIVE

Language used by providers in medical documentation may reveal evidence of race-related implicit bias. We aimed to use natural language processing (NLP) to examine if prevalence of stigmatizing language in emergency medicine (EM) encounter notes differs across patient race/ethnicity.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort of EM encounters, NLP techniques identified stigmatizing and positive themes. Logistic regression models analyzed the association of race/ethnicity and themes within notes. Outcomes were the presence (or absence) of 7 different themes: 5 stigmatizing (difficult, non-compliant, skepticism, substance abuse/seeking, and financial difficulty) and 2 positive (compliment and compliant).

RESULTS

The sample included notes from 26,363 unique patients. NH Black patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.88), skepticism (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.96), and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) compared to NH White patient notes but more likely to contain non-compliant (OR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.17-1.36) and financial difficulty (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.04-1.25). Hispanic patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.58-0.80) and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.66-0.93). NH NA/AI patient notes had twice the odds as NH White patient notes to contain a stigmatizing theme (OR 2.02, 95% CI, 1.64-2.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Using an NLP model to analyze themes in EM notes across racial groups, we identified several inequities in the usage of positive and stigmatizing language. Interventions to minimize race-related implicit bias should be undertaken.

Critical Self-reflection on Racism by Hospital Physicians in Large German Cities. A Qualitative Reconstructive Study Using Episodic Interviews

Racism permeates healthcare institutions and interpersonal interactions, impacting both staff and patients. The role of doctors, given their influential position in the healthcare system, is particularly crucial in this context. Despite this, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding the manifestation of racism among healthcare professionals in Germany. Critical whiteness studies emphasize the importance of white* individuals engaging in critical self-reflection to mitigate racism. This study aimed to explore the attitudes of white* physicians in hospitals in major German cities towards racism and their critical reflection on personal attitudes and actions concerning racism in interactions with staff members and patients. Data was collected through six episodic interviews with physicians, analyzed using the reconstructive qualitative procedure of the documentary method, leading to a sense-genetic typology. The sense-genetic typology revealed three distinct attitudes towards racism: acknowledging, individualistic, and ignoring. Four types emerged concerning the self-reflection of white doctors: self-critical, socially critical, worried, and defensive. The most promising potential for interventions to reduce racism lies within the self-critical and socially critical types, both demonstrating an acknowledging attitude. Conversely, the worrying and defensive types may present challenges in deconstruction. This suggests that interventions aimed at reducing racism should be tailored and implemented with a nuanced approach.

Acceptability of Racial Microaggressions From the Perspective of Speech-Language Pathology Students

PURPOSE

Implicit racial and ethnic biases have been documented across a variety of allied health professions; however, minimal research on this topic has been conducted within the field of speech-language pathology. The purpose of this study was to understand implicit racial and ethnic bias in speech-language pathology students by examining their perceptions and attitudes about the acceptability of racial and ethnic microaggressions. We also examined whether the student ratings varied by their racial and ethnic identity (White vs. people of color [POC]).

METHOD

Fifty-nine students (72% White, 28% POC) currently enrolled in a speech-language pathology program voluntarily completed the Acceptability of Racial Microaggressions Scale via an online Qualtrics survey.

RESULTS

Although 70% of the student ratings classified the microaggressive statements as unacceptable, 30% of their ratings classified the statements as either (a) acceptable or (b) neither acceptable nor unacceptable. Although both groups of students rated the majority of statements as unacceptable, students who self-identified as White rated more statements as acceptable than students who self-identified as POC.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicating relatively high rejection of microaggressive statements by speech-language pathology students are promising. However, responses were not uniform, and a nontrivial proportion of responses provided by speech-language pathology students reflected passivity toward or active endorsement of microaggressive statements.

'You don't see what I see': Co-designing simulation to uncover and address cognitive bias in healthcare

EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGE

Each year, adverse events are reported in healthcare, of which many relate to healthcare workforce cognitive bias. The active involvement of workforce and consumers in the review and co-design of effective training for the healthcare workforce to recognise, monitor, and manage unconscious bias is required.

PROPOSED SOLUTION

We used participatory action research to co-design an innovative, interprofessional simulation based on 'real world' clinical incidents and lived experiences to improve the delivery of safe, high quality, consumer-focused healthcare. Following ethics approval, content analysis of serious adverse patient safety events involving cognitive bias was conducted. These data informed audio-recorded interviews with the healthcare workforce and consumers to explore their experiences of cognitive bias. Following thematic analysis, key themes of communication, stigma, diagnostic overshadowing, and fragmented systems were uncovered. Guided by consumers, these themes were interwoven into a simulation scenario that included real places, stories, and verbatim quotes delivered through mixed media artefacts. This heightened the immersive and experiential learning that aimed to uncover unconscious bias and help learners recognise its impact on clinical decisions and practice.

POTENTIAL BENEFITS AND NEXT STEPS

To our knowledge, this is the first interprofessional, co-designed simulation to specifically address cognitive bias in current and future healthcare workforce. Plans to translate this research into a practical framework on how to work with key stakeholders (including consumers) to identify 'real-world' health service risks and co-design targeted simulations to address these gaps are described, including lessons learned.

Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians

Introduction

Clinician implicit racial bias (IB) may lead to lower quality care and adverse health outcomes for Black patients. Educational efforts to train clinicians to mitigate IB vary widely and have insufficient evidence of impact. We developed and pilot-tested an evidence-based clinician IB curriculum, "REACHing Equity."

Methods

To assess acceptability and feasibility, we conducted an uncontrolled one-arm pilot trial with post-intervention assessments. REACHing Equity is designed for clinicians to: (1) acquire knowledge about IB and its impact on healthcare, (2) increase awareness of one's own capacity for IB, and (3) develop skills to mitigate IB in the clinical encounter. We delivered REACHing Equity virtually in three facilitated, interactive sessions over 7-9 weeks. Participants were health care providers who completed baseline and end-of-study evaluation surveys.

Results

Of approximately 1,592 clinicians invited, 37 participated, of whom 29 self-identified as women and 24 as non-Hispanic White. Attendance averaged 90% per session; 78% attended all 3 sessions. Response rate for evaluation surveys was 67%. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum objectives were met, and that REACHing Equity equipped them to mitigate the impact of implicit bias in clinical care. Participants consistently reported higher self-efficacy for mitigating IB after compared to before completing the curriculum.

Conclusions

Despite apparent barriers to clinician participation, we demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the REACHing Equity intervention. Further research is needed to develop objective measures of uptake and clinician skill, test the impact of REACHing Equity on clinically relevant outcomes, and refine the curriculum for uptake and dissemination.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03415308.

Inherent Bias in Large Language Models: A Random Sampling Analysis

There are mounting concerns regarding inherent bias, safety, and tendency toward misinformation of large language models (LLMs), which could have significant implications in health care. This study sought to determine whether generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based simulations of physicians making life-and-death decisions in a resource-scarce environment would demonstrate bias. Thirteen questions were developed that simulated physicians treating patients in resource-limited environments. Through a random sampling of simulated physicians using OpenAI's generative pretrained transformer (GPT-4), physicians were tasked with choosing only 1 patient to save owing to limited resources. This simulation was repeated 1000 times per question, representing 1000 unique physicians and patients each. Patients and physicians spanned a variety of demographic characteristics. All patients had similar a priori likelihood of surviving the acute illness. Overall, simulated physicians consistently demonstrated racial, gender, age, political affiliation, and sexual orientation bias in clinical decision-making. Across all demographic characteristics, physicians most frequently favored patients with similar demographic characteristics as themselves, with most pairwise comparisons showing statistical significance (P<.05). Nondescript physicians favored White, male, and young demographic characteristics. The male doctor gravitated toward the male, White, and young, whereas the female doctor typically preferred female, young, and White patients. In addition to saving patients with their own political affiliation, Democratic physicians favored Black and female patients, whereas Republicans preferred White and male demographic characteristics. Heterosexual and gay/lesbian physicians frequently saved patients of similar sexual orientation. Overall, publicly available chatbot LLMs demonstrate significant biases, which may negatively impact patient outcomes if used to support clinical care decisions without appropriate precautions.

De-Biased Disentanglement Learning for Pulmonary Embolism Survival Prediction on Multimodal Data

Health disparities among marginalized populations with lower socioeconomic status significantly impact the fairness and effectiveness of healthcare delivery. The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare presents an opportunity to address these inequalities, provided that AI models are free from bias. This paper aims to address the bias challenges by population disparities within healthcare systems, existing in the presentation of and development of algorithms, leading to inequitable medical implementation for conditions such as pulmonary embolism (PE) prognosis. In this study, we explore the diverse bias in healthcare systems, which highlights the demand for a holistic framework to reducing bias by complementary aggregation. By leveraging de-biasing deep survival prediction models, we propose a framework that disentangles identifiable information from images, text reports, and clinical variables to mitigate potential biases within multimodal datasets. Our study offers several advantages over traditional clinical-based survival prediction methods, including richer survival-related characteristics and bias-complementary predicted results. By improving the robustness of survival analysis through this framework, we aim to benefit patients, clinicians, and researchers by enhancing fairness and accuracy in healthcare AI systems.

Examining Linguistic Differences in Electronic Health Records for Diverse Patients With Diabetes: Natural Language Processing Analysis

Background

Individuals from minoritized racial and ethnic backgrounds experience pernicious and pervasive health disparities that have emerged, in part, from clinician bias.

Objective

We used a natural language processing approach to examine whether linguistic markers in electronic health record (EHR) notes differ based on the race and ethnicity of the patient. To validate this methodological approach, we also assessed the extent to which clinicians perceive linguistic markers to be indicative of bias.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we extracted EHR notes for patients who were aged 18 years or older; had more than 5 years of diabetes diagnosis codes; and received care between 2006 and 2014 from family physicians, general internists, or endocrinologists practicing in an urban, academic network of clinics. The race and ethnicity of patients were defined as White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, or Hispanic or Latino. We hypothesized that Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE) components (ie, negative adjectives, positive adjectives, joy words, fear and disgust words, politics words, respect words, trust verbs, and well-being words) and mean word count would be indicators of bias if racial differences emerged. We performed linear mixed effects analyses to examine the relationship between the outcomes of interest (the SEANCE components and word count) and patient race and ethnicity, controlling for patient age. To validate this approach, we asked clinicians to indicate the extent to which they thought variation in the use of SEANCE language domains for different racial and ethnic groups was reflective of bias in EHR notes.

Results

We examined EHR notes (n=12,905) of Black non-Hispanic, White non-Hispanic, and Hispanic or Latino patients (n=1562), who were seen by 281 physicians. A total of 27 clinicians participated in the validation study. In terms of bias, participants rated negative adjectives as 8.63 (SD 2.06), fear and disgust words as 8.11 (SD 2.15), and positive adjectives as 7.93 (SD 2.46) on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being extremely indicative of bias. Notes for Black non-Hispanic patients contained significantly more negative adjectives (coefficient 0.07, SE 0.02) and significantly more fear and disgust words (coefficient 0.007, SE 0.002) than those for White non-Hispanic patients. The notes for Hispanic or Latino patients included significantly fewer positive adjectives (coefficient -0.02, SE 0.007), trust verbs (coefficient -0.009, SE 0.004), and joy words (coefficient -0.03, SE 0.01) than those for White non-Hispanic patients.

Conclusions

This approach may enable physicians and researchers to identify and mitigate bias in medical interactions, with the goal of reducing health disparities stemming from bias.

Racism against healthcare users in inpatient care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Racism in the healthcare system has become a burgeoning focus in health policy-making and research. Existing research has shown both interpersonal and structural forms of racism limiting access to quality healthcare for racialised healthcare users. Nevertheless, little is known about the specifics of racism in the inpatient sector, specifically hospitals and rehabilitation facilities. The aim of this scoping review is therefore to map the evidence on racial discrimination experienced by people receiving treatment in inpatient settings (hospitals and rehabilitation facilities) or their caregivers in high-income countries, focusing specifically on whether intersectional axes of discrimination have been taken into account when describing these experiences.

METHODS

Based on the conceptual framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, this scoping review surveyed existing research on racism and racial discrimination in inpatient care in high-income countries published between 2013 and 2023. The software Rayyan was used to support the screening process while MAXQDA was used for thematic coding.

RESULTS

Forty-seven articles were included in this review. Specifics of the inpatient sector included different hospitalisation, admission and referral rates within and across hospitals; the threat of racial discrimination from other healthcare users; and the spatial segregation of healthcare users according to ethnic, religious or racialised criteria. While most articles described some interactions between race and other social categories in the sample composition, the framework of intersectionality was rarely considered explicitly during analysis.

DISCUSSION

While the USA continue to predominate in discussions, other high-income countries including Canada, Australia and the UK also examine racism in their own healthcare systems. Absent from the literature are studies from a wider range of European countries as well as of racialised and disadvantaged groups other than refugees or recent immigrants. Research in this area would also benefit from an engagement with approaches to intersectionality in public health to produce a more nuanced understanding of the interactions of racism with other axes of discrimination. As inpatient care exhibits a range of specific structures, future research and policy-making ought to consider these specifics to develop targeted interventions, including training for non-clinical staff and robust, transparent and accessible complaint procedures.

Relationships among race, ethnicity, and gender and whole health among U.S. veterans

Racial, ethnic, and gender health care disparities in the United States are well-documented and stretch across the lifespan. Even in large integrated health care systems such as Veteran Health Administration, which are designed to provide equality in care, social and economic disparities persist, and limit patients' achievement of health goals across multiple domains. We explore Veterans' Whole Health priorities among Veteran demographic groups. Participants who were enrolling in Veteran Health Administration provided demographics and Whole Health priorities using eScreening, a web-based self-assessment tool. Veterans had similar health care goals regardless of demographic characteristics but differences were noted in current health appraisals. Non-White and women Veterans reported worse health-relevant functioning. Black Veterans were more likely to endorse a low rating for their personal development/relationships. Multiracial Veterans were more likely to endorse a low rating of their surroundings. Asian Veterans were less likely to provide a high rating of their surroundings. Women Veterans reported lower appraisals for body and personal development but higher appraisals of professional care. Results indicated that demographic factors such as race and gender, and to a lesser extent ethnicity, were associated with health disparities. The Whole Health model provides a holistic framework for addressing these disparities. These findings may inform more culturally sensitive care and enhance Veteran Health Administration equal access initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Differences in testing for drugs of abuse amongst racial and ethnic groups at children's hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Racial and ethnic differences in drug testing have been described among adults and newborns. Less is known regarding testing patterns among children and adolescents. We sought to describe the association between race and ethnicity and drug testing at US children's hospitals. We hypothesized that non-Hispanic White children undergo drug testing less often than children from other groups.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of emergency department (ED)-only encounters and hospitalizations for children diagnosed with a condition for which drug testing may be indicated (abuse or neglect, burns, malnutrition, head injury, vomiting, altered mental status or syncope, psychiatric, self-harm, and seizure) at 41 children's hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System during 2018 and 2021. We compared drug testing rates among (non-Hispanic) Asian, (non-Hispanic) Black, Hispanic, and (non-Hispanic) White children overall, by condition and patient cohort (ED-only vs. hospitalized) and across hospitals.

RESULTS

Among 920,755 encounters, 13.6% underwent drug testing. Black children were tested at significantly higher rates overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.18; 1.05-1.33) than White children. Black-White testing differences were observed in the hospitalized cohort (aOR: 1.42; 1.18-1.69) but not among ED-only encounters (aOR: 1.07; 0.92-1.26). Asian, Hispanic, and White children underwent testing at similar rates. Testing varied by diagnosis and across hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized Black children were more likely than White children to undergo drug testing at US children's hospitals, though this varied by diagnosis and hospital. Our results support efforts to better understand and address healthcare disparities, including the contributions of implicit bias and structural racism.

Designing Communication Feedback Systems To Reduce Healthcare Providers' Implicit Biases In Patient Encounters

Healthcare providers' implicit bias, based on patients' physical characteristics and perceived identities, negatively impacts healthcare access, care quality, and outcomes. Feedback tools are needed to help providers identify and learn from their biases. To incorporate providers' perspectives on the most effective ways to present such feedback, we conducted semi-structured design critique sessions with 24 primary care providers. We found that providers seek feedback designed with transparent metrics indicating the quality of their communication with a patient and trends in communication patterns across visits. Based on these metrics and trends, providers want this feedback presented in a dashboard paired with actionable, personalized tips about how to improve their communication behaviors. Our study provides new insights for interactive systems to help mitigate the impact of implicit biases in patient-provider communication. New systems that build upon these insights could support providers in making healthcare more equitable, particularly for patients from marginalized communities.

Piloting racial bias training for hospital emergency department providers treating patients with opioid use disorder

Racial disparities in opioid overdose have increased in recent years. Several studies have linked these disparities to health care providers' inequitable delivery of opioid use disorder (OUD) services. In response, health care policymakers and systems have designed new programs to improve equitable OUD care delivery. Racial bias training has been 1 commonly utilized program. Racial bias training educates providers about the existence of racial disparities in the treatment of people who use drugs and the role of implicit bias. Our study evaluates a pilot racial bias training delivered to 25 hospital emergency providers treating patients with OUDs in 2 hospitals in Detroit, Michigan. We conducted a 3-part survey, including a baseline assessment, post-training assessment, and a 2-month follow-up to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of scaling the racial bias training to larger audiences. We also investigate preliminary data on changes in self-awareness of implicit bias, knowledge of training content, and equity in care delivery to patients with OUD. Using qualitative survey response data, we found that training participants were satisfied with the content and quality of the training and especially valued the small-group discussions, motivational interviewing, and historical context.

Intergroup Contact Improves Medical Student Attitudes and Skill in Transgender Health Care

Purpose

Poorer health outcomes for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals have been associated with lack of health care provider knowledge and personal bias. Training at all levels of medical education has been positioned as one strategy to combat these inequities. This study sought to characterize preclinical medical student attitude, skill, and knowledge pre- and post-teaching with TGD community volunteers.

Methods

This matched pre- and post-test study was conducted from July 2020 to August 2021 capturing two preclinical medical student cohorts exposed to the same teaching intervention. Students completed the Transgender Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (TABS) and the Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (T-DOCSS) at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month after the clinical skills session. Tutors' attitudes to TGD health were measured before facilitating teaching, using the Attitudes Toward Transgender Patients and Beliefs and Knowledge about Treating Transgender Patients scales.

Results

Fifty-nine students completed questionnaires at three time points and were included in this study. Total TABS and T-DOCCS scores increased from preintervention to 1-week follow-up, maintained at 1 month, with significant changes in Interpersonal Comfort and Sex and Gender Beliefs subscales. Scores on the Human Value subscale did not change, remaining consistently high. Postintervention knowledge-question scores were high. Nine of 13 tutors completed surveys, demonstrating overall positive attitudes toward gender diversity and TGD health.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates improvement in preclinical medical student attitudes and self-reported skill toward gender health care sustained at 1 month after small-group teaching with TGD community volunteers.

Professional stigma towards clients with methamphetamine use disorder - a qualitative study

Background

Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is associated with poor health outcomes. Pharmacists play a role in delivery of substance use treatment, with several studies having examined their attitudes to people with opioid use disorder, but little is known about their attitude towards people with MUD. This study aimed to explore pharmacists' perspectives on the provision of services to clients with MUD.

Methods

A convenience sampling strategy was used to recruit community pharmacists across Sydney, Australia. Semi structured interviews examined views and ideas of pharmacists surrounding the treatment and management of MUD, followed by coding of transcribed interview data by all members of the research team.

Results

Nineteen pharmacists completed the interviews. The main theme identified was stigma held by healthcare professionals. The almost unanimous perception amongst pharmacists was fear and apprehension towards people with MUD, including underlying assumptions of criminality, misinformation regarding people with MUD, and lack of education and knowledge surrounding MUD.

Conclusion

A substantial amount of stigma towards people with MUD was found in this study. Negative attitudes by healthcare professionals can perpetuate healthcare disparities and impede the accessibility of future treatment programs for people with MUD. Appropriate educational interventions on MUD for pharmacists are needed.

Racial Implicit Bias and Communication Among Physicians in a Simulated Environment

Importance

Racial implicit bias can contribute to health disparities through its negative influence on physician communication with Black patients. Interventions for physicians to address racial implicit bias in their clinical encounters are limited by a lack of high-fidelity (realistic) simulations to provide opportunities for skill development and practice.

Objective

To describe the development and initial evaluation of a high-fidelity simulation of conditions under which physicians might be influenced by implicit racial bias.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study, performed on an online platform from March 1 to September 30, 2022, recruited a convenience sample of physician volunteers to pilot an educational simulation.

Exposures

In the simulation exercise, physicians saw a 52-year-old male standardized patient (SP) (presenting as Black or White) seeking urgent care for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The case included cognitive stressors common to clinical environments, including clinical ambiguity, stress, time constraints, and interruptions. Physicians explained their diagnosis and treatment plan to the SP, wrote an assessment and management plan, completed surveys, and took the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT) and Race Medical Cooperativeness IAT. The SPs, blinded to the purpose of the study, assessed each physician's communication using skills checklists and global rating scales.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Association between physicians' IAT scores and SP race with SP ratings of communication skills.

Results

In 60 physicians (23 [38.3%] Asian, 4 [6.7%] Black, 23 [38.3%] White, and 10 [16.7%] other, including Latina/o/x, Middle Eastern, and multiracial; 31 [51.7%] female, 27 [45.0%] male, and 2 [3.3%] other), the interaction of physicians' Race IAT score and SP race was significant for overall communication (mean [SD] β = -1.29 [0.41]), all subdomains of communication (mean [SD] β = -1.17 [0.52] to -1.43 [0.59]), and overall global ratings (mean [SD] β = -1.09 [0.39]). Black SPs rated physicians lower on communication skills for a given pro-White Race IAT score than White SPs; White SP ratings increased as physicians' pro-White bias increased.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, a high-fidelity simulation calibrated with cognitive stressors common to clinical environments elicited the expected influence of racial implicit bias on physicians' communication skills. The outlined process and preliminary results can inform the development and evaluation of interventions that seek to address racial implicit bias in clinical encounters and improve physician communication with Black patients.

Sensitization Lectures for Reducing Weight Bias in Undergraduate Medical Students

INTRODUCTION

Discrimination exists in one form or another in every society, usually against those who are weaker, in fewer numbers, or different from the rest. Most physicians are empathetic towards their patients but can either not keep an eye on their subordinates or lack the power to act against such employees. Persons experiencing discrimination in healthcare centers may try to avoid or postpone future visits, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment of ailments. Obesity bias present in society has crept into healthcare centers and intimidates persons with obesity who are seeking medical aid. Implicit and explicit obesity bias has been recorded in healthcare students.

METHODS

Data from 102 undergraduate medical students (23 female) who completed this study was analyzed. Implicit bias (tested online using the Implicit Association Test) and explicit bias (measured using four types of tool kits) were measured before and after conducting an obesity sensitization program (OSP) comprising four lectures on the causes and consequences of obesity and obesity discrimination and its consequences.

RESULTS

The change in implicit bias was not significant. However, a significant reduction was noted in the four different types of tools for explicit bias after conducting the OSP.

CONCLUSION

OSP helped medical students identify obesity bias and reduce explicit bias. Sensitization lectures conducted in medical colleges and schools can help reduce such discrimination in healthcare centers.

Health Care Students' Perceptions of Bias During Their Clinical Training and Insights on Mitigating It

PURPOSE

To understand health care students' perception of implicit bias and examine their insights to create a bias-free training environment.

METHODS

Clinical phase students from one university's 4 health care programs participated in this study. Students were surveyed regarding their knowledge of implicit bias and perception of their experiences in the clinical learning environment.

RESULTS

The response rate was 50.9%, N = 161. In total, 52.6% reported having prior training on implicit bias, and 55% self-reported that they had personally observed preceptors who exhibited an implicit bias toward patients based on race, ethnicity, or other qualities. There was no statistically significant relationship between those with prior training on implicit bias and being able to identify implicit bias exhibited by preceptors. Participants also expressed their unwillingness to report an incident unless it is confidential due to fear of retribution.

CONCLUSION

This study found that health care students from one university's 4 health care programs perceived implicit bias in their clinical learning environment, which they believe could be improved by taking intentional steps. Some suggestions provided were "Safe space to report and openly discuss bias," "Education/training on implicit bias," "Time for self-reflection," and "Hiring process that evaluates/trains against implicit bias." The implication of our study is to create a bias-free training environment that will help interrupt the propagation of biases contributing to health disparity. Further research should examine a national population and identify interventional methods and outcomes in multiple health care disciplines.

Training Student Pharmacists in Microaggressions and Gender Inclusive Communication

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to describe the implementation of a microaggression and gender inclusive communication (MGIC) module in a required course in a Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum; and to evaluate the impact on student pharmacist knowledge, comfort, and confidence using gender inclusive communication and addressing microaggressions.

METHODS

Students participated in MGIC module, which included training on microaggressions, and terminology related to gender. The module implementation was evaluated through a pre and post training knowledge assessment and survey of student confidence, comfort, and perceived importance of gender inclusive care. Additional evaluation included qualitative review of the graphics depicting the terminology and rephrasing statement with a microaggression to inclusive language. Survey responses were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and knowledge responses were analyzed using the Fisher exact test in SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 106 students completed the module, 105 completed presurvey and knowledge assessment, and 92 completed the postsurvey and knowledge assessment. Results demonstrated a statistically significant increase from pre to post on the comfort and importance domain questions. A statistically significant increase in the student confidence was seen on all questions except for 2. The pre and postknowledge assessment results on all questions showed improvement from pre to post, although not all changes were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The MGIC module was effective in increasing to evaluate the impact on student pharmacist knowledge, comfort, and confidence using gender inclusive communication and addressing microaggressions. Reflections echoed the value and need for this training.