Time-dependency of test-retest reliability and measurement error of center-of-pressure synchronization and symmetry during quiet standing within specific frequencies in early sub-acute stroke

BACKGROUND

People with unilateral sensorimotor impairments after a stroke exhibit poor between-limb synchronization and asymmetries in balance control by relying on their less-affected side to maintain stability during standing. Therefore, there is a growing consensus to include center-of-pressure metrics as between-limb synchronization and dynamic control asymmetry when investigating balance improvements poststroke. However, the test-retest reliability of these metrics remains under-investigated, hindering uptake of these assessments in future stroke rehabilitation and recovery studies.

RESEARCH QUESTION

First, are three immediate test-repetitions necessary for obtaining reliable synchronization and asymmetry scores in individuals with sub-acute stroke, or can fewer repetitions suffice? Second, does timing of assessments at 3-, 5-, 8-, and 12-weeks poststroke affect these estimates' test-retest reliability and measurement error?

METHODS

Thirty stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe motor impairments were tested at 3-, 5-, 8-, and 12-weeks poststroke. At each timepoint, they completed three 40-second quiet standing trials on a dual force plate which measured center-of-pressure signals separately on each side. We calculated between-limb synchronization (i.e., cross-correlation) and dynamic control asymmetry (i.e., symmetry index) using the original center-of-pressure signal, and after decomposition into high and low (cut-off 0.4 Hz) frequency bands. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess test-retest reliability and measurement error. A cut-off was used to determine acceptable reliability (ICC>0.75).

RESULTS

Between-limb synchronization and dynamic control asymmetry showed good-to-excellent reliability (ICCs=0.80-0.97) across three repetitions at all timepoints. Reducing to two repetitions yielded acceptable reliability (ICC=0.77-0.95) for dynamic control asymmetry and high-frequency measures, yet insufficient reliability for between-limb synchronization. At the 3-weeks timepoint, ICCs were generally lower, with more error, compared to later timepoints.

CONCLUSION

Novel performance metrics quantifying synchronization and asymmetry of balance control can be reliably obtained during the early sub-acute phase if three test-repetitions are administered per assessment.

Can motion capture improve task-based fMRI studies of motor function post-stroke? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Variability in motor recovery after stroke represents a major challenge in its understanding and management. While functional MRI has been used to unravel interactions between stroke motor function and clinical outcome, fMRI alone cannot clarify any relation between brain activation and movement characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify fMRI and kinematic coupling approaches and to evaluate their potential contribution to the understanding of motor function post-stroke.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on studies using fMRI and kinematics in post-stroke individuals. We assessed the internal, external, statistical, and technological validity of each study. Data extraction included study design and analysis procedures used to couple brain activity with movement characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 404 studies found, 23 were included in the final review. The overall study quality was moderate (0.6/1). Thirteen studies used kinematic information either parallel to the fMRI results, or as a real-time input to external devices, for instance to provide feedback to the patient. Ten studies performed a statistical analysis between movement and brain activity by either using kinematics as variables during group or individual level regression or correlation. This permitted establishing links between movement characteristics and brain activity, unraveling cortico-kinematic relationships. For instance, increased activity in the ipsilesional Premotor Cortex was related to less smooth movements, whereas trunk compensation was expressed by increased activity in the contralesional Primary Motor Cortex.

CONCLUSION

Our review suggests that the coupling of fMRI and kinematics may provide valuable insight into cortico-kinematic relationships. The optimization and standardization of both data measurement and treatment procedures may help the field to move forward and to fully use the potential of multimodal cortico-kinematic integration to unravel the complexity of post-stroke motor function and recovery.

A quantitative assessment of the hand kinematic features estimated by the oculus Quest 2

In the past decade, immersive virtual reality (VR) has garnered significant interest due to its capacity to ability a strong sense of presence and allow users to act in virtual environments. In particular, VR has been increasingly used in clinical settings to present scenarios for motor rehabilitation purposes. Existing research efforts mostly focus on investigating the clinical effectiveness of different routines. However, modern VR systems, in addition to presenting scenarios, also have hand motion tracking capabilities that could be potentially used to gather clinically relevant kinematic data from the patients while they execute the VR tasks. Here, we quantitatively assess the capability of tracking hand movements of a popular VR system, the Oculus Quest 2 by Meta, by comparing its kinematic measures with those provided by a commercial marker-based motion capture system. Our findings suggest that the Quest 2 provides reasonably reliable estimates of hand position and velocity. Estimates of acceleration are noisier and might be sometime unsuitable for kinematic assessments. Notably, the accuracy of the kinematic estimates varies across spatial directions. Estimates along the left/right direction are the most accurate, followed by estimates along the up/down axis. Estimates along the near/far axis appear to be the noisiest. Furthermore, we also found that Quest 2 can provide fine-grained measures of grip aperture, but the precision of these measures might be affected by the subject's head movements while wearing the system. Our results suggest that modern VR devices, in addition to presenting immersive scenarios, could be potentially used in rehabilitation settings also to provide clinically relevant kinematic measures that can potentially inform medical decisions.

Relationships Between Cognitive Impairments and Motor Learning After Stroke: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Stroke is one of the leading causes of chronic disability worldwide. Sensorimotor recovery relies on principles of motor learning for the improvement of movement and sensorimotor function after stroke. Motor learning engages several cognitive processes to effectively learn and retain new motor skills. However, cognitive impairments are common and often coexist with motor impairments after stroke. The specific relationships between poststroke cognitive impairments and motor learning have not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the existing evidence related to cognitive impairments and motor learning after stroke. Specific goals were to determine: (1) how motor learning is studied in individuals with poststroke cognitive impairments; (2) how cognitive impairments are assessed; (3) which cognitive domains impact motor learning.

RESULTS

Over 400 studies were screened for specific inclusion criteria and 19 studies that related poststroke cognitive impairments to motor learning were included. Studies used a wide variety of experimental designs, sample sizes, and measures for cognitive evaluation. Cognitive impairments impacting motor improvement and learning capacity after stroke were reported in all but 4 studies. The most common domains impacting motor learning were attention, executive function, and memory.

CONCLUSION

Detailed cognitive assessments, retention testing, and a combination of clinical and kinematic outcomes are recommended for future studies. The presence of specific cognitive impairments measured with sensitive instruments should be considered when designing effective training interventions for patients with stroke to maximize sensorimotor recovery.

The Use of Extrinsic Performance Feedback and Reward to Enhance Upper Limb Motor Behavior and Recovery Post-Stroke: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

During post-stroke motor rehabilitation, patients often receive feedback from therapists or via rehabilitation technologies. Research suggests that feedback may benefit motor performance, skill acquisition, and action selection. However, there is no consensus on how extrinsic feedback should be implemented during stroke rehabilitation to best leverage specific neurobehavioral mechanisms to optimize recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the existing evidence and research gaps regarding the effects of extrinsic feedback on upper extremity motor function in stroke survivors, and to map the evidence onto neurobehavioral concepts of motor performance, motor learning, and action selection.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, PsychInfo, EMBASE, and CINHAL databases were searched for relevant articles. A sequential screening process and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers, and the results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were identified that met the criteria for inclusion. Beneficial effects of feedback were reported for clinical outcomes of rehabilitation interventions as well as motor performance, motor learning, and action selection post-stroke. Three studies showed that the addition of rewarding elements to positive performance feedback benefited learning or recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Extrinsic feedback has the potential to improve outcomes of stroke rehabilitation through effects on motor performance, motor learning, or action selection. To understand how these specific neurobehavioral processes contribute to recovery, clinical trials should include more granular behavioral measures. Rewarding feedback may be particularly beneficial, but more research is needed regarding the specific implementation of feedback.

Clinical validation of an individualized auto-adaptative serious game for combined cognitive and upper limb motor robotic rehabilitation after stroke

BACKGROUND

Intensive rehabilitation through challenging and individualized tasks are recommended to enhance upper limb recovery after stroke. Robot-assisted therapy (RAT) and serious games could be used to enhance functional recovery by providing simultaneous motor and cognitive rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to clinically validate the dynamic difficulty adjustment (DDA) mechanism of ROBiGAME, a robot serious game designed for simultaneous rehabilitation of motor impairments and hemispatial neglect.

METHODS

A proof of concept, with 24 participants in subacute and chronic stroke, was conducted using a 5-day protocol (two days were dedicated to assessment and three days to consecutive training sessions). Participants performed three consecutive ROBiGAME sessions during which overall task difficulty was determined through simultaneous DDA of motor and attentional parameters. Relationships between clinical and robotic assessment scores with respective task-difficulty parameters were analyzed using a multivariate regression model and a principal component analysis.

RESULTS

Game difficulty rapidly (within approximately thirty minutes) auto-adapted to match individual impairment levels. The relationship between task-difficulty parameters with motor (Fugl Meyer Assessment: r = 0.84 p < 0.05) and with attentional impairments (Bells test total omissions: r = 0.617 p < 0.05) showed that task-difficulty during RAT adapted to each participant's degree of impairment. Principal component analysis identified two data subsets determining overall task-difficulty, one subset for motor and the other for cognitive functional evaluation scores with respective task-difficulty parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This proof of concept clinically validated a DDA mechanism and showed how task-difficulty adequately adapted to match individual degrees of impairment during RAT after stroke. ROBiGAME provided simultaneous motor and attentional exercises with parameters determining task-difficulty strongly related with respective clinical and robotic evaluation scores. Individualized levels of game difficulty and rapid adjustment of the system suggest implementation in clinical practice. Registry number This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02543424).

Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Post-Stroke Spastic Paralysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research from 2000 to 2024

Objective

This study aims to explore the research landscape, hot topics, and future trends of non-pharmacological therapies for post-stroke spastic paralysis globally from 2000 to 2024 through a bibliometric analysis.

Methods

We conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection database to analyze literature related to non-pharmacological therapies for post-stroke spastic paralysis published between 2000 and 2024. Tools including CiteSpace, VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, Scimago, and R language were used to identify and analyze countries, institutions, journals, references, keywords, as well as the most commonly used therapies and acupuncture points. The results were presented in the form of knowledge maps.

Results

The bibliometric analysis identified a total of 297 publications. Over the study period, the number of publications showed an overall upward trend. China had the highest number of publications. The journal *Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation* published the most articles. The most frequently occurring keywords were "stroke", "reliability", and "muscle spasticity." The most commonly used therapy was "acupuncture.".

Conclusion

From 2000 to 2024, non-pharmacological therapies have shown positive effects in improving post-stroke spastic paralysis; however, more rigorously designed large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm their long-term efficacy and mechanisms. Moving forward, international and domestic research institutions should strengthen collaboration to produce more impactful research and further explore individualized, precision rehabilitation treatment plans.

Effectiveness of Game-Based Training of Selective Voluntary Motor Control in Children With Upper Motor Neuron Lesions: Randomized Multiple Baseline Design Study

BACKGROUND

Selective voluntary motor control (SVMC) is the ability to control joint movements independently. Impairments in SVMC can affect functional activities, but only a few interventions directly target SVMC. Therefore, we developed a game-based intervention for children with upper motor neuron lesions to improve SVMC. The intervention trained selective activation of a muscle or joint movement while providing immediate feedback about involuntarily occurring muscle activations or movements in another joint. The intervention was provided in a playful manner with a custom-made game environment and a technology-based interface to capture muscle activation or joint movements.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this game-based intervention and explore treatment response-related factors in children with impaired SVMC undergoing inpatient neurorehabilitation.

METHODS

We conducted a single-case research study with a randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple baseline design. The study consisted of a random-length baseline phase where no SVMC-specific intervention was provided and an intervention phase with additional SVMC training. Concurrently in both phases, children attended their individual multimodal rehabilitation program at our clinic, Swiss Children's Rehab. During the intervention phase, participants completed ten 45-minute sessions with our game-based SVMC training. SVMC was measured repeatedly throughout both phases and at the 3-month follow-up with a short custom-made assessment.

RESULTS

Eighteen children with reduced SVMC from upper motor neuron lesions participated in the study. The mean age of the children was 12.7 (SD 2.9) years, and they mostly had spastic cerebral palsy. A linear mixed-effects model revealed a significant trend (P<.001) for improved SVMC already in the baseline phase. This trend did not change significantly (P=.15) when the game-based SVMC training was introduced in the intervention phase, suggesting no additional improvements due to the SVMC training. Although we could not find an overall treatment effect, we could explain 89.4% of the total random variation of the treatment effect by patient and therapy characteristics. Children with spasticity in the trained movement (20.1%), and those who trained the more affected side (23.5%) benefited most from the intervention. At the 3-month follow-up, SVMC had deteriorated compared to the end of the intervention but was still better than at the beginning of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The regular concomitant rehabilitation program already yielded improvements in SVMC, while the game-based SVMC training showed no additional effects. Although the intervention did not show a group effect, we could identify patient and therapy characteristics that determine who is likely to profit from the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025184; https://tinyurl.com/msnkek9b.

A Statistical Approach for Functional Reach-to-Grasp Segmentation Using a Single Inertial Measurement Unit

The aim of this contribution is to present a segmentation method for the identification of voluntary movements from inertial data acquired through a single inertial measurement unit placed on the subject's wrist. Inertial data were recorded from 25 healthy subjects while performing 75 consecutive reach-to-grasp movements. The approach herein presented, called DynAMoS, is based on an adaptive thresholding step on the angular velocity norm, followed by a statistics-based post-processing on the movement duration distribution. Post-processing aims at reducing the number of erroneous transitions in the movement segmentation. We assessed the segmentation quality of this method using a stereophotogrammetric system as the gold standard. Two popular methods already presented in the literature were compared to DynAMoS in terms of the number of movements identified, onset and offset mean absolute errors, and movement duration. Moreover, we analyzed the sub-phase durations of the drinking movement to further characterize the task. The results show that the proposed method performs significantly better than the two state-of-the-art approaches (i.e., percentage of erroneous movements = 3%; onset and offset mean absolute error < 0.08 s), suggesting that DynAMoS could make more effective home monitoring applications for assessing the motion improvements of patients following domicile rehabilitation protocols.

Computer vision for kinematic metrics of the drinking task in a pilot study of neurotypical participants

Assessment of the upper limb is critical to guiding the rehabilitation cycle. Drawbacks of observation-based assessment include subjectivity and coarse resolution of ordinal scales. Kinematic assessment gives rise to objective quantitative metrics, but uptake is encumbered by costly and impractical setups. Our objective was to investigate feasibility and accuracy of computer vision (CV) for acquiring kinematic metrics of the drinking task, which are recommended in stroke rehabilitation research. We implemented CV for upper limb kinematic assessment using modest cameras and an open-source machine learning solution. To explore feasibility, 10 neurotypical participants were recruited for repeated kinematic measures during the drinking task. To investigate accuracy, a simultaneous marker-based motion capture system was used, and error was quantified for the following kinematic metrics: Number of Movement Units (NMU), Trunk Displacement (TD), and Movement Time (MT). Across all participant trials, kinematic metrics of the drinking task were successfully acquired using CV. Compared to marker-based motion capture, no significant difference was observed for group mean values of kinematic metrics. Mean error for NMU, TD, and MT were - 0.12 units, 3.4 mm, and 0.15 s, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no bias. Kinematic metrics of the drinking task can be measured using CV, and preliminary findings support accuracy. Further study in neurodivergent populations is needed to determine validity of CV for kinematic assessment of the post-stroke upper limb.

Wearable-Based Kinematic Analysis of Upper-Limb Movements During Daily Activities Could Provide Insights into Stroke Survivors' Motor Ability

BACKGROUND

Frequent and objective monitoring of motor recovery progression holds significant importance in stroke rehabilitation. Despite extensive studies on wearable solutions in this context, the focus has been predominantly on evaluating limb activity. This study aims to address this limitation by delving into a novel measure of wrist kinematics more intricately related to patients' motor capacity.

OBJECTIVE

To explore a new wearable-based approach for objectively and reliably assessing upper-limb motor ability in stroke survivors using a single inertial sensor placed on the stroke-affected wrist.

METHODS

Seventeen stroke survivors performed a series of daily activities within a simulated home setting while wearing a six-axis inertial measurement unit on the wrist affected by stroke. Inertial data during point-to-point upper-limb movements were decomposed into movement segments, from which various kinematic variables were derived. A data-driven approach was then employed to identify a kinematic variable demonstrating robust internal reliability, construct validity, and convergent validity.

RESULTS

We have identified a key kinematic variable, namely the 90th percentile of movement segment distance during point-to-point movements. This variable exhibited robust reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient of .93) and strong correlations with established clinical measures of motor capacity (Pearson's correlation coefficients of .81 with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper-Extremity; .77 with the Functional Ability component of the Wolf Motor Function Test; and -.68 with the Performance Time component of the Wolf Motor Function Test).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the potential for continuous, objective, and convenient monitoring of stroke survivors' motor progression throughout rehabilitation.

Influence of virtual reality and task complexity on digital health metrics assessing upper limb function

BACKGROUND

Technology-based assessments using 2D virtual reality (VR) environments and goal-directed instrumented tasks can deliver digital health metrics describing upper limb sensorimotor function that are expected to provide sensitive endpoints for clinical studies. Open questions remain about the influence of the VR environment and task complexity on such metrics and their clinimetric properties.

METHODS

We aim to investigate the influence of VR and task complexity on the clinimetric properties of digital health metrics describing upper limb function. We relied on the Virtual Peg Insertion Test (VPIT), a haptic VR-based assessment with a virtual manipulation task. To evaluate the influence of VR and task complexity, we designed two novel tasks derived from the VPIT, the VPIT-2H (VR environment with reduced task complexity) and the PPIT (physical task with reduced task complexity). These were administered in an observational longitudinal study with 27 able-bodied participants and 31 participants with multiple sclerosis (pwMS, VPIT and PPIT only) and the value of kinematic and kinetic metrics, their clinimetric properties, and the usability of the assessment tasks were compared.

RESULTS

Intra-participant variability strongly increased with increasing task complexity (coefficient of variation + 56%) and was higher in the VR compared to the physical environment (+ 27%). Surprisingly, this did not translate into significant differences in the metrics' measurement error and test-retest reliability across task conditions (p > 0.05). Responsiveness to longitudinal changes in pwMS was even significantly higher (effect size + 0.35, p < 0.05) for the VR task with high task complexity compared to the physical instrumented task with low task complexity. Increased inter-participant variability might have compensated for the increased intra-participant variability to maintain good clinimetric properties. No significant influence of task condition on concurrent validity was present in pwMS. Lastly, pwMS rated the PPIT with higher usability than the VPIT (System Usability Scale + 7.5, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The metrics of both the VR haptic- and physical task-based instrumented assessments showed adequate clinimetric properties. The VR haptic-based assessment may be superior when longitudinally assessing pwMS due to its increased responsiveness. The physical instrumented task may be advantageous for regular clinical use due to its higher usability. These findings highlight that both assessments should be further validated for their ideal use-cases.

The Use of Head-Mounted Display Systems for Upper Limb Kinematic Analysis in Post-Stroke Patients: A Perspective Review on Benefits, Challenges and Other Solutions

In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the clinical adoption of instrumental upper limb kinematic assessment. This trend aligns with the rising prevalence of cerebrovascular impairments, one of the most prevalent neurological disorders. Indeed, there is a growing need for more objective outcomes to facilitate tailored rehabilitation interventions following stroke. Emerging technologies, like head-mounted virtual reality (HMD-VR) platforms, have responded to this demand by integrating diverse tracking methodologies. Specifically, HMD-VR technology enables the comprehensive tracking of body posture, encompassing hand position and gesture, facilitated either through specific tracker placements or via integrated cameras coupled with sophisticated computer graphics algorithms embedded within the helmet. This review aims to present the state-of-the-art applications of HMD-VR platforms for kinematic analysis of the upper limb in post-stroke patients, comparing them with conventional tracking systems. Additionally, we address the potential benefits and challenges associated with these platforms. These systems might represent a promising avenue for safe, cost-effective, and portable objective motor assessment within the field of neurorehabilitation, although other systems, including robots, should be taken into consideration.

Upper limb movement quality measures: comparing IMUs and optical motion capture in stroke patients performing a drinking task

Introduction

Clinical assessment of upper limb sensorimotor function post-stroke is often constrained by low sensitivity and limited information on movement quality. To address this gap, recent studies proposed a standardized instrumented drinking task, as a representative daily activity combining different components of functional arm use. Although kinematic movement quality measures for this task are well-established, and optical motion capture (OMC) has proven effective in their measurement, its clinical application remains limited. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) emerge as a promising low-cost and user-friendly alternative, yet their validity and clinical relevance compared to the gold standard OMC need investigation.

Method

In this study, we conducted a measurement system comparison between IMUs and OMC, analyzing 15 established movement quality measures in 15 mild and moderate stroke patients performing the drinking task, using five IMUs placed on each wrist, upper arm, and trunk.

Results

Our findings revealed strong agreement between the systems, with 12 out of 15 measures demonstrating clinical applicability, evidenced by Limits of Agreement (LoA) below the Minimum Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for each measure.

Discussion

These results are promising, suggesting the clinical applicability of IMUs in quantifying movement quality for mildly and moderately impaired stroke patients performing the drinking task.

Extended reality to assess post-stroke manual dexterity: contrasts between the classic box and block test, immersive virtual reality with controllers, with hand-tracking, and mixed-reality tests

BACKGROUND

Recent technological advancements present promising opportunities to enhance the frequency and objectivity of functional assessments, aligning with recent stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Within this framework, we designed and adapted different manual dexterity tests in extended reality (XR), using immersive virtual reality (VR) with controllers (BBT-VR-C), immersive VR with hand-tracking (BBT-VR-HT), and mixed-reality (MD-MR).

OBJECTIVE

This study primarily aimed to assess and compare the validity of the BBT-VR-C, BBT-VR-HT and MD-MR to assess post-stroke manual dexterity. Secondary objectives were to evaluate reliability, usability and to define arm kinematics measures.

METHODS

A sample of 21 healthy control participants (HCP) and 21 stroke individuals with hemiparesis (IHP) completed three trials of the traditional BBT, the BBT-VR-C, BBT-VR-HT and MD-MR. Content validity of the different tests were evaluated by asking five healthcare professionals to rate the difficulty of performing each test in comparison to the traditional BBT. Convergent validity was evaluated through correlations between the scores of the traditional BBT and the XR tests. Test-retest reliability was assessed through correlations between the second and third trial and usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Lastly, upper limb movement smoothness (SPARC) was compared between IHP and HCP for both BBT-VR test versions.

RESULTS

For content validity, healthcare professionals rated the BBT-VR-HT (0[0-1]) and BBT-MR (0[0-1]) as equally difficult to the traditional BBT, whereas they rated BBT-VR-C as more difficult than the traditional BBT (1[0-2]). For IHP convergent validity, the Pearson tests demonstrated larger correlations between the scores of BBT and BBT-VR-HT (r = 0.94;p < 0.001), and BBT and MD-MR (r = 0.95;p < 0.001) than BBT and BBT-VR-C (r = 0.65;p = 0.001). BBT-VR-HT and MD-MR usability were both rated as excellent, with median SUS scores of 83[57.5-91.3] and 83[53.8-92.5] respectively. Excellent reliability was found for the BBT-VR-C (ICC = 0.96;p < 0.001), BBT-VR-HT (ICC = 0.96;p < 0.001) and BBT-MR (ICC = 0.99;p < 0.001). The usability of the BBT-VR-C was rated as good with a median SUS of 70[43.8-83.8]. Upper limb movements of HCP were significantly smoother than for IHP when completing either the BBT-VR-C (t = 2.05;p = 0.043) and the BBT-VR-HT (t = 5.21;p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The different XR manual tests are valid, short-term reliable and usable tools to assess post-stroke manual dexterity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04694833 ; Unique identifier: NCT04694833, Date of registration: 11/24/2020.

A translational roadmap for transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this Third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR3) was to develop consensus recommendations to address outstanding barriers for the translation of preclinical and clinical research using the non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and provide a roadmap for the integration of these techniques into clinical practice.

METHODS

International NIBS and stroke recovery experts (N = 18) contributed to the consensus process. Using a nominal group technique, recommendations were reached via a five-stage process, involving a thematic survey, two priority ranking surveys, a literature review and an in-person meeting.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Results of our consensus process yielded five key evidence-based and feasibility barriers for the translation of preclinical and clinical NIBS research, which were formulated into five core consensus recommendations. Recommendations highlight an urgent need for (1) increased understanding of NIBS mechanisms, (2) improved methodological rigor in both preclinical and clinical NIBS studies, (3) standardization of outcome measures, (4) increased clinical relevance in preclinical animal models, and (5) greater optimization and individualization of NIBS protocols. To facilitate the implementation of these recommendations, the expert panel developed a new SRRR3 Unified NIBS Research Checklist. These recommendations represent a translational pathway for the use of NIBS in stroke rehabilitation research and practice.

Error Enhancement for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in the Chronic Phase after Stroke: A 5-Day Pre-Post Intervention Study

A large proportion of chronic stroke survivors still struggle with upper limb (UL) problems in daily activities, typically reaching tasks. During three-dimensional reaching movements, the deXtreme robot offers error enhancement forces. Error enhancement aims to improve the quality of movement. We investigated clinical and patient-reported outcomes and assessed the quality of movement before and after a 5 h error enhancement training with the deXtreme robot. This pilot study had a pre-post intervention design, recruiting 22 patients (mean age: 57 years, mean days post-stroke: 1571, male/female: 12/10) in the chronic phase post-stroke with UL motor impairments. Patients received 1 h robot treatment for five days and were assessed at baseline and after training, collecting (1) clinical, (2) patient-reported, and (3) kinematic (KINARM, BKIN Technologies Ltd., Kingston, ON, Canada) outcome measures. Our analysis revealed significant improvements (median improvement (Q1-Q3)) in (1) UL Fugl-Meyer assessment (1.0 (0.8-3.0), p < 0.001) and action research arm test (2.0 (0.8-2.0), p < 0.001); (2) motor activity log, amount of use (0.1 (0.0-0.3), p < 0.001) and quality of use (0.1 (0.1-0.5), p < 0.001) subscale; (3) KINARM-evaluated position sense (-0.45 (-0.81-0.09), p = 0.030) after training. These findings provide insight into clinical self-reported and kinematic improvements in UL functioning after five hours of error enhancement UL training.

A translational roadmap for transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this Third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR3) was to develop consensus recommendations to address outstanding barriers for the translation of preclinical and clinical research using the non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and provide a roadmap for the integration of these techniques into clinical practice.

METHODS

International NIBS and stroke recovery experts (N = 18) contributed to the consensus process. Using a nominal group technique, recommendations were reached via a five-stage process, involving a thematic survey, two priority ranking surveys, a literature review and an in-person meeting.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Results of our consensus process yielded five key evidence-based and feasibility barriers for the translation of preclinical and clinical NIBS research, which were formulated into five core consensus recommendations. Recommendations highlight an urgent need for (1) increased understanding of NIBS mechanisms, (2) improved methodological rigor in both preclinical and clinical NIBS studies, (3) standardization of outcome measures, (4) increased clinical relevance in preclinical animal models, and (5) greater optimization and individualization of NIBS protocols. To facilitate the implementation of these recommendations, the expert panel developed a new SRRR3 Unified NIBS Research Checklist. These recommendations represent a translational pathway for the use of NIBS in stroke rehabilitation research and practice.

Mild Stroke, Serious Problems: Limitations in Balance and Gait Capacity and the Impact on Fall Rate, and Physical Activity

BACKGROUND

After mild stroke persistent balance limitations may occur, creating a risk factor for fear of falling, falls, and reduced activity levels. Objective. To investigate whether individuals in the chronic phase after mild stroke show balance and gait limitations, elevated fall risk, reduced balance confidence, and physical activity levels compared to healthy controls.

METHODS

An observational case-control study was performed. Main outcomes included the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BEST), Timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-m Walking Test (10-MWT), and 6-item version Activity-specific Balance Confidence (6-ABC) scale which were measured in 1 session. Objectively measured daily physical activity was measured for 7 consecutive days. Fall rate in daily life was recorded for 12 months. Individuals after a mild stroke were considered eligible when they: (1) sustained a transient ischemic attack or stroke longer than 6 months ago, resulting in motor and/or sensory loss in the contralesional leg at the time of stroke, (2) showed (near-) complete motor function, that is, ≥24 points on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (range: 0-28).

RESULTS

Forty-seven healthy controls and 70 participants after mild stroke were included. Participants with stroke fell more than twice as often as healthy controls, had a 2 point lower median score on the mini-BEST, were 1.7 second slower on TUG, 0.6 km/h slower on the 10-MWT, and had a 12% lower 6-ABC score. Intensity for both total activity (8%) as well as walking activity (6%) was lower in the participants with stroke, while no differences were found in terms of duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals in the chronic phase after a mild stroke demonstrate persistent balance limitations and have an increased fall risk. Our results point at an unmet clinical need in this population.

Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework

PURPOSE

To propose a consensus-based definition and framework for motor rehabilitation after stroke.

METHODS

An expert European working group reviewed the literature, attaining internal consensus after external feedback.

FINDINGS

Motor rehabilitation is defined as a process that engages people with stroke to benefit their motor function, activity capacity and performance in daily life. It is necessary for people with residual motor disability whose goal is to enhance their functioning, independence and participation. Motor rehabilitation operates through learning- and use-dependent mechanisms. The trajectory of motor recovery varies across patients and stages of recovery. Early behavioral restitution of motor function depends on spontaneous biological mechanisms. Further improvements in activities of daily living are achieved by compensations. Motor rehabilitation is guided by regular assessment of motor function and activity using consensus-based measures, including patient-reported outcomes. Results are discussed with the patient and their carers to set personal goals. During motor rehabilitation patients learn to optimize and adapt their motor, sensory and cognitive functioning through appropriately dosed repetitive, goal-oriented, progressive, task- and context-specific training. Motor rehabilitation supports people with stroke to maximize health, well-being and quality of life. The framework describes the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the context of stroke, describes neurobiological mechanisms of behavioral restitution and compensation, and summarizes recommendations for clinical assessment, prediction tools, and motor interventions with strong recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (2016-2022).

CONCLUSIONS

This definition and framework may guide clinical educators, inform clinicians on current recommendations and guidelines, and identify gaps in the evidence base.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With Motor Recovery in Patients With Nondisabling Stroke: GWAS Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite notable advances in genetic understanding of stroke recovery, most studies focus only on candidate genes. To date, only 2 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have focused on stroke outcomes, but they were limited to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS maps poorly to biological processes. Therefore, we performed a GWAS to discover single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with motor recovery poststroke.

METHODS

We used the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) data set of 2,100 genotyped participants with nondisabling stroke. We included only participants who had motor impairment at randomization. Participants with a recurrent stroke during the trial were excluded. Genotyped data underwent strict quality control and imputation. The GWAS used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to leverage the repeated NIH Stroke Scale motor score measurements spanning 6 time points over 24 months. The primary outcome was a decrease in the motor drift score of ≥1 vs <1 at each time point. Our model estimated the odds ratio (OR) of motor improvement for each SNP after adjusting for age, sex, race, days from stroke to visit, initial motor score, VISP treatment arm, and principal components.

RESULTS

A total of 488 (64%) participants with a mean (SD) age of 66 ± 11 years were included in the GWAS. Although no associations reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10-8), our analysis detected 115 suggestive associations (p < 5 × 10-6). Notably, we found multiple SNP clusters near genes with plausible neuronal repair biology mechanisms. The CLDN23 gene had the most convincing association with rs1268196-T as its most significant SNP (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.21-0.48; p value 6.19 × 10-7). CLDN23 affects blood-brain barrier integrity, neurodevelopment, and immune cell transmigration.

DISCUSSION

We identified novel suggestive genetic associations with the first-ever motor-specific poststroke recovery GWAS. The results seem to describe a distinct stroke recovery phenotype compared with prior genetic stroke outcome studies that use outcome measures, such as the mRS. Replication and further mechanistic investigation are warranted. In addition, this study demonstrated a proof-of-principle approach to optimize statistical efficiency with longitudinal data sets for genetic discovery.

Responsiveness of the Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to estimate the internal and external responsiveness of the Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke (RPSS) in individuals with stroke.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data from 4 randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Recruitment locations spanning rehabilitation centers and hospitals in Canada, Italy, Argentina, Peru, and Thailand.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from 567 participants (acute to chronic stroke; N=567) were available.

INTERVENTIONS

All 4 studies involved training using virtual reality for upper limb rehabilitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

RPSS and upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) scores. Responsiveness was quantified for all data and across different stages of stroke. Internal responsiveness of the RPSS was quantified as effect-sizes calculated using post and preintervention change data. External responsiveness was quantified using orthogonal regressions between FMA-UE and RPSS scores. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) was quantified based on the ability of RPSS scores to detect change above FMA-UE minimal clinically important different values across different stages of stroke.

RESULTS

The RPSS had high internal responsiveness overall and across the acute or subacute and chronic stages of stroke. For external responsiveness, orthogonal regression analyses indicated that change in FMA-UE scores had positive moderate correlations with both RPSS Close and Far Target scores for all data and across the acute or subacute and chronic stages of stroke (0.6

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to being reliable and valid, the RPSS is also responsive. Along with the FMA-UE, using RPSS scores can help present a more comprehensive picture of motor compensations to characterize poststroke upper limb motor improvement.

Collapse

Key Words

• Movement quality
• cerebrovascular accident
• compensation
• outcomes
• reaching
• restitution or true recovery
• upper limb

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Disability Evaluation
• Recovery of Function
• Retrospective Studies
• Stroke
• Stroke Rehabilitation
• Upper Extremity
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Sandeep K Subramanian Departments of Physical Therapy, Physician Assistant Studies and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
Gita Margolese School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, Canada
Andrea Turolla Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Laboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies, Hospital San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy
Gustavo Saposnik Stroke Outcomes and Decision Neuroscience Unit, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Mindy F Levin School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, Canada.

Collapse

Quantitative Comparison of Hand Kinematics Measured with a Markerless Commercial Head-Mounted Display and a Marker-Based Motion Capture System in Stroke Survivors

Upper-limb paresis is common after stroke. An important tool to assess motor recovery is to use marker-based motion capture systems to measure the kinematic characteristics of patients' movements in ecological scenarios. These systems are, however, very expensive and not readily available for many rehabilitation units. Here, we explored whether the markerless hand motion capabilities of the cost-effective Oculus Quest head-mounted display could be used to provide clinically meaningful measures. A total of 14 stroke patients executed ecologically relevant upper-limb tasks in an immersive virtual environment. During task execution, we recorded their hand movements simultaneously by means of the Oculus Quest's and a marker-based motion capture system. Our results showed that the markerless estimates of the hand position and peak velocity provided by the Oculus Quest were in very close agreement with those provided by a marker-based commercial system with their regression line having a slope close to 1 (maximum distance: mean slope = 0.94 ± 0.1; peak velocity: mean slope = 1.06 ± 0.12). Furthermore, the Oculus Quest had virtually the same sensitivity as that of a commercial system in distinguishing healthy from pathological kinematic measures. The Oculus Quest was as accurate as a commercial marker-based system in measuring clinically meaningful upper-limb kinematic parameters in stroke patients.

Synergy-based functional electrical stimulation and robotic-assisted for retraining reach-to-grasp in stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Stroke survivors have long-term upper limb impairment, which impacts the quality of life (QOL) and social reintegration, but there is lack of effective therapeutic strategies and novel technologies. Customized multi-muscle functional electrical stimulation (FES) based on the muscle synergy of healthy adults and robotic-assisted therapy (RAT) have been proved efficacy respectively. Synergy-based FES combined with RAT can be a novel and more effective therapy for upper limb recovery of stroke survivors from the perspective of synergistic enhancement. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of combined synergy-based FES and RAT, especially for motor control evaluated by reach-to-grasp (RTG) movements. The main objective of the following research protocol is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy, as well as adoptability, of FES-RAT and FES or RAT rehabilitation program for upper limb function improvement after stroke.

METHODS

This will be an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial involving a 12-week intervention and a 6-month follow-up. Stratified randomization will be used to equally and randomly assign 162 stroke patients into the FES + conventional rehabilitation program (CRP) group, RAT + CRP group and FES-RAT + CRP group. Interventions will be provided in 5 sessions per week, with a total of 60 sessions. The primary outcome measurements will include the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Biomechanical Assessment of RTG movements. The secondary outcome measurements will include quality of life and brain neuroplasticity assessments by MRI. Evaluations will be performed at five time points, including at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks from the start of treatment, and 3 months and 6 months following the end of treatment. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures will be applied to examine the main effects of the group, the time factor and group-time interaction effects.

DISCUSSION

The results of the study protocol will provide high quality evidence for integrated synergy-based FES and RAT, and synergy-based FES alone and guide the design of more effective treatment methods for stroke rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300071588.

Adaptive Neuroplasticity in Brain Injury Recovery: Strategies and Insights

This review addresses the relationship between neuroplasticity and recovery from brain damage. Neuroplasticity's ability to adapt becomes crucial since brain injuries frequently result in severe impairments. We begin by describing the fundamentals of neuroplasticity and how it relates to rehabilitation. Examining different forms of brain injuries and their neurological effects highlights the complex difficulties in rehabilitation. By revealing cellular processes, we shed light on synaptic adaptability following damage. Our study of synaptic plasticity digs into axonal sprouting, dendritic remodeling, and the balance of long-term potentiation. These processes depict neural resilience amid change. Then, after damage, we investigate immediate and slow neuroplastic alterations, separating reorganizations that are adaptive from those that are maladaptive. As we go on to rehabilitation, we evaluate techniques that use neuroplasticity's potential. These methods take advantage of the brain's plasticity for healing, from virtual reality and brain-computer interfaces to constraint-induced movement therapy. Ethics and individualized neurorehabilitation are explored. We scrutinize the promise of combination therapy and the difficulties in putting new knowledge into clinical practice. In conclusion, this analysis highlights neuroplasticity's critical role in brain injury recovery, providing sophisticated approaches to improve life after damage.

Spanish consensus of occupational therapists on upper limb assessment tools in stroke

Introduction

There is a lack of explicit tool recommendations for upper limb (UL) assessment in stroke, occupational therapists are frequently underrepresented in consensus studies, and the frequency of use of tools is highly variable between countries. The objective was to generate national occupational therapy consensus recommendations on UL assessment tools in stroke, and to classify the tools that achieve consensus according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) components.

Methods

Three-round e-Delphi study of national scope. Occupational therapists working in Spain with training and experience in neurorehabilitation were recruited. Rounds were based on the completion of questionnaires on UL stroke assessment tools. Consensus was reached when ⩾75% of experts gave a ⩾7 rating on a nine-point Likert scale.

Results

A total of 29 occupational therapists comprised the expert panel. Twenty-three (17.8%) assessment tools achieved consensus and were classified according to the ICF components of body functions and structures (7), activities (11), participation (3) and other (2).

Conclusion

The expert panel recommended 23 outcome measures for UL recovery in stroke, representing all ICF components. The consensus recommendations are intended to assist occupational therapists in their clinical decision-making process, and to reduce the heterogeneity of research tools.

Bimanual Movement Characteristics and Real-World Performance Following Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

The purpose of this study was to quantify characteristics of bimanual movement intensity during 30 h of hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) and bimanual performance (activities and participation) in real-world settings using accelerometers in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). Twenty-five children with UCP participated in a 30 h HABIT program. Data were collected from bilateral wrist-worn accelerometers during 30 h of HABIT to quantify the movement intensity and three days pre- and post-HABIT to assess real-world performance gains. Movement intensity and performance gains were measured using six standard accelerometer-derived variables. Bimanual capacity (body function and activities) was assessed using standardized hand function tests. We found that accelerometer variables increased significantly during HABIT, indicating increased bimanual symmetry and intensity. Post-HABIT, children demonstrated significant improvements in all accelerometer metrics, reflecting real-world performance gains. Children also achieved significant and clinically relevant changes in hand capacity following HABIT. Therefore, our findings suggest that accelerometers can objectively quantify bimanual movement intensity during HABIT. Moreover, HABIT enhances hand function as well as activities and participation in real-world situations in children with UCP.

Do kinematic measures, added to clinical measures, better predict upper extremity motor impairments at three months post-stroke?

OBJECTIVE

Predicting post-stroke recovery through prediction models is crucial for choosing appropriate treatment options. However, the existing models predominantly incorporate clinical measures although measurement of movement quality using kinematic measures is essential for distinguishing various types of recovery. Thus, this study aimed at determining if, by considering varied aspects of recovery, adding kinematic measurements over clinical measures would better predict upper extremity (UE) motor impairments at three months post-stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine stroke survivors (58.9 ± 11.8 years) were assessed for clinical predictors between 4 and 7 days, kinematic predictors within 1 month, and the impairment outcome of the Fugl Meyer Assessment of the UE (FM-UE) at three months post-stroke. Significant predictors (p<0.05) with a variation inflation factor (VIF) <10 were selected for model development. After performing further step-wise selection, three models incorporating clinical outcomes, kinematic measurements, and a combination of these two, respectively, were formulated.

RESULTS

The clinical model (R2 = 0.70) included shoulder abduction finger extension (SAFE) scores, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The kinematic model (R2 = 0.34) included total displacement, total time, and reaction time. The combined model (R2 = 0.72) comprised of SAFE score and shoulder flexion. All the models had a minimal mean squared error on cross validation, which indicated a good validity.

CONCLUSION

The performance of clinical and combined prediction models for predicting three-month post-stroke UE motor recovery was nearly similar. However, in order to detect minimal changes over time and to understand all aspects of motor recovery, there is a need to add instrument-based kinematic measures.

Perspectives of users for a future interactive wearable system for upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Wearable sensor technology can facilitate diagnostics and monitoring of people with upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of clinicians, people living with stroke, and their caregivers on an interactive wearable system that detects UE movements and provides feedback.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews relating to the perspectives of a future interactive wearable system including a wearable sensor to capture UE movement and a user interface to provide feedback as the means of data collection. Ten rehabilitation therapists, 9 people with stroke, and 2 caregivers participated in this study.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified (1) "Everyone is different" highlighted the need for addressing individual user's rehabilitation goal and personal preference; (2) "The wearable system should identify UE and trunk movements" emphasized that in addition to arm, hand, and finger movements, detecting compensatory trunk movements during UE movements is also of interest; (3) "Both quality and amount of movements are necessary to measure" described the parameters related to how well and how much the user is using their affected UE that participants envisioned the system to monitor; (4) "Functional activities should be practiced by the users" outlined UE movements and activities that are of priority in designing the system.

CONCLUSIONS

Narratives from clinicians, people with stroke, and their caregivers offer insight into the design of interactive wearable systems. Future studies examining the experience and acceptability of existing wearable systems from end-users are warranted to guide the adoption of this technology.

Measuring Arm and Hand Joint Kinematics to Estimate Impairment During a Functional Reach and Grasp Task after Stroke

BACKGROUND

Current approaches to characterizing deficits in upper limb movements after stroke typically focus either on changes in a functional measure, for example, how well a patient can complete a task, or changes in impairment, for example, isolated measurements of joint range of motion. However, there can be notable dissociations between static measures of impairment versus those of function.

OBJECTIVE

We develop a method to measure upper limb joint angles during performance of a functional task and use measurements to characterize joint impairment in the context of a functional task.

METHODS

We developed a sensorized glove that can precisely measure select finger, hand, and arm joints while participants complete a functional reach-to-grasp task involving manipulation of a sensorized object.

RESULTS

We first characterized the accuracy and precision of the glove's joint angle measurements. We then measured joint angles in neurologically intact participants (n = 4 participants, 8 limbs) to define the expected distribution of joint angle variation during task execution. These distributions were used to normalize finger, hand, and arm joint angles in stroke participants (n = 6) as they performed the task. We present a participant-specific visualization of functional joint angle variance which illustrated that stroke participants with nearly identical clinical scores exhibited unique patterns of joint angle variation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, measuring individual joint angles in the context of a functional task may inform whether changes in functional scores over recovery or rehabilitation are driven by changes in impairment or the development of compensatory strategies, and provide a quantified path toward personalized rehabilitative therapy.

Calibration of Impairment Severity to Enable Comparison across Somatosensory Domains

Comparison across somatosensory domains, important for clinical and scientific goals, requires prior calibration of impairment severity. Provided test score distributions are comparable across domains, valid comparisons of impairment can be made by reference to score locations in the corresponding distributions (percentile rank or standardized scores). However, this is often not the case. Test score distributions for tactile texture discrimination (n = 174), wrist joint proprioception (n = 112), and haptic object identification (n = 98) obtained from pooled samples of stroke survivors in rehabilitation settings were investigated. The distributions showed substantially different forms, undermining comparative calibration via percentile rank or standardized scores. An alternative approach is to establish comparable locations in the psychophysical score ranges spanning performance from just noticeably impaired to maximally impaired. Several simulation studies and a theoretical analysis were conducted to establish the score distributions expected from completely insensate responders for each domain. Estimates of extreme impairment values suggested by theory, simulation and observed samples were consistent. Using these estimates and previously discovered values for impairment thresholds in each test domain, comparable ranges of impairment from just noticeable to extreme impairment were found. These ranges enable the normalization of the three test scales for comparison in clinical and research settings.

Computer-assisted approaches for measuring, segmenting, and analyzing functional upper extremity movement: a narrative review of the current state, limitations, and future directions

The analysis of functional upper extremity (UE) movement kinematics has implications across domains such as rehabilitation and evaluating job-related skills. Using movement kinematics to quantify movement quality and skill is a promising area of research but is currently not being used widely due to issues associated with cost and the need for further methodological validation. Recent developments by computationally-oriented research communities have resulted in potentially useful methods for evaluating UE function that may make kinematic analyses easier to perform, generally more accessible, and provide more objective information about movement quality, the importance of which has been highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. This narrative review provides an interdisciplinary perspective on the current state of computer-assisted methods for analyzing UE kinematics with a specific focus on how to make kinematic analyses more accessible to domain experts. We find that a variety of methods exist to more easily measure and segment functional UE movement, with a subset of those methods being validated for specific applications. Future directions include developing more robust methods for measurement and segmentation, validating these methods in conjunction with proposed kinematic outcome measures, and studying how to integrate kinematic analyses into domain expert workflows in a way that improves outcomes.

The 2-min walk test could replace the 6-min walk test in ambulant persons with subacute or chronic stroke: a two-stage retrospective study

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used to assess walking capacity among persons with stroke. Whether a shorter and more convenient test, the 2-minute walk test (2MWT) could replace it, was tested. Two retrospective analyses were conducted. The first one was performed on a sample of 20 persons with stroke who performed both the 2MWT and the 6MWT, and the second one, on a group of 82 persons with stroke who performed the 6MWT while measuring the distance covered each minute. Linear regression models were applied to test the validity of 2MWT with regard to 6MWT. In the first group, distances covered during the 2MWT were highly predictive of the distances covered during the 6MWT (estimated adjusted R ² = 0.98; P  < 0.001). In the second group, distances covered by participants during the first 2 min of the 6MWT were highly and linearly related to the distances they covered during the whole 6MWT (estimated adjusted R ² = 0.98; P  < 0.001). Furthermore, the distance covered during the first 2 min of the whole 6MWT allowed us to predict 98% of the variance of the 6MWT. Given its good metric properties and its practical advantages, clinicians and researchers could reasonably use the 2MWT when assessing the walking capacity of persons with stroke, instead of the 6MWT.

Clinically Applicable Experimental Design and Considerations for Stroke Recovery Preclinical Studies

Development of stroke recovery therapies is an active field of research and represents an opportunity to reduce the global impact of stroke as the leading cause of acquired, long-term disability in adults. The negative outcomes of recent large-scale clinical trials have highlighted deficiencies in the translational process and endanger the trajectory of post-stroke recovery research. Because of this, a number of strategies have been recommended by experts to better navigate the translational pipeline. To assist the field in advancing to the next stage for successful clinical translation, the goal of this chapter is to discuss concepts relevant to the experimental design of in vivo preclinical pharmacological studies to make them clinically relevant and informative for future trials.

Opportunities for Improving Motor Assessment and Rehabilitation After Stroke by Leveraging Video-Based Pose Estimation

ABSTRACT

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability in adults in the United States. As the healthcare system moves further into an era of digital medicine and remote monitoring, technology continues to play an increasingly important role in post-stroke care. In this Analysis and Perspective article, opportunities for using human pose estimation-an emerging technology that uses artificial intelligence to track human movement kinematics from simple videos recorded using household devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets)-to improve motor assessment and rehabilitation after stroke are discussed. The focus is on the potential of two key applications: (1) improving access to quantitative, objective motor assessment and (2) advancing telerehabilitation for persons post-stroke.

Early prediction of upper limb functioning after stroke using clinical bedside assessments: a prospective longitudinal study

Early and accurate prediction of recovery is needed to assist treatment planning and inform patient selection in clinical trials. This study aimed to develop a prediction algorithm using a set of simple early clinical bedside measures to predict upper limb capacity at 3-months post-stroke. A secondary analysis of Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at Gothenburg University (SALGOT) included 94 adults (mean age 68 years) with upper limb impairment admitted to stroke unit). Cluster analysis was used to define the endpoint outcome strata according to the 3-months Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores. Modelling was carried out in a training (70%) and testing set (30%) using traditional logistic regression, random forest models. The final algorithm included 3 simple bedside tests performed 3-days post stroke: ability to grasp, to produce any measurable grip strength and abduct/elevate shoulder. An 86-94% model sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was reached for differentiation between poor, limited and good outcome. Additional measurement of grip strength at 4 weeks post-stroke and haemorrhagic stroke explained the underestimated classifications. External validation of the model is recommended. Simple bedside assessments have advantages over more lengthy and complex assessments and could thereby be integrated into routine clinical practice to aid therapy decisions, guide patient selection in clinical trials and used in data registries.

Performing a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test in immersive virtual reality to assess post-stroke upper limb activity

BACKGROUND

To plan treatment and measure post-stroke recovery, frequent and time-bounded functional assessments are recommended. With increasing needs for neurorehabilitation advances, new technology based methods, such as virtual reality (VR) have emerged. Here, we developed an immersive VR version of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT-VR) to complement neurorehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the validity, usability and test-retest reliability of the ARAT-VR among individuals with stroke, healthcare professionals and healthy control subjects (HCS).

METHODS

Among the 19 items of the ARAT, 13 items were selected and developed in immersive VR. 11 healthcare professionals, 30 individuals with stroke, and 25 HCS were recruited. Content validity was assessed by asking healthcare professionals to rate the difficulty of performing each item of the ARAT-VR in comparison to the classical Action Research Arm Test (ARAT-19). Concurrent validity was first measured using correlation (Spearman tests) between the ARAT-VR and ARAT-19 scores for the individuals with stroke, and second through correlation and comparison between the scores of the ARAT-VR and the reduced version of the ARAT (ARAT-13) for both individuals with stroke and HCS (Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Bland-Altman plots). Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale. A part of individuals with stroke and HCS were re-tested following a convenient delay to measure test-retest reliability (Intra-class correlation and Wilcoxon tests).

RESULTS

Regarding the content validity, median difficulty of the 13 ARAT-VR items (0[0 to - 1] to 0[0-1]) evaluated by healthcare professionals was rated as equivalent to the classical ARAT for all tasks except those involving the marbles. For these, the difficulty was rated as superior to the real tasks (1[0-1] when pinching with the thumb-index and thumb-middle fingers, and 1[0-2] when pinching with thumb-ring finger). Regarding the concurrent validity, for paretic hand scores, there were strong correlations between the ARAT-VR and ARAT-13 (r = 0.84), and between the ARAT-VR and ARAT-19 (r = 0.83). Usability (SUS = 82.5[75-90]) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.99; p < 0.001) were excellent.

CONCLUSION

The ARAT-VR is a valid, usable and reliable tool that can be used to assess upper limb activity among individuals with stroke, providing potential to increase assessment frequency, remote evaluation, and improve neurorehabilitation. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04694833 ; Unique identifier: NCT04694833, Date of registration: 11/24/2020.

A Pilot Study of Compensatory Strategies for Reach-to-Grasp-Pen in Patients with Stroke

Coordinated reaching and grasping movements may be impaired in patients with poststroke hemiplegia. Patients frequently adopt compensatory strategies, which require investigation. This pilot study used kinematic parameters to examine compensatory strategies by assessing the reach-to-grasp-pen movements in patients with stroke and unaffected participants. Twelve patients with stroke with mild impairment (45.16 ± 12.62 years, 2.41 ± 1.97 months), twelve with moderate impairment (50.41 ± 12.92 years, 3.83 ± 3.58 months), and ten healthy individuals (20.6 ± 0.69 years) performed a reach-to-grasp-pen task. Kinematics parameters of upper limb and fingers, such as movement time, number of movement units, index of curvature, spectral arc length, trunk forward transition, trunk lateral transition, elbow extension, shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, trunk rotation, arm-plane angle, the joint angles of interphalangeal joints of the thumb, index, middle, ring, and little fingers were examined in the study. These parameters were evaluated with two Microsoft Azure Kinect and Leap Motion, which belong to markerless motion capture systems. Patients with stroke showed longer reaching movement time, less smooth movement trajectories, and more trunk rotation (P < 0.05). In patients with stroke, the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) of the thumb were flexed in the starting position; the MCP and PIP joints of the index finger in the stroke group were more extended during pen grasp; the range of motion of the MCP of the middle finger and the PIP joints of the middle, ring, and little fingers became greater, suggesting a larger peak aperture (P < 0.05). The more significant extension was observed in the index finger at the end of the grasp, suggesting inadequate flexion (P < 0.05). In clinical practice, the reach-to-grasp-pen task using markless sensing technology can effectively distinguish patients with stroke from healthy individuals and evaluate the recovery and compensation strategies of upper limb and hand functions. It can potentially become an evaluation tool in hospital and community scenes. Accurate identification of abnormal trunk, arm, and finger strategies is crucial for therapists to develop targeted upper limb treatment methods and evaluate treatment effects.

Assessment of Upper Extremity Function in People With Stroke Based on the Framework of the ICF: A Narrative Review

Although there are many assessment tools for upper extremity (UE) function, it is still difficult to select an appropriate outcome measurement for the rehabilitation process of individuals with stroke. This review aims to classify each tool within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework and provide an overview of UE assessments. Through a comprehensive understanding of assessments based on ICF, health care professionals will be able to choose suitable measurement tools for individuals, facilitating their rehabilitation.

A low-dimensional representation of arm movements and hand grip forces in post-stroke individuals

Characterizing post-stroke impairments in the sensorimotor control of arm and hand is essential to better understand altered mechanisms of movement generation. Herein, we used a decomposition algorithm to characterize impairments in end-effector velocity and hand grip force data collected from an instrumented functional task in 83 healthy control and 27 chronic post-stroke individuals with mild-to-moderate impairments. According to kinematic and kinetic raw data, post-stroke individuals showed reduced functional performance during all task phases. After applying the decomposition algorithm, we observed that the behavioural data from healthy controls relies on a low-dimensional representation and demonstrated that this representation is mostly preserved post-stroke. Further, it emerged that reduced functional performance post-stroke correlates to an abnormal variance distribution of the behavioural representation, except when reducing hand grip forces. This suggests that the behavioural repertoire in these post-stroke individuals is mostly preserved, thereby pointing towards therapeutic strategies that optimize movement quality and the reduction of grip forces to improve performance of daily life activities post-stroke.

Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Estimate Clinical Scores of Upper Limb Movement Quality in Stroke

Neurorehabilitation is progressively shifting from purely in-clinic treatment to therapy that is provided in both clinical and home-based settings. This transition generates a pressing need for assessments that can be performed across the entire continuum of care, a need that might be accommodated by application of wearable sensors. A first step toward ubiquitous assessments is to augment validated and well-understood standard clinical tests. This route has been pursued for the assessment of motor functioning, which in clinical research and practice is observation-based and requires specially trained personnel. In our study, 21 patients performed movement tasks of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), one of the most widely used clinical tests of upper limb motor functioning, while trained evaluators scored each task on pre-defined criteria. We collected data with just two wrist-worn inertial sensors to guarantee applicability across the continuum of care and used machine learning algorithms to estimate the ARAT task scores from sensor-derived features. Tasks scores were classified with approximately 80% accuracy. Linear regression between summed clinical task scores (across all tasks per patient) and estimates of sum task scores yielded a good fit (R 2 = 0.93; range reported in previous studies: 0.61-0.97). Estimates of the sum scores showed a mean absolute error of 2.9 points, 5.1% of the total score, which is smaller than the minimally detectable change and minimally clinically important difference of the ARAT when rated by a trained evaluator. We conclude that it is feasible to obtain accurate estimates of ARAT scores with just two wrist worn sensors. The approach enables administration of the ARAT in an objective, minimally supervised or remote fashion and provides the basis for a widespread use of wearable sensors in neurorehabilitation.

Association between self-perceived activity performance and upper limb functioning in subacute stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate to what extent upper limb (UL) motor impairment, trunk compensation, and activity performance are related to self-perception of UL activity performance in subacute stroke.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. Twenty-four adults with subacute stroke (age: 65.4 ± 10.8 years) underwent clinical and kinematic assessments at baseline (33.9 ± 5.2 days after stroke onset) and 4 weeks after the baseline. The clinical assessment included the UL Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA), Simple Test for Evaluating hand Function (STEF), and the performance and satisfaction scores of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The kinematic measurement was performed using a motion capture system during a standardized reach-to-grasp task. Endpoint performance variables and trunk displacement were calculated as kinematic outcomes. An inpatient rehabilitation program of 3 h/day was provided every day for 4 weeks between the two measurement points. The relationships between COPM scores and clinical/kinematic outcomes were examined by multiple regression analysis. Significance levels of p < 0.05 were used.

RESULTS

The results of the multiple regression analysis showed that the changes in STEF (β = 0.520, p = 0.005) and trunk compensation (β = -0.398, p = 0.024) were moderately related to the change in the COPM satisfaction (R² _adj  = 0.426, p = 0.001), while the change in UL FMA was not.

DISCUSSION

The changes in activity performance and trunk compensation were related to improved self-perception of UL activity performance. Therapeutic management for activity performance and trunk compensation may be important for improving self-perception of UL activity performance after stroke.

Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Rodent Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Forelimb Movement Quality Using Kinematics

Kinematics is the gold-standard method for measuring detailed joint motions. Recent research demonstrates that post-stroke kinematic analysis in rats reveals reaching abnormalities similar to those seen in humans after stroke. Nonetheless, behavioral neuroscientists have failed to incorporate kinematic methods for assessing movement quality in stroke models. The availability of a user-friendly method to assess multi-segment forelimb kinematics models should greatly increase uptake of this approach. Here, we present a framework for multi-segment forelimb analysis in rodents after stroke. This method greatly enhances the understanding of post-stroke forelimb motor recovery by including several movement quality metrics often used in human clinical work, such as upper-limb linear and angular kinematics, movement smoothness and kinetics, abnormal synergies, and compensations. These metrics may constitute a preclinical surrogate for the Fugl-Meyer assessment of hemiplegic patients. The data obtained using this method are 83 outputs of linear and angular kinematics and kinetics. The outputs also include 24 time series of continuous data, which afford a graphical representation of the kinematics and kinetics of the reaching cycle. We show that post-stroke rodents displayed many features resembling those seen in humans after stroke that are evident only when multi-segment kinematics models are considered. This method expands the knowledge derived from methods constrained to paw movements to a multi-segment forelimb movement quality framework. Moreover, it highlights the need for preclinical work to consider more sensitive measures of sensorimotor impairment and recovery as a means to enhance the interpretation of true recovery and compensation. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Recording and data analysis of rodents performing the Montoya staircase task.

Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective

Background

Rehabilitation is critical for reducing stroke-related disability and improving quality-of-life post-stroke. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used as stand-alone or adjunct treatment to physiotherapy, may be of benefit for motor recovery in subgroups of stroke patients. The Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim) seeks to advance the use of these techniques to improve post-stroke recovery through clinical trials and pre-clinical studies using standardized research protocols. Here, we review existing clinical trials for demographic, clinical, and neurobiological factors which may predict treatment response to identify knowledge gaps which need to be addressed before implementing these parameters for patient stratification in clinical trial protocols.

Objective

To provide a review of clinical rTMS trials of stroke recovery identifying factors associated with rTMS response in stroke patients with motor deficits and develop research perspectives for pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Methods

A literature search was performed in PubMed, using the Boolean search terms stroke AND repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS AND motor for studies investigating the use of rTMS for motor recovery in stroke patients at any recovery phase. A total of 1,676 articles were screened by two blinded raters, with 26 papers identified for inclusion in this review.

Results

Multiple possible factors associated with rTMS response were identified, including stroke location, cortical thickness, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genotype, initial stroke severity, and several imaging and clinical factors associated with a relatively preserved functional motor network of the ipsilesional hemisphere. Age, sex, and time post-stroke were generally not related to rTMS response. Factors associated with greater response were identified in studies of both excitatory ipsilesional and inhibitory contralesional rTMS. Heterogeneous study designs and contradictory data exemplify the need for greater protocol standardization and high-quality controlled trials.

Conclusion

Clinical, brain structural and neurobiological factors have been identified as potential predictors for rTMS response in stroke patients with motor impairment. These factors can inform the design of future clinical trials, before being considered for optimization of individual rehabilitation therapy for stroke patients. Pre-clinical models for stroke recovery, specifically developed in a clinical context, may accelerate this process.

Predicting post-stroke motor recovery of upper extremity using clinical variables and performance assays: A prospective cohort study protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Measurement of movement quality is essential to distinguish motor recovery patterns and optimize rehabilitation strategies post-stroke. Recently, the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Taskforce (SRRR) recommended four kinetic and kinematic performance assays to measure upper extremity (UE) movements and distinguish behavioral restitution and compensation mechanisms early post-stroke. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a prediction model to analyze the added prognostic value of performance assays over clinical variables assessed up to 1-month post stroke for predicting recovery of UE motor impairment, capacity and quality of movement (QoM) measured at 3 months post-stroke onset.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 120 stroke survivors will be recruited within seven days post-stroke. Candidate predictors such as baseline characteristics, demographics and performance assays as per SRRR recommendations along with tonic stretch reflex threshold will be measured up to 1-month post-stroke. Upper extremity motor recovery will be evaluated in terms of motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer assessment for UE), UE capacity measured with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and QoM (movement smoothness in the form of peak metrics [PM]) assessed with a reach-to-grasp-to-mouth task (mimicking a drinking task) at 3 months post-stroke. Three multivariable linear regression models will be developed to predict factors responsible for the outcomes of Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FM-UE), ARAT and movement quality. The developed models will be internally validated using a split-sample method.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide a validated prediction model inclusive of clinical and performance assays that may assist in prediction of UE motor recovery. Predicting the amount of recovery and differentiating between behavioral restitution and compensation (as reflected by the FM-UE, QoM and ARAT) would enable us in realistic goal formation and planning rehabilitation. It would also help in encouraging patients to partake in early post-stroke rehabilitation thus improving the recovery potential.

Robotic Kinematic measures of the arm in chronic Stroke: part 2 - strong correlation with clinical outcome measures

BACKGROUND

A detailed sensorimotor evaluation is essential in planning effective, individualized therapy post-stroke. Robotic kinematic assay may offer better accuracy and resolution to understand stroke recovery. Here we investigate the added value of distal wrist measurement to a proximal robotic kinematic assay to improve its correlation with clinical upper extremity measures in chronic stroke. Secondly, we compare linear and nonlinear regression models.

METHODS

Data was sourced from a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted from 2012 to 2016, investigating the combined effect of robotic therapy and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). 24 kinematic metrics were derived from 4 shoulder-elbow tasks and 35 metrics from 3 wrist and forearm evaluation tasks. A correlation-based feature selection was performed, keeping only features substantially correlated with the target attribute (R > 0.5.) Nonlinear models took the form of a multilayer perceptron neural network: one hidden layer and one linear output.

RESULTS

Shoulder-elbow metrics showed a significant correlation with the Fugl Meyer Assessment (upper extremity, FMA-UE), with a R = 0.82 (P < 0.001) for the linear model and R = 0.88 (P < 0.001) for the nonlinear model. Similarly, a high correlation was found for wrist kinematics and the FMA-UE (R = 0.91 (P < 0.001) and R = 0.92 (P < 0.001) for the linear and nonlinear model respectively). The combined analysis produced a correlation of R = 0.91 (P < 0.001) for the linear model and R = 0.91 (P < 0.001) for the nonlinear model.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal wrist kinematics were highly correlated to clinical outcomes, warranting future investigation to explore our nonlinear wrist model with acute or subacute stroke populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Actual study start date September 2012. First registered on 15 November 2012. Retrospectively registered. Unique identifiers: NCT01726673 and NCT03562663 .