Factors Affecting Performance of Insulin Pen Injector Technology: A Narrative Review

Advance Insulin Injection Technique and Education With FITTER Forward Expert Recommendations

Injectable insulin therapy is a valuable therapeutic option for millions of people with diabetes worldwide. However, many people with diabetes undergoing insulin therapy experience suboptimal outcomes and/or have complications because of inadequate injection technique and training. Practical, current, evidence-based recommendations are mandatory for primary care practitioners and diabetes specialists alike to address unmet needs in insulin injection technique, education, and consequent outcomes. The most recent global insulin injection technique best practices were published in 2016 by the Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations (FITTER). While injection technique efforts in different regions have reflected some developments since 2016, a global effort was warranted to comprehensively capture new evidence and modern expert perspectives. In this article, we share the output of the "FITTER Forward" initiative, authored by 16 diabetes specialists from 13 countries who met virtually in 2023-2024. FITTER Forward provides an updated rationale for the importance of proper injection technique training and its impact on diabetes management. The FITTER Forward recommendations are organized for use in clinical practice and include 4 sections describing (1) the foundational science informing injection device design, experiences, and outcomes, (2) proper injection technique procedures for insulin pens and syringes from insulin storage to needle disposal, (3) lipodystrophy risk reduction, with a focus on lipohypertrophy, and (4) structured injection technique training programs for people with diabetes. Overall, FITTER Forward aims to better equip health care professionals to advance diabetes care by empowering people with diabetes and their caregivers to correctly and safely deliver insulin.

Novel Robust Needle Tip Design Enables Needle Reuse and Reduced Skin Trauma in Combination With Autoinjector Needle Shields

BACKGROUND

Pen needles and autoinjectors are necessary for millions of patients needing injectable drug treatment but pose economic and environmental burdens. A durable device with a multiuse needle could reduce cost and improve user experience. This study explores a novel robust needle tip (EXP) designed for multiple uses and durability against hooking.

METHOD

Needle robustness was investigated through a structural analysis. Furthermore, EXP and control needles (NF30, NF28) were evaluated in an in-vivo porcine model as pen needles or embedded in autoinjectors to study the resulting increase in skin blood perfusion (SBP). The SBP was assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) of 192 randomized and blinded needle insertions.

RESULTS

Forming a 33 µm hook against a hard surface requires 0.92 N for the NF30 control needle and 5.38 N for EXP. The EXP did not induce more tissue trauma than the NF30. There was a positive relation between needle diameter and SBP (P < .05). Furthermore, the presence of an autoinjector shield and applied force of 10 N was found to significantly reduce SBP for worn EXP needles (P < .05) compared to insertions without autoinjector shield.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigated robust needle EXP is on par with the single-use needle NF30 in terms of tissue trauma, which is further reduced by combining the needle with a needle shield. These results should encourage the innovation and development of durable, reusable injection systems with pharmacoeconomic and environmental value and a simplified and enhanced user experience for patients.

Transitioning to Insulin Analogs in Tunisian Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Efficacy and Safety

INTRODUCTION

there is a lack of research evaluating the impact of therapeutic switching from human insulin to analogues, particularly in paediatric populations from low- and middle-income countries.

AIM

The study aimed to retrospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of transitioning from human insulin to insulin analogs in Tunisian children with diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive study included children with type 1 diabetes who changed their insulin therapy protocol after at least one year of treatment with human insulin. Clinical, therapeutic, and glycaemic homeostasis parameters were assessed following the transition from human insulin (NPH + rapid-acting insulin) to the Basal-Bolus insulin analog- protocol.

RESULTS

The study included 60 patients. Following the switch, all patients showed a significant reduction in mean fasting blood glucose levels (11.11 mmol/l vs. 8.62 mmol/l; p=0.024). Glycated haemoglobin A1C levels decreased notably in children who adhered to their diet (from 9.93% to 8.38%; p=0.06) and/or engaged in regular physical activity (from 10.40% to 8.61%; p=0.043). The average number of hypoglycemic events per year decreased from 4.03 events/year to 2.36 events/year (p=0.006), along with a decrease in the rate of patients hospitalized for acid-ketotic decompensation (from 27% to 10%; p=0.001). Financial constraints led to 82% of patients reusing microfine needles ≥2 times per day, and 12% were compelled to revert to the initial insulin therapy protocol due to a lack of access to self-financed microfine needles or discontinued social coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although insulin analogues offer clear benefits, their use poses challenges as a therapeutic choice for children with diabetes in low- to middle-income countries. These challenges hinder the achievement of optimal glycemic control goals.

Preference for a Novel Oral Alternative to Parenterally Administered Medications

Background

Rani Therapeutics is developing a robotic pill (RP), an oral drug delivery platform called RaniPill™ that can deliver a number of biotherapeutics with high bioavailability; eliminating the need for injections. While patients in general prefer oral to injectable therapies, preference for a more frequent oral regimen compared to a less frequent injectable regimen is unknown. Two marketing surveys were conducted to gather data on preference for oral versus injectable therapies. A clinical study gathered data on participant preference for oral pills vs injections before and after swallowing a Mock-RP capsule.

Methods

A total of 1689 adults taking injections (mean duration 3-7 years) to treat endocrine or inflammatory conditions were anonymously surveyed online for their preference to administer/prescribe medications orally via the RP. In the clinical study, 150 participants currently taking injections for chronic conditions evaluated the swallowability of a Mock-RP and completed a questionnaire regarding their preferences.

Results

Majority of respondents surveyed stated they would be willing to convert to an oral alternative over their current parenteral therapy regardless of drug or disease. In the clinical study, all participants were able to swallow the Mock-RP and 91% indicated their preference for the oral route versus their current parenteral route of drug administration. Survey respondents and those in the clinical study using frequent injections were more willing to select a once-daily capsule compared to those injecting infrequently. Even study participants who inject infrequently (≥monthly: 80%) would prefer a once-daily pill over their injection regimen.

Conclusion

Patients taking injections and prescribing physicians strongly prefer oral dosing to parenteral administration of biologics even if dosing frequency with the oral option, such as the RP, is increased.

Is it advantageous to use quality by design (QbD) to develop nanoparticle-based dosage forms for parenteral drug administration?

Parenteral administration is one of the most commonly used drug delivery routes for nanoparticle-based dosage forms, such as lipid-based and polymeric nanoparticles. For the treatment of various diseases, parenteral administration include intravenous, subcutaneous, and intramuscular route. In drug development phase, multiparameter strategy with a focus on drug physicochemical properties and the specificity of the administration route is required. Nanoparticle properties in terms of size and targeted delivery, among others, are able to surpass many drawbacks of conventional dosage forms, but these unique properties can be a bottleneck for approval by regulatory authorities. Quality by Design (QbD) approach has been widely utilized in development of parenteral nanoparticle-based dosage forms. It fosters knowledge of product and process quality by involving sound scientific data and risk assessment strategies. A full and comprehensive investigation into the state of implementation and applications of the QbD approach in these complex drug products can highlight the gaps and challenges. In this review, the analysis of critical attributes and Design of Experiment (DoE) approach in different nanoparticulate systems, together with the proper utilization of Process Analytical Technology (PAT) applications are described. The essential of QbD approach for the design and development of nanoparticle-based dosage forms for delivery via parenteral routes is discussed thoroughly.