Allogeneic, but not autologous, hematopoietic cell transplantation improves survival only among younger adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Autologous stem cell transplantation for adults with Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission. A study by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

BACKGROUND

The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-ALL) remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze results of AHSCT and to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

Overall, 700 patients transplanted in first complete remission between the years 1999-2020 were included. Median patient age was 31.9 years (68% male). B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) and T-cell precursor ALL (TCP-ALL) was diagnosed in 35% and 65%, respectively. Among 190 patients with available data, negative minimal residual disease (MRD) status was reported in 167 (88%) cases.

RESULTS

The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 2 years were 67% and 56%; relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 39% and 5%, respectively. TCP-ALL was associated with lower RI (41% vs. 56%, p=0.001), higher LFS (52% vs. 38%, p=0.002) and OS (58% vs 45%, p=0.001) at 5 years when compared to BCP-ALL. In the multivariate analysis, TCP-ALL and longer interval from diagnosis do AHSCT were associated with reduced risk of relapse (HR 0.7, p=0.006 and HR=0.95, p=0.018), better LFS (HR=0.76, p=0.02 and HR=0.95, p=0.01) and OS (HR=0.75, p=0.024 and HR=0.94, p=0.013, respectively). Increasing patient age was associated with higher NRM (HR=1.49, p<0.0001), worse LFS (HR=1.1, p=0.01) and OS (HR=1.17, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is relatively safe option of late treatment intensification in adults with Ph- ALL. It may be a valuable option especially in patients with TCP-ALL, however it should be proved in prospective clinical trials.

Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation (TMLI) Is Associated with Good Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Matched Sibling Donor and Haplo-identical Transplants for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) can deliver higher doses of irradiation without increased toxicity. This study evaluated TMLI and cyclophosphamide in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A total of 58 patients underwent matched related, unrelated, or haplo-identical donor transplantation using TMLI. The graft source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in ALL whereas graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine with methotrexate or post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The median age was 20 years (range: 5-49 years) and included 20 children. Engraftment occurred in 56 (96.5%) at a median of 15 days (range: 12-23) with 2 early deaths. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was seen in 10 patients whereas hemorrhagic cystitis and cardiac dysfunction occurred in 2 patients each. Cumulative incidence (CI) of grades II-IV acute GVHD was 23.6% whereas the CI of grades III-IV was 10.9%. Chronic GVHD was seen in 46.9% whereas relapse was seen in 10 patients (17.2%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 65.9% ± 6.8% and the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 59% ± 6.7%. Outcomes were compared with 52 patients who received either Cy/TBI or Flu/Bu4 for conditioning during the same period. Engraftment rates and time to engraftment were similar. Acute GVHD (P = .002), regimen-related toxicity (P = .043) and day 100 non-relapse mortality (P = .020) were significantly lower with TMLI. TMLI was associated with better OS (P = .004) and DFS (P = .005) for haplo-identical transplants. Better DFS was seen with TMLI in patients with high-risk disease (P = .007) and disease status > CR1 (P = .041). The use of TMLI and cyclophosphamide is associated with good outcomes in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for ALL, especially with haplo-identical stem cell transplants.

Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the adoption of pediatric-like chemotherapy protocols, the introduction of new immunotherapies and a better understanding of the oncogenic landscape, the outcome for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remain substantially dismal. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome in terms of survival in a cohort of adult patients with ALL who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) between 2013 and 2023.

METHODS

This was a single-center observational retrospective study including all consecutive adult patients with ALL who received an alloSCT between April 2013 and April 2023 at the Stem Cell Transplant Center AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS), Leukemia-Free Survival (LFS) and cumulative incidence (CI) of Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM).

RESULTS

The 4-year OS and LFS were 63.4% and 48.1%, respectively, and the 1-year GRFS was 42.9%. The 1-year CI of bloodstream infections (BSI), invasive fungal infections and NRM were 38%, 7% and 18.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the use of total body irradiation (TBI), a time interval from diagnosis to alloSCT 7 months and female gender were factors significantly associated with better OS. Relapse of the underlying malignancy and BSI were the main causes of death.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that alloSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) and alternative donors may be considered an effective tool for patients with ALL achieving a CR.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients >40 Years of Age With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Reduced Intensity Versus Myeloablative Conditioning

BACKGROUND

The outcome in older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unsatisfactory due to high relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) as postremission therapy has an important role in reducing relapse rate, albeit its application is limited in older adult patients due to alloHSCT-related morbidity and mortality. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) alloHSCT has been developed as a less toxic conditioning regimen, but comparative studies with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) are limited in patients with ALL.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, RIC-alloHSCT (n = 111) was compared with MAC-alloHSCT (n = 77) in patients aged 41 to 65 y with ALL in first complete remission. MAC was predominantly applied by combining high-dose total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide, whereas RIC mainly consisted of fludarabine and 2 Gy total body irradiation.

RESULTS

Unadjusted overall survival was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42%-65%) at 5 y in MAC recipients compared with 39% (95% CI, 29%-49%) in RIC recipients. Overall survival and relapse-free survival were not significantly associated with type of conditioning after adjusted for the covariates age, leukemia risk status at diagnosis, donor type, and donor and recipient gender combination. NRM was significantly lower after RIC (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.41, 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; P  = 0.006), whereas relapse was significantly higher (subdistribution hazard ratio: 3.04, 95% CI, 1.71-5.40; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, RIC-alloHSCT has resulted in less NRM, but it was also found to be associated with a significantly higher relapse rate. These results suggest that MAC-alloHSCT may provide a more effective type of consolidation therapy for the reduction of relapse and that RIC-alloHSCT may be restricted to patients at higher risk for NRM.

Total marrow lymphoid irradiation and cyclophosphamide is associated with low toxicity and good outcomes in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast crises - A phase I study

INTRODUCTION

Total marrow lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) can deliver higher doses of irradiation without increasing toxicity compared to Total body irradiation (TBI).

METHODS

Twenty adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic myeloid leukemia with lymphoid blast crises (CML-LBC) received TMLI and cyclophosphamide for conditioning. Ten patients each received 13.5 or 15 Gy of TMLI. The graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in all, and donors included matched related (n = 15), haplo-identical (n = 3) or matched unrelated donors (n = 2).

RESULTS

The median cell dose infused was 9 × 106 CD34/kg (range 4.8-12.4). Engraftment occurred in all (100%) at a median of 15 days (range: 14-17). Toxicity was low with hemorrhagic cystitis seen in two but no sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Acute GVHD occurred in 40% while chronic GVHD was seen in 70.5%. Viral infections were seen in 55% while blood stream bacterial infections occurred in 20% and invasive fungal disease (IFD) in 10%. The Day 100 non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 10%. At a median follow up of 25 months (range 2-48), two patients have relapsed. Overall survival at 2 years is 80% while the disease-free survival is 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TMLI and cyclophosphamide for myeloablative conditioning is associated with low toxicity and favorable early outcomes in patients undergoing HSCT for ALL and CML-LBC.

Outcomes of allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation followed by maintenance chemotherapy in adult patient with B-ALL in CR1 with no detectable minimal residual disease

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) as a treatment for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) has been rigorously debated in recent years. We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of 355 adult patients with B-ALL in first complete remission who had received auto-HSCT or allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in our centre. The treatment efficacy was evaluated from a model stratified on the risk classification and minimal residue disease (MRD) status after three chemotherapy cycles. Auto-HSCT demonstrated comparable 3-year overall survival (OS) (72.7% vs. 68.5%, p = 0.441) and leukaemia-free survival rates (62.8% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.383) compared to allo-HSCT for patients with negative MRD, while the advantage of lower non-relapse mortality (1.5% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.001) was offset by a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates (35.7% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.018), especially in high-risk patients. For patients at high risk and with positive MRD, there was a lower trend of 3-year OS (50.0% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.078) and significantly higher CIR rates (71.4% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.018) in auto-HSCT. However, no significant interaction was observed in the tests. In conclusion, auto-HSCT appears to be an attractive treatment for patients with negative MRD after three chemotherapy cycles. For MRD-positive patients, allo-HSCT may be a more effective treatment.

Pediatric chemotherapy versus allo-HSCT for adolescent and adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL in first complete remission: a meta-analysis

Pediatric-inspired chemotherapy significantly improves survival for adolescent and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, the benefits over allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remain unclear. To compare clinical outcomes between pediatric-inspired chemotherapy and allo-HSCT in consolidation therapy of adolescent and adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) ALL in first complete remission (CR1), related studies from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials updated to July 2022 were searched. A total of 13 relevant trials including 3161 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with allo-HSCT, pediatric-inspired chemotherapy achieved better OS (hazard risk (HR), 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41 to 0.68) and DFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86), with a significant reduction in NRM (risk ratio (RR), 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.51), but no difference in the relapse rate (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.39). When only studies based on intention-to-treat analysis were included, pediatric-inspired chemotherapy consistently conferred a survival advantage. In subgroup analyses, patients with baseline high-risk features demonstrated similar OS and DFS between pediatric-style chemotherapy and allo-HSCT, while pediatric-style chemotherapy had an OS and DFS advantage in standard-risk subgroup. Particularly, patients with positive minimal residual disease (MRD) achieved better OS and DFS if proceeded to allo-HSCT.

Autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is an option for elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We retrospectively compared results of RIC-allo-HCT from either a matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 209) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 209) with autologous (auto, n = 142) HCT for patients aged 55 years or more treated in first complete remission (CR1) between 2000 and 2018. The probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years were 34% for RIC-allo-HCT versus 39% for auto-HCT (p = 0.11) while overall survival (OS) rates were 42% versus 45% (p = 0.23), respectively. The incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 41% versus 51% (p = 0.22) and 25% versus 10% (p = 0.001), respectively. In a multivariate model, using auto-HCT as reference, the risk of NRM was increased for MSD-HCT (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1, p = 0.02) and MUD-HCT (HR = 3.08, p < 0.001), which for MUD-HCT translated into a decreased chance of LFS (HR = 1.55, p = 0.01) and OS (HR = 1.62, p = 0.008). No significant associations were found with respect to the risk of relapse. We conclude that for patients with ALL in CR1, aged above 55 years, auto-HCT may be considered a transplant option alternative to RIC-allo-HCT, although its value requires verification in prospective trials.

Long-Term Results of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Ph- Negative High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is standard treatment for adult high-risk (HR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and contributed to the overall improved outcome. We report a consecutive cohort of prospectively defined HR patients treated on German Multicenter Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia trials 06/99-07/03 with similar induction/consolidation therapy and HCT in first remission. A total of 542 patients (15-55 years) with BCR-ABL-negative ALL were analyzed. Sixty-seven percent received HCT from matched unrelated donors (MUD) and 32% from matched sibling donors (MSD). The incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 20% at 5 years. NRM occurred after median 6.6 months; the leading cause (46%) was infection. NRM after MUD decreased from 39% in trial 06/99 to 16% in trial 07/03 (P < .00001). Patient age was the strongest predictor of NRM. The 5-year relapse incidence was 23% using MSD and 25% using MUD. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was the strongest predictor of relapse (45% for molecular failure versus 6% for molecular CR; P < .0001). The median follow-up was 67 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 58%. Age, subtype/high risk feature, MRD status, trial and acute GvHD were significant prognostic factors. We provide a large reference analysis with long follow-up confirming a similar outcome of MSD and MUD HCT and improved NRM for MUD HCT over years. MRD has a strong impact on relapse risk, whereas age was the strongest predictor of NRM. New adapted conditioning strategies should be considered for older patients combined with the goal to reduce the MRD level before stem cell transplantation.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy versus Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Evolving Perspective

Cellular therapy modalities, including autologous (auto-) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), allogeneic (allo-) HCT, and now chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, have demonstrated long-term remission in advanced hematologic malignancies. Auto-HCT and allo-HCT, through hematopoietic rescue, have permitted the use of higher doses of chemotherapy. Allo-HCT also introduced a nonspecific immune-mediated targeting of malignancy resulting in protection from relapse, although at the expense of similar targeting of normal host cells. In contrast, CAR T therapy, through genetically engineered immunotherapeutic precision, allows for redirection of autologous immune effector cells against malignancy in an antigen-specific and MHC-independent fashion, with demonstrated efficacy in patients who are refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy. It too has unique toxicities and challenges, however. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (including large B cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma), B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma are the 3 main diseases associated with the use of fully developed CAR T products with widespread deployment. Recent and ongoing clinical trials have been examining the interface among the 3 cellular therapy modalities (auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CAR T) to determine whether they should be "complementary" or "competitive" therapies. In this review, we examine the current state of this interface with respect to the most recent data and delve into the controversies and conclusions that may inform clinical decision making.

CNS Involvement at Initial Diagnosis and Risk of Relapse After Allogeneic HCT for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved over time. Studies have shown that total body irradiation (TBI) is the preferable type of myeloablative conditioning (MAC). However, outcomes based on central nervous system (CNS) involvement, namely CNS-positive versus CNS-negative, have not been compared. Here, we evaluated outcomes of 547 patients (CNS-positive = 96, CNS-negative = 451) who were allografted in the first complete remission (CR1) between 2009 and 2019. Primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Median follow-up was not different between the CNS-positive and CNS-negative groups (79 versus 67.2 months, P = 0.58). The CNS-positive group were younger (median age 31.3 versus 39.7 years, P = 0.004) and were allografted more recently (median year 2012 versus 2010, P = 0.003). In both groups, MAC was the preferred approach (82.3% versus 85.6%, P = 0.41). On multivariate analysis, the CNS-positive group had higher incidence of relapse (RI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-2.35], P = 0.025), but no adverse effect on LFS (HR = 1.38 [95% CI = 0.99-1.92], P = 0.057) or overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.28 [95% CI = 0.89-1.85], P = 0.18). A subgroup multivariate analysis limited to CNS-positive patients showed that a TBI-based MAC regimen resulted in better LFS (HR = 0.43 [95% CI = 0.22-0.83], P = 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.44 [95% CI = 0.21-0.92], P = 0.03) and lower RI (HR = 0.35 [95% CI = 0.15-0.79], P = 0.01). Another subgroup analysis in CNS-negative patients showed that MAC-TBI preparative regimens also showed a lower RI without a benefit in LFS or OS. While a MAC-TBI allo-HCT regimen may not be suitable to all, particularly for older patients with comorbidities, this approach should be considered for patients who are deemed fit and able to tolerate.

The current treatment approach to adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (AYA-ALL): challenges and considerations

INTRODUCTION

AYA-ALL differs from pediatric ALL in terms of clinical, biological, psychosocial factors and access to care and has an inferior outcome. It is now being recognized that pediatric-inspired protocols are superior to adult protocols for this cohort, but given the lack of randomized trials, several questions remain unanswered.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss how AYA-ALL is different from the pediatric ALL population, compare AYA ALL with ALL in middle and older age adults, review the studies that have enrolled the AYA cohort, summarize risk-stratified and response-adapted approaches, describe the biological subtypes, and review the novel agents/approaches under evaluation.

EXPERT OPINION

AYA-ALL is a complex and challenging disease that needs multidisciplinary and focused care. Well-designed clinical trials that focus on this cohort are needed to further improve the outcomes.

Haploidentical transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia effect than HLA-matched sibling transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background:

Compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplantation, it remains unclear whether haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect for Philadelphia-negative (Ph–) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to compare the GVL effect between HID and MSD transplantation for Ph– high-risk B-ALL.

Methods:

This study population came from two prospective multicenter trials (NCT01883180, NCT02673008). Immunosuppressant withdrawal and prophylactic or pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were administered in patients without active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to prevent relapse. All patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity posttransplantation (post-MRD+) or non-remission (NR) pre-transplantation received prophylactic/pre-emptive interventions. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-MRD+.

Results:

A total of 335 patients with Ph– high-risk B-ALL were enrolled, including 145 and 190, respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence of post-MRD+ was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.2%–34.7%) and 42.6% (35.5%–49.6%) in the HID and MSD groups (P = 0.003), respectively. A total of 156 patients received DLI, including 60 (41.4%) and 96 (50.5%), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups (P = 0.096). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.6% (95% CI: 12.7%–25.4%) and 25.9% (19.9%–32.3%; P = 0.116) in the two groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 67.4% (95% CI: 59.1%–74.4%) and 61.6% (54.2%–68.1%; P = 0.382), leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0%–70.7%) and 58.2% (50.8%–64.9%; P = 0.429), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 51.7% (95% CI: 43.3%–59.5%) and 37.8% (30.9%–44.6%; P = 0.041), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups.

Conclusion:

HID transplantation has a lower incidence of post-MRD+ than MSD transplantation, suggesting that HID transplantation might have a superior GVL effect than MSD transplantation for Ph– high-risk B-ALL patients.

Trial registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01883180, NCT02673008.

Allogeneic transplant compared to pediatric-inspired therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-negative adolescent and adult ALL in first complete remission

BACKGROUND

Pediatric-inspired non-transplant regimens for adolescent and adult ALL patients are becoming standard in many institutions. We aimed to compare a cohort of patients receiving a pediatric-inspired protocol to a cohort of patients treated with adult type ALL therapy followed by allografting after achieving CR1.

METHOD

Eighty-five adolescent and adult ALL patients treated with CALGB 19802 protocol who received MSD transplant in CR1 were retrospectively compared to a matched cohort of 72 adolescent and adult ALL patients treated with a modified version of Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1900 protocol.

RESULTS

The five years OS in the allo-HCT cohort was 63.1% compared to 80.2% in the pediatric-inspired chemotherapy arm (P = 0.03). The five years EFS in the allo-HCT arm was 58.8% compared to 61.6% in the pediatric-inspired chemotherapy arm (P = 0.07). The five years DFS in the allo-HCT arm was 58.8% as compared to 71.9% in the pediatric-inspired chemotherapy arm (P = 0.07). The relapse rate in the allo-HCT cohort was 30.58% compared to 21.68% in the pediatric-inspired chemotherapy arm (P = 0.16). The NRM in the allo-HCT cohort was 10.59 as compared to 6.45 in the pediatric-inspired chemotherapy arm (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

For adolescent and adult patients with Ph-negative ALL, pediatric-inspired chemotherapy resulted in higher OS compared to allo-HCT.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Second Complete Remission

Even in the era of high-intensity chemotherapy, disease recurrence remains a major cause of treatment failure in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-negative B-ALL). For patients who achieved second complete remission (CR2) with salvage chemotherapy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) could be the best curative treatment. However, limited data are available on the outcomes of allo-HSCT for adult Ph-negative B-ALL in CR2 in the high-intensity chemotherapy era. We evaluated the transplantation outcomes of adult patients with Ph-negative B-ALL in CR2 compared with those in CR1. We also clarified the prognostic factors among adult allo-HSCT recipients with Ph-negative B-ALL in CR2. We conducted a nationwide retrospective study using the data form Japanese transplant registry database. Patients aged ≥16 years and underwent their first allo-HSCT between 2003 and 2017 were included. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of the patients in CR2 (n = 382) was significantly lower than that in first complete remission (n = 1375) (51.8% versus 68.1%; P < .001), accompanied by a higher relapse rate (34.2% versus 17.6% at 3 years; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis among CR2 patients, time from diagnosis to allo-HSCT (≤2 years) was a significant factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87; P < .001) and relapse (HR = 1.88; P < .001), whereas age at allo-HSCT (≥30 years) was a significant factor for OS (HR = 2.10, P < .001) and nonrelapse mortality (HR = 2.68; P < .001). By assigning a score of 1 to each factor, the 3-year OS rate of CR2 patients significantly stratified: 70.7% in patients with score 0, 56.4% with score 1, and 28.4% with score 2 (P < .001). The survival outcomes of allo-HSCT in adult Ph-negative B-ALL patients in CR2 were inferior to those in CR1 in the high-intensity chemotherapy era, mainly because of the higher relapse rate. Among the CR2 patients, the short time between diagnosis and allo-HSCT was a significant risk factor for disease recurrence and overall mortality. Better disease control with novel treatment strategies may be needed for early relapse. In addition, the nonrelapse mortality rate in patients over 30 years of age was particularly high among CR2 patients, suggesting the need for improved supportive care for these patients. Further studies are warranted on the outcomes of allo-HSCT after achieving CR2 with novel drugs, such as inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab.

Prognostic Significance of Comprehensive Gene Mutations and Clinical Characteristics in Adult T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Next-Generation Sequencing

Background

Adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a heterogeneous malignant tumor with poor prognosis. However, accurate prognostic stratification factors are still unclear.

Methods

Data from 90 adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) patients were collected. The association of gene mutations detected by next-generation sequencing and clinical characteristics with the outcomes of T-ALL/LBL patients were retrospectively analyzed to build three novel risk stratification models through Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Forty-seven mutated genes were identified. Here, 73.3% of patients had at least one mutation, and 36.7% had ≥3 mutations. The genes with higher mutation frequency were NOTCH1, FBXW7, and DNMT3A. The most frequently altered signaling pathways were NOTCH pathway, transcriptional regulation pathway, and DNA methylation pathway. Age (45 years old), platelet (PLT) (50 G/L), actate dehydrogenase (LDH) (600 U/L), response in D19-BMR detection, TP53 and cell cycle signaling pathway alterations, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were integrated into a risk stratification model of event-free survival (EFS). Age (45 years old), white blood cell (WBC) count (30 G/L), response in D19-BMR detection, TP53 and cell cycle signaling pathway alterations, and HSCT were integrated into a risk stratification model of overall survival (OS). According to our risk stratification models, the 1-year EFS and OS rates in the low-risk group were significantly higher than those in the high-risk group.

Conclusions

Our risk stratification models exhibited good prognostic roles in adult T-ALL/LBL patients and might guide individualized treatment and ultimately improve their outcomes.

Decision Analysis for Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation or Immediate Cord Blood Transplantation for Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

An HLA-matched relative is the first-choice donor for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). The most promising alternative donor is thought to be an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) in patients who do not have an HLA-matched related donor. Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is an alternative option. Higher rates of engraftment failure and nonrelapse mortality are significant problems, but the ready availability of cord blood can be an advantage, because patients can immediately undergo transplantation before progression. This study was conducted to identify an appropriate alternative donor in patients with Ph-negative ALL in CR1 who do not have an HLA-matched related donor (MRD). Decision analyses using a Markov model were performed to compare immediate CBT, in which CBT was performed at 1 month after the achievement of CR1, with elective unrelated bone marrow transplantation (uBMT) from an 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) (8/8 uBMT) or uBMT from 7/8 MUD (7/8 uBMT), in which uBMT was performed at 4 months, in patients age 16 to 55 years with Ph-negative ALL in CR1 who did not have an MRD. We constructed a decision tree. The cycle length was set at 3 months, and analyses were performed for 19 cycles for uBMT and 20 cycles for CBT, resulting in evaluation of the 5-year life expectancy after both decisions. Transition probabilities (TPs) and utilities were estimated from prospective and retrospective Japanese studies and the registry database of Japan. Subgroup analyses were performed according to risk stratification based on WBC count and cytogenetics at diagnosis and according to age stratification, with a cutoff of 25 years. One-way sensitivity analyses for TPs and utilities were performed as well. The baseline analyses showed that 8/8 uBMT or 7/8 uBMT had superior results to CBT, with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 2.86 in 8/8 uBMT, 2.84 in 7/8 uBMT, and 2.75 in CBT. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results of the baseline analyses were reversed if the probability of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in CBT improved. Subgroup analyses showed similar results in younger, older, and high-risk patients. However, QALY was worse in 8/8 uBMT compared with CBT in standard-risk patients. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of NRM in uBMT and CBT affected the baseline results in all analyses except for comparisons between 8/8 uBMT and CBT in younger and high-risk patients. In these 2 populations, the superiority of 8/8 uBMT was consistently demonstrated throughout the one-way sensitivity analyses. For patients with Ph-negative ALL in CR1 who decide to undergo transplantation from an alternative donor, elective uBMT from either an 8/8 MUD or a 7/8 MUD is expected to yield a better outcome than immediate CBT. Nonetheless, CBT is a viable option, and improvements to reduce the risk of NRM in CBT may change these results.

Comparison of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and TKI combined with chemotherapy for adult philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study seeks to clarify whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is necessary for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in post-remission based on a comparison with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with chemotherapy.

METHODS

We searched the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and limited the date range for the studies from January 2010 to August 2020. A hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was employed to assess overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), and an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI was used to evaluate the ratio of non-relapsed mortality (NRM) and non-relapsed survival (NRS). All analyses were conducted with Stata software 16.0 and Revman 5.3.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, totaling 959 patients, were included in our analysis. Among those patients, 473 underwent allo-HSCT, and 486 received TKI plus chemotherapy. The pooled results showed no difference in OS between outcomes for patients receiving TKI plus chemotherapy and those treated with allo-HSCT (HR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.51-1.12], p = 0.16). Patients undergoing allo-HSCT did better than those receiving TKI plus chemotherapy regarding RFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.37-0.63], p = 0.00), and NRS (OR = 2.64, 95% CI [1.25-5.57], p = 0.00). The NRM rate of the TKI plus chemotherapy group was significantly lower than the allo-HSCT group (OR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.51-3.59], p = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

TKI combined with chemotherapy can be considered a post-remission treatment option for adult Ph+ ALL patients who are ineligible for allo-HSCT. However, more prospective studies with large sample sizes should be carried out in the future.

Impact of timely BCR-ABL1 monitoring before allogeneic stem cell transplantation among patients with BCR-ABL1-positive B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background

With the emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the incorporation of stringent measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, risk stratification for BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients has changed significantly. However, whether this monitoring can replace conventional risk factors in determining whether patients need allogeneic stem cell transplantation is still unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of BCR-ABL1 monitoring on the outcome of patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the survival outcome of patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL based on the quantification of BCR-ABL1 at 3 timepoints the end of induction (timepoint 1), post-consolidation week 16 (timepoint 2), and the end of treatment for patients who were either transplant-eligible or non-transplant eligible (timepoint 3).

Results

From 2006 to 2018, a total of 96 patients newly diagnosed with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL were treated with chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thirty-eight (41.3%) patients achieved complete remission, and 33 patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our data showed that pre-transplant MRD monitoring by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction had the highest correlation with survival in patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL, especially for those who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Conclusion

Patients without MRD pre-transplantation had superior survival compared with those who had MRD, and they had excellent long-term outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Haploidentical vs. sibling, unrelated, or cord blood hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Haploidentical HCT is the preferred alternate donor approach for adults with ALL.

Haploidentical transplantation had similar survival compared with fully HLA-matched donor HCT but with reduced GVHD.

The role of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is being defined. We performed a retrospective, multivariable analysis comparing outcomes of HCT approaches by donor for adults with ALL in remission. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) among haploidentical HCTs using PTCy and HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD), 7 /8 HLA-MUD, or umbilical cord blood (UCB) HCT. Comparing haploidentical HCT to MSD HCT, we found that OS, leukemia-free survival (LFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were not different but chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was higher in MSD HCT. Compared with MUD HCT, OS, LFS, and relapse were not different, but MUD HCT had increased NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; P = .02), grade 3 to 4 aGVHD (HR, 1.59; P = .005), and cGVHD. Compared with 7/8 UD HCT, LFS and relapse were not different, but 7/8 UD HCT had worse OS (HR, 1.38; P = .01) and increased NRM (HR, 2.13; P ≤ .001), grade 3 to 4 aGVHD (HR, 1.86; P = .003), and cGVHD (HR, 1.72; P ≤ .001). Compared with UCB HCT, late OS, late LFS, relapse, and cGVHD were not different but UCB HCT had worse early OS (≤18 months; HR, 1.93; P < .001), worse early LFS (HR, 1.40; P = .007) and increased incidences of NRM (HR, 2.08; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 aGVHD (HR, 1.97; P < .001). Haploidentical HCT using PTCy showed no difference in survival but less GVHD compared with traditional MSD and MUD HCT and is the preferred alternative donor HCT option for adults with ALL in complete remission.

Comparing outcomes of a second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant using HLA-matched unrelated versus T-cell replete haploidentical donors in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT

Optimal donor choice for a second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains undefined. We compared outcomes using HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD) versus haploidentical donors in this population. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The MUD allo-HCT group comprised 104 patients (male = 56, 54%), median age 36 years, mostly (76%) with B-cell phenotype in complete remission (CR) (CR2/CR3 + = 76, 73%). The 61 patients (male = 38, 62%) in the haploidentical group were younger, median age 30 years (p = 0.002), had mostly (79%) a B-cell phenotype and the majority were also in CR at time of the second allo-HCT (CR2/CR3 + = 40, 66%). Peripheral blood stem cells was the most common cell source in both, but a significantly higher number in the haploidentical group received bone marrow cells (26% vs. 4%, p < 0.0001). A haploidentical donor second allo-HCT had a 1.5-fold higher 2-year OS (49% vs. 31%), albeit not statistically significant (p = 0.13). A longer time from first allo-HCT to relapse was associated with improved OS, leukemia-free survival, graft-versus-host disease-free-relapse-free survival, and lower cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality. Results suggest no major OS difference when choosing either a MUD or haploidentical donor for ALL patients needing a second allo-HCT.

Antibody and cellular immunotherapies for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

Despite improvements in the outcomes of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), traditional therapies (including hematopoietic stem cell transplant) often still fail. Antigen-specific immunotherapies for the treatment of ALL such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy and are rapidly evolving. With indisputable activity in patients with relapsed or refractory ALL, efforts now hope to integrate these agents into earlier phases of treatment. In this review, we will discuss the available antibody and cellular-based immunotherapies for the treatment of patients with ALL and provide a clinical and biologic framework with which to inform treatment approaches.

Optimal treatment for Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission in the era of high-intensity chemotherapy

The optimal treatment for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) has not been established in the high-intensity chemotherapy era. The outcomes of patients with Ph-negative ALL who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donor in CR1 (HSCT-MRD group and HSCT-MUD group) were obtained from a Japanese registry database. Patients aged 16-24 years and 25-65 years were analyzed separately, and their outcomes were compared to those of patients who continued high-intensity chemotherapy in CR1 in studies (202U group and 202O group) by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG). In the HSCT-MRD group, patients younger than 25 years had lower overall survival (OS) than the 202U group, presumably due to the higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the HSCT-MRD group. Patients 25 years and older had similar OS to the 202O group. The lower relapse rate was counterbalanced by higher NRM in the HSCT-MRD group. In the HSCT-MUD group, patients in both age groups had similar OS to their corresponding groups in the JALSG studies. In conclusion, high-intensity chemotherapy may change the role of HSCT for Ph-negative ALL.

Superior survival with pediatric-style chemotherapy compared to myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older adolescents and young adults with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: analysis from CALGB 10403 and the CIBMTR

Optimal post-remission therapy for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) is not established. We compared overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients receiving post-remission therapy on CALGB 10403 to a cohort undergoing myeloablative (MA) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in CR1. In univariate analysis, OS was superior with chemotherapy compared to MA allogeneic HCT (3-year OS 77% vs. 53%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, allogeneic HCT showed inferior OS (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.5-2.66, P < 0.001), inferior DFS (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25-2.12, P < 0.001), and increased NRM (HR 5.41, 95% CI 3.23-9.06, P < 0.001) compared to chemotherapy. A higher 5-year relapse incidence was seen with chemotherapy compared to allogeneic HCT (34% vs. 23%, P = 0.011). Obesity was independently associated with inferior OS (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.63-2.89, P < 0.001), inferior DFS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.51-2.57, P < 0.001), increased relapse (1.84, 95% CI 1.31-2.59, P < 0.001), and increased NRM (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.37-3.23, P < 0.001). For AYA ALL patients in CR1, post-remission therapy with pediatric-style chemotherapy is superior to MA allogeneic HCT for OS, DFS, and NRM.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prevention in haploidentical transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) include post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). Utilizing EBMT registry, we compared ATG versus PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients undergoing haplo-HCT. Included were 434 patients; ATG (n=98) and PTCy (n=336). Median follow-up was ~2 years. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except that the ATG-group was more likely to have relapsed/refractory ALL (P=0.008), non-TBI conditioning (P<0.001), peripheral blood graft source (P=<0.001) and transplanted at an earlier time-period (median year of HCT 2011 vs. 2015). The 100-day grade II-IV and III-IV acute-GVHD was similar between ATG and PTCy, as was 2-year chronic-GVHD. On multivariate analysis (MVA), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) was better with PTCy compared to ATG prophylaxis. Relapse incidence (RI) was lower in the PTCy group (P=0.03), while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was not different. Advanced disease and lower performance score were associated with poorer LFS and OS and advanced disease with inferior GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Peripheral grafts were associated with higher GVHD compared to bone marrow grafts. In ALL patients undergoing unmanipulated haplo-HCT, PTCy for GVHD prevention resulted in lower RI and improved LFS and OS compared to ATG.

Outcomes of Adolescent Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Long-term Follow-up of 335 Patients

BACKGROUND

Adolescents (aged 10-17 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a unique patient population, with a disproportionate survival disadvantage compared with younger patients. We aimed to determine the outcomes and prognostic factors of adolescent patients treated at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2017, 335 adolescents with ALL were enrolled; clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared between adolescents and younger children (1-9 years old, n = 704).

RESULTS

Adolescents were more likely to have high-risk factors such as hyperleukocytosis, a T-cell immunophenotype, BCR-ABL1, and/or poor early treatment responses. Compared with younger children, adolescents had significantly worse 5-year event-free survival (EFS) (73.0% ± 2.5% vs. 82.6% ± 1.5%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS) (77.1% ± 2.3% vs. 87.7% ± 1.3%; P < .001). Furthermore, younger adolescents (10-14 years) tended to have better outcomes compared with those older than 15 years (5-year OS: 79.3% ± 2.5% vs. 68.4% ± 5.7%; P = .042), mainly because of the lower frequencies of toxicities. On multivariate analysis, white blood count ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L and extramedullary involvement at diagnosis were the most powerful prognostic factors for both OS and EFS.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes among adolescent patients were not as good as that of younger children. Further studies are required to define optimal treatment strategies for adolescents, particularly those aged 15 to 17 years.

Hematopoeitic Cell Transplantation and CAR T-Cell Therapy: Complements or Competitors?

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy are the main modalities of adoptive cellular immunotherapy that have widely permeated the clinical space. The advent of both technologies revolutionized treatment of many hematologic malignancies, both offering the chance at sustained remissions for patients who would otherwise invariably succumb to their diseases. The understanding and exploitation of the nonspecific alloreactivity of allo-HCT and the graft-versus-tumor effect is contrasted by the genetically engineered precision of CAR T therapy. Historically, those with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies have often been considered for allo-HCT, although outcomes vary dramatically and are associated with potential acute and chronic toxicities. Such patients, mainly with B-lymphoid malignancies, may now be offered CAR T therapy. Yet, a lack of prospective data to guide decisions thereafter requires individualized approaches on whether to proceed to allo-HCT or observe. The continued innovations to make CAR T therapy more effective and accessible will continue to alter such approaches, but similar innovations in allo-HCT will likely result in similarly improved clinical outcomes. In this review, we describe the history of the two platforms, dissect the clinical indications emphasizing their intertwining and competitive roles described in trials and practice guidelines, and highlight innovations in which they complement or inform one another.

New approaches to the treatment of older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Outcomes for older adults (defined here as ≥55-65 years old) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are poor, with long-term survival less than 20%. Pediatric chemotherapy regimens produce long-term cure rates of 80% to 90% in children and 60% to 70% in adolescents and young adults with Ph-negative ALL, however, tolerability of intensive chemotherapy becomes problematic with advanced age due to comorbidities and reduced tolerability of chemotherapy leading to high rates of treatment-related mortality. For older adults with Ph-positive ALL, BCR-ABL1-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with corticosteroids or chemotherapy produce deep remissions with low treatment-related toxicity but optimal postremission therapy is not known. New therapeutic approaches for older adults with ALL involve integration of the novel targeted agents including monoclonal antibody-based therapy with blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin in the frontline. Ongoing studies will ideally define optimal combinations and sequencing of novel agents with or without chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and/or corticosteroids to maximize efficacy while avoiding treatment-related death. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells are a promising modality, with high rates of remission and minimal residual disease negativity achieved in early phase trials for adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL but the tolerability of chimeric antigen receptor modified T cell therapies in older adults is yet to be well defined. Advances in minimal residual disease detection have helped to effectively stratify adults in complete response in terms of relapse risk and predicted relative benefit for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. For older adults with ALL in complete response at high risk for relapse for whom myeloablative conditioning is predicted to result in excessive transplant-related mortality, reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant is a less toxic approach for providing a graft-versus-leukemia effect and long-term disease control.

Updated risk-oriented strategy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adult patients 18-65 years: NILG ALL 10/07

An updated strategy combining pediatric-based chemotherapy with risk-oriented allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was evaluated in Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- ALL) and compared with a published control series. Following induction-consolidation chemotherapy, responsive patients were assigned to receive maintenance chemotherapy or undergo early HCT according to the risk stratification criteria and minimal residual disease (MRD) status. Of the 203 study patients (median age 41 years, range 17-67), 140/161 with Ph- ALL achieved complete remission (86.9%; 91.6% ≤55 years, P = 0.0002), with complete MRD clearing in 68/109; 55 patients were assigned to maintenance chemotherapy, and 85 to HCT due to very high-risk characteristics (hyperleukocytosis, adverse genetics, early/mature T-precursor ALL, and MRD persistence). The 5-year relapse incidence was 36%, and the treatment-related mortality rate was 18%. Median overall and relapse-free survival were 7.4 and 6.2 years, with rates of 54 and 53% at 5 years, respectively, which were significantly better than those obtained with the historical protocol (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively), without significant differences between maintenance and HCT cohorts. In prognostic analysis, MRD negativity and age ≤55 years were the most favorable independent prognostic factors. A reduction in treatment toxicity and further improvements in the risk definitions and risk-oriented design are the focuses of this ongoing research.

Outcome predictors after retransplantation in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a multicenter, retrospective study

Retransplantation is the only curative treatment option for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that has relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT); however, data in this setting remain scant. Hence, this multicenter, retrospective study aims to determine outcome predictors after retransplantation in relapsed ALL. We examined 55 recipients who underwent multiple allo-HCTs during 2006-2018. The 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and non-relapse mortality rates were 35.9%, 29.1%, and 23.6%, respectively. We observed a trend of better outcome in Ph + ALL (n = 22) patients compared with non-Ph ALL (n = 33) patients; the 2-year PFS was 40.9% versus 21.2%, indicating a beneficial effect of more potent second- or third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Univariate analysis revealed that late relapse after the previous transplant was the only significant predictor of better transplant outcome among Ph + ALL patients, whereas factors related to prolonged OS/PFS in non-Ph ALL patients were late relapse after the previous transplant, longer duration from disease relapse/progression to second or more allo-HCT, disease status at the transplantation, and good performance status. Nevertheless, further investigations are warranted to determine whether novel molecular-targeted agents with higher efficacy and fewer toxicities could exceed conventional chemotherapies as a bridging strategy to next allo-HCT and improve the outcomes of non-Ph ALL patients.

Prognostic factors for survival after allogeneic transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) offers a curative option in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Prognostic factors for survival after allo-SCT have not been sufficiently defined: pheno-/genotype, patients´ age, conditioning regimens and remission at allo-SCT are under discussion. We analyzed the outcome of 180 consecutive adult ALL-patients undergoing allo-SCT at our center between 1995 and 2018 to identify specific prognostic factors. In our cohort 19% were older than 55 years, 28% had Philadelphia-positive B-ALL, 24% T-ALL. 54% were transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), 13% in CR2 after salvage therapy, 31% reached no remission (8% within first-line, 23% within salvage therapy). In 66% conditioning contained total body irradiation (TBI). With a median follow-up of 10 years, we observed an overall survival of 33% at 10 years, and a progression free survival of 31%. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 41% at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality 28%. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) II°-IV° occurred in 31%, moderate/severe chronic GvHD in 27%. Survival was better in patients reaching CR before allo-SCT and in those receiving TBI. No difference between patients younger/older than 55 years and between different phenotypes was observed. Survival after allo-SCT improved considerably over the last decades.

Cryostorage to What End? - Autologous Stem Cell Products in Burkitt Lymphoma, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Patients

Introduction

Recently, we identified a huge discrepancy between the collection practice and the actual utilization of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). Specifically, patients with Burkitt lymphoma, acute leukemia, and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were frequently not referred for ABSCT after successful PBSC collection.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify variables that are associated with the non-utilization of PBSC grafts.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC grafts in Burkitt lymphoma (n = 18), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 22), MPN (n = 18), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 71) patients. Patients who underwent autologous PBSC collection at 2 collection and transplantation centers between 2001 and 2012 were included and followed up until 2016.

Results

None of the Burkitt lymphoma patients were referred for ABSCT. Only in 1 (6%) patient, the graft was discarded after the patient's death. In all other patients (n = 17, 94%), the grafts were stored independently of the patient's status (death, n = 4, 22%; no follow-up, n = 6, 33%; no indication for ABSCT given, n = 7, 39%). In ALL patients, 4 (18%) patients underwent ABSCT after a median follow-up of 74 (1-182) months. In the remaining patients, PBSC grafts were either discarded (8 patients, 36%) or stored until the reference date (10 patients, 45%). Seven of 18 MPN patients (39%) underwent ABSCT. ABSCT was performed in 24 (34%) AML patients. In 20 (28%) patients who were not referred to ABSCT, an allogeneic transplantation (TPL) was performed. Fifteen (21%) patients received palliative care or deceased, and their grafts were discarded in all but 1 patient. Additional grafts were discarded in 21 (31%) patients and stored in 9 (13%) patients who underwent ABSCT or allogeneic TPL (n = 44).

Conclusions

As the role and efficacy of autologous HDCT/ABSCT are not established in the analyzed entities, the indication for PBSC collection should be reanalyzed in regular intervals. Moreover, PBSC grafts from patients who have deceased, have insufficient grafts, or have already undergone an allogeneic TPL should be considered for disposal or (if applicable) for research use, to economize storage costs on a rational basis.

Optimal approach to the treatment of young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 2020

Akin to the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors to Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), pediatric-based asparaginase-heavy approaches have revolutionized the treatment of young adults with the Philadelphia chromosome-negative subset the past decades. Once again, we are approaching a new era. An era of precision medicine with immunotherapy and other molecularly targeted treatments that offers unique opportunities to customize treatment intensity with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, reduce the burden of toxicities, and combat persistent residual disease. Recently approved agents for refractory/relapsed B-cell precursor ALL include the chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells, the anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and the bispecific anti-CD19 T-cell engager, blinatumomab. These agents are expected to move widely into the frontline setting along with the proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib and carfilzomib, as well as tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Philadelphia-like rearrangements that are especially frequent among young adults. To this add the BH3 mimetics, venetoclax and navitoclax, which are being widely explored in refractory/relapsed as well as frontline settings for B- and T-cell ALL. The promising anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab, is entering the scene of refractory/relapsed T-ALL, whereas the old purine analogue, nelarabine, is being evaluated in a new upfront setting. This review focuses on 2 main questions: How do we optimize frontline as well as salvage ALL treatment of young adults in the 2020s? Not least, how do we address the current burden of serious toxicities unique to young adults?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia harboring t(1;19)(q23;p13.3); comparison with normal karyotype

There are few reports on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) harboring t(1;19)(q23;p13.3). We used nationwide registry data of Japan for 2003-2016 to evaluate transplant outcomes and clarified prognostic factors among adult allo-HSCT recipients with B-ALL harboring t(1;19)(q23;p13.3) (n = 125). Compared with cytogenetically normal (CN) B-ALL patients (n = 1057), their 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were comparable (55.4% for t(1;19) and 54.4% for CN; P = 0.76). Considering only patients in first complete hematological remission (CR1), the 3-year OS rates remained comparable (70.5% for t(1;19) and 67.8% for CN; P = 0.86). For t(1;19) patients in CR1, minimal residual disease (MRD) at transplantation was associated with relatively worse outcomes. The 3-year OS rates were 43.6% for patients with MRD and 77.4% for those without it (P = 0.016). The 3-year relapse rates were 54.5% for patients with MRD and 12.8% for those without it (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that MRD at transplantation was a significant risk factor for OS and relapse. In the high-intensity chemotherapy era, t(1;19)(q23;p13.3) did not have a poorer posttransplant prognosis than the normal karyotype. However, even for patients in CR1, MRD at transplantation was associated with comparatively worse OS and higher relapse rates.

Practical guidance for the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the adolescent and young adult population

The outstanding therapeutic progress achieved with modern pediatric regimens in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) led efforts to explore whether a similar treatment approach could be equally effective and safe in older patients, starting initially with older adolescents and young adults (AYA), variably defined in different studies by an age between 15–18 and 25–39 years. Several comparative and noncomparative trials of this type have been carried out during the last two decades, enrolling thousands of patients. Almost without exception, the new strategy improved patients’ outcomes compared with traditional adult treatments in B-lineage and T-lineage Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-ALL, while the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) led to comparative progress in Ph+ ALL, a former high-risk subset more typically observed in older age groups. At present, highly effective pediatric-based regimens warrant 5-year survival rates of 60–70% in AYA patients. In view of these data, the same approach was progressively extended to older patients, improving the results up to 55 years of age. Issues of treatment compliance and drug-related toxicity have thus far prevented a comparable therapeutic advancement in patients aged >55 years. This critical review updates and summarizes with pertinent examples this global, positive therapeutic change, and examines how to promote further progress with new targeted therapies that include novel immuno-therapeutics and other agents developed against the many molecular dysfunctions detectable in various ALL subsets. Substantial progress is expected to occur soon, bringing AYA survival figures very close to that of children, and also to improve the outcome of ALL at all ages.

Haploidentical transplant in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Argentina: a comparison with matched related and unrelated donors

We aimed at analyzing the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), comparing Haploidentical (Haplo) with HLA-matched (sibling and unrelated) donors. Between 2008 and 2017, we collected data from 236 patients (median age 31 years; range 16-64; 90% HCT-CI 0-1) who underwent unmanipulated ASCT in first complete remission and subsequent remissions in 15 Argentinian centers. Donors were HLA-matched (n = 175; 74%) and Haplo (n = 61; 26%). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 55% (95% CI 47-63) for the HLA-matched group and 49% (95% CI 34-62) for the Haplo group (p = 0.351). For OS, crude HR, adjusted HR for covariates (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.77-1.99; p = 0.363) and HR including a propensity score in the model (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.71-2.08; p = 0.414) showed no impact of donor category on the OS. No difference was found in terms of nonrelapse mortality, relapse, leukemia-free survival, and grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); 2-year incidence of chronic GVHD was higher in HLA-matched vs Haplo group (p = 0.028). Patients with ALL who underwent ASCT were young subjects with low HCT-CI. In this setting, a Haplo donor represents an alternative widely available in the absence of an HLA-matched donor. Relapse remains a challenge for all donor categories.

Pediatric-Inspired Treatment Regimens for Adolescents and Young Adults With Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Review

Importance

The incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (age range, 15-39 years) in the United States is increasing at a greater rate than in younger or older persons. Their optimal treatment has been increasingly debated as pediatric regimens have become more widely used in the age group. This review compares the basic features of pediatric and adult chemotherapy regimens for ALL and LBL, recognizes and describes the challenges of the pediatric regimen, and suggests strategies to facilitate its adoption for AYAs with ALL and LBL.

Observations

All but 2 of 25 published comparisons of outcomes with pediatric and adult regimens for ALL and LBL in AYAs and 1 meta-analysis favor the pediatric regimen. After more than a half-century of clinical trials of the pediatric regimens, including at least 160 phase 3 trials in the United States, the pediatric regimens have become far more complex than most adult regimens. Asparaginase, a critical component of the pediatric regimens, is more difficult to administer to AYAs (and older patients) but nonetheless has a favorable benefit to toxicity ratio for AYAs. A dramatic reduction in outcome of ALL and LBL during the AYA years (the "survival cliff") is coincident with similar reductions in proportions of AYAs referred to academic centers and enrolled on clinical trials (the "accrual cliff" and "referral cliff").

Conclusions and Relevance

The accumulating data increasingly support treating AYAs with ALL and LBL with a pediatric-inspired regimen or an approved institutional or national clinical trial tailored for this patient group. A need to develop clinical trials specifically for AYAs and to encourage their participation is paramount, with a goal to improve both the quantity and quality of survival.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Updated 2019 Evidence-Based Review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

The role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is reviewed and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of ALL experts developed consensus on the treatment recommendations based on the evidence. Allogeneic HCT offers a survival benefit in selected patients with ALL, and this review summarizes the standard indications as well as the areas of controversy. There is now greater experience with pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens that has transformed upfront therapy for adult ALL, resulting in higher remission rates and overall survival. This in turn has increased the equipoise around decision making for ALL in first complete remission (CR1) when there is no measurable residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction and/or consolidation. Randomized studies are needed for adults with ALL to compare allogeneic HCT in CR1 with pediatric-inspired chemotherapy alone. Indications for transplantation in the evolving landscape of MRD assessments and novel targeted and immune therapeutics remain important areas of investigation.

Indications for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2019

This is the seventh special EBMT report on the indications for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders. Our aim is to provide general guidance on transplant indications according to prevailing clinical practice in EBMT countries and centres. In order to inform patient decisions, these recommendations must be considered together with the risk of the disease, the risk of the transplant procedure and the results of non-transplant strategies. In over two decades since the first report, the EBMT indications manuscripts have incorporated changes in transplant practice coming from scientific and technical developments in the field. In this same period, the establishment of JACIE accreditation has promoted high quality and led to improved outcomes of patient and donor care and laboratory performance in transplantation and cellular therapy. An updated report with operating definitions, revised indications and an additional set of data with overall survival at 1 year and non-relapse mortality at day 100 after transplant in the commonest standard-of-care indications is presented. Additional efforts are currently underway to enable EBMT member centres to benchmark their risk-adapted outcomes as part of the Registry upgrade Project 2020 against national and/or international outcome data.

New Approaches to the Management of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Traditional treatment regimens for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, result in an overall survival of approximately 40%, a figure hardly comparable with the extraordinary 80% to 90% cure rate currently reported in children. When translated to the adult setting, modern pediatric-type regimens improve the survival to approximately 60% in young adults. The addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease and the measurement of minimal residual disease to guide risk stratification and postremission approaches has led to additional improvements in outcomes. Relapsed disease and treatment toxicity-sparing no patient but representing a major concern especially in the elderly-are the most critical current issues awaiting further therapeutic advancement. Recently, there has been considerable progress in understanding the disease biology, specifically the Philadelphia-like signature, as well as other high-risk subgroups. In addition, there are several new agents that will undoubtedly contribute to additional improvement in the current outcomes. The most promising agents are monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and, to a lesser extent, several new drugs targeting key molecular pathways involved in leukemic cell growth and proliferation. This review examines the evidence supporting the increasing role of the new therapeutic tools and treatment options in different disease subgroups, including frontline and relapsed or refractory disease. It is now possible to define the best individual approach on the basis of the emerging concepts of precision medicine.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Clinical Practice

Over half of patients diagnosed with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) develop relapsed or refractory disease. Traditional chemotherapy salvage is inadequate, and new therapies are needed. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel, immunologic approach where T cells are genetically engineered to express a CAR conferring specificity against a target cell surface antigen, most commonly the pan-B-cell marker CD19. After infusion, CAR T cells expand and persist, allowing ongoing tumor surveillance. Several anti-CD19 CAR T cell constructs have induced high response rates in heavily pre-treated populations, although durability of response varied. Severe toxicity (cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity) is the primary constraint to broad implementation of CAR T cell therapy. Here, we review the experience of CAR T cell therapy for ALL and ongoing efforts to modify existing technology to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity. As an anti-CD19 CAR T cell construct may be FDA approved soon, we focus on issues relevant to practicing clinicians.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma in adolescents and young adults

Compared to younger and older age groups, the incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) has increased more in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population, the cause of which is unknown. As of the last decade, only half of the AYA patients with these diseases were surviving 10 years. Strong evidence exists that favors "pediatric" treatment regimens for AYAs compared to "adult" treatment regimens in terms of survival rates, hospitalization time, toxicities, late effects, and quality of life both during and after treatment. Targeted agents are clinically accessible for certain subsets of patients with Philadelphia-like ALL, the incidence of which peaks in AYAs. Treatment teams must appreciate the complex psychosocial underpinnings in these patients in order to maximize compliance with the prolonged and complex treatment plans during the AYA years.

Proceedings From the Fourth Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Symposium (HAPLO2016), San Diego, California, December 1, 2016

The resurgence of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT) over the last decade is one of the most important advances in the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The modified platforms of T cell depletion either ex vivo (CD34+ cell selection, "megadoses" of purified CD34+ cells, or selective depletion of T cells) or newer platforms of in vivo depletion of T cells, with either post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide or intensified immune suppression, have contributed to better outcomes, with survival similar to that in HLA-matched donor transplantation. Further efforts are underway to control viral reactivation using modified T cells, improve immunologic reconstitution, and decrease the relapse rate post-transplantation using donor-derived cellular therapy products, such as genetically modified donor lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Improvements in treatment-related mortality have allowed the extension of haploidentical donor transplants to patients with hemoglobinopathies, such as thalassemia and sickle cell disease, and the possible development of platforms for immunotherapy in solid tumors. Moreover, combining HSCT from a related donor with solid organ transplantation could allow early tapering of immunosuppression in recipients of solid organ transplants and hopefully prevent organ rejection in this setting. This symposium summarizes some of the most important recent advances in HaploSCT and provides a glimpse in the future of fast growing field.

Management of older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: challenges & current approaches

The management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in older patients is challenging. Older patients often have multiple comorbidities and poor performance status, and disease factors associated with poor prognosis are more common in this age group. Patient and disease-related factors should be taken into account to determine whether intensive therapy is appropriate. The use of comorbidity indices and comprehensive geriatric assessment tools can be valuable in this setting. Fit patients should be considered for aggressive therapies including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, whereas low intensity options may be more suitable for the frail. The Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome is present in up to half of the cases of ALL in older patients. The incorporation of TK inhibitors into the treatment plans of older patients with Ph-positive ALL has improved the outcomes significantly. For less fit patients with Ph-positive ALL, the use of TK inhibitors with reduced-intensity chemotherapy or steroids alone results in high rates of remission, but, without further consolidation, relapses are inevitable. Many novel targeted and immunotherapeutic agents are being developed, offering more effective and tolerable treatment options.