The effect of donor characteristics on survival after unrelated donor transplantation for hematologic malignancy

'A perfect match': how hematologists discuss donor options and risks with black and white patients considering allogeneic stem cell transplant

Patients of racial minorities have lower chance of securing a suitable donor, essential part of successful allogeneic stem cell transplant. In this simulated interview study, we sought to examine how hematologists discuss donor options and risks with patients with high-risk myeloid neoplasm considering transplant. Thirty-seven US hematologists participated (65% male; 65% white, 24% Asian, none Black), randomly assigned to meet with a Black or white patient actor. The hematologists emphasized the benefits of a full match with the white patient and high chance of securing a donor. Conversely, with the Black patient, they tended not to ask about ancestry, discuss the donor registry, race implications or challenges with donor search. Knowing the patient had children, many recommended haploidentical transplant. The unique circumstances of transplant argue for a focused communication including discussing race. While conversations should be tailored to each patient, limiting essential information on donor options may contribute to disparities.

Donor selection in T-cell-replete haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

The effects of donor characteristics on outcomes after T-cell-replete (TCR) haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) or low-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) remain unclear. We evaluated the impact in 1,677 patients who received a PTCy protocol (PTCy-haplo; n = 1,107) or low-dose ATG protocol (ATG-haplo; n = 570). A low CD34+ cell dose (<4 ×106/kg) was the only donor characteristic associated with worse overall survival (OS) after PTCy-haplo (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] = 1.49, P = 0.008), whereas increasing donor age by decade (aHR = 1.12, P = 0.008) and human leukocyte antigen 2-3 antigen mismatches (aHR = 1.46, P = 0.010), compared to HLA 0-1 antigen mismatches, were associated with worse OS after ATG-haplo. Increasing donor age was associated with a high risk of grade III-IV acute GVHD both after PTCy-haplo (HR: 1.32, P = 0.009) and ATG-haplo (HR: 1.22, P = 0.006). Offspring donors had better relapse-free survival and GVHD-free relapse-free survival than sibling donors after ATG-haplo. Our data highlights the donor characteristics associated with improved transplant outcomes after TCR haploidentical donor PBSCT with PTCy or low-dose ATG.

Donor telomeres and their magnitude of shortening post-allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant impact survival for patients with early-stage leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Donor selection is a key success factor in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We evaluated the potential impact of donor leucocyte telomere length (LTL) and LTL shortening in recipients at three-month post-HCT (LTL-3MS) on the two-year HCT outcomes.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of 384 HCT recipients for early-stage leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trial Network protocol#1202 with blood samples collected three-month post-HCT. Blood samples from respective donors were available at the Centre for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research biorepository. We used Cox proportional hazards models for statistical analyses.

FINDINGS

A better two-year overall survival (OS) was associated with longer donor LTL (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37-0.96, for LTL ≥6.7 kb vs LTL< 6.7 kb, p = 0.03), and higher LTL-3MS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.34-0.80, for LTL-3MS ≥ 230 vs < 230 bp, p = 0.003). Longer donor LTL was associated with a lower risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM; HR = 0.48, p = 0.05), while higher LTL-3MS was associated with lower relapse risk (HR for relapse risk = 0.53, p = 0.008). The adjusted 2-year cumulative risk of all-cause mortality was reduced by about half for patients with both donor LTL ≥6.7 kb and LTL-3MS ≥ 230 bp vs patients with neither characteristic (21% vs 41%, respectively; p < 0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Selection of donors with longer LTL may improve HCT outcomes. Limited LTL shortening in recipients post-HCT may guide relapse prediction.

FUNDING

The NCI intramural research program and NIH grant U01AG066529.

Importance of measurable residual disease in the outcome of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Long follow-up analysis from a single transplant center

INTRODUCTION

In this retrospective study, with prolonged follow-up, we analyze the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the impact of pre-transplantation measurable residual disease (pre-HSCT MRD).

METHODS

Detection of MRD was performed by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) for Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL (Ph-neg ALL) and by classic genetic tests for Ph-pos ALL.

RESULTS

Among 46 patients in first complete remission (CR1) who had available MRD data, 1- and 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse (CIR) for patients with positive and negative MRD were 47.1% and 52.9% vs. 3.4% and 6.9%, respectively (p<0.001). Disease free survival (DFS) at 1 and 3 years was 82.8% (95% CI 70.1-97.7) and 79.3% (95% CI 65.9-95.5) in the negative MRD group and 35.3% (95% CI 18.5-67.2) and 29.4% (95% CI 14.1-61.4) in the positive MRD group (p<0.001). With a median follow up of 29 months in the entire cohort and 177.6 months (14.8 years) in survivors, 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) for the pre-HSCT negative MRD group was 82.8% (95% CI 70.1-97.7) and 79.2% (95% CI 65.6-95.5), respectively, compared to 64.7% (95% CI 45.5-91.9) and 41.2% (95% CI 23.3-72.7) in the positive MRD group (p=0.001). In a multivariate model, positive pre-HSCT MRD is associated with increased CIR and poorer DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

These results support that pre-HSCT MRD should be eradicated to improve survival of adult ALL patients who undergo allo-HSCT.

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation as a Paradigm for Cellular Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is an established curative treatment for hematological malignancies and other severe blood disorders. However, alloHCT is also known for its significant side effects.

SUMMARY

Here we review recent advances in targeted molecular therapy, immunotherapy, infectiology, and diagnostics that have enhanced the tolerability and efficacy of alloHCT, expanding its use to less fit and elderly patients. We analyze developments in conditioning regimens, donor selection, and the management of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and infections and discuss posttransplantation strategies to prevent relapse.

KEY MESSAGE

In a fresh perspective, alloHCT can serve as a platform to enhance the potential of emerging targeted and immune therapies.

How I treat sickle cell disease with gene therapy

ABSTRACT

In 2023, 2 different gene therapies were approved for individuals with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). The small number of patients treated on the pivotal clinical trials that led to these approvals have experienced dramatic short-term reductions in the occurrence of painful vaso-occlusive crises, but the long-term safety and efficacy of these genetic therapies are yet to be ascertained. Several challenges and treatment-related concerns have emerged in regard to administering these therapies in clinical practice. This article discusses the selection and preparation of individuals with SCD who wish to receive autologous gene therapy, as well as the salient features of the care needed to support them through a long and arduous treatment process. I specifically focus on postinfusion care, as it relates to immune monitoring and infection prevention. Compared with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, delivering autologous gene therapy to an individual with SCD has distinct nuances that require awareness and special interventions. Using clinical vignettes derived from real-life patients, I provide perspectives on the complex decision-making process for gene therapy for SCD based on currently available data and make recommendations for evaluating and supporting these patients.

Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease: Immune Insights, Therapeutic Advances, and Parallels for Solid Organ Transplantation

Chronic graft-versus-host disease remains a frequent and morbid outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, in which the donor-derived immune system attacks healthy recipient tissue. Preceding tissue damage mediated by chemoradiotherapy and alloreactive T cells compromise central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms, leading to aberrant donor T cell and germinal center B cell differentiation, culminating in pathogenic macrophage infiltration and differentiation in a target tissue, with ensuant fibrosis. This process results in a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality, frequently requiring prolonged therapy. In this review, we discuss the processes that interrupt immune tolerance, the subsequent clinical manifestations, and new Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic approaches that have been born from a greater understanding of disease pathogenesis in preclinical systems, linking to parallel processes following solid organ transplantation.

HLA and Non-HLA Factors for Donor Selection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide GvHD Prophylaxis

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches in stem cell transplantation can be well-tolerated with the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Haploidentical (Haplo) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donors become acceptable donors. This review focuses on Haplo and unrelated donor selection in the context of PTCy-transplant for hematological malignancy, in comparison with conventional GvHD prophylaxis. Evaluating patient's donor-specific antibody (DSA) is critical in donor selection regardless of donor type or the use of PTCy. High DSA levels and positive C1q increase the risk of engraftment failure and unsuccessful desensitization. On the other hand, the degree of donor HLA matching is less critical under PTCy compared to conventional GvHD prophylaxis. Donor age was found to be important, as younger donors improve survival outcomes. HLA-B leader match appears to be preferable. The impacts of donor gender, donor cytomegalovirus serostatus, and ABO mismatch are unclear or non-significant. Additionally, available studies suggest that, in PTCy-transplant, preferred Haplo-donors are HLA class II mismatched (DRB1 mismatch and DPB1 non-permissive), siblings or offspring over parents, and if parent, father over mother, while preferred unrelated donors are HLA class I matched. Further study is warranted.

Novel machine learning technique further clarifies unrelated donor selection to optimize transplantation outcomes

ABSTRACT

We investigated the impact of donor characteristics on outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients using a novel machine learning approach, the Nonparametric Failure Time Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (NFT BART). NFT BART models were trained on data from 10 016 patients who underwent a first HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT between 2016 and 2019, reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, then validated on an independent cohort of 1802 patients. The NFT BART models were adjusted based on recipient, disease, and transplant variables. We defined a clinically meaningful impact on overall survival (OS) or event-free survival (EFS; survival without relapse, graft failure, or moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease) as >1% difference in predicted outcome at 3 years. Characteristics with <1% impact (within a zone of indifference) were not considered to be clinically relevant. Donor cytomegalovirus, parity, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope matching fell within the zone of indifference. The only significant donor factor that associated with OS was age, in which, compared with 18-year-old donors, donors aged ≥31 years old were associated with lower OS. Both donor age (≤32 years) and use of a male donor, regardless of recipient sex, improved EFS. We, therefore, recommend selecting the earliest available donor within the 18 to 30 years age range for HCT to optimize OS. If several donors in the 18 to 30 years age range are available, a male donor may be chosen to optimize EFS.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current Status and Future Directions of Donor Selection

The landscape of HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is continuously advancing, introducing more nuanced criteria beyond traditional 10/10 HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 allele matching. For 10/10 matched donors, prioritizing a donor with a "core" permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch is recommended over "noncore" permissive mismatches, with nonpermissive mismatches being the least prefered. In the one-antigen mismatched setting (7/8 HLA-matched), HLA-C matching, particularly avoiding high-expression mismatches at residues 116 or 77/80, is preferred over HLA-A or HLA-B mismatches. HLA B-leader matching is beneficial in both one-antigen mismatched and haploidentical HCT. Additionally, specific HLA mismatches in haploidentical HCT, such as DRB1 mismatches with DQB1 matches and DPB1 nonpermissive mismatches are linked to better outcomes. Among non-HLA factors, evidence consistently underscores the pivotal impact of donor age on overall survival. For HLA-mismatched transplants, including haploidentical HCT, avoidance of donors against whom the recipient has preformed donor-specific antibodies is paramount. Selecting a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor is important particularly for CMV-negative recipients; however, more research is needed in the letermovir prophylaxis era. The impact of ABO-matching on transplant outcomes is debatable. Other unanswered questions include defining "younger" donors and establishing hierarchy in donor selection based on factors like CMV status, ABO compatibility, or sex-mismatch, to name a few. Future research addressing these issues will refine donor selection algorithms and improve transplant success. In conclusion, selecting a donor for HCT requires multifaceted considerations, integrating evolving HLA-matching criteria and non-HLA factors, to optimize HCT outcomes in this rapidly advancing field.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative donors in acute myeloid leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) potentially provides a cure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unlikely to be cured with chemotherapy alone. Previously, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donors were used exclusively, which made the procedure available for a limited proportion of patients. The introduction of high-resolution HLA-typing technology, innovations in immunosuppressive therapy, and improved supportive care measures have significantly changed the situation. Now, patients without a matched related donor have an ample opportunity to receive allogeneic HCT with the use of matched or mismatched unrelated donors, umbilical cord blood grafts, or haploidentical related donors. The outcomes of alternative donor transplantations have improved over the past decades, and the growth of unrelated donor registries as well as the donor diversification have enhanced the chance of finding a suitable donor. With multiple alternative donor choices available for most patients, the donor selection is becoming increasingly important. To discuss the optimal donor choice in case of unavailability of an HLA-matched related donor, this article reviews the existing literature of retrospective and prospective comparisons of different alternative donor transplantations in AML and discusses the current state-of-art modalities in allogeneic HCT using alternative donors.

Haematopoietic cell transplantation for 106 infants and preschoolers with acquired and inherited bone marrow failures

Aplastic anaemia in infants and young children presents unique challenges due to high prevalence of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) in this age group. The objective of this study is assessing clinical characteristics and outcomes of haematopoietic cell transplantation in children ≤5 years with bone marrow failure syndromes. We analysied 106 patients (66% males), median age 4.6 years, including 40 with Fanconi anaemia (FA), 32 with Acquired Severe Aplastic anaemia (aSAA), 15 with Diamond-Blackfan Anaemia, 11 with Amegakaryocytic Purpura and 8 with other IBMFS. Molecular testing was limited (39%), with 25.4% confirmed genetically. Retrospective longitudinal study across three paediatric transplantation centres (1982-2020). Overall survival (OS) was 76.4% over a median 10-year follow-up. OS rates were similar between aSAA and IBMFS (FA 77.5%, other IBMFS 76.5%). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was lower in aSAA (9.4%) compared with IBMFS (16.2%). Recent years showed improved outcomes, with TRM declining post-2010. Choice of stem cell source impacted OS, favouring bone marrow over umbilical cord, but showing encouraging results with haploidentical. Late complications were common, including endocrine-metabolic issues and delayed neuropsychomotor development. Diagnosing and managing bone marrow failures in young children pose significant challenges. Despite advancements in transplant practices, ongoing vigilance and comprehensive care are necessary to improve long-term survival rates.

Donor clinical characteristics and impacts on transfusion recipient outcomes

Clinical characteristics of blood donors may affect short- and long-term outcomes of transfusion recipients. The impact of donor sex and age on recipient outcomes have not yielded consistent results in observational studies. One recently published randomized controlled trial (iTADS) addressing the impact of donor sex on recipient outcomes noted no differences between a female versus male transfusion strategy; a second Canadian multicenter trial has just been funded. Other donor characteristics - including pregnancy history, smoking status, obesity, and chronic illnesses - remain incompletely explored. More robust clinical studies with vein-to-vein capabilities are needed to understand the complex interplay between donors and recipients.

A New Tool Supporting the Selection of the Best Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donor by Modelling Local Own Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

The selection of the best donor for each specific patient is crucial for the success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there is debate on the choice of the best donor when multiple suitable donors exist.

METHODS

By using own data from two transplant centers, we have developed a calculator able to provide the patients' 2-year overall survival (OS) associated with each of the potential donor options during the selection process, in order to support the transplant physician during the choice. Data on 737 HSCTs with HLA-identical siblings, and unrelated or related haploidentical donors from January 2010 to July 2022 have been retrospectively obtained.

RESULTS

Patients' age, disease, comorbidity index, and donor type were found to be significant variables able to predict the outcome with robustness (concordance index: 0.677). Estimates are provided within an example in the text showing outcomes with four donor options for a specific patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the prototype of a tool supporting the selection of the best donor, guiding transplant physicians during the delicate process of donor selection before HSCT. This approach relies on real data from the centers, reflecting their local clinical experience. Improvements are underway with a larger, ongoing multicenter study.

Clonal dynamics after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) replaces the stem cells responsible for blood production with those from a donor1,2. Here, to quantify dynamics of long-term stem cell engraftment, we sequenced genomes from 2,824 single-cell-derived haematopoietic colonies of ten donor-recipient pairs taken 9-31 years after HLA-matched sibling HCT3. With younger donors (18-47 years at transplant), 5,000-30,000 stem cells had engrafted and were still contributing to haematopoiesis at the time of sampling; estimates were tenfold lower with older donors (50-66 years). Engrafted cells made multilineage contributions to myeloid, B lymphoid and T lymphoid populations, although individual clones often showed biases towards one or other mature cell type. Recipients had lower clonal diversity than matched donors, equivalent to around 10-15 years of additional ageing, arising from up to 25-fold greater expansion of stem cell clones. A transplant-related population bottleneck could not explain these differences; instead, phylogenetic trees evinced two distinct modes of HCT-specific selection. In pruning selection, cell divisions underpinning recipient-enriched clonal expansions had occurred in the donor, preceding transplant-their selective advantage derived from preferential mobilization, collection, survival ex vivo or initial homing. In growth selection, cell divisions underpinning clonal expansion occurred in the recipient's marrow after engraftment, most pronounced in clones with multiple driver mutations. Uprooting stem cells from their native environment and transplanting them to foreign soil exaggerates selective pressures, distorting and accelerating the loss of clonal diversity compared to the unperturbed haematopoiesis of donors.

Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent progress in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) characterization, increased accrual of unrelated donors and cord blood units, and a new platform for haploidentical transplantation have resulted in the widespread availability of donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in HLA typing have identified an increasing number of loci and alleles that are crucial for successful transplantation. Newer HLA A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 alleles, DPB1 mismatches, and HLA B leader sequence matching are incorporated into donor selection algorithms. Donor selection is highly relevant because of recently published conflicting studies using different donor types. These studies are largely retrospective and compare patients with different diseases and stages, conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and time periods. A broad consensus indicates that the best donor is an available matched sibling, followed by a matched unrelated donor, and then alternative donors such as haploidentical, mismatched unrelated, and cord blood units. This consensus is being challenged by other factors, such as donor age, patient condition, urgency of transplantation, and costs involved.

SUMMARY

In this review, we will analyze the unique characteristics of each donor type, the HLA and non HLA factors that affect donor choices, and the outstanding comparative outcome studies of different donor usage in hematologic malignancies.

A Tool for the Assessment of HLA-DQ Heterodimer Variation in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

When optimizing transplants, clinical decision-makers consider HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 (8 matched alleles out of 8), and sometimes HLA-DQB1 (10 out of 10) matching between the patient and donor. HLA-DQ is a heterodimer formed by the β chain product of HLA-DQB1 and an α chain product of HLA-DQA1. In addition to molecules defined by the parentally inherited cis haplotypes, α-β trans-dimerization is possible between certain alleles, leading to unique molecules and a potential source of mismatched molecules. Recently, researchers uncovered that clinical outcome after HLA-DQB1-mismatched unrelated donor HCT depends on the total number of HLA-DQ molecule mismatches and the specific α-β heterodimer mismatch. Our objective in this study is to develop an automated tool for analyzing HLA-DQ heterodimer data and validating it through numerous datasets and analyses. By doing so, we provide an HLA-DQ heterodimer tool for DQα-DQβ trans-heterodimer evaluation, HLA-DQ imputation, and HLA-DQ-featured source selection to the transplant field. In our study, we leverage 352,148 high-confidence, statistically phased (via a modified expectation-maximization algorithm) HLA-DRB1∼DQA1∼DQB1 haplotypes, 1,052 pedigree-phased HLA-DQA1∼DQB1 haplotypes, and 13,663 historical transplants to characterize HLA-DQ heterodimers data. Using our developed QLASSy (HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 Heterodimers Assessment) tool, we first assessed the data quality of HLA-DQ heterodimers in our data for trans-dimers, missing HLA-DQA1 typing, and unexpected HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 combinations. Since trans-dimers enable up to four unique HLA-DQ molecules in individuals, we provide in-silico validations for 99.7% of 275 unique trans-dimers generated by 176,074 U.S. donors with HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 data. Many individuals lack HLA-DQA1 typing, so we developed and validated high-confidence HLA-DQ annotation imputation via HLA-DRB1 with >99% correct predictions in 23,698 individuals. A select few individuals displayed unexpected HLA-DQ combinations. We revisited the typing of 61 donors with unexpected HLA-DQ combinations based on their HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 typing and corrected 22 out of 61 (36%) cases of donors through data review or retyping and used imputation to resolve unexpected combinations. After verifying the data quality of our datasets, we analyzed our datasets further: we explored the frequencies of observed HLA-DQ combinations to compare HLA-DQ across populations (for instance, we found more high-risk molecules in Asian/Pacific Islander and Black/African American populations), demonstrated the effect of HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 mismatching on HLA-DQ molecular mismatches, and highlighted where donor selections could be improved at the time of search for historical transplants with this new HLA-DQ information (where 51.9% of G2-mismatched transplants had lower-risk, G2-matched alternatives). We encapsulated our findings into a tool that imputes missing HLA-DQA1 as needed, annotates HLA-DQ (mis)matches, and highlights other important HLA-DQ data to consider for the present and future. Altogether, these valuable datasets, analyses, and a culminating tool serve as actionable resources to enhance donor selection and improve patient outcomes.

Young (<35 years) haploidentical versus old (≥35 years) mismatched unrelated donors and vice versa for allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

We compared transplantation (HSCT) outcomes in AML patients undergoing HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in first complete remission from 1065 young (<35 years) haploidentical (Haplo) donors (yHaplo) vs. 147 old (≥35 years) mismatched unrelated donors (oMMUD) (first comparison) and from 271 young (<35 years) MMUD (yMMUD) vs. 1315 old (≥35 years) Haplo donors (oHaplo) (second comparison). Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) grades II-IV were significantly lower in the yHaplo vs. oMMUD group (HR = 0.62, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival. As for the second comparison, more patients in the oHaplo group had de novo AML, 86.6% vs. 81.9% in the yMMUD group (p = 0.044), while myeloablative conditioning was used more frequently in the yMMUD group, 53.3% vs. 46.8% in the oHaplo group (p = 0.049). aGVHD grades II-IV and NRM were significantly lower in the yMMUD vs. oHaplo group (HR = 0.69, p = 0.013 and HR = 0.60, p = 0.022). All other transplant outcomes did not differ. In conclusion, HSCT from young alternative donors (<35 years) results in a lower incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD. In addition, NRM is lower in HSCT from yMMUD compared to HSCT from oHaplo.

Interplay between donor age and HLA-DP matching in 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT

ABSTRACT

In 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based prophylaxis, T-cell epitope DP-matched and permissive mismatched donors are associated with similar overall survival (OS) whereas donors with nonpermissive mismatches should be avoided. Younger unrelated donors are also favored over older donors. We explored outcomes associated with different combinations of DP-matching and donor age (dichotomized at 35 years) to further guide donor selection. Using a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data set, we categorized 10 783 patients into 6 groups: DP-matched/younger donor (n = 1591), DP-matched/older donor (n = 526), permissive-mismatched/younger donor (n = 3845), permissive-mismatched/older donor (n = 1184), nonpermissive mismatched/younger donor (n = 2659), and nonpermissive mismatched/older donor (n = 978). We noted that younger donor age, rather than DP matching, was associated with better OS. Younger donors with permissive mismatches were associated with improved OS compared with older matched donors. Furthermore, younger donors with nonpermissive mismatches were associated with improved OS compared with older donors with permissive mismatches. Our study adds further information about the association of DP matching and donor age with HCT outcomes. Donor age should be prioritized over DP matching in patients undergoing 10/10 HLA-MUD with CNI prophylaxis. Among those with younger donors, permissive-mismatched or DP-matched donors are preferred over nonpermissive mismatched donors.

Haploidentical vs HLA-matched sibling donor HCT with PTCy prophylaxis: HLA factors and donor age considerations

ABSTRACT

HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) are preferred for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the use of alternative donors, especially haploidentical, is increasing, as is our understanding of the impact of HLA factors such as B-leader and DRB1-matching on its outcomes. Yet, data comparing these donor types, particularly considering these HLA factors, is lacking. Herein, we compared haploidentical-HCT (n = 1052) with MSD-HCT (n = 400), both with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, haploidentical group had similar overall survival (OS; hazard ratio (HR), 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.14; P = .54), nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.72-1.32; P = .87), and relapse (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08; P = .20) as the MSD group. Younger donor age was a significant predictor of improved OS. Next, we directly compared the outcomes of "younger" haploidentical (donor age <35 years, n = 347) vs an "older" MSD (donor age ≥50 years, n = 143) in older recipients (patient age ≥50 years). Patients with younger haploidentical B-leader-matched donors had significantly superior OS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; P = .009) than the older MSD group. Additionally, patients with younger DRB1-mismatched haploidentical donors (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P = .004) had significantly lower risk of relapse than older MSDs. Our study suggests that haploidentical-HCT may offer comparable outcomes to MSD-PTCy HCT. Moreover, among older patients, a younger haploidentical B-leader-matched donor might be preferable to an older MSD. These findings need validation in larger data sets.

Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation using haploidentical grandchildren donors and post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

High-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide allows safe and effective use of allografts from haploidentical relatives (siblings, parents and children) in patients undergoing allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT). More recently, second- and third-degree relatives have also been shown to be safe allograft donors. An increasing number of older patients undergoing alloBMT have been receiving allografts from haploidentical donors. However, older patients are more likely to have older siblings and children, and older donor age is associated with worse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

In the current study, we report the safety and utility of grandchildren as haploidentical donors and compared with children as donors in patients undergoing alloBMT.

METHODS

We compared characteristics and outcomes of alloBMT patients aged 55 years and older with children older than 30 years as donors (C group; n = 276) and those with grandchildren as donors (GC group; n = 40). Because many important baseline characteristics predict outcomes after alloBMT, we performed propensity score matched analysis based on recipient age, alloBMT year, disease, graft source and haematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI).

RESULTS

The median age of recipients was 67 years (range 55-79) in the C group and 73 years (range 57-78) in the GC group. More than 70% of recipients in the GC group were older than 70 years, compared with 27% in the C group. The median donor age was 37 years (range 31-52) in the C group and 20 years (range 14-34) in the GC group. More patients in the GC group had HCT-CI scores ≥3 than in the C group (32.5% vs. 23%, p = 0.27). Two-year overall survival did not differ between the two groups (GC 62% vs. C 60%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.75, p = 0.90) despite recipients of allografts from grandchildren being older. The 2-year RFS was 55% in the C group compared with 50% in the GC group (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.77, p = 0.85). Non-relapse mortality subdistribution [SD] (SDHR 1.36, 95% 0.70-2.63, p = 0.36), relapse (SDHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.33-1.58, p = 0.42) or relapse-free survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.77, p = 0.85). Propensity score matching analysis showed no significant differences in 2-year overall survival (GC 64% vs. C 53%; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.42-1.42, p = 0.40), non-relapse mortality (SDHR 1.26, 95% 0.66-2.41, p = 0.48), relapse (SDHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.21-1.52, p = 0.26) or relapse-free survival (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.57-1.54, p = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that outcomes of alloBMT patients with grandchild donors are similar to those with child donors, despite recipients' older age and higher comorbidities in the GC group. Grandchildren should be considered when selecting a donor for older alloBMT recipients.

Long-term survival after unrelated donor marrow transplantation for aplastic anaemia after optimized conditioning regimen: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

Background

Almost all acquired severe aplastic anaemia is immune mediated and characterised by hypocellular bone marrow and ≥2 affected haematopoietic lineages. The optimal preparartive regimen for unrelated donor transplantation remains to be established. We aimed to study long-term outcomes after unrelated donor transplantation for severe aplastic anaemia with de-escalation of cyclophosphamide (Cy) dose in steps of 50 mg/kg (150, 100, 50, 0 mg/kg) in combination with total body irradiation (TBI) 2 Gy, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and fludarabine.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with severe aplastic anaemia aged ≤65 years with adequate organ function enrolled on a trial of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched or 1 HLA-locus mismatched unrelated donor marrow transplantation conducted between 02/2006 and 12/2013 in the United States (NCT00326417). Exclusion criteria were Karnofsky performance status of less than 60, clonal cytogenetic abnormalities and inherited marrow failure syndormes. The primary outcome was day-100 engraftment (achievement of absolute neutrophil recovery to at least 0.5 × 109/L without subsequent decline) and day-100 survival. The trial determined the lowest effective Cy dose as 50 mg/kg (n = 38) for day-100 engraftment and survival. Cy dose 100 mg/kg (n = 41) was also acceptable. Accrual to Cy doses 150 mg/kg (n = 15) and 0 mg/kg (n = 3) was terminated early for toxicities. The current study is an extended follow up of patients enrolled on the trial (NCT00326477) and includes 76 of 96 patients alive ≥1 year after transplantation. There were 20 deaths in the first year after transplantation (Cy 0 mg/kg [n = 2], Cy 50 mg/kg [n = 1], Cy 100 mg/kg [n = 10], Cy 150 mg/kg [n = 7]). Patients were followed prospectively from transplantation and data reported using standardized data collection forms until death, loss to follow up or last contact through November 2023. The incidence of graft failure was calculated using the cumulative incidence estimator and the probability of survival using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

Findings

The median follow up of the cohort is 8.02 (IQR) 5.16-10.12) years. With Cy 50 mg/kg, there was one graft failure and five deaths ≥1 year after transplantation. With Cy 100 mg/kg there was only one late death and no graft failure. The 8-year probabilities of survival were 85.0% (95% CI 67.3-93.5) and 75.6% (95% CI 59.4-86.1) after Cy 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg, respectively, P = 0.31. With Cy 0 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg, there were no graft failures or death ≥1 year after transplantation. Regardless of Cy dose 12 of 15 patients aged ≥50 years died.

Interpretation

Cy 50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg with TBI 2 Gy, ATG and fludarabine are effective conditioning regimens for unrelated donor marrow transplants for aplastic anaemia. Identification of an optimized transplantation approach for patients aged ≥50 years is needed.

Funding

US National Institutes of Health.

Older MRD vs. younger MUD in patients older than 50 years with AML in remission using post-transplant cyclophosphamide

An increasing number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Normally, older patients have older matched related donors (MRD). Matched unrelated donors (MUD) are an important alternative, but it remains unclear whether a younger MUD is associated with better outcomes, especially in the context of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We compared outcomes of patients older than 50 years with AML in first complete remission (CR1) and receiving a first HSCT from a 10/10 MUD aged younger than 40 years to those receiving a graft from a MRD aged older than 50 years, using PTCy and with well-known transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. A total of 345 consecutive patients were included and classified according to TCI score as low, intermediate, or high. On multivariable analysis in the TCI-intermediate/high group, MUD was associated with better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower non-relapse mortality and lower relapse incidence. For patients receiving a TCI-low regimen, outcomes are independent on the type of donor. In patients with AML in CR1, older than 50 years and receiving a TCI-intermediate/high conditioning regimen using PTCy, a MUD younger than 40 years is preferable over a MRD older than 50 years.

Associations between acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

ABSTRACT

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is 1 of the major complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although various risk factors for chronic GVHD have been reported, limited data are available regarding the impact of acute GVHD on chronic GVHD. We examined the association between acute and chronic GVHD using a Japanese registry data set. The landmark point was set at day 100 after allo-HCT, and patients who died or relapsed before the landmark point were excluded. In total, 14 618 and 6135 patients who underwent allo-HCT with bone marrow or peripheral blood (BM/PB) and with umbilical cord blood (UCB), respectively, were analyzed. In the BM/PB cohort, the risk for chronic GVHD that requires systemic steroids increased with each increase in acute GVHD grade from 0 to 2 (grade 0 vs 1 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.46; P < .001]; grade 1 vs 2 [HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.28-1.56; P < .001]), but the risk was similar between acute GVHD grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.15; P = 1.0). These findings were confirmed in the UCB cohort. We further observed that the risk for severe chronic GVHD increased with each increment in the grade of acute GVHD, even between acute GVHD grade 2 and grade 3 to (grade 2 vs 3-4: HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.12-2.58; P = .025). In conclusion, the preceding profiles of acute GVHD should help to stratify the risk for chronic GVHD and its severity, which might be useful for the development of risk-adopted preemptive strategies for chronic GVHD.

Reduced intensity conditioning regimen of fludarabine, busulfan, ATG based haploidentical stem cell transplantation for older or unfit patients

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was developed for older patients or those with poor functional status. Haploidentical donor was appropriate alternative donor for patients without matched donors or patients with emergency disease state. However, there was few studies report the outcomes of RIC regimen of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) based haploidentical HSCT. The selection of the appropriate RIC regimen based on age and comorbidities in ATG-based haploidentical HSCT remains poorly described. To investigate the safety and efficacy of RIC regimen ATG-based haploidentical HSCT in older or unfit patients. Additionally, to explore the potential factors that impact the prognosis of RIC regimen of ATG-based haploidentical HSCT. We included a retrospective cohort of 63 patients with hematologic malignant diseases who underwent their first RIC haploidentical HSCT from November 2016 to June 2022 at our institutions. The conditioning regimen involved fludarabine (Flu) 30 mg/m²/kg 6 days combined with busulfan 3.2 mg/kg 2 days (Bu2) or 3 days (Bu3). ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) was administered 10 mg/kg in total, ATG-thymoglobulin (ATG-T) was administered 6 mg/kg in total. The median age of patients in the entire cohort was 60 (32-67) years with a median follow-up of 496 (83-2182) days. There were 29 patients with AML, 20 patients with MDS, and 14 patients with ALL. A total of 32 patients underwent Bu2 RIC haplo-HSCT and 31 patients were treated with Bu3 RIC haplo-HSCT. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) in whole cohort were 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.8 - 85.1%) and 61.4% (95% CI, 48.8 - 77.3%) respectively. The cumulative incidence rates of grades II to IV and grades III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in whole cohort were 15.8% (95% CI, 4.8 - 19.6%) and 9.7% (95% CI, 0.0 - 11.8%) respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 34.0% (95% CI, 18.9 - 46.3%). The 2-year cumulative incidence rates of relapse (IR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates in whole cohort were 27.5% (95% CI, 14.5 - 33.7%) and 11.6% (95% CI, 2.2 - 21.9%) respectively. The probability of 2-year OS were 60.2% (95% CI:42.5-85.3%) in Bu2 and 85.5%(95% CI:73.0-100%) in Bu3 group respectively(P = 0.150). The probability of 2-year DFS were 49.7% (95% CI:33.0-74.8%) in Bu2 and 72.6% (95% CI:55.5-95.5%) in Bu3 group respectively (P = 0.045). The 2-year IR of Bu2 group was significantly higher than Bu3 group (P = 0.045). However, the 2-year NRM were not significantly different between Bu2 and Bu3 group(P > 0.05). In multivariable analysis, RIC regimen of Bu3 had superior OS and DFS than Bu2 group respectively [HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98; P = 0.044; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.86; P = 0.022]. Besides, RIC regimen of Bu3 had lower IR than Bu2 group [HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.89; P = 0.029]. The RIC regimen of ATG-based haploidentical HSCT is a safe and effective treatment option for patients who are older or have poor functional status. In particular, a relatively high-intensity pre-treatment regimen consisting of Bu achieves significant improvements in OS and DFS, thus providing more favorable post-transplantation clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Older Related versus Younger Unrelated Donors for Older Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Large Single-Center Analysis

For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), HLA-matched related donors (MRDs) have traditionally been the preferred donor source. However, as the age of recipients increases, their sibling donors are aging as well. In this study, we investigated whether younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) might be a better donor source than similarly aged sibling donors for patients age >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 499 patients age 60 to 70 years with AML or MDS who underwent alloHCT from an older MRD (donor age ≥50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ≤35 years) between 2010 and 2022 were evaluated. Of these, 360 patients (72%) received an MUD graft and 139 (28%) received an MRD graft. The median recipient age was 64 years in the MRD group and 66 years in the MUD group. With a median follow-up among survivors of 53 months (range, 9 to 147 months ), the 4-year progression-free survival was 40% in the MRD group and 41% in the MUD group (P = .79) and the 4-year overall survival was 50% and 44%, respectively (P = .15), with no between-group differences in nonrelapse mortality, relapse, and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. In the MUD group, we also compared the effect of donor age 18 to 24 years and donor age 25 to 35 years and found no differences in outcomes between the groups. We conclude that outcomes are comparable between the use of older MRDs and use of younger MUDs for elderly patients with AML or MDS, that there is no donor age effect among younger MUDs, and that the use of either donor type is reasonable.

Bone Marrow Harvest: A White Paper of Best Practices by the NMDP Marrow Alliance

Data on recent bone marrow harvest (BMH) collections from the NMDP has shown that bone marrow (BM) quality has decreased based on total nucleated cell count in the product. To ensure that quality BM products are available to all recipients, the NMDP Marrow Alliance was formed in April 2021 to increase the capability of BM collection centers to safely deliver high-quality products consistently and to identify and disseminate guidelines for performing BMH. This white paper describes the best practices for BMH as defined by the NMDP Marrow Alliance.

Navigating Treatment Options and Communication in Relapsed Pediatric AML

Despite improved outcomes in newly diagnosed pediatric AML, relapsed disease remains a therapeutic challenge. Factors contributing to slow progress in improving outcomes include inherent challenges in pediatric clinical trial accrual and the scarcity of novel targeted/immunotherapy agents available for pediatric development. This paradigm is changing, however, as international collaboration grows in parallel with the development of promising targeted agents. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic landscape of relapsed pediatric AML, including conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and the challenges of drug approvals in this patient population. We highlight current efforts to improve communication among academia, industry, and regulatory authorities and discuss the importance of international collaboration to improve access to new therapies. Among the therapeutic options, we highlight the approach to second hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and discuss which patients are most likely to benefit from this potentially curative intervention. Importantly, we acknowledge the challenges in providing these high-risk interventions to our patients and their families and the importance of shared communication and decision making when considering early-phase clinical trials and second HSCT.

Engineering the best transplant outcome for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: the donor, the graft and beyond

Allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation remains the goal of therapy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, treatment failure in the form of leukemia relapse or severe graft-versus-host disease remains a critical area of unmet need. Recently, significant progress has been made in the cell therapy-based interventions both before and after transplant. In this review, the Stem Cell Engineering Committee of the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy summarizes the literature regarding the identification of high risk in AML, treatment approaches before transplant, optimal transplant platforms and measures that may be taken after transplant to ideally prevent, or, if need be, treat AML relapse. Although some strategies remain in the early phases of clinical investigation, they are built on progress in pre-clinical research and cellular engineering techniques that are already improving outcomes for children and adults with high-risk malignancies.

The impact of MICB mismatches in unrelated haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

MICA polymorphisms have been associated with increased incidence of acute GvHD and adverse outcome in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MICB is another expressed member of MHC class I-related chain genes and its impact on HSCT outcome is yet to be fully defined. We typed a large cohort of patients and donors for MICB polymorphisms and investigated the impact of MICB matching on outcome after unrelated HSCT. 69.2% of the patients were 10/10 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched and 30.8% were 9/10 HLA matched. MICB typing was performed using a short amplicon-based NGS typing assay on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Differences in proteins were considered as mismatches. MICA polymorphisms were identified as possible confounder and were therefore included as parameter in the multivariate analyses. Due to the strong linkage disequilibrium with the classical HLA-genes, sub-stratification for HLA matching status was necessary, and no effect of MICB mismatches was seen in the 10/10 HLA matched group when compared to the MICB matched cases. However, in the 9/10 HLA matched group, MICB mismatched cases showed significantly worse disease free survival (DFS), GvHD and relapse free survival (GRFS) compared to the MICB matched cases (DFS: HR 1.24, p = 0.011; GRFS: HR 1.26, p = 0.002). MICA mismatches had no impact on any outcome parameter. According to our findings, effects previously attributed to MICA differences may have been confounded by MICB polymorphisms. We show that MICB differences contribute a small but relevant effect in 9/10 HLA-matched transplantations, which in turn highlights the possible usefulness of MICB typing in donor selection among similarly suitable 9/10 matched donors, especially when HLA-B mismatches have to be accepted.

A systematic review of lifespan studies in rodents using stem cell transplantations

Organismal aging involves the progressive decline in organ function and increased susceptibility to age-associated diseases. Regardless of its origin, cellular aging is consequently reflected at the level of organ and associated systems dysfunction. Aging of stem cell populations within the body and their decreased ability to self-renew, differentiate, and regenerate damaged tissues, is a key contributor to organismal decline. Based on this, supplementing young stem cells may delay tissue aging, improve frailty and extend health and lifespan. This review investigates studies in rodents using stem cell transplantation from either mice or human donors. The aim is to consolidate available information on the efficacy of stem cell therapies in rodent models and provide insights to guide further research efforts. Out of the 21 studies included in this review, the methodology varied significantly including the lifespan measurement. To enable comparison the median lifespan was calculated using WebPlotDigitizer 4.6 if not provided by the literature. A total of 18 out of 21 studies evidenced significant lifespan extension post stem cell transplant, with 7 studies demonstrating benefits in reduced frailty and other aging complications.

Haploidentical stem cell donor choice for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT

ABSTRACT

There is a paucity of information to guide the selection of the most suitable donor in haploidentical (Haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For this reason, from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of Haplo donor characteristics on outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The primary end point was graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). Overall, 2200 patients were included. The median age of donors was 37 years (range, 8-71); 820 (37%) were females, including 458 (21%) who were used for male recipients. In addition, 1631 donors (74%) donated peripheral blood (PB). Multivariable analysis identified certain donor-related risk factors with a detrimental impact on transplant outcomes. The use of PB, older donors' ages (>37 years), and female donors to male recipients negatively affected GRFS. Donor's age and female donor-to-male recipient combination also affected nonrelapse mortality, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival. In conclusion, donor-related variables significantly influence outcomes in patients with AML after Haplo-HSCT with PTCy. When possible, younger donors and male donors for male recipients should be prioritized. The use of bone marrow can additionally prevent GVHD.

Combined effect of unrelated donor age and HLA peptide-binding motif match status on HCT outcomes

ABSTRACT

An HLA-mismatched unrelated donor who is class I peptide-binding motif (PBM)-matched is preferred over a PBM-mismatched donor. We hypothesized that using a younger donor (aged ≤35 years vs >35 years) could compensate for the inferior overall survival (OS) associated with PBM mismatches. We compared 6 groups: HLA-matched/younger donor (n = 10 531), HLA-matched/older donor (n = 3572), PBM-matched/younger donor (n = 357), PBM-matched/older donor (n = 257), PBM-mismatched/younger donor (n = 616), and PBM-mismatched/older donor (n = 339) in patients undergoing transplantation with conventional graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, HLA-matched/younger donors were associated with superior OS relative to any other group. Pairwise comparisons showed that donor age significantly impacted OS in both HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched groups. Moreover, younger donors appeared to negate the detrimental effect of PBM mismatching: the PBM-matched/younger donor group had similar OS as the HLA-matched/older donor group and the PBM-mismatched/younger donor group had similar OS as the PBM-matched/older donor group. Our study suggests that older unrelated donor age and PBM mismatching confer similarly adverse effects on OS and the impacts are additive, a finding which may widen the "acceptable" donor pool. The best OS is observed with HLA-matched/younger donors and the worst with PBM-mismatched/older donors. These findings should be validated with other data sets and with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis.

Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using HLA-haploidentical donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA-matched sibling donor for lymphoma

Data comparing HLA-haploidentical donors and HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) in peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for lymphoma are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 465 patients with lymphoma aged 16 years or older who underwent PBSCT using haploidentical donors with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo) (n = 166) or MSDs with calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (n = 299). Two-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the PTCy-haplo and MSD groups were 49.2% versus 51.9% (P = 0.64), 38.0% versus 39.9% (P = 0.97), and 27.7% versus 18.5% (P = 0.006), respectively. In multivariable analyses, PTCy-haplo recipients had slower neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P < 0.001) and platelet recovery (HR, 0.54; P < 0.001), lower risk of chronic GVHD (HR, 0.64; P = 0.038) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.45; P = 0.008), and better GRFS (HR, 0.66; P = 0.003) than MSD transplant recipients. OS, PFS, relapse or progression, and non-relapse mortality were similar between the groups. The difference might be mainly due to PTCy use rather than donor type; however, the results suggested that PTCy-haplo could be a possible option as an alternative to conventional MSD transplantation for lymphoma in PBSCT.

Optimizing Access to Unrelated Donors in Canada: Re-Examining the Importance of Donor Factors on Outcomes Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative therapy for many patients. Unrelated HLA-matched donors are the most frequently used donor for HCT. When more than one donor transplant option is available, transplant centers can select donors based on non-HLA factors. With improved ability to prevent and treat immune complications, such as graft-versus-host disease and infections, it may be possible to proceed more often using HLA-mismatched donors, allowing greater consideration of non-HLA factors, such as donor age, CMV serostatus, and ABO blood group matching, which have demonstrated important impacts on transplant outcomes. Additional factors to consider are donor availability rates and the usage of domestic donors to optimize outcomes. A review of non-HLA factors and considerations on the selection of optimal unrelated donors for HCT are provided within this updated current context.

Determining the predictive impact of donor parity on the outcomes of human leukocyte antigen matched hematopoietic stem cell transplants: a retrospective, single-center study

Introduction

Donor choosing remains to play a pivotal role in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Numerous criteria beyond HLA compatibility impact the selection of a suitable donor.

Methods

We evaluated the effect of donor parity on transplant outcomes in a large homogeneously treated population that received an HLA-matched allo-HSCT between 2010 and 2021 at our center. All patients were transplanted from a peripheral blood stem cell source following a myeloablative Busulfan-based conditioning and an identical protocol for graftversus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen.

Results

A total of 1103 allo-HSCT recipients were included. 188 (17%) had transplants from parous female donors, whereas 621 (56.30%) and 294 (26.70%) received transplants from male and nulliparous female donors, respectively. HSCTs from parous female donors compared to male and nulliparous females were associated with a significantly higher incidence of grade III-IV acute (a) GVHD (55.27% vs. 11.34 and 10.84%) and extensive chronic (c) GVHD (64.32% vs. 15.52 and 13.65%), as well as lower relapse incidence (RI).

Discussion

This study finds that while parous female donors are associated with higher incidences of grade III-IV aGVHD and extensive cGVHD post-allo-HSCT, the advantages, such as a lower RI, outweigh the risks. The results of our study provide valuable insights for donor selection.

Allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplant for patients with refractory T-Cell lymphomas

OBJECTIVE

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) may have a curative potential due to the graft versus lymphoma effect. In this study, we aimed to compare transplant outcomes between refractory-T-NHL (ref-NHL) and Chemosensitive-T-NHL (CS-T-NHL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 ref-NHL and 29 CS-T-NHL consecutive patients who underwent allo-SCT at our center and compared the transplant outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

All patients were heavily pretreated with 27% of patients relapsing post-auto-SCT and two patients in the ref-T-NHL post-allo-SCT. Patients were transplanted mainly from unrelated donors. There were no differences in leucocytes and platelet engraftment between the two groups. At 3 years, the relapse incidence was 34% in Ref-TNHL and 19% in CS-TNHL (p = .33), with non-relapse mortality rates of 28% and 22%, respectively (p = .52). Female patients and those with a previous auto-SCT had lower relapse incidence (p = .045, p = .003). The 3-year overall survival was 39% in Ref-TNHL and 56% in CS-TNHL (p = .15). Trends for improved progression-free survival (PFS) and graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) were observed in the CS-TNHL group (PFS: 60% vs. 30%, p = .075; GRFS: 38% vs. 21%, p = .1).

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging the retrospective nature of our study, our results indicate that allo-SCT has a curative potential in patients with T-NHL even in refractory status.

Clonal hematopoiesis in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in autologous transplant recipients and allogeneic transplant donors has genetic features and clinical associations that are distinct from each other and from non-cancer populations. CH in the setting of autologous transplant is enriched for mutations in DNA damage response pathway genes and is associated with adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and inferior overall survival. Studies of CH in allogeneic transplant donors have yielded conflicting results but have generally shown evidence of potentiated alloimmunity in recipients, with some studies showing an association with favorable recipient outcomes.

Recruiting refugees and migrants as potential hematopoietic stem cell donors to serve patients of comparable ethnicities with rare human leucocyte antigen patterns - The BluStar.NRW project in North Western Germany

Currently, approximately 19 million people with a migration background live in Germany. The majority of those descend from regions where the population has a genetically different distribution of HLA antigens when compared to the HLA frequencies usually found in North Western Europe. In case of severe haematological disorders of these individuals, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be the treatment of choice. However, finding appropriate histocompatible hematopoietic stem cell donors continues to be a major challenge. If no matching sibling donors are available, there are only few suitable donors with a similar genetic background available in international blood stem cell donor registries. The "BluStar.NRW" project aimed to recruit new blood and hematopoietic stem cell donors with a migration background and to noticeably increase the number of suitable donors for patients within this group. Since December 2017, a total number of 9100 blood and stem cell donors with a migration background were recruited and typed for this project. HLA typing for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1, and -DPB1 was performed by Next Generation Sequencing. We assessed the proportion of rare alleles according to HLA frequency tables, as defined by a frequency of <1:1000. The rare HLA allele frequencies according to HLA frequency tables of the BluStar.NRW cohort were compared with a matched control donor cohort: Rare HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles occurred three times more frequent than in the control group, but rare HLA-DPB1 alleles occurred more frequently in the control cohort. This difference was highly significant for all HLA alleles (p < 0.0001 for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DPB1; p = 0.0002 for HLA-DQB1). In addition, the distribution of rare alleles differed between the two groups. To date, 29 work-ups were initiated, 12 PBSC, one BM and three DLI were collected so far out of the BluStar.NRW cohort. The apheresis probability is twofold higher (0.18% vs. 0.07%) compared to the control group which clearly shows a serious medical need. However, 13 work-ups were cancelled in the BluStar.NRW donor cohort which represents an almost twice as higher cancellation rate (45% vs. 25%). This single registry analysis with a large sample cohort clearly indicates that hematopoietic stem cell donors with a migration background represent an adequate donor pool to serve patients of comparable ethnicity.

Genetic Findings of Potential Donor Origin following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Recommendations on Donor Disclosure and Genetic Testing from the World Marrow Donor Association

Following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), recipients are subjected to extensive genetic testing to monitor the efficacy of the transplantation and identify relapsing malignant disease. This testing is increasingly including the use of large gene panels, which may lead to incidental identification of genetic and molecular information of potential donor origin. Deciphering whether variants are of donor origin, and if so, whether there are clinical implications for the donor can prove challenging. In response to queries from donor registries and transplant centers regarding best practices in managing donors when genetic mutations of potential donor origin are identified, the Medical Working Group of the World Marrow Donor Association established an expert group to review available evidence and develop a framework to aid decision making. These guidelines aim to provide recommendations on predonation consenting, postdonation testing of recipients, and informing and managing donors when findings of potential donor origin are identified in recipients post-transplantation. It is recognized that registries will have different access to resources and financing structures, and thus whenever possible, we have made suggestions on how recommendations can be adapted.

[Unrelated donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

The selection of a donor is an essential element in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the absence of an HLA-matched related donor, the selection of an unrelated donor is considered, and is currently the most common type of allogenic donor used in practice. Many criteria are considered for the selection when multiple donors are available, particularly in case of partial match. The aim of this workshop is to assist in the selection of an unrelated donor, in keeping with recent data from the literature.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients aged 60-79 years in Germany (1998-2018): a registry study

Incidences of diseases treated with transplantation frequently peak at higher age. The contribution of age to total risk of transplantation has not been estimated amidst an aging society. We compare outcomes of 1,547 patients aged 70-79 years and 9,422 patients aged 60-69 years transplanted 1998-2018 for myeloid, lymphoid and further neoplasia in Germany. To quantify the contribution of population mortality to survival, we derive excess mortality based on a sex-, year- and agematched German population in a multistate model that incorporates relapse and graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS) and GvHD-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) is inferior in patients aged 70-79 years, compared to patients aged 60-69 years, with 36% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 34-39%) versus 43% (41-44%), 32% (30- 35%) versus 36% (35-37%) and 23% (21-26%) versus 27% (26-28%) three years post-transplant (P<0.001). Cumulative incidences of relapse at three years are 27% (25-30%) for patients aged 70-79 versus 29% (29-30%) (60-69 years) (P=0.71), yet the difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM) (40% [38-43%] vs. 35% [34-36%] in patients aged 70-79 vs. 60-69 years) (P<0.001) translates into survival differences. Median OS of patients surviving >1 year relapse-free is 6.7 (median, 95% CI: 4.5-9.4, 70-79 years) versus 9 (8.4-10.1, 60-69 years) years since landmark. Three years after RFS of one year, excess NRM is 14% (95% CI: 12-18%) in patients aged 70-79 versus 12% [11-13%] in patients aged 60-69, while population NRM is 7% (6-7%) versus 3% (3-3%). Mortality for reasons other than relapse, GvHD, or age is as high as 27% (24-29%) and 22% (22-23%) four years after transplantation. In conclusion, survival amongst older patients is adequate after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Comparison of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes Between Matched Sibling Donors and Alternative Donors in Patients Over 50 Years of Age with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 8/8 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and Unrelated Cord Blood Provide Better Leukemia-Free Survival Compared with Matched Sibling Donors During Nonremission Status

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other post-transplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and nonremission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were nonremission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = .005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P < .001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P = .794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .146) compared to the MSD group in nonremission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas nonrelapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and nonremission status. Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during nonremission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes of patients aged ≥ 55 years with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes in China: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes (AML/MDS) have historically had poor prognoses. However, there has been a recent increase in the use of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are in this patient population. Nevertheless, the optimal choice of donor type for the patients remains an unmet need. Limited data exist on the use of allo-HSCT in elderly patients with AML/MDS from China. To better understand and optimize the selection of donor type for the elderly patients, particularly for those with refractory or relapsed disease, in comparison with the previous studies in the US and Europe.

METHODS

Our retrospective study enrolled 259 patients aged over 55 years who underwent their first allo-HSCT between April 2015 and August 2022. These patients were divided into three groups based on donor type: haploidentical related donor group (haploidentical related donor transplantation [HID], n = 184), matched sibling donor group (matched sibling donor transplantation [MSD], n = 39), and matched unrelated donor group (matched unrelated donor transplantation [MUD], n = 36). Statistics were performed with the chi-square test, the log-rank and Fine-Gray tests.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 57 years (range: 55-75) and 26.25% of patients were over 60 years old. Younger patients had a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (HR = 1.942, P = 0.035), faster neutrophil recovery (HR = 1.387, P = 0.012), and better overall survival (HR = 0.567, P = 0.043) than patients aged ≥ 60 years across the entire cohort. Patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) diseases had delayed neutrophil engraftment (P = 0.010, HR = 0.752) and platelet engraftment (P < 0.001, HR = 0.596), higher incidence of relapses (HR = 2.300, P = 0.013), and inferior relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.740, HR = 0.016) regardless of donor type. When it came to graft-versus-host-disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), MUDs turned out to be superior to HIDs (HR = 0.472, P = 0.026) according to the multivariable analysis. In contrast, we found MSDs had an inferior GRFS to HIDs in parallel (HR = 1.621, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The choice of donor type did not significantly affect the outcomes of allo-HSCT. However, when considering the quality of post-transplant life, MUDs or HIDs from younger donors may be the optimal choice for elderly patients.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part I: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations

Chronic graft-versus-host disease is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and a leading cause of long-term morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. The skin is commonly affected and presents heterogeneously, making the role of dermatologists critical in both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, new clinical classification and grading schemes inform treatment algorithms, which now include 3 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, and evolving transplant techniques are changing disease epidemiology. Part I reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II discusses disease grading and therapeutic management.

DNA methylation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from donor peripheral blood to patient bone marrow: implications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a life-saving treatment for selected hematological malignancies. So far, it remains unclear whether transplanted hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) undergo epigenetic changes upon engraftment in recipient bone marrow (BM) after AHSCT and whether these changes might be useful in the transplant diagnostics. The purpose of this study was to characterize the whole genome methylation profile of HSPCs following AHSCT. Moreover, the relationship between the observed methylation signature and patient outcome was analyzed. Mobilized peripheral blood (mPB)-HSPCs from seven donors and BM-HSPCs longitudinally collected from transplanted patients with hematological malignancies up to one year from AHSCT (a total of twenty-eight samples) were analyzed using DNA methylation based-arrays. The obtained data showed that DNA methylation of mPB-HSPCs differs between young and adult donors and changes following HSPC engraftment in the BM of recipient patients. Looking at methylation in promoter regions, at 30 days post-AHSCT, BM-HSPCs showed a higher number of differentially methylated genes (DMGs) compared to those of mPB-HSPCs, with a prevalent hyper-methylation. These changes were maintained during all the analyzed time points, and methylation became like the donors after one year from transplant. Functional analysis of these DMGs showed an enrichment in cell adhesion, differentiation and cytokine (interleukin-2, -5 and -7) production and signaling pathways. Of note, DNA methylation analysis allowed to identify a potential "cancer/graft methylation signature" of transplant failure. It was evident in the latest available post-transplant BM-HSPC sample (at 160 days) and surprisingly already in early phase (at 30 days) in patients whose transplant was doomed to fail. Overall, the analysis of HSPC methylation profile could offer useful prognostic information to potentially assess engraftment success and predict graft failure in AHSCT.

Haploidentical and Matched Sibling Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Hospital-Based Study

Background

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) has been increasing for the last years in Latin America. The objective of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving allogeneic PBSCT between 2013 and 2019 in a single center of Cali, Colombia.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Fundacion Valle del Lili. Patients diagnosed with AML who received an allogeneic PBSCT between 2013 and 2019 using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors (MSDs) or haploidentical related donors (HRDs) with myeloablative conditioning regimen were included. Cases with diagnosis of promyelocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome-related AML and therapy-related AML were excluded. Data were obtained directly from the hospital PBSCT database and clinical records.

Results

A total of 50 patients were included (HRD, n = 32; MSD, n = 18). Sixty-two percent was in the first complete remission (CR1) at the time of the transplant, of which 26% were MSD and 74% were HRD. The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk score was: 44% vs. 50% low, 28% vs. 28% intermediate and 28% vs. 22% high for MSD vs. HRD, respectively. Overall survival at 5 years for MSD was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 31-83%) and 43% (95% CI: 25-60%) for HRD. Event-free survival was 56% (95% CI: 26-78%) and 35.6% (95% CI: 18-53%), respectively. Non-relapse mortality at day-100 was 6% (95% CI: 0.8-35%) and 20% (95% CI: 9-39%). Relapse at5 years was 18% (95% CI: 4-58%) and 25% (95% CI: 10-52%). Overall mortality rate was 46%. The grade II-IV, III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease and severe chronic graft-versus-host disease was 44%, 11% and 12% for MSD, and 43%, 9% and 0% for HRD.

Conclusion

These results underline that MSD remains the first donor choice for AML patients in CR1 when available. HRDs are still our next option among alternative donors. It is necessary to find strategies that have a positive impact on those outcomes that markedly affect the quality of allogeneic PBSCT and the prognosis of patients. Comparative, randomized, prospective studies with longer follow-up of haploidentical allogeneic PBSCT with other donor types are required to definitely establish its role among alternative donors.