The response to combination therapy treatment regimens in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma

Barriers to inhaled gene therapy of obstructive lung diseases: A review

Knowledge of genetic origins of obstructive lung diseases has made inhaled gene therapy an attractive alternative to the current standards of care that are limited to managing disease symptoms. Initial lung gene therapy clinical trials occurred in the early 1990s following the discovery of the genetic defect responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF), a monogenic disorder. However, despite over two decades of intensive effort, gene therapy has yet to help patients with CF or any other obstructive lung disease. The slow progress is due in part to poor understanding of the biological barriers to inhaled gene therapy. Encouragingly, clinical trials have shown that inhaled gene therapy with various viral vectors and non-viral gene vectors is well tolerated by patients, and continued research has provided valuable lessons and resources that may lead to future success of this therapeutic strategy. In this review, we first introduce representative obstructive lung diseases and examine limitations of currently available therapeutic options. We then review key components for successful execution of inhaled gene therapy, including gene delivery systems, primary physiological barriers and strategies to overcome them, and advances in preclinical disease models with which the most promising systems may be identified for human clinical trials.

Long-acting beta-agonists plus inhaled corticosteroids safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies

Background

Although several systematic reviews investigated the safety of long-acting beta–agonists (LABAs) in asthma, they mainly addressed randomized clinical trials while evidence from non-randomized studies has been mostly neglected. We aim to assess the risk of serious adverse events in adults and children with asthma treated with LABAs and Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICs), compared to patients treated only with ICs, from published non-randomized studies.

Methods

The protocol registration number was CRD42012003387 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/Prospero). Literature search for articles published since 1990 was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Two authors selected studies independently for inclusion and extracted the data. A third reviewer resolved discrepancies. To assess the risk of serious adverse events, meta-analyses were performed calculating odds ratio summary estimators using random effect models when heterogeneity was found, and fixed effect models otherwise.

Results

Of 4,415 candidate articles, 1,759 abstracts were reviewed and 220 articles were fully read. Finally, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of them were retrospective observational cohorts. Sample sizes varied from 50 to 514,216. The meta-analyses performed (69,939-624,303 participants according to the outcome considered) showed that odds ratio of the LABAs and ICs combined treatment when compared with ICs alone was: 0.88 (95% CI 0.69-1.12) for asthma-related hospitalization; 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.84) for asthma-related emergency visits; 1.02 (95% CI 0.94-1.10) for systemic corticosteroids; and 0.95 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) for the combined outcome.

Conclusions

Evidence from observational studies shows that the combined treatment of LABAs and ICs is not associated with a higher risk of serious adverse events, compared to ICs alone. Major gaps identified were prospective design, paediatric population and inclusion of mortality as a primary outcome.

Severe asthma in adults: an orphan disease?

Severe asthma affects fewer than 10% of patients with asthma, is associated with a severe risk of death and disability, has a great impact on health and quality of life, and represents a huge cost to patients and society. Given the poor response to treatment and the side effects associated with medications for severe asthma, more efficient, cost-effective, and phenotype-specific medications are needed. Considering severe asthma as an orphan disease could encourage the pharmaceutical industry to stratify studies based on a more detailed characterization of study subjects at baseline, resulting in the development of novel therapeutic approaches.

Key findings and clinical implications from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study

Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma are an understudied population but account for considerable asthma morbidity, mortality, and costs. The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study was a large, 3-year, multicenter, observational cohort study of 4756 patients (n=3489 adults ≥ 18 years of age, n=497 adolescents 13-17 years of age, and n=770 children 6-12 years of age) with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. TENOR's primary objective was to characterize the natural history of disease in this cohort. Data assessed semiannually and annually included demographics, medical history, comorbidities, asthma control, asthma-related health care use, medication use, lung function, IgE levels, self-reported asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life. We highlight the key findings and clinical implications from more than 25 peer-reviewed TENOR publications. Regardless of age, patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma demonstrated high rates of health care use and substantial asthma burden despite receiving multiple long-term controller medications. Recent exacerbation history was the strongest predictor of future asthma exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma, as defined by the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines' impairment domain, was highly prevalent and predictive of future asthma exacerbations; this assessment can be used to identify high-risk patients. IgE and allergen sensitization played a role in the majority of severe or difficult-to-treat asthmatic patients.

Oligonucleotides: a multi-targeted approach for the treatment of respiratory diseases

Reversing inflammatory lung disease remains the foremost challenge in treating respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Reducing (or modifying) the underlying inflammatory process with mono-target drugs has proven challenging. The era of designing ‘one target for one disease’ has evolved such that a growing body of evidence suggests a single drug that is capable of specifically targeting multiple targets and pathways would be better at arresting progression of these respiratory diseases and be an important advancement in current therapy. Oligonucleotide-based drugs represent an emerging class of drug candidates. Their properties, a broader range of targets over conventional small-molecule drugs and recent clinical proof-of-concept support their development as novel multi-targeting agents for the treatment of respiratory diseases.

Airway microbiota and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with suboptimally controlled asthma

BACKGROUND

Improvement in lung function after macrolide antibiotic therapy has been attributed to reduction in bronchial infection by specific bacteria. However, the airway might be populated by a more diverse microbiota, and clinical features of asthma might be associated with characteristics of the airway microbiota present.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether relationships exist between the composition of the airway bacterial microbiota and clinical features of asthma using culture-independent tools capable of detecting the presence and relative abundance of most known bacteria.

METHODS

In this pilot study bronchial epithelial brushings were collected from 65 adults with suboptimally controlled asthma participating in a multicenter study of the effects of clarithromycin on asthma control and 10 healthy control subjects. A combination of high-density 16S ribosomal RNA microarray and parallel clone library-sequencing analysis was used to profile the microbiota and examine relationships with clinical measurements.

RESULTS

Compared with control subjects, 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon concentrations (a proxy for bacterial burden) and bacterial diversity were significantly higher among asthmatic patients. In multivariate analyses airway microbiota composition and diversity were significantly correlated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Specifically, the relative abundance of particular phylotypes, including members of the Comamonadaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, and other bacterial families were highly correlated with the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

CONCLUSION

The composition of bronchial airway microbiota is associated with the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness among patients with suboptimally controlled asthma. These findings support the need for further functional studies to examine the potential contribution of members of the airway microbiota in asthma pathogenesis.

Severe asthma: what makes it so hard to manage?

Severe asthma presents significant management challenges. Patients can be difficult to control despite use of current standard-of-care therapy, including inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. Alternative diagnoses, noncompliance, and comorbidities all can influence asthma control, future risk, and response to currently available therapy. Definitions of severe asthma evaluate and address these confounding variables, and yet patients are still symptomatic despite aggressive, appropriate therapy. Severe asthma has a distinct pathophysiology including airway remodeling that contributes to the decreased effectiveness of standard therapy. Multiple phenotypes exist within severe asthma that likely require distinct therapeutic approaches to achieve control and improve long-term health outcomes. New therapeutic approaches to these distinct phenotypes will improve our understanding and treatment of this difficult-to-manage disease.

Therapeutic targets for new therapy for corticosteroid refractory asthma

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are the most potent anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of mild to moderate asthma. However, a small percentage of the asthma population (< 10%) do not respond well, or at all, to corticosteroid therapy, and this severe corticosteroid-refractory asthma contributes to more than 50% of health care expenditure for all asthma because these is no appropriate pharmacological therapy.

METHODS

If the molecular mechanism of corticosteroid insensitivity is uncovered, it may in turn provide insights into the key mechanism of corticosteroid action and rational implementation of treatment regimens that restore corticosteroid sensitivity or replace corticosteroid therapy. This review focuses on why severe asthma patients are corticosteroid-insensitive, and discusses present and future therapeutic and preventative strategies for corticosteroid-refractory asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroid-refractory asthma is a heterogeneous disease and can be controlled by add-on treatment of corticosteroid-sparing agents or effective new drugs based on individual abnormalities. The elucidation of the cause of the relative lack of corticosteroid response in this subgroup of asthmatic individuals may have important implications for other diseases.