Inhaled corticosteroids and hospitalisation due to exacerbation of COPD

Risk factors and associated outcomes of hospital readmission in COPD: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of unplanned readmission. There is need to identify risk factors for, and strategies to prevent readmission in patients with COPD.

AIM

To systematically review and summarise the prevalence, risk factors and outcomes associated with rehospitalisation due to COPD exacerbation.

METHOD

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Five databases were searched for relevant studies.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies from 30 countries met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of COPD-related readmission varied from 2.6 to 82.2% at 30 days, 11.8-44.8% at 31-90 days, 17.9-63.0% at 6 months, and 25.0-87.0% at 12 months post-discharge. There were differences in the reported factors associated with readmissions, which may reflect variations in the local context, such as the availability of community-based services to care for exacerbations of COPD. Hospitalisation in the previous year prior to index admission was the key predictor of COPD-related readmission. Comorbidities (in particular asthma), living in a deprived area and living in or discharge to a nursing home were also associated with readmission. Relative to those without readmissions, readmitted patients had higher in-hospital mortality rates, shorter long-term survival, poorer quality of life, longer hospital stay, increased recurrence of subsequent readmissions, and accounted for greater healthcare costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalisation in the previous year was the principal risk factor for COPD-related readmissions. Variation in the prevalence and the reported factors associated with COPD-related readmission indicate that risk factors cannot be generalised, and interventions should be tailored to the local healthcare environment.

Dual versus triple therapy in patients hospitalized for COPD in France: a claims data study

Purposes

Following a hospitalization for COPD, dual and triple therapies were compared in terms of persistence and relations with outcomes (exacerbations, health care resource use and costs).

Methods

This was a historical observational database study. All patients aged ≥45 hospitalized for COPD between 2007 and 2015 were identified in a 1/97^th random sample of French claims data. Patients receiving dual therapy within 60 days after hospitalization were compared to patients receiving triple therapy, after propensity score matching on disease severity.

Results

Of the 3,089 patients hospitalized for COPD, 1,538 (49.8%) received either dual or triple therapy in the 2 months following inclusion, and 1,500 (48.6%) had at least 30 days of follow-up available; 846 (27.4%) received dual therapy, and 654 (21.2%) received triple therapy. After matching, the number of exacerbations was 2.4 per year in the dual vs 2.3 in the triple group (p=0.45). Among newly treated patients (n=206), persistence at 12 months was similar in the dual and triple groups (48% vs 41%, respectively, p=0.37). As compared to patients on dual therapy, more patients on triple therapy received oral corticosteroids (49.1 vs 40.4%, p=0.003) or were hospitalized for any reason (67% vs 55.8%, p=0.0001) or for COPD (35.3 vs 25.1%, p=0.0002) during follow-up. Cost of care was higher for patients on triple than for those on dual therapy (€11,877.1 vs €9,825.1, p=0.01).

Conclusion

Following hospitalizations for COPD, patients on dual and triple therapy experienced recurrent exacerbations, limited adherence to therapies and high cost of care. Patients on triple therapy appeared more severe than those on dual therapy, as reflected by exacerbations and health care resource use.

Greater Access to Long Acting Beta2 Agonists Is Associated with Less Hospital Admissions Due to COPD: A Longitudinal Nation-Wide Study

PURPOSE

Long Acting Beta₂ Agonists (LABA) prevent COPD exacerbations in strictly standardized clinical trials. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between the amount of LABA provided by the government and the trend in COPD hospital admission (HA) rate in Brazil.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal large-scale real-life study. We calculated COPD HA rate and the number of subjects per 10⁵ inhabitant who received LABA supplied by the government in each Brazilian municipality, between years 2004 and 2013. We used Poisson Multilevel Regression analysis to calculate the rate ratio between LABA dispensation rate and COPD HA rate.

RESULTS

In Brazil, COPD HA rate reduced 59% among subjects between 40 and 59 years of age and 60% among subjects older than 59 years of age. Most of the 5506 Brazilian municipalities reduced COPD HA rate [4149 (75%) municipalities & 1357 (25%) municipalities]. The dispensation of LABA was greater among municipalities that reduced COPD HA rate. In the 40-59 age group, the gap in LABA dispensation between the two groups of municipalities increased during the study period from 90.40 to 614.28 subjects per 10⁵ inhabitants. In the > 59 age group, the gap in LABA dispensation increased from 35.87 to 912.99 subjects per 10⁵ inhabitants. For each one hundred subjects who received LABA there was less one HA (RR 0.99, 95 CI 0.99-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

COPD HA rate reduced in Brazil. LABA dispensation growth was associated with COPD HA rate reduction.

Observational Studies of Inhaled Corticosteroid Effectiveness in COPD: Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials at times investigate findings suggested by observational studies. For example, the Towards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) trial, which did not show a mortality reduction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD, was motivated by some observational studies that suggested considerable reductions in mortality with these drugs. Reasons for these discrepancies are unclear.

METHODS

The literature was searched to identify all observational studies, including cohort and case-control studies, investigating the effectiveness of ICS on major outcomes in patients with COPD; these outcomes included death and hospitalization for COPD.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were identified. Nine studies were affected by immortal time bias, five by immeasurable time bias, and seven by the "asthma factor" bias; some studies were affected by more than one bias. These studies found important reductions in the rates of major COPD outcomes with ICS use, with pooled rate ratios of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.76), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.83), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.87), respectively, for the three sources of bias. In contrast, the five studies unaffected by these major biases did not find an association (pooled rate ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.88-1.17]).

CONCLUSIONS

Observational studies are important to provide evidence from real-world data on medication effects. However, appropriate study design and analysis are essential to avoid biases and ensure randomized trials with greater chances of success. The observational studies suggesting potential beneficial effects of nonrespiratory drugs to treat COPD, such as statins and beta-blockers, will also need careful review before long and expensive randomized trials are conducted.

Severe exacerbation and pneumonia in COPD patients treated with fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 agonist

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether severe exacerbation and pneumonia of COPD differs between patients treated with budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of those who used budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol for COPD.

METHODS

Subjects in this population-based cohort study comprised patients with COPD who were treated with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol. All patients were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. The outcomes including severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) were measured.

RESULTS

During the study period, 11,519 COPD patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol and 7,437 patients receiving budesonide/formoterol were enrolled in the study. Pairwise matching (1:1) of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol populations resulted in to two similar subgroups comprising each 7,295 patients. Patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher annual rate and higher risk of severe exacerbation than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (1.2219/year vs 1.1237/year, adjusted rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.10). In addition, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (12.11 per 100 person-years vs 10.65 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20). Finally, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia requiring MV than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (3.94 per 100 person-years vs 3.47 per 100 person-years, aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24). A similar trend was seen before and after propensity score matching analysis, intention-to-treat, and as-treated analysis with and without competing risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this retrospective observational study, long-term treatment with fixed combination budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring MV than fluticasone/salmeterol in COPD patients.

Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Canada: a systematic review

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic, irreversible disease and a leading cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. In Canada, COPD is the fourth leading cause of death. This systematic review was undertaken to update healthcare professionals and decision makers regarding the recent clinical, humanistic and economic burden evidence in Canada.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify original research published January 2000 through December 2012 on the burden of COPD in Canada. Each search was conducted using controlled vocabulary and key words, with “COPD” as the main search concept and limited to Canadian studies, written in English and involving human subjects. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies and systematic reviews/meta-analyses that reported healthcare resource utilization, quality of life and/or healthcare costs.

Results

Of the 972 articles identified through the literature searches, 70 studies were included in this review. These studies were determined to have an overall good quality based on the quality assessment. COPD patients were found to average 0–4 annual emergency department visits, 0.3–1.5 annual hospital visits, and 0.7–5 annual physician visits. Self-care management was found to lessen the overall risk of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization and unscheduled physician visits. Additionally, integrated care decreased the mean number of hospitalizations and telephone support reduced the number of annual physician visits. Overall, 60–68 % of COPD patients were found to be inactive and 60–72 % reported activity restriction. Pain was found to negatively correlate with physical activity while breathing difficulties resulted in an inability to leave home and reduced the ability to handle activities of daily living. Evidence indicated that treating COPD improved patients’ overall quality of life. The average total cost per patient ranged between CAN $2444–4391 from a patient perspective to CAN $3910–6693 from a societal perspective. Furthermore, evidence indicated that COPD exacerbations lead to higher costs.

Conclusions

The clinical, humanistic and economic burden of COPD in Canada is substantial. Use of self-care management programs, telephone support, and integrated care may reduce the overall burden to Canadian patients and society.

Risk factors and outcomes associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations requiring hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory exacerbations are the most frequent cause of medical visits, hospitalization and death for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and, thus, exert a significant social and economic burden on society.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors associated with hospital readmission(s) for acute exacerbation(s) of COPD (AECOPD).

METHODS

A review of admission records from three large urban hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, identified 310 consecutive patients admitted for an AECOPD between April 1, 2001, and December 31, 2002. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for readmissions following an AECOPD.

RESULTS

During the study period, 38% of subjects were readmitted at least once. The mean (+/- SD) duration from the index admission to the first readmission was 5+/-4.08 months. Comparative analysis among the three hospitals identified a significant difference in readmission rates (54%, 36% and 18%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that preadmission home oxygen use (OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.45 to 4.42; P=0.001), history of a lung infection within the previous year (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.97; P=0.048), other chronic respiratory disease (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.99; P=0.03) and shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.945 to 0.995; P=0.021) were independently associated with frequent readmissions for an AECOPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital readmission rates for AECOPD were high. Only four clinical factors were found to be independently associated with COPD readmission. There was significant variability in the readmission rate among hospitals. This variability may be a result of differences in the patient populations that each hospital serves or may reflect variability in health care delivery at different institutions.

Is Airway Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Events?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a very common cause of death in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smoking is a well-described risk factor for both COPD and CVD, but CVD in patients with COPD is likely to be due to other factors in addition to smoking. Inflammation may be an important common etiological link between COPD and CVD, being well described in both diseases. It is hypothesized that in COPD a "spill-over" of local airway inflammation into the systemic circulation could contribute to increased CVD in these patients. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have well-documented anti-inflammatory effects and are commonly used for the treatment of COPD, but their effects on cardiovascular endpoints and all-cause mortality have only just started to be examined. A recent meta-analysis has suggested that ICS may reduce all-cause mortality in COPD by around 25%. A case-controlled study specifically examined the effects of ICS on myocardial infarction and suggested that ICS may decrease the incidence of MI by as much as 32%. A large multicenter prospective randomized trial (Towards a Revolution in COPD Health [TORCH]) is now ongoing and will examine the effect of fluticasone propionate in combination with salmeterol on all-cause mortality.

Immeasurable time bias in observational studies of drug effects on mortality

Observational studies suggesting that some drugs are effective at reducing mortality may have been subject to "immeasurable time bias" arising from the unidentified presence of hospitalizations when defining drug exposure with computerized health databases. The author illustrates the bias using a case-control study of 1,313 deaths and 1,313 controls selected from a cohort of 2,049 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from Saskatchewan, Canada, identified from 1990 and followed up through 1999. Different approaches were used to estimate the rate ratio of death associated with inhaled corticosteroid exposure, defined by a prescription dispensed in the 30-day period prior to the index date. More cases had been hospitalized during the 30-day exposure period (72%) than controls (26%), with lower durations of stay for cases who received an inhaled corticosteroid prescription (9.9 vs.16.2 days), thus introducing variations in measurable exposure times. The raw analysis that did not consider hospitalization found a rate ratio of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.73). Alternatively, analyses accounting for variations in measurable times resulted in a rate ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.14) when weighted by measurable time, while use of the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the 30-day cumulative incidence of exposure found a rate ratio of 1.35 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.60). In conclusion, immeasurable time bias may be present in several observational database studies suggesting that certain drugs are effective at reducing mortality.

Impact of regular inhaled corticosteroid use on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes

Inhaled corticosteroids are often used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, although the evidence regarding their long-term efficacy in preventing or reducing adverse health outcomes is not definitive. This retrospective cohort study analyzed whether regular inhaled corticosteroid use is associated with reduced health care utilization and all-cause mortality related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Subjects were 2,902 health maintenance organization members aged 50 and over who met criteria for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The study used a composite endpoint of time to (1) death or (2) hospitalization or emergency room care related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, whichever occurred first, during a 4-year follow-up. Among the 42% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with an indication of co-morbid asthma, inhaled corticosteroid use was associated with significantly reduced risk for both all-cause mortality and the composite outcome. The reduction in risk was greatest in never- and ex-smokers. Among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with no indication of asthma, inhaled corticosteroid use was associated with reduced risk only in never smokers. These findings generally persisted in separate analyses stratified by asthma status and in sensitivity analyses using four alternative definitions of regular medication use, with comparable results when regular medication use was treated as a fixed covariate defined at the start of follow-up. We conclude that use of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with reduced risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and all-cause mortality. This benefit was most pronounced among never-smokers and in those with evidence of co-morbid asthma.

A Refill Adherence Algorithm for Multiple Short Intervals to Estimate Refill Compliance (ReComp)

BACKGROUND

There are many measures of refill adherence available, but few have been designed or validated for use with repeated measures designs and short observation periods.

OBJECTIVE

To design a refill-based adherence algorithm suitable for short observation periods, and compare it to 2 reference measures.

METHODS

A single composite algorithm incorporating information on both medication gaps and oversupply was created. Electronic Veterans Affairs pharmacy data, clinical data, and laboratory data from routine clinical care were used to compare the new measure, ReComp, with standard reference measures of medication gaps (MEDOUT) and adherence or oversupply (MEDSUM) in 3 different repeated measures medication adherence-response analyses. These analyses examined the change in low density lipoprotein (LDL) with simvastatin use, blood pressure with antihypertensive use, and heart rate with beta-blocker use for 30- and 90-day intervals. Measures were compared by regression based correlations (R2 values) and graphical comparisons of average medication adherence-response curves.

RESULTS

In each analysis, ReComp yielded a significantly higher R2 value and more expected adherence-response curve regardless of the length of the observation interval. For the 30-day intervals, the highest correlations were observed in the LDL-simvastatin analysis (ReComp R2 = 0.231; [95% CI, 0.222-0.239]; MEDSUM R2 = 0.054; [95% CI, 0.049-0.059]; MEDOUT R2 = 0.053; [95% CI, 0.048-0.058]).

CONCLUSIONS

ReComp is better suited to shorter observation intervals with repeated measures than previously used measures.

Immortal time bias in observational studies of drug effects

PURPOSE

Recent observational studies suggest that various drugs are remarkably effective at reducing morbidity and mortality. These cohort studies used a flawed approach to design and data analysis which can lead to immortal time bias. We describe the bias from 20 of these studies and illustrate it by showing that unrelated drugs can be made to appear effective at treating cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

The illustration used a cohort of 3315 patients, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), identified from the Saskatchewan Health databases, hospitalised for CVD and followed for up to a year. We used the biased approach to assess the effect of two medications, namely gastrointestinal drugs (GID) and inhaled beta-agonists (IBA), both unknown to be effective in CVD, on the risk of all-cause mortality. We also estimated these effects using the proper person-time approach.

RESULTS

Using the inappropriate approach, the rates ratios of all-cause death were 0.73 (95%CI: 0.57-0.93), with IBA and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.61-0.99), with GID. These rate ratios became 0.98 (95%CI: 0.77-1.25) and 0.94 (95%CI: 0.73-1.20), respectively, with the proper person-time analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Several recent observational studies used a flawed approach to design and data analysis, leading to immortal time bias, which can generate an illusion of treatment effectiveness. Observational studies, with surprising beneficial drug effects should be re-assessed to account for this source of bias.

Use of inhaled and oral glucocorticoids, severity of inflammatory disease and risk of hip/femur fracture: a population-based case-control study

BACKGROUND

Patients using higher dosages of inhaled or oral glucocorticoids (GCs) have an increased risk of hip/femur fractures. The role of the underlying disease in the aetiology of this increased risk has not been widely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the contribution of the underlying disease to the risk of hip/femur fracture in patients using inhaled or oral GCs.

DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

A case-control study within the Dutch PHARMO-RLS database was conducted. Cases (n = 6763) were adult patients with a first hip/femur fracture during enrolment. Each case was matched to four controls by age, gender and region.

RESULTS

The risk of hip/femur fracture increased with current use of inhaled GCs (crude OR 1.30, 95% CI:1.16-1.47) and with current use of oral GCs (crude OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.46-1.90). After adjustment for disease severity, the risk of hip/femur fracture was no longer statistically significantly increased in inhaled GC users (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91-1.27), whilst it remained elevated in oral GC users (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.22-1.67). Patients using inhaled GCs without any exposure to oral GCs had no increased risk of fracture (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.79-1.22).

CONCLUSION

Inhaled GC users had no increased risk of femur/hip fracture after adjustment for underlying disease severity. Our data suggest that, even at higher dosages, inhaled GC use is not an independent risk factor for fracture. In contrast, oral GC use was associated with an increased risk of fracture, which was not fully explained by the underlying disease severity.

Initial treatment regimen and risk of hospitalization in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Compare hospitalization risk of various initial treatment regimens for COPD.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort design.

SETTING

Patients enrolled in 24 different managed care plans across the United States during 1997-2000.

PATIENTS

Aged at least 45 years with a primary diagnosis of COPD identified. Initiation date was the date the first inhaler was dispensed. Patients were required to have filled this prescription within 60 days of the first documented COPD diagnosis in the database.

INTERVENTIONS

Five therapy cohorts were identified 1) ipratropium alone or in combination with albuterol (IPR), 2) long-acting beta agonists (LABA), 3) inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), 4) ICS+IPR and 5) ICS+LABA.

MEASUREMENTS

Subjects were observed for 12 months or until a COPD-related hospitalization was observed, whichever came first. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by varying the observation period from >60, >90 and >180 days to determine if this would impact the results.

RESULTS

3616 patients were identified, 1754 (49%) on IPR alone, 1032 (29%) on ICS alone, 357 (10%) on ICS+IPR, 266 (7%) on LABA alone and 207 (6%) on ICS+LABA. Compared with IPR alone, patients in the ICS alone and ICS plus LABA groups had a 36% and 47% reductions in the risk of a COPD hospitalization, (HR: 0.643; 95% CI 0.512, 0.808 and HR: 0.533; 95% CI 0.328, 0.865) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this analysis suggest that initial treatment with an ICS alone or in combination with a LABA , compared to IPR alone, was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of COPD hospitalization 12 months following the start of therapy independent of concomitant asthma diagnosis. Similar outcomes were observed when the observation period was varied from >60, >90 and >180 days.

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on mortality and hospitalisation in elderly asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: appraising the evidence

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common conditions that have substantial effects on daily functioning and medical resource utilisation. In elderly populations, the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a mainstay of treatment in asthma has long been accepted whereas the appropriateness and extent of use of ICS in COPD is not as clear. This paper reviews data associated with ICS treatment in the elderly, specifically characteristics of ICS users, rates of adherence, hospitalisation and mortality associated with ICS treatment. Studies examining the use of ICS in asthma and COPD have generally found that ICS may be underused compared with guideline recommendations or that there are substantial differences between patients who receive ICS and those who do not. Among elderly asthma or COPD patients who receive ICS, there are lower rates of hospitalisation among those who adhere to their treatment plan. Among elderly patients with asthma, the combination of ICS plus long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists has been shown to be superior in terms of mortality and hospitalisation compared with either treatment alone. There may be an interaction effect between oral corticosteroids and ICS among elderly COPD patients, although important differences may be present in the clinical characteristics of patients who receive one versus both forms of corticosteroids. A dose-response relationship between ICS and both all-cause and pulmonary-specific mortality has been shown among older COPD patients. Several existing studies are subject to selection bias, as they have identified patients who survived for a specified period, for example, long enough to have received a specified number of prescriptions for ICS. This bias must be further explored. Future research should also clearly delineate asthma and COPD populations in order to identify different benefits from ICS. The use of a claims database that also includes clinical metrics would be useful to identify additional possible outcomes of ICS use. Further, symptom diaries or other patient-reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life and health status, should be included in studies of ICS among the elderly to identify other benefits that should be considered in treatment selection.

Inhaled corticosteroids and survival in COPD patients receiving long-term home oxygen therapy

BACKGROUND

Several observational studies suggest that therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is associated with reduced mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, none of these has reported survival data in COPD patients with respiratory insufficiency who require domiciliary oxygen therapy. The present study was conducted to examine the association between ICS and all-cause mortality in patients with severe COPD and chronic hypoxemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a tertiary referral clinic, we identified 145 consecutive COPD patients who met the criteria for long-term oxygen therapy between 1996 and 2002. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality over 1 year between patients who were (n=55) and were not treated with ICS (n=90).

RESULTS

In a crude analysis, the use of ICS was associated with a HR of 0.38 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.18-0.79). After adjustments for age, sex, use of oral steroids, and beta2-agonists, PaO2 and PaCO2, the HR was 0.46 (95% CI=0.21-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that ICS may reduce all-cause mortality in patients with severe COPD and chronic hypoxemia, who require long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy. These data suggest that ICS may play an important role in improving clinical outcomes in patients with advanced COPD.

The risk/benefit of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Although inhaled corticosteroids have a well defined role in asthma therapy, their use remains controversial in nonasthmatic, smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Some studies have shown an effect of inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation in COPD, but the clinical relevance of these results is unknown. Data from five long-term, large studies, provide evidence that prolonged treatment with inhaled corticosteroids does not modify the rate of decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in patients with COPD and no reversibility to short-acting beta(2)-agonists. FEV1 was slightly improved over the first six months of treatment and lower reactivity in response to methacholine challenge has been observed. Improvement of respiratory symptoms and health status were also reported. A reduction of exacerbations rate was observed in two studies. No survival benefit was demonstrated. Two recent reports suggest that long term use of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients improves quality-adjusted life expectancy and is cost-effective. Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists have proven benefit in four long term large studies compared to placebo for FEV1, exacerbation rate, symptoms and health status. However, only two studies found that combination therapy was more effective than long-acting beta(2)-agonists alone for symptoms and health status improvement. The long term safety of inhaled corticosteroids is not known in COPD patients but topical adverse effects, and systemic effects such as a decrease of bone density of lumbar spine and femur and cutaneous adverse effects, have been reported after three years of treatment. However, three recent observational studies found a slight increase in the risk of fractures (hip, upper extremities and vertebral) in association with high doses of inhaled corticotherapy.

Factors Associated With Outcomes of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The purpose of this article is to provide a general review of the current literature on the factors associated with the outcomes of hospitalizations, survival and health-related quality of life in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), highlighting the limitations and the complexities in interpretation of the results of current studies. There is no consensus definition for AECOPD; onsets may be difficult to define and the determination of duration elusive. The prevalence of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) in the community appears to be underestimated as exacerbations are underreported by patients and their doctors. Hospitalization for COPD is due mainly to severe AECOPDs which drive the cost of care. There are few longitudinal epidemiological studies on factors associated with hospitalizations for AECOPD. The results of current studies do not allow clear differentiation between associations that are predictors of event, the consequences of the event, or indicators of severity. Strategies to reduce severe exacerbations of COPD include pharmacological treatment, vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation, and home care programs. The optimal strategy for the reduction of hospitalization in COPD remains unclear. Long-term interventional studies are needed to provide clearer information for the prevention of exacerbations and hospitalizations in COPD.