1
|
Pfaar O, Sousa-Pinto B, Papadopoulos NG, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Ordak M, Torres MJ, Mösges R, Klimek L, Zuberbier T, Matricardi PM, Berger UE, Berger M, Dramburg S, Mahler V, Toppila-Salmi SK, Bergmann KC, Ollert M, Tripodi S, Jutel M, Agache I, Eguiluz-Gracia I, Canonica GW, Akdis CA, Sokolowska M, Sofiev M, Shamji MH, Czarlewski W, Fonseca JA, Bedbrook A, Bousquet J. Digitally-enabled, person-centred care (PCC) in allergen immunotherapy: An ARIA-EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2024. [PMID: 38700063 DOI: 10.1111/all.16135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
In rhinitis and asthma, several mHealth apps have been developed but only a few have been validated. However, these apps have a high potential for improving person-centred care (PCC), especially in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). They can provide support in AIT initiation by selecting the appropriate patient and allergen shared decision-making. They can also help in (i) the evaluation of (early) efficacy, (ii) early and late stopping rules and (iii) the evaluation of (carried-over) efficacy after cessation of the treatment course. Future perspectives have been formulated in the first report of a joint task force (TF)-Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI)-on digital biomarkers. The TF on AIT now aims to (i) outline the potential of the clinical applications of mHealth solutions, (ii) express their current limitations, (iii) make proposals regarding further developments for both clinical practice and scientific purpose and (iv) suggest which of the tools might best comply with the purpose of digitally-enabled PCC in AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Désirée E Larenas-Linnemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico
| | - Michal Ordak
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria J Torres
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND, Universidad de Malaga, RICORS de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, Malaga, Spain
| | - Ralph Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- ClinCompetence Cologne GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paolo M Matricardi
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medecine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin - Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe E Berger
- Department of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- European Aeroallergen Network (EAN), Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Berger
- Department of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- European Aeroallergen Network (EAN), Vienna, Austria
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Klinik Hietzing, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medecine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin - Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Sanna K Toppila-Salmi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Allergy, Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karl-Christian Bergmann
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
| | - Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND, Universidad de Malaga, RICORS de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, Malaga, Spain
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Asthma and Allergy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Milena Sokolowska
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mikhail Sofiev
- Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Joao A Fonseca
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- MASK-air, Montpellier, France
- ARIA, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
- MASK-air, Montpellier, France
- ARIA, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miao BY, Sushil M, Xu A, Wang M, Arneson D, Berkley E, Subash M, Vashisht R, Rudrapatna V, Butte AJ. Characterisation of digital therapeutic clinical trials: a systematic review with natural language processing. Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6:e222-e229. [PMID: 38395542 PMCID: PMC11074920 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00244-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Digital therapeutics (DTx) are a somewhat novel class of US Food and Drug Administration-regulated software that help patients prevent, manage, or treat disease. Here, we use natural language processing to characterise registered DTx clinical trials and provide insights into the clinical development landscape for these novel therapeutics. We identified 449 DTx clinical trials, initiated or expected to be initiated between 2010 and 2030, from ClinicalTrials.gov using 27 search terms, and available data were analysed, including trial durations, locations, MeSH categories, enrolment, and sponsor types. Topic modelling of eligibility criteria, done with BERTopic, showed that DTx trials frequently exclude patients on the basis of age, comorbidities, pregnancy, language barriers, and digital determinants of health, including smartphone or data plan access. Our comprehensive overview of the DTx development landscape highlights challenges in designing inclusive DTx clinical trials and presents opportunities for clinicians and researchers to address these challenges. Finally, we provide an interactive dashboard for readers to conduct their own analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Y Miao
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Madhumita Sushil
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ava Xu
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michelle Wang
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas Arneson
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ellen Berkley
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; UC Davis Health, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Meera Subash
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rohit Vashisht
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vivek Rudrapatna
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Atul J Butte
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; University of California Health, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sykes DL, See YY, Chow ECY, Crooks MG, Cummings H, Robinson M, Watkins K, Thompson J, Overton K, Riches C, Faruqi S. Digitally monitored inhaled therapy: a 'smart' way to manage severe asthma? J Asthma 2024:1-6. [PMID: 38323583 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2316726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One of the fundamental challenges of managing patients with severe asthma is treatment adherence, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids. Adherence is difficult to measure objectively and poor adherence is associated with worse outcomes. In this study, assess the ability of a 'smart' inhaler to record adherence in severe asthma patients and measure the impact of this on asthma control. METHODS Consecutive consenting patients meeting criteria for biologics had their existing high-dose ICS/LABA//LAMA combination inhaler/s switched to mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (114/46/136). Routine clinical data, including blood eosinophils, FeNO, and ACQ-6 scores were collected at baseline and at 4 wk. Adherence was then checked on the Propeller Health app, and good adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed usage. Participants were then followed-up at 12 months to record the proportion of patients who were initiated on biologics. RESULTS 77 patients (mean [SD] age = 50.4 [15.7] years, 67.5% female [n = 52]) participated. 71 participants were able to use the device and 65% (n = 46) of these attained good asthma control and were not initiated on biologics at 12-month follow-up. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in ACQ6 score at follow-up (2.81 vs. 1.92, p < 0.001 and 3.05 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference in improvement between groups. Patients with optimal adherence also demonstrated a significant reduction in median FeNO at follow-up (47 ppb vs. 40 ppb, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS In severe asthma patients, 'smart' inhalers may represent an effective management tool to improve adherence and asthma control, therefore avoiding the need for patients to commence biological therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic L Sykes
- Respiratory Research Group, Hull York Medical School, Heslington, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Yee Yong See
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Evon C Y Chow
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Michael G Crooks
- Respiratory Research Group, Hull York Medical School, Heslington, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | | | - Mandy Robinson
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Karen Watkins
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Joanne Thompson
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Kylie Overton
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Riches
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Shoaib Faruqi
- Respiratory Research Group, Hull York Medical School, Heslington, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggelidis X, Kritikou M, Makris M, Miligkos M, Papapostolou N, Papadopoulos NG, Xepapadaki P. Tele-Monitoring Applications in Respiratory Allergy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:898. [PMID: 38337592 PMCID: PMC10856055 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Respiratory allergic diseases affect over 500 million people globally and pose a substantial burden in terms of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Restrictive factors such as geographical disparities, infectious pandemics, limitations in resources, and shortages of allergy specialists in underserved areas impede effective management. Telemedicine encompasses real-time visits, store-and-forward option triage, and computer-based technologies for establishing efficient doctor-patient communication. Recent advances in digital technology, including designated applications, informative materials, digital examination devices, wearables, digital inhalers, and integrated platforms, facilitate personalized and evidence-based care delivery. The integration of telemonitoring in respiratory allergy care has shown beneficial effects on disease control, adherence, and quality of life. While the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, certain concerns regarding technical requirements, platform quality, safety, reimbursement, and regulatory considerations remain unresolved. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in telemonitoring applications holds promise for data analysis, pattern recognition, and personalized treatment plans. Striking the balance between AI-enabled insights and human expertise is crucial for optimizing the benefits of telemonitoring. While telemonitoring exhibits potential for enhancing patient care and healthcare delivery, critical considerations have to be addressed in order to ensure the successful integration of telemonitoring into the healthcare landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xenofon Aggelidis
- Allergy Unit, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (X.A.); (M.M.); (N.P.)
| | - Maria Kritikou
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (N.G.P.); (P.X.)
| | - Michael Makris
- Allergy Unit, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (X.A.); (M.M.); (N.P.)
| | - Michael Miligkos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (N.G.P.); (P.X.)
| | - Niki Papapostolou
- Allergy Unit, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (X.A.); (M.M.); (N.P.)
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (N.G.P.); (P.X.)
| | - Paraskevi Xepapadaki
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (N.G.P.); (P.X.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaplan A, Boivin M, Bouchard J, Kim J, Hayes S, Licskai C. The emerging role of digital health in the management of asthma. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2023; 14:20406223231209329. [PMID: 38028951 PMCID: PMC10657529 DOI: 10.1177/20406223231209329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The most common reasons seen for lack of asthma control include misconceptions about disease control, low controller treatment adherence, poor inhaler technique, and the resulting underuse of controllers and overuse of short-acting beta2 agonists (SABAs). Narrowing these care gaps may be achieved through well-designed patient education that considers the patient's motivation, beliefs, and capabilities regarding their asthma and its management and empowers the patient to become an active participant in treatment decisions. Digital health technologies (DHTs) and digital therapeutic (DT) devices provide new opportunities to monitor treatment behaviors, improve communication between healthcare providers and patients, and generate data that inform educational interactions. DHT and DT have been proven effective in enhancing patient self-management in other chronic conditions, particularly diabetes. Accelerated integration of DHT and DT into the management of asthma patients is facilitated by the use of digital inhalers that employ sensor technology ("smart" inhalers). These devices efficiently provide real-time feedback on controller adherence, SABA use, and inhaler technique that have the strong potential to optimize asthma control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Kaplan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 14872 Yonge Street, Aurora, Toronto, ON L4G 1N2, Canada
- Family Physician Airways Group of Canada, Markham, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - James Kim
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Christopher Licskai
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van de Hei SJ, Kim CH, Honkoop PJ, Sont JK, Schermer TRJ, MacHale E, Costello RW, Kocks JWH, Postma MJ, van Boven JFM. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Inhaler Adherence Technologies in Difficult-to-Treat Asthma. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3064-3073.e15. [PMID: 37406806 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management, and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma. METHODS A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic (AdViSHE) tool. The INCA (Inhaler Compliance Assessment) Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]). RESULTS The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (ie, regular inhalers) of €7,546 ($7,946) and €10,752 ($11,322), respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 ($3,377) for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted in cost savings of €26,309 ($27,703) for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 ($2,408) (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 ($4,824) (increased control, decreased exacerbations). CONCLUSIONS In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler-based interventions can be cost-saving in the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne J van de Hei
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chong H Kim
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo
| | - Persijn J Honkoop
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob K Sont
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tjard R J Schermer
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Science Support Office, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Elaine MacHale
- Clinical Research Centre, Smurfit Building Beaumont Hospital, Department of Respiratory Medicine, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard W Costello
- Clinical Research Centre, Smurfit Building Beaumont Hospital, Department of Respiratory Medicine, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands; Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands; Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia; Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics & Business, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sousa-Pinto B, Louis R, Anto JM, Amaral R, Sá-Sousa A, Czarlewski W, Brussino L, Canonica GW, Chaves Loureiro C, Cruz AA, Gemicioglu B, Haahtela T, Kupczyk M, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Okamoto Y, Ollert M, Pfaar O, Pham-Thi N, Puggioni F, Regateiro FS, Romantowski J, Sastre J, Scichilone N, Taborda-Barata L, Ventura MT, Agache I, Bedbrook A, Becker S, Bergmann KC, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bonini M, Boulet LP, Brusselle G, Buhl R, Cecchi L, Charpin D, de Blay F, Del Giacco S, Ivancevich JC, Jutel M, Klimek L, Kraxner H, Kuna P, Laune D, Makela M, Morais-Almeida M, Nadif R, Niedoszytko M, Papadopoulos NG, Papi A, Patella V, Pétré B, Rivero Yeverino D, Robalo Cordeiro C, Roche N, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Savouré M, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Suppli Ulrik C, Usmani OS, Valiulis A, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Costa EM, Bousquet J. Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists in asthma: A MASK-air study. Pulmonology 2023:S2531-0437(23)00130-7. [PMID: 37543524 DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adherence to controller medication is a major problem in asthma management, being difficult to assess and tackle. mHealth apps can be used to assess adherence. We aimed to assess the adherence to inhaled corticosteroids+long-acting β2-agonists (ICS+LABA) in users of the MASK-air® app, comparing the adherence to ICS+formoterol (ICS+F) with that to ICS+other LABA. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed complete weeks of MASK-air® data (2015-2022; 27 countries) from patients with self-reported asthma and ICS+LABA use. We compared patients reporting ICS+F versus ICS+other LABA on adherence levels, symptoms and symptom-medication scores. We built regression models to assess whether adherence to ICS+LABA was associated with asthma control or short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use. Sensitivity analyses were performed considering the weeks with no more than one missing day. RESULTS In 2598 ICS+LABA users, 621 (23.9%) reported 4824 complete weeks and 866 (33.3%) reported weeks with at most one missing day. Higher adherence (use of medication ≥80% of weekly days) was observed for ICS+other LABA (75.1%) when compared to ICS+F (59.3%), despite both groups displaying similar asthma control and work productivity. The ICS+other LABA group was associated with more days of SABA use than the ICS+F group (median=71.4% versus 57.1% days). Each additional weekly day of ICS+F use was associated with a 4.1% less risk in weekly SABA use (95%CI=-6.5;-1.6%;p=0.001). For ICS+other LABA, the percentage was 8.2 (95%CI=-11.6;-5.0%;p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In asthma patients adherent to the MASK-air app, adherence to ICS+LABA was high. ICS+F users reported lower adherence but also a lower SABA use and a similar level of control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS@RISE - Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - R Louis
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium; GIGA I3 Research Group, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - J M Anto
- ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Amaral
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS@RISE - Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - A Sá-Sousa
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS@RISE - Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - W Czarlewski
- Medical Consulting Czarlewski, Levallois, France; MASK-air, Montpellier, France
| | - L Brussino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - G W Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - C Chaves Loureiro
- Department of Pneumology, University of Coimbra, Medicine Faculty, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - A A Cruz
- Fundaçao ProAR, Federal University of Bahia and GARD/WHO Planning Group, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - B Gemicioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Kupczyk
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - V Kvedariene
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest Diseases and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - D E Larenas-Linnemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico
| | - Y Okamoto
- Chiba Rosai Hospital, Chiba, Japan; Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - M Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), and Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - O Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - N Pham-Thi
- Ecole Polytechnique de Palaiseau, Palaiseau, France; IRBA (Institut de Recherche Bio-Médicale des Armées), Brétigny sur Orge, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - F Puggioni
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Center, Personalized Medicine Asthma & Allergy, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - F S Regateiro
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Institute of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - J Romantowski
- Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Allergology, Gdansk, Poland
| | - J Sastre
- Allergy Service, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonoma University of Madrid, CIBERES-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - N Scichilone
- PROMISE Department, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Taborda-Barata
- Department of Immunoallergology, Cova da Beira University Hospital Centre, Covilhã, Portugal; UBIAir - Clinical & Experimental Lung Centre and CICS-UBI Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - M T Ventura
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy; Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (ISPA-CNR), Bari, Italy
| | - I Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
| | - A Bedbrook
- MASK-air, Montpellier, France; ARIA, Montpellier, France
| | - S Becker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - K C Bergmann
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Bosnic-Anticevich
- Quality Use of Respiratory Medicines Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - M Bonini
- Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Neurological, ENT and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy; National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - L-P Boulet
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - G Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - R Buhl
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany
| | - L Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - D Charpin
- Clinique des Bronches, Allergie et Sommeil, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - F de Blay
- Allergy Division, Chest Disease Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Federation of Translational Medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - S Del Giacco
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health and Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital "Duilio Casula", University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J C Ivancevich
- Servicio de Alergia e Immunologia, Clinica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland; ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - L Klimek
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - H Kraxner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - P Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - D Laune
- KYomed INNOV, Montpellier, France
| | - M Makela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - R Nadif
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France; Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - M Niedoszytko
- Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - N G Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Papi
- Respiratory Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - V Patella
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, "Santa Maria della Speranza" Hospital, Battipaglia, Salerno, Italy; Agency of Health ASL, Salerno, Italy; Postgraduate Programme in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - B Pétré
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - D Rivero Yeverino
- Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología clínica, Hospital Universitario de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - C Robalo Cordeiro
- Department of Pneumology, University of Coimbra, Medicine Faculty, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - N Roche
- Pneumologie, AP-HP Centre Université de Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; UMR 1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | - P W Rouadi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and Ear University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dar Al Shifa Hospital, Salmiya, Kuwait
| | - B Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Savouré
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France; Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - M H Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - A Sheikh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Suppli Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - O S Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK; Royal Brompton Hospital, Airways Disease Section, London, UK
| | - A Valiulis
- Interdisciplinary Research Group of Human Ecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS-SP), Brussel, Belgium
| | - A Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - T Zuberbier
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - J A Fonseca
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS@RISE - Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - E M Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUINTE, Faculty of Pharmacy and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (Porto4Ageing), Porto, Portugal
| | - J Bousquet
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany; Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France; University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lommatzsch M, Criée CP, de Jong CCM, Gappa M, Geßner C, Gerstlauer M, Hämäläinen N, Haidl P, Hamelmann E, Horak F, Idzko M, Ignatov A, Koczulla AR, Korn S, Köhler M, Lex C, Meister J, Milger-Kneidinger K, Nowak D, Nothacker M, Pfaar O, Pohl W, Preisser AM, Rabe KF, Riedler J, Schmidt O, Schreiber J, Schuster A, Schuhmann M, Spindler T, Taube C, Christian Virchow J, Vogelberg C, Vogelmeier CF, Wantke F, Windisch W, Worth H, Zacharasiewicz A, Buhl R. [Diagnosis and treatment of asthma: a guideline for respiratory specialists 2023 - published by the German Respiratory Society (DGP) e. V.]. Pneumologie 2023; 77:461-543. [PMID: 37406667 DOI: 10.1055/a-2070-2135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The management of asthma has fundamentally changed during the past decades. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma was developed for respiratory specialists who need detailed and evidence-based information on the new diagnostic and therapeutic options in asthma. The guideline shows the new role of biomarkers, especially blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO), in diagnostic algorithms of asthma. Of note, this guideline is the first worldwide to announce symptom prevention and asthma remission as the ultimate goals of asthma treatment, which can be achieved by using individually tailored, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs such as inhaled steroids, allergen immunotherapy or biologics. In addition, the central role of the treatment of comorbidities is emphasized. Finally, the document addresses several challenges in asthma management, including asthma treatment during pregnancy, treatment of severe asthma or the diagnosis and treatment of work-related asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Lommatzsch
- Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Abt. für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock
| | | | - Carmen C M de Jong
- Abteilung für pädiatrische Pneumologie, Abteilung für Pädiatrie, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
| | - Monika Gappa
- Klinik für Kinder und Jugendliche, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
| | | | | | | | - Peter Haidl
- Abteilung für Pneumologie II, Fachkrankenhaus Kloster Grafschaft GmbH, Schmallenberg
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld
| | | | - Marco Idzko
- Abteilung für Pulmologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Medizinische Universität Wien
| | - Atanas Ignatov
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
| | - Andreas Rembert Koczulla
- Schön-Klinik Berchtesgadener Land, Berchtesgaden
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Stephanie Korn
- Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Thoraxklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Michael Köhler
- Deutsche Patientenliga Atemwegserkrankungen, Gau-Bickelheim
| | - Christiane Lex
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
| | - Jochen Meister
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Helios Klinikum Aue
| | | | - Dennis Nowak
- Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, LMU München
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Sektion für Rhinologie und Allergie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg
| | - Wolfgang Pohl
- Gesundheitszentrum Althietzing, Karl Landsteiner Institut für klinische und experimentelle Pneumologie, Wien
| | - Alexandra M Preisser
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - Klaus F Rabe
- Pneumologie, LungenClinic Großhansdorf, UKSH Kiel
| | - Josef Riedler
- Abteilung für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Kardinal Schwarzenberg Klinikum Schwarzach
| | | | - Jens Schreiber
- Universitätsklinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
| | - Antje Schuster
- Klinik für Allgemeine Pädiatrie, Neonatologie und Kinderkardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | | | | | - Christian Taube
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen-Ruhrlandklinik
| | | | - Christian Vogelberg
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden
| | | | | | - Wolfram Windisch
- Lungenklinik Köln-Merheim, Lehrstuhl für Pneumologie, Universität Witten/Herdecke
| | - Heinrich Worth
- Pneumologische & Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Fürth
| | | | - Roland Buhl
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Zentrum für Thoraxerkrankungen, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inocencio TJ, Sterling KL, Sayiner S, Minshall ME, Kaye L, Hatipoğlu U. Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2023; 21:36. [PMID: 37271821 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00443-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive debilitating condition with frequent exacerbations that have a high burden for patients and society. Digital tools may help to reduce the economic burden for patients and payers by improving outcomes. The Propeller platform is a digital self-management tool that facilitates passive monitoring of inhaler medication utilization, potentially assisting the healthcare team to identify patients at risk of a COPD exacerbation who may require further intervention. This study estimated the budget impact of Propeller from commercial payer and Medicare fee-for-service payer perspectives. METHODS An Excel-based model was used to estimate the budget impact of Propeller for COPD patients in commercial and Medicare population sizes of 5 million members. Data on prevalence, baseline healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and baseline use of rescue and controller inhaler medications with unit costs (adjusted to 2020 US dollars) were obtained from peer-reviewed literature. Data on reductions in HCRU during Propeller usage were based on direct evidence. Estimates for costs of remote monitoring were obtained from publicly available information. All patients were assumed to have insurance claims related to ongoing remote monitoring. RESULTS The estimated number of annual eligible COPD patients for commercial and Medicare was 212,200 and 606,600, respectively. Propeller decreased costs by an estimated $2,475 (commercial) and $915 (Medicare) per enrolled patient. The greatest increase in expenditure was for remote monitoring related expenses. After accounting for estimated reductions in hospitalizations, emergency department visits and short-acting beta-agonist use, total net savings were approximately $1.60 and $1.70 per-member per-month for commercial and Medicare payers, respectively. CONCLUSION Propeller is projected to be cost saving from both the commercial and Medicare payer perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kimberly L Sterling
- ResMed Science Center, 9001 Spectrum Center Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
| | | | - Michael E Minshall
- ResMed Science Center, 9001 Spectrum Center Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA
| | - Leanne Kaye
- ResMed Science Center, 9001 Spectrum Center Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ari A, Alhamad BR. Evaluating dry powder inhalers: From in vitro studies to mobile health technologies. Respir Med 2023:107281. [PMID: 37244487 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are essential in treating patients with pulmonary diseases. Since DPIs were introduced in the 1960s, a remarkable improvement has been made in their technology, dose delivery, efficiency, reproducibility, stability, and performance based on safety and efficacy. While there are many DPIs on the market and several more under development, it is vital to evaluate the performance of DPIs for effective aerosol drug delivery to patients with respiratory disorders. Their performance evaluation includes particle size, metering system, device design, dose preparation, inhalation technique, and patient-device integration. The purpose of this paper is to review current literature evaluating DPIs through in vitro studies, computational fluid models, and in vivo/clinical studies. We will also explain how mobile health applications are used to monitor and evaluate patients' adherence to prescribed medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Ari
- Department of Respiratory Care, Texas State University, 200 Bobcat Way, Suite 214, Round Rock, TX, 78665, USA.
| | - Bshayer Ramadan Alhamad
- Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van de Hei SJ, Stoker N, Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, Poot CC, Meijer E, Postma MJ, Chavannes NH, Kocks JWH, van Boven JFM. Anticipated barriers and facilitators for implementing smart inhalers in asthma medication adherence management. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2023; 33:22. [PMID: 37208358 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00343-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Smart inhalers are electronic monitoring devices which are promising in increasing medication adherence and maintaining asthma control. A multi-stakeholder capacity and needs assessment is recommended prior to implementation in healthcare systems. This study aimed to explore perceptions of stakeholders and to identify anticipated facilitators and barriers associated with the implementation of smart digital inhalers in the Dutch healthcare system. Data were collected through focus group discussions with female patients with asthma (n = 9) and healthcare professionals (n = 7) and through individual semi-structured interviews with policy makers (n = 4) and smart inhaler developers (n = 4). Data were analysed using the Framework method. Five themes were identified: (i) perceived benefits, (ii) usability, (iii) feasibility, (iv) payment and reimbursement, and (v) data safety and ownership. In total, 14 barriers and 32 facilitators were found among all stakeholders. The results of this study could contribute to the design of a tailored implementation strategy for smart inhalers in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne J van de Hei
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte C Poot
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Meijer
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barrett M, Gondalia R, Vuong V, Kaye L, Hill AB, Attisha E, Holtrop T. Retrospective assessment of a collaborative digital asthma program for Medicaid-enrolled children in southwest Detroit: reductions in short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use. Asthma Res Pract 2023; 9:3. [PMID: 37210572 DOI: 10.1186/s40733-023-00092-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world evidence for digitally-supported asthma programs among Medicaid-enrolled children remains limited. Using data from a collaborative quality improvement program, we evaluated the impact of a digital intervention on asthma inhaler use among children in southwest Detroit. METHODS Children (6-13 years) enrolled with Kids Health Connection (KHC), a program involving home visits with an asthma educator, were invited to participate in a digital self-management asthma program (Propeller Health). Patients were provided with a sensor to capture short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use, and given access to a paired mobile app to track usage. Patients' healthcare providers and caregivers ("followers") were invited to view data as well. Retrospective paired t-tests assessed change in mean SABA use and SABA-free days (SFD) over time, and regressions explored the relationship between followers and medication use. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were assessed. Mean program participation was nine months, and patients had on average 3 followers. From the first to last participation month, mean SABA use decreased from 0.68 to 0.25 puffs/day (p < 0.001), and mean SFD increased from 25.2 to 28.1 days/month (p < 0.001). 76% of patients had an increase in the number of SFD. There was a positive, but non-significant, relationship between the number of followers and reductions in SABA inhaler use. CONCLUSIONS We observed a significant reduction in SABA inhaler use and an increase in the number of SABA-free days among Medicaid-enrolled children enrolled in a multi-modal digital asthma program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vy Vuong
- ResMed Science Center, San Diego, USA
| | | | - Alex B Hill
- Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Wayne State University; formerly Detroit Health Department, Detroit, USA
| | - Elliott Attisha
- Formerly Detroit Public Schools Community District, Detroit, USA
| | - Teresa Holtrop
- Wayne Children's Healthcare Access Program, Inc, Dba Kids' Health Connections, Detroit, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide and is characterised by variable airflow obstruction, causing dyspnoea and wheezing. Highly effective therapies are available; asthma morbidity and mortality have vastly improved in the past 15 years, and most patients can attain good asthma control. However, undertreatment is still common, and improving patient and health-care provider understanding of when and how to adjust treatment is crucial. Asthma management consists of a cycle of assessment of asthma control and risk factors and adjustment of medications accordingly. With the introduction of biological therapies, management of severe asthma has entered the precision medicine era-a shift that is driving clinical ambitions towards disease remission. Patients with severe asthma often have co-existing conditions contributing to their symptoms, mandating a multidimensional management approach. In this Seminar, we provide a clinically focused overview of asthma; epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management in children and adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Porsbjerg
- Department of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Erik Melén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet and Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lauri Lehtimäki
- Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dominick Shaw
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Clinical Impact of Electronic Monitoring Devices of Inhalers in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:ph16030414. [PMID: 36986513 PMCID: PMC10055893 DOI: 10.3390/ph16030414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain insight into the characteristics and clinical impact of electronic monitoring devices of inhalers (EMDs) and their clinical interventions in adult patients with asthma or COPD. The search included PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases, as well as official EMDs websites. We found eight observational studies and ten clinical trials, assessing a wide range of clinical outcomes. Results from the meta-analysis on adherence to inhalers in a period over three months were favourable in the EMD group (fixed effects model: SMD: 0.36 [0.25–0.48]; random effects model SMD: 0.41 [0.22–0.60]). An exploratory meta-analysis found an improvement in ACT score (fixed effect model SMD: 0.25 [0.11–0.39]; random effects model: SMD: 0.47 [−0.14–1.08]). Other clinical outcomes showed mixed results in the descriptive analyses. The findings of this review highlight the benefits of EMDs in the optimization of adherence to inhaled therapy as well as the potential interest in other clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
McDowell PJ, Busby J, Heaney LG. Asthma Exacerbations in Severe Asthma: Why Systemic Corticosteroids May not Always Be the Best Treatment Option. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-023-00330-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Advances in the management of severe, eosinophilic asthma have improved, but asthma exacerbations continue to occur. This review aims to look at the evidence we have about why exacerbations may occur; their phenotype and why oral corticosteroids may not always be the best treatment option for all exacerbation of symptoms in individuals with severe asthma.
Recent findings
Studies dating back to the 1990s showed that asthma exacerbations across the spectrum of asthma severity were of different inflammatory endotypes. In addition, there is a wealth of evidence suggesting that eosinophilic inflammation is very responsive to corticosteroid therapy, but that non-eosinophilic inflammation is less so. Two recent UK-based studies have undertaken systematic phenotyping of exacerbations in severe asthma and have shown that there are a significant minority of exacerbation events with an increase in asthma symptoms, fall in lung function, but without evidence of raised T2 biomarkers.
Summary
The evidence to date would suggest that T2 biomarker low asthma exacerbations do not benefit from the administration of oral corticosteroids; in fact, the effect of the oral corticosteroids is harmful. However, there is a paucity of data to answer this question directly. Further research is needed to assess the evolution of non-T2 exacerbations not treated with OCS in a randomised, placebo-controlled, manner.
Collapse
|
16
|
Manchanda N, Aggarwal A, Setya S, Talegaonkar S. Digital Intervention For The Management Of Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2023; 19:CAR-EPUB-129308. [PMID: 36744687 DOI: 10.2174/1567205020666230206124155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive, multifactorial, chronic, neurodegenerative disease with high prevalence and limited therapeutic options, making it a global health crisis. Being the most common cause of dementia, AD erodes the cognitive, functional, and social abilities of the individual and causes escalating medical and psychosocial needs. As yet, this disorder has no cure and current treatment options are palliative in nature. There is an urgent need for novel therapy to address this pressing challenge. Digital therapeutics (Dtx) is one such novel therapy that is gaining popularity globally. Dtx provides evidence based therapeutic interventions driven by internet and software, employing tools such as mobile devices, computers, videogames, apps, sensors, virtual reality aiding in the prevention, management, and treatment of ailments like neurological abnormalities and chronic diseases. Dtx acts as a supportive tool for the optimization of patient care, individualized treatment and improved health outcomes. Dtx uses visual, sound and other non-invasive approaches for instance-consistent therapy, reminiscence therapy, computerised cognitive training, semantic and phonological assistance devices, wearables and computer-assisted rehabilitation environment to find applications in Alzheimer's disease for improving memory, cognition, functional abilities and managing motor symptom. A few of the Dtx-based tools employed in AD include "Memory Matters", "AlzSense", "Alzheimer Assistant", "smart robotic dog", "Immersive virtual reality (iVR)" and the most current gamma stimulation. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current trends in digital health in AD and explore the benefits, challenges, and impediments of using Dtx as an adjunctive therapy for the management of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namish Manchanda
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research University, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi-110017, India
| | - Akanksha Aggarwal
- Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences And Research, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research University, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi-110017, India
| | - Sonal Setya
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SGT College of Pharmacy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana-122505, India
| | - Sushama Talegaonkar
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research University, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi-110017, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Teleallergy: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:126-131. [PMID: 36064184 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Telemedicine uptake in allergy/immunology was slow before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, but has accelerated since. This review examines where telemedicine has been in allergy/immunology and where it is headed in the future. Focus is placed on patient, physician, and health care professional satisfaction with telemedicine, capacity to expand access to allergy/immunology care, cost considerations, the regulatory environment, and future applications of telemedicine including adherence monitoring, wearable biosensors, artificial intelligence, and machine learning addressed.
Collapse
|
18
|
van de Hei SJ, Poot CC, van den Berg LN, Meijer E, van Boven JFM, Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, Postma MJ, Chavannes NH, Kocks JWH. Effectiveness, usability and acceptability of a smart inhaler programme in patients with asthma: protocol of the multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, cluster randomised controlled ACCEPTANCE trial. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022; 9:9/1/e001400. [PMID: 36522130 PMCID: PMC9756226 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suboptimal asthma control is associated with incorrect inhaler use and poor medication adherence, which could lead to unfavourable clinical and economic outcomes. Smart inhaler programmes using electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) could support self-management and increase medication adherence and asthma control. However, evidence on long-term benefits and acceptability is scarce. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a smart inhaler asthma self-management programme on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in adults with uncontrolled asthma, to evaluate its acceptability and to identify subgroups who would benefit most based on patient characteristics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This open-label cluster randomised controlled trial of 12 months will be conducted in primary care in the Netherlands. General practices will be randomly assigned to either intervention or control group. We aim to include 242 patients. The intervention consists of (1) an EMD attached to the patient's inhaler that measures medication use; (2) a smartphone application to set medication reminders, receive motivational messages and track asthma symptoms; and (3) a portal for healthcare professionals to view data on medication use. The control group is passively monitored by the EMD but cannot view their inhaler data or receive feedback. Eligible patients are adults with suboptimal controlled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≥0.75) with evidence of non-adherence established by the EMD during a 6-week run-in period. Primary outcome is the difference in mean medication adherence between intervention and control group. Secondary outcomes include asthma control, asthma-related quality of life, exacerbations, acceptance, cost-effectiveness and whether the effect of the intervention on medication adherence and asthma control is modified by patient characteristics (eg, self-efficacy, medication beliefs and eHealth literacy).Trial registration numberNL7854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne J van de Hei
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte C Poot
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Liselot N van den Berg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Meijer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands,Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands,Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands,Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands,Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Häußermann S, Arendsen LJ, Pritchard JN. Smart dry powder inhalers and intelligent adherence management. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 191:114580. [PMID: 36273513 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Adherence to inhaled treatments is a complex challenge for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, it not only involves following the prescribed treatment plans but also administering the medications correctly. When using a dry powder inhaler (DPI), the inhalation flow is particularly critical. Patients frequently fail to use a rapid enough onset and fast enough inhalation when using DPIs. At the same time, there is increasing pressure on physicians to switch patients to DPIs, to minimise the environmental impact of pMDI propellants. This makes it critical to understand whether a patient will maintain or improve disease control by using their new inhaler correctly. However, it is challenging for health care professionals to understand how a patient behaves away from the clinic. Therefore, it would be beneficial to obtain real-world data through the use of monitoring tools, i.e., "smart inhalers". This paper reviews the technologies used to monitor DPIs, how effective they have been in a clinical setting, and how well these have been adopted by patients and health care providers.
Collapse
|
20
|
Benfante A, Sousa-Pinto B, Pillitteri G, Battaglia S, Fonseca J, Bousquet J, Scichilone N. Applicability of the MASK-Air® App to Severe Asthma Treated with Biologic Molecules: A Pilot Study. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231911470. [PMID: 36232771 PMCID: PMC9569460 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
MASK-air®, a good practice of the DG Santé, has been fully validated in allergic rhinitis, but little is known about its applicability to asthmatics. We explored whether the MASK-air® application is applicable to patients with severe asthma. Severe asthmatics were proposed to use the MASK-air® application for 6 months, along with best practice treatment. Treatment of the patients was not changed based on the application results. The evolution of the visual analogue scales (VAS) for asthma, shortness of breath, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, work, and sleep was monitored using MASK-air®. Adherence to MASK-air® and to the asthma treatment was also checked. Thirteen patients reported on 1229 days of MASK-air® use. The average application adherence was 51.8% (range: 19.7–98.9%). There was no correlation between application and medication adherence. Highly variably trends were found for the VAS for asthma. Five patients had over 90% well-controlled days, four had well- or moderately controlled asthma (with up to 20% uncontrolled days), one patient had moderately controlled asthma with approximately 20% uncontrolled days, and one patient had 80% uncontrolled days. Highly significant correlations were found for the VAS for asthma, and other patients reported VASs for work, dyspnea, sleep, and rhinitis. MASK-air® can be used in patients with severe asthma. VAS asthma appears to be an interesting patient-reported outcome highly correlated with dyspnea and impacts on work. Adherence to the application was better than that for rhinitis, but it needs to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alida Benfante
- PROMISE—Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n. 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0916552681
| | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS—Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- RISE—Health Research Network, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Gianluca Pillitteri
- PROMISE—Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n. 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Battaglia
- PROMISE—Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n. 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Joao Fonseca
- MEDCIDS—Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- RISE—Health Research Network, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, 34000 Montpellier, France
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - Nicola Scichilone
- PROMISE—Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n. 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dierick BHJ, Achterbosch M, Been-Buck S, Klemmeier T, van de Hei SJ, Hagedoorn P, Kerstjens HAM, Kocks JWH, van Boven JFM. Can electronic monitoring with a digital smart spacer support personalised medication adherence and inhaler technique education in patients with asthma?: Protocol of the randomised controlled OUTERSPACE trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059929. [PMID: 35697450 PMCID: PMC9196171 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication adherence and inhaler technique in patients with asthma remain suboptimal. A digital, smart spacer may support personalised adherence and inhaler technique education. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial of personalised, smart spacer data-driven education and explore clinical benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We present the design of the multicentre, randomised controlled OUtcomes following Tailored Education and Retraining: Studying Performance and AdherenCE feasibility trial of 2 months. Patients will be recruited from four Dutch general practices. At t=-1, patients with asthma ≥18 years using inhaled corticosteroids±long-acting beta-agonists±short-acting beta-agonists administered with a pressurised-metered-dose-inhaler and spacer (n=40) will use a smart spacer for 1 month. The rechargeable CE-marked smart spacer (Aerochamber Plus with Flow Vu) includes a sensor that monitors adherence and inhalation technique to prescribed dosing regimen of both maintenance and reliever inhalers. After 1 month (t=0), patients are 1:1 randomised into two groups: control group (usual care) versus intervention group (personalised education). At t=-1, t=0 and t=1 month, the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) are administered and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is assessed. At t=0 and t=1, spirometry is performed. At t=1, usability and satisfaction will be analysed using the System Usability Scale and interviews with patients and healthcare providers. Primary outcome is the overall feasibility of a definitive trial assessed by patient recruitment speed, participation and drop-out rate. Secondary outcomes are patient and healthcare provider satisfaction and exploratory clinical outcomes are adherence, inhaler technique, TAI score, FeNO, lung function, ACQ and WPAI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the RTPO in Leeuwarden, Netherlands (number: NL78361.099.21). Patients will provide written informed consent. Study findings will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed scientific and professional journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL9637.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boudewijn H J Dierick
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Achterbosch
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Been-Buck
- Department of Pulmonology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Titia Klemmeier
- Department of Pulmonology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne J van de Hei
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Hagedoorn
- Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chan A, De Simoni A, Wileman V, Holliday L, Newby CJ, Chisari C, Ali S, Zhu N, Padakanti P, Pinprachanan V, Ting V, Griffiths CJ. Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD013030. [PMID: 35691614 PMCID: PMC9188849 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013030.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is the most common chronic lung condition worldwide, affecting 334 million adults and children globally. Despite the availability of effective treatment, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), adherence to maintenance medication remains suboptimal. Poor ICS adherence leads to increased asthma symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalisations, and healthcare utilisation. Importantly, suboptimal use of asthma medication is a key contributor to asthma deaths. The impact of digital interventions on adherence and asthma outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving adherence to maintenance treatments in asthma. SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted the most recent searches on 1 June 2020, with no restrictions on language of publication. A further search was run in October 2021, but studies were not fully incorporated. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including cluster- and quasi-randomised trials of any duration in any setting, comparing a digital adherence intervention with a non-digital adherence intervention or usual care. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, receiving maintenance treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures for data collection. We used GRADE to assess quantitative outcomes where data were available. MAIN RESULTS We included 40 parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults and children with asthma (n = 15,207), of which eight are ongoing studies. Of the included studies, 30 contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. The total number of participants ranged from 18 to 8517 (median 339). Intervention length ranged from two to 104 weeks. Most studies (n = 29) reported adherence to maintenance medication as their primary outcome; other outcomes such as asthma control and quality of life were also commonly reported. Studies had low or unclear risk of selection bias but high risk of performance and detection biases due to inability to blind the participants, personnel, or outcome assessors. A quarter of the studies had high risk of attrition bias and selective outcome reporting. We examined the effect of digital interventions using meta-analysis for the following outcomes: adherence (16 studies); asthma control (16 studies); asthma exacerbations (six studies); unscheduled healthcare utilisation (four studies); lung function (seven studies); and quality of life (10 studies). Pooled results showed that patients receiving digital interventions may have increased adherence (mean difference of 14.66 percentage points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.74 to 21.57; low-certainty evidence); this is likely to be clinically significant in those with poor baseline medication adherence. Subgroup analysis by type of intervention was significant (P = 0.001), with better adherence shown with electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) (23 percentage points over control, 95% CI 10.84 to 34.16; seven studies), and with short message services (SMS) (12 percentage points over control, 95% CI 6.22 to 18.03; four studies). No significant subgroup differences were seen for interventions having an in-person component versus fully digital interventions, adherence feedback, one or multiple digital components to the intervention, or participant age. Digital interventions were likely to improve asthma control (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.31 higher, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44; moderate-certainty evidence) - a small but likely clinically significant effect. They may reduce asthma exacerbations (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91; low-certainty evidence). Digital interventions may result in a slight change in unscheduled healthcare utilisation, although some studies reported no or a worsened effect. School or work absence data could not be included for meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in reporting and the low number of studies. They may result in little or no difference in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)): there was an improvement of 3.58% predicted FEV1, 95% CI 1.00% to 6.17%; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is unlikely to be clinically significant as the FEV1 change is below 12%. Digital interventions likely increase quality of life (SMD 0.26 higher, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.45; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is a small effect that may not be clinically significant. Acceptability data showed positive attitudes towards digital interventions. There were no data on cost-effectiveness or adverse events. Our confidence in the evidence was reduced by risk of bias and inconsistency. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, digital interventions may result in a large increase in adherence (low-certainty evidence). There is moderate-certainty evidence that digital adherence interventions likely improve asthma control to a degree that is clinically significant, and likely increase quality of life, but there is little or no improvement in lung function. The review found low-certainty evidence that digital interventions may reduce asthma exacerbations. Subgroup analyses show that EMDs may improve adherence by 23% and SMS interventions by 12%, and interventions with an in-person element and adherence feedback may have greater benefits for asthma control and adherence, respectively. Future studies should include percentage adherence as a routine outcome measure to enable comparison between studies and meta-analysis, and use validated questionnaires to assess adherence and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Chan
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anna De Simoni
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Vari Wileman
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lois Holliday
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Chris J Newby
- Research Design Service, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claudia Chisari
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sana Ali
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Natalee Zhu
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Victoria Ting
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Chris J Griffiths
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tay TR, van Boven JFM, Chan A, Hew M. Electronic Inhaler Monitoring for Chronic Airway Disease: Development and Application of a Multidimensional Efficacy Framework. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:1189-1201.e1. [PMID: 34915225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Inhaled therapy is the cornerstone of chronic airway disease therapy, but poor adherence to controller inhalers worsens clinical outcomes and increases cost. Monitoring of controller use is needed to improve adherence, and monitoring of reliever use can predict impending exacerbations. Both can be accurately achieved by electronic inhaler monitoring (EIM). However, evidence for EIM use in clinical practice is limited and varied, and knowledge gaps remain across different outcomes and health settings. We aimed to develop a framework to assess EIM systematically across all aspects of efficacy, apply this framework to the current literature, and identify gaps in efficacy to inform future development in the field. We adapted an existing framework for diagnostic tests, consisting of six levels of efficacy with ascending clinical relevance: technical, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic thinking, therapeutic, patient outcome, and societal efficacy. Tailoring this framework to EIM, we incorporated expert feedback and applied it to the EIM efficacy literature. We found that EIM has good diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic thinking, and therapeutic efficacies, but evidence is lacking for specific aspects of technical, patient outcome, and societal efficacies. Further development of EIM requires improved reliability, usability, and data security for patients, and optimal integration with electronic medical records and overall patient care. Defining appropriate target patient groups and pairing EIM data with effective interventions, in conjunction with reducing costs through technological innovation and economies of scale, will enhance patient and societal outcome efficacies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tunn Ren Tay
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Amy Chan
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Denning J, Negus J, Cullen N. Patient experiences of biologic treatment for severe asthma: the good, the outstanding and the deeply frustrating. Breathe (Sheff) 2022; 17:210145. [PMID: 35296102 PMCID: PMC8919790 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0145-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Biologic treatments can be life changing, apart from when they are not; healthcare professionals and researchers must not forget those for whom biologics are not an option.https://bit.ly/3DJVmxP
Collapse
|
25
|
The relationship between objective app engagement and medication adherence in asthma and COPD: a retrospective analysis. Sci Rep 2021; 11:24343. [PMID: 34934164 PMCID: PMC8692590 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03827-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital health tools can promote disease self-management, but the association of smartphone app engagement and medication adherence is unclear. We assessed the relationship between objective smartphone app engagement and controller medication use in adults with asthma and COPD. We retrospectively analyzed data from participants enrolled in a digital self-management platform for asthma and COPD. Eligible adults had a smartphone and a paired electronic medication monitor (EMM). Longitudinal, mixed-effects logistic regressions estimated the relationship between daily app engagement (app opens, session duration) and daily controller medication use. Data from 2309 participants (71% asthma; 29% COPD) was analyzed. Opening the app (vs. not opening the app) was associated with significantly greater odds (OR (95% CI)) of using controller medications in asthma (2.08 (1.98, 2.19)) and COPD (1.61 (1.49, 1.75). Longer session duration was also associated with greater odds of using controller medications in asthma and COPD, but the odds of use attenuated with longer session duration in COPD. This study presents a novel assessment of the relationship between objectively-measured smartphone app engagement and controller medication use in asthma and COPD. Such insights may help develop targeted digital health tools and interventions.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bagnasco D, Paggiaro P, Latorre M, Folli C, Testino E, Bassi A, Milanese M, Heffler E, Manfredi A, Riccio AM, De Ferrari L, Blasi F, Canevari RF, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G. Severe asthma: One disease and multiple definitions. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100606. [PMID: 34871335 PMCID: PMC8609160 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is, so far, no universal definition of severe asthma. This definition usually relies on: number of exacerbations, inhaled therapy, need for oral corticosteroids, and respiratory function. The use of such parameters varies in the different definitions used. Thus, according to the parameters chosen, each patient may result in having severe asthma or not. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the choice of a specific definition of severe asthma can change the allocation of patients. Methods Data collected from the Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) registry were analyzed. All the patients included were then reclassified according to the definitions of U-BIOPRED, NICE, WHO, ATS/ERS, GINA, ENFUMOSA, and TENOR. Results 540 patients, were extracted from the SANI database. We observed that 462 (86%) met the ATS/ERS criteria as well as the GINA criteria, 259 (48%) the U-Biopred, 222 (41%) the NICE, 125 (23%) the WHO, 313 (58%) the Enfumosa, and 251 (46%) the TENOR criteria. The mean eosinophil value were similar in the ATS/ERS, U-Biopred, and Enfumosa (528, 532 and 516 cells/mcl), higher in WHO and Tenor (567 and 570 cells/mcl) and much higher in the NICE classification (624 cells/mcl). Lung function tests resulted similarly in all groups, with WHO (67%) and ATS/ERS-GINA (73%), respectively, showing the lower and upper mean FEV1 values. Conclusions The present observations clearly evidence the heterogeneity in the distribution of patients when different definitions of severe asthma are used. However, the recent definition of severe asthma, provided by the GINA document, is similar to that indicated in 2014 by ATS/ERS, allowing mirror reclassification of the patients examined. This lack of homogeneity could complicate the access to biological therapies. The definition provided by the GINA document, which reflects what suggested by ATS/ERS, could partially overcome the problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Bagnasco
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Paggiaro
- Department of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Manuela Latorre
- Department of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Italy.,Pulmonary Unit, Nuovo Ospedale Apuano, Massa, Italy
| | - Chiara Folli
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Testino
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Arianna Bassi
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Manlio Milanese
- Division of Pneumology, S.Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Manfredi
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Riccio
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura De Ferrari
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Blasi
- Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Internal Medicine Department, Respiratory Unit and Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, Milano, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Rikki Frank Canevari
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rupani H, Fong WCG, Kyyaly A, Kurukulaaratchy RJ. Recent Insights into the Management of Inflammation in Asthma. J Inflamm Res 2021; 14:4371-4397. [PMID: 34511973 PMCID: PMC8421249 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s295038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The present prevailing inflammatory paradigm in asthma is of T2-high inflammation orchestrated by key inflammatory cells like Type 2 helper lymphocytes, innate lymphoid cells group 2 and associated cytokines. Eosinophils are key components of this T2 inflammatory pathway and have become key therapeutic targets. Real-world evidence on the predominant T2-high nature of severe asthma is emerging. Various inflammatory biomarkers have been adopted in clinical practice to aid asthma characterization including airway measures such as bronchoscopic biopsy and lavage, induced sputum analysis, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Blood measures like eosinophil counts have also gained widespread usage and multicomponent algorithms combining different parameters are now appearing. There is also growing interest in potential future biomarkers including exhaled volatile organic compounds, micro RNAs and urinary biomarkers. Additionally, there is a growing realisation that asthma is a heterogeneous state with numerous phenotypes and associated treatable traits. These may show particular inflammatory patterns and merit-specific management approaches that could improve asthma patient outcomes. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the mainstay of asthma management but their use earlier in the course of disease is being advocated. Recent evidence suggests potential roles for ICS in combination with long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) for as needed use in mild asthma whilst maintenance and reliever therapy regimes have gained widespread acceptance. Other anti-inflammatory strategies including ultra-fine particle ICS, leukotriene receptor antagonists and macrolide antibiotics may show efficacy in particular phenotypes too. Monoclonal antibody biologic therapies have recently entered clinical practice with significant impacts on asthma outcomes. Understanding of the efficacy and use of those agents is becoming clearer with a growing body of real-world evidence as is their potential applicability to other treatable comorbid traits. In conclusion, the evolving understanding of T2 driven inflammation alongside a treatable traits disease model is enhancing therapeutic approaches to address inflammation in asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitasha Rupani
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Wei Chern Gavin Fong
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, Isle of Wight NHS Trust, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - Aref Kyyaly
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, Isle of Wight NHS Trust, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - Ramesh J Kurukulaaratchy
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, Isle of Wight NHS Trust, Isle of Wight, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van Boven JFM, Dierick BJH, Usmani OS. When biology meets behaviour: can medication adherence mask the contribution of pharmacogenetic effects in asthma? Eur Respir J 2021; 58:58/3/2100304. [PMID: 34475112 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00304-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Job F M van Boven
- Dept of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands .,Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn J H Dierick
- Dept of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Omar S Usmani
- Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chan AHY, Pleasants RA, Dhand R, Tilley SL, Schworer SA, Costello RW, Merchant R. Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective. Pulm Ther 2021; 7:345-376. [PMID: 34379316 PMCID: PMC8589868 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-021-00167-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Impressive advances in inhalation therapy for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have occurred in recent years. However, important gaps in care remain, particularly relating to poor adherence to inhaled therapies. Digital inhaler health platforms which incorporate digital inhalers to monitor time and date of dosing are an effective disease and medication management tool, promoting collaborative care between clinicians and patients, and providing more in-depth understanding of actual inhaler use. With advances in technology, nearly all inhalers can be digitalized with add-on or embedded sensors to record and transmit data quantitating inhaler actuations, and some have additional capabilities to evaluate inhaler technique. In addition to providing an objective and readily available measure of adherence, they allow patients to interact with the device directly or through their self-management smartphone application such as via alerts and recording of health status. Clinicians can access these data remotely and during patient encounters, to better inform them about disease status and medication adherence and inhaler technique. The ability for remote patient monitoring is accelerating interest in and the use of these devices in clinical practice and research settings. More than 20 clinical studies of digital inhalers in asthma or COPD collectively show improvement in medication adherence, exacerbation risk, and patient outcomes with digital inhalers. These studies support previous findings about patient inhaler use and behaviors, but with greater granularity, and reveal some new findings about patient medication-taking behaviors. Digital devices that record inspiratory flows with inhaler use can guide proper inhaler technique and may prove to be a clinically useful lung function measure. Adoption of digital inhalers into practice is still early, and additional research is needed to determine patient and clinician acceptability, the appropriate place of these devices in the therapeutic regimen, and their cost effectiveness. Video: Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective (MP4 74535 kb)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H. Y. Chan
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - Roy A. Pleasants
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Rajiv Dhand
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN USA
| | - Stephen L. Tilley
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Stephen A. Schworer
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Richard W. Costello
- Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77 Ireland
| | - Rajan Merchant
- Dignity Health Woodland Clinic, 632 W Gibson Rd, Woodland, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
d'Ancona G, Weinman J. Improving adherence in chronic airways disease: are we doing it wrongly? Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17:210022. [PMID: 34295423 PMCID: PMC8291927 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0022-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-adherence to medicines is a significant clinical and financial burden, but successful strategies to improve it, and thus bring about significant improvements in clinical outcome, remain elusive. Many barriers exist, including a lack of awareness amongst some healthcare professionals as to the extent and impact of non-adherence and a dearth of skills to address it successfully. Patients may not appreciate that they are non-adherent, feel they cannot disclose it or underestimate its impact on their health in the short and longer term. In describing the evidence-based frameworks that identify the causal factors behind medicines taking (or not taking) behaviours, we can start to personalise interventions to enable individuals to make informed decisions about their treatments and thus overcome real and perceived barriers to adherence. Medicines non-adherence is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. @GrainnedAn and colleagues outline causal factors behind this behaviour and the appropriate individualised interventions available to support optimal medicines use.https://bit.ly/3ejJNTV
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gráinne d'Ancona
- Pharmacy Dept/Thoracic Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Weinman
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Holmes J, Heaney LG. Measuring adherence to therapy in airways disease. Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17:210037. [PMID: 34295430 PMCID: PMC8291934 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0037-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-adherence to medication is one of the most significant issues in all airways disease and can have a major impact on disease control as well as on unscheduled healthcare utilisation. It is vital that clinicians can accurately determine a patient's level of adherence in order to ensure they are gaining the maximal benefit from their therapy and also to avoid any potential for unnecessary increases in therapy. It is essential that measurements of adherence are interpreted alongside biomarkers of mechanistic pathways to identify if improvements in medication adherence can influence disease control. In this review, the most common methods of measuring adherence are discussed. These include patient self-report, prescription record checks, canister weighing, dose counting, monitoring drug levels and electronic monitoring. We describe the uses and benefits of each method as well as potential shortcomings. The practical use of adherence measures with measurable markers of disease control is also discussed. Educational aims To understand the various methods available to measure adherence in airways disease.To learn how to apply these adherence measures in conjunction with clinical biomarkers in routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Holmes
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brennan V, Mulvey C, Costello RW. The clinical impact of adherence to therapy in airways disease. Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17:210039. [PMID: 34295431 PMCID: PMC8291957 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0039-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
For a physician, the final step of a consultation consists of developing a treatment plan and prescription. For the patient, this is the start of a process. First, their role in the treatment plan must be clarified, then they may have to obtain an alternative prescription from their general practitioner. Next, they must have the prescription filled and dispensed from the pharmacy and, finally, they must take the treatment on time and for the required duration. For people with chronic conditions, this requires repeatedly returning to the pharmacy for the prescription to be renewed and dispensed. Given that many patients are on multiple treatment regimens and may have poor health literacy, this becomes a complex process and it is not surprising that this can, and frequently does, go wrong. Research shows that when a patient does not adhere to standard asthma or COPD treatment, they report poor control and overuse of rescue β-agonists, experience frequent exacerbations and are often prescribed add-on treatments such as biological agents. In short, poor treatment adherence can manifest in the same way as a refractory condition. These clinical features should prompt a clinician to investigate poor adherence as they might investigate a new blood or radiological finding. Examining a patient's prescription refill records or a digitally enabled inhaler can demonstrate a number of patterns of inhaler use. A small minority regularly use their treatment as prescribed but many appear to be “cluster users”: a group of patients who use their treatment correctly when they are unwell, but once some level of personal control is attained, they cease or reduce their use. Others may cease using their treatment because they are not perceiving a benefit or because an alternative condition accounts for their symptoms. In other words, clinicians can consider that treatment adherence is like a clinical sign: something to be investigated so that they may understand the patient's condition better. Suspected poor treatment adherence should be treated as a clinical sign. It should be suspected among patients with asthma and COPD who have excessive reliever use or recurrent exacerbations. It can be detected using pharmacy data or electronic devices.https://bit.ly/3oqwS5L
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Brennan
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,INCA Group, Dept of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christopher Mulvey
- INCA Group, Dept of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard W Costello
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,INCA Group, Dept of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Weatherall M. Improving adherence to asthma medications: same-old, same-old? Eur Respir J 2021; 57:57/6/2004284. [PMID: 34088756 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04284-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
34
|
Price D, Jones R, Pfister P, Cao H, Carter V, Kemppinen A, Holzhauer B, Kaplan A, Clark A, Halpin DMG, Pinnock H, Chalmers JD, van Boven JFM, Beeh KM, Kostikas K, Roche N, Usmani O, Mastoridis P. Maximizing Adherence and Gaining New Information For Your Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (MAGNIFY COPD): Study Protocol for the Pragmatic, Cluster Randomized Trial Evaluating the Impact of Dual Bronchodilator with Add-On Sensor and Electronic Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes. Pragmat Obs Res 2021; 12:25-35. [PMID: 34079422 PMCID: PMC8163732 DOI: 10.2147/por.s302809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Poor treatment adherence in COPD patients is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased healthcare burden. Personalized approaches for adherence management, supported with technology-based interventions, may offer benefits to patients and providers but are currently unproven in terms of clinical outcomes as opposed to adherence outcomes. Methods Maximizing Adherence and Gaining New Information For Your COPD (MAGNIFY COPD study), a pragmatic cluster randomized trial, aims to evaluate the impact of an adherence technology package (interventional package), comprising an adherence review, ongoing provision of a dual bronchodilator but with an add-on inhaler sensor device and a connected mobile application. This will compare time to treatment failure and other clinical outcomes in patients identified at high risk of exacerbations with historic poor treatment adherence as measured by prescription collection to mono/dual therapy over one year (1312 patients) versus usual care. Treatment failure is defined as the first occurrence of one of the following: (1) moderate/severe COPD exacerbation, (2) prescription of triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist [ICS/LABA/LAMA]), (3) prescription of additional chronic therapy for COPD, or (4) respiratory-related death. Adherence, moderate/severe exacerbations, respiratory-related healthcare resource utilization and costs, and intervention package acceptance rate will also be assessed. Eligible primary care practices (N=176) participating in the Optimum Patient Care Quality Improvement Program will be randomized (1:1) to either adherence support cluster arm (suitable patients already receiving or initiated Ultibro® Breezhaler® [indacaterol/glycopyrronium] will be offered interventional package) or the control cluster arm (suitable patients continue to receive usual clinical care). Patients will be identified and outcomes collected from anonymized electronic medical records within the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. On study completion, electronic medical record data will be re-extracted to analyze outcomes in both study groups. Registration Number ISRCTN10567920. Conclusion MAGNIFY will explore patient benefits of technology-based interventions for electronic adherence monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rupert Jones
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | | | - Hui Cao
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Victoria Carter
- Observational and Pragmatic Research International Ltd, Stubbs House Stubbs Green, London, Norwich, UK
| | - Anu Kemppinen
- Observational and Pragmatic Research International Ltd, Stubbs House Stubbs Green, London, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Alan Kaplan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Kai M Beeh
- Clinical Research, Insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Kostikas
- Respiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Cochin Hospital and Institute, APHP Centre, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Omar Usmani
- National Heart & Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brennan V, Mulvey C, Greene G, Hale EM, Costello RW. A Clinical Perspective on the Role of Electronic Devices in Monitoring and Promoting Adherence in Airways Disease. FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 2021; 3:604475. [PMID: 35047901 PMCID: PMC8757727 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.604475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Poor adherence to treatment is a common reason why patients with chronic disease have worse outcomes than might be expected. Poor treatment adherence is of particular concern among people with airways disease because, apart from not taking treatment as prescribed, inhaled medication can also be administered incorrectly. Recently, a number of technological advances that accurately document when an inhaled treatment has been used and, in certain instances, how it was used have been developed. There is good evidence from a number of research groups that these devices, either by patient reminders or physician feedback, promote adherence to inhaled treatments. What is less certain is how, in a real-world setting, these devices change outcomes. In this perspective article, the role of electronic devices in quantifying treatment use and addressing poor treatment adherence and their potential role in clinical practice outside of clinical validation trials are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Brennan
- Clinical Research Center, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christopher Mulvey
- Clinical Research Center, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Garrett Greene
- Clinical Research Center, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Elaine Mac Hale
- Clinical Research Center, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard W. Costello
- Clinical Research Center, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|