1
|
Gillard S, Foster R, White S, Bhattacharya R, Binfield P, Eborall R, Gibson SL, Harnett D, Simpson A, Lucock M, Marks J, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Salla A, Worner J. Implementing peer support into practice in mental health services: a qualitative comparative case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:1050. [PMID: 39261915 PMCID: PMC11391751 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11447-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer workers are people with personal experience of mental distress, employed within mental health services to support others with similar experiences. Research has identified a range of factors that might facilitate or hinder the introduction of new peer worker roles into mental health services. While there is mixed evidence for the effectiveness of peer worker delivered interventions, there are no studies exploring how implementation might be associated with effect. METHODS This was a qualitative comparative case study using data from interviews with 20 peer workers and their five supervisors. Peer workers delivered peer support for discharge from inpatient to community mental health care as part of a randomised controlled trial. In the trial, level of participant engagement with peer support was associated with better outcome (hospital readmission). Study sites with higher levels of engagement also had higher scores on a measure of fidelity to peer support principles. We compared data from sites with contrasting levels of engagement and fidelity using an analytical framework derived from implementation theory. RESULTS In high engagement-high fidelity sites, there was regular work with clinical teams preparing for working alongside peer workers, and a positive relationship between staff on inpatient wards and peer workers. The supervisor role was well resourced, and delivery of peer support was highly consistent with the intervention manual. In low engagement-low fidelity sites peer workers were employed in not-for-profit organisations to support people using public mental health services and in rural areas. Supervisors faced constrained resources and experienced barriers to joint working between organisations. In these sites, peer workers could experience challenging relationships with ward staff. Issues of geography and capacity limited opportunities for supervision and team-building, impacting consistency of delivery. CONCLUSIONS This study provides clear indication that implementation can impact delivery of peer support, with implications for engagement and, potentially, outcomes of peer worker interventions. Resourcing issues can have knock-on effects on consistency of delivery, alongside challenges of access, authority and relationship with clinical teams, especially where peer workers were employed in not-for-profit organisations. Attention needs to be paid to the impact of geography on implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry number ISRCTN10043328, registered 28 November 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah White
- St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Rachel Eborall
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mike Lucock
- University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | | | - Julie Repper
- Implementing Recovery through Organisational Change, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miles Rinaldi
- South West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Peter S, Kuesel M, Ziegenhagen J, Fehler G, Schmidt D, Ruiz-Perez G. ["Change Agents" Or "Peer Washing": Can Peer Support Workers Contribute To The Transformation Of Psychiatric Institutions?]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS 2024. [PMID: 39159660 DOI: 10.1055/a-2361-4057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Peer support workers (=PSW) are expected to change the culture of a care facility. It is examined whether and how they can implement such a change mandate. METHODS The material is based on two sub-studies of the ImpPeer-Psy5 study, investigating the implementation of PSW in the German psychiatric care system. Data from 57 problem-centered interviews and two focus groups were analyzed using a thematic analysis. RESULTS PSW need courage, also as their impulses for change are often insufficiently received. This can lead to the reproduction of exclusion and to the PSWs' adaption to the attitudes of the teams. CONCLUSIONS To facilitate the implementation of the PSWs' change mandate, power relations and structural discrimination should be reflected, exchange spaces and a culture of critique should be established, and enough time be allowed for the implementation of PSW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian von Peter
- Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS GmbH, Neuruppin
| | | | - Jenny Ziegenhagen
- IAG Psychische Gesundheiten, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin
| | - Georgia Fehler
- Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS GmbH, Neuruppin
| | - Daniela Schmidt
- Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS GmbH, Neuruppin
| | - Guillermo Ruiz-Perez
- Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS GmbH, Neuruppin
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Branjerdporn G, Kimball H, Pirotta R, Branjerdporn N, Collins T, Bowman G, Gillespie KM. Characteristics and outcomes of community-based perinatal peer support: Protocol for a systematic review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303277. [PMID: 38950030 PMCID: PMC11216617 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health issues and parenting difficulties in the perinatal period are common, and have significant negative impacts on individuals, families, and broader society. Community-based peer support programs might be an effective adjunct to standard mental health interventions in perinatal mental health issues, specifically where low-cost interventions are required, or access to professional care is limited. METHODS A systematic review will be undertaken. Searches will be conducted on four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycINFO), using terms related to perinatal mental health and peer support. Literature will be screened by title and abstract and then by full text. Selected studies will be evaluated using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool. Data relevant to community-based perinatal peer support intervention characteristics and outcomes will be extracted, and synthesised narratively. DISCUSSION This review will contribute to the existing evidence about perinatal mental health peer support, by synthesising information about community-based interventions specifically. The findings will be used to inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of a community-based perinatal mental health peer support program in urban and rural/remote hospital and health services in Australia. TRIAL REGISTRATION Systematic review registration: CRD42023451568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Branjerdporn
- Mater Health, Catherine’s House for Mothers, Babies and Families, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Mater Research Institute—University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hayley Kimball
- Mater Research Institute—University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Reaksmey Pirotta
- Mater Research Institute—University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Taryn Collins
- Mater Health, Catherine’s House for Mothers, Babies and Families, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Genevieve Bowman
- Mater Health, Catherine’s House for Mothers, Babies and Families, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kerri M. Gillespie
- Mater Research Institute—University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haun MH, Girit S, Goldfarb Y, Kalha J, Korde P, Kwebiiha E, Moran G, Mtei R, Niwemuhwezi J, Nixdorf R, Nugent L, Puschner B, Ramesh M, Ryan GK, Slade M, Charles A, Krumm S. Mental health workers' perspectives on the implementation of a peer support intervention in five countries: qualitative findings from the UPSIDES study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081963. [PMID: 38749688 PMCID: PMC11097849 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The introduction of peer support in mental health teams creates opportunities and challenges for both peer and non-peer staff. However, the majority of research on mental health workers' (MHWs) experiences with peer support comes from high-income countries. Using Peer Support In Developing Empowering Mental Health Services (UPSIDES) is an international multicentre study, which aims at scaling up peer support for people with severe mental illness in Europe, Asia and Africa. This study investigates MHWs experiences with UPSIDES peer support. DESIGN Six focus groups with MHWs were conducted approximately 18 months after the implementation of the UPSIDES peer support intervention. Transcripts were analysed with a descriptive approach using thematic content analysis. SETTING Qualitative data were collected in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel) and Pune (India). PARTICIPANTS 25 MHWs (19 females and 6 males) from UPSIDES study sites in the UPSIDES Trial (ISRCTN26008944) participated. FINDINGS Five overarching themes were identified in MHWs' discussions: MHWs valued peer support workers (PSWs) for sharing their lived experiences with service users (theme 1), gained trust in peer support over time (theme 2) and provided support to them (theme 3). Participants from lower-resource study sites reported additional benefits, including reduced workload. PSWs extending their roles beyond what MHWs perceived as appropriate was described as a challenge (theme 4). Perceptions about PSWs varied based on previous peer support experience, ranging from considering PSWs as equal team members to viewing them as service users (theme 5). CONCLUSIONS Considering local context is essential in order to understand MHWs' views on the cooperation with PSWs. Especially in settings with less prior experience of peer support, implementers should make extra effort to promote interaction between MHWs and PSWs. In order to better understand the determinants of successful implementation of peer support in diverse settings, further research should investigate the impact of contextual factors (eg, resource availability and cultural values). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN26008944.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Selina Girit
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yael Goldfarb
- Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel
| | - Jasmine Kalha
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Palak Korde
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Eric Kwebiiha
- Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Galia Moran
- Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel
| | - Rachel Mtei
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Jackline Niwemuhwezi
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Rebecca Nixdorf
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lena Nugent
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Puschner
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mary Ramesh
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Grace Kathryn Ryan
- Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mike Slade
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ashleigh Charles
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Silvia Krumm
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
von Peter S, Kraemer UM, Cubellis L, Fehler G, Ruiz‐Pérez G, Schmidt D, Ziegenhagen J, Kuesel M, Ackers S, Mahlke C, Nugent L, Heuer I. Implementing peer support work in mental health care in Germany: The methodological framework of the collaborative, participatory, mixed-methods study (ImpPeer-Psy5). Health Expect 2024; 27:e13938. [PMID: 39102703 PMCID: PMC10729536 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Starting in the 1990s in the United States, individuals with lived experience of mental health crises and recovery have been employed as peer support workers (PSWs) internationally. However, the implementation of PSW in clinical contexts remains challenging. METHODS This manuscript presents and discusses the methodological framework of the ImpPeer-Psy5 study on the PSW implementation in the German mental healthcare sector. This study used a mixed-methods and collaborative research approach, as well as participatory research strategies. After describing the study design, populations, teamwork and assessments, the epistemic challenges of its methodological framework will be critically discussed and how it has iteratively shaped the object of study. DISCUSSION AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The healthcare, policy and funding context of PSW implementation as well as the study's methodological framework have differently influenced the ways in which the implementation of PSW has been conceived in this study. The choice of a collaborative or participatory methodological framework is advised to better align research questions and procedures to the specific needs and challenges of PSWs and other stakeholders concerned with PSW implementation. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The research team of the ImpPeer-Psy5 study was collaboratively staffed by a portion of researchers who also identify as users or survivors of psychiatric services. A nonprofit organization for the training of PSWs served as a practice partner throughout the research process. Different participatory formats involve a significant number of diverse stakeholders relevant to PSW implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian von Peter
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Ute Maria Kraemer
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Lauren Cubellis
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Georgia Fehler
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Guillermo Ruiz‐Pérez
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Daniela Schmidt
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Jenny Ziegenhagen
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | - Madeleine Kuesel
- Brandenburg Medical School, Centre of Mental HealtPsychiatry and PsychotherapyImmanuel Klinik RüdersdorfNeuruppinGermany
| | | | - Candelaria Mahlke
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Lena Nugent
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Imke Heuer
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haun M, Adler Ben-Dor I, Hall C, Kalha J, Korde P, Moran G, Müller-Stierlin AS, Niwemuhwezi J, Nixdorf R, Puschner B, Ramesh M, Charles A, Krumm S. Perspectives of key informants before and after implementing UPSIDES peer support in mental health services: qualitative findings from an international multi-site study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:159. [PMID: 38302955 PMCID: PMC10835950 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10543-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support is an essential part of recovery-oriented care worldwide. Contextual factors have an impact on the implementation of peer support work. However, research has paid little attention to similarities and differences of implementation factors in settings varying by income-level and cultural values. The aim of this study is to assess the factors influencing the implementation of a peer support intervention across study sites in low-, middle- and high-income countries in line with the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHOD 6 focus groups with a total of 54 key informants with relevant contextual (organisational) knowledge regarding implementation facilitators and barriers were conducted at six study sites Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel), and Pune (India) before and 1.5 years after the start of UPSIDES peer support. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Across study sites key informants reported benefits of peer support for service users and peer support workers as implementation facilitators. At study sites with lower resources, reduced workload for mental health workers and improved access to mental health services through peer support were perceived as implementation facilitators (CFIR Domain 1: Intervention characteristics). The degree of engagement of mental health workers (CFIR Domain 3: Inner Setting/Domain 4: Individuals involved) varied across study sites and was seen either as a barrier (low engagement) or a facilitator (high engagement). Across study sites, adequate training of peer support workers (CFIR Domain 5: Implementation process) was seen as animplementation facilitator, while COVID-19 as well as low resource availability were reported as implementation barriers (CFIR Domain 2: Outer setting). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of considering contextual factors when implementing peer support, including previous experience and perceived benefits. Particular attention should be given to organisational benefits such as workload reduction and the allocation of sufficient resources as key drivers in LMICs. In HICs, the potential of organisational benefits for successful implementation should be further investigated and promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Haun
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Inbar Adler Ben-Dor
- Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Cerdic Hall
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jasmine Kalha
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Palak Korde
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Galia Moran
- Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | | | | | - Rebecca Nixdorf
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Puschner
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mary Ramesh
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Ashleigh Charles
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Silvia Krumm
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Corbin S, Damiolini E, Termoz A, Huchon L, Rode G, Schott AM, Haesebaert J. Rehabilitation professionals' views on individual peer support interventions for assisting stroke survivors with reintegration into the community: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:4413-4423. [PMID: 36576210 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2152115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to explore stroke rehabilitation professionals' understanding and representations of peer support; the benefits they anticipated for patients; and the levers and barriers they perceived to implement the intervention in their practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS This qualitative study comprised four focus groups with 21 rehabilitation professionals and four semi-structured interviews. It was held in a French hospital. Interpretation was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS Although professionals had poor knowledge on peer support, they identified many unmet needs of stroke survivors that peer support could meet such as social, emotional and informational support. Main barriers were the lack of human and financial resources, and of linkage between hospital and community professionals, and the fear that peer support would give false hope to survivors if not delivered properly. They showed ambivalence towards patient engagement, acknowledging its importance, but demonstrating top-down attitudes. They also identified potential avenues for the implementation of peer support for stroke survivors. CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the necessity to involve professionals in the construction of peer-support interventions and to sensitise them to provide patient-centred care. It delivers insights on effective implementation strategies to develop peer support interventions for stroke survivors reintegrating the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Corbin
- Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, France
| | - Eleonore Damiolini
- Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Lyon, France
| | - Anne Termoz
- Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, France
- Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Lyon, France
| | - Laure Huchon
- Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Saint-Genis-Laval, France
- Equipe "Trajectoires", Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Inserm UMR-S 1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Bron, France
| | - Gilles Rode
- Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Saint-Genis-Laval, France
- Equipe "Trajectoires", Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Inserm UMR-S 1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Bron, France
| | - Anne-Marie Schott
- Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, France
- Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Lyon, France
| | - Julie Haesebaert
- Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, France
- Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sinclair A, Gillieatt S, Fernandes C, Mahboub L. Inclusion as Assimilation, Integration, or Co-optation? A Post-Structural Analysis of Inclusion as Produced Through Mental Health Research on Peer Support. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2023; 33:543-555. [PMID: 36938673 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231163735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
In the last 20 years, research on the inclusion of peer support within mental health settings has burgeoned, paralleling the broad adoption of service user inclusion within policy as a moral imperative and universally beneficial. Despite the seemingly progressive impetus behind inclusion, increasingly peer support workers talk of exhaustion working within mental health systems, the slow rate of change to oppressive values and practices, and ongoing experiences of workplace exclusion. Such experiences suggest differences in the way in which inclusion is produced across different stakeholder groups and contexts. In this article, we adopt Bacchi's 'what's the problem represented to be?' approach to identify how mental health research, often understood as an a-political activity, produces versions of inclusion. We argue current research predominantly produces inclusion as 'assimilation' and 'integration'. We use critical inclusion, mental health, and survivor scholarship to evaluate the effects these productions have for peer support and peer support workers, finding that both problematise peer support workers and those seeking support. We consider possibilities for more liberatory productions of inclusion, building on the notion of inclusion as 'co-optation'. Our analysis points to the need for researchers to engage with an uncomfortable reflexivity to enable more emancipatory possibilities regarding inclusion and peer support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee Sinclair
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sue Gillieatt
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Lyn Mahboub
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu JR, Iwanaga K, Chan F, Lee B, Chen X, Walker R, Fortuna KL, Brooks JM. Positive Organizational Psychology Factors as Serial Multiple Mediators of the Relationship between Organization Support and Job Satisfaction Among Peer Support Specialists. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2023; 33:121-133. [PMID: 35933569 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10054-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of peer support specialists in helping people with severe mental illness increase community tenure, decrease hospitalization, boost treatment satisfaction, improve social functioning, and increase quality of life. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study was to evaluate positive organizational psychology constructs as serial multiple mediators of the relationships between perceived organizational support and job satisfaction among peer support specialists. METHODS One hundred and twenty-one peer support specialists from the Texas statewide peer certification training programs and the National Association of Peer Supporters participated in the present study. These peer support specialists completed an online survey composed of self-report measures related to perceived organizational support, positive organizational psychology factors, and job satisfaction. A serial multiple mediation (SMMA) analysis was conducted to evaluate autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, and organizational commitment as mediators of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job satisfaction. RESULTS The SMMA model accounted for 49% of the variation in job satisfaction scores (R2 =. 49, f2 = 0.96 [> 0.35], a large effect size). Autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, and organizational commitment were significantly associated with job satisfaction after controlling for the effect of perceived organizational support. CONCLUSIONS Perceived organizational support increased autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction. Peer support specialists are integral members of the interdisciplinary mental health treatment team. Leaders of community-based mental health and rehabilitation agencies who are committed to hire and retain peer support specialists must provide strong organizational support and develop interventions to increase peer support specialists' autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, and organizational commitment as a job retention and career development strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Rung Wu
- Department of Counselor Education, Northeastern Illinois University, 5500 North St. Louis Ave, 60625, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Kanako Iwanaga
- Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, 900 East Leigh Street, 23298, Richmond, VG, USA
| | - Fong Chan
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Special Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1000 Bascom Hall, 53706, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Beatrice Lee
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Special Education, Michigan State University, 460 Erickson Hall, 48824, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Xiangli Chen
- Center for Employment and Disability Research, Kessler Foundation and Rutgers University, 120 Eagle Rock Avenue, 07936, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Robert Walker
- Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, 25 Staniford St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen L Fortuna
- Geisel School of Medicine, Department of Mental Health, Dartmouth College, 03766, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Jessica M Brooks
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peeples AD, Muralidharan A, McCarthy S, Goldberg R, Kuykendall L, Vineyard N, Chinman M. Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Peer Specialists in Veterans Health Administration Primary Care: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:707-714. [PMID: 36127539 PMCID: PMC9971381 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07782-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer specialists (PSs) are increasingly deployed in a variety of settings to provide patient-centered care. In the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), efforts are underway to integrate PSs into primary care settings. Little is known about the barriers and enablers to implementing PS services in primary care. OBJECTIVE To characterize barriers and enablers to implementing PSs in primary care. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS PSs and their supervisors from 25 VHA primary care settings. APPROACH PSs and supervisors were interviewed about their experiences integrating PSs in primary care. Rapid analysis was conducted to identify barriers and enablers to PS integration, as well as to examine the role of external facilitation in implementation experiences. KEY RESULTS Fifty-two interviews were completed (25 PSs from 19 sites and 27 supervisors from 24 sites). Barriers and enablers to PS integration in VHA primary care settings included PS role clarity and constraints, provider buy-in, supervision, leadership support, and primary care culture. The barriers and enablers were consistent across both external facilitation and control sites. CONCLUSIONS Results describe how the characteristics of the innovation, the recipients, and the context impact successful implementation of PSs in primary care settings. The identification of barriers and enablers holds promise for improving future efforts to embed PSs in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02732600 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02732600 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda D Peeples
- VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Anjana Muralidharan
- VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA
- University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sharon McCarthy
- VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Richard Goldberg
- VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA
- University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lorrianne Kuykendall
- VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Natalie Vineyard
- VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Chinman
- VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Osborn T, Town R, Ellis R, Buckman J, Saunders R, Fonagy P. Implementing peer support in higher education: A feasibility study. SSM - MENTAL HEALTH 2022; 2:100175. [PMID: 37916032 PMCID: PMC10616816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background When experiencing mental distress, many university students seek support from their peers. In schools and mental health services, formalised peer support interventions have demonstrated some success but implementation challenges have been reported. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of a novel manualized peer support intervention and associated data collection processes. Methods A longitudinal mixed methods study was conducted following the pilot of a peer support intervention at a large London university between June 2021 and May 2022. The study utilised data routinely recorded on all students who booked a peer support session, focus groups with nine peer workers and five staff members implementing the intervention, pre-post intervention surveys with 13 students and qualitative interviews with 10 of those students. Results 169 bookings were made during the pilot, of which 130 (77%) were attended, with November the peak month. Staff and peer workers described strong motivation and commitment to implement the intervention, noting that the peer support model and peer worker role addressed previously unmet needs at the university. However, students described implementation problems relating to the coherence of the intervention and the burden of participation. While students mostly described acceptable experiences, there were examples where acceptability was lower. No adverse events were reported during the pilot. Conclusion The training and supervision of peer workers, and the provision of one-to-one peer support to students was found to be feasible, mostly acceptable, and safe. However, sustained implementation difficulties were observed. These pose challenges to the scalability of peer support in universities. We make recommendations to improve implementation of peer support including improving reach, greater clarity about the intervention, and fuller involvement of students throughout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T.G. Osborn
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
| | - R. Town
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
- Evidence Based Practice Unit, 4-8 Rodney Street, University College London, London, N1 9JH, UK
| | - R. Ellis
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
- PsychUP for Wellbeing, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
| | - J.E.J. Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
- iCope – Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, NW1 0PE, UK
- UCL University Clinic, Research Department of Clinical Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - R. Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - P. Fonagy
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krumm S, Haun M, Hiller S, Charles A, Kalha J, Niwemuhwezi J, Nixdorf R, Puschner B, Ryan G, Shamba D, Epstein PG, Moran G. Mental health workers' perspectives on peer support in high-, middle- and low income settings: a focus group study. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:604. [PMID: 36088330 PMCID: PMC9464408 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04206-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support is increasingly acknowledged as an integral part of mental health services around the world. However, most research on peer support comes from high-income countries, with little attention to similarities and differences between different settings and how these affect implementation. Mental health workers have an important role to play in integrating formal peer support into statutory services, and their attitudes toward peer support can represent either a barrier to or facilitator of successful implementation. Thus, this study investigates mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support across a range of high- (Germany, Israel), middle- (India), and low-income country (Tanzania, Uganda) settings. METHODS Six focus groups were conducted in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel), and Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India) with a total of 35 participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Participants across the study sites demonstrated overall positive attitudes towards peer support in mental health care, although some concerns were raised on potentially harmful effects of peer support such as negative role modelling and giving inadequate advice to service users. Notably, mental health workers from low- and middle-income countries described peer support workers as bridge-builders and emphasized the mutual benefits of peer support. Mental health workers' views on peer support workers' roles and role boundaries differed between sites. In some settings, mental health workers strongly agreed on the need for role clarity, whereas in others, mental health workers expressed mixed views, with some preferring blurred role boundaries. Regarding collaboration, mental health workers described peer support workers as supporters and utilizers, equal partners or emphasized a need for trust and commitment. CONCLUSIONS Mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support workers were positive overall, but they also varied depending on local context, resources and previous experiences with peer support. This affected their conceptions of peer support workers' roles, role clarity, and collaboration. This study demonstrated that reconciling the need for local adaptations and safeguarding the core values of peer support is necessary and possible, especially when the implementation of recovery-oriented interventions such as peer support is accelerating worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Krumm
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany.
| | - Maria Haun
- grid.6582.90000 0004 1936 9748Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany
| | - Selina Hiller
- grid.6582.90000 0004 1936 9748Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany
| | - Ashleigh Charles
- grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jasmine Kalha
- grid.32056.320000 0001 2190 9326Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Jackie Niwemuhwezi
- grid.461309.90000 0004 0414 2591Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rebecca Nixdorf
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Puschner
- grid.6582.90000 0004 1936 9748Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany
| | - Grace Ryan
- grid.8991.90000 0004 0425 469XCentre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Donat Shamba
- grid.414543.30000 0000 9144 642XDepartment of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Paula Garber Epstein
- grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Galia Moran
- grid.7489.20000 0004 1937 0511Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gillard S, Foster R, White S, Barlow S, Bhattacharya R, Binfield P, Eborall R, Faulkner A, Gibson S, Goldsmith LP, Simpson A, Lucock M, Marks J, Morshead R, Patel S, Priebe S, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Ussher M, Worner J. The impact of working as a peer worker in mental health services: a longitudinal mixed methods study. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:373. [PMID: 35650562 PMCID: PMC9158348 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03999-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer workers are increasingly employed in mental health services to use their own experiences of mental distress in supporting others with similar experiences. While evidence is emerging of the benefits of peer support for people using services, the impact on peer workers is less clear. There is a lack of research that takes a longitudinal approach to exploring impact on both employment outcomes for peer workers, and their experiences of working in the peer worker role. METHODS In a longitudinal mixed methods study, 32 peer workers providing peer support for discharge from inpatient to community mental health care - as part of a randomised controlled trial - undertook in-depth qualitative interviews conducted by service user researchers, and completed measures of wellbeing, burnout, job satisfaction and multi-disciplinary team working after completing training, and four and 12 months into the role. Questionnaire data were summarised and compared to outcomes for relevant population norms, and changes in outcomes were analysed using paired t-tests. Thematic analysis and interpretive workshops involving service user researchers were used to analysis interview transcripts. A critical interpretive synthesis approach was used to synthesise analyses of both datasets. RESULTS For the duration of the study, all questionnaire outcomes were comparable with population norms for health professionals or for the general population. There were small-to-medium decreases in wellbeing and aspects of job satisfaction, and increase in burnout after 4 months, but these changes were largely not maintained at 12 months. Peer workers felt valued, empowered and connected in the role, but could find it challenging to adjust to the demands of the job after initial optimism. Supervision and being part of a standalone peer worker team was supportive, although communication with clinical teams could be improved. CONCLUSIONS Peer workers seem no more likely to experience negative impacts of working than other healthcare professionals but should be well supported as they settle into post, provided with in-work training and support around job insecurity. Research is needed to optimise working arrangements for peer workers alongside clinical teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rhiannon Foster
- grid.28577.3f0000 0004 1936 8497City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sarah White
- grid.264200.20000 0000 8546 682XSt George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sally Barlow
- grid.28577.3f0000 0004 1936 8497City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rahul Bhattacharya
- grid.450709.f0000 0004 0426 7183East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Binfield
- grid.450709.f0000 0004 0426 7183East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Eborall
- grid.37640.360000 0000 9439 0839South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Sarah Gibson
- grid.264200.20000 0000 8546 682XSt George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy P. Goldsmith
- grid.264200.20000 0000 8546 682XSt George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Mike Lucock
- grid.15751.370000 0001 0719 6059University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Jacqui Marks
- grid.264200.20000 0000 8546 682XSt George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rosaleen Morshead
- grid.264200.20000 0000 8546 682XSt George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Shalini Patel
- grid.439450.f0000 0001 0507 6811South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stefan Priebe
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
| | - Julie Repper
- Implementing Recovery through Organisational Change, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miles Rinaldi
- grid.439450.f0000 0001 0507 6811South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- grid.264200.20000 0000 8546 682XSt George’s, University of London, London, UK ,grid.11918.300000 0001 2248 4331University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bhugra D, Killaspy H, Kar A, Levin S, Chumakov E, Rogoza D, Harvey C, Bagga H, Owino-Wamari Y, Everall I, Bishop A, Javate KR, Westmore I, Ahuja A, Torales J, Rubin H, Castaldelli-Maia J, Ng R, Nakajima GA, Levounis P, Ventriglio A. IRP commission: sexual minorities and mental health: global perspectives. Int Rev Psychiatry 2022; 34:171-199. [PMID: 36151836 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2045912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Sexual orientation is a key determinant of the identity of human beings. It has also been seen as a social determinant of health. People whose sexual orientation is non-heterosexual or sexual minorities or sexually diverse are included in the broad umbrella term LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) which is a commonly used acronym in activism, social policy, and subsequently cultural literature. For this reason, this Commission focuses primarily on sexual orientation i.e. lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) groups. We have used terms non-heterosexual, sexual minorities or sexual variation interchangeably. We have not considered asexual individuals as research in the field is too limited. We are cognisant of the fact that topics relating to mental health and sexual orientation discussed in this Commission will intersect with other issues of personal, cultural and social identity, and will thus be relevant to individuals including many transgender individuals. The inclusion of mental health issues relevant to gender-diverse individuals as well as gender identity is important and deserves its own separate detailed discussion. The exact number of sexually diverse individuals in a population is often difficult to estimate but is likely to be somewhere around 5% of the population. Rates of various psychiatry disorders and suicidal ideation and acts of suicide in LGB populations are higher than general population and these have been attributed to minority stress hypothesis. Elimination of inequality in law can lead to reduction in psychiatric morbidity in these groups. However, these are all diverse groups but even within each group there is diversity and each individual has a distinct and unique experiences, upbringing, responses to their own sexual orientation, and generating varying responses from families, peers and friends as well as communities (including healthcare professionals). The mental healthcare needs of sexual minority individuals vary and these variations must be taken into account in design, development and delivery of healthcare and policies. Improving access to services will help engagement and outcomes and also reduce stigma. The commission recommends that there is no role for so-called conversion therapies and other recommendations are made for clinicians, researchers and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Bhugra
- Emeritus Mental Health & Cultural Diversity, PO72, Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Helen Killaspy
- Rehabilitation Psychiatry, University College, London, UK
| | - Anindya Kar
- Advanced Neuropsychiatry Institute, Kolkata, India
| | - Saul Levin
- Chief Executive and Medical Director, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Egor Chumakov
- Department of Psychiatry, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Daniel Rogoza
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Carol Harvey
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and North Western Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Ian Everall
- Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Amie Bishop
- OutRight Action International, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Ian Westmore
- South African Society of Psychiatrists, Bloemfonten, South Africa
| | - Amir Ahuja
- Los Angeles LGBT Center, AGLP: The Association of LGBTQ Psychiatrists, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Julio Torales
- Department of Psychiatry, National University of Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | - Howard Rubin
- Department of Psychiatry, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joao Castaldelli-Maia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.,Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roger Ng
- Alpha Clinic, Central, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Petros Levounis
- Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kessing ML, Mik‐Meyer N. Negotiating mental illness across the lay-professional divide: Role play in peer work consultations. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2022; 44:815-829. [PMID: 35247209 PMCID: PMC9311446 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Patient involvement is a prominent policy aim in modern health care. Today, mental health services employ peer workers (PWs) who have personal experiences with mental illness. Based on 22 interviews with PWs and 26 audio recordings of real-life consultations, we show how PWs talk about their personal experiences as professional qualifications. Furthermore, we demonstrate how in real-life encounters, PWs and patients convert personal experiences into a professional approach through an interactionist role play that balance PWs role as former patients and current professionals. Our analysis shows that PWs combine the personal pronoun 'I' (stressing that it is personal) with the indefinite pronoun 'one' (referring to generalised patient experiences) when they recount illness experiences. This convey that PWs engage with mental illness as both a personal and professional topic. In addition, the analysis shows that PWs (and patients) use professional clues to manifest PWs' positions as professionals. Overall, the article demonstrates that instead of focussing on authentic patient relationships, as previous research has done, it is beneficial to investigate peer work from a symbolic interactionist approach revealing how PWs and patients skilfully manoeuvre the contradictions embedded in the PWs' dual role as former patients and current professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Lue Kessing
- The Danish Center for Social Science ResearchCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of SociologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Nanna Mik‐Meyer
- Department of OrganizationCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Foglesong D, Spagnolo AB, Cronise R, Forbes J, Swarbrick P, Edwards JP, Pratt C. Perceptions of Supervisors of Peer Support Workers (PSW) in Behavioral Health: Results from a National Survey. Community Ment Health J 2022; 58:437-443. [PMID: 34089113 PMCID: PMC8177034 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-021-00837-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
This content analysis of open-ended survey responses compares and contrasts perceptions on supervision from supervisors with experience providing direct peer support services (PS) and supervisors without experience providing direct peer support services (NPS).A 16-item online survey was distributed via the National Association of Peer Supporters (N.A.P.S.) listserv and through peer networks and peer run organizations. Responses from 837 respondents, across 46 US states, were analyzed. Four open ended questions assessed supervisors' perceptions on differences supervising peer support workers (PSW) as compared to other staff, important qualities of PSW supervisors, roles when supervising a PSW, and concerns about PSWs in the organization. Among NPS and PS, three major differences in themes emerged: the knowledge required of supervisors, understanding of the role of the PSW, and supervisors' beliefs regarding PSW competencies. PS have a more nuanced understanding of the peer support worker role and the impact of lived experience in the role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Foglesong
- Magellan Complete Care, 691029, Orlando, FL, 32869, USA.,Southpark Center Loop, Bldg. 1200, Suite 250, Orlando, FL, 32819, USA
| | - Amy B Spagnolo
- Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
| | - Rita Cronise
- Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Joanne Forbes
- Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Peggy Swarbrick
- Rutgers University Behavioral Health, Collaborative Support Programs of NJ, 8 Spring Street, Freehold, NJ, USA
| | - Jonathan P Edwards
- National Association of Peer Supporters (N.A.P.S.), Washington D.C, Was, USA
| | - Carlos Pratt
- Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parkes T, Matheson C, Carver H, Foster R, Budd J, Liddell D, Wallace J, Pauly B, Fotopoulou M, Burley A, Anderson I, Price T, Schofield J, MacLennan G. Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and accessibility of a peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of people who experience homelessness with problem substance use: the SHARPS study. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:10. [PMID: 35120539 PMCID: PMC8815224 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00582-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use, access to appropriate services can be challenging. There is evidence that the development of trusting relationships with non-judgemental staff can facilitate service engagement. Peer-delivered approaches show particular promise, but the evidence base is still developing. METHODS The study used mixed methods to assess the feasibility, acceptability and accessibility of a peer-delivered, relational intervention to reduce harms and improve health/well-being, quality of life and social functioning, for people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use. Four Peer Navigators were employed to support individuals (n = 68 total, intervention participants). They were based in outreach services and hostels in Scotland and England. Qualitative interviews were conducted with intervention participants, Peer Navigators and staff in services, and observations were conducted in all settings. Quantitative outcomes relating to participants' substance use, physical and mental health, and quality of the Peer Navigator relationship, were measured via a 'holistic health check' with six questionnaires completed at two time-points. RESULTS The intervention was found to be acceptable to, and feasible and accessible for, participants, Peer Navigators, and service staff. Participants reported improvements to service engagement, and feeling more equipped to access services independently. The lived experience of the Peer Navigators was highlighted as particularly helpful, enabling trusting, authentic, and meaningful relationships to be developed. Some challenges were experienced in relation to the 'fit' of the intervention within some settings. Among participants there were reductions in drug use and risky injecting practices. There were increases in the number of participants receiving opioid substitution therapy. Overall, the intervention was positively received, with collective recognition that the intervention was unique and highly valuable. While most of the measures chosen for the holistic health check were found to be suitable for this population, they should be streamlined to avoid duplication and participant burden. CONCLUSIONS The study established that a peer-delivered, relational harm reduction intervention is acceptable to, and feasible and accessible for, people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use. While the study was not outcomes-focused, participants did experience a range of positive outcomes. A full randomised controlled trial is now required to assess intervention effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION Study registered with ISRCTN: 15900054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Parkes
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
| | - Catriona Matheson
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Hannah Carver
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - John Budd
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Bernie Pauly
- The Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Maria Fotopoulou
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Isobel Anderson
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Tracey Price
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Joe Schofield
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Parkes T, Matheson C, Carver H, Foster R, Budd J, Liddell D, Wallace J, Pauly B, Fotopoulou M, Burley A, Anderson I, MacLennan G. A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-128. [PMID: 35212621 PMCID: PMC8899911 DOI: 10.3310/wvvl4786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use, access to appropriate services can be challenging. There is evidence that development of trusting relationships with non-judgemental staff can facilitate service engagement. Peer-delivered approaches show particular promise, but the evidence base is still developing. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-delivered intervention, through 'Peer Navigators', to support people who are homeless with problem substance use to address a range of health and social issues. OBJECTIVES The study objectives were to design and implement a peer-delivered, relational intervention to reduce harms and improve health/well-being, quality of life and social functioning for people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use, and to conduct a concurrent process evaluation to inform a future randomised controlled trial. DESIGN A mixed-methods feasibility study with concurrent process evaluation was conducted, involving qualitative interviews [staff interviews (one time point), n = 12; Peer Navigator interviews (three or four time points), n = 15; intervention participant interviews: first time point, n = 24, and second time point, n = 10], observations and quantitative outcome measures. SETTING The intervention was delivered in three outreach services for people who are homeless in Scotland, and three Salvation Army hostels in England; there were two standard care settings: an outreach service in Scotland and a hostel in England. PARTICIPANTS Participants were people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use (n = 68) (intervention). INTERVENTION This was a peer-delivered, relational intervention drawing on principles of psychologically informed environments, with Peer Navigators providing practical and emotional support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes relating to participants' substance use, participants' physical and mental health needs, and the quality of Peer Navigator relationships were measured via a 'holistic health check', with six questionnaires completed at two time points: a specially created sociodemographic, health and housing status questionnaire; the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items plus the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; the Maudsley Addiction Profile; the Substance Use Recovery Evaluator; the RAND Corporation Short Form survey-36 items; and the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure. RESULTS The Supporting Harm Reduction through Peer Support (SHARPS) study was found to be acceptable to, and feasible for, intervention participants, staff and Peer Navigators. Among participants, there was reduced drug use and an increase in the number of prescriptions for opioid substitution therapy. There were reductions in risky injecting practice and risky sexual behaviour. Participants reported improvements to service engagement and felt more equipped to access services on their own. The lived experience of the Peer Navigators was highlighted as particularly helpful, enabling the development of trusting, authentic and meaningful relationships. The relationship with the Peer Navigator was measured as excellent at baseline and follow-up. Some challenges were experienced in relation to the 'fit' of the intervention within some settings and will inform future studies. LIMITATIONS Some participants did not complete the outcome measures, or did not complete both sets, meaning that we do not have baseline and/or follow-up data for all. The standard care data sample sizes make comparison between settings limited. CONCLUSIONS A randomised controlled trial is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the Peer Navigator intervention. FUTURE WORK A definitive cluster randomised controlled trial should particularly consider setting selection, outcomes and quantitative data collection instruments. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN15900054. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Parkes
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Catriona Matheson
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Hannah Carver
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - John Budd
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Bernie Pauly
- The Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Greater Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Maria Fotopoulou
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Adam Burley
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Isobel Anderson
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Le PD, Agrest M, Mascayano F, Dev S, Kankan T, Dishy G, Tapia-Muñoz T, Tapia E, Toso-Salman J, Pratt C, Alves-Nishioka S, Schilling S, Jorquera MJ, Castro-Valdez J, Geffner N, Price LN, Conover S, Valencia E, Yang LH, Alvarado R, Susser ES. Understanding Users' Perspectives of Psychosocial Mechanisms Underpinning Peer Support Work in Chile. Community Ment Health J 2022; 58:111-120. [PMID: 33646493 PMCID: PMC8408283 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-021-00800-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
This study explores the beliefs and attitudes about the psychosocial mechanisms of peer support work among users who participated in Critical Time Intervention-Task Shifting (CTI-TS), which tested the acceptability and feasibility of a peer support work model to improve community-based mental health care for individuals with psychosis in Latin America. We conducted a secondary analysis of 15 in-depth interviews with CTI-TS participants in Chile, using the framework method and defined the framework domains based on five major mechanisms of peer support work identified by a recent literature review. The analysis revealed that users' perceptions of peer support work mechanisms were strongly shaped by personal motivations, beliefs about professional hierarchies, familial support, and the Chilean mental health system's incipient recovery orientation. The findings underscore the importance of adopting culturally tailored strategies to promote peer support work, such as involving mental health professionals and fostering equal-powered relationships between PSWs and users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PhuongThao D Le
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA.
| | | | - Franco Mascayano
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Saloni Dev
- Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tanvi Kankan
- Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Thamara Tapia-Muñoz
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Eric Tapia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Charissa Pratt
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sara Schilling
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - María José Jorquera
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | | | - LeShawndra N Price
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Conover
- Center for the Advancement of Critical Time Intervention, Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eliecer Valencia
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence H Yang
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rubén Alvarado
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ezra S Susser
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Russell C, Ali F, Nafeh F, LeBlanc S, Imtiaz S, Elton-Marshall T, Rehm J. A qualitative examination of substance use service needs among people who use drugs (PWUD) with treatment and service experience in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:2021. [PMID: 34742267 PMCID: PMC8571863 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12104-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who use drugs (PWUD) often have complex health and social support needs related to substance use, yet face numerous barriers to service access, resulting in unmet treatment needs and a corresponding gap in treatment. While initiatives to scale up substance use services for PWUD in Canada - and Ontario - have been undertaken, these have excluded PWUD' perspectives, and their needs have largely been defined by other actors. As end-users of services, PWUD' perspectives are vital to understanding what services are required, and whether existent services are adequate, appropriate and effective. Thus, the present study aimed to elicit in-depth knowledge from PWUD with lived experience of accessing services to better understand their unmet treatment and service needs, towards closing the service and treatment gap in Ontario. METHODS This qualitative study included one-on-one interviews conducted with a cohort of n = 45 adult PWUD with substance use and treatment experience in Ontario, Canada. Participants were recruited from substance use services based on ConnexOntario's directory of all provincial addiction services, as well as by word-of-mouth. Questions focused on participants' experiences and perspectives on substance use services towards understanding their service needs. Data underwent an inductive thematic analysis based on key themes that emerged. RESULTS Participants commonly engaged in polysubstance use, and identified a number of unmet substance use service needs including complex factors within the current service system that influenced access to available programs. Specifically, participants suggested the need to address stigmatization and system fragmentation, increase service provision and capacity, and scale up specific services and related supports such as harm reduction, counseling, treatment, and housing. CONCLUSIONS This study identified PWUD' needs in relation to substance use service provision in Ontario, Canada, and highlighted important areas for policy change and program planning and implementation. Concrete recommendations include the development of a government-funded, low-barrier, comprehensive and integrated service delivery and referral models that include PWUD as collaborators and program facilitators to ensure that services are as accessible, effective, and cohesive as possible. Results from this study can be used to enhance provincial substance use treatment and service provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayley Russell
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), #2035-33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada.
| | - Farihah Ali
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), #2035-33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada
| | - Frishta Nafeh
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), #2035-33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada
| | - Sean LeBlanc
- Drug Users Advocacy League (DUAL), 216 Murray St, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5S6, Canada
| | - Sameer Imtiaz
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), #2035-33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada
| | - Tara Elton-Marshall
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), #2035-33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, Ontario, M6A 5C1, Canada.,Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 250 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8, Canada.,Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1, Canada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), #2035-33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 250 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.,Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, 01187, Dresden, Germany.,Department of International Health Projects, Institute for Leadership and Health Management, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Bol'shaya Pirogovskaya Ulitsa, 19с1, Moscow, Russia, 119146
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Roennfeldt H, Byrne L. Skin in the game: The professionalization of lived experience roles in mental health. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30 Suppl 1:1445-1455. [PMID: 34137149 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The lived experience workforce has moved from being a grassroots support and activist movement to become the fastest growing workforce within mental health. As lived experience work becomes assimilated within mainstream mental health service delivery, it faces mounting pressure to become more professionalized. Professionalization has evoked both optimism and fear, with diverging views within the lived experience workforce. In this paper, an assessment of the existing professionalization of the lived experience workforce is undertaken by drawing on theoretical positions and indices of what constitutes a profession. The arguments for and against professionalization are explored to identify the risks, benefits, and considerations for the lived experience workforce. The drive for professionalization has largely occurred due to the clinically focused mental health systems' valuing of professional identity. The argument in favour of professionalization is motivated by a need for credibility within the views of that system, as well as greater regulation of the workforce. However, tensions are acknowledged with concerns that professionalization to appeal to the clinically focused system may lead to erosion of the values and uniqueness of lived experience work and nullify its effectiveness as an alternative and complementary role. Given mental health nurses are increasingly colleagues and often line managers of lived experience workers, it is important at this stage of lived experience workforce development that mental health nurses understand and are able to advocate for lived experience roles as a distinct professional discipline to help avoid the risks of co-option to more dominant clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Roennfeldt
- Centre for Psychiatric Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Management, RMIT, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Byrne
- School of Management, RMIT, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Program for Recovery and Community Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stirrup V, Jones FW, Dimond I, Green D, Kaur J, Wattingham A, MacInnes D. Developing and evaluating mental health lived experience practitioner (LXP) roles in an NHS trust. J Ment Health 2021; 31:255-262. [PMID: 34569392 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1952956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of establishing roles for people with lived experience of mental distress within mental health services is increasingly being recognised. However, there is limited information to guide the introduction of these roles into mental health services. AIMS This study details the development and evaluation of a new mental health peer worker role, the Lived Experience Practitioner (LXP), within an NHS Trust. METHODS A three-phase exploratory mixed-methods approach was used. Qualitative data were collected and analysed in the first phase. The qualitative findings were then translated into the formal procedures for introducing LXPs into the Trust, with the approach examined quantitatively in the third phase. RESULTS The qualitative analysis identified five themes; role design, training, piloting, career pathways and communication. These formed the basis for working groups (workstreams) which developed policies and procedures for introducing the LXP role into the Trust. Twenty-eight applicants commenced a training programme with 10 successful completions. Seven LXPs were employed by the Trust and were still in their posts after 2 years. CONCLUSION In this study, three areas were viewed as important when introducing LXP roles into mental health services; organisational support, the training programme and employment procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Stirrup
- Faculty of Medicine Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Fergal W Jones
- Salomons Institute for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Tunbridge Wells, UK
| | | | - Debbie Green
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | | | | | - Douglas MacInnes
- Faculty of Medicine Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Byrne L, Roennfeldt H, Wolf J, Linfoot A, Foglesong D, Davidson L, Bellamy C. Effective Peer Employment Within Multidisciplinary Organizations: Model for Best Practice. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 49:283-297. [PMID: 34478040 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-021-01162-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
This study sought a clearer understanding of organizational mechanisms reinforcing effective peer employment and organizational change from the perspectives of peer workers, non-peer staff and management in multidisciplinary mental health and substance use recovery services. Findings were used to develop a model for organizational best practice for peer employment and associated organizational change to promote recovery-oriented and person-directed services. Qualitative research was undertaken, involving 132 people participating in 14 focus groups and eight individual interviews. These people were employed across five U.S. multidisciplinary organizations providing mental health and substance use recovery services and deemed by a panel of experts to provide effective employment of peer workers. Study findings include the articulation of an interactive working model of best practice, comprising organizational commitment, organizational culture and effective organizational strategies necessary for a "whole-of-organization" approach to support authentic peer work and enable organizational transformation, to actualize recovery-oriented values and person-driven services. Strategies include Human Resources engagement, peers in positions of senior organizational authority, recurring whole of workforce training, along with peer training and peer-led supervision. Findings suggest whole-of-organization commitment, culture and practice are essential for the organizational transformation needed to support effective employment of peers in multidisciplinary environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Byrne
- School of Management, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. .,Department of Psychiatry, Program for Recovery and Community Health, Yale School of Medicine, Building. 1 Erector Square, 319 Peck Street, New Haven, CT, 06513, USA.
| | - Helena Roennfeldt
- School of Management, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Jessica Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, 300 George St #901, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Ally Linfoot
- Clackamas County Behavioral Health Division, Peer Delivered Services System of Care, 2051 Kaen Road, Oregon City, OR, 97045, USA
| | - Dana Foglesong
- National Association of Peer Supporters, 712 H St NE PMB 65, Washington, DC, 20002, USA
| | - Larry Davidson
- Department of Psychiatry, Program for Recovery and Community Health, Yale School of Medicine, Building. 1 Erector Square, 319 Peck Street, New Haven, CT, 06513, USA
| | - Chyrell Bellamy
- Department of Psychiatry, Program for Recovery and Community Health, Yale School of Medicine, Building. 1 Erector Square, 319 Peck Street, New Haven, CT, 06513, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Marks J, Foster R, Gibson SL, Simpson A, Rinaldi M, Repper J, Worner J, Patel S, Lucock M, Ussher M, White S, Goldsmith L, Barlow S, Gillard S. Development of a peer support intervention to improve the experience and outcomes of discharge from inpatient mental health care: the role of experiential knowledge in a coproduced approach. BMC Res Notes 2021; 14:320. [PMID: 34419155 PMCID: PMC8379721 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Peer support is rapidly being introduced into mental health services internationally, yet peer support interventions are often poorly described, limiting the usefulness of research in informing policy and practice. This paper reports the development of a peer support intervention that aims to improve outcomes of discharge from inpatient to community mental health care. People with experiential knowledge of using mental health services—peer workers and service user researchers—were involved in all stages of developing the intervention: generating intervention components; producing the intervention handbook; piloting the intervention. Results Systematic review and expert panels, including our Lived Experience Advisory Panel, identified 66 candidate intervention components in five domains: Recruitment and Role Description of Peer Workers; Training for Peer Workers; Delivery of Peer Support; Supervision and Support for Peer Workers; Organisation and Team. A series of Local Advisory Groups were used to prioritise components and explore implementation issues using consensus methods, refining an intervention blueprint. A peer support handbook and peer worker training programme were produced by the study team and piloted in two study sites. Feedback workshops were held with peer workers and their supervisors to produce a final handbook and training programme. The ENRICH trial is registered with the ISRCTN clinical trial register, number ISRCTN 10043328, and was overseen by an independent steering committee and a data monitoring committee. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-021-05735-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Miles Rinaldi
- South West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Nordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway
| | - Julie Repper
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Shalini Patel
- South West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mike Lucock
- University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | | | - Sarah White
- St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Goldsmith
- St George's, University of London, London, UK.,City, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Steve Gillard
- St George's, University of London, London, UK. .,City, University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zeng G, Chung D, McNamara B. Organisational contexts and practice developments in mental health peer provision in Western Australia. J Health Organ Manag 2021; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 32520471 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-09-2019-0281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the past decade, the push for recovery-oriented services has birthed a growth in the recruitment of peer providers in mental health services: Persons who live with and manage their mental health challenges and are employed to support persons currently using mental health services. The aim of this paper is to compare the responses of government and non-government organisations to the implementation of peer provision. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Employing a qualitative study design, 15 people who supervised peer providers or who were strategically involved in peer provision were recruited using snowball sampling. Participants completed an in-depth interview that explored how peer provision services operated at their organisation and factors that shaped the way peer provision operates. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using Moore's Strategic Triangle. Synthesised member checking and researcher triangulation ensued to establish trustworthiness. FINDINGS The way in which peer provision operated sat along a continuum ranging from adoption (where practices are shaped by the recovery ethos) to co-option (where recovery work may be undertaken, but not shaped by the recovery ethos). Political and legal mandates that affected the operational capacities of each organisation shaped the way peer provision services operated. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS The findings of the study highlight the need to reconsider where peer provision services fit in the mental health system. Research investigating the value of peer provision services may attract the support of funders, service users and policy makers alike. ORIGINALITY/VALUE In employing Moore's strategic triangle to evaluate the alignment of policy (the authorising environment) with the operational capacity and practice of peer provision services (the task environment), this study found that organisational response to peer provision is largely influenced by political and legal mandates externally. The successful implementation of peer provision is mediated by effective supervision of peer providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Zeng
- School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University Bentley Campus, Perth, Australia
| | - Donna Chung
- School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University Bentley Campus, Perth, Australia
| | - Beverley McNamara
- School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University Bentley Campus, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pereira L, Radovic T, Haykal KA. Peer support programs in the fields of medicine and nursing: a systematic search and narrative review. CANADIAN MEDICAL EDUCATION JOURNAL 2021; 12:113-125. [PMID: 34249197 PMCID: PMC8263025 DOI: 10.36834/cmej.71129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Peer-provided services exist in many different domains and professions. However, there is a knowledge gap in the existing programs' descriptions and grouping that hinders creating new high-quality peer support programs. The objectives of this article are two-fold in describing existing peer support programs published in the literature in the medical field and evaluating their descriptive quality. Six electronic databases, grey literature, and reference lists were systematically searched. Studies reporting the existence of a support program delivered by peers and its description or methodology were included. Studies targeting patients and children were excluded. 11 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis and explored in detail. A total of 2155 peers participated in support programs in the fields of medicine, nursing, or both. Programs in other professional fields were not found. Programs were described in five different countries. Three methods of peer support delivery were found: in person, online, and mixed varying in their goals, duration, peer training supervision and participant demographics and number. Program descriptions were rated as good, fair, or poor using a verified rating scale. There are numerous well-described programs varying in their methodology and type of delivery. Thus, the emergence of new programs can be based on such models that have been well-described in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pereira
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - T Radovic
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - KA Haykal
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hui A, Rennick-Egglestone S, Franklin D, Walcott R, Llewellyn-Beardsley J, Ng F, Roe J, Yeo C, Deakin E, Brydges S, Penas Moran P, McGranahan R, Pollock K, Thornicroft G, Slade M. Institutional injustice: Implications for system transformation emerging from the mental health recovery narratives of people experiencing marginalisation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250367. [PMID: 33861807 PMCID: PMC8051813 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Institutional injustice refers to structures that create disparities in resources, opportunities and representation. Marginalised people experience institutional injustice, inequalities and discrimination through intersecting personal characteristics and social circumstances. This study aimed to investigate sources of institutional injustice and their effects on marginalised people with experience of mental health problems. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 77 individuals from marginalised groups with experience of mental health problems, including psychosis, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) populations, complex needs and lived experience as a work requirement. These were analysed inductively enabling sensitising concepts to emerge. FINDINGS Three processes of institutional injustice were identified: not being believed because of social status and personal backgrounds; not being heard where narratives did not align with dominant discourses, and not being acknowledged where aspects of identity were disregarded. Harmful outcomes included disengagement from formal institutions through fear and mistrust, tensions and reduced affiliation with informal institutions when trying to consolidate new ways of being, and damaging impacts on mental health and wellbeing through multiple oppression. CONCLUSIONS Institutional injustice perpetuates health inequalities and marginalised status. Master status, arising from dominant discourses and heuristic bias, overshadow the narratives and experiences of marginalised people. Cultural competency has the potential to improve heuristic availability through social understandings of narrative and experience, whilst coproduction and narrative development through approaches such as communities of practice might offer meaningful avenues for authentic expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ada Hui
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Rennick-Egglestone
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Donna Franklin
- NEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rianna Walcott
- Department of Digital Humanities, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Ng
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Roe
- National Institute for Health Research, ARC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Yeo
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emilia Deakin
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Brydges
- School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Penas Moran
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of Deusto, Bilbo, Spain
| | - Rose McGranahan
- Unit of Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Slade
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lantta T, Anttila M, Varpula J, Välimäki M. Facilitators for improvement of psychiatric services and barriers in implementing changes: From the perspective of Finnish patients and family members. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30:506-523. [PMID: 33216435 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The need for psychiatric patients and their family members to have access to quality user-friendly services has been studied for decades, yet few improvements have been made in treatment services. This study aims to explain how patients and family members have experienced facilitators of improvements, and their thoughts about barriers in the implementation of changes. An explanatory qualitative design was adopted. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with eight focus groups made up of a total of 35 participants from mental health associations in Finland. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the deductive data analysis. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) was followed in the study. Participants in patient and family member associations had similar experiences and thoughts about facilitators of improvements in psychiatric services and barriers in the implementation of changes. For example, both participant groups experienced that promoting more positive roles of professionals could facilitate improvements in psychiatric care. On the other hand, a lack of theoretical competence and interpersonal skills of professionals could hinder change. We conclude that many of the facilitators that patients and families suggested could be addressed by enhancing collaboration and communication, having a more person-centred approach, focusing on recovery throughout the course of care, and acknowledging staff's well-being at work. Second, the barriers to implementing changes centre around the limited knowledge and skills of staff, and a paternalistic system that focuses on managing risk and administering treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jaakko Varpula
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Evolvement of Peer Support Workers' Roles in Psychiatric Hospitals: A Longitudinal Qualitative Observation Study. Community Ment Health J 2021; 57:589-597. [PMID: 33367956 PMCID: PMC7904537 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00741-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Peer support workers (PSWs) use their experiential knowledge and specific skills to support patients in their recovery process. The aim of our study was to examine the integration and role-finding process of PSWs in adult psychiatric hospitals in Germany. We conducted open nonparticipant observations of 25 multiprofessional team meetings and 5 transregional peer support worker meetings over a period of six months. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Regarding the integration of PSWs into multiprofessional teams, we identified three subcategories: "Features of success," "challenges" and "positioning between team and patients." Concerning the PSWs' roles, we developed two subcategories: "Offers" and "self-perception." The PSWs' specific roles within a multiprofessional mental healthcare team evolve in a process over a longer period of time. This role-finding process should be supported by a framework role description which leaves sufficient freedom for individual development. Regular opportunities for mutual exchange among PSWs can help to address specific support needs at different points in time.
Collapse
|
30
|
Strategies Used to Support Peer Provision in Mental Health: A Scoping Review. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 48:1034-1045. [PMID: 33655461 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-021-01118-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The employment of peer providers (people who draw on their lived experience of mental health challenges) has grown in conjunction with the increased acceptance of recovery as a key principle in mental health policy and practice. Barriers to the integration of peer providers in mental health services have been well documented. This review addresses an under-explored area by consolidating strategies undertaken by mental health organizations for the successful implementation of peer provision. A scoping review was chosen to facilitate the rapid summary and dissemination of research findings that are relevant to policymakers and practitioners. Peer-reviewed articles and grey literature were sourced from three databases, key peer support websites and a hand search of the included studies. Following screening, data were extracted from 28 studies: 25 qualitative and three mixed methods studies. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis and organized into themes. Four themes emerged from the data. Championing of peer provision initiatives by organizational leadership is central to the success and sustainability of peer provision. Leadership undergirds three strategies that were discussed: organizational preparation, recruitment, training and induction, and support and development. When peer provision is championed by organizational leadership, measures can be undertaken to prepare the organization for peer provision; recruit, train and induce peer providers successfully into the organization; and support peer providers on the job.
Collapse
|
31
|
Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18041720. [PMID: 33578966 PMCID: PMC7916654 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Perceived social support opportunities are central to successful exercise referral scheme (ERS) client experiences. However, there remains a lack of guidance on how ERSs can embed social support opportunities within their provision. This study presents retrospective acceptability findings from a 12-week social-identity-informed peer support intervention to enhance perceived social support among clients of an English ERS. Five peer volunteers were recruited, trained, and deployed in supervised ERS sessions across two sites. Peers assisted exercise referral officers (EROs) by providing supplementary practical, informational, motivational, and emotional support to ERS clients. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with peers (n = 4), EROs (n = 2), and clients (n = 5) and analysed thematically. The analysis identified three primary themes. The first theme detailed how EROs utilised peer volunteers to supplement the ERS client experience. This theme delineated peer roles within the ERS context and identified salient individual peer characteristics that contributed to their success. The second theme described peer acceptability among the various stakeholders. Peers were valued for their ability to reduce burden on EROs and to enhance perceptions of comfort among ERS clients. The final theme presented participant feedback regarding how the intervention may be further refined and enhanced. Peers represented a cost-effective and acceptable means of providing auxiliary social support to ERS clients. Moving forward, the structured integration of peers can improve the accessibility of social support among ERS participants, thus facilitating better rates of ERS completion.
Collapse
|
32
|
Organizational Climate and Support Among Peer Specialists Working in Peer-Run, Hybrid and Conventional Mental Health Settings. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 47:150-167. [PMID: 31564032 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00980-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
As the peer specialist workforce continues to expand, it is critical to better understand peer providers' working conditions and workplace experiences. The current study utilized a targeted non-probability sample of 801 peer specialists to explore whether key organizational climate and support variables would yield distinct multivariate groups, and to investigate the correlates of these groups. Analyses yielded a seven-group solution, with peer run organizations comprising a substantially greater proportion of the groups with high organizational climate and support scores. In direct comparisons, peer-run programs outranked all other groups in the areas of perceived organizational climate, supports for career development and perceived service quality.
Collapse
|
33
|
Magasi S, Papadimitriou C. Peer Support Interventions in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: A Framework to Advance the Field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 103:S222-S229. [PMID: 33440133 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Peer support is a central tenet of the Disability Rights Movement and is based on the recognition that experiential knowledge and shared experiences provide opportunities for informational, emotional, and appraisal support among people with physical disabilities. "Peer support interventions" is an umbrella term used to describe a range of ancillary services provided by people with disabilities to people with disabilities, including peer mentoring, peer health education, and peer health navigation. A growing body of research documents the development, implementation, and outcomes of peer support interventions for people with physical disabilities in physical medicine and rehabilitation. The organization, structure, and objectives of peer support interventions vary tremendously, making it difficult to synthesize findings across studies and establish best practices to support their systematic implementation across the continuum of care. This article is a call to action for greater conceptual clarity in how peer support interventions are developed, implemented, and evaluated. We propose a 9-part evidence-informed framework delineating both theory-driven and contextual considerations to help strengthen the evidence base of peer support interventions for people with disabilities in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Magasi
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gillard S, Banach N, Barlow E, Byrne J, Foster R, Goldsmith L, Marks J, McWilliam C, Morshead R, Stepanian K, Turner R, Verey A, White S. Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; 56:1903-1911. [PMID: 33606048 PMCID: PMC8429155 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support-compared to clinical-patient relationships-can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services, designed to assess fidelity to principles that characterise the distinctiveness of peer support. METHODS A draft index was developed using expert panels of service user researchers and people doing peer support, informed by an evidence-based, peer support principles framework. Two rounds of testing took place in 24 mental health services providing peer support in a range of settings. Fidelity was assessed through interviews with peer workers, their supervisors and people receiving peer support. Responses were tested for spread and internal consistency, independently double rated for inter-rater reliability, with feedback from interviewees and service user researchers used to refine the index. RESULTS A fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services was produced with good psychometric properties. Fidelity is assessed in four principle-based domains; building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; reciprocity and mutuality; leadership, choice and control; building strengths and making connections to community. CONCLUSIONS The index offers potential to improve the evidence base for peer support in mental health services, enabling future trials to assess fidelity of interventions to peer support principles, and service providers a means of ensuring that peer support retains its distinctive qualities as it is introduced into mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Gillard
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK ,grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - N. Banach
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - E. Barlow
- grid.451317.50000 0004 0489 3918Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | - J. Byrne
- grid.451317.50000 0004 0489 3918Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | - R. Foster
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - L. Goldsmith
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - J. Marks
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - C. McWilliam
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - R. Morshead
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - K. Stepanian
- grid.15751.370000 0001 0719 6059School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - R. Turner
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - A. Verey
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - S. White
- grid.4464.20000 0001 2161 2573Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
White S, Foster R, Marks J, Morshead R, Goldsmith L, Barlow S, Sin J, Gillard S. The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:534. [PMID: 33176729 PMCID: PMC7657356 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support is being introduced into mental health services internationally, often in response to workforce policy. Earlier systematic reviews incorporate different modalities of peer support (i.e. group and one-to-one), offer inconsistent evidence of effectiveness, and also indicate substantial heterogeneity and issues of quality in the evidence base at that time. An updated review, focussed on one-to-one peer support, is timely given current policy interest. This study aims to systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of one-to-one peer support interventions for adults using mental health services, and to explore heterogeneity in peer support interventions. METHOD We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases from inception until 13 June 2019. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias, and meta-analyses conducted where multiple trials provided usable data. RESULTS Twenty-three studies reporting nineteen trials were eligible, providing data from 3329 participants. While seven trials were of low to moderate risk of bias, incomplete reporting of data in many studies suggested bias in the evidence base. Peer support interventions included peer workers in paraclinical roles (e.g. case manager), providing structured behavioural interventions, or more flexible support for recovery. Meta-analyses were conducted for eleven outcomes, with evidence that one-to-one peer support may have a modest positive impact on self-reported recovery and empowerment. There was no impact on clinical symptoms or service use. Analyses of heterogeneity suggest that peer support might improve social network support. CONCLUSIONS One-to-one peer support in mental health services might impact positively on psychosocial outcomes, but is unlikely to improve clinical outcomes. In order to better inform the introduction of peer support into mental health services, improvement of the evidence base requires complete reporting of outcome data, selection of outcomes that relate to intervention mechanisms, exploration of heterogeneity in the implementation of peer support and focused reviews of specific types of one-to-one peer support. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospero identifier: CRD42015025621 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah White
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Rhiannon Foster
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Jacqueline Marks
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Rosaleen Morshead
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Lucy Goldsmith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Sally Barlow
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Jacqueline Sin
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Steve Gillard
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Roennfeldt H, Byrne L. How much 'lived experience' is enough? Understanding mental health lived experience work from a management perspective. AUST HEALTH REV 2020; 44:898-903. [PMID: 32753099 DOI: 10.1071/ah19261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to explore management understanding of the lived experience required for designated lived experience or peer roles within mental health. Method This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews and one focus group with 29 participants employed in diverse management roles from the public and not-for-profit health and community sector in Queensland, Australia. Results The findings indicate a lack of consensus in defining 'lived experience', including what lived experience is required to be eligible for designated roles. Although some participants were clear on what designated roles added to the workforce, uncertainty and attempts to avoid stigma led to some participants questioning the need for designated roles. Conclusion This study suggests the ongoing expansion of the lived experience workforce is affected by challenges in defining 'lived experience' as a requirement for designated roles and fears regarding stigmatised identities. What is known about the topic? In the mental health sector, opportunities and challenges exist in attempting to effectively incorporate the emerging lived experience or peer workforce. Research has highlighted the need for support from senior management, the need for role clarity and the risk of 'othering' for the lived experience workforce. What does this paper add? This paper responds to the gap in existing research on the experiences of management in defining and articulating their understanding of lived experience and potential impact of uncertainty and inconsistency in understanding for the lived experience workforce. What are the implications for practitioners? This study identifies the need to strengthen management understanding of lived experience to facilitate ongoing development of lived experience roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Roennfeldt
- Central Queensland University, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, 700 Yaamba Road, Norman Gardens, Qld 4701, Australia; and Present address: RMIT University, School of Management, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. ; and Corresponding author.
| | - Louise Byrne
- Central Queensland University, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, 700 Yaamba Road, Norman Gardens, Qld 4701, Australia; and Present address: RMIT University, School of Management, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Thomson G, Balaam MC. Sharing and modifying stories in neonatal peer support: an international mixed-methods study. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 35:805-812. [PMID: 32729148 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
While shared personal experiences are a valued prerequisite of the peer supporter-service-user relationship, they have the potential to create harm. There are challenges in peer supporters being emotionally ready to hear the experiences of others, and how much personal information peers should disclose. As part of an international study that aimed to explore how peer supporters who worked in a neonatal context (providing support to parents whose infant(s) has received neonatal care) were trained and supported, new insights emerged into how peers' personal stories were used and modified to instil boundaries in peer support services. In this paper, we report on a secondary analysis of the data to describe how peer supporters' stories were valued, used, assessed and moderated in neonatal peer support services; to safeguard and promote positive outcomes for peers and parents. Following University ethics approval, a mixed-methods study comprising online surveys and follow-up interviews was undertaken. Surveys were distributed through existing contacts and via social media. Thirty-one managers/coordinators/trainers and 77 peer supporters completed the survey from 48 peer support services in 16 different countries, and 26 interviews were held with 27 survey respondents. Three themes describe variations in the types of stories that were preferred and when peers were perceived to be 'ready' to share them; the different means by which sharing personal accounts was encouraged and used to assess peer readiness; and the methods used to instil (and assess) boundaries in the stories the peers shared. In neonatal-related peer support provision, the expected use of peer supporters' stories resonates with the 'use of self' canon in social work practice. Peer supporters were expected to modify personal stories to ensure that service-user (parents) needs were primary, the information was beneficial, and harm was minimised. Further work to build resilience and emotional intelligence in peer supporters is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gill Thomson
- Maternal and Infant Nutrition & Nurture Unit (MAINN), School of Community Health and Midwifery, UCLan, Preston, UK.,School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Adams WE. Unintended consequences of institutionalizing peer support work in mental healthcare. Soc Sci Med 2020; 262:113249. [PMID: 32768773 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The widespread shift towards recovery-oriented mental healthcare has led to the extensive growth of peer-delivered services. Peer support workers draw on lived experience of mental health challenges and service use to provide non-clinical support services. As peer support services have grown, they have also formalized. This mixed-methods study of peer support work in Pennsylvania (USA) explores how peer support has been institutionalized, and identifies the intended impacts and unintended consequences associated with that process. In Pennsylvania, the inclusion of peer support services as a Medicaid reimbursable service, in addition to county level mandates regarding peer support service availability, have served to institutionalize the field. Data include 49 semi-structured interviews conducted with peer support workers (n = 35) and stakeholders (n = 14) in 2016. Qualitative analyses reveal changes to the scope and nature of peer support work, the peer workforce, peer client relationships, and to stigma in the workplace. Despite these changes, peer workers frequently remain underpaid and unable to advance professionally. The institutionalization of peer support serves as a barrier to worker entry and retention and highlights tensions between the consumer-driven origin of the recovery field and the current mental healthcare system. The institutionalization of roles defined by experiential expertise, such as peer support, has the potential to reduce the very centrality of experiential expertise, reproduce social inequalities, and paradoxically impact stigma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wallis E Adams
- Institute for Health Equity & Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shalaby RAH, Agyapong VIO. Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7:e15572. [PMID: 32357127 PMCID: PMC7312261 DOI: 10.2196/15572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing gap has emerged between people with mental illness and health care professionals, which in recent years has been successfully closed through the adoption of peer support services (PSSs). Peer support in mental health has been variously defined in the literature and is simply known as the help and support that people with lived experience of mental illness or a learning disability can give to one another. Although PSSs date back to several centuries, it is only in the last few decades that these services have formally evolved, grown, and become an integral part of the health care system. Debates around peer support in mental health have been raised frequently in the literature. Although many authors have emphasized the utmost importance of incorporating peer support into the health care system to instill hope; to improve engagement, quality of life, self-confidence, and integrity; and to reduce the burden on the health care system, other studies suggest that there are neutral effects from integrating PSSs into health care systems, with a probable waste of resources. OBJECTIVE In this general review, we aimed to examine the literature, exploring the evolution, growth, types, function, generating tools, evaluation, challenges, and the effect of PSSs in the field of mental health and addiction. In addition, we aimed to describe PSSs in different, nonexhaustive contexts, as shown in the literature, that aims to draw attention to the proposed values of PSSs in such fields. METHODS The review was conducted through a general search of the literature on MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts, and PsycINFO. Search terms included peer support, peer support in mental health, social support, peer, family support, and integrated care. RESULTS There is abundant literature defining and describing PSSs in different contexts as well as tracking their origins. Two main transformational concepts have been described, namely, intentional peer support and transformation from patients to peer support providers. The effects of PSSs are extensive and integrated into different fields, such as forensic PSSs, addiction, and mental health, and in different age groups and mental health condition severity. Satisfaction of and challenges to PSS integration have been clearly dependent on a number of factors and consequently impact the future prospect of this workforce. CONCLUSIONS There is an internationally growing trend to adopt PSSs within addiction and mental health services, and despite the ongoing challenges, large sections of the current literature support the inclusion of peer support workers in the mental health care workforce. The feasibility and maintenance of a robust PSS in health care would only be possible through collaborative efforts and ongoing support and engagement from all health care practitioners, managers, and other stakeholders.
Collapse
|
40
|
Scanlan JN, Still M, Radican J, Henkel D, Heffernan T, Farrugia P, Isbester J, English J. Workplace experiences of mental health consumer peer workers in New South Wales, Australia: a survey study exploring job satisfaction, burnout and turnover intention. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:270. [PMID: 32487169 PMCID: PMC7268613 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02688-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consumer peer workers are individuals with lived experience of mental health issues and recovery who are employed to use their lived experience to support others. The consumer peer workforce has expanded substantially in recent years. While some research has explored the workplace experiences of peer workers, no previous studies have explored job satisfaction, burnout or turnover intention for this workforce. METHODS Consumer peer workers in New South Wales, Australia were invited to complete a survey designed to explore their workplace experiences. The survey included measures of job satisfaction, burnout, turnover intention, job demands and job resources, and satisfaction with supervision, professional development and opportunities for career progression. Questions also explored positive and negative aspects of positions. Analyses included exploration of the relationships between of job satisfaction, burnout, turnover intention, job demands and job resources as well as tabulation of common positive and negative aspects of positions. Results were also compared with findings from a previous study exploring workplace experiences of other mental health workers. RESULTS A total of 67 peer workers participated in the study. Overall job satisfaction, burnout (disengagement and exhaustion) and turnover intention for peer workers was not significantly different to other mental health workers. Job satisfaction, disengagement, exhaustion and turnover intention were all significantly inter-related. Job resources of social support, job control, feedback, and rewards and recognition were associated with positive workplace experiences and the job demand of "physical environment" was most substantially associated with poorer workplace experiences. The most common positive aspect of positions was "connecting with consumers" and the most common negative aspect of positions was "attitudes of clinicians / workplace culture". Access to supervision from a senior peer worker was associated with more positive workplace experiences. CONCLUSIONS This research demonstrates that while consumer peer workers do not appear to experience poorer job satisfaction or higher levels of burnout or turnover intention than other mental health workers, a range of challenges do exist. Efforts to further expand the peer workforce (especially senior peer worker roles) and to promote more positive attitudes and workplace cultures are likely to promote better workplace experiences for peer workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Newton Scanlan
- Present Affiliation: Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Office J120, Cumberland Campus, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 2141, Australia. .,Present Affiliation: Mental Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Concord, NSW, Australia.
| | - Megan Still
- Present Affiliation: Mental Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Concord, NSW Australia
| | - Jae Radican
- Present Affiliation: Official Visitors Program, Gladesville, NSW Australia ,Previous affiliation (at the time of the study): NSW Ministry of Health, Mental Health Branch, North Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Daya Henkel
- Present Affiliation: NSW Ministry of Health, Mental Health Branch, Chatswood, NSW Australia ,Previous affiliation (at the time of the study): Hunter New England Local Health District, Mental Health Services, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Tim Heffernan
- Present Affiliation: COORDINARE – South Eastern NSW Primary Health Network, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| | - Peter Farrugia
- Present Affiliation: Flourish Australia, Sydney Olympic Park, NSW Australia
| | - Jemima Isbester
- Present Affiliation: Mental Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Concord, NSW Australia
| | - Jessica English
- Present Affiliation: ReachOut Australia, Sydney, Australia ,Previous affiliation (at the time of the study): Being: Mental Health and Wellbeing Consumer Advisory Group, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fehily CMC, Bartlem KM, Wiggers JH, Wye PM, Clancy RV, Castle DJ, Wilson A, Rissel CE, Wutzke S, Hodder RK, Colyvas K, Murphy F, Bowman JA. Effectiveness of embedding a specialist preventive care clinician in a community mental health service in increasing preventive care provision: A randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2020; 54:620-632. [PMID: 32403938 PMCID: PMC7285986 DOI: 10.1177/0004867420914741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical practice guidelines recommend that community mental health services provide preventive care for clients' chronic disease risk behaviours; however, such care is often not routinely provided. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of offering clients an additional consultation with a specialist clinician embedded within a community mental health service, in increasing client-reported receipt of, and satisfaction with, preventive care. METHOD A randomised controlled trial was undertaken in one Australian community mental health service. Participants (N = 811) were randomised to receive usual care (preventive care in routine consultations; n = 405) or usual care plus the offer of an additional consultation with a specialist preventive care clinician (n = 406). Blinded interviewers assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up the client-reported receipt of preventive care (assessment, advice and referral) for four key risk behaviours individually (smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol overconsumption and physical inactivity) and all applicable risks combined, acceptance of referrals and satisfaction with preventive care received. RESULTS Analyses indicated significantly greater increases in 12 of the 18 preventive care delivery outcomes in the intervention compared to the usual care condition from baseline to follow-up, including assessment for all risks combined (risk ratio = 4.00; 95% confidence interval = [1.57, 10.22]), advice for all applicable risks combined (risk ratio = 2.40; 95% confidence interval = [1.89, 6.47]) and offer of referral to applicable telephone services combined (risk ratio = 20.13; 95% confidence interval = [2.56, 158.04]). For each component of care, there was a significant intervention effect for at least one of the individual risk behaviours. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with preventive care received, ranging from 77% (assessment) to 87% (referral), with no significant differences between conditions. CONCLUSION The intervention had a significant effect on the provision of the majority of recommended elements of preventive care. Further research is needed to maximise its impact, including identifying strategies to increase client uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin MC Fehily
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate M Bartlem
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
| | - John H Wiggers
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula M Wye
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard V Clancy
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Mental Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, NSW Health, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - David J Castle
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- St Vincent’s Health, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Wilson
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris E Rissel
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NSW Office of Preventive Health, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Sonia Wutzke
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca K Hodder
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Kim Colyvas
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Fionna Murphy
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny A Bowman
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Charles A, Thompson D, Nixdorf R, Ryan G, Shamba D, Kalha J, Moran G, Hiltensperger R, Mahlke C, Puschner B, Repper J, Slade M, Mpango R. Typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2020; 216:301-307. [PMID: 31992375 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support work roles are being implemented internationally, and increasingly in lower-resource settings. However, there is no framework to inform what types of modifications are needed to address local contextual and cultural aspects. AIMS To conduct a systematic review identifying a typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems. METHOD We systematically reviewed the peer support literature following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews (registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) on 24 July 2018: CRD42018094832). All study designs were eligible and studies were selected according to the stated eligibility criteria and analysed with standardised critical appraisal tools. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify types of, and rationales for modifications. RESULTS A total of 15 300 unique studies were identified, from which 39 studies were included with only one from a low-resource setting. Six types of modifications were identified: role expectations; initial training; type of contact; role extension; workplace support for peer support workers; and recruitment. Five rationales for modifications were identified: to provide best possible peer support; to best meet service user needs; to meet organisational needs, to maximise role clarity; and to address socioeconomic issues. CONCLUSIONS Peer support work is modified in both pre-planned and unplanned ways when implemented. Considering each identified modification as a candidate change will lead to a more systematic consideration of whether and how to modify peer support in different settings. Future evaluative research of modifiable versus non-modifiable components of peer support work is needed to understand the modifications needed for implementation among different mental health systems and cultural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashleigh Charles
- Research Assistant, School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Dean Thompson
- Research Fellow, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Nixdorf
- Research Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Grace Ryan
- Research Fellow, Centre of Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Donat Shamba
- Researcher, Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Tanzania
| | - Jasmine Kalha
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India
| | - Galia Moran
- Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | | | - Candelaria Mahlke
- Researcher, Department of Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Puschner
- Professor, Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Germany
| | | | - Mike Slade
- Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion, School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model. Clin Psychol Rev 2020; 76:101815. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
44
|
Gillard S, Bremner S, Foster R, Gibson SL, Goldsmith L, Healey A, Lucock M, Marks J, Morshead R, Patel A, Priebe S, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Roberts S, Simpson A, White S. Peer support for discharge from inpatient to community mental health services: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant). Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19192. [PMID: 32150057 PMCID: PMC7478470 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the period shortly after discharge from inpatient to community mental health care, people are at increased risk of self-harm, suicide, and readmission to hospital. Discharge interventions including peer support have shown potential, and there is some evidence that community-based peer support reduces readmissions. However, systematic reviews of peer support in mental health services indicate poor trial quality and a lack of reporting of how peer support is distinctive from other mental health support. This study is designed to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of a peer worker intervention to support discharge from inpatient to community mental health care, and to address issues of trial quality and clarity of reporting of peer support interventions. METHODS This protocol describes an individually randomized controlled superiority trial, hypothesizing that people offered a peer worker discharge intervention in addition to usual follow-up care in the community are less likely to be readmitted in the 12 months post discharge than people receiving usual care alone. A total of 590 people will be recruited shortly before discharge from hospital and randomly allocated to care as usual plus the peer worker intervention or care as usual alone. Manualized peer support provided by trained peer workers begins in hospital and continues for 4 months in the community post discharge. Secondary psychosocial outcomes are assessed at 4 months post discharge, and service use and cost outcomes at 12 months post discharge, alongside a mixed methods process evaluation. DISCUSSION Clearly specified procedures for sequencing participant allocation and for blinding assessors to allocation, plus full reporting of outcomes, should reduce risk of bias in trial findings and contribute to improved quality in the peer support evidence base. The involvement of members of the study team with direct experience of peer support, mental distress, and using mental health services, in coproducing the intervention and designing the trial, ensures that we theorize and clearly describe the peer worker intervention, and evaluate how peer support is related to any change in outcome. This is an important methodological contribution to the evidence base. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was prospectively registered as ISRCTN 10043328 on November 28, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Gillard
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London
| | - Stephen Bremner
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton, Brighton
| | - Rhiannon Foster
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London
| | | | - Lucy Goldsmith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London
| | - Andrew Healey
- Health Services & Population Research Department, King's College London, London
| | - Mike Lucock
- School of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield
| | - Jacqueline Marks
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London
| | - Rosaleen Morshead
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London
| | | | - Stefan Priebe
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary, University of London, London
| | - Julie Repper
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham
| | - Miles Rinaldi
- South West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust
| | - Sarah Roberts
- Health Services & Population Research Department, King's College London, London
| | - Alan Simpson
- Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah White
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ibrahim N, Thompson D, Nixdorf R, Kalha J, Mpango R, Moran G, Mueller-Stierlin A, Ryan G, Mahlke C, Shamba D, Puschner B, Repper J, Slade M. A systematic review of influences on implementation of peer support work for adults with mental health problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2020; 55:285-293. [PMID: 31177310 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-019-01739-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The evidence base for peer support work in mental health is established, yet implementation remains a challenge. The aim of this systematic review was to identify influences which facilitate or are barriers to implementation of mental health peer support work. METHODS Data sources comprised online databases (n = 11), journal table of contents (n = 2), conference proceedings (n = 18), peer support websites (n = 2), expert consultation (n = 38) and forward and backward citation tracking. Publications were included if they reported on implementation facilitators or barriers for formal face-to-face peer support work with adults with a mental health problem, and were available in English, French, German, Hebrew, Luganda, Spanish or Swahili. Data were analysed using narrative synthesis. A six-site international survey [Germany (2 sites), India, Israel, Tanzania, Uganda] using a measure based on the strongest influences was conducted. The review protocol was pre-registered (Prospero: CRD42018094838). RESULTS The search strategy identified 5813 publications, of which 53 were included. Fourteen implementation influences were identified, notably organisational culture (reported by 53% of papers), training (42%) and role definition (40%). Ratings on a measure using these influences demonstrated preliminary evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of the identified influences. CONCLUSION The identified influences provide a guide to implementation of peer support. For services developing a peer support service, organisational culture including role support (training, role clarity, resourcing and access to a peer network) and staff attitudes need to be considered. The identified influences provide a theory base to prepare research sites for implementing peer support worker interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nashwa Ibrahim
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Dean Thompson
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Rebecca Nixdorf
- Department of Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jasmine Kalha
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | | | - Galia Moran
- Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | | | - Grace Ryan
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Julie Repper
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mike Slade
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Barr KR, Townsend ML, Grenyer BFS. Using peer workers with lived experience to support the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a qualitative study of consumer, carer and clinician perspectives. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2020; 7:20. [PMID: 32884819 PMCID: PMC7465429 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-020-00135-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support is a recovery oriented approach where consumers and carers are introduced to people with lived experience of the disorder who have recovered. Paid roles within health services for such consumer peer workers and carer peer workers (or 'specialists') are increasingly common. To date specific studies on such peer support for consumers with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and their carers has not been conducted. METHODS This qualitative study used interviews to explore perceptions and models of peer support for BPD from the perspectives of 12 consumers, 12 carers, and 12 mental health professionals. Participant responses were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis within a phenomenological methodology. RESULTS All groups described how consumer peer workers may provide hope, connection, and validation to a consumer's lived experience. Offering both traditional mental health treatment plus peer support, and giving consumers choice regarding a consumer peer worker was welcomed. Differences in opinion were found regarding the consumer peer worker's role in relation to the mental health team, including whether consumer peer workers should access medical records. Perspectives differed regarding the consumer peer worker and carer peer worker positions, highlighting potential role confusion. Carers discussed the value of receiving support from carer peer workers and consumer peer workers. Mental health professionals described how consumer peer workers can experience workplace stigma and problems with boundary setting, and acknowledged a need for peer workers to be valued by having a duty of care and confidentiality code to follow and be offered supervision. CONCLUSIONS Two models of peer support for BPD emerged: an integrated model where consumer peer workers work within the mental health team, and a complementary model where consumer peer workers are separate from the mental health team. Based on these findings we provide recommendations for services to help support such peer work for consumers with BPD and their carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlen R Barr
- School of Psychology and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| | - Michelle L Townsend
- School of Psychology and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| | - Brin F S Grenyer
- School of Psychology and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Surey J, Menezes D, Francis M, Gibbons J, Sultan B, Miah A, Abubakar I, Story A. From peer-based to peer-led: redefining the role of peers across the hepatitis C care pathway: HepCare Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74:v17-v23. [PMID: 31782500 PMCID: PMC6883389 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HCV infection disproportionately affects underserved populations such as homeless individuals, people who inject drugs and prison populations. Peer advocacy can enable active engagement with healthcare services and increase the likelihood of favourable treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES This observational study aims to assess the burden of disease in these underserved populations and describe the role of peer support in linking these individuals to specialist treatment services. METHODS Services were identified if they had a high proportion of individuals with risk factors for HCV, such as injecting drug use or homelessness. Individuals were screened for HCV using point-of-care tests and a portable FibroScan. All positive cases received peer support for linkage to specialist care. Information was gathered on risk factors, demographics and follow-up information regarding linkage to care and treatment outcomes. RESULTS A total of 461 individuals were screened, of which 197 (42.7%) were chronically infected with HCV. Referral was made to secondary care for 176 (89.3%) and all received peer support, with 104 (52.8%) individuals engaged with treatment centres. Of these, 89 (85.6%) started treatment and 76 (85.4%) had a favourable outcome. Factors associated with not being approved for treatment were recent homelessness, younger age and current crack cocaine injecting. CONCLUSIONS Highly trained peer support workers working as part of a specialist outreach clinical team help to identify a high proportion of individuals exposed to HCV, achieve high rates of engagement with treatment services and maintain high rates of treatment success amongst a population with complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Surey
- Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- Find and Treat, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dee Menezes
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Francis
- Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- Find and Treat, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - John Gibbons
- Find and Treat, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Groundswell, London, UK
| | - Binta Sultan
- Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ibrahim Abubakar
- Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alistair Story
- Find and Treat, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Galvin HK, Petersen C, Subbian V, Solomonides A. Patients as Agents in Behavioral Health Research and Service Provision: Recommendations to Support the Learning Health System. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10:841-848. [PMID: 31694055 PMCID: PMC6834452 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Authentic inclusion and engagement of behavioral health patients in their care delivery and in the process of scientific discovery are often challenged in the health care system. Consequently, there is a growing need to engage with and better serve the needs of behavioral health patients, particularly by leveraging health information technologies. In this work, we present rationale and strategies for improving patient engagement in this population in research and clinical care. First, we describe the potential for creating meaningful patient-investigator partnerships in behavioral health research to allow for cocreation of knowledge with patients. Second, in the context of behavioral health services, we explore the utility of sharing clinical notes to promote patients' agency in care delivery. Both lines of inquiry are centered in a Learning Health System model for behavioral health, where patients are agents in enhancing the therapeutic alliance and advancing the process of knowledge generation. Recommendations include genuinely democratizing the health care system and biomedical research enterprise through patient-centered information technologies such as patient portals. In research and technology development, we recommend seeking and tailoring behavioral health patients' involvement to their abilities, promoting patient input in data analysis plans, evaluating research and informatics initiatives for patients and clinicians, and sharing success and research findings with patients. In clinical practice, we recommend encouraging patients to read behavioral health notes on portals, engaging in proactive communication regarding note content, assessing outcomes including stress and anxiety in response to note content, and working with technology providers to support note-sharing governance and deployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolyn Petersen
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Vignesh Subbian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States
| | - Anthony Solomonides
- Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Oborn E, Barrett M, Gibson S, Gillard S. Knowledge and expertise in care practices: the role of the peer worker in mental health teams. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2019; 41:1305-1322. [PMID: 31012987 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Our research examines how different forms of knowledge and expertise are increasingly important in caring for people experiencing mental illness. We build on theoretical developments regarding multiple ontologies of knowing about illness. We examine how experiential knowledge of mental health problems, learned by being subject to illness rather than through objective study, is enacted in mental healthcare teams. We focus on Peer Workers (PW), individuals who have lived experience of mental health problems, and who contribute knowledge and expertise to mental health care within multidisciplinary healthcare teams. Our longitudinal study was undertaken over 2 years by a multidisciplinary team who conducted 91 interviews with PW and other stakeholders to peer support within a comparative case study design. We show how workers with tacit, experiential knowledge of mental ill health engaged in care practice. First, we show how subjective knowing is underpinned by unique socialisation that enables the development of shared interactional spaces. Second, we point to how the situated nature of subjective knowing is uniquely embedded in time and space and allows for the alignment of embodied knowledge with trajectories of care. Third, we provide insight into how subjective forms of expertise might be incorporated into multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivor Oborn
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
| | - Michael Barrett
- Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Gibson
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Steve Gillard
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Thomson G, Balaam MC. International insights into peer support in a neonatal context: A mixed-methods study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219743. [PMID: 31365559 PMCID: PMC6668779 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Peer support is a widely used intervention that offers information and emotional support to parents during their infant's admission to the neonatal unit and/or post-discharge. Despite its widespread use, there are no comprehensive insights into the nature and types of neonatal-related peer support, or the training and support offered to peer supporters. We aimed to bridge these knowledge gaps via an international study into neonatal peer support provision. A mixed-methods study comprising an online survey was issued to peer support services/organisations, and follow-up interviews held with a purposive sample of survey respondents. Survey/interview questions explored the funding, types of peer support and the recruitment, training and support for peer supporters. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken. Thirty-one managers/coordinators/trainers and 77 peer supporters completed the survey from 48 peer support organisations/services in 16 different countries; with 26 interviews undertaken with 27 survey respondents. We integrated survey and interview findings into five themes: 'background and infrastructure of peer support services', 'timing, location and nature of peer support', 'recruitment and suitability of peer supporters', 'training provision' and 'professional and emotional support'. Findings highlight variations in the types of peer support provided, training and development opportunities, supervisory and mentoring arrangements and the methods of recruitment and support for peer supporters; with these differences largely related to the size, funding, multidisciplinary involvement, and level of integration of peer support within healthcare pathways and contexts. Despite challenges, promising strategies were reported across the different services to inform macro (e.g. to facilitate management and leadership support), meso (e.g. to help embed peer support in practice) and micro (e.g. to improve training, supervision and support of peer supporters) recommendations to underpin the operationalisation and delivery of PS provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gill Thomson
- Maternal and Infant Nutrition & Nurture (MAINN), School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Marie-Clare Balaam
- ReaCH, School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|