HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping from antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve and first-line treatment failures in Djiboutian patients

Mutation patterns, cross resistance and virological failure among HIV type-1 patients in Alexandria, Egypt

Aim: The main purpose of this cross-sectional study was to detect the prevalence of drug resistance mutations related to nonnucleoside/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs/NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs). Patients & methods: Patients (n = 45) with HIV type-1 were recruited, 30 of whom were treatment naive and 15 treatment experienced. A partial pol gene covering the protease/reverse transcriptase (PRRT) region was amplified and then sequenced by the Sanger method. Results & conclusion: The most common NNRTI/NRTI-related mutations were ‘V179I (24%) and K103N (14.3%)’ and ‘M41L and V75M’ (14.3% each). M36I and H69K were the most prevalent PI-related mutations (86% each). The results of the current study serve as an initial crucial step in defining the overall prevalence of HIV type-1 drug resistance in Egypt.

Drug resistance mutations in protease gene of HIV-1 subtype C infected patient population

Failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-1 infection is a critical issue for the physicians treating HIV patients. The major cause of drug failure is the development of resistance mutations in reverse transcriptase (RT) and/or protease (PR) genes. Mutations associated with drug resistance decrease drug effectiveness. This study was conducted to assess drug resistance profile of the entire PR gene in 90 HIV-1 patients consisting of 23 ART non-responsive, 32 ART responsive and 35 drug naive patients. It was observed that the majority of the sequences (94.4%) belonged to subtype C and (5.5%) to subtype A1. The ART non-responsive and responsive patients were treated with either first line of ART regimen (two NRTI and one NNRTI) or second line of ART regimen that included additional one protease inhibitor (PI). All the patients in each group except one responsive patient had various minor resistance mutations. Thus, drug failures in ART non-responsive patients may not always be due to drug resistance mutations instead other factors may also be responsible for drug failures such as non-compliance, suboptimal dose or drug interaction. The presence of minor drug resistance mutations in drug naive patients is suggestive of transmitted resistance mutations.

Genotyping and antiretroviral drug resistance of human immunodeficiency Virus-1 in Jazan, Saudi Arabia

Determination of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) genotypes and identification of antiretroviral drug-resistant mutations. Among treatment naïve HIV patients in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. HIV is a major public health problem. HIV genotyping and antiretroviral resistance testing is an important guide for better management of treatment-naive. Antiretroviral resistance testing before starting of treatment regimen leads to a better virological response. A total of 57 samples of treatment-naive patients were collected from King Fahd Central Hospital in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Samples were tested for HIV-1 antibodies, western blot, viral load, HIV-1 genotypes through direct sequencing, and antiretroviral resistance testing. The HIV-1 Genotypes were as follow; C: 66.6%, D: 10.5%, G: 8.8%, B: 7.0%, CRF01_AE: 3.5%, A and CRF02_AG: 1.8% each. 77.2% of cases showed susceptibility to the 3 major classes of antiretroviral drugs; Protease inhibitor (PI), Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI); while 8.8% had mutations conferring resistance to NRTI. Mutations conferring resistance to PI were detected in 7.0% of cases, and 1.8% of cases had mutations conferring resistance to both NRTI and PI. Mutations conferring resistance to NNRTI were detected in 5.3% of cases. Mutations associated with antiretroviral drugs include (V82A+I84IV), (L10F+Q58E), (L10F+V82Y), L10FV, L33LF, L89LMV, M184V, E138A, V106I, and V179VD. The prevalence of HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance mutations is 22.8% in the studied population, which may warrant antiretroviral drug resistance testing as a pretreatment to help and guide physicians for the proper HIV treatment.

High levels of virological failure with major genotypic resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected children after 5 years of care according to WHO-recommended 1st-line and 2nd-line antiretroviral regimens in the Central African Republic: A cross-sectional study

A large cohort of 220 HIV-1-infected children (median [range] age: 12 [4-17] years) was cared and followed up in the Central African Republic, including 198 in 1st-line and 22 in 2nd-line antiretroviral regimens. Patients were monitored clinically and biologically for HIV-1 RNA load and drug resistance mutations (DRMs) genotyping. A total of 87 (40%) study children were virological responders and 133 (60%) nonresponders. In children with detectable viral load, the majority (129; 97%) represented a virological failure. In children receiving 1st-line regimens in virological failure for whom genotypic resistance test was available, 45% displayed viruses harboring at least 1 DRM to NNRTI or NRTI, and 26% showed at least 1 major DRM to NNRTI or NRTI; more than half of children in 1st-line regimens were resistant to 1st-generation NNRTI and 24% of the children in 1st-line regimens had a major DRMs to PI. Virological failure and selection of DRMs were both associated with poor adherence. These observations demonstrate high rate of virological failure after 3 to 5 years of 1st-line or 2nd-line antiretroviral treatment, which is generally associated with DRMs and therapeutic failure. Overall, more than half (55%) of children receiving 1st-line antiretroviral treatment for a median of 3.4 years showed virological failure and antiretroviral-resistance and thus eligible to 2nd-line treatment. Furthermore, two-third (64%) of children under 2nd-line therapy were eligible to 3rd-line regimen. Taken together, these observations point the necessity to monitor antiretroviral-treated children by plasma HIV-1 RNA load to diagnose as early as possible the therapeutic failure and operate switch to a new therapeutic line.

Comparative analysis of drug resistance mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase gene in patients who are non-responsive, responsive and naive to antiretroviral therapy

Drug resistance mutations in the Pol gene of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) are one of the critical factors associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure in HIV-1 patients. The issue of resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) in HIV infection has not been adequately addressed in the Indian subcontinent. We compared HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) gene sequences to identify mutations present in HIV-1 patients who were ART non-responders, ART responders and drug naive. Genotypic drug resistance testing was performed by sequencing a 655-bp region of the RT gene from 102 HIV-1 patients, consisting of 30 ART-non-responding, 35 ART-responding and 37 drug-naive patients. The Stanford HIV Resistance Database (HIVDBv 6.2), IAS-USA mutation list, ANRS_09/2012 algorithm, and Rega v8.02 algorithm were used to interpret the pattern of drug resistance. The majority of the sequences (96 %) belonged to subtype C, and a few of them (3.9 %) to subtype A1. The frequency of drug resistance mutations observed in ART-non-responding, ART-responding and drug-naive patients was 40.1 %, 10.7 % and 20.58 %, respectively. It was observed that in non-responders, multiple mutations were present in the same patient, while in responders, a single mutation was found. Some of the drug-naive patients had more than one mutation. Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs), however, were found in non-responders and naive patients but not in responders. Although drug resistance mutations were widely distributed among ART non-responders, the presence of resistance mutations in the viruses of drug-naive patients poses a big concern in the absence of a genotyping resistance test.

Assessment of the magnitude and associated factors of immunological failure among adult and adolescent HIV-infected patients in St. Luke and Tulubolo Hospital, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Introduction

The use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has become a standard of care for the treatment of HIV infection. However, cost and resistance to ART are major obstacles for access to treatment especially in resource-limited settings. In this study, we aimed to assess the magnitude and associated factors of Immunological failure among adult and adolescent HIV infected Patients (with age ‘15yrs) on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) in St. Luke and Tulu Bolo Hospitals, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.

Methods

A retrospective follow-up study was conducted among HIV-infected patients initiated 1st line ART at St. Luke and Tulu Bolo Hospitals, South West Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Results

A total of 828 patient charts were reviewed. 477(57.6%) were female and the median age was 32 years. The median baseline CD4 count was 148cells/mm3. The most common prescribed ART was TDF based (36.7%). Out of 828 patients chart reviewed 6.8% (56) were developed immunological failure. Out of them only 20 (2.4%) were detected and put on second line regimen. The incidence of immunological failure was 1.8 cases per 100 person years of follow-up. Patients who had not disclosed their HIV status to any one had high risk of immunological failure compared with patients those who had disclosed their HIV status (AHR, 0.429; 95% CI 0.206 - 0.893; P-value=0.024).

Conclusion

Non disclosures of HIV status and with ambulatory of baseline functional status were found to be predictors of immunological failure. Most of the immunological failure cases were not detected early and not switched to second line ARV regimen. So patients with the above risk factors should be considered for a timely switch to second line HAART.

Presence of HIV drug resistance in antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced patients from Papua New Guinea

OBJECTIVES

The optimal benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART) can be compromised by the emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) resulting in treatment failure. ART was introduced in Papua New Guinea (PNG) in 2004, yet biological data on HIVDR are lacking. The aim of the study was to investigate levels of HIVDR in ART-naive and -experienced patients in PNG.

METHODS

We recruited, interviewed and collected blood from 108 ART-naive and 102 ART-experienced patients from two Highlands provinces of PNG. Dried blood spots were tested for HIVDR from all patients with detectable plasma viral load of ≥200 copies/mL using established in-house assays.

RESULTS

The PCR amplification success was 90.6% (n = 96) and 66.7% (n = 12) using dried blood spots from ART-naive and -experienced patients, respectively. Transmitted drug resistance was detected in 2.1% (n = 2) of samples from ART-naive patients; acquired drug resistance was detected in 50% (n = 6) of samples from ART-experienced individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that transmitted drug resistance in PNG is low and acquired drug resistance is higher with 12.7% of the ART-experienced patients failing treatment. As ART access is rapidly expanding in PNG, monitoring of drug resistance is paramount for early detection of treatment failure.