Local effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors in 130 Japanese patients

Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath-hold vs. free-breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.

Is There a Role for Locoregional Therapies for Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Malignancies?

The liver is the most common site of metastases from solid gastrointestinal tract tumors. Over the past few decades, the role of locoregional therapies, resection and thermal ablation, for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases has been widely studied. However, for liver metastases originating from other gastrointestinal organs, the role of locoregional treatment remains unclear. This review summarizes and discusses the available evidence regarding benefits, risks, and indications for locoregional therapies for non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine gastrointestinal liver metastases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach and patient selection.

Optimal hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been emerging as an efficacious and safe treatment modality for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but optimal fractionation regimens are unknown. This study aims to analyze published clinical tumor control probability (TCP) data as a function of biologically effective dose (BED) and to determine radiobiological parameters and optimal fractionation schemes for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical 1- to 5-year TCP data of 4313 patients from 41 published papers were collected for hypofractionated radiation therapy at 2.5-4.5 Gy/fraction and SBRT of early-stage HCC. BED was calculated at isocenter using three representative radiobiological models developed per the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) initiative. Radiobiological parameters were determined from a fit to the TCP data using the least χ2 method with one set of model parameters regardless of tumor stages or Child-Pugh scores A and B.

RESULTS

The fits to the clinical TCP data for SBRT of early-stage HCC found consistent α/β ratios of about 14 Gy for all three radiobiological models. TCP increases sharply with BED and reaches an asymptotic maximal plateau, which results in optimal fractionation schemes of least doses to achieve asymptotic maximal tumor control for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage HCC that are found to be model-independent.

CONCLUSION

From the fits to the clinical TCP data, we presented the first determination of radiobiological parameters and model-independent optimal fractionation regimens in 1-20 fractions to achieve maximal tumor control whenever safe for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage HCC. The determined optimal fractionation schemes agree well with clinical practice for SBRT of early-stage HCC. However, most existing hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes of 3-5 Gy/fraction are not optimal, higher doses are required to maximize tumor control, further validation of these findings is essential with clinical TCP data.

Carbon-ion radiotherapy for oligometastatic liver disease: A national multicentric study by the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS)

Reports on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for oligometastatic liver disease are limited, with insufficient evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of C-ion RT for oligometastatic liver disease at all Japanese facilities using the nationwide cohort data. We reviewed the medical records to obtain the nationwide cohort registry data on C-ion RT between May 2016 and June 2020. Patients (1) with oligometastatic liver disease as confirmed by histological or diagnostic imaging, (2) with ≤3 synchronous liver metastases at the time of treatment, (3) without active extrahepatic disease, and (4) who received C-ion RT for all metastatic regions with curative intent were included in this study. C-ion RT was performed with 58.0-76.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 1-20 fractions. In total, 102 patients (121 tumors) were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up duration for all patients was 19.0 months. The median tumor size was 27 mm. The 1-year/2-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 85.1%/72.8%, 90.5%/78.0%, and 48.3%/27.1%, respectively. No patient developed grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicity. C-ion RT is a safe and effective treatment for oligometastatic liver disease and may be beneficial as a local treatment option in multidisciplinary treatment.

Comprehensive analysis of Japanese nationwide cohort data of particle beam therapy for pulmonary, liver and lymph node oligometastases: particle beam therapy versus high-precision X-ray radiotherapy

Japanese national oncological experts convened to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle beam therapy (PT) for pulmonary, liver and lymph node oligometastases (P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM, respectively) and to conduct a statistically comparative analysis of the local control (LC) rate and overall survival (OS) rate of PT versus those of X-ray stereotactic body radiotherapy (X-SBRT) and X-ray intensity-modulated radiotherapy (X-IMRT). They conducted [1] an analysis of the efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy with PT for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM using a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional cohort study data set; [2] a systematic review of X-ray high-precision radiotherapy (i.e. X-SBRT/X-IMRT) and PT for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM; and [3] a statistical comparison between LC and OS of the cohort data set in PT and that of the extracted historical data set in X-SBRT/X-IMRT from the preceding systematic review. Safety was evaluated as the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, while statistical comparisons of LC and OS were conducted by estimating the incidence rate ratios (IRR) for local progression and mortality, respectively. This study demonstrated that PT provided durable LC (3-year LC rate: 72.8-83.2%) with acceptable OS (3-year OS rate: 38.5-68.1%) and risk of severe toxicity incidence of 0.8-3.5% in radical metastasis-directed therapy for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM. Compared to LC with X-SBRT or X-IMRT, LC with PT was potentially superior for P-OM; superior for L-OM; and equivalent for LN-OM. In particular, this study demonstrated that PT may be a new treatment option for L-OM tumors measuring > 5 cm.

Effectiveness of proton beam therapy for liver oligometastatic recurrence in patients with postoperative esophagus cancer

There are several reports of hepatic resection for postoperative hepatic metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer. However, it is unclear whether surgery is the best local treatment for liver metastases. Thus, this study aimed to retrospectively analyze proton beam therapy (PBT) for postoperative liver metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer without extrahepatic lesions and examine outcomes and adverse events. This single-center historical cohort study selected patients who underwent PBT at our proton therapy center between 2012 and 2018. The patients were selected based on the following criteria: primary esophagus carcinoma was resection and metachronous liver oligometastasis recurrence without extrahepatic tumors and no more than three liver metastases. This study included seven males with a median age of 66 (range, 58-78) years, and 15 lesions were included in the study. The median tumor size was 22.6 (7-55.3) mm. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy relative biological effect (RBE)/22 fractions (fr) for four lesions and 64 Gy (RBE)/8 fr for four lesions. The median survival time was 35.5 (13.2-119.4) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 100%, 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 8.7 (1.2-44.1) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates were 28.6%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 100%. No grade ≥4 radiation-induced adverse events (AEs) were observed. We conclude that PBT can be considered an alternative to hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases postoperative esophageal cancer.

MR-guided adaptive versus ITV-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatic metastases (MAESTRO): a randomized controlled phase II trial

Background

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established local treatment method for patients with hepatic oligometastasis or oligoprogression. Liver metastases often occur in close proximity to radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs). This limits the possibility to apply sufficiently high doses needed for optimal local control. Online MR-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) is expected to hold potential to improve hepatic SBRT by offering superior soft-tissue contrast for enhanced target identification as well as the benefit of gating and daily real-time adaptive treatment. The MAESTRO trial therefore aims to assess the potential advantages of adaptive, gated MR-guided SBRT compared to conventional SBRT at a standard linac using an ITV (internal target volume) approach.

Methods

This trial is conducted as a prospective, randomized, three-armed phase II study in 82 patients with hepatic metastases (solid malignant tumor, 1–3 hepatic metastases confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), maximum diameter of each metastasis ≤ 5 cm (in case of 3 metastases: sum of diameters ≤ 12 cm), age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 60%). If a biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 100 Gy (α/β = 10 Gy) is feasible based on ITV-based planning, patients will be randomized to either MRgRT or ITV-based SBRT. If a lesion cannot be treated with a BED ≥ 100 Gy, the patient will be treated with MRgRT at the highest possible dose. Primary endpoint is the non-inferiority of MRgRT at the MRIdian Linac® system compared to ITV-based SBRT regarding hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal toxicity CTCAE III or higher. Secondary outcomes investigated are local, locoregional (intrahepatic) and distant tumor control, progression-free survival, overall survival, possible increase of BED using MRgRT if the BED is limited with ITV-based SBRT, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life, dosimetric parameters of radiotherapy plans as well as morphological and functional changes in MRI. Potential prognostic biomarkers will also be evaluated.

Discussion

MRgRT is known to be both highly cost- and labor-intensive. The MAESTRO trial aims to provide randomized, higher-level evidence for the dosimetric and possible consecutive clinical benefit of MR-guided, on-table adaptive and gated SBRT for dose escalation in critically located hepatic metastases adjacent to radiosensitive OARs.

Trial registration

The study has been prospectively registered on August 30th, 2021: Clinicaltrials.gov, “Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatic Metastases (MAESTRO)”, NCT05027711.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02033-2.

Characterization of rib fracture development following liver directed stereotactic body radiation therapy

Purpose

Rib fractures are a well-described complication following thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, there are limited data in the setting of liver-directed SBRT.

Methods

Patients who underwent liver SBRT from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to identify the demographic, clinical, and dosimetric factors associated with the development of rib fractures.

Results

Three hundred and forty-three consecutive patients were reviewed with median follow-up of 9.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.7-17.4 months); 81% of patients had primary liver tumors and 19% had liver metastases. Twenty-one patients (6.2%) developed rib fractures with a median time to diagnosis of 7 months following SBRT (IQR: 5-19 months). Of those patients, 11 experienced concomitant chest wall pain, while 10 patients had an incidental finding of a rib fracture on imaging. On univariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 2.29; p = 0.05), V30 Gy (OR: 1.02; p < 0.001), V40 Gy (OR: 1.08; p < 0.001), maximum chest wall dose (OR: 1.1; p < 0.001), and chest wall D30 cm³ (OR: 1.09; p < 0.001) were associated with an increased probability of developing a rib fracture. On multivariate analysis, maximum chest wall dose (OR: 1.1; p < 0.001) was associated with developing a rib fracture. Receipt of more than one course of SBRT (p = 0.34), left versus right sided lesion (p = 0.69), osteoporosis (p = 0.54), age (p = 0.82), and PTV volume (p = 0.55) were not significant.

Conclusions

Rib fractures following liver SBRT were observed in 6.2% of patients with the majority being asymptomatic. To mitigate this risk, clinicians should minimize dose delivery to the chest wall. Female patients may be at increased risk.

Treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for hepatocellular carcinomas

AIM

To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

METHODS

From January 2005 to July 2018, 63 patients with 74 lesions with a maximum diameter ≤52 mm were treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system. No patient with a Child-Pugh Score ≥9 was included, and 85.6% had a score of 5 or 6. Using the biological effective dose (BED) with an α/β ratio of 10 (BED₁₀ ), the median dose in BED₁₀ at the reference point was 76.8 Gy (range 60-122.5 Gy). Overall survival (OS) and local control rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up period of 24.6 months (range 0.9-118.4 months), the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 86.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 75.8-93.3) and 71.1% (57.8-81.6), respectively. The 2-year OS was 89.6% in patients with the baseline modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade =1, and 61.7% in patients with grade ≥2a. In the multivariate analysis, the mALBI grade (=1 vs. ≥2a) was a significant factor for OS (p = 0.028, 95% CI 1.11-6.18). The 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 100% (100-100%) and 92.0% (77.5-97.5%). The local control rates were significantly higher in the BED₁₀ ≥100 Gy group than in the BED₁₀ <100 Gy group (2-year 100% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.049) at the reference point.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of stereotactic body radiotherapy using real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma showed favorable outcomes with lower incidence of toxicities, especially in patients treated with BED₁₀ ≥100 Gy to the reference point.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with Macrovascular invasion

BACKGROUND

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), macrovascular invasion (MVI) is associated with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to describe long-term outcomes of patients with HCC and MVI treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

Patients with HCC and MVI who were treated with SBRT from January 2003 to December 2016 were analyzed. Patients who had extrahepatic disease or previous liver transplant were excluded. Demographical, clinical, and treatment variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

128 eligible patients with HCC and MVI were treated with SBRT. Median age was 60.5 years (39 to 90 years). Baseline Child-Pugh (CP) score was A5 in 67%, A6 in 20%. Median SBRT dose was 33.3 Gy (range: 27 to 54 Gy) in 5 fractions. Local control at 1 year was 87.4% (95% CI 78.6 to 96.1%). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.3 months (95% CI 11.2 to 21.4 months); ECOG performance status > 1 (HR:1.85, p = 0.0138) and earlier treatment era (HR: 2.20, p = 0.0015) were associated with worsening OS. In 43 patients who received sorafenib following SBRT, median OS was 37.9 months (95% CI 19.5 to 54.4 months). Four patients developed GI bleeding possibly related to SBRT at 2 to 8 months, and 27% (31/112 evaluable patients) had worsening of CP class at three months after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT was associated with encouraging outcomes for patients with HCC and MVI, especially in those patients who received sorafenib after SBRT. Randomized phase III trials of SBRT with systemic and/or regional therapy are warranted and ongoing.

Is There a Role for Locoregional Therapies for Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Malignancies?

The liver is the most common site of metastases from solid gastrointestinal tract tumors. Over the past few decades, the role of locoregional therapies, resection and thermal ablation, for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases has been widely studied. However, for liver metastases originating from other gastrointestinal organs, the role of locoregional treatment remains unclear. This review summarizes and discusses the available evidence regarding benefits, risks, and indications for locoregional therapies for non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine gastrointestinal liver metastases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach and patient selection.

Local control by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent/residual hepatocellular carcinoma after other local therapies

Background: To clarify local control by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for recurrent/residual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with initial definitive SBRT for local treatment-naïve HCC.Material and methods: We retrospectively investigated HCC patients that received SBRT between July 2005 and December 2017. We classified HCC tumors as the initial definitive SBRT group (Arm-1; initial definitive SBRT, Arm-2; initial definitive planned SBRT following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) and salvage SBRT group (Arm-3; salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual tumors after TACE, Arm-4; salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual tumors after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Arm-5; salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual other than Arm-3 or Arm-4). Local control was evaluated by mRECIST.Results: We reviewed 389 HCC tumors of 323 patients treated by 35-40 Gy/5 fr. The median follow-up time for local recurrence of tumors was 34.8 months (range, 6.5-99.2). The cumulative local recurrence rates at 3 years of Arm-1-5 were 1.4% (95% CI, 0.3-4.4%), 5.0% (95% CI, 1.6-11.5%), 12.4% (95% CI, 5.7-21.9%), 14.8% (95% CI, 3.3-34.3%) and 7.3% (95% CI, 1.9-18.0%), respectively. The cumulative local recurrence rates at 3 years of initial definitive treatment and salvage treatment groups were 2.8% (95% CI, 1.1-5.6%) and 11.1% (95% CI, 6.3-17.3%), respectively (p=.004). On multivariate analysis, salvage treatment and the tumor diameter were significant risk factors of local recurrence (p = .02, p < .001 respectively). Estimated overall survival at 3 years for all patients in initial definitive treatment and salvage treatment groups were 71.5% (95% CI, 63.4-78.1%) and 66.1% (95% CI, 56.4-74.2%), respectively (p = .20). No treatment-related death caused by SBRT was observed.Conclusions: This analysis showed local control of salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual HCC was significantly worse than that of initial definitive SBRT for local treatment-naïve HCC. However, local control of salvage SBRT was relatively good, and salvage SBRT is one of the favorable treatment options for recurrent/residual HCC.

Structure guided deformable image registration for treatment planning CT and post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Primovist® (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of structure‐guided deformable image registration (SG‐DIR) relative to rigid registration and DIR using TG‐132 recommendations. This assessment was performed for image registration of treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with Primovist^® contrast agent acquired post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT treatment planning CT scans and posttreatment Primovist^® MRI scans were obtained for 14 patients. The liver was delineated on both sets of images and matching anatomical landmarks were chosen by a radiation oncologist. Rigid registration, DIR, and two types of SG‐DIR (using liver contours only; and using liver structures along with anatomical landmarks) were performed for each set of scans. TG‐132 recommended metrics were estimated which included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), Target Registration Error (TRE), and Jacobian determinant. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. The median (range) DSC for rigid registration was 0.88 (0.77–0.89), 0.89 (0.81–0.93) for DIR, and 0.90 (0.86–0.94) for both types of SG‐DIR tested in this study. The median MDA was 4.8 mm (3.7–6.8 mm) for rigid registration, 3.4 mm (2.4–8.7 mm) for DIR, 3.2 mm (2.0–5.2 mm) for SG‐DIR where liver structures were used to guide the registration, and 2.8 mm (2.1–4.2 mm) for the SG‐DIR where liver structures and anatomical landmarks were used to guide the registration. The median TRE for rigid registration was 7.2 mm (0.5–23 mm), 6.8 mm (0.7–30.7 mm) for DIR, 6.1 mm (1.1–20.5 mm) for the SG‐DIR guided by only the liver structures, and 4.1 mm (0.8–19.7 mm) for SG‐DIR guided by liver contours and anatomical landmarks. The SG‐DIR shows higher liver conformality as per TG‐132 metrics and lowest TRE compared to rigid registration and DIR in Velocity AI software for the purpose of registering treatment planning CT and post‐SBRT MRI for the liver region. It was found that TRE decreases when liver contours and corresponding anatomical landmarks guide SG‐DIR.

[Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: Clinical features and technical consequences, results. Which treatment machine in which situation?]

Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is a developing technique for the treatment of primary tumours and metastases. Its implementation is complex because of the particularities of the treated organ and the comorbidities of the patients. However, this technique is a treatment opportunity for patients otherwise in therapeutic impasse. The scientific evidence of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy has been considered by the French health authority as insufficient for its widespread use outside specialized and experienced centers, despite a growing and important number of retrospective and prospective studies, but few comparative data. This article focuses on the specific features of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver treatments and the results of published studies of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy performed with classic linear accelerators and dedicated radiosurgery units.

Patient specific outcomes of charged particle therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma - A systematic review and quantitative analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a raising condition world-wide. Most of patients are ineligible for surgery at diagnosis due to the advanced stage of the disease or poor medical condition of the patient. Charged particle therapy (CPT) is a radiotherapy modality showing promising results. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize current knowledge on patient-specific outcomes of CPT for HCC, including overall survival, local control, the effect of radiation dose and the toxicity burden. The systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After comprehensive database search 17 cohorts (16 studies, 1516 patients) were included into qualitative and quantitative analyses; 11 of 16 studies were retrospective. Eleven studies were on protons, 2 studies were on protons and carbon ions and 4 on carbon ions alone, were identified. Median BED10 (biologically equivalent dose) range was 68.75-122.5 GyE. Mean weighted overall survival across studies was 86%, 62%, 59% and 35% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Mean weighted local control was 86%, 89%, 87% and 89% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Adjusted morbidity rates were: 54% for acute G1-2 toxicities and 6% for acute ≥G3 toxicities; 9% for late G1-2 toxicities and less than 4% for late ≥G3 toxicities. There was no treatment-associated mortality. CONCLUSIONS: CPT offers high local control, acceptable overall survival and low post-treatment morbidity. Quality of findings, especially on toxicities, is decreased by incomplete reporting and retrospective designs of available studies. Therefore, there is a strong need for better reporting and prospective studies.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of radiation therapy that has been used in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over the past decade. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of SBRT in primary HCC, a literature search was conducted to identify original research articles published from January 2000 through January 2018 in PubMed on SBRT in HCC. All relevant studies published from 2004 to 2018 were included. Prospective studies demonstrated 2-year local control (LC) rates ranging from 64-95% and overall survival (OS) rates ranging from 34% (2-year) to 65% (3-year). Retrospective studies demonstrated 2-year LC rates of 44-90% and 2-year OS rates of 24-67%. Reported toxicities in primary HCC patients vary but SBRT appears to be relatively well tolerated. Studies comparing SBRT to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are few, but they suggest SBRT may be more effective than RFA in specific primary HCC populations. Additionally, SBRT appears to increase the efficacy of both transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib in selected primary HCC populations.

Local Control After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Tumors

PURPOSE

To quantitatively evaluate published experiences with hepatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to determine local control rates after treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors and to examine whether outcomes are affected by SBRT dosing regimen.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified published articles that reported local control rates after SBRT for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated for each dosing regimen using the linear-quadratic equation. We excluded series in which a wide range of BEDs was used. Individual lesion data for local control were extracted from actuarial survival curves, and data were aggregated to form a single dataset. Actuarial local control curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method after grouping lesions by disease type and BED (<100 Gy₁₀ vs >100 Gy₁₀). Comparisons were made using log-rank testing.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria and formed the dataset for this analysis. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial local control rates after SBRT for primary liver tumors (n = 431) were 93%, 89%, and 86%, respectively. Lower 1- (90%), 2- (79%), and 3-year (76%) actuarial local control rates were observed for liver metastases (n = 290, log-rank P = .011). Among patients treated with SBRT for primary liver tumors, there was no evidence that local control is influenced by BED within the range of schedules used. For liver metastases, on the other hand, outcomes were significantly better for lesions treated with BEDs exceeding 100 Gy₁₀ (3-year local control 93%) than for those treated with BEDs of ≤100 Gy₁₀ (3-year local control 65%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors provides high rates of durable local control, with no clear evidence for a dose-response relationship among commonly utilized schedules. Excellent local control rates are also seen after SBRT for liver metastases when BEDs of >100 Gy₁₀ are utilized.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligo-recurrence in the liver in a patient with esophageal carcinoma: A case report

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective treatment for solitary cancerous lesions. The present study reported a rare case of sustained remission after SBRT for oligorecurrence in the liver in a patient with esophageal carcinoma. A 60-year-old Japanese man presented with a chief complaint of dysphagia. On medical examination, the patient was diagnosed as having squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus that was clinically staged as T4bN1M0. The patient received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consisting of four 28-day cycles of chemotherapy comprising nedaplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 and S-1 120 mg/body orally on days 1-14, with radiotherapy comprising a total of 50 Gy in daily fractions of 2 Gy. After a 9-month disease-free interval following the primary treatment, a solitary liver metastasis was identified. The patient underwent SBRT using a radiation dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions and two 28-day cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising nedaplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 100 mg/body orally on days 1-14. The patient exhibited no signs of recurrence for 3 years with sustained local control. SBRT may be considered a treatment option for patients with relapsed esophageal cancer with oligo-recurrence in the liver.

Consensus on Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Small-Sized Hepatocellular Carcinoma at the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an advanced technique of external beam radiation therapy that delivers large ablative doses of radiation. In the past decade, many cancer centers have adopted SBRT as one mode of radically treating small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on encouraging clinical outcomes. SBRT thus seems reasonable as first-line treatment of inoperable HCC confined to the liver. However, most of the clinical studies to date have been retrospective in nature, with key issues still under investigation.

SUMMARY

The above-mentioned publications were subjected to scrutiny, fueling discussions at the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE 2016) Meeting on various clinical variables, such as indications for SBRT, therapeutic outcomes, treatment-related toxicities, doses prescribed, and specific techniques. The consensus reached should be of interest to all professionals active in the treatment of HCC, especially radiation oncologists.

KEY MESSAGES

SBRT is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with small-sized HCC, offering substantial local control, improved overall survival, and low toxicity.

Effect of primary tumor location and tumor size on the response to radiotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Metastatic liver tumors (MLTs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are often treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The present study aimed to examine the predictive factors for response of MLTs to SBRT. A total of 39 MLTs from 24 patients with CRC were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy for MLT was typically performed with a prescribed dose equivalent to a biologically effective dose (BED)10 of 100 Gy. The median follow-up period was 16 months (range, 5-64 months). The median prescribed dose and total BED10 were 56 Gy (range, 45-72 Gy) and 97.5 Gy (range, 71.7-115.5 Gy), respectively, in a median of 8 fractions (range, 4-33 fractions). The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 67.2 and 35.9%, respectively. For patients with MLT treated with ablative SBRT (BED10 ≥100 Gy in ≤5 fractions), the 1- and 2-year local control rates were 83.3 and 62.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that primary tumor location (left-sided colon), maximum tumor diameter (≤30 mm) and ablative SBRT (BED10 ≥100 Gy in ≤5 fractions) were significantly associated with improved local control (P=0.0058, P=0.0059 and P=0.0268, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor diameter was significantly associated with improved local control (P=0.0314). In addition, patients who received ablative SBRT had significantly prolonged overall survival times compared with those treated with non-ablative SBRT (P=0.0261). To conclude, tumors ≤30 mm that can be treated with ablative SBRT are associated with good local control rates. The primary tumor location may affect the radiosensitivity of MLTs.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver oligo-recurrence and oligo-progression from various tumors

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with liver oligo-recurrence and oligo-progression from various primary tumors.

Materials and Methods

Between 2002 and 2013, 72 patients with liver oligo-recurrence (oligo-metastasis with a controlled primary tumor) and oligo-progression (contradictory progression of a few sites of disease despite an overall tumor burden response to therapy) underwent SBRT. Of these, 9 and 8 patients with uncontrollable distant metastases and patients immediate loss to follow-up, respectively, were excluded. The total planning target volume was used to select the SBRT dose (median, 48 Gy; range, 30 to 60 Gy, 3–4 fractions). Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

Results

We evaluated 55 patients (77 lesions) treated with SBRT for liver metastases. All patients had controlled primary lesions, and 28 patients had stable lesions at another site (oligo-progression). The most common primary site was the colon (36 patients), followed by the stomach (6 patients) and other sites (13 patients). The 2-year local control and progression-free survival rates were 68% and 22%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 56% and 20%, respectively. The most common adverse events were grade 1–2 fatigue, nausea, and vomiting; no grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. Univariate analysis revealed that oligo-progression associated with poor survival.

Conclusion

SBRT for liver oligo-recurrence and oligo-progression appears safe, with similar local control rates. For liver oligo-progression, criteria are needed to select patients in whom improved overall survival can be expected through SBRT.

Relationship between the SER treatment period and prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between SER (time between the start of any treatment and the end of radiation therapy) and the survival of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2013, 135 cases of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treated with consecutively curative chemoradiotherapy were included in this retrospective analysis. In terms of SER, patients were divided into early radiotherapy group (SER<30 days, n=76) and late radiotherapy group (SER≥30 days, n=59) with a cut- off of SER 30 days. Outcomes of the two groups were compared for overall survival.

RESULTS

For all analyzable patients, median follow-up time was 23.8 months and median overall survival time was 16.8 months. Although there was no significant differences in distant metastasis free survival between the two groups, patients in early radiotherapy group had a significantly better PFS (p=0.003) and OS (p=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

A short SER may be a good prognostic factor for LD-SCLC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Inoperable Liver Tumors: Results of a Single Institutional Experience

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver tumors unsuitable for ablation or surgery. We report our experience with SBRT in the treatment of liver tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with primary or secondary liver cancer were identified in our local SBRT database. Patients were included irrespective of prior liver-directed therapies. The primary endpoint of our review was in-field local control (LC). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2015, a total of 71 liver lesions in 68 patients were treated with SBRT (three patients had two liver lesions treated). The median age was 71 years (27-89 years). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the diagnosis in 23 patients (34%), with the grade of Child-Pugh A (52%), B (39%), or C (nine percent) cirrhosis. Six patients (nine percent) had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). The remaining 39 patients (57%) had metastatic liver lesions. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was the most common primary tumor type (81%). The median size for HCC, IHC, and metastatic lesions was 5 cm (2-9 cm), 3.6 cm (2-4.9 cm), and 4 cm (1-8 cm), respectively. The median prescribed dose was 45 Gy (16-50 Gy). Median follow-up was 11.5 months (1-45 months). Actuarial one-year in-field LC for HCC and metastatic lesions was 85% and 64% respectively (p= 0.66). At one year, the actuarial rate of new liver lesions was 40% and 26%, respectively, (p=0.58) for HCC and metastases. Only six patients with IHC were treated with SBRT in this study - in these patients, one-year LC was 78% with new liver lesions in 53%. The SBRT treatments were well tolerated. The side effects included common criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4 grade 1 acute gastrointestinal toxicity in three patients, grade 3 nausea in one patient, and grade 3 acute dermatitis in another patient. Two patients had grade 5 toxicity. Radiation pneumonitis was observed in one patient two months post-SBRT treatment, and another patient was suspected to have had radio-induced liver disease (RILD) two months after SBRT. No late toxicity was seen.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a well-tolerated and effective alternative treatment option for selected patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Feasibility study on image guided patient positioning for stereotactic body radiation therapy of liver malignancies guided by liver motion

Background

Fiducial markers are the superior method to compensate for interfractional motion in liver SBRT. However this method is invasive and thereby limits its application range. In this retrospective study, the compensation method for the interfractional motion using fiducial markers (gold standard) was compared to a new non-invasive approach, which does rely on the organ motion of the liver and the relative tumor position within this volume.

Methods

We analyzed six patients (3 m, 3f) treated with SBRT in 2014. After fiducial marker implantation, all patients received a treatment CT (free breathing, without abdominal compression) and a 4D-CT (consisting of 10 respiratory phases). For all patients the gross tumor volumes (GTVs), internal target volume (ITV), planning target volume (PTV), internal marker target volumes (IMTVs) and the internal liver target volume (ILTV) were delineated based on the CT and 4D-CT images. CBCT imaging was used for the standard treatment setup based on the fiducial markers. According to the patient coordinates the 3 translational compensation values (t_x, t_y, t_z) for the interfractional motion were calculated by matching the blurred fiducial markers with the corresponding IMTV structures. 4 observers were requested to recalculate the translational compensation values for each CBCT (31) based on the ILTV structures. The differences of the translational compensation values between the IMTV and ILTV approach were analyzed.

Results

The magnitude of the mean absolute 3D registration error with regard to the gold standard overall patients and observers was 0.50 cm ± 0.28 cm. Individual registration errors up to 1.3 cm were observed. There was no significant overall linear correlation between the respiratory motion and the registration error of the ILTV approach.

Conclusions

Two different methods to calculate the translational compensation values for interfractional motion in stereotactic liver therapy were evaluated. The registration accuracy of the ILTV approach is mainly limited by the non-rigid behavior of the liver and the individual registration experience of the observer. The ILTV approach lacks the accuracy that would be desired for stereotactic radiotherapy of the liver.

CyberKnife Radiosurgery - Value as an Adjunct to Surgical Treatment of HCC?

INTRODUCTION

CyberKnife radiosurgery (CK) is an effective tool for the treatment of malignancies. Its greatest potential is in high-dose radiosurgery delivered to targets in organs that move with respiration, e.g., liver tumors. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, surgical treatment (resection, transplantation) is most likely to produce long-term survival; for non-resectable tumors, therapies other than radiosurgery are typically recommended. This study evaluated the long-lasting anti-tumor effects of CK combined with surgery in patients with HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS : Eighteen patients (three women, 15 men) were included in this prospective observational study. They received 21 single-fraction CK treatments (26 Gy). Patient characteristics, treatment effects, tumor response (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) grading) and survival were measured for a median period of 29 months.

RESULTS

Local tumor control was achieved in 15 patients, with complete and partial remission observed in 10 and five patients, respectively. One patient was treated for two separate lesions in one session, and one received three treatments each separated by two-year intervals; both patients are tumor-free. Two patients showed minimal response, and in one patient local tumor viability could not be excluded by MRI. Nine patients had HCC recurrence, all distant to the treated site. Nine patients died during follow-up, including two with clear relation to tumor progress. Tumor-free survival was 79.4% after one year and 29.8% after three years, and the corresponding overall survival was 84.8% and 66%. CONCLUSION : This study shows the high effectiveness of single-session frameless CyberKnife radiosurgery for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and reconfirms previous results of fractioned radiotherapy of HCC. It also demonstrates the potential of radiosurgery to be combined with surgical concepts.

Benefits of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with incomplete transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) after incomplete transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

The study enrolled 178 HCC patients initially treated with TACE between 2006 and 2011. Patients were included if they had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 or A, ≤3 nodules with a total sum of longest diameter ≤10 cm, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score of ≤7, no major vessel invasion, and no extra-hepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients achieved a complete response to TACE (group 1). Among those with incomplete response, 47 patients received other curative treatments (group 2), 37 received SABR (group 3), and 70 received non-curative treatments (group 4). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rates for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 88 %, 81 %, 73 %, and 54 %, respectively. The corresponding 5-year OS rates were 50 %, 58 %, 53 %, and 28 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with SABR after incomplete TACE had similar survival outcomes to those achieving complete response to TACE or receiving curative treatments. However, patients receiving non-curative treatments had significantly lower survival rates than the other groups. Therefore, if SABR was indicated at the initial diagnosis, it might be recommended after TACE failure.

Clinical research on alternating hyperfraction radiotherapy for massive hepatocellular carcinoma

The delivery of high tumoricidal doses of radiation with low rates of toxicity is of particular significance for massive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) radiotherapy. In order to observe the efficacy and adverse reactions of alternating hyperfraction radiotherapy treatment of massive HCC, seventy-two cases of massive HCC were randomly divided into two groups, group A and group B. The liver lesions of group A were divided into sublesions and treated with alternating hyperfraction radiotherapy [intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)]. The interval between radiotherapy to the sublesions was a minimum of six hours. The average radiotherapy dose to the sublesions was 2 Gy/fraction, once a day, five times per week, treating the gross tumor volume with a total dose of 40-50 Gy, and the clinical target volume with a total dose of 30-40 Gy. By contrast, the lesions of group B were not divided into sublesions for the IMRT treatment, but were treated with an otherwise identical protocol, by 2 Gy/fraction, once a day, five times per week, and with the same total dose. Patients were followed up with regular blood tests, liver function tests, measurements of serum α-fetoprotein levels and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver. Treatment responses were assessed every 3 months by MRI. The results revealed that the overall response rates of the two groups were 82.9 and 81.3%, respectively (P=0.864). The alternating hyperfraction radiotherapy protocol resulted in enhanced survival (P=0.002). The median survival time of the two groups was 9.7 and 6.5 months, respectively. The overall 6-month, 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates of the two groups were 62.9 and 59.4% (P=0.770), 48.6 and 21.9% (P=0.040), 17.1 and 0.0% (P=0.025) and 2.9 and 0.0% (P=1.000), respectively. The I-II degree of abnormal liver function and radiation-induced liver disease of group B was higher than that of group A (P=0.021 and 0.046, respectively). In addition, the incidence rate of radiation-induced liver injury of group A was lower than that of group B. Therefore, treatment of massive HCC with alternating hyperfraction radiotherapy improved the quality of life and prolonged the overall survival time, compared with conventional IMRT, suggesting that it was an effective radiation pattern.

Survival outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy for 79 Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a relatively new treatment for liver tumor. Outcomes of SBRT for liver tumors unsuitable for ablation or surgical resection were evaluated. A total of 79 patients treated with SBRT for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 2004 and 2012 in six Japanese institutions were studied retrospectively. Patients treated with SBRT preceded by trans-arterial chemoembolization were eligible. Their median age was 73 years, 76% were males, and their Child-Pugh scores were Grades A (85%) and B (11%) before SBRT. The median biologically effective dose (α/β = 10 Gy) was 96.3 Gy. The median follow-up time was 21.0 months for surviving patients. The 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival were 53%, 40% and 76%, respectively. Sex and serum PIVKA-II values were significant predictive factors for OS. Hypovascular or hypervascular types of HCC, sex and clinical stage were significant predictive factors for PFS. The 2-year PFS was 66% in Stage I vs 18% in Stages II-III. Multivariate analysis indicated that clinical stage was the only significant predictive factor for PFS. No Grade 3 laboratory toxicities in the acute, sub-acute, and chronic phases were observed. PFS after SBRT for liver tumor was satisfactory, especially for Stage I HCC, even though these patients were unsuitable for resection and ablation. SBRT is safe and might be an alternative to resection and ablation.

Radiotherapy for liver tumors

Many patients with primary hepatic malignancies present with advanced disease that is not suitable for surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation, or radiofrequency ablation. Outcomes are particularly dismal in patients with large, unresectable tumors and/or tumor venous thrombosis. Liver-directed radiotherapy, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is able to treat a variety of tumor sizes and tumors with venous involvement and has demonstrated excellent safety and control outcomes. SBRT should be considered a standard option in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who are not candidates for surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. SBRT should be strongly considered in patients with larger tumors and/or tumors with tumor venous thrombosis who have adequate liver function. Radiotherapy should remain a focus of hepatocellular carcinoma research.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases

The role for local ablative therapies in the management paradigm of oligometastatic liver disease is increasing. The evidence base supporting the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases has expanded rapidly over the past decade, showing high rates of local control with low associated toxicity. This review summarises the evidence base to date, discussing optimal patient selection, challenges involved with treatment delivery and optimal dose and fractionation. The reported toxicity associated with liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is presented, together with possible pitfalls in interpreting the response to treatment using standard imaging modalities. Finally, potential avenues for future research in this area are highlighted.